Next Article in Journal
Antifungal Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations of Mold Isolates from Patients with Cancer; Single-Center Experience, 2018–2023
Previous Article in Journal
Host-Specific and Environment-Dependent Effects of Endophyte Alternaria oxytropis on Three Locoweed Oxytropis Species in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biocontrol Strategies Against Plant-Parasitic Nematodes Using Trichoderma spp.: Mechanisms, Applications, and Management Perspectives

by
María Belia Contreras-Soto
1,
Juan Manuel Tovar-Pedraza
1,
Alma Rosa Solano-Báez
2,
Heriberto Bayardo-Rosales
1 and
Guillermo Márquez-Licona
2,*
1
Laboratorio de Fitopatología, Subsede Culiacán, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, Culiacán 80110, Sinaloa, Mexico
2
Centro de Desarrollo de Productos Bióticos, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Yautepec 62731, Morelos, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2025, 11(7), 517; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11070517
Submission received: 15 May 2025 / Revised: 6 July 2025 / Accepted: 8 July 2025 / Published: 11 July 2025

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes represent a significant threat to agriculture, causing substantial economic losses worldwide. Among the biological alternatives for their control, the genus Trichoderma has emerged as a promising solution for suppressing various nematode species. This article reviews key studies on the interaction between Trichoderma spp. and plant-parasitic nematodes, highlighting the most studied species such as Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma longibrachiatum, Trichoderma virens, and Trichoderma viride, mainly against the genera Meloidogyne, Pratylenchus, Globodera, and Heterodera. Trichoderma spp. act through mechanisms such as mycoparasitism, antibiosis, competition for space in the rhizosphere, production of lytic enzymes, and modulation of plant defense responses. They also produce metabolites that affect nematode mobility, reproduction, and survival, such as gliotoxin, viridin and cyclosporine A. In addition, they secrete enzymes such as chitinases, proteases, lipases, and glucanases, which degrade the cuticle of nematodes and their eggs. Furthermore, Trichoderma spp. induce systemic resistance in plants through modulation of phytohormones such as jasmonic acid, ethylene, salicylic acid and auxins. The use of Trichoderma in integrated nematode management enables its application in combination with crop rotation, organic amendments, plant extracts, and resistant varieties, thereby reducing the reliance on synthetic nematicides and promoting more sustainable and climate-resilient agriculture.

1. Introduction

Plant-parasitic nematodes represent a significant threat to global agricultural productivity, as they infect a wide range of economically important crops and cause substantial yield and financial losses [1,2]. Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) alone are responsible for yield reductions of up to 60% in tomato, pepper, soybean and other vegetable crops. Cyst nematodes such as Heterodera glycines and Globodera spp. affect soybean and potato, respectively, leading to regional yield losses of 30–80%. According to global estimates, annual crop losses attributed to plant-parasitic nematodes exceed USD 100 billion. These hidden pests compromise food security and the sustainability of agricultural systems, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions where environmental conditions favor their proliferation [1,3,4,5]. In this context, biocontrol strategies have gained prominence as low-environmental-impact solutions, particularly in response to climate challenges and the growing demands for sustainable agricultural systems [6,7].
Among the available biological alternatives, the use of species from the Trichoderma genus has gained relevance due to its effectiveness in the biocontrol of soil-borne pathogens, including plant-parasitic nematodes [7,8]. Various Trichoderma species, with their multifunctional capacity, act as natural antagonists that inhibit nematode development through mechanisms such as the production of secondary metabolites, nematotoxic proteins, and competition in the rhizosphere [9].
In addition, Trichoderma induces systemic resistance in plants by activating defensive responses and promoting the production of phytoalexins and the expression of defense-related genes [10,11]. This activation increases tolerance to attacks from nematodes and other pathogens, while enhancing the overall health of the plant. The capacity of Trichoderma to improve biodiversity and soil structure makes it a valuable tool in the transition toward sustainable agricultural systems that are resilient to climate change.
Climate change causes the gradual increase in soil temperature due to more frequent and prolonged heat waves, exacerbating crop losses [12]. These effects become more severe when nematodes attack plants weakened by thermal stress, altering their physiology and causing greater damage. In this context, tools such as Trichoderma spp. gain strategic relevance by contributing not only to nematode biocontrol, but also to mitigating the impact of climate change on agricultural systems.
Several studies have documented the ability of Trichoderma spp. to suppress plant-parasitic nematodes through strategies such as direct predation and the induction of resistance in hosts [9,13]. Yan et al. [14] reported that secondary metabolites from T. harzianum caused high mortality in juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita and significantly reduced the hatching of their eggs. These interactions, along with the stimulation of compounds such as jasmonic acid and chitinases in plants, demonstrate the impact of Trichoderma on enhancing resistance to nematodes and protecting crops.
This review aims to deepen the understanding of the effects of Trichoderma spp. on plant-parasitic nematodes by exploring the nematicidal mechanisms of action and discussing the advantages and limitations of using Trichoderma, either alone or in combination with other microorganisms.

2. Taxonomy, Morphological Characteristics, and Environmental Adaptation of Trichoderma spp.

The genus Trichoderma (family Hypocreaceae) has been widely studied, not only for its biotechnological and agricultural importance, but also for its taxonomic complexity; its classification has traditionally been challenging due to the high morphological variability among species. Initially, identifications were based on phenotypic characteristics such as the color and shape of conidia and other reproductive structures. However, classification has advanced considerably with the development of phylogenetic analyses using ITS region sequences, as well as fragments of the tef-1α and rpb2 genes [15]. These molecular analyses have allowed for better differentiation between closely related species and have revealed the existence of cryptic species that could not be discerned by traditional methods [16].
With over 500 recognized species, Trichoderma has undergone considerable expansion in its taxonomic classification. The genomic diversity within the genus has been the subject of research, revealing not only the fungus’s adaptability to different environments, but also its ability to hybridize and evolve rapidly in response to ecological pressures. For example, it has been observed that different species exhibit variations in the genes responsible for producing secondary metabolites and enzymes, which confer specific biocontrol properties and organic-matter degradation capabilities [17].
The genus Trichoderma is divided into phylogenetic clades, such as Longibrachiatum, Harzianum, Viride, Virens, and Strictipile, defined based on molecular, morphological, and ecological studies. These divisions group species that share genetic and taxonomic similarities. The Longibrachiatum clade includes species associated with specific habitats and is known for containing organisms with a high capacity for producing lignocellulolytic enzymes, making them useful in industrial applications. The Harzianum clade groups species with biocontrol capabilities, with T. harzianum standing out as one of the most studied and widely used biocontrol agents in agriculture. In the other hand, the Viride clade represents a group of ecologically diverse species capable of colonizing different soil types and exhibiting antagonistic activity against a variety of plant pathogens. The Strictipile clade comprises species that are less commonly studied but have been isolated from soil and decaying wood, and some members have shown potential in biocontrol and plant-growth promotion, although their roles and mechanisms remain less characterized compared to other clades [18].
Species of the genus Trichoderma have excellent ecological adaptation capabilities, being able to colonize a wide range of habitats, from forest environments to agricultural soils. This adaptability is due to the fact that these fungi are capable of producing antibiotics, excreting extracellular enzymes, and directly competing for resources, making them excellent competitors for space and nutrients in the rhizosphere. In addition, Trichoderma induces the natural systemic resistance in plants and improves nutrient uptake, which also contributes to its success as a rhizosphere colonizer [19]. A central element of its effectiveness as a biological agent is the production of secondary metabolites, such as antibiotics and hydrolytic enzymes (chitinases and glucanases), which inhibit the growth of plant pathogens and decompose lignocellulosic material [20]. The saprophytic capacity of Trichoderma allows its establishment in soils rich in organic matter or even in those that have been disturbed, where it can efficiently decompose plant residues and other organic materials [21]. The rapid growth rate of Trichoderma spp. is also an important advantage when competing with other microorganisms for space and resources, since the colonization of ecological niches in the rhizosphere is quicker. The ability to compete is enhanced by the production of metabolites that disturb the integrity of other fungi’s membranes and secrete enzymes that degrade the cell walls of pathogens. Likewise, the production of volatile compounds and pigments also contributes to its capacity to compete and survive in diverse environments [22].
The morphology of Trichoderma species is not reliable for distinguishing between them. Therefore, phylogenetic identification of species through multilocus sequence typing must be used. Individuals of the genus are characterized by fast-growing and easily sporulating green colonies. They often produce thin mycelium with broad hyphae, branched, with conidiophores irregularly verticillate, which end in clusters of divergent, flask-shaped phialides bearing hyaline conidia in chains. The chlamydospores are formed after seven days or more, are hyaline, and can be intercalary or terminal. From a biological perspective, Trichoderma exhibits a versatile lifestyle. It can act as a saprophytic fungus, decomposing organic matter in the soil and actively participating in the carbon cycle [23]. At the same time, other species may display endophytic abilities by colonizing plant tissues without causing apparent damage to the plants [24,25,26]. This endophytic capability is often associated with benefits for the host plants, such as increased resistance to plant pathogens [27].

3. Interactions of Trichoderma with Plants and Other Microorganisms

Trichoderma plays a key role in plant nutrition, due to its ability to interact with the root system and enhance nutrient availability in the soil [28,29,30]. This fungus stimulates root development by producing phytohormones, such as auxins, which increase the absorption surface and optimize the acquisition of essential nutrients [31,32]. Additionally, it facilitates the release of insoluble phosphorus through the production of organic acids (such as citric, oxalic, malic, and lactic acids), which lower the pH of the environment, solubilize calcium, iron, and aluminum phosphates, and release phosphorus in forms available to the plant [33]. The production of phosphatase enzymes and the formation of chelates with blocking cations (Fe3+ and Al3+) contribute to releasing this key nutrient, enhancing its utilization efficiency. By boosting the absorption of phosphorus, nitrogen, and micronutrients, Trichoderma strengthens root growth, resulting in higher photosynthetic efficiency, more vigorous plant development, and increased resistance to adverse conditions [34]. It also promotes a healthy soil microbiome, competing against plant pathogens and fostering synergistic interactions with beneficial bacteria [35].
Due to their complementary action, the interaction between Trichoderma and mycorrhizae is crucial for promoting plant growth and improving soil health. Mycorrhizae, particularly arbuscular mycorrhizae, establish a symbiotic relationship with roots that expands the absorption area through a network of extraradical hyphae, enhancing the uptake of nutrients such as phosphorus, nitrogen, and micronutrients [36].
The inoculation of plants with Trichoderma and mycorrhizae produces synergistic effects, such as increased root colonization, improved nutrient absorption, and enhanced resistance to abiotic (drought, salinity) and biotic stress (soil-borne pathogens) [37]. The interaction of Trichoderma and mycorrhizae strengthens the plants, optimizes nutrient use, and reduces the dependence on chemical fertilizers and pesticides, thereby contributing to more sustainable agriculture. In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), pepper (Capsicum annuum), corn (Zea mays), and cereals, this strategy has been demonstrated to increase productivity, improve fruit quality, and enhance water and nutrient use efficiency [38].
Trichoderma is known for its ability to interact with a wide variety of microorganisms in the soil. These interactions can be both antagonistic and beneficial; they can also promote plant growth by establishing mutualistic relationships or inducing systemic resistance. These complex interactions contribute to Trichoderma’s ability to influence the structure and function of soil ecosystems [39]. Several studies have demonstrated the synergism between Trichoderma and certain bacteria, among which the application of T. harzianum in combination with Bacillus subtilis promotes growth, yield, and quality in various crops [40]. In peppers, an increase in yield has been reported, associated with the interaction between Trichoderma sp., Pseudomonas fluorescens, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [41]. In addition, the co-inoculation of Trichoderma with bacteria has shown significant benefits for plants by enhancing nutrient supply through atmospheric nitrogen fixation, phosphorus and potassium solubilization, and siderophore production. This synergistic effect can manifest in one or both microorganisms involved [42].

4. Application of Trichoderma in Nematode Control

The interest in using Trichoderma fungi for nematode control began to emerge in the late 1980s, with some of the earliest studies indicating promising nematicidal effects. Windham et al. [43] reported a reduction in the reproduction of M. arenaria on maize when treated with T. harzianum and T. koningii. In 1998, Spiegel and Chet [44] evaluated various isolates of T. harzianum and T. lignorum as biocontrol agents against the root-knot nematode M. javanica, showcasing their nematicidal potential. These foundational studies predate the work of Sharon et al. [45], who demonstrated the effectiveness of T. harzianum against root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.), and they highlight the early scientific interest in this biocontrol approach. Since then, several studies have confirmed the efficacy of Trichoderma spp. in inhibiting plant-parasitic nematodes, with notable effects on the genera Meloidogyne, Pratylenchus, Globodera, and Heterodera. More than 60 investigations have reported promising results for the control of these plant-parasitic nematodes, with M. incognita and M. javanica being the most extensively studied species (Figure 1).
Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 were developed based on the information presented in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively, with the aim of graphically representing the collected data.
Nematodes are key soil-borne pests in agriculture, due to their capacity to parasitize a wide range of crops. Root-knot nematodes, especially Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica, are among the most damaging species globally. These endoparasites induce gall formation in roots, impairing water and nutrient uptake, which leads to stunted growth and significant yield losses [3]. Their high reproductive rate, wide host range, and ability to persist in soil make them difficult to manage through conventional practices. Moreover, their interactions with other pathogens can increase disease severity [46].
The Trichoderma clades Harzianum, Viride, and Longibrachiatum have been the focus of studies addressing nematode control (Figure 2), with China, India, and Brazil standing out as leading countries in conducting these studies (Figure 3). The Harzianum and Viride clades are particularly notable for their efficiency in nematode control, owing to their broad genetic diversity and evolutionary adaptability, which allow them to thrive in various soil conditions and target a wide range of nematodes. Those species produce antinematode metabolites (gliotoxin, harzianolide, and viridin) that affect nematode motility, fecundity, and viability. Additionally, they excrete enzymes such as proteases and chitinases to degrade the cuticle and eggs of the nematodes. They are also able to directly parasitize nematode eggs and juveniles via the formation of hyphal networks that immobilize and hydrolyze the nematodes. The effectiveness of root colonization allows them to outcompete nematodes while promoting the presence of favorable microorganisms that assist in their control. In addition, they elicit a defense in plants that deters nematode penetration and feeding, leading to healthy root development. Due to these characteristics, species within these clades have been comprehensively studied and commercialized as biocontrol agents, making them effective for nematode management in diverse agricultural systems.
Among these are the studies conducted by Moo-Koh et al. [47], who reported that T. harzianum, T. koningiopsis, T. ghanense, and T. virens caused 51 to 100% mortality of J2 juveniles of M. incognita and M. javanica in tomato plants. Similarly, other researchers have identified T. virens, T. hamatum, T. harzianum, and T. citrinoviride as effective agents for inhibiting egg hatching, increasing juvenile mortality, and reducing gall formation in various plant species [14,48,49,50].
Table 1 provides details of the research conducted with Trichoderma species against economically important plant-parasitic nematodes, showing that parasitism is the primary mechanism of action identified in most studies. In cases where the specific mode of action was not determined, the term “antagonism” is often used broadly, to describe the overall suppressive effect of Trichoderma spp. on nematodes. Spore concentration was the most used application method in these studies, achieving promising results, with egg hatching inhibition and juvenile mortality ranging from 40 to 100%.
Table 1. Application of Trichoderma spp. for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes.
Table 1. Application of Trichoderma spp. for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes.
Trichoderma Species and Application TypeMechanism of Action and Study TypeNematodeCountry and CropResults and References
T. harzianum and
T. koningi/C.S
Antagonism/In vivoM. arenariaUSA/CornReduction in egg production [43]
T. longibrachiatum/C.FAntagonism/In vitroMeloidogyne spp.,
Heterodera sachari, G. rostochiensis
FranceInhibited movement of infective juveniles [51]
T. harzianum rifai/-Parasitism/In vitroG. rostochiensisPakistan/PotatoTrichoderma penetrated cysts and eggs, causing larval death [52]
T. harzianum and T. lignorum/C.FParasitism/In vivoM. javanicaIsrael/TomatoEnhanced plant growth and reduced gall formation [44]
T. virens/C.FAntagonism/In vitro and in vivoM. incognitaUSA/Tomato42% fewer eggs and J2 per gram of roots [53]
T. harzianum/C.SParasitism/In vitroM. javanicaIsrael/TomatoAbility to colonize eggs and second-stage juveniles (J2) [45]
T. harzianum/C.FAntagonism/In vitroM. incognitaSpainSignificant reduction in eggs [54]
T. atrovirens and T. harzianum/C.SParasitism/In vitroM. javanicaIsrael/TomatoNematode biocontrol activity [55]
T. harzianum/C.SParasitism/In vitro and in vivoM. javanicaIran/TomatoReduces egg hatching and activates defense enzymes [56]
T. asperellum, T. harzianum,
T. brevicompactum, T. hamatum and T. erinaceum/C.S
Antagonism/In vivoM. incognitaBenin/Tomato and carrotLowers J2 density, cuts egg production by 86%, and increases tomato yield by 30% [57]
T. harzianum/C.FParasitism/In vitro and in vivoM. javanicaIran/TomatoInhibited egg hatching, 84% reduction in egg parasitism, and decreased nematode damage [58]
T. harzianum/C.SParasitism/In vitro and in vivoM. incognitaBrazil/CucumberInhibited movement of 60% of eggs and J2 [59]
T. harzianum/C.SAntibiosis and induction of resistance of the plant/In vivoM. enterolobiiThailand/GuavaReduced nematode numbers and stopped J2 development [60]
T. harzianum/C.SParasitism/In vivoM. javanicaSaudi Arabia/Tomato89% of eggs infected; reduced egg hatching by 8.8% and caused 64.5% J2 mortality [61]
T. harzianum/C.SParasitism/In vivoG. rostochiensisPakistan/TomatoCyst wall or egg surface penetration was chemical and mechanical [52]
T. longibrachiatum/C.SParasitism/In vitro and in vivoH. avenaeChina/WheatThe parasitic effects of T. longibrachiatum were >91% after 18 days [62]
T. longibrachiatum/C.SParasitism/In vitroM. incognitaChina/CucumberStrong lethal effect (>88%) and improved plant growth [63]
T. harzianum/C.SAntagonism/In vitroM. incognitaMexico/TomatoReproduction was reduced by 87–90%, nematode damage and gall formation decreased and plant height and dry biomass increased [64]
T. harzianum and T. viride/C.SAntagonism/In vivoM. javanicaSaudi Arabia/TomatoSuppression of nematode reproduction and gall formation, increased tomato plant growth [65]
T. harzianum/C.SAntagonism/In vitro and in vivoM. incognitaEthiopia/Tomato80% of J2 mortality at 72 h [66]
T. asperellum, T. harzianum, T. virens, T. atroviride, T. lacuwombatense, T. viride/C.SAntagonism/In vivoM. haplaNew Zealand/TomatoTrichoderma strains reduced 1.1 eggs mL
soil−1 and suppressed galling by 42–88% [67]
T. harzianum/C.SAntagonism/In vivoG. pallidaUSA/Potato60% reduction in nematode reproduction [68]
T. atroviride/C.SInduce resistance/In vivoM. javanicaSpain/TomatoReductions of 42% in galls, 60% in egg masses, and 90% in adult nematodes [69]
T. harzianum, T. atroviride, T. virens/C.SAntagonism/In vivoM. incognitaMexico/Bell pepperEgg production reduced by 63% and female production by 14.3%; plant growth enhanced [70]
T. harzianum/C.SInduced resistance/In vivoM. incognitaSpain/TomatoHost defenses enhanced during infection, varying by parasitism stage [71]
T. longibrachiatum/C.SParasitism and induced resistance/In vivoP. brachyurus and
M. javanica
Brazil/SoybeanAll treatments effectively controlled P. brachyurus and M. javanica [72]
T. harzianum/C.SParasitism/In vivoM. incognitaItaly/TomatoRoot colonization primed Systemic Acquired Resistance against root-knot nematodes [73]
T. longibrachiatum/C.SParasitism/In vivoH. avenaeChina/Wheat89.8% reduction in cysts and juveniles in soil, and 88.3% reduction in J2 and females in roots [74]
T. harzianum, T. asperellum and T. longibrachiatum/-In vitroM. javanicaMorocco/OliveTrichoderma strains killed 50% of the J2s [75]
T. harzianum, T. hamatum, T. viride, T. virens and T. koningii/C.S and C.FIn vivoM. incognitaIndia/TomatoCulture suspensions caused the greatest reduction in hatching and juvenile mortality [76]
T. viride/C.SAntagonism/In vivoM. incognitaIndia/TomatoIncreased shoot weight and decreased root weight of tomato, with dose-dependent reductions in galls, egg masses and eggs per egg mass [77]
T. harzianum and T. viride/C.SAntagonism/In vivoM. incognitaPakistan/TomatoSignificant reductions in number
of galls, egg masses, eggs per egg mass and reproductive factors of M. incognita in a dose-dependent
manner [78]
T. harzianum, T. viride, and T. virens/C.SParasitism/In vivoM. incognitaEgypt/Pea78 to 89% reduction in nematode numbers and gall numbers [79]
T. koningiopsis/C.S and C.FEnzymatic hydrolysis/In vitroM. javanica and M. incognitaBrazilHigh nematode mortality when applied as an enzymatic filtrate or conidial suspension [80]
T. citrinoviride/C.SAntagonism/In vivoM. incognitaChina/TomatoEgg hatching inhibition 90% and promoted the growth of tomato plants [48]
T. harzianum, T. afroharzianum, T. hirsutum/C.SParasitism/In vitroG. rostochiensis and Meloidogyne spp.Algeria/TomatoMortality above 70% [81]
T. pseudoharzianum, T. koingiopsis, T. asperelloides, T. afroharzianum, T. acitrinoviride, T. hamatum, T. viride/C.FAntagonism/In vitroM. incognitaChina/ChiliOnly the secondary metabolites of T. virens showed strong nematicidal activity, causing the highest egg hatch inhibition and J2 mortality [82]
T. longibrachiatum/C.FInduce resistance/In vitroM. incognitaChina/Marine algaeThe metabolite cyclodepsipeptides 7–9 showed
moderate nematicidal activities [83]
T. asperellum and T. harzianum (commercial formulates)/C.SAntagonism/In vitroM. incognitaSpain/Tomato and cucumberThe number of egg masses and eggs per plant were reduced.
Induced resistance to M. incognita in tomato but not in cucumber [10]
T. harzianum/C.SParasitism/In vivoM. incognitaChina/TomatoNematode reduction percentage of 62%. The gall number per plant decreased by 75% [14]
T. hamatum/C.FInduce resistance/In vitroM. incognitaSaudi Arabia/TomatoEgg hatch inhibition was 78% and juvenile stage mortality rate was 89% [49]
T. harzianum, T. viride and T. virens/C.SInduce resistance/In vivoM. javanicaEgypt/PeanutThe highest percentages reduction in J2 in soil (being 81%) was recorded with T. viride, followed by T. harzianum (77%) and T. virens (73%) [84]
T. asperellum and T. harzianum/C.FAntibiosis/In vivoP. brachyurusBrazil/SoybeanBoth isolates have nematicide effects
that improve J2 mortality by 41–65% [85]
T. citrinoviride, T. ghanense, T. harzianum, T. koningiopsis, T. simmonsii, and T. virens/C.FAntibiosis/In vitroM. javanica and
M. incognita
Mexico/TomatoThe most lethal strains were T. harzianum, T. koningiopsis, T. ghanense and T. virens, which caused 51–100% mortality of J2 of both nematodes [47]
T. virens/C.SAntagonism/In vitro and in vivoM. incognitaIndia/ChickpeaReduction in J2 hatching [50]
T. harzianum/C.SAntibiosis/In vivoM. javanicaEgypt/TomatoThe penetration rates of nematodes, as well as the number of J2, females, egg
mass, and galls were significantly reduced [86]
T. asperellum/C.SIn vivoM. incognitaIndia/OkraHatching suppression 96% and J2 mortality 90% [9]
Note: Abbreviations used in this table: C.S = concentrate of spores; C.F. = culture filtrate.
In addition to these studies, there are effective results from the application of Trichoderma spp. in combination with other microorganisms and bioactive substances, as described in Table 2. For example, the control of Tylenchulus semipenetrans has been evaluated through the combination of Trichoderma spp. isolates and plant extracts, such as neem, karanj, castor oil, and carob galactomannan [87,88]. Also, the effectiveness of Trichoderma harzianum combined with 1,3-dichloropropene and organic fertilizers for the control of M. incognita has been demonstrated [89]. Another strategy to enhance the efficacy of Trichoderma spp. in controlling nematodes such as Pratylenchus brachyurus and M. javanica is its combination with bacteria such as Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus spp. [72,90]. On the other hand, the use of Trichoderma in combination with nematophagous bacteria and fungi, such as T. asperellum, B. subtilis, and Purpureocillium lilacinum, has been proposed, achieving up to an 85% reduction in the nematode reproduction factor [91]. It has also been reported that a mixture of antagonistic fungi, composed of T. harzianum and Pochonia chlamydosporia, applied as a drench in tomato crops, reduced the number of females and egg masses by up to 46% in plants infected by the root-knot nematode M. incognita [92].
Table 2. Application of Trichoderma spp. consortia with other microorganisms and bioactive substances for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes.
Table 2. Application of Trichoderma spp. consortia with other microorganisms and bioactive substances for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes.
Trichoderma Species with Different ProductsMechanism of Action and Study TypeApplication TypeNematodeCountry and CropResults and References
T. harzianum + neem, karanj, and castor oil cakesParasitism/In vivoC.STylenchulus semipenetransIndia/limeTrichoderma in combination with vegetable oils showed good control of the nematode [87]
T. virens + Burkholderia cepaciaAntagonism/In vivoC.F.M. incognitaUSA/Bell pepperT. virens suppresses M. incognita; when combined, it decreases effectiveness [53]
T. harzianum + Pseudomonas fluorescensAntagonism/In vitro and in vivoC.FM. javanicaPakistan/TomatoMixtures of P. fluorescens and T. harzianum improve nematode biocontrol [90]
T. asperellum and
T. atroviride with Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies
Parasitism/In vitroC.SM. javanicaIsrael/TomatoTrichoderma parasitism increased with antibodies in bioassays [93]
T. longibrachiatum and cadusafosParasitism/In vivoC.SM. javanicaIran/ZuchiniThe optimal concentrations for best plant growth and lowest nematode reproduction were 1.7 mg a.i. kg−1 soil and 108 conidia mL−1 [94]
Bacillus licheniformis,
B. subtilis, T. longibrachiatum
Parasitism and induced resistance/In vivoC.SP. brachyurus and
M. javanica
Brazil/SoybeanNematode reduction
percentage of 34–40% for P. brachyurus and
88–92% for M. javanica [72]
T. asperellum, T. atroviride, Trichoderma sp. and Purpureocillium lilacinumAntagonism/In vivoC.SM. javanicaKenya/PineappleReduced nematode egg and egg mass production, lowering root galling damage by 60.8–81.8% and increasing root mass growth [95]
T. viride,
T. harzianum, Trichoderma sp.
Antibiosis/In vitroC.FM. incognita race 2India/TomatoCulture filtrates of Trichoderma significantly induced
inhibition of egg hatching and mortality of M. incognita race 2 [96]
T. asperellum, B. subtilis, Purpureocillium lilacinum, and abamectinAntagonism/In vivoC.SPratylenchus brachyurusBrazil/SoybeanReduction in the reproduction factor: T. asperellum 56%, B. subtilis 78%, and the combination of T. asperellum with B. subtilis and/or P. lilacinum 72.2% [91]
T. harzianum and Pochonia chlamydosporiaAntagonism/In vivoC.SM. incognitaItaly/TomatoTomato plants pre-treated with a mixture of
beneficial bio-control agents (BCAs), as soil-drenches, were less sensitive to infection of the
root-knot nematode [92]
T. harzianum, T. atroviride, T. longibrachiatum and carob
galactomannan biopolymer
Antagonism/In vivoC.SM. incognitaItaly/TomatoCoating tomato roots with the carob
galactomannan biopolymer followed by soil application of selected Trichoderma strains reduced the root galling index [88]
Bacillus megatarium,
B. subtilis,
T. harzianum
Antibiosis/In vivoC.S and C.FM. incognitaIndia/Sweet basilReducing M. incognita infestation by 46 to 72%.
A consortium of BM and TH was the most potent treatment [97]
T. harzianum
and
arbuscular mycorrhizae
Antibiosis/In vivoC.SM. javanicaEgypt/TomatoThe lowest number of juveniles was observed in the
case of either single mycorrhizal inoculation (45%) or in combination with T. harzianum (55%) [86]
1,3-
dichloropropene with T. harzianum
and an organic fertilizer
Antagonism/In vivoC.SM. incognitaItaly/TomatoThe greatest nematicidal
effect was caused by a combination of the three products [89]
T. asperellum, T. hamatum, T. atrobruneum,
and Clonostachys rosea
In vitroC.SGlobodera spp.Kenya/PotatoT. asperellum and T. breve suppressed nematode egg hatching by 50%, while T. breve specifically reduced egg viability by 41%
T. harzianum. and Bacillus velezensisAntibiosis/In vitroC.SM. javanicaIran/TomatoSignificant nematicidal activity, inhibiting egg hatching (16–45%) and inducing J2 mortality (30–46%) [98]
Note: Abbreviations used in this table: C.S = concentrate of spores; C.F. = culture filtrate.

5. Mechanisms of Action of Trichoderma Against Nematodes

Several studies detail how Trichoderma spp. interact with nematodes, including mechanisms of mycoparasitism, antibiosis, competition for space in the rhizosphere and roots, production of lytic enzymes, and induction of plant resistance [99] (Figure 4).

5.1. Parasitism

Parasitism involves the direct interaction between the fungus and the eggs or juveniles of the nematode, inhibiting their development and significantly reducing populations in the soil. One of the key aspects of parasitism is the ability of Trichoderma hyphae to firmly adhere to the surface of nematode eggs and juveniles, a process mediated by the recognition of specific molecules present in the cuticle or the external structure of the nematode. This initial adhesion is essential for the establishment of the parasitic attack. Recent studies have shown that this hyphal adhesion is mediated by specific carbohydrate–lectin interactions. For instance, Trichoderma asperellum conidia can bind to the surface of Meloidogyne javanica eggs and juveniles through Ca2+-dependent lectin–carbohydrate recognition. This process may be further stabilized by antibody-like binding to both conidia and nematodes, facilitating firm attachment [55,93]. Additionally, Inbar and Chet [100] reported the presence of lectins in culture filtrates of T. viride and T. harzianum, suggesting that these proteins play a significant role in the recognition of, and attachment to, host surfaces. These molecular interactions are considered a crucial step in the parasitic process, enabling the fungus to remain anchored and initiate penetration. From there, the fungus envelops the eggs through the growth of its hyphae and generates an extracellular matrix that facilitates colonization and the subsequent development of specialized structures, such as appressoria, which exert mechanical pressure on the outer wall of the egg, promoting its penetration and the subsequent invasion of its internal contents [101].
In parallel, Trichoderma spp. complement the mechanical attack with a potent biochemical mechanism that enhances the infection process’s effectiveness. This biochemical arsenal is mainly regulated by heterotrimeric G protein, cAMP, and MAPK motif signals, based on the production of hydrolytic enzymes with nematicidal properties, such as chitinases, proteases, lipases, and glucanases. These enzymes break down vital components of the cuticle and cell wall of nematode eggs and juveniles, compromising their structural integrity and allowing fungal hyphae to penetrate and, ultimately, kill them. Furthermore, these enzymes disrupt the nematodes’ capacity to infect plant roots [14,45,62].
The combined effects of mechanical disruption and enzymatic breakdown significantly diminish the survival rate of eggs and limit juvenile hatching, thus disrupting the nematode life cycle. Recent research indicates that this combination of physical and biochemical mechanisms can greatly reduce the population density of plant-parasitic nematodes, positioning Trichoderma spp. as a promising element in integrated nematode management strategies within agricultural systems [49].

5.2. Secondary Metabolite Production (Antibiosis)

Trichoderma spp. produce secondary metabolites with nematicidal activity that act through various mechanisms. The production of these metabolites is influenced by environmental and physiological factors, including cultivation conditions such as medium composition, pH, temperature, aeration, and nutrient availability [82,102]. Among these metabolites, one of the most relevant groups is the volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including alcohols, ketones, terpenes, and other organic molecules, which can affect the mobility, reproduction, and survival of nematodes, thereby contributing to their control [103].
In addition to VOCs, Trichoderma also synthesizes non-volatile metabolites, such as peptaibols, alkaloids, and polyketides, which impact the nervous system, reproduction, and mobility of nematodes [104,105,106].
Moreover, the interaction of Trichoderma spp. with nematodes or whit plant root exudates released in response to nematode infection can trigger the production of nematicidal secondary metabolites [8]. Several studies have reported that the secondary metabolites produced by certain Trichoderma species directly affect egg hatching and juvenile survival of M. incognita. These compounds include toxic molecules such as gliotoxin, immunosuppressive peptides like cyclosporin A, and other bioactive secondary metabolites, which exert nematicidal or nematostatic effects by interfering with the development and viability of nematode populations [51,82,107,108].

5.3. Competition for Resources and Rhizosphere Colonization

Trichoderma controls plant-parasitic nematodes through competition for resources and rhizosphere colonization, displacing them by occupying ecological niches in the roots. This fungus adheres to and colonizes the roots using specialized structures such as hyphae and appressoria, preventing nematodes from finding feeding or reproduction sites [28]. In addition, it competes for root exudates, a key nutrient source for nematodes, reducing their availability and limiting their development [109]. By occupying the same sites that nematodes would use to parasitize the roots, Trichoderma acts as a physical barrier, blocking their access [110]. At the same time, it induces changes in the soil microbiome, stimulating antagonistic microorganisms that produce nematicidal compounds or enzymes that degrade nematode eggs and juveniles, such as Pseudomonas fluorescens, Bacillus subtilis, Purpureocillium lilacinum, and Pasteuria penetrans [82,90,111,112]. It also secretes secondary metabolites, such as organic acids and volatile compounds, which alter the composition of the microbiome, creating an unfavorable environment for nematodes [108,113].

5.4. Induction of Systemic Resistance in Plants

The induction of systemic resistance is one of the key mechanisms by which Trichoderma protects plants against plant-parasitic nematodes, activating their natural defenses through the production and regulation of hormones such as jasmonic acid, ethylene, and salicylic acid, which strengthen physical and chemical barriers against infection [28,109].
This defense response may occur through two main pathways: Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR), typically triggered by beneficial microbes like Trichoderma via jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling, and Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR), usually activated by pathogen infection and mediated by salicylic acid [28]. In the context of ISR, T. harzianum colonization has been shown to reduce M. incognita infection in tomato by priming the plant’s defense genes [71]. Although less frequently reported, SAR may also be enhanced indirectly. In addition, plants recognize conserved microbial patterns known as Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs) or Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns (MAMPs), such as chitin fragments, small proteins, or polysaccharides produced by Trichoderma. These molecules trigger basal immune responses without causing disease [114]. When nematodes damage root cells, they release Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs), which further amplify plant defenses. These overlapping signals collectively contribute to enhanced nematode resistance [109]. Jasmonic acid promotes the synthesis of defensive compounds, such as protease inhibitors and secondary metabolites toxic to nematodes [28,109]. Ethylen promotes the lignification of cell walls, reinforcing the tissue structure and hindering the penetration and feeding of nematodes [115]. Meanwhile, salicylic acid stimulates the accumulation of phytoalexins and the activation of resistance genes, negatively affecting the nematodes [104]. As a result, plants treated with Trichoderma spp. show reduced penetration and reproduction of nematodes, a decrease in cyst and egg formation in the case of Globodera spp. and Heterodera spp. [62], as well as a significant reduction in the formation of galls in roots infected by Meloidogyne spp. [28], and improved growth and vigor, demonstrating its ability to reduce the damage caused by these plant-parasitic nematodes and enhance stress tolerance [109]. Additionally, molecular studies have shown that plants treated with Trichoderma spp. exhibit higher expression of defense genes, further strengthening their defense response against nematodes [115].
To provide a clearer overview of the diverse strategies employed by Trichoderma spp., Table 3 summarizes the main mechanisms of action involved in the control of plant-parasitic nematodes and plant pathogenic fungi. These mechanisms include the production of secondary metabolites, secretion of lytic enzymes, induction of systemic resistance, physical interactions, and competition for space and nutrients. Although many of these strategies are shared between both target groups, there are relevant distinctions. For instance, direct parasitic interaction, commonly referred to as mycoparasitism in the context of fungal pathogens, has also been reported in nematodes, where Trichoderma hyphae adhere to eggs or juveniles, form appressoria, and penetrate the host through mechanical and enzymatic means. This comparative analysis highlights the versatility and adaptability of Trichoderma spp. in suppressing a wide range of plant pathogens, reinforcing its potential as a valuable component of integrated pest- and disease-management programs.

6. Commercial Applications, Limitations, and Future Perspectives of Trichoderma spp. in Nematode Management

Numerous studies have documented the efficacy of commercial formulations of Trichoderma spp. in the control of plant-parasitic nematodes. For instance, preparations based on T. harzianum have been shown, both in greenhouse and field conditions, to significantly reduce galling index and egg production of M. javanica and M. incognita, while improving plant vigor and yield in crops such as tomato and soybean [44]. In one specific study, soil treatment with T. harzianum filtrate reduced the gall index from 2.78 to 0.4 in celosia plant infected with M. incognita, along with a drastic reduction in nematode population and notable improvements in plant growth [122]. Additionally, commercial formulations containing strains T-22 (T. harzianum) and T-34 (T. asperellum) induced systemic resistance in tomato plants against M. incognita, showing a cumulative effect, with resistance genes such as Mi-1.2 [10].
The management of plant-parasitic nematodes using Trichoderma faces several challenges. Variability in effectiveness is influenced by the specific species or strain used, the target nematode, soil physicochemical properties, and interactions with native-soil microbiota. Factors such as formulation stability, storage, handling, and application methods significantly impact the viability and efficacy of these products [123]. Moreover, environmental conditions (temperature, moisture, pH) and interactions with other agrochemicals can affect fungal survival and biocontrol activity. The lack of standardized protocols regarding inoculation techniques, dosage, and environmental requirements further limits consistent field application, particularly in smallholder contexts. Addressing these issues through targeted research and regulatory support is essential to fully harness Trichoderma as a reliable nematode management tool. Figure 5 presents a proposed diagram summarizing the management of Trichoderma spp. from isolation to field application.
The potential to combine Trichoderma-based biopreparations with chemical nematicides presents a promising strategy within integrated pest management (IPM). Evidence suggests additive or synergistic effects that allow reduced chemical inputs while maintaining efficacy, thus minimizing environmental impact. Some Trichoderma strains tolerate low concentrations of pesticides, and co-application may enhance root colonization and biocontrol performance [89]. Advances in genetic engineering offer exciting opportunities to improve Trichoderma strains. Current research focuses on overexpressing genes related to secondary metabolite production, plant immune activation, and stress tolerance, as well as applying CRISPR-Cas9 for precise genome editing. These approaches aim to develop more robust strains capable of functioning effectively under diverse and challenging field conditions [124].
It is crucial to consider biotic and abiotic factors that influence the performance of Trichoderma formulations. Soil texture, organic matter content, microbial competition, and environmental fluctuations can significantly alter fungal survival and efficacy. Laboratory results often differ from field outcomes, due to the complexity and variability of natural ecosystems [125]. Therefore, extensive field validation and long-term trials are necessary to ensure the practical reliability of these products under real agricultural conditions. Looking forward, Trichoderma spp. can play a central role in integrated nematode management strategies, provided current knowledge gaps are addressed. Omics technologies (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) promise to enhance understanding of the complex interactions between Trichoderma, nematodes, other soil microorganisms, and host plants [126]. This knowledge will enable the identification of key genes and pathways to select or engineer superior strains and optimize application protocols. Furthermore, microbial consortia combining Trichoderma spp. with other beneficial microbes, such as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), have the potential to improve biocontrol efficacy, product stability, and persistence in the soil [127]. Finally, integrating Trichoderma spp. with cultural practices (crop rotation, organic amendments, etc.) and host genetic resistance can reduce reliance on synthetic nematicides, supporting more sustainable and environmentally friendly agricultural-production systems.

7. Conclusions

The effectiveness of Trichoderma spp. in controlling plant-parasitic nematodes from the genera Heterodera, Globodera, Meloidogyne, and Pratylenchus has been widely demonstrated. The biocontrol capacity of Thichoderma against plant-parasitic nematodes arises from a combination of diverse mechanisms, including the production of enzymes that facilitate the infectious process, metabolites with antimicrobial activity, its rapid growth, which allows it to compete for space and resources, and the induction of systemic resistance in plants. However, the efficacy of a treatment based on Trichoderma can be affected by multiple factors, for example, the strain selected, the nematode, the application technique, and soil conditions. This highlights the need for further studies to optimize the extensive use of Trichoderma. The recent development of formulations incorporating Trichoderma spp. as a part of microbial consortia is a promising alternative to the conventional use of individual strains, to increase their effectiveness and sustainability. As research expands on the long-term ecological consequences of using Trichoderma in agriculture, and as protocols for its use are developed, we will be able to recommend it for extensive and widespread applications in a variety of sustainable agricultural systems. The adaptability and flexibility of Trichoderma spp. make them a promising asset for the development of sustainable alternatives to nematode management.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.C.-S. and J.M.T.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B.C.-S., J.M.T.-P. and G.M.-L.; review and editing, M.B.C.-S., H.B.-R. and J.M.T.-P.; writing—review and editing, M.B.C.-S., A.R.S.-B. and J.M.T.-P.; funding acquisition, G.M.-L. and A.R.S.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Secretary of Research and Graduate Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute (Instituto Politécnico Nacional), grant number 20250746.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mesa-Valle, C.M.; Garrido-Cardenas, J.A.; Cebrian-Carmona, J.; Talavera, M.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Global research on plant nematodes. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ning, J.; Zhou, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Ahmad, F.; Feng, X.; Fu, Y.; Gu, X.; Zhao, L. Parallel evolution of C-type lectin domain gene family sizes in insect-vectored nematodes. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 856826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jones, J.T.; Haegeman, A.; Danchin, E.G.; Gaur, H.S.; Helder, J.; Jones, M.G.; Kikuchi, T.; Manzanilla-López, R.; Palomares-Rius, J.E.; Wesemael, W.M. Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 14, 946–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chitwood, D.J. Research on plant-parasitic nematode biology conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service. Pest Manag. Sci. Former. Pestic. Sci. 2003, 59, 748–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nicol, J.; Turner, S.; Coyne, D.L.; Nijs, L.d.; Hockland, S.; Maafi, Z.T. Current nematode threats to world agriculture. In Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant-Nematode Interactions; Springer: Dordrecht, Switzerland, 2011; pp. 21–43. [Google Scholar]
  6. Harman, G.; Khadka, R.; Doni, F.; Uphoff, N. Benefits to plant health and productivity from enhancing plant microbial symbionts. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 610065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yao, X.; Guo, H.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, M.; Ruan, J.; Chen, J. Trichoderma and its role in biological control of plant fungal and nematode disease. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1160551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. TariqJaveed, M.; Farooq, T.; Al-Hazmi, A.S.; Hussain, M.D.; Rehman, A.U. Role of Trichoderma as a biocontrol agent (BCA) of phytoparasitic nematodes and plant growth inducer. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2021, 183, 107626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saharan, R.; Patil, J.; Yadav, S.; Kumar, A.; Goyal, V. The nematicidal potential of novel fungus, Trichoderma asperellum FbMi6 against Meloidogyne incognita. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 6603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pocurull, M.; Fullana, A.M.; Ferro, M.; Valero, P.; Escudero, N.; Saus, E.; Gabaldón, T.; Sorribas, F.J. Commercial formulates of Trichoderma induce systemic plant resistance to Meloidogyne incognita in tomato and the effect is additive to that of the Mi-1.2 resistance gene. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Agbessenou, A.; Akutse, K.S.; Yusuf, A.A.; Khamis, F.M. The endophyte Trichoderma asperellum M2RT4 induces the systemic release of methyl salicylate and (Z)-jasmone in tomato plant affecting host location and herbivory of Tuta absoluta. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 860309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Natural Resources Defense Council. ¿Cuáles Son los Efectos del Cambio Climático? Available online: https://www.nrdc.org/es/stories/cuales-son-efectos-cambio-climatico (accessed on 14 January 2025).
  13. Tayyrov, A.; Schmieder, S.S.; Bleuler-Martinez, S.; Plaza, D.F.; Künzler, M. Toxicity of potential fungal defense proteins towards the fungivorous nematodes Aphelenchus avenae and Bursaphelenchus okinawaensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02051-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yan, Y.; Mao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Fu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Peng, X.; Zhang, M.; Bai, B.; Liu, A. Trichoderma harzianum induces resistance to root-knot nematodes by increasing secondary metabolite synthesis and defense-related enzyme activity in Solanum lycopersicum L. Biol. Control 2021, 158, 104609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, G.-Z.; Yang, H.-T.; Zhang, X.-J.; Zhou, F.-Y.; Wu, X.-Q.; Xie, X.-Y.; Zhao, X.-Y.; Zhou, H.-Z. Five new species of Trichoderma from moist soils in China. MycoKeys 2022, 87, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cai, F.; Druzhinina, I.S. In honor of John Bissett: Authoritative guidelines on molecular identification of Trichoderma. Fungal Divers. 2021, 107, 1–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sousa, T.F.; Reça, B.N.P.V.; Castro, G.S.; da Silva, I.J.S.; Caniato, F.F.; de Araújo Júnior, M.B.; Yamagishi, M.E.B.; Koolen, H.H.F.; Bataglion, G.A.; Hanada, R.E. Trichoderma agriamazonicum sp. nov.(Hypocreaceae), a new ally in the control of phytopathogens. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 275, 127469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chen, K.; Zhuang, W.-Y. Trichoderma shennongjianum and Trichoderma tibetense, two new soil-inhabiting species in the Strictipile clade. Mycoscience 2016, 57, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Contreras-Cornejo, H.A.; Macías-Rodríguez, L.; Del-Val, E.; Larsen, J. Ecological functions of Trichoderma spp. and their secondary metabolites in the rhizosphere: Interactions with plants. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hernández-Melchor, D.J.; Ferrera-Cerrato, R.; Alarcón, A. Trichoderma: Importancia agrícola, biotecnológica, y sistemas de fermentación para producir biomasa y enzimas de interés industrial. Chil. J. Agric. Anim. Sci. 2019, 35, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guzmán-Guzmán, P.; Kumar, A.; de Los Santos-Villalobos, S.; Parra-Cota, F.I.; Orozco-Mosqueda, M.d.C.; Fadiji, A.E.; Hyder, S.; Babalola, O.O.; Santoyo, G. Trichoderma species: Our best fungal allies in the biocontrol of plant diseases—A review. Plants 2023, 12, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Boddy, L.; Hiscox, J. Fungal ecology: Principles and mechanisms of colonization and competition by saprotrophic fungi. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jouhten, P.; Pitkänen, E.; Pakula, T.; Saloheimo, M.; Penttilä, M.; Maaheimo, H. 13C-metabolic flux ratio and novel carbon path analyses confirmed that Trichoderma reesei uses primarily the respirative pathway also on the preferred carbon source glucose. BMC Syst. Biol. 2009, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bailey, B.A.; Melnick, R.L. The endophytic Trichoderma. In Trichoderma: Biology and Applications; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2013; pp. 152–172. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cortés-Hernández, F.d.C.; Alvarado-Castillo, G.; Sánchez-Viveros, G. Trichoderma spp., an alternative for sustainable agriculture: A review. Rev. Colomb. De Biotecnol. 2023, 25, 73–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Natsiopoulos, D.; Topalidou, E.; Mantzoukas, S.; Eliopoulos, P.A. Endophytic Trichoderma: Potential and prospects for plant health management. Pathogens 2024, 13, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kubicek, C.P.; Steindorff, A.S.; Chenthamara, K.; Manganiello, G.; Henrissat, B.; Zhang, J.; Cai, F.; Kopchinskiy, A.G.; Kubicek, E.M.; Kuo, A. Evolution and comparative genomics of the most common Trichoderma species. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Harman, G.E.; Howell, C.R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma species—Opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. El Enshasy, H.A.; Ambehabati, K.K.; El Baz, A.F.; Ramchuran, S.; Sayyed, R.; Amalin, D.; Dailin, D.J.; Hanapi, S.Z. Trichoderma: Biocontrol agents for promoting plant growth and soil health. In Agriculturally Important Fungi for Sustainable Agriculture: Volume 2: Functional Annotation for Crop Protection; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 239–259. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jemo, M.; Nkenmegne, S.; Buernor, A.B.; Raklami, A.; Ambang, Z.; Souleyamanou, A.; Ouhdouch, Y.; Hafidi, M. Mycorrhizas and Trichoderma fungi increase the accumulation of secondary metabolites in grain legume leaves and suppress foliar diseases in field-grown conditions of the humid forest of Cameroon. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martínez, B.; Infante, D.; Reyes, Y. Trichoderma spp. y su función en el control de plagas en los cultivos. Rev. Protección Veg. 2013, 28, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang, R.; Qin, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Xu, S.; Zhao, W.; Huang, Z. The interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma longibrachiatum enhance maize growth and modulate root metabolome under increasing soil salinity. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Woo, S.L.; Ruocco, M.; Vinale, F.; Nigro, M.; Marra, R.; Lombardi, N.; Pascale, A.; Lanzuise, S.; Manganiello, G.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma-based products and their widespread use in agriculture. Open Mycol. J. 2014, 8, 71–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mehetre, S.T.; Mukherjee, P.K. Trichoderma Improves Nutrient Use Efficiency in Crop Plants. In Nutrient Use Efficiency: From Basics to Advances; Rakshit, A., Singh, H.B., Sen, A., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 173–180. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sharma, S.; Kour, D.; Rana, K.L.; Dhiman, A.; Thakur, S.; Thakur, P.; Thakur, S.; Thakur, N.; Sudheer, S.; Yadav, N. Trichoderma: Biodiversity, ecological significances, and industrial applications. In Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology Through Fungi: Volume 1: Diversity and Enzymes Perspectives; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 85–120. [Google Scholar]
  36. Medina-García, L.R. Los hongos micorrízicos arbusculares y su rol en los agroecosistemas. Cultiv. Trop. 2022, 43, e14. [Google Scholar]
  37. Betancourt Tituaña, H.F. Sinergismo Entre Hongos Micorrícicos y Trichoderma harzianum en el Control del Nematodo Nacobbus aberrans en Plantas de Tomate (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Master’s Thesis, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  38. Asghar, W.; Craven, K.D.; Kataoka, R.; Mahmood, A.; Asghar, N.; Raza, T.; Iftikhar, F. The application of Trichoderma spp., an old but new useful fungus, in sustainable soil health intensification: A comprehensive strategy for addressing challenges. Plant Stress 2024, 12, 100455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hu, J.; Chen, K.; Li, J.; Wei, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Ryder, M.; Denton, M.D. Large-scale Trichoderma diversity was associated with ecosystem, climate and geographic location. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 1011–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Firdu, Z.; Alemu, T.; Assefa, F. Field performance of Trichoderma harzianum AAUT14 and Bacillus subtilis AAUB95 on faba bean (Vicia faba L.) growth promotion and management of chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae Sard.). IJPSS 2020, 32, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Duc, N.; Mayer, Z.; Pék, Z.; Helyes, L.; Posta, K. Combined inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma spp. for enhancing defense enzymes and yield of three pepper cultivars. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2017, 15, 1815–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Velmourougane, K.; Prasanna, R.; Singh, S.; Chawla, G.; Kumar, A.; Saxena, A.K. Modulating rhizosphere colonisation, plant growth, soil nutrient availability and plant defense enzyme activity through Trichoderma viride-Azotobacter chroococcum biofilm inoculation in chickpea. Plant Soil 2017, 421, 157–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Windham, G.; Windham, M.; Williams, W. Effects of Trichoderma spp. on maize growth and Meloidogyne arenaria reproduction. Plant Dis. 1989, 73, 493–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Spiegel, Y.; Chet, I. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. as a biocontrol agent against soilborne fungi and plant-parasitic nematodes in Israel. Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 1998, 3, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sharon, E.; Bar-Eyal, M.; Chet, I.; Herrera-Estrella, A.; Kleifeld, O.; Spiegel, Y. Biological control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica by Trichoderma harzianum. Phytopathology 2001, 91, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Moens, M.; Perry, R.N.; Starr, J.L. Meloidogyne species-a diverse group of novel and important plant parasites. In Root-Knot Nematodes; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2009; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  47. Moo-Koh, F.A.; Cristóbal-Alejo, J.; Andrés, M.F.; Martín, J.; Reyes, F.; Tun-Suárez, J.M.; Gamboa-Angulo, M. In vitro assessment of organic and residual fractions of nematicidal culture filtrates from thirteen tropical Trichoderma strains and metabolic profiles of most-active. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fan, H.; Yao, M.; Wang, H.; Zhao, D.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Duan, Y.; Chen, L. Isolation and effect of Trichoderma citrinoviride Snef1910 for the biological control of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Baazeem, A.; Almanea, A.; Manikandan, P.; Alorabi, M.; Vijayaraghavan, P.; Abdel-Hadi, A. In vitro antibacterial, antifungal, nematocidal and growth promoting activities of Trichoderma hamatum FB10 and its secondary metabolites. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Khan, A.; Bani Mfarrej, M.F.; Nadeem, H.; Ahamad, L.; Hashem, M.; Alamri, S.; Gupta, R.; Ahmad, F. Trichoderma virens mitigates the root-knot disease progression in the chickpea plant. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B—Soil Plant Sci. 2022, 72, 775–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Djian, C.; Pijarowski, L.; Ponchet, M.; Arpin, N.; Favre-Bonvin, J. Acetic acid: A selective nematicidal metabolite from culture filtrates of Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Samson and Trichoderma longibrachiatum Rifai. Nematologica 1991, 37, 101–112. [Google Scholar]
  52. Saifullah, S.; Khan, N. Low temperature scanning electron microscopic studies on the interaction of Globodera rostochiensis Woll. and Trichoderma harzianum Rifai. Pak. J. Bot. 2014, 43, 357–361. [Google Scholar]
  53. Meyer, S.L.; Massoud, S.I.; Chitwood, D.J.; Roberts, D.P. Evaluation of Trichoderma virens and Burkholderia cepacia for antagonistic activity against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Nematology 2000, 2, 871–879. [Google Scholar]
  54. Suarez, B.; Rey, M.; Castillo, P.; Monte, E.; Llobell, A. Isolation and characterization of PRA1, a trypsin-like protease from the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413 displaying nematicidal activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 65, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sharon, E.; Chet, I.; Viterbo, A.; Bar-Eyal, M.; Nagan, H.; Samuels, G.J.; Spiegel, Y. Parasitism of Trichoderma on Meloidogyne javanica and role of the gelatinous matrix. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2007, 118, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sahebani, N.; Hadavi, N. Biological control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica by Trichoderma harzianum. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 2016–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Affokpon, A.; Coyne, D.L.; Htay, C.C.; Agbèdè, R.D.; Lawouin, L.; Coosemans, J. Biocontrol potential of native Trichoderma isolates against root-knot nematodes in West African vegetable production systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 600–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Naserinasab, F.; Sahebani, N.; Etebarian, H.R. Biological control of Meloidogyne javanica by Trichoderma harzianum BI and salicylic acid on tomato. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2011, 5, 276–280. [Google Scholar]
  59. Mascarin, G.M.; Bonfim Junior, M.; de Araújo Filho, J. Trichoderma harzianum reduces population of Meloidogyne incognita in cucumber plants under greenhouse conditions. J. Entomol. Nematol. 2012, 4, 54–57. [Google Scholar]
  60. Jindapunnapat, K.; Chinnasri, B.; Kwankuae, S. Biological control of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne enterolobii) in guava by the fungus Trichoderma harzianum. J. Dev. Sustain. Agric. 2013, 8, 110–118. [Google Scholar]
  61. Elgorban, A.M.; Abdel-Wahab, M.A.; Bahkali, A.H. Biocontrol of Meloidogyne javanica on Tomato Plants by Hypocrea lixii (the Teleomorph of Trichoderma harzianum). CLEAN–Soil Air Water 2014, 42, 1464–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, S.; Gan, Y.; Xu, B.; Xue, Y. The parasitic and lethal effects of Trichoderma longibrachiatum against Heterodera avenae. Biol. Control 2014, 72, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, S.; Gan, Y.; Xu, B. Biocontrol potential of a native species of Trichoderma longibrachiatum against Meloidogyne incognita. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 94, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pinzón Espinoza, L.; Candelero de la Cruz, J.; Tun Suárez, J.; Reyes Oregel, V.; Cristóbal Alejo, J. Meloidogyne incognita control in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to the implementation of Trichoderma harzianum. Fitosanidad 2015, 19, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  65. Al-Hazmi, A.S.; TariqJaveed, M. Effects of different inoculum densities of Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma viride against Meloidogyne javanica on tomato. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 288–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Feyisa, B.; Lencho, A.; Selvaraj, T.; Amb, P.; Getaneh, G. Evaluation of some botanicals and Trichoderma harzianum for the management of tomato root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) Chit Wood). Adv. Crop Sci. Technol. 2016, 4, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Braithwaite, M.; Clouston, A.; Minchin, R.; Yardley, J.; Nieto-Jacobo, M.F.; Mendoza-Mendoza, A.; Steyaert, J.; Hill, R.; Marshall, J.; Stewart, A. The density-dependent effect of initial nematode population levels on the efficacy of Trichoderma as a bio-nematicide against Meloidogyne hapla on tomato. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2016, 45, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Contina, J.; Dandurand, L.; Knudsen, G. Use of GFP-tagged Trichoderma harzianum as a tool to study the biological control of the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 115, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Medeiros, H.A.d.; Araújo Filho, J.V.d.; Freitas, L.G.d.; Castillo, P.; Rubio, M.B.; Hermosa, R.; Monte, E. Tomato progeny inherit resistance to the nematode Meloidogyne javanica linked to plant growth induced by the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma atroviride. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Herrera-Parra, E.; Cristóbal-Alejo, J.; Ramos-Zapata, J.A. Trichoderma strains as growth promoters in Capsicum annuum and as biocontrol agents in Meloidogyne incognita. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 77, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Martínez-Medina, A.; Fernandez, I.; Lok, G.B.; Pozo, M.J.; Pieterse, C.M.; Van Wees, S.C. Shifting from priming of salicylic acid-to jasmonic acid-regulated defences by Trichoderma protects tomato against the root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 1363–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Miamoto, A.; Silva, M.T.R.e.; Dias-Arieira, C.R.; Puerari, H.H. Alternative products for Pratylenchus brachyurus and Meloidogyne javanica management in soya bean plants. J. Phytopathol. 2017, 165, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Leonetti, P.; Zonno, M.C.; Molinari, S.; Altomare, C. Induction of SA-signaling pathway and ethylene biosynthesis in Trichoderma harzianum-treated tomato plants after infection of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, S.; Gan, Y.; Ji, W.; Xu, B.; Hou, B.; Liu, J. Mechanisms and characterization of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 in suppressing nematodes (Heterodera avenae) in wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Aït Hamza, M.; Lakhtar, H.; Tazi, H.; Moukhli, A.; Fossati-Gaschignard, O.; Miché, L.; Roussos, S.; Ferji, Z.; El Mousadik, A.; Mateille, T. Diversity of nematophagous fungi in Moroccan olive nurseries: Highlighting prey-predator interactions and efficient strains against root-knot nematodes. Biol. Control 2017, 114, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Khan, M.R.; Ahmad, I.; Ahamad, F. Effect of pure culture and culture filtrates of Trichoderma species on root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infesting tomato. Indian Phytopathol. 2018, 71, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sonkar, S.; Bhatt, J.; Meher, J.; Kashyap, P. Bio-efficacy of Trichoderma viride against the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) in tomato plant. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem 2018, 7, 2010–2014. [Google Scholar]
  78. Mukhtar, T.; Jabbar, A.; Raja, M.; Javed, H. Management of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, in tomato with two Trichoderma species. Pak. J. Zool. 2018, 50, 1589–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. El-Nagdi, W.M.; Youssef, M.M.; El-Khair, H.A.; Abd-Elgawad, M.M. Effect of certain organic amendments and Trichoderma species on the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, infecting pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2019, 29, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Baldoni, D.B.; Antoniolli, Z.I.; Mazutti, M.A.; Jacques, R.J.S.; Dotto, A.C.; de Oliveira Silveira, A.; Ferraz, R.C.; Soares, V.B.; de Souza, A.R.C. Chitinase production by Trichoderma koningiopsis UFSMQ40 using solid state fermentation. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 1897–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Benttoumi, N.; Colagiero, M.; Sellami, S.; Boureghda, H.; Keddad, A.; Ciancio, A. Diversity of nematode microbial antagonists from Algeria shows occurrence of nematotoxic Trichoderma spp. Plants 2020, 9, 941. Plants 2020, 9, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Khan, R.A.A.; Najeeb, S.; Mao, Z.; Ling, J.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xie, B. Bioactive secondary metabolites from Trichoderma spp. against phytopathogenic bacteria and root-knot nematode. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Du, F.-Y.; Ju, G.-L.; Xiao, L.; Zhou, Y.-M.; Wu, X. Sesquiterpenes and cyclodepsipeptides from marine-derived fungus Trichoderma longibrachiatum and their antagonistic activities against soil-borne pathogens. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Elkelany, U.; Hammam, M.; El-Nagdi, W.; Abd-El-Khair, H. Field application of Trichoderma spp. for controlling the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica in peanut plants. Egypt. J. Agronematology 2021, 20, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. de Oliveira, C.M.; Almeida, N.O.; Côrtes, M.V.d.C.B.; Júnior, M.L.; da Rocha, M.R.; Ulhoa, C.J. Biological control of Pratylenchus brachyurus with isolates of Trichoderma spp. on soybean. Biol. Control 2021, 152, 104425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nafady, N.A.; Sultan, R.; El-Zawahry, A.M.; Mostafa, Y.S.; Alamri, S.; Mostafa, R.G.; Hashem, M.; Hassan, E.A. Effective and promising strategy in management of tomato root-knot nematodes by Trichoderma harzianum and arbuscular mycorrhizae. Agronomy 2022, 12, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Parvatha Reddy, P.; Rao, M.; Nagesh, M. Management of the citrus nematode Tylenchulus semipenetrans by integration of Trichoderma harzianum with oil cakes [India]. Nematol. Mediterr. 1996, 24, 265–267. [Google Scholar]
  88. D’Errico, G.; Mormile, P.; Malinconico, M.; Bolletti Censi, S.; Lanzuise, S.; Crasto, A.; Woo, S.L.; Marra, R.; Lorito, M.; Vinale, F. Trichoderma spp. and a carob (Ceratonia siliqua) galactomannan to control the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2021, 43, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. d’Errico, G.; Greco, N.; Vinale, F.; Marra, R.; Stillittano, V.; Davino, S.W.; Woo, S.L.; D’Addabbo, T. Synergistic effects of Trichoderma harzianum, 1, 3 dichloropropene and organic matter in controlling the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on tomato. Plants 2022, 11, 2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Siddiqui, I.; Shaukat, S. Trichoderma harzianum enhances the production of nematicidal compounds in vitro and improves biocontrol of Meloidogyne javanica by Pseudomonas fluorescens in tomato. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 38, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Oliveira, K.C.L.d.; Araújo, D.v.d.; Meneses, A.C.d.; Silva, J.M.e.; Tavares, R.L.C. Biological management of Pratylenchus brachyurus in soybean crops. Rev. Caatinga 2019, 32, 041–051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Molinari, S.; Leonetti, P. Bio-control agents activate plant immune response and prime susceptible tomato against root-knot nematodes. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sharon, E.; Chet, I.; Spiegel, Y. Improved attachment and parasitism of Trichoderma on Meloidogyne javanica in vitro. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2009, 123, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sokhandani, Z.; Moosavi, M.R.; Basirnia, T. Optimum concentrations of Trichoderma longibrachiatum and cadusafos for controlling Meloidogyne javanica on zucchini plants. J. Nematol. 2016, 48, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kiriga, A.W.; Haukeland, S.; Kariuki, G.M.; Coyne, D.L.; Beek, N.V. Effect of Trichoderma spp. and Purpureocillium lilacinum on Meloidogyne javanica in commercial pineapple production in Kenya. Biol. Control 2018, 119, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Devi, G.; Bora, L. Effect of some biocontrol agents against root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita race2). Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 3, 265260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tiwari, S.; Pandey, R.; Gross, A. Identification of rhizospheric microorganisms that manages root knot nematode and improve oil yield in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Agronomy 2021, 11, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rostami, M.; Shahbazi, S.; Soleimani, R.; Ghorbani, A. Optimizing sustainable control of Meloidogyne javanica in tomato plants through gamma radiation-induced mutants of Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus velezensis. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 17774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Poveda, J.; Abril-Urias, P.; Escobar, C. Biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes by filamentous fungi inducers of resistance: Trichoderma, mycorrhizal and endophytic fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Inbar, J.; Chet, I. The role of lectins in recognition and adhesion of the mycoparasitic fungus Trichoderma spp. to its host. Towar. Anti-Adhes. Ther. Microb. Dis. 1996, 408, 229–231. [Google Scholar]
  101. Zeilinger, S.; Atanasova, L. Sensing and regulation of mycoparasitism-relevant processes in Trichoderma. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 39–55. [Google Scholar]
  102. Sivasithamparam, K.; Ghisalberti, E. Secondary metabolism in Trichoderma and Gliocladium. In Trichoderma and Gliocladium; Kubicek, C.P., Harman, G.E., Eds.; Francis & Taylor Ltd.: London, UK, 1998; Volume 1, pp. 139–191. [Google Scholar]
  103. Yang, Z.; Yu, Z.; Lei, L.; Xia, Z.; Shao, L.; Zhang, K.; Li, G. Nematicidal effect of volatiles produced by Trichoderma sp. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2012, 15, 647–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Vinale, F.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Marra, R.; Woo, S.L.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Reino, J.L.; Guerrero, R.F.; Hernández-Galán, R.; Collado, I.G. Secondary metabolites from species of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma. Phytochem. Rev. 2008, 7, 89–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Li, M.F.; Li, G.H.; Zhang, K.Q. Non-Volatile Metabolites from Trichoderma spp. Metabolites 2019, 9, 58. Metabolites 2019, 9, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Anitha, R.; Murugesan, K. Production of gliotoxin on natural substrates by Trichoderma virens. J. Basic Microbiol. Int. J. Biochem. Physiol. Genet. Morphol. Ecol. Microorg. 2005, 45, 12–19. [Google Scholar]
  108. Li, G.; Zhang, K.; Xu, J.; Dong, J.; Liu, Y. Nematicidal substances from fungi. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 2007, 1, 212–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Shoresh, M.; Harman, G.E.; Mastouri, F. Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48, 21–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bordallo, J.; Lopez-Llorca, L.; Jansson, H.B.; Salinas, J.; Persmark, L.; Asensio, L. Colonization of plant roots by egg-parasitic and nematode-trapping fungi. New Phytol. 2002, 154, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cao, H.; Jiao, Y.; Yin, N.; Li, Y.; Ling, J.; Mao, Z.; Yang, Y.; Xie, B. Analysis of the activity and biological control efficacy of the Bacillus subtilis strain Bs-1 against Meloidogyne incognita. Crop Prot. 2019, 122, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Dube, B.; Smart, G.C., Jr. Biological control of Meloidogyne incognita by Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans. J. Nematol. 1987, 19, 222. [Google Scholar]
  113. Jansson, H.-B.; Lopez-Llorca, L.V. Control of nematodes by fungi. Mycol. Ser. 2004, 21, 205–216. [Google Scholar]
  114. Tyśkiewicz, R.; Nowak, A.; Ozimek, E.; Jaroszuk-Ściseł, J. Trichoderma: The current status of its application in agriculture for the biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens and stimulation of plant growth. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Martínez-Medina, A.; Fernández, I.; Sánchez-Guzmán, M.J.; Jung, S.C.; Pascual, J.A.; Pozo, M.J. Deciphering the hormonal signalling network behind the systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma harzianum in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Li, J.; Philp, J.; Li, J.; Wei, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, K.; Ryder, M.; Toh, R.; Zhou, Y.; Denton, M.D. Trichoderma harzianum inoculation reduces the incidence of clubroot disease in Chinese cabbage by regulating the rhizosphere microbial community. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Asad, S.A. Mechanisms of action and biocontrol potential of Trichoderma against fungal plant diseases—A review. Ecol. Complex. 2022, 49, 100978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Forghani, F.; Hajihassani, A. Recent advances in the development of environmentally benign treatments to control root-knot nematodes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hinterdobler, W.; Li, G.; Spiegel, K.; Basyouni-Khamis, S.; Gorfer, M.; Schmoll, M. Trichoderma reesei isolated from Austrian soil with high potential for biotechnological application. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 552301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Panchalingam, H.; Powell, D.; Adra, C.; Foster, K.; Tomlin, R.; Quigley, B.L.; Nyari, S.; Hayes, R.A.; Shapcott, A.; Kurtböke, D.İ. Assessing the various antagonistic mechanisms of Trichoderma strains against the brown root rot pathogen Pyrrhoderma noxium infecting heritage fig trees. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mohiddin, F.A.; Padder, S.A.; Bhat, A.H.; Ahanger, M.A.; Shikari, A.B.; Wani, S.H.; Bhat, F.A.; Nabi, S.U.; Hamid, A.; Bhat, N.A. Phylogeny and optimization of Trichoderma harzianum for chitinase production: Evaluation of their antifungal behaviour against the prominent soil borne phyto-pathogens of temperate India. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Izuogu, N. Nematicidal Effect of Trichoderma harzianum T22 on Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood, Infecting Celosia argentea TLV8. J. Agric. Res. Dev. 2013, 12, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  123. Cumagun, C.J.R. Chapter 39—Advances in Formulation of Trichoderma for Biocontrol. In Biotechnology and Biology of Trichoderma; Gupta, V.K., Schmoll, M., Herrera-Estrella, A., Upadhyay, R.S., Druzhinina, I., Tuohy, M.G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 527–531. [Google Scholar]
  124. Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Ma, L.; Gong, M.; Wu, Y.; Bao, D.; Zou, G. Use of CRISPR-Cas tools to engineer Trichoderma species. Microb. Biotechnol. 2022, 15, 2521–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. dos Santos, L.B.P.R.; Oliveira-Santos, N.; Novais, D.P.S.d.; Cruz-Magalhães, V.; Loguercio, L.L. Beneficial plants-Trichoderma interactions on host tolerance to abiotic stresses: A meta-analysis. Front. Plant Physiol. 2025, 3, 1569221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Lorito, M.; Woo, S.L.; Harman, G.E.; Monte, E. Translational research on Trichoderma: From’omics to the field. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48, 395–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Comite, E.; El-Nakhel, C.; Rouphael, Y.; Ventorino, V.; Pepe, O.; Borzacchiello, A.; Vinale, F.; Rigano, D.; Staropoli, A.; Lorito, M. Bioformulations with beneficial microbial consortia, a bioactive compound and plant biopolymers modulate sweet basil productivity, photosynthetic activity and metabolites. Pathogens 2021, 10, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Frequency of studies on the biocontrol of plant-parasitic nematodes with Trichoderma spp.
Figure 1. Frequency of studies on the biocontrol of plant-parasitic nematodes with Trichoderma spp.
Jof 11 00517 g001
Figure 2. Clades of Trichoderma most reported as biocontrol agents against plant-parasitic nematodes.
Figure 2. Clades of Trichoderma most reported as biocontrol agents against plant-parasitic nematodes.
Jof 11 00517 g002
Figure 3. Countries where studies on Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agents for nematodes have been conducted.
Figure 3. Countries where studies on Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agents for nematodes have been conducted.
Jof 11 00517 g003
Figure 4. Mechanisms of Trichoderma in the control of plant-parasitic nematodes and in the promotion of plant growth and stress tolerance.
Figure 4. Mechanisms of Trichoderma in the control of plant-parasitic nematodes and in the promotion of plant growth and stress tolerance.
Jof 11 00517 g004
Figure 5. Isolation and application of Trichoderma spp. with a farmer-friendly approach.
Figure 5. Isolation and application of Trichoderma spp. with a farmer-friendly approach.
Jof 11 00517 g005
Table 3. Comparison of Trichoderma spp. mechanisms of action against plant-parasitic nematodes and fungal pathogens.
Table 3. Comparison of Trichoderma spp. mechanisms of action against plant-parasitic nematodes and fungal pathogens.
Mechanism of ActionAgainst NematodesAgainst Fungal Pathogens
Production of secondary metabolitesGliotoxin, viridin, cyclosporin A, acetic acid—inhibit egg hatching and juvenile development [48,51,107,116]Peptaibols, gliotoxin, 6-pentyl-α-pyrone—inhibit fungal growth and spore germination [117]
Production of lytic enzymesProteases, chitinases—degrade cuticle or eggshell [49,78,118]Chitinases, glucanases—degrade fungal cell walls [82]
Induced systemic resistance (ISR)Activation of jasmonic acid/ethylene pathways—increased plant-defense compounds [10]Similar activation to ISR—enhanced plant resistance to fungal infection [10,119]
Direct physical interactionLimited or absent [45]Mycoparasitism: coiling, penetration, and degradation of fungal hyphae [28]
Competition for space and nutrientsPresent in the rhizosphere [19]Strong competition on root and rhizoplane surfaces [120,121]
Plant growth promotionEnhances plant tolerance to nematode stress [10,65]Improves plant vigor, indirectly reducing fungal susceptibility [114]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Contreras-Soto, M.B.; Tovar-Pedraza, J.M.; Solano-Báez, A.R.; Bayardo-Rosales, H.; Márquez-Licona, G. Biocontrol Strategies Against Plant-Parasitic Nematodes Using Trichoderma spp.: Mechanisms, Applications, and Management Perspectives. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11070517

AMA Style

Contreras-Soto MB, Tovar-Pedraza JM, Solano-Báez AR, Bayardo-Rosales H, Márquez-Licona G. Biocontrol Strategies Against Plant-Parasitic Nematodes Using Trichoderma spp.: Mechanisms, Applications, and Management Perspectives. Journal of Fungi. 2025; 11(7):517. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11070517

Chicago/Turabian Style

Contreras-Soto, María Belia, Juan Manuel Tovar-Pedraza, Alma Rosa Solano-Báez, Heriberto Bayardo-Rosales, and Guillermo Márquez-Licona. 2025. "Biocontrol Strategies Against Plant-Parasitic Nematodes Using Trichoderma spp.: Mechanisms, Applications, and Management Perspectives" Journal of Fungi 11, no. 7: 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11070517

APA Style

Contreras-Soto, M. B., Tovar-Pedraza, J. M., Solano-Báez, A. R., Bayardo-Rosales, H., & Márquez-Licona, G. (2025). Biocontrol Strategies Against Plant-Parasitic Nematodes Using Trichoderma spp.: Mechanisms, Applications, and Management Perspectives. Journal of Fungi, 11(7), 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11070517

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop