Next Article in Journal
The Stool Microbiome in African Ruminants: A Comparative Metataxonomic Study Suggests Potential for Biogas Production
Previous Article in Journal
The Application of Protective Cultures in Cheese: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Study on Screening and Genetic Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains with Cadmium, Lead, and Chromium Removal Potentials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Fermentation Time and Blending Ratio on Microbial Dynamics, Nutritional Quality and Sensory Acceptability of Shameta: A Traditional Cereal-Based Fermented Porridge for Lactating Mothers in Ethiopia

1
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Shambu Campus, Wollega University, Jimma P.O. Box 38, Ethiopia
2
Department of Postharvest Management, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 307, Ethiopia
3
Department of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 378, Ethiopia
4
Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Science, Texas Tech University, P.O. Box 41270, Lubbock, TX 41270, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(3), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10030118
Submission received: 4 January 2024 / Revised: 19 January 2024 / Accepted: 19 January 2024 / Published: 21 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Fermented Food)

Abstract

:
Ethiopia has one of the highest levels of malnourished lactating mothers in sub-Saharan Africa. However, traditionally, different communities prepare foods solely for lactating mothers. For example, “Shameta” is one of the cereal-based fermented cultural foods exclusively produced for lactating mothers with the perception that it would support the health, increase the strength, and promote the recovery process of mothers after childbirth. This study investigated the effects of the fermentation time and blending ratio on the nutritional quality of “Shameta”. Three levels of blending ratio of ingredients (maize–barley–fava bean) and three levels of fermentation times were laid down in a completely randomized design (CRD). The study showed that lactic acid bacteria was the dominant group, followed by yeasts. Notably, the ingredient formulation ratio of Maize–barley–fava bean (81:5:5) had the highest LAB dominance with the highest crude fat (13.23 g/100g) content in all fermentation times (8, 10, and 12 days). However, the highest crude protein (16.56 g/100g) and mineral contents were observed in a ratio mix of 66:10:15 fermented for 12 days. The results of this study indicate that the nutritional quality of culturally prepared Shameta can be improved by optimizing the fermentation time and ingredient compositions for fast recovery, increased strength, and improved health of lactating mothers.

1. Introduction

Traditional fermentation of foods often leads to improved nutritional quality [1]. The process enables the breakdown of complex compounds and the synthesis of vitamins and other growth factors for a better diet [2]. During lactic acid fermentation, the solubility of proteins and amino acids is enhanced [3], while the concentrations of anti-nutrient factors are decreased [4]. In addition, the fermentation increases the bioavailability of mineral and trace elements by reducing the non-digestible material of plants such as glucuronic and polygalacturonic acids, cellulose, and hemicelluloses [5]. However, the nutritional quality of the final product can be affected by the ingredient composition and fermentation time [6].
Globally, about 14 million adolescent girls become lactating mothers each year, and more than 90% of them are living in the developing world [7]. As a result of limited resources, lactating mothers in developing countries are often exposed to undernutrition due to increased physiological requirements and the multiple roles played by mothers [8]. Insufficient dietary diversity, an unbalanced distribution of food within households, improper food storage and preparation, dietary taboos, and infectious diseases all contribute to undernutrition among lactating mothers [9].
Some studies carried out in different parts of Ethiopia showed that the prevalence of underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) among lactating women ranges from 20 to 40.6% [10,11]. In the country, an estimated number of 404,000 pregnant women and lactating mothers are at risk of malnutrition [7]. Another study also showed that one in every four lactating mothers in Ethiopia is undernourished [9].
To address this problem, in different parts of the country and communities in Ethiopia, several indigenous foods are exclusively produced for lactating mothers, usually following the spontaneous fermentation process. “Shameta” is one of the cereal-based fermented foods commonly produced by the Oromo community in the western part of Ethiopia. The production practices, utilization patterns, and nutrient contents are described elsewhere [12,13].
Cognizant of the significance of fermentation, lactating mothers in the western part of Ethiopia prepare and consume Shameta from the day they give birth. Unlike other staple foods, the community perceives “Shameta” as being able to provide rapid recovery and strength for the mother and increase breast milk for the newborn. Shameta is mainly prepared from maize, barley, sorghum and wheat. Vegetable oil, spices, and herbs are also added as flavor enhancers and preservatives [13]. Unlike other fermented products in the country, Shameta preparation involves a double fermentation process with intermediate cooking between two fermentation stages [13]. The process involves one week in the first fermentation phase, followed by intermediate cooking to make porridge, and is eventually subjected to 20–30 days in the second fermentation phase [13]. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effects of the blending ratio of ingredients and fermentation time to enhance the benefits of Shameta, an affordable and alternative nutrient-rich diet source for mothers. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to determine the effects of the ingredient mix ratio and fermentation time on microbial succession during fermentation and investigate the dynamics in the physicochemical properties and nutrient contents of ready-to-consume Shameta.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials

In this study, maize (Zea mays), barley (Hordeum vulgare), and fava bean (Vicia fava) were used as significant ingredients bought from the local market of Nekemte town. Other ingredients, including fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgraecum), black cumin (Nigella sativa), black cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum), and white cumin (Cuminum cyminum), were also bought from the same market. Rapeseed (Brassica napus) was also used as an oil source during Shameta preparation.

2.2. Experimental Design and Plan

The experiment was laid out in a complete factorial design consisting of two factors: the blending ratio of primary ingredients [12,13] and fermentation time [14]. Three blending ratios of maize/barley/fava bean (81:5:5, 71:10:10, and 66:10:15) and three levels of fermentation times (8, 10, and 12 days) were used based on our previous works [14].

2.3. Samples Preparation

Preparation of maize, barley, and fava bean flours: Maize grain was sorted, cleaned, and washed by immersion in cold tap water, stirred very well, and the impurities were removed by decanting. The bran of barley was removed with the help of a wooden mortar and pestle. Kernels of maize and barley were then sun-dried and milled into flour using a flour miller to a sieve size of 0.5 mm. Finally, the flour was packed and stored in moisture and airproof plastic bags at room temperature.
The fava bean was sorted and cleaned, and a hammer mill removed the seed coat. Then, after dehulling, it was milled into flour using a flour miller to a sieve size of 0.5 mm. Finally, the fava bean flour was packed in air and moisture-proof plastic bags and stored at room temperature.
Preparation of rapeseed: During the preparation of rapeseed, 1.18 kg of the seed was ground using a wooden mortar and pestle until oil was visible in the mortar. The ground rapeseed was transferred to a clay pot (6 L holding capacity) where hot water (3 L/kg) was added and covered for three days at ambient temperature to allow equilibration and incubation for maximum potential to extract the oil. After three days of incubation, 1.2 L of hot water was added to the crude to allow the separation of the oil. The oil was eventually extracted from the crude by decanting the upper layer, followed by multiple pressing and decanting the residue using cloth and a sieve. Although commercially purified oils are available on the market, pregnant mothers in the community prefer rapeseed oil extracted using traditional methods rather than commercially available oil.
Preparation of spices: Spices used in Shameta preparation such as fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) (51 g), black cumin (Nigella sativa) (25.25 g), black cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum) (26.56 g), white cumin (Cuminum cyminum) (23.67 g), and ginger (Zingiber officinale) (20.62 g) were roasted on a metal griddle, cooled to ambient temperature and ground using a spice grinding machine. Garlic bulb and basil leaves were cleaned and washed fresh without size reduction. During the second fermentation stage, bulbs of garlic and basil leaves were placed in different layers of the porridge strata (Figure 1).

2.4. Composite Flour for Shameta Preparation

The flour composition was determined considering the availability of major ingredients and with the potential to improve the nutrient content of the final product [13,14] The nutrient content considered for improvement was the proximate compositions and mineral contents.

2.5. Fermentation of Composite Ingredients

The above formulations (13.38 kg) were mixed with 18 L of tap water in a 30 L holding capacity plastic bucket to make the dough. The dough was then left to ferment for two days for the first fermentation stage, followed by cooking for 1:30 h to make the porridge. Extracted rapeseed oil and spice powders (147.1 g) were added before the porridge was fully cooked. For the second-stage fermentation, overnight cooled porridge to ambient temperature was transferred to 9 vessels (5 L capacity each). At the same time, garlic bulbs (30 bulbs) and basil leaves (12 basil branches) were placed (laid) at different strata of the porridge. Finally, the porridge was allowed to ferment for 12 days with intermittent sampling on three occasions during fermentation (on the 8th, 10th, and 12th days).
Zero-day fermentation implies that the fresh porridge was mixed with garlic bulbs and basil leaves in the vessel after overnight cooling before it was subjected to the second fermentation phase as a control sample to assess the impact of fermentation duration on the quality of Shameta. The duration of fermentation was selected based on the results of a previous report [14].

2.6. Determination of Microbial Dynamic in the Second Phase of Fermentation

Counting dominant microbial groups during fermentation followed standard microbiological methods [15]. For microbial analysis, a 10 g sample was aseptically transferred into 90 mL sterile peptone water at zero, eight, ten, and twelve days and homogenized in a flask at 100 rpm for 10 min on a shaker (Compact shaker, D-72379 Hechingen, Germany). After homogenization, 1 mL of the sample was aseptically transferred into 9 mL of pre-sterilized peptone water and mixed thoroughly using a vortex mixer. The homogenate was serially diluted up to 10−7, and 100 µL of the dilution was transferred to an agar medium and incubated at an appropriate temperature and duration to conduct the enumeration as indicated below.
Aerobic mesophilic bacteria (AMB) counts were inoculated onto plate count agar (PCA); duplicate samples were incubated at 32 °C for 48 h.
Enterobacteriaceae counts: A 100 µL aliquot from appropriate dilution was spread plated in duplicate on Violet Red Bile Glucose agar and incubated at 32 °C for 24 h, and purple/pink colored colonies surrounded by purple halos were counted as members of Enterobacteriaceae.
Total coliform counts: A 100 µL aliquot of serially diluted sample was inoculated into Trypticase soy agar (TSA) (Oxoid) after 30 min of overlay with violate red bile agar (VRBA) medium (BFCO). The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h.
Aerobic spore-forming bacteria counts (ASFB): For ASFB counts, 10 mL of appropriate dilution was heat treated in a water bath adjusted to 80 °C for 10 min and cooled rapidly under tap water. Then, a 100 µL aliquot from appropriate dilution was spread-plated on nutrient agar (NA) and incubated at 32 °C for 72 h.
Lactic acid bacteria counts: From appropriate dilutions, 100 µL aliquots were spread plated in duplicate on pre-dried surfaces of MRS (de-Mann, Rogosa, and Sharp) agar (Oxoid) plates. The plates were incubated under anaerobic conditions using an anaerobic jar (BBL, anaerobic Jar System) at 30–32 °C for 48 h [16].
Staphylococci counts: A volume of 100 µL of the aliquot from appropriate dilution was spread plated on mannitol salt agar and incubated at 32 °C for 48 h, and then yellow colonies surrounded by red color were counted as staphylococci.
Yeast and mold count: Yeast and mold were counted by inoculating a 100 µL sample on PDA (BFCO) medium supplemented with 200 mgL−1 chloramphenicol and incubated at 25 °C for five days.

2.7. Sample Preparation for Analytical Measurements

Except for moisture content determination, samples were dried at 50 °C for 24 to 30 h to reduce the moisture content and converted into flour for further analysis. The flour was then packed into moisture-proof plastic bags and stored in air-tight containers at 4 °C until analysis. All chemicals and reagents used were analytical grades.

2.8. Determination of pH and Titratable Acidity (TA.)

The pH was measured using a digital portable pH meter (pH-013, China) after homogenizing 5 g of the Shameta sample in 20 mL distilled water, followed by pipetting 10 mL of the homogenized sample into a beaker [17]. The TA of “Shameta” was determined by homogenizing 2.5 g of the sample in 10 mL of distilled water and filtering it through Whatman No. 1 filter paper [18]. In the filtrate, 3 to 5 drops of 1 g per 100 mL of phenolphthalein indicator were added, and samples were titrated with a freshly prepared 0.1 mol/L NaOH solution until a faint pink color persisted for 30 s. The TA value was determined according to the following equation, considering lactic acid as a dominant organic acid in the sample:
%   Lactic   acid   wt / v = N × V NaOH × Eq . wt × 100 Vs mL × 1000
where N = normality of titrant (mEq/mL), VNaOH = volume of titrant (mL), Eq. wt = equivalent weight of predominant acid (mg/mEq, which is 90.08 for lactic acid), Vs = volume of sample (mL), and 1000 = factor relating mg to grams.

2.9. Determination of Proximate Composition and Gross Energy

The proximate composition, i.e., crude protein, fat, fiber, ash, and moisture content, was determined according to AOAC [19]. The utilizable carbohydrate content was determined using the method described by FAO [20], and gross energy was determined using Atwater’s conversion factors [21].

2.10. Determination of Minerals Content

The contents of calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn) were determined using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (SH 90273010, China) ([22] official method N° 985.35). Lanthanum was used to compensate for ionization interferences in the analysis of Ca.

2.11. Determination of Anti-Nutritional Factors

2.11.1. Determination of Condensed Tannin Contents

Condensed tannin contents in Shameta samples were determined according to Maxson and Rooney [23]. Briefly, 10 mL of 1% HCl solution was added to methanol in a test tube with a screw cap, to which 1 g of sample was added and mixed. In order to extract the condensed tannin in the cell wall matrix, the solution was shaken for 24 h at ambient temperature on a mechanical shaker (Hy-2(C), Shanghai, China), followed by centrifugation (sigma 2-16KC, UK) at 1000 rpm for 5 min. Then, 1 mL of centrifuged supernatant was transferred to another test tube and mixed with 5 mL of vanillin-HCl reagent. For the standard preparation, the D (+)- catechin was weighed (40 mg) and dissolved in 1000 mL of 1% HCl solution in methanol to make a series of 0, 10, 25, 40, 60, and 80 μg/mL. Finally, the absorbances of samples were measured at 500 nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (JASCO V-630, Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The condensed tannin content was determined from the standard curve of catechin and expressed as mg/100g sample.

2.11.2. Determination of Phytate Contents

The phytate content was determined as described by Vaintraub and Lapteva [24]. Accordingly, about 0.5 g of sample was weighed and mixed with 10 mL of 2.4% HCl, followed by further mixing using a mechanical shaker (Hy-2(C), Shanghai, China) for one hour at ambient temperature. After the sample was centrifuged (Sigma 2-16KC, UK) at 3000 rpm for 30 min, the clear supernatant was taken for phytate determination. Three milliliters of the supernatant was mixed with one milliliter of Wade reagent and mixed thoroughly on a vortex for five seconds. The standard solution was prepared from sodium phytate in 0.2 N HCl to make a series of 0.0, 5.0, 12.0, 25.0, 40.0, and 55.0 μg/mL. One milliliter of the Wade reagent was added to each sample in test tubes and mixed thoroughly using a vortex for five seconds. The mixture was centrifuged for 10 min and measured at 500 nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (JASCO V-630, Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The phytate content was determined from the standard curve and reported in mg/100g.

2.12. Determination of Total Antioxidant Activities

The antioxidant activities of the extract were determined by the 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) assays, as described by Villano and others [25]. A measure of 1 mg of each extract was mixed with 4 mL of solution (0.004 g DPPH in 100 mL methanol) and incubated in the dark at ambient temperature for one hour. The absorbance of the mixture was then measured at 517 nm using a UV spectrophotometer (Model SP9, PyeUnican, Cambridge, UK). The concentrations for the standard calibration curve were 0.0, 6.50, 12.50, 25.00, 50.00, and 100.00 μg/mL. The concentration of total antioxidant activities was expressed in milligrams of ascorbic acid equivalent (AAE) per gram of sample from the calibration curve (R2 = 0.9973).

2.13. Sensory Evaluation

Sensory evaluations of the formulated Shameta were carried out in the East Wallaga zone, Ethiopia. Based on data from this study, two Shameta samples were selected and prepared together with two more control samples. The control samples were prepared from different ingredients based on local experiences. For the evaluation, 55 untrained panelists of lactating mothers who have experience in the preparation and consumption of Shameta were randomly selected for sensory evaluation. The selected mothers were informed of the evaluation and grading methods of the samples. The samples were coded to separate one judge from the others. Sensory attributes such as aroma, color, taste, texture, and overall acceptability were analyzed. Sensory evaluation was conducted in the morning between 10:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. A five-point hedonic scale was used as 5 = like extremely, 4 = like slightly, 3 = neither like nor dislike, 2 = dislike slightly, and 1 = dislike extremely.

2.14. Data Analysis

The microbial counts and physicochemical properties of samples were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least significant difference (LSD). The samples were statistically analyzed using SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) version 9.3, and the significance threshold was p < 0.05. Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) was used to identify significant differences among means (p < 0.05). The coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated from the standard deviations and means of the parameters and expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microbial Dynamics of Shameta Fermentation

There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in mean microbial counts (log cfu/g) among fermentation times for all formulated samples (Table 1). In the present results, the mean counts (log cfu/g) of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in MBF1 increased from 3.75 to 8.41, 8.88, and 9.41 on days 8, 10, and 12 of fermentation, respectively. However, the growth rate between the 8th, 10th, and 12th day was <2 log cfu/g. In the case of MBF2 and MBF3, the mean colony counts (log cfu/g) at the start of fermentation were 4.45 and 4.44, which later increased to 7.95 and 7.71 on the eighth day, respectively. However, colony counts were reduced on the 10th and 12th days of fermentation with a reduction rate of <2 log cfu/g. The colony counts of LAB in MBF1 samples fermented for 8, 10, and 12 days were higher than those for the fermentation of other formulations (MBF2 and MBF3) for the same days of fermentation. The highest counts in MBF1 samples might be due to the availability of more carbohydrate-rich substrates, including maize, compared to fava bean [26]. The availability of fermentable cereals and favorable conditions created during fermentation time may have affected the nature of microbial dynamics [27,28]. Nemo and Bacha [29] reported lower mean counts of LAB (6.87 log cfu/g) in Borde, whose fermentation time was shorter than that of MBF1, formulation fermented for 12 days, but the mean count was greater than that of MBF2 and MBF3. Cereal fermentation is usually characterized by a complex microbial ecosystem dominated mainly by LAB species and yeasts [30].
Members of AMB can grow in an aerobic environment under moderate temperatures as an indicator of the quality of ready-to-eat foods and help to estimate the shelf life of stored products [31]. In the present finding, the fermentation time showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in AMB count, with the lowest colony count from the MBF3 sample (3.85 log cfu/g) fermented for 12 days (Table 1). With an increase in fermentation time, the AMB count for MF3 decreased from 5.54 to 3.85 log cfu/g. The drop in count might be associated with an increase in the LAB population and acidification of the medium as the fermentation proceeds. Similar to the present results, in many cereal-based fermented food products such as Keribo, Akamu, and sourdough used for bread preparation, AMB persists until the final stage of fermentation but with relatively lower counts [32,33,34]. In addition, a more or less comparable mean AMB count (3.36 log cfu/g) was observed for Shameta samples collected from households of lactating mothers that fermented their Shameta for at least two weeks [13].
On the other hand, Enterobacteriaceae and TC showed more or less similar trends and counts during the fermentation of all formulations. At zero hours of fermentation, the mean counts of both Enterobacteriaceae and TC showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in all formulations; however, after the onset of fermentation, they showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) with mean colony counts less than 2 log cfu/g. This might be associated with an increase in the dominance of LAB with an increase in fermentation time inhibiting their growth through the production of antimicrobial compounds regardless of variation in the ingredient composition [28,35].
In addition to their role in foodborne illness, some members of the Enterobacteriaceae family are associated with food spoilage, which results in significant economic losses in the food industry [36]. Some of these microorganisms might contaminate flour and continue in the processing chain of inadequate cooking products and post-processing contamination [31,36]. In the current results, the primary source of Enterobacteriaceae in the control sample of all formulated products might be contaminants from the fermentation vessels, garlic bulbs, and basil leaves introduced as flavoring ingredients [37,38]; furthermore, the garlic bulb antimicrobial effects could be contributed to control microbial growth [39]. Coliforms are commonly used as indicators of the sanitary quality of foods and water, as some are pathogenic enteric bacteria [40,41]. Water used for washing fermentation vessels, bulbs, and basil leaves during the second fermentation round could be another source of coliforms counted from the formulations [41].
There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in mean colony counts of Staphylococcus species between the flour compositions and fermentation time (Table 1). Compared to the control samples, the counts of Staphylococcus species decreased with fermentation time at all stages. However, the reduction rate was higher in samples fermented for 12 days than for those fermented for 8 and 10 days. The colony counts of Staphylococcus species in MBF1, MBF2, and MBF3 reduced from 3.23, 3.81, and 3.22 log cfu/g in control samples (0 h fermentation) to 2.48, 2.47, and 2.13 log cfu/g at 12 days of fermentation, respectively. This implies that as the fermentation time increased, the counts of Staphylococcus decreased by about one log unit. Some Staphylococcus species are pathogenic, while others are responsible for the spoilage of foods, with coagulase-negative staphylococci playing an essential role in food fermentation [42,43,44]. Generally, in the present finding, except for the MBF2 sample that fermented for eight days, the microbial counts at all stages of fermentation for all formulations were below the borderline (3.28 log cfu/g) of Staphylococcus aureus and other coagulase-positive staphylococci in foods [45]. This implies that except for the MBF2 sample fermented for eight days of fermentation time, others could be consumed with minor treatment with spices and salt, which are typical side dishes and appetizers during Shameta consumption.
The results of this study found a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the mean counts (log cfu/g) of aerobic spore-forming bacteria (ASFB) among samples at all fermentation times for all formulated samples (Table 1), except for the fermentation time at zero hours and eight days for the MBF2 sample and fermentation time on the 8th and 10th day for the MBF3 sample. The absence of a significant difference between zero and eight days of fermentation time for the MBF2 sample might be due to the growth of the microbes with a growth rate of more than 2 log cfu/g for specific days and then reduced with a reduction rate of less than 2 log cfu/g. In this result, the highest colony count was observed in the MBF1 sample (3.42 log cfu/g) fermented for eight days, and the lowest in the MBF3 sample (2.07 log cfu/g) fermented for 12 days. This variation is due to the length of fermentation time and the inhibitory effect of secondary metabolites produced by LAB and yeasts against spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms [46]. Contrary to the present results, Anumudu and others [47] reported that ASFB could not persist until the final stage of fermentation of Ogi, cereal-based fermented porridge in Nigeria. However, in some cereal-based fermented food products, ASFB is reported to persist until the end of fermentation [48,49], although the duration of fermentation among the products differs, thus accounting for the observed variation.
The highest mean colony counts (log cfu/g) of yeast were recorded in the MBF1 sample (6.65) fermented for ten days and the lowest in the MBF3 control sample (2.22 log cfu/g). There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in counts of yeast between consecutive fermentation times (Table 1). In addition, even if there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between control samples, the yeast count of the MBF1 sample fermented for 12 days was the highest, while the counts of all formulated samples decreased as the proportion of maize decreased in the formulation. This effect might be due to the fast growth of lactic acid bacteria in carbohydrate-rich products, as lactic acid bacteria facilitate the growth of yeasts [50]. Many authors also explored the co-existence and symbiotic association between lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in spontaneously fermented foods [51,52], which was further confirmed by the presence of yeasts until the final stage of fermentation in cereal-based fermented foods such as Kirario in Kenya [53], Akamu and Ogi in Nigeria [54], and Borde in Ethiopia [55]. The role of yeasts in Shameta may be the production of flavor-enhancing and aroma-producing secondary metabolites and inhibiting the growth of mycotoxin-producing molds [56,57,58]. Nwokoro and Chukwu [34] reported that Saccharomyces spp. in pure culture did not produce ethanol from carbohydrates in maize fermentation. However, Saccharomyces rouxii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are responsible for the organoleptic properties of the same product during fermentation.
In addition to these microorganisms, mold was also detected at the initial and final stages of fermentation in MBF1 formulations. However, mold observed at the initial stage in MBF2 and MBF3 samples were not observed on days 8, 10, and 12 of fermentation time, which agrees with previous work by Kitessa and others [14]. Unlike samples prepared in the laboratory, mold was observed in all the samples collected from the households of lactating mothers, which aligns with the result of MBF1 [14]. The reduction in oxygen and production of antimicrobial compounds by lactic acid bacteria and yeasts could be main reasons for the subsequent disappearance of molds during fermentation a [34]. Likewise, molds detected at the initial stage of fermentation of maize dough during Ogi and Kenkey production were subsequently eliminated at the end of fermentation [51,52]. However, in different works, molds were detected at the initial and final stages of the fermentation of ‘Akamu’, fermented for 72 h [34], probably because of the short duration of fermentation. The occurrence of mold could not be always considered responsible for the spoilage, but there are some non-spoilage molds that could contribute to the flavor and overall digestibility of the fermented products [59].

3.2. Effect of Flour Composition and Fermentation Time on the Chemical Composition of Shameta

3.2.1. Effect of Flour Composition and Fermentation Time on pH and Titratable Acidity (TA)

The interaction effect of both factors on pH and TA are indicated in Table 2. The pH of control samples (unfermented porridge) was in the range of 5.22 to 5.26. However, with increased fermentation time, the pH decreased to values below four pH units for fava bean flour-rich samples (MBF2 and MBF3). Shameta samples collected from households of lactating mothers made from similar ingredients composition to MBF1 resulted in a pH value of 3.9 [13]. Furthermore, the pH values of MBF1 and MBF3 fermented for 12 days were in line with some Ethiopian traditional fermented foods such as Azo and Cheka, with values of 3.81 and 3.74, respectively, while the pH of MBF1 fermented for the same days was slightly lower than Borde with a value of 4.2 [60,61,62]. The result of this study shows that the pH of the controlled study was more or less the same as the pH value of traditionally processed Shameta made at the household level.
The decrease in pH value with an increase in fermentation time is expected for fermented products due to the growth and dominance of LAB and yeast to produce lactic acid and other organic acids during the fermentation [63,64,65]. A significant change in pH values for all formulations was observed in the first week of fermentation. The pH value decreased from an average of 5.24 units to 4.29 units after eight days of fermentation. From a food safety point of view, the required pH reduction below 4.5 could be achieved within the first week of fermentation. However, the products were fermented up to the 12th day to attain the required nutritional values and sensory properties.
Change in titratable acidy (TA) negatively correlated with change in pH of the fermenting foods. As indicated in Table 2, the TA increased with a decrease in pH value with fermentation time. However, the TA values observed in this study were lower than the TA value (0.82%) of the Shameta sample collected from households of lactating mothers made using the same ingredient composition (MBF1) as reported in a previous study [13]. The higher TA value associated with over-fermentation of the product could affect the sensorial property of the same product, resulting in low acceptability of the product by the product consumers. Both the pH and TA values recorded in this study and the previous work carried out on microbial dynamics during the fermentation of Shameta [14] indicate that a maximum of 12 days of fermentation of Shameta could be sufficient enough to attain the desired product maturity and safety.

3.2.2. Effect of Flour Composition and Fermentation Time on Proximate Composition

The highest moisture content value was observed in MBF1 fermented for 12 days (66.32 g/100g), while the lowest was in the MBF2 control sample (60.58 g/100g). Accordingly, all control samples (cooked porridge not fermented for the second round) have lower moisture content than porridge fermented for the second-round ‘Shameta’ (Table 3). This might be associated with the microbial breakdown of polysaccharides to simple sugar during fermentation, while there could be free water in the control samples as the large polymer polysaccharides do not bind water molecules [66,67]. Food’s moisture content levels significantly impact the aesthetic values: taste, texture, appearance, shape, and even safety of products. Accordingly, an excessive amount of water could facilitate the spoilage of food products as its excessive losses could also change the sensorial properties of foods, making the product unacceptable [68]. Regarding the moisture content, almost all of the formulated products assessed in the study were near the category of intermediate moisture foods [69] in which some of the water bound that makes the products safe for some more weeks in combination with the inhibitory effects of low pH of the products (Table 2) and essential oils in spices and herbs added during preparation (Figure 1). The moisture contents of all Shameta formulations (MBF1-3) were lower than the co-fermented Ogi made of maize soybean (67.35 g/100g) and millet soybean (67.86 g/100g). However, the values align with co-fermented Ogi made of sorghum soybean with a moisture content of 64.52 g/100g [70].
In the present study, the highest crude protein was observed in MBF3 fermented for 12 days (16.56 g/100g), followed by the same sample fermented for ten days (16.32 g/100g). However, the lowest was observed in the MBF1 control sample (12.22 g/100g), followed by the same sample fermented for eight days (12.82 g/100g). The difference might be associated with a higher proportion of fava beans than the MBF1 sample. In addition, the prolonged fermentation time could contribute to the release of bound proteins and other macromolecules. It is possible to blend cereals’ relatively poor protein quality with protein-rich food crops to achieve a nutritionally balanced diet [71]. Studies showed that the fermentation of cereals with lactic acid bacteria and yeast cultures increased the protein content of the fermented foods [72,73]. With high counts of LAB and yeast in the cereal-based fermented products, the microbial cell mass protein (commonly called single-cell protein) could also contribute to the total crude protein of the fermented product. Omemu and others [70] also indicated the incremental effect of fermentation on the crude protein content of Ogi. However, crude protein contents in the present study are different than the values in co-fermented Ogi made of maize–soybean (6.53 g/100g), millet–soybean (6.64 g/100g), and sorghum–soybean (8.44 g/100g) at a ratio of 66.67:33.33 and fermented for 48 h. Contrastively, the crude protein content (18.28 g/100g) of complimentary food made of a formulation of maize, haricot bean, and cooked banana flour at a ratio of 30:60:10 and fermented for 36 h is greater than the values in the present finding [74].
The proteins in human milk come from the diet and maternal body stores. The potential to supply the extra protein required by lactating mothers (20 g/day) among the formulations assessed in the present study is the highest in MBF3 fermented for 12 days (82.8%), followed by the same sample fermented for 10 days (81.6%). The extra protein requirement yield in the present finding is greater than the yield in Borde (48%), made of 100% maize fermented for four days, and average values of co-fermented Ogi (36.02%) made of maize–soybean, millet–soybean, and sorghum–soybean fermented for two days [54,55]. However, it was lower than complimentary food (91.4%) made of maize, haricot bean, and cooked banana flour (30:60:10) fermented for 36 h [74]. The finding revealed that to improve the extra protein requirement yield of Shameta, supplementing primary ingredients (maize and barley) with legumes such as fava bean is a necessity.
As indicated in Table 3, the flour compositions and fermentation time showed significant differences in crude fat contents. The prolonged fermentation time from the 8th to the 10th and 12th day has provided better crude fat contents. The better crude fat content in MBF1 could be due to the relatively high proportion of maize flour rich in fat content and rapeseed oil added during the preparation of Shameta (Figure 1). Studies have shown that maize is richer in fat content than fava beans [26,75]. Maize and rapeseed oil are rich in mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids with good oxidative stability [76,77,78]. Fatty acids are considered to be a fundamental building material for the structural components of cells, tissues, organs, and synthesis of specific biologically active substances, and facilitate the absorption and transport of fat-soluble vitamins [79].
In general, the crude fat content in the present finding is far greater than what was reported from other cereal-based fermented foods in Ethiopia, including Borde (6.9 g/100g) made of maize [60] and Cheka (1.3 g/100g) [62] made of maize and taro leaves (approximately in the ratio of 70:30) and fermented for four days. Therefore, Shameta is an excellent candidate to promote supplementary fermented cereal-based food rich in fat to support the strength and health of lactating mothers. In addition, the better fat content, likely rich in mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids, could contribute to better breastfeeding of newborns [80].
One of the ingredients of Shameta, barley, contains significant amounts of soluble fiber (beta-glucans), which microorganisms can ferment to produce short-chain fatty acids, an important energy source for the brain, muscles, and tissues [81,82]. In addition, the fatty acids contribute to lowering the pH to prevent the growth of pathogenic microorganisms and reduce peptide breakdown and toxin formation [83,84]. Fava bean is also a rich source of oligosaccharides, the third most abundant nutrient in breast milk behind lactose and fat, and serves as prebiotic soluble fibers for the infant’s gut, ensuring proper immune responses [85,86].
The fiber contents of different formulations assessed in the current study were significantly different (p < 0.05) from each other (Table 3). The possible reduction in crude fiber content during the fermentation process could be attributed to the partial solubilization of cellulose and hemicellulosic materials in fermentation by the activities of microbial enzymes [87]. Although the reduction in fiber content during fermentation is sound, as a high fiber content increases the viscosity of food, which reduces food intake, it plays an essential role in increasing the utilization of nitrogen and absorption of some other micronutrients [88,89]. The average fiber content of the current formulations is lower than complementary food made of maize, haricot bean, and cooking banana flour (4.21 g/100g) but significantly different than values in Cheka (1.1 g/100g), Injera (pancake-like bread made of teff) (2.8 g/100g) made of 100% teff (Eragrostis tef) fermented for 24 h and co-fermented Ogi (0.30 g/100g) [62,70,74,90].
The ash content of the present finding ranged between 3.75 and 2.45 g/100g for MBF3 and MBF1 control samples, respectively, with an average value of 3.05 g/100g. The initial ash content for the fresh porridges showed significant differences due to differences in the proportion of ingredients used to make the porridges. Porridge using a relatively higher fava bean composition (10 or 15%) showed better ash content than porridge with 5% fava bean. Variations in ash content might be associated with a higher mineral concentration in fava bean than in maize and barley flours [57,91]. However, the difference has little association with fermentation time compared to the effect of variation in ingredient composition.
The average ash content of all the different formulations is significantly different than values in a complementary food made from maize, haricot bean and cooking banana flour (2.23 g/100g), co-fermented Ogi (3.01 g/100g), Cheka (0.75 g/100g) and wheat-based Borde (0.78 g/100g), while it was lower than the maize-based Borde (3.7 g/100g) [60,62,70,74,92]. The variation could be attributed to differences in composition, preparation steps, and fermentation time. Shameta could contribute to total ash intake, translating to a better mineral supply than other commonly consumed cereal-based fermented foods like Cheka and Borde.
Most of the values of carbohydrates in the present findings were not significantly different (p > 0.05) from each other (Table 3). The highest value was observed in MBF1 fermented for eight days (69.23 g/100g) and the lowest in MBF3 fermented for 12 days (66.19 g/100g). The difference might be associated with the higher accumulation of carbohydrates in maize than in fava bean [26]. The recorded carbohydrate content is significantly different than value observed in Azo (16.6 g/100g) made of sorghum and endod (Phytolaca dodecandra) leaves (50:50) as significant ingredients fermented for 30 days, Cheka (9.6 g/100g), and co-fermented Ogi (22.26 g/100g), but lower than complementary food made of maize, haricot bean and cooking banana flour (71.16 g/100g) [61,62,70,74].
Carbohydrates are primary energy sources that comprise 55% of the total caloric intake [93]. Therefore, lactating mothers should consume at least 100g/kg/day of carbohydrates from locally available food crops [92]. The Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) of carbohydrates for lactating women is 160 g/kg/day [93]. Accordingly, MBF3 fermented for 12 days contributed 41.37% of carbohydrates. The current selected Shameta formulation (MBF3) contributes the highest carbohydrate for lactating mothers when compared to other cereal-based fermented condiments, beverages, and porridges such as Azo (10.38%), Cheka (6%), and Ogi (13.91%), while this was slightly lower than complementary food made of maize, haricot bean and cooking banana flour (44.48%) [61,62,70,74].
Most of the values of gross energy in the present finding were not significantly different (p > 0.05) from each other, with the highest value in MBF1 fermented for 12 days (446.87 Kcal/100g) and the lowest in MBF3 fermented for 8 days (425.49 Kcal/100g) (Table 3). The gross energy in the present finding is significantly different from values in a complementary food made of maize, haricot bean, and cooked banana flour (397.11 Kcal/100g) and co-fermented Ogi (218.77 Kcal/100g) [70,74]. Although the increase in energy requirements during lactation is maximal compared to protein requirements, if the energy intake is low, protein will be used for energy production rather than its primary role [94]. According to the extra energy demand for exclusive breastfeeding from birth to six months postpartum (500 kcal/day), the MBF3 fermented for 12 days provides 85.38% for lactating mothers. All gross energy values recorded in the current study are significantly different than values in Injera (76.8), Azo (18.3), and Cheka (18.8%) of the extra energy required for lactating mothers, respectively [61,62,95].

3.2.3. Effect of Flour Composition and Fermentation Time on Minerals Contents

Calcium (Ca) is one of the essential mineral elements for better recovery and strength of lactating mothers. Calcium deficiency in maternal nutrition could lead to hypertensive conditions, pregnancy disorders, lower blood pressure, and osteoporosis [96]. Results in Table 4 showed that flour formulations had a significant effect on the Ca content than the effects of fermentation time. Porridge prepared from flour composition rich in fava beans results in better Ca content (15%) than others. A relatively high Ca content was observed in MBF3 porridge fermented for 12 days (61.3 mg/100g), followed by the same formulation fermented for 10 days (60.7 mg/100g). However, the lowest Ca content was observed in the MBF1 formulation (25.8 mg/100g) because of its small proportion of fava bean flour (5%). Even if the fermentation time appears to have some effect on the Ca content, overall, the effect was not as significantly high as that of the composition of ingredients.
The results of this study are in agreement with complementary foods made of maize, haricot bean, and cooking banana flours (30:60:10) with a value of 61.43 mg/100g; however, this value is lower than the average value in co-fermented Ogi (2073.54 mg/100g) made of maize–soybean, millet–soybean, and sorghum–soybean with a cereal–soybean ratio of 66.67:33.33 and fermented for 48 h [70,74]. According to the present analysis, the highest recorded Ca content could meet only close to 6.1% of DRA of Ca for lactating mothers. However, ‘Injera’ made from 100% teff (Eragrostis tef) and fermented for 24 h, could meet 16.77% of DRA for lactating mothers [90]. Cheka, the other form of cereal-based fermented food made of maize and taro leaves (approximately 70:30) and fermented for four days, could meet only 1.47% DRA [62]. Even if there is an improvement in the Ca content by more than double as compared to the control, there is a need to have additional Ca from other sources, including the consumption of Shameta with Injera, to improve Ca contents for rapid recovery and strength of lactating mothers.
The iron (Fe) and Zinc (Zn) contents of the Shameta formulations were not significantly (p > 0.05) affected by the fermentation time (Table 4). In this study, the Fe and Zn contents improved with an increment in the proportion of fava bean flour in the mix from 5 to 15%. The highest Fe content (8.83 mg/100g) and better Zn contents were observed in MBF3 porridge fermented for 12 days (Table 4).
The Fe contents in most of the analyzed samples were different than values in complementary foods made of maize, haricot bean, and cooking banana flour (5.69 mg/100g) and Ogwo (0.34 mg 100 g−1) made of malted sorghum, un-malted sorghum and potato (54.55:27.27:18.18) fermented for 48 h; however, the contents were lower than the Fe contents of Cheka (18.3 mg 100 g−1) and Injera (15.4 mg 100 g−1) [62,90,97,98]. Iron deficiency revealed during lactation may not only be because of a lack of access to iron-rich foods. However, it could also be associated with complications related to iron status before pregnancy, hemorrhage after delivery, low-vitamin C diet, excessive consumption of tannin-rich foods, frequent pregnancies, and early pregnancy. According to this study, the Fe content in MBF3 porridge fermented for 12 days could meet close to 98% of the recommended dietary allowance of Fe for lactating mothers.
Although the demand for Zn increases during lactation is required for many biological activities, it has been reported that the amount of zinc in breast milk is independent of Zn in diet [99]. Fermented porridge produced from MBF3 samples fermented for different days could provide close to 74% of RDA of Zn for lactating mothers. These values are better than those reported from cereal-based fermented foods in Ethiopia, such as Cheka and Injera, which could provide only 7.67 and 20% of RDA, respectively [62,90]. Thus, the mineral composition of fermented products could be improved by considering the ingredients’ compositions more than monitoring the fermentation time. Therefore, further improvement in mineral content can be achieved through home or industry-based formulations for better health and recovery of the mothers and their infants.

3.2.4. Effect of Flour Composition and Fermentation Time on Anti-Nutritional Factors and Antioxidant Capacity

The adverse health effect of phytate in the diet reduces the absorption of minerals such as Zn2+, Fe2+/3+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, and Cu2+; Zn and Fe deficiencies in particular have been reported as a consequence of high phytate intake [100]. A report indicated that a high level of dietary tannin (120 mg/kg) reduces protein absorption and damages the intestinal walls [101]. This study aimed to minimize the negative impact of phytate and tannin in traditionally produced fermented porridge. Results of the study showed that both the formulation of flour to make the porridge and fermentation time have significantly different (p < 0.05) effects on the phytate and tannin contents. The concentrations decreased with a decrease in maize flour from 90% to 75% due to an increase in fava bean proportion.
Similarly, an increased fermentation time significantly reduced the phytate and tannin contents. For instance, after 12 days of fermentation, the phytate content decreased by 84, 70, and 71% compared to fresh Shameta for MBF1, MBF2, and MBF3, respectively (Table 5). Similarly, the tannin concentration decreased by 88, 78.5, and 78.5% after 12 days of fermentation for the same formulations. As expected for fermented food products, the fermentation time’s impact was significant compared to flour formulations.
The phytate content recorded in the current study is significantly lower than its content in complementary food made of maize, haricot bean, and cooking banana flour (30:60:10) (36.99 mg/100g) fermented for 36 h and Kutukutu (12.4 mg/100g) made of 100% corn fermented for 24 h, while it is greater than co-fermented Ogi (0.2 mg/100g) made of maize–soybean, millet–soybean, and sorghum–soybean with a cereal/soybean ratio of 66.67:33.33 and fermented for 48 h [70,74,102]. Consumption of dietary phytate up to 500 mg/day leads to a 0.04 mg/day reduction in zinc absorption [103], while Ndie and Okaka [104] reported that the levels of phytate between 23.5 and 130.65 mg/kg are high enough to be associated with health risk. However, the phytate contents in this study are below 1% after one week of fermentation of the product.
The tannin content recorded in this study is also lower than the content in complementary food made of maize, haricot bean, and cooking banana flour (31.32 mg/100g) but significantly different than value in co-fermented Ogi (0.13 mg/100g) [70,74]. According to Ndie and Okaka, [104], levels of tannins up to 108.3 mg/kg are high enough to be associated with health risks beyond reducing the bioavailability of nutrients. However, the tannin level for fermented porridge is significantly lower than 1% for all durations of fermentation. The observed lower value could be associated with the combined effects of first-stage fermentation, intermediate cooking, and second-stage fermentation of the product. The absence or lower value of tannin will increase the prevalence of high bioavailability of minerals and proteins, which is necessary for lactating mothers in support of their rapid recovery, strength, and health.
Consuming food products rich in phytochemicals during pregnancy and lactation is a critical component of dietary guidelines to protect mothers and infants from oxidative damage and related diseases [105]. The result showed that the MBF3 sample fermented for 12 days had a better DPPH scavenging ability with a lower IC50 value than other formulations fermented at different fermentation times. However, in all formulations, the potential for scavenging activities increased as fermentation time increased. Adebo and Gabriela Medina-Meza [106] also reported that an increase in fermentation time increased the total phenolic contents and antioxidant activities of whole cereal grains. The ability of fermentation to improve the antioxidant activity is primarily due to an increase in the number of phenolic compounds and flavonoids as a result of the structural breakdown of plant cell walls by microbial hydrolysis reaction [106,107]. Meanwhile, the variation in antioxidant activities in control samples might be due to the variation during the roasting of spices and intermediate cooking to make porridge [108,109,110]. Generally, in addition to providing protein and some minerals, the consumption of Shameta improves the health of lactating mothers and newborns by preventing oxidative stress.

3.3. Sensory Properties

Sensory characteristics are one of the most essential and influential determinants of food preferences, especially in developing new food products [111]. In the present finding, the sensory attributes and mean sensory scores of Shameta products are indicated in Table 6. The aroma of Shameta samples ranged from 4.13 to 4.42. The values showed no significant (p > 0.05) differences in aroma among the control samples and the formulated products. This might be due to added spices, herbs, and rapeseed oil during preparation [12]. Puleo and others [112] reported that the aroma of foods plays a pivotal role in the perception and liking of food products, especially in new product development. On the other hand, unlike a pleasing aroma, an offensive smell for food is one of the primordial senses to avoid potential food hazards and contributes to the evolutionary function of disgust as a disease avoidance mechanism [113,114].
Color is the most critical food-product-intrinsic sensory cue that helps consumers to predict the likely taste and flavor of foods [115]. That is why, since ancient times, adding coloring agents to foods and drinks have been considered one of the practices to enhance the acceptability of foods by consumers [115,116]. In the present study, the highest color value was scored (4.82) by the control samples due to their acceptance by the panelists associated with their experience of using Shameta for a long time (Figure 2). However, there was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in color between the two formulated samples. The preference for whitish-colored Shameta and the addition of maize for coloring purposes during barley-based Shameta preparation is reported elsewhere [12]. The present finding is in close agreement with Ogi fortified with moringa leaf powder, where the lowest color preference was recorded in formulated samples compared with control samples [117]. However, during the sensory analysis of Ogi formulated with synthetic provitamin, the formulated sample recorded the highest score compared with the control sample [118].
Many intrinsic and extrinsic factors influence taste responses to food products [119]. In the present finding, the highest taste recorded was observed in C1, followed by C2. However, no significant (p > 0.05) differences existed between the values recorded in the formulated samples. In line with the present finding, the highest taste preference was recorded in the control sample rather than in formulated Ogi samples [117]. However, the present finding is different from those in the study by Akinsola and others [118] as the highest taste preference was recorded in formulated samples compared to the control sample.
The texture of foods is derived from the structure of the food and consists of a complex set of sensory attributes important to food enjoyment and choice [120]. In addition to processing methods such as fermentation, types of ingredients affect the texture of foods [13,14]. In the present finding, the highest texture value was scored (4.55) by the C1 sample, followed by C2 with no significant (p > 0.05) difference between each other (Figure 2). However, the highest texture preference recorded in Ogi was made by adding synthetic provitamin rather than the control sample [118]. Regarding the overall acceptability, the value of C2 was not statistically significantly different from the values of F1 and F2 formulated Shameta products. The present finding agrees with the work of Abioye and Aka [117], as the general acceptability scored for the control sample is more than for formulated products. However, this finding disagrees with the report by Akinsola and others [118].

4. Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrated that crude protein and mineral contents were affected by the proportion of formulation and fermentation time of Shameta. An increment in the fava bean flour ratio from 5 to 15% significantly improved the crude protein content. The improvement in calcium content was more than double compared to the control. Iron and zinc contents also significantly improved when the traditional maize- or barley-based formulation was enriched with 15% fava bean flour. The fermentation time also played a significant role in modifying the pH of the product to a safe range (3.89–4.01) to control the growth of potentially pathogenic microorganisms. The observed rapid growth of LAB contributed to the modification of the pH of the product to control the growth of members of Enterobacteriaceae, TC, Staphylococcus spp., and ASFB. An extended fermentation time also significantly reduced the phytate and tannin contents below one percent after the first week of fermentation. In general, Shameta made with the help of LAB from a flour composition rich in fava bean (66:10:15) fermented for 10–12 days could contribute to better nutrition, recovery, and strength for lactating mothers than traditionally produced Shameta. However, improving beyond this level of nutritional quality can be achieved by developing appropriate starter cultures and optimizing other fermentation conditions such as temperature and pH.

Author Contributions

D.A.K.: conceived and designed the experiments; performed the experiments; analyzed and interpreted the data; drafted the manuscript. K.B.: conceived and designed the experiments; provided reagents and tools; supervision; reviewed the manuscript. Y.B.T. Conceived and designed the experiments; provided reagents and tools; supervision; wrote and reviewed the manuscript. M.M.: Analyzed and interpreted the data; reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partly funded by Jimma University, to purchase part of the chemicals for laboratory analysis, with no funding number.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and will be available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Jimma University for allowing us to use the laboratory facilities and partly budget support to purchase chemicals for analyses. The authors also acknowledge the panelists who participated in the sensory analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sharma, R.; Garg, P.; Kumar, P.; Bhatia, S.K.; Kulshrestha, S. Microbial Fermentation and Its Role in Quality Improvement of Fermented Foods. Fermentation 2020, 6, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kennedy, D.O. B vitamins and the brain: Mechanisms, dose, and effecacy: A review. Nutrients 2016, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rollan, G.C.; Gerez, C.L.; LeBlanc, J.G. Lactic fermentation as a strategy to improve the nutritional and functional values of pseudocereals. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Samtiya, M.; Aluko, R.E.; Dhewa, T. Plant food anti-nutritional factors and their reduction strategies: An overview. Food Prod. Process. Nutr. 2020, 2, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gupta, R.K.; Gangoliya, S.S.; Singh, N.K. Reduction of phytic acid and enhancement of bioavailable micronutrients in food grains. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 676–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Minh, N.G. Investigation of pickled water spinach (Ipomoea aquatic) fermentation by Lactobacillus sp. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Dev. 2014, 1, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  7. CARE (Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere). Emergency Nutritional Assistance; CARE International: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ahmed, W.A.M.; Ahmed, E.A.; Arafa, K.A.O.; El-Amin, E.I.S.; Alostaz, Z.M.; Khalid, K.E. Nutritional status of mothers and its determinants in Alemtidad area, Khartoum. Food Nutr. Sci. 2014, 5, 2203–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia and ORC Macro. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2005; Central Statistical Agency and ORC Macro: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Calverton, MD, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  10. Alemayehu, M.; Argaw, A.; Mariam, A.G. Factors associated with malnutrition among lactating women in subsistence farming households from Dedo and Seqa-Chekorsa Districts, Jimma Zone. Dev. Ctry. Stud. 2015, 5, 117–118. [Google Scholar]
  11. Moges, A.; Gudina, E.; Yadeta, D. Under Nutrition and Associated Factors among Adolescent Pregnant Women in Afdem District, Ethiopian Somali Region; Harmaya University: Haramaya, Ethiopia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kitessa, D.A.; Bacha, K.; Tola, Y.B.; Murimi, M. Assessment of the Preparation and Consumption of Shameta: An Indigenous Cereal-based Fermented Porridge in Ethiopia. East Afr. J. Sci. 2023, 17, 55–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kitessa, D.A.; Bacha, K.; Tola, Y.B.; Murimi, M.; Smith, E.; Gershe, S. Nutritional compositions and bioactive compounds of “Shameta”, a traditional home made fermented porridge provided exclusively to lactating mothers in the western part of Ethiopia. Heliyon 2022, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kitessa, D.A.; Bacha, K.; Tola, Y.B.; Murimi, M.; Gershe, S.; Guta, M. Microbial Quality and Growth Dynamics in Shameta: A Traditional Ethiopian Cereal-Based Fermented Porridge. Fermentation 2022, 8, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mugula, J.K.; Nnko, S.A.M.; Sorhaug, T. Changes in quality attributes during storage of togwa: A lactic acid fermented gruel. J. Food Saf. 2001, 21, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soda, M.E.; Ahmed, N.; Omran, N.; Osman, G.; Morsi, A. Isolation, identification and selection of lactic acid bacteria cultures for cheese making. Emir. J. Agric. Sci. 2003, 15, 51–71. [Google Scholar]
  17. Abegaz, K. Isolation, characterization and identification of lactic acid bacteria involved in traditional fermentation of borde: An Ethiopian cereal-based beverage. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 6, 1469–1478. [Google Scholar]
  18. Antony, U.; Chandra, T. Microbial Population and biochemical changes in fermenting finger millet (Eleusine coracana). World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 13, 533–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC, 18th ed.; AOAC: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  20. FAO. Fermented Fruits Vegetables: AGlobal Perspective; Battcock, M., Azam-Ali, S., Eds.; FAO, Agricultural Service Bulletin No. 134; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nguyen, T.T.T.; Loiseau, G.; Icard-Vernière, C.; Rochette, I.; Trèche, S.; Guyot, J.-P. Effect of fermentation by amylolytic lactic acid bacteria, in process combinations, on characteristics of rice/soybean slurries: A new method for preparing high energy density complementary foods for young children. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. AACC. Official Methods of Analysis of the AACC, 11th ed.; AACC: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  23. Maxson, E.D. Evaluation of Methods for Tannin Analysis in Sorghum Grain; American Association of Cereal Chemists: St Paul, MN, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vaintraub, I.A.; Lapteva, N.A. Colorimetric determination of phytate in unpurified extracts of seeds and the products of their processing. Anal. Biochem. 1988, 175, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Villaño, D.; Fernández-Pachón, M.S.; Moyá, M.L.; Troncoso, A.M.; García-Parrilla, M.C. Radical scavenging ability of polyphenolic compounds towards DPPH free radical. Talanta 2007, 71, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Temba, M.C. Quality Evaluation of Porridges Prepared from Maize-Groundnut Composite Flour. Master’s Thesis, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liptáková, D.; Matejčeková, Z.; Valík, Ľ. Lactic Acid Bacteria and Fermentation of Cereals and Pseudocereals. Ferment. Process. 2017, 10, 224–242. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nsofor, C.A.; Ume, S.C.; Uzor, B.C. Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from ogi sold in Elele, Nigeria. J. Biol. Food Sci. Res. 2014, 3, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nemo, R.; Bacha, K. Microbial dynamic and growth potential of selected pathogens in Ethiopian traditional fermented beverages. Ann. Microbiol. 2021, 71, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Corsetti, A.; Settanni, L. Lactobacilli in sourdough fermentation. Food Res. Int. 2007, 40, 539–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Center for Food Safety (CFS). Microbiological Guidelines for Food: For Ready-to-Eat Foods in General and Specific Food Items (Revised); Environmental Hygiene Department, Queensway: Hong Kong, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  32. Abawari, R.A. Microbiology of keribo fermentation: An Ethiopian traditional fermented beverage. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 16, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Alba, C.; Alberto, A.; Leticia, G.; Domingo, F.; Marcos, L.; Tornadijo, E. Effect of fermentation on microbiological, physicochemical and physical characteristics of sourdough and impact of its use on bread quality. Czech J. Food Sci. 2017, 35, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nwokoro, O.; Chukwu, B.C. Studies on Akamu; a traditional fermented maize food. Rev. Chil. Nutr. 2012, 39, 180–184. [Google Scholar]
  35. Adebayo, W.A.; Ogunsina, B.S.; Gbadamosi, S.O. Some physicochemical and functional properties of kariya (Hildegardia baterii) kernel flours. IFE J. Sci. 2013, 15, 477–488. [Google Scholar]
  36. GFIRA (German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment). Escherichia coli in flour—Sources, risks and prevention. BfR Opin. 2020, 4, 1–28. [CrossRef]
  37. Delbeke, S. Prevalence, Behavior and Risk Assessment of Salmonella spp. and Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli on basil Leaves and Strawberries. Ph.D. Thesis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  38. Holzapfel, W.H. Appropriate starter culture technologies for small-scale fermentation in developing countries. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 75, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Banerjee, M.; Sarkar, P.K. Inhibitory effect of garlic on bacterial pathogens from spices. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 19, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maffei, D.F.; de Arruda Silveira, N.F.; da Penha Longo Mortatti Catanozi, M. Microbiological quality of organic and conventional vegetables sold in Brazil. Food Control 2013, 29, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rocha-Meneses, L.; Zannerni, R.; Inayat, A.; Abdallah, M.; Shanableh, A.; Ghenai, C.; Kamil, M.; Kikas, T. Current progress in anaerobic digestion reactors and parameters optimization. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cook, F.K.; Johnson, B.L. Microbiological Spoilage of Cereal Products. In Compendium of the Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages. Food Microbiology and Food Safety; Sperber, W., Doyle, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dias, I.; Laranjo, M.; Potes, M.E.; Agulheiro-Santos, A.C.; Ricardo-Rodrigues, S.; João Fraqueza, M.J.; Oliveira, M.; Elias, M. Staphylococcus spp. and Lactobacillus sakei Starters with High Level of Inoculation and an Extended Fermentation Step Improve Safety of Fermented Sausages. Fermentation 2022, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Heo, S.; Lee, J.H.; Jeong, D.W. Food-derived coagulase-negative Staphylococcus as starter cultures for fermented foods. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 1023–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. FSANZ (Food Standards Australia New Zealand). Compendium of Microbiological Criteria for Food; FSANZ: Kingston, Australia; Wellington, New Zealand, 2022; pp. 1–51. [Google Scholar]
  46. Fredlund, E.; Druvefors, U.Ä.; Olstorpe, M.N.; Passoth, V.; Schnürer, J. Influence of ethyl acetate production and ploidy on the anti-mould activity of Pichia anomala. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 238, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Anumudu, C.K.; Omeje, F.I.; Obinwa, G.N. Microbial succession pattern in Ogi fermentation. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 2018, 5, 247–251. [Google Scholar]
  48. Almeida, E.G.; Rachid, C.C.; Schwan, R.F. Microbial population present in fermented beverage ‘cauim’ produced by Brazilian Amerindians. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 120, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bacha, K. Microbial Ecology of Borde and Shamita Fermentation. Master’s Thesis, Department of Biology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  50. Preetha, S.S.; Narayanan, R. Factors Influencing the Development of Microbes in Food. Shanlax Int. J. Arts Sci. Humanit. 2020, 7, 57–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jespersen, L.; Halm, M.; Kpodo, K.; Jacobsen, M. Significance of yeasts and moulds occurring in maize dough fermentation for kenkey production. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994, 24, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Omemu, A.M.; Oyewole, O.B.; Bankole, M.O.; Akintokun, A.K. Yeasts and moulds associated with ogi; a cereal-based weaning food during storage. Res. J. Microbiol. 2007, 2, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kunyanga, C.N. Microbiological Studies of Kirario, an Indigenous Kenyan Fermented Porridge Based on Green Maize and Millet. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  54. Omemu, A.M. Fermentation dynamics during production of ogi, a Nigerian fermented cereal porridge. Rep. Opin. 2011, 3, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
  55. Abegaz, K.; Beyene, F.; Thor, L.; Judith, A.N. Parameters of processing and microbial changes during fermentation of borde, a traditional Ethiopian beverage. J. Food Technol. Afr. 2002, 7, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fleet, G.H. Yeasts in foods and beverages: Impact on product quality and safety. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2007, 18, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ali, A.; Shehzad, A.; Khan, M.R.; Shabbir, M.A.; Amjid, M.R. Yeast, its types and role in fermentation during bread making process: A review. Pak. J. Food Sci. 2012, 22, 171–179. [Google Scholar]
  58. Romano, P.; Capace, A.; Jespersen, L. Taxonomic and ecological diversity of food and beverage yeasts. In The Yeast Handbook-Yeasts in Food and Beverages; Querol, A., Fleet, G.H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 13–53. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tamang, J.P.; Fleet, G.H. Yeasts diversity in fermented foods and beverages. In Yeasts Biotechnology: Diversity and Applications; Satyanarayana, T., Kunze, G., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 169–198. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ashenafi, M.; Mehari, T. Some microbiological and nutritional properties of “borde” and “shamita”, traditional Ethiopian fermented beverages. Ethiop. J. Health Dev. 1995, 9, 105–110. [Google Scholar]
  61. Gebrelibanos, L. Microbiological and Physicochemical Study of Azo, A Traditional Fermented Condiment Prepared from Sorghum and Leaves of Endod (Phytolacca dodecandra) in KaftaHumera, Tigray Regional State. Master’s Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  62. Binitu, B.W.; Fekadu, H.G.; Zewdu, A.W. Nutritional and alcoholic contents of Cheka: A traditional fermented beverage in South western Ethiopia. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 2466–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Boontim, N.; Khanongnuch, C.; Pathom-aree, W.; Niamsup, P.; Lumyong, S. Production of l-lactic acid by thermotorelant lactic acid bacteria. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2018, 45, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
  64. Coelho, L.F.; de Lima, C.J.B.; Rodovalho, C.M.; Bernardo, M.P.; Contiero, J. Lactic acid production by new Lactobacillus plantarum LMISM6 grown in molasses: Optimization of medium composition. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 28, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Skory, C.D. Lactic acid production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a Rhizopus oryzae lactate dehydrogenase gene. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 30, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Minton, P.E. Handbook of Evaporation Technology, 1st ed.; Noyes Publications: West Wood, NJ, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  67. Alrosan, M.; Tan, T.-C.; Koh, W.Y.; Easa, A.M.; Gammoh, S.; Alu’datt, M.H. Overview of fermentation process: Structurefunction relationship on protein quality and nonnutritive compounds of plant-based proteins and carbohydrates. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 63, 7677–7691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mannheim, C.H.; Liu, J.X.; Gilbert, S.G. Control of water in foods during storage. J. Food Eng. 1994, 22, 509–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Panja, P.; Deepika; Bhattacharjee, D. An overview of the principles and effects of intermediate moisture fruits and vegetables. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2019, 6, 848–855. [Google Scholar]
  70. Omenna, E.C.; Olanipekun, O.T.; Ogunwale, F.J. Nutritional and sensory properties of co-fermented maize, millet and sorghum/soybean pap-(ogi). MOJ Food Process. Technol. 2018, 6, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Onwulata, C.; Konstance, R. Extruded corn meal and whey protein concentrate: Effect of particle size. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2006, 30, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.K.; Park, K.I.; Hwang, I.K.; Ji, G.E. Fermentation of rice using amylo lytic Bifidobacterium. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 50, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Svanberg, U.; Lorri, W. Fermentation and nutrient availability. Food Control 1997, 8, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Feyera, M.; Abera, S.; Temesgen, M. Effect of fermentation time and blending ratio on nutrients and some anti-nutrient composition of complementary flour. J. Food Process. Technol. 2021, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  75. Ullah, I.; Ali, M.; Farooqi, A. Chemical and nutritional properties of some maize (Zea mays L.) varieties grown in NWFP, Pakistan. Pak. J. Nutr. 2010, 9, 1113–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sanjeev, P.; Chaudhary, D.P.; Sreevastava, P.; Saha, S.; Rajenderan, A.; Sekhar, J.C.; Chikkappa, G.K. Comparison of Fatty Acid Profile of Specialty Maize to Normal Maize. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2014, 91, 1001–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sagan, A.; Blicharz-Kania, A.; Szmigielski, M.; Andrejko, D.; Sobczak, P.; Zawi’slak, K.; Starek, A. Assessment of the properties of rapeseed oil enriched with oils characterized by high content of linolenic acid. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jouanne, M.; Oddoux, S.; Noël, A.; Voisin-Chiret, A.S. Nutrient Requirements during Pregnancy and Lactation. Nutrients 2021, 13, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Sokoła-Wysoczanska, E.; Wysoczanski, T.; Wagner, J.; Czyz, K.; Bodkowski, R.; Lochynski, S.; Patkowska-Sokoła, B. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and their potential therapeutic role in cardiovascular system disorders: A review. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Covaciu, F.D.; Feher, I.; Molnar, C.; Floare-Avram, V.; Dehelean, A. Characterization of the Fatty Acid and Elemental Composition of Human Milk with Chemometric Processing to Determine the Nutritional Value. Anal. Lett. 2022, 56, 344–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Slavin, J.L.; Lloyd, B. Health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Adv. Nutr. 2012, 3, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Koh, A.; De Vadder, F.; Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Bäckhed, F. From dietary fiber to host physiology: Short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell 2016, 165, 1332–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hajhoseini, L. Importance of optimal fiber consumption during pregnancy. Int. J. Women’s Health Reprod. Sci. 2013, 1, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Holscher, H.D. Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes 2017, 8, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Çavdar, G.; Papich, T.; Ryan, E.P. Microbiome, breastfeeding and public health policy in the United States: The Case for Dietary Fiber. Nutr. Metab. Insights 2019, 12, 1178638819869597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Rupérez, P. Oligosaccharides in raw and processed legumes. Z Leb. Unters Forsch 1998, 206, 130–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Oyarekua, M.A. Evaluation of the nutritional and microbiological status of co-fermented cereals/cowpea ‘ogi’. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2011, 2, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Adams, S.; Sello, T.C.; Qin, G.X.; Che, D.; Han, R. Does dietary fiber affect the levels of nutritional components after feed formulation? Fibers 2018, 6, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zakari, U.M.; Hassan, A.; Abbo, E.S. Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of “Agidi” from Pearl-Millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranean) flour blends. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2010, 4, 662–667. [Google Scholar]
  90. Yegrem, L. Evaluation of Nutritional Composition and Sensory Acceptability of tef (Eragrostis Tef (Zucc.) Trotter) Complemented with Lupine (Lupinus spp.) Injera. Master’s Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramay, Ethiopia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  91. Enyisi, I.S.; Umoh, V.J.; Whong, C.M.Z.; Abdullahi, I.O.; Alabi, O. Chemical and nutritional value of maize and maize products obtained from selected markets in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Afr. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 5, 100–104. [Google Scholar]
  92. Nemo, R.; Bacha, K. Microbial, physico-chemical and proximate analysis of selected Ethiopian traditional fermented beverages. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 131, 109713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wilson, P.R.; Pugh, L.C. Promoting Nutrition in Breastfeeding Women. JOGNN-J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2005, 34, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Segura, S.A.; Ansotegui, J.A.; Diaz-Gomez, N.M. The importance of maternal Nutrition during lactation, do nursing mothers need nutritional supplements? An. Pediatr. 2016, 84, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cherie, Z.; Gregory, R.Z.; Fekadu, H.G.; Zewdu, A.W. Optimization and modeling of teff-maize-rice based formulation by simplex lattice mixture design for the preparation of brighter and acceptable injera. Cogent Food Agric. 2018, 4, 1444–3381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cormick, G.; Belizán, M.J. Review calcium intake and health. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Worku, B.B.; Woldegiorgis, A.Z.; Gemeda, H.F. Indigenous processing methods of Cheka: A traditional fermented beverage in Southwestern Ethiopia. J. Food Process. Technol. 2015, 7, 540. [Google Scholar]
  98. Adegbehingbe, K.T. Effect of starter cultures on the anti-nutrient contents, minerals and viscosity of ogwo; a fermented sorghum-Irish potato gruel. Int. Food Res. J. 2015, 22, 1247–1252. [Google Scholar]
  99. Sian, L.; Krebs, N.F.; Westcott, J.E.; Fengliang, L.; Tong, L.; Miller, L.V.; Sonko, B.; Hambidge, M. Zinc homeostasis during lactation in a population with a low zinc intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 75, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gemede, H.F. Potential health benefits and adverse effects associated with phytate in foods: A review. Glob. J. Med. Res. 2014, 27, 2224–6088. [Google Scholar]
  101. Osagie, A.U.; Eka, O.U. Nutritional Quality of Plant Foods: Post-Harvest Research Unit; Department of Biochemistry, University of Benin: Benin, Nigeria, 1998; pp. 221–244. [Google Scholar]
  102. Roger, T.; Léopold, T.N.; Funtong, M. Nutritional properties and anti-nutritional factors of corn paste (kutukutu) fermented by different strains of lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Food Sci. 2015, 2015, 502910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Miller, L.V.; Hambidge, K.M.; Krebs, N.F. Zinc absorption is not related to dietary phytate intake in infants and young children based on modeling combined data from multiple studies. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 1763–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ndie, E.C.; Okaka, J.C. Risk assessment of antinutrient consumption of plant foods of south eastern Nigeria. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 1, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  105. Tsopmo, A. Review Phytochemicals in Human Milk and Their Potential Antioxidative Protection. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Adebo, O.A.; Gabriela Medina-Meza, I. Impact of fermentation on the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of whole cereal grains: A mini review. Molecules 2020, 25, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Hur, S.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, Y.C.; Choi, I.; Kim, G.B. Effect of fermentation on the antioxidant activity in plant-based foods. Food Chem. 2014, 160, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hunter, K.J.; Fletcher, J.M. The antioxidant activity and composition of fresh, frozen, jarred and canned vegetables. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2002, 3, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ploenkutham, R.; Sripromma, P.; Amornraksa, S.; Yasurin, P.; Soontrunnarudrungsri, A. Effect of roasting and kneading on antioxidant activity and consumer acceptance towards Asiatic pennywort tea. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 187, 01004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Saikia, S.; Mahanta, C.L. Effect of steaming, boiling and microwave cooking on the total phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant properties of different vegetables of Assam, India. Int. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2013, 2, 47–56. [Google Scholar]
  111. Moskowitz, H.R.; Porretta, S.; Silcher, M. Concept Research in Food Product Design and Development; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  112. Puleo, S.; Braghieri, A.; Pacelli, C.; Bendini, A.; Toschi, T.G.; Torri, L.; Piochi, M.; Monaco, R.D. Food Neophobia, Odor and Taste Sensitivity, and Overall Flavor Perception in Food. Foods 2021, 10, 3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Stevenson, R.J.; Case, T.I.; Oaten, M.J. Frequency and recency of infection and their relationship with disgust and contamination sensitivity. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2009, 30, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Stevenson, R.J. An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction. Chem. Senses 2010, 35, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Spence, C. On the psychological impact of food colour. Flavour 2015, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Downham, A.; Collins, P. Colouring our foods in the last and next millennium. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2000, 35, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Abioye, V.F.; Aka, M.O. Proximate composition and sensory properties of moringa fortified maize-ogi. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2015, 12, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  118. Akinsola, O.T.; Alamu, E.O.; Otegbayo, B.O.; Menkir, A.; Maziya-Dixon, B. Nutritional properties of ogi powder and sensory perception of ogi porridge made from synthetic provitamin: A maize genotype. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 685004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Drewnowski, A. Taste preferences and food intake. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1997, 17, 237–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Licker, S.P. Understanding Food Texture Perception and Preference Based on Mouth Behavior. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Flow diagram of preparation steps of Shameta.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of preparation steps of Shameta.
Fermentation 10 00118 g001
Figure 2. Control and formulated Shameta samples for sensory evaluation. C1 = Shameta made of 91% maize and fermented for 25 days; C2 = Shameta made of 81% maize, 5% barley, and 5% fava bean, and fermented for 20 days; F1 and F2 showed Shameta made of 66% maize, 10% barley and 15% fava bean, and fermented for 10 and 12 days, respectively.
Figure 2. Control and formulated Shameta samples for sensory evaluation. C1 = Shameta made of 91% maize and fermented for 25 days; C2 = Shameta made of 81% maize, 5% barley, and 5% fava bean, and fermented for 20 days; F1 and F2 showed Shameta made of 66% maize, 10% barley and 15% fava bean, and fermented for 10 and 12 days, respectively.
Fermentation 10 00118 g002
Table 1. Effect of fermentation time (days) on microbial counts (log cfu/g) of Shameta.
Table 1. Effect of fermentation time (days) on microbial counts (log cfu/g) of Shameta.
FCFT (Day)Mean Count (log cfu/g) of Different Microbial Groups
Lactic Acid BacteriaAerobic Mesophilic BacteriaEnterobacteriaceaeTotal ColiformsStaphylococcus spp.ASFBYeastMold
MBF103.75 ± 0.05 d4.45 ± 0.02 c4.17 ± 0.01 a3.85 ± 0.02 a3.23 ± 0.01 a3.14 ± 0.01 c2.51 ± 0.01 d3.36 ± 0.02 a
88.41 ± 0.01 c6.43 ± 0.03 a<2<23.21 ± 0.01 a3.42 ± 0.01 a5.94 ± 0.02 b2.75 ± 0.01 b
108.88 ± 0.01 b5.11 ± 0.01 b<2<23.14 ± 0.02 b3.30 ± 0.01 b6.65 ± 0.02 a2.53 ± 0.01 c
129.41 ± 0.01 a4.16 ± 0.02 d<2<22.48 ± 0.01 c2.83 ± 0.02 d4.83 ± 0.01 c2.52 ± 0.02 c
CV0.350.420.481.040.440.420.320.32
LSD0.060.050.010.020.030.030.040.04
MBF204.45 ± 0.03 d5.20 ± 0.2 a3.75 ± 0.02 a3.30 ± 0.01 a3.81 ± 0.01 a3.29 ± 0.01 a2.52 ± 0.01 d2.52 ± 0.02 a
87.95 ± 0.03 a5.44 ± 0.02 a<2<23.38 ± 0.01 b3.28 ± 0.01 a6.45 ± 0.03 a<2
107.56 ± 0.03 b4.61 ± 0.01 b<2<22.52 ± 0.02 c2.58 ± 0.01 b5.26 ± 0.03 b<2
126.28 ± 0.02 c4.04 ± 0.04 c<2<22.47 ± 0.02 d2.51 ± 0.01 c4.43 ± 0.01 c<2
CV0.422.131.070.610.520.300.480.64
LSD0.070.260.020.010.040.020.050.01
MBF304.44 ± 0.02 d5.54 ± 0.01 a3.82 ± 0.02 a3.03 ± 0.01 a3.22 ± 0.01 a3.64 ± 0.02 a2.22 ± 0.01 d2.47 ± 0.01 a
87.71 ± 0.01 a4.15 ± 0.02 b<2<22.83 ± 0.02 b2.55 ± 0.01 b5.94 ± 0.02 a<2
107.46 ± 0.03 b3.95 ± 0.03 c<2<22.22 ± 0.01 c2.51 ± 0.01 c4.97 ± 0.02 b<2
126.45 ± 0.04 c3.85 ± 0.01 d<2<22.13 ± 0.01 d2.07 ± 0.01 d4.25 ± 0.02 c<2
CV0.420.441.050.660.510.490.231.01
LSD0.070.050.020.010.030.030.040.01
ASFB = aerobic spore-forming bacteria; FC = flour composition; FT = fermentation time; MBF1 = maize–barley–fava bean with 81:5:5 ratio; MBF2 = maize–barley–fava bean with 71:10:10 ratio and MBF3 = maize–barley–fava bean with 66:10:15 ratio; CV = coefficient of variation. Different letters in superscript along a column indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Effect flour compositions and fermentation time on pH and TA of Shameta.
Table 2. Effect flour compositions and fermentation time on pH and TA of Shameta.
Flour CompositionFermentation Time (Days)pHTitratable Acidity (TA)
MBF105.26 ± 0.03 a0.37 ± 0.01 h
84.42 ± 0.02 b0.58 ± 0.01 f
104.21 ± 0.21 c0.63 ± 0.03 e
124.00 ± 0.02 d0.66 ± 0.02 d
MBF205.24 ± 0.02 a0.39 ± 0.01 gh
84.42 ± 0.02 b0.61 ± 0.01 e
104.02 ± 0.02 d0.68 ± 0.01 cd
123.98 ± 0.01 d0.69 ± 0.01 bc
MBF305.22 ± 0.01 a0.41 ± 0.01 g
84.04 ± 0.04 d0.63 ± 0.01 e
104.01 ± 0.01 d0.71 ± 0.01 ab
123.87 ± 0.01 e0.73 ± 0.01 a
CV1.272.22
LSD0.090.02
MBF1 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 81:5:5; MBF2 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 71:10:10 and MBF3 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 66:10:15; CV = coefficient of variation, LSD = least significant difference. Different letters in superscript along a column indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Effect of flour composition and duration of fermentation on proximate composition (g/100g) of Shameta.
Table 3. Effect of flour composition and duration of fermentation on proximate composition (g/100g) of Shameta.
Flour CompositionFermentation Time (Days)Moisture ContentCP ContentCF ContentFiber ContentAsh ContentCarbohydrate ContentGross Energy (kcal/100g)
MBF1061.34 ± 0.34 g12.22 ± 0.02 g12.46 ± 0.05 d3.61 ± 0.01 c2.45 ± 0.01 l72.20 ± 0.82 a449.79 ± 0.11 a
865.89 ± 0.11 b12.82 ± 0.02 f12.89 ± 0.02 b2.43 ± 0.01 j2.63 ± 0.01 j69.23 ± 0.05 b444.24 ± 0.03 ab
1066.00 ± 0.00 b13.00 ± 0.5 f13.11 ± 0.11 a2.24 ± 0.02 k2.64 ± 0.02 j69.01 ± 0.42 bc446.05 ± 0.47 ab
1266.32 ± 0.02 a13.52 ± 0.02 e13.23 ± 0.01 a2.21 ± 0.01 l2.61 ± 0.01 k68.43 ± 0.06 bcd446.87 ± 0.02 ab
MBF2060.58 ± 0.09 i13.56 ± 0.1 e11.68 ± 0.03 e4.66 ± 0.02 b2.87 ± 0.01 e67.24 ± 0.15 bcd428.29 ± 0.05 cd
864.77 ± 0.08 def13.77 ± 0.1 de12.41 ± 0.10 d3.34 ± 0.01 b2.85 ± 0.01 f67.63 ± 0.19 bcd437.31 ± 0.47 bc
1064.79 ± 0.20 de13.98 ± 0.01 d12.81 ± 0.04 b3.31 ± 0.01 f2.84 ± 0.01 g67.06 ± 0.04 bcd439.43 ± 0.16 b
1265.11 ± 0.11 c14.68 ± 0.1 c12.63 ± 0.06 c2.98 ± 0.01 g2.82 ± 0.12 h66.89 ± 0.14 bcd439.94 ± 0.30 ab
MBF3060.87 ± 0.13 h14.89 ± 0.1 c10.01 ± 0.21 g4.84 ± 0.02 a3.75 ± 0.01 a66.51 ± 0.09 cd415.73 ± 1.13 e
864.56 ± 0.19 f15.88 ± 0.1 b10.75 ± 0.06 f3.36 ± 0.02 d3.70 ± 0.02 d66.31 ± 0.18 d425.49 ± 0.19 de
1064.66 ± 0.33 ef16.32 ± 0.32 a10.80 ± 0.11 f2.88 ± 0.01 h3.72 ± 0.01 c66.28 ± 0.22 d427.57 ± 0.48 cd
1264.98 ± 0.02 cd16.56 ± 0.1 a10.66 ± 0.01 f2.86 ± 0.01 i3.73 ± 0.02 b66.19 ± 0.11 d426.91 ± 0.14 d
CV0.201.360.690.130.152.181.35
LSD0.220.330.140.0070.0082.519.97
CP = crude protein, CF = crude fat, MBF1 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 81:5:5, MBF2 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 71:10:10, and MBF3 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 66:10:15, CV = coefficient of variation, LSD = least significant difference. Different letters in superscript along a column indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Effect of flour composition and duration of fermentation on mineral contents (mg/100g) of Shameta.
Table 4. Effect of flour composition and duration of fermentation on mineral contents (mg/100g) of Shameta.
Flour CompositionsFermentation Time (Day)Calcium (Ca)Iron (Fe)Zinc (Zn)
MBF1025.75 ± 0.22 h5.66 ± 0.01 f6.76 ± 0.18 e
827.90 ± 0.19 g6.81 ± 0.01 d7.47 ± 0.46 cd
1027.98 ± 0.23 g6.83 ± 0.01 d7.50 ± 0.47 cd
1228.12 ± 0.22 g6.84 ± 0.01 d7.51 ± 0.46 cd
MBF2035.53 ± 0.22 f6.32 ± 0.01 e7.14 ± 0.31 de
836.86 ± 0.04 e6.87 ± 0.01 d7.67 ± 0.16 c
1037.49 ± 0.64 d6.89 ± 0.01 d7.71 ± 0.18 c
1237.93 ± 0.71 d6.89 ± 0.01 d7.73 ± 0.20 c
MBF3059.15 ± 0.56 c7.06 ± 0.05 c8.24 ± 0.21 b
860.16 ± 0.47 b8.72 ± 0.13 b8.83 ± 0.16 a
1060.66 ± 0.19 ab8.73 ± 1.15 b8.87 ± 0.14 a
1261.27 ± 0.42 a8.83 ± 1.16 a8.89 ± 0.14 a
CV0.890.843.03
LSD0.630.100.40
MBF1 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 81:5:5; MBF2 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 71:10:10 and MBF3 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 66:10:15; CV = coefficient of variation; LSD = least significant difference. Different letters in superscript along a column indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Effect of flour composition and duration of fermentation on anti-nutritional factors (mg/100g) and antioxidant activities.
Table 5. Effect of flour composition and duration of fermentation on anti-nutritional factors (mg/100g) and antioxidant activities.
Flour CompositionFermentation Time (Days)PhytateTanninAntioxidant Activities (IC50) (mg AAE/g)
MBF101.76 ± 0.03 a1.58 ± 0.01 a10.16 ± 0.23 b
80.56 ± 0.02 e0.26 ± 0.01 h0.64 ± 0.02 c
100.34 ± 0.02 j0.20 ± 0.00 i0.44 ± 0.01 cde
120.28 ± 0.01 k0.19 ± 0.00 i0.31 ± 0.01 de
MBF201.34 ± 0.02 b1.26 ± 0.02 b10.89 ± 0.19 a
80.77 ± 0.02 d0.47 ± 0.01 d0.52 ± 0.03 cd
100.42 ± 0.02 i0.39 ± 0.00 e0.46 ± 0.03 cde
120.53 ± 0.01 fg0.34 ± 0.02 g0.19 ± 0.05 e
MBF301.22 ± 0.02 c0.98 ± 0.01 c11.15 ± 0.45 a
80.54 ± 0.02 f0.39 ± 0.00 e0.71 ± 0.17 c
100.52 ± 0.01 gh0.36 ± 0.01 f0.56 ± 0.11 cd
120.51 ± 0.01 h0.34 ± 0.01 g0.31 ± 0.08 de
CV 0.851.755.44
LSD 0.010.020.28
MBF1 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 81:5:5; MBF2 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 71:10:10; MBF3 = maize–barley–fava bean with ratios of 66:10:15; CV = coefficient of variation; LSD = least significant difference. Different letters in superscript along a column indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Sensory scores of control and formulated Shameta samples (N = 55).
Table 6. Sensory scores of control and formulated Shameta samples (N = 55).
FormulationAromaColorTasteTextureOverall Acceptability
C14.13 ± 0.86 a4.82 ± 0.39 a4.55 ± 0.50 a4.55 ± 0.50 a 4.45 ± 0.50 a
C24.18 ± 0.88 a3.91 ± 0.40 b4.07 ± 0.26 b4.36 ± 0.52 a 4.02 ± 0.24 b
F14.30 ± 0.71 a3.41 ± 0.89 c3.96 ± 0.69 b4.05 ± 0.49 b4.05 ± 0.35 b
F24.42 ± 0.68 a3.40 ± 0.89 c3.91 ± 0.67 b4.09 ± 0.51 b4.02 ± 0.30 b
C1 = 100% maize and fermented for 25 days; C2 = 90% Maize, 5% barley, 5% fava bean and fermented for 20 days; F1 and F2 = 75% maize, 10% barley, and 15% fava bean, and fermented for 10 and 12 days, respectively. Different letters in superscript along a column indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05), and the same letters indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kitessa, D.A.; Bacha, K.; Tola, Y.B.; Murimi, M. Effect of Fermentation Time and Blending Ratio on Microbial Dynamics, Nutritional Quality and Sensory Acceptability of Shameta: A Traditional Cereal-Based Fermented Porridge for Lactating Mothers in Ethiopia. Fermentation 2024, 10, 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10030118

AMA Style

Kitessa DA, Bacha K, Tola YB, Murimi M. Effect of Fermentation Time and Blending Ratio on Microbial Dynamics, Nutritional Quality and Sensory Acceptability of Shameta: A Traditional Cereal-Based Fermented Porridge for Lactating Mothers in Ethiopia. Fermentation. 2024; 10(3):118. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10030118

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kitessa, Daniel Asfaw, Ketema Bacha, Yetenayet B. Tola, and Mary Murimi. 2024. "Effect of Fermentation Time and Blending Ratio on Microbial Dynamics, Nutritional Quality and Sensory Acceptability of Shameta: A Traditional Cereal-Based Fermented Porridge for Lactating Mothers in Ethiopia" Fermentation 10, no. 3: 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10030118

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop