Next Article in Journal
The Potential of Traditional ‘Gaja’ and New Breed Lines of Waxy, Blue and Purple Wheat in Wholemeal Flour Fermentation
Previous Article in Journal
A Molecular Dynamic Model of Tryptophan Overproduction in Escherichia coli
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Solid-State Fermentation Pretreatment with Single or Dual Culture White Rot Fungi on White Tea Residue Nutrients and In Vitro Rumen Fermentation Parameters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Effect of Different Inducer Sources on Cellulase Enzyme Production by White-Rot Basidiomycetes Pleurotus ostreatus and Phanerochaete chrysosporium under Submerged Fermentation

1
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
2
National Sheep Breeding Station, Animal Production Department, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, P.O. Box EA33, Ejura 3223, Ghana
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2022, 8(10), 561; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8100561
Submission received: 7 October 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biotransformation of Plant Materials by Molds and Higher Fungi)

Abstract

:
Cellulase enzymes attract a lot of research due to their industrial application. Diverse cellulase-producing organisms and substances that induce cellulase are highly sought after. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different inducer sources on cellulase production by white rot fungi P. ostreatus CGMCC 3.7292 and P. chrysosporium CGMCC 3.7212 under submerged fermentation employing a completely randomized experimental design. The different inducer sources tested were nitrogen (yeast, potassium nitrate, sodium nitrate, ammonium sulphate, aqueous ammonia and urea), carbon (malt extract, glucose, fructose, carboxymethylcellulose, starch and xylose) and agro-biomass (stevia straw, wheat straw, oat straw, alfalfa straw, corn cobs and corn stover). These inducer sources strongly impacted enzyme activities by P. ostreatus CGMCC 3.7292 and P. chrysosporium CGMCC 3.7212. The suitable nitrogen and carbon inducer sources for cellulase activity by P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium were yeast (1.354 U/mL and 1.154 U/mL) and carboxymethylcellulose (0.976 U/mL and 0.776 U/mL) while the suitable agro-biomass were wheat straw (6.880 U/mL) and corn stover (6.525 U/mL), respectively. The least inducer sources in terms of nitrogen, carbon and agro-biomass for cellulase activity by P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium were urea (0.213 U/mL and 0.081 U/mL), glucose (0.042 U/mL and 0.035), xylose (0.042 U/mL and 0.035 U/mL) and stevia straw (1.555 U/mL and 0.960 U/mL). In submerged fermentation, the cellulase enzyme activity of P. ostreatus in response to various inducer sources was relatively higher than P. chrysosporium.

1. Introduction

Cellulase of microbial origin has become a crucial biocatalyst due to its intricate nature and extensive industrial uses. Cellulases refer to a group of glycosyl hydrolases that includes endoglucanase, exoglucanase and β-glucosidase, acting in a synergistic way to promote the hydrolysis of cellulose into glucose [1]. Cellulases are inducible enzymes synthesized by many microorganisms, including filamentous fungi and bacteria [2,3]. Among microbes, the genera of Clostridium, Cellulomonas, Thermomonospora, Trichoderma and Aspergillus are the widely considered cellulase producers [4]. White rot basidiomycetes are a group of wood-decaying fungi that can be exploited as an alternative and safe source for extracellular cellulolytic enzymes. Production of cellulase by white rot basidiomycetes is known to be influenced by several factors, such as species [5], the composition of the growth medium (carbon, nitrogen) [6], type of cultivation (solid state cultivation or submerged cultivation) [7], culturing condition (pH, temperature, aeration, humidity) [8] and the nature of the substrate (purified, lignified or non lignified) [9], among others.
Pleurotus spp. and Phanerochaete spp. are two of the most widely studied basidiomycetes species for cellulolytic enzyme assessment under different fermentation processes. Submerged fermentation (SmF) is the fancied method of cultivation because it is currently the most conveniently used in industry for the commercial production of cellulase enzymes [10]. Moreover, Elisashvili et al. [11] reported that the production of hydrolytic enzymes is favored by submerged fermentation compared to solid-state fermentation processes. Several species of P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium are distributed across different geographical regions. Various independent studies have also been conducted to ascertain and verify the factors that affect cellulolytic enzymes production involving several species of these fungi [12,13,14,15]. In China, numerous Pleurotus and Phanerochaete species have been isolated, characterized and exploited for their potential to produce cellulase, among other uses. However, a detailed investigation of the existing literature revealed a paucity of information regarding the cellulase production from P. ostreatus CGMCC 3.7292 and P. chrysosporium CGMCC 3.7212 in response to different inducer sources.
The purpose of this investigation was thus to study the effect of different inducer sources, i.e., nitrogen (yeast, potassium nitrate, sodium nitrate, ammonium sulphate, aqueous ammonia and urea), carbon (malt extract, glucose, fructose, carboxymethyl cellulose, starch and xylose) and agro-biomass (stevia straw, wheat straw, oat straw, alfalfa straw, corn cobs and corn stover) under conditions of submerged fermentation (SmF) on cellulase production by P. ostreatus CGMCC 3.7292 and P. chrysosporium CGMCC 3.7212. This study sought to fill the existing knowledge gap, and the results obtained would help to identify suitable inducer sources that favor cellulase production by these fungi species. This would be the first study on cellulase production by P. ostreatus CGMCC 3.7292 and P. chrysosporium CGMCC 3.7212 under submerged fermentation in response to different inducer sources.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Organisms and Inoculum Preparation

Basidiomycete white-rot fungi, P. ostreatus CGMCC 3.7292 and P. chrysosporium CGMCC 3.7212 were acquired from the China Agricultural University in Beijing, China. Fungi culture were maintained on malt extract agar slants at 4 °C. Fungal inoculants were prepared by growing fungi at 24 ± 1 °C in 200 mL flasks containing 100 mL of the following nutrient medium: glucose,10.0 g/L; NH4NO3, 1.0 g/L; KH2PO4, 0.8 g/L; Na2HPO4, 0.2 g/L; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.5 g/L; yeast extract, 2.0 g/L. The pH of the medium was altered to 6.0 using 2 M NaOH before sterilization for 20 min at 121 °C. After culturing fungi for 6 days, mycelial pellets were harvested and homogenized with a Waring laboratory blender.

2.2. Cultivation Conditions

2.2.1. Enzyme Activities with Carbon Inducer Sources

Submerged fermentation of the fungi was performed in a static condition at 24 ± 1 °C in 200 mL flasks containing 50 mL of standard medium: carbon source 10.0 g/L; NH4NO3, 1.0 g/L; KH2PO4, 0.8 g/L; Na2HPO4, 0.2 g/L; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.5 g/L. The medium was adjusted to pH 6.0 with 2 M NaOH before sterilization at 121 °C for 20 min. To elucidate the effect of different carbon inducers on enzyme activities, equal amounts (10 g/L) of malt extract, glucose, fructose, carboxymethylcellulose, starch and xylose procured from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) were used as substitute carbon sources. About 3 mL of homogenized fungus were inoculated into 200 mL flasks containing 50 mL of standard medium and incubated at 24 ± 1 °C for 10 days. Controls without carbon were run in parallel. All experiments had four replications. After 10 days of incubation, when the cultures had completed the beginning, middle and end of the logarithmic phase and at the stationary phase of growth, solid fungal mass was separated by filtration using Whatman filter paper, followed by centrifugation (14,000× g; 15 min) at 4 °C. The supernatants obtained after fungi mass separations were assayed to determine cellulase enzyme activity.

2.2.2. Enzyme Activities with Nitrogen Inducer Sources

Nitrogen inducers were appraised similarly by substituting ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) with other nitrogen inducers such as yeast, potassium nitrate (KNO3), sodium nitrate (NaNO3), ammonium sulphate ((NH4)2SO4), ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) and urea (CH4N2O) procured from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The medium was supplemented with all nitrogen-containing inorganic and organic substances at a final concentration of 20 mM. The pH of the medium was altered to 6.0 using 2 M NaOH before sterilization for 20 min at 121 °C. About 3 mL of homogenized fungus mycelium were transferred into 200 mL flasks containing standard medium and incubated at 24 ±1 °C for 10 days. There were parallel runs of controls without nitrogen. All experiments had four replications. After 10 days of incubation, solid fungal mass was separated by filtration using Whatman filter paper, followed by centrifugation (14,000× g; 15 min) at 4 °C. The supernatants obtained after biomass separations were assayed to determine cellulase enzyme activity.

2.2.3. Enzyme Activities with Agro-Biomass Inducer Sources

The agro-biomass substrates stevia straw, wheat straw, oat straw, alfalfa, corn cobs and corn stover were procured from the cereal crop test field of Yangzhou University, Jiangsu, China. They were firstly dried at 60 °C in a drying oven (Shanghai Jinghong Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for 24 h and chopped into miniature pieces using a chopper (Zhengzhou Yike Heavy Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Henan, China). The chopped agro-biomasses were ground into lesser particles in a hammer mill (Shanghai Jinghong Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and separated by a 0.45 mm (40 meshes) sieve. The portion that made it through the sieve was used for the medium preparation in the submerged fermentation (SmF). Submerged fermentation of agro-biomass was carried out in a static condition at 24 °C in 200 mL flasks containing 50 mL of the above-mentioned standard medium with 40 g/L of agro-biomass as carbon substituents. The pH of the medium was altered to 6.0 using 2 M NaOH before sterilization for 20 min at 121 °C. Three mL of mycelial homogenate was transferred into the flasks containing the media with agro-biomass. All experiments had four replications. After 10 days of incubation, fungal solid mass and agro-biomass were separated by filtration through Whatman filter paper. This was followed by centrifugation (14,000× g; 15 min) at 4 °C. The supernatants obtained after biomass separations were assayed to determine cellulolytic enzyme activity.

2.3. Enzyme Assay

Endoglucanase activity was employed to assess the cellulase enzyme activities. Endoglucanase activity (carboxymethyl cellulase; CMCase) was measured as described previously [16] using a reaction mixture having 1 mL of 1% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) in 0.05 M citrate acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and aliquots of appropriately diluted filtrate. The reaction mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 30 min. The reducing sugar produced was determined by the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method and measuring the absorbance at 540 nm using a Multiskan Go UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Oy, Ratastie 2, 01620 Vantaa, Finland). Reducing sugar content was determined via a glucose standard curve. One unit (IU) of endoglucanase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme releasing one μmole of reducing sugar per min. Enzyme yield was expressed as U/mL.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The results of the enzyme activities are the mean ± SD (standard deviation) values of the four replicates. The means were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). One-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan test was employed to assess the effect of each inducer source on the enzyme production by each white rot fungi. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. Data analysis was done using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Error bars in all figures referred to the SD of four replicates values of each treatment. Prior to conducting the ANOVA, the assumption of homogeneity of variances was tested and satisfied based on Levene’s test (p  >  0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Cellulase Activity of White Rot Fungus P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium under Submerged Fermentation on Different Nitrogen Inducer Sources

Significant differences were recorded in the cellulase activity of P. ostreatus on the different nitrogen inducers observed in the present study, as shown in Figure 1A. Yeast recorded significantly the highest cellulase activity (1.354 U/mL), while CH4N2O recorded the least cellulase activity (0.213 U/mL). Even though there was no significant difference between KNO3 and NaNO3, they did record comparatively a higher cellulase activity (0.756 U/mL and 0.757 U/mL), respectively, compared to the (NH4)2SO4 (0.571 U/mL) and NH4OH (0.444 U/mL). The cellulase activity of NH4OH (0.444 U/mL) was comparatively lower compared to that of (NH4)2SO4 (0.571 U/mL). Significant differences were recorded in the cellulase activity of P. chrysosporium on the different nitrogen inducers observed in the study, as shown in Figure 1B. Yeast recorded significantly the highest cellulase activity (1.154 U/mL), while CH4N2O, on the other hand, recorded the least cellulase activity (0.081 U/mL) in the current study. Much as there was no significant difference between the KNO3 and the NaNO3, they did record comparatively a higher cellulase activity (0.557 U/mL and 0.556 U/mL, respectively) compared to the (NH4)2SO4 (0.371 U/mL) and NH4OH (0.144 U/mL). The cellulase activity of NH4OH (0.144 U/mL) was comparatively lower compared to that of (NH4)2SO4 (0.371 U/mL).

3.2. Cellulase Activity of White Rot Fungus P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium under Submerged Fermentation on Different Carbon Inducer Sources

As shown in Figure 2A, with the exception of glucose and xylose, which did not record any significant differences in the activity of cellulase (0.042 U/mL and 0.042 U/mL), all the other carbon inducers (fructose, 0.211 U/mL; malt extract, 0.694 U/mL; starch, 0.824 U/mL and carboxymethylcellulose, 0.976 U/mL) considered in the study recorded significant differences in cellulase activity of P. ostreatus with the carboxymethylcellulose recording the highest cellulase activity. The cellulase activity of P. ostreatus on starch (0.824 U/mL) was significantly higher compared to malt extract (0.694 U/mL) and fructose (0.211 U/mL). Fructose, however, recorded significantly lower cellulase activity (0.211 U/mL) compared to the malt extract (0.694 U/mL). With the exception of glucose and xylose, which did not record any significant differences and the least cellulase activity (0.035 U/mL and 0.035 U/mL), all the other carbon sources (fructose, 0.181 U/mL; malt extract, 0.536 U/mL; starch, 0.624 U/mL and carboxymethylcellulose, 0.776 U/mL) considered in the study recorded significant differences in cellulase activity of P. chrysosporium, with the carboxymethylcellulose recording the highest cellulase activity, as shown in Figure 2B. The cellulase activity of P. chrysosporium on the fructose was significantly lower (0.181 U/mL) compared to the starch (0.6204 U/mL) and malt extract (0.536 U/mL). On the other hand, starch recorded a significantly higher cellulase activity (0.624 U/mL) than malt extract (0.536 U/mL).

3.3. Cellulase Activity of White Rot Fungus P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium under Submerged Fermentation on Different Agro-Biomass

Significant differences were recorded in the cellulase activity of P. ostreatus on all the agro-biomass observed in the study under submerged fermentation, as shown in Figure 3A. Wheat straw recorded significantly the highest cellulase activity (6.880 U/mL), while stevia straw recorded the least cellulase activity (1.555 U/mL) in the current study. Corn stover did record comparatively a higher cellulase activity (6.342 U/mL) compared to the oat straw (5.247 U/mL) and alfalfa straw (3.172 U/mL). Although the cellulase activity of the alfalfa straw (3.172 U/mL) was significantly higher than that of the corn cob (2.037 U/mL), it was not comparable to that of the oat straw (5.247 U/mL). Significant differences were recorded in the cellulase activity of P. chrysosporium on all the agro-biomass observed in the study under submerged fermentation, as shown in Figure 3B. Corn stover recorded significantly the highest cellulase activity (6.525 U/mL), while stevia straw recorded the least cellulase activity (0.960 U/mL). Wheat straw recorded comparatively a higher cellulase activity (5.550 U/mL) compared to the oat straw (4.240 U/mL), alfalfa straw (2.025 U/mL), and corn cob (1.617 U/mL). Although the cellulase activity of the alfalfa straw (2.02 U/mL) was significantly higher than that of the corn cob (1.617 U/mL), it was not comparable to that of the oat straw (4.240 U/mL).

4. Discussion

Naturally, nitrogen stimulates fungal cell growth, enhancing biomass formation and cellulase enzyme expression [11]. P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium fungi used in the current study showed a similar response to different nitrogen sources with respect to cellulase activity. The highest enzyme activity from the nitrogen sources considered in the study was recorded in the yeast extract. Yeast extract is the sole complex source of nitrogen among those tested. This observation is coherent with the findings of Chuwech et al. [17] and Jonathan and Adeoyo [18]. The enhanced enzyme production by yeast extract, according to Jonathan and Fasidi [19], could be attributed to its chemical composition: high amino acid and vitamin. That is, nitrogen sources: nitrate-based vis-à-vis ammonium-based equally has influence on the cellulase enzyme activity. This gives a basis for the observed higher cellulase activity of the nitrate-based compound (potassium nitrate and sodium nitrate) compared with the ammonium-based compounds (ammonium sulphate, ammonium hydroxide, and urea). Similarly, Rajmane and Korekar [20] indicated that nitrogen sources like sodium nitrate stimulated higher cellulase activity while phosphate and sulphate ammonium-based nitrogen were proven to hamper cellulase activities. This may be due to the tendency of the mycelium to absorb the ammonium ions, which resulted in the lowering of the pH, which subsequently reduced the production of cellulase enzymes [21]. Potassium nitrate and sodium nitrate enhancing cellulase activity could be due to the simplicity of the nitrogen sources utilized for the biosynthesis of cellulase enzymes. Though adding yeast as the sole organic nitrogen source resulted in increased cellulase enzyme activity in this study, the authors share the same view with Hammad et al. [22], who explained that organic nitrogen sources are not effective substituents for inorganic nitrogen sources because they are costly. The cellulase activity of both fungi on urea which recorded the least cellulase activity is similar to the reports of both Elsebaay et al. [23] and Sethi and Gupta [24].
Much as carbon is known to have a positive effect on cellulase production [25], the selection of carbon-based materials/substrates from plant polymers and their degraded products/derivatives in the assessment of enzymatic activity was attributed to their abundance or availability and cost-effectiveness compared to other sources. Therefore, carbon sources such as malt extract, glucose, fructose, carboxymethylcellulose, starch and xylose used in the current study were intentional. Among the carbon sources tested in the study, carboxymethylcellulose produced the highest cellulase activity. This observation agrees with the study of Niranjane et al. [26], in which carboxymethylcellulose as a carbon substrate proved to be the strongest inducer of cellulase activity. Similarly, crystalline cellulose was noted to be the best carbon source and to have the highest cellulase activity among the three substrates evaluated among all filamentous fungi [27]. The observed high performance of fungi on carboxymethylcellulose, according to Kobakhidze et al. [28], may be due to the presence of several inducers capable of initiating cellulase production and catalyzing the hydrolysis of cellulose to simple assimilable sugars.
Moreover, Yoav et al. [29] and Suzuki et al. [30], respectively, stated that the cellulases of P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium are inducible enzymes. According to Elisashvili et al. [31], these filamentous white rot basidiomycetes secrete cellulases with high efficiency upon cultivation in the presence of carboxymethylcelluloses. Most studies also have appreciated cellobiose as a primary product of cellulose degradation that considerably induces cellulase production in most filamentous fungi [6]. On a transcriptional level, cellobiose is known to induce transcriptional factor Clr-Clr1which subsequently induces the expression of the transcriptional factor Clr-2 responsible for the expression of significant cellulase genes [32].
Cellulase enzyme activity of the starch was higher than fructose, glucose, and xylose. Filamentous fungi possess starch-active enzymes [33] whose expression is known to be induced by starch as well as its intermediary metabolite maltose [34,35]. This, therefore, might explain the enhanced cellulase activity observed with starch. Cellulase from filamentous basidiomycetes fungi is induced by cellulose/polysaccharide-containing materials [28,36]. Thus, since malt extracts are heterogeneous polysaccharides [37], their ability to elicit increased cellulase activity compared to fructose¸ glucose, and xylose may originate from several cellulase-inducing metabolites generated during its degradation. In various metabolic processes, glucose serves as a significant energy. However, the efficiency of filamentous white rot fungi to secrete cellulase is informed by the presence of a cellulase intermediary metabolite like cellobiose. In this study, glucose and xylose demonstrated the least cellulase activity. Similarly, Elisashvili, Khardziani, Tsiklauri and Kachlishvili [31], Kobakhidze et al. [38], and Cai et al. [39] reported the least cellulase activity when white rot fungi were cultured on glucose as the sole carbon source. Similarly, Salmon, et al. [40] analyzed the effect of different carbon sources, including xylose, as inducers of cellulase activity by the filamentous basidiomycete fungi Ganoderma applanatum mr-56 and reported that xylose has the least cellulase activity, which is coherent with the observation made in this study. According to Lynd et al. [41] and Suzuki et al. [42] readily, metabolizable carbon sources turn to lower/suppress cellulase synthesis. Thus, the comparatively reduced cellulase activity in the presence of glucose and xylose in the current study could be attributed to the repression of the filamentous white rot fungi due to the glucose concentration in the extracellular media [6,43] since the readily available glucose is utilized by the fungi to meet its energy requirement and not an intermediary metabolite.
From a genetic perspective, glucose, in the presence of filamentous fungi, usually serves as a repressor of cellulolytic genes [44]. That is, the cellulase regulatory mechanism is influenced by the presence of glucose as it acts as a negative feedback mechanism which suppresses cellulase induction [32]. Aslam et al. [45] monitored cellulase activity in the culture filtrate, which had only glucose as a carbon source in the medium and witnessed very low levels to almost zero activity. Muthuvelayudham and Viruthagiri [46] explained that glucose is the end product of carbohydrate hydrolysis by cellulases, and glucose in the medium shows the end product inhibition. In other words, although glucose may promote mycelia growth, it is not a good inducer of cellulase enzyme. Cellulase enzyme activity on fructose by both fungi was thus higher than glucose and xylose. Similarly, Mehboob et al. [47] observed an increased cellulase enzyme activity when filamentous fungi were grown in a wheat straw-based medium with additional fructose than glucose. Although glucose, xylose, and fructose are easily metabolizable sugar, the cellulase activity of fructose being higher than glucose and xylose suggests the absence or low levels of repressors during fructose metabolism.
The suitability of common agricultural biomass wastes as carbon sources for cellulase production by P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium revealed that cellulase activity levels varied among the substrates, suggesting that the composition of these substrates induces different quantities (levels) of enzymes. In accordance with the general observations [7,48,49,50], P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium produced cellulases when grown on different lignocellulose agro-biomass. The capacity of these basidiomycetes filamentous fungi to produce these enzymes is vital in furnishing the growing cultures with a carbon source essential for their biosynthetic activity. The substrate not only provides a supply of carbon but also generates the required inducing compounds for the filamentous fungi [51].
In the present study, cellulase activity by P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium on wheat straw, oat straw, and corn stover were generally high. The corn stover used in this study referred to the above-ground structure; the stalk with its leaves after harvesting of the main crop. Similarly, among the several agro-biomass tested, wheat straw, corn stover, and oat straw exhibited enhanced cellulase activity by filamentous fungi Morchella spongiola [52], Aspergillus terreus [25], and T. reeesi [53], respectively. The variation in terms of the level of cellulase activity observed in the present study may be due to the variation in agro-biomass compositions. These findings were in agreement with Elisashvili et al. [54], who mentioned that the nature of the lignocellulosic biomass substrate had a positive impact on enzyme secretion. The level of cellulase activity of the corn cob was lower compared to the alfalfa, oat straw, wheat straw, and corn stover. Similarly, among several agro-biomasses, Reddy et al. [55], Ganash et al. [56], and Govumoni et al. [57], respectively, reported the least cellulase activity when Aspergillus niger, P. ostreatus, and Phanerochaete chrysosporeum (MTCC 787) were grown on corn cobs. Corn cob’s inability to produce higher cellulase compared to the other agro-biomass is due to its structural nature. Corn cob has a dense or compact micro-structural carbohydrate configuration [58]. As such, compared to the other agro-biomass, the fungi mycelium could not easily penetrate and access the hydrolyzable fibers, which are essential for cellulase enzyme biosynthesis. Furthermore, Reyes et al. [59] stated that better contact with the cellulosic material could initiate improved enzyme production associated with cellulose hydrolysis.
Among the agro-biomasses considered in the study, the cellulase activity of stevia was the least. The logical explanation is that stevia biomass mainly consists of soluble sugars [60,61]. According to Amore et al. [62], genes encoding hydrolytic enzymes, including cellulase implicated in plant cell wall breakdown in filamentous fungi, can be repressed during the growth period in the presence of easily utilizable carbon substrate sources but are induced/stimulated in the presence of cellulosic substrates (or product thereof) [63]. Authors, therefore, concur that besides stevia having a poly-carbohydrate composition, it still has more easily assimilable sugars compared to other agro-biomass that would serve as a carbon source and possibly repress cellulase activity. In general, the cellulase enzyme activity of P. ostreatus in response to various inducers was relatively higher than P. chrysosporium in submerged fermentation. The genomes of P. ostreatus are known to encode more glycoside hydrolase family cellulase genes compared to P. chrysosporium [64].

5. Conclusions

It is clear from the present study that yeast and carboxymethylcellulose are suitable nitrogen and carbon inducer sources of cellulase activity by P. ostreatus and the reference culture P. chrysosporium under submerged fermentation, while the most suitable agro-biomasses are wheat straw and corn stover, respectively. The least inducer sources in terms of nitrogen, carbon, and agro-biomass for cellulase activity by both P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium were urea, glucose, xylose, and stevia straw, respectively. Further research could focus on optimizing the various inducers aiming at higher enzyme activities by P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.D.; Data curation, O.D.; Formal analysis, O.D.; Methodology, O.D. and Q.Y.; Supervision, G.Z. and L.M.; Validation, O.D., Q.Y. and L.M.; Writing—original draft, O.D.; Writing—review and editing, O.D. and L.O.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-36).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhat, M. Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2000, 18, 355–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, S.-M.; Koo, Y.-M. Pilot-scale production of cellulase using Trichoderma Reesei rut C-30 fed-batch mode. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 11, 229–233. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kirk, O.; Borchert, T.V.; Fuglsang, C.C. Industrial enzyme applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kuhad, R.; Gupta, R.; Khasa, Y. Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: An overview. In Wealth from Waste; Lal, B., Ed.; Teri Press: New Delhi, India, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bentil, J.A.; Thygesen, A.; Mensah, M.; Lange, L.; Meyer, A.S. Cellulase production by white-rot basidiomycetous fungi: Solid-state versus submerged cultivation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 5827–5839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Okal, E.J.; Aslam, M.M.; Karanja, J.K.; Nyimbo, W.J. Mini review: Advances in understanding regulation of cellulase enzyme in white-rot basidiomycetes. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 147, 104410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elisashvili, V.; Penninckx, M.; Kachlishvili, E.; Tsiklauri, N.; Metreveli, E.; Kharziani, T.; Kvesitadze, G. Lentinus edodes and Pleurotus species lignocellulolytic enzymes activity in submerged and solid-state fermentation of lignocellulosic wastes of different composition. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Téllez-Téllez, M.; Diaz-Godinez, G. Omic tools to study enzyme production from fungi in the Pleurotus genus. BioResources 2019, 14, 2420–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Persson, I.; Tjerneld, F.; Hahn-Hägerdal, B. Fungal cellulolytic enzyme production: A review. Process Biochem. 1991, 26, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Barragán, L.P.; Figueroa, J.; Durán, L.R.; González, C.A.; Hennigs, C. Fermentative production methods. In Biotransformation of Agricultural Waste and By-Products, 1st ed.; Poltronieri, P., D’Urso, O., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 189–217. [Google Scholar]
  11. Elisashvili, V.; Kachlishvili, E.; Penninckx, M. Effect of growth substrate, method of fermentation, and nitrogen source on lignocellulose-degrading enzymes production by white-rot basidiomycetes. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35, 1531–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kachlishvili, E.; Penninckx, M.J.; Tsiklauri, N.; Elisashvili, V. Effect of nitrogen source on lignocellulolytic enzyme production by white-rot basidiomycetes under solid-state cultivation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 22, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Radhika, R.; Jebapriya, G.R.; Gnanadoss, J.J. Production of cellulase and laccase using Pleurotus sp. under submerged and solid-state fermentation. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. 2013, 6, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  14. Khan, M.H.; Ali, S.; Fakhru’l-Razi, A.; Alam, Z. Use of fungi for the bioconversion of rice straw into cellulase enzyme. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2007, 42, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Uzcategui, E.; Raices, M.; Montesino, R.; Johansson, G.; Pettersson, G.; Eriksson, K. Pilot-scale production and purification of the cellulolytic enzyme system from the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 1991, 13, 323–334. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghose, T. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chuwech, M.; Rakariyatham, N.; Chandet, N.; Tinoi, J. Utilization of pretreated corn cobs for cellulase production by Pycnoporus coccineus. Asia-Pac. J. Sci. Technol. 2016, 21, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jonathan, S.G.; Adeoyo, O.R. Evaluation of ten wild Nigerian mushrooms for amylase and cellulase activities. Mycobiology 2011, 39, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jonathan, S.; Fasidi, I. Effect of carbon, nitrogen and mineral sources on growth of Psathyerella atroumbonata (Pegler), a Nigerian edible mushroom. Food Chem. 2001, 72, 479–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rajmane, S.; Korekar, S. Cellulase enzyme production of post-harvest fungi under the influence of carbon and nitrogen sources. Curr. Botany 2012, 3, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, C. Cellulolytic enzymes of Volvariella volvacea. In Tropical Mushrooms; Chang, S.T., Quimio, M.H., Eds.; The Chinese Press: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1984; pp. 167–186. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hammad, A.; Swelim, M.; Gannam, R. Enhanced production of cellulase (S) by Aspergillus spp. isolated from agriculture wastes by solid state fermentation. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. 2010, 8, 402–410. [Google Scholar]
  23. Elsebaay, H.; Shoukry, A.; Hassan, F.; El-Shall, H. Optimization of cellulase enzyme production from Pleurotus under submerged fermentation. Middle East J. Agric. Res. 2018, 7, 50–59. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sethi, S.; Gupta, S. Optimization of cultural parameters for cellulase enzyme production from fungi. BioLife 2014, 2, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gao, J.; Weng, H.; Zhu, D.; Yuan, M.; Guan, F.; Xi, Y. Production and characterization of cellulolytic enzymes from the thermoacidophilic fungal Aspergillus terreus M11 under solid-state cultivation of corn stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 7623–7629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Niranjane, A.P.; Madhou, P.; Stevenson, T.W. The effect of carbohydrate carbon sources on the production of cellulase by Phlebia gigantea. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 40, 1464–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Metreveli, E.; Khardziani, T.; Elisashvili, V. The Carbon Source Controls the Secretion and Yield of Polysaccharide-Hydrolyzing Enzymes of Basidiomycetes. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kobakhidze, A.; Asatiani, M.; Kachlishvili, E.; Elisashvili, V. Induction and catabolite repression of cellulase and xylanase synthesis in the selected white-rot basidiomycetes. Ann. Agrar. Sci. 2016, 14, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yoav, S.; Salame, T.M.; Feldman, D.; Levinson, D.; Ioelovich, M.; Morag, E.; Yarden, O.; Bayer, E.A.; Hadar, Y. Effects of cre1 modification in the white-rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus PC9: Altering substrate preference during biological pretreatment. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Suzuki, H.; Igarashi, K.; Samejima, M. Cellotriose and cellotetraose as inducers of the genes encoding cellobiohydrolases in the basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 6164–6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Elisashvili, V.; Khardziani, T.S.; Tsiklauri, N.; Kachlishvili, E. Cellulase and xylanase activities in higher basidiomycetes. Biochemistry 1999, 64, 718–722. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, B.-T.; Hu, S.; Yu, X.-Y.; Jin, L.; Zhu, Y.-J.; Jin, F.-J. Studies of cellulose and starch utilization and the regulatory mechanisms of related enzymes in fungi. Polymers 2020, 12, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Andlar, M.; Rezić, T.; Marđetko, N.; Kracher, D.; Ludwig, R.; Šantek, B. Lignocellulose degradation: An overview of fungi and fungal enzymes involved in lignocellulose degradation. Eng. Life Sci. 2018, 18, 768–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vankuyk, P.A.; Benen, J.A.; Wösten, H.A.; Visser, J.; de Vries, R.P. A broader role for AmyR in Aspergillus niger: Regulation of the utilisation of D-glucose or D-galactose containing oligo-and polysaccharides. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Xiong, Y.; Wu, V.W.; Lubbe, A.; Qin, L.; Deng, S.; Kennedy, M.; Bauer, D.; Singan, V.R.; Barry, K.; Northen, T.R. A fungal transcription factor essential for starch degradation affects integration of carbon and nitrogen metabolism. PLoS Genet. 2017, 13, e1006737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Rytioja, J.; Hildén, K.; Yuzon, J.; Hatakka, A.; De Vries, R.P.; Mäkelä, M.R. Plant-polysaccharide-degrading enzymes from basidiomycetes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014, 78, 614–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Merck. Malt Extract. In Microbiology Manual, 12th ed.; Merck and Co., Inc.: Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 2010; p. 688. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kobakhidze, A.; Elisashvili, V.; Irbe, I.; Tsiklauri, N.; Andersone, I.; Andersons, B.; Isikhuemhen, O.S. Lignocellulolytic enzyme activity of new corticoid and poroid basidiomycetes isolated from latvian cultural monuments. J. Waste Convers. Bioprod. Biotechnol. 2012, 1, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cai, Y.; Gong, Y.; Liu, W.; Hu, Y.; Chen, L.; Yan, L.; Zhou, Y.; Bian, Y. Comparative secretomic analysis of lignocellulose degradation by Lentinula edodes grown on microcrystalline cellulose, lignosulfonate and glucose. J. Proteom. 2017, 163, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Salmon, D.N.X.; Spier, M.R.; Soccol, C.R.; de Souza Vandenberghe, L.P.; Montibeller, V.W.; Bier, M.C.J.; Faraco, V. Analysis of inducers of xylanase and cellulase activities production by Ganoderma applanatum LPB MR-56. Fungal Biol. 2014, 118, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lynd, L.R.; Weimer, P.J.; Van Zyl, W.H.; Pretorius, I.S. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 506–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Suzuki, H.; Igarashi, K.; Samejima, M. Real-time quantitative analysis of carbon catabolite derepression of cellulolytic genes expressed in the basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 80, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kubicek, C.P.; Messner, R.; Gruber, F.; Mandels, M.; Kubicek-Pranz, E.M. Triggering of cellulase biosynthesis by cellulose in Trichoderma reesei. Involvement of a constitutive, sophorose-inducible, glucose-inhibited beta-diglucoside permease. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 19364–19368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ilmen, M.; Saloheimo, A.; Onnela, M.-L.; Penttilä, M.E. Regulation of cellulase gene expression in the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 1298–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Aslam, N.; Sheikh, M.; Ashraf, M.; Jalil, A. Expression pattern of Trichoderma cellulases under different carbon sources. Pak. J. Bot. 2010, 42, 2895–2902. [Google Scholar]
  46. Muthuvelayudham, R.; Viruthagiri, T. Fermentative production and kinetics of cellulase protein on Trichoderma reesei using sugarcane bagasse and rice straw. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 1873–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mehboob, N.; Asad, M.J.; Asgher, M.; Gulfraz, M.; Mukhtar, T.; Mahmood, R.T. Exploring thermophilic cellulolytic enzyme production potential of Aspergillus fumigatus by the solid-state fermentation of wheat straw. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 172, 3646–3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Silva, E.; Machuca, A.; Milagres, A. Effect of cereal brans on Lentinula edodes growth and enzyme activities during cultivation on forestry waste. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 40, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Papinutti, V.; Forchiassin, F. Lignocellulolytic enzymes from Fomes sclerodermeus growing in solid-state fermentation. J. Food Eng. 2007, 81, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Levin, L.; Herrmann, C.; Papinutti, V.L. Optimization of lignocellulolytic enzyme production by the white-rot fungus Trametes trogii in solid-state fermentation using response surface methodology. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 39, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Haltrich, D.; Nidetzky, B.; Kulbe, K.D.; Steiner, W.; Župančič, S. Production of fungal xylanases. Bioresour. Technol. 1996, 58, 137–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Reddy, M.S.; Kanwal, H.K. Influence of carbon, nitrogen sources, inducers, and substrates on lignocellulolytic enzyme activities of Morchella spongiola. J. Agric. Food Res. 2022, 7, 100271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ortiz, G.E.; Guitart, M.E.; Cavalitto, S.F.; Albertó, E.O.; Fernández-Lahore, M.; Blasco, M. Characterization, optimization, and scale-up of cellulases production by Trichoderma reesei cbs 836.91 in solid-state fermentation using agro-industrial products. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2015, 38, 2117–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Elisashvili, V.; Kachlishvili, E.; Tsiklauri, N.; Metreveli, E.; Khardziani, T.; Agathos, S.N. Lignocellulose-degrading enzyme production by white-rot Basidiomycetes isolated from the forests of Georgia. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Reddy, G.P.K.; Narasimha, G.; Kumar, K.D.; Ramanjaneyulu, G.; Ramya, A.; Kumari, B.S.; Reddy, B.R. Cellulase production by Aspergillus niger on different natural lignocellulosic substrates. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2015, 4, 835–845. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ganash, M.; Ghany, T.M.A.; Al Abboud, M.A.; Alawlaqi, M.M.; Qanash, H.; Amin, B.H. Lignocellulolytic Activity of Pleurotus ostreatus under Solid State Fermentation Using Silage, Stover, and Cobs of Maize. BioResources 2021, 16, 3797–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Govumoni, S.P.; Jahnavi, G.; Sravanthi, K.; Haragopal, V.; Venkateshwar, S.; Rao, L.V. Extracellular lignocellulolytic enzymes by Phanerochaete chrysosporium (MTCC 787) under solid-state fermentation of agro wastes. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2015, 4, 700–710. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ji, G.; Gao, C.; Xiao, W.; Han, L. Mechanical fragmentation of corncob at different plant scales: Impact and mechanism on microstructure features and enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 205, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Reyes, C.; Poulin, A.; Nyström, G.; Schwarze, F.W.; Ribera, J. Enzyme activities of five white-rot fungi in the presence of nanocellulose. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lucho, S.R.; do Amaral, M.N.; Auler, P.A.; Bianchi, V.J.; Ferrer, M.Á.; Calderón, A.A.; Braga, E.J.B. Salt stress-induced changes in in vitro cultured Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni: Effect on metabolite contents, antioxidant capacity and expression of steviol glycosides-related biosynthetic genes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 1341–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Putnik, P.; Bezuk, I.; Barba, F.J.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Polunić, I.; Bursać, D.K. Sugar reduction: Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni as a natural sweetener. In Agri-Food Industry Strategies for Healthy Diets and Sustainability; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 123–152. [Google Scholar]
  62. Amore, A.; Giacobbe, S.; Faraco, V. Regulation of cellulase and hemicellulase gene expression in fungi. Curr. Genom. 2013, 14, 230–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Carle-Urioste, J.C.; Escobar-Vera, J.; El-Gogary, S.; Henrique-Silva, F.; Torigoi, E.; Crivellaro, O.; Herrera-Estrella, A.; El-Dorry, H. Cellulase induction in Trichoderma reesei by cellulose requires its own basal expression. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 10169–10174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Alfaro, M.; Majcherczyk, A.; Kües, U.; Ramírez, L.; Pisabarro, A.G. Glucose counteracts wood-dependent induction of lignocellulolytic enzyme secretion in monokaryon and dikaryon submerged cultures of the white-rot basidiomycete Pleurotus ostreatus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. ostreatus under submerged fermentation on different nitrogen inducers. Bars with different letters (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05. (B) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. chrysosporium under submerged fermentation on different nitrogen inducers. Bars with different letters (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. (A) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. ostreatus under submerged fermentation on different nitrogen inducers. Bars with different letters (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05. (B) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. chrysosporium under submerged fermentation on different nitrogen inducers. Bars with different letters (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Fermentation 08 00561 g001
Figure 2. (A) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. ostreatus under submerged fermentation on different carbon inducers. Bars with different letters (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05. (B) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. chrysosporium under submerged fermentation on different carbon inducers. Bars with different letters (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. (A) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. ostreatus under submerged fermentation on different carbon inducers. Bars with different letters (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05. (B) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. chrysosporium under submerged fermentation on different carbon inducers. Bars with different letters (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Fermentation 08 00561 g002
Figure 3. (A) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. ostreatus under submerged fermentation on different agro-biomass. Bars with different letters (a–f) are significantly different at p < 0.05. (B) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. chrysosporium under submerged fermentation on different agro-biomass inducers. Bars with different letters (a–f) are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. (A) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. ostreatus under submerged fermentation on different agro-biomass. Bars with different letters (a–f) are significantly different at p < 0.05. (B) Cellulase activity of white rot fungus P. chrysosporium under submerged fermentation on different agro-biomass inducers. Bars with different letters (a–f) are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Fermentation 08 00561 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Datsomor, O.; Yan, Q.; Opoku-Mensah, L.; Zhao, G.; Miao, L. Effect of Different Inducer Sources on Cellulase Enzyme Production by White-Rot Basidiomycetes Pleurotus ostreatus and Phanerochaete chrysosporium under Submerged Fermentation. Fermentation 2022, 8, 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8100561

AMA Style

Datsomor O, Yan Q, Opoku-Mensah L, Zhao G, Miao L. Effect of Different Inducer Sources on Cellulase Enzyme Production by White-Rot Basidiomycetes Pleurotus ostreatus and Phanerochaete chrysosporium under Submerged Fermentation. Fermentation. 2022; 8(10):561. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8100561

Chicago/Turabian Style

Datsomor, Osmond, Qi Yan, Louis Opoku-Mensah, Guoqi Zhao, and Lin Miao. 2022. "Effect of Different Inducer Sources on Cellulase Enzyme Production by White-Rot Basidiomycetes Pleurotus ostreatus and Phanerochaete chrysosporium under Submerged Fermentation" Fermentation 8, no. 10: 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8100561

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop