Annual Dynamics of Mycobiota in Symptomatic Century-Old Trees of Aesculus hippocastanum, Fagus sylvatica, Populus alba, and Quercus robur
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Wood Sampling and Processing
2.2. Extraction of the DNA and DNA Pooling
2.3. Library Preparation and Sequencing
2.4. Bioinformatic Analysis
2.5. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Sequencing
3.2. Relative Abundance
3.2.1. Phylum Level
3.2.2. Class Level
3.2.3. Order Level
3.2.4. Family Level
3.2.5. Genus Level
3.3. Alfa Diversity
3.3.1. Shannon Diversity Index
3.3.2. Simpson Diversity Index
3.3.3. Chao1 Richness
3.4. Beta Diversity
3.5. Fungal Trophic Groups
3.6. Microbial Co-Occurrence Networks
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| DBH | Diameter at Breast Height |
| HTAS | High-Throughput Amplicon Sequencing |
| NCBI | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| OTU | Operational Taxonomic Unit |
| PCoA | Principal Coordinates Analysis |
| PERMANOVA | Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance |
| PERMDISP | Permutational Analysis of Multivariate Dispersion |
| CLR | Centered Log-Ratio Transformation |
| TSS | Total Sum Scaling |
| SRA | Sequence Read Archive |
| FUNGuild | Fungal Guild Assignment Tool |
References
- Blicharska, M.; Mikusinski, G. Incorporating Social and Cultural Significance of Large Old Trees in Conservation Policy. Conserv. Biol. 2014, 28, 1558–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Konijnendijk, C. The Forest and the City-the Cultural Landscape of Urban Woodland; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Stagoll, K.; Lindenmayer, D.B.; Knight, E.; Fischer, J.; Manning, A.D. Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks. Conserv. Lett. 2012, 5, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindenmayer, D.B.; Laurance, W.F.; Franklin, J.F. Global Decline in Large Old Trees. Science 2012, 338, 1305–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fay, N. Environmental arboriculture, tree ecology and veteran tree management. Arboric. J. 2002, 26, 213–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwarze, F.W.M.R.; Engels, J.; Mattheck, C. Fungal Strategies of Wood Decay in Trees; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Lonsdale, D. Principles of Tree Hazard Assessment and Management; Stationery Office: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Parfitt, D.; Hunt, J.; Dockrell, D.; Rogers, H.J.; Boddy, L. Do all trees carry the seeds of their own destruction? PCR reveals numerous wood decay fungi latently present in sapwood of a wide range of angiosperm trees. Fungal Ecol. 2010, 3, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boddy, L.; Heilmann-Clausen, J. Chapter 12 Basidiomycete community development in temperate angiosperm wood. In British Mycological Society Symposia Series; Boddy, L., Frankland, J.C., van West, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008; Volume 28, pp. 211–237. [Google Scholar]
- Gilmartin, E.C.; Jusino, M.A.; Pyne, E.J.; Banik, M.T.; Lindner, D.L.; Boddy, L. Fungal endophytes and origins of decay in beech (Fagus sylvatica) sapwood. Fungal Ecol. 2022, 59, 101161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, R.; Gazis, R.; Skaltsas, D.; Chaverri, P.; Hibbett, D. Unexpected diversity of basidiomycetous endophytes in sapwood and leaves of Hevea. Mycologia 2015, 107, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fukasawa, Y. Ecological impacts of fungal wood decay types: A review of current knowledge and future research directions. Ecol. Res. 2021, 36, 910–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Guo, L.-D. Endophytic fungal diversity: Review of traditional and molecular techniques. Mycology 2012, 3, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardoim Pablo, R.; van Overbeek Leonard, S.; Berg, G.; Pirttilä Anna, M.; Compant, S.; Campisano, A.; Döring, M.; Sessitsch, A. The Hidden World within Plants: Ecological and Evolutionary Considerations for Defining Functioning of Microbial Endophytes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2015, 79, 293–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liao, C.; Doilom, M.; Jeewon, R.; Hyde, K.D.; Manawasinghe, I.S.; Chethana, K.W.T.; Balasuriya, A.; Thakshila, S.A.D.; Luo, M.; Mapook, A.; et al. Challenges and update on fungal endophytes: Classification, definition, diversity, ecology, evolution and functions. Fungal Divers. 2025, 131, 301–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Z.; Kennedy, P.G.; Liew, F.J.; Schilling, J.S. Fungal endophytes as priority colonizers initiating wood decomposition. Funct. Ecol. 2017, 31, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldrian, P. Forest microbiome: Diversity, complexity and dynamics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 109–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heilmann-Clausen, J.; Barron, E.S.; Boddy, L.; Dahlberg, A.; Griffith, G.W.; Nordén, J.; Ovaskainen, O.; Perini, C.; Senn-Irlet, B.; Halme, P. A fungal perspective on conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 2015, 29, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawksworth David, L.; Lücking, R. Fungal Diversity Revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 Million Species. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5, 10-1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindahl, B.D.; Nilsson, R.H.; Tedersoo, L.; Abarenkov, K.; Carlsen, T.; Kjøller, R.; Kõljalg, U.; Pennanen, T.; Rosendahl, S.; Stenlid, J.; et al. Fungal community analysis by high-throughput sequencing of amplified markers—A user’s guide. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackwell, M. The Fungi: 1, 2, 3 … 5.1 million species? Am. J. Bot. 2011, 98, 426–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toju, H.; Tanabe, A.S.; Yamamoto, S.; Sato, H. High-Coverage ITS Primers for the DNA-Based Identification of Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes in Environmental Samples. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nilsson, R.H.; Anslan, S.; Bahram, M.; Wurzbacher, C.; Baldrian, P.; Tedersoo, L. Mycobiome diversity: High-throughput sequencing and identification of fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tordoni, E.; Ametrano, C.G.; Banchi, E.; Ongaro, S.; Pallavicini, A.; Bacaro, G.; Muggia, L. Integrated eDNA metabarcoding and morphological analyses assess spatio-temporal patterns of airborne fungal spores. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 121, 107032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desprez-Loustau, M.-L.; Aguayo, J.; Dutech, C.; Hayden, K.J.; Husson, C.; Jakushkin, B.; Marçais, B.; Piou, D.; Robin, C.; Vacher, C. An evolutionary ecology perspective to address forest pathology challenges of today and tomorrow. Ann. For. Sci. 2016, 73, 45–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eichmeier, A.; Spetik, M.; Frejlichova, L.; Pecenka, J.; Cechova, J.; Stefl, L.; Simek, P. Survey of the Trunk Wood Mycobiome of an Ancient Tilia × europaea L. Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 5, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sieber, T.N. Endophytic fungi in forest trees: Are they mutualists? Fungal Biol. Rev. 2007, 21, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terhonen, E.; Blumenstein, K.; Kovalchuk, A.; Asiegbu, F.O. Forest Tree Microbiomes and Associated Fungal Endophytes: Functional Roles and Impact on Forest Health. Forests 2019, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawson, S.K.; Berglund, H.; Ovaskainen, O.; Jonsson, B.G.; Snäll, T.; Ottosson, E.; Jönsson, M. Fungal trait-environment relationships in wood-inhabiting communities of boreal forest patches. Funct. Ecol. 2024, 38, 1944–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jönsson, M.T.; Edman, M.; Jonsson, B.G. Colonization and extinction patterns of wood-decaying fungi in a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. J. Ecol. 2008, 96, 1065–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, H.-L.; Bonito, G.; Rojas, J.A.; Hameed, K.; Wu, S.; Schadt, C.W.; Labbé, J.; Tuskan, G.A.; Martin, F.; Grigoriev, I.V.; et al. Fungal Endophytes of Populus trichocarpa Alter Host Phenotype, Gene Expression, and Rhizobiome Composition. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.® 2019, 32, 853–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Helander, M.; Ahlholm, J.; Sieber, T.N.; Hinneri, S.; Saikkonen, K. Fragmented environment affects birch leaf endophytes. New Phytol. 2007, 175, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scholtysik, A.; Unterseher, M.; Otto, P.; Wirth, C. Spatio-temporal dynamics of endophyte diversity in the canopy of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior). Mycol. Prog. 2013, 12, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ihrmark, K.; Bödeker, I.T.M.; Cruz-Martinez, K.; Friberg, H.; Kubartova, A.; Schenck, J.; Strid, Y.; Stenlid, J.; Brandström-Durling, M.; Clemmensen, K.E.; et al. New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region–evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 82, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
- Stover, N.A.; Cavalcanti, A.R.O. Using NCBI BLAST. Curr. Protoc. Essent. Lab. Tech. 2017, 14, 11.11.11–11.11.34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data; Babraham Bioinformatics, Babraham Institute: Cambridge, UK, 2010; Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed on 8 January 2026).
- Větrovský, T.; Baldrian, P.; Morais, D. SEED 2: A user-friendly platform for amplicon high-throughput sequencing data analyses. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 2292–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aronesty, E. Comparison of Sequencing Utility Programs. Open Bioinform. J. 2013, 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Ryberg, M.; Hartmann, M.; Branco, S.; Wang, Z.; Godhe, A.; De Wit, P.; Sánchez-García, M.; Ebersberger, I.; de Sousa, F.; et al. Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from ribosomal ITS sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2013, 4, 914–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blaxter, M.; Mann, J.; Chapman, T.; Thomas, F.; Whitton, C.; Floyd, R.; Abebe, E. Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 360, 1935–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edgar, R.C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nilsson, R.H.; Larsson, K.-H.; Taylor, A.F.S.; Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Jeppesen, T.S.; Schigel, D.; Kennedy, P.; Picard, K.; Glöckner, F.O.; Tedersoo, L.; et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: Handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldrian, P.; Větrovský, T.; Lepinay, C.; Kohout, P. High-throughput sequencing view on the magnitude of global fungal diversity. Fungal Divers. 2022, 114, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tedersoo, L.; Bahram, M.; Põlme, S.; Kõljalg, U.; Yorou, N.S.; Wijesundera, R.; Ruiz, L.V.; Vasco-Palacios, A.M.; Thu, P.Q.; Suija, A.; et al. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 2014, 346, 1256688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gloor, G.B.; Macklaim, J.M.; Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.; Egozcue, J.J. Microbiome Datasets Are Compositional: And This Is Not Optional. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenacre, M.; Martínez-Álvaro, M.; Blasco, A. Compositional Data Analysis of Microbiome and Any-Omics Datasets: A Validation of the Additive Logratio Transformation. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 727398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hill, M.O. Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences. Ecology 1973, 54, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willis, A.D. Rarefaction, Alpha Diversity, and Statistics. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, M.J. Distance-Based Tests for Homogeneity of Multivariate Dispersions. Biometrics 2006, 62, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, N.H.; Song, Z.; Bates, S.T.; Branco, S.; Tedersoo, L.; Menke, J.; Schilling, J.S.; Kennedy, P.G. FUNGuild: An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 2016, 20, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohl, M.; Wiese, S.; Warscheid, B. Cytoscape: Software for Visualization and Analysis of Biological Networks. In Data Mining in Proteomics: From Standards to Applications; Hamacher, M., Eisenacher, M., Stephan, C., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 291–303. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, S.; Poorter, L.; Kuramae, E.E.; Sass-Klaassen, U.; Leite, M.F.A.; Costa, O.Y.A.; Kowalchuk, G.A.; Cornelissen, J.H.C.; van Hal, J.; Goudzwaard, L.; et al. Stem traits, compartments and tree species affect fungal communities on decaying wood. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 3625–3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krah, F.-S.; Bässler, C.; Heibl, C.; Soghigian, J.; Schaefer, H.; Hibbett, D.S. Evolutionary dynamics of host specialization in wood-decay fungi. BMC Evol. Biol. 2018, 18, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menkis, A.; Redr, D.; Bengtsson, V.; Hedin, J.; Niklasson, M.; Nordén, B.; Dahlberg, A. Endophytes dominate fungal communities in six-year-old veteranisation wounds in living oak trunks. Fungal Ecol. 2022, 59, 101020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cregger, M.A.; Veach, A.M.; Yang, Z.K.; Crouch, M.J.; Vilgalys, R.; Tuskan, G.A.; Schadt, C.W. The Populus holobiont: Dissecting the effects of plant niches and genotype on the microbiome. Microbiome 2018, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ding, C.; Zhang, B.; Huang, Q.; Huang, R.; Su, X. Endophytic Communities of Transgenic Poplar Were Determined by the Environment and Niche Rather Than by Transgenic Events. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spies, C.F.J.; Moyo, P.; Halleen, F.; Mostert, L. Phaeoacremonium species diversity on woody hosts in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Persoonia-Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2018, 40, 26–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Travadon, R.; Lawrence, D.P.; Rooney-Latham, S.; Gubler, W.D.; Wilcox, W.F.; Rolshausen, P.E.; Baumgartner, K. Cadophora species associated with wood-decay of grapevine in North America. Fungal Biol. 2015, 119, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spetik, M.; Pecenka, J.; Stuskova, K.; Stepanova, B.; Eichmeier, A.; Kiss, T. Fungal Trunk Diseases Causing Decline of Apricot and Plum Trees in the Czech Republic. Plant Dis. 2023, 108, 1425–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Damm, U.; Mostert, L.; Crous, P.W.; Fourie, P.H. Novel Phaeoacremonium species associated with necrotic wood of Prunus trees. Persoonia-Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2008, 20, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argiroff William, A.; Carrell Alyssa, A.; Klingeman Dawn, M.; Dove Nicholas, C.; Muchero, W.; Veach Allison, M.; Wahl, T.; Lebreux Steven, J.; Webb Amber, B.; Peyton, K.; et al. Seasonality and longer-term development generate temporal dynamics in the Populus microbiome. mSystems 2024, 9, e00886-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hiscox, J.; Savoury, M.; Müller, C.T.; Lindahl, B.D.; Rogers, H.J.; Boddy, L. Priority effects during fungal community establishment in beech wood. ISME J. 2015, 9, 2246–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.-P.; Lin, Y.-F.; Liu, Y.-C.; Lu, M.-Y.J.; Ke, H.-M.; Tsai, I.J. Spatiotemporal dynamics reveal high turnover and contrasting assembly processes in fungal communities across contiguous habitats of tropical forests. Environ. Microbiome 2025, 20, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purahong, W.; Wubet, T.; Lentendu, G.; Hoppe, B.; Jariyavidyanont, K.; Arnstadt, T.; Baber, K.; Otto, P.; Kellner, H.; Hofrichter, M.; et al. Determinants of Deadwood-Inhabiting Fungal Communities in Temperate Forests: Molecular Evidence from a Large Scale Deadwood Decomposition Experiment. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoppe, B.; Purahong, W.; Wubet, T.; Kahl, T.; Bauhus, J.; Arnstadt, T.; Hofrichter, M.; Buscot, F.; Krüger, D. Linking molecular deadwood-inhabiting fungal diversity and community dynamics to ecosystem functions and processes in Central European forests. Fungal Divers. 2016, 77, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Runnel, K.; Tedersoo, L.; Krah, F.-S.; Piepenbring, M.; Scheepens, J.F.; Hollert, H.; Johann, S.; Meyer, N.; Bässler, C. Toward harnessing biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships in fungi. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2025, 40, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, E.L.; Weatherhead, E.; Koide, R.T. The potential saprotrophic capacity of foliar endophytic fungi from Quercus gambelii. Fungal Ecol. 2023, 62, 101221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cline, L.C.; Schilling, J.S.; Menke, J.; Groenhof, E.; Kennedy, P.G. Ecological and functional effects of fungal endophytes on wood decomposition. Funct. Ecol. 2018, 32, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanney, J.B.; Kemler, M.; Vivas, M.; Wingfield, M.J.; Slippers, B. Silent invaders: The hidden threat of asymptomatic phytobiomes to forest biosecurity. New Phytol. 2025, 247, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosner, J.; Pandharikar, G.; Tremble, K.; Nash, J.; Rush, T.A.; Vilgalys, R.; Veneault-Fourrey, C. Fungal endophytes. Curr. Biol. 2025, 35, R904–R910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peay, K.G.; Kennedy, P.G.; Talbot, J.M. Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.; Wang, H.; Dsouza, M.; Lou, J.; He, Y.; Dai, Z.; Brookes, P.C.; Xu, J.; Gilbert, J.A. Geographic patterns of co-occurrence network topological features for soil microbiota at continental scale in eastern China. ISME J. 2016, 10, 1891–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boddy, L.; Hiscox, J. Fungal Ecology: Principles and Mechanisms of Colonization and Competition by Saprotrophic Fungi. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 0019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toju, H.; Peay, K.G.; Yamamichi, M.; Narisawa, K.; Hiruma, K.; Naito, K.; Fukuda, S.; Ushio, M.; Nakaoka, S.; Onoda, Y.; et al. Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, C.; Xu, L.; Montoya, L.; Madera, M.; Hollingsworth, J.; Chen, L.; Purdom, E.; Singan, V.; Vogel, J.; Hutmacher, R.B.; et al. Co-occurrence networks reveal more complexity than community composition in resistance and resilience of microbial communities. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kitagami, Y.; Matsuda, Y. Forest types matter for the community and co-occurrence network patterns of soil bacteria, fungi, and nematodes. Pedobiologia 2024, 107, 151004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordén, B.; Andreasen, M.; Gran, O.; Menkis, A. Fungal diversity in wood of living trees is higher in oak than in beech, maple or linden, and is affected by tree size and climate. Biodivers. Conserv. 2025, 34, 3609–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| No. | Species | GPS Coordinates | Tree Age Estimate * [Years] | Stem Diam. ** [cm] | Stem Circumference ** [cm] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aesculus hippocastanum | 48°47′58.1″ N 16°48′35.6″ E | 80–100 | 79 | 248 |
| 2 | Aesculus hippocastanum | 48°48′49.7″ N 16°48′38.0″ E | 80–100 | 75 | 236 |
| 3 | Aesculus hippocastanum | 48°48′19.1″ N 16°48′32.1″ E | 60–80 | 78 | 245 |
| 4 | Aesculus hippocastanum | 48°48′04.7″ N 16°48′42.3″ E | 100–120 | 111 | 349 |
| 5 | Aesculus hippocastanum | 48°48′12.9″ N 16°48′38.8″ E | 100–120 | 89 | 280 |
| 6 | Fagus sylvatica ‘Atropunicea’ | 48°47′56.4″ N 16°48′35.5″ E | ≈150 | 114 | 358 |
| 7 | Fagus sylvatica ‘Atropunicea’ | 48°48′00.5″ N 16°48′32.4″ E | 150–200 | 136 | 426 |
| 8 | Fagus sylvatica ‘Atropunicea’ | 48°48′03.6″ N 16°48′16.4″ E | ≈150 | 125 | 393 |
| 9 | Fagus sylvatica ‘Atropunicea’ | 48°48′10.7″ N 16°48′25.9″ E | ≈150 | 109 | 343 |
| 10 | Fagus sylvatica ‘Atropunicea’ | 48°48′47.9″ N 16°48′22.6″ E | 150–200 | 121 | 381 |
| 11 | Populus alba | 48°48′03.4″ N 16°48′48.8″ E | 80–100 | 117 | 367 |
| 12 | Populus alba | 48°48′15.9″ N 16°48′49.2″ E | 60–80 | 87 | 273 |
| 13 | Populus alba | 48°48′19.3″ N 16°49′04.6″ E | 60–80 | 80 | 251 |
| 14 | Populus alba | 48°48′29.9″ N 16°48′47.4″ E | ≈100 | 120 | 377 |
| 15 | Populus alba | 48°48′25.4″ N 16°48′42.0″ E | 100–120 | 133 | 418 |
| 16 | Quercus robur | 48°48′00.7″ N 16°48′50.2″ E | 150–200 | 157 | 493 |
| 17 | Quercus robur | 48°48′40.3″ N 16°48′28.4″ E | 150–200 | 129 | 405 |
| 18 | Quercus robur | 48°48′20.8″ N 16°48′45.4″ E | 150–200 | 153 | 480 |
| 19 | Quercus robur | 48°48′19.8″ N 16°48′38.5″ E | 150–200 | 163 | 512 |
| 20 | Quercus robur | 48°48′48.9″ N 16°48′37.1″ E | 150–200 | 148 | 465 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Spetik, M.; Frejlichova, L.; Cechova, J.; Bulir, P.; Miksova, L.; Stefl, L.; Simek, P.; Eichmeier, A. Annual Dynamics of Mycobiota in Symptomatic Century-Old Trees of Aesculus hippocastanum, Fagus sylvatica, Populus alba, and Quercus robur. J. Fungi 2026, 12, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010050
Spetik M, Frejlichova L, Cechova J, Bulir P, Miksova L, Stefl L, Simek P, Eichmeier A. Annual Dynamics of Mycobiota in Symptomatic Century-Old Trees of Aesculus hippocastanum, Fagus sylvatica, Populus alba, and Quercus robur. Journal of Fungi. 2026; 12(1):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010050
Chicago/Turabian StyleSpetik, Milan, Lucie Frejlichova, Jana Cechova, Pavel Bulir, Lenka Miksova, Lukas Stefl, Pavel Simek, and Ales Eichmeier. 2026. "Annual Dynamics of Mycobiota in Symptomatic Century-Old Trees of Aesculus hippocastanum, Fagus sylvatica, Populus alba, and Quercus robur" Journal of Fungi 12, no. 1: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010050
APA StyleSpetik, M., Frejlichova, L., Cechova, J., Bulir, P., Miksova, L., Stefl, L., Simek, P., & Eichmeier, A. (2026). Annual Dynamics of Mycobiota in Symptomatic Century-Old Trees of Aesculus hippocastanum, Fagus sylvatica, Populus alba, and Quercus robur. Journal of Fungi, 12(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010050

