Next Article in Journal
Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Complete Mitogenomes of Valsa mali and Valsa pyri
Previous Article in Journal
Whole-Genome Characterization of Inonotus hispidus from Ulmus macrocarpa and Its Comparative Genomics with Strains from Morus alba and Acer truncatum
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Preliminary Exploration of Transcriptome and Proteomic Changes During the Young and Harvest Periods in Morchella sextelata
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Screening of Lentinula edodes Strains for High Polysaccharide Production and In Vitro Antioxidant Activities

College of Resource, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2025, 11(5), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11050347
Submission received: 28 February 2025 / Revised: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 26 April 2025 / Published: 30 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breeding and Metabolism of Edible Fungi)

Abstract

:
Lentinan is one of the main metabolites of Lentinula edodes and exhibits numerous biological properties, such as antitumor and antioxidant activity. Despite recent advancements, its commercialization remains constrained by a lengthy cultivation cycle, low yield, and high cost. Therefore, screening strains with high polysaccharide production or enhanced bioactivity at the mycelial fermentation stage is of significant importance. In this study, the mycelial polysaccharide content and in vitro antioxidant activity of 18 L. edodes strains were evaluated under shaking and static culture conditions. The total polysaccharide content and IC50 values under both culture conditions served as indicators for screening high-yielding and high in vitro antioxidant activity strains. Strain XG21 demonstrated superior polysaccharide production, with a total polysaccharide content of 78.80 mg in 50 mL of culture medium, which was 1.82 times higher than that of the main cultivated strain Xin808 (43.30 mg). Additionally, strain XG19 was identified for its high in vitro antioxidant activity, with total IC50 values of 3.11 and 3.38 mg mL−1 under shaking and static culture conditions, respectively. Further analyses on polysaccharide components, molecular weight, and enzyme activities were conducted on strains XG19, XG21, and Xin808. The results reveal that the polysaccharide from strain XG19 exhibited high uronic acid content and a significant weight-average molecular weight. Specifically, the intracellular polysaccharide uronic acid content (2.96%) was 2.22 and 1.14 times higher than that of Xin808 and XG21, respectively, while its weight-average molecular weight (Mw, 702.924 kDa) was 2.60 and 1.28 times greater than that of Xin808 and XG21. While the uronic acid content in its extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs) (8.26%) was similar to Xin808 and XG21, the Mw (83.894 kDa) was 1.56 times greater than that of XG21. Correlation analysis revealed that the content of extracellular polysaccharides and total polysaccharides was positively correlated with phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI) activity but negatively correlated with phosphoglucomutase (PGM) activity. These findings provide valuable strain information for the screening of mycelial polysaccharides with high yields and bioactivities.

1. Introduction

Lentinula edodes, commonly known as shiitake mushroom, is classified within the Basidiomycetes class, Agaricales order, and Tricholomataceae family under the genus Lentinula. This species is renowned for its high nutritional value, as it contains a wide range of essential amino acids, abundant mineral elements, and various trace elements [1,2]. Additionally, L. edodes is rich in various medicinal compounds, including lentinan, which exhibits a range of therapeutic properties. Lentinan has been shown to possess antitumor, anti-viral, and antioxidant effects, as well as the ability to lower blood pressure and blood lipid levels. Due to these beneficial properties, it has been widely utilized in clinical applications [3,4]. Lentinan, the main secondary metabolite of L. edodes, is a polysaccharide characterized by a β-(1→3)-D-glucan main chain. Traditionally, it is extracted from the fruiting bodies of the mushroom. However, the cultivation of fruiting bodies is a time-intensive and often inconsistent process, resulting in low lentinan yields and inefficient extraction of active compounds. These limitations hinder its broader development and application. Consequently, extracting and purifying active polysaccharides, such as lentinan, from mycelium through fermentation represents a highly promising and significant approach to overcome these challenges.
The selection of a strain capable of efficiently producing both biomass and bioactive compounds is crucial for optimizing the fermentation process. Microbial secondary metabolism is influenced by numerous factors, including strain characteristics [5,6] and fermentation conditions [7,8]. For instance, studies have shown significant variations in polysaccharide and ganoderic acid content among different Ganoderma lucidum strains, with strain-specific differences observed in the production of both intracellular and extracellular polysaccharides [5,6]. Fermentation techniques are primarily divided into two categories: static culture and shaking culture. These methods differ in cultivation approaches, oxygen supply, growth effects, and application scenarios. In liquid static culture, G. lucidum undergoes differentiation and morphological changes, leading to the formation of aerial mycelia and asexual spores, which are associated with high concentrations of ganoderic acids [9,10]. A two-stage fermentation approach, combining shaking culture followed by static culture, has been shown to enhance both the total triterpene content and yield [11]. However, whether differences exist in polysaccharide content and bioactivity among different L. edodes strains or under shaking and static fermentation conditions remains unclear. Understanding these variations is essential for optimizing the production of bioactive compounds in L. edodes.
Mushroom polysaccharides exhibit a wide range of biological activities, including notable antioxidant effects. These activities are influenced by a combination of factors, such as extraction and purification methods, polysaccharide structure, culture conditions, and the regulation of exogenous substances. For example, polysaccharides extracted from L. edodes at four different developmental stages demonstrated varying physicochemical properties and bioactivities. Among these stages, the immature phase was identified as the optimal harvest time for obtaining crude polysaccharides with higher biological activity [10]. Heteropolysaccharides derived from Poria cocos mycelia exhibit varying antitumor activities depending on the strain and culture medium used [12]. Similarly, polysaccharides extracted from L. edodes demonstrate significant antioxidant activity in a concentration-dependent manner [13,14]. For instance, at a concentration of 3.0 mg mL−1, the scavenging rate for DPPH radicals reached 98.47%, comparable to that of vitamin C [15]. The bioactivities of polysaccharides are influenced by structural characteristics such as monosaccharide composition, molecular weight distribution, degree of branching, and degree of sulfation [16,17]. Among these factors, monosaccharide composition and molecular weight are the most straightforward and commonly measured indicators of polysaccharide properties.
Therefore, in this study, the mycelial biomass, polysaccharide content, and in vitro antioxidant activity of 19 L. edodes strains were evaluated under both static and shaking submerged culture conditions, and strains with the highest polysaccharide content and antioxidant activity were screened. The screened strains were further analyzed for their polysaccharide components, molecular weight, and enzyme activity, aiming to establish a foundation for further understanding the relationships between polysaccharide synthesis, structural characteristics, and bioactivity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials

Xin808, a commercially cultivated L. edodes strain, was obtained from the Chengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences. The remaining strains were generated by our group through monokaryotic hybridization in earlier stages, having undergone cultivation trials, and exhibited relatively high stability. For strain preservation and activation, Potato Sucrose Agar (PDA) medium was utilized, prepared with 200 g of potato, 20 g of glucose, 20 g of agar, and distilled water to make up 1 L. Three activated plugs (diameter 5 mm) were inoculated into 50 mL of fermentation medium, which consisted of 35 g of sucrose, 5 g of peptone, 2.5 g of yeast powder, 1 g of KH2PO4·H2O, 0.5 g of MgSO4·7H2O, and 0.5 g of vitamin B1 and was adjusted to pH 7.0, and diluted to 1 L with distilled water. The cultures were incubated under two conditions: shaking (initial static period of 1 day followed by shaking at 150 r min−1 for 39 days at 25 °C) and static (maintained at 25 °C for 40 days). Each treatment was performed in triplicate to ensure biological reproducibility.

2.2. Determination of Mycelial Biomass

The mycelium was separated from the liquid culture medium via filtration. The collected mycelium was rinsed three times with distilled water to remove any residual medium, followed by drying in an oven at 60 °C until a constant weight was achieved. The dry weight (g) of the mycelium from 50 mL of culture medium was then measured to determine the mycelial biomass.

2.3. Polysaccharide Extractions and Determinations

Polysaccharides were extracted using the hot water alcohol precipitation method as described previously [8]. Intracellular polysaccharides (IPSs) were extracted from the mycelium, while extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs) were obtained from the filtered fermentation broth. The polysaccharide content was quantified using the phenol–sulfuric acid method, with D-glucose serving as the standard [18]. The total IPS, total EPS, and total polysaccharide (TPS) content in 50 mL of fermentation broth was calculated to compare differences between different strains. The calculation methods were as follows: the total IPS content was calculated using the formula GI = Y × g, where GI is the total IPS content (mg), Y is the IPS concentration (mg g−1), and g is the mycelium biomass (mg); the total EPS content was calculated using the formula GE= w × v, where w is the EPS concentration (mg mL−1) and v is the volume of the fermentation broth (50 mL); and the TPS content was the sum of the total intracellular and total extracellular polysaccharides.

2.4. In Vitro Antioxidant Activities of Polysaccharides

The in vitro antioxidant activities of intracellular polysaccharides (IPSs) and extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs) were assessed based on their ability to scavenge the superoxide anion (O2), hydroxyl (·OH), and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals, following the methodology described by Xiang et al. [8]. Solutions of IPSs, EPSs and Vitamin C (used as a positive control) were prepared at varying concentrations (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 mg mL−1) for the antioxidant activity assays. Deionized water, replacing the polysaccharide solution, served as the negative control. The IC50 value, defined as the concentration required to reduce 50% of the initial free radical concentration, was determined as per Liu et al. [19].

2.5. Enzyme Activities and Expression Profiles of Key Genes in Polysaccharide Synthesis

Fresh mycelium (0.1 g) was washed three times with 1 mL of 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), ground into a fine powder using liquid nitrogen, and then homogenized in 1 mL of the same phosphate buffer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C, and the resulting supernatant was collected as the crude enzyme solution. The activities of key enzymes involved in polysaccharide synthesis, including phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI), phosphoglucomutase (PGM), and UDPG-pyrophosphorylase (UGP), were determined according to previously established methods [7]. Enzyme activity was quantified based on the molar extinction coefficient of NAD(P)H (ε340 = 6.22 × 103 mol L−1 cm−1), with one unit of enzyme activity defined as the amount required to oxidize 1 nmol of NAD(P)H per minute.
Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol method and subsequently reverse transcribed into cDNA with the AMV First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). The transcriptional expression levels of PGI, PGM, and UGP were quantified following the previously described protocol [7].

2.6. Determination of Polysaccharide Monosaccharide Components and Molecular Weight

The monosaccharide composition of the crude polysaccharides was analyzed following the method described by Salvador et al. and Zhu et al. [20,21]. Briefly, approximately 5 mg of the polysaccharide sample was hydrolyzed using 2 M trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) at 121 °C for 2 h in a sealed tube. The hydrolyzed sample was dried under a nitrogen stream, washed with methanol, and then dried again. This methanol washing step was repeated 2–3 times to ensure the complete removal of residual TFA. The resulting residue was re-dissolved in deionized water and filtered through a 0.22 μm microporous membrane for further analysis.
High-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC) was performed on a CarboPac PA-20 anion-exchange column (3 × 150 mm; Dionex, Sunnyvale, MA, USA) coupled with a pulsed amperometric detector (PAD; Dionex ICS 5000 system). The analysis conditions were as follows: flow rate, 0.5 mL min−1; injection volume, 5 μL; solvent system A (ddH2O), solvent system B (0.1 M NaOH), and solvent system C (0.1 M NaOH, 0.2 M NaAc). The gradient program was set as follows: 95:5:0 (A:B:C) at 0 min, 85:5:10 at 26 min, 85:5:10 at 42 min, 60:0:40 at 42.1 min, 60:40:0 at 52 min, 95:5:0 at 52.1 min, and 95:5:0 at 60 min. Data acquisition was performed using the ICS5000 system (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the results were processed with Chromeleon 7.2 CDS software (Thermo Scientific). The quantified data were exported into Excel (Version 2024) for further analysis and interpretation.
The molecular weight of the polysaccharides was measured according to the method reported previously [22,23]. The polysaccharide samples were dissolved in a 0.1M NaNO3 aqueous solution containing 0.02% NaN3 at a concentration of 1 mg mL−1 and filtered through a filter of 0.45 μm pore size. The homogeneity and molecular weight of the polysaccharide fractions were analyzed using size-exclusion chromatography coupled with multi-angle laser light scattering and refractive index detection (SEC-MALLS-RI).
The weight-average molecular weight (Mw), number-average molecular weight (Mn), and polydispersity index (Mw/Mn) were measured using a DAWN HELEOS-II laser photometer (Wyatt Technology Co., Santa Barbara, CA, USA) equipped with three tandem columns (300 × 8 mm, Shodex OH-pak SB-805, 804, and 803; Showa Denko K.K., Tokyo, Japan). The columns were maintained at 45 °C using a column heater. The elution flow rate was set at 0.4 mL min−1. A differential refractive index detector (Optilab T-rEX, Wyatt Technology Co., Santa Barbara, CA, USA) was connected in parallel to determine the concentration of the fractions and the specific refractive index increment (dn/dc). The dn/dc value for the polysaccharide fractions in the 0.1 M NaNO3 aqueous solution containing 0.02% NaN3 was determined to be 0.141 mL g−1. Data acquisition and processing were performed using ASTRA 6.1 software (Wyatt Technology). The quantified results were exported into Excel for further analysis and interpretation.

2.7. Data Analysis

The analysis was conducted using SPSS 24.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Parson correlation coefficient (r2, ranging from +1 to −1) was calculated to analyze the relationship between the key enzyme activities involved in polysaccharide synthesis and the polysaccharide content from the data of the three varieties. Correlations were interpreted as follows: no correlation (r = 0), positive correlation (r > 0), or negative correlation (r < 0). All data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) derived from triplicate experiments. Statistical comparisons of means were performed using the least significant difference (LSD) test, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Polysaccharide Content of Mycelium from Different Strains Under Shaking and Static Culture Conditions

To identify the strain with the highest polysaccharide production, eighteen strains of L. edodes were inoculated into 50 mL of liquid medium and cultivated under both shaking and static fermentation conditions. The mycelial biomass, intracellular polysaccharide (IPS), extracellular polysaccharide (EPS), and total polysaccharide content were systematically measured and compared across all strains.
Among the eighteen strains cultivated, six strains exhibited mycelial biomass over 0.2 g in 50 mL of culture medium after 39 days of shaking culture. Strain XG24 demonstrated the highest mycelial biomass (0.55 g), which was 1.29 times greater than that of the reference strain L. edodes Xin808 (Table S1). Additionally, seven strains showed intracellular polysaccharide (IPS) concentrations above 15 mg g−1, with strains XG20 and XG21 displaying the highest IPS levels at 21.75 mg g−1 and 17.97 mg g−1, respectively. Furthermore, three strains—XG21, XG24, and XG30—produced extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) concentrations exceeding 0.50 mg mL−1. Notably, strain XG21 exhibited the strongest EPS production capacity (0.70 mg mL−1), representing an 89.82% increase compared to Xin808 (Table S1). When evaluating total polysaccharide content as an indicator, strain XG21 demonstrated superior polysaccharide production from shaking culture, with a total content of 44.06 mg, which was 88.31% higher than that of Xin808 (Table 1).
Similar to G. lucidum, which exhibits higher biomass under static culture conditions [9], L. edodes strains also demonstrate greater biomass accumulation under static culture conditions, and there were only four strains exhibiting a biomass below 0.20 g. UStrains XG14 and XG24 achieved the highest biomass, measuring 0.56 g and 0.57 g, respectively, which were 1.65 and 1.68 times greater than that of the reference strain Xin808 (Table S1). Among the strains, 14 displayed intracellular polysaccharide (IPS) concentrations exceeding 15 mg g−1. Strains XG20 and XG21 demonstrated strong IPS and EPS production capabilities, with IPS and EPS contents reaching 74.94 mg g−1 and 0.51 mg mL−1, respectively. These values were 5.77 and 0.91 times higher than those of Xin808. When evaluating total polysaccharide content from static culture as an indicator, strain XG20 exhibited superior polysaccharide production under static culture, with a total content of 46.06 mg, representing a 1.31-fold increase over Xin808. Across the two culture conditions, strain XG21 emerged as the top performer in mycelial polysaccharide production, with a total polysaccharide content of 78.80 mg.

3.2. In Vitro Antioxidant Activity of Mycelium Polysaccharides from Different Strains Under Shaking and Static Culture Conditions

The antioxidant activities of mycelium intracellular polysaccharides (IPSs) and extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs) from 18 L. edodes strains were assessed using three distinct in vitro assays. As summarized in Table S2, IPS and EPS derived from different strains under both static and shaking culture conditions demonstrated varying levels of antioxidant activity.
The mycelium IPSs and EPSs from strain XG5, cultured under shaking conditions, exhibited strong DPPH radical scavenging activity, with IC50 values of 0.01 and 0.20 mg mL−1, respectively (Table S2). Similarly, under static culture conditions, the IPSs and EPSs from strain XG4 demonstrated notable DPPH radical clearance, with IC50 values of 0.01 and 0.20 mg mL−1, respectively (Table S3). In terms of hydroxyl radical (OH) scavenging ability, the EPSs from strain XG5 under shaking culture and the IPSs from strain XG14 under static culture displayed lower IC50 values, measuring 0.07 and 0.01 mg mL−1, respectively. Additionally, IPSs and EPSs from strain XG19, cultured under shaking conditions, showed excellent superoxide anion (O2−) radical scavenging activity, with IC50 values of 0.01 and 0.19 mg mL−1, respectively. When considering the total IC50 values as the screening criterion, the polysaccharides from strain XG19 exhibited strong in vitro antioxidant activity, with total IC50 values of 3.11 and 3.38 mg mL−1 under shaking and static culture conditions, respectively (Table 2). Along with the main cultivated strain Xin808, strain XG21 (high polysaccharide yield) and strain XG19 (high in vitro antioxidant activity) were further analyzed for their polysaccharide synthase activity and structural characteristics.

3.3. Transcriptional Expression Levels and Enzyme Activities of Key Enzymes in Polysaccharide Biosynthesis

Polysaccharide biosynthesis is regulated by a complex network of enzymes, among which phosphoglucomutase (PGM), phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI), and UDPG-pyrophosphorylase (UGP) play pivotal roles [24]. The activities of these key enzymes in three L. edodes strains (high polysaccharide yield strain XG21, high in vitro antioxidant activity strain XG19, and Xin 808) are illustrated in Figure 1A. UGP exhibited the highest activity, while PGM showed the lowest. Strain Xin808 demonstrated the highest UGP activity (966.96 U mg−1), which was 1.9 and 5.1 times greater than that of strains XG19 and XG21, respectively. In contrast, strain XG21 displayed the highest PGI activity (275.50 U mg−1), surpassing that of Xin808 and XG19 by 3.1 and 3.0 times, respectively.
The transcriptional expression levels of three key enzymes in the three strains are presented in Figure 1B. The results reveal that the gene expression levels of PGI and PGM in strains XG19 and XG21 were lower than those in Xin808. Specifically, the expression level of PGI in Xin808 was 1.9 and 21.3 times higher than that in XG19 and XG21, respectively, while the expression level of PGM in Xin808 was 1.4 and 2.3 times higher than that in XG19 and XG21. In contrast, the highest expression of UGP was observed in strain XG19, being 6.0 and 23.2 times greater than that in Xin808 and XG21, respectively.
The Pearson correlation coefficient analysis between the key enzyme activities involved in polysaccharide synthesis and the polysaccharide content from the data of the three varieties indicated no significant correlation between intracellular polysaccharide (IPS) content and the activities of the three key enzymes (Table 3). However, extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) content showed a strong positive correlation with PGI activity (r = 0.981, p < 0.01) and a significant negative correlation with PGM activity (r = −0.851, p < 0.01). Additionally, the total polysaccharide content was positively correlated with PGI activity (r = 0.987, p < 0.01) and negatively correlated with PGM activity (r = −0.782, p < 0.05).

3.4. Monosaccharide Composition of Mycelial Polysaccharides

The structural features of polysaccharides play a critical role in determining and influencing their bioactivities. Monosaccharides, as the fundamental units and building blocks of polysaccharides, not only affect properties such as electrification, functional group composition, and bioactivity but also serve as one of the most straightforward and measurable indicators of polysaccharide structure [16]. To further investigate these relationships, we analyzed the monosaccharide composition of the three L. edodes strains (high polysaccharide yield strain XG21, high in vitro antioxidant activity strain XG19, and Xin 808).
Previous reports showed that the monosaccharide composition of polysaccharides varied within the same strain from different producing areas [24], in different parts [25], or among different strains of the same species [26]. This study further revealed differences in polysaccharide composition among the three strains examined, as well as distinct variations between intracellular and extracellular polysaccharides within the same strain. Eight monosaccharides—fucose, galactose, glucose, xylose, mannose, ribose, galacturonic acid, and glucuronic acid—were identified in the IPSs of the three L. edodes strains (Table 4). In contrast, ribose was absent from all EPS samples, and xylose was not detected in the EPS of strain XG21, indicating that only six monosaccharides were present in the EPS of XG21. Mannose was the most abundant monosaccharide, with EPSs containing a higher proportion of mannose (ranging from 51.41% to 51.91%) compared to IPSs (ranging from 30.65% to 35.11%). These findings align with previous studies showing that mannose, glucose, and galactose are common monosaccharides in mushrooms [27].
Notably, the IPSs from strain XG19 contained a higher proportion of galacturonic acid (1.22%), which was 2.18 and 1.39 times greater than that of Xin808 and XG21, respectively. This observation is consistent with research indicating that an increase in uronic acid content enhances the antioxidant activity of polysaccharides, as demonstrated in Sagittaria sagittifolia L. [28], and other studies showing a positive correlation between uronic acid content and antioxidant activity [29].
These data clearly demonstrate that L. edodes polysaccharides are heterogeneous, with mannose and galactose dominating the IPS composition, while mannose and glucose are predominant in EPSs. Arabinose (Ara) and galacturonic acid (GalA) appear to play critical roles in determining the IC50 values for DPPH-scavenging activity [30]. Interestingly, the IPSs from the three strains with lower galacturonic acid content exhibited better DPPH scavenging activity, suggesting a complex relationship between monosaccharide composition and antioxidant properties.

3.5. Analysis of Molecular Weight of Mycelial Polysaccharides

Molecular weight is a critical structural feature that influences the bioactivity of polysaccharides. Studies have shown that low-molecular weight (low-Mw) polysaccharides often exhibit superior immunomodulatory effects compared to their high-molecular weight (high-Mw) counterparts [31].
The molecular weight distributions of intracellular polysaccharides (IPSs) and extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs) from the three strains are summarized in Table 5. The weight-average molecular weight (Mw) and number-average molecular weight (Mn) of the IPSs were consistently higher than those of the EPSs. Among the strains, XG19 exhibited the highest molecular weights for both IPSs and EPSs. Specifically, the Mws of IPSs and EPSs from strain XG19 were 702.924 kDa and 83.894 kDa, respectively, which were 2.60 and 1.05 times greater than those of Xin808 and 1.28 and 1.56 times higher than those of XG21.
The weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of polysaccharides from strain Xin808 was higher than that of the other two strains. The IPSs and EPSs of strain Xin808 measured 69.401 kDa and 83.894 kDa, respectively, which were 2.33 and 1.87 times greater than those of XG19 and 2.37 and 3.168 times higher than those of XG21. The ratio of Mw to Mn (Mw/Mn), known as the polydispersity index (PDI), reflects the uniformity of polysaccharide molecular weight distribution. An analysis of the PDI values revealed that IPSs and EPSs from Xin808 exhibited smaller PDIs (3.887 and 9.01, respectively), indicating a more uniform molecular weight distribution compared to the other strains.
Polysaccharides with molecular weights ranging from 4 to 100 kDa are generally associated with high DPPH radical scavenging activity [30]. It is widely accepted that polysaccharides with lower molecular weights tend to exhibit stronger antioxidant activity [32,33]. In this study, the molecular weights of extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs) were consistently lower than those of intracellular polysaccharides (IPSs) across the three strains. This difference in molecular weight may partially explain the higher DPPH scavenging activity observed for EPSs compared to IPSs.

4. Conclusions

In this study, L. edodes strains XG21 and XG19 were identified as promising candidates due to their high polysaccharide productivity and strong in vitro antioxidant activity, respectively. Further analysis of polysaccharide components, molecular weight, and enzyme activities was conducted on XG19, XG21, and the widely cultivated strain Xin808. Strain XG19, which exhibited superior in vitro antioxidant activity, was characterized by higher uronic acid content and weight-average molecular weight (Mw). Specifically, the uronic acid content in its intracellular polysaccharides (IPSs) (2.96%) was 2.22 and 1.14 times higher than that of Xin808 and XG21, respectively, while its Mw (702.924 kDa) was 2.60 and 1.28 times greater than that of Xin808 and XG21. While the uronic acid content in its extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) (8.26%) was similar to Xin808 and XG21, the Mw (83.894 kDa) was1.56 times greater than that of XG21.
Correlation analysis revealed that the content of EPS and total polysaccharides (TPS) was positively correlated with phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI) activity and negatively correlated with phosphoglucomutase (PGM) activity. These findings suggest that strains XG19 and XG21 are potential candidates for further process optimization and scale-up studies aimed at enhancing their polysaccharide production and bioactivities. However, additional research is needed to test strain stability and optimize the fermentation conditions, extraction methods, and purification processes for these strains to maximize polysaccharide yield and bioactivity. Such efforts will help broaden the applications of L. edodes polysaccharides in various fields.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof11050347/s1. Table S1: Mycelial biomass, intracellular and extracellular polysaccharide contents of 18 L. edodes strains under shaking and static culture conditions; Table S2: In vitro antioxidant activities of polysaccharide from 18 L. edodes strains under shake culture conditions; Table S3: In vitro antioxidant activities of polysaccharide from 18 L. edodes strains under static culture conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.X.; data curation, J.W., J.Z. and K.R.; funding acquisition, Y.G. and Q.C.; investigation, Q.X.; methodology, Q.X. and M.H.; resources, X.Y. and Q.X.; writing—original draft, J.Z. and K.R.; Writing—review and editing, Q.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Edible Fungus Innovation Team of Sichuan Province, grant number sccxtd-2025-07, Science and Technology Planning Project of Sichuan Province, grant number 2021YFYZ0026, and Central Guidance Local Science and Technology Development Special Project of Sichuan Province, grant number 2024ZYD0128.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
IPSIntracellular polysaccharide
EPSExtracellular polysaccharide
TPSTotal polysaccharide
PGIPhosphoglucose isomerase
PGMPhosphoglucomutase
UGPUDPG-pyrophosphorylase

References

  1. Finimundy, T.C.; Dillon, A.J.P.; Henriques, J.A.P.; Ely, M.R. A Review on general nutritional compounds and pharmacological properties of the Lentinula edodes mushroom. Food Nutr. Sci. 2014, 5, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar]
  2. Reis, F.S.; Barros, L.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Chemical composition and nutritional value of the most widely appreciated cultivated mushrooms: An inter-species comparative study. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wasser, S. Medicinal mushrooms as a source of antitumor and immunomodulating polysaccharides. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 60, 258–274. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Bisen, P.S.; Baghel, R.K.; Sanodiya, B.S.; Thakur, G.S.; Prasad, G.B.K.S. Lentinus edodes: A macrofungus with pharmacological activities. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010, 17, 2419–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Duan, Y.Q.; Xing, Z.C.; Xu, J.W. Screening of a high yield polysaccharide strain from ten edible and medicinal fungi and optimization of its culture conditions. Res. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 8, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wei, Z.H.; Duan, Y.Y.; Qian, Y.Q.; Guo, X.F.; Li, Y.J.; Jin, S.H.; Zhou, Z.X.; Shan, S.Y.; Wang, C.R.; Chen, X.J. Screening of Ganoderma strains with high polysaccharides and ganoderic acid contents and optimization of the fermentation medium by statistical methods. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 37, 1789–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adil, B.; Xiang, Q.J.; He, M.L.; Wu, Y.T.; Muhammad Ahsan, A.; Muhammad, A.; Qin, P.; Gu, Y.F.; Yu, X.M.; Zhao, K.; et al. Effect of sodium and calcium on polysaccharide production and the activities of enzymes involved in the polysaccharide synthesis of Lentinus edodes. Amb Express 2020, 10, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xiang, Q.J.; Zhang, H.J.; Chen, X.Q.; Hou, S.Y.; Gu, Y.F.; Yu, X.M.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, X.P.; Ma, M.G.; Chen, Q. Enhanced effects of iron on mycelial growth, metabolism and in vitro antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from Lentinula edodes. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, G.; Zhai, M.; Niu, R.; Xu, X.; Liu, Q.; Jia, J. Optimization of culture condition for ganoderic acid production in Ganoderma lucidum liquid static culture and design of a suitable bioreactor. Molecules 2018, 23, 2563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hou, Z.; Cao, J. Comparative study of the P2X gene family in animals and plants. Purinergic Signal 2016, 12, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luo, J.X.; Zhang, J.S.; Jia, W.; Feng, N.; Yang, Y.; Tang, Q.J.; Liu, Y.F.; Zhang, H. Influences of culture methods on the yield and antineoplastic activity of intracellular triterpene of Ganoderma lucidum mycelia. Acta Agric. Shanghai 2014, 2, 33–37. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Jin, Y.; Lina Zhang, L.N.; Zhang, M.; Chen, L.; Peter, C.K.C.; Oi, V.E.C.; Lin, Y.Y. Antitumor activities of heteropolysaccharides of Poria cocos mycelia from different strains and culture media. Carbohydr. Res. 2003, 338, 1517–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, H.L.; Ju, Y.; Li, J.J.; Yu, M. Antioxidant activities of polysaccharides from Lentinus edodes and their significance for disease prevention. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 50, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sheng, K.; Wang, C.; Chen, B.; Kang, M.; Wang, M.; Liu, K.; Wang, M. Recent advances in polysaccharides from Lentinus edodes (Berk.): Isolation, structures and bioactivities. Food Chem. 2021, 358, 129883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yin, C.M.; Li, C.; Ma, K.; Fan, X.Z.; Yao, F.; Shi, D.F.; Wu, W.J.; Qiu, J.H.; Hu, G.Y.; Gao, H. The physicochemical, antioxidant, hypoglycemic and prebiotic properties of γ-irradiated polysaccharides extracted from Lentinula edodes. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 32, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Lai, Z.; Hu, X.L.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.Q.; Li, Z.T.; Gao, M.J.; Yang, Y.H.; Wang, Q.; et al. Effect of monosaccharide composition and proportion on the bioactivity of polysaccharides: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, L.; Wang, C.; Shi, Q.; Ma, C. Preparation of different molecular weight polysaccharides from Porphyridium cruentum and their antioxidant activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2009, 45, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, Y.J.; Zhang, W.; Zhong, J.J. Performance analyses of a pH-shift and DOT-shift integrated fed-batch fermentation process for the production of ganoderic acid and ganoderma polysaccharides by medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 1852–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, X.Y.; Chen, Y.X.; Wu, L.X.; Wu, X.Q.; Huang, Y.F.; Liu, B. Optimization of polysaccharides extraction from Dictyophora indusiata and determination of its antioxidant activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 103, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Salvador, L.D.; Suganuma, T.; Kitahara, K.; Tanoue, H.Y.; Ichiki, M. Monosaccharide composition of sweetpotato fiber and cell wall polysaccharides from sweetpotato, cassava, and potato analyzed by the high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection method. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3448–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, M.; Huang, R.M.; Wen, P.; Song, Y.; He, B.L.; Tan, J.L.; Hao, H.L.; Wang, H. Structural characterization and immunological activity of pectin polysaccharide from kiwano (Cucumis metuliferus) peels. Carbohyd. Polym. 2021, 254, 117371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, T.; Huang, Q.L.; Wong, K.H.; Yang, H. Structure, molecular conformation, and immunomodulatory activity of four polysaccharide fractions from Lignosus rhinocerotis sclerotia. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 194, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chen, P.; You, Q.; Li, X.; Chang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, B.D.; Hu, X.K.; Zeng, H.L. Polysaccharide fractions from Fortunella margarita affect proliferation of Bifidobacterium adolescentis ATCC 15703 and undergo structural changes following fermentation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 123, 1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Song, R.Q.; Nan, T.G.; Yuan, Y.; Jin, Y.; Hu, K.Y. Study on polysaccharide content and monosaccharide composition of Polyporus umbellatus from different production areas. China J. Chin. Mater. Medica 2019, 17, 3608–3614. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, H.; Yan, Y.; Nie, S.P.; Chen, L.; Xie, M.Y. Monosaccharide composition and antioxidant activity in vitro of polysaccharides from different parts of Ganoderma atrum. Food Sci. 2011, 32, 56–61. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zheng, C.C.; Li, T.; Tang, Y.Y.; Lu, T.; Wu, M.K.; Sun, J.; Man, R.J.; He, X.M.; Zhou, Z.G. Structural and functional investigation on stem and peel polysaccharides from different varieties of pitaya. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 259 Pt 1, 129172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, S.; Shah, N.P. Characterization, antioxidative and bifidogenic effects of polysaccharides from Pleurotus eryngii after heat treatments. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Feng, Y.; Juliet, I.C.; Wen, C.; Duan, Y.; Zhou, J.; He, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ma, H. Effects of multi-mode divergent ultrasound pretreatment on the physicochemical and functional properties of polysaccharides from Sagittaria sagittifolia L. Food Biosci. 2021, 42, 101145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, P.; Qu, Z.; Bai, D.; Gao, X.; Zhao, C.; Chen, J.; Gao, W. Physicochemical characterizations of polysaccharides from Angelica Sinensis Radix under different drying methods for various applications—ScienceDirect. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 121, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Z.; Nie, K.; Wang, Z.; Luo, D. Quantitative structure activity relationship models for the antioxidant activity of polysaccharides. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, L.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y. Immunomodulation and antitumor activities of different-molecular-weight polysaccharides from Porphyridium cruentum. Carbohyd Polym. 2012, 87, 1206–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sun, T.; Zhou, D.; Xie, J.; Mao, F. Preparation of chitosan oligomers and their antioxidant activity. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2007, 225, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tomida, H.; Fujii, T.; Furutani, N.; Michihara, A.; Yasufuku, T.; Akasaki, K.; Maruyama, T.; Otagiri, M.; Gebicki, J.M.; Anraku, M. Antioxidant properties of some different molecular weight chitosans. Carbohyd Res. 2009, 344, 1690–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Enzyme activities (A) and relative expression levels (B) of key enzymes involved in polysaccharide biosynthesis in three L. edodes strains. Different lowercase letters above columns denote statistically significant differences among the strains at p < 0.05 (ANOVA-LSD, n = 3).
Figure 1. Enzyme activities (A) and relative expression levels (B) of key enzymes involved in polysaccharide biosynthesis in three L. edodes strains. Different lowercase letters above columns denote statistically significant differences among the strains at p < 0.05 (ANOVA-LSD, n = 3).
Jof 11 00347 g001
Table 1. Total mycelial polysaccharide content of 18 L. edodes strains under shaking and static culture.
Table 1. Total mycelial polysaccharide content of 18 L. edodes strains under shaking and static culture.
Strain
No.
TPS (mg) a
Shaking bStatic cShaking and Static d
Xin80823.40 ± 2.80 ef19.90 ± 1.13 i43.30 ± 2.24 h
XG214.77 ± 0.81 g19.36 ± 0.29 i34.14 ± 0.66 i
XG329.86 ± 2.23 cd33.36 ± 0.91 c63.23 ± 2.35 bcd
XG419.97 ± 2.36 f27.95 ± 0.24 ef47.92 ± 1.98 fg
XG512.28 ± 0.99 g19.03 ± 1.15 i31.31 ± 0.98 i
XG617.40 ± 0.56 fg24.47 ± 0.5 g41.86 ± 0.85 h
XG88.36 ± 0.43 h9.23 ± 0.2 k17.59 ± 0.34 j
XG927.29 ± 2.66 de32.64 ± 0.41 c59.93 ± 2.20 de
XG1220.27 ± 0.29 f11.01 ± 0.18 j31.28 ± 0.36 i
XG1325.65 ± 1.43 e35.28 ± 0.75 b60.93 ± 1.45 cde
XG1414.90 ± 0.17 g28.92 ± 0.93 e43.82 ± 0.89 gh
XG1925.70 ± 1.43 e24.14 ± 0.24 g49.85 ± 1.30 f
XG2029.15 ± 1.84 d46.06 ± 0.41 a75.21 ± 1.83 a
XG2144.06 ± 2.69 a34.74 ± 0.47 b78.80 ± 2.58 a
XG2218.18 ± 2.24 f21.22 ± 0.58 h39.40 ± 1.36 h
XG2437.54 ± 4.15 b27.53 ± 0.21 f65.07 ± 3.54 bc
XG2627.44 ± 2.04 de30.07 ± 0.4 d57.51 ± 1.65 e
XG3032.39 ± 1.58 c33.34 ± 0.27 c65.72 ± 1.51 b
a: TPS content is the sum of intracellular and extracellular polysaccharides extracted from 50 mL of fermentation broth and calculated by the formular as shown in Section 2.3; b: the TPS content from the shaking culture; c: the TPS content from the static culture; d: the TPS from the shaking and static culture. All values are presented as the means of three replicates ± standard deviation (SD). Different lowercase letters adjacent to the values indicate statistically significant differences between individual strains at p < 0.05, as determined by ANOVA followed by the least significant difference (LSD) test (n = 3). This notation applies to all subsequent data presented in a similar manner.
Table 2. The total IC50 values of antioxidant activities of polysaccharide from 18 strains.
Table 2. The total IC50 values of antioxidant activities of polysaccharide from 18 strains.
Strain No.Total IC50 (mg mL−1) a
Shaking bStatic cShaking and Static d
Xin80827.79 ± 2.64 c15.06 ± 2.60 h42.85
XG218.26 ± 1.38 f8.63 ± 1.08 j26.89
XG353.99 ± 3.83 a23.22 ± 2.71 d77.21
XG45.83 ± 0.31 j3.48 ± 0.31 no9.31
XG53.21 ± 0.19 m19.13 ± 0.83 f22.34
XG633.23 ± 3.55 b4.16 ± 0.23 l37.39
XG84.77 ± 0.34 k37.54 ± 2.34 b42.31
XG96.18 ± 0.97 j4.28 ± 1.11 l10.46
XG123.21 ± 0.25 m15.76 ± 0.48 g18.97
XG1323.45 ± 2.61 e65.29 ± 5.82 a88.74
XG144.05 ± 0.30 l3.82 ± 0.79 m7.87
XG193.11 ± 0.21 m3.38 ± 0.14 o6.49
XG203.11 ± 0.39 m4.11 ± 0.46 l7.22
XG217.10 ± 1.40 i8.99 ± 0.12 i16.09
XG2226.90 ± 2.42 d37.36 ± 3.27 c64.26
XG247.99 ± 0.26 h3.57 ± 0.11 n11.56
XG264.01 ± 0.36 l22.24 ± 3.37 e26.25
XG3015.86 ± 1.74 g5.86 ± 1.17 k21.72
a: the total IC50 value is the sum of intracellular and extracellular polysaccharide IC50 value; b: the total IC50 value of IPSs and EPSs from the shaking culture; c, the total IC50 value of IPS and EPS from the static culture; d: the total IC50 from the shaking and static culture. Different lowercase letters above columns denote statistically significant differences among the strains at p < 0.05 (ANOVA-LSD, n = 3).
Table 3. Correlation analysis between polysaccharide content and enzyme activity.
Table 3. Correlation analysis between polysaccharide content and enzyme activity.
Enzyme ActivityIPSEPSTPS
PGI0.4260.981 **0.987 **
PGM0.125−0.851 **−0.782 *
UGP0.455−0.603−0.533
The Pearson correlation coefficients were evaluated between the contents and enzyme activity from the data of the three varieties. “**” and “*” indicate significant (p < 0.05) and highly significant (p < 0.01) correlations, respectively.
Table 4. Monosaccharide composition and percentage of mycelium IPS and EPS of three L. edodes strains.
Table 4. Monosaccharide composition and percentage of mycelium IPS and EPS of three L. edodes strains.
Monosaccharide
Composition
Monosaccharide Percentage (%)
Xin 808XG19XG21
IPSEPSIPSEPSIPSEPS
Fucose6.003.504.041.932.661.07
Galactose30.3211.1630.906.7431.436.25
Glucose20.6223.0624.1929.7728.0933.08
Xylose5.552.792.221.383.24-
Mannose35.1151.4134.5951.9130.6551.65
Ribose1.06-1.11-1.33-
Galacturonic acid0.562.111.222.430.882.22
Glucuronic acid0.775.971.745.831.725.74
“-”, not detected.
Table 5. Molecular weight of mycelium IPSs and EPSs of three L. edodes strains.
Table 5. Molecular weight of mycelium IPSs and EPSs of three L. edodes strains.
Molecular WeightXin 808XG19XG21
IPSEPSIPSEPSIPSEPS
Mw (kDa)269.78379.875702.92483.894547.91353.824
Mn (kDa)69.4018.86529.7524.75029.2293.168
Mz(kDa)1780.1792375.1466448.1875629.4693551.6111500.835
PDI (Mw/Mn)3.8879.01023.62617.66318.74616.992
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Rida, K.; Wen, J.; Yu, X.; Gu, Y.; He, M.; Chen, Q.; Xiang, Q. Screening of Lentinula edodes Strains for High Polysaccharide Production and In Vitro Antioxidant Activities. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11050347

AMA Style

Zhang J, Rida K, Wen J, Yu X, Gu Y, He M, Chen Q, Xiang Q. Screening of Lentinula edodes Strains for High Polysaccharide Production and In Vitro Antioxidant Activities. Journal of Fungi. 2025; 11(5):347. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11050347

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jie, Kanwal Rida, Jiahao Wen, Xiumei Yu, Yunfu Gu, Maoqiang He, Qiang Chen, and Quanju Xiang. 2025. "Screening of Lentinula edodes Strains for High Polysaccharide Production and In Vitro Antioxidant Activities" Journal of Fungi 11, no. 5: 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11050347

APA Style

Zhang, J., Rida, K., Wen, J., Yu, X., Gu, Y., He, M., Chen, Q., & Xiang, Q. (2025). Screening of Lentinula edodes Strains for High Polysaccharide Production and In Vitro Antioxidant Activities. Journal of Fungi, 11(5), 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11050347

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop