Next Article in Journal
Improved Sugarcane-Based Fermentation Processes by an Industrial Fuel-Ethanol Yeast Strain
Previous Article in Journal
ChsA, a Class Ⅱ Chitin Synthase, Contributes to Asexual Conidiation, Mycelial Morphology, Cell Wall Integrity, and the Production of Enzymes and Organic Acids in Aspergillus niger
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficacy of Biological and Chemical Control Agents against Heterobasidion Spore Infections of Norway Spruce and Scots Pine Stumps on Drained Peatland
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Wide Distribution and Intraspecies Diversity in the Pathogenicity of Calonectria in Soil from Eucalyptus Plantations in Southern Guangxi of China

J. Fungi 2023, 9(8), 802; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9080802
by Wenxia Wu and Shuaifei Chen *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
J. Fungi 2023, 9(8), 802; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9080802
Submission received: 31 May 2023 / Revised: 21 July 2023 / Accepted: 26 July 2023 / Published: 29 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tree Fungal Disease Problems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors have presented their research work related to the distribution and intraspecies diversity in the pathogenicity of Calonectria in Soil from Eucalyptus Plantations in GuangXi, southern China.  A total of 188 Calonectria isolates were obtained from soil close to Eucalyptus trees. These isolates were identified based on DNA sequence comparisons of four partial gene regions of the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1), β-tubulin (tub2), calmodulin 16 (cmdA), as well as histone H3 (his3).  They have done pathogenicity tests too to satisfy the Koch postulates. Overall, it is a good effort but require some inclusions and revisions as follows:

Author citations of all scientific names are missing throughout the manuscript e.g., Eucalyptus, Calonectria, Medicago sativa…and many more

It is suggested to include sampling site map so that one can judge the distance present between sampling sites.

Discuss why  some Calonectria isolates of the same species differed significantly in their virulence on the tested Eucalyptus genotypes. What could be the possible reason that the resistance of different  Eucalyptus genotypes to Calonectria isolates within the same species was inconsistent.

 

 

 

line 31 :  italicize Calonectria

table 2: accessions are missing

 line 461: italicize Eucalyptus

 

Author Response

Our point by point responses to Reviewer One’s comments and details of the revisions have been listed and explained in the attached file “July 21, 2023_Response to Reviewer One Comments and Changes Made.docx”.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Your manuscript entitled "Wide Distribution and Intraspecies Diversity in the Pathogenicity of Calonectria in Soil from Eucalyptus Plantations in GuangXi, southern China" (ID: jof-2453842) submitted to Journal of Fungi was reviewed. I thank you for writing this scientific manuscript about Calonectria spp.

Regarding to this manuscript, the following points should be considered.

Title:

The title should be written more concisely.

Abstract:

It should be noted which species had the highest virulence in the pathogenicity tests.

 

Introduction:

In the introduction, it is better to refer to previous studies conducted on Calonectria species on Eucalyptus plantations and other plant species in china as well as other countries (with more detailed explanations to show the importance of the species of this genus).

 

Materials and Methods:

1-In this part, it is necessary to consider the morphological identification of the Calonectria isolates and references used.

2-Describe the isolate considered as a positive control. Has it previously been tested for pathogenicity trial? How was it identified? on which host and genotype and …..?

 

 Results:

1-Which morphological characteristics have been used for the identification and initial grouping of this number of isolates?

 

2-Table 2. takes up a lot of space in the manuscript and it might be better to consider it as Supplementary Materials and put some figures of identified species instead of this table (of course, this is only a suggestion and it is not mandatory).

3- The pathogenicity tests are a little confusing and it is better to write this section in two parts as the experiment 1 and 2. This can be more convenient for readers. This can also be considered for materials and methods.

 

Discussion:

The discussion seems a bit weak. It is better to use more references about the importance of species of this genus on Eucalyptus and other plant species in china as well as other countries (of course, with more explanations). Such as:

 Li, J. Q., Wingfield, M. J., Liu, Q. L., Barnes, I., Roux, J., Lombard, L., Crous, P. W., and Chen, S. F. 2017. Calonectria species isolated from Eucalyptus plantations and nurseries in South China. IMA Fungus 8:259–286.

 Zhang, Y.; Chen, C.; Chen, C.; Chen, J.; Xiang, M.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Hsiang, T.; Hyde, K.D.; Manawasinghe, I.S. Identification and Characterization of Calonectria Species Associated with Plant Diseases in Southern China. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 719. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jof8070719

 Pham, N., Marincowitz, S., Chen, S. et al. Calonectria species, including four novel taxa, associated with Eucalyptus in Malaysia. Mycol Progress 21, 181–197 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-021-01768-8

 L. Lombard, P.W. Crous, B.D. Wingfield, M.J. Wingfield, Species concepts in Calonectria (Cylindrocladium), Studies in Mycology, Volume 66, 2010, Pages 1-13, ISSN 0166-0616, https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2010.66.01.

 Dalia Aiello, Vladimiro Guarnaccia, Alessandro Vitale, Nicholas LeBlanc, Nina Shishkoff, and Giancarlo Polizzi. 2022. Impact of Calonectria Diseases on Ornamental Horticulture: Diagnosis and Control Strategies. Plant Disease, 106: 1773-1787, https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-21-2610-FE.

 

More recommendations:

To improve this manuscript, more suggestions and comments are included in the revised PDF file (attached file).

Best regards

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

I advise the respected authors to find a native English speaker to thoroughly revise the grammar of this manuscript.

Author Response

Our point by point responses to Reviewer Two’s comments and details of the revisions have been listed and explained in the attached file “July 21, 2023_Response to Reviewer Two Comments and Changes Made.docx”.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop