Next Article in Journal
Valorisation through Lactic Fermentation of Industrial Wastewaters from a Bean Blanching Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Prognostic Metamodel Development for Waste-Derived Biogas-Powered Dual-Fuel Engines Using Modern Machine Learning with K-Cross Fold Validation
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Effect of Lipid Type on the Acidogenic Performance of Food Waste
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Biomethane Production from Sugarcane Vinasse in a Circular Economy: Developments and Innovations

Júlio Cesar de Carvalho
Luciana Porto de Souza Vandenberghe
Eduardo Bittencourt Sydney
Susan Grace Karp
Antonio Irineudo Magalhães, Jr.
Walter José Martinez-Burgos
Adriane Bianchi Pedroni Medeiros
Vanete Thomaz-Soccol
Sabrina Vieira
Luiz Alberto Junior Letti
Cristine Rodrigues
Adenise Lorenci Woiciechowski
1 and
Carlos Ricardo Soccol
Department of Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology, Centro Politécnico, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 81531-990, PR, Brazil
Department of Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology, Federal University of Technology—Paraná, Ponta Grossa 84016-210, PR, Brazil
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2023, 9(4), 349;
Submission received: 27 February 2023 / Revised: 27 March 2023 / Accepted: 28 March 2023 / Published: 1 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaerobic Fermentation and High-Value Bioproducts)


Sugarcane ethanol production generates about 360 billion liters of vinasse, a liquid effluent with an average chemical oxygen demand of 46,000 mg/L. Vinasse still contains about 11% of the original energy from sugarcane juice, but this chemical energy is diluted. This residue, usually discarded or applied in fertigation, is a suitable substrate for anaerobic digestion (AD). Although the technology is not yet widespread—only 3% of bioethanol plants used it in Brazil in the past, most discontinuing the process—the research continues. With a biomethane potential ranging from 215 to 324 L of methane produced by kilogram of organic matter in vinasse, AD could improve the energy output of sugarcane biorefineries. At the same time, the residual digestate could still be used as an agricultural amendment or for microalgal production for further stream valorization. This review presents the current technology for ethanol production from sugarcane and describes the state of the art in vinasse AD, including technological trends, through a recent patent evaluation. It also appraises the integration of vinasse AD in an ideal sugarcane biorefinery approach. It finally discusses bottlenecks and presents possible directions for technology development and widespread adoption of this simple yet powerful approach for bioresource recovery.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The Importance of Biohydrogen Production

The idea of using anaerobic digestion (AD) to reclaim energy while treating residues from sugarcane ethanol production was described as early as 1983 [1]. Although the technology was recognized as one of the most feasible ways to treat vinasse [2,3], many industries were still looking at vinasse solely as a fertilizer (or a nuisance) until recently. The biorefinery and circular economy wave brought a new impulse to integrate vinasse processing into the existing autonomous distilleries (those that convert all sugarcane into ethanol) or annexed distilleries (those that use residual molasses from sugar production for ethanol production). This trend also aligns with many of the United Nations SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals), most directly with SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 13 (Climate Action), with the potential to increase the recovery of green energy stored in sugarcane, and to reduce pollution [4,5].
Sugarcane is one of the major world energy crops, traditionally used as feedstock for bioethanol, sugar, and bioelectricity production. The high demand for biofuels has boosted production, favored by increasing fossil fuel prices, environmental impacts, global warming, concerns with greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions, and increasing governmental incentives [6,7]. In 2018, sugarcane ethanol production appeared in second place with 30 billion liters—the primary feedstock for ethanol has been coarse grains (i.e., corn) with 61 billion liters. Together, these two feedstocks comprise 84% of the world’s ethanol production [8]. Differently from sugarcane vinasse, the residue from grain fermentation has significant nutritional content and is generally concentrated and dried into DDGS (distillers dried grains with solubles) [9,10]. In contrast, vinasse from sugarcane ethanol has limited direct use [11].
Sugarcane production worldwide reached about 1.86 billion tons in 2021, with 75% of this production concentrated in Brazil, India, China, Pakistan, and Thailand (respectively, 38.5, 21.8, 5.8, 4.8, and 3.6% of the worldwide production). Brazil produced 75% more sugarcane than India, but similar amounts of refined sugar (38.1 million tons in Brazil and 35.8 million tons in India, in the same period [12]). These figures show the importance of sugarcane bioethanol in Brazil—where more than half of the sugarcane, about 55%, is converted into biofuel—and also the potential for other countries to add a clean fraction of biofuel to the automotive fleet, most remarkably India, which has an estimated production capacity of 30 billion liters of ethanol annually [13].
Brazilian production areas are located mainly to the South of the Amazon Rainforest; therefore, there is no competition with native forest areas. South-Central Brazil is the heart of the country’s sugarcane production and industry. In addition to the technological potential, Brazil has much land available for production, using about 100,000 square kilometers for plantation, less than 1.2% of the national territory [14,15]. Various by-products/wastes are generated in sugarcane mills, such as sugarcane bagasse, straw, leaves and grasses, molasses, vinasse, and CO2 [16]. Developing integrated processes using these residual fractions could amplify sugarcane processing units’ viability and sustainability through biorefinery approaches under a circular bioeconomy [17]. Vinasse is a necessary coproduct of distillation, generated in large amounts (10–15 L per liter of ethanol) [18]. It is rich in organic and mineral residues, leading to a tremendous environmental problem [19,20,21], and also to many processing opportunities. Increasing circularity towards zero-waste biorefineries makes different vinasse applications ever more attractive, such as a fertilizer, animal feed, or energy source through AD. The latter is increasingly important, with active research and recent large-scale implementation. The anaerobic digestion of vinasse can increase process circularity and energy efficiency while still allowing further use of the digested vinasse. Although the simple digestion technology is not new, it is not optimized for the composition and scale of the sugarcane processing industry, and there is space for technology improvement. Aspects such as pretreatments, nutrient amendments, microbiota control and succession, biogas and biomethane yields, and digestate destination are still under intensive research and present many challenges and opportunities, as discussed in the following sections.

2. Sugarcane Vinasse

Vinasse is a residue of complex composition, with an acidic pH. The effluent has a high organic load: on average, it has 46 g O2/L of COD (chemical oxygen demand), a dark brown color caused by melanoidins, and an unpleasant, strong odor [22,23]. Its typical composition is presented in Table 1. The effluent can be a source of salts, micronutrients, and macronutrients, especially phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and nitrogen. These are essential for microbial growth [24]. Vinasse also contains smaller amounts of other ions, such as SO42−, Mg2+, Cl, and Fe2+ [25], and trace amounts of heavy metals, such as Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, and others [25,26]. The effluent’s physicochemical composition is somewhat variable because of the variability of the raw material, alcohol fermentation conditions, the proportion of molasses and juice, conditions used in distillation, cane plant variety, and maturity of the crops [27,28]
Environmentally speaking, the effluent is considered highly polluting because it can impact the different environmental matrices (soil, water, and air). Excessive vinasse application harms soil composition and its microbial population [18,29], reducing up to 90% of the dissolved oxygen in the soil [11].
Vinasse can also highly pollute water bodies and marine ecosystems because its high nitrogen and phosphorus contents cause eutrophication. With its high COD and acidity, the residue causes depletion of the dissolved oxygen in the water and changes its pH [11,23]. If improperly applied to soils or stored in lagoons, vinasse can also be a source of greenhouse gases from organic matter decomposition, mainly CH4, N2O, and CO2 [18,30,31,32]. The nitrogen content in vinasse is high and usually expressed as total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and is probably primarily organic because of prior consumption of inorganic sources by yeasts; in one analysis by [33], NO3-N represented ca. 27% of the total nitrogen, and in another, 17% [34]. The repeated application can increase the content of heavy metals in soils, with potential toxicity to plants, animals, and humans: excessive amounts of Cd, Cr, and Ni are carcinogenic, while Pb, Cu, and Zn can affect the central nervous system, as well as the gastrointestinal system [35]. However, proper use of vinasse (75 t.ha−1 per growing season for up to 18 years) showed a negligible biomagnification effect [36].
Table 1. Physicochemical composition of sugar cane vinasse before utilization.
Table 1. Physicochemical composition of sugar cane vinasse before utilization.
(1st Generation)
COD (g O2/L)10328.5nd36.03949.031.725.23367.345.8
BOD (g O2/L)57.416.5ndndndnd13.47.91521.021.87
Ca (mg/L)719515.23160741150213048286711180nd1180
Cl (mg/L)nd1218.959.4ndndndndnd2161nd1146
P (mg/L)190120.856011135645518207135nd852.5
Mg (mg/L)237244.7162.4354428543321.3264523.5nd319.3
N (mg/L)1190356.6nd1603570762234171329.51100698.09
K (mg/L)20561750.91620314723342827327634012557.9nd2551.5
SO4 (mg/L)7101537.61680230027002900340.329932264nd1936.1
nd: no data—the component may be present in vinasse, but its concentration was not reported in the referenced text.

2.1. Current Pretreatments, Treatments, Disposal, and Usage

Dealing with vast volumes of vinasse is one of the biggest challenges in the sugar-alcohol industry [43] due to the potential environmental risk, especially to water bodies, if deposited without proper treatment. In this way, several alternatives for in situ valorization of vinasse have been evaluated, with variable success.
The main application of vinasse today is as an irrigation fertilizer (in “fertigation”), mainly for sugarcane [23]. Returning vinasse to fields can supply up to 50% of the required nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium [44,45]. However, repeated use may increase soil salinity, favor lixiviation to water sources [18], increase the content of organic matter and nitrogen in the soil, release unpleasant odors, increase greenhouse gas emissions, and foster insect proliferation [30,46,47]. To mitigate these problems, vinasse is usually diluted before being applied as fertilizer [48].
Another classical method to remove organic matter from effluents, aerobic treatment, has been reported for vinasse—mainly for removing color and reducing COD. The large amount of biomass formed in aerobic processes has also been studied as a protein source. However, the high concentration of organic matter limits oxygen transfer [27,49], and the required intensive aeration increases operational costs.
Regarding effluent treatments, anaerobic digestion is more common because of its low operational costs and the possibility of producing by-products of commercial interest, such as biogas and agricultural fertilizer [27]. This process is mediated by different microorganisms that work in symbiosis, converting complex organic compounds into different biomolecules, such as methane and carbon dioxide. Anaerobically digested vinasse has also been studied to produce food and feed fungal biomass [50].
Other uses for vinasse are in development, such as in producing hydrogen or volatile fatty acids [51], or energy production through concentration and incineration [43,52]. However, one of the most significant interests today is the production of biomethane while still recovering mineral nutrients in the secondary effluent and the sludge [53] and removing up to 80% of the COD [54].
The high content of organic matter and nutrients make the effluent a tempting substrate for fermentation. However, finding microorganisms that can quickly convert residual carbon from a previous fermentation is not trivial. There are reports of the production of biosurfactants [55], lipids [47], solutions for hydroponic culture [25], yeasts [18], and as a culture medium for several fungal species [56,57].
Reducing the large volumes of vinasse may be required for some applications, which can be done using evaporation or ultrafiltration systems. While these pretreatments increase energy costs, they can reduce disposal costs [43,58]. Other methods are investigated to treat vinasse, such as trickling filters, coagulation-flocculation, electrocoagulation, ultrasonication, photo-Fenton reactions, and ozone pre-processing. These methods can decrease vinasse’s phenolic compounds, color, and COD content, but usually require much energy [59,60,61].
Vinasse pH amendment—The natural pH of vinasse is low, around 4.6 (Table 1). This is far from the optimal range required for the development of a methanogenic microbiota of pH 6.5 to 8 [62]. Although many reports describe the direct biodigestion of vinasse, it is good practice to increase its pH before processing, as is disclosed in patents [63,64,65]. This can be done by adding alkalis, such as NaOH or Ca(OH)2 [18,66,67], residual filter cake (also known as press mud) from the sugarcane juice liming process, or even boiler ash [68,69]. However, the pH quickly drops in batch anaerobic digesters [67] because of the low buffering capacity of the vinasse and the formation of volatile fatty acids (VFA). With the subsequent consumption of VFAs, the pH rises again in batch reactors. Therefore, a strategy for pH maintenance is partitioning the system into two reactors, one optimized for the acidogenic and another for the methanogenic phase. It is possible to recycle effluent from the methanogenic reactor as a buffer for the acidogenic reactor [70,71]. Vinasse with an average pH of 4.6 (Table 1) would require at least 1 kg3 of NaOH per cubic meter of vinasse to raise the pH to 7.5, at the cost of about USD 0.31–0.53 per kg of NaOH [72,73], not considering buffering effects.

2.2. Energetic Potential in Vinasse

Vinasse may be efficiently used as a substrate for bioenergy generation, even with its variable [19,27,74,75,76,77] composition. The anaerobic digestion process can reclaim part of the energy content in organic molecules, currently lost to decomposition in fields, while still maintaining the mineral nutrients necessary for fertigation. Santos et al. [74] found similar bioenergy yields and electrical energy potential for different types of sugarcane vinasse. Brazil’s sugarcane harvest in the season 2020/2021 was 665 million tons, with an ethanol production of 29.8 billion liters [78]. The generation of vinasse in the same period was about 360 billion liters, considering the average production of 12 L of residue per liter of ethanol [20,29]. With the above values and based on the methodology used by Bernal et al. [76], the energy production potential from the vinasse of all annexed and autonomous plants of ethanol in Brazil could reach 3.28 TWh per season—or 2.3% of the domestic electricity consumption in Brazil in 2019 [78]. This is equivalent to 1.9 million barrels of oil.

3. Vinasse Anaerobic Digestion

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a natural and ubiquitous process where a microbial community works synergically, converting the available organic carbon into methane and carbon dioxide. This process can be explained in four stages: hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis [79,80]. The gaseous mixture produced is commonly termed biogas, containing 60–70% methane and 30–40% carbon dioxide. Trace gases, such as hydrogen and hydrogen sulfide [81], can also be found in small amounts. The purified fraction, after CO2 absorption and, therefore, with a higher methane concentration, is termed biomethane. This fraction can be pure enough to be fed to natural gas pipelines.
Refs. [82,83,84,85,86] show that vinasse anaerobic digestion depends on detailed information about its chemical composition, the inherent microbial community, and the biochemical steps to which the organic matter is subjected [84,85,86]. The scientific literature is rich in studies showing relations between process parameters and the optimal efficiency of biodigestion systems [82,83]. However, it is frequent that these conditions are not reproducible in other environments. This is a consequence of the microbial community’s variable composition, which depends on nutrient availability.

3.1. Microbial Community Diversity in Vinasse AD

Microbial activity is central to AD. All four stages, from the breakdown of complex organic matter to the final generation of methane, are mediated by different microorganisms [87]. Besides the obvious exchange of metabolites, the signaling and quorum sensing between populations [88,89] and the extracellular transport of electrons [90] are hot topics for research that can further improve processes. The more efficient and specialized microorganisms are present, the more efficient the chemical conversion. Ideally, attaining a productive microbial community would be done by inoculation and using selected nutrients and culture conditions. However, understanding and manipulating these complex microbial communities is not a simple task: recent metagenomic analyses seldom identified the microorganisms at the species level [91], but show a complex and variable ecosystem.
An analysis of 134 studies of the microbial community diversity in the anaerobic digestion of vinasse identified 1635 MAGs (metagenome-assembled genomes); however, only 25 MAGs were identified frequently in the samples, which clearly shows that the microbial community is vastly variable. In this study, >96% of the identified MAGs belonged to bacteria [92]. Bacteria are responsible for the hydrolysis of complex organic matter (Clostridium, Cellulomonas, Bacillus, Thermomonospora, Ruminococcus, Bacteroides, Acetovibrio, and Microbispora genera) [27], bioconversion of the readily fermentable substrates into volatile fatty acids (Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Bacillus, and Escherichia) [93], and production of acetic acid and biohydrogen (Acetobacterium, Syntrophomonas, Clostridium, Sporomusa, Syntrophospora, Thermosyntropha, and Eubacterium) [27]. Among the 61 MAGs of Archea identified by Campanaro et al. [92], 53 referred to Euryarchaeota: Methanococcus, Methanosarcina, and Methanolobus are considered the main archeobacteria in methane production. The acetoclastic biosynthesis (from acetate) contributes about 70% of the methane in anaerobic digestion, while the remainder, 30%, comes from methanogenic hydrogenotrophs (e.g., Methanosarcinia sp.). However, a high degree of inter cooperation and even interspecies hydrogen transfer occurs in the microbial community [94,95].
This overview is compatible with the composition of a mesophilic biogas production from sugarcane vinasse where the prevalent phyla identified were Bacteroidetes (58.5%), Firmicutes (14.1%), and Proteobacteria (13.1%), while the methanogens were mainly composed by Crenarchaeota (2.39%) and Euryarchaeota (Methanosaeta 1.97%, Methanomassiliicoccaceae 1.15%, and Methanobacterium 0.7%) [96]. In a thermophilic biogas production from the co-digestion of vinasse with filter cake, Methanothermobacter (order Methanobacteriales), Thermotogae, and Thermodesulfovibrio (Nitrospirae) were identified as the most common thermophilic microorganisms [53]. The intricate relationship between the anaerobic microbiota and its action on organic matter for biogas production is shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Vinasse Methanogenic Potential and Digestion

Although vinasse is produced from a widely known and established process, its composition varies with the season, the quality of the processed sugarcane, the raw material (sugarcane juice or molasses), and fermentation efficiency. There is a variation in composition within the same ethanol industry and, consequently, in the potential for biomethane production from vinasse. For example, Leite et al. [98] observed more than 20% in the methane yield using vinasse from the beginning and end of the operation season.
The biochemical methane potential (BMP) can be expressed in liters of methane per kilogram of chemical oxygen demand or volatile solids; since gas volume varies with temperature, the volume is expressed as “normal” liters of gas at 25 °C, leading to units such as NLCH4.kgCOD−1. The BMP of vinasse was estimated as 231 NLCH4.kgvs−1 [99,100], 215 COD−1 [101,102], and 324 COD−1 (recalculated from [103]). The latter is closer to the theoretical maximal BMP of 350 COD−1, considering a substrate such as a carbohydrate, lactic, or acetic acid, with the minimal formula CH2O.
Among the bioreactors used for vinasse biodigestion, UASB (upflow anaerobic sludge bioreactor) is the most common due to its high biomass retention capacity, which allows for a low hydraulic retention time. Moreover, UASB systems are less expensive than traditional CSTR systems (continuous stirred-tank reactors) [104,105]. The efforts to increase biomass concentration through sludge retention are evident in the studies that describe the use of an AFBR (anaerobic fluidized bed reactor) with immobilized biomass [39] and membranes in AnSBBR (anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor) [106]. The higher the biomass retention, the fewer total suspended solids are lost, increasing the effluent quality: 90% COD removal can be reached [107] by favoring the maintenance of slow-growing microorganisms, such as methanogens. Despite the advantages of AnSBBR over conventional reactors, membrane fouling is common and brings additional operational costs [108] that were not overcome to date. UASB and CSTR continue to be the most frequently used bioreactors.

3.3. Vinasse Composition Effects on Methanogenesis

As presented in Table 1, sugarcane vinasse is rich in organic matter (carbohydrates and organic acids), nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus. Despite the high potassium content (1.6 to 2.4 g/L) [19,25], no study indicates adverse effects of this ion on the anaerobic community. The C:N ratio of vinasse from sugarcane (12:1) or sugarcane + vinasse (16:1) is below the recommended for anaerobic digestion (20–40:1) [99]. This can result in the accumulation of ammonia due to the excess nitrogen that inhibits the whole process. A possible way to increase the C:N ratio in N-rich vinasses is the addition of carbon sources, e.g., small amounts of sugarcane juice or bagasse.
In descending order, vinasse’s most abundant micronutrients are sulfur, calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese, and copper [19]. The sulfur content must be quantified in the vinasse from sugarcane and molasses mixtures. Unlike potassium, excess sulfur is known to disturb AD, especially at concentrations above 200 mg/L, when sulfate-reducing bacteria are favored instead of methanogens and can inhibit methane production [109].
The most common toxic chemical species for methanogens are oxygen, nitrates, and nitrites, higher fatty acids, heavy metals (Ni > Cu > Cd > Cr > Pb), aromatic compounds, chlorinated hydrocarbons, sulfides [110], and antibiotics [111], the last two largely used in ethanol fermentation. Another aspect to consider is the low pH of vinasse, which is due to the presence of volatile fatty acids [19] and low alkalinity [112]: the acidogenesis in AD results in further acidification, which is incompatible with the optimal pH for methanogenic bacteria (6.5–8.0). The pH must be regulated, but the chemicals used must consider the sustainability of the process [29].
Methanogenic bacteria are more sensitive to unbalanced nutrients and process parameters, such as pH reduction and high organic loading rates, which require careful system operation. Concerning the toxic compounds of vinasse, Methanosarcina is less susceptible than Methanothrix [27]. Both genera can produce methane from acetate and are responsible for >70% of the methane generated. However, the first has a higher growth rate, lower affinity to acetate [113], and sensibility to the presence of propionate [96]. It is directly related to the medium’s cobalt, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, and tungsten content [114]. In the case of UASB reactors, the presence of Methanotrix in granular sludge is crucial for stabilizing the system [115]. Finally, the main enzyme involved in acetate degradation in methanogens is carbon monoxide dehydrogenase, which contains iron, sulfur, and nickel in its composition [113]. Iron and sulfur content in vinasse is generally sufficient, but nickel is not [99] and may have to be added to the system.

3.4. Improving Vinasse Biodigestion with Co-Substrates

The choice of co-substrates to correct the above-mentioned low C:N ratio should also consider the need to supplement desired nutrients and dilute toxic compounds. Moreover, the low pH of vinasse, the presence of toxic compounds, and the low biodegradable fraction content should also be considered in the strategy of co-digestion [116]. Some examples of co-digestion are presented in Table 2.
Sugarcane processing into bioethanol gives by-products such as filter cake, straw, and bagasse that should be prioritized as co-substrates—especially considering logistics and a circular economy context. Press mud, for instance, is generated at about 2–3% of the sugarcane crushed [120]; it is a nutrient-rich residue with 25–30% solids [121], used as fertilizer and with incipient use in anaerobic digestion [122]. On the other hand, using solid substrates in biodigestion has some technical limitations, such as the total solids content, which explains the clear preference for studying liquid co-substrates. Furthermore, attention must be given to lignocellulosic substrates with lower biodegradation rates [99], which increase the hydraulic retention time and biodigester size, impacting process economics.
Using molasses as a co-substrate improves the efficiency of vinasse anaerobic digestion compared to sucrose and sugarcane juice [19]. Co-digestion of vinasse with sugarcane filter cake (press mud) may improve the process stability and methane production (by 21 and 64%, based on reports by Volpi et al. [103] and López González et al. [117]). Hemicellulosic hydrolysates, yeast extract, and sugarcane bagasse ash have also been recently studied [34] and showed a positive impact on methane production when added to vinasse.

3.5. Early Implementations of Industrial Processes

Although biodigestion technologies are widespread in India and China [123] and are expanding in other sugarcane-producing countries, such as Thailand and Pakistan, vinasse is still primarily used for fertigation, eventually after anaerobic treatment in lagoons [124]. However, the technology is being picked up by industry now, with examples of economic and process evaluation in Mauritius [125], Cuba [126], Colombia [127,128], Thailand [129], and Indonesia [130]. Most reports of industrial processing come from Brazil, where 10 out of 355 distilleries have developed vinasse biogas facilities in the past, most no longer in operation [131]; however, there are large projects recently launched, further described in Section 4.2.
The first experience of biodigestion of vinasse in Brazil took place in Rio de Janeiro in 1981, with a modified Indian model reactor of 330 m3. In 1986, a mesophilic UASB was installed in São Paulo’s state with a total capacity of 1500 m3. Since 1987, the “Usina São Martinho” in São Paulo has carried out a thermophilic process (55–57 °C) for the digestion of vinasse, with a pilot reactor type UASB with 75 m3 of capacity and gas production two times higher than that reported for mesophilic processes, and at significative lower hydraulic retention time (10.8 h versus 8.6–15 days). Although the system showed promising results, it had a high operation cost and did not reach an industrial scale [132]. The number of pilot and real-scale studies (0.5 to 15,000 m3) is much smaller than those carried out at the laboratory scale [117,133,134,135,136,137]. At large scales, the methane concentrations in the biogas (60–68%) [134,136] are lower than those obtained at the lab scale (60–84%) [108,138], with methane production rates 5–34% lower [133,137,139].
The anaerobic degradation of vinasse on an industrial scale is a challenge and still needs scientific and technological development [140], primarily due to the difficulties of maintaining process stability and a high rate of vinasse degradation [137]. Moreover, sugarcane seasonality must be considered. Government incentives are essential for installing biodigestion plants in the sugarcane-based ethanol industry [141]. Considering the increase in ethanol production for the coming years, the energy produced from vinasse biomethane could add 29.4% more than ethanol alone to the Brazilian energy matrix [142]. Moreover, vinasse biomethane is a biofuel produced locally with little connection to fossil fuel prices and variations in exchange rates.

4. Current Trends and Technologies

Although anaerobic digestion, in general, is a mature technology, applying it to vinasse processing in sugarcane biorefineries is not trivial. It implies working with the enormous volumes required for economic bioethanol production and dealing with specific problems, such as the C:N ratio, its high ionic content, and the lack of vinasse out of the harvesting season. A look at the patent literature and market developments can inform how research impacts the development of vinasse AD and give a glimpse of the necessary directions to be investigated.

4.1. Patents in Vinasse Biodigestion

To assess the state of the art in biomethane production from sugarcane vinasse, a patent search was carried out in the Derwent Innovations Index database, considering the period between 2005 and 2020. The search retrieved 132 documents, and 51 relevant documents were selected. Data were exported to the software Excel® and analyzed to exclude patents or utility models unrelated to biogas production.
The first patent deposit for biomethane production from vinasse dates back to 1981 [143], but patent filings’ most pronounced evolution occurred in the last 15 years. In the evaluated period (2005–2020), 51 patent documents were found, peaking in 2009 (8 filed documents). This can be attributed to the increase in the energy crisis and green movements due to the eagerness to find alternative energy sources [144]. In the subsequent years, around four patents were filed per year, except for the years 2007 and 2008, where only one patent document was found. In the case of the years 2019 and 2020, only two and three patent filings were found, respectively (Figure 2A), but it should be considered that there is a latency period of approximately 18 months between the filing date of the patent and the date of publication [145].
Among the countries protecting technologies to produce biomethane from sugarcane vinasse, Brazil, China, and the United States dominate, with a share of 20%, 18%, and 18%, respectively. Other countries such as India, Canada, France, Germany, Mexico, Spain, Japan, and the United Kingdom have less participation. In general, it is observed that the countries filing patents in biomethane production from vinasse are the largest producers of sugarcane. As the primary producer of sugarcane ethanol and, consequently, vinasse, it makes sense that Brazil has filed most patents on technological advances to use vinasse in biomethane production. This is because the large volume of effluent generated is a problem for the sugar and alcohol industry and calls for a sustainable solution [146]. The production of energy as biomethane is a promising alternative since the energy recovery from the effluent improves environmental indicators and positively impacts local and regional socio-economic parameters [45].
The top two most recurrent International Patent Classification (IPC) codes [147] were C12P (fermentation or enzyme-using processes to synthesize a desired chemical compound or composition or to separate optical isomers from a racemic mixture) with 51% of patent documents, and C02F (treatment of water, wastewater, sewage, or sludge), found in 23% of patent documents. Other patent classification codes were C10L (fuels not otherwise provided for; natural gas; synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by subclasses) with 16%, C12M (apparatus for enzymology or microbiology) with 14%, and C12N (microorganisms or enzymes; compositions thereof; propagating, preserving, or maintaining microorganisms; mutation or genetic engineering; culture media) with 12%, among others (Figure 2B).
While anaerobic digestion itself cannot be patented, improvements are described as processes or utility models. For example, WO2008/040358Al describes a sequential process for recovering proteins from the liquid phase of vegetable materials (sugarcane) and producing fermented bioproducts from fermentable sugars, such as alcohols, fertilizers, and bioenergy in the form of biomethane from vinasse. The process starts with treating the raw material (mechanically or enzymatically), disrupting the cells, and making proteins available for recovery and carbohydrates for fermentation. Proteins are recovered by precipitation (acid or salt) or by chromatography. Sugars are fermented to alcohol using yeast or bacteria, and the resulting effluent is used to produce biomethane using bacterial methanogens [148]. In the patent document WO2009/010959A2, Yogev and Gamzon [138] describe methods for producing fuels from simpler molecules, such as CO2, H2O, or CH4, the latter obtained from the anaerobic fermentation of wastewater as, for example, stillage.
The patent BRPI0915815B1 presented a process to produce biogas using effluents from the sugar and alcohol industry, mainly vinasse and biogenic material (washing waters and other organic wastes from the process) with up to 85% of conversion [63]. The effluents are mixed and transferred to a bioreactor, the pH is adjusted, and the fermentation is carried out by adding or immobilizing bacteria. The process can operate at temperatures between 37 and 50 °C and a pH between 6 and 8. The gas produced is collected in a gas reservoir. A recirculation pipe takes the biomethane to the bottom of the bioreactors to support the CH4 reaction and expel the reaction-inhibiting CO2. The discharge effluent, as well as the sludge, can be used for irrigation or fertilization purposes. The patent WO2012/153189A2 shows a process for biogas production, which could operate in a semi-continuous or continuous mode using a mixture of solid and liquid residues: lignocellulosic biomass from sugarcane, and vinasse [64]. Unlike the patent BRPI0915815B1, in this case, the lignocellulosic biomass was pretreated through steam explosion. In a second bioreactor, anaerobic digestion is carried out with 10–20% v/v of anaerobic bacteria (anaerobic sludge from treatment stations), enzymes (cellulases and xylanases), and up to 20% v/v vinasse. Digestion can be done under mesophilic or thermophilic conditions (20–70 °C) and at a pH between 5 and 8.
Finally, Huandong et al. [65] presented a process for producing biogas rich in biomethane from cane vinasse in the patent document CN105039422B. The process is conducted in batch mode, using a 75% bioreactor working volume and alternating agitation at 120 rpm (3 to 15 min each hour). The substrate fermentation uses a 16% v/v inoculum, pH 7.5–8.5, and a temperature of 55 °C for 44 days.
A patent search was also run in the Brazilian patent database, considering that the country is the primary producer of vinasse and the main depositor of patents in this field and that the national patent database is not yet fully integrated with the Derwent worldwide database. The results of relevant patent documents are presented in Table 3.

4.2. Recent and Announced Projects

The enormous volumes of sugarcane vinasse produced in Brazil have stimulated the development of projects to convert this liquid residue into biogas for energy generation, first at the academic/research level and, today, at the industrial level. Since 2011, the São Carlos School of Engineering (University of São Paulo) has been developing compact and robust bioreactors that allow the optimized conversion of vinasse to biogas using bacteria and archaea that remain immobilized in biofilms, in a project with the cost of USD 428,000. An important bioethanol research center in Brazil, CTBE, has launched a project (USD 927,000) of a virtual “first-generation biorefinery”, which aims to develop mathematical models to optimize sugarcane production plants in all their stages, including the anaerobic digestion of vinasse to generate bioenergy, employing the software Environment for Modeling, Simulation and Optimization (EMSO) [161].
Despite the considerable potential for energy generation, biogas production from sugarcane vinasse is not yet a widespread technology. In 2017, in the state of São Paulo, the major Brazilian bioethanol producer, only 8 of 165 distilleries applied alternative treatments for vinasse, including anaerobic digestion. In all other cases, vinasse was used directly in fertigation [76]. However, there is an estimation that the production of biogas in the sugar and alcohol segment will increase by 80% in the next seven years, considering that the use of sugarcane vinasse and filter cake as raw materials for biogas production boosts the energy recovery from sugarcane by 31% [162].
In 2018, a vinasse biogas production project was scaled up in the Ivinhema production plant in Minas Gerais. This project was a partnership between the company Methanum and the Cooperative Adecoagro, initiated in 2013 and funded (BRL 4.87 million, or approximately USD 2,250,000 at the time) by the Brazilian Innovation Agency FINEP (Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos), in the frame of the PAISS Program (Plano BNDES-Finep de Apoio à Inovação dos Setores Sucroenergético e Sucroquímico), an initiative dedicated to supporting innovation in the sugar and alcohol segment. Today, the produced biogas is used to heat the water used in the industrial processes, and the digestate is employed as an organomineral fertilizer in sugarcane cultivation. The vinasse is concentrated before the biodigestion process [163]. In the São Martinho production plant, located in São Paulo, biogas from vinasse is produced to provide heat for the drying process of yeast cells [164].
Recently, biogas production technology from the anaerobic digestion of sugarcane vinasse for electricity generation has reached an industrial scale in Brazil. In July 2020, large-scale electricity production in biogas moto-generators started in the Bonfim production plant in Guariba (São Paulo). This joint venture between the companies Raízen (a joint venture between Shell and Cosan) and Geo Energética, announced in 2018, had an investment of BRL 153 million (approximately USD 30 million in December 2020) and represents the first project in the world that uses vinasse and filter cake from ethanol production to generate electric energy from biomethane at a large scale. The production plant operates with three turbines that generate 8955 kW. The estimated annual production is 138,000 MWh. Another project of BRL 160 million (approximately USD 31 million in December 2020) applying the same technology shall be implemented in the Narandiba production plant, which belongs to the Cocal group and is in Presidente Prudente (São Paulo). This plant will produce around 114,000 Nm3 of biogas per day during the sugarcane harvest. Part of the biogas will be used for electric energy generation (up to 33,300 MWh/year). Around 24,000 Nm3/day of purified biomethane will be introduced in the distribution pipeline of the company Gas Brasiliano. The production plant will be started in April 2021 [165,166,167]. The company Jalles Machado, located in the state of Goiás, also plans to start biogas production from vinasse in 2021 [164].
Mixing two different substrates allows for regular biogas production throughout the year. The vinasse has an irregular organic load and energetic density, and its storage is not economical due to the high water content and huge volumes. The filter cake, in contrast, has a more stable composition and high solids content, and thus can be used to compensate for the variations of vinasse composition. Before being scaled up to the Bonfim commercial plant, this technology, developed by Geo Energética, was successfully applied in the Regional Cooperative of Sugarcane Producers (Coopcana) in the state of Paraná, in a demonstration plant with the capacity to produce 4 MW [167].

5. Vinasse Treatment and the Circular Economy

5.1. Current Practices of Circular Economy in the Sugarcane Industry

The circular economy concept involves all material streams and flows and their utilization routes in an industrial process, from raw materials, other inputs, and resources to products, by-products, and residues, including gas emissions. Unlike the traditional linear economy, which considers only resource consumption and residue disposal, the circular approach adopts reuse and recycling to close the material flow cycle to the maximum. Thus, a well-established circular economy reduces the extraction of natural resources.
Analysis tools, such as modeling, simulation, and optimization, can aid in increasing the process’s yield and productivity, reduce capital and operational costs, and improve the management and conservation of energy resources to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Life cycle analysis (LCA) is a technique used to minimize environmental problems, evaluating the impacts from raw material production to product consumption based on the input and output of materials and energy [168]. These analyses are fundamental to determining an ideal biorefinery configuration, such as sugar and ethanol plants that convert the feedstock into sugar, ethanol, steam, and electricity [16].
Since the 1970s, in Brazil, approaches have been adopted to increase circularity in sugarcane ethanol production plants. From this decade until the mid-1990s, the transformation of sugarcane bagasse into electric energy grew linearly and, from then on, exponentially (Figure 3). This co-generation strategy is the most significant measure towards a circular economy that allows production plants to become self-sufficient in energy. Other approaches highlighted by Raízen, one of the leading Brazilian ethanol-producing companies, were: strategies for water reuse, e.g., efficient recovery of condensates; the use of ashes from burning bagasse as fertilizer in the field, together with vinasse and filter cake; and the conversion of sugarcane bagasse and straw to second-generation ethanol, which reduces the carbon footprint by 35% [169].

5.2. The Next Challenge: Valorization of Liquid Residues

A critical aspect for the ethanol industry, both for the first-generation (from sugarcane juice or molasses) and the second-generation (from lignocellulosic biomass, such as straw and bagasse), is the environmental impact of the liquid residues generated in the process, mainly vinasse [171]. Effluent biodigestion can improve the energy balance in ethanol processing and the environmental suitability of waste disposal [172]. One of the advantages of biogas energy is the prospect of storing biogas and production in periods of low energy generation in hydroelectric plants, which can make the price more competitive [173]. Therefore, the inclusion of a unit of anaerobic digestion of vinasse using process integration techniques in sugarcane biorefineries is the reason for studies by several researchers [117,172,173,174]. A summary of climate change impacts analyses of biogas production from sugarcane vinasse is shown in Table 4.
The energy potential of biogas production vinasse AD was evaluated both as a product and in electricity generation [76,105]. The surplus electricity, not used in the factory’s energy demand, can be sent to the local grid companies. Using vinasse biogas could have generated about USD 85 million in carbon credits in revenues for Brazil in 2009 [173]. Electricity production is one of the potential uses of biogas that can maximize energy recovery based mainly on the availability of well-established efficient conversion technologies, such as engines and turbines [176]. Moraes et al. [173] estimated that about 12% of the energy produced by bagasse burning could be supplied by vinasse biogas. Barrera et al. [177] showed that anaerobic digestion plants improve the vinasse lagoon’s environmental profile. LCA analyses indicated a reduction of up to 77% of the total score, and the exergy recovery from the natural environment was up to 46% [177]. Pereira et al. [105] evaluated the economic viability using net present value and electricity cost parameters for biogas production in São Paulo state, Brazil (one of the world’s largest ethanol-producing regions). Total annual electricity generation was determined to be 659 GWh, with one-third of the municipalities studied considered economically viable. The vinasse could supply electricity to almost 295,000 inhabitants, representing 0.45% of the state’s energy demand [105].
On alternative anaerobic digestion methods, Fuess et al. [141] analyzed two-phase biodigestion to increase vinasse energy production compared to single-phase schemes. The two-phase system increased biogas production by 20 to 30% without harming the profitability of the biorefinery. Using an optimized alkalinization strategy can improve the environmental performance of the ethanol production chain. López-González et al. [126] investigated the feasibility of anaerobic digestion of press sludge previously pretreated by liquid hot water and alkaline heat. Economic, energy, and environmental analyses showed that co-digestion of the vinasse from the pressed sludge without pretreatment was the most viable for a sugar and ethanol plant.
Biomethane can be injected into the natural gas network or used as a substitute for fossil diesel oil in the sugarcane harvesting and transportation operations at the plant [131]. In the ethanol life cycle, fossil energy (diesel oil) is used in the mechanical harvesting and transport of sugarcane and emits greenhouse gases [178]. Diesel consumption depends on the conditions of mechanical harvesting, such as crop density, distance traveled, and truck capacity [131,179]. Transportation and sugarcane harvesting is responsible for consuming about 0.98 and 0.9 L of diesel per ton of sugarcane, and operations can reach 3.5 L/ton [180].
Longati et al. [181] analyzed different configurations to produce biogas from vinasse as complementary fuel in the boiler and as a substitute for diesel in agricultural operations. There was an insignificant reduction in environmental impacts using biogas as a complementary fuel in a boiler. Biogas used as a substitute for diesel obtained significant improvements in all categories analyzed, such as abiotic depletion, global warming, depletion of the ozone layer, human toxicity, and aquatic marine ecotoxicity. Thus, the application of biogas is fundamental for an efficient biorefinery. Studies by da Silva Neto et al. [131] show that using vinasse can improve energy balance indicators by 3.5% in electricity generation, 7.9% in the injection of biomethane in the gas network, and 27% in the substitution of diesel in plant operations. Total greenhouse gas emissions have declined by about 7% in all three applications.

5.3. The Ideal Sugarcane Biorefinery

A biorefinery that uses all waste and by-products to generate energy or product tends to minimize environmental impacts regardless of its configuration. For example, the ecological advantages of producing second-generation ethanol or biogas from the hemicellulosic biomass fraction are similar. Thus, the application of the generated product also needs to be evaluated. According to Junqueira et al. [175], second-generation ethanol can boost bioethanol production by 27% in autonomous distilleries, reaching 108.4 L of first- and second-generation ethanol per ton of sugarcane. However, Longati et al. [172] estimated an increase of about 9% in electricity production if a first-generation ethanol plant used vinasse biodigestion. Therefore, by replacing part of the biomass used in the boiler, biogas would increase by almost 8% the biomass diverted to second-generation ethanol. The studies showed that the best scenario for most of the parameters studied was the production of first- and second-generation ethanol with the fermentation of the cellulosic and hemicellulosic fraction hydrolyzed and biodigestion of vinasse. This scenario produced 113.64 L of ethanol per ton of cane and 9.2 m3 of biogas per m3 of vinasse. However, the increase in ethanol production would generate even more vinasse, requiring extra capital investment. The biodigestion of vinasse has reduced the environmental impacts in all simulations analyzed.
Different configurations of sugarcane biorefineries have economic, energy, and environmental potential, but the most promising ones, which can already integrate sugar and alcohol plants, are those with biodigestion of vinasse. Figure 4 shows the main biogas production steps according to the studies presented in Table 4.

6. Perspectives and Challenges in Vinasse Anaerobic Digestion

The unique combination of large volumes, high conductivity, high COD, and nutrient content in vinasse makes its efficient processing challenging yet full of opportunities—and industrial implementations of vinasse AD, described in Section 4, prove that.
The potential for many countries to add a clean fraction of bioethanol to the automotive fleet, most remarkably Brazil, India, and China, may push industries towards increasing circularity and a complete water recycling process. With the surplus energy provided by biomethane, more sophisticated uses for sugarcane bagasse can be implemented, starting with second-generation ethanol (and second-generation vinasse, in a virtuous cycle) and evolving to other fermentation products. Further ahead, membrane technologies may altogether change the composition of press mud and vinasse, calling for processes supporting higher solids content. In the meantime, the surplus energy can continue to be sold to feed power grids—a welcome green component to the world energy matrix.
For now, seven aspects and trends are especially promising routes to improve the anaerobic digestion of vinasse, increasing process sustainability: (i) developing and modulating microbial consortia; (ii) improving vinasse pretreatment for enhanced AD; (iii) developing microalgal processes coupled to biorefineries; (iv) improving the AD of second-generation vinasse; (v) developing biohydrogen or biohythane production from vinasse; (vi) recovering organic acids from the digestate; and (vii) developing bioelectrochemical systems. These trends are detailed below.
Microbial consortia are critical to effective biodigestion. The makeup of the microbial communities in anaerobic reactors, and its modification through space (bioreactor zones) and time (crop season), must be better understood. Modern molecular biology tools can tell us a lot about these microbial communities. Microbiota composition and dynamics can lead to insights on strategies for inoculation boosts, nutrient amendment, and process modifications, ultimately leading to higher energy recovery and a lower residual COD [96].
Residue pretreatment and composition amendment strategies can intensify CH4 production: chemical or thermal treatment can be used to better control the outcome of AD [182,183], especially in systems with co-substrates. Furthermore, additives such as iron nanoparticles [184] can aid in enhancing methane yield.
Microalgae culture can be done in the digested vinasse, further improving the use of the residue and expanding the possibilities in sugarcane biorefineries, and increasing process circularity [185]. Microalgal cultures can grow quickly in wastewater media [186,187], although nutrient correction may be necessary [185]. The microalgal biomass can be fed directly to biodigesters in a first-generation biorefinery, enhancing biomethane generation. In a second-generation biorefinery, algal biomass can be further processed into value-added products such as lipids, protein meal, and carotenoids [188]. This requires robust strain development that can grow on the clarified but acidic and still COD-rich vinasse or strategies for residue pretreatment, e.g., filtration to reduce self-shadowing [189]. Anaerobic digestates tend to have high contents of acetic, propionic, butyric, and valeric acids, ref. [81] and vinasse digestate is no exception.
Second-generation ethanol will probably increase its participation in sugarcane biorefineries over time. That implies adapting the processes developed for first-generation vinasse to mixed residues also containing second-generation vinasse. Is that vinasse richer in organic compounds? Will typical by-products of hydrolysis (furfural, hydroxymethyl furfural, and acetic acid) make their way to the anaerobic digester? And to what effect? The literature on the composition of second-generation vinasse is still scarce (an example is Silverio et al. [190]), with most of the research effort being put into hydrolysis and fermentation. This is because second-generation processes are yet to reach a large scale, allowing the potential of residues to be unleashed before it is produced on a large scale, thus developing processes with circularity by design.
Biohydrogen can also be produced anaerobically from vinasse or as an upgrade from biomethane. The technology is in development, and it is already clear that to be economical, biohydrogen production must be done on a large scale [191]. Similarly to classical biodigestion, microbial consortia and nutrient amendment are critical to the process, with the extra concern of avoiding the domination of a methanogenic microbial population—a challenge for continuous systems. Biohydrogen produced via methane reforming can be used to produce ammonia. There is a recent agreement between the Dutch–Brazilian company Raízen to provide biomethane to the Norwegian company Yara [192] for this purpose.
Organic acids can be recovered from vinasse or its digestate. Their origin may be the sugarcane juice [193], molasses or fermentation metabolites in the initial vinasse, or the residues from the acidogenic phase. These acids may become especially relevant in biorefineries integrating lignocellulosic bioethanol. Their relatively low concentration would make profiting tricky: recovery processes, such as adsorption, extraction, or even electrodialysis, could be used but require technology development and techno-economic analysis. Still, it is a promising line of investigation when the large volumes involved are considered, and organic acid removal may be unavoidable in 2G ethanol production.
Bioelectrochemical systems have high capital cost, but are elegant processes that use microbiota capable of direct electron transfer to electrodes, generating electrical energy during effluent digestion, without combustion. This technology is compatible with high-conductivity effluents such as vinasse [194]. With the development of new materials and cost reduction, these systems could reclaim part of the vinasse energy.

7. Conclusions

Both ethanol fermentation and anaerobic digestion (AD) are long-known technologies. However, the mapping of patents and business news shows that large-scale processes are still uncommon, and most of the vinasse still proceeds to field application (fertigation) with minimal treatment. However, good results have already been obtained in small-scale methanogenic fermentation: the experimental BMP of vinasse ranges from 215 to 324 COD−1.
Since the basics of vinasse anaerobic digestion are established, further developing the technology is paramount in order to lead to stable and profitable processes. The opportunities for improvement abound, from developing stable consortia and co-digestion to better understanding bioreactor dynamics and developing microalgal bioproducts. The techno-economical assessment of large-scale biorefinery strategies is also essential in deciding on biorefinery routes and optimizing capital and operational costs, ultimately leading to a return on investment and increased circularity.

Author Contributions

J.C.d.C.: conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, and supervision; L.P.d.S.V.: writing—original draft preparation and writing—review and editing; E.B.S.: writing—original draft preparation and visualization; S.G.K.: data curation and writing—original draft preparation; A.I.M.J.: writing—original draft preparation and visualization; W.J.M.-B.: data curation, patent scoping, and analysis; A.B.P.M.: data curation, writing—original draft preparation, and writing—review and editing; V.T.-S.: writing—review and editing; S.V.: writing—original draft preparation; L.A.J.L.: writing—original draft preparation; C.R.: writing—original draft preparation; A.L.W.: writing—original draft preparation; C.R.S.: conceptualization, resources, supervision, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research was supported by the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq), grant 442271/2017-4, and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), PNPD Program.

Data Availability Statement

There is no supplementary data for this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.


  1. Cho, Y.K. Performance of a Two-Stage Methane Digestor for Alcohol Stillage Derived from Sugarcane Molasses. Biotechnol. Lett. 1983, 5, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Laluce, C. Current Aspects of Fuel Ethanol Production in Brazil. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 1991, 11, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Olguín, E.J.; Doelel, H.W.; Mercado, G. Resource Recovery through Recycling of Sugar Processing By-Products and Residuals. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1995, 15, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Solarte-Toro, J.C.; Cardona Alzate, C.A. Biorefineries as the Base for Accomplishing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Transition to Bioeconomy: Technical Aspects, Challenges and Perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 340, 125626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Obaideen, K.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Wilberforce, T.; Elsaid, K.; Sayed, E.T.; Maghrabie, H.M.; Olabi, A.G. Biogas Role in Achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals: Evaluation, Challenges, and Guidelines. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2022, 131, 104207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Klein, B.C.; Chagas, M.F.; Watanabe, M.D.B.; Bonomi, A.; Maciel Filho, R. Low Carbon Biofuels and the New Brazilian National Biofuel Policy (RenovaBio): A Case Study for Sugarcane Mills and Integrated Sugarcane-Microalgae Biorefineries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 115, 109365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vasconcelos, M.H.; Mendes, F.M.; Ramos, L.; Dias, M.O.S.; Bonomi, A.; Jesus, C.D.F.; Watanabe, M.D.B.; Junqueira, T.L.; Milagres, A.M.F.; Ferraz, A. Techno-Economic Assessment of Bioenergy and Biofuel Production in Integrated Sugarcane Biorefinery: Identification of Technological Bottlenecks and Economic Feasibility of Dilute Acid Pretreatment. Energy 2020, 125, 117422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sydney, E.B.; Letti, L.A.J.; Karp, S.G.; Sydney, A.C.N.; de Souza Vandenberghe, L.P.; de Carvalho, J.C.; Woiciechowski, A.L.; Medeiros, A.B.P.; Soccol, V.T.; Soccol, C.R. Current Analysis and Future Perspective of Reduction in Worldwide Greenhouse Gases Emissions by Using First and Second Generation Bioethanol in the Transportation Sector. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2019, 7, 100234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zeng, A.-P. New Bioproduction Systems for Chemicals and Fuels: Needs and New Development. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 508–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fuess, L.T.; Garcia, M.L. Anaerobic Biodigestion for Enhanced Bioenergy Generation in Ethanol Biorefineries: Understanding the Potentials of Vinasse as a Biofuel. In Bioenergy Systems for the Future; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 149–183. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fuess, L.T.; Rodrigues, I.J.; Garcia, M.L. Fertirrigation with Sugarcane Vinasse: Foreseeing Potential Impacts on Soil and Water Resources through Vinasse Characterization. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2017, 52, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. FAOSTAT-Database Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: (accessed on 3 March 2023).
  13. Sakthivel, P.; Subramanian, K.A.; Mathai, R. Indian Scenario of Ethanol Fuel and Its Utilization in Automotive Transportation Sector. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 132, 102–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vandenberghe, L.P.S.; Valladares-Diestra, K.K.; Bittencourt, G.A.; Zevallos Torres, L.A.; Vieira, S.; Karp, S.G.; Sydney, E.B.; de Carvalho, J.C.; Thomaz Soccol, V.; Soccol, C.R. Beyond Sugar and Ethanol: The Future of Sugarcane Biorefineries in Brazil. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 167, 112721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Produção de Cana-de-Açúcar No Brasil. IBGE. Available online: (accessed on 25 March 2023).
  16. de Souza Dias, M.O.; Maciel Filho, R.; Mantelatto, P.E.; Cavalett, O.; Rossell, C.E.V.; Bonomi, A.; Leal, M.R.L.V. Sugarcane Processing for Ethanol and Sugar in Brazil. Environ. Dev. 2015, 15, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Formann, S.; Hahn, A.; Janke, L.; Stinner, W.; Sträuber, H.; Logroño, W.; Nikolausz, M. Beyond Sugar and Ethanol Production: Value Generation Opportunities through Sugarcane Residues. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Christofoletti, C.A.; Escher, J.P.; Correia, J.E.; Marinho, J.F.U.; Fontanetti, C.S. Sugarcane Vinasse: Environmental Implications of Its Use. Waste Manag. 2013, 33, 2752–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sydney, E.B.; Larroche, C.; Novak, A.C.; Nouaille, R.; Sarma, S.J.; Brar, S.K.; Letti, L.A.J.; Soccol, V.T.; Soccol, C.R. Economic Process to Produce Biohydrogen and Volatile Fatty Acids by a Mixed Culture Using Vinasse from Sugarcane Ethanol Industry as Nutrient Source. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 159, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Sydney, E.B.; de Carvalho, J.C.; Letti, L.A.J.; Magalhaes, A.I., Jr.; Karp, S.G.; Martinez-Burgos, W.J.; de Souza Candeo, E.; Rodrigues, C.; de Souza Vandenberghe, L.P.; Neto, C.J.D.; et al. Current Developments and Challenges of Green Technologies for the Valorization of Liquid, Solid, and Gaseous Wastes from Sugarcane Ethanol Production. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 404, 124059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rodrigues Reis, C.E.; Hu, B. Vinasse from Sugarcane Ethanol Production: Better Treatment or Better Utilization? Front. Energy Res. 2017, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Chandra, R.; Bharagava, R.N.; Rai, V. Melanoidins as Major Colourant in Sugarcane Molasses Based Distillery Effluent and Its Degradation. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4648–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hoarau, J.; Caro, Y.; Grondin, I.; Petit, T. Sugarcane Vinasse Processing: Toward a Status Shift from Waste to Valuable Resource. A Review. J. Water Process. Eng. 2018, 24, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Martinez-Burgos, W.J.; Sydney, E.B.; de Paula, D.R.; Medeiros, A.B.P.; de Carvalho, J.C.; Molina, D.; Soccol, C.R. Hydrogen Production by Dark Fermentation Using a New Low-Cost Culture Medium Composed of Corn Steep Liquor and Cassava Processing Water: Process Optimization and Scale-Up. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 320, 124370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Santos, J.D.; Lopes da Silva, A.L.; da Luz Costa, J.; Scheidt, G.N.; Novak, A.C.; Sydney, E.B.; Soccol, C.R. Development of a Vinasse Nutritive Solution for Hydroponics. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 114, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Correia, J.E.; Christofoletti, C.A.; Marcato, A.C.C.; Marinho, J.F.U.; Fontanetti, C.S. Histopathological Analysis of Tilapia Gills (Oreochromis Niloticus Linnaeus, 1758) Exposed to Sugarcane Vinasse. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 135, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Parsaee, M.; Kiani Deh Kiani, M.; Karimi, K. A Review of Biogas Production from Sugarcane Vinasse. Biomass. Bioenergy 2019, 122, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carpanez, T.G.; Moreira, V.R.; Assis, I.R.; Amaral, M.C.S. Sugarcane vinasse as organo-mineral fertilizers feedstock: Opportunities and environmental risks. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 154998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fuess, L.T.; Garcia, M.L.; Zaiat, M. Seasonal Characterization of Sugarcane Vinasse: Assessing Environmental Impacts from Fertirrigation and the Bioenergy Recovery Potential through Biodigestion. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 634, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cherubin, M.R.; Carvalho, J.L.N.; Cerri, C.E.P.; Nogueira, L.A.H.; Souza, G.M.; Cantarella, H. Land Use and Management Effects on Sustainable Sugarcane-Derived Bioenergy. Land 2021, 10, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. do Carmo, J.B.; Filoso, S.; Zotelli, L.C.; De Sousa Neto, E.R.; Pitombo, L.M.; Duarte-Neto, P.J.; Vargas, V.P.; Andrade, C.A.; Gava, G.J.C.; Rossetto, R.; et al. Infield Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Sugarcane Soils in Brazil: Effects from Synthetic and Organic Fertilizer Application and Crop Trash Accumulation. GCB Bioenergy 2013, 5, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. de Oliveira, B.G.; Carvalho, J.L.N.; Cerri, C.E.P.; Cerri, C.C.; Feigl, B.J. Soil Greenhouse Gas Fluxes from Vinasse Application in Brazilian Sugarcane Areas. Geoderma 2013, 200–201, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Reis, C.E.R.; Bento, H.B.S.; Alves, T.M.; Carvalho, A.K.F.; De Castro, H.F. Vinasse Treatment within the Sugarcane-Ethanol Industry Using Ozone Combined with Anaerobic and Aerobic Microbial Processes. Environments 2019, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Adarme, O.F.H.; Baêta, B.E.L.; Filho, J.B.G.; Gurgel, L.V.A.; de Aquino, S.F. Use of Anaerobic Co-Digestion as an Alternative to Add Value to Sugarcane Biorefinery Wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 287, 121443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fu, F.; Wang, Q. Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewaters: A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yin, J.; Deng, C.-B.; Wang, X.-F.; Chen, G.; Mihucz, V.G.; Xu, G.-P.; Deng, Q.-C. Effects of Long-Term Application of Vinasse on Physicochemical Properties, Heavy Metals Content and Microbial Diversity in Sugarcane Field Soil. Sugar Tech. 2019, 21, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Robertiello, A. Upgrading of Agricultural and Agro-Industrial Wastes: The Treatment of Distillery Effluents (Vinasses) in Italy. Agric. Wastes 1982, 4, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sydney, E. Valorization of Vinasse as Broth for Biological Hydrogen and Volatile Fatty Acids Production by Means of Anaerobic Bacteria. Ph.D. Thesis, Federal University of Paraná—UFPR, Curitiba, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  39. Siqueira, L.M.; Damiano, E.S.G.; Silva, E.L. Influence of Organic Loading Rate on the Anaerobic Treatment of Sugarcane Vinasse and Biogás Production in Fluidized Bed Reactor. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2013, 48, 1707–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Garcia, C.F.H.; de Souza, R.B.; Souza, C.P.; Christofoletti, C.A.; Fontanetti, C.S. Toxicity of Two Effluents from Agricultural Activity: Comparing the Genotoxicity of Sugar Cane and Orange Vinasse. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 142, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. De Godoi, L.A.G.; Camiloti, P.R.; Bernardes, A.N.; Sanchez, B.L.S.; Torres, A.P.R.; da Conceição Gomes, A.; Botta, L.S. Seasonal Variation of the Organic and Inorganic Composition of Sugarcane Vinasse: Main Implications for Its Environmental Uses. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 29267–29282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rulli, M.M.; Villegas, L.B.; Colin, V.L. Treatment of Sugarcane Vinasse Using an Autochthonous Fungus from the Northwest of Argentina and Its Potential Application in Fertigation Practices. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cortes-Rodríguez, E.F.; Fukushima, N.A.; Palacios-Bereche, R.; Ensinas, A.V.; Nebra, S.A. Vinasse Concentration and Juice Evaporation System Integrated to the Conventional Ethanol Production Process from Sugarcane—Heat Integration and Impacts in Cogeneration System. Renew. Energy 2018, 115, 474–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ortegón, G.P.; Arboleda, F.M.; Candela, L.; Tamoh, K.; Valdes-Abellan, J. Vinasse Application to Sugar Cane Fields. Effect on the Unsaturated Zone and Groundwater at Valle Del Cauca (Colombia). Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 539, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Buller, L.S.; Romero, C.W.; da, S.; Lamparelli, R.A.C.; Ferreira, S.F.; Bortoleto, A.P.; Mussatto, S.I.; Forster-Carneiro, T. A Spatially Explicit Assessment of Sugarcane Vinasse as a Sustainable By-Product. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 765, 142717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fuess, L.T.; Garcia, M.L. Implications of Stillage Land Disposal: A Critical Review on the Impacts of Fertigation. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 145, 210–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fernandes, B.S.; Vieira, J.P.F.; Contesini, F.J.; Mantelatto, P.E.; Zaiat, M.; Pradella, J.G.D.C. High Value Added Lipids Produced by Microorganisms: A Potential Use of Sugarcane Vinasse. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 1048–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. España-Gamboa, E.; Vicent, T.; Font, X.; Dominguez-Maldonado, J.; Canto-Canché, B.; Alzate-Gaviria, L. Pretreatment of Vinasse from the Sugar Refinery Industry under Non-Sterile Conditions by Trametes Versicolor in a Fluidized Bed Bioreactor and Its Effect When Coupled to an UASB Reactor. J. Biol. Eng. 2017, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Robles-González, V.; Galíndez-Mayer, J.; Rinderknecht-Seijas, N.; Poggi-Varaldo, H.M. Treatment of Mezcal Vinasses: A Review. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 157, 524–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ahmed, P.; De Figueroa, L.I.C.; Pajot, H.F. Dual Purpose of Ligninolytic- Basidiomycetes: Mycoremediation of Bioethanol Distillation Vinasse Coupled to Sustainable Bio-Based Compounds Production. Fungal. Biol. Rev. 2020, 34, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sydney, E.B.; Duarte, E.R.; Martinez Burgos, W.J.; de Carvalho, J.C.; Larroche, C.; Soccol, C.R. Development of Short Chain Fatty Acid-Based Artificial Neuron Network Tools Applied to Biohydrogen Production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 5175–5181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fukushima, N.A.; Palacios-Bereche, M.C.; Palacios-Bereche, R.; Nebra, S.A. Energy Analysis of the Ethanol Industry Considering Vinasse Concentration and Incineration. Renew. Energy 2019, 142, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. de Barros, V.G.; Duda, R.M.; da Silva Vantini, J.; Omori, W.P.; Ferro, M.I.T.; de Oliveira, R.A. Improved Methane Production from Sugarcane Vinasse with Filter Cake in Thermophilic UASB Reactors, with Predominance of Methanothermobacter and Methanosarcina Archaea and Thermotogae Bacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kiyuna, L.S.M.; Fuess, L.T.; Zaiat, M. Unraveling the Influence of the COD/Sulfate Ratio on Organic Matter Removal and Methane Production from the Biodigestion of Sugarcane Vinasse. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 232, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. De Lima, A.M.; De Souza, R.R. Use of Sugar Cane Vinasse as Substrate for Biosurfactant Production Using Bacillus Subtilis Pc. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014, 37, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Reis, C.E.R.; Valle, G.F.; Bento, H.B.S.; Carvalho, A.K.F.; Alves, T.M.; de Castro, H.F. Sugarcane By-Products within the Biodiesel Production Chain: Vinasse and Molasses as Feedstock for Oleaginous Fungi and Conversion to Ethyl Esters. Fuel 2020, 277, 118064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sánchez, F.; Tadeu Fuess, L.; Soares Cavalcante, G.; Ângela Talarico Adorno, M.; Zaiat, M. Value-Added Soluble Metabolite Production from Sugarcane Vinasse within the Carboxylate Platform: An Application of the Anaerobic Biorefinery beyond Biogas Production. Fuel 2021, 286, 119378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. da Silva, S.C.; Moravia, M.C.S.A.; Couto, C.F. Combined Process of Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration for Vinasse Treatment With and Without Pre-Coagulation. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 36, 101326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cabrera-Díaz, A.; Pereda-Reyes, I.; Dueñas-Moreno, J.; Véliz-Lorenzo, E.; Díaz-Marrero, M.A.; Menéndez-Gutiérrez, C.L.; Oliva-Merencio, D.; Zaiat, M. Combined Treatment of Vinasse by an Upflow Anaerobic Filter-Reactor and Ozonation Process. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 33, 753–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Siles, J.A.; García-García, I.; Martín, A.; Martín, M.A. Integrated Ozonation and Biomethanization Treatments of Vinasse Derived from Ethanol Manufacturing. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 188, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hadavifar, M.; Zinatizadeh, A.A.; Younesi, H.; Galehdar, M. Fenton and Photo-Fenton Treatment of Distillery Effluent and Optimization of Treatment Conditions with Response Surface Methodology. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 5, 454–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bianco, F.; Şenol, H.; Papirio, S. Enhanced Lignocellulosic Component Removal and Biomethane Potential from Chestnut Shell by a Combined Hydrothermal–Alkaline Pretreatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 762, 144178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rietzler, J. Process for the Production of Methane from Process Waters and Biogenic Material. BR Patent PI0915815B1, 4 January 2009. [Google Scholar]
  64. Adrianus, C.; Claudia, R. Process and System for Producing Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion of Plant Biomass in Solid Phase. WO2012/153189A2, 17 January 2013. [Google Scholar]
  65. Huandong, Z.; Yuancheng, Z.; Mengmeng, Y.; Zhifeng, L.; Kaiyan, T. A Method of Biogas Is Produced Using Vinasse for Raw Material High-Temperature Anaerobic Fermentation. CN Patent 105039422B, 27 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  66. Barros, V.G.d.; Duda, R.M.; Oliveira, R.A.d. Biomethane Production from Vinasse in Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactors Inoculated with Granular Sludge. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 628–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Silva, C.E.d.F.; Abud, A.K.d.S. Anaerobic Biodigestion of Sugarcane Vinasse under Mesophilic Conditions Using Manure as Inoculum. Rev. Ambiente Água 2016, 11, 763–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chingono, K.E.; Sanganyado, E.; Bere, E.; Yalala, B. Adsorption of Sugarcane Vinasse Effluent on Bagasse Fly Ash: A Parametric and Kinetic Study. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 224, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Meng, Y.; Yu, S.; Qiu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Yao, T.; Qin, J. Modeling and Optimization of Sugarcane Juice Clarification Process. J. Food Eng. 2021, 291, 110223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dibaba, O.R.; Lahiri, S.K.; T’Jonck, S.; Dutta, A. Experimental and Artificial Neural Network Modeling of a Upflow Anaerobic Contactor (UAC) for Biogas Production from Vinasse. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2016, 14, 1241–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tena, M.; Perez, M.; Solera, R. Benefits in the Valorization of Sewage Sludge and Wine Vinasse via a Two-Stage Acidogenic-Thermophilic and Methanogenic-Mesophilic System Based on the Circular Economy Concept. Fuel 2021, 296, 120654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rahimi, V.; Shafiei, M.; Karimi, K. Techno-Economic Study of Castor Oil Crop Biorefinery: Production of Biodiesel without Fossil-Based Methanol and Lignoethanol Improved by Alkali Pretreatment. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yusuf, A.; Giwa, A.; Mohammed, E.O.; Mohammed, O.; Al Hajaj, A.; Abu-Zahra, M.R.M. CO2 Utilization from Power Plant: A Comparative Techno-Economic Assessment of Soda Ash Production and Scrubbing by Monoethanolamine. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Santos, P.S.; Zaiat, M.; Oller do Nascimento, C.A.; Fuess, L.T. Does Sugarcane Vinasse Composition Variability Affect the Bioenergy Yield in Anaerobic Systems? A Dual Kinetic-Energetic Assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. CONAB, (Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento) Acompanhamento Da Safra Brasileira. Available online: (accessed on 18 December 2022).
  76. Bernal, A.P.; dos Santos, I.F.S.; Moni Silva, A.P.; Barros, R.M.; Ribeiro, E.M. Vinasse Biogas for Energy Generation in Brazil—An Assessment of Economic Feasibility, Energy Potential and Avoided CO2 Emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 151, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Gong, R.; Lunelli, B.H. Exergy Analysis of Biogas Production from Sugarcane Vinasse. BioEnergy Res. 2023, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. EPE (Empresa de Pesquisa Energética). Cenários de Oferta de Etanol e Demanda de Ciclo Otto 2021–2030; EPE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2020; pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  79. Van, D.P.; Fujiwara, T.; Tho, B.L.; Toan, P.P.S.; Minh, G.H. A Review of Anaerobic Digestion Systems for Biodegradable Waste: Configurations, Operating Parameters, and Current Trends. Environ. Eng. Res. 2020, 25, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Goswami, R.; Chattopadhyay, P.; Shome, A.; Banerjee, S.N.; Chakraborty, A.K.; Mathew, A.K.; Chaudhury, S. An Overview of Physico-Chemical Mechanisms of Biogas Production by Microbial Communities: A Step towards Sustainable Waste Management. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Mahmoud, A.; Zaghloul, M.S.; Hamza, R.A.; Elbeshbishy, E. Comparing VFA Composition, Biomethane Potential, and Methane Production Kinetics of Different Substrates for Anaerobic Fermentation and Digestion. Fermentation 2023, 9, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mao, C.; Wang, X.; Xi, J.; Feng, Y.; Ren, G. Linkage of Kinetic Parameters with Process Parameters and Operational Conditions during Anaerobic Digestion. Energy 2017, 135, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kainthola, J.; Kalamdhad, A.S.; Goud, V. V Optimization of Process Parameters for Accelerated Methane Yield from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Rice Straw and Food Waste. Renew. Energy 2020, 149, 1352–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mlinar, S.; Weig, A.R.; Freitag, R. Influence of Mixing and Sludge Volume on Stability, Reproducibility, and Productivity of Laboratory-Scale Anaerobic Digestion. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2020, 11, 100444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. De Vrieze, J. The next Frontier of the Anaerobic Digestion Microbiome: From Ecology to Process Control. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 2020, 3, 100032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, Q.; Wang, M.; Ma, X.; Gao, Q.; Wang, T.; Shi, X.; Zhou, J.; Zuo, J.; Yang, Y. High Variations of Methanogenic Microorganisms Drive Full-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Process. Environ. Int. 2019, 126, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Li, G.; Xu, F.; Yang, T.; Wang, X.; Lyu, T.; Huang, Z. Microbial Behavior and Influencing Factors in the Anaerobic Digestion of Distiller: A Comprehensive Review. Fermentation 2023, 9, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, F.; Yan, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Jha, A.K. Specific Quorum Sensing Signal Molecules Inducing the Social Behaviors of Microbial Populations in Anaerobic Digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 273, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Maeda, T.; Sabidi, S.; Sanchez-Torres, V.; Hoshiko, Y.; Toya, S. Engineering Anaerobic Digestion via Optimizing Microbial Community: Effects of Bactericidal Agents, Quorum Sensing Inhibitors, and Inorganic Materials. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 7607–7618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Baek, G.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Lee, C. Role and Potential of Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer in Anaerobic Digestion. Energies 2018, 11, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Ordaz-Diaz, L.A.; Bailón-Salas, A.M. Molecular Identification of Microbial Communities in the Methane Production from Vinasse: A Review. Bioresources 2020, 15, 4528–4552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Campanaro, S.; Treu, L.; Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Kovalovszki, A.; Ziels, R.M.; Maus, I.; Zhu, X.; Kougias, P.G.; Basile, A.; Luo, G.; et al. New Insights from the Biogas Microbiome by Comprehensive Genome-Resolved Metagenomics of Nearly 1600 Species Originating from Multiple Anaerobic Digesters. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Merlin Christy, P.; Gopinath, L.R.; Divya, D. A Review on Anaerobic Decomposition and Enhancement of Biogas Production through Enzymes and Microorganisms. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 34, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lackner, N.; Hintersonnleitner, A.; Wagner, A.O.; Illmer, P. Hydrogenotrophic Methanogenesis and Autotrophic Growth of Methanosarcina Thermophila. Archaea 2018, 2018, 4712608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Schink, B. Syntrophic Associations in Methanogenic Degradation. In Molecular Basis of Symbiosis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  96. Iltchenco, J.; Almeida, L.G.; Beal, L.L.; Marconatto, L.; dos Anjos Borges, L.G.; Giongo, A.; Paesi, S. Microbial Consortia Composition on the Production of Methane from Sugarcane Vinasse. Biomass. Convers. Biorefin. 2020, 10, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Anukam, A.; Mohammadi, A.; Naqvi, M.; Granström, K. A Review of the Chemistry of Anaerobic Digestion: Methods of Accelerating and Optimizing Process Efficiency. Processes 2019, 7, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Leite, A.F.; Janke, L.; Harms, H.; Zang, J.W.; Fonseca-Zang, W.A.; Stinner, W.; Nikolausz, M. Assessment of the Variations in Characteristics and Methane Potential of Major Waste Products from the Brazilian Bioethanol Industry along an Operating Season. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 4022–4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Janke, L.; Leite, A.; Nikolausz, M.; Schmidt, T.; Liebetrau, J.; Nelles, M.; Stinner, W. Biogas Production from Sugarcane Waste: Assessment on Kinetic Challenges for Process Designing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 20685–20703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Caillet, H.; Lebon, E.; Akinlabi, E.; Madyira, D.; Adelard, L. Influence of Inoculum to Substrate Ratio on Methane Production in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) Tests of Sugarcane Distillery Waste Water. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 35, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Caillet, H.; Adelard, L. Start-Up Strategy and Process Performance of Semi-Continuous Anaerobic Digestion of Raw Sugarcane Vinasse. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2021, 12, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Vaquerizo, F.R.; Cruz-Salomon, A.; Valdovinos, E.R.; Pola- Albores, F.; Lagunas- Rivera, S.; Meza- Gordillo, R.; Ruiz Valdiviezo, V.M.; Simuta Champo, R.; Moreira- Acosta, J. Anaerobic Treatment of Vinasse from Sugarcane Ethanol Production in Expanded Granular Sludge Bed Bioreactor. J. Chem. Eng. Process Technol. 2017, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Volpi, M.P.C.; Brenelli, L.B.; Mockaitis, G.; Rabelo, S.C.; Franco, T.T.; Moraes, B.S. Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) from Sugarcane Biorefinery Residues: Maximizing Their Use by Co-Digestion. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Schiochet Pinto, L.; Pinheiro Neto, D.; de Leles Ferreira Filho, A.; Domingues, E.G. An Alternative Methodology for Analyzing the Risk and Sensitivity of the Economic Viability for Generating Electrical Energy with Biogas from the Anaerobic Bio-Digestion of Vinasse. Renew. Energy 2020, 155, 1401–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Pereira, I.Z.; dos Santos, I.F.S.; Barros, R.M.; de Castro e Silva, H.L.; Tiago Filho, G.L.; Moni e Silva, A.P. Vinasse Biogas Energy and Economic Analysis in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 121018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Albanez, R.; Chiaranda, B.C.; Ferreira, R.G.; França, A.L.P.; Honório, C.D.; Rodrigues, J.A.D.; Ratusznei, S.M.; Zaiat, M. Anaerobic Biological Treatment of Vinasse for Environmental Compliance and Methane Production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 178, 21–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Santos, F.S.; Ricci, B.C.; França Neta, L.S.; Amaral, M.C.S. Sugarcane Vinasse Treatment by Two-Stage Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor: Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on Changes in Efficiency, Biogas Production and Membrane Fouling. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mota, V.T.; Santos, F.S.; Amaral, M.C.S. Two-Stage Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor for the Treatment of Sugarcane Vinasse: Assessment on Biological Activity and Filtration Performance. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 146, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Verona Peruzzo, V.; Sachet, F.H.; R Torres, A.P.; de Souza, M.P.; Beal, L.L. Influence of Sulfide on the Evaluation of Methane Production through the Degradation of Sugarcane Vinasse. Sci. Cum. Ind. 2018, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lyberatos, G.; Pullammanappallil, P.C. Anaerobic Digestion in Suspended Growth Bioreactors. In Environmental Biotechnology; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 395–438. [Google Scholar]
  111. da Silva, J.J.; da Silva, B.F.; Zanoni, M.V.B.; Stradiotto, N.R. Sample preparation and antibiotic quantification in vinasse generated from sugarcane ethanol fuel production. J. Chromatogr. A 2022, 1666, 462833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Janke, L.; Leite, A.F.; Batista, K.; Silva, W.; Nikolausz, M.; Nelles, M.; Stinner, W. Enhancing Biogas Production from Vinasse in Sugarcane Biorefineries: Effects of Urea and Trace Elements Supplementation on Process Performance and Stability. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 217, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jetten, M.S.M.; Stams, A.J.M.; Zehnder, A.J.B. Methanogenesis from Acetate: A Comparison of the Acetate Metabolism in Methanothrix soehngenii and Methanosarcina Spp. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1992, 88, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wintsche, B.; Glaser, K.; Sträuber, H.; Centler, F.; Liebetrau, J.; Harms, H.; Kleinsteuber, S. Trace Elements Induce Predominance among Methanogenic Activity in Anaerobic Digestion. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. España-Gamboa, E.; Mijangos-Cortes, J.; Barahona-Perez, L.; Dominguez-Maldonado, J.; Hernández-Zarate, G.; Alzate-Gaviria, L. Vinasses: Characterization and Treatments. Waste Manag. Res. 2011, 29, 1235–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sousa, S.P.; Lovato, G.; Albanez, R.; Ratusznei, S.M.; Rodrigues, J.A.D. Improvement of Sugarcane Stillage (Vinasse) Anaerobic Digestion with Cheese Whey as Its Co-Substrate: Achieving High Methane Productivity and Yield. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 189, 987–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. López González, L.M.; Pereda Reyes, I.; Romero Romero, O. Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sugarcane Press Mud with Vinasse on Methane Yield. Waste Manag. 2017, 68, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lovato, G.; Batista, L.P.P.; Preite, M.B.; Yamashiro, J.N.; Becker, A.L.S.; Vidal, M.F.G.; Pezini, N.; Albanez, R.; Ratusznei, S.M.; Rodrigues, J.A.D. Viability of Using Glycerin as a Co-Substrate in Anaerobic Digestion of Sugarcane Stillage (Vinasse): Effect of Diversified Operational Strategies. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 188, 720–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Syaichurrozi, I.; Rusdi, R.; Dwicahyanto, S.; Toron, Y.S. Biogas Production from Co-Digestion Vinasse Waste and Tofu-Processing Wastewater and Kinetics. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2016, 6, 1057–1070. [Google Scholar]
  120. Gupta, N.; Tripathi, S.; Balomajumder, C. Characterization of Pressmud: A Sugar Industry Waste. Fuel 2011, 90, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Gangavati, P.B.; Safi, M.J.; Singh, A.; Prasad, B.; Mishra, I.M. Pyrolysis and Thermal Oxidation Kinetics of Sugar Mill Press Mud. Acta 2005, 428, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Silva-Martínez, R.D.; Sanches-Pereira, A.; Ortiz, W.; Galindo, M.F.G.; Coelho, S.T. The State-of-the-Art of Organic Waste to Energy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Challenges and Opportunities. Renew Energy 2020, 156, 509–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. IEA Outlook for Biogas and Biomethane: Prospects for Organic Growth; IEA: Paris, France, 2020.
  124. Li, Y.-R.; Song, X.-P.; Wu, J.-M.; Li, C.-N.; Liang, Q.; Liu, X.-H.; Wang, W.-Z.; Tan, H.-W.; Yang, L.-T. Sugar Industry and Improved Sugarcane Farming Technologies in China. Sugar Technol. 2016, 18, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Bundhoo, Z.M.A.; Mauthoor, S.; Mohee, R. Potential of Biogas Production from Biomass and Waste Materials in the Small Island Developing State of Mauritius. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 1087–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. López González, L.M.; Pereda Reyes, I.; Pedraza Garciga, J.; Barrera, E.L.; Romero Romero, O. Energetic, Economic and Environmental Assessment for the Anaerobic Digestion of Pretreated and Codigested Press Mud. Waste Manag. 2020, 102, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hernández-Melchor, D.J.; Cañizares-Villanueva, R.O.; Terán-Toledo, J.R.; López-Pérez, P.A.; Cristiani-Urbina, E. Hydrodynamic and Mass Transfer Characterization of Flat-Panel Airlift Photobioreactors for the Cultivation of a Photosynthetic Microbial Consortium. Biochem. Eng. J. 2017, 128, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hurtado, A.; Arroyave, C.; Peláez, C. Effect of Using Effluent from Anaerobic Digestion of Vinasse as Water Reuse on Ethanol Production from Sugarcane-Molasses. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 23, 101677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sriroth, K.; Vanichsriratana, W.; Sunthornvarabhas, J. The Current Status of Sugar Industry and By-Products in Thailand. Sugar Technol. 2016, 18, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Harihastuti, N.; Yuliasni, R.; Djayanti, S.; Handayani, N.I.; Rame, R.; Prasetio, A.; Kadier, A. Full-Scale Application of Up-Flow High Rate Anaerobic Reactor with Substrate Modification and Effluent Recirculation for Sugarcane Vinasse Degradation and Biogas Generation. J. Ecol. Eng. 2021, 22, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. da Silva Neto, J.V.; Gallo, W.L.R.; Nour, E.A.A. Production and Use of Biogas from Vinasse: Implications for the Energy Balance and GHG Emissions of Sugar Cane Ethanol in the Brazilian Context. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2020, 39, 13226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Cortez, L.A.B.; Rossell, C.E.V.; Jordan, R.A.; Leal, M.R.L.V.; Lora, E.E.S. R&D Needs in the Industrial Production of Vinasse. In Sugarcane Bioethanol—R&D for Productivity and Sustainability; ditora Edgard Blücher: São Paulo, Brazil, 2014; pp. 619–636. [Google Scholar]
  133. da Silva Neto, J.V.; Elaiuy, M.L.C.; Nour, E.A.A. ADM1 Approach to the Performance Optimisation and Biogas H2S Prediction of a Large-Scale Anaerobic Reactor Fed on Sugarcane Vinasse. Water Sci. Technol. 2019, 80, 1774–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. López, I.; Borzacconi, L.; Passeggi, M. Anaerobic Treatment of Sugar Cane Vinasse: Treatability and Real-Scale Operation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 1320–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Utami, I.; Redjeki, S.; Astuti, D.H. Biogas Production and Removal COD—BOD and TSS from Wastewater Industrial Alcohol (Vinasse) by Modified UASB Bioreactor. MATEC Web Conf. 2016, 58, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Souza, M.E.; Fuzaro, G.; Polegato, A.R. Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Vinasse in Pilot Plant UASB Reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 1992, 25, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Del Nery, V.; Alves, I.; Zamariolli Damianovic, M.H.R.; Pires, E.C. Hydraulic and Organic Rates Applied to Pilot Scale UASB Reactor for Sugar Cane Vinasse Degradation and Biogas Generation. Biomass Bioenergy 2018, 119, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. España-Gamboa, E.I.; Mijangos-Cortés, J.O.; Hernández-Zárate, G.; Maldonado, J.A.D.; Alzate-Gaviria, L.M. Methane Production by Treating Vinasses from Hydrous Ethanol Using a Modified UASB Reactor. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Cabrera-Díaz, A.; Pereda-Reyes, I.; Oliva-Merencio, D.; Lebrero, R.; Zaiat, M. Anaerobic Digestion of Sugarcane Vinasse Through a Methanogenic UASB Reactor Followed by a Packed Bed Reactor. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 183, 1127–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Leme, R.M.; Seabra, J.E.A. Technical-Economic Assessment of Different Biogas Upgrading Routes from Vinasse Anaerobic Digestion in the Brazilian Bioethanol Industry. Energy 2017, 119, 754–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Fuess, L.T.; Zaiat, M. Economics of Anaerobic Digestion for Processing Sugarcane Vinasse: Applying Sensitivity Analysis to Increase Process Profitability in Diversified Biogas Applications. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 115, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Silva Neto, J.V.; Gallo, W.L.R. Potential Impacts of Vinasse Biogas Replacing Fossil Oil for Power Generation, Natural Gas, and Increasing Sugarcane Energy in Brazil. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Fontam, G.; Cambon, J.-L. Method and Device for Manufacturing Combustible Gases by Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Residues. EP Patent 79832-A, 16 November 1981. [Google Scholar]
  144. Olivo, C.; Lebedeva, I.; Chu, C.Y.; Lin, C.Y.; Wu, S.Y. A Patent Analysis on Advanced Biohydrogen Technology Development and Commercialisation: Scope and Competitiveness. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 14103–14110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kirnev, P.C.S.; Carvalho, J.C.; Vandenberghe, L.P.S.; Karp, S.G.; Soccol, C.R. Technological Mapping and Trends in Photobioreactors for the Production of Microalgae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Siqueira, J.C.; Braga, M.Q.; Ázara, M.S.; Garcia, K.J.; Alencar, S.N.M.; Ramos, T.S.; Siniscalchi, L.A.B.; Assemany, P.P.; Ensinas, A.V. Recovery of vinasse with combined microalgae cultivation in a conceptual energy-efficient industrial plant: Analysis of related process considerations. Renew. Sustain. EnergyRev. 2022, 155, 111904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kiel, P.; Andersen, M.; Lübeck, M. Method for Providing Proteins and Fermentation Products from a Plant Material. WO2015197078A1, 25 June 2015. [Google Scholar]
  148. Hans-Joachim, A. Method for Exploitation of Material and Energy from Wastes from/ /Sugar Cane Processing and Arrangement for Carrying out the Method. BR Patent 1120190097686A2, 13 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
  149. Bastos, R.G.; Goldenberg, S.; Cherix, J.; Mattos, L.F.A. Effuent Valuation Process of the Sucro Energy Sector. BR Patent 102016023277-5A2, 06 October 2016. [Google Scholar]
  150. Godoy, A.; Lorenzi, M.S.; Paulillo, S.C.L.; Machado, S.C.V.; Lucas, C.M.R.S.; Lopes, M.L. Integrated Process of Oil and Biogas Production from Vinasse. BR Patent 1020150310110A8, 10 December 2015. [Google Scholar]
  151. Silva, J.; Coelho, R.S. Process for Production of Bioenergy and Biofertilizers through Anaerobic Digestion and Algae Cultivation Using Agro-Industrial by-Products. BR Patent 132014025044, 07 October 2014. [Google Scholar]
  152. Fabian, E.M.; Gardemann, A.A. Equipment and Process for Anaerobic Digestion of Vinasse and Biogas Production. BR Patent 1020140247572A2, 03 October 2014. [Google Scholar]
  153. Rosenberger, G.; Dunaev, T. Ethanol and Biogas Production Method, and Ethanol Installation for Ethanol and Biogas Production. BR Patent 1020130219029A2, 27 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
  154. Florindo, E.; Marcello, A. Biological Purification Plant for Recycling of Vegetable Vegetable Waste. BR Patent 1020120203359A2, 14 August 2012. [Google Scholar]
  155. Frohlich, S. Vinasse Treatment System with Power Generation, Reuse Water Generation and Concentrated Organic Fertilization. BR Patent 1100736-2 B1, 21 January 2011. [Google Scholar]
  156. Goldemberg, S.; Ambrogi, V.S. Method of Sequential Treatment of Wastes from the Sugar and Alcohol Sector with Production of Microalgal Biomass and Production of Renewable Fuels. BR Patent 09039848A2, 14 October 2009. [Google Scholar]
  157. Giannetti, B.W. Incentivized Methanization of the Concentrated Organic Matter of the Effluent from Ethyl Alcohol Distillation. BR Patent 0704885A2, 18 June 2007. [Google Scholar]
  158. Audi, R. Processes for Obtaining CO + H2O through the Reform of CH4 from Biogas in an Aluminum / Nickel and Water Vapor Mixed-Bed Gasifier, as Well as CO2 / Hydrocarbon Reform through the Integral Biogas Passage into the Fixed-Bed Reformer to Obtain CO. BR Patent PI 0002731-6, 13 July 2000. [Google Scholar]
  159. Audi, R. Process for Obtaining Methanol from Waste and Waste Left by the Production of Ethanol and Sugar. BR Patent 97043826A, 15 December 1997. [Google Scholar]
  160. Silveira, E. Vinasse to Generate Energy. Pesquisa FAPESP. Available online: (accessed on 20 December 2022).
  161. COGEN, (Associação da Indústria de Cogeração de Energia) ABiogás Divulga Novo Potencial Do Biogás Para o Mercado Brasileiro Durante Fórum Em São Paulo. 2022. Available online: (accessed on 21 December 2022).
  162. FINEP Brasil Domina Tecnologia Que Transforma Vinhaça Em Biogás. Available online: (accessed on 21 December 2022).
  163. Bioenergia Produção de Biogás e o Setor Sucroenergético. Available online: (accessed on 21 December 2022).
  164. Buosi, G. Projeto Pioneiro Em Distribuição de Biometano Segue Em Expansão. 2022. Available online: (accessed on 21 December 2022).
  165. UNICA Usina de Biogás Da Raízen Entra Em Operação Comercial. 2022. Available online: (accessed on 21 December 2022).
  166. Zaparolli, D. O Impulso Que Vem Do Canavia. Available online: (accessed on 21 December 2022).
  167. Khasreen, M.M.; Banfill, P.F.G.; Menzies, G.F. Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review. Sustainability 2009, 1, 674–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Raizen. 2020 Circular Economy. Available online: (accessed on 26 December 2022).
  169. EPE, (Empresa de Pesquisa Energética) Balanço Energético Nacional (BEN)—Séries Históricas Completas. Available online: (accessed on 26 December 2022).
  170. Maga, D.; Thonemann, N.; Hiebel, M.; Sebastião, D.; Lopes, T.F.; Fonseca, C.; Gírio, F. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of First- and Second-Generation Ethanol from Sugarcane in Brazil. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2019, 24, 266–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Longati, A.A.; Lino, A.R.A.; Giordano, R.C.; Furlan, F.F.; Cruz, A.J.G. Biogas Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Vinasse in Sugarcane Biorefinery: A Techno-Economic and Environmental Analysis. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2020, 11, 4573–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Moraes, B.S.; Junqueira, T.L.; Pavanello, L.G.; Cavalett, O.; Mantelatto, P.E.; Bonomi, A.; Zaiat, M. Anaerobic Digestion of Vinasse from Sugarcane Biorefineries in Brazil from Energy, Environmental, and Economic Perspectives: Profit or Expense? Appl. Energy 2014, 113, 825–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Fuess, L.T.; Klein, B.C.; Chagas, M.F.; Alves Ferreira Rezende, M.C.; Garcia, M.L.; Bonomi, A.; Zaiat, M. Diversifying the Technological Strategies for Recovering Bioenergy from the Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion of Sugarcane Vinasse: An Integrated Techno-Economic and Environmental Approach. Renew. Energy 2018, 122, 674–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Junqueira, T.L.; Chagas, M.F.; Gouveia, V.L.R.; Rezende, M.C.A.F.; Watanabe, M.D.B.; Jesus, C.D.F.; Cavalett, O.; Milanez, A.Y.; Bonomi, A. Biotechnology for Biofuels Techno—Economic Analysis and Climate Change Impacts of Sugarcane Biorefineries Considering Different Time Horizons. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Barragán-Escandón, A.; Ruiz, J.M.O.; Tigre, J.D.C.; Zalamea-León, E.F. Assessment of Power Generation Using Biogas from Landfills in an Equatorial Tropical Context. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Barrera, E.L.; Rosa, E.; Spanjers, H.; Romero, O.; De Meester, S.; Dewulf, J. A Comparative Assessment of Anaerobic Digestion Power Plants as Alternative to Lagoons for Vinasse Treatment: Life Cycle Assessment and Exergy Analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 113, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Macedo, I.C.; Seabra, J.E.A.; Silva, E.A.R. Green House Gases Emissions in the Production and Use of Ethanol from Sugarcane in Brazil: The 2005 / 2006 Averages and a Prediction for 2020. Biomass. Bioenergy 2020, 32, 582–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Cardoso, T.D.F.; Cavalett, O.; Chagas, M.F.; De Morais, E.R.; Nunes, J.L.; Franco, H.C.J.; Galdos, M.V.; Scarpare, F.V.; Braunbeck, O.A.; Cortez, L.A.B.; et al. Technical and Economic Assessment of Trash Recovery in the Sugarcane Bioenergy. Sci. Agric. 2013, 62, 353–360. [Google Scholar]
  179. Novacana Sugarcane and Ethanol Production Costs and the New Technologies of the Plants. Available online: (accessed on 26 December 2022).
  180. Longati, A.A.; Cavalett, O.; Cruz, A.J.G. Life Cycle Assessment of Vinasse Biogas Production in Sugarcane Biorefineries; Elsevier Masson SAS: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Volume 40, ISBN 9780444639653. [Google Scholar]
  181. Boontian, N.; Phorndon, T.; Piasai, C.; Padri, M. Combination of Alkaline and Heat Pretreatments with Zero-Valent Iron Application in Cassava Pulp and Wastewater for Methane Generation: Development from Batch to Continuous Systems. Fermentation 2023, 9, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Montiel-Rosales, A.; Montalvo-Romero, N.; García-Santamaría, L.E.; Sandoval-Herazo, L.C.; Bautista-Santos, H.; Fernández-Lambert, G. Post-Industrial Use of Sugarcane Ethanol Vinasse: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Bkoor Alrawashdeh, K.A.; Al-Zboon, K.K.; Al-Tabbal, J.A.; AL-Samrraie, L.A.; Al Bsoul, A.; Damseh, R.A.; Khasawneh, A.; Dessouky, Y.; Tonbol, K.; Ali, B.M.; et al. The Effects of Nanoparticles- Zerovalent Iron on Sustainable Biomethane Production through Co-Digestion of Olive Mill Wastewater and Chicken Manure. Fermentation 2023, 9, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. de Carvalho, J.C.; Molina-Aulestia, D.T.; Martinez-Burgos, W.J.; Karp, S.G.; Manzoki, M.C.; Medeiros, A.B.P.; Rodrigues, C.; Scapini, T.; Vandenberghe, L.P.d.S.; Vieira, S.; et al. Agro-Industrial Wastewaters for Algal Biomass Production, Bio-Based Products, and Biofuels in a Circular Bioeconomy. Fermentation 2022, 8, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Li, G.; Hao, Y.; Yang, T.; Xiao, W.; Pan, M.; Huo, S.; Lyu, T. Enhancing Bioenergy Production from the Raw and Defatted Microalgal Biomass Using Wastewater as the Cultivation Medium. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. de Freitas, B.B.; Overmans, S.; Medina, J.S.; Hong, P.Y.; Lauersen, K.J. Biomass Generation and Heterologous Isoprenoid Milking from Engineered Microalgae Grown in Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor Effluent. Water Res. 2023, 229, 119486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. de Carvalho, J.C.; Magalhães, A.I.; de Melo Pereira, G.V.; Medeiros, A.B.P.; Sydney, E.B.; Rodrigues, C.; Aulestia, D.T.M.; de Souza Vandenberghe, L.P.; Soccol, V.T.; Soccol, C.R.; et al. Microalgal Biomass Pretreatment for Integrated Processing into Biofuels, Food, and Feed. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 300, 122719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. de Carvalho, J.C.; Goyzueta-Mamani, L.D.; Molina-Aulestia, D.T.; Magalhães Júnior, A.I.; Iwamoto, H.; Ambati, R.R.; Ravishankar, G.A.; Soccol, C.R. Microbial Astaxanthin Production from Agro-Industrial Wastes—Raw Materials, Processes, and Quality. Fermentation 2022, 8, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Silverio, M.S.; Calegari, R.P.; Leite, G.M.F.L.; Martins, B.C.; da Silva, E.A.; Neto, J.P.; Cusatis, M.W.; Calegari, R.P.; Gomig, A.; Baptista, A.S. Biogas Production from Second Generation Ethanol Vinasse. In Agronomia: Elo da Cadeia Produtiva; Silva, D.A.S., Ed.; Atena Editora: Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2019; Volume 6, pp. 174–184. ISBN 978-85-7247-825-0. [Google Scholar]
  190. Sydney, E.B.; Novak, A.C.; Rosa, D.; Pedroni Medeiros, A.B.; Brar, S.K.; Larroche, C.; Soccol, C.R. Screening and Bioprospecting of Anaerobic Consortia for Biohydrogen and Volatile Fatty Acid Production in a Vinasse Based Medium through Dark Fermentation. Process Biochem. 2018, 67, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Raízen, S.A. Notice to the Market. Available online: (accessed on 24 October 2022).
  192. Arif, S.; Batool, A.; Nazir, W.; Khan, R.S.; Khalid, N. Physiochemical Characteristics Nutritional Properties and Health Benefits of Sugarcane Juice. In Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 227–257. [Google Scholar]
  193. Sindhu, R.; Gnansounou, E.; Binod, P.; Pandey, A. Bioconversion of Sugarcane Crop Residue for Value Added Products–An Overview. Renew. Energy 2016, 98, 203–215. [Google Scholar]
  194. Estrada-Arriaga, E.B.; Reynoso-Deloya, M.G.; Guillén-Garcés, R.A.; Falcón-Rojas, A.; García-Sánchez, L. Enhanced Methane Production and Organic Matter Removal from Tequila Vinasses by Anaerobic Digestion Assisted via Bioelectrochemical Power-to-Gas. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 320, 124344. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The role of the most common microorganisms in the anaerobic microbiota of a mesophilic biodigester. R, R′, and R″ are organic radical groups, while n and y denote the number of biomolecules or radicals of its composition [92,97].
Figure 1. The role of the most common microorganisms in the anaerobic microbiota of a mesophilic biodigester. R, R′, and R″ are organic radical groups, while n and y denote the number of biomolecules or radicals of its composition [92,97].
Fermentation 09 00349 g001
Figure 2. Search for patent documents in the Derwent Innovations Index database: (A) distribution of patent documents per year. Keywords: TS = (sugarcane or cane or sugar cane) and (vinasse or effluent or waste water or wastewater) and (biomethane or methane or CH4 or biogas), period 2005–2020. Date of search: 9 December 2020; (B) distribution of patent documents according to WIPO’s International Patent Classification codes (IPC): C12P (fermentation or enzyme processes); C02F (treatment of water); C10L (fuels); C12M (apparatus for enzymology or microbiology); C12N (microorganisms or enzymes).
Figure 2. Search for patent documents in the Derwent Innovations Index database: (A) distribution of patent documents per year. Keywords: TS = (sugarcane or cane or sugar cane) and (vinasse or effluent or waste water or wastewater) and (biomethane or methane or CH4 or biogas), period 2005–2020. Date of search: 9 December 2020; (B) distribution of patent documents according to WIPO’s International Patent Classification codes (IPC): C12P (fermentation or enzyme processes); C02F (treatment of water); C10L (fuels); C12M (apparatus for enzymology or microbiology); C12N (microorganisms or enzymes).
Fermentation 09 00349 g002
Figure 3. Transformation of sugarcane bagasse in electric energy (1970–2019) in Brazil [170].
Figure 3. Transformation of sugarcane bagasse in electric energy (1970–2019) in Brazil [170].
Fermentation 09 00349 g003
Figure 4. Conceptual processing of a sugarcane biorefinery, with expected yields for bioethanol, vinasse, surplus electricity, and biogas, in different configurations: (a) first-generation ethanol production without biodigestion of vinasse; (b) second-generation ethanol production with biodigestion of vinasse; and (c) biodigestion of vinasse attached to traditional ethanol distillery—the main flow (first-generation) is not altered (adapted from Longati et al. [172]).
Figure 4. Conceptual processing of a sugarcane biorefinery, with expected yields for bioethanol, vinasse, surplus electricity, and biogas, in different configurations: (a) first-generation ethanol production without biodigestion of vinasse; (b) second-generation ethanol production with biodigestion of vinasse; and (c) biodigestion of vinasse attached to traditional ethanol distillery—the main flow (first-generation) is not altered (adapted from Longati et al. [172]).
Fermentation 09 00349 g004
Table 2. Biochemical methane potential, BMP, in vinasse co-digestion.
Table 2. Biochemical methane potential, BMP, in vinasse co-digestion.
Co-SubstrateProportion (Vinasse: Co-Substrate)Solids ContentBMP, as ReportedBMP, Recalculated, NL CH4 kg−1 CODHRT or Batch Duration, DaysReference
Press mud (filter cake)75:25, VS% basis7.1%365 L CH4 kg−1 VS 268.1 NL CH4 kg−1 COD24.1[117]
Hemicellulose hydrolysate 75:25
Plus 1 g/L yeast extract and 15 g/L ash
5%279 CH4 kg−1 COD279 NL CH4 kg−1 COD34[34]
Glycerin50:50, COD-basis0.5%15.25 mol CH4 kg COD applied341.6 NL CH4 kg−1 COD15[118]
Tofu wastewater20:80 by volume (74:26 by COD)2.1%159 NL CH4 kg−1 COD159 NL CH4 kg−1 COD20[119]
Cheese whey75:252.4%15.76 mmol CH4 gCOD−1353 NL CH4 kg−1 COD20[116]
Table 3. Relevant patent documents retrieved from the Brazilian patent database (National Institute of Industrial Property, INPI).
Table 3. Relevant patent documents retrieved from the Brazilian patent database (National Institute of Industrial Property, INPI).
Document Number and YearAssigneeTranslated TitleIPCTechnologyStatusReference
BR 11 2019 009768 6 A2/WO 2018/091004
Christine Apelt (Germany)Process for material and energy recovery of residues from sugar cane processing and arrangement for performing the processC12P 7/06; C12P 5/02; C02F 1/24; C02F 1/40; C02F 11/04; C02F 3/28; C02F 9/00; C05F 11/00; C05F 17/00; C05F 5/00Liquid and solid (ground) residues are hydrolyzed and fermented in continuous multi-stage culturesFiled, active[149]
BR 10 2016 023277 5 A2
Federal University of Sao Carlos (Brazil)Valorization process of effluents from the sucroenergetic sectorC02F 11/04; C02F 103/32; C05F 5/00The vinasse is pretreated to separate solid and liquid fractions; the liquid is used for microalgae cultivation, and the solid is used as a fertilizer, animal feed, or as a substrate in composting and biodigestion processesFiled, active[150]
BR 10 2015 031011 0 A8
Fermentec—Tecnologias em Açúcar e Álcool Ltda. (Brazil)Integrated process for the production of oil and biogas from vinasseC10L 1/08; C10L 9/08; C12P 7/62Oleaginous yeasts are cultivated in the vinasse, and the residual broth is used for biogas production in a UASB reactorFiled, active[151]
BR 13 2014 025044 0 E2 and
BR 10 2014 009156 4 A2
Jorge Vinicius da Silva Neto (Brazil)Process for the production of bioenergy and biofertilizers through anaerobic digestion and algae cultivation using agro-industrial by-productsC02F 9/14; C02F 3/28; C02F 3/32; C05F 5/00; C02F 103/20; C02F 103/32; C02F 11/04Vinasse is used for biogas production in an anaerobic reactor, and the digested broth is used for microalgae cultivation; CO2 from biogas combustion feeds the algal culture, and algal biomass feeds the biodigesterAbandoned[152]
BR 10 2014 024757 2 A2
Geo Energética Participações S.A. (Brazil)Equipment and process for anaerobic vinasse biodigestion and biogas productionC02F 11/04; C12M 1/107Bioreactor of high vertical dimension with temperature control and continuous biodigestion process with biomass recirculation and O2 injection for biological consumption of H2SFiled, active[153]
BR 10 2013 021902 9 A2
Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support (USA)Method of ethanol and biogas production, and ethanol facility for the production of ethanol and biogasC12P 7/06; C12P 7/14; C02F 9/02; C12M 1/107Biogas is produced from “distilled beer” vinasse in a membrane anaerobic bioreactorAbandoned[154]
BR 10 2012 020335 9 A2
Geo Energética Participações S.A. (Brazil)Biological purification production plant for recycling vegetable waste from sugar and alcohol productionC02F 103/32; C02F 9/14; C02F 9/08Two tank bioreactors and one lagoon to process solid and liquid wastes from distilleries producing biogas and an organic fertilizerFiled, active[155]
PI 1100736-2 B1
Arka Ambiental Ltd.a. (Brazil)Vinasse treatment system with power generation, reuse water generation, and concentrated organic fertilizationC12F 3/00; F03G 7/00; C05F 5/00Anaerobic reactor of internal circulation; system of biogas washing and drying for use in electric energy generation; system of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis to separate reuse water and fertilizerGranted, active[156]
PI 0903984-8 A2
Algae Biotecnologia Ltd.a. (Brazil)Method of sequential treatment of wastes from the sugar and alcohol sector with production of microalgal biomass and production of renewable fuelsC12S 3/10; C12S 3/02; C12R 1/865; C12R 1/89Cultivation of microalgae in clarified vinasse, while the removed solids are destined for biogas and biofertilizer production; the residual liquid can alternatively be used for microalgae cultivation, and microalgal biomass can be alternatively biodigested; microalgae can biologically purify biogasAbandoned[157]
PI 0915815-4 B1/WO 2010/003397
Johann Rietzler (Germany)Process for the production of methane from process waters and biogenic materialC12P 5/02; C02F 3/28; C02F 3/30; C12M 1/113Process water containing biogenic material is converted to methane by immobilized or free bacteria, with biogas recirculation inside the bioreactorGranted, active[63]
PI 0704885-8 A2
Bruce Wilson Giannetti (Brazil)Incentivized methanization of the concentrated organic matter of the effluent from ethyl alcohol distillationC07C 9/04; C02F 11/04The process comprises a reactor containing a membrane of expanded clay spheres serving as support for methanogenic bacteria; the effluent is pumped through sprayers inside the membrane; part of the biogas is reinjected inside the membrane to force the release of gas bubblesAbandoned[158]
PI 0002731-6 A2
Ricardo Audi (Brazil)Processes for obtaining CO + H2O through the reform of CH4 from biogas in an aluminum/nickel and water vapor mixed-bed gasifier, as well as CO2/hydrocarbon reform through the integral biogas passage into the fixed-bed reformer to obtain COC01B 3/40; C01B 3/44; C01B 32/40A process that involves biogas production from vinasse anaerobic digestion, separation of CO2 by monoethanolamine absorption, and CH4 reform in a fluidized bed gasifier to produce CO and H2; also, the biogas passes through a fixed-bed tubular reactor with catalyzers and is converted to CODenied[159]
PI 0002730-8 A2
PI 9905239-3 A2
PI 9905240-7 A2
PI 9706185-9 A2
PI 9704382-6 A2
Ricardo Audi (Brazil)VariousVariousTechnologies involving the catalytic reform of CH4 obtained from vinasse anaerobic digestion, resulting in syngas for the synthesis of organic moleculesAbandoned or denied[160]
Search terms (in the abstract): (CANA* OR SUCRO* OR AÇÚCAR* OR ETANOL OR ÁLCOOL OR VINHAÇA) AND (VINHAÇA OR VINHOTO OR EFLUENTE* OR ÁGUA* RESIDU* OR RESÍDUO* LÍQUIDO* OR SUBPRODUTO* LÍQUIDO* OR ÁGUA* DE PROCESSO) AND (METANO OR BIOMETANO OR BIOGÁS OR CH4 OR BIODIGESTÃO OR DIGESTÃO ANAERÓBICA OR ENERG*). Date of search: 2 January 2021. Because the INPI database does not provide rewritten titles and abstracts, the search strategy included additional keywords, as does the Derwent database. The search retrieved 73 documents, analyzed based on the abstract and claims, and 18 relevant documents were selected. The database does not cover patents filed before 1997.
Table 4. Climate change impacts per unit of ethanol energy produced in different configurations and scenarios of biorefineries for ethanol production. “X” indicates if a specific step is present. Generally, scenarios including 2nd generation ethanol production and vinasse biodigestion have a lower impact.
Table 4. Climate change impacts per unit of ethanol energy produced in different configurations and scenarios of biorefineries for ethanol production. “X” indicates if a specific step is present. Generally, scenarios including 2nd generation ethanol production and vinasse biodigestion have a lower impact.
Biorefinery ProductsClimate Change Impacts (gCO2eq/
First-Generation EthanolSecond-Generation EthanolSugarVinasseEnergy
XX a-X bX15.9
XX a-X cX15.6
---XX11.3 e[76]
X-X-X23.0 f[174]
X-XXX22.6 f
X XX dX22.8 f
a Fermentation of hydrolyzed cellulosic fraction; b biodigestion of hydrolyzed hemicellulosic fraction; c biodigestion of vinasse and hydrolyzed hemicellulosic fraction; d biogas-H2 purification for sale; e calculated from article data (100,000 ha); f calculated from article data, considering the specific energy of ethanol 25 MJ/kg.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Carvalho, J.C.; de Souza Vandenberghe, L.P.; Sydney, E.B.; Karp, S.G.; Magalhães, A.I., Jr.; Martinez-Burgos, W.J.; Medeiros, A.B.P.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Vieira, S.; Letti, L.A.J.; et al. Biomethane Production from Sugarcane Vinasse in a Circular Economy: Developments and Innovations. Fermentation 2023, 9, 349.

AMA Style

de Carvalho JC, de Souza Vandenberghe LP, Sydney EB, Karp SG, Magalhães AI Jr., Martinez-Burgos WJ, Medeiros ABP, Thomaz-Soccol V, Vieira S, Letti LAJ, et al. Biomethane Production from Sugarcane Vinasse in a Circular Economy: Developments and Innovations. Fermentation. 2023; 9(4):349.

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Carvalho, Júlio Cesar, Luciana Porto de Souza Vandenberghe, Eduardo Bittencourt Sydney, Susan Grace Karp, Antonio Irineudo Magalhães, Jr., Walter José Martinez-Burgos, Adriane Bianchi Pedroni Medeiros, Vanete Thomaz-Soccol, Sabrina Vieira, Luiz Alberto Junior Letti, and et al. 2023. "Biomethane Production from Sugarcane Vinasse in a Circular Economy: Developments and Innovations" Fermentation 9, no. 4: 349.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop