The Four Critical Priority Fungi According to the World Health Organization and the Hope for New Therapies: A Focus on Cell Wall Antifungal Targets
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. General Characteristics
1.2. Fungal Cell Wall
2. Cryptococcus Neoformans
2.1. New Treatment Options: Nanomedicine and Drug Combinations
2.2. Fosmanogepix and Cryptococcus neoformans
2.3. Natural Products
2.4. Other Molecules and Vaccines
3. Candidozyma auris
3.1. New Treatment Options: Nanomedicine and Drug Combinations
3.2. Natural Products
3.3. New Antifungal Drugs
3.4. Other Molecules and Vaccines
4. Aspergillus fumigatus
4.1. New Treatment Options: Nanomedicine and Drug Combinations
4.2. Drugs in Use or Under Investigation
4.3. Natural Products
5. Candida albicans
5.1. New Treatment Options: Nanomedicine and Drug Combinations
5.2. Natural Products
5.3. New Antifungal Drugs
5.4. Other Molecules and Vaccines
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brown, G.D.; Ballou, E.R.; Bates, S.; Bignell, E.M.; Borman, A.M.; Brand, A.C.; Brown, A.J.P.; Coelho, C.; Cook, P.C.; Farrer, R.A.; et al. The Pathobiology of Human Fungal Infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024, 22, 687–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kriegl, L.; Egger, M.; Boyer, J.; Hoenigl, M.; Krause, R. New Treatment Options for Critically Important WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2024, 31, 922–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carvalho, G.C.; Sábio, R.M.; de Cássia Ribeiro, T.; Monteiro, A.S.; Pereira, D.V.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; Chorilli, M. Highlights in Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as a Multifunctional Controlled Drug Delivery Nanoplatform for Infectious Diseases Treatment. Pharm. Res. 2020, 37, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. WHO Fungal Priority List to Guide, Development and Public Health Action; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 1–48. [Google Scholar]
- Baddley, J.W.; Chen, S.C.A.; Huisingh, C.; Benedict, K.; Debess, E.E.; Galanis, E.; Jackson, B.R.; Macdougall, L.; Marsden-Haug, N.; Oltean, H.; et al. MSG07: An International Cohort Study Comparing Epidemiology and Outcomes of Patients with Cryptococcus neoformans or Cryptococcus Gattii Infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, 1133–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diniz-Lima, I.; Fonseca, L.M.D.; da Silva-Junior, E.B.; Guimarães-de-Oliveira, J.C.; Freire-de-Lima, L.; Nascimento, D.O.; Morrot, A.; Previato, J.O.; Mendonça-Previato, L.; Decote-Ricardo, D.; et al. Cryptococcus: History, Epidemiology and Immune Evasion. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Huthaifi, A.M.; Radman, B.A.; Al-Alawi, A.A.; Mahmood, F.; Liu, T.B. Mechanisms and Virulence Factors of Cryptococcus neoformans Dissemination to the Central Nervous System. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakotoarivelo, R.A.; Raberahona, M.; Rasamoelina, T.; Rabezanahary, A.; Rakotomalala, F.A.; Razafinambinintsoa, T.; Bénet, T.; Vanhems, P.; Randria, M.J.d.D.; Romanò, L.; et al. Epidemiological Characteristics of Cryptococcal Meningoencephalitis Associated with Cryptococcus neoformans Var. Grubii from Hiv-Infected Patients in Madagascar: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0007984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Aguiar, P.A.D.F.; Pedroso, R.D.S.; Borges, A.S.; Moreira, T.d.A.; De Araújo, L.B.; Röder, D.v.D.d.B. The Epidemiology of Cryptococcosis and the Characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans Isolated in a Brazilian University Hospital. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2017, 59, e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, S.; Lu, H.; Yu, H.; Wang, X.; Jia, X.; Tang, D.; Wu, L.; Huang, S.; et al. Epidemiology of Cryptococcal Meningitis and Fluconazole Heteroresistance in Cryptococcus neoformans Isolates from a Teaching Hospital in Southwestern China. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e0072524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.; Song, W.; Liu, L.; Qi, T.; Wang, Z.; Tang, Y.; Sun, J.; Xu, S.; Yang, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Trends in Clinico-Epidemiological Profile and Outcomes of Patients with HIV-Associated Cryptococcal Meningitis in Shanghai, China, 2013–2023. Viruses 2024, 16, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaakoub, H.; Courdavault, V.; Papon, N. The High-Osmolarity Glycerol (HOG) Pathway in Candida auris. mBio 2025, 16, e03538-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, R. Emergence of Resistant Candida auris. Lancet Microbe 2023, 4, e396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Hu, Z.D.; Zhao, X.M.; Zhao, W.N.; Feng, Z.X.; Yurkov, A.; Alwasel, S.; Boekhout, T.; Bensch, K.; Hui, F.L.; et al. Phylogenomic Analysis of the Candida auris- Candida Haemuli Clade and Related Taxa in the Metschnikowiaceae, and Proposal of Thirteen New Genera, Fifty-Five New Combinations and Nine New Species. Persoonia Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2024, 52, 22–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davi Marena, G.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Taborda, C.P. Candidozyma auris Alert in South America: An Epidemiological and Therapeutic Update. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2025, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Gaetano, S.; Midiri, A.; Mancuso, G.; Avola, M.G.; Biondo, C. Candida auris Outbreaks: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OYong, K.; Knight, W.; Nguyen, J.; Bhaurla, S.; Archer, R.; Rubin, Z. 2449. Attributable Mortality and Cause of Death of Candida auris Cases, Los County. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2023, 10, ofad500.2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benedict, K.; Forsberg, K.; Gold, J.A.W.; Baggs, J.; Lyman, M. Candida auris-Associated Hospitalizations, United States, 2017–2022. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2023, 29, 1485–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alanazi, K.H.; Roushdy, H.M.; ALzubaidi, W.I.; Alanazi, A.S.; Alanazi, N.M.; Alamri, A.H.; Alnshbah, Y.I.; Almatrafi, N.M.A.L.; Al Shahrani, Z.M.; Alanazi, A.S.; et al. An Overview of Healthcare-Associated Candida auris Outbreaks in Ministry of Health Hospitals-Saudi Arabia 2020-2022; Retrospective Multicentric Study. PLoS ONE 2025, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marena, G.D.; Carvalho, G.C.; Monazzi, L.C.S.; Maschio-Lima, T.; De Almeida, M.T.G.; Da Silva, J.L.M.; Fortunato, G.C.; Araújo, V.H.S.; Venancio, D.C.V.; Chang, M.R.; et al. Infection Caused by Candida auris: State of the Art. Mycosphere 2022, 13, 820–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, H.; Bing, J.; Hu, T.; Ennis, C.L.; Nobile, C.J.; Huang, G. Candida auris: Epidemiology, Biology, Antifungal Resistance, and Virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Araújo, I.F.; Ramos, R.S.; Matos, M.J.S.; Santos, C.B.R.D.; Maryam; Souto, R.N.P.; Ferreira, I.M. Natural Products Diversity from Genus Aspergillus: A Bioinformatics Study for Insecticidal Activity against the Aedes Aegypti Vector. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2025, 36, e-20240161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steenwyk, J.L.; Balamurugan, C.; Raja, H.A.; Gonçaves, C.; Li, N.; Martin, F.; Berman, J.; Oberlies, N.H.; Gibbons, J.G.; Goldman, G.H.; et al. Phylogenomics Reveals Extensive Misidentification of Fungal Strains from the Genus Aspergillus. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e0398023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanellopoulos, S.G.; Snelders, E. Moving beyond Multi-Triazole to Multi-Fungicide Resistance: Broader Selection of Drug Resistance in the Human Fungal Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Pathog. 2025, 21, e1012851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Zeng, M.; Zhou, X.; Huang, F.; Song, Z. Aspergillus fumigatus Escape Mechanisms from Its Harsh Survival Environments. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morrissey, C.O.; Kim, H.Y.; Duong, T.M.N.; Moran, E.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Denning, D.W.; Perfect, J.R.; Nucci, M.; Chakrabarti, A.; Rickerts, V.; et al. Aspergillus fumigatus-a Systematic Review to Inform the World Health Organization Priority List of Fungal Pathogens. Med. Mycol. 2024, 62, myad129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abou-Kandil, A.; Tröger-Görler, S.; Pschibul, A.; Krüger, T.; Rosin, M.; Schmidt, F.; Akbarimoghaddam, P.; Sarkar, A.; Cseresnyés, Z.; Shadkchan, Y.; et al. The Proteomic Response of Aspergillus fumigatus to Amphotericin B (AmB) Reveals the Involvement of the RTA-like Protein RtaA in AmB Resistance. MicroLife 2025, 6, uqae024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Earle, K.; Valero, C.; Conn, D.P.; Vere, G.; Cook, P.C.; Bromley, M.J.; Bowyer, P.; Gago, S. Pathogenicity and Virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus. Virulence 2023, 14, 2172264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borman, A.M.; Johnson, E.M. Name Changes for Fungi of Medical Importance, 2018 to 2019. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Talapko, J.; Juzbašić, M.; Matijević, T.; Pustijanac, E.; Bekić, S.; Kotris, I.; Škrlec, I. Candida albicans-the Virulence Factors and Clinical Manifestations of Infection. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaziano, R.; Sabbatini, S.; Monari, C. The Interplay between Candida albicans, Vaginal Mucosa, Host Immunity and Resident Microbiota in Health and Disease: An Overview and Future Perspectives. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Min, K.; Park, A. Shape-Shifting Mechanisms: Integrative Multi-Omics Insights Into Candida albicans Morphogenesis. Mycobiology 2025, 53, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salmanton-García, J.; Cornely, O.A.; Stemler, J.; Barać, A.; Steinmann, J.; Siváková, A.; Akalin, E.H.; Arikan-Akdagli, S.; Loughlin, L.; Toscano, C.; et al. Attributable Mortality of Candidemia—Results from the ECMM Candida III Multinational European Observational Cohort Study. J. Infect. 2024, 89, 106229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y. Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Candida albicans Bloodstream and Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. BIO Web Conf. 2024, 124, 02017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, D.L.; Lima, C.M.; Magalhães, V.C.R.; Baltazar, L.M.; Peres, N.T.A.; Caligiorne, R.B.; Moura, A.S.; Fereguetti, T.; Martins, J.C.; Rabelo, L.F.; et al. Fungal and Bacterial Coinfections Increase Mortality of Severely Ill COVID-19 Patients. J. Hosp. Infect. 2021, 113, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kessler, S.Q.S.; Lang, P.M.; Dal-Pizzol, T.S.; Montagner, F. Resistance Profiles to Antifungal Agents in Candida albicans Isolated from Human Oral Cavities: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022, 26, 6479–6489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramírez-Zavala, B.; Krüger, I.; Schwanfelder, S.; Barker, K.S.; Rogers, P.D.; Morschhäuser, J. The Zinc Cluster Transcription Factor Znc1 Regulates Rta3-Dependent Miltefosine Resistance in Candida albicans. mSphere 2024, 9, e0027024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sah, S.K.; Hayes, J.J.; Rustchenko, E. The Role of Aneuploidy in the Emergence of Echinocandin Resistance in Human Fungal Pathogen Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes, J.P.; Lionakis, M.S. Pathogenesis and Virulence of Candida albicans. Virulence 2022, 13, 89–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaffin, W.L. Candida albicans Cell Wall Proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008, 72, 495–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoshimi, A.; Miyazawa, K.; Abe, K. Cell Wall Structure and Biogenesis in Aspergillus Species. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2016, 80, 1700–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lima, S.L.; Colombo, A.L.; de Almeida Junior, J.N. Fungal Cell Wall: Emerging Antifungals and Drug Resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gow, N.A.R.; Latge, J.-P.; Munro, C.A. The Fungal Cell Wall: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5, 28513415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lord, A.K.; Vyas, J.M. Host Defenses to Fungal Pathogens. In Clinical immunology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- de Oliveira, H.C.; Rossi, S.A.; García-Barbazán, I.; Zaragoza, Ó.; Trevijano-Contador, N. Cell Wall Integrity Pathway Involved in Morphogenesis, Virulence and Antifungal Susceptibility in Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, P.; Heiss, C.; Santiago-Tirado, F.H.; Black, I.; Azadi, P.; Doering, T.L. Pbx Proteins in Cryptococcus neoformans Cell Wall Remodeling and Capsule Assembly. Eukaryot. Cell 2014, 13, 560–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukaremera, L. The Cryptococcus Wall: A Different Wall for a Unique Lifestyle. PLoS Pathog. 2023, 19, e1011141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casadevall, A.; Coelho, C.; Cordero, R.J.B.; Dragotakes, Q.; Jung, E.; Vij, R.; Wear, M.P. The Capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans. Virulence 2019, 10, 822–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Meara, T.R.; Andrew Alspaugh, J. The Cryptococcus neoformans Capsule: A Sword and a Shield. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 387–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Upadhya, R.; Lam, W.C.; Hole, C.R.; Vasselli, J.G.; Lodge, J.K. Cell Wall Composition in Cryptococcus neoformans Is Media Dependent and Alters Host Response, Inducing Protective Immunity. Front. Fungal Biol. 2023, 4, 1183291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, L.G.; Specht, C.A.; Lodge, J.K. Cell Wall Chitosan Is Necessary for Virulence in the Opportunistic Pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot. Cell 2011, 10, 1264–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ren, Z.; Chhetri, A.; Guan, Z.; Suo, Y.; Yokoyama, K.; Lee, S.Y. Structural Basis for Inhibition and Regulation of a Chitin Synthase from Candida albicans. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2022, 29, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hole, C.R.; Lam, W.C.; Upadhya, R.; Lodge, J.K. Cryptococcus neoformans Chitin Synthase 3 Plays a Critical Role in Dampening Host Inflammatory Responses. mBio 2020, 11, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Correia, A.; Lermann, U.; Teixeira, L.; Cerca, F.; Botelho, S.; Gil Da Costa, R.M.; Sampaio, P.; Gärtner, F.; Morschhäuser, J.; Vilanova, M.; et al. Limited Role of Secreted Aspartyl Proteinases Sap1 to Sap6 in Candida albicans Virulence and Host Immune Response in Murine Hematogenously Disseminated Candidiasis. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 4839–4849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Veni, A.; Lokeswari, T.S.; Pavithra, D.; Sugapriya, T. Melianone Inhibits Secreted Aspartic Proteases (SAP), a Virulence Factor During Hyphal Formation in Candida albicans. Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Des. 2022, 18, 327–336. [Google Scholar]
- Kryštůfek, R.; Šácha, P.; Starková, J.; Brynda, J.; Hradilek, M.; Tloušt’ová, E.; Grzymska, J.; Rut, W.; Boucher, M.J.; Drąg, M.; et al. Re-Emerging Aspartic Protease Targets: Examining Cryptococcus neoformans Major Aspartyl Peptidase 1 as a Target for Antifungal Drug Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 6706–6719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vernel-Pauillac, F.; Laurent-Winter, C.; Fiette, L.; Janbon, G.; Aimanianda, V.; Dromer, F. Cryptococcus neoformans Infections: Aspartyl Protease Potential to Improve Outcome in Susceptible Hosts. mBio 2024, 15, e0273324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Rubio, R.; de Oliveira, H.C.; Rivera, J.; Trevijano-Contador, N. The Fungal Cell Wall: Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus Species. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lenardon, M.D.; Sood, P.; Dorfmueller, H.C.; Brown, A.J.P.; Gow, N.A.R. Scalar Nanostructure of the Candida albicans Cell Wall; a Molecular, Cellular and Ultrastructural Analysis and Interpretation. Cell Surf. 2020, 6, 100047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazu, T.K.; Bricker, B.A.; Flores-Rozas, H.; Ablordeppey, S.Y. The Mechanistic Targets of Antifungal Agents: An Overview. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2016, 16, 555–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preechasuth, K.; Anderson, J.C.; Peck, S.C.; Brown, A.J.P.; Gow, N.A.R.; Lenardon, M.D. Cell Wall Protection by the Candida albicans Class I Chitin Synthases. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 82, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.; Robbins, N.; Cowen, L.E. Molecular Mechanisms Governing Antifungal Drug Resistance. Npj Antimicrob. Resist. 2023, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoyer, L.L.; Cota, E. Candida albicans Agglutinin-like Sequence (Als) Family Vignettes: A Review of Als Protein Structure and Function. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Groot, P.W.J.; Bader, O.; de Boer, A.D.; Weig, M.; Chauhan, N. Adhesins in Human Fungal Pathogens: Glue with Plenty of Stick. Eukaryot. Cell 2013, 12, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosiana, S.; Zhang, L.; Kim, G.H.; Revtovich, A.V.; Uthayakumar, D.; Sukumaran, A.; Geddes-McAlister, J.; Kirienko, N.V.; Shapiro, R.S. Comprehensive Genetic Analysis of Adhesin Proteins and Their Role in Virulence of Candida albicans. Genetics 2021, 217, iyab003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S.K.; Osmanoglu, Ö.; Minocha, R.; Bandi, S.R.; Bencurova, E.; Srivastava, M.; Dandekar, T. Genome-Wide Scan for Potential CD4+ T-Cell Vaccine Candidates in Candida auris by Exploiting Reverse Vaccinology and Evolutionary Information. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 1008527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Uppuluri, P.; Mamouei, Z.; Alqarihi, A.; Elhassan, H.; French, S.; Lockhart, S.R.; Chiller, T.; Edwards, J.E.; Ibrahim, A.S. The NDV-3A Vaccine Protects Mice from Multidrug Resistant Candida auris Infection. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balakumar, A.; Bernstein, D.; Thangamani, S. The Adhesin SCF1 Mediates Candida auris Colonization. Trends Microbiol. 2024, 32, 4–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, X.; Hurabielle, C.; Drummond, R.A.; Bouladoux, N.; Desai, J.V.; Sim, C.K.; Belkaid, Y.; Lionakis, M.S.; Segre, J.A. Murine Model of Colonization with Fungal Pathogen Candida auris to Explore Skin Tropism, Host Risk Factors and Therapeutic Strategies. Cell Host Microbe 2021, 29, 210–221.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, N.; Magdaleno, J.S.L.; Ranjan, S.; Wani, A.K.; Grewal, R.K.; Oliva, R.; Shaikh, A.R.; Cavallo, L.; Chawla, M. Secreted Aspartyl Proteinases Targeted Multi-Epitope Vaccine Design for Candida Dubliniensis Using Immunoinformatics. Vaccines 2023, 11, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Loaiza-Loeza, S.; Parra-Ortega, B.; Cancino-Díaz, J.C.; Illades-Aguiar, B.; Hernández-Rodríguez, C.H.; Villa-Tanaca, L. Differential Expression of Candida Dubliniensis-Secreted Aspartyl Proteinase Genes (CdSAP1-4) under Different Physiological Conditions and during Infection of a Keratinocyte Culture. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2009, 56, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.S.; Lee, K.T.; Bahn, Y.S. Secreted Aspartyl Protease 3 Regulated by the Ras/CAMP/PKA Pathway Promotes the Virulence of Candida auris. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1257897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schatzman, S.S.; Peterson, R.L.; Teka, M.; He, B.; Cabelli, D.E.; Cormack, B.P.; Culotta, V.C. Copper-Only Superoxide Dismutase Enzymes and Iron Starvation Stress in Candida Fungal Pathogens. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 570–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martchenko, M.; Alarco, A.M.; Harcus, D.; Whiteway, M. Superoxide Dismutases in Candida albicans: Transcriptional Regulation and Functional Characterization of the Hyphal-Induced SOD5 Gene. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15, 456–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beauvais, A.; Fontaine, T.; Aimanianda, V.; Latgé, J.P. Aspergillus Cell Wall and Biofilm. Mycopathologia 2014, 178, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latgé, J.P.; Mouyna, I.; Tekaia, F.; Beauvais, A.; Debeaupuis, J.P.; Nierman, W. Specific Molecular Features in the Organization and Biosynthesis of the Cell Wall of Aspergillus fumigatus. Med. Mycol. 2005, 43, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dickwella Widanage, M.C.; Gautam, I.; Sarkar, D.; Mentink-Vigier, F.; Vermaas, J.V.; Ding, S.Y.; Lipton, A.S.; Fontaine, T.; Latgé, J.P.; Wang, P.; et al. Adaptative Survival of Aspergillus fumigatus to Echinocandins Arises from Cell Wall Remodeling beyond Β−1,3-Glucan Synthesis Inhibition. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namvar, S.; Warn, P.; Farnell, E.; Bromley, M.; Fraczek, M.; Bowyer, P.; Herrick, S. Aspergillus fumigatus Proteases, Asp f 5 and Asp f 13, Are Essential for Airway Inflammation and Remodelling in a Murine Inhalation Model. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2015, 45, 982–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishida, K.; Cipriano, T.F.; Rocha, G.M.; Weissmüller, G.; Gomes, F.; Miranda, K.; Rozental, S. Silver Nanoparticle Production by the Fungus Fusarium Oxysporum: Nanoparticle Characterisation and Analysis of Antifungal Activity against Pathogenic Yeasts. Memórias Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2014, 109, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, X.; Kong, Q.; Wei, Q.; Guo, S.; Chen, Q.; Peng, M.; An, B.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Sang, H. Verapamil Enhances the Activity of Caspofungin against Cryptococcus neoformans, Coinciding with Inhibited Ca2+/CN Pathway and Damage to Cell Wall Integrity. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2024, 64, 107303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shaw, K.J.; Schell, W.A.; Covel, J.; Duboc, G.; Giamberardino, C.; Kapoor, M.; Moloney, M.; Soltow, Q.A.; Tenor, J.L.; Toffaletti, D.L.; et al. In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Apx001a/Apx001 and Other Gwt1 Inhibitors against Cryptococcus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00523-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, K.J.; Ibrahim, A.S. Fosmanogepix: A Review of the First-in-Class Broad Spectrum Agent for the Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopecká, M.; Yamaguchi, M.; Kawamoto, S. The Effects of the F-Actin Inhibitor Latrunculin a on the Pathogenic Yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Chemotherapy 2014, 60, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vaou, N.; Stavropoulou, E.; Voidarou, C.; Tsigalou, C.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Towards Advances in Medicinal Plant Antimicrobial Activity: A Review Study on Challenges and Future Perspectives. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardoso, N.N.R.; Alviano, C.S.; Blank, A.F.; Romanos, M.T.V.; Fonseca, B.B.; Rozental, S.; Rodrigues, I.A.; Alviano, D.S. Synergism Effect of the Essential Oil from Ocimum Basilicum Var. Maria Bonita and Its Major Components with Fluconazole and Its Influence on Ergosterol Biosynthesis. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 5647182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horn, C.; Vediyappan, G. Anticapsular and Antifungal Activity of α-Cyperone. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, S.Z.; Carneiro, H.C.; Lara, H.A.; Alves, R.B.; Resende, J.M.; Oliveira, H.M.; Silva, L.M.; Santos, D.A.; Freitas, R.P. Synthesis of a New Peptide-Coumarin Conjugate: A Potential Agent against Cryptococcosis. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartland, K.; Pu, J.; Palmer, M.; Dandapani, S.; Moquist, P.N.; Munoz, B.; Didone, L.; Schreiber, S.L.; Krysan, D.J. High-Throughput Screen in Cryptococcus neoformans Identifies a Novel Molecular Scaffold That Inhibits Cell Wall Integrity Pathway Signaling. ACS Infect. Dis. 2016, 2, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, F.L.; Kronstad, J.W. Discovery of a Novel Antifungal Agent in the Pathogen Box. mSphere 2017, 2, e00120-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Wei, S.; Ye, X.; Xu, P.; Chen, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, C. Antifungal Activity of Peptide MSI-1 against Cryptococcus neoformans Infection in Vitro and in Murine Cryptococcal Meningoencephalitis. Peptides 2020, 130, 170334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Oliveira, H.C.; Castelli, R.F.; Reis, F.C.G.; Samby, K.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Alves, L.R.; Rodrigues, M.L. Screening of the Pandemic Response Box Reveals an Association between Antifungal Effects of MMV1593537 and the Cell Wall of Cryptococcus neoformans, Cryptococcus deuterogattii, and Candida auris. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0060122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adhikari, S.; Essandoh, M.A.; Starr, W.C.; Sah, P.; La Force, C.N.; Eleshy, R.G.; Lutter, E.I.; Nelson, T.L. Eumelanin-Inspired Antimicrobial with Biocidal Activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2022, 5, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conn, B.N.; Lieberman, J.A.; Chatman, P.; Cotton, K.; Essandoh, M.A.; Ebqa’ai, M.; Nelson, T.L.; Wozniak, K.L. Antifungal Activity of Eumelanin-Inspired Indoylenepheyleneethynylene against Cryptococcus neoformans. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1339303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Ambati, S.; Meagher, R.B.; Lin, X. Developing MRNA Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Effective for Cryptococcosis in a Murine Model. NPJ Vaccines 2025, 10, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marena, G.D.; Carvalho, G.C.; Ruiz-Gaitán, A.; Onisto, G.S.; Bugalho, B.C.M.; Genezini, L.M.V.; Santos, M.O.D.; Blanco, A.L.; Chorilli, M.; Bauab, T.M. Potential Activity of Micafungin and Amphotericin B Co-Encapsulated in Nanoemulsion against Systemic Candida auris Infection in a Mice Model. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marena, G.D.; López, A.; Carvalho, G.C.; Marín, M.d.P.; Pérez Ruiz, M.D.; Pérez-Royo, J.M.; Tormo-Mas, M.Á.; Bernabé, P.; Valentín, E.; Bauab, T.M.; et al. Sunflower Oil and Cholesterol Nanoemulsion: A Novel Carrier for Micafungin to Combat Multi-Resistant Candida auris. Pathogens 2024, 13, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Shao, J.; Wang, T.; Wu, D.; Ma, K.; Yan, G.; Yin, D. Antifungal Evaluation of Traditional Herbal Monomers and Their Potential for Inducing Cell Wall Remodeling in Candida albicans and Candida auris. Biofouling 2020, 36, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, H.N.H.; Graham, L.; Adukwu, E.C. In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Cinnamomum Zeylanicum Bark and Leaf Essential Oils against Candida albicans and Candida auris. Appl. Microb. Cell Physiol. 2020, 104, 8911–8924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bandara, N.; Samaranayake, L. Emerging and Future Strategies in the Management of Recalcitrant Candida auris. Med. Mycol. 2022, 60, myac008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Honorato, L.; Artunduaga Bonilla, J.J.; Ribeiro da Silva, L.; Kornetz, J.; Zamith-Miranda, D.; Valdez, A.F.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Gonçalves Paterson Fox, E.; Nimrichter, L. Alkaloids Solenopsins from Fire Ants Display in Vitro and in Vivo Activity against the Yeast Candida auris. Virulence 2024, 15, 2413329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, M.; Shivarathri, R.; Aptekmann, A.A.; Chowdhary, A.; Kuchler, K.; Desai, J.V.; Chauhan, N. The Gcn5 Lysine Acetyltransferase Mediates Cell Wall Remodeling, Antifungal Drug Resistance, and Virulence of Candida auris. mSphere 2025, 10, e0006925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hager, C.L.; Larkin, E.L.; Long, L.; Abidi, F.Z.; Shaw, K.J.; Ghannoum, M.A. In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of the Antifungal Activity of APX001A/APX001 against Candida auris. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkow, E.L.; Lockhart, S.R. Activity of Novel Antifungal Compound APX001A against a Large Collection of Candida auris. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 3060–3062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez, J.A.; Pappas, P.G.; Boffard, K.; Paruk, F.; Bien, P.A.; Tawadrous, M.; Ople, E.; Wedel, P.; Oborska, I.; Hodges, M.R. Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Antifungal, Fosmanogepix, in Patients with Candidemia Caused by Candida auris: Results from a Phase 2 Trial. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2023, 67, e0141922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, F.; Zhao, M.; Braun, D.R.; Ericksen, S.S.; Piotrowski, J.S.; Nelson, J.; Peng, J.; Ananiev, G.E.; Chanana, S.; Barns, K.; et al. A Marine Microbiome Antifungal Targets Urgent-Threat Drug-Resistant Fungi. Science 2020, 370, 974–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Apgar, J.M.; Wilkening, R.R.; Parker, D.L.; Meng, D.; Wildonger, K.J.; Sperbeck, D.; Greenlee, M.L.; Balkovec, J.M.; Flattery, A.M.; Abruzzo, G.K.; et al. Ibrexafungerp: An Orally Active β-1,3-Glucan Synthesis Inhibitor. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 127661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Larkin, E.; Hager, C.; Chandra, J.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Retuerto, M.; Salem, I.; Long, L.; Isham, N.; Kovanda, L.; Borroto-Esoda, K.; et al. The Emerging Pathogen Candida auris: Growth Phenotype, Virulence Factors, Activity of Antifungals, and Effect of SCY-078, a Novel Glucan Synthesis Inhibitor, on Growth Morphology and Biofilm Formation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arendrup, M.C.; Jørgensen, K.M.; Hare, R.K.; Chowdhary, A. In Vitro Activity of Ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) against Candida auris Isolates as Determined by EUCAST Methodology and Comparison with Activity against C. albicans and C. glabrata and with the Activities of Six Comparator Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghannoum, M.; Isham, N.; Angulo, D.; Borroto-Esoda, K.; Barat, S.; Long, L. Efficacy of Ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) against Candida auris in an In Vivo Guinea Pig Cutaneous Infection Model. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2020, 64, e00854-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berkow, E.L.; Lockhart, S.R. Activity of CD101, a Long-Acting Echinocandin, against Clinical Isolates of Candida auris. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 90, 196–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hager, C.L.; Larkin, E.L.; Long, L.A.; Ghannoum, M.A. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rezafungin, a Novel Echinocandin, in the Treatment of Disseminated Candida auris Infection Using an Immunocompromised Mouse Model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 2085–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bentz, M.L.; Nunnally, N.; Lockhart, S.R.; Sexton, D.J.; Berkow, E.L. Antifungal Activity of Nikkomycin Z against Candida auris. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 1495–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adnan, A.; Borman, A.M.; Tóth, Z.; Forgács, L.; Kovács, R.; Balázsi, D.; Balázs, B.; Udvarhelyi, G.; Kardos, G.; Majoros, L. In Vitro Killing Activities of Anidulafungin and Micafungin with and without Nikkomycin Z against Four Candida Auris Clades. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tu, J.; Zhu, T.; Wang, Q.; Yang, W.; Huang, Y.; Xu, D.; Liu, N.; Sheng, C. Discovery of a New Chemical Scaffold for the Treatment of Superbug Candida auris Infections. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2023, 12, 2208687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tetz, G.; Collins, M.; Vikina, D.; Tetz, V. In Vitro Activity of a Novel Antifungal Compound, MYC-053, against Clinically Significant Antifungal-Resistant Strains of Candida Glabrata, Candida auris, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Pneumocystis spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e01975-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Mambro, T.; Vanzolini, T.; Bruscolini, P.; Perez-Gaviro, S.; Marra, E.; Roscilli, G.; Bianchi, M.; Fraternale, A.; Schiavano, G.F.; Canonico, B.; et al. A New Humanized Antibody Is Effective against Pathogenic Fungi in Vitro. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perdoni, F.; Signorelli, P.; Cirasola, D.; Caretti, A.; Galimberti, V.; Biggiogera, M.; Gasco, P.; Musicanti, C.; Morace, G.; Borghi, E. Antifungal Activity of Myriocin on Clinically Relevant Aspergillus fumigatus Strains Producing Biofilm. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horvat, S.; Yu, Y.; Manz, H.; Keller, T.; Beilhack, A.; Groll, J.; Albrecht, K. Nanogels as Antifungal-Drug Delivery System Against Aspergillus fumigatus. Adv. Nanobiomed Res. 2021, 1, 2000060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Gu, Y.; He, Z.; Wu, J.N.; Wu, C.; Xie, Y.; You, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; et al. In Vitro and in Vivo Antimicrobial Effects of Domiphen Combined with Itraconazole against Aspergillus fumigatus. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1264586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamimi, R.; Kyazze, G.; Keshavarz, T. Antifungal Effect of Triclosan on Aspergillus fumigatus: Quorum Quenching Role as a Single Agent and Synergy with Liposomal Amphotericin-B. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiederhold, N.P.; Najvar, L.K.; Matsumoto, S.; Bocanegra, R.A.; Herrera, M.L.; Wickes, B.L.; Kirkpatrick, W.R.; Patterson, T.F. Efficacy of the Investigational Echinocandin ASP9726 in a Guinea Pig Model of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 2875–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kritsi, E.; Matsoukas, M.T.; Potamitis, C.; Detsi, A.; Ivanov, M.; Sokovic, M.; Zoumpoulakis, P. Novel Hit Compounds as Putative Antifungals: The Case of Aspergillus fumigatus. Molecules 2019, 24, 3853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuhnert, E.; Li, Y.; Lan, N.; Yue, Q.; Chen, L.; Cox, R.J.; An, Z.; Yokoyama, K.; Bills, G.F. Enfumafungin Synthase Represents a Novel Lineage of Fungal Triterpene Cyclases. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 3325–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apgar, J.M.; Wilkening, R.R.; Greenlee, M.L.; Balkovec, J.M.; Flattery, A.M.; Abruzzo, G.K.; Galgoci, A.M.; Giacobbe, R.A.; Gill, C.J.; Hsu, M.J.; et al. Novel Orally Active Inhibitors of β-1,3-Glucan Synthesis Derived from Enfumafungin. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 5813–5818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiederhold, N.P.; Patterson, T.F.; Srinivasan, A.; Chaturvedi, A.K.; Fothergill, A.W.; Wormley, F.L.; Ramasubramanian, A.K.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. Repurposing Auranofin as an Antifungal: In Vitro Activity against a Variety of Medically Important Fungi. Virulence 2017, 8, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, P.; Yang, J.; Jin, Y.; Lu, C.; Feng, Z.; Gao, F.; Chen, Y.; Wang, F.; Shang, Z.; Lin, W. In Vitro Antifungal and Antibiofilm Activities of Auranofin against Itraconazole-Resistant Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Med. Mycol. 2023, 33, 101381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoenigl, M.; Sprute, R.; Egger, M.; Arastehfar, A.; Cornely, O.A.; Krause, R.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Prattes, J.; Spec, A.; Thompson, G.R.; et al. The Antifungal Pipeline: Fosmanogepix, Ibrexafungerp, Olorofim, Opelconazole, and Rezafungin. Drugs 2021, 81, 1703–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du Pré, S.; Beckmann, N.; Almeida, M.C.; Sibley, G.E.M.; Law, D.; Brand, A.C.; Birch, M.; Read, N.D.; Oliver, J.D. Effect of the Novel Antifungal Drug F901318 (Olorofim) on Growth and Viability of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00231-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, M.; Lepak, A.J.; Marchillo, K.; Vanhecker, J.; Sanchez, H.; Ambrose, P.G.; Andesa, D.R. Apx001 Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Determination against Aspergillus fumigatus in an in Vivo Model of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jørgensen, K.M.; Astvad, K.M.T.; Arendrup, M.C. In Vitro Activity of Manogepix (APX001A) and Comparators against Contemporary Molds: MEC Comparison and Preliminary Experience with Colorimetric MIC Determination. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Time to Prioritise Invasive Fungal Diseases. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2025, 25, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kimura, G.; Nakaoki, T.; Colley, T.; Rapeport, G.; Strong, P.; Ito, K.; Kizawa, Y. In Vivo Biomarker Analysis of the Effects of Intranasally Dosed PC945, a Novel Antifungal Triazole, on Aspergillus fumigatus Infection in Immunocompromised Mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, J.; Wang, G.; Li, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, X. Effects of Cinnamaldehyde on the Cell Wall of A. fumigatus and Its Application in Treating Mice with Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 2018, 5823209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoda, S.; Vermani, M.; Joshi, R.K.; Shankar, J.; Vijayaraghavan, P. Anti-Melanogenic Activity of Myristica Fragrans Extract against Aspergillus fumigatus Using Phenotypic Based Screening. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020, 20, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoda, S.; Gupta, L.; Shankar, J.; Gupta, A.K.; Vijayaraghavan, P. Cis-9-Hexadecenal, a Natural Compound Targeting Cell Wall Organization, Critical Growth Factor, and Virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 10077–10088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, L.; Sen, P.; Bhattacharya, A.K.; Vijayaraghavan, P. Isoeugenol Affects Expression Pattern of Conidial Hydrophobin Gene RodA and Transcriptional Regulators MedA and SomA Responsible for Adherence and Biofilm Formation in Aspergillus fumigatus. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.N.; Khan, S.; Iqbal, J.; Khan, R.; Khan, A.U. Enhanced Killing and Antibiofilm Activity of Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde against Candida albicans. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Li, M.; Tian, B.; Yang, X.; Du, W.; Wang, X.; Zhou, H.; Ding, C.; Sai, S. Calcofluor White-Cholesteryl Hydrogen Succinate Conjugate Mediated Liposomes for Enhanced Targeted Delivery of Voriconazole into Candida albicans. Biomater. Sci. 2022, 11, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salehi, Z.; Fattahi, A.; Lotfali, E.; Kazemi, A.; Shakeri-Zadeh, A.; Ahmad Nasrollahi, S. Susceptibility Pattern of Caspofungin-Coated Gold Nanoparticles Against Clinically Important Candida Species. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2021, 2021, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zarnowski, R.; Jaromin, A.; Zagórska, A.; Dominguez, E.G.; Sidoryk, K.; Gubernator, J.; Andes, D.R. A Label-Free Cellular Proteomics Approach to Decipher the Antifungal Action of Dimiq, a Potent Indolo[2,3-b]Quinoline Agent, against Candida albicans Biofilms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, H.S.; Kim, Y. Aucklandia Lappa Causes Cell Wall Damage in Candida albicans by Reducing Chitin and (1,3)-β-d-Glucan. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.M.; Liao, Y.L.; Chang, C.K.; Lan, C.Y. Candida albicans Sfp1 Is Involved in the Cell Wall and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Responses Induced by Human Antimicrobial Peptide Ll-37. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, P.W.; Yang, C.Y.; Chang, H.T.; Lan, C.Y. Human Antimicrobial Peptide LL-37 Inhibits Adhesion of Candida albicans by Interacting with Yeast Cell-Wall Carbohydrates. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsai, P.W.; Yang, C.Y.; Chang, H.T.; Lan, C.Y. Characterizing the Role of Cell-Wall β-1,3-Exoglucanase Xog1p in Candida albicans Adhesion by the Human Antimicrobial Peptide LL-37. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldman, M.; Sionov, R.V.; Mechoulam, R.; Steinberg, D. Anti-Biofilm Activity of Cannabidiol against Candida albicans. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, N.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Q. Phloretin Inhibited the Pathogenicity and Virulence Factors against Candida albicans. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 2420–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Q.; Pan, L.; Han, Y.; Zhou, Z. Antimicrobial Mechanisms of Enterocin CHQS Against Candida albicans. Curr. Microbiol. 2022, 79, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, H.; Du, Z.; Li, Q.; Wang, R. Fleagrass (Adenosma Buchneroides Bonati) Acts as a Fungicide Against Candida albicans by Damaging Its Cell Wall. J. Microbiol. 2024, 62, 661–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Sun, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Li, R.; Sui, M.; Gao, Z.; Wang, W.; Sun, H.; Dai, J. Antifungal Activity and Multi-Target Mechanism of Action of Methylaervine on Candida albicans. Molecules 2024, 29, 4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quindós, G.; Miranda-Cadena, K.; San-Millán, R.; Borroto-Esoda, K.; Cantón, E.; Linares-Sicilia, M.J.; Hamprecht, A.; Montesinos, I.; Tortorano, A.M.; Prigitano, A.; et al. In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) Against Contemporary Blood Isolates From Medically Relevant Species of Candida: A European Study. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 906563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mesquida, A.; Vicente, T.; Reigadas, E.; Palomo, M.; Sánchez-Carrillo, C.; Muñoz, P.; Guinea, J.; Escribano, P. In Vitro Activity of Ibrexafungerp and Comparators against Candida albicans Genotypes from Vaginal Samples and Blood Cultures. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 915.e5–915.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez-Ortigosa, C.; Paderu, P.; Motyl, M.R.; Perlin, D.S. Enfumafungin Derivative MK-3118 Shows Increased in Vitro Potency against Clinical Echinocandin-Resistant Candida Species and Aspergillus Species Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 1248–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arendrup, M.C.; Meletiadis, J.; Zaragoza, O.; Jørgensen, K.M.; Marcos-Zambrano, L.J.; Kanioura, L.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Mouton, J.W.; Guinea, J. Multicentre Determination of Rezafungin (CD101) Susceptibility of Candida Species by the EUCAST Method. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, 1200–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Locke, J.B.; Almaguer, A.L.; Donatelli, J.L.; Bartizal, K.F. Time-Kill Kinetics of Rezafungin (CD101) in Vagina-Simulative Medium for Fluconazole-Susceptible and Fluconazole-Resistant Candida albicans and Non- Albicans Candida Species. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 2018, 7040498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tóth, Z.; Forgács, L.; Locke, J.B.; Kardos, G.; Nagy, F.; Kovács, R.; Szekely, A.; Borman, A.M.; Majoros, L. In Vitro Activity of Rezafungin against Common and Rare Candida Species and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 3505–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trapani, F.; Viceconte, G.; Morena, V.; Tiseo, G.; Mori, G.; Kölking, B.; Khatamzas, E. Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Rezafungin Treatment in Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Results From an Early Access Program in Italy and Germany. In Open Forum Infectious Diseases; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2025; Volume 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wassil, J.; Sisti, M.; Fairman, J.; Davis, M.; Fierro, C.; Bennett, S.; Johnson, D.; Migone, T.-S.; Nguyen, K.; Sauer, P.; et al. Evaluating the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a 24-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (VAX-24) in healthy adults aged 18 to 64 years: A phase 1/2, double-masked, dose-finding, active-controlled, randomised clinical trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, G.R.; Huang, H.; Feng, S.; Yu, Y.; Soriano, A.; Cornely, O.A.; Kullberg, B.J.; Pappas, P.G.; Kollef, M.; Vazquez, J.A.; et al. Rezafungin Versus Caspofungin for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Results from the Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3 ReSTORE Trial Including the China Extension Study. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2025, 12, ofaf034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Lee, M.H.; Paderu, P.; Lee, A.; Jimenez-Ortigosa, C.; Park, S.; Mansbach, R.S.; Shaw, K.J.; Perlin, D.S. Significantly Improved Pharmacokinetics Enhances In Vivo Efficacy of APX001 against Echinocandin-and Multidrug-Resistant Candida Isolates in a Mouse Model of Invasive Candidiasis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00425-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoy, S.M. Oteseconazole: First Approval. Drugs 2022, 82, 1017–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Ruan, H.; Xiong, Z.; Wang, W.; Qiu, J.; Song, W.; Zhang, C.; Xue, F.; Qin, T.; et al. Oteseconazole versus Fluconazole for the Treatment of Severe Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Phase 3 Trial. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2024, 68, e0077823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Duvenage, L.; Walker, L.A.; Bojarczuk, A.; Johnston, S.A.; Maccallum, D.M.; Munro, C.A.; Gourlay, C.W. Inhibition of Classical and Alternative Modes of Respiration in Candida albicans Leads to Cell Wall Remodeling and Increased Macrophage Recognition. mBio 2019, 10, e02535-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ballou, E.R.; Avelar, G.M.; Childers, D.S.; Mackie, J.; Bain, J.M.; Wagener, J.; Kastora, S.L.; Panea, M.D.; Hardison, S.E.; Walker, L.A.; et al. Lactate Signalling Regulates Fungal β-Glucan Masking and Immune Evasion. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 2, 16238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xing, X.R.; Liao, Z.B.; Tan, F.; Zhu, Z.Y.; Jiang, Y.; Cao, Y.Y. Effect of Nicotinamide against Candida albicans. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Sá, N.P.; Pôssa, A.P.; Perez, P.; Ferreira, J.M.S.; Fonseca, N.C.; Lino, C.I.; Cruz, L.B.; de Oliveira, R.B.; Rosa, C.A.; Borelli, B.M.; et al. Antifungal Activity Directed Toward the Cell Wall by 2-Cyclohexylidenhydrazo- 4-Phenyl-Thiazole Against Candida albicans. Infect. Disord.-Drug Targets 2019, 19, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Liu, P.; Jiang, Y.; Han, B.; Yan, L. The Prophylactic Effects of Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting the Cell Wall Pmt4 Protein Epitopes of Candida albicans in a Murine Model of Invasive Candidiasis. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 992275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| Target | Sample | Methods Used | Activity (Result Against Fungus) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell wall and capsule | Silver nanoparticles (SNPs) from the fungus Fusarium oxysporum | Production and characterization of the SNP; antifungal activity assay; scanning electron microscopy | Cell wall disruptions and increased thickness; cytoplasmic membrane alterations and loss of the inside content | [79] |
| Calcium channel inhibition | Verapamil (VER) | Quantification of cell surface molecules; fluorescence microscopy; calcium measurement; stresses susceptibility assay; in vivo assay on G. mellonella model | Membrane permeability alteration; chitosan reduction; cell wall disruption; melanin leakage; sensitivity to Caspofungin | [80] |
| Gw1t enzyme | APX001A and its prodrug, APX001 | Antifungal activity assay; in vivo assay on murine model; fungal burden analysis; pharmacokinetic analysis | Mislocalization of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored mannoproteins | [81] |
| F-actin cytoskeleton | LA (Lipoic Acid) | Phase-contrast and fluorescent microscopy, flow cytometry, and transmission electron microscopy | Arrested cellular proliferation; ultrastructural disorder; aberrant cell walls. | [83] |
| Ergosterol biosynthesis and capsule | Essential oil of Ocimum basilicum var. Maria Bonita | Antifungal activity assay; ergosterol quantification assay; electron microscopy; cytotoxicity assay | Capsule reduction and disruption; membrane irregularities and invaginations; cell wall thickening | [85] |
| Cell wall and capsule | α-Cyperone from Cyperus rotundus’s essential oil | Antifungal activity assay; PI uptake assay; India ink assay; checkerboard assay | Reduction in capsule thickness; acapsular cells; easily broken cells | [86] |
| Mannoproteins, glucuronoxylomannan and galactoxylomannan | Ubiquicidin (UBI) and its fragments | Cytotoxicity assay; antifungal activity assay; peptide synthesis mass spectrum; high performance liquid chromatography purification | Cell surface electrostatic imbalance; growth inhibition | [87] |
| Cell Wall Integrity and Pigmentation pathway (CWIP) pathway | Benzothioureas | NIH Molecular Libraries Initiative screening; antifungal activity assay; adenylate kinase assay; cytotoxicity assay; Western blotting; cellular protein kinase activity | Inhibition of Mpk1 phosphorylation and CWIP pathway inhibition; cell wall impairment | [88] |
| Cell wall and membrane | MMV688271 | The Pathogen Box—MMV screening; antifungal activity assay; cell viability assay; electronic microscopy; sorbitol assay | Fungicide effect; aberrant cell wall and membrane; tightly packed organelles | [89] |
| Glucuronoxylomannan | MSI-1 (Antimicrobial peptide) | Zeta potential analysis; flow cytometry; antifungal activity assay; both transmission electron and fluorescence microscopy; in vivo assay on murine model | Increase in membrane fluidity and permeability leading to its integrity loss | [90] |
| Chitinase-mediated hydrolysis of chitin | MMV1593537 | Pandemic Response Box screening; antifungal activity assay; cytotoxicity assay; antifungal characterization; electron microscopy | Repression of capsule formation; capsule thickness reduction; increase in chitooligomers | [91] |
| Cell membrane viability and stability | EIPE-1 | Cytotoxicity assay; antifungal activity assay; electron microscopy; RNA analysis; in vivo assay on G. mellonella model | Aberrant cell structures; capsule and ergosterol biosynthesis impairment; cell wall and membranes remodeling; internal content leak | [93] |
| Stimulation of the host immune response | Capsule as an adjuvant to a CDA1-LNP vaccine | Synthesis of mRNAs encoding the antigen; synthesis and characterization (NanoFCM INC) of lipid nanoparticles; in vivo assay on murine model; Western blot, capitule purification; mCherry assay | Reduced fungal burden | [94] |
| Target | Sample | Methods Used | Activity (Result Against Fungus) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,3-β-d-glucan | Nanoemulsion co-encapsulated with amphotericin B and micafungin | In vivo study in leukopenic mice. The fungal load of the lung, thymus, kidneys, spleen and liver was analyzed. | The co-encapsulated nanoemulsion significantly reduced the fungal load in the tissues in a shorter treatment time when compared to the free or nanoencapsulated drugs separately | [95] |
| 1,3-β-d-glucan | nanoemulsion of micafungin | In vitro: Inhibition of biofilm formation. In vivo: In a Galleria mellonella model with quantification of the fungal load. | NEM had its most effective activity on mature biofilms, and in the in vivo study the nanoemulsion potentiated the activity of micafungin, resulting in a reduction in the fungal load compared to the controls. | [96] |
| 1,3-β-d-glucan and chitin | Traditional Herbal Monomers | MIC | The MIC of the Traditional Herbal Monomers (THMs) separately ranged from 50 to 64 mg/mL. While the best combination was CIN/PAL with an MIC of 12.5 mg/mL. All the compounds were effective in combating C. auris. | [97] |
| Cell wall | Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume bark essential oil and C. zeylanicum Blume leaf essential oil | MIC and MFC | The MIC and CMFs of CBEO were lower than 0.03% (v/v), while CLEO showed a result of 0.06% (v/v) and 0.25% (v/v) for MIC and CMFs, respectively, so CBEO showed better antifungal activity. | [98] |
| Cell membrane | alkaloids solenopsins from fire ants (natural fire ant extract or a synthetic mixture of analogs) | MIC, Synergism, acute toxicity assay in G. mellonella, cytotoxicity assay and systemic infection model in G. mellonella | IC50: 1.4–0.7 µg/mL for natural fire ant extract and synthetic mixture of analogs FIC (AmB + alkaloids): 0.59–1.03 for Checkerboard test and 1.58–3.03 for Bliss model Significant reduction in biofilm mass after treatment with alkaloids (except at a concentration of 10 µg/mL). Treatment with a natural fire ant extract or a synthetic mixture of analogs significantly reduced the metabolic activity of mature biofilms. Rupture of the fungal cell membrane Increased survival rate of larvae infected and treated with alkaloids. | [100] |
| lysine acetyltransferase | CPTH2 and caspofungin | Fungal growth (Absorbance 600 nm) | Lower growth of C. auris was obtained in the culture with the presence of CPTH2 + CAS with results below 0.5 in absorbance, while the monotherapies the growth was approximately 1.0 in absorbance. | [101] |
| Fungal protein Gwt1 | Fosmanogepix | In vitro: MIC by broth microdilution according to CLSI M27-A3 guidelines. In vivo: Fungal load in kidney, lung and brain tissue per CFU/mL | Anidulafungin and Fosmanogepix were effective in reducing the fungal load in the kidneys and lungs, but only Fosmanogepix reduced the fungal load in the brain. | [102] |
| Fungal protein Gwt1 | Fosmanogepix | MIC by broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines | MIC of fosmanogepix ranged from <0.005 to 0.015 mg/L, with a mean of <0.005 mg/L, MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.002 and 0.008 mg/L respectively, and there was no significant difference between clades and resistant isolates. | [103] |
| Fungal protein Gwt1 | Fosmanogepix | In vitro broth microdilution test according to EUCAST and CLSI. Phase 2 study in humans. | MIC using the CLSI (0.008 to 0.015 μg/mL) and EUCAST (0.004 to 0.03 μg/mL) test methods. All patients had negative blood cultures at the end of treatment. | [104] |
| Yeast phosphatidylinositol transfer protein (Sec 14p) | Turbinmycin | - | Important action against yeast phosphatidylinositol transfer protein (Sec 14p). Mice infected with C. auris were treated with turbinmycin with a logarithmic reduction of 3.610 | [105] |
| 1,3-β-d-glucan | Ibrexafungerp | MIC90 and growth inhibition evaluation | Ibrexafungerp inhibits the growth of the fungus due to the morphological changes it causes to the pathogen and the MIC90 was 1 mg/L. The drug is therefore effective. | [107] |
| 1,3-β-d-glucan | Ibrexafungerp | MIC Evaluation for Antifungal Effectiveness | Ibrexafungerp was active against all clinical isolates, with MICs ranging from 0.06 to 2 mg/L with an average of 0.5 mg/L. | [108] |
| 1,3-β-d-glucan | Ibrexafungerp | CFU/mL of skin tissue | The antifungal activity was successful, with a reduced fungal load with Ibrexafungerp treatment (no quantification data). | [109] |
| 1,3-β-d-glucan | Rezafungin | MIC50 and MIC90 | The MIC of the different clades showed no statistically significant difference. The MIC ranged from 0.03 to 8 μg/mL, while the MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.125 μg/mL and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively. | [110] |
| 1,3-β-d-glucan | Rezafungin | CFU/mL in renal tissue | Rezafungin showed a greater reduction in the fungal load in kidney tissue than amphotericin B and micafungin. The highlight of rezafungin is the lower number of doses over the course of treatment. | [111] |
| Chitin Synthase Enzyme | Nikkomycin Z | MIC by broth microdilution as determined by CLSI | The results obtained among the different clades were similar, with the exception of Clade III. The MIC results in this clade ranged from 16 to >64 mg/L and MIC50 was 32 mg/L, while the average MIC of the other clades ranged from 0.125 to >64 mg/L, with an overall average of 2 mg/L, MIC50 and MIC90 were 2 and 32 mg/L, respectively. | [112] |
| Chitin Synthase Enzyme | Echinocandins + Nikkomycin Z | MIC and Time Kill | MIC of anidulafungin, micafungin, and nikkomycin Z: 0.015–4, 0.03–4, and 2–>16 mg/L, respectively. Anidulafungin and micafungin isolates showed low antifungal activity against wild-type isolates and the isolate with a mutation in the FKS1 hotspot region 2. However, they showed significant antifungal activity against isolates with a mutation in the hotspot region 1. A total of 36.7% of the strains were susceptible to anidulafungin combined with nikkomycin Z, and 40% were sensitive to micafungin with nikkomycin Z, with fungicidal effects of 41.7% and 20%, respectively, against wild-type isolates. | [113] |
| Inhibition of Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) | Compound A1 | MIC, human cell toxicity and fungal load of infected and treated mouse liver tissue. | MICs among the different isolates ranged from 0.06 to 2.0 μg/mL. The toxicity in human cell lines was IC50 > 29 μg/mL, showing low toxicity. In vivo study, the renal fungal load was significantly lower in the animals treated with compound A1 compared to the untreated control. | [114] |
| Inhibition of chitin synthase | Compound MYC-053 | MIC | MIC ranges from 1 to 4 µg/mL among the strains analyzed, demonstrating sensitivity to compound MYC-053. | [115] |
| Enzymatic hydrolysis of chitin | Compound MMV1593537 | MIC, MFC and cytotoxicity in macrophages (RAW 264.7) | The MIC and CFM results were 5 μM for both strains. The cytotoxicity test showed that the compound had no significant toxicity | [91] |
| 1,3-β-d-glucan | NDV-3A and Micafungin | Survival rate after challenge | The animals that received double therapy, immunization with NDV-3A and treatment with micafungin after infection had a survival rate of 70%, higher than the controls with only one therapy. | [67] |
| 1,3-β-d-glucan and chitin | H5K1 monoclonal antibody | In vitro studies of growth inhibition, fungal adhesion to mammalian cells and MIC50 | The 250 and 100 µg/mL concentrations of H5K1 inhibited approximately 70% of the growth of C. auris, while the 50 µg/mL concentration inhibited 60%, and the reduction in fungal adhesion to mammalian cells was 51.5%. The MIC evaluated the activity of H5K1 with caspofungin (CAS) and amphotericin B (AMB), the combination H5K1 + CAS was the one that showed the best result with MIC50 0.125 µg/mL | [116] |
| Target | Sample | Methods Used | Activity (Result Against Fungus) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serine palmitoyl transferase enzyme | Af293 (Myriocin + SLNs) | In vitro broth microdilution, following EUCAST guideline for planktonic cells, to define MEC. In vitro XTT reduction assay for biofilm evaluation. CLSM for biofilm evaluation. | Impaired cell wall and biofilm formation, cell-wall collapse | [117] |
| Hyphae cell wall Ergosterol (ITZ mechanism) | (PGBN + ITZ) | In vitro broth microdilution for MIC determination, using the CLSI guideline. In vitro biofilm formation evaluation. In vitro cytotoxicity test analyzed through luminescent cell viability assay. | Reduced ITZ MIC | [118] |
| Chitin and mannoprotein interaction Ergosterol (ITZ mechanism) | (Domiphen + ITZ) | In vitro broth microdilution for MIC evaluation through CLSI guideline. In vitro biofilm and cell wall analysis. In vivo acute toxicity in zebrafish model. In vivo antifungal efficacy in Galleria mellonella larvae. | Reduced ITZ MIC; reduced mortality and melanization in larvae | [119] |
| Galactosaminogalactan and α-1,3-glucan biosynthesis | Triclosan + L-AMB | In vitro broth microdilution for MIC evaluation, following the EUCAST guideline. In vitro evaluation of triclosan and L-AMB in combination through fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). In vitro biofilm evaluation through crystal violet assay. | Synergistic effect, with fungal viability reduction | [120] |
| β-1,3-glucan | ASP9726 | In vivo ASP9726 efficacy evaluation in guinea pig model (single and multiple doses, in 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg, subcutaneous administration). Treatment evaluation through pulmonary fungal burden (CFU/g), histopathology and β-d-glucan and galactomannan levels. | Reduced mortality and serum beta-glucan detection | [121] |
| CYP51A enzyme | Compounds 1, 2 and 4 | In vitro microdilution broth, following the CLSI guideline, for MIC and MFC evaluation. | Higher MIC when compared to ITZ—possible structural changes to improve the compounds | [122] |
| β-1,3-glucan synthase enzyme | (Enfumafungin-derived structures through C2 replacement with heterocycles or C3 replacement with aminoethers) | In vitro broth microdilution, according to CLSI guideline, to define the MECs for A. fumigatus MF5668. | Some compounds presented low MICs | [124] |
| Extracellular matrix (exact mechanism of action still unknown) | Auranofin | In vitro microdilution broth, according to the CLSI guideline, to define the MIC50 and MIC100. | Fungal death through ROS release | [125] |
| Extracellular matrix (exact mechanism of action still unknown) | Auranofin and auranofin + ITZ or AMB | In vitro microdilution broth, following the CLSI guideline, for MIC evaluation. In vitro checkerboard assay for interaction evaluation between auranofin, ITZ and AMB. In vitro biofilm formation evaluated by crystal violet assay. and microscopy) | Low MICs alone; synergistic effect with ITZ and AMB, increasing susceptibility in resistant strains | [126] |
| Pyrimidine biosynthesis | Olorofim—F901318 | In vitro analysis through transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for growth analysis, and confocal microscopy viability evaluation. | Impaired germination and hyphae cell wall disruption | [128] |
| GPI-anchor biosynthesis (Gwt1 protein) | AF293, AF41, EMFR S678P, F11628, AF72 and F14532 isolates (APX001A—MGX and APX001—FMGX) | In vitro broth microdilution, according to the CLSI guideline, to evaluate MEC results for APX001A. In vivo evaluation of APX001 treatment with fungal burden and dose–response evaluation. | Lower MICs when compared to ITZ, VRC and POS | [82] |
| GPI-anchor biosynthesis (Gwt1 protein) | MGX—APX001A | In vitro microdilution broth, according to the EUCAST guideline, to evaluate MGX MEC in comparison to other EUCAST- and CLSI-based studies. | Reduced MIC/MEC when compared to azoles; reduced fungal burden at the same level of azoles | [129] |
| Yeast phosphatidylinositol transfer protein (Sec 14p) | Turbinmycin | Important action against yeast phosphatidylinositol transfer protein (Sec 14p). Significant inhibition of fungal load in lungs after treatment with 1 mg/kg. Dose-dependent reductions in fungal load with a 1.5 logarithm. | [105] | |
| GPI-anchor biosynthesis (Gwt1 protein) | MGX—APX001A | In vitro broth microdilution, according to the CLSI guideline, to evaluate MIC and MEC. | Lower MECs for itraconazole-resistant strains | [130] |
| lanosterol 14α-demethylase | Opelconazole | In vitro and in vivo in immunocompromised mice | Inhibition of pulmonary fungal load and reduction in galactomannan concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum, as well as in several biomarkers in a dose-dependent manner, being >3 and >47 times more potent than other antifungals, such as posaconazole and voriconazole. | [132] |
| β-1,3-glucan biosynthesis | Cinnamaldehyde | In vivo evaluation of 14-day treatment with cinnamaldehyde, in comparison to voriconazole (both through oral administration). The used methods were microscopy, culture, histopathology and β-d-glucan dosage in the lung. | Lower MICs and MECs when compared to azoles | [133] |
| Ergosterol and melanin biosynthesis | Myristica fragrans hexane extract | In vitro broth microdilution test, according to the CLSI guideline, to identify the MEC of each compound. In vitro evaluation of fungal structure through TEM. | Reduced mortality and fungal burden; thinner hyphae cell wall | [134] |
| Melanin biosynthesis | Cis-9-hexadecenal | In vitro microdilution broth, according to the CLSI guideline, to define the compound’s MEC. In vitro melanin production evaluation. In vitro SEM and TEM microscopies analysis of the cell surface. | Reduced rodlet layer hydrophobicity and melanin formation | [135] |
| RodA and gene expression melanin biosynthesis | Isoeugenol | In vitro microdilution broth, following the CLSI guideline, to identify MIC100 and MIC50. In vitro TEM, SEM and CLSM evaluation of biofilm and conidia surfaces. | Low MEC, reduced melanin and ergosterol concentration | [136] |
| Target | Compound | Methodology | Activity | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell well and hyphal cell wall (Hwp1) | Cinemaldeio encapsulated in lipossome | In vitro: MIC and Biofilm | Cell wall defragmentation and reduction in HWP1 expression, important for adhesion and biofilm formation. | [137] |
| 1,3-β-glucan synthase | Caspofungin-loaded gold nanoparticles | In vitro: MIC | Increased antifungal activity of caspofungin | [139] |
| 1,3-β-glucan synthase | Micafungin-loaded in nanoemulsion | In vitro and in vivo: MIC, Biofilm and Galleria mellonella (in vivo assay) | Enhancement of antifungal activity of loaded micafungin and efficient anti-Candida albicans activity in Galleria mellonella model. | [96] |
| Cell well | 5,11-dimethyl-5H-indolo[2,3-b]quinoline | In vitro: Biofilms | Increased hexoses; Detrimental effect on the content of pentoses (ribose, xylose and arabinose) | [140] |
| Chitin and 1,3 β-glucans | Aucklandia lappa Decne or Saussurea lappa | in vitro: MIC, Sorbitol protection, Spot Assay after Cell Wall Stress on C. albicans and calcofluor (for quantification of chitin) | Decrease Chitin and 1,3 β-glucansrease of | [141] |
| Cell well | LL-37 | In vitro: Cell Susceptibility; Protein Secretion and BSA Degradation; Detection of the Redox State of Ero1; Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species | Cell-wall stress, reactive oxygen species, activation of endoplasmic reticulum-related unfolded protein response signaling, and altered protein secretion. | [142] |
| Chitin and glucanas | Fleagrass | In vitro | Glucan exposure and chitin increase | [148] |
| Multi-Target | Methylaervine | In vitro | Cell-wall damage, increased thickness, growth inhibition and filamentation | [149] |
| 1,3-β-glucan synthase | Ibrexafungerp (formerly SCY-078) | In vitro | MIC 0.062 mg/L, MIC range 0.016–0.5 mg/L | [150] |
| 1,3-β-glucan synthase | Ibrexafungerp (formerly SCY-078) | In vitro | MIC ranging from 0.06 to 0.25 µg/mL | [151] |
| 1,3-β-glucan synthase | Ibrexafungerp (formerly SCY-078) | In vitro | MIC from 0.03 mg/L to 0.25 mg/L | |
| 1,3-β-glucan synthase | Enfumafungin MK-3118 | Antifungal susceptibility assay with 95 Candida strains (20 C. albicans and other strains). Determination of IC50s wild-type and echinocandin-resistant strains containing fks mutations of C. albicans (1 WT and 3 fks mutant strains) and other Candida and non-Candida strains. | MIC with serum of ≤0.03 µg/mL and MIC without serum of 0.5 µg/mL | [152] |
| 1,3-β-glucan synthase | Rezafungin | In vitro | MIC 0.016 mg/L (0.002–0.125 mg/L) | [153] |
| 1,3-β-glucan synthase | Rezafungin | In vitro | MIC 0.03 to 0.25 in RPMI medium (depend of Candida) Activity fungicide | [154] |
| 1,3-β-glucan synthase | Rezafungin | In vitro | MIC90 of 0.06 mg/L | [155] |
| 1,3-β-glucan synthase | Rezafungin | Human | Improved quality of life for patients with candidemia. | [156] |
| 1,3-β-glucan synthase | Rezafunin | Human | In the study, all-cause mortality on day 30 was 25.2% and 24.8% for the groups treated with rezafungin and caspofungin, respectively. Mycological eradication after 5 days was higher, at 68.7% and 63.2% for rezafungin and caspofungin, respectively. Overall cure on day 14 was 56.5% and 57.3% for rezafungin and caspofungin, respectively. Finally, safety was 53.3% and 53.7% for rezafungin and caspofungin, respectively. | [158] |
| glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins through inhibition of the fungal enzyme Gwt1 | Manogepix/fosmanogepix | In vitro and In vivo | Reduction in fungal load in mice | [159] |
| 14α demethylase | Oteseconazole | Human | Therapeutic cure rate of 66.88% treated with oteseconazole compared to 45.91% with fluconazole. Mycological cure rate of 82.5% with oteseconazole compared to 59.12% treated with fluconazole. Clinical cure rate of 71.25% treated with oteseconazole compared to 55.97% treated with fluconazole. | [161] |
| Well cells: chitin, β-glucans and structure | Sodium nitroprusside and the alternative oxidase inhibitor salicylhydroxamic acid | In vitro and In vivo | Wall remodeling, increased exposure of chitin and β-glucans and increased immune recognition | [162] |
| β-d-glucan, chitin and manana | Nicotinamide | In vitro | Exposure to β-glucans, increased chitin and decreased mannans | [164] |
| Cell well, especially 1,3-β-d-glucan | Cyclohexylidene-4-phenyl-thiazole | In vitro and in vivo | Decreased amount of 1,3-β-d-glucan and inhibition of adhesion. | [165] |
| recombinant mannosyltransferase 4 (rPmt4p) protein | Anti-rPmt4p monoclonal antibody | In vitro and in vivo | Increased survival of infected mice and increased recruitment of defense cells. | [166] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Marena, G.D.; Carvalho, G.C.; Magalhães, M.H.C.; Figueiredo, J.M.; Ramos, D.H.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Taborda, C.P. The Four Critical Priority Fungi According to the World Health Organization and the Hope for New Therapies: A Focus on Cell Wall Antifungal Targets. J. Fungi 2026, 12, 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12030162
Marena GD, Carvalho GC, Magalhães MHC, Figueiredo JM, Ramos DH, Nosanchuk JD, Taborda CP. The Four Critical Priority Fungi According to the World Health Organization and the Hope for New Therapies: A Focus on Cell Wall Antifungal Targets. Journal of Fungi. 2026; 12(3):162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12030162
Chicago/Turabian StyleMarena, Gabriel Davi, Gabriela Corrêa Carvalho, Martha Helena Chaves Magalhães, Julia Marcondes Figueiredo, Danilo Henrique Ramos, Joshua D. Nosanchuk, and Carlos Pelleschi Taborda. 2026. "The Four Critical Priority Fungi According to the World Health Organization and the Hope for New Therapies: A Focus on Cell Wall Antifungal Targets" Journal of Fungi 12, no. 3: 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12030162
APA StyleMarena, G. D., Carvalho, G. C., Magalhães, M. H. C., Figueiredo, J. M., Ramos, D. H., Nosanchuk, J. D., & Taborda, C. P. (2026). The Four Critical Priority Fungi According to the World Health Organization and the Hope for New Therapies: A Focus on Cell Wall Antifungal Targets. Journal of Fungi, 12(3), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12030162

