3.1. Initial Conditions of Jets
Near the exit of both the circular and six-lobed hemispherical jets (
X/
De = 0.1), the average distributions of the streamwise velocity and turbulent intensity were obtained as shown in
Figure 4 and
Figure 5, respectively. The turbulent intensity is represented by the root-mean-square (RMS) values of the axial velocity fluctuations. A laminar behavior is observed at the exit plane for both jets.
Figure 4 shows a “smooth dome” shape of the mean streamwise velocity profile for the circular jet, whereas a sharper “dome” is observed for the minor plane of the lobed jet. A two-step distribution is also observed for the mean velocity profile in the major plane, indicating enhanced layered mixing, driven by distinct shear layers and vortex structures, which promote asymmetric entrainment patterns, faster jet spreading, and sustained entrainment efficiency along the flow development.
In comparison, El Hassan and Meslem [
3] used 2D planar orifices in their TR-PIV jet investigations. A “saddle-backed” shape of the average streamwise velocity profiles for the circular jet and the minor plane of the lobed jet was observed. Whereas, an “M” shape was observed for the major plane of the lobed jet. Krueger [
32] reported similar observations, at a jet planar exit. Moreover, El Hassan and Meslem [
3] observed the “vena-contracta” effect due to significant increases in velocity at the exit edges of the planar orifices’ jets. Qunin et al. [
33] and Ashforth et al. [
34] observed similar behavior.
Figure 5 shows the turbulent intensity profiles where no flat regions are observed for both types of jets (circular and lobed). This indicates the start of high turbulence levels not only at edges where local shear is expected to be high but also along the entire axial span of jet cross-planes. Such behavior might lead to higher entrainment rates and thus better mixing phenomena in the near-field regions of the jets, with higher expected values for the lobed jet.
The broader turbulence intensity peaks in the circular jet indicate stronger radial spreading compared to the lobed jets. This is due to the absence of geometric modulation in the circular nozzle, which leads to more uniform azimuthal shear layer development and earlier roll-up of Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities. This can also lead to the higher turbulence intensity peaks observed in the circular jet. In contrast, the lobed nozzles generate streamwise vortices that enhance axial entrainment and mixing, particularly in the minor plane. This results in narrower turbulence intensity around the double peak, as shown in
Figure 5.
Furthermore, higher values of turbulence intensity were observed for hemispherical nozzle ranges between 3 and 17% for the circular jet and 3 and 11% for the lobed jet compared to ranges between 0 and 6%, which were observed for planar orifice circular jets and between 0 and 14% for planar orifice lobed jets [
3]. In addition, at the jets’ edges, significantly higher RMS values were observed in the central regions of all 3D hemispherical jets compared to 2D planar ones.
In comparison, El Hassan and Meslem [
3] demonstrated that the turbulent intensity profile remains flat at approximately 2% in the center of the circular jet as well as for both the minor and major planes of the lobed jet. However, in the regions of the shear layer (jet edges), the RMS values increase in both planar jets (6%, 14%, and 11% for the circular jet, minor plane, and major plane of the lobed jet, respectively). The authors [
3] expected such high RMS values in regions where the local shear in the average streamwise velocity is high.
3.3. Entrainment Mechanism
The entrainment is defined as the streamwise spatial derivative of the volume flux
Q(
x), i.e.,
dQ/
dx [
3]. The net volume flux in the longitudinal direction (
X/
De) is balanced by the volume flux in the radial direction (
r/
De). Therefore, to obtain the entrainment rate, Equation (1) [
3] is used.
where
is the initial volumetric flow rate,
is the volumetric flow rate at the longitudinal distance (
X/
De) from the jet exit plane,
De is the jet equivalent diameter,
r is the radial distance (
r/
De), and
is the radial velocity.
Figure 7 shows the dependence of the normalized average volume flux (average entrainment rate) on the radial distance (
r/
De) for different streamwise longitudinal locations. It is seen that a strong dependence of the radial volume flux is present in the hemispherical lobed jets within the initial near-field region for
X/
De ≤ 1. For the hemispherical circular jets, the spatial dependency is mainly observed near the jet exit (
X/
De = 0.1), then it almost stabilizes (plateau behavior with slight positive values) for
X/
D = 0.5 and 1.
By analyzing the radial spatial dependency of the average volume flux, higher positive values of entrainment were observed by the hemispherical jets presented in this work compared to the planar orifice jets [
3]. It is worth mentioning that the positive values of the radial volume flux indicate the entrainment process of the surrounding fluid toward the core (center) of the jet, while negative values are explained as a jet flow expansion away from its center.
Figure 7 also indicates that the effect of the lobed jet extends further radially as compared to the circular jet. Such analysis helps with choosing a proper integration radius for the calculation of the entrainment rate for both jets. These fluctuations are more pronounced for the hemispherical lobed nozzle jet compared to the circular nozzle jet. This indicates that the lobed geometry enhances mixing and entrainment mechanisms, leading to greater variability in the radial flow field. Additionally, the increased radial reach of the lobed jet highlights its ability to extend entrainment effects further from the jet centerline, making it more effective for applications requiring broader mixing.
Furthermore, by analyzing
Figure 7 and depending on the distance, almost double the positive entrainment rates are observed for the hemispherical nozzle lobed jets compared to planar lobed orifice jets [
3]. In other words, twice the absolute values of entrainment rates’ fluctuations are observed. All of the above-mentioned interesting observations indicate higher potential rates of efficient mixing phenomena in the near-field regions of jet flows utilizing the hemispherical nozzle geometries as one of the passive control methods of mixing processes. Moreover, for hemispherical jets, another interesting observation is that no negative values were observed, i.e., negligible rates of jet flow expansions. This indicates higher positive entrainment rates that lead to better mixing phenomena in the near-field regions of the jets.
Figure 7 also shows that the lobed nozzle jet sustains a greater volume flux peak, reflecting this jet’s ability to promote more vigorous mixing and entrainment at midstream locations, consistent with Zaman (1999) [
36]. For
X/
De = 1, circular nozzle continues to exhibit weaker radial flux and limited mixing, whereas the lobed nozzle retains its strong radial volume flux, sustaining turbulence and enhanced entrainment downstream, also noted by Mi et al. (2001) [
37]. The lobed nozzle consistently excels the circular one in generating radial spreading and turbulence, critical for rapid mixing applications, e.g., combustion or chemical processing.
Quantitative investigations of the S-W vorticity evolution are presented in order to better understand and relate jets’ evolution with the evolved entrainment process. The effect of different S-W structures on mixing enhancement can be quantified by computing the averaged ( and maximum () S-W vorticity in the longitudinal direction.
Figure 8 and
Figure 9 show a detailed analysis of the S-W averaged
) and maximum (
) vorticity distributions, respectively, for both circular and lobed hemispherical jets compared along the longitudinal direction of the jets’ flow. It can be observed that, for both investigated jets,
values fluctuate along the entire span in the longitudinal direction (0 ≤
X/
De ≤ 5) with slightly greater values for the lobed jet for most streamwise locations. For
values, higher values are observed for the lobed jet when compared to the circular jet for 0 ≤
X/
De ≤ 2, whereas the situation is inverted further downstream, as greater values were observed for the circular jet.
Additionally, from
Figure 8, it is observed that the lobed nozzle shows higher values of
) at the jet exit, indicating stronger initial vorticity generation compared to the circular nozzle. As
X/
De increases, the lobed nozzle demonstrates more significant oscillations in vorticity up to
X/
De = 3, which reflects enhanced mixing and periodic vortex shedding. Beyond
X/
De = 3, the vorticity values for both nozzles converge, indicating that the turbulence decays with downstream distance. This behavior aligns with the findings of Gutmark and Grinstein (1999) [
38], who observed that lobed nozzles generate higher turbulence levels at the early stages of jet development.
In comparison, El Hassan and Meslem [
3] reported that when planar orifice jets flow from
X/
De = 1 to 3, the S-W vorticity continued intensifying gradually for the circular jet while it decayed for the lobed jet. That was attributed to the growth of the vortices in the longitudinal direction, which heavily contributes to the entrainment process while moving downstream from the jet exit. For the distributions of the averaged and maximum S-W vorticity for planar jets, it was reported that higher
values were observed for the lobed mixing jet compared to the circular one within 0 ≤
X/
De ≤ 3. Whereas, the situation is inverted afterward, as greater
values were observed for the circular jet. On the other hand, a decrease in the
values was observed as
X/
De increased for the planar orifice lobed jet. Eckerle et al. [
39] and Werle et al. [
40] related this behavior to a breakdown of the large-scale S-W vortices into many small-scale ones.
Negative averaged S-W vorticity values imply that the jet flows are decelerating in those regions of observation (i.e., the S-W velocity vectors are rotating opposite to flow direction). This might complicate the flow dynamics, or it can be attributed to a “vortex shedding” phenomenon. It is also worth emphasizing that, eventually, the understanding of the flow dynamics depends on the balance of all relevant flow phenomena in the region of interest of the application being investigated. Therefore, further detailed analysis of flow dynamics is still required to accurately assess such effects on the mixing phenomena by entrainment.
From
Figure 9, it is observed that the lobed nozzle exhibits significantly higher peak values near the jet exit (
X/
De ≈ 0.5), with a gradual decline as
X/
De increases. The circular nozzle, in contrast, shows a more modest increase in vorticity, with irregular fluctuations along the jet’s length. This suggests that the lobed nozzle promotes stronger coherent streamwise vortical structures, which enhance entrainment and mixing, particularly in the early and midstream regions.
It is observed from
Figure 9 that the development of the S-W vortices becomes more significant for the circular jet between
X/
De = 2 and 4, indicating a stronger growth of vortices in that region. This supports more prolonged, coherent vortex structures, which can lead to less efficient mixing. However, beyond this point, the strength of these vortices starts to decay. For the lobed nozzle jet, the decay starts directly from
X/
De = 2, indicating the disruption of the coherence of the vortices earlier, likely due to enhanced shear layer interactions and increased mixing efficiency introduced by the lobes. After
X/
De = 4, both jets decay, with higher values for the circular hemispherical nozzle jet.
The cross-plane distributions of the Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE) are used to compare the flow evolution of both jets along the axial downstream distance [
3]. Hu et al. [
35] proposed to study the Averaged Turbulent Kinetic Energy (ATKE). It can be calculated at any selected longitudinal cross-plane location using Equation (2) [
6], as follows:
where
K is the Turbulent Kinetic Energy calculated from the three components of the velocity obtained from stereoscopic TR-PIV measurements using Equation (3) [
6], as follows:
where
RMS values are the three root-mean-squared components in the (
x,
y,
z) directions, respectively;
N = 500 is the number of instantaneous TR-PIV images used in the averaging calculation for the streamwise velocities; and (
u,
v,
w) are the three instantaneous velocity components (3C) in the (
x,
y,
z) directions (3D), respectively.
The distribution of the Averaged Turbulent Kinetic Energy (
ATKE) for hemispherical nozzle jets is presented in
Figure 10, comparing circular and lobed jet configurations. Close to the nozzle exit (0.1 ≤
X/
De ≤ 0.5), the lobed jet exhibits significantly higher
ATKE values than the circular jet, due to the nozzle geometry itself, which inherently enhances mixing in the near-field region. Beyond
X/
De = 0.5, the behavior diverges: the lobed jet maintains a relatively flat
ATKE profile across the flow span, persisting downstream after
X/
De = 1. This consistent
ATKE profile suggests that the lobes are effective in maintaining mixing efficiency over a longer distance further downstream. In contrast, the circular jet demonstrates a rapid increase in
ATKE between
X/
De = 0.5 and
X/
De = 2, attributed to the significant K–H instability, suggesting intensified mixing activity in this region. This is followed by a gradual decline as the jet transitions further downstream.
Furthermore, as can be inferred from
Figure 10, higher
ATKE can be a disadvantage for many industrial applications. Thus, the lobed jet presents the advantage of lower
TKE and much higher entrainment and mixing. Thus, less noise and drag would arise from the lobed jet.
In comparison, El Hassan and Meslem [
3] observed that, for the circular orifice jet,
ATKE rapidly increases within 0 ≤
X/
De ≤ 3, then stabilizes. For the lobed orifice jet,
ATKE decreases within 0 ≤
X/
De ≤ 1 and then rapidly increases within 1 ≤
X/
De ≤ 2.5 until plateauing. Near the jet exit (
X/
De ≤ 0.7),
ATKE values are lower for the circular orifice jet compared to the lobed one but become higher downstream in the longitudinal S-W direction due to the pairing of the K–H structures. According to the “collective interaction mechanism” [
41], small vortices roll up to form K–H structures. Ho and Nosseir [
42] noted that vortices coalesce into large vortices due to the induced field. The axis-switching phenomena and flow convergence observed further downstream contribute to decreased
ATKE values within 0.5 ≤
X/
De ≤ 1. The high energetic level of S-W vortices in the lobed jet explains higher
ATKE values near the exit compared to the circular jet. Additionally, azimuthal modes could compete with each other for growth of the shear layer [
43].
3.4. Shear Layer Growth
The shear layer growth is a measure of the momentum entrained into the shear layer [
44] and is calculated using Equation (4) [
6], as follows:
where
U1 and
U2 are the velocities of the two streams at the inlet of the mixing region,
U is the local ensemble averaged velocity, and
U0m is the centerline exit longitudinal velocity of air obtained from PIV measurements at
X/
De = 0.1. In the present study,
U2 = 0 and
U1 =
U0m.
Figure 11 shows the normalized shear layer growth in terms of the momentum thickness along the longitudinal direction reflecting the distribution of momentum across that layer. For the hemispherical circular nozzle jet, it is observed that the rate of shear layer growth decreases near the nozzle until reaching
X/
De = 1, then it rapidly increases downstream of the nozzle to the end of investigated longitudinal span due to the mixing between the air jet and the surrounding fluid. This indicates a slower rate of expansion of the shear layer and thus less mixing in this region. As the jet progresses, increased mixing between the air jet and surrounding occurs. In contrast, for hemispherical lobed nozzle jets, the rate of shear layer growth increases near the nozzle till reaching
X/
De = 2 then stabilizes to the end of investigated longitudinal span. It indicates enhanced mixing right from the lobed nozzle exit, leading to a sustained growth in the shear layer.
In light of the passive-control mechanisms of jets’ flows, these observations present various behaviors where applications determine the choice between hemispherical circular or lobed nozzles, which can be optimized based on the desired shear layer behavior. For instance, the hemispherical lobed nozzles might be more effective in applications where rapid (early stages) mixing is desired right at the nozzle exit, while hemispherical circular nozzles may be preferable where initial flow stability is more critical, i.e., late-stage mixing is preferred.
Figure 12 visualizes the normalized distribution in the longitudinal plan of the circular and lobed jets. This distribution highlights distinct regions of high vorticity, which correspond to locations of strong shear within the flow. These regions are indicative of the formation and interaction of vortices in the shear layer.
Figure 12a shows that the vorticity is concentrated near the centerline, suggesting a more symmetrical flow pattern.
Figure 12b exhibits a more complex flow pattern with distinct regions of higher vorticity, indicating increased turbulence and mixing. The flow is less symmetrical, displaying more complex interactions within the fluid.
Figure 12c demonstrates a different flow behavior with variations in the vorticity magnitude distribution indicating a flow pattern in the minor plan that confirms the fast-mixing rate in both the major and minor plans up to
X/
De = 2.
The normalized vorticity magnitude, that which is more concentrated near the nozzle exit in both investigated jets, suggests stronger vortex formation closer to the origin of jets. Higher values near the nozzle exit suggest more intense mixing and momentum transfer, leading to higher entrainment rates in the near-field region.
3.5. Momentum Flux Distribution
To obtain the conservation equations for the volume flux and axial momentum, the continuity and axial momentum equations, respectively, can be integrated across the jet [
45]. The kinematic momentum flux
M(
x) can be obtained by integrating the axial momentum equation as follows using Equation (5) [
3]:
where
is the mean streamwise velocity,
and
are the contributions from the velocity fluctuations and mean pressure, respectively, and
S is the jet surface in the cross-plane.
For many years, it was believed that the momentum flux in any jet is very nearly constant [
46,
47]. Kotsovinos [
48,
49] challenged the assumption that momentum flux is constant along the jet’s path and showed that it varies due to external factors like entrainment, jet geometry, and pressure fields. Self-preservation in jets, while widely accepted, is only achievable if the source is considered a point source of momentum. Laboratory jets, however, cannot replicate this idealized point source.
Miller and Comings [
50] and Bradbury [
51], in their experimental studies, proposed that the contributions from the velocity fluctuations (turbulences) and mean static pressure to the kinematic momentum flux
M(
x) are negligible. In addition, the S-W pressure gradient was replaced by the radial momentum equation as suggested by Hussein et al. [
52] and as follows using Equation (6) [
6] to obtain
M(
x):
In this paper, the kinematic momentum flux (momentum integral),
M(
x), was estimated from the average axial velocity PIV measurements. Theoretically, the longitudinal turbulences contribute to
M(
x) can be defined using Equation (7) [
3,
6], as follows:
Figure 13 proves that the contribution from the S-W turbulence intensity to the momentum flux in the initial region of both the hemispherical circular and the six-lobed jet flows should not be neglected. Indeed, this contribution is considerable for the hemispherical lobed nozzle jet flow ranging between 2 and 7% at early stages of the near-field region up to
X/
De = 1 and is lower for the hemispherical circular nozzle jet up to 1% in the same mentioned region. However, after
X/
De = 1, the situations change significantly, where for the hemispherical lobed nozzle jet flow, a gradual increase in the momentum flux (
Figure 13) ranged between 2 and 4% till the end of the investigated longitudinal span. Whereas, for the hemispherical circular nozzle jet flow, a rapid increase was observed, reaching up to 10% at
X/
De = 5.
In comparison, El Hassan and Meslem [
3] reported similar behavior (and values) to that of the hemispherical circular nozzle jet upstream along the entire investigated range for the case of planar circular orifice jet. However, for the lobed nozzle jet, the flow behavior diverges significantly between the hemispherical nozzle jets and planar lobed orifice jets just prior to
X/
De = 1, though the flow characteristics for both geometries align similarly along the remainder of the investigated longitudinal jet flow span.
Figure 14 shows a rapid increase in the normalized momentum flux (up to ratio of 2.5) when traveling downstream along the hemispherical lobed nozzle jet shear layer from the nozzle near exit to
X/
De = 1, while it remains almost constant (below ratio of 1.25) for the hemispherical circular nozzle jet along the entire investigated longitudinal span. This indicates a more uniform momentum distribution along the jet’s flow span, with less pronounced mixing and momentum transfer, compared to the lobed nozzle. However, for the hemispherical lobed nozzle jet and after
X/
De = 1, the normalized momentum flux continues to significantly increase up to a ratio of 3.5, then stabilizes to the end of the investigated longitudinal span of the jet flow.
The behavior of the hemispherical lobed nozzle jet enhances the jet’s momentum transfer, likely due to increased mixing and turbulence generated by the lobed geometry. With further growth and stabilization beyond X/De = 1, the momentum flux continues to grow, peaking at around 3.5 before stabilizing. This sustained increase indicates that the lobed nozzle continues to promote strong momentum exchange further downstream, contributing to efficient mixing over a larger distance.
In comparison, El Hassan and Meslem [
3] reported that the normalized momentum fluxes behavior of the planar orifice circular jet is almost the same as for the hemispherical circular nozzle jet along the entire flow span. However, the normalized momentum flux for hemispherical lobed nozzle jets is almost 100% higher than that of the planar orifice jets. Generally, the increase in the momentum flux for lobed nozzle jets was previously observed and indicated in many studies in the literature [
6].