Multifunctional Bacillus Strains for Integrated Fruit Rot Management and Improved Soil Phosphorus Availability in Longan Orchards
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Fungal Isolation and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis
2.2. Isolation of Antagonistic Bacteria
2.3. Isolation of Bacteria for Phosphate Solubilization
2.4. In Vitro Analysis of Plant-Growth-Promoting Traits and Extracellular Enzyme Production
2.5. Morphological, Biochemical, and Molecular Identification of the Selected Isolates
2.6. Antagonistic Activity Under in Planta Conditions
2.7. Evaluation of the Selected Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacterial Isolates Under Pot Conditions
2.8. Evaluation of a Multi-Strain Bacillus Formulation Under Field Conditions
3. Results
3.1. Fungal Isolation and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis

3.2. Isolation of Antagonistic Bacteria
3.3. Isolation of Bacteria for Phosphate Solubilization
3.4. In Vitro Analysis of Plant-Growth-Promoting Traits and Extracellular Enzyme Production
3.5. Morphological, Biochemical, and Molecular Identification of the Selected Isolate
3.6. Antagonistic Activity Under in Planta Conditions
3.7. Evaluation of the Selected Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacterial Isolates Under Pot Conditions
3.8. Evaluation of a Multi-Strain Bacillus Formulation Under Field Conditions
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rakariyatham, N.; Zhou, D.; Wu, X.; Chen, F.; Yang, Z. Nutritional Composition and Health Benefits of Longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.). J. Food Compos. Anal. 2020, 90, 103468. [Google Scholar]
- Paul, P.; Biswas, P.; Dey, D.; Saikat, A.S.M.; Islam, M.A.; Sohel, M.; Hossain, R.; Mamun, A.A.; Rahman, M.A.; Hasan, M.N.; et al. Exhaustive Plant Profile of Dimocarpus longan Lour. with Significant Phytomedicinal Properties: A Literature-Based Review. Processes 2021, 9, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subhadrabandhu, S.; Yapwattanaphun, C. Lychee and Longan Production in Thailand. Acta Hortic. 2001, 558, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubo, K. The Geography of the Labor-Intensive Fruit Export Industry in Southeast Asia: A Case Study of Thai Longan. In New Trends and Challenges for Agriculture in the Mekong Region: From Food Security to Development of Agri-Businesses; Bangkok Research Center, JETRO/IDE-JETRO: Bangkok, Thailand, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Nairong, S.; Chaiyapa, W.; Cheng, L.K. Toward a Better Longan Pricing Policy: Case Study of Chiang Mai and Lamphun Provinces, Thailand; School of Public Policy, Chiang Mai University: Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Pipattanapuckdee, A.; Boonyakait, D.; Tiyayon, C.; Seehanam, P.; Ruangwong, O.-U. Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae causes postharvest fruit rot of longan in Thailand. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes 2019, 14, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Visitpanich, J.; Sittigul, C.; Chanbang, Y. Diseases and Pests of Longan, Lychee, and Mango; Thanabaan Interprint: Bangkok, Thailand, 2002; p. 296. [Google Scholar]
- Sudswang, A.; Somjai, S.; Toopgrajank, S. Management and Agricultural Technology Affecting to Longan Security in Thailand. World J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 6, 738–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ons, L.; Bylemans, D.; Thevissen, K.; Cammue, B.P.A. Combining Biocontrol Agents with Chemical Fungicides for Integrated Plant Fungal Disease Control. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sawatphanit, N.; Sutthisa, W.; Kumlung, T. Bioformulation Development of Bacillus velezensis Strain N1 to Control Rice Bacterial Leaf Blight. Trends Sci. 2022, 19, 6315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uasoontornnop, R.; Junniam, K.; Maseechan, P.; Lanongkan, N.; Chotelersak, K.; Nantavisai, K.; Tangteerawatana, P.; Namsa-Aid, M.; Puttikamonkul, S. Antifungal Activity of Streptomyces spectabilis SP-O2 against Aflatoxin Producing Mold, Aspergillus flavus. Trends Sci. 2022, 19, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fira, D.; Dimkić, I.; Berić, T.; Lozo, J.; Stanković, S. Biological Control of Plant Pathogens by Bacillus Species. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 285, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, H.; Godana, E.A.; Sui, Y.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, L. Biological Control as an Alternative to Synthetic Fungicides for the Management of Grey and Blue Mould Diseases of Table Grapes: A Review. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 46, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- La Bella, E.; Riolo, M.; Luz, C.; Baglieri, A.; Puglisi, I.; Meca, G.; Cacciola, S.O. Fermentates of Consortia of Lactic Acid Bacteria and a Cyanobacterium Are Effective against Toxigenic Fungi Contaminating Agricultural Produces. Biol. Control 2024, 191, 105478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suksakol, S.; Liamkraituan, J.; Teeraarunsiri, W.; Na Chiangmai, P.; Mahadtanapuk, S. Biocontrol of Fruit Discoloring and Fruit Rot Disease in Longan (Dimocarpus longan) by Using Antagonistic Bacillus spp. Trends Sci. 2024, 21, 7455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnes, E.H. Atlas and Manual of Plant Pathology; Appleton-Century-Crofts: New York, NY, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
- Bhunjun, C.S.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Promputtha, I.; Hyde, K.D. Importance of Molecular Data to Identify Fungal Plant Pathogens and Guidelines for Pathogenicity Testing Based on Koch’s Postulates. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Özkaya, S.; Soylu, S.; Kara, M.; Gümüş, Y.; Soylu, E.M.; Teke, İ.; Özcan, O.B.; Sevilmiş, D.; Ölmez, Y.A.; Bilaloğlu, İ.; et al. Disease Prevalence, Incidence, Morphological and Molecular Characterisation of Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae Causing Collar Rot Disease on Peanut Plants in Turkey. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2024, 131, 1639–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
- Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of Primer Sets Designed for Use with the PCR to Amplify Conserved Genes from Filamentous Ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alves, A.; Crous, P.W.; Correia, A.; Phillips, A.J.L. Morphological and Molecular Data Reveal Cryptic Speciation in Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Fungal Divers. 2008, 28, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paopun, Y.; Thanomchat, P. Reducing Osmium Tetroxide Usage in Preparing Plant Samples for Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis; Kasetsart University: Bangkok, Thailand, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, W.; Zhou, G.; Yang, J.; Munir, S.; Ahmed, A.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Ji, G. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens WS-10 as a potential plant growth-promoter and biocontrol agent for bacterial wilt disease of flue-cured tobacco. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest. Control 2022, 32, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuguse, M.; Kejela, T. Actinomycetes Isolated from Rhizosphere of Wild Coffea arabica L. Showed Strong Biocontrol Activities against Coffee Wilt Disease. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0306837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Q.; Tang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, J.; Du, X.; Hu, X.; Bilal, M. Isolation and Characterization of Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria from Rhizosphere of Poplar on Road Verge and Their Antagonistic Potential against Various Phytopathogens. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pikovskaya, R. Mobilization of Phosphorus in Soil in Connection with the Vital Activity of Some Microbial Species. Mikrobiologiya 1948, 17, 362–370. [Google Scholar]
- Nautiyal, C.S. An Efficient Microbiological Growth Medium for Screening Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 170, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ducousso-Détrez, A.; Lahrach, Z.; Fontaine, J.; Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui, A.; Hijri, M. Cultural Techniques Capture Diverse Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria in Rock Phosphate-Enriched Habitats. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1280848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chapman, H.D.; Pratt, P.F. Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters; University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1961. [Google Scholar]
- Mahadtanapuk, S. Fruit Discoloring and Cracking Disease Control of Export Longan Production in Phayao Province; Agricultural Research Development Agency (Public Organization): Bangkok, Thailand, 2019.
- Ashwini, N.; Srividya, S. Potentiality of Bacillus subtilis as Biocontrol Agent for Management of Anthracnose Disease of Chilli Caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides OGC1. 3 Biotech 2014, 4, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vehapi, M.; İnan, B.; Kayacan-Cakmakoglu, S.; Sagdic, O.; Özçimen, D. Production of Bacillus subtilis Soil Isolate as Biocontrol Agent under Bioreactor Conditions. Arch. Microbiol. 2023, 205, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chowdhury, S.P.; Hartmann, A.; Gao, X.; Borriss, R. Biocontrol Mechanism by Root-Associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stein, T. Bacillus subtilis Antibiotics: Structures, Syntheses and Specific Functions. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 56, 845–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schwyn, B.; Neilands, J.B. Universal Chemical Assay for the Detection and Determination of Siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 160, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hashmi, S.; Iqbal, S.; Ahmed, I.; Janjua, H.A. Production, optimization, and partial purification of alkali-thermotolerant proteases from newly isolated Bacillus subtilis S1 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens KSM12. Processes 2022, 10, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, D.; Yu, W.-J.; Lim, J.-Y.; Kang, N.-S.; Kwon, Y.-M.; Choi, G.; Bae, S.-S.; Cho, K.; Lee, D.-S. Characterization of the proteolytic activity of a halophilic Aspergillus reticulatus strain SK1-1 isolated from a solar saltern. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dobrzyński, J.; Wróbel, B.; Górska, E.B. Cellulolytic properties of a potentially lignocellulose-degrading Bacillus sp. 8E1A strain isolated from bulk soil. Agronomy 2022, 12, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabiri, S.; Legrifi, I.; Benhammou, M.; Laasli, S.-E.; Mokrini, F.; Amraoui, M.B.; Lahlali, R. Screening of rhizobacterial isolates from apple rhizosphere for their biocontrol and plant growth promotion activity. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 3, 948–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holt, J.G. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 9th ed.; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Lane, D.J. 16S/23S rRNA Sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics; Stackebrandt, E., Goodfellow, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: West Sussex, UK, 1991; pp. 115–147. [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto, S.; Harayama, S. PCR Amplification and Direct Sequencing of gyrB Genes with Universal Primers and Their Application to the Detection and Taxonomic Analysis of Pseudomonas putida Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1104–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tamura, K.; Nei, M. Estimation of the Number of Nucleotide Substitutions in the Control Region of Mitochondrial DNA in Humans and Chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sinta, B.; Wulandari, R.S.; Herawatiningsih, R. Proporsi Penambahan Media Tanam Cocopeat, Arang Sekam Padi dan Gambut terhadap Pertumbuhan Bibit Mahoni (Swietenia mahagoni) di Persemaian Permanen RPH Sadaniang. J. Lingkung. Hutan Trop. 2024, 3, 325–333. [Google Scholar]
- Adekiya, A.O.; Ogunboye, O.I.; Ewulo, B.S.; Olayanju, A. Effects of Different Rates of Poultry Manure and Split Applications of Urea Fertilizer on Soil Chemical Properties, Growth, and Yield of Maize. Sci. World J. 2020, 2020, 4610515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bahadori, M.; Tofighi, H. Investigation of Soil Organic Carbon Recovery by the Walkley-Black Method Under Diverse Vegetation Systems. Soil. Sci. 2017, 182, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An Examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter and a Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil. Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaosumain, Y.; Sritontip, C.; Changjeraja, S.; Manochai, P.; Jaroenkit, T. On-Farm Validation of Fertilizer Management Technology for Longan. Acta Hortic. 2020, 1293, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thai Meteorological Department. Monthly Weather Summary in Thailand. 2026. Available online: https://cmmet.tmd.go.th/forecast/pt/Max_Min_Rainfall.html (accessed on 9 July 2026).
- Serrato-Diaz, L.M.; Mariño, Y.A.; Guadalupe, I.; Bayman, P.; Goenaga, R. First Report of Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae and Colletotrichum siamense Causing Cacao Pod Rot, and First Report of C. tropicale Causing Cacao Pod Rot in Puerto Rico. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lü, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Chen, A.; Zhang, Z.; Shen, G. Antibiofilm Activity of d-Limonene against Spoilage Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Food Biosci. 2024, 61, 104568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.-T.; Lee, F.-L.; Tai, C.-J.; Kuo, H.-P. Bacillus velezensis Is a Later Heterotypic Synonym of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, L.; Liang, M.; Li, L.; Sun, L.; Xu, Y.; Gao, J.; Wang, L.; Hou, Y.; Huang, S. Synergistic Effects of the Combined Application of Bacillus subtilis H158 and Strobilurins for Rice Sheath Blight Control. Biol. Control 2018, 119, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.-T.; Lee, F.-L.; Tai, C.-J.; Kasai, H. Comparison of gyrB Gene Sequences, 16S rRNA Gene Sequences and DNA–DNA Hybridization in the Bacillus subtilis Group. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 1846–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ortiz, A.; Sansinenea, E. The Role of Beneficial Microorganisms in Soil Quality and Plant Health. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morin, L. Progress in Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2020, 58, 201–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Niu, B.; Wang, W.; Yuan, Z.; Sederoff, R.R.; Sederoff, H.; Chiang, V.L.; Borriss, R. Microbial Interactions within Multiple-Strain Biological Control Agents Impact Soil-Borne Plant Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 585404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chao, S.; Song, L.; Wu, G.; Sun, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lv, B. Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Bacillus subtilis A9 against Rot Disease of Morchella esculenta. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1388669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaddoura, M.J.; Kannan, U.; Amaya-Quiroz, L.; George, S. Bacterial Endophytes in Sustainable Agriculture: Perspectives and Advancements as Biostimulants and Fungal Biocontrol Agents in Crops. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2026, 13, 25655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caulier, S.; Nannan, C.; Gillis, A.; Licciardi, F.; Bragard, C.; Mahillon, J. Overview of the Antimicrobial Compounds Produced by Members of the Bacillus subtilis Group. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gharsallah, H.; Cheffi, M.; Mallek, R.; Omri, N.; Triki, M.A.; Öztop, M.H.; Zarai, Z. Antifungal Potential of Bacillus Strains: Implications for Biocontrol Strategies in Food Safety and Sustainable Agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1615252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grahovac, J.; Pajčin, I.; Vlajkov, V. Bacillus VOCs in the Context of Biological Control. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poulaki, E.G.; Tjamos, S.E. Bacillus Species: Factories of Plant Protective Volatile Organic Compounds. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 134, lxad037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gomez-Ramirez, L.F.; Uribe-Velez, D. Phosphorus solubilizing Bacillus spp. contribute to rice growth promotion using soil amended with rice straw. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 932–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prakash, J.; Arora, N.K. Phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus sp. enhances growth, phosphorus uptake and oil yield of Mentha arvensis L. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.H.; Yan, X.J.; Wang, M.K.; Cai, Y.Y.; Weng, X.F.; Su, D.; Guo, J.X.; Wang, W.Q.; Hou, Y.; Ye, D.L.; et al. Long-Term Excessive Phosphorus Fertilization Alters Soil Phosphorus Fractions in the Acidic Soil of Pomelo Orchards. Soil. Tillage Res. 2022, 215, 105214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miljaković, D.; Marinković, J.; Balešević-Tubić, S. The Significance of Bacillus spp. in Disease Suppression and Growth Promotion of Field and Vegetable Crops. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tariq, H.; Subramanian, S.; Geitmann, A.; Smith, D.L. Bacillus and Paenibacillus as Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in Soybean and Cannabis. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1529859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ning, J.; Ning, T.; Jin, L.; Li, Q.; Niu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Han, C.; Tang, Y.; Deng, C.; Xie, Y.; et al. Biocontrol Effects of Bacillus velezensis and Bacillus subtilis against Strawberry Root Rot Caused by Neopestalotiopsis clavispora. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1683291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Won, S.-J.; Moon, J.-H.; Ajuna, H.B.; Choi, S.-I.; Maung, C.E.H.; Lee, S.; Ahn, Y.S. Biological Control of Leaf Blight Disease Caused by Pestalotiopsis maculans and Growth Promotion of Quercus acutissima Carruth Container Seedlings Using Bacillus velezensis CE 100. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boiu-Sicuia, O.-A.; Toma, R.C.; Diguță, C.F.; Matei, F.; Cornea, C.P. In Vitro Evaluation of Some Endophytic Bacillus to Potentially Inhibit Grape and Grapevine Fungal Pathogens. Plants 2023, 12, 2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.-A.; Song, J.-S.; Kim, P.I.; Kim, D.-H.; Kim, Y. Bacillus velezensis TSA32-1 as a Promising Agent for Biocontrol of Plant Pathogenic Fungi. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wei, P.; Gao, M.; Zhou, S.; Liu, G.; Wang, P.; Liu, C.; Yang, F.; Fu, H. Anti-fungal Activity of Bacillus velezensis X3-2 Against Plant Pathogens and Biocontrol Effect on Potato Late Blight. Agriculture 2024, 14, 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, P.; Li, P.; Wu, S.; Zhou, M.; Zhi, R.; Gao, H. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from Bacillus subtilis CF-3 reduce anthracnose and elicit active defense responses in harvested litchi fruits. AMB. Express 2019, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raaijmakers, J.M.; Paulitz, T.C.; Steinberg, C.; Alabouvette, C.; Moënne-Loccoz, Y. The rhizosphere: A playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant Soil 2009, 321, 341–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajuna, H.B.; Lim, H.-I.; Moon, J.-H.; Won, S.-J.; Choub, V.; Choi, S.-I.; Yun, J.-Y.; Ahn, Y.S. The Prospect of Hydrolytic Enzymes from Bacillus Species in the Biological Control of Pests and Diseases in Forest and Fruit Tree Production. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maslennikova, V.S.; Tsvetkova, V.P.; Shelikhova, E.V.; Selyuk, M.P.; Alikina, T.Y.; Kabilov, M.R.; Dubovskiy, I.M. Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Mix Suppresses Rhizoctonia Disease and Improves Rhizosphere Microbiome, Growth and Yield of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Su, Z.; He, X.; Duan, H.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, C.; Hu, C. Co-Culture of Bacillus subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens for Control of Maize Sheath Blight and Growth Promotion via Microbial Vetch Fertiliser. BioControl Sci. Technol. 2026, 36, 855–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, K.B.; Hyde, K.D.; Guest, D.I. Preliminary studies on endophytic fungal communities of Musa acuminata species complex in Hong Kong and Australia. Fungal Divers. 1998, 1, 27–51. [Google Scholar]
- Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Xu, J.; Crous, P.W. Pestalotiopsis revisited. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 79, 121–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubicek, C.P.; Starr, T.L.; Glass, N.L. Plant cell wall–degrading enzymes and their secretion in plant-pathogenic fungi. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2014, 52, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, Z.; Liu, H.; Wang, C.; Xu, J.-R. Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ongena, M.; Jacques, P. Bacillus lipopeptides: Versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 16, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michiko, M.N.; Zuber, P. Molecular Biology of Antibiotic Production in Bacillus. Biotechnology 1990, 10, 223–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adesemoye, A.O.; Torbert, H.A.; Kloepper, J.W. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Allow Reduced Application Rates of Chemical Fertilizers. Microb. Ecol. 2009, 58, 921–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Backer, R.; Rokem, J.S.; Ilangumaran, G.; Lamont, J.; Praslickova, D.; Ricci, E.; Subramanian, S.; Smith, D.L. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria: Context, Mechanisms of Action, and Roadmap to Commercialization of Biostimulants for Sustainable Agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Compant, S.; Samad, A.; Faist, H.; Sessitsch, A. A Review on the Plant Microbiome: Ecology, Functions, and Emerging Trends in Microbial Application. J. Adv. Res. 2019, 19, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Compant, S.; Duffy, B.; Nowak, J.; Clément, C.; Barka, E.A. Use of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria for Biocontrol of Plant Diseases: Principles, Mechanisms of Action, and Future Prospects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 4951–4959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hibbing, M.E.; Fuqua, C.; Parsek, M.R.; Peterson, S.B. Bacterial Competition: Surviving and Thriving in the Microbial Jungle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ding, Y.; Yi, Z.; Fang, Y.; He, S.; Li, Y.; He, K.; Zhao, H.; Jin, Y. Multi-omics reveal the efficient phosphate-solubilizing mechanism of bacteria on rocky soil. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 761972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodríguez, H.; Fraga, R. Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria and Their Role in Plant Growth Promotion. Biotechnol. Adv. 1999, 17, 319–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Richardson, A.E.; Barea, J.-M.; McNeill, A.M.; Prigent-Combaret, C. Acquisition of Phosphorus and Nitrogen in the Rhizosphere and Plant Growth Promotion by Microorganisms. Plant Soil 2009, 321, 305–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, L.; Li, S.; Xie, J.; Xue, X.; Jiang, Y. Screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and their abilities of phosphorus solubilization and wheat growth promotion. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basu, A.; Prasad, P.; Das, S.N.; Kalam, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Reddy, M.S.; El Enshasy, H. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: Recent developments, constraints, and prospects. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stelluti, S.; Caser, M.; Demasi, S.; Rodríguez Herrero, E.; García-González, I.; Lumini, E.; Bianciotto, V.; Scariot, V. Beneficial microorganisms: A sustainable horticultural solution to improve the quality of saffron in hydroponics. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 319, 112155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.B.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Trivedi, M.H.; Gobi, T.A. Phosphate Solubilizing Microbes: Sustainable Approach for Managing Phosphorus Deficiency in Agricultural Soils. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aloo, B.N.; Mbega, E.R.; Makumba, B.A. Rhizobacteria-Based Technology for Sustainable Cropping of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato Res. 2020, 63, 157–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, L.I.; Pereira, M.C.; Carvalho, A.M.X.; Buttrós, V.H.; Pasqual, M.; Dória, J. Phosphorus-Solubilizing Microorganisms: A Key to Sustainable Agriculture. Agriculture 2023, 13, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahid, F.; Fahad, S.; Danish, S.; Adnan, M.; Yue, Z.; Saud, S.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Brtnicky, M.; Hammerschmiedt, T.; Datta, R. Sustainable Management with Mycorrhizae and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria for Enhanced Phosphorus Uptake in Calcareous Soils. Agriculture 2020, 10, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, S.S.; Biswas, D.R.; Ghosh, A.; Sarkar, A.; Das, A.; Roy, T. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria inoculated low-grade rock phosphate can supplement P fertilizer to grow wheat in subtropical inceptisol. Rhizosphere 2022, 23, 100556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Bacterial Isolate | Soluble Phosphorus (mg/L) | IAA Production (ug/mL) | Zinc Solubilization | Ammonia Production | ACCD Production | Siderophore Production |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPBA63 | 77.52 | 86 | − | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| SBP04 | 90.12 | 69 | − | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| Bacterial Isolate | Production of Extracellular Enzymes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Protease | Amylase | Cellulase | |
| UPBA63 | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| SBP04 | ++ | +++ | ++ |
| Biochemical Test | Bacterial Isolate | |
|---|---|---|
| UPBA63 | SBP04 | |
| Shape | Rod | Rod |
| Gram reaction | Gram-positive | Gram-positive |
| Aerobe-anaerobe test | − | − |
| Endospore forming | + | + |
| Starch Hydrolysis | + | + |
| VP test | + | + |
| Citrate test | + | + |
| Indole test | − | − |
| Motility test | + | + |
| Catalase test | + | + |
| Treatments | P (mgP/kg) | pH ns | OM (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Control (distilled water) | 107.92 ± 4.10 e | 5.42 ± 0.29 | 3.22 ± 0.20 e |
| 2. Organic matter alone | 113.00 ± 4.13 de | 5.38 ± 0.21 | 3.55 ± 0.23 bcd |
| 3. Selected bacterial inoculum (UPBA63) | 114.50 ± 4.56 de | 5.39 ± 0.19 | 3.35 ± 0.19 cde |
| 4. Selected bacterial inoculum (SBP04) | 118.67 ± 6.05 cd | 5.30 ± 0.14 | 3.29 ± 0.26 de |
| 5. Selected bacterial inoculum (UPBA63+ SBP04) | 122.75 ± 4.96 c | 5.26 ± 0.14 | 3.34 ± 0.24 cde |
| 6. Selected bacterial inoculum (UPBA63) + organic matter | 123.08 ± 7.06 c | 5.28 ± 0.32 | 3.59 ± 0.23 bc |
| 7. Selected bacterial inoculum (SBP04) + organic matter | 137.83 ± 5.94 b | 5.23 ± 0.26 | 3.78 ± 0.22 ab |
| 8. Selected bacterial inoculum (UPBA63+ SBP04) + organic matter | 146.92 ± 7.13 a | 5.20 ± 0.16 | 3.92 ± 0.15 a |
| Treatments | Disease Incidence (%) | Yield (kg/Tree) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Untreated control | 47.38 ± 17.12 a | 15.92 ± 4.10 e |
| 2. Organic matter alone | 46.71 ± 12.67 a | 23.67 ± 6.19 d |
| 3. Bacillus spp. (UPBA63 + SBP04) | 19.91 ± 7.22 b | 28.67 ± 5.99 cd |
| 4. Bacillus spp. (UPBA63 + SBP04) + organic matter | 20.51 ± 3.59 b | 36.33 ± 5.82 bc |
| 5. Bacillus spp. (UPBA63 + SBP04) + organic matter + ½ chemical fertilizer + ½ fungicide | 15.40 ± 7.42 b | 42.17 ± 6.29 ab |
| 6. Organic matter + ½ chemical fertilizer + ½ fungicide | 16.81 ± 6.91 b | 40.25 ± 5.45 ab |
| 7. Organic matter + full chemical fertilizer + full fungicide | 2.26 ± 5.82 c | 45.58 ± 8.95 a |
| Treatments | P (mgP/kg) | pH | OM (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Untreated control | 109.75 ± 5.52 c | 4.36 ± 0.20 c | 2.36 ± 0.18 b |
| 2. Organic matter alone | 114.70 ± 5.34 bc | 4.71 ± 0.30 a | 2.88 ± 0.24 a |
| 3. Bacillus spp. (UPBA63 + SBP04) | 120.65 ± 7.42 b | 4.68 ± 0.26 ab | 2.40 ± 0.25 b |
| 4. Bacillus spp. (UPBA63 + SBP04) + organic matter | 146.25 ± 7.41 a | 4.64 ± 0.26 ab | 3.01 ± 0.42 a |
| 5. Bacillus spp. (UPBA63 + SBP04) + organic matter + ½ chemical fertilizer + ½ fungicide | 149.25 ± 10.18 a | 4.56 ± 0.20 abc | 2.92 ± 0.36 a |
| 6. Organic matter + ½ chemical fertilizer + ½ fungicide | 115.65 ± 7.04 bc | 4.60 ± 0.19 ab | 2.82 ± 0.35 a |
| 7. Organic matter + full chemical fertilizer + full fungicide | 117.60 ± 7.10 b | 4.48 ± 0.16 bc | 2.81 ± 0.41 a |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Suksakol, P.; Thongrote, C.; Bansra, T.; Intha, K.; Liamkraituan, J.; Mahadtanapuk, S. Multifunctional Bacillus Strains for Integrated Fruit Rot Management and Improved Soil Phosphorus Availability in Longan Orchards. J. Fungi 2026, 12, 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12080550
Suksakol P, Thongrote C, Bansra T, Intha K, Liamkraituan J, Mahadtanapuk S. Multifunctional Bacillus Strains for Integrated Fruit Rot Management and Improved Soil Phosphorus Availability in Longan Orchards. Journal of Fungi. 2026; 12(8):550. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12080550
Chicago/Turabian StyleSuksakol, Pisi, Chananbhorn Thongrote, Tatiya Bansra, Kanlayawat Intha, Jirapinya Liamkraituan, and Supuk Mahadtanapuk. 2026. "Multifunctional Bacillus Strains for Integrated Fruit Rot Management and Improved Soil Phosphorus Availability in Longan Orchards" Journal of Fungi 12, no. 8: 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12080550
APA StyleSuksakol, P., Thongrote, C., Bansra, T., Intha, K., Liamkraituan, J., & Mahadtanapuk, S. (2026). Multifunctional Bacillus Strains for Integrated Fruit Rot Management and Improved Soil Phosphorus Availability in Longan Orchards. Journal of Fungi, 12(8), 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12080550

