1. Introduction
Wounds from daily accidents can progress to chronic states when the physiological balance of the healing process is disrupted, prolonging inflammatory phases. Chronic wounds are frequently colonized or infected by pathogenic microorganisms, which not only impede the regenerative cascade but also exacerbate underlying systemic conditions [
1,
2]. Pathological hallmarks of these wounds include impaired proliferation of dermal fibroblasts, reduced synthesis of extracellular matrix components and proteins, and diminished bioavailability of critical growth factors [
3,
4]. To address these challenges, significant research has focused on developing biocompatible, non-toxic natural materials with potent antimicrobial and regenerative properties, particularly as sophisticated drug delivery vehicles [
5,
6]. Among various natural polymers, chitosan has garnered attention for its molecular weight-dependent biological activities, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial effects, positioning it as a versatile matrix for hydrogels and targeted delivery systems.
Chitosan, a linear polysaccharide composed of D-glucosamine (GlcN) units, has been extensively utilized in biomedical applications due to its multifaceted biological activities [
7,
8]. Derived from the deacetylation of chitin—the second most abundant natural polymer after cellulose—it shares a structural framework of ß-(1,4)-linked
N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc). The biological efficacy of both chitin and chitosan is critically governed by their molecular weight (MW) and degree of deacetylation (DD) [
9,
10]. Unlike the predominantly insoluble chitin macromolecule, whose biological activity is often restricted to low-molecular-weight derivatives (<1 kDa), chitosan exhibits superior solubility in organic acids such as acetic and lactic acid. Consequently, academic interest has shifted toward characterizing the physicochemical properties of chitosan. Systematic efforts to identify the optimal MW and DD for pharmacological and pharmaceutical purposes have further elucidated its molecular-driven functionalities, including immuno-enhancing [
11], antimicrobial [
12], antioxidant [
13], and antineoplastic activities [
14].
Despite extensive research on the biological activities of chitosan, inconsistent results persist due to inherent variations in its MW and DD. For instance, high-molecular-weight chitosan (HMWC) exceeding 1000 kDa has demonstrated significant anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory potential [
15]. However, the clinical translation of HMWC is frequently hampered by its poor digestibility and limited bioavailability within the human gastrointestinal tract [
16,
17]. Furthermore, the biochemical requirements for HMWC in in vitro settings—such as the necessity for specific organic solvents and the maintenance of a low pH to ensure solubility—restrict its versatility in diverse experimental models. Consequently, the standardization of chitosan to well-defined, low-molecular-weight or specific MW fractions remains a critical prerequisite for the rigorous assessment of its pharmacological efficacy and for ensuring the reproducibility of bioactivity data.
Chitooligosaccharides (COS), typically comprising (GlcN)
2 to (GlcN)
6, face significant scalability challenges for industrial-scale production. To address this, our group has developed an optimized enzymatic process to mass-produce hydrolysates with a MW range of 1–3 kDa, which exhibit potent antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities [
13,
18]. To distinguish this specific fraction from conventional COS (<1 kDa), we designated it as “Active Molecular Chitosan (AMC).” While efficient MW control for AMC production has been established, the purification of individual oligomers for clinical standardization remains an ongoing challenge. In this study, we formulated AMC-incorporated hydrogels and evaluated their therapeutic efficacy in wound healing, focusing on their capacity to prevent secondary infections and modulate inflammatory responses. Current polymer-based hydrogels, such as those derived from cellulose and hyaluronic acid, are favored in clinical settings for their high biocompatibility and low toxicity. However, these materials primarily serve as passive scaffolds and lack inherent antimicrobial properties. This deficiency often leads to critical clinical failures, including an inability to prevent secondary infections and a lack of active signals required for rapid tissue regeneration. Consequently, their effectiveness in managing chronic or infected wounds remains insufficient, necessitating the development of next-generation biologically active dressings. Among natural biopolymers, chitosan stands out for its unique ability to disrupt microbial cell walls through cationic interaction while simultaneously promoting collagen synthesis and cell proliferation. Despite these advantages, its pharmaceutical translation is severely hindered by the challenge of selective MW control. The biological performance of chitosan is inextricably linked to its MW distribution [
19,
20]; however, traditional production methods often yield wide polydispersity and inconsistent purity, leading to unpredictable clinical outcomes.
The production of water-soluble, low-molecular-weight COS has historically relied on diverse physical, chemical, and enzymatic methods. However, as demand for biocompatibility and environmental sustainability grows, enzymatic hydrolysis has emerged as the preferred approach, using both specific chitosanases and non-specific enzymes such as cellulases [
20,
21]. Despite this shift, the field lacks a standardized processing framework because of the inherent insolubility of HMWC, which complicates the precise determination of enzymatic kinetics, including Vmax and Km. While auxiliary treatments such as sonication or acidification are often used to overcome solubility barriers, these variations hinder the establishment of universal reaction protocols. Consequently, a critical research priority is to systematically standardize production methods to bridge the gap between biochemical processing conditions and the resulting biological activities of COS, thereby ensuring reproducible and clinically relevant therapeutic outcomes.
To overcome the inherent insolubility and limited biological utility of HMWC, we have systematically optimized hydrolysis protocols to precisely modulate its molecular weight. While conventional COS often exhibit suboptimal antimicrobial and antioxidant activities, recent evidence suggests that heterogeneous COS fractions around 1 kDa can elicit potent antibacterial and anti-inflammatory immune responses [
19]. This functional disparity is likely attributable to specific oligomers, such as hexa-glucosamine [(GlcN)
6: ~1 kDa], and to the technical challenges of precisely characterizing them. Under the hypothesis that AMC within the 1–3 kDa range possesses superior biological efficacy, we again emphasize the critical need for controlled enzymatic degradation of the purified HMWC. In this study, we refined an efficient production method to obtain structurally homogeneous AMC—a hydrolysate with a defined average MW of approximately 1.3 kDa—and rigorously validated its biological activity. Our findings offer significant academic and pharmaceutical insights, providing a robust framework for integrating AMC into diverse biomedical applications.
A critical limitation of traditional HMWC is its inherent insolubility at physiological pH, requiring acidic environments for dissolution that are often incompatible with clinical hydrogel formulations. By tailoring the MW and DD, we have engineered AMC416 to overcome these solubility constraints, ensuring its functionality and stability within pharmaceutical-grade hydrogels. While HMWC may exhibit certain biological activities in vitro, its high MW restricts its bioavailability and penetration. In contrast, AMC416 demonstrates superior relative bactericidal activity compared to its parent material. This enhanced efficacy, combined with its favorable solubility, provides a significant advantage in formulating potent therapeutic agents against resistant pathogens. This research contributes to the development of materials with potential therapeutic applications by exploring the relationship between the molecular structure of chitosan derivatives and their biological activity. By using AMC416 in hydrogel formulations, this study provides insights for the future development of materials with improved properties and potential uses in various fields.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Materials
HMWC, a raw material for the production of COS or AMC, was purchased from Sokcho Trading Co. in Sokcho, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea. HMWC with a DD of approximately 98% and an average MW of roughly 2000 kDa was used as the raw material for producing chitosan hydrolysates. Chitosanase derived from Bacillus species (EC 3.2.1.132) for COS or AMC production, along with glucose, GlcN, and GlcNAc for reducing sugar quantification to assess enzyme activity, was obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHA), a matrix material for measuring the MW of COS or AMC via Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-Of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry, was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). The molecular porous membrane tube (MWCO 12–14 kDa) for material dialysis was acquired from Spectrum Lab, Inc., in Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA. Specific pathogen-free (SPF) rats, Hsd: Sprague DawleyⓇ™ SDⓇ™, were obtained from Coretech Co., Ltd. (406 Dongcheon-ri, Jinwi-myeon, Pyeongtaek-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea). Tissue immunological examinations were performed at the Korea Nonclinical Technology Support Center in Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. Tissue slides for immunohistological examination were imaged using an Eclipse TE2000-U microscope (Nikon, NI tech Bio Co., Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea). Preclinical experiments involving wound healing and histological evaluation were conducted by HLB BioStep in Incheon, Republic of Korea, following the Animal Research Ethics Act. All other reagents used are ultra-pure substances.
4.2. Immobilized Enzyme Treatment for Chitosan MW Control
4.2.1. Purification and Preparation of Chitosan Substrate
The basic protocol was slightly modified and performed as follows. Briefly, 15 g of HMWC (DD 98%, <100 mesh) was added to a 50% NaOH solution (100 mL) and deacetylated by heating in a double boiler using cooking oil maintained at 120 °C for 12 h. After completion of the reaction, chitosan was filtered through a filter paper when the temperature reached approximately 30–40 °C. Subsequently, it was washed with a large amount of water to remove impurities and residual NaOH. After washing, it was freeze-dried at −50 °C (TFD8503, Ilshin, Republic of Korea). The preparation and purification of the chitosan solution for enzyme treatment were performed according to this method [
31]. For the enzymatic substrate preparation, the purified HMWC was dissolved in 2% (
w/
v) acetic acid and subsequently diluted with 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) at a volumetric ratio of 1:4 (
v/
v) to achieve optimal reaction conditions.
4.2.2. Production of COS via Batch Reaction
COS was synthesized through a batch enzymatic hydrolysis process. Commercial chitosanase (2.0 U) was introduced as a free enzyme into 10 mL of the prepared chitosan solution. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C with constant agitation. To monitor the hydrolysis kinetics, aliquots were collected at 2 h intervals. The reaction endpoint was determined by quantifying the concentration of reducing sugars, identifying the time point at which no further increase in enzymatic liberation of reducing ends was observed [
20].
4.2.3. Synthesis of AMC via a Continuous Immobilized Enzyme System
AMC was produced using a continuous flow reactor system utilizing immobilized chitosanase, as described by Lee et al. [
19]. It consisted of 3 steps: (1)
Desalination and buffer exchange: 50 mL of the 2% (
w/
v) chitosan solution was subjected to primary dialysis using a membrane with a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of 12–14 kDa to remove residual solvents. A secondary dialysis was performed against 1 L of 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) for equilibration. (2)
Column chromatography and reaction: The immobilized chitosanase (2 U) was packed into a cylindrical glass column (1.0 cm i.d. × 8 cm). The chitosan substrate was delivered through the immobilized enzyme bed at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min using a calibrated peristaltic pump (Innofluid Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China). (3)
Sampling and quantitative analysis: Effluent samples (100 µL) were collected every 2 h over 24 h and stored at −20 °C for subsequent analysis. The degree of HMWC degradation and the reaction efficiency were evaluated by the 4-hydroxybenzhydrazide (4-PHBAH) method [
20]. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm using an Infinite M200 Pro Nano-Quant microplate reader (Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria). D-glucosamine (GlcN) served as the external standard for the quantification of reducing sugar equivalents.
4.3. Application of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for the Identification of COS and AMC
The MW of both COS and AMC was determined via a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF-MS) mass spectrometer (Bruker Autoflex Speed, Billerica, MA, USA) following the method of Lee et al. [
13]. Mass spectra were acquired in positive reflector mode (
m/
z 400–5000) using a 355 nm Nd:YAG laser (200 Hz) and an accumulation of 1050 shots per spectrum. The system was calibrated with a TOF/TOF mixture, and data were analyzed using Data Explorer software (Voyager, AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). Product MWs were calculated based on the
m/
z values of GlcN and GlcNAc units. The molecular weights of these chitosan hydrolysates were measured by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. The mass range was set from 599 to 2500
m/
z, and the relative masses were measured using 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHA) as the base matrix. These results were provided by the Seoul National University Joint Research Institute.
4.4. Inhibition and Removal of Biofilm Formation by AMC416
4.4.1. Biofilm Inhibition Assay (Formation Phase)
To assess the prophylactic potential of AMC416, Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) (1 × 106 CFU/mL) was inoculated into 96-well plates to induce biofilm formation. The base hydrogel (AMC-free) used as a control contained the following: AMC 5%, (Excipient) Glycerin 8% (DUKSAN Chemicals, Ansan-si, Republic of Korea), (Thickening Agent) Hydroxyethyl-cellulose 1.0% (Ashland, Wilmington, DE, USA), (Solubilizer) PEG-60 Hydrogenated Castor Oil 0.02% (Covix, Inchon, Republic of Korea), (Solvent) Distilled Water 85.98%. The inhibitory capacity was evaluated by treating the inoculum with a concentration gradient of AMC416 (0.625 to 10 mg/mL). Simultaneously, the functional stability of AMC416 (5 mg/mL) was tested by incorporating it into the REOGEN hydrogel (in this study, a specific composite hydrogel formulated with AMC416 as the primary active pharmaceutical ingredient is designated as ‘REOGEN’). After 48 h of incubation at 37 °C, biomass was quantified via crystal violet staining. Following three washes with distilled water, the stained biofilm was solubilized in 0.2 mL of ethanol, and optical density (OD) was measured at 680 nm to calculate relative inhibition compared to untreated controls.
4.4.2. Biofilm Eradication Assay (Mature Phase)
To determine the efficacy against pre-established biofilms, VRSA (1 × 108 CFU/mL) was first incubated for 48 h to allow for complete matrix maturation. After the removal of the supernatant, the mature biofilm was exposed to varying concentrations of AMC416 (0.156 to 10 mg/mL) and AMC416-loaded REOGEN (5 mg/mL) for 8 h at 37 °C. Residual biomass was analyzed using the 4-hydroxybenzhydrazide-linked crystal violet method. Absorbance was recorded at 680 nm, and the results were expressed as a percentage of biofilm removal relative to the control group (medium-only treatment) to validate the therapeutic potential of the AMC416-hydrogel system.
4.5. Investigation of the Wound-Healing Efficacy of AMC416-Functionalized Hydrogels Through Targeted Anti-Inflammatory Action
This study validates the antibacterial and therapeutic potential of REOGEN, an AMC416-integrated hydrogel, against VRSA. Beyond assessing the intrinsic activity of AMC416, the research focuses on its functional stability within a multicomponent pharmaceutical matrix, confirming sustained bactericidal efficacy by suppressing colony formation over 14 days. The hydrogel formulations, optimized for biocompatibility, gelation kinetics, and thermal stability, were compared with Vancomycin and HMWC controls. Quantitative analysis of wound closure (mean ± SD, n = 3) further demonstrated that REOGEN maintains potent antimicrobial activity while significantly accelerating healing, establishing its efficacy as a safe, stable topical agent for resistant infections.
4.6. Validation of Wound Healing Promotion by AMC416-Incorporated Hydrogels: An Animal Study Focused on Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms
To evaluate the therapeutic potential of the test substances, this study utilized a robust Sprague–Dawley (SPF) rat model to simulate both surgical and VRSA-induced infectious wounds, a methodology that holds significant academic weight by addressing the critical challenge of multidrug-resistant pathogen management in regenerative medicine. SPF rats, Hsd: Sprague DawleyⓇ™ SDⓇ™, were purchased from Coretech Co., Ltd. (406 Dongcheon-ri, Jinwi-myeon, Pyeongtaek-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea). Acclimation of the mice was performed in a controlled environment at 22 ± 3 °C with a relative humidity of 50 ± 10% under a 12 h light/dark cycle for one week. “All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of HLB BioStep Co., Ltd. (Approval No. 24-HB-0343) and were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.” A key procedural specificity lies in the dynamic administration of the viscous test substance (1 mL), which was strategically applied nine times over 14 days to ensure sustained pharmacological contact and functional stability within the infected microenvironment. Furthermore, the use of longitudinal ImageJ (v1.53)-based morphometric analysis—while carefully preserving the physiological integrity of the wound by leaving scabs intact when necessary—allowed precise, non-invasive quantification of the wound-closure trajectory. This integrated approach not only validates the biocompatibility and safety of the formulation but also provides essential preclinical evidence of its ability to overcome the inhibitory effects of bacterial biofilms on the natural healing process.
4.7. Characterization of Tissue Architecture and Inflammatory Response During Hydrogel-Induced Wound Healing
To evaluate the dynamic wound-healing process, necropsies were performed in two stages: an interim assessment on Day 5 (n = 2 per group) and a final evaluation on Day 14 (remaining animals). The excised wound sites, including adjacent normal tissues, were bifurcated for multifaceted analysis, with one half cryopreserved at −80 °C and the other fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathological examination. Formalin-fixed specimens underwent standardized processing—including trimming, dehydration, and paraffin embedding—and were subsequently analyzed using Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) for structural morphology, Masson’s Trichrome (MT) for collagen deposition, and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for inflammatory markers (IL-10 and TNF-α). Quantitative scoring was conducted under an Olympus BX53 light microscope according to the validated criteria of Nisbet et al. [
31], while MT-stained images were digitized via a Carl Zeiss Axio Scan.Z1 and quantified using ZEN software (ZEN 2.3) to ensure a statistically robust and integrated assessment of therapeutic efficacy (Carl Zeiss ZEN, Oberkochen, Germany).
4.8. Immunomodulatory Analysis of Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Expression in Response to VRSA-Triggered Inflammation
The quantitative evaluation of pro-inflammatory (IL-1ß, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4, IL-10) cytokines is a critical prerequisite for validating the immunomodulatory efficacy of the developed hydrogels in VRSA-infected wounds. Given that multidrug-resistant infections often trigger a dysregulated and prolonged inflammatory phase that stalls the regenerative process, monitoring these specific biomarkers is essential to demonstrate the transition from a pathological inflammatory state to an active healing trajectory [
19]. To achieve this, 1 g of each hydrogel formulation was administered biannually following wound induction, with target tissues harvested at strategic intervals (Days 5 and 14) to capture the kinetic shifts in the cytokine profile. Proteins were precisely extracted from the excised tissues and quantified via high-sensitivity Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA) in strict accordance with standardized protocols. By meticulously balancing the ratio between pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators, this analysis provides pivotal evidence of the hydrogel’s ability to resolve chronic inflammation and re-establish a pro-regenerative microenvironment in the presence of highly resistant pathogens.
4.9. Statistical Analysis
To ensure the reproducibility and statistical robustness of the findings, all experimental procedures were performed in at least triplicate. Quantitative data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (S.D.), reflecting the precision of the observed outcomes. Statistical significance was rigorously evaluated to determine the efficacy of the treatments compared to the control group. Differences were considered statistically significant at p-values of less than 0.05 (* p < 0.05), 0.01 (** p < 0.01), or 0.001 (*** p < 0.001), while values of p ≥ 0.05 were regarded as not significant. This hierarchical approach to p-value designation allows for the precise interpretation of the biological impact and the statistical confidence of the AMC-integrated hydrogel’s therapeutic performance.