Next Article in Journal
Fungal Biodegradation of Polyurethanes
Next Article in Special Issue
Volatile Fingerprint Mediates Yeast-to-Mycelial Conversion in Two Strains of Beauveria bassiana Exhibiting Varied Virulence
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Altissimacoumarin D and Other Prenylated Coumarins and Their Ability to Reverse the Multidrug Resistance Phenotype in Candida albicans
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cuticular Lipids as a First Barrier Defending Ixodid Ticks against Fungal Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/jof9070759
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Potential of Metarhizium anisopliae Blastospores to Control Aedes aegypti Larvae in the Field

by
Simone Azevedo Gomes
1,
Aline Teixeira Carolino
1,
Thais Berçot Pontes Teodoro
1,
Gerson Adriano Silva
1,
Ricardo de Oliveira Barbosa Bitencourt
1,
Carlos Peres Silva
2,
Abeer M. Alkhaibari
3,
Tariq M. Butt
4 and
Richard Ian Samuels
1,*
1
Laboratório de Entomologia e Fitopatologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro 28013-602, Brazil
2
Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Brazil
3
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(7), 759; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9070759
Submission received: 4 June 2023 / Revised: 15 July 2023 / Accepted: 16 July 2023 / Published: 18 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multifaceted Beauveria bassiana and Other Insect-Related Fungi 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Entomopathogenic fungi are promising as an environmentally benign alternative to chemical pesticides for mosquito control. The current study investigated the virulence of Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores against Aedes aegypti under both laboratory and field conditions. Virulence bioassays of conidia and blastospores were conducted in the laboratory, while field simulation bioassays were conducted under two conditions: totally shaded (TS) or partially shaded (PS). In the first bioassay (zero h), the larvae were added to the cups shortly after the preparation of the blastospores, and in the subsequent assays, larvae were added to the cups 3, 6, 9, and 12 days later. The survival of the larvae exposed to blastospores in the laboratory was zero on day two, as was the case for the larvae exposed to conidia on the sixth day. Under TS conditions, zero survival was seen on the third day of the bioassay. Under PS conditions, low survival rates were recorded on day 7. For the persistence bioassay under PS conditions, low survival rates were also observed. Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores were more virulent to Ae. aegypti larvae than conidia in the laboratory. Blastospores remained virulent under field simulation conditions. However, virulence rapidly declined from the third day of field bioassays. Formulating blastospores in vegetable oil could protect these propagules when applied under adverse conditions. This is the first time that blastospores have been tested against mosquito larvae under simulated field conditions, and the current study could be the basis for the development of a new biological control agent.

1. Introduction

Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) vectors dengue (DENV), Zika (ZIKV), and chikungunya (CHIKV) arboviruses, which pose a risk to over half the world’s population, affecting millions of people annually [1]. The extensive use of synthetic insecticides for mosquito control has resulted in insecticide resistance and a corresponding increase in Aedes-transmitted diseases [2]. Aedes mosquito populations have become resistant to virtually all currently available classes of insecticide [3,4,5,6]. To reduce dependency on synthetic insecticides, research has been carried out to investigate the potential of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) to control insect vectors [7,8,9,10].
EPF belonging to the genera Metarhizium and Beauveria are already sold for the control of crop pests and show promise for the control of arthropod disease vectors, including sandflies, kissing bugs, ticks [11,12,13,14], and mosquitoes [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. EPF cause mortality following the ingestion of inoculum (conidia, blastospores) or by the direct penetration of the host cuticle and subsequent colonization of the host body [15,23]. One major advantage of EPF over the extensively used entomopathogenic bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis, is that it is not restricted to the control of mosquito larvae, but can also kill adults, pupae, and eggs [8,24,25,26,27].
Hydrophilic blastospores and hydrophobic conidia can be produced in liquid media or solid substrates, respectively [27,28]. Conidia production can take 15–21 days whereas blastospores can be produced within 2–4 days [29]. The thin-walled blastospores are marginally more virulent than conidia against the larvae of Aedes, Culex, and Anopheles mosquito species [15,21,30]. The fact that blastospores have multiple routes of entry (cuticle and gut) may explain why these propagules killed Ae. aegypti larvae in a relatively short time (12–24 h), significantly quicker than when larvae were exposed to conidia [16,22].
Studies have shown that M. anisopliae conidia did not adhere to the mosquito larval cuticle nor germinate within the insect gut, being expelled in fecal pellets [7,31]. It has been suggested that M. anisopliae conidia caused stress-induced mortality, a very different mode of action to that normally seen when fungi infect and kill terrestrial hosts [7]. In addition, Daoust and Roberts [32] showed that M. anisopliae conidia attached to the respiratory siphon in order to infect Ae. aegypti, Culex pipiens, and Anopheles stephensi larvae. Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores were also more virulent than conidia against Ae. aegypti pupae and, interestingly, sporulation was observed on the pupae after exposure to blastospores [27].
We also recently demonstrated that blastospores are highly virulent to adult Ae. aegypti under laboratory conditions [26], killing mosquitoes more rapidly than conidia; however, virulence declined over time. Previous studies have shown that blastospores are highly virulent under laboratory conditions, but it is also important to test the efficiency of these fungal propagules under conditions similar to the natural situation.
Here, the virulence of M. anisopliae conidia and blastospores against Ae. aegypti larvae from a native population was first assessed under laboratory conditions. Then, blastospore virulence was investigated under simulated field conditions. Finally, blastospore virulence over time (persistence) was also investigated. This study is a very important step forward in the development of a new biological control agent for use against Ae. aegypti larvae.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mosquito Collection and Rearing

Aedes aegypti larvae were reared from eggs collected at strategic sites on the Campus of the State University of North Fluminense (UENF). Aedes aegypti populations derived from eggs collected in the field are considered fitter than the more homogeneous, laboratory-reared mosquitoes, and therefore more appropriate for use for investigating pathogen virulence. The eggs were collected using “ovitraps”, which consist of black plastic plant pots (12 cm in diameter × 15 cm in height) with 4 wooden strips or paddles (3 × 12 cm) placed vertically within the pots, providing a highly conducive landing platform for gravid, ovipositing females (See Supplementary Material Figure S1). Approximately 300 mL of tap water was added to each ovitrap before placing them outdoors at sites that were protected from rain and direct sunlight and close to the University Insectary (Latitude: −21°45′8.17″ S; Longitude: −41°19′49.58″ W). After 5 days, the paddles with eggs were collected and dried at room temperature for 24 h. To initiate egg hatching, the paddles were submerged in water and the emergent larvae were maintained in plastic trays (approximately 100 larvae per 100 mL) and fed on freshly ground, autoclaved commercial fish food (Nuvilab, São Paulo, Brazil; 0.05 g per L).

2.2. Fungal Isolate

Metarhizium anisopliae isolate LEF 2000 was obtained from a soil sample in Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil (Latitude: −21°45′8.17″ S; Longitude: −41°19′49.58″ W). LEF 2000 is part of the fungal collection of the Insect Pathology Group (UENF). Fungi are maintained on freeze-dried rice grains at −20 °C. This isolate was obtained from a soil sample using an insect bait method, and consecutive purification was carried out on media + antibiotics using standard procedures. Subsequently, monosporic culturing was performed. This isolate has been previously shown by our research group to be highly virulent against Ae. aegypti larvae [24], pupae [27], and adults [26] under laboratory conditions.

2.3. Conidial Production and Suspensions

Metarhizium anisopliae conidia were obtained by culturing the fungus on medium containing potato, dextrose, and agar (PDA), maintained in an incubator for ten days at 27 °C and 70% RH. After this time, conidia were carefully removed from the culture medium with the aid of a spatula, and a suspension was prepared using Tween 80 (0.01%) at a concentration of 1 × 107 conidia mL−1, estimated using a Neubauer hemocytometer. Viability tests were carried out by plate counting, and only batches with > 90% germination were used in the experiments.

2.4. Blastospore Production and Suspension

Blastospores were produced in corn steep medium liquid consisting of 3% (v/v) corn steep liquor (Sigma-Aldrich, São Paulo, Brazil), 4% yeast extract (w/v), and 4% glucose (w/v). Briefly, 500 µL of a 1 × 107 mL−1 conidial suspension was added to 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 mL of culture medium. The flasks were incubated at 27 °C in an orbital shaker at 152 rpm, and blastospores were harvested after three days. The blastospores were separated from the hyphal fragments using a “Miracloth” filter (Sigma-Aldrich, São Paulo, Brazil), and the yield was estimated using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A final concentration of 1 × 107 mL−1 was used in the following assays. All batches were tested for viability by plating out suspensions on PDA. Only batches with >90% colony-forming units were used in the experiments.

2.5. Laboratory and Semi-field Bioassays

The bioassays were carried out using a fungal concentration of 1 × 107 propagules mL−1. In the laboratory, bioassays were conducted to compare the virulence of conidia and blastospores. These bioassays were carried out in a BOD at 25 °C and a photoperiod of 12 h light: 12 h dark. For the field simulation bioassays, blastopore virulence was monitored under totally shaded conditions (TS) or partially shaded conditions (PS) at ambient temperatures (see Section 3). Ten 2nd or 3rd instar larvae (L2/3) were transferred to 100 mL cups with 50 mL of fungal suspensions. The larvae from the control groups were exposed to Tween 80 at 0.01% (conidial control) or pure distilled water (blastospores control group). For each bioassay group, four cups were used (10 larvae per cup), totaling 40 larvae. Three replications were performed; therefore, 120 larvae were used in total per treatment. Larval survival was monitored daily for seven days by visual observation. Dead larvae were removed from the cups.

2.6. Blastospore Persistence under Laboratory Conditions

Bioassays were conducted to verify how long the blastospore suspensions remained virulent. Recipients were maintained on the laboratory bench at approximately 25 °C, 50% RH, and 12 h light: 12 h dark. Aedes aegypti larvae were added to each recipient at different times after the preparation of suspensions as follows: time zero (T0 = the larvae were immediately exposed to blastospores as soon as the suspension had been prepared); 3 days (T3 = the larvae were exposed to blastospores 72 h after preparing the suspension); and larvae were also exposed to blastospores at T6, T9, and T12 days after the preparation of the suspensions.

2.7. Blastospore Virulence When Tested against Larvae under Totally Shaded and Partially Shaded Conditions in the Field

Semi-field bioassays were performed using blastospore suspensions at 1 × 107 mL−1, and experiments were carried out on two balconies outside the Dengue Research Unit at UENF. One of the balconies, due to its position, did not receive direct sunlight at any time of the day and was denominated as totally shaded (TS) (Supplementary Material Figure S2A). On the other balcony, the experimental area received direct sunlight at certain times of the day (from around 11 am to 4 pm) and was thus denominated as partially shaded (PS) (Supplementary Material Figure S2B). The bioassays were carried out inside cages (15 × 60 × 75 cm) covered with fine mesh to avoid predators from interfering with the experiments. Blastospore virulence bioassays over time (persistence) were performed under PS conditions. The temperature and humidity were monitored constantly using dataloggers (Watchdog Ltd., Aurora, IL, USA).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

For survival data, the homogeneity of the repetitions was analyzed using the log-rank test at a 95% significance level. Homogenous results were then pooled for survival curve analysis. The average survival time (S50) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method [33]. Statistical differences between the survival curves of different treatments were compared using the log-rank test. The results for all the control groups were pooled and only one control survival curve was shown.
Comparisons of Ae. aegypti endpoint survival percentages for the different treatments were assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). When significant differences were observed between treatments, the data were further analyzed by Duncan’s post-hoc test at the 5% level.

3. Results

3.1. Comparison of Blastospore and Conidial Virulence under Laboratory Conditions

Blastospores caused a 100% reduction in larval survival after two days of exposure, whereas conidia reduced larval survival by approximately 50% at the same time point. Furthermore, conidia resulted in a 100% reduction of larval survival only on the sixth day of the bioassay (Figure 1). During seven days of monitoring, 100% and 97% of the larvae survived in the two control groups. The larvae exposed to blastospores had an S50 of 1 day and the larvae exposed to conidia an S50 of 3 days. The treatments using blastospores or conidia differed statistically from each other and from their respective controls [F8.11 = 49.976; p < 0.05].

3.2. Blastospore Persistence under Laboratory Conditions

Larvae exposed to blastospores at time zero (T0) reduced survival by 100% on the fifth day of monitoring (S50 = 1 day) (Figure 2). At the end of the bioassays, 4.1% of the larvae exposed to blastospores at T3 survived (S50 = 3 days), followed by T6 (4.8% survival; S50 = 2 days), T9 (16.6% survival; S50 = 3 days), and T12 (45.8% survival; S50 = 6 days) (Figure 2). In the control group, 95% of the larvae survived during the bioassay. Regardless of the treatment, larvae exposed to blastospores had a significant reduction [F12.17 = 5.071; p < 0.05] in survival when compared with the control group.

3.3. Assessment of Blastospore Virulence under Semi-Field Conditions: Totally Shaded (TS) and Partially Shaded (PS)

Under totally shaded conditions, blastospores reduced larval survival by 100% on the third day of monitoring (Figure 3). Here, the ambient temperature ranged from 25 to 28 °C, and the relative humidity (RH) ranged from 71 to 82% during the experiment. Under partially shaded conditions, blastospores reduced larval survival by 20% within three days of exposure (Figure 3); however, after seven days, larval survival decreased to 0.8%. During this experiment, the temperature ranged from 25 to 38 °C and the RH ranged from 44 to 55%. The control group survival rates for TS and PS conditions were 97% and 98%, respectively.
After 48 h of monitoring, 5.8% (S50 = 1 day) of the larvae survived exposure to blastopores under TS conditions (Table 1). On the other hand, blastospores under partially shaded conditions reduced larval survival by 43.3% (S50 = 2 days). Once again, regardless of treatment, blastospores significantly reduced larval survival [F8.11 = 389.200; p < 0.05] in comparison to the control groups (Table 1).

3.4. Blastospore Persistence under Semi-Field Conditions

The bioassays to investigate blastospore persistence were carried out under partially shaded (PS) conditions. After seven days, approximately 1% of larvae survived exposure to blastospores at T0. However, 17% of the larvae survived after being exposed to blastospores at T3, followed by 76% (T6), 93% (T9), and 95% (T12). The control group larval survival was 93% (Figure 4).
After 48 h, larval survival ranged from 23.3 to 100% (Table 2). Larvae exposed to blastospores at T0 and T3 had significantly reduced survival (p < 0.05) compared with T6, T9, T12, and the control group. However, the reduction in survival was not statistically different when comparing the groups exposed to blastospores at T6, T9, and T12 and the control group [F12.17 = 24.006; p < 0.05]

4. Discussion

Here, we investigated the virulence of M. anisopliae (isolate LEF 2000) blastospores and conidia against Ae. aegypti larvae under laboratory conditions, and blastospore virulence under semi-field conditions. This is the first time that blastospores have been tested against mosquito larvae in the field. The persistence of blastopores was also investigated under both laboratory conditions and semi-field conditions.
Blastospores were significantly more virulent than conidia to Ae. aegypti larvae. No larvae remained alive after a 2-day exposure to blastopores, whereas after the same time period, approximately 50% of the larvae exposed to conidia were still alive. Previously published data demonstrated that Ae. aegypti larvae are more susceptible to infection by blastospores than conidia under laboratory conditions [15]. According to Alkhaibari et al. [15], the higher virulence attributed to blastospores when compared to conidia is due to the presence of a thinner cell wall, which facilitates the secretion of fungal enzymes onto the insect cuticle, and also the production of large amounts of mucilage, which facilitated the adhesion of the fungus to the insect cuticle, accelerating the infection process.
Blastospores of the entomopathogenic fungus Tolypocladium cylindrosporum were also more virulent than conidia against Aedes sierrensis mosquito larvae [34]. The hydrophilic characteristics of blastospores mean that they are able to disperse in an aqueous environment. This characteristic may facilitate the interaction between the fungus and larval integument [30], different from that of conidia, which are hydrophobic and are less likely to adhere to the larval cuticle in an aquatic environment [31]. Blastospores were also more virulent than conidia to Ae. aegypti pupae, an important characteristic when considering that this phase of development only lasts 2–3 days [27]. Although the results confirmed the higher virulence of blastospores to Ae. aegypti larvae, for mosquito biological control in the field, it is important to establish the virulence of the propagules over time as well as application protocols, due to the abiotic adversities found in this environment.
Conventional control measures against larvae involve the elimination of breeding sites (plastic bags, bottles, tyres) and the application of larvicides into receptacles that cannot be eliminated, such as drains and water tanks [35]. Chemical and biological control agents need to be applied to recipients that are putative breeding sites as a preventative measure. Therefore, the control agent should have a longer active time in the field, although this could be considered a problem for some persistent or toxic chemicals, limiting their use in, for example, residential water tanks.
The virulence of blastospores was observed here over different time periods by preparing all blastospore suspensions as a single batch and then placing the larvae in these suspensions at different times post-preparation. The most virulent propagules were those to which the larvae were exposed immediately following preparation (time zero), in which case, a 100% reduction in survival was seen after 5 days. The virulence gradually fell when larvae were added to cups with blastospore suspensions at different time periods of up to 12 days, when the experiment was terminated. For larvae placed in blastospore suspensions 12 days after initial preparation, approximately 50% of the larvae remained alive 7 days later. Although larval survival for all of the blastospore treatments (0 h up to 12 days) was significantly different from the control survival percentages, the results indicated the need for further work on blastospore formulations in order to increase persistence.
Similar results were seen when testing blastospores against adult Ae. aegypti [26], where the virulence declined rapidly following the application of blastospores to black cloths. In that case, it was possible to increase persistence by adding vegetable oil to the blastospore suspensions. This approach is currently being tested with the aim of increasing the persistence of blastospores against larvae.
Compared to conidia, blastospores appear to have a low adaptation to the critical condition caused by abiotic stress. Some researchers have modified the fermentation process to produce blastospores that are more tolerant to stress. These types of study have shown that osmotic stress during fermentation promotes the production of more tolerant blastospores [36,37,38]. Furthermore, modifying the media by increasing the glucose concentration above 40 g/L, or encapsulating the propagule in calcium alginate with nutrients to increase viability in stressful conditions may have a positive effect [36,39,40]. Blastospore granules in soil used to control the tick Rhipicephalus microplus under semi-field conditions presented a decrease in fungal viability over time [14]. Fungal viability dropped significantly 15 days after the first application. The authors attributed the reduced viability to climatic factors, such as high levels of rainfall and high RH, that occurred during the tests. Nevertheless, none of these studies tested the persistence of blastospores in an aquatic environment under field conditions. Unsurprisingly, blastospores are negatively affected in terrestrial environments where they are subjected to rapid desiccation. However, the decline in virulence in an aquatic environment was unexpected. It was interesting to note that blastospores could germinate in the water and produce conidiophores and conidia on the water surface (personal observation), which could infect any remaining larvae alive in the recipients. As mentioned before, conidia are more resistant to ambient conditions because they possess a thick cell wall containing hydrophobins that protect the conidia against environmental stress [41]. The results of virulence bioassays when testing entomopathogenic fungi in the laboratory may not necessarily correlate with effectiveness against target insects in the field. This is due to the fact that the external environmental conditions are more challenging for fungal survival compared to the laboratory environment.
In the bioassays performed under totally shaded (TS) natural environmental conditions, it was demonstrated that no larvae remained alive by the third day of the experiment. In the same type of field bioassay carried out under partially shaded conditions (PS), with direct exposure to sunlight at specific times of the day, it was possible to verify that even at ambient temperatures of between 25 and 38 °C, M. anisopliae blastospores were still able to reduce the larval survival to almost zero over a five-day period. Aedes aegypti females are known to prefer oviposition sites located in shaded areas, as these sites reduce environmental stress on the immature stages [42]. Therefore, it would be unusual for larvae to develop in recipients that are in unshaded positions. The two environmental regimes chosen here were those which females would normally select as oviposition sites.
Unfortunately, blastospore virulence rapidly decreased over time when suspensions were maintained in the field before placing larvae in the recipients. Here, the persistence of blastospores was tested under PS conditions and only the 0-h and 3-day treatments resulted in significant reductions in larval survival (Figure 4 and Table 2). Although survival was slightly reduced (approx. 8%) when larvae were exposed to suspensions that had been maintained on the veranda for 6 days, these data and those for the longer time periods were not significantly different to the control survival.
Solar radiation can influence the germination capacity of the fungus and consequently its virulence [43,44,45]. UV-B radiation can permanently or temporarily block the cell cycle, preventing or considerably delaying fungal germination [46]. However, some adjuvants can improve the persistence of microbial agents in the field by protecting them from inactivation by sunlight [47]. Using entomopathogenic fungi in oil-based formulations is a promising strategy to preserve them from negative environmental effects [48]. Oil formulations prolong propagule survival and decrease sensitivity to UV radiation when compared to aqueous suspensions [49]. Solar radiation and temperature may have been factors that caused a delay in the rate of larval infection. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is responsible for reducing the virulence of entomopathogenic fungal conidia [50].
The present study showed that under semi-field conditions, M. anisopliae (isolate LEF 2000) blastospores are virulent against the larvae of a natural strain of Ae. aegypti, and have the potential to be used in the biological control of this vector. However, further work on formulations to protect the blastospores from solar radiation needs to be carried out.

5. Conclusions

This study shows for the first time that blastospores are virulent against larvae of a native strain of Ae. aegypti, obtained from field-collected eggs. Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores were more virulent than conidia to Ae. aegypti larvae under laboratory conditions. Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores were also virulent to Ae. aegypti larvae under conditions that simulated a natural situation in the field, but virulence declined over time.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9070759/s1, Figure S1: Ovitrap used for collecting Aedes eggs in the field; Figure S2: Two types of field conditions used in the evaluation of blastospore virulence. (A) Totally shaded conditions and e (B) Partially shaded conditions. The large cages were used to prevent predators from interfering with the experiments. The partially shaded conditions had direct sunlight from approximately 11 am to 4 pm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.A.G., A.T.C., A.M.A., T.M.B. and R.I.S.; Methodology: S.A.G., A.T.C. and R.I.S.; Validation: S.A.G., A.T.C., T.B.P.T. and R.d.O.B.B.; Formal analysis: S.A.G., A.T.C. and G.A.S.; Investigation: S.A.G., A.T.C., T.B.P.T. and R.I.S.; Resources: G.A.S., T.M.B. and R.I.S.; Data curation: S.A.G., G.A.S. and C.P.S.; Writing—original draft preparation: S.A.G., A.T.C. and R.I.S.; Writing—review and editing: S.A.G., A.T.C., T.B.P.T., R.I.S. and R.d.O.B.B.; Visualization: RIS; Supervision: T.M.B. and R.I.S.; Project administration: C.P.S. and R.I.S.; Funding acquisition: T.M.B. and R.I.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FAPERJ (Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro) grant numbers: E-26/201.336/2016; E-26/210.120/2022; EI-260003/000339/2023. RIS (productivity grant number: 309975/2021-2) and CPS are CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) research fellows.

Data Availability Statement

All data will be made available upon request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank UENF for providing the infrastructure for the current research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Powell, J.R. Mosquito-borne human viral diseases: Why Aedes aegypti? Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 98, 1563–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zulfa, R.; Lo, W.C.; Cheng, P.C.; Martini, M.; Chuang, T.W. Updating the insecticide resistance status of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Estep, A.S.; Sanscrainte, N.D.; Waits, C.M.; Bernard, S.J.; Lloyd, A.M.; Lucas, K.J.; Buckner, E.A.; Vaidyanathan, R.; Morreale, R.; Conti, L.A.; et al. Quantification of permethrin resistance and kdr alleles in Florida strains of Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse). PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Al-Amin, H.M.; Johora, F.T.; Irish, S.R.; Hossainey, M.R.H.; Vizcaino, L.; Paul, K.K.; Khan, W.A.; Haque, R.; Alam, M.S.; Lenhart, A. Insecticide resistance status of Aedes aegypti in Bangladesh. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Parker, C.; Ramirez, D.; Thomas, C.; Connelly, C.R. Baseline susceptibility status of Florida populations of Aedes aegypti (Diperta: Culicide) and Aedes albopictus. J. Med. Entomol. 2020, 57, 1550–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Silalahi, C.N.; Tu, W.C.; Chang, N.T.; Singham, G.V.; Ahmad, I.; Neoh, K.B. Insecticide resistance profiles and synergism of field Aedes aegypti from Indonesia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Butt, T.M.; Greenfield, B.P.J.; Greig, C.; Maffeis, T.G.; Taylor, J.W.D.; Piasecka, J.; Dudley, E.; Abdulla, A.; Dubovskiy, I.M.; Garrido-Jurado, I.; et al. Metarhizium anisopliae pathogenesis of mosquito larvae: A verdict of accidental death. PLoS ONE 2013, 13, e81686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gomes, S.A.; Paula, A.R.; Ribeiro, A.; Moraes, C.O.P.; Santos, J.W.A.B.; Silva, C.P.; Samuels, R.I. Neem oil increases the efficiency of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae for the control of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Noskov, Y.A.; Polenogova, O.V.; Yaroslavtseva, O.N.; Belevich, O.E.; Yurchenko, Y.A.; Chertkova, E.A.; Kryukova, N.A.; Kryukov, V.Y.; Glupov, V.V. Combined effect of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium robertsii and avermectins on the survival and immune response of Aedes aegypti larvae. Peer J. 2019, 7, e7931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rodrigues, J.; Bergamini, C.; Montalva, C.; Humber, R.A.; Luz, C. Simple method to detect and to isolate entomopathogenic fungi (Hypocreales) from mosquito larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2021, 182, 107581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Amóra, S.S.A.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L.; Feijó, F.M.C.; Pereira, R.H.M.A.; Alves, N.D.; Freire, F.A.M.; Kamimura, M.T.; de Oliveira, D.M.; Luna-Alves Lima, E.A.; Rocha, M.F.G. The effects of the fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum on different stages of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae). Acta Trop. 2010, 113, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Castellanos-Sánchez, P.; Falconi-Agapito, F.; Pariona, N.; Paredes-Esquivel, C. Isolation of Beauveria bassiana Pr-11 from Andean orthopterans and its effectiveness against Chagas disease vectors in Peru. Trop. Biomed. 2020, 37, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Figueredo, L.A.; Luna, R.L.N.; Miranda, D.E.O.; Silva, F.J.; Otranto, D.; Cafarchia, C.; Figueiredo, R.C.B.Q.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Brandão-Filho, S.P. Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) reduces the survival time of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae), the main vector of the visceral leishmaniasis agent in the Americas. J. Med. Entomol. 2020, 13, 2025–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Marciano, A.F.; Mascarin, G.M.; Franco, R.F.F.; Golo, P.S.; Jaronski, S.T.; Fernandes, É.K.K.; Bittencourt, V.R.E.P. Innovative granular formulation of Metarhizium robertsii microsclerotia and blastospores for cattle tick control. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alkhaibari, A.M.; Carolino, A.T.; Yavasoglu, S.I.; Maffeis, T.; Matosso, T.C.; James, C.B.; Bull, J.C.; Samuels, R.I.; Butt, T.M. Metarhizium brunneum blastospore pathogenesis in Aedes aegypti larvae: Attack on several fronts accelerates mortality. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Alkhaibari, A.M.; Carolino, A.T.; Bull, J.C.; Samuels, R.I.; Butt, T.M. Differential pathogenicity of Metarhizium blastospores and conidia against larvae of three mosquito species. J. Med. Entomol. 2017, 54, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Alkhaibari, A.M.; Lord, A.M.; Maffeis, T.; Bull, J.C.; Olivares, F.L.; Samuels, R.I.; Butt, T.M. Highly specific host-pathogen interactions influence Metarhizium brunneum blastospore virulence against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. Virulence 2018, 9, 1449–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Alkhaibari, A.M.; Wood, M.J.; Yavasoglu, S.I.; Bull, J.C.; Butt, T.M. Optimizing the application timing and dosage of Metarhizium brunneum (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) as a biological control agent of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae. J. Med. Entomol. 2023, 60, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ramirez, J.L.; Muturi, E.J.; Barletta, A.B.F.; Rooney, A.P. The Aedes aegypti IMD pathway is a critical component of the mosquito antifungal immune response. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2019, 95, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lovett, B.; Bilgo, E.; Millogo, S.A.; Ouattarra, A.K.; Sare, I.; Gnambani, E.J.; Dabire, R.K.; Diabate, A.; St Leger, R.J. Transgenic Metarhizium rapidly kills mosquitoes in a malaria-endemic region of Burkina Faso. Science 2019, 364, 894–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bitencourt, R.O.B.; Mallet, J.R.S.; Mesquita, M.; Gôlo, P.S.; Fiorotti, J.; Bittencourt, R.E.P.; Pontes, E.G.; Angelo, I.C. Larvicidal activity, route of interaction and ultrastructural changes in Aedes aegypti exposed to entomopathogenic fungi. Acta Trop. 2021, 213, 105732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bitencourt, R.O.B.; Faria, F.S.; Marchesini, P.; Santos-Mallet, J.R.; Camargo, M.G.; Bittencourt, V.R.E.P.; Pontes, E.G.; Pereira, D.B.; Chaves, D.S.A.; Angelo, I.C. Entomopathogenic fungi and Schinus molle essential oil: The combination of two eco-friendly agents against Aedes aegypti larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2022, 194, 107827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mannino, M.C.; Huarte-Bonnet, C.; Davyt-Colo, B.; Pedrini, N. Is the insect cuticle the only entry gate for fungal infection? Insights into alternative modes of action of entomopathogenic fungi. J. Fungi. 2019, 5, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Carolino, A.T.; Teodoro, T.B.P.; Gomes, S.A.; Silva, C.P.; Samuels, R.I. Production of conidia using different culture media modifies the virulence of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium against Aedes aegypti larvae. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2021, 58, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Paula, A.R.; Brito, E.S.; Pereira, C.R.; Carrera, M.P.; Samuels, R.I. Susceptibility of adult Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to infection by Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana: Prospects for Dengue vector control. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2008, 18, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Paula, A.R.; Silva, L.E.I.; Ribeiro, A.; Silva, G.A.; Silva, C.P.; Butt, T.M.; Samuels, R.I. Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores are highly virulent to adult Aedes aegypti, an important arbovirus vector. Parasit. Vectors 2021, 14, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Carolino, A.T.; Gomes, S.A.; Teodoro, T.B.P.; Mattoso, T.C.; Samuels, R.I. Aedes aegypti pupae are highly susceptible to infection by Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 13, 1629–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Jaronski, S.T.; Mascarin, G.M. Mass production of fungal entomopathogens. In Microbial Control of Insect and Mite Pests; Lacey, L.A., Ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Volume 9, pp. 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mascarin, G.M.; Jackson, M.A.; Kobori, N.N.; Behle, R.W.; Delalibera Júnior, Í. Liquid culture fermentation for rapid production of desiccation tolerant blastospores of Beauveria bassiana and Isaria fumosorosea strains. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2015, 127, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Miranpuri, G.S.; Khachatourians, G.G. Larvicidal activity of blastospores and conidiospores of Beauveria bassiana (strain GK 2016) against age groups of Aedes aegypti. Vet. Parasitol. 1990, 37, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Greenfield, B.P.J.; Lord, A.M.; Dudley, E.; Butt, T.M. Conidia of the insect pathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae, fail to adhere to mosquito larval cuticle. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2014, 1, 140193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Daoust, R.A.; Roberts, D.W. Virulence of natural and insect-passaged strains of Metarhizium anisopliae to mosquito larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1982, 40, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Blanford, S.; Chan, B.H.K.; Jenkins, N.; Sim, D.; Turner, R.J.; Read, A.F.; Thomas, M.B. Fungal pathogen reduces potential for malaria transmission. Science 2005, 308, 1638–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Soares, G.G., Jr.; Pinnock, D.E. Effect of temperature on germination, growth, and infectivity of the mosquito pathogen Tolypocladium cylindrosporum (Deuteromycotina; Hyphomycetes). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1984, 43, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. WHO (World Health Organization). Control: Environmental management. In Guidelines for Dengue Surveillance and Mosquito Control; WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data; World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific Manila: Manila, Philippines, 2003; pp. 23–28. ISBN 92-9061-068-9. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jackson, M.A.; Mcguire, M.R.; Lacey, L.A.; Wraight, S.P. Liquid culture production of desiccation tolerant blastospores of the bioinsecticidal fungus Paecilomyces fumosoroseus. Mycol. Res. 1997, 101, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Iwanicki, N.S.; Ferreira, B.O.; Mascarin, G.M.; Delalibera, Í., Jr. Modified Adamek’s medium renders high yields of Metarhizium robertsii blastospores that are desiccation tolerant and infective to cattle-tick larvae. Fungal Biol. 2018, 122, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mascarin, G.M.; Kobori, N.N.; Jackson, M.A.; Dunlap, C.A.; Delalibera, Í., Jr. Nitrogen sources affect productivity, desiccation tolerance and storage stability of Beauveria bassiana blastospores. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 124, 810–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lorenz, S.-C.; Humbert, P.; Patel, A.V. Chitin increases drying survival of encapsulated Metarhizium pemphigi blastospores for Ixodes ricinus control. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2022, 11, 101537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mascarin, G.M.; Jackson, M.A.; Kobori, N.N.; Behle, R.W.; Dunlap, C.W.; Delalibera, Í., Jr. Glucose concentration alters dissolved oxygen levels in liquid cultures of Beauveria bassiana and affects formation and bioefficacy of blastospores. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 6653–6665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Leger, R.J.S.; Staples, R.C.; Roberts, D.W. Cloning and regulatory analysis of starvation-stress gene, ssgA, encoding a hydrophobin-like protein from the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae. Gene 1992, 120, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wong, J.; Stoddard, S.T.; Astete, H.; Morrison, A.C.; Scott, T.W. Oviposition site selection by the dengue vector Aedes aegypti and its implications for dengue control. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rangel, D.E.N.; Braga, G.U.L.; Flint, S.D.; Anderson, A.J.; Roberts, D.W. Variations in UV-B tolerance and germination speed of Metarhizium anisopliae conidia produced on insects and artificial substrates. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2004, 81, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Carolino, A.T.; Paula, A.R.; Silva, C.P.; Butt, T.M.; Samuels, R.I. Monitoring persistence of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae under simulated field conditions with the aim of controlling adult Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasit. Vectors 2014, 7, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Falvo, M.L.; Pereira-Junior, R.A.; Rodrigues, J.; Lastra, C.C.L.; García, J.J.; Fernandes, E.K.K.; Luz, C. UV-B radiation reduces in vitro germination of Metarhizium anisopliae s.l. but does not affect virulence in fungus-treated Aedes aegypti adults and development on dead mosquitoes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 121, 1710–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Braga, G.U.L.; Flint, S.D.; Miller, C.D.; Anderson, A.J.; Roberts, D.W. Variability in response to UV-B among species and strains of Metarhizium isolated from sites at latitudes from 61° N to 54° S. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2001, 78, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Reddy, N.P.; Khan, P.A.A.; Devi, K.U.; Victor, J.S.; Sharma, H.C. Assessment of the suitability of Tinopal as an enhancing adjuvant in formulations of the insect pathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuillemin. Pest Manag. Sci. 2008, 9, 909–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Luz, C.; Silva, I.G.; Magalhães, B.P.; Cordeiro, C.M.T.; Tigano, M.S. Control of Triatoma infestans (Klug) (Reduviidae: Triatominae) with Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill.: Preliminary assays on formulation and application in the field. Biological Control An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 1999, 98, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Inglis, G.D.; Goettel, M.S.; Johnson, D.L. Influence of ultraviolet light protectants on persistence of the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana. Biol. Control 1995, 5, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Braga, G.U.L.; Rangel, D.E.N.; Fernandes, E.K.K.; Flint, S.D.; Roberts, D.W. Molecular and physiological effects of environmental UV radiation on fungal conidia. Curr. Genet. 2015, 61, 405–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 09 00759 g001 550
Figure 1. Daily survival of Aedes aegypti larvae exposed to Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores or conidia (1 × 107 propagules mL−1) and their respective control groups (either pure distilled water or 0.01% Tween 80) under laboratory conditions. The results are shown as mean % survival with bars being standard error of the mean. Note: when bars are not shown, the SE was very low.
Figure 1. Daily survival of Aedes aegypti larvae exposed to Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores or conidia (1 × 107 propagules mL−1) and their respective control groups (either pure distilled water or 0.01% Tween 80) under laboratory conditions. The results are shown as mean % survival with bars being standard error of the mean. Note: when bars are not shown, the SE was very low.
Jof 09 00759 g001
Jof 09 00759 g002 550
Figure 2. Daily survival of Aedes aegypti larvae exposed to Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores (1 × 107 propagules mL−1) at different times following preparation of blastopores suspensions. The results are shown as mean % survival with bars being standard error of the mean. Note: when bars are not shown, the SE was very low.
Figure 2. Daily survival of Aedes aegypti larvae exposed to Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores (1 × 107 propagules mL−1) at different times following preparation of blastopores suspensions. The results are shown as mean % survival with bars being standard error of the mean. Note: when bars are not shown, the SE was very low.
Jof 09 00759 g002
Jof 09 00759 g003 550
Figure 3. Survival curves of Aedes aegypti larvae following exposure to Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores under totally shaded (TS) and partially shaded (PS) conditions over 7 days. The blastospore concentration was 1 × 107 mL−1. Control treatments were carried out with distilled water only. The results are shown as mean % survival with bars being standard error of the mean. Note: when bars are not shown, the SE was very low.
Figure 3. Survival curves of Aedes aegypti larvae following exposure to Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores under totally shaded (TS) and partially shaded (PS) conditions over 7 days. The blastospore concentration was 1 × 107 mL−1. Control treatments were carried out with distilled water only. The results are shown as mean % survival with bars being standard error of the mean. Note: when bars are not shown, the SE was very low.
Jof 09 00759 g003
Jof 09 00759 g004 550
Figure 4. Survival curves of Aedes aegypti larvae exposed to Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores during persistence bioassays under partially shaded conditions over 7 days. The blastospore concentration was 1 × 107 mL−1. Control treatments were carried out with distilled water only. The results are shown as mean % survival with bars being standard error of the mean. Note: when bars are not shown, the SE was very low.
Figure 4. Survival curves of Aedes aegypti larvae exposed to Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores during persistence bioassays under partially shaded conditions over 7 days. The blastospore concentration was 1 × 107 mL−1. Control treatments were carried out with distilled water only. The results are shown as mean % survival with bars being standard error of the mean. Note: when bars are not shown, the SE was very low.
Jof 09 00759 g004
Table
Table 1. Survival (means ± SD) of Aedes aegypti larvae following exposure to Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores when maintained under totally shaded (TS) or partially shaded (PS) conditions.
Table 1. Survival (means ± SD) of Aedes aegypti larvae following exposure to Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores when maintained under totally shaded (TS) or partially shaded (PS) conditions.
Treatments% Survival (±SD)S50
Blastospores TS5.8 ± 2.1 c1
Blastospores PS43.3 ± 4.5 b2
Control TS97.5 ± 1.3 aND
Control PS98.3 ± 1.1 aND
Note: Survival was evaluated 48 h after exposure to the fungus under two ambient regimes. The S50 data was calculated on day 7 of the experiment. Results followed by the same letter indicated that there was no significant difference between means using ANOVA and Duncan’s post hoc test (5% probability). Values for S50 were calculated using log-rank survival analysis. ND = Not determined due to high survival values.
Table
Table 2. Aedes aegypti survival (% mean ± SD) when larvae were placed in blastospore suspensions at different times after preparation and the cups with larvae + fungus were maintained under partially shaded (PS) conditions.
Table 2. Aedes aegypti survival (% mean ± SD) when larvae were placed in blastospore suspensions at different times after preparation and the cups with larvae + fungus were maintained under partially shaded (PS) conditions.
Treatments% Survival ± SDS50
0 h23.3 ± 3.8 c2
3 days62.5 ± 4.4 b3
6 days92.5 ± 2.4 aND
9 days95 ± 1.9 aND
12 days95.8 ± 1.8 aND
Control (water)100 aND
Note: Survival percentages were evaluated 48 h after placing the larvae in the cups with blastospore suspensions. The S50 values were calculated from data obtained after 7 days. Results followed by the same letter indicated that there was no significant difference between means using ANOVA and Duncan’s post hoc test (5% probability). Values for S50 were calculated using log-rank survival analysis. ND = Not determined due to high survival values.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gomes, S.A.; Carolino, A.T.; Teodoro, T.B.P.; Silva, G.A.; Bitencourt, R.d.O.B.; Silva, C.P.; Alkhaibari, A.M.; Butt, T.M.; Samuels, R.I. The Potential of Metarhizium anisopliae Blastospores to Control Aedes aegypti Larvae in the Field. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9070759

AMA Style

Gomes SA, Carolino AT, Teodoro TBP, Silva GA, Bitencourt RdOB, Silva CP, Alkhaibari AM, Butt TM, Samuels RI. The Potential of Metarhizium anisopliae Blastospores to Control Aedes aegypti Larvae in the Field. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(7):759. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9070759

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gomes, Simone Azevedo, Aline Teixeira Carolino, Thais Berçot Pontes Teodoro, Gerson Adriano Silva, Ricardo de Oliveira Barbosa Bitencourt, Carlos Peres Silva, Abeer M. Alkhaibari, Tariq M. Butt, and Richard Ian Samuels. 2023. "The Potential of Metarhizium anisopliae Blastospores to Control Aedes aegypti Larvae in the Field" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 7: 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9070759

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop