Next Article in Journal
Flow Configurations in a Y Splitting-Junction Microchannel
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Wall Flexibility on the Deformation during Flow in a Stenosed Coronary Artery
Open AccessReview

On the Values for the Turbulent Schmidt Number in Environmental Flows

1
Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering (DICEA), University of Napoli “Federico II”, Napoli 80125, Italy
2
Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College, SW7 2AZ London, UK
3
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
4
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada
5
Hydro-environmental Research Centre, School of Engineering, Cardiff University, The Parade, CF24 3AA Cardiff, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Meir Teitel
Fluids 2017, 2(2), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids2020017
Received: 25 February 2017 / Revised: 13 April 2017 / Accepted: 17 April 2017 / Published: 19 April 2017
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has consolidated as a tool to provide understanding and quantitative information regarding many complex environmental flows. The accuracy and reliability of CFD modelling results oftentimes come under scrutiny because of issues in the implementation of and input data for those simulations. Regarding the input data, if an approach based on the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations is applied, the turbulent scalar fluxes are generally estimated by assuming the standard gradient diffusion hypothesis (SGDH), which requires the definition of the turbulent Schmidt number, Sct (the ratio of momentum diffusivity to mass diffusivity in the turbulent flow). However, no universally-accepted values of this parameter have been established or, more importantly, methodologies for its computation have been provided. This paper firstly presents a review of previous studies about Sct in environmental flows, involving both water and air systems. Secondly, three case studies are presented where the key role of a correct parameterization of the turbulent Schmidt number is pointed out. These include: (1) transverse mixing in a shallow water flow; (2) tracer transport in a contact tank; and (3) sediment transport in suspension. An overall picture on the use of the Schmidt number in CFD emerges from the paper. View Full-Text
Keywords: environmental fluid mechanics; computational fluid dynamics; Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS); turbulent Schmidt number environmental fluid mechanics; computational fluid dynamics; Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS); turbulent Schmidt number
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gualtieri, C.; Angeloudis, A.; Bombardelli, F.; Jha, S.; Stoesser, T. On the Values for the Turbulent Schmidt Number in Environmental Flows. Fluids 2017, 2, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids2020017

AMA Style

Gualtieri C, Angeloudis A, Bombardelli F, Jha S, Stoesser T. On the Values for the Turbulent Schmidt Number in Environmental Flows. Fluids. 2017; 2(2):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids2020017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gualtieri, Carlo; Angeloudis, Athanasios; Bombardelli, Fabian; Jha, Sanjeev; Stoesser, Thorsten. 2017. "On the Values for the Turbulent Schmidt Number in Environmental Flows" Fluids 2, no. 2: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids2020017

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop