Next Article in Journal
Small-Spored Alternaria Species (Pleosporales, Pleosporaceae) Associated with Cucurbitaceae in China
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of the Biocontrol Effect of Bacillus velezensis LYH8 Against Fusarium Head Blight of Wheat
Previous Article in Special Issue
Extremophilic Yeasts as Next-Generation Eukaryotic Models: Mechanisms of Stress Integration, Systems Biology and Biotechnological Applications: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptomic Insights into Sre1-Related Regulatory Responses to Hypoxia, Cobalt Chloride, and Clotrimazole in Phaffia rhodozyma

by
Marcelo Baeza
,
María Soledad Gutiérrez
,
Melissa Gómez
and
Jennifer Alcaíno
*
Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 7800003, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2026, 12(3), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12030200
Submission received: 29 January 2026 / Revised: 4 March 2026 / Accepted: 6 March 2026 / Published: 10 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stress Research in Filamentous Fungi and Yeasts)

Abstract

Sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs) are transcription factors that regulate lipid homeostasis and have been associated with hypoxia adaptation in fungi. In the yeast Phaffia rhodozyma, the SREBP ortholog named Sre1 regulates sterol biosynthesis, but its contribution to stress-responsive transcriptional programs remains poorly understood. We performed RNA-seq analyses to evaluate the transcriptional responses of wild-type (WT) and ∆sre1 mutant strains exposed to hypoxia, cobalt chloride (CoCl2), and clotrimazole treatments. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed using KEGG mapping to assess the treatment-induced transcriptional changes in both strains and to evaluate the potential contribution of Sre1 to these responses. In the WT strain, hypoxia induced the most extensive transcriptional changes, while CoCl2 elicited a moderate response partially overlapping with hypoxia. Downregulated DEGs predominated in both conditions, and all CoCl2-associated KEGG pathways were also identified under hypoxia. In contrast, the Δsre1 mutant showed an increased number of DEGs in response to clotrimazole and CoCl2, with most clotrimazole-responsive genes being mutant-specific, indicating distinct Sre1-associated transcriptional responses under these conditions. Shared downregulated DEGs under CoCl2 and hypoxia suggest that basal Sre1 activity may contribute to modulation of gene expression programs related to core cellular processes. However, Sre1-dependent regulation alone did not account for the extensive transcriptional reprogramming observed under the applied hypoxic treatment.

1. Introduction

Phaffia rhodozyma (formerly Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous) is a basidiomycete yeast best known for its ability to synthesize astaxanthin, a carotenoid of high industrial relevance due to its antioxidant properties and applications in aquaculture, cosmetics, and biotechnology [1,2,3]. As one of the few organisms that produces astaxanthin de novo, P. rhodozyma has become an important model for studying carotenoid biosynthesis and its regulation [4]. In nature, this yeast is typically found in cold habitats and oxidative or UV-exposed environments [5,6], and astaxanthin accumulation has been proposed to contribute to its tolerance under such conditions [7,8]. However, the molecular mechanisms that connect environmental stimuli to transcriptional regulation and stress-responsive pathways in P. rhodozyma remain poorly understood.
Environmental and chemical perturbations provide valuable tools for dissecting stress-responsive pathways in fungi. Among these, oxygen availability is a major factor influencing cellular physiology. Aerobic organisms rely on mitochondrial respiration for efficient energy production. Because oxygen levels fluctuate across natural habitats and lifestyles, fungi have evolved mechanisms to detect and respond to oxygen limitation [9,10]. These mechanisms are crucial for adapting to hypoxic conditions that may arise during growth on diverse substrates or within host environments [11]. Research in this field has largely focused on pathogenic fungi, where hypoxia responses contribute to virulence [12,13]. Oxygen levels can be sensed directly through oxygen-sensing proteins or ligands, or indirectly through changes in cellular homeostasis, such as alterations in redox balance [13]. Sterol metabolism also functions as an oxygen-sensing system, as several steps of lipid biosynthesis require molecular oxygen. For example, in Candida albicans, oxygen limitation induces the transcription of genes involved in ergosterol biosynthesis and fatty acid metabolism, highlighting the central role of oxygen in lipid pathway regulation [14,15,16]. Cobalt chloride (CoCl2) is widely used as a chemical hypoxia mimetic [17]. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cobalt interferes with oxygen-dependent Fe-containing enzymes, including diiron-oxo enzymatic steps involved in sterol synthesis and fatty acid desaturation, as well as 4Fe-4S dehydratase enzymes of the mitochondria [18]. In Cryptococcus neoformans, CoCl2 disrupts several steps of ergosterol biosynthesis and induces a transcriptional response that only partially overlaps with that triggered by low oxygen, indicating that although CoCl2 and hypoxia share some consequences, they also affect cellular physiology in distinct ways [17]. Clotrimazole likewise perturbs sterol metabolism, but through a different mechanism. As an azole antifungal, it inhibits the cytochrome P450 lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase (Erg11), an essential oxygen-dependent enzyme of the ergosterol pathway [19]. Inhibition of Erg11 reduces ergosterol levels, leading to the accumulation of toxic sterol intermediates that compromise membrane integrity [20]. This triggers compensatory transcriptional and metabolic responses to restore sterol homeostasis [21]. Together, hypoxia, CoCl2, and clotrimazole perturb overlapping but mechanistically distinct aspects of fungal metabolism, making them suitable for comparative analyses of transcriptional regulation linked to sterol homeostasis and cellular stress.
A central regulator expected to respond to these perturbations is the sterol-regulatory element–binding protein (SREBP) family. SREBPs are ER-membrane-bound transcription factors that regulate lipid homeostasis by regulating genes of enzymes involved in sterol, fatty acid (FA), triacylglycerol, and phospholipid biosynthesis [22]. In fungi, SREBPs coordinate sterol metabolism and contribute to adaptation under restrictive environmental conditions. The best-characterized fungal SREBP pathway is that of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, where the SREBP ortholog named Sre1 is activated under hypoxia and sterol depletion and is essential for the transcriptional induction of genes required for adaptation to low-oxygen conditions [23,24]. In S. pombe, CoCl2 and ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors, such as clotrimazole, induced an Sre1-dependent reporter, whereas the Δsre1 mutant failed to induce these responses [25], reflecting the activation of Sre1 by the treatments. In the basidiomycete pathogen C. neoformans, Sre1 is similarly required for adaptation to hypoxia and for survival during azole treatment [26]. In Aspergillus fumigatus, hypoxia induces proteolytic activation of the SREBP-like transcription factor SrbA, which is required for ergosterol biosynthesis, azole drug resistance, and virulence [27,28,29]. Loss of SrbA results in defective growth under hypoxia and causes extreme susceptibility to triazoles [30]. SrbA also contributes to the transcriptional remodeling that occurs during hypoxia [31], underscoring the conserved role of fungal SREBPs in coordinating lipid metabolism and responding to environmental stress. In plant pathogenic fungi, SREBP homologs have also been implicated in adaptation to host-associated environments. In the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, the SREBP homolog MoSre1 is induced under hypoxic conditions and contributes to sterol biosynthesis and invasive growth during infection, although it was not shown to be strictly required for disease severity [32]. More recently, functional analysis of Sre1 in the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea demonstrated that Sre1 is required for proper ergosterol biosynthesis, hypoxia adaptation, and virulence, highlighting a conserved role for fungal SREBPs in coordinating lipid homeostasis, development, and pathogenicity in plant–fungus interactions [33]. In P. rhodozyma, sterol homeostasis is also regulated by the SREBP homolog Sre1 [34], which additionally influences carotenoid biosynthesis by regulating genes of the mevalonate pathway and of key carotenogenic enzymes [35,36]. Heterologous expression of the N-terminal domain of Sre1 (Sre1N) from P. rhodozyma partially rescued the hypoxic growth defect of a S. pombe Δsre1 mutant, and Δsre1 mutants of P. rhodozyma failed to grow in the presence of CoCl2 or clotrimazole [34], suggesting a conserved role of Sre1 from P. rhodozyma that contributes to oxygen-responsive signaling and sterol homeostasis.
Studies across fungi show that SREBPs act as conserved regulators that integrate signals derived from low-oxygen conditions, CoCl2 exposure, and azole inhibition. These signals converge on sterol homeostasis and stress adaptation, positioning SREBPs as key regulators of transcriptional responses induced by these perturbations. While SREBP function and lipid-based oxygen sensing have been characterized in pathogenic fungi, this has not been explored in P. rhodozyma. Accordingly, this study was designed as a comparative and exploratory transcriptomic analysis aimed at capturing early transcriptional responses to these perturbations and to define the contribution of Sre1 at a global level. Consistent with this approach, we analyzed the transcriptomic responses of P. rhodozyma exposed to short-term hypoxia, CoCl2, and clotrimazole treatments, including comparisons with a Δsre1 mutant.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Culture Conditions

The P. rhodozyma strains used in this work were the wild-type (WT) CBS 6938 (ATCC 96594) and the mutant CBS.sre1 (hereafter referred to as Δsre1 mutant), in which approximately 90% of the coding region of the SRE1 gene was replaced with a zeocin resistance cassette [34]. Strains were grown at 22 °C with constant agitation in YM medium (0.3% yeast extract, 0.3% malt extract, and 0.5% peptone) supplemented with 1% glucose. For all RNA-seq analyses, three biological replicates were included for each strain and condition. Cultures were grown for 36 h (exponential growth phase) under normoxic conditions (21% O2) to ensure metabolically active cells, and were subsequently exposed for 4 h to the following treatments: (i) hypoxia (2–3% O2, in an Anaerobic Chamber, Coy Lab Products, Grass Lake, MI, USA), (ii) supplementation with CoCl2 (400 μM), (iii) supplementation with clotrimazole (0.1 μg/mL), or (iv) a control condition maintained under normoxia without chemical supplementation. This experimental design was chosen to evaluate early transcriptional responses (i.e., within a single P. rhodozyma generation time) under metabolically active conditions, as the Δsre1 mutant cannot grow in the presence of CoCl2 or clotrimazole [34]. Identical conditions were applied to both strains (WT and Δsre1 mutant) to allow direct comparisons.

2.2. RNA Purification and RNAseq Analysis

RNA extraction was carried out according to Chomczynski and Sacchi [37]. Briefly, 5 mL of yeast culture was centrifuged at 4000× g for 5 min, the cellular pellet was resuspended in 200 μL of lysis buffer (0.02 M sodium acetate, pH 5.5; 0.5% SDS; 1 mM EDTA), and 100 μL of 0.5 mm glass beads (BioSpec Products Inc., Bartlesville, OK, USA) were added. The suspension was homogenized for 1 min using a Mini-Beadbeater 16 (BioSpec Products Inc., Bartlesville, OK, USA). Then, 800 μL of TRI Reagent (AmbionTM, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was added, the mixture was homogenized again for 1 min and then incubated on ice for 10 min. Next, 200 μL of chloroform was added, the mixture was manually shaken for 15 s, incubated at room temperature for 6 min, and centrifuged at 18,000× g for 10 min at room temperature. The aqueous phase was recovered, and one volume of cold isopropanol and half a volume of precipitation solution (1.2 M NaCl, 0.8 M sodium citrate) were added. The mixture was incubated for 1 h at −20 °C and then centrifuged at 18,000× g for 10 min. The RNA pellet was washed with 1 mL of 70% ethanol and centrifuged at 18,000× g for 5 min. The supernatant was carefully removed, the pellet was dried at 37 °C, and the RNA pellet was resuspended in 30–60 μL of nuclease-free Milli-Q water and stored at −80 °C until analysis. RNA concentration was measured spectrophotometrically using the Epoch 2 system with a Take3 microplate and Gene5 software (version 2.09) (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). RNA purity was evaluated by the A260/A280 absorbance ratio, and RNA integrity was assessed using the BioAnalyzer 2100 system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
Library construction and high-throughput sequencing were performed by the National Center for Genomic Analysis (Barcelona, Spain). Briefly, libraries were prepared using the TruSeq Stranded mRNA kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) with a target fragment size of 75 bp, and sequencing was conducted as paired-end reads on the HiSeq 2000 system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Raw paired-end RNA-Seq reads were quality-filtered and adapter-trimmed using fastp v0.23.2 [38]. For each library, the average read length was estimated, and the minimum read length threshold was set adaptively according to sequencing depth (50 bp for 150 bp reads, 40 bp for 100 bp reads, and 30 bp for 75 bp reads). Low-quality bases with a Phred score < 20 were trimmed, and reads failing to meet this threshold were discarded. Poly-G and poly-X tails were removed to eliminate sequencing artifacts. Paired reads were synchronized to maintain mate consistency, and adapter sequences were removed. Quality control metrics are summarized in Supplementary Table S1.
RNA-Seq reads were aligned to the P. rhodozyma CBS 6938 reference genome (GenBank accession: GCA_014706385.1) using previously annotated gene information [35,39], with Rsubread v2.18.3 [40]. The resulting BAM files were then sorted, indexed, and filtered to retain high-quality, properly paired reads using functions from the Rsamtools package [41,42]. Gene-level counts were generated using featureCounts with GFF annotation, and expression values were normalized to RPKM and TPM for each gene in each sample, resulting in matrices of raw counts and normalized expression for downstream analyses. Reproducibility across biological replicates was assessed using Pearson and Spearman correlations on log2(TPM + 1)-transformed expression values. All biological replicates showed high reproducibility with Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients ranging from 0.93 to 1.00 and from 0.92 to 1.00, respectively. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 v1.40.1 [43] in R. Raw gene-level counts were imported from the count matrix generated by featureCounts. Sample conditions were assigned based on the first character of each sample name, and all pairwise comparisons between conditions were conducted. For each comparison, a DESeqDataSet was constructed, with the design formula ~ Condition, and the reference condition was specified to ensure consistent contrast direction. The DESeq2 workflow was executed to estimate size factors, dispersion, and negative binomial model parameters, followed by Wald tests to identify differentially expressed genes. Results for each condition pair are shown in Supplementary Table S2.
KEGG’s pathway analysis was performed using the KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS) [44], applying default GHOSTX parameters [45] and eukaryotic gene datasets. Plots were generated in Python 3 using pandas (version 2.2.3) [46], Matplotlib (version 3.9.2) [47], seaborn (version 0.13.2) [48], and NumPy (version 2.1.3) [49] libraries.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Transcriptomic Profiling of P. rhodozyma Under Hypoxia, CoCl2, and Clotrimazole Treatments

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the wild-type (WT) strain of P. rhodozyma exposed to hypoxia, CoCl2, and clotrimazole were identified by comparing transcriptomes obtained from treated cultures with the untreated control. The strongest response was observed under hypoxia, where the number of DEGs was 6.7-fold higher than in the CoCl2 treatment (Figure 1A,B). In both conditions, the number of downregulated DEGs (DwDEGs) exceeded that of upregulated ones (UpDEGs), by 1.4-fold under hypoxia and 2.6-fold under CoCl2. Only two DEGs, both downregulated, were detected in response to clotrimazole (Figure 1A,B). Comparison of the hypoxia and CoCl2 treatment responses revealed substantial divergence. Overall, 92% of the DwDEGs and 95% of the UpDEGs identified under the hypoxic treatment did not match those found under the CoCl2 treatment, whereas 49% of the DwDEGs and 70% of the UpDEGs in CoCl2 were exclusive to this treatment. Among the DEGs common to both treatments, 79 were DwDEGs, 15 were UpDEGs, and 36 DEGs showed opposite regulation. These results indicate substantial differences in the transcriptional responses of P. rhodozyma to these treatments, with hypoxia triggering the strongest response and CoCl2 producing a more moderate response that partially overlaps with that of hypoxia.
To further characterize the transcriptomic changes in response to the treatments, the DEGs were classified into KEGG metabolic pathways and functional modules (Figure 1C,D). Considerable differences were observed among treatments in both the number of identified KEGG pathways and modules, and the number of DEGs in each category. The two DwDEGs detected under clotrimazole treatment were assigned to the Amino acid metabolism and Glycan biosynthesis and metabolism pathways, and the Arginine and proline metabolism module. Six pathways and nine modules among DwDEGs were found exclusively under hypoxia, among which the Cell motility, Translation, and Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites pathways, as well as modules related to Fatty acid metabolism and Serine and threonine metabolism, contained the highest numbers of DwDEGs. Similarly, nine pathways and 17 modules among UpDEGs were exclusive to hypoxia treatment, where the Folding sorting and degradation, Translation, and Transcription pathways and the modules Arginine and proline metabolism, Aromatic amino acid metabolism, and ATP synthesis contained the highest numbers of UpDEGs within the hypoxia-exclusive set. All pathways and modules detected under CoCl2 exposure were also detected in hypoxia. In general, the number of DEGs associated with each category was higher under the hypoxic treatment. The largest differences regarding the DwDEGs were observed in the Signal transduction, Carbohydrate metabolism, and Cell growth and death pathways, as well as in the ATP synthesis, Other carbohydrate metabolism, Cofactor and vitamin metabolism, and Fatty acid metabolism modules. The most pronounced differences among the UpDEGs were observed in the Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, Transport and catabolism, and Lipid metabolism pathways, and the Lipid metabolism module. In general, our results show down- and upregulation of cellular processes under hypoxic and CoCl2 treatments, consistent with observations in other yeasts and fungi. Previous studies have reported upregulation of lipid and fatty acid metabolism under hypoxia in C. albicans [50] and of genes involved in sterol biosynthesis in C. albicans and A. fumigatus [51]. Downregulation of genes associated with fatty acid degradation was reported in C. neoformans [52], and upregulation under CoCl2 treatment of genes related to DNA synthesis and repair in Debaryomyces hansenii [53].
Overall, the observed transcriptomic changes in P. rhodozyma indicate distinct magnitudes of transcriptional responses under clotrimazole, CoCl2, and hypoxia treatments under the tested conditions, with clotrimazole inducing minimal changes, CoCl2 eliciting a moderate response, and hypoxia triggering the most extensive transcriptional remodeling. Interestingly, the CoCl2 transcriptional response partially overlaps with that induced by hypoxia.

3.2. Comparison of Transcriptomic Responses Between Hypoxia, CoCl2, and Clotrimazole Treatments

The DEGs identified by BLASTp (version 2.17.0) searches against the NCBI databases were classified according to whether they were observed exclusively under hypoxia, under CoCl2 treatment, or under both treatments (Figure 2). Among the 655 downregulated genes exclusively observed under hypoxia, the five with the strongest downregulation were Alcohol dehydrogenase 2, Yizg_schpo uncharacterized transporter c1002.16c, Probable beta-glucosidase a, Aldehyde dehydrogenase, and Short chain dehydrogenases/reductase notp’, a pattern that contrasts with previous reports. For example, aldehyde dehydrogenase, which, together with long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, participates in the detoxification of aldehydes formed during anaerobic metabolism or oxidative stress, is induced in Paracoccidioides under short-term hypoxia [54]. Similarly, the induction of three intracellular β-glucosidase genes in response to oxygen depletion was described in Phlebia radiata [55]. Besides the carbon source, fungal alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) genes are also regulated by oxygen level. For example, in Scheffersomyces stipitis (formerly Pichia stipitis) cultured on xylose, ADH1 expression increased when cells were shifted to oxygen-limited conditions [56,57]. Moreover, the ADH2 promoter from this yeast has been utilized to drive protein expression in Pichia pastoris under microaerobic conditions [58] and has also been engineered for enhanced performance under these conditions [59]. However, in S. cerevisiae, both the RNA and protein levels of ADH2 decreased as oxygen availability decreased [60], which is consistent with our observations. Overall, our results suggest that the products of the top five hypoxia-responsive DwDEGs are not essential for the initial response to hypoxia in P. rhodozyma. However, it is probable that their expression may be induced following prolonged hypoxic exposure as part of a secondary or delayed hypoxia-regulated response.
Of the 539 exclusively upregulated genes under the hypoxic treatment, the top five corresponded to 10 kDa heat shock protein mitochondrial, Heat shock protein 60 mitochondrial, D-arabinitol dehydrogenase 1, Hsp90 co-chaperone Aha1, and Extracellular metalloprotease mgg_08041. The upregulation of these genes likely reflects an early broad transcriptional response associated with metabolic adjustment and stress-related pathways under hypoxic conditions. Mitochondrial chaperones are involved in proper protein folding within mitochondria, which is crucial for energy production under oxygen-limited conditions [61]. The Hsp90 co-chaperone Aha1 enhances the activity of Hsp90, a molecular chaperone required for folding and stabilization of a wide range of substrate proteins [62]. Among metabolic enzymes, D-arabinitol dehydrogenase 1 primarily produces D-arabinitol, a compound that quenches reactive oxygen species in Uromyces faba [63], while extracellular metalloproteases contribute to nutrient acquisition from the environment, and have been implicated in stress-associated processes [64].
A total of 62 genes were downregulated exclusively under CoCl2 treatment, with the five most strongly repressed corresponding to ATP-dependent permease yor1, Cytochrome c, Catalase, Sdha_schpo probable succinate dehydrogenase[ubiquinone] flavoprotein subunit mitochondrial, and Efflux pump hime. On the other hand, 50 genes were exclusively upregulated under CoCl2, with the top five including Isopenicillin N synthase-like, two probable beta-glucosidases, Beta-mannosidase b, and Ferric reductase NADH/NADPH oxidase and related proteins. This pattern is consistent with observations in S. cerevisiae, where cobalt stress induced genes involved in iron uptake and homeostasis, and of proteins involved in cell wall maintenance [65]. Moreover, transcriptomic profiling under cobalt stress in the yeast D. hansenii reported the upregulation of genes encoding proteins involved in cell wall repair [53], in line with our observation of carbohydrate-active enzymes, such as beta-glucosidase and beta-mannosidase, which may be associated with cell wall-related transcriptional responses. In addition, 85 genes were regulated under both hypoxic and CoCl2 treatments. Of these, 50 were downregulated, 11 were upregulated, and 24 showed opposite regulation. The log2FC of shared genes was generally comparable across treatments, although some showed stronger regulation under hypoxia. These included genes encoding High-affinity glucose transporter GHT2, Zinc finger HIT-type, Fumarate reductase, Pheromone-regulated membrane protein 10, Alternative oxidase mitochondrial, and Pkinase-domain-containing protein, all of which were more strongly downregulated under hypoxic conditions. In contrast, the Major facilitator-type transporter ecdD showed stronger upregulation under hypoxia. Among the genes with the most pronounced opposite regulation were a Probable beta-glucosidase, Lactose permease, and Xyl5_phach beta-xylosidase, which were downregulated under hypoxia but upregulated under CoCl2. Conversely, genes encoding DnaJ homolog 1 mitochondrial, DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 4, and Heat Shock Protein 90 homolog were upregulated under hypoxia but repressed by CoCl2 treatment. Together, these contrasting transcriptional patterns suggest that P. rhodozyma engages distinct gene expression programs in response to hypoxic versus CoCl2 exposure. Under oxygen limitation, repression of specific metabolic pathways and induction of molecular chaperones are consistent with a transcriptional profile associated with protein homeostasis, particularly in the mitochondria. In contrast, CoCl2 exposure is associated with transcriptional changes linked to nutrient utilization and detoxification-related processes, probably as part of a broader stress-responsive program.

3.3. Differential Transcriptomic Responses of the Δsre1 Mutant and the Wild-Type Under Hypoxia, CoCl2, and Clotrimazole Treatments

To investigate the potential role of Sre1 in response to the three treatments, the transcriptomes of the Δsre1 mutant were determined under normoxic conditions and after exposure to hypoxia, CoCl2, or clotrimazole, and compared with the transcriptome of the untreated WT control. The transcriptional changes between the Δsre1 mutant and WT under normoxic conditions were minimal, with 12 DwDEGs and two UpDEGs (Figure 3). This observation suggests that the basal activity of Sre1 is associated with the maintenance of gene expression levels of a set of genes under untreated conditions, representing a core group of “basal Sre1-regulated genes”, consistent with the fact that Sre1 is activated at basal levels under this condition [35]. Among these genes, nine of the DwDEGs were previously identified as direct Sre1 targets by ChIP-Exo analysis, including the SRE1 gene itself (g4728) [35] (Table 1). As expected, g4728 appears downregulated in the Δsre1 mutant under normoxic conditions, serving as an internal control. The other eight genes are related to ergosterol biosynthesis as they were assigned to the Sterol biosynthesis or Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis KEGG modules.
Unlike what was observed under untreated conditions, major changes were observed under the three treatments, with the strongest response under hypoxia (937 DwDEGs and 723 UpDEGs), followed by CoCl2 (988 DwDEGs and 510 UpDEGs) and clotrimazole (713 DwDEGs and 307 UpDEGs) (Figure 3A,B). In all cases, the number of DwDEGs exceeded the number of UpDEGs, a pattern consistent with that observed in the WT. In contrast to the WT treated under the same conditions, the Δsre1 mutant exhibited a higher number of DEGs in response to clotrimazole and CoCl2, but a reduced response to the hypoxic treatment. Across all conditions, the number of DEGs that were shared among treatments was greater in the Δsre1 than in the WT. The proportion of shared DEGs ranged from 45% to 86% for downregulated genes and from 34% to 74% for upregulated genes under hypoxic and clotrimazole treatments, respectively. The largest groups of shared DEGs corresponded to those downregulated under clotrimazole and CoCl2 (279 DEGs), downregulated across all three treatments (239 DEGs), and upregulated under clotrimazole and CoCl2 (134 DEGs). These results point to a stronger similarity in the transcriptomic response to clotrimazole and CoCl2 in the Δsre1 mutant.
When the direct Sre1 targets belonging to the core group of “basal Sre1-regulated genes” were examined, none of them showed significant changes in the WT under exposure to clotrimazole or CoCl2, and only one gene (g3516, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase) was downregulated in the WT under hypoxia. It is also important to note that the SRE1 gene itself (g4728) did not show differential expression in the WT under any of the three treatments applied (Table 1). These observations indicate that, under the applied conditions, the treatments did not elicit transcriptional patterns consistent with robust activation of the SREBP pathway.
Therefore, most of the transcriptional changes observed in the Δsre1 mutant are likely attributable to the biological effects of the basal expression differences affecting the core group of “basal Sre1-regulated genes”, which appear to confer partial protection against the applied stress conditions in the WT, a protection that is lost in the Δsre1 mutant. Consequently, the transcriptional differences observed in the mutant, but not in the WT, can be attributed to the loss of a Sre1-mediated basal protection. Consistent with this, comparison of the Δsre1 and WT transcriptomes revealed DEGs exclusive to the mutant, including 713 downregulated and 306 upregulated under clotrimazole treatment, 798 downregulated and 470 upregulated under CoCl2 exposure, and 280 downregulated and 269 upregulated under hypoxic conditions (Figure 3C–E). Interestingly, under clotrimazole treatment, nearly all DEGs were detected exclusively in the Δsre1 mutant, suggesting that Sre1 in the WT is sufficient to confer resistance to clotrimazole, a function that is absent in the mutant, as previously reported [34]. A higher number of DEGs were shared between the mutant and the WT under CoCl2 and hypoxia, particularly among downregulated genes. Moreover, under hypoxia, the number of shared DEGs between the Δsre1 mutant and WT exceeded those exclusive to the mutant. These findings suggest that Sre1 is associated with a basal transcriptional buffering effect in the WT, which is more pronounced under CoCl2 stress than under low-oxygen conditions.
Analysis of DEGs classified into KEGG metabolic pathways and modules (Figure 4A,B) revealed similar patterns across treatments in the Δsre1 mutant, with the clotrimazole and CoCl2 being once again the most similar. The top five pathways and modules with the highest number of DwDEGs across treatments included Carbohydrate metabolism, Amino acid metabolism, Signal transduction, and Transport and catabolism pathways, together with Other carbohydrate metabolism, Cofactor and vitamin metabolism, and Central carbohydrate metabolism modules. For UpDEGs, the most common top five categories were Carbohydrate metabolism and Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins pathways, and Cofactor and vitamin metabolism and Other carbohydrate metabolism modules. Major differences were also observed, particularly among DwDEGs assigned to Pyrimidine metabolism, and UpDEGs associated with the Biosynthesis of phytochemical compounds, Glycosaminoglycan metabolism, and Other amino acid metabolism, which were detected exclusively under hypoxic treatment. Notably, a substantial number of DwDEGs were assigned to the ATP synthesis module in response to CoCl2 treatment, with higher representation in the mutant. Under normoxic conditions, DwDEGs in the Δsre1 mutant were mainly classified within the Lipid metabolism and Metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides pathways, as well as the Sterol biosynthesis and Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis modules, consistent with the role of Sre1 in the upregulation of ergosterol biosynthetic genes [35]. Conversely, several pathways and modules were detected exclusively in the mutant but not in the WT (Figure 4A,B). Under clotrimazole treatment, these included 21 pathways and 17 modules among DwDEGs, mainly associated with Carbohydrate metabolism, Lipid metabolism, Signal transduction, Transport and catabolism, and Cofactor and vitamin metabolism. For UpDEGs, 21 pathways and 18 modules were identified, primarily related to Carbohydrate metabolism, Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, Cell growth and death, and Central and Other carbohydrate metabolism. Under CoCl2 treatment, six pathways and four modules with DwDEGs were exclusively found in the mutant, including Cell motility, Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, Metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides, Fatty acid metabolism, and Sterol biosynthesis. The exclusive UpDEGs in the mutant were associated with eight pathways and 16 modules, mainly related to Translation, Signal transduction, and Folding sorting and degradation pathways, and Cofactor and vitamin metabolism and Central carbohydrate metabolism modules. Under hypoxia, mutant-exclusive DEGs were limited to three modules for UpDEGs, with a higher number of DEGs in Fatty acid metabolism. In general, when comparing pathways and modules shared between the Δsre1 mutant and the WT, a higher number of DwDEGs and UpDEGs was observed in the mutant under clotrimazole and CoCl2 treatments, while more similar numbers were detected under hypoxia. These observations are consistent with the limited overlap observed in transcriptomic studies of Δsre1 mutants and wild-type strains in C. neoformans subjected to different stressors. For example, under CoCl2 treatment, the WT displayed elevated expression of plasma membrane transporters, components of the electron transport chain, and enzymes associated with fatty acid, carbohydrate, and amino acid metabolism relative to the mutant. Such differential expression patterns were not observed between Δsre1 and wild-type strains under hypoxic conditions [17,26].
Overall, comparisons of DEGs across functional classifications revealed fewer transcriptional changes in the WT than in the Δsre1 mutant under CoCl2 and, particularly, under clotrimazole treatment. These observations are consistent with previous reports showing that the P. rhodozyma Δsre1 mutant is unable to grow in the presence of clotrimazole (0.15 µg/mL) or CoCl2 (400 µM), unlike the WT strain [34]. Therefore, a higher number of DEGs in the mutant compared to the WT under these treatments was expected. In contrast, under hypoxic conditions, the WT displayed a similar or even greater number of DEGs than the mutant across the KEGG metabolic pathways and modules. Taken together, these results indicate that basal Sre1 activity in the WT is associated with a reduced magnitude of transcriptional changes under clotrimazole and CoCl2 exposure, whereas under hypoxia, Sre1-dependent regulation alone is insufficient to account for the observed transcriptional responses. This suggests that hypoxia-responsive gene expression in P. rhodozyma likely involves additional regulatory components or pathways beyond basal Sre1 activity. This differs from what has been reported in other fungi. For example, in A. fumigatus, SrbA (the SREBP homolog) is essential for ergosterol and heme biosynthesis under hypoxia [31], and sterol biosynthesis has been described as an indirect oxygen-sensing process due to its strong oxygen dependence [51]. In C. neoformans, Sre1 regulates genes involved in sterol biosynthesis and hypoxia adaptation, and is required for growth under low-oxygen conditions [17,26]. Similarly, in C. albicans, the Zn(2)-Cys(6) transcription factor Upc2 is required for the induction of sterol biosynthetic genes and plays a key role in adaptation to hypoxia [12,15]. In line with these comparisons, our results suggest that under the conditions analyzed, hypoxia-induced transcriptional responses in P. rhodozyma are not fully explained by Sre1-dependent regulation alone.

3.4. Influence of Basal Sre1 Activity on Transcriptional Changes Under the Different Stress Conditions

To investigate the influence of basal Sre1 activity and of the core group “basal Sre1-regulated genes” on transcriptional responses to the different treatments, we focused on genes whose expression significantly changed in the mutant compared to the WT. This expression pattern suggests that basal Sre1 activity in the WT may contribute to buffering transcriptional changes induced by the treatments, an effect that is lost in the mutant. These genes include those that were unchanged in the WT but differentially expressed in the Δsre1 mutant, as well as genes that changed in the same direction in both strains but with a greater magnitude of change in the mutant. In addition, to have a clear view of the transcriptional changes, genes without BLASTp hits or with hypothetical proteins were excluded. Applying these criteria, a higher number of genes was detected in the CoCl2 and clotrimazole treatments (535 and 505, respectively), whereas a lower number was observed under hypoxia (59 genes; Figure 5). This distribution indicates that the absence of basal Sre1 activity is associated with more pronounced transcriptional changes under clotrimazole and CoCl2 treatments, and to a lesser extent under hypoxic conditions. Among all selected genes, the highest number of shared genes was observed between the cobalt and clotrimazole treatments, and the lowest between the hypoxic treatment and the others. Notably, the majority of genes shared between the cobalt and clotrimazole treatments correspond to a group of strongly regulated genes, particularly those that are downregulated. Consistently, when the selected genes were classified into metabolic pathways and functional modules, major similarities were observed between CoCl2 and clotrimazole treatments, with a higher number of pathways (22 and 23, respectively) and modules (15 and 17, respectively), in which both down- and upregulated genes were classified (Figure 6). As can be observed, the pathways in which a high number of genes were classified correspond to core cellular processes and global metabolic functions, such as Carbohydrate metabolism, Amino acid metabolism, Signal transduction, Lipid metabolism, and Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins. These results indicate that, in the absence of basal Sre1 activity, clotrimazole and CoCl2 treatments are associated with broader transcriptional reprogramming in the Δsre1 mutant, whereas such changes are less pronounced in the WT. This effect was particularly evident under clotrimazole treatment. Furthermore, genes were also classified into more specific pathways, such as Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, Glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, Metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides, and Xenobiotic biodegradation and metabolism, which may be involved in more specific responses to these compounds. Among the identified genes (Table S3), some were reported to be upregulated in the opportunistic pathogen A. fumigatus exposed to azoles, including glutathione S-transferase, Glutathione S-transferase family protein, several putative cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, and an aldehyde reductase II [66]. An upregulation of Glutathione S-transferase, dependent on Sre1, was reported in the pathogenic fungus C. neoformans treated with 0.6 mM CoCl2 [17]. An increase in azole susceptibility of A. fumigatus by deletion of alleles of two different ABC transporter-encoding genes in three different strains suggested a contribution of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Proteins to drug resistance in this fungus [67]. Other detected genes encoded sterol 14α-demethylase (Cyp51), a cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme required for sterol biosynthesis in various phyla, in which transcriptional regulation mechanisms have been studied mainly in mammalian cells, being regulated primarily by the cholesterol level through SREBP, a regulation that has also been stated to be highly conserved in fungi [68].
Therefore, the transcriptomic changes observed in the absence of Sre1 basal activity involve both global cellular aspects and others directly related to the SREBP pathway, including direct gene targets of Sre1.

3.5. Direct Sre1 Targets Under the Different Stress Conditions

As previously stated, the genes differentially expressed under the treatments are likely attributable to the biological effects of the basal Sre1 activity acting on the core group of “basal Sre1-regulated genes”. In previous work, ChIP-exo experiments identified putative direct Sre1 targets in P. rhodozyma [35], which were analyzed among DEGs in the Δsre1 mutant relative to WT under all three treatments. All of these potential direct Sre1 targets were differentially expressed only in the Δsre1 mutant under all the tested conditions, except for a single gene (g3516), which was differentially expressed in the WT, but to a lesser extent than in the mutant under hypoxia. These observations support an association between basal Sre1 activity in the WT and the maintenance of expression of these genes under the applied stresses, an association that is lost when Sre1 is absent.
Once again, the transcriptional pattern under hypoxia differs from that under the other treatments, with the Δsre1 mutant showing fewer differentially expressed genes than WT. The hypoxia treatment had only three potential Sre1 target genes in common with the other treatments and two exclusive genes (g943 and g5758) that were upregulated. The upregulation of these two genes (encoding NAD(P)-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase and ATP-dependent permease, respectively) may reflect transcriptional adjustments related to redox balance and transport processes under low-oxygen conditions. Together, these observations suggest that Sre1-dependent transcriptional regulation is less prominent under the applied hypoxic conditions, or alternatively, that the hypoxic treatment used here was insufficient to elicit a distinct Sre1-associated transcriptional signature.
Seven of the potential direct Sre1 target genes (g190, g904, g1347, g1377, g3516, g3611, and g5928) encode key enzymes of the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway. Three of them (g904, g1347, and g3516) were downregulated in the Δsre1 mutant under all three treatments. Gene g1377 was downregulated under clotrimazole and CoCl2, two genes (g190 and g3616) were downregulated exclusively under CoCl2, and gene g5828 was downregulated exclusively under clotrimazole (Table 2). Within this group of genes, two of them encode enzymes of the mevalonate pathway (g3516, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Synthase, and g1317, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase), which provide the precursors required for ergosterol biosynthesis in P. rhodozyma [69]. The gene g5928 encodes a Cytochrome P450 reductase, which donates electrons to cytochrome P450 enzymes, two of which are involved in ergosterol biosynthesis. Downregulation or mutation of this type of reductase has been associated with increased azole sensitivity [34,70,71], which is consistent with its downregulation under clotrimazole treatment in the Δsre1 mutant. In this context, gene g190 encodes a Lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase, which is a cytochrome P450 (Cyp51). The lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase is the primary target of azole antifungals, and its upregulation is a known mechanism of resistance towards these types of compounds [72]. Then, its downregulation in the Δsre1 mutant under CoCl2 is consistent with altered transcriptional regulation of sterol biosynthetic genes in the absence of Sre1. Gene g3611 encodes Lanosterol synthase (Erg7), which catalyzes the formation of lanosterol, the first committed intermediate of the sterol pathway. The downregulation of ERG7 under CoCl2 in the Δsre1 mutant further supports the idea that Sre1 contributes to sustain early steps of sterol biosynthesis during stress. A reduction in lanosterol production would be expected to impact the downstream reactions needed to restore sterol levels. The gene g1347 encodes Delta 14-sterol reductase (Erg24), which catalyzes a reduction step post-lanosterol production of the ergosterol pathway. In A. fumigatus, two ERG24 paralogs have been identified, in which a conditional double mutant showed defects in ergosterol biosynthesis and growth. The severe growth defect in this mutant could be rescued by supplementation of metal ions or by overexpressing ion transporters, indicating that Erg24 activity is associated with ion homeostasis [73]. Related to this, the gene g4256, which encodes a potential Cation diffusion facilitator family transporter, was downregulated exclusively in the mutant under CoCl2 treatment. Therefore, the downregulation of g1347 in the Δsre1 mutant under clotrimazole and CoCl2 and of g4256 under CoCl2 is consistent with a reduced capacity to maintain sterol and membrane homeostasis in the absence of Sre1. Finally, the gene g904 encodes a Sterol 24-C-methyltransferase, which generally catalyzes the conversion of zymosterol to fecosterol, which occurs several steps downstream of lanosterol production [74]. However, in basidiomycetes such as C. neoformans, this enzyme also participates in an alternative pathway that converts lanosterol into eburicol, also leading to ergosterol, and its inhibition disrupts ergosterol homeostasis [75]. In this alternative pathway, Sterol 24-C-methyltransferase functions upstream of the azole target Lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase (Cyp51), highlighting its relevance in azole-related antifungal responses [76]. Taken together, these patterns are consistent with the idea that basal Sre1 activity supports multiple points of the ergosterol pathway, from the initial production of lanosterol to later modification steps, thereby contributing to membrane and sterol homeostasis during stress.
In addition, the downregulation of carbohydrate-modifying enzymes encoding genes, such as Glycosyltransferase family 25 (g806), Glycoside hydrolase superfamily (g5034), L-rhamnonate dehydratase (g1192), and Alpha-amylase 1 (g5613), in the Δsre1 mutant under clotrimazole and CoCl2 exposure suggests a broader association between basal Sre1 activity and transcriptional programs related to carbon metabolism during stress. This interpretation is consistent with the KEGG-based functional classification of DEGs, where Carbohydrate metabolism, Other carbohydrate metabolism, and Central carbohydrate metabolism were among the most represented categories in the mutant under both treatments (Figure 6). Omics studies in Candida and other yeasts have shown that antifungal treatment frequently reshapes metabolic pathways being carbohydrate metabolism consistently affected [77], and the Sre1-dependent changes observed in this work are in line with such a metabolically centered adaptation to clotrimazole and CoCl2 stress. The reduced expression of these genes in the absence of Sre1 may indicate an impaired ability to redirect carbon fluxes under stress, thereby limiting the metabolic flexibility required for an effective response to clotrimazole and CoCl2. Interestingly, g750 was upregulated in the Δsre1 mutant under CoCl2. This gene encodes ATP-citrate lyase, which plays a key role linking carbohydrate metabolism to lipid synthesis. This enzyme converts citrate into acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate, and acetyl-CoA is required for fatty acid and sterol biosynthesis [78]. Then, even though this gene may represent a direct Sre1 target, its upregulation in the Δsre1 mutant under CoCl2 likely reflects Sre1-independent compensatory transcriptional regulation.
It is also noteworthy that gene g944, which encodes an RTA1 domain-containing protein, was upregulated under both clotrimazole and CoCl2, and that gene g2548, which encodes an MFS general substrate transporter, was upregulated under CoCl2. RTA1-domain-containing proteins have been implicated in antimicrobial resistance and secretion-related functions in C. neoformans [79], and the upregulation of genes encoding members of the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) has been associated with azole resistance in C. albicans [80]. Therefore, although g944 and g2548 may represent direct Sre1 targets, their upregulation in the Δsre1 mutant in clotrimazole and CoCl2 treatments likely reflects compensatory transcriptional mechanisms operating independently of Sre1.

4. Conclusions

Comparative transcriptomic analysis revealed that, under the tested conditions, loss of Sre1 in P. rhodozyma had only a minor impact on the early hypoxic transcriptional response, suggesting that Sre1 is not a dominant regulator of hypoxia-associated gene expression during short-term oxygen limitation in this yeast. In contrast, clear Sre1-associated transcriptional changes were detected under clotrimazole treatment and, to a lesser extent, following CoCl2 exposure, predominantly affecting genes related to membrane-associated processes and central metabolism. These patterns are consistent with the mode of action of the applied treatments, as clotrimazole directly targets sterol biosynthesis, whereas hypoxia and CoCl2 are expected to influence lipid metabolism more indirectly and in a time-dependent manner. Despite the limitations imposed by the sensitivity of the Δsre1 mutant to these treatments, the short-term treatments used in this study allowed for the identification of putative Sre1-associated transcriptional responses. Together, these results suggest that in P. rhodozyma, Sre1 plays a more prominent role in transcriptional responses to perturbations of sterol biosynthesis than in the early hypoxic response. These findings provide a framework for future studies exploring a broader range of treatment conditions and growth states, combined with targeted gene expression analyses and complementary functional approaches, to further clarify the role of Sre1 in stress-associated transcriptional regulation in this yeast.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof12030200/s1, Table S1. FASTQ file statistics and quality control summary. Table S2. Log2 fold change strain1_condition versus strain2_condition and BLASTp hits. Table S3. Genes exhibiting significantly greater transcriptional changes in the Δsre1 mutant than in the WT across treatments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A. and M.B.; Data curation, M.B.; Formal analysis, M.B., M.S.G., M.G. and J.A.; Funding acquisition, J.A.; Investigation, M.S.G., M.G., J.A., and M.B.; Methodology, M.S.G., J.A., and M.B.; Project administration, M.B. and J.A.; Supervision, M.B. and J.A.; Writing—original draft, J.A. and M.B.; Writing—review and editing, M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Grant Fondecyt 1220384 from the Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Chile.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information BioProject: PRJNA966154 and as supplementary materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CloClotrimazole
CobCobalt chloride, CoCl2
DEGsDifferentially Expressed Genes
DwDEGsDownregulated Differentially Expressed Genes
EREndoplasmic Reticulum
GOGene Ontology
HypHypoxia
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
NorNormoxia
SRESterol Regulatory Element
SREBPSterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein
UpDEGsUpregulated Differentially Expressed Genes
WTWild-type

References

  1. Higuera-Ciapara, I.; Félix-Valenzuela, L.; Goycoolea, F.M. Astaxanthin: A review of its chemistry and applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Galasso, C.; Corinaldesi, C.; Sansone, C. Carotenoids from Marine Organisms: Biological Functions and Industrial Applications. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sun, J.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, L.; Yang, F. Advances and trends for astaxanthin synthesis in Phaffia rhodozyma. Microb. Cell Fact. 2025, 24, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, C.; Chen, X.; Too, H.P. Microbial astaxanthin biosynthesis: Recent achievements, challenges, and commercialization outlook. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 5725–5737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Libkind, D.; Moline, M.; van Broock, M. Production of the UVB-absorbing compound mycosporine-glutaminol-glucoside by Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous (Phaffia rhodozyma). FEMS Yeast Res. 2011, 11, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Contreras, G.; Barahona, S.; Sepúlveda, D.; Baeza, M.; Cifuentes, V.; Alcaíno, J. Identification and analysis of metabolite production with biotechnological potential in Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous isolates. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 31, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schroeder, W.A.; Johnson, E.A. Singlet Oxygen and Peroxyl Radicals Regulate Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Phaffia rhodozyma. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 18374–18379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schroeder, W.A.; Johnson, E.A. Carotenoids protect Phaffia rhodozyma against singlet oxygen damage. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1995, 14, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nakayama, K.; Kataoka, N. Regulation of Gene Expression under Hypoxic Conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kindrick, J.D.; Mole, D.R. Hypoxic Regulation of Gene Transcription and Chromatin: Cause and Effect. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Butler, G. Hypoxia and gene expression in eukaryotic microbes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 67, 291–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Grahl, N.; Shepardson, K.M.; Chung, D.; Cramer, R.A. Hypoxia and fungal pathogenesis: To air or not to air. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 560–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chung, H.; Lee, Y.H. Hypoxia: A Double-Edged Sword During Fungal Pathogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ernst, J.F.; Tielker, D. Responses to hypoxia in fungal pathogens. Cell. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Synnott, J.M.; Guida, A.; Mulhern-Haughey, S.; Higgins, D.G.; Butler, G. Regulation of the hypoxic response in Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9, 1734–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Burgain, A.; Tebbji, F.; Khemiri, I.; Sellam, A. Metabolic Reprogramming in the Opportunistic Yeast Candida albicans in Response to Hypoxia. mSphere 2020, 5, e00913-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, H.; Bien, C.M.; Hughes, A.L.; Espenshade, P.J.; Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Chang, Y.C. Cobalt chloride, a hypoxia-mimicking agent, targets sterol synthesis in the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 65, 1018–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gleason, J.E.; Corrigan, D.J.; Cox, J.E.; Reddi, A.R.; McGinnis, L.A.; Culotta, V.C. Analysis of hypoxia and hypoxia-like states through metabolite profiling. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Monk, B.C.; Keniya, M.V. Roles for structural biology in the discovery of drugs and agrochemicals targeting sterol 14α-demethylases. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rosam, K.; Monk, B.C.; Lackner, M. Sterol 14α-Demethylase Ligand-Binding Pocket-Mediated Acquired and Intrinsic Azole Resistance in Fungal Pathogens. J. Fungi 2020, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Song, L.; Wang, S.; Zou, H.; Yi, X.; Jia, S.; Li, R.; Song, J. Regulation of Ergosterol Biosynthesis in Pathogenic Fungi: Opportunities for Therapeutic Development. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Eberlé, D.; Hegarty, B.; Bossard, P.; Ferré, P.; Foufelle, F. SREBP transcription factors: Master regulators of lipid homeostasis. Biochimie 2004, 86, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hughes, A.L.; Todd, B.L.; Espenshade, P.J. SREBP Pathway Responds to Sterols and Functions as an Oxygen Sensor in Fission Yeast. Cell 2005, 120, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Todd, B.L.; Stewart, E.V.; Burg, J.S.; Hughes, A.L.; Espenshade, P.J. Sterol regulatory element binding protein is a principal regulator of anaerobic gene expression in fission yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 26, 2817–2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Miao, H.; Liu, Q.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, W.; Liu, K.; Gao, X.; Huo, Y.; Chen, S.; Kato, T.; Sakamoto, N.; et al. AMPKα Subunit Ssp2 and Glycogen Synthase Kinases Gsk3/Gsk31 are involved in regulation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) activity in fission yeast. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chang, Y.C.; Bien, C.M.; Lee, H.; Espenshade, P.J.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. Sre1p, a regulator of oxygen sensing and sterol homeostasis, is required for virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 64, 614–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bien, C.M.; Espenshade, P.J. Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Proteins in Fungi: Hypoxic Transcription Factors Linked to Pathogenesis. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chung, D.; Haas, H.; Cramer, R.A. Coordination of hypoxia adaptation and iron homeostasis in human pathogenic fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Blosser, S.J.; Merriman, B.; Grahl, N.; Chung, D.; Cramer, R.A. Two C4-sterol methyl oxidases (Erg25) catalyse ergosterol intermediate demethylation and impact environmental stress adaptation in Aspergillus fumigatus. Microbiology 2014, 160, 2492–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Willger, S.D.; Puttikamonkul, S.; Kim, K.H.; Burritt, J.B.; Grahl, N.; Metzler, L.J.; Barbuch, R.; Bard, M.; Lawrence, C.B.; Cramer, R.A. A sterol-regulatory element binding protein is required for cell polarity, hypoxia adaptation, azole drug resistance, and virulence in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chung, D.; Barker, B.M.; Carey, C.C.; Merriman, B.; Werner, E.R.; Lechner, B.E.; Dhingra, S.; Cheng, C.; Xu, W.; Blosser, S.J.; et al. ChIP-seq and in vivo transcriptome analyses of the Aspergillus fumigatus SREBP SrbA reveals a new regulator of the fungal hypoxia response and virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Choi, J.; Chung, H.; Lee, G.W.; Koh, S.K.; Chae, S.K.; Lee, Y.H. Genome-Wide Analysis of Hypoxia-Responsive Genes in the Rice Blast Fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yuan, Y.; Cao, S.; Sun, J.; Hou, J.; Zhang, M.; Qin, Q.; Li, G. Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein Sre1 Mediates the Development and Pathogenicity of the Grey Mould Fungus Botrytis cinerea. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gutiérrez, M.S.; Campusano, S.; González, A.M.; Gómez, M.; Barahona, S.; Sepúlveda, D.; Espenshade, P.J.; Fernández-Lobato, M.; Baeza, M.; Cifuentes, V.; et al. Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein (Sre1) Promotes the Synthesis of Carotenoids and Sterols in Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gómez, M.; Campusano, S.; Gutiérrez, M.S.; Sepúlveda, D.; Barahona, S.; Baeza, M.; Cifuentes, V.; Alcaíno, J. Sterol regulatory element-binding protein Sre1 regulates carotenogenesis in the red yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. J. Lipid Res. 2020, 61, 1658–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gómez, M.; Baeza, M.; Cifuentes, V.; Alcaíno, J. The SREBP (Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein) pathway: A regulatory bridge between carotenogenesis and sterol biosynthesis in the carotenogenic yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Biol. Res. 2021, 54, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chomczynski, P.; Sacchi, N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 162, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Baeza, M.; Gómez, M.; Barahona, S.; Coche-Miranda, M.; Apariz, G.; Alcaíno, J. Comparative Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal Potential Stp1 Regulatory Roles Independent of Sre1 in Phaffia rhodozyma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 12008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liao, Y.; Smyth, G.K.; Shi, W. The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R. 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rsamtools: Binary Alignment (BAM), FASTA, Variant Call (BCF), and Tabix File Import. R Package Version 2.16.0. Available online: https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/Rsamtools.html (accessed on 10 March 2025).
  43. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Moriya, Y.; Itoh, M.; Okuda, S.; Yoshizawa, A.C.; Kanehisa, M. KAAS: An automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W182–W185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Suzuki, S.; Kakuta, M.; Ishida, T.; Akiyama, Y. GHOSTX: An improved sequence homology search algorithm using a query suffix array and a database suffix array. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. McKinney, W. Data structures for statistical computing in Python. Proc. Python Sci. Conf. 2010, 445, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hunter, J.D. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007, 9, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Waskom, M. seaborn: Statistical data visualization. J. Open Source Softw. 2021, 6, 3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Harris, C.R.; Millman, K.J.; van der Walt, S.J.; Gommers, R.; Virtanen, P.; Cournapeau, D.; Wieser, E.; Taylor, J.; Berg, S.; Smith, N.J.; et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 2020, 585, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Setiadi, E.R.; Doedt, T.; Cottier, F.; Noffz, C.; Ernst, J.F. Transcriptional response of Candida albicans to hypoxia: Linkage of oxygen sensing and Efg1p-regulatory networks. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 361, 399–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Barker, B.M.; Kroll, K.; Vödisch, M.; Mazurie, A.; Kniemeyer, O.; Cramer, R.A. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of the Aspergillus fumigatus hypoxia response using an oxygen-controlled fermenter. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hommel, B.; Sturny-Leclère, A.; Volant, S.; Veluppillai, N.; Duchateau, M.; Yu, C.-H.; Hourdel, V.; Varet, H.; Matondo, M.; Perfect, J.R.; et al. Cryptococcus neoformans resists to drastic conditions by switching to viable but non-culturable cell phenotype. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gumá-Cintrón, Y.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Rosado, W.; Shu-Hu, W.; Nadathur, G.S. Transcriptomic analysis of cobalt stress in the marine yeast Debaryomyces hansenii. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, fov099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lima, P.D.S.; Chung, D.; Bailao, A.M.; Cramer, R.A.; Soares, C.M.D.A. Characterization of the Paracoccidioides hypoxia response reveals new insights into pathogenesis mechanisms of this important human pathogenic fungus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0004282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mattila, H.K.; Mäkinen, M.; Lundell, T. Hypoxia is regulating enzymatic wood decomposition and intracellular carbohydrate metabolism in filamentous white rot fungus. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cho, J.-Y.; Jeffries, T.W. Transcriptional control of ADH genes in the xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 2363–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gutiérrez-Corona, J.F.; González-Hernández, G.A.; Padilla-Guerrero, I.E.; Olmedo-Monfil, V.; Martínez-Rocha, A.L.; Patiño-Medina, J.A.; Meza-Carmen, V.; Torres-Guzmán, J.C. Fungal Alcohol Dehydrogenases: Physiological Function, Molecular Properties, Regulation of Their Production, and Biotechnological Potential. Cells 2023, 12, 2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chien, L.J.; Lee, C.K. Expression of bacterial hemoglobin in the yeast, Pichia pastoris, with a low O2-induced promoter. Biotechnol. Lett. 2005, 27, 1491–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhou, H.; Wang, Z.; Qian, J. Engineering of the hypoxia-induced Pichia stipitis ADH2 promoter to construct a promoter library for Pichia pastoris. J. Biotechnol. 2023, 376, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rintala, E.; Toivari, M.; Pitkänen, J.P.; Wiebe, M.G.; Ruohonen, L.; Penttilä, M. Low oxygen levels as a trigger for enhancement of respiratory metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Voos, W.; Röttgers, K. Molecular chaperones as essential mediators of mitochondrial biogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1592, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wolmarans, A.; Lee, B.; Spyracopoulos, L.; LaPointe, P. The Mechanism of Hsp90 ATPase Stimulation by Aha1. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Link, T.; Lohaus, G.; Heiser, I.; Mendgen, K.; Hahn, M.; Voegele, R.T. Characterization of a novel NADP(+)-dependent D-arabitol dehydrogenase from the plant pathogen Uromyces fabae. Biochem. J. 2005, 389, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  64. Klein, T.; Bischoff, R. Physiology and pathophysiology of matrix metalloproteases. Amino Acids 2011, 41, 271–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Stadler, J.A.; Schweyen, R.J. The yeast iron regulon is induced upon cobalt stress and crucial for cobalt tolerance. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 39649–39654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hokken, M.W.J.; Coolen, J.P.M.; Steenbreker, H.; Zoll, J.; Baltussen, T.J.H.; Verweij, P.E.; Melchers, W.J.G. The Transcriptome Response to Azole Compounds in Aspergillus fumigatus Shows Differential Gene Expression across Pathways Essential for Azole Resistance and Cell Survival. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Paul, S.; Diekema, D.; Moye-Rowley, W.S. Contributions of Aspergillus fumigatus ATP-binding cassette transporter proteins to drug resistance and virulence. Eukaryot. Cell 2013, 12, 1619–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Song, J.; Zhang, S.; Lu, L. Fungal cytochrome P450 protein Cyp51: What we can learn from its evolution, regulons and Cyp51-based azole resistance. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2018, 32, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Schmidt, I.; Schewe, H.; Gassel, S.; Jin, C.; Buckingham, J.; Hümbelin, M.; Sandmann, G.; Schrader, J. Biotechnological production of astaxanthin with Phaffia rhodozyma/Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 89, 555–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. González, A.M.; Venegas, M.; Barahona, S.; Gómez, M.; Gutiérrez, M.S.; Sepúlveda, D.; Baeza, M.; Cifuentes, V.; Alcaíno, J. Damage response protein 1 (Dap1) functions in the synthesis of carotenoids and sterols in Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. J. Lipid Res. 2022, 63, 100175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. He, D.; Feng, Z.; Gao, S.; Wei, Y.; Han, S.; Wang, L. Contribution of NADPH-cytochrome P450 Reductase to Azole Resistance in Fusarium oxysporum. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 709942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Lv, Q.; Yan, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y. The Fungal CYP51s: Their Functions, Structures, Related Drug Resistance, and Inhibitors. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Li, Y.; Dai, M.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, L. The sterol C-14 reductase Erg24 is responsible for ergosterol biosynthesis and ion homeostasis in Aspergillus fumigatus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 1253–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hu, Z.; He, B.; Ma, L.; Sun, Y.; Niu, Y.; Zeng, B. Recent Advances in Ergosterol Biosynthesis and Regulation Mechanisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Indian J. Microbiol. 2017, 57, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nes, W.D.; Zhou, W.; Ganapathy, K.; Liu, J.; Vatsyayan, R.; Chamala, S.; Hernandez, K.; Miranda, M. Sterol 24-C-methyltransferase: An enzymatic target for the disruption of ergosterol biosynthesis and homeostasis in Cryptococcus neoformans. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2009, 481, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Xie, J.; Rybak, J.M.; Martin-Vicente, A.; Guruceaga, X.; Thorn, H.I.; Nywening, A.V.; Ge, W.; Parker, J.E.; Kelly, S.L.; Rogers, P.D.; et al. The sterol C-24 methyltransferase encoding gene, erg6, is essential for viability of Aspergillus species. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ribeiro, G.F.; Denes, E.; Heaney, H.; Childers, D.S. What ‘Omics can tell us about antifungal adaptation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2022, 21, foab070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chávez-Cabrera, C.; Marsch, R.; Bartolo-Aguilar, Y.; Flores-Bustamante, Z.R.; Hidalgo-Lara, M.E.; Martínez-Cárdenas, A.; Cancino-Díaz, J.C.; Sánchez, S.; Flores-Cotera, L.B. Molecular cloning and characterization of the ATP citrate lyase from carotenogenic yeast Phaffia rhodozyma. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, fov054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  79. Smith-Peavler, E.S.; Patel, R.; Onumajuru, A.M.; Bowring, B.G.; Miller, J.L.; Brunel, J.M.; Djordjevic, J.T.; Prabu, M.M.; McClelland, E.E. RTA1 Is Involved in Resistance to 7-Aminocholesterol and Secretion of Fungal Proteins in Cryptococcus neoformans. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. White, T.C. Increased mRNA levels of ERG16, CDR, and MDR1 correlate with increases in azole resistance in Candida albicans isolates from a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 1482–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Comparative analysis of transcriptional response of P. rhodozyma to different treatments. The transcriptomes of the wild-type strain under hypoxic (Hyp), CoCl2 (Cob), and clotrimazole (Clo) treatments were compared to those of the untreated control. (A) Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Significance thresholds are indicated by dashed lines (|log2FC| ≥ 1.0, padj ≤ 0.05). (B) Upset plot displaying exclusive and overlapping down-regulated (Dw) and up-regulated (Up) DEGs among treatments. Classification of DEGs with KEGG pathways (C) and functional modules (D). Circle size represents the number of DEGs, and circle color indicates the average log2FC.
Figure 1. Comparative analysis of transcriptional response of P. rhodozyma to different treatments. The transcriptomes of the wild-type strain under hypoxic (Hyp), CoCl2 (Cob), and clotrimazole (Clo) treatments were compared to those of the untreated control. (A) Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Significance thresholds are indicated by dashed lines (|log2FC| ≥ 1.0, padj ≤ 0.05). (B) Upset plot displaying exclusive and overlapping down-regulated (Dw) and up-regulated (Up) DEGs among treatments. Classification of DEGs with KEGG pathways (C) and functional modules (D). Circle size represents the number of DEGs, and circle color indicates the average log2FC.
Jof 12 00200 g001
Figure 2. Highly differentially expressed genes in P. rhodozyma under hypoxic and CoCl2 treatments. Volcano plots show genes exclusively regulated under (A) hypoxia (Hyp) and (B) CoCl2 (Cob) treatments, with the top five up- and downregulated genes labeled. Significance thresholds are indicated by dashed lines (|log2FC| ≥ 1.0, padj ≤ 0.05). (C) Heatmap of genes commonly regulated under both treatments: log2FC value (circle color) and |log2FC| value (circle size).
Figure 2. Highly differentially expressed genes in P. rhodozyma under hypoxic and CoCl2 treatments. Volcano plots show genes exclusively regulated under (A) hypoxia (Hyp) and (B) CoCl2 (Cob) treatments, with the top five up- and downregulated genes labeled. Significance thresholds are indicated by dashed lines (|log2FC| ≥ 1.0, padj ≤ 0.05). (C) Heatmap of genes commonly regulated under both treatments: log2FC value (circle color) and |log2FC| value (circle size).
Jof 12 00200 g002
Figure 3. Transcriptional response of the P. rhodozyma Δsre1 mutant and wild-type (WT) under different treatments. Transcriptomes from normoxic (Nor), hypoxic (Hyp), cobalt chloride (Cob), and clotrimazole (Clo) conditions were compared with the untreated WT control. (A) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the Δsre1 mutant. Significance thresholds are indicated by dashed lines (|log2FC| ≥ 1.0, padj ≤ 0.05). (B) UpSet plot showing exclusive and shared downregulated (Dw) and upregulated (Up) DEGs among treatments in the Δsre1 mutant. (CE) UpSet plots showing exclusive and shared DwDEGs and UpDEGs between the Δsre1 mutant and WT under each treatment.
Figure 3. Transcriptional response of the P. rhodozyma Δsre1 mutant and wild-type (WT) under different treatments. Transcriptomes from normoxic (Nor), hypoxic (Hyp), cobalt chloride (Cob), and clotrimazole (Clo) conditions were compared with the untreated WT control. (A) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the Δsre1 mutant. Significance thresholds are indicated by dashed lines (|log2FC| ≥ 1.0, padj ≤ 0.05). (B) UpSet plot showing exclusive and shared downregulated (Dw) and upregulated (Up) DEGs among treatments in the Δsre1 mutant. (CE) UpSet plots showing exclusive and shared DwDEGs and UpDEGs between the Δsre1 mutant and WT under each treatment.
Jof 12 00200 g003
Figure 4. Differentially expressed genes across KEGG metabolic pathways and functional modules. (A) KEGG pathways and (B) KEGG modules. The heatmaps show the number of DEGs (circle size) and the average log2FC (circle color) for each category in the Δsre1 mutant and wild-type (WT) under normoxia (Nor), and clotrimazole (Clo), cobalt chloride (Cob), and hypoxia (Hyp) treatments.
Figure 4. Differentially expressed genes across KEGG metabolic pathways and functional modules. (A) KEGG pathways and (B) KEGG modules. The heatmaps show the number of DEGs (circle size) and the average log2FC (circle color) for each category in the Δsre1 mutant and wild-type (WT) under normoxia (Nor), and clotrimazole (Clo), cobalt chloride (Cob), and hypoxia (Hyp) treatments.
Jof 12 00200 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of genes exhibiting significantly greater transcriptional changes in the Δsre1 mutant than in the WT across clotrimazole (Clo), cobalt chloride (Cob), and hypoxia (Hyp) treatments. Analyses were conducted using all selected genes and were further classified into categories of strong (|log2FC| ≥ 1.5), moderate (1.3 > |log2FC| ≥ 1.0), and low (|log2FC| < 1.0) transcriptional changes.
Figure 5. Comparison of genes exhibiting significantly greater transcriptional changes in the Δsre1 mutant than in the WT across clotrimazole (Clo), cobalt chloride (Cob), and hypoxia (Hyp) treatments. Analyses were conducted using all selected genes and were further classified into categories of strong (|log2FC| ≥ 1.5), moderate (1.3 > |log2FC| ≥ 1.0), and low (|log2FC| < 1.0) transcriptional changes.
Jof 12 00200 g005
Figure 6. Classification of genes significantly expressed in the Δsre1 mutant versus WT under different treatments. (A) KEGG pathways, (B) KEGG modules. The heatmaps show the number of DEGs (circle size) and the average log2FC (circle color) for each category in the Δsre1 mutant under (Clo), cobalt chloride (Cob), and hypoxia (Hyp) treatments.
Figure 6. Classification of genes significantly expressed in the Δsre1 mutant versus WT under different treatments. (A) KEGG pathways, (B) KEGG modules. The heatmaps show the number of DEGs (circle size) and the average log2FC (circle color) for each category in the Δsre1 mutant under (Clo), cobalt chloride (Cob), and hypoxia (Hyp) treatments.
Jof 12 00200 g006
Table 1. Direct Sre1 targets differentially expressed in the Δsre1 mutant versus the WT under normoxic conditions, and their log2 fold change values in the WT under each treatment.
Table 1. Direct Sre1 targets differentially expressed in the Δsre1 mutant versus the WT under normoxic conditions, and their log2 fold change values in the WT under each treatment.
Δsre1_NorWT_CloWT_CobWT_Hyp
GeneProtein (KEGG Module Level 2)log2padjlog2padjlog2padjlog2padj
g1347Delta 14-sterol reductase, Erg24 (Sterol biosynthesis)−1.87.4 × 10−90.21.0 × 1000.09.8 × 10−10.27.1 × 10−1
g1377Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis)−1.05.3 × 10−30.01.0 × 100−0.28.2 × 10−1−1.23.0 × 10−6
g190Lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase (Sterol biosynthesis)−1.13.2 × 10−20.21.0 × 100−0.46.9 × 10−10.85.8 × 10−2
g3516Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase (Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis)−1.51.6 × 10−20.41.0 × 1000.56.5 × 10−1−1.31.2 × 10−2
g3611Lanosterol synthase (Sterol biosynthesis)−1.37.5 × 10−40.11.0 × 1000.09.7 × 10−1−0.54.5 × 10−1
g5794Delta(7)-sterol 5(6)-desaturase, Erg3 (Sterol biosynthesis)−1.03.9 × 10−2−0.11.0 × 100−0.27.2 × 10−10.52.2 × 10−1
g602Methylsterol monooxygenase, Erg25 (Sterol biosynthesis)−1.63.9 × 10−20.01.0 × 100−0.37.1 × 10−10.09.8 × 10−1
g904Sterol 24-C-methyltransferase (Sterol biosynthesis)−1.91.7 × 10−40.51.0 × 1000.65.6 × 10−1−0.82.6 × 10−1
g4728Sterol regulatory element binding protein−2.01.5 × 10−18−0.11.0 × 100−0.27.8 × 10−1−0.91.8 × 10−4
Table 2. Direct Sre1 targets that showed differential expression in the Δsre1 mutant versus the WT under the same conditions.
Table 2. Direct Sre1 targets that showed differential expression in the Δsre1 mutant versus the WT under the same conditions.
Δsre1 vs. WT (Hyp) Δsre1 vs. WT (Cob) Δsre1 vs. WT (Clo)
Gene BLASTp Hit log2padj log2padj log2padj
g190Lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase, Cyp51 −1.61.5 × 10−5
g750ATP-citrate lyase 1.72.2 × 10−6
g806Glycosyltransferase family 25 −3.81.0 × 10−5−4.33.6 × 10−65
g904Sterol 24-C-methyltransferase−1.62.7 × 10−2−2.51.5 × 10−8−1.92.3 × 10−9
g943NAD(P)-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase2.26.3 × 10−3
g944RTA1 domain-containing protein 2.14.4 × 10−93.03.0 × 10−12
g1192L-rhamnonate dehydratase −2.41.1 × 10−38−1.72.3 × 10−8
g1193Hypothetical protein_g1193 −2.35.3 × 10−6−1.53.7 × 10−3
g1347Delta(14)-sterol reductase (Erg24)−1.83.7 × 10−3−1.43.8 × 10−9−1.37.6 × 10−6
g1377Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase −1.58.6 × 10−10−1.13.9 × 10−6
g2548MFS general substrate transporter 1.95.4 × 10−19
g3516 *Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Synthase−1.32.4 × 10−2−2.94.4 × 10−13−1.57.8 × 10−5
g3611Lanosterol synthase (Erg7) −1.33.4 × 10−6
g4112Hypothetical protein_g4112 −1.46.8 × 10−10
g4256Cation diffusion facilitator family transporter/Metal tolerance protein −1.68.3 × 10−4
g5034Glycoside hydrolase superfamily −1.25.4 × 10−7−1.51.3 × 10−6
g5613Alpha-amylase −3.51.3 × 10−17−2.24.3 × 10−6
g5758ATP-dependent permease1.92.2 × 10−2
g5928Cytochrome P450 reductase −1.33.6 × 10−5
All genes included in this Table were exclusively differentially expressed in the Δsre1 mutant under the conditions tested, except for g3516 (indicated with an *), which was differentially expressed in the WT, but to a lesser extent than in the mutant under hypoxia. Clotrimazole (Clo), cobalt chloride (Cob), and hypoxia (Hyp) treatments.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baeza, M.; Gutiérrez, M.S.; Gómez, M.; Alcaíno, J. Transcriptomic Insights into Sre1-Related Regulatory Responses to Hypoxia, Cobalt Chloride, and Clotrimazole in Phaffia rhodozyma. J. Fungi 2026, 12, 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12030200

AMA Style

Baeza M, Gutiérrez MS, Gómez M, Alcaíno J. Transcriptomic Insights into Sre1-Related Regulatory Responses to Hypoxia, Cobalt Chloride, and Clotrimazole in Phaffia rhodozyma. Journal of Fungi. 2026; 12(3):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12030200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baeza, Marcelo, María Soledad Gutiérrez, Melissa Gómez, and Jennifer Alcaíno. 2026. "Transcriptomic Insights into Sre1-Related Regulatory Responses to Hypoxia, Cobalt Chloride, and Clotrimazole in Phaffia rhodozyma" Journal of Fungi 12, no. 3: 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12030200

APA Style

Baeza, M., Gutiérrez, M. S., Gómez, M., & Alcaíno, J. (2026). Transcriptomic Insights into Sre1-Related Regulatory Responses to Hypoxia, Cobalt Chloride, and Clotrimazole in Phaffia rhodozyma. Journal of Fungi, 12(3), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12030200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop