Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels for Osteoarthritis: A Review of Preparation Strategies, Modification Approaches, and Challenges
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Strategies for the Preparation and Functionalization of PVA
2.1. Network Construction Methods
2.2. Mechanical Property Enhancement
2.3. Biofunctionalization
3. PVA Hydrogels for Articular Cartilage Repair
3.1. Surgical Adjunctive Materials
3.2. Replacement Implants
3.3. Surface Replacement and Reconstruction
4. Challenges and Future Perspectives
- (1)
- Preparation and Clinical Translation: Although laboratory-scale preparation methods for PVA hydrogels (e.g., cyclic freezing-thawing, chemical crosslinking) are well established, significant challenges remain in transitioning from laboratory samples to standardized medical devices. Current research primarily focuses on optimizing material properties while overlooking the development of large-scale manufacturing processes. PVA hydrogel properties—including water content, pore size, and mechanical strength—are highly sensitive to preparation parameters (temperature, time, concentration). Minor process fluctuations can lead to considerable batch-to-batch variation, making it difficult to meet stringent medical device quality requirements. Future research should prioritize scalable, sterilizable manufacturing processes. Developing continuous, automated production equipment and establishing standardized sterilization validation protocols to transition from laboratory-scale to large-scale sterile production that is compliant with medical device standards are considered crucial for successful clinical translation.
- (2)
- Beyond the scalability issues of manufacturing processes, the translation of PVA hydrogels also faces a series of specific regulatory and clinical integration challenges. The first is sterilization requirements: conventional sterilization methods, such as autoclaving, can destroy the hydrogel structure and drastically reduce its mechanical properties; ethylene oxide sterilization may introduce toxic residues; and high-dose gamma or electron-beam irradiation can cause chain scission of PVA molecules. Therefore, it is necessary to develop at low temperatures. These nondestructive sterilization protocols comply with medical device regulations, such as those for supercritical carbon dioxide sterilization and optimized irradiation doses, while establishing corresponding validation standards. The second challenge is implant fixation and integration: PVA cannot actively bind to host tissues, making long-term stable fixation difficult to achieve solely through mechanical press-fitting or tissue suturing. Early postoperative migration, dislodgement, or interfacial micromotion may occur, leading to repair failure. To address this, researchers are exploring surface modification (e.g., with dopamine), porous/gradient structures to promote tissue ingrowth, and bioresorbable fixation devices. Furthermore, from a regulatory perspective, as a long-term implant, PVA hydrogels require comprehensive data on biocompatibility, mechanical stability, and degradation behavior. There is currently a lack of dedicated product standards for cartilage repair hydrogels. Establishing in vitro performance testing methods and animal models that correlate with clinical endpoints is a critical bottleneck for obtaining regulatory approval.
- (3)
- Performance Synergy: A major challenge in current research lies in achieving cartilage-like mechanical properties while maintaining efficient tissue regeneration capability within a single material system. To withstand joint loading, researchers have significantly enhanced the strength and wear resistance of PVA hydrogels using nanocomposite and double-network strategies. However, these dense networks often compromise porosity, hindering cell migration and nutrient diffusion and ultimately preventing regeneration. Conversely, porous scaffolds or growth factor-loaded soft gels designed to promote regeneration frequently lack sufficient mechanical properties to support early mobilization. Future modification strategies should aim for integrated and intelligent performance. Drawing inspiration from the gradient structure and anisotropy of natural cartilage, biomimetic gradient scaffolds can be designed using 3D/4D printing technologies. Developing multi-stimuli-responsive (e.g., pH- or enzyme-specific) drug- or growth factor-controlled release systems may achieve synergistic effects between mechanical protection and biological signal delivery during the repair process.
- (4)
- To address the challenge of synergistic performance, it is necessary to move beyond the single-material paradigm toward multiphase, multifunctional integration. For example, constructing a “soft–hard” composite system: a dense PVA layer for load-bearing and a porous PVA layer to promote cell ingrowth. However, interfacial bonding between layers is a critical issue that can be improved through layer-by-layer freeze–thaw cycling or in situ graft polymerization. Furthermore, conventional homogeneous PVA hydrogels struggle to mimic the modulus of natural cartilage. Introducing reversible physical crosslinks (e.g., hydrogen bonds, coordination bonds) or double networks enables the hydrogel to dissipate energy under large deformation while maintaining integrity, achieving self-reinforcement or self-healing and enhancing long-term stability. Finally, in vitro mechanical testing should more closely replicate the real joint environment, shifting from static compression to multiaxial fatigue testing (including shear, torsion, and impact) to accurately evaluate the practical performance of the hydrogel.
- (5)
- Osteoarthritis Treatment: PVA hydrogels in osteoarthritis therapy should function not merely as physical barriers or supports, but as bioactive platforms that modulate the local microenvironment and guide endogenous repair capabilities. Although studies incorporating growth factors or stem cells exist, research on maintaining their activity in complex inflammatory environments and achieving precise controlled release remains at a preliminary stage. Therefore, future PVA-based hydrogel therapeutic systems must possess immunomodulatory and microenvironment management capabilities. Designing smart hydrogels with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant (e.g., incorporating tannic acid), or immunomodulatory (e.g., guiding macrophage polarization toward the regenerative M2 phenotype) functions can actively create a regeneration-favorable immune microenvironment. Through such technological advances, PVA-based hydrogels are expected to transcend their current role as simple fillers and evolve into intelligent medical systems capable of sensing and actively regulating their environment.
- (6)
- Beyond immunomodulation, the application of PVA hydrogels for osteoarthritis treatment should also consider the disease staging and combination therapy strategies. Osteoarthritis involves multiple pathological events, including cartilage degradation, synovial inflammation, and subchondral bone remodeling. An ideal hydrogel should address the entire disease process, for example, by co-delivering anti-degradation agents (e.g., MMP inhibitors) and pro-anabolic factors (e.g., TGF-β) to achieve a dual “protection–repair” function. Furthermore, drug release can be coupled with the mechanical environment of the joint: using piezoelectric materials or mechanosensitive molecular switches enables on-demand drug release triggered by cyclic pressure from movement. For large or irregular defects, injectable in situ forming hydrogels offer a minimally invasive approach to match individualized contours; however, challenges remain in post-curing mechanical strength and tissue integration. Finally, for composite hydrogels incorporating degradable components, the degradation rate and product safety must be systematically evaluated, and long-term simulation studies using animal models of osteoarthritis are required to verify their clinical superiority over existing treatment strategies.
- (7)
- Building on 3D printing, 4D bioprinting, as a cutting-edge technology, introduces a dynamic regulatory dimension to cartilage regeneration by incorporating smart materials that can undergo morphological or functional changes over time in response to external stimuli (e.g., temperature, humidity, pH, or enzymatic activity). For example, it enables the printing of planar scaffolds that spontaneously curl into a meniscus shape, or microstructures that slowly unfold in the in vivo environment to adapt to defect cavities. Concurrently, artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted biomaterial design is revolutionizing scaffold development—by employing machine learning algorithms to analyze the correlations between material compositions, processing parameters, and biological outcomes, AI can efficiently predict and optimize bioink formulations and mechanical properties, thereby substantially shortening the translation cycle from laboratory to clinic. In the future, the deep integration of the dynamic deformation and spatiotemporal programming capabilities of 4D bioprinting, AI-driven rational material design, and the aforementioned strategies for biofunctionalization and degradation control is expected to construct truly intelligent and personalized cartilage regeneration systems.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yao, H.; Kang, J.; Li, W.; Liu, J.; Xie, R.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, D.A.; Ren, L. Novel β-TCP/PVA bilayered hydrogels with considerable physical and bio-functional properties for osteochondral repair. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 13, 015012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fox, A.J.S.; Bedi, A.; Rodeo, S.A. The Basic Science of Articular Cartilage: Structure, Composition, and Function. Sports Health 2009, 1, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vilá y Rico, J.; Dalmau, A.; Chaqués, F.J.; Asunción, J. Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus With Bone Marrow Stimulation and Chitosan–Glycerol Phosphate/Blood Implants (BST-CarGel). Arthrosc. Tech. 2015, 4, e663–e667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Knutsen, G.; Engebretsen, L.; Ludvigsen, T.C.; Drogset, J.O.; Grøntvedt, T.; Solheim, E.; Strand, T.; Roberts, S.; Isaksen, V.; Johansen, O. Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Compared with Microfracture in the Knee: A Randomized Trial. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2004, 86, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholten, P.M.; Ng, K.W.; Joh, K.; Serino, L.P.; Warren, R.F.; Torzilli, P.A.; Maher, S.A. A semi-degradable composite scaffold for articular cartilage defects. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2011, 97, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Mooney, D.J. Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drury, J.L.; Mooney, D.J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: Scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 4337–4351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di, J.; Li, J.; Sun, C.; Xu, L.; Li, X. Advances in Cellulose-Based Hydrogels for Drug Delivery: Preparation, Modification and Challenges. Gels 2025, 11, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burdick, J.A.; Mauck, R.L.; Gorman, J.H., 3rd; Gorman, R.C. Acellular biomaterials: An evolving alternative to cell-based therapies. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 176ps4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elisseeff, J.; Puleo, C.; Yang, F.; Sharma, B. Advances in skeletal tissue engineering with hydrogels. Orthod. Craniofacial Res. 2005, 8, 150–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashemi-Afzal, F.; Fallahi, H.; Bagheri, F.; Collins, M.N.; Eslaminejad, M.B.; Seitz, H. Advancements in hydrogel design for articular cartilage regeneration: A comprehensive review. Bioact. Mater. 2025, 43, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noguchi, T.; Yamamuro, T.; Oka, M.; Kumar, P.; Kotoura, Y.; Hyonyt, S.-H.; Ikadat, Y. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel as an artificial articular cartilage: Evaluation of biocompatibility. J. Appl. Biomater. 1991, 2, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, M.; Hyu, H.S. Development and Evaluation of Polyvinyl Alcohol-Hydrogels as an Artificial Atrticular Cartilage for Orthopedic Implants. Materials 2010, 3, 2753–2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman Khan, M.M.; Rumon, M.M.H. Synthesis of PVA-Based Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications: Recent Trends and Advances. Gels 2025, 11, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leone, G.; Consumi, M.; Pepi, S.; Pardini, A.; Bonechi, C.; Tamasi, G.; Donati, A.; Lamponi, S.; Rossi, C.; Magnani, A. Enriched Gellan Gum hydrogel as visco-supplement. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 227, 115347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Todros, S.; Barbon, S.; Stocco, E.; Favaron, M.; Macchi, V.; De Caro, R.; Porzionato, A.; Pavan, P.G. Time-dependent mechanical behavior of partially oxidized polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels for tissue engineering. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2022, 125, 104966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roca-Arroyo, A.F.; Gutierrez-Rivera, J.A.; Morton, L.D.; Castilla-Casadiego, D.A. Hydrogel Network Architecture Design Space: Impact on Mechanical and Viscoelastic Properties. Gels 2025, 11, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoffman, A.S. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adelnia, H.; Ensandoost, R.; Shebbrin Moonshi, S.; Gavgani, J.N.; Vasafi, E.I.; Ta, H.T. Freeze/thawed polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels: Present, past and future. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 164, 110974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Górska, A.; Baran, E.; Knapik-Kowalczuk, J.; Szafraniec-Szczęsny, J.; Paluch, M.; Kulinowski, P.; Mendyk, A. Physically Cross-Linked PVA Hydrogels as Potential Wound Dressings: How Freezing Conditions and Formulation Composition Define Cryogel Structure and Performance. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, C.M.; Peppas, N.A. Structure and Applications of Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels Produced by Conventional Crosslinking or by Freezing/Thawing Methods. In Biopolymers · PVA Hydrogels, Anionic Polymerisation Nanocomposites; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 37–65. [Google Scholar]
- Kudo, K.; Ishida, J.; Syuu, G.; Sekine, Y.; Ikeda-Fukazawa, T. Structural changes of water in poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel during dehydration. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 044909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Sabagh, A.M.; Abdeen, Z. Preparation and Characterization of Hydrogel Based on Poly(vinyl alcohol) Cross-Linked by Different Cross-Linkers Used to Dry Organic Solvents. J. Polym. Environ. 2010, 18, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, S.G. Production and Application of Biomaterials Based on Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as Wound Dressing. Chem. Asian J. 2022, 17, e202200595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosiak, J.M.; Ulański, P. Synthesis of hydrogels by irradiation of polymers in aqueous solution. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1999, 55, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Yang, M.; Zhang, W.; Guo, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, B. Facile Preparation of Irradiated Poly(vinyl alcohol)/Cellulose Nanofiber Hydrogels with Ultrahigh Mechanical Properties for Artificial Joint Cartilage. Materials 2024, 17, 4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, M.; Jameel, F.; Jabri, T.; Jabbar, A.; Salim, A.; Khan, I.; Shah, M.R. α-Terpineol loaded, electron beam crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol/tapioca starch hydrogel sheets; fabrication, characterization and evaluation of wound healing potential on a full thickness acid burn wound. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 28058–28076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.-Q.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, J.-H.; Li, X.-N.; Wu, X.-G.; Qin, Y.-X.; Chen, W.-Y. Fe3+, NIR light and thermal responsive triple network composite hydrogel with multi-shape memory effect. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 206, 108653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, J.P.; Katsuyama, Y.; Kurokawa, T.; Osada, Y. Double-Network Hydrogels with Extremely High Mechanical Strength. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 1155–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pulat, M.; Özgündüz, H.İ. Swelling behavior and morphological properties of semi-IPN hydrogels based on ionic and non-ionic components. Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. 2014, 24, 1725–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, F.; Marto-Costa, C.; Branco, A.C.; Oliveira, A.S.; Galhano dos Santos, R.; Salema-Oom, M.; Diaz, R.L.; Williams, S.; Colaço, R.; Figueiredo-Pina, C.; et al. Tribomechanical Properties of PVA/Nomex® Composite Hydrogels for Articular Cartilage Repair. Gels 2024, 10, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.-Y.; Zhao, X.; Illeperuma, W.R.K.; Chaudhuri, O.; Oh, K.H.; Mooney, D.J.; Vlassak, J.J.; Suo, Z. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 2012, 489, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Jin, Z. Tannic Acid-Based Multifunctional Hydrogels with Facile Adjustable Adhesion and Cohesion Contributed by Polyphenol Supramolecular Chemistry. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 6668–6676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Kuss, M.; Yan, Y.; Shi, W. Dynamic Alginate Hydrogel as an Antioxidative Bioink for Bioprinting. Gels 2023, 9, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, Q.-F.; Ling, Z.-C.; Han, Z.-M.; Yang, H.-B.; Yu, S.-H. Ultra-Strong, Ultra-Tough, Transparent, and Sustainable Nanocomposite Films for Plastic Substitute. Matter 2020, 3, 1308–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, D.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, J.; Cao, W.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Cao, T.; Han, J.; Zhu, J. Strong, Tough, and Biocompatible Poly(vinyl alcohol)–Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) Multiscale Network Hydrogels Reinforced by Aramid Nanofibers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 25304–25316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mredha, M.T.I.; Jeon, I. Biomimetic anisotropic hydrogels: Advanced fabrication strategies, extraordinary functionalities, and broad applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2022, 124, 100870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soto-Quintero, A.; González Castillo, E.I.; Gómez Lizárraga, K.; Barba-Pingarrón, A.; Hernández, M. Enhancing the performance of nanostructured PVA/SA scaffolds through incorporation of macromolecules: From synergistic effects to advanced multifunctionalities. Mater. Lett. 2024, 376, 137251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavallo, C.; Amore, E.; Carpentieri, S.; Roseti, L. Challenges and Strategies in Hydrogel-Based Cartilage Regeneration. Gels 2026, 12, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, L.; Zhang, G.; Hou, R.; Xu, H.; Li, Y.; Fu, J. Controllable promotion of chondrocyte adhesion and growth on PVA hydrogels by controlled release of TGF-β1 from porous PLGA microspheres. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 125, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, R.; Nie, L.; Du, G.; Xiong, X.; Fu, J. Natural polysaccharides promote chondrocyte adhesion and proliferation on magnetic nanoparticle/PVA composite hydrogels. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 132, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, A.S.; Schweizer, S.; Nolasco, P.; Barahona, I.; Saraiva, J.; Colaço, R.; Serro, A.P. Tough and Low Friction Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogels Loaded with Anti-inflammatories for Cartilage Replacement. Lubricants 2020, 8, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbon, S.; Confalonieri, M.; Stocco, E.; D’Osualdo, A.; Contran, M.; Parnigotto, P.P.; De Caro, R.; Todros, S.; Macchi, V.; Pavan, P.G.; et al. Bio-hybrid scaffolds combining polyvinyl alcohol and decellularized articular cartilage for the treatment of focal chondral lesions in hemophilic patients. Front. Pharmacol. 2025, 16, 1650467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Y.; Yu, C.; Xing, M.; Wang, L.; Guan, G. Surface modification of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/polyacrylamide (PAAm) hydrogels with polydopamine and REDV for improved applicability. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2020, 108, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; Liu, Q.; Tan, J.; Lu, Y.; Li, Y.; Ye, H.; Xu, Z.; Wang, M.; Wang, C.; Li, X.; et al. CAP-CD56(+)CD271(+) BMSCs exos-loaded PVA/SA sustained-release hydrogel attenuates chondrocyte senescence and ameliorates lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis. Bioact. Mater. 2026, 57, 73–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Meng, H.; Konst, S.; Sarmiento, R.; Rajachar, R.; Lee, B.P. Injectable Dopamine-Modified Poly(ethylene glycol) Nanocomposite Hydrogel with Enhanced Adhesive Property and Bioactivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 16982–16992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Yang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Xie, Y.; Xu, S.; Shang, Y.; et al. Bionic Janus hydrogel drives infected Achilles tendon regeneration via mechano-immune spatiotemporal steering. Nat. Commun. 2026, 17, 1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saidin, S.; Zubairi, S.I.; Ambreen, J.; Md Lazim, N.A.; Sadia, M.; Lim, J.T.W.; Ulum, M.F.; Elliyanti, A.; Sefat, F. Biode-gradable synthetic polymers for biomedical and tissue engineering applications: Tailoring degradation kinetics with tissue regeneration timeline. BioMed. Eng. OnLine 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastard, C.; Schulte, J.C.; Asaduzzaman, M.; Hohn, C.; Kittel, Y.; De Laporte, L.; Gebhardt, R. Casein microparticles filled with cellulase to enzymatically degrade nanocellulose for cell growth. Biomater. Sci. 2025, 13, 2435–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Q.; Yang, J.; Bei, J.; Wang, S. A novel porous cells scaffold made of polylactide–dextran blend by combining phase-separation and particle-leaching techniques. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 4483–4492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deller, R.C.; Richardson, T.; Richardson, R.; Bevan, L.; Zampetakis, I.; Scarpa, F.; Perriman, A.W. Artificial cell membrane binding thrombin constructs drive in situ fibrin hydrogel formation. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thai, N.L.B.; Beaman, H.T.; Perlman, M.; Obeng, E.E.; Du, C.; Monroe, M.B.B. Chitosan Poly(vinyl alcohol) Methacrylate Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2024, 7, 7818–7827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, M.; Tang, Y.; He, X.; Liu, K.; Qin, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q. Enzyme-Integrated Hydrogels for Advanced Biological Applications. Polym. Sci. Technol. 2026, 3, 136–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Sang, Z.; Chen, S.; Li, H.; Ren, X.; Mei, X.; Chen, Z. A rationally engineered PVA-HA hydrogel orchestrates osteochondral regeneration and matrix mineralization by cytoprotecting chondrocytes mitochondrion. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 521, 167100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasuda, K.; Ping Gong, J.; Katsuyama, Y.; Nakayama, A.; Tanabe, Y.; Kondo, E.; Ueno, M.; Osada, Y. Biomechanical properties of high-toughness double network hydrogels. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 4468–4475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spiller, K.L.; Holloway, J.L.; Gribb, M.E.; Lowman, A.M. Design of semi-degradable hydrogels based on poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2011, 5, 636–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, J.P.; Kurokawa, T.; Narita, T.; Kagata, G.; Osada, Y.; Nishimura, G.; Kinjo, M. Synthesis of hydrogels with extremely low surface friction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5582–5583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ten Broek, R.P.G.; Strik, C.; Issa, Y.; Bleichrodt, R.P.; van Goor, H. Adhesiolysis-Related Morbidity in Abdominal Surgery. Ann. Surg. 2013, 258, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Shu, X.Z.; Gray, S.D.; Prestwich, G.D. Crosslinked hyaluronan hydrogels containing mitomycin C reduce postoperative abdominal adhesions. Fertil. Steril. 2005, 83, 1275–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bae, S.-H.; Son, S.-R.; Kumar Sakar, S.; Nguyen, T.-H.; Kim, S.-W.; Min, Y.-K.; Lee, B.-T. Evaluation of the potential anti-adhesion effect of the PVA/Gelatin membrane. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2014, 102, 840–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, P.; Liang, W.; Huang, R.; Zheng, B.; Feng, K.; He, W.; Huang, Z.; Shen, H.; Wang, H.; Wu, D. Super-Structured Wet-Adhesive Hydrogel with Ultralow Swelling, Ultrahigh Burst Pressure Tolerance, and Anti-Postoperative Adhesion Properties for Tissue Adhesion. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2305400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, H.; Jeong, Y.; Lee, N.; Lee, I.; Lee, J.H. Recent Advances in Injectable Hydrogels for Biomedical and Aesthetic Applications: Focus on Rheological Characteristics. Gels 2025, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunziker, E.B. Articular cartilage repair: Basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2002, 10, 432–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenton, O.S.; Olafson, K.N.; Pillai, P.S.; Mitchell, M.J.; Langer, R. Advances in Biomaterials for Drug Delivery. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spiller, K.L.; Liu, Y.; Holloway, J.L.; Maher, S.A.; Cao, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhou, G.; Lowman, A.M. A novel method for the direct fabrication of growth factor-loaded microspheres within porous nondegradable hydrogels: Controlled release for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Control. Release 2012, 157, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dashtdar, H.; Murali, M.R.; Abbas, A.A.; Suhaeb, A.M.; Selvaratnam, L.; Tay, L.X.; Kamarul, T. PVA-chitosan composite hydrogel versus alginate beads as a potential mesenchymal stem cell carrier for the treatment of focal cartilage defects. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2015, 23, 1368–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiang, C.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Chen, W.; Wei, X.; Li, P.; Xiang, C. Physically crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol)-based hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Mater. Des. 2024, 243, 113048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chelu, M.; Musuc, A.M. Polymer Gels: Classification and Recent Developments in Biomedical Applications. Gels 2023, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cercone, M.; Chevalier, J.; Kennedy, J.G.; Miller, A.D.; Fortier, L.A. Early Failure of a Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel Implant with Osteolysis and Foreign Body Reactions in an Ovine Model of Cartilage Repair. Am. J. Sports Med. 2021, 49, 3395–3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcala-Orozco, C.R.; Mutreja, I.; Cui, X.; Hooper, G.J.; Lim, K.S.; Woodfield, T.B.F. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair. Bone 2022, 154, 116198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghandforoushan, P.; Alehosseini, M.; Golafshan, N.; Castilho, M.; Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A.; Hanaee, J.; Davaran, S.; Orive, G. Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue regeneration: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 246, 125674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- von Lospichl, B.; Hemmati-Sadeghi, S.; Dey, P.; Dehne, T.; Haag, R.; Sittinger, M.; Ringe, J.; Gradzielski, M. Injectable hydrogels for treatment of osteoarthritis—A rheological study. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 159, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, X.; Wan, J.; Yang, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhou, C.; Su, J.; Hua, S.; Pu, H.; Zou, Y.; Zhu, H.; et al. Thermosensitive hydrogel for cartilage regeneration via synergistic delivery of SDF-1α like polypeptides and kartogenin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 304, 120492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hong, S.; Sycks, D.; Chan, H.F.; Lin, S.; Lopez, G.P.; Guilak, F.; Leong, K.W.; Zhao, X. 3D Printing of Highly Stretchable and Tough Hydrogels into Complex, Cellularized Structures. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 4035–4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Qin, J.; Ma, J. Silk fibroin/poly (vinyl alcohol) blend scaffolds for controlled delivery of curcumin. Regen. Biomater. 2015, 2, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathish, P.B.; Gayathri, S.; Priyanka, J.; Shalini, M.; Narmadha, R.; Shankar, K.G.; Selvakumar, R. Tricomposite gelatin-carboxymethylcellulose-alginate bioink for direct and indirect 3D printing of human knee meniscal scaffold. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 195, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aitchison, A.H.; Allen, N.B.; Mitra, K.; Abar, B.; O’Neill, C.N.; Bagheri, K.; Anastasio, A.T.; Adams, S.B. Tunable Alginate-Polyvinyl Alcohol Bioinks for 3D Printing in Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Gels 2024, 10, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Y.; Lin, Q.; Yu, H.; Shao, L.; Cui, X.; Pang, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Hou, R. Construction methods and biomedical applications of PVA-based hydrogels. Front. Chem. 2024, 12, 1376799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, D.; Yan, Y.; Wei, W.; Bai, C.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhai, F.; Liu, D.; Wang, X. Mechanically Robust Lubricating Hydrogels Contrived by Harnessing Low-Entropy Nanocrystalline Polymer Network. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2508450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, M.; Toguchida, J.; Oka, M. Preliminary study of polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel (PVA-H) artificial meniscus. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kotlarz, M.; O’Keeffe, C.; Kronemberger, G.S.; Burdis, R.; Rana, S.; Rodriguez, N.; Bonizzi, M.; Brama, P.; Kelly, D.J. Biofabrication and in vivo evaluation of a hybrid osteochondral implant consisting of structurally organised engineered cartilage on a 3D-printed metal scaffold. Biomaterials 2026, 327, 123788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bichara, D.A.; Bodugoz-Sentruk, H.; Ling, D.; Malchau, E.; Bragdon, C.R.; Muratoglu, O.K. Osteochondral defect repair using a polyvinyl alcohol-polyacrylic acid (PVA-PAAc) hydrogel. Biomed. Mater. 2014, 9, 045012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du, S.; Huynh, T.; Lu, Y.-Z.; Parker, B.J.; Tham, S.K.; Thissen, H.; Martino, M.M.; Cameron, N.R. Bioactive polymer composite scaffolds fabricated from 3D printed negative molds enable bone formation and vascularization. Acta Biomater. 2024, 186, 260–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, H.; Zhao, Y. Bionic Peek with Drug-Loaded Hydrogel for Cartilage Repair. Int. Dent. J. 2025, 75, 104320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, C.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, K.; Liu, S.; Luo, H.; Zhang, Q.; Wan, Y. Strong, tough, and elastic poly(vinyl alcohol)/polyacrylamide DN hydrogels based on the Hofmeister effect for articular cartilage replacement. J. Mater. Chem. B 2024, 12, 3079–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Strategy | Core Techniques | Limitations | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Network Construction | Physical crosslinking, chemical crosslinking, radiation crosslinking | Potential residual toxicity from chemical methods; relatively loose single-network structure; limited mechanical properties. | [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27] |
| Mechanical Enhancement | Interpenetrating networks (IPNs), dynamic bonds, biomimetic structures | Complex preparation processes; challenges in component compatibility; difficulty in scaling up biomimetic structures. | [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38] |
| Biofunctionalization | Surface modification, controllable degradation, growth factor loading | Risk of bioactivity loss for loaded factors; difficulty in matching degradation rate with tissue regeneration; challenges in achieving long-term controlled release in vivo. | [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53] |
| Method | Principle | Limitations | Applications | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Crosslinking | Microcrystallites formed via repeated freezing-thawing cycles act as physical crosslinking points. | Limited mechanical strength; lower stability than chemically crosslinked networks. | Tissue engineering scaffolds; cartilage substitutes; cell/drug carriers. | [19,20,21] |
| Chemical Crosslinking | Covalent bonds are formed between crosslinking agents and hydroxyl groups on PVA chains. | Potential residual crosslinker toxicity; requires careful control of reaction conditions. | High-strength materials; absorbents; applications demanding superior mechanical performance. | [22,23] |
| Radiation Crosslinking | Free radicals generated by γ-rays or electron beams induce covalent crosslinking. | High equipment costs, precise dose control needed; challenges in mass production. | Medical dressings; cartilage repair; wound dressings; sterile implantable devices. | [24,25,26,27] |
| Preparation Method | Reaction Principle | Main Limitations | Application Fields | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interpenetrating Polymer Networks (IPN) | Two or more polymer networks interpenetrate and entangle. | Poor component compatibility; complex multi-step processing. | Cartilage repair; load-bearing tissue replacement. | [29,30,31] |
| Dynamic Reversible Bonds | Reversible breaking/reformation of metal coordination or hydrogen bonds enables self-healing. | Poor long-term stability; sensitive to environmental conditions. | Self-healing materials; flexible electronics. | [32,33,34] |
| Biomimetic Structural Design | Mimics nacre “brick-and-mortar” or wood anisotropic structures. | Difficult to scale up; complex structural control required. | Artificial cartilage/ligaments; tissue engineering scaffolds. | [35,36,37,38] |
| Preparation Method | Reaction Principle | Main Limitations | Application Fields | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface Modification | Introduction of coatings to improve cell adhesion and hemocompatibility. | Difficult to control coating stability and coverage uniformity. | Vascular grafts; cell scaffolds. | [40,41,42,43] |
| Introduction of Degradable Units | Incorporation of enzyme-cleavable peptide segments for controlled degradation. | Degradation rate mismatches with tissue regeneration rate. | Absorbable scaffolds; tissue engineering. | [44,45,46,47] |
| Growth Factor Loading | Integration of growth factors to promote localized regeneration. | Risk of factor inactivation; burst release effect. | Wound dressings; cartilage regeneration. | [48,49,50,51,52,53,54] |
| Application Type | Representative Composition | Mechanical Properties | Primary Applications | Advantages | Key Challenges | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical Adjunctive Materials (preclinical) | PTGH + Icariin | Compressive strength: 2.87 ± 0.45 MPa; compressive modulus: 0.761 ± 0.072 MPa | Anti-adhesion membranes; drug/cell delivery vehicles. | Physical barrier preventing adhesions; localized, sustained release; dual barrier + therapy functionality. | Matching the degradation rate to the healing window to achieve long-term release of bioactive factors. | [58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66] |
| Replacement Implants (in vitro and preclinical) | 3D-printed PVA/alginate scaffold | Elastic modulus: 0.22 MPa; tunable by adjusting the PVA/alginate ratio | Injectable thermosensitive gels; 3D-printed scaffolds. | Minimally invasive injection; mechanical stability; induction of stem cell differentiation. | Insufficient initial strength; invasive implantation for 3D-printed scaffolds. | [67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74] |
| Surface Replacement & Reconstruction (Preclinical) | PVA-poly(acrylic acid) (PAAc) hydrogel | Maintains stable mechanical properties for 12 weeks in the rabbit model; low friction, high wear resistance, creep resistance | High-strength PVA/PAAc; PVA/Nomex® composites; osteochondral integrated implants. | Low friction coefficient; high wear resistance; creep resistance; long-term load bearing. | Poor long-term stability of interfacial fixation; difficulty achieving smooth edge integration. | [75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Di, J.; He, Y.; Sun, C.; Jia, J.; Zheng, X.; Li, X. Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels for Osteoarthritis: A Review of Preparation Strategies, Modification Approaches, and Challenges. Gels 2026, 12, 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12060498
Di J, He Y, Sun C, Jia J, Zheng X, Li X. Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels for Osteoarthritis: A Review of Preparation Strategies, Modification Approaches, and Challenges. Gels. 2026; 12(6):498. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12060498
Chicago/Turabian StyleDi, Jiaxuan, Yan He, Chao Sun, Jingna Jia, Xing Zheng, and Xinyu Li. 2026. "Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels for Osteoarthritis: A Review of Preparation Strategies, Modification Approaches, and Challenges" Gels 12, no. 6: 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12060498
APA StyleDi, J., He, Y., Sun, C., Jia, J., Zheng, X., & Li, X. (2026). Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels for Osteoarthritis: A Review of Preparation Strategies, Modification Approaches, and Challenges. Gels, 12(6), 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12060498

