Next Article in Journal
Effects of a Low-Molecular-Weight Gelator in Vegetable, Mineral Oil and Cocoa Butter: A Comparative Rheological Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Action Mechanism, Research Progress and Development Trend of High-Temperature Steam Flooding and Profile Control/Flooding Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Durability of Cellulose-Reinforced PVA-SA Beads for Long-Term Quorum Quenching Applications in Membrane Bioreactors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of the Gelation Process of a Polymer Composition Based on an Acrylic Polymer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Decoupling Foam Stability from Formation Damage: Interfacial Pseudo-Gelation via Nanoparticle–Fluorosurfactant Synergy for Unconventional Reservoirs

1
School of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
2
Hubei Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Drilling and Production Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Catalysis and Carbon Dioxide Utilization, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2026, 12(6), 481; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12060481
Submission received: 16 April 2026 / Revised: 18 May 2026 / Accepted: 19 May 2026 / Published: 30 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Gels for Oil Recovery and Industry Applications)

Abstract

A critical challenge in coalbed methane (CBM) extraction is the severe formation damage induced by conventional foam fracturing fluids, primarily through polymer retention and hydrogen bond disruption within the microporous matrix. This study presents a molecularly engineered, low-damage foam fracturing fluid that leverages synergistic nanoparticle–surfactant interactions to construct a robust interfacial pseudo-gel network, thereby decoupling effective fracture stimulation from adverse geochemical damage. The primary novelties of this work are threefold: (i) establishing a direct, quantitative cause-and-effect relationship between molecular interfacial architecture and reservoir protection, (ii) proposing a comprehensive “interfacial control” design paradigm that engineers viscoelasticity at the gas–liquid interface rather than through bulk polymer gelation, and (iii) demonstrating the complete decoupling of foam stability from formation damage in a polymer-free system. A systematic optimization methodology was employed: initial foaming agents were screened via the Waring Blender method, evaluating foam volume, half-life, and a derived comprehensive index; subsequently, synergistic binary surfactant mixtures and foam stabilizers were assessed to formulate the final systems. An optimized formulation, designated Foam System I (0.5 wt.% fluorosurfactant FK + 0.5 wt.% nano-silica RX + 2.0 wt.% KCl), demonstrated exceptional foam quality (Γ = 77.1 ± 1.5%) and kinetic stability (T1/2 > 350 s). Rheological characterization confirmed shear-thinning behavior conforming to the Herschel–Bulkley model (n = 0.38–0.42, R2 > 0.98) and a structural recovery of 92.5 ± 2.1%—comparable to crosslinked polymer gels but achieved without any bulk viscosifier. Core flood analyses revealed that Foam System I induced a permeability damage of only 12.75 ± 1.8%, representing a 55–75% reduction compared to polyethylene glycol (PEG)-stabilized reference fluids (28.36–51.91%). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) correlated this enhanced reservoir compatibility with an 18.0 ± 2.0% suppression of oxygen-containing functional group adsorption, attributed to the steric hindrance conferred by the fluorinated hydrophobic moieties. This work establishes an “interfacial control” paradigm wherein gel-like stabilization for proppant transport is achieved via interfacial viscoelasticity rather than bulk polymer gelation, thereby directly addressing the critical imperative to harmonize fracture conductivity with reservoir protection in unconventional energy development. The findings are validated for shallow CBM reservoir conditions (25–35 °C), with extension to higher-temperature formations identified as a priority for future investigation.
Keywords: foam fracturing fluid; interfacial pseudo-gel; low formation damage; nanoparticle stabilization; coalbed methane; shear-thinning rheology; fluorosurfactant foam fracturing fluid; interfacial pseudo-gel; low formation damage; nanoparticle stabilization; coalbed methane; shear-thinning rheology; fluorosurfactant

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, H.; Kong, X. Decoupling Foam Stability from Formation Damage: Interfacial Pseudo-Gelation via Nanoparticle–Fluorosurfactant Synergy for Unconventional Reservoirs. Gels 2026, 12, 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12060481

AMA Style

Wu H, Kong X. Decoupling Foam Stability from Formation Damage: Interfacial Pseudo-Gelation via Nanoparticle–Fluorosurfactant Synergy for Unconventional Reservoirs. Gels. 2026; 12(6):481. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12060481

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Hongjian, and Xiangwei Kong. 2026. "Decoupling Foam Stability from Formation Damage: Interfacial Pseudo-Gelation via Nanoparticle–Fluorosurfactant Synergy for Unconventional Reservoirs" Gels 12, no. 6: 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12060481

APA Style

Wu, H., & Kong, X. (2026). Decoupling Foam Stability from Formation Damage: Interfacial Pseudo-Gelation via Nanoparticle–Fluorosurfactant Synergy for Unconventional Reservoirs. Gels, 12(6), 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12060481

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop