Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant Capacity, Phenolic and Organoleptic Profiles of Beers Maturated with Bilberries
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of the Effect of Different Microbial Agents on the Decomposition of Rice Straw
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimization of Pectinase Production from Silkworm Excrement Using Aspergillus niger

1
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sericulture Ecology and Applied Intelligent Technology, School of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hechi University, Hechi 546300, China
2
Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Sericulture and Silk, Hechi 546300, China
3
Guangxi Colleges Universities Key Laboratory of Exploitation and Utilization of Microbial and Botanical Resources, Hechi 546300, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2025, 11(6), 333; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11060333
Submission received: 3 May 2025 / Revised: 29 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 June 2025 / Published: 10 June 2025

Abstract

Silkworm excrement, a byproduct of the sericulture industry, is rich in organic compounds and presents a sustainable substrate for enzyme production. This study investigates the potential of silkworm excrement as a substrate for pectinase production using Aspergillus niger submerged fermentation. Single-factor experiments and a Box–Behnken Design (BBD) were employed to identify and optimize the key medium components and their interactions. Results indicated that the optimal concentrations for maximum pectinase activity were CaCl2 at 0.437 g/L, orange peel powder at 4.223 g/L, (NH4)2SO4 at 15.761 g/L, and bran at 33.590 g/L. The optimized conditions achieved a pectinase activity of 20.505 U/mL, validating the robustness of the RSM model. This approach not only maximizes enzyme activity but also presents a sustainable and cost-effective method for utilizing a byproduct in the sericulture industry, aligning with principles of circular economy and waste minimization.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The sericulture industry, an ancient and enduring sector, remains a vital part of the global economy. Currently, nearly 40 countries and regions engage in sericulture, with the majority of production concentrated in Asia, particularly in China, India, Japan, and Brazil. China stands out as the world’s largest producer of cocoons and raw silk, accounting for over 80% of the global output. A byproduct of this industry, silkworm excrement—also known as silkworm castings or frass—presents both opportunities and challenges. Annually, significant quantities of silkworm excrement are generated during the rearing process. For instance, producing one ton of cocoons typically yields 3.3 tons of silkworm excrement [1]. As the largest sericulture producer, China raises approximately 15 million silkworm eggs per year, generating around 4.5 million tons of silkworm excrement. This byproduct is often underutilized and discarded, posing environmental challenges such as soil and water pollution [2].
Silkworm excrement is a rich source of nutrients and active ingredients, including proteins, cellulose, pectin, and essential minerals like calcium, phosphorus, copper, iron, zinc, and manganese. These characteristics make it a valuable resource for agricultural applications. Recent research has explored innovative ways to utilize silkworm excrement effectively, including composting for organic fertilizer production, vermicomposting with earthworms to enhance nutrient availability, and as a substrate for enzyme production through microbial fermentation processes [3]. In agriculture, silkworm excrement is widely used as an organic fertilizer due to its high content of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, which improve soil fertility and promote plant growth [4]. It also serves as a substrate for earthworm cultivation, enhancing the production of vermicompost that enriches soil with beneficial microorganism [3]. Additionally, silkworm excrement is being explored for its potential in ecological restoration, particularly in remediating heavy metal-contaminated soils by immobilizing metals and supporting vegetation growth [5]. Research is also ongoing to optimize the composting process of silkworm excrement by isolating and using cellulose-degrading bacteria, which can improve the efficiency of its decomposition and utilization [6]. In recent years, the production of biological enzymes using silkworm excrement through microbial fermentation has gained attention. For instance, He et al. confirmed the feasibility of microbial fermentation of silkworm excrement to produce pectinase using Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus acanthus [7,8].
Pectinase holds significant industrial value, particularly in juice clarification and wine production, where it enhances yield and stability (Zion Market Research, 2023) [9]. However, the high cost of conventional substrates for enzyme production limits its scalability. This study addresses this gap by utilizing silkworm excrement—a nutrient-rich, low-cost byproduct—to produce pectinase via Aspergillus niger, aligning with circular economy principles.
Over the past decades, statistical experimental methods have been widely applied to optimize industrial processes. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) has been particularly effective in optimizing the production of enzymes, such as pectinases, cellulolytic enzymes, and xylanase [10,11,12]. Box–Behnken Design (BBD) is an experimental design method within RSM that optimizes response variables by exploring the interactions among three or more continuous factors. Aspergillus niger, an important industrial microorganism known for its strong enzyme secretion capacity, is capable of producing a variety of enzymes, including amylase, acid protease, cellulase, pectinase, and glucose oxidase. It has been recognized as food-grade due to its safety and efficacy [13,14]. To date, no study has optimized silkworm excrement-based fermentation using RSM, nor has any work reported the isolation of Aspergillus niger strains directly adapted to this substrate. Herein, we present the first systematic investigation of pectinase production from silkworm excrement using submerged fermentation with Aspergillus niger. A native strain (JA026) isolated from silkworm excrement was employed to leverage substrate-specific adaptability. Single-factor experiments identified critical parameters (e.g., CaCl2, orange peel powder), followed by RSM-BBD optimization to model interactions and maximize enzyme activity. This dual approach not only addresses a critical gap in waste valorization but also establishes a novel framework for sustainable enzyme production aligned with circular economy principles.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganism and Substrate

Aspergillus niger JA026 (Zenodo database: 15325017) was isolated from silkworm excrement collected from Hechi, Guangxi Province, China.
Silkworm excrement comes from a sericulture farm of Hechi, Guangxi Province, China. The raw silkworm excrement was subjected to a thorough cleaning process to eliminate impurities, primarily residual mulberry leaves and other foreign materials that could potentially interfere with the fermentation process or provide a substrate for the growth of unwanted microorganisms. Following the removal of these impurities, the material was dried in a controlled environment at 60 °C for a duration of 3 h. Once dried, the silkworm excrement was mechanically crushed using a specialized crusher to achieve a uniform particle size. The crushed material was then passed through a 40-mesh sieve to obtain a consistent texture. In addition to the physical pre-treatment, the silkworm excrement was comprehensively characterized to determine its nutritional composition. Through a series of laboratory analyses conducted as part of this study, it was found to contain 15.7% crude protein, 3.4% crude fat, 19.3% crude fiber, and 7.6% pectin. These analyses were performed using well-established methodologies, including Kjeldahl nitrogen analysis for the determination of protein content, Soxhlet extraction for fat content, and gravimetric procedures for fiber and pectin content.

2.2. Medium and Fermentation Conditions

The basal fermentation medium consisted of the following (g/L): silkworm excrement 60, bran 35, orange peel powder 5, (NH4)2SO4 1, K2HPO4 1. The initial pH of the fermentation medium was adjusted to 5.0.
Submerged fermentation was conducted in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of medium, inoculated with 2 mL spore suspension (1 × 108 spores/mL) and incubated at 30 °C for 3 days at 150 rpm.

2.3. Experimental Design

2.3.1. Single-Factor Experiments

To evaluate the impact of various medium components on pectinase production during fermentation, single-factor experiments were conducted. The specific parameters and their levels were designed as outlined in Table 1. Each experiment was performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility and statistical significance. Statistical analyses, including one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests, were performed to determine the significance of inter-group differences and identify specific variations among dosage levels.

2.3.2. Box–Behnken Design

Following the single-factor experiments, a BBD was employed to further optimize the fermentation conditions. This design utilizes RSM to evaluate the effects of multiple variables and their interactions on the response. The concentrations of the medium components were set at three levels: low (−1), center (0), and high (+1). The software for BBD was Design-Expert 12.0.3. The experimental design, including the symbolic codes, names, and actual levels of the variables, is detailed in Table 2.
A total of 29 experimental runs were conducted, with each run performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility. The average pectinase activity was recorded as the response variable. The BBD was implemented using Design-Expert 12 to analyze the data and determine the optimal conditions for pectinase production.

2.4. Pectinase Assay

Following fermentation, the culture medium was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C to separate the biomass from the supernatant. The resulting filtrate was utilized for the enzyme assay.
The pectinase activity was determined using the DNS method as described in [15]. The reaction mixture was prepared by adding 1.5 mL of 0.5% (w/v) pectin, dissolved in 0.2 mol/L sodium phosphate–citric acid buffer (pH 5.0), to 1.0 mL of appropriately diluted crude enzyme solution. The mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 30 min to allow the enzymatic reaction to proceed. After the incubation period, 3.0 mL of DNS reagent (1% 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid, 20% potassium sodium tartrate, 1% NaOH, 0.2% phenol, and 0.05% Na2SO3) was added to the reaction mixture to stop the reaction. The tubes were then boiled for 10 min to stabilize the color development. Once cooled to room temperature, the volume of the mixture was adjusted to 25 mL with distilled water, and the optical density was measured at 540 nm. A standard curve of D-galacturonic acid was prepared to quantify the amount of galacturonic acid released. One unit of pectinase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 µmol of galacturonic acid per minute under the specified assay conditions. All enzyme activity values are presented as the mean of triplicate measurements.

3. Results

3.1. Single-Factor Analysis of Pectinase Production

To investigate the influence of various medium components on pectinase production during fermentation, a series of single-factor experiments were conducted. The results are summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1a shows the effect of Calcium chloride (CaCl2) concentration on pectinase activity. Pectinase activity increased with increasing CaCl2 concentration, reaching a maximum of 16.25 U/mL at 0.4 g/L. Further increases in CaCl2 concentration led to a decline in enzyme activity, indicating an optimal concentration for pectinase production. Figure 1b illustrates the impact of orange peel powder concentration on pectinase activity. Enzyme activity peaked at 9.48 U/mL with the addition of 5 g/L of orange peel powder. Higher concentrations of orange peel powder resulted in decreased enzyme activity, suggesting that excessive amounts may inhibit pectinase production. Figure 1c presents the effect of Ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4) concentration on pectinase activity. Enzyme activity increased with the addition of (NH4)2SO4, reaching a maximum of 14.87 U/mL at 15 g/L. Beyond this concentration, enzyme activity declined, indicating that optimal pectinase production is sensitive to (NH4)2SO4 levels. Figure 1d illustrates the effect of bran concentration on pectinase production. The highest enzyme activity (8.2 U/mL) was achieved at a bran concentration of 32.5 g/L. This finding underscores the importance of maintaining an optimal balance between carbon and nitrogen sources for maximizing pectinase yield.
Statistical analysis of the results of the single-factor experiments showed that all single-factor experiments demonstrated statistically significant inter-group differences (p < 0.01) (Table S1).

3.2. Optimization of Medium Components for Pectinase Production by Box–Behnken Design

The BBD was employed to optimize the concentrations of key medium components (CaCl2, orange peel powder, (NH4)2SO4, and bran) and to evaluate their interactions on pectinase activity. The experimental design and responses for the 29 experimental runs are detailed in Table 3. The highest pectinase activity, ranging from 20.22 to 20.86 U/mL, was achieved at the central levels of all four components (Table 3: Runs 5, 10, 19, 24, and 25).
A second-order polynomial equation was fitted to the data to describe the relationship between pectinase activity and the four variables:
Y = 20.48 + 0.4050A − 0.4317B − 0.0908C + 0.2242D − 1.09AB − 0.5150AC + 0.0000AD − 0.3400BC − 1.44BD + 1.47CD − 2.04A2 − 1.69B2 − 1.93C2 − 1.16D2
where Y represents pectinase activity (U/mL), and A, B, C, and D are the coded variables for CaCl2, orange peel powder, (NH4)2SO4, and bran, respectively.
The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for the BBD is presented in Table 4. The model’s Predicted R2 value of 0.9772 closely aligns with the observed R2 value of 0.9925, indicating a strong agreement between the predicted and observed values. This high correlation confirms the model’s accuracy in describing the relationship between the independent variables and pectinase production. The model’s F-value of 132.90 and a p-value of <0.0001 indicate that the model is highly significant. The terms A, B, AB, BD, CD, A2, B2, C2, and D2 were highly significant (p < 0.0001), while D, AC, and BC were significant (p < 0.05). The terms C and AD were not significant.
The normal probability plot of the residuals (Figure 2) shows that the residuals are approximately normally distributed, supporting the assumption of normality. The straight-line relationship in the plot indicates that the error terms are normally distributed, validating the model’s assumptions.
The optimal concentrations of medium components for achieving maximal pectinase activity were determined using response surface and contour plots, as depicted in Figure 3a–f. These plots elucidate the interactions among the experimental variables—CaCl2, orange peel powder, (NH4)2SO4, and bran—and their collective influence on pectinase activity. The three-dimensional (3D) surface plots exhibit a distinct peak, signifying the optimal conditions for pectinase production.
Figure 3a demonstrates that pectinase activity is significantly influenced by the concentrations of CaCl2 and orange peel powder. The peak enzyme activity was observed within an intermediate range for both components: CaCl2 concentrations between 0.4 and 0.5 g/L and orange peel powder concentrations between 4 and 6 g/L. This finding suggests that an optimal balance of these medium components is essential for maximizing pectinase yield.
Figure 3b illustrates the interaction between CaCl2 (factor A) and (NH4)2SO4 (factor C) and its effect on pectinase activity. The 3D surface plot delineates the complex relationship between these two variables and their combined impact on enzyme production. The plot indicates that pectinase activity is modulated by the interaction between CaCl2 and (NH4)2SO4, with optimal production occurring within specific concentration ranges for both factors. Notably, the highest enzyme activity was observed when CaCl2 was between 0.4 g/L and 0.5 g/L and (NH4)2SO4 was between 12.5 g/L and 17.5 g/L, suggesting a synergistic effect between these two components that significantly enhances pectinase activity.
Figure 3c presents the impact of CaCl2 (factor A) and bran (factor D) on pectinase activity. The circular shape of the 3D response surface in Figure 3c indicates significant decreases in pectinase activity at both lower and higher concentrations of CaCl2 and bran. The plot reveals that optimal pectinase production occurs within a specific concentration range for both components, specifically when CaCl2 concentration is between 0.4 g/L and 0.5 g/L and bran concentration ranges from 31.25 g/L to 33.75 g/L, highlighting a narrow optimal range for these components that significantly influences pectinase production.
Figure 3d illustrates the significant influence of orange peel powder (factor B) and (NH4)2SO4 (factor C) on pectinase production. The plot demonstrates that pectinase production is notably affected when both orange peel powder and (NH4)2SO4 are present at their lower concentrations. The maximum pectinase activity was recorded within an intermediate concentration range for both components, orange peel powder between 4 and 6 g/L and (NH4)2SO4 between 12.5 and 17.5 g/L, indicating that an optimal balance of these two components is essential for achieving peak enzyme yields.
Figure 3e provides a detailed examination of the interaction between orange peel powder (factor B) and bran (factor D) on pectinase production. The plot indicates that pectinase activity significantly diminishes at both lower concentrations of orange peel powder and bran but peaks when both components are present at intermediate concentrations. Specifically, the maximum pectinase activity was observed at orange peel powder concentrations ranging from 4 to 6 g/L and bran concentrations ranging from 32.5 to 33.75 g/L, suggesting that an optimal balance of these two components is crucial for achieving the highest enzyme yields.
Figure 3f presents the impact of (NH4)2SO4 and bran concentrations on pectinase production. The plot reveals a pronounced effect on pectinase production when both (NH4)2SO4 and bran are present at lower levels. The maximum pectinase activity was recorded at intermediate concentrations of (NH4)2SO4 (12.5–17.5 g/L) and bran (31.25–33.75 g/L), suggesting that an optimal balance between these two substrates is critical for achieving peak enzyme yields.

3.3. Validation of the RSM Model

The RSM model was validated to ensure the reliability of the optimized conditions for pectinase production. The optimized conditions suggested by the RSM model for pectinase production were CaCl2 at 0.437 g/L, orange peel powder at 4.223 g/L, (NH4)2SO4 at 15.761 g/L, and bran at 33.590 g/L. To verify these predictions, a validation experiment was conducted under the optimized conditions. The experimentally observed pectinase activity was 20.505 U/mL, which closely approximated the predicted response of 20.645 U/mL. This close agreement between the predicted and actual values confirms the robustness of the RSM model. The optimized conditions demonstrated that the response values were indeed close to the model predictions, effectively validating the strategy used for enzyme production optimization. The R-squared (R2) values, which are commonly accepted metrics for assessing the fit of statistical models, indicated a high degree of correlation between the observed and predicted responses. These reasonable R2 values describe the actual behavior of the statistical system, affirming its applicability for interpolation within the experimental domain.

4. Discussion

The present study successfully utilized silkworm excrement as a substrate for pectinase production using Aspergillus niger through submerged fermentation. The optimization of the fermentation medium components and conditions was achieved using single-factor experiments combined with RSM. This approach not only maximized pectinase activity but also demonstrated the potential of this byproduct for sustainable enzyme production and waste management in the sericulture industry.

4.1. Optimization of Fermentation Medium Components

In this study, silkworm excrement served as the primary substrate for pectinase production via fermentation. Previous experiments investigated how varying concentrations of silkworm excrement influenced pectinase yield. Enzyme activity reached its maximum at 60 g/L. Lower concentrations provided inadequate nutrients, limiting enzyme production, while higher concentrations caused clumping, hindering microbial access and maintaining low enzyme activity. Based on these prior findings, we set the silkworm excrement concentration at 60 g/L for subsequent experiments. The optimization study then concentrated on refining other medium components to enhance enzyme output, while keeping silkworm manure as the main substrate. The single-factor experiments indicated that the supplementation of CaCl2, orange peel powder, and (NH4)2SO4 had positive effects on pectinase production, while an excessive amount of these components led to a decline in enzyme activity. These findings are consistent with previous studies showing that certain mineral elements and organic acids can enhance microbial enzyme production. Calcium ions are crucial for maintaining cell membrane integrity and stabilizing enzyme structures, thereby improving their activity. This is supported by a study by Ketipally et al. (2018) [16], which demonstrated that calcium ions can enhance enzyme activity by interacting with specific amino acid residues in the enzyme structure. Similarly, organic acids, such as those found in orange peel powder, act as carbon sources and chelate metal ions, promoting enzyme synthesis. AbdRahman NH et al. (2024) reported that organic acids can provide essential carbon sources for microbial growth and enzyme production, and they can also chelate metal ions, which are often required as cofactors for enzyme activity [17]. Additionally, (NH4)2SO4 has been found to improve enzyme production by providing a nitrogen source and stabilizing the enzyme structure [16,18].

4.2. Interaction Analysis and Model Validation

The RSM analysis further confirmed the significant impact of the interaction between different medium components on pectinase production. The regression model generated from the BBD provided a clear relationship between the four variables (CaCl2, orange peel powder, (NH4)2SO4, and bran) and pectinase activity. While Factor C [(NH4)2SO4] and the AD interaction exhibited non-significant main effects, their retention aligns with the hierarchy principle of RSM, ensuring model completeness and interpretability. The significant quadratic term for (NH4)2SO4 (C2, p < 0.0001) underscores its nonlinear impact on enzyme activity, reflecting substrate inhibition at elevated concentrations. Non-significant terms (e.g., AD) were retained to maintain model structure, as their exclusion did not enhance predictive power but risked omitting potential mechanistic insights.
The optimal concentrations identified by the model were CaCl2 at 0.437 g/L, orange peel powder at 4.223 g/L, (NH4)2SO4 at 15.761 g/L, and bran at 33.590 g/L. These results highlight the importance of balancing the nutrient composition of the medium to achieve maximum enzyme production. The optimization of medium components is crucial for enhancing enzyme production, as it ensures that all necessary nutrients are available in optimal quantities to support microbial growth and enzyme synthesis. These findings are consistent with previous studies that have demonstrated the importance of optimizing medium components for enzyme production. For instance, a study by Ketipally and Ram (2018) showed that the optimization of medium components, including CaCl2 and (NH4)2SO4, significantly improved the production of pectinase [16]. Similarly, de Alencar Guimarães et al. (2023) reported that the addition of organic acids, such as those found in orange peel powder, enhanced the production of pectinolytic enzymes [19]. Additionally, Abd-Elhalem et al. (2015) highlighted the role of bran as a carbon source in optimizing enzyme production [20]. The RSM analysis and BBD model provided valuable insights into the optimal concentrations of medium components for maximum pectinase production. These results underscore the necessity of a balanced nutrient composition in the medium to achieve high enzyme yields, which is essential for industrial applications.
The validation experiment showed that the predicted pectinase activity of 20.645 U/mL closely matched the experimentally observed value of 20.505 U/mL, confirming the robustness and accuracy of the RSM model. This validation step is crucial as it ensures that the optimized conditions can be reliably applied in industrial-scale processes [21]. The validation of the RSM model is particularly important in industrial applications because it ensures that the optimized conditions are reproducible and reliable. This step helps in minimizing the risk of process failure and ensures consistent enzyme production, which is critical for commercial applications. The successful validation of the model in this study suggests that the optimized conditions can be effectively translated to larger-scale production, potentially leading to significant cost savings and improved process efficiency.

4.3. Practical Applications and Environmental Sustainability

In terms of practical applications, the use of silkworm excrement as a substrate offers several advantages. It provides a cost-effective and readily available source of nutrients for microbial growth, reducing the need for synthetic media components. Additionally, the utilization of this waste product minimizes environmental pollution associated with its disposal, aligning with the principles of circular economy and sustainable development. In the broader context of pectinase research, a comparison of our study with previous work using Aspergillus niger via submerged fermentation reveals both similarities and unique aspects. Li et al. (2020) induced fermentation with soybean shells, achieving pectinase activity of 6.36 U/mL [22], while Wagh et al. (2022) reported 99.21 U/mL after optimization using agricultural waste orange peel [23]. Esawy et al. (2022) achieved 40 U/mL under optimized conditions using a citrus pectin-based medium [24]. These studies, like ours, highlight the significant potential of Aspergillus niger for pectinase production. However, our study differs in several key ways. First, we utilized silkworm excrement as the substrate, a novel and underutilized resource. Second, our research not only focused on enzyme production optimization but also emphasized its potential application in waste management systems. These unique aspects provide new insights into the sustainable production of pectinase and its practical applications. By converting a waste material into a valuable resource, this approach not only reduces production costs but also promotes environmental sustainability, making it an attractive option for industrial-scale enzyme production [25].
The global pectinase market, valued at $41.2 billion in 2022, is driven by demand in food processing and biofuels [9]. Our method not only reduces reliance on expensive synthetic media but also offers a sustainable alternative for industries seeking cost-effective enzyme production. The use of agricultural and industrial byproducts as substrates for microbial fermentation has gained significant attention in recent years. These byproducts are often rich in organic matter and can serve as excellent carbon and nitrogen sources for microbial growth, thereby reducing the reliance on expensive synthetic media [26,27].
For instance, studies have shown that various agricultural residues, such as orange peel, banana peel, and wheat bran, can be effectively used for the production of enzymes like cellulase, pectinase, and amylase [28,29,30]. Similarly, silkworm excrement, which is rich in organic compounds, can provide essential nutrients for microbial fermentation, enhancing the production of target enzymes. Moreover, the utilization of silkworm excrement addresses environmental concerns related to its disposal. The accumulation of untreated waste can lead to soil and water pollution, contributing to environmental degradation [31]. By repurposing this waste as a substrate for enzyme production, we can significantly reduce the environmental impact associated with its disposal. This approach aligns with the principles of the circular economy, which emphasizes the importance of minimizing waste and maximizing resource efficiency. Sustainable development goals, particularly those related to environmental protection and economic growth, can be achieved through such innovative practices.

5. Conclusions

This study validates silkworm excrement as a sustainable substrate for pectinase production via Aspergillus niger submerged fermentation, achieving 20.5 U/mL activity under optimized conditions—a 26% enhancement over baseline performance. Key innovations include the isolation of the silkworm-adapted strain JA026 and pioneering RSM-BBD modeling of critical component interactions (e.g., CaCl2/orange peel synergy). However, challenges remain regarding industrial translation: scale-up from 250 mL flasks to industrial bioreactors requires validation of oxygen transfer dynamics; seasonal variability in excrement composition may impact process reproducibility; and economic viability hinges on cost-effective sourcing of orange peel powder (4.223 g/L). Further, downstream processing requirements and integrated optimization of physical parameters were not explored. Nevertheless, by addressing sericulture waste valorization and industrial enzyme demand, this work establishes a scalable circular bioeconomy framework with transformative potential for food processing and bioremediation sectors, aligning economic viability with environmental sustainability pending resolution of these constraints.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation11060333/s1, Table S1: Statistical analysis of the results of the single-factor experiments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.L. and F.Q.; methodology, F.L.; validation, C.T. and H.L.; formal analysis, F.L. and C.T.; investigation, C.T. and H.L.; resources, F.Q.; data curation, F.L.; writing—original draft preparation, F.L.; writing—review and editing, F.L. and F.Q.; project administration, F.L.; funding acquisition, F.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 2023GXNSFBA026142, and the High-level Talents Scientific Research startup Fund of Hechi University, grant number 2021GCC019. The APC was funded by the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China and High-level Talents Scientific Research startup Fund of Hechi University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, J.; Bian, P.; Huang, H.; Zhong, K.; Huang, D.; Nong, X.; Mao, J.; Zhang, C. The mechanism of silkworm excrement organic fertilizer to reduce the Cd availability in paddy soil. Soil Sediment Contam. 2022, 31, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shen, X.; He, J.; Zhang, N.; Li, Y.; Lei, X.; Sun, C.; Muhammad, A.; Shao, Y. Assessing the quality and eco-beneficial microbes in the use of silkworm excrement compost. Waste Manag. 2024, 183, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Qian, F.; Lu, F.; Yang, L.; Li, T. Cultivation of earthworms and analysis of associated bacterial communities during earthworms’ growth using two types of agricultural wastes. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2024, 11, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shi, S.; Yang, J.; Lin, M.; Chen, Q.; Wang, B.; Zhao, J.; Rensing, C.; Liu, H.; Fan, Z.; Feng, R. Using silkworm excrement to restore vegetation and soil ecology in heavily contaminated mining soils by multiple metal (loid)s: A recyclable sericultural measure. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 459, 132184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fan, W.; Kong, Q.; Chen, Y.; Lu, F.; Wang, S.; Zhao, A. Safe utilization and remediation potential of the mulberry-silkworm system in heavy metal-contaminated lands: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 927, 172352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, H.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, R.; Gui, Z. Characterization of cellulose-degrading bacteria isolated from silkworm excrement and optimization of its cellulase production. Polymers 2023, 15, 4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, H.; Luo, C.; Li, F.; Lu, S.; Qin, Y. Optimization of processing conditions for the production of pectinase by fermentation of silkworm sand. China Feed 2014, 13, 22–24. [Google Scholar]
  8. He, H.; Li, F.; Tu, X.; Qin, Y. Study on the optimum condition of pectinase production by Aspergillus aculeatus with silkworm faeces fermentation. China Food Addit. 2015, 3, 92–96. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zion Market Research. Global Pectinase Market Report. Available online: https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/news/global-pectinase-market (accessed on 27 April 2023).
  10. Gonçalves, D.B.; Teixeira, J.A.; Bazzolli, D.M.S.; de Queiroz, M.V.; de Araújo, E.F. Use of response surface methodology to optimize production of pectinases by recombinant Penicillium griseoroseum T20. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2012, 1, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Garai, D.; Kumar, V. A Box–Behnken design approach for the production of xylanase by Aspergillus candidus under solid state fermentation and its application in saccharification of agro residues and Parthenium hysterophorus L. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 44, 352–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Das, A.; Paul, T.; Halder, S.K.; Jana, A.; Maity, C.; Das Mohapatra, P.K.; Pati, B.R.; Mondal, K.C. Production of cellulolytic enzymes by Aspergillus fumigatus ABK9 in wheat bran-rice straw mixed substrate and use of cocktail enzymes for deinking of waste office paper pulp. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 128, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cairns, T.C.; Nai, C.; Meyer, V. How a fungus shapes biotechnology: 100 years of Aspergillus niger research. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2018, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, X.; Pan, B.; Yu, L.; Wang, B.; Pan, L. Enhancement of protein production in Aspergillus niger by engineering the antioxidant defense metabolism. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2024, 17, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Esawy, M.A.; Gamal, A.A.; Kamel, Z.; Ismail, A.-M.S.; Abdel-Fattah, A.F. Evaluation of free and immobilized Aspergillus niger NRC1ami pectinase applicable in industrial processes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 1463–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ketipally, R.; Ram, M.R. Optimization of pectinase production by Aspergillus oryzae RR 103. Curr. Agric. Res. J. 2018, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abd Rahman, N.H.; Rahman, R.A.; Rahmat, Z.; Jaafar, N.R.; Puspaningsih, N.N.T.; Illias, R.M. Innovative biocatalyst synthesis of pectinolytic enzymes by cross-linking strategy: Potentially immobilized pectinases for the production of pectic-oligosaccharides from pectin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 256, 128260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abd-Elhalim, B.T.; Gamal, R.F.; El-Sayed, S.M.; Abu-Hussien, S.H. Optimizing alpha-amylase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on bread waste for effective industrial wastewater treatment and textile desizing through response surface methodology. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 19216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. de Alencar Guimarães, N.C.; Glienke, N.N.; Contato, A.G.; Galeano, R.M.; Marchetti, C.R.; Rosa, M.P.; de Sa Teles, J.S.; de Oliveira Simas, A.L.; Zanoelo, F.F.; Masui, D.C.; et al. Production and biochemical characterization of Aspergillus japonicus pectinase using a low-cost alternative carbon source for application in the clarification of fruit juices. Waste Biomass Valorization 2024, 15, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abd-Elhalem, B.T.; El-Sawy, M.; Gamal, R.F.; Abou-Taleb, K.A. Production of amylases from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens under submerged fermentation using some agro-industrial by-products. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2015, 60, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdel Hamid, E.M.; Mohamed, A.E.; Mohamed, A.A.; Galal, A.A.; Mekhemr, A.A.; Saleh, E.S.; Hassan, M.I.; Ahmed, M.H.; Elgendy, S.K. Optimization of corn starch/glycerol, acetic acid, and cellulose fibers ratio on biodegradable plastic synthesis by Box–Behnken design (BBD). Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2025, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Q.; Ray, C.S.; Callow, N.V.; Loman, A.A.; Islam, S.; Ju, L.-K. Aspergillus niger production of pectinase and alpha-galactosidase for enzymatic soy processing. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2020, 134, 109476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wagh, V.; Patel, H.; Patel, N.; Vamkudoth, K.R.; Ajmera, S. Pectinase production by Aspergillus niger and its applications in fruit juice clarification. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 16, 2724–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Esawy, M.A.; Gamal, A.A.; Kamel, Z. Optimization of Aspergillus niger NRC1ami pectinase using citrus peel pectin, purification, and thermodynamic characterization of the free and modified enzyme. Waste Biomass Valorization 2022, 13, 4823–4837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brodin, M.; Vallejos, M.; Opedal, M.T.; Area, M.C.; Chinga-Carrasco, G. Lignocellulosics as sustainable resources for production of bioplastics–A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 646–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shrestha, S.; Khatiwada, J.R.; Kognou, A.L.M.; Chio, C.; Qin, W. A comparative study of Cellulomonas sp. and Bacillus sp. in utilizing lignocellulosic biomass as feedstocks for enzyme production. Arch. Microbiol. 2023, 205, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Haile, S.; Ayele, A. Pectinase from microorganisms and its industrial applications. Sci. World J. 2022, 2022, 1881305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Amin, F.; Bhatti, H.N.; Bilal, M. Recent advances in the production strategies of microbial pectinases—A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Laswai, F.C.; Matofari, J.W.; Nduko, J.M. Pectinolytic enzyme production from orange processing waste using Aspergillus brasiliensis strain. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2024, 14, 25173–25186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hanif, A.; Ejaz, U.; Ansari, I.; Sohail, M.; Samma, M.K.; Siddiqi, M.; Suleman, F.; Karim, M. Potential application of Suaeda fruticosa and Cressa cretica biomass as a substrate for pectinase production by Geotrichum candidum. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2024, 49, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, H.; Xu, X.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, X.; Xin, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Gui, Z. Accelerated degradation of cellulose in silkworm excrement by the interaction of housefly larvae and cellulose-degrading bacteria. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 323, 116295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The results of single-factor experiments. The error bars shown in the figure represent standard deviations. Different letters (a/b/c/d/e) show significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments.
Figure 1. The results of single-factor experiments. The error bars shown in the figure represent standard deviations. Different letters (a/b/c/d/e) show significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments.
Fermentation 11 00333 g001
Figure 2. The normal probability plot of the residuals.
Figure 2. The normal probability plot of the residuals.
Fermentation 11 00333 g002
Figure 3. Response surface plot showing the interaction between (a) CaCl2 and orange peel powder, (b) CaCl2 and (NH4)2SO4, (c) CaCl2 and bran, (d) orange peel powder and (NH4)2SO4, (e) orange peel powder and bran, and (f) (NH4)2SO4 and bran on pectinase activity.
Figure 3. Response surface plot showing the interaction between (a) CaCl2 and orange peel powder, (b) CaCl2 and (NH4)2SO4, (c) CaCl2 and bran, (d) orange peel powder and (NH4)2SO4, (e) orange peel powder and bran, and (f) (NH4)2SO4 and bran on pectinase activity.
Fermentation 11 00333 g003
Table 1. The setting of single-factor experiments.
Table 1. The setting of single-factor experiments.
FactorAdditive Amount (g/L)
123456
Calcium chloride00.20.40.60.8-
Orange peel powder013579
Ammonium sulfate02.55101520
Bran2527.53032.535-
Table 2. Coded values of independent variables used in the Box–Behnken design.
Table 2. Coded values of independent variables used in the Box–Behnken design.
CodeVariablesLevel
−101
ACalcium chloride0.20.40.6
BOrange peel powder357
CAmmonium sulfate101520
DBran3032.535
Unit: g/L.
Table 3. Box–Behnken Design (BBD) of factors in coded levels with pectinase activity as a response.
Table 3. Box–Behnken Design (BBD) of factors in coded levels with pectinase activity as a response.
RunABCDPectinase (U/mL)
ExperimentalPredicted
1100117.9417.92
201−1016.7416.86
3−100117.1717.11
4011016.1516.00
5000020.8620.48
6101016.1516.32
7001−115.6415.61
8100−117.4317.47
9−101016.4116.54
10000020.2520.48
110−10−116.416.39
120−1−1016.9117.04
1300−1116.1516.24
140−11017.6817.54
15110015.6315.64
160−10119.7419.73
17−1−10015.6415.69
1810−1017.6917.53
19000020.2220.48
201−10018.7118.68
21−100−116.6616.66
2200−1−118.7118.74
23−10−1015.8915.69
24000020.7820.48
25000020.3020.48
26010−118.4518.42
27010116.0115.98
28001118.9719.00
29−110016.9217.01
Table 4. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for response surface quadratic model of Box–Behnken Design (BBD) for the production of pectinase.
Table 4. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for response surface quadratic model of Box–Behnken Design (BBD) for the production of pectinase.
SourceSum of SquaresDfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model79.93145.71132.90<0.0001significant
A1.9711.9745.82<0.0001
B2.2412.2452.05<0.0001
C0.099010.09902.300.1512
D0.603010.603014.040.0022
AB4.7514.75110.62<0.0001
AC1.0611.0624.700.0002
AD0.000010.00000.00001.0000
BC0.462410.462410.760.0055
BD8.3518.35194.42<0.0001
CD8.6718.67201.89<0.0001
A226.88126.88625.64<0.0001
B218.59118.59432.82<0.0001
C224.14124.14562.03<0.0001
D28.6818.68202.06<0.0001
Residual0.6014140.0430
Lack of Fit0.2142100.02140.22120.9758not significant
Pure Error0.387340.0968
Corr. Total80.5328
R2 = 0.9925, R2 (Pred) = 0.9772; df = degree of freedom; significant, p ≤ 0.05; non-significant, p > 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, F.; Tan, C.; Li, H.; Qian, F. Optimization of Pectinase Production from Silkworm Excrement Using Aspergillus niger. Fermentation 2025, 11, 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11060333

AMA Style

Lu F, Tan C, Li H, Qian F. Optimization of Pectinase Production from Silkworm Excrement Using Aspergillus niger. Fermentation. 2025; 11(6):333. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11060333

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Fuzhi, Caimei Tan, Huizhen Li, and Feng Qian. 2025. "Optimization of Pectinase Production from Silkworm Excrement Using Aspergillus niger" Fermentation 11, no. 6: 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11060333

APA Style

Lu, F., Tan, C., Li, H., & Qian, F. (2025). Optimization of Pectinase Production from Silkworm Excrement Using Aspergillus niger. Fermentation, 11(6), 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11060333

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop