Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties and Structures of Clay-Polyelectrolyte Blend Hydrogels
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Gels
Volume 4
Issue 3
10.3390/gels4030072
gels-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Thiol-Mediated Chemoselective Strategies for In Situ Formation of Hydrogels

by
Jing Su
Department of Chemistry, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, IL 60625, USA
Gels 2018, 4(3), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels4030072
Submission received: 31 July 2018 / Revised: 28 August 2018 / Accepted: 31 August 2018 / Published: 2 September 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hydrogels are three-dimensional networks composed of hydrated polymer chains and have been a material of choice for many biomedical applications such as drug delivery, biosensing, and tissue engineering due to their unique biocompatibility, tunable physical characteristics, flexible methods of synthesis, and range of constituents. In many cases, methods for crosslinking polymer precursors to form hydrogels would benefit from being highly selective in order to avoid cross-reactivity with components of biological systems leading to adverse effects. Crosslinking reactions involving the thiol group (SH) offer unique opportunities to construct hydrogel materials of diverse properties under mild conditions. This article reviews and comments on thiol-mediated chemoselective and biocompatible strategies for crosslinking natural and synthetic macromolecules to form injectable hydrogels for applications in drug delivery and cell encapsulation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hydrogels are a class of highly hydrated materials with three-dimensional (3D) networks composed of hydrophilic polymers, which are either synthetic or natural in origin [1]. The structural integrity of hydrogels depends on the crosslinks formed between polymer chains via various physical interactions and chemical bonds. Because they have mechanical properties similar to the extracellular matrix in native tissues, hydrogels have been widely employed as implantable medical devices such as contact lenses and biosensors [2,3,4,5], surgical adhesives [6,7], immunoisolating capsules for tissue transplantations [8,9], scaffolds for tissue regeneration [10,11,12], and materials for drug delivery [13,14]. In particular, in situ forming hydrogels have been very attractive since they allow the delivery of polymer precursors in combination with cells and soluble drugs in aqueous solutions through injection, resulting in the formation of 3D functional hydrogel networks at desired locations [15,16].
Tremendous natural and synthetic materials have been developed for the in situ formation of physical hydrogels by noncovalent electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonding, and hydrophobic interactions [15,17]. Many of these, however, need to be initiated by changes in pH, temperature, or ionic concentration, such as pH-sensitive leucine-zipper protein assembly [18], thermosensitive collagen gelation [19], Alginate-Ca2+ crosslinking [20], and peptide amphiphile assembly [21,22,23]. These environmental triggers are not always physiologically relevant or biocompatible, and can be irreversibly detrimental to encapsulated cells and macromolecule drugs. It is also difficult to reproducibly control these conditions in clinical settings. In addition, physically crosslinked hydrogels do not have sufficient mechanical strength and structural stability against environmental changes or even hydrodynamic shearing. On the other hand, the crosslinking of polymers through covalent chemical bond formation in physiological conditions can produce robust hydrogel networks bearing tunable mechanical strength and stability in a much greater range. Hydrogels formed in situ through chemical crosslinking alone or through a hybrid of physical and chemical crosslinking have been shown to meet the needs of many different biomedical applications, from artificial load-bearing connective tissue, to 3D tissue scaffolds, to controlled delivery of therapeutics [24,25].
In order to develop chemically crosslinked hydrogels to achieve a desired biomedical function, the right polymer precursors, crosslinking methods, and degradation properties of formed hydrogel are all essential. A good understanding of the biological system of interest is required to evaluate the interactions between the system and the applied polymer precursors, crosslinking catalyst/initiators, any possible product released from the crosslinking reaction, and degradation products from hydrogels. In many cases, methods of polymer crosslinking would benefit from being highly selective to avoid cross-reactivity and adverse effects on functional components of the biological system (Figure 1). In physiologically relevant environments, as focused on in this review, chemoselectivity is defined as the preferred reactivity of a chemical group toward another specific functionality in the presence of multiple potentially reactive functionalities, especially those existing in biological complexes. The past two decades have witnessed a remarkable advancement of bio-orthogonal chemical reactions that covalently connect unnatural chemical structures [26], for example, 1,3-dipolar click cycloaddition and Diels–Alder cycloaddition, providing promising solutions to eliminate interference with biological systems during the formation of polymeric hydrogels, as summarized in several recent reviews [24,25,27]. However, these unnatural, usually expensive building blocks may significantly increase the cost of materials, and this limits the use of bio-orthogonal reactions for producing hydrogels in reality.
On the other hand, polymers presenting naturally existing functionalities such as the amino groups (NH2) and thiols (SH, sulfhydryl), are still widely used in biomedical research and applications because of the relatively low cost and great availability. For example, the natural polymer chitosan presents amino groups; polypeptides can present amino groups through lysine residues and thiol groups at cysteine residues; and synthetic macromolecules functionalized with amine or thiol groups are readily available from many chemical suppliers at affordable prices. When these polymers are used in the presence of biological components, a commonly applied strategy for achieving chemoselectivity during hydrogel crosslinking is by kinetic control, in which exogenous polymer precursors are applied at much higher concentrations than those biological components that are potentially reactive, driving crosslinking reactions to occur mainly between externally supplied polymers.
Compared to the amino group, the thiol group occurs at lower abundance in naturally existing molecules and therefore bears relatively higher chemoselectivity, which can be kinetically “manipulated” to direct reactions mainly taking place between exogenous thiol-containing polymers and crosslinkers. This review summarizes the strategies for chemically crosslinking polymers through thiol-mediated reactions to form hydrogels in situ for biomedical applications. The goal of this review is not to provide a complete coverage of works that utilized these strategies, but rather to highlight inspiring research that opened new horizons of chemoselective hydrogels. Discussions are aimed at giving guidance on how the crosslinking method shall be chosen based on the type of polymer precursors, the desired gelation kinetics, the need for modification of hydrogel networks with biochemical cues, and the effects of crosslinking on the biological targets and surroundings.

2. Reactivity of the Thiol Group

A thiol compound refers to an organic molecule containing a sulfhydryl (SH) group bonded to a carbon atom. The SH group is a naturally existing functionality, as seen on the side chain of the amino acid cysteine in proteins and peptides, and in low-molecular-weight natural molecules [28]. The SH group participates in the formation of disulfide bonds (S–S) that are essential to tertiary structures of proteins. This functionality or its anion form (–S−) is also present in the active sites of many enzymes such as caspase proteases and ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes [29,30], using its nucleophilicity to mediate various transformations of substrates. These natural biochemical reactions inspired the development of thiol-based conjugation methods, mainly utilizing the good nucleophilicity of the sulfur atom toward electron-deficient moieties including α-halo carbonyl-containing compounds and α, β-unsaturated compounds, such as maleimide and vinyl sulfone, as reviewed by Stenzel [31]. At the physiological pH, the nucleophilicity of thiol is 1000 times stronger than the ionized amino group, enabling thiols to react with electrophiles with a much higher selectivity. Therefore, the thiol group has been an attractive functionality used in the chemical modification and crosslinking of polymers [31], despite the strong odors of thiol-containing compounds.
Most of the thiol-engaged crosslinking methods can be assigned to two categories according to the mechanisms of reactions: addition reactions and substitution reactions. Addition reactions simply connect the reactive groups present on the polymers (or crosslinkers) without releasing any side products to the solution environment. Some of the most widely used bioconjugation methods including Michael-type addition and photoinitiated thiol-ene addition belong to this category. In substitution reactions each bonding formation is accompanied by the release of by-products, usually low-molecular-weight molecules. Several reactions for the formation of disulfide bonds, native chemical ligation and the thiol-epoxy reaction are examples of thiol-involved substitution reactions. Presumably, addition reactions would be ideal for the crosslinking of biocompatible polymeric molecules because no side products are generated and interfere with the biological targets in contact with the hydrogels formed. On the other hand, the use of substitution reactions for in situ hydrogel formation does require additional examination of how released side products affect a system of study, such as encapsulated drugs and cells/tissues. Methods based on both types of reaction mechanisms have been applied in the development of in situ forming hydrogels. Table 1 outlines the pros and cons of each crosslinking reaction that will be discussed in detail in Section 3 and Section 4.

3. Substitution Reactions of Thiols for Hydrogel Crosslinking

3.1. Formation of Disulfide Bonds

Figure 2 summarizes the strategies for constructing disulfide-crosslinked hydrogels. Traditionally disulfide formation results from the oxidation of thiols exposed to molecular oxygen in ambient air or mild oxidizing reagents such as Cu(II)SO4 (Figure 2A). Disulfide bonds can dissociate in a reductive environment, for example, in the presence of free thiols such as glutathione (GSH) and dithiothreitol (DTT), which allows the design of redox-responsive degradation [32,33].
The formation of disulfide-crosslinked hydrogel nanoparticles was reported by Zhang et al. using hyperbranched polyglycerol terminated with reduced dithiolane groups (Figure 3) [34]. In a stepwise manner, thiol groups on the polymers were partially used for disulfide crosslinking, while the remaining thiols were reserved to conjugate maleimide-tagged doxorubicin (DOX). By carrying out the gel formation and DOX conjugation in different orders, the researchers were able to control the presentation of the DOX drug molecules either at the gel surface or within the gel particles. Both types of nanogel particles were shown to be redox-degradable through disulfide cleavage and tested for delivering the DOX to cancer cells in vitro.
Because a strong oxidative environment can damage the function of many bioactive molecules, mild oxidative conditions are needed to crosslink thiol-presenting polymers to form disulfide hydrogels for encapsulating drugs and cells. However, most of these mild oxidation conditions cannot produce a sufficiently crosslinked network in a short period of time (usually it needs more than a day) [35]. The slow reaction kinetics allows undesired interactions between the thiol-presenting polymers/crosslinkers and those naturally occurring thiols, disulfides and electrophiles to become competitive, which may alter the biological system of study [36]; therefore, this crosslinking method is not always considered as biocompatible. Additionally, the slow crosslinking prevents disulfide hydrogels from applications in clinical settings where the rapid gelation of injectable materials is necessary.
Thiol-disulfide exchange is a substitution reaction used by nature to form disulfide bonds (Figure 2B); however, it also occurs at a relatively slow rate unless high local concentrations of thiols and disulfides are available [37,38]. Zhang and Waymouth recently reported a thiol-triggered ring-opening of thiolane disulfide in polymeric self-assembly produced free thiol groups, which participated in the formation of a dynamic thiol-disulfide exchange hydrogel network with a self-healing property (Figure 4) [39]. Maleimide was added to consume free thiol groups within the hydrogel and prohibited thiol-disulfide exchange, changing an adaptable network to a rigid, permanent network.
A photo-initiated, radical-mediated thiol-disulfide exchange reaction was demonstrated by Wang et al. to construct hydrogels using a comb-like polymer of polyethylene glycol grafted with disulfide-linked poly(ethyl methacrylate) derivative P(EMA-SS-PEG) [40]. UV irritation in the presence of a radical initiator triggered the breakage of some disulfides between PEG and grafted EMA and generated free thiols that formed new disulfides among PEG polymer chains to produce crosslinked network through a mechanism suggested in Figure 5.
A modified version of thiol-disulfide exchange between thiols and activated disulfides (e.g., pyridyl disulfide) proceeds faster than thiol oxidation to form disulfides, and has been applied to polymer crosslinking to form nanogels within hours [41]. Recent examples include the work by Peng et al. that demonstrated the crosslinking of pyridyl disulfide-presenting copolymers with four-armed, thiol-terminated linkers [42]. The disulfide-crosslinked nanogels were used for the encapsulation and deactivation of a cellulase. The enzyme activity of the cellulase was recovered as the protein was released from the hydrogel trap upon DTT-induced disulfide bond breaking and gel degradation (Figure 6).
A rapid exchange between thiols and thiosulfonates was reported by Schäfer and co-workers [43]. Polyamides presenting S-ethylsulfonyl-l-cysteine units were used to react with free thiols and generate disulfide tags along the polymer chains within a minute (Figure 7). This substitution reaction was shown to be quantitative and highly selective, and released small alkylsulfonate as a side product with low toxicity. This method has been used by the same research group to react thiolsulfonate-containing block copolymers with dithiol crosslinkers to interconnect self-assembled micelles (Figure 7B) [44], and may serve as an effective strategy for the production of disulfide hydrogel networks in situ for other applications.

3.2. Native Chemical Ligation

Native chemical ligation (NCL) is the substitution reaction between a thioester and a 2-aminoethanethiol moiety, for example, an N-terminal cysteine residue of a protein or peptide. The reaction yields an initial thioester exchange product that spontaneously undergoes an S- to N-acyl migration to form a new amide bond [45], as shown in Figure 8A.
The chemoselectivity of NCL lies in that only the 2-aminoethanethiol moiety is reactive with a thioester to complete this transthioesterification-rearrangement process and form a stable amide bond. A thiol group alone, as on the side chain of a cysteine residue in the middle of polypeptide chains, or an amino group only, does not interfere with the NCL reaction. This mild ligation method has proven useful in the chemical synthesis of large peptides and proteins [46] and peptide-based block polymers and dendrimers [47,48]. In an early application of NCL to covalently connect polymers, Collier and co-workers reported the cross-linking of pre-assembled β-sheet-forming peptides with terminal thioester and cysteine groups to increase the stiffness of physical peptide hydrogels [49].
Hu et al. applied NCL to form PEG hydrogels in situ in an aqueous environment (Figure 8B) [35]. Mixing solutions of four-armed PEG macromonomers terminated with thioester and cysteine groups at pH 7~8 resulted in the formation of robust hydrogels rapidly within minutes. These hydrogels remained stable after treatment with excess reducing agents such as tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) and 2-mercaptoethanol, implying the polymeric network was crosslinked by amide bonds formed through the NCL mechanism, rather than by intermolecular disulfide bonds between Cys groups. This hydrogel formation strategy was later applied to the encapsulation of extracellular matrix proteins to engineer the microenvironment of human mesenchymal stem cells in 3D culture by Jung and co-workers [50]. In a more recent application of the strategy, cysteine-functionalized hyaluronic acids were crosslinked with multi-armed PEG-thioester macromonomers to form hydrogels in situ, expanding the choices of biomedical polymers for NCL crosslinking [51].
Early studies of NCL-mediated hydrogel crosslinking revealed some drawbacks of the method including the instability of thioesters toward hydrolysis and especially a potential concern about the adverse biological effects of low-molecular-weight thiol side products released from NCL and hydrolysis of thioesters, which may vary in different applications. The use of thiolactone in place of a thioester to react with cysteine can generate an amide bond without releasing a soluble thiol by-product, as shown in Figure 9. Fan and co-workers used thiolactone-grafted and cysteine-grafted poly(glutamic acid) precursors to form NCL-crosslinked hydrogels compatible with cultured mouse fibroblast cells [52].
A modified version of the NCL method, oxo-ester-mediated NCL (OMNCL, Figure 10), was used by Strehin and co-workers to crosslink eight-armed PEG macromonomers terminated with N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) active ester and cysteine [53]. The gelation of these macromonomers occurred rapidly within 20 s after mixing, while the crosslinking of macromonomers presenting NHS and amino groups was shown to be 10 times slower, confirming the initial, rapid ester exchange between NHS and the thiol group in cysteine, followed by S→N rearrangement to form an amide bond. Although NHS ester is hydrolytically unstable, the hydrolysis product, NHS, also as the side product released from the OMNCL, has much less interference with biological systems than thiols produced in NCL. In a recent report by Boere et al., NCL and OMNCL methods were compared in connecting cysteine-grafted poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) with linkers containing thioester or NHS [54]. Chemical crosslinking by OMNCL produced hydrogels with higher stiffness and lower in vitro toxicity to mouse endothelial cells than gels formed by NCL.
Hydrogel crosslinking by NCL and OMNCL reactions generates free thiol moieties bound to the polymeric network, which may introduce anti-oxidative properties to hydrogels and therefore can increase the survival of cells cultured in the hydrogel or at the gel surface [55]. Furthermore, these immobilized thiol groups can be used to conjugate molecules containing thiol-reactive structures including maleimide and α-halo carbonyl groups, to install desired functions in formed hydrogel networks (Figure 11A) [35]. A second strategy of hydrogel functionalization is to sacrifice a certain amount of thiol groups in the polymer precursors to attach thiol-reactive molecules prior to in situ gelation. Su et al. utilized a rapid and quantitative Michael-type addition to conjugate a maleimide-terminated, anti-inflammatory peptide to a low percentage of Cys moieties of four-armed PEG-Cys macromonomers (Figure 11B) [56]. Subsequent mixing of the modified macromonomers with thioester-terminated four-armed PEGs resulted in the formation of peptide-conjugated NCL hydrogels that promoted the survival of encapsulated pancreatic islet β-cells. However, a limitation of this functionalization strategy is that bioactive molecules can only be incorporated at low densities since the majority of Cys groups need to be retained to react with thioester groups for productive crosslinking. Alternatively, the incorporation of the functional molecules (e.g., cell survival-promoting peptides) into the initial macromonomer structures for NCL or OMNCL crosslinking (Figure 11C), may offer a better way to present these molecules at more variable densities in a hydrogel system.
An interesting application of the NCL strategy in the dissolution of thioester-linked hydrogels was demonstrated by Ghobril and co-workers [57]. Dendritic macromers presenting multiple thiol termini were used to react with a PEG crosslinker containing the NHS active esters to form thiolester networks (Figure 12). A small thiol molecule, methyl ester of l-cysteine, added at high concentrations to the hydrogel, was able to trigger the dissolution of the gel by the NCL mechanism that broke the thioester links in the macromolecular network. This gel dissolution strategy was applied to the development of dissolvable sealant for wound closure [57,58], as examples of smart biomaterial design inspired by good understanding of chemical reaction mechanisms.

3.3. Thiol-Epoxy Reaction (Ring-Opening Reaction of Epoxides)

The thiol-epoxy reaction involves a nucleophilic substitution between the thiol/thiolate nucleophile and an electrophilic carbon on the epoxy ring, leading to the ring opening followed by proton transfer to generate a thioether-alcohol product (Figure 13A). Although initiated by the substitution mechanism, the overall outcome of the reaction is similar to an addition reaction in which there are no organic by-products.
The thiol-epoxy reaction has been used for the polymerization of monomer building blocks [59], the functionalization of polymers [60], and was shown by Gao et al. for crosslinking poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide-co-glycidyl methacrylate) to form hydrogels in situ under physiological conditions (pH 7~8, 37 °C, Figure 13B) [61]. The polymer precursors started gelation within seconds when present at 10~20% weight percent in aqueous solutions, and the resultant hydrogels were shown to be nontoxic to Hela cells incubated together. The fast reaction kinetics and relatively high selectivity shown in this study suggest a strong potential of the thiol-epoxy reaction for the development of injectable hydrogel materials.

4. Addition Reactions Involving Thiols for Hydrogel Crosslinking

4.1. Michael-Type Additions

A Michael-type addition reaction refers to the addition of a nucleophile to an electron-deficient carbon–carbon double bond (olefin). This type of reaction between thiols and various activated double bonds, such as those in acrylates, maleimide and vinyl sulfones (Figure 14), has been widely applied in bioconjugation and biomaterials due to mild conditions and high yields. One of the early examples of thiol-acrylate Michael addition for hydrogel crosslinking was reported by Hubbell et al., where PEGs multi-functionalized with thiols and acrylate groups were crosslinked to form hydrogels for the encapsulation and controlled release of albumin [62]. The same strategy was used by Elia and co-workers to produce hydrogels by connecting thiol-modified heparin and hyaluronic acid with PEG-diacrylate for the local delivery of growth factors by injection to achieve stimulated angiogenesis in a mouse model [63]. In a very recent application of this reaction, four-armed PEG-acrylate macromonomers were crosslinked by thiol groups of cysteines in heparin-binding peptides to generate a 3D environment for culturing encapsulated mouse cardiac stem cells [64]. The study showed that the crosslinking kinetics and the mechanical and biodegradation properties of the hydrogel can be tuned by varying the concentrations of the acrylate-macromonomers and the cysteine-bearing peptides to resemble the natural mouse heart tissue.
While maleimide is an electron-deficient olefin widely used for thiol-mediated bioconjugation [31,65], its utilization in chemical crosslinking of hydrogel has not been as common as acrylates and vinyl sulfones. Phelps et al., demonstrated that in triethanolamine-buffered solutions, four-armed PEG macromonomers presenting maleimide groups were able to crosslink by reacting with peptides presenting two terminal cysteines with faster kinetics compared to acrylate- or vinyl sulfone-presenting four-armed PEG macromere [66]. However, vinyl sulfone moieties have been shown in other reports as the more reactive in Michael-type additions for the crosslinking of PEG hydrogel networks [36,67]. Vinyl sulfones are expected to merely undergo nucleophilic addition at the olefin double bond, while the addition to maleimide is often accompanied by a ring opening reaction that generate charged products that may alter the properties of polymers after crosslinking [68].
A drawback of the Michael-type addition for hydrogel crosslinking manifests where nucleophilic molecules other than thiol-containing polymers/linkers are present during gel formation. Hammer et al. investigated the nonspecific chemical interaction between lysosome and linear PEGs terminated with maleimide, acrylamide or vinyl sulfone [36]. Elevating the pH of the environment (inorganic buffers) from 4 to 9 resulted in increased PEG conjugation to lysozyme by each of the three groups tested, with vinyl sulfone giving the highest modification and acrylamide the lowest modification of the protein. Even when high concentrations of thiol-functionalized PEGs were introduced to compete with lysozyme to react with these electron-deficient olefin groups, protein modification through the vinyl sulfone was still significant, implying a relatively low chemoselectivity of vinyl sulfone. Additionally, these fast Michael-type additions may not be ideal for applications that need consistent hydrogel crosslinking. For example, nonuniformity at the microscale due to different degrees of crosslinking were observed in PEG hydrogels formed by the thiol-maleimide addition, resulting in varied cellular responses to hydrogels, as reported by Darling et al. [69].
The dynamic character of Michael-type addition reactions has received increasing attention because of its potential use in the development of degradable and malleable polymeric hydrogel materials (Figure 15A). Baldwin and Kiick reported maleimide-thiol crosslinked hydrogels degraded through a glutathione-triggered retro Michael-type addition reaction, which took place at a slower rate than gel breakdown by reductive cleavage of disulfides [70]. A similar strategy of crosslinking and dissolution of hydrogels through the reversible maleimide-thiol addition was later utilized by Kharkar and co-workers to develop multifunctional PEG hydrogels that degraded in response to three orthogonal stimuli, one of which is reductive GSH that triggers the retromaleimide-thiol addition by, with tunable degradation kinetics (Figure 15B) [71]. Kuhl et al. and Chakma et al. reported that the reversible Michael-addition crosslinking could be used to improve the self-healing properties of gels at elevated temperature (≥60 °C) and increased pH (≥9) [72,73]; however, these conditions may not find immediate application in current biomedical studies.

4.2. Photo-Initiated Thiol-Ene and Thiol-Yne Additions

Photo-initiated crosslinking of hydrophilic polymers is one of the most widely used methods for in situ hydrogel formation. Traditionally, a solution containing polymeric precursors with photo-reactive groups (e.g., acrylate derivatives) and low concentrations of radical-generating initiators is delivered to a desired location, and subsequent irradiation of UV light triggers the crosslinking of polymers to form gels [74,75,76,77]. Although, in principle, photocrosslinking can take place preferably among reactive polymers through kinetic control, the reaction lacks high chemoselectivity because many bioactive molecules contain UV-sensitive groups and can be chemically transformed upon UV irradiation. There are inherent limitations associated with the photo-curing process such as the use of potentially toxic photoinitiators [78,79], the generation of highly reactive radicals, and the eventual exothermic effect of photo-reactions, which can be detrimental to functions of biological systems in contact with hydrogels [80]. Limited penetration of light into deeper tissues further restricts the use of photocrosslinked hydrogels as carriers of therapeutics in many applications [74]. Nevertheless, the great availability of various polymers with photo-reactive groups and the convenience of applying light on demand to control gelation and thus the mechanic properties of the hydrogels render this method still attractive.
The application of thiol addition across unsaturated carbon-carbon bonds, such as the double bonds in alkenes and triple bonds in alkynes, has flourished in the field of biomaterials in the last decade [81,82,83,84]. The photochemically induced thiol-ene reaction proceeds by a radical mechanism to give an anti-Markovnikov-type thioether, which is compatible with water and oxygen and usually accompanied by Michael-type addition (Figure 16). An early study by Roydholm et al. described that varying the ratios of thiol- and acrylate-containing polymer precursors and reaction conditions could switch the main hydrogel crosslinking mechanism between the different modes, Michael-type addition, radical-initiated thiol-ene, or the mixed mechanism, resulting in hydrogels with adjustable mechanical and degradation properties [85]. The photochemical thiol-ene addition has been considered “clickable” because of its high efficiency and orthogonality to a wide range of functional groups [86,87]. Beside its use in bioconjugation [88,89,90], this reaction has been widely applied to crosslinking of polymeric hydrogels for the delivery and controlled release of therapeutics as discussed in a recent review [91].
The use of norbornene as the ene moiety enables a strain-promoted thiol-ene reaction and further improves the gelation speed and chemoselectivity of this method (Figure 17A) [77,92]. Shih et al. reported a comparison between hydrogels formed by thiol-ene photocrosslinking of PEG-tetra-norbornene (PEG4NB) and dithiothreitol (DTT) and those by Michael addition crosslinking of PEG-tetra-acrylate with DTT [93]. The thiol-ene photocrosslinking resulted in faster gelation rate and higher degree of network formation as revealed by rheometry. Fairbanks et al. demonstrated the functionalization of thiol-norbenene photocrosslinked hydrogels in two ways: (1) dicysteine-terminated peptides containing a protease substrate sequence were used to react with norbornene-terminated crosslinkers to form degradable hydrogels; (2) the conjugation of cysteine-containing peptides to the formed gels were achieved through a second thiol-ene reaction between the cysteine thiol and unlinked norbornene on the polymer network [92]. Both methods were used to present an RGD-presenting cell adhesion peptide on hydrogels to support the attachment and spreading of human MSC cells (Figure 17B). The majority of studies using thiol-norbornene linked hydrogels for the delivery of therapeutics have been reviewed elsewhere [77,91]. Recent advancement in the fast-booming regime of these hydrogels includes varying the type of polymers, radical initiators [94,95], and light sources [95,96] combined with modern material processing technologies [97,98,99], providing better control over the mechanical and biological properties of thiol-ene hydrogels for biomedical applications.
Photo-initiated thiol-alkyne addition reactions were reported more than half a century ago but not used for materials development until recently, and received a lot less attention than other photocrosslinking reactions [84,100]. Compared to the 1:1 stoichiometry of the thiol-ene reaction, a thiol-yne addition utilizes each alkyne group to react with two thiols groups, where a vinylene sulfide intermediate is first formed and bears higher reactivity than the starting alkyne toward the addition of thiols (Figure 18). Theoretically, thiol-yne reactions result in higher crosslink density of polymer networks than thiol-ene hydrogels, and have been verified by their high conversion rates under ambient humidity and atmospheric oxygen conditions [101]. In early demonstrations of thiol-yne crosslinked hydrogels by Fairbanks et al. and Chan et al., uniform networks were produced from multi-armed macromonomers presenting thiol and alkyne groups [101,102]. The geometry of macromonomers exerted an effect on the reactivity of thiol and alkyne groups toward crosslinking, observed as the decreased network formation with increased branchness of macromonomers (multiplicity of arms) [102]. Unreacted thiol and alkyne groups on the hydrogel network can be used for incorporation of desired chemical functionalities either during crosslinking or post-gelation [103,104].
As an alternative to the photo-initiated thiol-yne reaction, a non-radical thiol-yne addition was reported by Truong and Dove as a base-catalyzed nucleophilic addition reaction between thiols and electrophilic alkynes to produce vinylene sulfide [105]. This reaction has been shown to be efficient for crosslinking thiol- and alkyne-containing PEG macromonomers in PBS solutions at pH 7.4 [106], and applied to the formation of ECM-mimicking hydrogels as a model system for supporting cancer cell growth (Figure 19) [107].
A unique capacity of photo-initiated crosslinking methods (as well as degradation) mentioned above is to allow temporal and spatial control over the hydrogel structure and properties in order to generate complex bioactive scaffolds [108,109,110]. For instance, the thiol-ene photocrosslinking was used to fabricate ultrathin, micro-patterned hydrogel films on solid substrates and 3D-patterned peptide-presenting hydrogels with tunable crosslinking density and biochemical cues for cell encapsulation [92,111,112,113,114]. Again, as new methods for photo crosslinking advance toward the use of light in the visible and near IR range [78,115] and initiators with low toxicity [95,116,117], these hydrogels will find even wider applications in developing responsive biomaterials and creating complex 3D microenvironments for tissue engineering.

5. Summary and Perspectives

Covalently crosslinked hydrogels have structure stability and biomechanical properties that are tunable in a large range. Chemoselective crosslinking strategies are necessary for developing injectable, in situ-formed hydrogels in contact with the human body and encapsulated therapeutics. Although not completely bio-orthogonal, the thiol group is one of the most utilized functionalities for selective crosslinking of polymers, producing hydrogels through a diversity of chemical reactions, as discussed in this review. Kinetic control is necessary to limit the unwanted cross-reaction of polymers with a system of study and further improve the chemoselectivity and compatibility of the thiol-mediated hydrogel crosslinking in situ. It should be noted that, when thiol-containing polymers are present at high concentrations, disulfide formation among thiols is unavoidable and always results in additional crosslinking during and after the initial formation of hydrogel by a different reaction [35,118], which may make it difficult to precisely control the crosslinking degree of gel networks.
So far, studies of hydrogel material have been focused on bulk characteristics such as the rate of gelation, and the mechanical and/or biological properties, but the fundamental understanding of polymer crosslinking at the molecular level has not received adequate attention. For instance, during hydrogel network formation, the functionalities of the polymer backbone that are not directly involved in crosslinking reactions can gather and compose a local environment, influencing the continuation of crosslinking by H-bonding and acid–base catalysis (not only limited to thiol-based reactions). While the PEG backbone may be considered to be “inert” or “nondisturbing” to many crosslinking reactions, other types of polymers need to be examined depending on the specific crosslinking reaction used [119]. Investigation of the molecular interaction within the 3D network is challenging and requires the use of advanced instrumentation and computer-aided molecular simulation. The knowledge from future studies in this area will provide guidance for the design and selection of polymers and chemoselective strategies in applications of chemically crosslinked hydrogels in biomedical research and clinical practice.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the Northeastern Illinois University Faculty Research Stipend Program for the support in completing this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peppas, N.A.; Hilt, J.Z.; Khademhosseini, A.; Langer, R. Hydrogels in biology and medicine: From molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 1345–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Willis, S.L.; Court, J.L.; Redman, R.P.; Wang, J.H.; Leppard, S.W.; O’Byrne, V.J.; Small, S.A.; Lewis, A.L.; Jones, S.A.; Stratford, P.W. A novel phosphorylcholine-coated contact lens for extended wear use. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 3261–3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miyata, T.; Uragami, T.; Nakamae, K. Biomolecule-sensitive hydrogels. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 2002, 54, 79–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chaterji, S.; Kwon, I.K.; Park, K. Smart polymeric gels: Redefining the limits of biomedical devices. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 1083–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Richter, A.; Paschew, G.; Klatt, S.; Lienig, J.; Arndt, K.F.; Adler, H.J.P. Review on hydrogel-based pH sensors and microsensors. Sensors 2008, 8, 561–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Brubaker, C.E.; Messersmith, P.B. Enzymatically degradable mussel-inspired adhesive hydrogel. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 4326–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ghobril, C.; Grinstaff, M.W. The chemistry and engineering of polymeric hydrogel adhesives for wound closure: A tutorial. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 1820–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, R.H. Materials for immunoisolated cell transplantation. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 1998, 33, 87–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zimmermann, U.; Mimietz, S.; Zimmermann, H.; Hillgartner, M.; Schneider, H.; Ludwig, J.; Hasse, C.; Haase, A.; Rothmund, M.; Fuhr, G. Hydrogel-based non-autologous cell and tissue therapy. BioTechniques 2000, 29, 564–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Suh, J.K.F.; Matthew, H.W.T. Application of chitosan-based polysaccharide biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering: A review. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 2589–2598. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Slaughter, B.V.; Khurshid, S.S.; Fisher, O.Z.; Khademhosseini, A.; Peppas, N.A. Hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3307–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sgambato, A.; Cipolla, L.; Russo, L. Bioresponsive hydrogels: Chemical strategies and perspectives in tissue engineering. Gels 2016, 2, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hoare, T.R.; Kohane, D.S. Hydrogels in drug delivery: Progress and challenges. Polymer 2008, 49, 1993–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kabanov, A.V.; Vinogradov, S.V. Nanogels as pharmaceutical carriers: Finite networks of infinite capabilities. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5418–5429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yu, L.; Ding, J.D. Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1473–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kretlow, J.D.; Young, S.; Klouda, L.; Wong, M.; Mikos, A.G. Injectable biomaterials for regenerating complex craniofacial tissues. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3368–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nguyen, Q.V.; Huynh, D.P.; Park, J.H.; Lee, D.S. Injectable polymeric hydrogels for the delivery of therapeutic agents: A review. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 72, 602–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Petka, W.A.; Harden, J.L.; McGrath, K.P.; Wirtz, D.; Tirrell, D.A. Reversible hydrogels from self-assembling artificial proteins. Science 1998, 281, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yamazaki, C.M.; Asada, S.; Kitagawa, K.; Koide, T. Artificial collagen gels via self-assembly of de novo designed peptides. Biopolymers 2008, 90, 816–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mano, J.F.; Silva, G.A.; Azevedo, H.S.; Malafaya, P.B.; Sousa, R.A.; Silva, S.S.; Boesel, L.F.; Oliveira, J.M.; Santos, T.C.; Marques, A.P.; et al. Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Present status and some moving trends. J. R. Soc. Interface 2007, 4, 999–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Anderson, J.M.; Andukuri, A.; Lim, D.J.; Jun, H.W. Modulating the gelation properties of self-assembling peptide amphiphiles. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 3447–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Capito, R.M.; Azevedo, H.S.; Velichko, Y.S.; Mata, A.; Stupp, S.I. Self-assembly of large and small molecules into hierarchically ordered sacs and membranes. Science 2008, 319, 1812–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hainline, K.M.; Fries, C.N.; Collier, J.H. Progress toward the clinical translation of bioinspired peptide and protein assemblies. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1700930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nimmo, C.M.; Shoichet, M.S. Regenerative biomaterials that “click”: Simple, aqueous-based protocols for hydrogel synthesis, surface immobilization, and 3d patterning. Bioconjug. Chem. 2011, 22, 2199–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Buwalda, S.J.; Vermonden, T.; Hennink, W.E. Hydrogels for therapeutic delivery: Current developments and future directions. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 316–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Anseth, K.S.; Klok, H.-A. Click chemistry in biomaterials, nanomedicine, and drug delivery. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lin, C.-C. Recent advances in crosslinking chemistry of biomimetic poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 39844–398583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Gruhlke, M.C.H.; Slusarenko, A.J. The biology of reactive sulfur species (rss). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 59, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, J.; Yuan, J. Caspases in apoptosis and beyond. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6194–6206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Tolbert, B.S.; Tajc, S.G.; Webb, H.; Snyder, J.; Nielsen, J.E.; Miller, B.L.; Basavappa, R. The active site cysteine of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes has a significantly elevated PKA: Functional implications. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 16385–16391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Stenzel, M.H. Bioconjugation using thiols: Old chemistry rediscovered to connect polymers with nature’s building blocks. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Y.-L.; Zhu, L.; Liu, Z.; Cheng, R.; Meng, F.; Cui, J.-H.; Ji, S.-J.; Zhong, Z. Reversibly stabilized multifunctional dextran nanoparticles efficiently deliver doxorubicin into the nuclei of cancer cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9914–9918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Meng, F.; Hennink, W.E.; Zhong, Z. Reduction-sensitive polymers and bioconjugates for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 2180–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, X.; Achazi, K.; Steinhilber, D.; Kratz, F.; Dernedde, J.; Haag, R. A facile approach for dual-responsive prodrug nanogels based on dendritic polyglycerols with minimal leaching. J. Control. Release 2014, 174, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hu, B.H.; Su, J.; Messersmith, P.B. Hydrogels cross-linked by native chemical ligation. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 2194–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hammer, N.; Brandl, F.P.; Kirchhof, S.; Messmann, V.; Goepferich, A.M. Protein compatibility of selected cross-linking reactions for hydrogels. Macromol. Biosci. 2015, 15, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nagy, P. Kinetics and mechanisms of thiol–disulfide exchange covering direct substitution and thiol oxidation-mediated pathways. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 2013, 18, 1623–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yoon, J.A.; Kamada, J.; Koynov, K.; Mohin, J.; Nicolaÿ, R.; Zhang, Y.; Balazs, A.C.; Kowalewski, T.; Matyjaszewski, K. Self-healing polymer films based on thiol–disulfide exchange reactions and self-healing kinetics measured using atomic force microscopy. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, X.; Waymouth, R.M. 1,2-Dithiolane-derived dynamic, covalent materials: Cooperative self-assembly and reversible cross-linking. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3822–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, L.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Huang, D.; Yang, F.; Shen, H.; Li, Z.; Wu, D. UV-triggered thiol-disulfide exchange reaction towards tailored biodegradable hydrogels. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 1429–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ryu, J.-H.; Jiwpanich, S.; Chacko, R.; Bickerton, S.; Thayumanavan, S. Surface-functionalizable polymer nanogels with facile hydrophobic guest encapsulation capabilities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8246–8247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Peng, H.; Rübsam, K.; Jakob, F.; Pazdzior, P.; Schwaneberg, U.; Pich, A. Reversible deactivation of enzymes by redox-responsive nanogel carriers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2016, 37, 1765–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Schafer, O.; Huesmann, D.; Muhl, C.; Barz, M. Rethinking cysteine protective groups: S-alkylsulfonyl-l-cysteines for chemoselective disulfide formation. Chemistry (Easton) 2016, 22, 18085–18091. [Google Scholar]
  44. Schäfer, O.; Klinker, K.; Braun, L.; Huesmann, D.; Schultze, J.; Koynov, K.; Barz, M. Combining orthogonal reactive groups in block copolymers for functional nanoparticle synthesis in a single step. ACS Macro Lett. 2017, 1140–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Johnson, E.C.B.; Kent, S.B.H. Insights into the mechanism and catalysis of the native chemical ligation reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6640–6646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dawson, P.E.; Kent, S.B.H. Synthesis of native proteins by chemical ligation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 923–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Paramonov, S.E.; Gauba, V.; Hartgerink, J.D. Synthesis of collagen-like peptide polymers by native chemical ligation. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 7555–7561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dirksen, A.; Meijer, E.W.; Adriaens, W.; Hackeng, T.M. Strategy for the synthesis of multivalent peptide-based nonsymmetric dendrimers by native chemical ligation. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1667–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jung, J.P.; Jones, J.L.; Cronier, S.A.; Collier, J.H. Modulating the mechanical properties of self-assembled peptide hydrogels via native chemical ligation. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 2143–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Jung, J.P.; Sprangers, A.J.; Byce, J.R.; Su, J.; Squirrell, J.M.; Messersmith, P.B.; Eliceiri, K.W.; Ogle, B.M. Ecm-incorporated hydrogels cross-linked via native chemical ligation to engineer stem cell microenvironments. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 3102–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhang, X.; Sun, P.; Huangshan, L.; Hu, B.-H.; Messersmith, P.B. Improved method for synthesis of cysteine modified hyaluronic acid for in situ hydrogel formation. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 9662–9665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Fan, Z.; Cheng, P.; Liu, M.; Li, D.; Liu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Ding, Z.; Chen, F.; Wang, B.; Tan, X.; et al. Poly(glutamic acid) hydrogels crosslinked via native chemical ligation. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 8656–8662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Strehin, I.; Gourevitch, D.; Zhang, Y.; Heber-Katz, E.; Messersmith, P.B. Hydrogels formed by oxo-ester mediated native chemical ligation. Biomater. Sci. 2013, 1, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Boere, K.W.; van den Dikkenberg, J.; Gao, Y.; Visser, J.; Hennink, W.E.; Vermonden, T. Thermogelling and chemoselectively cross-linked hydrogels with controlled mechanical properties and degradation behavior. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 2840–2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, J.; Shu, Y.; Hao, T.; Wang, Y.; Qian, Y.; Duan, C.; Sun, H.; Lin, Q.; Wang, C. A chitosan-glutathione based injectable hydrogel for suppression of oxidative stress damage in cardiomyocytes. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 9071–9081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Su, J.; Hu, B.H.; Lowe, W.L.; Kaufman, D.B.; Messersmith, P.B. Anti-inflammatory peptide-functionalized hydrogels for insulin-secreting cell encapsulation. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Cynthia, G.; Kristie, C.; Rodriguez, E.K.; Ara, N.; Grinstaff, M.W. A dendritic thioester hydrogel based on thiol–thioester exchange as a dissolvable sealant system for wound closure. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 14070–14074. [Google Scholar]
  58. Konieczynska, M.D.; Grinstaff, M.W. On-demand dissolution of chemically cross-linked hydrogels. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Brandle, A.; Khan, A. Thiol-epoxy ‘click’ polymerization: Efficient construction of reactive and functional polymers. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 3224–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gadwal, I.; Stuparu, M.C.; Khan, A. Homopolymer bifunctionalization through sequential thiol-epoxy and esterification reactions: An optimization, quantification, and structural elucidation study. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 1393–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gao, L.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, W.; Shen, Z.; Li, X. Injectable thiol-epoxy “click” hydrogels. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2016, 54, 2651–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Elbert, D.L.; Pratt, A.B.; Lutolf, M.P.; Halstenberg, S.; Hubbell, J.A. Protein delivery from materials formed by self-selective conjugate addition reactions. J. Control. Release 2001, 76, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Elia, R.; Fuegy, P.W.; van Delden, A.; Firpo, M.A.; Prestwich, G.D.; Peattie, R.A. Stimulation of in vivo angiogenesis by in situ crosslinked, dual growth factor-loaded, glycosaminoglycan hydrogels. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 4630–4638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Speidel, A.T.; Stuckey, D.J.; Chow, L.W.; Jackson, L.H.; Noseda, M.; Abreu Paiva, M.; Schneider, M.D.; Stevens, M.M. Multimodal hydrogel-based platform to deliver and monitor cardiac progenitor/stem cell engraftment. ACS Cent. Sci. 2017, 3, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fu, Y.; Kao, W.J. In situ forming poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels via thiol-maleimide michael-type addition. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2011, 98A, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Phelps, E.A.; Enemchukwu, N.O.; Fiore, V.F.; Sy, J.C.; Murthy, N.; Sulchek, T.A.; Barker, T.H.; García, A.J. Maleimide cross-linked bioactive peg hydrogel exhibits improved reaction kinetics and cross-linking for cell encapsulation and in situ delivery. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Qiu, B.; Stefanos, S.; Ma, J.; Lalloo, A.; Perry, B.A.; Leibowitz, M.J.; Sinko, P.J.; Stein, S. A hydrogel prepared by in situ cross-linking of a thiol-containing poly(ethylene glycol)-based copolymer: A new biomaterial for protein drug delivery. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fontaine, S.D.; Reid, R.; Robinson, L.; Ashley, G.W.; Santi, D.V. Long-term stabilization of maleimide–thiol conjugates. Bioconjug. Chem. 2015, 26, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Darling, N.J.; Hung, Y.-S.; Sharma, S.; Segura, T. Controlling the kinetics of thiol-maleimide michael-type addition gelation kinetics for the generation of homogenous poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Biomaterials 2016, 101, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Baldwin, A.D.; Kiick, K.L. Reversible maleimide-thiol adducts yield glutathione-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol)-heparin hydrogels. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Kharkar, P.M.; Kiick, K.L.; Kloxin, A.M. Design of thiol- and light-sensitive degradable hydrogels using michael-type addition reactions. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 5565–5574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chakma, P.; Rodrigues Possarle, L.H.; Digby, Z.A.; Zhang, B.; Sparks, J.L.; Konkolewicz, D. Dual stimuli responsive self-healing and malleable materials based on dynamic thiol-michael chemistry. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 6534–6543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kuhl, N.; Geitner, R.; Bose, R.K.; Bode, S.; Dietzek, B.; Schmitt, M.; Popp, J.; Garcia, S.J.; van der Zwaag, S.; Schubert, U.S.; et al. Self-healing polymer networks based on reversible michael addition reactions. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2016, 217, 2541–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Elisseeff, J.; Anseth, K.; Sims, D.; McIntosh, W.; Randolph, M.; Langer, R. Transdermal photopolymerization for minimally invasive implantation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 3104–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Elbert, D.L.; Hubbell, J.A. Conjugate addition reactions combined with free-radical cross-linking for the design of materials for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 2001, 2, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Leach, J.B.; Bivens, K.A.; Patrick, C.W.; Schmidt, C.E. Photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels: Natural, biodegradable tissue engineering scaffolds. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 82, 578–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Lin, C.-C.; Ki, C.S.; Shih, H. Thiol–norbornene photoclick hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 41563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Bryant, S.J.; Nuttelman, C.R.; Anseth, K.S. Cytocompatibility of uv and visible light photoinitiating systems on cultured nih/3t3 fibroblasts in vitro. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2000, 11, 439–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Williams, C.G.; Malik, A.N.; Kim, T.K.; Manson, P.N.; Elisseeff, J.H. Variable cytocompatibility of six cell lines with photoinitiators used for polymerizing hydrogels and cell encapsulation. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 1211–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wang, D.A.; Varghese, S.; Sharma, B.; Strehin, I.; Fermanian, S.; Gorham, J.; Fairbrother, D.H.; Cascio, B.; Elisseeff, J.H. Multifunctional chondroitin sulphate for cartilage tissue-biomaterial integration. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Cramer, N.B.; Reddy, S.K.; O’Brien, A.K.; Bowman, C.N. Thiol−ene photopolymerization mechanism and rate limiting step changes for various vinyl functional group chemistries. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 7964–7969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dondoni, A. The emergence of thiol-ene coupling as a click process for materials and bioorganic chemistry13. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8995–8997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kade, M.J.; Burke, D.J.; Hawker, C.J. The power of thiol-ene chemistry. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2010, 48, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Lowe, A.B. Thiol-yne ‘click’/coupling chemistry and recent applications in polymer and materials synthesis and modification. Polymer 2014, 55, 5517–5549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rydholm, A.E.; Bowman, C.N.; Anseth, K.S. Degradable thiol-acrylate photopolymers: Polymerization and degradation behavior of an in situ forming biomaterial. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 4495–4506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Hoyle, C.E.; Bowman, C.N. Thiol-ene click chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1540–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. McCall, J.D.; Anseth, K.S. Thiol–ene photopolymerizations provide a facile method to encapsulate proteins and maintain their bioactivity. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 2410–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Killops, K.L.; Campos, L.M.; Hawker, C.J. Robust, efficient, and orthogonal synthesis of dendrimers via thiol-ene “click” chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5062–5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Geng, Y.; Discher, D.E.; Justynska, J.; Schlaad, H. Grafting short peptides onto polybutadiene-block-poly(ethylene oxide): A platform for self-assembling hybrid amphiphiles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7578–7581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Wittrock, S.; Becker, T.; Kunz, H. Synthetic vaccines of tumor-associated glycopeptide antigens by immune-compatible thioether linkage to bovine serum albumin. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5226–5230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Kharkar, P.M.; Rehmann, M.S.; Skeens, K.M.; Maverakis, E.; Kloxin, A.M. Thiol–ene click hydrogels for therapeutic delivery. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Fairbanks, B.D.; Schwartz, M.P.; Halevi, A.E.; Nuttelman, C.R.; Bowman, C.N.; Anseth, K.S. A versatile synthetic extracellular matrix mimic via thiol-norbornene photopolymerization. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 5005–5010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Shih, H.; Lin, C.C. Cross-linking and degradation of step-growth hydrogels formed by thiol-ene photoclick chemistry. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 2003–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Xin, S.; Wyman, O.M.; Alge, D.L. Assembly of peg microgels into porous cell-instructive 3d scaffolds via thiol-ene click chemistry. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1800160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Batchelor, R.R.; Kwandou, G.; Spicer, P.T.; Stenzel, M.H. (-)-riboflavin (vitamin b2) and flavin mononucleotide as visible light photo initiators in the thiol-ene polymerisation of peg-based hydrogels. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 980–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yue, K.; Liu, Y.; Byambaa, B.; Singh, V.; Liu, W.; Li, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.S.; Tamayol, A.; Zhang, P.; et al. Visible light crosslinkable human hair keratin hydrogels. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2018, 3, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Le, N.N.T.; Zorn, S.; Schmitt, S.K.; Gopalan, P.; Murphy, W.L. Hydrogel arrays formed via differential wettability patterning enable combinatorial screening of stem cell behavior. Acta Biomater. 2016, 34, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Jivan, F.; Yegappan, R.; Pearce, H.; Carrow, J.K.; McShane, M.; Gaharwar, A.K.; Alge, D.L. Sequential thiol–ene and tetrazine click reactions for the polymerization and functionalization of hydrogel microparticles. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 3516–3523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Mabry, K.M.; Schroeder, M.E.; Payne, S.Z.; Anseth, K.S. Three-dimensional high-throughput cell encapsulation platform to study changes in cell-matrix interactions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 21914–21922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Richard, H. Thiol–yne chemistry: A powerful tool for creating highly functional materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3415–3417. [Google Scholar]
  101. Fairbanks, B.D.; Scott, T.F.; Kloxin, C.J.; Anseth, K.S.; Bowman, C.N. Thiol−yne photopolymerizations: Novel mechanism, kinetics, and step-growth formation of highly cross-linked networks. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Chan, J.W.; Shin, J.; Hoyle, C.E.; Bowman, C.N.; Lowe, A.B. Synthesis, thiol-yne “click” photopolymerization, and physical properties of networks derived from novel multifunctional alkynes. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 4937–4942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Xu, Y.; Xu, H.; Jiang, X.; Yin, J. Versatile functionalization of the micropatterned hydrogel of hyperbranched poly(ether amine) based on “thiol-yne” chemistry. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 1679–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cai, X.Y.; Li, J.Z.; Li, N.N.; Chen, J.C.; Kang, E.-T.; Xu, L.Q. Peg-based hydrogels prepared by catalyst-free thiol–yne addition and their post-antibacterial modification. Biomater. Sci. 2016, 4, 1663–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Truong, V.X.; Dove, A.P. Organocatalytic, regioselective nucleophilic “click” addition of thiols to propiolic acid esters for polymer–polymer coupling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4132–4136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Macdougall, L.J.; Truong, V.X.; Dove, A.P. Efficient in situ nucleophilic thiol-yne click chemistry for the synthesis of strong hydrogel materials with tunable properties. ACS Macro Lett. 2017, 6, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Macdougall, L.J.; Wiley, K.L.; Kloxin, A.M.; Dove, A.P. Design of synthetic extracellular matrices for probing breast cancer cell growth using robust cyctocompatible nucleophilic thiol-yne addition chemistry. Biomaterials 2018, 178, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Ifkovits, J.L.; Burdick, J.A. Review: Photopolymerizable and degradable biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng. 2007, 13, 2369–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Azagarsamy, M.A.; Anseth, K.S. Bioorthogonal click chemistry: An indispensable tool to create multifaceted cell culture scaffolds. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Zhang, Y.S.; Khademhosseini, A. Advances in engineering hydrogels. Science 2017, 356, eaaf3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Khire, V.S.; Harant, A.W.; Watkins, A.W.; Anseth, K.S.; Bowman, C.N. Ultrathin patterned polymer films on surfaces using thiol-ene polymerizations. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 5081–5086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Khire, V.S.; Benoit, D.S.W.; Anseth, K.S.; Bowman, C.N. Ultrathin gradient films using thiol-ene polymerizations. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2006, 44, 7027–7039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Dadoo, N.; Landry, S.B.; Bomar, J.D.; Gramlich, W.M. Synthesis and spatiotemporal modification of biocompatible and stimuli-responsive carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels using thiol-norbornene chemistry. Macromol. Biosci. 2017, 17, 1700107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Sawicki, L.A.; Kloxin, A.M. Design of thiol–ene photoclick hydrogels using facile techniques for cell culture applications. Biomater. Sci. 2014, 2, 1612–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kim, S.H.; Chu, C.C. Visible light induced dextran-methacrylate hydrogel formation using (-)-riboflavin vitamin b2 as a photoinitiator and l-arginine as a co-initiator. Fibers Polym. 2009, 10, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Fairbanks, B.D.; Schwartz, M.P.; Bowman, C.N.; Anseth, K.S. Photoinitiated polymerization of peg-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: Polymerization rate and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 6702–6707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Holmes, R.; Yang, X.-B.; Dunne, A.; Florea, L.; Wood, D.; Tronci, G. Thiol-ene photo-click collagen-peg hydrogels: Impact of water-soluble photoinitiators on cell viability, gelation kinetics and rheological properties. Polymers 2017, 9, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Perera, M.M.; Ayres, N. Gelatin based dynamic hydrogels via thiol–norbornene reactions. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 6741–6749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Schweller, R.M.; West, J.L. Encoding hydrogel mechanics via network cross-linking structure. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 1, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gels 04 00072 g001 550
Figure 1. In situ crosslinking of hydrogels in the presence of the biological complex including cells, extracellular components, and therapeutic agents. Hydrogel networks should form upon chemoselective interactions between polymer precursors in order to minimize the disturbance to the biological systems under study.
Figure 1. In situ crosslinking of hydrogels in the presence of the biological complex including cells, extracellular components, and therapeutic agents. Hydrogel networks should form upon chemoselective interactions between polymer precursors in order to minimize the disturbance to the biological systems under study.
Gels 04 00072 g001
Gels 04 00072 g002 550
Figure 2. Strategies of disulfide bond formation for in situ crosslinking of polymer hydrogels. (A) Mild oxidation of thiols. (B) Thiol-disulfide exchange (a substitution reaction). The disulfide-crosslinked network can break down when treated with reductive agents (e.g., soluble thiols).
Figure 2. Strategies of disulfide bond formation for in situ crosslinking of polymer hydrogels. (A) Mild oxidation of thiols. (B) Thiol-disulfide exchange (a substitution reaction). The disulfide-crosslinked network can break down when treated with reductive agents (e.g., soluble thiols).
Gels 04 00072 g002
Gels 04 00072 g003 550
Figure 3. Hydrogel nanoparticles generated by the crosslinking of PEGs terminated with reduced dithiolane that can form disulfide bonds. Maleimide-tagged doxorubicin can be attached either at the surface of the gel particles (A) or in the interior (B) depending on the order of gel crosslinking and drug conjugation. Image modified with permission from [34]. Copyright 2014 Elsevier.
Figure 3. Hydrogel nanoparticles generated by the crosslinking of PEGs terminated with reduced dithiolane that can form disulfide bonds. Maleimide-tagged doxorubicin can be attached either at the surface of the gel particles (A) or in the interior (B) depending on the order of gel crosslinking and drug conjugation. Image modified with permission from [34]. Copyright 2014 Elsevier.
Gels 04 00072 g003
Gels 04 00072 g004 550
Figure 4. Crosslinking of dithiolane-containing polymeric micelles by thiol-triggered disulfide-thiol exchange to form self-healing hydrogels. The addition of a thiol-capturing compound, maleimide, decreased the amount of free thiols necessary for the disulfide-thiol exchange, changing the dynamic gel to a permanent network. Image modified with permission from [39]. Copyright 2017 ACS.
Figure 4. Crosslinking of dithiolane-containing polymeric micelles by thiol-triggered disulfide-thiol exchange to form self-healing hydrogels. The addition of a thiol-capturing compound, maleimide, decreased the amount of free thiols necessary for the disulfide-thiol exchange, changing the dynamic gel to a permanent network. Image modified with permission from [39]. Copyright 2017 ACS.
Gels 04 00072 g004
Gels 04 00072 g005 550
Figure 5. The mechanism of UV-triggered thiol-disulfide exchange for the formation of hydrogels. Image reproduced with permission from [40]. Copyright 2016 RSC.
Figure 5. The mechanism of UV-triggered thiol-disulfide exchange for the formation of hydrogels. Image reproduced with permission from [40]. Copyright 2016 RSC.
Gels 04 00072 g005
Gels 04 00072 g006 550
Figure 6. Crosslinking of pyridyl disulfide-presenting polymer self-assembly with thiol-terminated linkers for the encapsulation and deactivation of a cellulase. Image modified with permission from [42]. Copyright 2016 Wiley.
Figure 6. Crosslinking of pyridyl disulfide-presenting polymer self-assembly with thiol-terminated linkers for the encapsulation and deactivation of a cellulase. Image modified with permission from [42]. Copyright 2016 Wiley.
Gels 04 00072 g006
Gels 04 00072 g007 550
Figure 7. Thiol-disulfide exchange between thiols and thiolsulfonates for the functionalization (A) and chemical crosslinking (B) of thiol-functionalized polymers. In both cases the formed disulfide links are redox-responsive. This exchange reaction in (B) was shown to be orthogonal to ester formation and 1,3-dipolar cyclic addition used for labeling the gel particles with dyes. Images are modified with permission from [44]. Copyright 2017 ACS.
Figure 7. Thiol-disulfide exchange between thiols and thiolsulfonates for the functionalization (A) and chemical crosslinking (B) of thiol-functionalized polymers. In both cases the formed disulfide links are redox-responsive. This exchange reaction in (B) was shown to be orthogonal to ester formation and 1,3-dipolar cyclic addition used for labeling the gel particles with dyes. Images are modified with permission from [44]. Copyright 2017 ACS.
Gels 04 00072 g007
Gels 04 00072 g008 550
Figure 8. (A) A general scheme of NCL. (B) Catalyst-free in situ hydrogel crosslinking by native chemical ligation. Four-armed PEG macromonomers terminated with N-terminal cysteine and thioester groups crosslink to form gels in aqueous media at pH 7~8. Image reproduced with permission from [35]. Copyright 2009 ACS.
Figure 8. (A) A general scheme of NCL. (B) Catalyst-free in situ hydrogel crosslinking by native chemical ligation. Four-armed PEG macromonomers terminated with N-terminal cysteine and thioester groups crosslink to form gels in aqueous media at pH 7~8. Image reproduced with permission from [35]. Copyright 2009 ACS.
Gels 04 00072 g008
Gels 04 00072 g009 550
Figure 9. The native chemical ligation (NCL) reaction between polymers presenting thiolactone (a cyclic thioester) and a 2-aminoethanethiol group does not release any soluble thiol by-product as in the traditional NCL reactions. All thiols groups are immobilized onto the covalent network of crosslinked polymers.
Figure 9. The native chemical ligation (NCL) reaction between polymers presenting thiolactone (a cyclic thioester) and a 2-aminoethanethiol group does not release any soluble thiol by-product as in the traditional NCL reactions. All thiols groups are immobilized onto the covalent network of crosslinked polymers.
Gels 04 00072 g009
Gels 04 00072 g010 550
Figure 10. A generalized reaction scheme for oxo-ester-mediated native chemical ligation (OMNCL) used for crosslinking eight-armed PEG macromonomers to form a chemical hydrogel network. Image reproduced with permission from [53]. Copyright 2013 RSC.
Figure 10. A generalized reaction scheme for oxo-ester-mediated native chemical ligation (OMNCL) used for crosslinking eight-armed PEG macromonomers to form a chemical hydrogel network. Image reproduced with permission from [53]. Copyright 2013 RSC.
Gels 04 00072 g010
Gels 04 00072 g011 550
Figure 11. Functionalization of NCL hydrogels. (A) The hydrogel network crosslinked by the NCL reaction presents thiols that can react with maleimide-attached peptides (or other bioactive molecules) post-gelation. (B) Maleimide-attached molecules can be conjugated to thiol-polymers prior to NCL crosslinking. (C) Molecules of desired properties can be synthetically inserted into the thiol-polymers or thioester-polymers to form functional NCL hydrogels.
Figure 11. Functionalization of NCL hydrogels. (A) The hydrogel network crosslinked by the NCL reaction presents thiols that can react with maleimide-attached peptides (or other bioactive molecules) post-gelation. (B) Maleimide-attached molecules can be conjugated to thiol-polymers prior to NCL crosslinking. (C) Molecules of desired properties can be synthetically inserted into the thiol-polymers or thioester-polymers to form functional NCL hydrogels.
Gels 04 00072 g011
Gels 04 00072 g012 550
Figure 12. The use of NCL to dissolve a thioester-linked hydrogel network by the addition of a cysteine derivative. Image modified with permission from [57]. Copyright 2013 Wiley.
Figure 12. The use of NCL to dissolve a thioester-linked hydrogel network by the addition of a cysteine derivative. Image modified with permission from [57]. Copyright 2013 Wiley.
Gels 04 00072 g012
Gels 04 00072 g013 550
Figure 13. (A) Thiol-triggered ring opening of epoxides undergoes a nucleophilic substitution mechanism but does not produce byproducts. (B) The thiol-epoxy reaction for the crosslinking of polymers to form injectable hydrogel. Image modified with permission from [61]. Copyright 2016 Wiley.
Figure 13. (A) Thiol-triggered ring opening of epoxides undergoes a nucleophilic substitution mechanism but does not produce byproducts. (B) The thiol-epoxy reaction for the crosslinking of polymers to form injectable hydrogel. Image modified with permission from [61]. Copyright 2016 Wiley.
Gels 04 00072 g013
Gels 04 00072 g014 550
Figure 14. Michael-type additions for in situ crosslinking of polymers through reactions of thiols with maleimide (A), acrylate (B), or vinyl sulfone (C) groups.
Figure 14. Michael-type additions for in situ crosslinking of polymers through reactions of thiols with maleimide (A), acrylate (B), or vinyl sulfone (C) groups.
Gels 04 00072 g014
Gels 04 00072 g015 550
Figure 15. Retro Michael-type addition (A) can be utilized to break down networks of crosslinked polymers on demand (B) in the presence of soluble thiols (e.g., glutathione, GSH), as an orthogonal method to the degradation by light (the reactive group shown in green) and hydrolysis (the reactive group shown in orange). Image B modified with permission from [71]. Copyright 2015 RSC.
Figure 15. Retro Michael-type addition (A) can be utilized to break down networks of crosslinked polymers on demand (B) in the presence of soluble thiols (e.g., glutathione, GSH), as an orthogonal method to the degradation by light (the reactive group shown in green) and hydrolysis (the reactive group shown in orange). Image B modified with permission from [71]. Copyright 2015 RSC.
Gels 04 00072 g015
Gels 04 00072 g016 550
Figure 16. Photoinitiated, radical-mediated thiol-ene addition generates a covalent bond rapidly between a thiol-presenting compound and an alkene (A). When electron-deficient alkenes are used, the photoinitiated thiol-ene reaction is often accompanied by the base-catalyzed Michael-type addition reaction (B).
Figure 16. Photoinitiated, radical-mediated thiol-ene addition generates a covalent bond rapidly between a thiol-presenting compound and an alkene (A). When electron-deficient alkenes are used, the photoinitiated thiol-ene reaction is often accompanied by the base-catalyzed Michael-type addition reaction (B).
Gels 04 00072 g016
Gels 04 00072 g017 550
Figure 17. (A) A general mechanism of radical-mediated thiol-norbornene addition. (B) Four-armed norbornene-presenting PEG macromonomers were used to crosslink with di-cysteine-terminated peptides to form hydrogels. The gel can be modified uniformly with a cell adhesion peptide CRGDS during crosslinking (C) or after gelation through unreacted norborenene at defined locations shown as the red sphere in (D), both supporting cell attachment and spreading. Images reproduced with permission from [92]. Copyright 2009 Wiley.
Figure 17. (A) A general mechanism of radical-mediated thiol-norbornene addition. (B) Four-armed norbornene-presenting PEG macromonomers were used to crosslink with di-cysteine-terminated peptides to form hydrogels. The gel can be modified uniformly with a cell adhesion peptide CRGDS during crosslinking (C) or after gelation through unreacted norborenene at defined locations shown as the red sphere in (D), both supporting cell attachment and spreading. Images reproduced with permission from [92]. Copyright 2009 Wiley.
Gels 04 00072 g017
Gels 04 00072 g018 550
Figure 18. (A) A general mechanism of photoinitiated, radical-mediated thiol-yne addition. (B) The crosslinking between four-armed C(CH2OOCCH2CH2SH)4 and a dialkyne linker produced network (blue) with a higher crosslinking density and higher elastic modulus, compared to the crosslinking between the same thiol and a dialkene linker (green). Images reproduced with from [101]. Copyright 2010 ACS.
Figure 18. (A) A general mechanism of photoinitiated, radical-mediated thiol-yne addition. (B) The crosslinking between four-armed C(CH2OOCCH2CH2SH)4 and a dialkyne linker produced network (blue) with a higher crosslinking density and higher elastic modulus, compared to the crosslinking between the same thiol and a dialkene linker (green). Images reproduced with from [101]. Copyright 2010 ACS.
Gels 04 00072 g018
Gels 04 00072 g019 550
Figure 19. The non-radical nucleophilic addition reaction between multi-armed PEG-thiol and PEG-alkyne produced vinylene sulfide-linked hydrogel for encapsulation of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. An extracellular matrix mimicking peptide CGRGDS is incorporated to the gel through the same type of addition between the thiol group in the cysteine and PEG-alkyne during the network formation. The hydrogel is degradable through hydrolysis of the esters in PEG-alkyne to allow cell growth and formation of cell clusters. Images reproduced with permission from [107]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Figure 19. The non-radical nucleophilic addition reaction between multi-armed PEG-thiol and PEG-alkyne produced vinylene sulfide-linked hydrogel for encapsulation of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. An extracellular matrix mimicking peptide CGRGDS is incorporated to the gel through the same type of addition between the thiol group in the cysteine and PEG-alkyne during the network formation. The hydrogel is degradable through hydrolysis of the esters in PEG-alkyne to allow cell growth and formation of cell clusters. Images reproduced with permission from [107]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Gels 04 00072 g019
Table
Table 1. Thiol-mediated reactions for hydrogel crosslinking in situ.
Table 1. Thiol-mediated reactions for hydrogel crosslinking in situ.
ReactionAdvantagesLimitations
Disulfide Formation
  • Produces disulfide links that break down in a reductive environment
Suitable for developing smart gels responsive to glutathione and other reducing agents
  • Slow gelation
  • Relatively low selectivity
When the thiol-disulfide exchange method is used, by-products are released.
Native Chemical Ligation
  • Catalyst-free
Generates thiol-presenting networks for structure modifications		Low-molecular-weight thiol by-product released
Thiol-Epoxy Reaction
  • Catalyst-free
No organic by-product released		Relatively slow gelation, high concentrations of reactants needed
Michael-Type Additions
  • Catalyst-free
  • Rapid gelation and high crosslinking degree
No by-product released
  • Possible cross-reactivity with amino groups
  • Nonuniform crosslinking at the microscale
Some crosslinks are unstable.
Photo-initiated Thiol-Ene and Thiol-Yne Additions
  • Fast gelation and tunable crosslinking density
  • Allow spatial and temporal control of gel formation
No by-product released
  • Require the use of photo-initiators that may be cytotoxic
UV light can cause cellular damage.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, J. Thiol-Mediated Chemoselective Strategies for In Situ Formation of Hydrogels. Gels 2018, 4, 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels4030072

AMA Style

Su J. Thiol-Mediated Chemoselective Strategies for In Situ Formation of Hydrogels. Gels. 2018; 4(3):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels4030072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Jing. 2018. "Thiol-Mediated Chemoselective Strategies for In Situ Formation of Hydrogels" Gels 4, no. 3: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels4030072

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop