Next Article in Journal
Performance, Metabolism, and Economic Implications of Replacing Soybean Meal with Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles in Feedlot Cattle Diets
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Commercial Pectinase as a Biocatalyst During Self-Induced Anaerobic Fermentation of Coffee (Coffea arabica L. var. Typica)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Postbiotics Derived from Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation: Therapeutic Potential in the Treatment of Muscular Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

by
Emili Bruna Toso Bueno
1,
Kimberlly de Oliveira Silva
2,
Maria Eduarda Ferraz Mendes
2,
Lívia Batista de Oliveira
1,
Felipe Prado de Menezes
3,
Anna Cardoso Imperador
3,
Lucimeire Fernandes Correia
1 and
Lizziane Kretli Winkelstroter
1,2,3,*
1
Graduate Program in Animal Science, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente 19050-920, SP, Brazil
2
Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente 19050-920, SP, Brazil
3
School of Health Sciences, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente 19050-920, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2025, 11(7), 362; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070362
Submission received: 17 April 2025 / Revised: 31 May 2025 / Accepted: 16 June 2025 / Published: 23 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Topic News and Updates on Probiotics)

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by chronic inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract, which can result in several muscular complications, including sarcopenia, the loss of muscle mass, and impaired muscle function. Recently, postbiotics derived from lactic bacteria, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, have emerged as potential therapeutic modulators for these complications. Postbiotics are bioactive metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), antimicrobial peptides, and other compounds produced by microorganisms during fermentation, which have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and metabolic regulatory effects. These metabolites are important due to their potential to positively influence muscle health in patients with IBD, mainly by reducing systemic and local inflammation, improving gut microbiota, and modulating muscle metabolism. Studies suggest that these postbiotics may help minimize muscle degradation and promote muscle tissue regeneration, assisting in the prevention or management of IBD-associated sarcopenia. Despite the promising results, challenges remain, such as variability in postbiotic production and the need for further clinical studies to establish clear therapeutic guidelines. This review article explores the mechanisms of action of postbiotics derived from lactic acid bacteria and their potential applications in the treatment of muscle complications in patients with IBD, highlighting future therapeutic perspectives.

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, progressive, immune-mediated condition characterized by the dysregulation of both innate and adaptive immune responses. The most well-known forms of IBD are Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, whose etiologies are complex and involve a combination of genetic, microbial, and environmental factors [1,2]. IBD is thought to arise as a response to an initial insult to the epithelial barrier in specific intestinal regions, which may be influenced by factors such as diet-induced dysbiosis, exposure to chemical compounds, or infectious agents [3].
In recent years, the prevalence of IBD has increased significantly worldwide [4]. For example, a retrospective study evaluating 226 patients found that approximately 54 were diagnosed with IBD, including 44 cases of ulcerative colitis (19.46%) and 10 cases of Crohn’s disease (4.42%), affecting individuals across different age groups and both sexes [5]. Clinically, IBD can lead to various muscular complications due to associated metabolic disorders and nutritional deficiencies, which negatively impact muscle function [4]. It has been reported that more than one-third of adult IBD patients present with myopenia and pre-sarcopenia [6], conditions linked to poor nutrient absorption, which is primarily caused by the inflammatory process. This inflammation reduces the contact time between the intestinal mucosa and nutrients, impairing the absorption of essential compounds such as aminoacids [4,7].
The incidence of sarcopenia in IBD patients is estimated to be as high as 60%, accompanied by reduced muscle strength [8]. This decline is not only due to the diminished bioavailability of nutrients but also the inflammatory milieu inherent to IBD. Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines inhibit protein synthesis and promote the generation of reactive oxygen species, further contributing to muscle dysfunction [8]. Therapeutic approaches to IBD commonly include the use of corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), biological agents, and dietary management [9]. Notably, the intestinal microbiota plays a critical role in these treatments, as scientific evidence supports the benefits of selected probiotic strains in preventing and managing ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease [10].
The intestinal microbiota consists of over 1000 bacterial species and other microorganisms, whose imbalance is linked to various metabolic diseases. Consequently, preserving and restoring the gut microbiome has become a significant focus, with functional dietary components such as prebiotics, probiotics, and postbiotics gaining prominence [11]. Prebiotics are non-digestible fibers that selectively promote the growth and activity of beneficial intestinal bacteria like Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Bacteroides [10]. Probiotics are live microorganisms that maintain intestinal homeostasis, modulate the immune system, and support physiological functions. Postbiotics, as defined by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP), are preparations of inactivated microorganisms and/or their components that confer health benefits to the host. These bioactive substances result from interactions between probiotics and prebiotics through fermentation [12].
Postbiotics offer several advantages over probiotics, including longer shelf life, easier storage and transportation, and no risk of transferring antibiotic resistance genes or virulence factors. This enhances their safety profile, especially for immunocompromised individuals [12]. Moreover, postbiotics are more stable against processing, storage, and gastrointestinal conditions, making them a promising therapeutic alternative [12]. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, are primary producers of postbiotics. These bacteria are extensively used industrially in fermentation processes to obtain postbiotic by-products, including organic acids, peptides, and exopolysaccharides (EPSs) [13].
Given their anti-inflammatory properties and role in restoring microbial balance, postbiotics have therapeutic potential in IBD management [14]. However, challenges remain in their clinical application, such as variability in postbiotic production and the need for further research to confirm their therapeutic efficacy. This review aims to discuss the mechanisms of action of postbiotics and explore their application in treating muscular complications associated with IBD.

2. Postbiotic: Mechanisms of Action and Benefits

Postbiotics are bioactive compounds generated by microorganisms during fermentation processes, which may include non-viable whole cells, cell fragments, metabolites, or other released substances. These components exert beneficial effects on the host’s health, similar to probiotics, but without the need for the microorganisms to be alive. Thus, postbiotics offer benefits such as greater safety and stability, reducing risks associated with the consumption of viable microorganisms [14,15,16,17].
Postbiotics have been considered as a therapeutic intervention for various pathologies, such as kidney diseases (hyperoxaluria), oncological diseases (colorectal cancer), metabolic disorders (diabetes), inflammatory diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and IBD), and even neurodegenerative diseases [18,19,20,21,22].
Some studies highlight the benefits of postbiotics. In the study by Du et al. (2022) [23], the action of postbiotics derived from the strains Lacticasebacillus rhamnosus, Limosilactobacillus reuteri and Bifidobacterium animalis on silica-induced cytotoxicity and inflammation in an in vitro macrophage model was investigated. The results demonstrated the compounds’ anti-inflammatory activity, in addition to a significant reduction in toxicity. Wang et al. (2024) [24] also noted a reduction in inflammation in addition to the proliferation and differentiation of intestinal stem cells in mice after the use of postbiotics. Di Chiano et al. (2024) [25] observed that postbiotics were able to act at the brain level, protecting and preventing microglial cells from experiencing oxidative stress.
However, the benefits of postbiotics are directly related to the fermentation process. Fermentation by LAB, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, is widely used for the synthesis of postbiotics due to their ability to produce a variety of bioactive compounds that are beneficial to human health. These bacteria, which are commonly found in fermented foods such as yogurt and kefir, play a crucial role in the production of organic acids, peptides, and other substances that can have antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effect [17,26]. During the fermentation process, these bacteria metabolize nutrients in the substrate, releasing cell fragments and metabolites that, even after the death of microorganisms, continue to provide health benefits to the hosts [17,26].
In addition to the widely studied genera mentioned above, other genera of microorganisms have shown potential for use in the production of postbiotics through the fermentation process, such as some species of the genera Fructilactobacillus, Enterococcus, Akkermansiamuciniphila, Eubacateriumhallii, and Streptococcus, found in various foods [13,27,28]. These strains display distinct metabolic behaviors and result in a variety of bioactive compounds beneficial to human health. Streptococcus thermophilus has been explored as a rich postbiotic source due to its applications in the food industry. It is associated with yogurt starter cultures as it is a bacterial strain considered ‘Generally Recognized as Safe’ (GRAS), converting lactose into lactic acid during fermentation, and an EPS producer, a status characterizing its anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, even after undergoing hydrolysis [29,30].
Other genera such as Lacticaseibacillus and Pediococcus are also of great relevance for the production of postbiotics. Studies have demonstrated the health properties of the postbiotics produced using strains of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei due to the immunomodulatory effects achieved by inducing the differentiation of Tfh cells through their action on the cytokine IL-12. These bacteria also produce EPSs, modulating the intestinal microbiota [27,28]. As for Pediococcus, the main strain exploited as a producer of postbiotics is Pediococcus acidilactici due to its growth properties at different pH values, temperatures, and osmotic pressures; it is therefore adaptable to different conditions, such as those imposed by the human gastrointestinal tract, having homofermentative capacity for the production of lactic acid and bacteriocins, which gives it antimicrobial properties [31,32].
Fermentation by LAB is an anaerobic process, i.e., it occurs in the absence of oxygen, in which these bacteria convert carbohydrates, mainly glucose, into lactic acid, among other products. There are two main types of fermentation in LAB: homofermentative, in which the final product is exclusively lactic acid; and heterofermentative, in which, in addition to lactic acid, by-products such as ethanol, acetic acid, and carbon dioxide are also produced. In addition to lactic acid, other bioactive substances can be generated during fermentation, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), vitamins, EPSs, biosurfactants, and bacteriocins [33,34,35].
The LAB fermentation process is widely used in food industry due to its contribution to the flavor, texture, and functional properties of foods, in addition to its potential beneficial effects on intestinal health and the immune system [26,36]. It is worth noting that the synthesis of postbiotics can vary according to the bacterial strain used in their synthesis. In addition, they are subject to factors such as physical criteria during fermentation, growth media, and nutrients provided [26,36].
SCFAs are produced from the bacterial fermentation of complex polysaccharides, i.e., non-digestible dietary fibers, the main representatives being butyrate, acetate, and propionate [17,36]. These substances have been shown to be effective in reducing inflammation generated in IBD through the inhibition of histones and the activation of G-protein-coupled receptors. Thus, they present advantages such as influencing cell proliferation, preventing the development of malignant cells, and improving the vitality of enterocytes and colonocytes, in addition to promoting intestinal barrier maintenance [26,36,37].
Studies have shown that butyrate has gene expression modulation properties and an immunosuppressive effect through the regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α). Moreover, it has been observed that it elevates anti-inflammatory mediators, such as IL-10, contributing to anoxidative stress reduction and being a source of energy for the colon mucosa. Thus, it was demonstrated that the dysbiosis associated with patients with IBD was closely linked to the reduction of SCFA, mainly from bacteria that synthesize butyrate, such as bacteria belonging to the phylum Firmicutes [17,37,38,39].
EPSs are biopolymers released by the bacterial cell wall that are responsible for modulating the immune response through the stimulation of dendritic cells and macrophages. They are also known to activate NK cells and increase the proliferation of T lymphocytes, in addition to reestablishing the intestinal barrier function during IBD through the regulation of adhesion proteins that make up tight junctions [17,26,40].
Zhou et al. (2018) [40] demonstrated the ability of EPSs produced by LAB to regulate intestinal barrier integrity during IBD through the activation of a transcriptional factor called STAT3. The antioxidant effects demonstrated by EPSs have also been quite attractive, as they act by neutralizing and eliminating reactive oxygen species (ROS) involved in oxidative stress reactions [26,41].
Postbiotic enzymes also play an important antioxidant role, the main ones being superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and NADH peroxidase [14,42]. Oxidative stress represents an imbalance between oxidation and antioxidant processes, with superoxide dismutase being one of the most important enzymes for regulating antioxidant function due to its ability to dismutate the O2− radical, which reduces the concentration of free cations and the damage caused by hydrogen peroxide [43,44].
Organic acids and some postbiotic proteins are relevant due to their antimicrobial effect. The main organic acids produced are lactic acid, propionic acid, and 3-phenyllactic acid, which have shown wide application as antimicrobials. Regarding synthesized proteins, it is worth mentioning bacteriocins and the S-Layer [15,45].
Bacteriocins are synthesized in the ribosomes of LAB as primary metabolites and released into the extracellular environment. They exercise antimicrobial action through the formation of pores in the cell membranes of susceptible pathogens. They can exert a bactericidal or bacteriostatic effect and are classified into classes I, II, and III, where class I and II bacteriocins are resistant to changes in pH and heat, while class III bacteriocins do not have the same resistance [15,26,46].
The other compounds that make up this postbiotic contribute to its overall effectiveness due to their diverse antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-catabolic properties, as well as their other properties, as demonstrated in Table 1.
The use of postbiotics in the nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, and food industries has shown promise due to their health benefits. However, large-scale production still faces challenges [13,14].
The production of postbiotics occurs through controlled fermentation using specific LAB (lactic acid bacteria) strains. The required conditions involve cultivation in MRS media or modified media, under anaerobic or microaerophilic atmospheric conditions, at temperatures between 30 and 37 °C and pH values between 5.0 and 6.5, depending on the desired postbiotic. Postbiotic production has advanced with the use of various modern biotechnological techniques aimed at increasing efficiency, standardization, and bioactivity [50,51].
The use of bioreactors with automated control is employed in the production of EPSs, bacteriocins, and organic acids. This technique allows the real-time monitoring of pH, temperature, oxygen, and substrates to optimize the process and increase productivity [52]. However, the use of bioreactors for large-scale fermentation still faces limitations, such as low tolerance to temperature variations [44,45].
Techniques such as spray-drying, freeze-drying, and alginate encapsulation have contributed to improving the stability of sensitive postbiotics, such as antioxidant enzymes and bioactive peptides. According to Thorakkattu et al. (2022) [14], freeze-drying is one of the most promising ways to commercialize these compounds, although this process may affect their stability and antimicrobial properties. On the other hand, microencapsulation techniques ensure proper storage and prolonged release (Jin et al., 2025) [53].
Thus, controlled industrial fermentation emerges as a viable alternative for the production of active postbiotics [13], as shown in Figure 1. Furthermore, the production of compounds such as EPSs by LAB has proven to be commercially unviable due to low yield [54].

3. Pathophysiology of Muscular Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Sarcopenia, characterized by the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, is a growing concern in patients with IBDs, such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. The prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with IBD is significantly higher than that in healthy individuals. It is estimated that approximately 51% of patients diagnosed with IBD show signs of muscle wasting [46,50]. Compared to the general population, where the prevalence of sarcopenia ranges from 5% to 13% in people aged 60 to 70 years, patients with IBD have an increased risk of developing this condition, with data revealing that prevalence can reach 65% in some groups [55].
Systemic and localized inflammation plays a key role in the muscle degeneration observed in patients with IBD, as demonstrated in Figure 2. Chronic inflammation in the intestine activates a systemic inflammatory response, promoting the release of inflammatory mediators that directly impact muscle integrity. Steell et al. (2021) [56] highlighted that intestinal inflammation, characteristic of IBD, results in an increase in intestinal permeability, facilitating the translocation of endotoxins into systemic circulation. This process aggravates systemic inflammation, leading to the activation of catabolic pathways, such as NF-kB pathway, which is directly involved in muscle degradation.
Furthermore, chronic inflammation results in increased levels of cortisol, a catabolic hormone that is released in response to inflammatory stress. As discussed by Nishiwaka et al. (2021) [4], increased cortisol in circulation favors the degradation of muscle proteins and reduces the synthesis of skeletal proteins, contributing to the development of sarcopenia.
Local inflammation in the intestine also increases the production of cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α, which have a direct effect on skeletal muscle, promoting resistance to protein synthesis and increasing muscle degradation [57]. The ubiquitin–proteasome proteolytic pathway is a primary cellular mechanism responsible for the selective degradation of damaged or unneeded proteins. In this process, proteins are tagged with ubiquitin molecules and subsequently directed to the proteasome, a protein complex that breaks them down. This pathway plays a crucial role in regulating muscle protein turnover, particularly during inflammation and muscle wasting conditions [58]. Muscle loss in patients with IBD is also often associated with insulin resistance and increased basal energy expenditure, processes that contribute to the metabolic imbalance that characterizes these conditions [59].
Increased basal energy expenditure in IBD patients can lead to excessive muscle catabolism, as the body uses muscle protein as an energy source. This phenomenon is particularly concerning in malnourished patients, who may have a reduced ability to mobilize fat and protein stores to support muscle function [55].
Moreover, intestinal malabsorption, common in individuals with IBD, makes it difficult to obtain essential nutrients, such as proteins and amino acids, which are fundamental for maintaining muscle mass. Leucine, an essential branched-chain amino acid, plays a crucial role in activating the mTOR pathway, which promotes muscle protein synthesis. In patients with IBD, leucine deficiency is one of the main factors contributing to muscle mass loss, since the insufficient intake of this amino acid results in a reduced anabolic response in the muscles [59].
In addition to leucine, other nutrients such as vitamin D play an important role in muscle health and sarcopenia prevention. Vitamin D is involved in regulating muscle function and promoting muscle protein synthesis, and is an important factor in maintaining muscle mass in patients with inflammatory diseases. Thus, vitamin D deficiency is common in patients with IBD, which worsens the loss of muscle mass and weakness associated with sarcopenia [55].
Insufficient protein intake may also be associated with the clinical condition of these patients, who have difficulty consuming the appropriate amount due to abdominal pain, distension, and other gastrointestinal symptoms. Studies show that approximately 40% of older patients with IBD do not reach the recommended daily protein intake, which contributes to the muscle deterioration observed in these individuals [59].
Thus, the protein destruction observed in many IBD patients further compromises the capacity for muscle regeneration, in addition to being associated with a higher rate of hospitalizations and postoperative complications [4]. With the loss of muscle mass and the resulting fragility, these patients become more vulnerable to falls, fractures, and an increased risk of premature death. Therefore, the nutritional management of these patients should include not only the correction of dietary deficiencies, but also strategies to improve the absorption of essential nutrients.

4. Application of Postbiotics Derived from Lactic Acid Bacteria in Muscular Complications

The application of postbiotics derived from lactic bacteria has shown great potential in alleviating muscle complications, particularly due to their immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties (Figure 3) [60,61,62,63].
In general, postbiotics comprise a broad range of bioactive compounds that exert beneficial effects on host health through distinct molecular pathways (as detailed in Table 1). SCFAs, such as butyrate, acetate, and propionate, modulate inflammation and muscle metabolism through histone deacetylase inhibition and the activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPR41 and GPR43), enhancing intestinal barrier function and promoting muscle regeneration [36,37,38,39]. Exopolysaccharides, derived from lactic acid bacteria, activate immune cells and neutralize reactive oxygen species via the STAT3 signaling pathway, contributing to oxidative stress reduction and mucosal healing [17,26,40,41]. Antioxidant enzymes like superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase scavenge free radicals, limiting tissue damage in chronic inflammatory states [14,42,47]. In addition, organic acids, bacteriocins, and biosurfactants demonstrate antimicrobial effects by lowering pH or disrupting pathogen membranes, while vitamins serve as enzymatic cofactors essential for cellular maintenance [15,45,46,48,49]. The integrated action of postbiotic metabolites underscores their therapeutic relevance in IBD treatment, especially in mitigating inflammation-driven muscle wasting.
Among the most studied postbiotics, SCFAs such as butyrate, acetate, and propionate are recognized for their key roles in inflammation control and redox balance. These compounds help to neutralize skeletal muscle damage, enhancing muscle repair and regeneration. Studies suggest that SCFAs may also act as metabolic modulators by activating G-protein-coupled receptors (GPR41 and GPR43), leading to the secretion of gut peptides that improve insulin sensitivity and increase glucose uptake in muscle tissue [63,64,65,66].
Butyrate, specifically, has demonstrated benefits in inflammatory modulation, mitochondrial function preservation, and energy metabolism regulation [61]. Its action on PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways and antioxidant capacity has been associated with muscle mass maintenance [60,61]. Acetate activates AMPK and supports mitochondrial biogenesis, while propionate influences lipid and glucose metabolism, contributing to gut barrier integrity and the modulation of inflammatory responses, factors considered essential in the management of sarcopenia [61,64,67].
Additional studies have evaluated the effects of Lactobacillus-derived postbiotics in muscle atrophy models. Jeong et al. (2024) [63] demonstrated that thermally processed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum postbiotics improved muscle mass and function through anti-inflammatory and anti-catabolic mechanisms. In another study, the use of sodium butyrate and ReFerm (a L. plantarum-derived product) significantly reduced clinical symptoms and improved quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome [68].
Furthermore, protein fractions from Lactobacillus delbrueckii CIDCA 133 postbiotics promoted mucosal healing, reinforced the intestinal epithelial barrier, and corrected dysbiosis in a murine model of 5-fluorouracil-induced mucositis, in addition to reducing inflammatory cytokine levels [69].
Other studies, such as the work of Han et al. (2023) [70], examined the use of polyphenol-rich melon peel extract and whey fermented with Lentilactobacillus kefiri (DH5) in mice. These interventions resulted in the attenuation of muscle atrophy, improved myotube morphology, and the modulation of the gut microbiota. The observed benefits were attributed to an increase in butyrate-producing microorganisms, reinforcing the importance of this SCFA in muscle health.
Moreover, bacteriocins produced by certain LAB strains inhibit intestinal pathogens, contributing to microbiota equilibrium and enhancing nutrient absorption important for muscle metabolism, while exopolysaccharides (EPSs) exert immunomodulatory effects, reducing systemic inflammation linked to sarcopenia and supporting muscle function [60,71,72].
Recent studies have revealed that the therapeutic effects of postbiotics are not limited to isolated mechanisms, but also involve synergistic interactions that enhance their efficacy (Figure 4). For instance, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as butyrate, acetate, and propionate, not only exert anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities, but also interact with intracellular signaling pathways. Butyrate has been shown to activate the PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis, promoting muscle protein synthesis and the preservation of muscle mass [36,39]. Acetate stimulates AMPK and mitochondrial biogenesis, which supports energy metabolism and reduces muscle atrophy [36,37,38,39,61,64,67]. These SCFAs also improve intestinal barrier integrity and reduce systemic inflammation, which are key factors in muscle catabolism associated with IBD [36,37,38,39]. These synergistic effects amplify the physiological responses to postbiotic supplementation, particularly in the context of IBD-related sarcopenia, where chronic inflammation and dysbiosis impair muscle homeostasis.
Thus, these postbiotics, due to their multifaceted biological actions, represent promising therapeutic candidates for the management of sarcopenia, particularly in elderly populations or individuals with inflammatory and degenerative muscle conditions.

5. Postbiotics as Adjuvant Therapy in the Management of Muscular Complications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The management of muscular complications in IBD requires an integrated approach, combining nutritional and pharmacological therapies with emerging strategies such as postbiotic supplementation [62,73].
The integration of postbiotics with nutritional therapies can optimize the absorption and utilization of nutrients essential for muscle protein synthesis [74,75]. In the context of pharmacological treatment, postbiotics may serve as adjunctive agents, enhancing the effects of conventional therapies for IBD. The prolonged use of corticosteroids and TNF-α inhibitors, although essential for controlling inflammation, can lead to adverse effects such as insulin resistance and muscle atrophy; postbiotics may help to mitigate these effects by modulating gut inflammation and supporting metabolic balance [76]. Table 2 summarizes the main interactions between postbiotics, nutritional and pharmacological therapies, highlighting their synergistic benefits and potential limitations [77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85].
Advances in research on postbiotic administration may lead to the optimization of formulations and the development of personalized therapies, thereby increasing the effectiveness of postbiotics in addressing muscle-related complications in IBD. The combination of these strategies with nutritional and pharmacological interventions could represent a significant step forward in the therapeutic management of these patients [86,87]. Table 3 summarizes the main postbiotic administration strategies and their impacts on bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy.
Postbiotics can be incorporated into different carriers to ensure their stability and absorption. Supplements in capsules or soluble powders offer precise dosing and are often used in standardized formulations containing SCFAs, antimicrobial peptides, and bioactive polysaccharides [88]. These compounds have high bioavailability and can be formulated for controlled release, enabling sustained action throughout the gastrointestinal tract [89].
A complementary strategy involves the incorporation of postbiotics into functional foods, such as fermented yogurts, dairy drinks, and nutritional bars. In addition to facilitating patient adherence to treatment, these foods can act synergistically with other essential nutrients, such as high-quality proteins and antioxidants [90]. However, the stability of postbiotics in these products must be considered, as fluctuations in pH and temperature can compromise biological functionality [88,91].
The bioavailability of postbiotics can also be improved through technologies such as microencapsulation and the use of polymeric nanoparticles, protecting bioactive compounds against enzymatic degradation and ensuring targeted delivery to the small intestine and colon. These strategies are essential to ensure that postbiotics reach the site of action with maximum efficacy [86,92].
Furthermore, attention should be paid to the dose when applying postbiotics. Defining the ideal dosage still requires more robust clinical studies, but preliminary evidence suggests that concentrations between 108 and 1011 CFU/mL (or their metabolic equivalents) may be effective in reducing inflammation and supporting muscle mass maintenance in patients with IBD [92]. Therefore, tailoring treatment based on the individual intestinal microbiota profile represents a promising future direction to maximize the therapeutic potential of postbiotics [87,89].

6. Challenges and Limitations in the Use of Postbiotics for Muscular Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The use of postbiotics for the management of muscular complications in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) is emerging due to their promising pharmacotherapeutic potential. In particular, postbiotics have shown potential in mitigating sarcopenia—a frequent and debilitating complication in IBD patients—by modulating inflammation and supporting muscle metabolism. However, limitations must be considered and challenges must be overcome for their safe and effective use [63].
During the LAB (lactic acid bacteria) selection process for postbiotic production, it is necessary to analyze and consider factors that alter the chemical composition of postbiotics, as these factors can affect their behavior and decrease the growth rate. The specificity of lactic bacteria is widely reported in the literature, with emphasis on the production of organic acids regardless of genus, but considering the specific strain used—an important consideration when tailoring postbiotics for muscle health in IBD patients [93].
Another important factor is the technology used in the microbial inactivation process. Recent studies have shown that different thermal treatments (air drying, spray drying, freeze-drying) directly and significantly impact the viability, availability, and immunomodulatory properties of postbiotics. Thus, heat-based processing may reduce their therapeutic potential, especially when targeting complex conditions like sarcopenia in IBD [94]. On the other hand, emerging non-thermal technologies—such as ionizing radiation, electric field treatment, magnetic field heating, and ultrasonication—have demonstrated promise in preserving functional compounds while improving stability and bioavailability [95].
Another critical challenge is the high degree of individual variability among IBD patients, including differences in gut microbiota composition, genetic predispositions, age, and nutritional status—all of which influence muscle health and responses to postbiotic therapy [96]. Furthermore, IBD itself disrupts gut homeostasis and absorption, reinforcing the need for personalized therapeutic strategies that ensure the selection of functional bacterial strains and effective delivery methods tailored to muscle recovery [14].
The interaction between administered postbiotics and the existing human microbiome can also result in unexpected outcomes, such as metabolite inactivation, toxicity, or dysbiosis, potentially compromising therapeutic goals like inflammation control and muscle preservation. Moreover, manipulating specific metabolites in the gut may disrupt homeostasis and impair endogenous synthesis. These concerns highlight the importance of identifying specific bioactive compounds produced by native LAB strains and assessing their compatibility with supplemented postbiotics before therapeutic application [97].
Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to analyze in vitro and in vivo results to establish a relationship with the unique characteristics of the human intestine, especially the colon. Through these clinical studies and biochemical evaluations, more precise mechanisms by which postbiotics support muscle recovery in IBD can be elucidated [98].
Regulatory clarity is another challenge. The US Food and Drug Administration has not specifically addressed postbiotics and will most likely evaluate them according to the category under which a product falls. The product’s safety and efficacy must meet all standards for medical and pharmacotherapeutic use [14]. The European Medicines Agency [99], for instance, only approved bacterial lysates for the prevention of recurrent respiratory infections, not for other uses, including IBD-related conditions—highlighting the current regulatory limitations as regards expanding the application of postbiotics to sarcopenia in IBD.
Further research is considered essential to establish the relationship between the efficacy and prophylactic effects of postbiotics. Studies that integrate multiple methodological perspectives, such as large-scale clinical trials, double-blind, longitudinal studies, are needed to verify the potential of postbiotics as adjuvants in muscle recovery and preservation in patients with IBD-associated sarcopenia. In addition, it is recommended to conduct research exploring strain combinations and improved formulation techniques tailored to muscle anabolism, aiming to accelerate recovery or adapt therapy to individual patient needs [12].

7. Future Perspectives on the Use of Postbiotics Derived from Lactic Acid Bacteria

Postbiotics have gained prominence due to their therapeutic potential in the treatment of several conditions, particularly in addressing muscle wasting associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In the context of IBD-associated sarcopenia, chronic inflammation and gut dysbiosis play a critical role in accelerating muscle catabolism, highlighting the need for targeted interventions. With the postbiotics market expected to reach $91.7 billion by 2030, there is growing interest in developing formulations specifically aimed at modulating the gut–muscle axis in IBD patients. Advances such as microencapsulation and genetic engineering have the potential to improve the stability and efficacy of these compounds, enhancing their targeted delivery to sites of intestinal inflammation and maximizing therapeutic effects in muscle preservation [100,101].
Postbiotics can act as key modulators of the intestinal microbiome and inflammatory responses, both of which are closely linked to sarcopenia in IBD. This therapeutic strategy offers promise for mitigating muscle catabolism driven by dysbiosis and systemic inflammation [8]. Regarding sarcopenia, targeted postbiotic interventions, including supplementation with SCFAs and fermented foods rich in bioactive metabolites, have shown the capacity to improve muscle health in IBD patients. Intestinal microbiome modulation through probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics can positively impact essential metabolic processes, such as protein metabolism and mitochondrial function, helping to counteract the catabolic effects of inflammation and promote muscle mass maintenance or gain [102]. This innovative approach not only offers an alternative to conventional treatment, but represents a promising path toward individualized therapy and precision medicine for patients suffering from both IBD and sarcopenia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.B.T.B. and L.K.W.; writing—original draft, E.B.T.B., K.d.O.S., M.E.F.M., L.B.d.O., F.P.d.M., A.C.I., L.F.C. and L.K.W.; writing—review & editing, L.K.W.; supervision, L.K.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AMPKAdenosine Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase
EPSExopolysaccharide
IBDInflammatory bowel disease
IL-1βInterleukin 1 beta
IL-10Interleukin 10
IL-6Interleukin 6
LABLactic acid bacteria
mTORMammalian Target of Rapamycin
ROSReactive oxygen species
SCFAsShort-chain fatty acids
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor

References

  1. Ashton, J.J.; Beattie, R.M. Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Recent Developments. Arch. Dis. Child. 2024, 109, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Singh, N.; Bernstein, C.N. Environmental Risk Factors for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2022, 10, 1047–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saez, A.; Herrero-Fernandez, B.; Gomez-Bris, R.; Sánchez-Martinez, H.; Gonzalez-Granado, J.M. Pathophysiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Innate Immune System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nishikawa, H.; Nakamura, S.; Miyazaki, T.; Kakimoto, K.; Fukunishi, S.; Asai, A.; Nishiguchi, S.; Higuchi, K. Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Sarcopenia: Its Mechanism and Clinical Importance. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Oli, A.K.; Maidur, R.N.; Hurkadli, P.S.; Javalgi, A.P.; Javaregowda, P.K.; Goni, M. Incidence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Single Centre Retrospective Study. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2022, 59, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fatani, H.; Olaru, A.; Stevenson, R.; Alharazi, W.; Jafer, A.; Atherton, P.; Brook, M.; Moran, G. Systematic Review of Sarcopenia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clin. Nutr. 2023, 42, 1276–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Massironi, S.; Viganò, C.; Palermo, A.; Pirola, L.; Mulinacci, G.; Allocca, M.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Danese, S. Inflammation and Malnutrition in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 8, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mendes, J.; Simões, C.D.; Martins, J.O.; Sousa, A.S. Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Sarcopenia: A Focus on Muscle Strength—Narrative Review. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2023, 60, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tie, Y.; Huang, Y.; Chen, R.; Li, L.; Chen, M.; Zhang, S. Current Insights on the Roles of Gut Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Extra-Intestinal Manifestations: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Targets. Gut Microbes 2023, 15, 2265028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martyniak, A.; Medyńska-Przęczek, A.; Wędrychowicz, A.; Skoczeń, S.; Tomasik, P.J. Prebiotics, Probiotics, Synbiotics, Paraprobiotics and Postbiotic Compounds in IBD. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al-Habsi, N.; Al-Khalili, M.; Haque, S.A.; Elias, M.; Olqi, N.A.; Al Uraimi, T. Health Benefits of Prebiotics, Probiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics. Nutrients 2024, 16, 3955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Om, H.; Chand, U.; Kushawaha, P.K. Postbiotics: An Alternative and Innovative Intervention for the Therapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 279, 127550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Prajapati, N.; Patel, J.; Singh, S.; Yadav, V.K.; Joshi, C.; Patani, A.; Prajapati, D.; Sahoo, D.K.; Patel, A. Postbiotic Production: Harnessing the Power of Microbial Metabolites for Health Applications. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1306192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Thorakkattu, P.; Khanashyam, A.C.; Shah, K.; Babu, K.S.; Mundanat, A.S.; Deliephan, A.; Deokar, G.S.; Santivarangkna, C.; Nirmal, N.P. Postbiotics: Current Trends in Food and Pharmaceutical Industry. Foods 2022, 11, 3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gervasoni, L.F.; Gervasoni, K.; de Oliveira Silva, K.; Ferraz Mendes, M.E.; Maddela, N.R.; Prasad, R.; Winkelstroter, L.K. Postbiotics in Active Food Packaging: The Contribution of Cellulose Nanocomposites. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2023, 36, 101280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Andresen, V.; Gschossmann, J.; Layer, P. Heat-Inactivated Bifidobacterium Bifidum MIMBb75 (SYN-HI-001) in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Żółkiewicz, J.; Marzec, A.; Ruszczyński, M.; Feleszko, W. Postbiotics—A Step Beyond Pre- and Probiotics. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Favero, C.; Giordano, L.; Mihaila, S.M.; Masereeuw, R.; Ortiz, A.; Sanchez-Niño, M.D. Postbiotics and Kidney Disease. Toxins 2022, 14, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ying, Z.-H.; Mao, C.-L.; Xie, W.; Yu, C.-H. Postbiotics in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Emerging Mechanisms and Intervention Perspectives. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1290015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kvakova, M.; Kamlarova, A.; Stofilova, J.; Benetinova, V.; Bertkova, I. Probiotics and Postbiotics in Colorectal Cancer: Prevention and Complementary Therapy. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 28, 3370–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gurunathan, S.; Thangaraj, P.; Kim, J.-H. Postbiotics: Functional Food Materials and Therapeutic Agents for Cancer, Diabetes, and Inflammatory Diseases. Foods 2024, 13, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Głowacka, P.; Oszajca, K.; Pudlarz, A.; Szemraj, J.; Witusik-Perkowska, M. Postbiotics as Molecules Targeting Cellular Events of Aging Brain—The Role in Pathogenesis, Prophylaxis and Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Du, X.; Rodriguez, J.; Wee, J. Dietary Postbiotics Reduce Cytotoxicity and Inflammation Induced by Crystalline Silica in an In Vitro RAW 264.7 Macrophage Model. Foods 2022, 11, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, M.; Ren, Y.; Guo, X.; Ye, Y.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Z.; Yu, K. Postbiotics from Lactobacillus Delbrueckii Alleviate Intestinal Inflammation by Promoting the Expansion of Intestinal Stem Cells in S. Typhimurium-Induced Mice. Foods 2024, 13, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Di Chiano, M.; Rocchetti, M.T.; Spano, G.; Russo, P.; Allegretta, C.; Milior, G.; Gadaleta, R.M.; Sallustio, F.; Pontrelli, P.; Gesualdo, L.; et al. Lactobacilli Cell-Free Supernatants Modulate Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Human Microglia via NRF2-SOD1 Signaling. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2024, 44, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Scott, E.; De Paepe, K.; Van de Wiele, T. Postbiotics and Their Health Modulatory Biomolecules. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mishra, B.; Mishra, A.K.; Mohanta, Y.K.; Yadavalli, R.; Agrawal, D.C.; Reddy, H.P.; Gorrepati, R.; Reddy, C.N.; Mandal, S.K.; Shamim, M.Z.; et al. Postbiotics: The New Horizons of Microbial Functional Bioactive Compounds in Food Preservation and Security. Food Prod. Process. Nutr. 2024, 6, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alameri, F.; Tarique, M.; Osaili, T.; Obaid, R.; Abdalla, A.; Masad, R.; Al-Sbiei, A.; Fernandez-Cabezudo, M.; Liu, S.-Q.; Al-Ramadi, B.; et al. Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Fresh Vegetable Products: Potential Probiotic and Postbiotic Characteristics Including Immunomodulatory Effects. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Allouche, R.; Hafeez, Z.; Dary-Mourot, A.; Genay, M.; Miclo, L. Streptococcus Thermophilus: A Source of Postbiotics Displaying Anti-Inflammatory Effects in THP 1 Macrophages. Molecules 2024, 29, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tarique, M.; Ali, A.H.; Kizhakkayil, J.; Liu, S.-Q.; Oz, F.; Dertli, E.; Kamal-Eldin, A.; Ayyash, M. Exopolysaccharides from Enterococcus faecium and Streptococcus thermophilus: Bioactivities, Gut Microbiome Effects, and Fermented Milk Rheology. Food Chem. X 2023, 21, 101073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Han, Y.; Zhou, Z. Modelling Growth and Bacteriocin Production by Pediococcus Acidilactici PA003 as a Function of Temperature and pH Value. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 166, 1388–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fugaban, J.I.I.; Vazquez Bucheli, J.E.; Park, Y.J.; Suh, D.H.; Jung, E.S.; Franco, B.D.G.d.M.; Ivanova, I.V.; Holzapfel, W.H.; Todorov, S.D. Antimicrobial Properties of Pediococcus Acidilactici and Pediococcus Pentosaceus Isolated from Silage. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 311–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mathur, H.; Beresford, T.P.; Cotter, P.D. Health Benefits of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) Fermentates. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Leeuwendaal, N.K.; Stanton, C.; O’Toole, P.W.; Beresford, T.P. Fermented Foods, Health and the Gut Microbiome. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Harper, A.R.; Dobson, R.C.J.; Morris, V.K.; Moggré, G.-J. Fermentation of Plant-Based Dairy Alternatives by Lactic Acid Bacteria. Microb. Biotechnol. 2022, 15, 1404–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Parada Venegas, D.; De la Fuente, M.K.; Landskron, G.; González, M.J.; Quera, R.; Dijkstra, G.; Harmsen, H.J.M.; Faber, K.N.; Hermoso, M.A. Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)-Mediated Gut Epithelial and Immune Regulation and Its Relevance for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ma, L.; Tu, H.; Chen, T. Postbiotics in Human Health: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, F.-C.; Huang, S.-C. The Combined Beneficial Effects of Postbiotic Butyrate on Active Vitamin D3-Orchestrated Innate Immunity to Salmonella Colitis. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pesce, M.; Seguella, L.; Del Re, A.; Lu, J.; Palenca, I.; Corpetti, C.; Rurgo, S.; Sanseverino, W.; Sarnelli, G.; Esposito, G. Next-Generation Probiotics for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, X.; Qi, W.; Hong, T.; Xiong, T.; Gong, D.; Xie, M.; Nie, S. Exopolysaccharides from Lactobacillus Plantarum NCU116 Regulate Intestinal Barrier Function via STAT3 Signaling Pathway. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9719–9727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sigala-Robles, R.; Santiago-López, L.; Hernández-Mendoza, A.; Vallejo-Cordoba, B.; Mata-Haro, V.; Wall-Medrano, A.; González-Córdova, A.F. Peptides, Exopolysaccharides, and Short-Chain Fatty Acids from Fermented Milk and Perspectives on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2022, 67, 4654–4665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yadav, R.S. Multifunctional Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Feng, T.; and Wang, J. Oxidative Stress Tolerance and Antioxidant Capacity of Lactic Acid Bacteria as Probiotic: A Systematic Review. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1801944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Łepecka, A.; Szymański, P.; Okoń, A.; Zielińska, D. Antioxidant Activity of Environmental Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains Isolated from Organic Raw Fermented Meat Products. LWT 2023, 174, 114440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mani-López, E.; Arrioja-Bretón, D.; López-Malo, A. The Impacts of Antimicrobial and Antifungal Activity of Cell-Free Supernatants from Lactic Acid Bacteria in Vitro and Foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 604–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mokoena, M.P. Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Bacteriocins: Classification, Biosynthesis and Applications against Uropathogens: A Mini-Review. Molecules 2017, 22, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jomova, K.; Alomar, S.Y.; Alwasel, S.H.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Several Lines of Antioxidant Defense against Oxidative Stress: Antioxidant Enzymes, Nanomaterials with Multiple Enzyme-Mimicking Activities, and Low-Molecular-Weight Antioxidants. Arch. Toxicol. 2024, 98, 1323–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Teame, T.; Wang, A.; Xie, M.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Ding, Q.; Gao, C.; Olsen, R.E.; Ran, C.; Zhou, Z. Paraprobiotics and Postbiotics of Probiotic Lactobacilli, Their Positive Effects on the Host and Action Mechanisms: A Review. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 570344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Calvillo, Á.; Pellicer, T.; Carnicer, M.; Planas, A. Bioprocess Strategies for Vitamin B12 Production by Microbial Fermentation and Its Market Applications. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pérez-Alvarado, O.; Zepeda-Hernández, A.; Garcia-Amezquita, L.E.; Requena, T.; Vinderola, G.; García-Cayuela, T. Role of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Yeasts in Sourdough Fermentation during Breadmaking: Evaluation of Postbiotic-like Components and Health Benefits. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 969460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. D’ambrosio, S.; Dabous, A.; Sadiq, S.; Casillo, A.; Schiraldi, C.; Cassese, E.; Bedini, E.; Corsaro, M.M.; Cimini, D. Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis HN019 Live Probiotics and Postbiotics: Production Strategies and Bioactivity Evaluation for Potential Therapeutic Properties. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 12, 1379574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bustos, A.Y.; Taranto, M.P.; Gerez, C.L.; Agriopoulou, S.; Smaoui, S.; Varzakas, T.; Enshasy, H.A.E. Recent Advances in the Understanding of Stress Resistance Mechanisms in Probiotics: Relevance for the Design of Functional Food Systems. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2025, 17, 138–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jin, Y.; Xu, X.; Huang, K.; Liang, Z. Pre-Administration of Saccharomyces Boulardii-Derived Postbiotics Effectively Prevents Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis in Mice. Foods 2025, 14, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Aguilar-Toalá, J.E.; Garcia-Varela, R.; Garcia, H.S.; Mata-Haro, V.; González-Córdova, A.F.; Vallejo-Cordoba, B.; Hernández-Mendoza, A. Postbiotics: An Evolving Term within the Functional Foods Field. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 75, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pizzoferrato, M.; de Sire, R.; Ingravalle, F.; Mentella, M.C.; Petito, V.; Martone, A.M.; Landi, F.; Miggiano, G.A.D.; Mele, M.C.; Lopetuso, L.R.; et al. Characterization of Sarcopenia in an IBD Population Attending an Italian Gastroenterology Tertiary Center. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Steell, L.; Gray, S.R.; Russell, R.K.; MacDonald, J.; Seenan, J.P.; Wong, S.C.; Gaya, D.R. Pathogenesis of Musculoskeletal Deficits in Children and Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moschen, A.R.; Kaser, A.; Enrich, B.; Ludwiczek, O.; Gabriel, M.; Obrist, P.; Wolf, A.M.; Tilg, H. The RANKL/OPG System Is Activated in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Relates to the State of Bone Loss. Gut 2005, 54, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guan, Y.; Hao, Y.; Guan, Y.; Bu, H.; Wang, H. Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Blood Markers in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. J. Nutr. 2022, 61, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Martínez-Arnau, F.M.; Fonfría-Vivas, R.; Buigues, C.; Castillo, Y.; Molina, P.; Hoogland, A.J.; van Doesburg, F.; Pruimboom, L.; Fernández-Garrido, J.; Cauli, O. Effects of Leucine Administration in Sarcopenia: A Randomized and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Nutrients 2020, 12, 932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liang, B.; Xing, D. The Current and Future Perspectives of Postbiotics. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2023, 15, 1626–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, M.; Lu, Y.; Xue, G.; Han, L.; Jia, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liu, P.; Yang, C.; Zhou, Y. Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Host Physiology. Anim. Models Exp. Med. 2024, 7, 641–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rolland, Y.; Ticinesi, A.; Sokol, H.; Barreto, P.D.S. Therapeutic Perspectives of Pre-, pro-, Post-Biotics in the Treatment of Sarcopenia. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2024, 28, 100298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jeong, Y.-J.; Kim, J.-H.; Jung, Y.-J.; Kwak, M.-S.; Sung, M.-H.; Imm, J.-Y. KL-Biome (Postbiotic Formulation of Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum KM2) Improves Dexamethasone-Induced Muscle Atrophy in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. van der Hee, B.; Wells, J.M. Microbial Regulation of Host Physiology by Short-Chain Fatty Acids. Trends Microbiol. 2021, 29, 700–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Prokopidis, K.; Chambers, E.; Ni Lochlainn, M.; Witard, O.C. Mechanisms Linking the Gut-Muscle Axis With Muscle Protein Metabolism and Anabolic Resistance: Implications for Older Adults at Risk of Sarcopenia. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 770455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lee, M.-C.; Ho, C.-S.; Hsu, Y.-J.; Huang, C.-C. Live and Heat-Killed Probiotic Lactobacillus Paracasei PS23 Accelerated the Improvement and Recovery of Strength and Damage Biomarkers after Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zeng, Z.; Fei, L.; Yang, J.; Zuo, J.; Huang, Z.; Li, H. MiR-27a-3p Targets GLP1R to Regulate Differentiation, Autophagy, and Release of Inflammatory Factors in Pre-Osteoblasts via the AMPK Signaling Pathway. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 783352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bednarska, O.; Biskou, O.; Israelsen, H.; Winberg, M.E.; Walter, S.; Keita, Å.V. A Postbiotic Fermented Oat Gruel May Have a Beneficial Effect on the Colonic Mucosal Barrier in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1004084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Freitas, A.D.S.; Barroso, F.A.L.; Campos, G.M.; Américo, M.F.; Viegas, R.C.D.S.; Gomes, G.C.; Vital, K.D.; Fernandes, S.O.A.; Carvalho, R.D.d.O.; Jardin, J.; et al. Exploring the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Postbiotic Proteins from Lactobacillus Delbrueckii CIDCA 133 on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Model. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 134216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Han, S.; Seo, K.-H.; Gyu Lee, H.; Kim, H. Effect of Cucumis melo L. Peel Extract Supplemented Postbiotics on Reprograming Gut Microbiota and Sarcopenia in Hindlimb-Immobilized Mice. Food Res. Int. 2023, 173, 113476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lin, D.; Rezaei, M.J. Plant Polysaccharides and Antioxidant Benefits for Exercise Performance and Gut Health: From Molecular Pathways to Clinic. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2025, 480, 2827–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Shin, J.S.; Kim, H.J.; Chae, J.; Ku, B.-H.; Lim, J.-M.; Kim, Y.-S.; Choi, J.-S. Preventing Effects of Exopolymers Purified from Aureobasidium Pullulans (EAP) Supplementation and Resistance Exercise on Muscle Aging and Loss in the Korean Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 2021, 13, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kang, C.-H.; Jung, E.-S.; Jung, S.-J.; Han, Y.-H.; Chae, S.-W.; Jeong, D.Y.; Kim, B.-C.; Lee, S.-O.; Yoon, S.-J. Pasteurized Akkermansia Muciniphila HB05 (HB05P) Improves Muscle Strength and Function: A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Nutrients 2024, 16, 4037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Conte, M.; Nigro, F.; Porpora, M.; Bellomo, C.; Furone, F.; Budelli, A.L.; Nigro, R.; Barone, M.V.; Nanayakkara, M. Gliadin Peptide P31-43 Induces mTOR/NFkβ Activation and Reduces Autophagy: The Role of Lactobacillus Paracasei CBA L74 Postbiotc. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rocha, R.; de J Santos, G.; Santana, G. Influence of Nutritional Status in the Postoperative Period of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 12, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Avci, G.A.; Yilmaz, Ü.İ.; Avci, E. Efficacy of Probiotics, Paraprobiotics, and Postbiotics in Colorectal Cancer Cell Line and Their Role in Immune Response. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2024, 70, e20240226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, C.; Dong, N.; Wu, B.; Mo, Z.; Xie, J.; Lu, Q. Dihydroberberine, an Isoquinoline Alkaloid, Exhibits Protective Effect against Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice. Phytomedicine 2021, 90, 153631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Olsen, W.; Liang, N.; Dallas, D.C. Macrophage-Immunomodulatory Actions of Bovine Whey Protein Isolate, Glycomacropeptide, and Their In Vitro and In Vivo Digests. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ferreiro, B.; Llopis-Salinero, S.; Lardies, B.; Granados-Colomina, C.; Milà-Villarroel, R. Clinical and Nutritional Impact of a Semi-Elemental Hydrolyzed Whey Protein Diet in Patients with Active Crohn’s Disease: A Prospective Observational Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kim, M.; Eo, H.; Lim, J.G.; Lim, H.; Lim, Y. Can Low-Dose of Dietary Vitamin E Supplementation Reduce Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and Oxidative Stress? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Maioli, T.U.; Trindade, L.M.; Souza, A.; Torres, L.; Andrade, M.E.R.; Cardoso, V.N.; Generoso, S.V. Non-Pharmacologic Strategies for the Management of Intestinal Inflammation. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 145, 112414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Mao, Q.; Pan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Hong, Y.; Huang, Z.; Li, Y.; Feng, X.; Fang, Y.; et al. GelNB Molecular Coating as a Biophysical Barrier to Isolate Intestinal Irritating Metabolites and Regulate Intestinal Microbial Homeostasis in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 19, 251–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Meng, D.; Sommella, E.; Salviati, E.; Campiglia, P.; Ganguli, K.; Djebali, K.; Zhu, W.; Walker, W.A. Indole-3-Lactic Acid, a Metabolite of Tryptophan, Secreted by Bifidobacterium longum Subspecies Infantis Is Anti-Inflammatory in the Immature Intestine. Pediatr. Res. 2020, 88, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, M.; Han, X.; Sun, L.; Liu, X.; Zhang, W.; Hao, J. Indole-3-Acetic Acid Alleviates DSS-Induced Colitis by Promoting the Production of R-Equol from Bifidobacterium pseudolongum. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2329147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Del Chierico, F.; Masi, L.; Petito, V.; Baldelli, V.; Puca, P.; Benvenuto, R.; Fidaleo, M.; Palucci, I.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Caristo, M.E.; et al. Solute Transporter OCTN1/Slc22a4 Affects Disease Severity and Response to Infliximab in Experimental Colitis: Role of Gut Microbiota and Immune Modulation. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2024, 30, 2259–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Díez-Sainz, E.; Lorente-Cebrián, S.; Aranaz, P.; Riezu-Boj, J.I.; Martínez, J.A.; Milagro, F.I. Potential Mechanisms Linking Food-Derived MicroRNAs, Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Barrier Functions in the Context of Nutrition and Human Health. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 586564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Xingrong, L.; Gorish, B.M.T.; Qaria, M.A.; Hussain, A.; Abdelmula, W.I.Y.; Zhu, D. Unlocking Ectoine’s Postbiotic Therapeutic Promise: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Directions. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Dong, B.; Calik, A.; Blue, C.E.C.; Dalloul, R.A. Impact of Early Postbiotic Supplementation on Broilers’ Responses to Subclinical Necrotic Enteritis. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103, 104420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Qureshi, W.; Dar, M.A.; Rather, M.Y. New Therapy for Metabolic Syndrome: Gut Microbiome Supplementation. World J. Diabetes 2024, 15, 1833–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rahimi, A.; Qaisar, S.A.; Janeh, T.; Karimpour, H.; Darbandi, M.; Moludi, J. Clinical Trial of the Effects of Postbiotic Supplementation on Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with CVA. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 24021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ríus, A.G.; Kaufman, J.D.; Li, M.M.; Hanigan, M.D.; Ipharraguerre, I.R. Physiological Responses of Holstein Calves to Heat Stress and Dietary Supplementation with a Postbiotic from Aspergillus Oryzae. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Ansari, S.R.; Mahajan, J.; Teleki, A. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Treatment and Diagnosis of Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 16, e1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Moradi, M.; Molaei, R.; Guimarães, J.T. A Review on Preparation and Chemical Analysis of Postbiotics from Lactic Acid Bacteria. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2021, 143, 109722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Salminen, S.; Collado, M.C.; Endo, A.; Hill, C.; Lebeer, S.; Quigley, E.M.M.; Sanders, M.E.; Shamir, R.; Swann, J.R.; Szajewska, H.; et al. The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) Consensus Statement on the Definition and Scope of Postbiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 649–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Charoux, C.M.G.; Free, L.; Hinds, L.M.; Vijayaraghavan, R.K.; Daniels, S.; O’Donnell, C.P.; Tiwari, B.K. Effect of Non-Thermal Plasma Technology on Microbial Inactivation and Total Phenolic Content of a Model Liquid Food System and Black Pepper Grains. LWT 2020, 118, 108716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ji, J.; Jin, W.; Liu, S.-J.; Jiao, Z.; Li, X. Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Postbiotics in Health and Disease. MedComm 2023, 4, e420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Song, D.; Wang, X.; Ma, Y.; Liu, N.-N.; Wang, H. Beneficial Insights into Postbiotics against Colorectal Cancer. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1111872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, C. Modulation of Gut Microbiota and Immune System by Probiotics, Pre-Biotics, and Post-Biotics. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 634897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bacterial Lysates-Containing Medicinal Products Indicated for Respiratory Conditions—Referral|European Medicines Agency (EMA). Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/referrals/bacterial-lysates-containing-medicinal-products-indicated-respiratory-conditions (accessed on 30 May 2025).
  100. Jäger, R.; Mohr, A.E.; Carpenter, K.C.; Kerksick, C.M.; Purpura, M.; Moussa, A.; Townsend, J.R.; Lamprecht, M.; West, N.P.; Black, K.; et al. International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2019, 16, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Piqué, N.; Berlanga, M.; Miñana-Galbis, D. Health Benefits of Heat-Killed (Tyndallized) Probiotics: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, C.; Cheung, W.-H.; Li, J.; Chow, S.K.-H.; Yu, J.; Wong, S.H.; Ip, M.; Sung, J.J.Y.; Wong, R.M.Y. Understanding the Gut Microbiota and Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2021, 12, 1393–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Comprehensive overview of postbiotic production.
Figure 1. Comprehensive overview of postbiotic production.
Fermentation 11 00362 g001
Figure 2. Relationship between inflammatory bowel disease and sarcopenia.
Figure 2. Relationship between inflammatory bowel disease and sarcopenia.
Fermentation 11 00362 g002
Figure 3. The effect of postbiotics on managing muscle complications associated with inflammatory bowel disease.
Figure 3. The effect of postbiotics on managing muscle complications associated with inflammatory bowel disease.
Fermentation 11 00362 g003
Figure 4. Postbiotic mechanisms and synergistic interactions.
Figure 4. Postbiotic mechanisms and synergistic interactions.
Fermentation 11 00362 g004
Table 1. Characterization of main postbiotics generated from lactic acid bacteria fermentation.
Table 1. Characterization of main postbiotics generated from lactic acid bacteria fermentation.
CategoryBiometaboliteMechanism ProprietiesFunctionalityReferences
Short chain fatty acids Butyrate
Acetate
Propionate
Histone inhibition and activation of G-protein-coupled surface receptorsAnti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-microbial, anti-catabolicIntestinal barrier maintenance, muscle restoration, protection against pathogens[36,37,38,39].
CarbohydratesExopolysaccharidesStimulation of dendritic cells and macrophages, neutralization of reactive oxygen species and activation of STAT3Anti-inflammatory and antioxidantImmune response modulation, oxidative stress reduction and barrier restoration[17,26,40,41].
EnzymesGlutathione peroxidase
Superoxide dismutase
NADH peroxidase
Dismutation and removal of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide radicalsAntioxidantOxidative stress reduction[14,42,47].
Organic acidsLactic acid
Propionic acid
3-phenyllactic acid
pH reduction AntimicrobialProtection against pathogens[15,45].
ProteinsS-Layer
Bacteriocins
Inhibition of adhesion and formation of pores in the membrane of microorganismsAntimicrobialProtection against pathogens[15,26,46,48].
VitaminsVitamin B
Vitamin K
Enzymatic cofactorsMaintains homeostasisCellular maintenance[15,49].
Biosurfactants-Inhibition of adhesion of microorganismsAntimicrobialProtection against pathogens and inhibition of biofilm formation[15].
Table 2. Interaction between postbiotic, nutritional, and pharmacological therapies in inflammatory bowel disease.
Table 2. Interaction between postbiotic, nutritional, and pharmacological therapies in inflammatory bowel disease.
Therapeutic ComponentObjectiveExampleSynergistic BenefitsPotential Adverse Effects/LimitationsReferences
Biotic therapyPostbioticsReduction in inflammation and mitochondrial improvementShort-chain fatty acids, exopolysaccharides, bacterial peptidoglycansReduced inflammation, improved cellular functionIndividual responses vary, need for standardization[70,80].
Nutritional therapiesProtein dietStimulation of protein synthesisLeucine, whey proteinMuscle mass recovery and maintenance Risk of renal overload in patients with renal failure[78,79].
Omega-3 and antioxidantsOxidative stress reduction and inflammationSupplementation with omega-3, vitamin EReduced muscle damage and chronic inflammationPossible interactions with anticoagulants[80,81].
Biotic therapyAnti-inflammatoriesControl of intestinal inflammationMesalazine, corticosteroidsReduced intestinal inflammatory activityAdverse effects such as osteoporosis and insulin resistance[82,83].
ImmunosuppressantsModulation of the immune responseAzathioprine, infliximabPrevention of inflammatory flare-ups and muscle protectionIncreased risk of infections and systemic adverse effects[77,84,85].
Table 3. Postbiotic administration strategies and their impacts on bioavailability.
Table 3. Postbiotic administration strategies and their impacts on bioavailability.
Form of AdministrationExample of PostbioticAdvantagesChallengesBioavailabilityReferences
Food supplementsShort-chain fatty acids, bioactive peptidesPrecise dosage control, convenienceNeed for standardization of the ideal doseMedium, depends on formulation and intestinal absorption[79,80].
Functional foodsPostbiotics enriched in yogurts, fermented beveragesGood consumer acceptance, easy daily consumptionThere may be degradation of bioactive compoundsVariable, influenced by digestive processes[79,81,82].
Nutritional formulasMixture of metabolites derived from Lactobacillus and BifidobacteriumIndicated for patients with eating difficultiesHigh cost and lower adherence in healthy individualsHigh, due to formulation optimized for absorption[77,79].
NanotechnologyNanoencapsulation of postbioticsIncreases bioavailability and protection of compoundsTechnology still under development, high costVery high, protection against gastric degradation[77,83].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bueno, E.B.T.; Silva, K.d.O.; Mendes, M.E.F.; de Oliveira, L.B.; Menezes, F.P.d.; Imperador, A.C.; Correia, L.F.; Winkelstroter, L.K. Postbiotics Derived from Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation: Therapeutic Potential in the Treatment of Muscular Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Fermentation 2025, 11, 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070362

AMA Style

Bueno EBT, Silva KdO, Mendes MEF, de Oliveira LB, Menezes FPd, Imperador AC, Correia LF, Winkelstroter LK. Postbiotics Derived from Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation: Therapeutic Potential in the Treatment of Muscular Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Fermentation. 2025; 11(7):362. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070362

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bueno, Emili Bruna Toso, Kimberlly de Oliveira Silva, Maria Eduarda Ferraz Mendes, Lívia Batista de Oliveira, Felipe Prado de Menezes, Anna Cardoso Imperador, Lucimeire Fernandes Correia, and Lizziane Kretli Winkelstroter. 2025. "Postbiotics Derived from Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation: Therapeutic Potential in the Treatment of Muscular Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease" Fermentation 11, no. 7: 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070362

APA Style

Bueno, E. B. T., Silva, K. d. O., Mendes, M. E. F., de Oliveira, L. B., Menezes, F. P. d., Imperador, A. C., Correia, L. F., & Winkelstroter, L. K. (2025). Postbiotics Derived from Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation: Therapeutic Potential in the Treatment of Muscular Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Fermentation, 11(7), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070362

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop