Next Article in Journal
Role of Protein Glycosylation in Interactions of Medically Relevant Fungi with the Host
Next Article in Special Issue
The Cell Wall Integrity Receptor Mtl1 Contributes to Articulate Autophagic Responses When Glucose Availability Is Compromised
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Fungal FAD-Dependent AA3_2 Glucose Oxidoreductases from Hitherto Unexplored Phylogenetic Clades
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cell Wall Integrity Pathway Involved in Morphogenesis, Virulence and Antifungal Susceptibility in Cryptococcus neoformans
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 7
Issue 10
10.3390/jof7100874
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Regulation of Pkc1 Hyper-Phosphorylation by Genotoxic Stress

by
Li Liu
1,
Jiri Veis
2,3,
Wolfgang Reiter
2,4,
Edwin Motari
1,†,
Catherine E. Costello
5,
John C. Samuelson
1,6,
Gustav Ammerer
2 and
David E. Levin
1,6,*
1
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Boston University Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
2
Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Max Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, 1030 Wien, Austria
3
Center for Medical Biochemistry, Max Perutz Laboratories, Medical University of Vienna, 1030 Wien, Austria
4
Mass Spectrometry Facility, Max Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, 1030 Wien, Austria
5
Department of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine and Center for Biomedical Mass Spectrometry, Boston, MA 02118, USA
6
Department of Microbiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA 01083, USA.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(10), 874; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7100874
Submission received: 11 September 2021 / Revised: 9 October 2021 / Accepted: 13 October 2021 / Published: 17 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Fungal Cell Wall Integrity Pathway)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The cell wall integrity (CWI) signaling pathway is best known for its roles in cell wall biogenesis. However, it is also thought to participate in the response to genotoxic stress. The stress-activated protein kinase Mpk1 (Slt2, is activated by DNA damaging agents through an intracellular mechanism that does not involve the activation of upstream components of the CWI pathway. Additional observations suggest that protein kinase C (Pkc1), the top kinase in the CWI signaling cascade, also has a role in the response to genotoxic stress that is independent of its recognized function in the activation of Mpk1. Pkc1 undergoes hyper-phosphorylation specifically in response to genotoxic stress; we have found that this requires the DNA damage checkpoint kinases Mec1 (Mitosis Entry Checkpoint) and Tel1 (TELomere maintenance), but not their effector kinases. We demonstrate that the casein kinase 1 (CK1) ortholog, Hrr25 (HO and Radiation Repair), previously implicated in the DNA damage transcriptional response, associates with Pkc1 under conditions of genotoxic stress. We also found that the induced association of Hrr25 with Pkc1 requires Mec1 and Tel1, and that Hrr25 catalytic activity is required for Pkc1-hyperphosphorylation, thereby delineating a pathway from the checkpoint kinases to Pkc1. We used SILAC mass spectrometry to identify three residues within Pkc1 the phosphorylation of which was stimulated by genotoxic stress. We mutated these residues as well as a collection of 13 phosphorylation sites within the regulatory domain of Pkc1 that fit the consensus for CK1 sites. Mutation of the 13 Pkc1 phosphorylation sites blocked hyper-phosphorylation and diminished RNR3 (RiboNucleotide Reductase) basal expression and induction by genotoxic stress, suggesting that Pkc1 plays a role in the DNA damage transcriptional response.

1. Introduction

The cell wall integrity (CWI) signaling pathway of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been well characterized with regard to its regulation by cell wall stress [1,2,3,4]. This pathway regulates biosynthesis of cell wall polymers, organization of the actin cytoskeleton, exocytosis, and the protein kinase C 1 (Pkc1)-mediated stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK) cascade through activation of the small GTPase, Rho1. The SAPK cascade is a linear pathway comprised of Pkc1, a MEKK (Bck1), a pair of redundant MEKs (Mkk1/2) and a SAPK (Mpk1/Slt2). The activation of Mpk1, in response to cell wall stress or hyper-activation of upstream pathway components, drives transcription in support of cell wall biogenesis [5,6,7,8,9] through the SRF-like transcription factor Rlm1 [10,11] and the cell cycle transcription factor SBF [12,13,14,15]. Moreover, loss-of-function mutants in the SAPK cascade display cell lysis defects that are suppressed by external osmotic support [2], highlighting the central role of this signaling pathway in the maintenance of cell wall integrity.
Although the CWI pathway is best understood for its essential role in maintaining the structural integrity of the cell wall during growth, morphogenesis, and in response to cell wall stressors, there is evidence that this pathway is also important for survival of genomic stress. Defects in any component of the CWI pathway, from the cell surface sensors to Mpk1, cause hyper-sensitivity to a variety of DNA damaging agents [16,17,18,19,20]. The CWI pathway SAPK Mpk1 is phosphorylated by the DNA damage checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Tel1 in response to treatment with methylmethane sulfonate (MMS) [21] or caffeine [22]. The Mec1 and Tel1 protein kinases are orthologs of mammalian ATR and ATM, respectively [23], and have overlapping but distinct functions in the maintenance of yeast genome integrity. Tel1 signals the presence of double-strand breaks specifically [24], whereas Mec1 signals the presence of a variety of DNA damage types, including double-strand breaks [25]. Mec1 and Tel1 phosphorylate and activate the checkpoint effector kinases Chk1 and Rad53, which mediate cell cycle arrest and gene expression in support of DNA repair [26,27,28,29].
In addition to phosphorylation of Mpk1, Soriano–Carot et al. [30] detected a DNA damage-induced hyper-phosphorylation of Pkc1. They suggested the existence of a reciprocal regulatory circuit in which Pkc1 was required to activate the DNA damage checkpoint and the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Tel1 was required for the phosphorylation-induced Pkc1 band-shift in response to DNA damage. However, we found that the DNA damage checkpoint is activated normally in pkc1Δ mutants from various strain backgrounds [31]. Additionally, there is a bifurcation of pathway outputs at Pkc1, first revealed as a 100-fold increase in mitotic recombination frequency in pkc1 mutants that is not observed in mutants of pathway components below Pkc1 [32]. This is significant because mitotic recombination is the principal mode of double-stranded break repair of DNA in yeast [33]. Moreover, Pkc1 phosphorylates and activates CTP synthetase directly [34], revealing a role in nucleotide metabolism.
Finally, Mpk1 is activated by genotoxic stress through a pathway that does not require the activation of Pkc1 or the other protein kinases that function above Mpk1, but involves ubiquitination and degradation of Msg5, the protein phosphatase that normally maintains Mpk1 in a low activity state [31,35]. Intriguingly, Mpk1 activated in response to genotoxic stress does not drive cell wall stress transcription, suggesting that its activation in this context has a different function. These observations have led to the proposal that Pkc1 plays important roles in the response to genotoxic stress that are separate from its function in the activation of the CWI SAPK cascade [30], but these roles have not been elucidated. We hypothesize that the CWI pathway plays multiple unrecognized roles in the response to DNA damage—some driven by Mpk1, others by another pathway branch from Pkc1. In this study, we establish the pathway through which Pkc1 is hyper-phosphorylated in response to DNA damage and identify several sites within the Pkc1 regulatory domain whose phosphorylation is stimulated under conditions of genotoxic stress. Mutation of these sites impacts DNA damage-regulated gene expression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains, Growth Conditions, and Transformations

The S. cerevisiae strains used in this study were derived from the EG123 background [36], the RDK2669 background (M. Smolka), the W303 background (J.C. Igual), or the Research Genetics background BY4742 (Research Genetics, Inc.; Huntsville, AL, USA) and are listed in Table 1.
Yeast cell cultures were grown in YPD (1% Bacto yeast extract, 2% Bacto Peptone, 2% glucose) or minimal selective medium, SD (0.67% Yeast nitrogen base, 2% glucose) supplemented with the appropriate nutrients to select for plasmids, which are listed in Table 2. Yeast cells were transformed according to Geitz et al. [38]. Sorbitol (0.5 M) was used to prevent cell lysis for pkc1∆ strains. Cell wall stress was induced by treatment with calcofluor white (CFW, 40 μg/mL; Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA), or by heat shock at 39 °C. Genotoxic stress was induced by treatment with hydroxyurea (HU; 250 mM, except where indicated otherwise; Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) or ultraviolet light (UV; 150 J/m2 for Pkc1 band-shift, or 250 J/m2 for viability assay). UV irradiation was carried out using an Analytik Jena UVP Crosslinker (Fisher Scientific). Cultures for viability tests were pelleted and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), dispersed on the surface of an empty petri dish for irradiation prior to dilution and plating. Cultures for Pkc1 band-shift were incubated in YPD for an additional 2 h for recovery after irradiation. To inhibit Hrr25 catalytic activity, 5 μM or 10 μM of PP1 analog IV, PP1 analog II (1NM PP1), or PP1 analog (Millipore Sigma) were used in agar plates. For Hrr25 inhibition in culture, PP1 analog IV (20 μM) was added to cultures at the time of addition of HU and incubated for 4 h.

2.2. Chromosomal Deletions and Strain Construction

A sml1∆::TRP1 mec1∆::HIS3 tel1∆::URA3 strain (DL4277) was generated as a meiotic segregant of DL3954 (MATa/α MBS115 SML1/sml1∆::TRP1 MEC1/mec1∆::HIS3 TEL1/tel1∆::URA3). An sml1∆::TRP1 mec1∆::KanMX tel1∆::URA3 strain (DL4503) was created by homologous recombination of mec1∆::KanMX at the MEC1 locus in an sml1∆::TRP1 tel1∆::URA3 strain (DL3951). The mec1∆::KanMX allele was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of yeast strain (DL3952) using Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). Transformants were selected for antibiotic G418 resistance and validated by genomic PCR across both integration junction sites. Endogenous tagging of Pkc1 with HTBeaq [43] was achieved by transformation of BY4741 with HB-tagging cassettes amplified from plasmid pWR268 [43], resulting in yeast strain JV826.
Plasmid-borne “gatekeeper” alleles of HRR25 were tested for function initially in an hrr25Δ strain maintained with a plasmid-borne, GAL1-controlled HRR25degron (DL4290) [37], which is viable only in galactose-containing medium. Later experiments with these mutant alleles were conducted in an hrr25Δ strain without the HRR25degron. To create hrr25Δ::HPHMX4 in W303 (DL4515), a plasmid bearing HRR25-HA (p3484; pRS425-HRR25-HA) was first introduced into DL4206 (MATa W303 ade2 trp1 leu2 his3 ura3 can1). The HPHMX4 gene was amplified by PCR from plasmid p3064 (pAG32-RGC2) using primers with extensions homologous to the 5′ and 3′ ends of HRR25 and used to transform DL4206 pRS425-HRR25-HA to hygromycin B resistance. Gene replacement was validated by PCR analysis across both integration junctions. The plasmid-borne HRR25 in DL4515 was replaced with other alleles of HRR25 carried on pRS313 or pRS423 using plasmid shuffle.

2.3. Plasmid Construction and Mutagenesis

The HRR25 gene was epitope-tagged on its C-terminus with 3xHA and expressed from its natural promoter. The promoter region of HRR25 (from position −979) and its entire coding sequence was amplified from genomic yeast DNA (DL2772) by high-fidelity PCR polymerase (Phusion) using primers designed with a HindIII site (upstream) and a NotI site (downstream), and subcloned into pRS425-3HA-ADH1T (p3149) to generate pRS425-HRR25-HA (p3484). To create pRS425-hrr25-∆404-HA (p3538), the promoter region of HRR25 (from position −979) and its C-terminally truncated coding sequence was amplified from pRS425-HRR25-HA (p3484) by high-fidelity PCR polymerase (Phusion) using primers designed with a HindIII site (upstream) and a NotI site (downstream) and subcloned into pRS425-3HA-ADH1T (p3149).
To express HA-tagged HRR25 from HIS3-marked plasmids pRS313-3HA-ADH1T (p3504) and pRS423-3HA-ADH1T (p3544), first required subcloning of the 3HA-ADH1T sequence from pRS425-3HA-ADH1T (p3149) into pRS313 or pRS423 [39] at SmaI and SacI sites. Plasmid pRS313-HRR25-HA (p3545) was next created by subcloning a Sal1-Not1 fragment containing the promoter region of HRR25 (from position −979) and its entire coding sequence from pRS425-HRR25-HA (p3484) into pRS313-3HA-ADH1T (p3504). Plasmid pRS313-hrr25-∆404-HA (p3546) was created similarly. Plasmid pRS423-HRR25-HA (p3547) was generated by subcloning the Sal1-Not1 fragment containing HRR25 into pRS423-3HA-ADH1T (p3544).
The HRR25 gene was also epitope-tagged on its C-terminus with GFP and expressed from its natural promoter. A PCR fragment containing the GFP coding sequence was amplified from pRS425-GFP (p1202) with primers designed with Sma1 and Not1 sites (upstream) and a SacII site (downstream) and cloned into pRS423 to create GFP-tagging vector pRS423-GFP (p3560). An Apa1-Not1 fragment containing the promoter region of HRR25 (from position −979) and its entire coding sequence digested from pRS423-HRR25-HA (p3547) was subcloned into pRS423-GFP (p3560) at the Apa1-Not1 sites to generate pRS423-HRR25-GFP (p3562). Plasmid pRS423-hrr25-∆404-GFP (p3567) was similarly created from pRS313-hrr25-∆404-HA (p3546).
Point mutations in PKC1 were constructed initially in high copy plasmid YEp351-PKC1-HA (p813) for use in band-shift assays. However, for phenotypic analyses, we expressed mutant alleles of PKC1-HA from a centromeric plasmid. To create pRS314-PKC1-HA, pkc1-3A-HA, and pkc1-S/T13A-HA, PKC1-HA (from position -950) with its 3′ region (640 bp) were PCR amplified from YEp351-PKC1-HA (p813), YEp351-pkc1-S3A-HA (p3619) or YEp351-pkc1-S/T13A-HA (p3612), respectively, by PrimeSTAR, Max DNA Polymerase (Takara Bio USA, Mountainview, CA) using primers designed with a SalI site (upstream) and with a SacII site (downstream) and cloned into pRS314 (p118).
All point mutations in HRR25 or PKC1 were created using QuickChange or QuikChange Lightning Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kits (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara) according to manufacturer’s instructions. All DNA sequences derived from PCR mutagenesis were confirmed by sequence across the entire gene.

2.4. Protein Extraction

Protein extraction was carried out as described previously for co-immunoprecipitation [44], or using the rapid boiling method [45] for direct immunoblot experiments.

2.5. β-galactosidase Measurements

Measurements of β-galactosidase activity from RNR3-lacZ (p2947) expression experiments were conducted in triplicate and carried out as described in Zhao et al. [46].

2.6. Dephosphorylation Assay

Protein extracts were prepared from sml1∆ (DL3950) cells carrying PKC1-HA (p813), treated with 250 mM HU or untreated, by bead-beating in lysis buffer (10% glycerol, 20 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCI, 0.5% triton X-100 and Mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Milipore Sigma), without phosphatase inhibitors, followed by centrifugation. The dephosphorylation reactions were performed using Lambda protein phosphatase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 10 µg of protein extract was incubated with 400 units of Lambda protein phosphatase in Lambda protein phosphatase buffer for 30 min at 30 °C. Phosphatase reactions were stopped by adding an equal volume of 2× SDS sample buffer and the resulting samples were boiled for 3 min prior to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis.

2.7. Co-immunoprecipitation

To detect association of Pkc1 with Hrr25 in wild-type cells, a plasmid expressing Pkc1-HA under the control of its own promoter (p813) was co-transformed with plasmids expressing either GFP-Hrr25 (p3357) or GFP alone (p3358) into DL100. Transformants were grown to mid-log phase in selective medium and starved for methionine for two hours to induce expression of GFP-Hrr25 or GFP, which were expressed under the control of the MET25 promoter. Cultures were then treated with 250 mM HU for 4 h. To test the effect of MEC1 and TEL1 loss on the association of Pkc1 with Hrr25, a plasmid expressing Hrr25-GFP under the control of its own promoter (p3562) was co-transformed with p813 into strains DL3950 (sml1Δ) and DL4503 (sml1Δ mec1∆ tel1∆). To test the association of Pkc1-HA with truncated Hrr25 (Hrr25-Δ404-GFP), plasmid p813 was transformed into strains bearing a chromosomal deletion of HRR25 complemented by plasmids expressing either Hrr25-GFP (DL4541) or Hrr25-∆404-GFP (DL4542). Transformants were grown to mid-log phase in selective medium and treated with 250 mM HU for 4 h. Protein extracts were made as described previously [44]. Extracts (100 µg of protein) were incubated with 10µL of GFP-trap agarose beads (Chromotek, Munich, Germany) at 4 °C for 2 h and the samples were washed with IP buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton) three times and boiled in SDS-PAGE buffer.

2.8. SDS-PAGE Electrophoresis and Immunoblot Analysis

Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (10% or 4–20% Mini-PROTEAN TGX gels, BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) followed by immunoblot analysis using mouse monoclonal α-HA (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) or α-GFP (Millipore Sigma) at a dilution of 1:10,000 and polyclonal rabbit α-Rad53 (Abcam) antibodies at a dilution of 1:2000 to detect Pkc1-HA or -GFP, Hrr25-HA or -GFP and Rad53, respectively. Secondary goat anti-mouse (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Westgrove, PA, USA) and donkey anti-rabbit (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:10,000. SDS-PAGE gels used to detect Pkc1 band-shifts were 10% and those used for Pkc1 association with Hrr25 were 4–20%.

2.9. Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Pkc1 Co-Immunoprecipitates

Pkc1-GFP was expressed from plasmid p2062 (gift of M. Cyert) in strain DL100 and isolated using GFP-trap agarose. Pkc1-GFP immunoprecipitates were run on SDS-PAGE gels prior to in-gel digestion of the contents of the entire lane with trypsin. After desalting, LC-MS/MS was performed using a nanoAcquity ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) capillary system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA), coupled to an LTQ-Orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a TriVersa NanoMate ion source (Advion, Ithaca, NY, USA). Sample concentration and desalting were performed online using a nanoAcquity UPLC trapping column (180 μm by 20 mm; packed with 5-μm, 100-Å-pore-size Symmetry C18 material; Waters Corp.) at a flow rate of 15 μL/min for 1 min. Separation was accomplished on a nanoAcquity UPLC capillary column (100 μm by 100 mm; packed with 1.7-μm, 130-Å-pore-size bridged ethyl hybrid [BEH] C18 material; Waters Corp.). A linear gradient of A and B buffers (buffer A, 3% ACN–0.1% formic acid [FA]; buffer B, 97% ACN–0.1% FA) from 7% to 45% buffer B over 124 min was used at a flow rate of 0.5 μL/min to elute peptides into the mass spectrometer. Columns were washed and re-equilibrated between LC-MS/MS experiments. Electrospray ionization was carried out at 1.7 kV using the NanoMate, with the LTQ heated capillary set to 150 °C.
Mass spectra were acquired in the orbitrap mass analyzer in the positive-ion mode over the range of m/z 300 to 2000 at a resolution of 60,000 @ m/z 400. Mass accuracy after internal calibration was within 4 ppm. Simultaneously, tandem MS spectra were acquired using the LTQ for the five most abundant, multiply charged species in the mass spectrum with signal intensities of >8000 signal/noise levels. With MS/MS collision energies set at 35%, and helium used as the collision gas, MS/MS spectra were acquired over a range of m/z values dependent on the precursor ion. Dynamic exclusion was set such that MS/MS data for each species were acquired a maximum of twice. All spectra were recorded in profile mode for further processing and analysis. Xcalibur software was used for MS and MS/MS data analysis, while peptide and protein assignments were conducted using Mascot to search against the ScerevisiaeOrfTrans database.

2.10. Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Pkc1 Phospho-Sites

Histidine-biotin tandem affinity purifications of Pkc1-HTBeaq were based on methods described elsewhere [43], with modifications below. Stable isotope labeling using amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) [47] was achieved as described previously [43]. Cells expressing Pkc1 C-terminally tagged with a HTBeaq tag [43] were grown to mid-logarithmic phase (OD600 nm = 2.0), treated with 200 mM HU for 4 h, harvested by filtration, and rapidly deep frozen in liquid N2. In-solution digestion with trypsin and enrichment of phosphorylated peptides using TiO2 was performed as described previously [43].
For these mass spectrometry analyses, a Q Exactive HF Orbitrap (Thermo Fisher Scientific) mass spectrometer was used with the following settings: Peptides were separated applying an increasing organic solvent (acetonitrile) gradient from 2.5% to 40% in 0.1% formic acid over 60 (YPD) or 120 (SILAC) minutes at a flow rate of 275 nl/min. MS1 resolution was set to 70,000 @ m/z 200, AGC 3 × 106. MS2 resolution was set to 17,500 @ m/z 200, AGC 1 × 105, 500 ms max. ion injection time (IIT). The mass spectrometer was configured to pick the twelve most abundant precursor ions for data-dependent MS2 scans, applying HCD for fragmentation with a normalized collision energy (NCE) of 27. Dynamic exclusion time was set to 30 s. MS raw files were processed using MaxQuant (Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Munich) [48] software version 1.5.2.8 using standard settings, except for the following modifications. Spectra were searched against the Saccharomyces Genome Database (http://www.yeastgenome.org/ accessed on 8 October 2015) containing 6717 entries (3 February 2011), including a list of 248 common laboratory contaminants as well as reversed versions of all sequences. The enzyme specificity was set to trypsin. A maximum of two missed cleavages was allowed. Phosphorylation of serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues, oxidation of methionine, and deamidation of asparagine were set as variable modifications. For stable isotope labeling using amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)–labeled samples, Lys6 and Arg6 were additionally selected. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was searched as a fixed modification. A maximum of five modifications per peptide was allowed. The false discovery rate for peptide, protein, and site identification was set to 1%. All files were searched together. Minimum delta score for modified peptides was set to 6. The MS phospho-proteomics data have been deposited at the zenodo repository (https://zenodo.org/ accessed on 10 September 2021) and can be accessed via https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5552273.

2.11. Notes on Reproducibility

All immunoblots, and co-IPs, were reproduced at least once in independent experiments with representative images shown.

3. Results and Discussion

Pkc1 undergoes a phosphorylation-induced band-shift in response to DNA damage [30]. We found that the Pkc1 band-shift was induced specifically in response to DNA damage by alkylating agent methylmethane sulfonate (MMS), by dNTP depletion by hydroxyurea (HU) treatment, or by UV irradiation, but not in response to cell wall stress treatments calcofluor white (CFW) or elevated growth temperature (Figure 1a). We confirmed that this band-shift results from hyper-phosphorylation by treatment with Lambda protein phosphatase (Figure 1b). We also found that it is dependent on the partially redundant DNA damage checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Tel1 (Figure 1c). This is in contrast to the findings of Soriano-Carot, et al. [30], who found that Tel1 was uniquely responsible for the Pkc1 band-shift. In any case, we found that both of the known effector kinase targets of the checkpoint kinases, Rad53 and Chk1 [49,50], were dispensable for the Pkc1 band-shift (Figure 1d). These results suggest that Mec1 and Tel1 either phosphorylate Pkc1 directly, or act on another protein kinase that phosphorylates Pkc1. Thus, the DNA damage checkpoint kinases, Mec1 and Tel1, regulate hyper-phosphorylation of Pkc1 in response to genotoxic stress.

3.1. Genotoxic Stress Induces Hrr25 Association with Pkc1

Next, we took a proteomics approach to identify protein kinases that associate with Pkc1 in response to HU-induced genotoxic stress. Cells expressing Pkc1-GFP were treated with 250 mM HU for 4 h, or were untreated, and Pkc1-GFP was immunoprecipitated from extracts and subjected to mass spectrometric (MS) analysis to identify co-precipitating proteins. Proteins that were found associated with Pkc1 only after HU treatment, or only without HU treatment are presented in Supplemental Tables S1 and S2, respectively. Although numerous non-specific associations were detected in both the untreated and treated samples, a minor signal from the DNA damage and repair kinase Hrr25 (HO and radiation repair) [51] was detected only in the HU-treated sample. HRR25 encodes an isoform of casein kinase 1 (CK1) that has been implicated in the repair of DNA double strand breaks [51] and is required for the transcriptional induction of the ribonucleotide reductase genes RNR2 and RNR3 in response to DNA damage [52]. Many physical interactors have been identified for Pkc1, but Hrr25 is not among them (Saccharomyces Genome Database). Therefore, we validated the physical association between Pkc1 and Hrr25 by co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP). Not only did we detect a stable interaction between Pkc1-HA and Hrr25-GFP, but the interaction was reproducibly induced 5–10-fold in response to treatment with HU (Figure 2a). We detected no non-specific binding of Pkc1-HA to either GFP alone (Figure 2a), or to the GFP-trap beads (Supplemental Figure S1). Hrr25 was recruited similarly to Pkc1 in response to ultraviolet (UV) light exposure (Figure 2b), suggesting that this is part of the generalized response to genotoxic stress.
We next tested the role of Mec1 and Tel1 in the induced association of Hrr25 with Pkc1. Here, we found that, not only are the DNA damage checkpoint kinases required for the Pkc1 phosphorylation band-shift, but they are also required for the induced association of Hrr25 with Pkc1 (Figure 2c), suggesting that Mec1 and Tel1 induce the Pkc1 phosphorylation band-shift indirectly by driving its association with Hrr25. Therefore, we sought to test this idea using mutants in HRR25. Because the HRR25 gene is essential for viability, we constructed two analog-sensitive “gatekeeper” alleles [53] of HRR25 (hrr25-I82A and hrr25-I82G). These were introduced on plasmids into an hrr25Δ strain that is maintained with a galactose-inducible form of HRR25 and tested for their sensitivity to a collection of protein kinase inhibitory ATP-analogs in glucose-containing medium (YPD). We determined that the hrr25-I82A allele conferred optimum growth sensitivity to PP1 analog IV, which did not appreciably inhibit the growth of the strain expressing wild-type HRR25 (Supplemental Figure S2). We next introduced the hrr25-I82A allele to an hrr25Δ strain by plasmid shuffle (See Materials and Methods, Section 2) to test the importance of this protein kinase in the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift. The strain expressing the hrr25-I82A allele along with an epitope tagged form of Pkc1, was subjected to inhibition of Hrr25, together with HU treatment to induce genotoxic stress. Pkc1 failed to display an HU-induced band-shift in the hrr25-I82A strain in the presence of inhibitor, in contrast to the HRR25 strain (Figure 3a). This suggests that Hrr25 catalytic activity is, indeed, required for the Pkc1-bandshift observed in response to genotoxic stress.
Hrr25 possesses three potential Mec1/Tel1 sites (S/T-Q) [21], which all reside within the C-terminal tail of Hrr25 (residues S405, S438, and T453). Therefore, we generated a truncated version of Hrr25 that is missing the C-terminal domain from residues 405–494 (hrr25-Δ404), which removes all three potential Mec1/Tel1 sites. This allele complemented the lethality of the hrr25Δ mutation, therefore we tested it for HU-induced association with Pkc1 and for the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift. The truncated form of Hrr25 was recruited normally to Pkc1 in response to HU treatment (Figure 3b) and retained its ability to drive the Pkc1 band-shift (Figure 3c). However, we considered the possibility that the Hrr25 C-terminal region might carry an auto-inhibitory domain, truncation of which could activate Hrr25 independently of Mec1/Tel1. To address this possibility, we mutated the three potential Mec1/Tel1 sites within this domain to Ala residues, yielding hrr25-3A, and tested the influence of this allele on the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift. As with the truncated allele, the hrr25-3A mutant was able to mediate the HU-induced band-shift normally (Figure 3d). Therefore, we conclude that Mec1 and Tel1 likely regulate HU-induced Hrr25 association with Pkc1 and the Pkc1 band-shift by means other than direct phosphorylation of Hrr25. Because neither Rad53, nor Chk1, the known effector kinases of Mec1 and Tel1, were required for the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift, it remains unclear how the sensor kinases regulate the Hrr25 action on Pkc1. It is possible that Mec1 and Tel1 act on Pkc1, rather than on Hrr25, to regulate the association of these protein kinases. Nevertheless, our results strongly suggest that both Hrr25 and Pkc1 are indirect Mec1/Tel1 effectors.

3.2. Identification of Pkc1 Phospho-Sites in Response to HU Treatment

Hrr25 is an ortholog of mammalian casein kinase 1 delta (CK1δ) [54]. Two phosphorylation site motifs for this class of protein kinase have been described [55,56,57,58]. These protein kinases require either a priming phosphorylation at position −3 relative to the target S/T site (i.e., p-S/TXXS/T) or an acidic residue at position −3 relative to the target site (i.e., D/EXXS/T).
We conducted both a shotgun mass spectrometric (MS) analysis and a quantitative SILAC MS analysis of HU-induced phosphorylation sites on Pkc1 [43]. These analyses identified many phosphorylation sites on Pkc1, several of which had not been described previously (i.e., T570, T626, S666, T779, S781, and T785; Supplemental Figure S3). Among the phosphorylation sites identified in our SILAC MS experiments, only three appeared to be upregulated in response to HU treatment: S2, S577, and S657 (Supplemental Table S3). Of these, both S577 and S657 are potential Hrr25 phosphorylation sites because S577 has a priming phosphorylation site (p-S574) and S657 is positioned three residues beyond E654 (Figure 4a). Therefore, we started our mutational analysis with these three sites. The individual mutations did not display a detectable impact on the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift (not shown), so we created a triple mutant. The pkc1-3A (pkc1-S2A, S577A, S657A) allele was able to complement the lethality of a pkc1Δ mutant for growth on rich medium in the absence of osmotic support. Therefore, we examined its behavior in response to genotoxic stress. The HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift was somewhat diminished in the pkc1-3A mutant (Figure 4b), revealing a cumulative effect of these phosphorylation sites. We next tested this mutant for its sensitivity to HU and UV treatment. However, this mutant did not display increased sensitivity to either treatment (Figure 4c). Therefore, we considered a larger collection of Pkc1 phosphorylation sites.
Among the phosphorylation sites identified in our analyses, together with those established previously [21,59,60,61], we identified 13 phosphorylation sites within Pkc1 that fit either of the two CK1 consensus sequences. Figure 4a shows a map of these sites, all of which reside within the N-terminal regulatory domain of Pkc1. However, most of these sites (11) are clustered in an area without recognizable regulatory features between residues 577 and 804. We mutated all of these phosphorylation sites to alanine residues in groups and in series. We were only able to detect an impact on the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift once at least nine of these CK1 residues were mutated (data not shown). Blocking the HU-induced band-shift completely required mutation of all 13 sites in the pkc1-S/T13A mutant (Figure 4d). The UV-induced band-shift was also blocked in the pkc1-S/T13A mutant (Figure 4e). The DNA damage checkpoint was activated normally in the pkc1-S/T13A mutant, as judged by a strong Rad53 band-shift (Figure 4d,e). The pkc1-S/T13A allele also complemented the null mutant for growth in the absence of osmotic support. Therefore, we tested the sensitivity of this strain to genotoxic stress. However, like the pkc1-3A mutant, the pkc1-S/T13A mutant did not display enhanced sensitivity to either HU or UV treatment (Figure 4c), suggesting that the biological impact of Pkc1 hyper-phosphorylation during genotoxic stress is too subtle to detect by this viability assay.
HRR25 has been implicated in the transcriptional response to DNA damage, most notably in the induction of the RNR3 gene [52], but its role has not been clearly established. The cell cycle transcriptional regulatory factor SBF, comprised of Swi4 and Swi6, is similarly important for this transcriptional response and Hrr25 associates with and phosphorylates Swi6 in vitro [52]. However, RNR3 induction in response to DNA damage was also shown to be largely under the control of the Mec1-Rad53-Dun1 pathway through the Crt1 transcriptional repressor, which is hyper-phosphorylated in response to genotoxic stress [26]. Therefore, we asked if the expression of an RNR3-lacZ reporter was influenced by PKC1. We found that both basal RNR3-lacZ expression and its induction by HU treatment were strongly diminished in a pkc1Δ mutant grown in the presence of osmotic support (Figure 4f). We also examined the effect of the pkc1-3A and pkc1-S/T13A alleles. RNR3-lacZ basal expression and induction were only modestly diminished in the pkc1-3A mutant, but were more strongly impaired in the pkc1-S/T13A mutant (Figure 4f). Although the basal and induced levels of RNR3-lacZ expression were reduced in each of these mutants, the relative induction was retained for all (approximately 6 to 8-fold). Finally, we tested the analog-sensitive hrr25-I82A mutant for induction of RNR3-lacZ expression and found that, as anticipated, inhibitor treatment strongly diminished HU induction (Figure 4f). These results suggest that Hrr25 may regulate the transcriptional response to DNA damage in part through phosphorylation of Pkc1 (Figure 5). This pathway would be independent of the Mec1-Rad53-Dun1 pathway, because Pkc1 hyper-phosphorylation in response to genotoxic stress does not require Rad53.

4. Conclusions

We can draw several conclusions from this study. First, the checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Tel1 regulate hyper-phosphorylation of Pkc1 under conditions of genotoxic stress by inducing the association of CK1 homolog Hrr25 with Pkc1. This happens through a mechanism that does not require the phosphorylation of Hrr25 by Mec1 or Tel1 and suggests that Hrr25 and Pkc1 are indirect effectors of the checkpoint kinases. Second, a large collection of CK1 phosphorylation sites contribute to the genotoxic stress-induced Pkc1 band-shift. Finally, CK1 phosphorylation site mutants in Pkc1 are partially deficient in RNR3-lacZ basal and DNA damage-induced expression, suggesting that Pkc1 hyper-phosphorylation by Hrr25 contributes to this response.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof7100874/s1, Table S1: Pkc1 MS with HU only, Table S2: Pkc1 MS without HU only, Table S3: SILAC MS Pkc1 with and without HU, Figure S1: Binding of Hrr25 to Pkc1. Figure S2: Sensitivity of hrr25 “gatekeeper” mutants to growth inhibition by inhibitory ATP analogs, Figure S3: Pkc1 phosphorylation sites identified in this study.

Author Contributions

D.E.L., L.L., W.R. and E.M. contributed to the design of the experimental approach and the interpretation of data. Conceptualization, D.E.L. and W.R.; Methodology, D.E.L., L.L., W.R., G.A. and E.M.; Software, J.V., W.R. and E.M.; Validation and Formal Analysis, D.E.L., L.L., W.R. and E.M.; Data Curation, L.L., J.V. and E.M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, D.E.L., L.L., W.R. and E.M.; Writing—Review & Editing, L.L., J.V., W.R., E.M., C.E.C., J.C.S., G.A. and D.E.L.; Supervision, Project Administration, and Funding Acquisition, D.E.L., G.A., C.E.C. and J.C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the NIH (R01 GM48533 to DEL; R01 GM129324 to JCS; and R24 GM134210 and S10 RR020946 to CEC). GA, JV, and WR were supported by the FWF Austrian Science Fund Special Research Program F34.

Data Availability Statement

The MS phospho-proteomics data have been deposited at the zenodo repository (https://zenodo.org/ accessed on 10 September 2021) and can be accessed via 10.5281/zenodo.5102666.

Acknowledgments

We thank David Hollenstein for general MS-related support, and Martha Cyert, Scott Emr, Juan Carlos Igual, Marcus Smolka, Stephen Elledge, and Gerhard Paravicini for yeast strains and plasmids.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Klis, F.M.; Mol, P.; Hellingwerf, K.; Brul, S. Dynamics of cell wall structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 26, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Levin, D.E. Cell Wall Integrity Signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2005, 69, 262–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Levin, D.E. Regulation of cell wall biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The cell wall integrity signaling pathway. Genetics 2011, 189, 1145–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Lesage, G.; Bussey, H. Cell Wall Assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2006, 70, 317–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Jung, U.S.; Levin, D. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression regulated by the yeast cell wall integrity signalling pathway. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 34, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Roberts, C.J.; Nelson, B.; Marton, M.J.; Stoughton, R.; Meyer, M.R.; Bennett, H.A.; He, Y.D.; Dai, H.; Walker, W.L.; Hughes, T.R.; et al. Signaling and Circuitry of Multiple MAPK Pathways Revealed by a Matrix of Global Gene Expression Profiles. Science 2000, 287, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Jung, U.S.; Sobering, A.K.; Romeo, M.J.; Levin, D.E. Regulation of the yeast Rlm1 transcription factor by the Mpk1 cell wall integrity MAP kinase. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 46, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Garcia, R.; Bermejo, C.; Grau, C.; Pérez, R.; Peña, J.M.R.; François, J.M.; Nombela, C.; Arroyo, J. The Global Transcriptional Response to Transient Cell Wall Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Its Regulation by the Cell Integrity Signaling Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 15183–15195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Boorsma, A.; De Nobel, H.; Ter Riet, B.; Bargmann, B.; Brul, S.; Hellingwerf, K.J.; Klis, F.M. Characterization of the transcriptional response to cell wall stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2004, 21, 413–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dodou, E.; Treisman, R. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MADS-box transcription factor Rlm1 is a target for the Mpk1 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 1848–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Watanabe, Y.; Takaesu, G.; Hagiwara, M.; Irie, K.; Matsumoto, K. Characterization of a serum response factor-like protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rlm1, which has transcriptional activity regulated by the Mpk1 (Slt2) mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 2615–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Madden, K.; Sheu, Y.-J.; Baetz, K.; Andrews, B.; Snyder, M. SBF Cell Cycle Regulator as a Target of the Yeast PKC-MAP Kinase Pathway. Science 1997, 275, 1781–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Baetz, K.; Moffat, J.; Haynes, J.; Chang, M.; Andrews, B. Transcriptional Coregulation by the Cell Integrity Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Slt2 and the Cell Cycle Regulator Swi4. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 6515–6528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kim, K.Y.; Truman, A.W.; Levin, D.E. Yeast Mpk1 mitogen-activated protein kinase activates transcription through Swi4/Swi6 by a non-catalytic mechanism that requires upstream signal. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28, 2579–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kim, K.-Y.; Levin, D.E. Mpk1 MAPK Association with the Paf1 Complex Blocks Sen1-Mediated Premature Transcription Termination. Cell 2011, 144, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. LeDuc, A.; He, C.H.; Ramotar, D. Disruption of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell-wall pathway gene SLG1 causes hypersensitivity to the antitumor drug bleomycin. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2003, 269, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Queralt, E.; Igual, J.C. Functional Connection Between the Clb5 Cyclin, the Protein Kinase C Pathway and the Swi4 Transcription Factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2005, 171, 1485–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zu, T.; Verna, J.; Ballester, R. Mutations in WSC genes for putative stress receptors result in sensitivity to multiple stress conditions and impairment of Rlm1-dependent gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2001, 266, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Soriano-Carot, M.; Bañó, M.C.; Igual, J.C. The yeast mitogen-activated protein kinase Slt2 is involved in the cellular response to genotoxic stress. Cell Div. 2012, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jiménez-Gutiérrez, E.; Alegría-Carrasco, E.; Sellers-Moya, A.; Molina, M.; Martín, H. Not just the wall: The other ways to turn the yeast CWI pathway on. Int. Microbiol. 2020, 23, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Albuquerque, C.P.; Smolka, M.B.; Payne, S.; Bafna, V.; Eng, J.; Zhou, H. A Multidimensional Chromatography Technology for In-depth Phosphoproteome Analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2008, 7, 1389–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Truman, A.; Kim, K.-Y.; Levin, D.E. Mechanism of Mpk1 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Binding to the Swi4 Transcription Factor and Its Regulation by a Novel Caffeine-Induced Phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 6449–6461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gobbini, E.; Cesena, D.; Galbiati, A.; Lockhart, A.; Longhese, M.P. Interplays between ATM/Tel1 and ATR/Mec1 in sensing and signaling DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair 2013, 12, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nakada, D.; Shimomura, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Sugimoto, K. The ATM-related Tel1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae controls a checkpoint response following phleomycin treatment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 1715–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zou, L.; Elledge, S.J. Sensing DNA Damage Through ATRIP Recognition of RPA-ssDNA Complexes. Science 2003, 300, 1542–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Huang, M.; Zhou, Z.; Elledge, S.J. The DNA Replication and Damage Checkpoint Pathways Induce Transcription by Inhibition of the Crt1 Repressor. Cell 1998, 94, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Melo, J.; Toczyski, D. A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2002, 14, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sidorova, J.M.; Breeden, L.L. Precocious G1/S transitions and genomic instability: The origin connection. Mutat. Res. 2003, 532, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liang, F.; Wang, Y. DNA Damage Checkpoints Inhibit Mitotic Exit by Two Different Mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 5067–5078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Soriano-Carot, M.; Quilis, I.; Bañó, C.; Igual, J.C. Protein kinase C controls activation of the DNA integrity checkpoint. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 7084–7095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Liu, L.; Levin, D.E. Intracellular mechanism by which genotoxic stress activates yeast SAPK Mpk1. Mol. Biol. Cell 2018, 29, 2898–2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Huang, K.N.; Symington, L.S. Mutation of the gene encoding protein kinase C 1 stimulates mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14, 6039–6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Li, X.; Heyer, W.-D. Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yang, W.-L.; Bruno, M.E.C.; Carman, G.M. Regulation of Yeast CTP Synthetase Activity by Protein Kinase C. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 11113–11119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lee, J.; Liu, L.; Levin, D.E. Stressing out or stressing in: Intracellular pathways for SAPK activation. Curr. Genet. 2019, 65, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Siliciano, P.G.; Tatchell, K. Transcription and regulatory signals at the mating type locus in yeast. Cell 1984, 37, 969–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kafadar, K.A.; Zhu, H.; Snyder, M.; Cyert, M.S. Negative regulation of calcineurin signaling by Hrr25p, a yeast homolog of casein kinase I. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 2698–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gietz, R.D.; Schiestl, R.H.; Willems, A.R.; Woods, R.A. Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure. Yeast 1995, 11, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sikorski, R.S.; Hieter, P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1989, 122, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hill, J.E.; Myers, A.; Koerner, T.J.; Tzagoloff, A. Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast 1986, 2, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Denis, V.; Cyert, M.S. Molecular Analysis Reveals Localization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Protein Kinase C to Sites of Polarized Growth and Pkc1p Targeting to the Nucleus and Mitotic Spindle. Eukaryot. Cell 2005, 4, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Lee, J.; Reiter, W.; Dohnal, I.; Gregori, C.; Beese-Sims, S.; Kuchler, K.; Ammerer, G.; Levin, D.E. MAPK Hog1 closes the S. cerevisiae glycerol channel Fps1 by phosphorylating and displacing its positive regulators. Genes Dev. 2013, 27, 2590–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Reiter, W.; Anrather, R.; Dohnal, I.; Pichler, P.; Veis, J.; Grøtli, M.; Posas, F.; Ammerer, G. Validation of regulated protein phosphorylation events in yeast by quantitative mass spectrometry analysis of purified proteins. Proteomics 2012, 12, 3030–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kamada, Y.; Jung, U.S.; Piotrowski, J.; Levin, D. The protein kinase C-activated MAP kinase pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mediates a novel aspect of the heat shock response. Genes Dev. 1995, 9, 1559–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kushnirov, V.V. Rapid and reliable protein extraction from yeast. Yeast 2000, 16, 857–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, C.; Jung, U.S.; Garrett-Engele, P.; Roe, T.; Cyert, M.S.; Levin, D.E. Temperature-Induced Expression of Yeast FKS2 Is under the Dual Control of Protein Kinase C and Calcineurin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 1013–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ong, S.-E.; Blagoev, B.; Kratchmarova, I.; Kristensen, D.B.; Steen, H.; Pandey, A.; Mann, M. Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, SILAC, as a Simple and Accurate Approach to Expression Proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2002, 1, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Cox, J.; Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1367–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nyberg, K.A.; Michelson, R.J.; Putnam, C.W.; Weinert, T.A. Toward Maintaining the Genome: DNA Damage and Replication Checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2002, 36, 617–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Harper, J.W.; Elledge, S.J. The DNA Damage Response: Ten Years After. Mol. Cell 2007, 28, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hoekstra, M.F.; Liskay, R.M.; Ou, A.C.; DeMaggio, A.J.; Burbee, D.G.; Heffron, F. HRR25, a putative protein kinase from budding yeast: Association with repair of damaged DNA. Science 1991, 253, 1031–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ho, Y.; Mason, S.; Kobayashi, R.; Hoekstra, M.; Andrews, B. Role of the casein kinase I isoform, Hrr25, and the cell cycle-regulatory transcription factor, SBF, in the transcriptional response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Lopez, M.S.; Kliegman, J.I.; Shokat, K.M. The Logic and Design of Analog-Sensitive Kinases and Their Small Molecule Inhibitors. Methods Enz. 2014, 548, 189–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Peng, Y.; Grassart, A.; Lu, R.; Wong, C.C.; Yates, J.; Barnes, G.; Drubin, D.G. Casein Kinase 1 Promotes Initiation of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. Dev. Cell 2015, 32, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Flotow, H.; Roach, P.J. Synergistic phosphorylation of rabbit muscle glycogen synthase by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and casein kinase I. Implications for hormonal regulation of glycogen synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 9126–9128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Flotow, H.; Roach, P.J. Role of acidic residues as substrate determinants for casein kinase I. Role of acidic residues as substrate determinants for casein kinase I. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 3724–3727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Flotow, H.; Graves, P.; Wang, A.; Fiol, C.; Roeske, R.; Roach, P. Phosphate groups as substrate determinants for casein kinase I action. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 14264–14269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pulgar, V.; Marin, O.; Meggio, F.; Allende, C.C.; Allende, J.E.; Pinna, L.A. Optimal sequences for non-phosphate-directed phoshorylation by protein kinase CK1 (casein kinase-1)—A re-evaluation. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 260, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Swaney, D.L.; Beltrao, P.; Starita, L.; Guo, A.; Rush, J.; Fields, S.; Krogan, N.J.; Villen, J. Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. MacGilvray, M.E.; Shishkova, E.; Place, M.; Wagner, E.R.; Coon, J.J.; Gasch, A.P. Phosphoproteome Response to Dithiothreitol Reveals Unique Versus Shared Features of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Stress Responses. J. Proteome Res. 2020, 19, 3405–3417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lanz, M.C.; Yugandhar, K.; Gupta, S.; Sanford, E.J.; Faça, V.M.; Vega, S.; Joiner, A.M.N.; Fromme, J.C.; Yu, H.; Smolka, M.B. In-depth and 3-dimensional exploration of the budding yeast phosphoproteome. EMBO Rep. 2021, 22, e51121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jof 07 00874 g001 550
Figure 1. A phosphorylation band-shift in Pkc1 requires the MEC1 and TEL1 DNA damage checkpoint genes. (a) A Pkc1 band-shift is induced specifically by genotoxic stressors. Wild-type cells (DL3950; sml1Δ) expressing Pkc1-HA (from p813) were exposed to genotoxic stress (250 mM HU for 4 h, 0.04% MMS for 2 h, or 150 J/m2 UV with a 2 h recovery period), cell wall stress (40 µg/mL CFW for 1 h, or heat shock at 39 °C for 1 h), or untreated (Con). Extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis for Pkc1-HA; (b) Phosphorylation is responsible for the HU-induced band-shift. Wild-type cells (DL3950) expressing Pkc1-HA were either treated with HU as above, or untreated. Extracts were treated with Lambda protein phosphatase (LPP), as described in Methods, prior to immunoblot analysis; (c,d) The HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift requires MEC1 and TEL1, but not the checkpoint genes that they regulate (RAD53 or CHK1). Cultures were treated with HU as above prior to immunoblot analysis for Pkc1-HA. Strains are DL3950 (sml1Δ), DL3951 (sml1Δ tel1Δ), DL3952 (sml1Δ mec1Δ), DL4277 (sml1Δ mec1Δ tel1Δ), DL3953 (sml1Δ rad53Δ), DL2772 (Res. Gen. WT), and DL4286 (Res. Gen. chk1Δ). The sml1Δ mutation is required to suppress the lethality of the mec1Δ and rad53Δ mutations.
Figure 1. A phosphorylation band-shift in Pkc1 requires the MEC1 and TEL1 DNA damage checkpoint genes. (a) A Pkc1 band-shift is induced specifically by genotoxic stressors. Wild-type cells (DL3950; sml1Δ) expressing Pkc1-HA (from p813) were exposed to genotoxic stress (250 mM HU for 4 h, 0.04% MMS for 2 h, or 150 J/m2 UV with a 2 h recovery period), cell wall stress (40 µg/mL CFW for 1 h, or heat shock at 39 °C for 1 h), or untreated (Con). Extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis for Pkc1-HA; (b) Phosphorylation is responsible for the HU-induced band-shift. Wild-type cells (DL3950) expressing Pkc1-HA were either treated with HU as above, or untreated. Extracts were treated with Lambda protein phosphatase (LPP), as described in Methods, prior to immunoblot analysis; (c,d) The HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift requires MEC1 and TEL1, but not the checkpoint genes that they regulate (RAD53 or CHK1). Cultures were treated with HU as above prior to immunoblot analysis for Pkc1-HA. Strains are DL3950 (sml1Δ), DL3951 (sml1Δ tel1Δ), DL3952 (sml1Δ mec1Δ), DL4277 (sml1Δ mec1Δ tel1Δ), DL3953 (sml1Δ rad53Δ), DL2772 (Res. Gen. WT), and DL4286 (Res. Gen. chk1Δ). The sml1Δ mutation is required to suppress the lethality of the mec1Δ and rad53Δ mutations.
Jof 07 00874 g001
Jof 07 00874 g002 550
Figure 2. HU treatment induces association of Pkc1 with Hrr25. (a) Wild-type cells (DL100) co-expressing Pkc1-HA (from p813) and Hrr25-GFP (from p3357) or GFP (from p3358) were treated with 250 mM HU for 4 h. Hrr25-GFP or GFP was immunoprecipitated (IP) from extracts and samples were tested by immunoblot analysis for co-IP of Pkc1-HA. Input Pkc1-HA from extracts is shown at bottom; (b) UV treatment induces association of Pkc1 with Hrr25. Wild-type cells (DL100) co-expressing Pkc1-HA (from p813) and Hrr25-GFP (from p3357) or GFP (from p3358) were treated with UV light (150 J/m2) and returned to culture for 2 h post-irradiation prior to extract preparation. Hrr25-GFP or GFP was immunoprecipitated (IP) from extracts and treated as above; (c) MEC1 and TEL1 are required for the HU-induced association of Hrr25 with Pkc1. Cultures co-expressing Pkc1-HA and Hrr25-GFP (from p3562) were treated with HU as above and processed for co-IP of Pkc1-HA with Hrr25-GFP. Strains were DL3950 (sml1Δ) and DL4277 (sml1Δ tel1Δ mec1Δ). Molecular mass markers (in kDa) are shown on the right.
Figure 2. HU treatment induces association of Pkc1 with Hrr25. (a) Wild-type cells (DL100) co-expressing Pkc1-HA (from p813) and Hrr25-GFP (from p3357) or GFP (from p3358) were treated with 250 mM HU for 4 h. Hrr25-GFP or GFP was immunoprecipitated (IP) from extracts and samples were tested by immunoblot analysis for co-IP of Pkc1-HA. Input Pkc1-HA from extracts is shown at bottom; (b) UV treatment induces association of Pkc1 with Hrr25. Wild-type cells (DL100) co-expressing Pkc1-HA (from p813) and Hrr25-GFP (from p3357) or GFP (from p3358) were treated with UV light (150 J/m2) and returned to culture for 2 h post-irradiation prior to extract preparation. Hrr25-GFP or GFP was immunoprecipitated (IP) from extracts and treated as above; (c) MEC1 and TEL1 are required for the HU-induced association of Hrr25 with Pkc1. Cultures co-expressing Pkc1-HA and Hrr25-GFP (from p3562) were treated with HU as above and processed for co-IP of Pkc1-HA with Hrr25-GFP. Strains were DL3950 (sml1Δ) and DL4277 (sml1Δ tel1Δ mec1Δ). Molecular mass markers (in kDa) are shown on the right.
Jof 07 00874 g002
Jof 07 00874 g003 550
Figure 3. An analog-sensitive form of Hrr25 shows that its catalytic activity is required for the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift. (a) An hrr25Δ strain complemented by plasmid-borne HRR25 (DL4527) or hrr25-182A (DL4528; encoding an analog-sensitive form) and expressing Pkc1-HA (from p813) was treated simultaneously with HU (250 mM) and/or PP1 analog IV (20 μM) for 4 h. Extracts were processed for immunoblot analysis of Pkc1-HA; (b) A C-terminal truncation of Hrr25 lacking three potential Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation sites associates normally with Pkc1. An hrr25Δ strain complemented by plasmid-borne HRR25-GFP (DL4541) or hrr25-Δ404 (DL4542) and expressing Pkc1-HA (from p813) was treated with HU (250 mM for 4 h). Hrr25-GFP was immunoprecipitated from extracts and tested for co-IP of Pkc1-HA by immunoblot analysis. Molecular mass markers (in kDa) are on the right; (c) A C-terminal truncation of Hrr25 does not impact the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift. An hrr25Δ strain complemented by plasmid-borne HRR25 (DL4527) or hrr25-Δ404 (DL4555) and expressing Pkc1-HA was treated with HU as above and processed for immunoblot analysis of Pkc1-HA (d) A mutant form of HRR25 lacking three potential Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation sites does not impact the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift. An hrr25Δ strain complemented by plasmid-borne HRR25 (DL4527) or hrr25-3A (DL4556) and expressing Pkc1-HA was treated with HU as above and processed for immunoblot analysis of Pkc1-HA.
Figure 3. An analog-sensitive form of Hrr25 shows that its catalytic activity is required for the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift. (a) An hrr25Δ strain complemented by plasmid-borne HRR25 (DL4527) or hrr25-182A (DL4528; encoding an analog-sensitive form) and expressing Pkc1-HA (from p813) was treated simultaneously with HU (250 mM) and/or PP1 analog IV (20 μM) for 4 h. Extracts were processed for immunoblot analysis of Pkc1-HA; (b) A C-terminal truncation of Hrr25 lacking three potential Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation sites associates normally with Pkc1. An hrr25Δ strain complemented by plasmid-borne HRR25-GFP (DL4541) or hrr25-Δ404 (DL4542) and expressing Pkc1-HA (from p813) was treated with HU (250 mM for 4 h). Hrr25-GFP was immunoprecipitated from extracts and tested for co-IP of Pkc1-HA by immunoblot analysis. Molecular mass markers (in kDa) are on the right; (c) A C-terminal truncation of Hrr25 does not impact the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift. An hrr25Δ strain complemented by plasmid-borne HRR25 (DL4527) or hrr25-Δ404 (DL4555) and expressing Pkc1-HA was treated with HU as above and processed for immunoblot analysis of Pkc1-HA (d) A mutant form of HRR25 lacking three potential Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation sites does not impact the HU-induced Pkc1 band-shift. An hrr25Δ strain complemented by plasmid-borne HRR25 (DL4527) or hrr25-3A (DL4556) and expressing Pkc1-HA was treated with HU as above and processed for immunoblot analysis of Pkc1-HA.
Jof 07 00874 g003
Jof 07 00874 g004 550
Figure 4. CK1 phosphorylation sites within the Pkc1 regulatory domain are responsible for the genotoxic stress-induced Pkc1 band-shift. (a) Phosphorylation sites within the Pkc1 regulatory domain mutated in this study. Phosphorylated residues are marked in red. The three residues mutated in the pkc1-3A allele (S2, S577, and S657) are marked by boxes and were identified by SILAC MS as increased in phosphorylation state in response to HU treatment. Two of these residues (S577 and S657) are within consensus CK1 phosphorylation sites, with either a priming phospho-Ser at position −3 (S577) or an acidic residue (Asp) at position −3 (S657). Other phosphorylated residues that reside within CK1 consensus sites are also indicated and were mutated in the pkc1-S/T13A allele. Known regulatory elements, Rho-binding domains (HR1), calcium/lipid-binding domain (C2), and Cys-rich domain (CRD) are also shown. The catalytic domain is C-terminal to the regulatory domain and starts at residue 824; (b) HU-induced phosphorylation band-shift of the Pkc1-3A mutant. Plasmids were PKC1-HA (p813) and pkc1-3A-HA (p3619) (c) The pkc1-3A and pkc1-S/T13A mutants do not show increased sensitivity to genotoxic stress. Serial 10-fold dilutions of cultures grown to mid-log phase in YPD were spotted onto plates (left to right) with or without HU. Cultures treated with UV were similarly diluted and spotted onto YPD plates. Plates were incubated at 25 °C for two days. Plasmids were PKC1-HA (p3623), pkc1-3A (p3624), and pkc1-S/T13A (p3625); (d) HU-induced phosphorylation band-shift of the Pkc1-S/T13A mutant and Rad53. Plasmids were PKC1-HA (p813) pkc1-S/T13A (p3612); (e) UV-induced phosphorylation band-shift of the Pkc1-S/T13A mutant and Rad53. Plasmids were PKC1-HA (p813) and pkc1-S/T13A (p3612). Strain DL1021 (pkc1Δ) was used for experiments shown in (b,d,e). Strain DL376 (pkc1Δ) was used for the experiment in panel (c); (f) HU-induced RNR3-lacZ expression is diminished in a pkc1Δ mutant, and in the pkc1-3A and pkc1-S/T13A mutants. Strain DL376 (pkc1Δ) was co-transformed with pRNR3-lacZ (p2947) and PKC1-HA (p3623), pkc1-3A (p3624), pkc1-S/T13A (p3625), or vector alone (p118). Cells were cultured in the presence of 0.5 M sorbitol for osmotic support (pair on left), or in the absence of sorbitol. Cultures were treated for 4 h with 250 mM HU and β-galactosidase activity was measured from extracts. The hrr25-I82A mutant (DL4528; right) was treated with HU plus or minus PP1 analog IV (20 μM) for 4 h. Each value is the mean and standard deviation from three independent cultures. Pair-wise p-values for HU-treated and untreated samples were calculated using student t-test and were all at least p ≤ 0.00001, except the HU-treated PKC1 and pkc1-3A pair, which was p = 0.0012. An additional p-value of p < 0.00001 was obtained for the hrr25-I82A mutant for HU-treated samples, with and without analog IV.
Figure 4. CK1 phosphorylation sites within the Pkc1 regulatory domain are responsible for the genotoxic stress-induced Pkc1 band-shift. (a) Phosphorylation sites within the Pkc1 regulatory domain mutated in this study. Phosphorylated residues are marked in red. The three residues mutated in the pkc1-3A allele (S2, S577, and S657) are marked by boxes and were identified by SILAC MS as increased in phosphorylation state in response to HU treatment. Two of these residues (S577 and S657) are within consensus CK1 phosphorylation sites, with either a priming phospho-Ser at position −3 (S577) or an acidic residue (Asp) at position −3 (S657). Other phosphorylated residues that reside within CK1 consensus sites are also indicated and were mutated in the pkc1-S/T13A allele. Known regulatory elements, Rho-binding domains (HR1), calcium/lipid-binding domain (C2), and Cys-rich domain (CRD) are also shown. The catalytic domain is C-terminal to the regulatory domain and starts at residue 824; (b) HU-induced phosphorylation band-shift of the Pkc1-3A mutant. Plasmids were PKC1-HA (p813) and pkc1-3A-HA (p3619) (c) The pkc1-3A and pkc1-S/T13A mutants do not show increased sensitivity to genotoxic stress. Serial 10-fold dilutions of cultures grown to mid-log phase in YPD were spotted onto plates (left to right) with or without HU. Cultures treated with UV were similarly diluted and spotted onto YPD plates. Plates were incubated at 25 °C for two days. Plasmids were PKC1-HA (p3623), pkc1-3A (p3624), and pkc1-S/T13A (p3625); (d) HU-induced phosphorylation band-shift of the Pkc1-S/T13A mutant and Rad53. Plasmids were PKC1-HA (p813) pkc1-S/T13A (p3612); (e) UV-induced phosphorylation band-shift of the Pkc1-S/T13A mutant and Rad53. Plasmids were PKC1-HA (p813) and pkc1-S/T13A (p3612). Strain DL1021 (pkc1Δ) was used for experiments shown in (b,d,e). Strain DL376 (pkc1Δ) was used for the experiment in panel (c); (f) HU-induced RNR3-lacZ expression is diminished in a pkc1Δ mutant, and in the pkc1-3A and pkc1-S/T13A mutants. Strain DL376 (pkc1Δ) was co-transformed with pRNR3-lacZ (p2947) and PKC1-HA (p3623), pkc1-3A (p3624), pkc1-S/T13A (p3625), or vector alone (p118). Cells were cultured in the presence of 0.5 M sorbitol for osmotic support (pair on left), or in the absence of sorbitol. Cultures were treated for 4 h with 250 mM HU and β-galactosidase activity was measured from extracts. The hrr25-I82A mutant (DL4528; right) was treated with HU plus or minus PP1 analog IV (20 μM) for 4 h. Each value is the mean and standard deviation from three independent cultures. Pair-wise p-values for HU-treated and untreated samples were calculated using student t-test and were all at least p ≤ 0.00001, except the HU-treated PKC1 and pkc1-3A pair, which was p = 0.0012. An additional p-value of p < 0.00001 was obtained for the hrr25-I82A mutant for HU-treated samples, with and without analog IV.
Jof 07 00874 g004
Jof 07 00874 g005 550
Figure 5. Proposed contribution of Hrr25 and Pkc1 to DNA damage-induced transcription. Pathway from Mec1 and Tel1 through Hrr25 and Pkc1 is added to the pathway established by Huang et al. [26]. Dashed arrows suggest indirect regulation.
Figure 5. Proposed contribution of Hrr25 and Pkc1 to DNA damage-induced transcription. Pathway from Mec1 and Tel1 through Hrr25 and Pkc1 is added to the pathway established by Huang et al. [26]. Dashed arrows suggest indirect regulation.
Jof 07 00874 g005
Table
Table 1. Yeast strains used in this study.
Table 1. Yeast strains used in this study.
StrainRelevant GenotypeSource or Reference
DL100MATa EG123 ura3-52 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 his4 can1r[36]
DL376MATa EG123 ura3-52 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 his4 pkc1∆::LEU2David Levin
DL1021MATa SEY6210 leu2-3,112 ura3-52 his3-200 trp1-901 ede2-101 pkc1∆::HIS3 suc2-9 (GPY1115)Gerhard Paravicini
DL2772MATα S288c (BY4742) his3 leu2 lys2 ura3Research Genetics
DL3950MATα MBS62 sml1∆::TRP1Marcus Smolka
DL3951MATα MBS103 sml1∆::TRP1 tel1∆::URA3Marcus Smolka
DL3952MATα MBS104 sml1∆::TRP1 mec1∆::KanMXMarcus Smolka
DL3953MATα MBS72 sml1∆::TRP1 rad53∆::HIS3Marcus Smolka
DL3954MATa/α MBS115 SML1/sml1∆::TRP1 MEC1/mec1∆::HIS3 TEL1/tel1∆::URA3Marcus Smolka
DL4206MATa W303 ade2 trp1 leu2 his3 ura3 can1Juan Carlos Igual
DL4277MATα MBS sml1∆::TRP1 mec1∆::HIS3 tel1∆::URA3 This study
DL4286MATα BY4742 chk1∆::KanMXResearch Genetics
DL4290MATa ura3-52 lys2-801 ade2-101 trp1-∆63 his3-∆200 leu2-∆1 hrr25∆::loxP-kanMX-loxP pGAL1-3HA-HRR25degron (KKY387)[37]
DL4503MATα MBS sml1∆::TRP1 mec1∆::KanMX tel1∆::URA3This study
DL4515MATa W303 hrr25∆::HPHMX4 (pHRR25-HA; p3484, LEU2 2µ)This study
DL4527MATa W303 hrr25∆::HPHMX4 (pHRR25-HA; p3545, HIS3 CEN)This study
DL4528MATa W303 hrr25∆::HPHMX4 (phrr25-I82A-HA; p3550, HIS3 CEN)This study
DL4541MATa W303 hrr25∆::HPHMX4 (pHRR25-GFP; p3562, HIS3 2µ)This study
DL4542MATa W303 hrr25∆::HPHMX4 (phrr25-∆404-GFP; p3567, HIS3 2µ) This study
DL4555MATa W303 hrr25∆::HPHMX4 (phrr25-∆404-HA; p3546, HIS3 CEN)This study
DL4556MATa W303 hrr25∆::HPHMX4 (phrr25-3A-HA; p3576, HIS3 CEN)This study
JV826MATa BY4741 PKC1-HTBeaq::NatMXThis study
Table
Table 2. Plasmids used in this study.
Table 2. Plasmids used in this study.
PlasmidDescriptionSource or Reference
p117pRS313[39]
p118pRS314[39]
p119pRS315[39]
p120YEp351[40]
p813YEp351-PKC1-HADavid Levin
p1105pRS425[39]
p1202pRS425-GFPDavid Levin
p2062pVDG7 PKC1-GFP[41]
p2454pRS413[39]
p2947pRNR3-lacZStephen Elledge
p3064pAG32-RGC2[42]
p3149pRS425-3HA-ADH1T[42]
p3357pUG36-HRR25-GFPMartha Cyert
p3358pUG36-GFPMartha Cyert
p3484pRS425-HRR25-HAThis study
p3504pRS313-3HA-ADH1T This study
p3517YEp351-pkc1-S577A-HAThis study
p3521YEp351-pkc1-S577A, S626A-HAThis study
p3522YEp351-pkc1-S577A, T626A, T753A-HAThis study
p3523YEp351-pkc1-S577A, T626A, T753A, S804A-HAThis study
p3525pRS315-HRR25-HAThis study
p3538pRS425-hrr25-∆404-HAThis study
p3544pRS423-3HA-ADH1TThis study
p3545pRS313-HRR25-HAThis study
p3546pRS313-hrr25-∆404-HAThis study
p3547pRS423-HRR25-HAThis study
p3550pRS313-hrr25-I82A-HAThis study
p3552pRS423-hrr25-I82A-HAThis study
p3553pRS423-hrr25-I82G-HAThis study
p3560pRS423-GFPThis study
p3562pRS423-HRR25-GFPThis study
p3567pRS423-hrr25-∆404-GFPThis study
p3570pRS313-hrr25-T453A-HAThis study
p3572pRS313-hrr25-T453A, S405A-HA This study
p3574YEp351-pkc1-S577A, T626A, T753A, S761A, S804A-HAThis study
p3576pRS313-hrr25-T453A, S405A, S438A-HAThis study
p3597YEp351-pkc1-S577A, T626A, T753A, S761A, S772A, S804A-HAThis study
p3603YEp351-pkc1-S577A, T626A, S686A, T753A, S761A, S772A, S804A-HAThis study
p3604YEp351-pkc1-S577A, T626A, S686A, S750A, T753A, S761A, S772A, S804A-HAThis study
p3605YEp351-pkc1-S152A, S577A, T626A, S686A, S750A, T753A, S761A, S772A, S804A-HAThis study
p3606YEp351-pkc1-S152A, S577A, T626A, S657A, S686A, S750A, T753A, S761A, S772A, S804A-HAThis study
p3608YEp351-pkc1-S152A, S577A, T626A, S657A, S686A, S750A, T753A, S761A, S772A, S781A, S804A-HAThis study
p3610YEp351-pkc1-S75A, S152A, S577A, T626A, S657A, S686A, S750A, T753A, S761A, S772A, S781A, S804A-HAThis study
p3612YEp351-pkc1-S75A, S152A, S577A, T626A, S657A, S686A, S750A, T753A, S761A, S772A, S781A, S797A, S804A-HA (S/T13A)This study
p3617YEp351-pkc1-S2A-HAThis study
p3618YEp351-pkc1-S2A, S657A-HAThis study
p3619YEp351-pkc1-S2A, S657A, S577A-HA (S3A)This study
p3623pRS314-PKC1-HAThis study
p3624pRS314-pkc1-S2A, S657A, S577A-HA (S3A)This study
p3625pRS314-pkc1-S75A, S152A, S577A, T626A, S657A, S686A, S750A, T753A, S761A, S772A, S781A, S797A, S804A-HA (S/T13A)This study
pWR268pFA6a-integrative HTBeaq tag, NatMX[43]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, L.; Veis, J.; Reiter, W.; Motari, E.; Costello, C.E.; Samuelson, J.C.; Ammerer, G.; Levin, D.E. Regulation of Pkc1 Hyper-Phosphorylation by Genotoxic Stress. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 874. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7100874

AMA Style

Liu L, Veis J, Reiter W, Motari E, Costello CE, Samuelson JC, Ammerer G, Levin DE. Regulation of Pkc1 Hyper-Phosphorylation by Genotoxic Stress. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(10):874. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7100874

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Li, Jiri Veis, Wolfgang Reiter, Edwin Motari, Catherine E. Costello, John C. Samuelson, Gustav Ammerer, and David E. Levin. 2021. "Regulation of Pkc1 Hyper-Phosphorylation by Genotoxic Stress" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 10: 874. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7100874

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop