Isolation and Identification of Endophytic Chaetomium sp. Strain V3 from Ambrosia and Its Effects on Tomato Plant Growth
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Isolation and Identification of Endophytic Fungus
2.1.1. Sample Processing and Isolation
2.1.2. Morphological Identification
2.1.3. Molecular Biological Identification
2.2. Determination of Growth-Promoting Characteristics
2.2.1. Hydrolytic Enzyme Activity Assay
- Protease activity: Strain V3 was inoculated onto skim milk medium (containing 1% skim milk) and cultured in the dark at 25 °C for 7 d. The presence of transparent zones around the colonies was observed as an indicator of protease activity [22].
- Cellulase activity: Carboxymethyl cellulose sodium (CMC-Na) was used as the sole carbon source. After culturing in the dark at 25 °C for 7 d, the medium was stained with 1 g/L Congo red solution for 2 h. The staining solution was then discarded, and the medium was soaked in a 1 M NaCl solution for 3 h to decolorize. Transparent zones around the colonies were observed as an indicator of cellulase activity.
2.2.2. Phytohormone Determination
2.3. Pot and Field Experiments
2.3.1. Pot Experiment
2.3.2. Field Experiment
2.4. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR
2.5. Root Colonization Observation
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Characterization of Chaetomium sp. V3: An Endophytic Fungus Isolated from Ragweed
3.2. Analysis of Growth-Promoting Characteristics
3.2.1. Hydrolytic Enzyme Activity
3.2.2. Plant Hormone Synthesis
3.3. Chaetomium sp. Promotes the Growth of Tomatoes
3.4. Field Growth and Quality Effects
3.4.1. Growth and Yield Indicators
3.4.2. Fruit Quality Analysis
3.5. Analysis of ARF Gene Expression
3.6. Observation of Root Colonization by Chaetomium sp. Strain V3
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Adeleke, B.S.; Babalola, O.O. The plant endosphere-hidden treasures: A review of fungal endophytes. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 2021, 37, 154–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, W.; Wu, Y.; Li, F.; Tang, W.; Gong, W.; Han, X.; White, J.F.; Ji, X.; Li, H. Seed endophytes and their roles in host plant stress resistance. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2023, 23, 2927–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayanan, Z.; Glick, B.R. Secondary metabolites produced by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Huang, X.; Li, J.; Huang, J.; Bao, S.; He, C.; Zhang, M.; Xiang, T. Metabolites of zearalenone and phytohormones secreted by endophytic fungus strain TH15 regulating the root development in Tetrastigma hemsleyanum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2022, 150, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batista, B.N.; Matias, R.R.; Oliveira, R.L.; Albuquerque, P.M. Hydrolytic enzyme production from açai palm (Euterpe precatoria) endophytic fungi and characterization of the amylolytic and cellulolytic extracts. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morales-Vargas, A.T.; López-Ramírez, V.; Álvarez-Mejía, C.; Vázquez-Martínez, J. Endophytic fungi for crops adaptation to abiotic stresses. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knolmajer, B.; Jócsák, I.; Taller, J.; Keszthelyi, S.; Kazinczi, G. Common ragweed—Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.: A review with special regards to the latest results in biology and ecology. Agronomy 2024, 14, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, H.; Liu, T.; Liu, Z.; Song, Z. Fate of the soil seed bank of giant ragweed and its significance in preventing and controlling its invasion in grasslands. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 4854–4866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, K.; Romero, J.; Liddell, C.; Creamer, R. Production of swainsonine by fungal endophytes of locoweed. Mycol. Res. 2003, 107, 980–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadeeva, G.; Ionova, N.; Kravtsova, O.; Bagaeva, T. Psychotropic endophytes of cereals as potential bioagents. BIO Web Conf. 2023, 67, 02031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajendran, L.; Durgadevi, D.; Kavitha, R.; Divya, S.; Ganeshan, K.; Vetrivelkalai, P.M.; Karthikeyan, G.; Raguchander, T. Characterization of chaetoglobosin producing Chaetomium globosum for the management of Fusarium–Meloidogyne wilt complex in tomato. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 134, lxac074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ortiz, J.; Soto, J.; Almonacid, L.; Fuentes, A.; Campos-Vargas, R.; Arriagada, C. Alleviation of metal stress by Pseudomonas orientalis and Chaetomium cupreum strains and their effects on Eucalyptus globulus growth promotion. Plant Soil 2019, 436, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, B.; Ma, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Zhu, D. Lignocellulolytic enzyme cocktail produced by plant endophytic Chaetomium globosum exhibits a capacity for high-efficient saccharification of raw rice straw. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 196, 116508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almaroai, Y.A.; Eissa, M.A. Effect of biochar on yield and quality of tomato grown on a metal-contaminated soil. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 265, 109210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panwar, A.; Manna, S.; Sahini, G.; Kaushik, V.; Kumar, M.; Govarthanan, M. The legacy of endophytes for the formation of bioactive agents, pigments, biofertilizers, nanoparticles and bioremediation of environment. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 41, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, G.; Wang, K.; Huang, B.; Mila, I.; Frasse, P.; Maza, E.; Djari, A.; Hernould, M.; Zouine, M.; Li, Z.; et al. The auxin-responsive transcription factor SlDOF9 regulates inflorescence and flower development in tomato. Nat. Plants 2022, 8, 419–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Z.; Liu, R.; Gu, W.; Dong, X. The Solanum lycopersicum auxin response factor SlARF2 participates in regulating lateral root formation and flower organ senescence. Plant Sci. 2017, 256, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waqar, S.; Bhat, A.A.; Khan, A.A. Endophytic fungi: Unravelling plant-endophyte interaction and the multifaceted role of fungal endophytes in stress amelioration. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 206, 108174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arumugam, S.; Ramessh, C.; Kaliappan, G.K.; Govindhan, R.; Prakasam, S.B.; Murugan, S.; Pandian, S.; Asgar, E.; Ravi, P. Lycopersene: A review on extraction, identification and purification and applications. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2023, 101, 158–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellis, M.B.; Ellis, J.P. Microfungi on Miscellaneous Substrates: An Identification Handbook; Timber Press: Portland, OR, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Bogiel, T.; Kwiecińska, P.; Górniak, R.; Kanarek, P.; Mikucka, A. The Use of Gel Electrophoresis to Separate Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplicons Allows for the Easy Identification and Assessment of the Spread of Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile Strains. Gels 2024, 10, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciuffreda, P.; Xynomilakis, O.; Casati, S.; Ottria, R. Fluorescence-Based Enzyme Activity Assay: Ascertaining the Activity and Inhibition of Endocannabinoid Hydrolytic Enzymes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, X.D.; Li, Z.; Liu, G.Z.; Wang, X.; Kwon, O.K.; Lee, H.K.; Whang, W.K.; Liu, X.Q. Quantitative determination of 15 bioactive triterpenoid saponins in different parts of Acanthopanax henryi by HPLC with charged aerosol detection and confirmation by LC–ESI-TOF-MS. J. Sep. Sci. 2016, 39, 2252–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waheed, H.; Javaid, M.M.; Shahid, A.; Ali, H.H.; Nargis, J.; Mehmood, A. Impact of foliar-applied Hoagland’s nutrient solution on growth and yield of mash bean (Vigna mungo L.) under different growth stages. J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 1133–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiese, K.L.; Dalmasso, J.P. Relationships of color, viscosity, organic acid profiles and ascorbic acid content to addition of organic acids and salt in tomato juice. J. Food Qual. 1994, 17, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouzroud, S.; Gouiaa, S.; Hu, N.; Bernadac, A.; Mila, I.; Bendaou, N.; Smouni, A.; Bouzayen, M.; Zouine, M. Auxin response factors (ARFs) are potential mediators of auxin action in tomato response to biotic and abiotic stress (Solanum lycopersicum). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, C.E.; Hong, T.W.; Zhou, Y.P.; Chen, Q.H.; Huang, X.L.; Guo, X.Y. The Length Limit of 5′ Nucleotide Additions to PCR Primers. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2018, 41, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- VerPlank, J.J.; Goldberg, A.L. Regulating protein breakdown through proteasome phosphorylation. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 3355–3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helal, G.A.; Khalil, R.R.; Galal, Y.G.; Soliman, S.M.; Abd Elkader, R.S. Studies on cellulases of some cellulose-degrading soil fungi. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waqas, M.; Khan, A.L.; Kamran, M.; Hamayun, M.; Kang, S.M.; Kim, Y.H.; Lee, I.J. Endophytic fungi produce gibberellins and indoleacetic acid and promotes host-plant growth during stress. Molecules 2012, 17, 10754–10773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guillaume, A.; Thorigné, A.; Carré, Y.; Vinh, J.; Levavasseur, L. Contribution of proteases and cellulases produced by solid-state fermentation to the improvement of corn ethanol production. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2019, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Yi, E.; Jiang, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Dong, Y.; Xu, F.; Yu, C.; Ma, L. Screening and Identification of Cadmium-Tolerant, Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Strain KM25, and Its Effects on the Growth of Soybean and Endophytic Bacterial Community in Roots. Plants 2025, 14, 2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rogis, C.; Gibson, L.R.; Knapp, A.D.; Horton, R. Can solid matrix priming with GA3 break seed dormancy in eastern gamagrass? J. Range Manag. 2004, 57, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hluska, T.; Dobrev, P.I.; Tarkowská, D.; Frébortová, J.; Zalabák, D.; Kopečný, D.; Plíhal, O.; Kokáš, F.; Briozzo, P.; Zatloukal, M.; et al. Cytokinin metabolism in maize: Novel evidence of cytokinin abundance, interconversions and formation of a new trans-zeatin metabolic product with a weak anticytokinin activity. Plant Sci. 2016, 247, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, B.; Sun, Y.; Tian, Z.; Fu, G.; Pei, X.; Pan, Z.; Nazir, M.F.; Song, S.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; et al. GhGASA10–1 promotes the cell elongation in fiber development through the phytohormones IAA-induced. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamayun, M.; Khan, S.A.; Iqbal, I.; Na, C.I.; Khan, A.L.; Hwang, Y.H.; Lee, B.H.; Lee, I.J. Chrysosporium pseudomerdarium produces gibberellins and promotes plant growth. J. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Airin, A.A.; Arafat, M.I.; Begum, R.A.; Islam, M.R.; Seraj, Z.I. Plant growth-promoting endophytic fungi of the wild halophytic rice Oryza coarctata. Ann. Microbiol. 2023, 73, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.Z.; Song, M.L.; Yao, X.; Chai, Q.; Simpson, W.R.; Li, C.J.; Nan, Z.B. The effect of seed-borne fungi and Epichloë endophyte on seed germination and biomass of Elymus sibiricus. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellidou, I.; Koukounaras, A.; Kostas, S.; Patelou, E.; Kanellis, A.K. Regulation of vitamin C accumulation for improved tomato fruit quality and alleviation of abiotic stress. Genes 2021, 12, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penrose, D.M.; Glick, B.R. Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Physiol. Plant. 2003, 118, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, F.; Wang, P.; Zou, Y.N.; Wu, Q.S.; Kuča, K. Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on root-hair growth and hormone levels of taproot and lateral roots in trifoliate orange under drought stress. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2019, 65, 1316–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Jia, X.; Yang, Z.; Fu, Q.; Yang, H.; Xu, X. Genome-wide identification of PEBP gene family in Solanum lycopersicum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Acosta, J.P.; Restrepo, S.; Henao, J.D.; López-Kleine, L. Multivariate method for inferential identification of differentially expressed genes in gene expression experiments. J. Comput. Biol. 2019, 26, 866–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noureddine, Y.; da Rocha, M.; An, J.; Médina, C.; Mejias, J.; Mulet, K.; Quentin, M.; Abad, P.; Zouine, M.; Favery, B.; et al. AUXIN RESPONSIVE FACTOR8 regulates development of the feeding site induced by root-knot nematodes in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 5752–5766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caumon, H.; Vernoux, T. A matter of time: Auxin signaling dynamics and the regulation of auxin responses during plant development. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 3887–3902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.M.; Zhang, H.K.; Zhai, J.F.; Zhang, X.S.; Sang, Y.L.; Cheng, Z.J. ARF4 regulates shoot regeneration through coordination with ARF5 and IAA12. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva, L.R.; de Mello, S.C.; Valadares-Inglis, M.C.; do Carmo Costa, M.M.; de Passos Saraiva, M.A.; Rego, E.C.; Zacaroni, A.B.; Muniz, P.H.; Pappas, M.D. Transcriptional responses and reduction in carpogenic germination of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum exposed to volatile organic compounds of Trichoderma azevedoi. Biol. Control 2022, 169, 104897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Gene | Forward Primer Sequence (5′-3′) | Reverse Primer Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| ARF2 | GCTGCTCTACGAGCTGCTG | CTGCTGCTGATGATGATGA |
| ARF4 | ACGACGACGATGATGATGA | GATGATGATGCTGCTGCT |
| ARF7 | TGCTGCTGATGATGATGC | ACGACGACGCTGCTGCT |
| ARF8 | GATGATGATGCTGCTGCT | TGCTGCTGACGACGACGA |
| ARF10 | ACGACGACGCTGCTGCT | GATGATGATGCTGCTGAT |
| ARF12 | TGCTGCTGATGATGATGG | ACGACGACGCTGCTGCTA |
| UBI3 | CAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAG | GATGATGATGATGATGAT |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jiang, Y.; Mehnaz, N.; Song, B.; Sun, M.; Yang, L.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Dong, Y.; et al. Isolation and Identification of Endophytic Chaetomium sp. Strain V3 from Ambrosia and Its Effects on Tomato Plant Growth. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11120870
Jiang Y, Mehnaz N, Song B, Sun M, Yang L, Li X, Li Y, Wang L, Wang Z, Dong Y, et al. Isolation and Identification of Endophytic Chaetomium sp. Strain V3 from Ambrosia and Its Effects on Tomato Plant Growth. Journal of Fungi. 2025; 11(12):870. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11120870
Chicago/Turabian StyleJiang, Yuping, Nazish Mehnaz, Bing Song, Mengyu Sun, Leibei Yang, Xuemei Li, Yueying Li, Lanlan Wang, Ze Wang, Yuzhu Dong, and et al. 2025. "Isolation and Identification of Endophytic Chaetomium sp. Strain V3 from Ambrosia and Its Effects on Tomato Plant Growth" Journal of Fungi 11, no. 12: 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11120870
APA StyleJiang, Y., Mehnaz, N., Song, B., Sun, M., Yang, L., Li, X., Li, Y., Wang, L., Wang, Z., Dong, Y., & Ma, L. (2025). Isolation and Identification of Endophytic Chaetomium sp. Strain V3 from Ambrosia and Its Effects on Tomato Plant Growth. Journal of Fungi, 11(12), 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11120870
