Next Article in Journal
Integrated Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Profiling Reveals Monotonic Molecular Signatures During Fruiting Body Development of Coprinus comatus
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Gradients Shape Fungal Diversity and Functional Traits in Arctic Biocrusts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mycobiomes of Six Lichen Species from the Russian Subarctic: A Culture-Independent Analysis and Cultivation Study

by
Armen Hakobjanyan
1,2,
Alexey Melekhin
3,4,
Marina Sukhacheva
5,
Alexey Beletsky
5 and
Timofey Pankratov
1,*
1
S.N. Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Centre of Biotechnology of RAS, 119071 Moscow, Russia
2
Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, 101000 Moscow, Russia
3
N.A. Avrorin Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden Institute, 184209 Apatity, Russia
4
Tobolsk Complex Scientific Station of the Ural Branch of RAS, 626152 Tobolsk, Russia
5
Skryabin Institute of Bioengineering, Research Centre of Biotechnology of RAS, 119071 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2025, 11(12), 848; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11120848 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 28 October 2025 / Revised: 27 November 2025 / Accepted: 28 November 2025 / Published: 29 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Evolution, Biodiversity and Systematics)

Abstract

Lichens are defined as holobionts, whose thalli are known to contain a significant diversity of bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses. Research into the presence of these organisms in lichens remains limited. Therefore, assessing the diversity of fungi in different species of lichen remains a relevant task. In this study, we analysed the taxonomic composition of the mycobiome of six lichen species from northern Russia. To achieve this, we employed high-throughput sequencing and cultivation methods using a modified nutrient medium. The study obtained data on the dominance of fungi from the classes Dothideomycetes, Eutypomycetes, Leotiomycetes and Tremellomycetes in the lichen samples studied. We found that the most common taxa among the lichen species studied were lichenicolous or parasitic fungi belonging to the genera Athelia, Epithamnolia and Cladosporium. The diversity of OTUs in Nephromopsis nivalis thalli that were processed using an abrasive to remove epiphytic fungi was found to be 30–50% lower than in intact thalli. Our findings suggest that the characteristics of the lichen species and its environment within the biocenosis can influence the diversity and abundance of fungi in thalli. Ninety-two fungal cultures were obtained and identified at various phylogenetic levels. Six strains were identified that presumably belong to new families within the orders Lecanorales, Tremellales, Septobasidiales and Myriangiales. We discovered that modifying cultivation methods can hasten the quest for novel, hitherto unexplored strains of lichenophilic fungi.

1. Introduction

Lichens are an example of a symbiotic association between fungi and phototrophic organisms capable of surviving and reproducing in extreme conditions. These complex organisms are characterised by an absence of dense barrier coverings, such as plant bark or animal skin, to protect them from the environment; their bodies are open systems that are only weakly isolated from the external environment. The diversity of lichens and their involvement in food, topical and phoretic interactions reflects their success in mountainous, tundra and humid tropical forest ecosystems. Surrounded by soil, plants and animals, lichens accumulate significant quantities of microorganisms in their thalli [1,2,3,4], which are associated with the mycobiont and photobiont through various forms of interaction, ranging from neutralism to parasitism. A significant and diverse component of lichen thalli is non-lichenized fungi, which, according to the latest findings, can be divided into two main groups [5]: (1) epiphytes, which inhabit or are temporarily present on the surface of thalli in the form of reproductive structures, mycelium or individual cells, and (2) endophytes, whose mycelium or cells are integrated into the intercellular spaces of mycobiont hyphae and photobiont cells. The first group includes both transient and permanently inhabiting species. The second group comprises parasites of mycobionts or algae, as well as a group of endophytes known as asymptomatic fungi. These fungi do not cause morphological or physiological changes in thalli and are often undetectable by classical visual examination of the thallus, even under a microscope [6]. Hafelnner [7] defined three subgroups of fungi that inhabit lichens. The first subgroup, lichenicolous fungi, are specific to lichens and can be identified by their morphological characteristics. This group includes approximately 1800 described species belonging to the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota phyla [8,9,10,11]. The second subgroup comprises endolichenic fungi (endophytes of lichens that are hidden or difficult to distinguish based on morphological characteristics, arising from primary non-lichenised lines of Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Leotiomycetes and Sordariomycetes [12,13,14,15]. These fungi are still poorly understood and difficult to diagnose using standard microscopic methods; their study requires a combination of molecular and culture-dependent methods. The third subgroup comprises lichen epiphytes: fungi that are usually lichenised and grow on lichen thalli. They are more commonly found among Lecanoromycetes [16,17]. Additionally, yeast forms can be found among epiphytes, localised among the surface structures of thalli [18,19]. Non-lichenised fungi in lichens, especially asymptomatic endolichenics, are of interest due to their significant diversity [20]. Following the introduction of high-throughput sequencing methods, a similar issue emerged to that encountered with bacterial microbiomes: a significant proportion of the microbial diversity pool consisted of previously uncultivated fungal lineages [21]. Using a limited range of traditional culture media such as wort agar, starch-dextrose agar and Sabouraud’s medium did not facilitate the isolation of new fungal taxa from lichens, leaving a significant amount of diversity unexplored. Departing from this practice by using nutrient media with low sugar and starch content, along with the addition of polyols, vitamins, and trace elements, and increasing incubation times at lower temperatures, led to the discovery of new species and genera of fungi [19,22,23,24,25].
Of the many lichen species, several groups are ecologically significant and have economic and medical importance. These groups are capable of forming lichen mats and accumulating large amounts of biomass in temperate and cold regions. Examples of these ubiquitous species include Cetraria islandica, Cladonia arbuscula, Cl. rangiferina, Cladonia stellaris, Cl. uncialis, Nephromopsis nivalis and species from the genera Alectoria, Stereocaulon and Umbilicaria.
Despite the fact that Cetraria islandica is widely distributed and economically important, the diversity of microorganisms in this lichen species has been poorly studied. Most of the existing literature focuses on lichenicolous fungi [26,27,28] and bacterial diversity in the thalli of these lichens [29,30]. Studies of the mycobiome of this lichen species using both cultural and non-cultural methods have probably not been conducted before. More data is available for Nephromopsis nivalis (Flavocetraria nivalis), as Zhang et al. published the results of 454 pyrosequencing of seven lichen samples collected in the Svalbard archipelago in 2015 [31]. These lichens were dominated by representatives of the orders Helotiales, Saccharomycetales and unknown ascomycetes. Studies of the mycobiomes of Cladonia stellaris and Cl. arbuscula have also been sporadic [31,32], although a fair amount of data is available on lichenicolous fungi [33]. Lichens of the Cl. arbuscula species [31] were dominated by representatives of the Capnodiales order (Dothideomycetes) and the Helotiales order (Leotiomycetes), as well as a significant proportion of ascomycetes of unknown origin. According to Shishido [32], Cl. stellaris and Cl. arbuscula were dominated by representatives of the Eurotiales and Onygenales orders (Eurotiomycetes class). These differences are evident as a result of samples being collected in different biotopes within different climatic zones. Among the lichenicolous fungi of lichens in the genus Stereocaulon are species such as Arthonia stereocaulina and Opegrapha stereocaulicola (order Arthoniales, class Arthoniomycetes), Rhymbocarpus stereocaulorum (order Cyttariales, class Leotiomycetes) and Roselliniella stereocaulorum (order Hypocreales), and others [34,35]. No metabarcoding data for the mycobiomes of species of this genus were found.
To understand the strategy of lichen mycobiome formation, it is crucial to study the taxonomic composition of fungi in identical or closely related lichen species found in different, distant ecosystems under similar or dissimilar climate conditions. This approach can successfully assess the presence of random fungal species, as well as those that have become permanent components of thalli due to selection processes. In other words, this will enable us to determine which types of fungi occur randomly in lichen mycobiomes and which are chosen and established as permanent components.
Vančurová et al. [36] carried out such work on algae and lichens of the genus Stereocaulon. This study demonstrated that the relationship between the mycobiont and the photobiont is more significant than geographical and climatic conditions. It was also noted that, regardless of climatic or geographical conditions, the mycobiont Stereocaulon selects a partner from three genera of algae.
An analysis of mycobiome similarity in two lichen species [25] revealed that the proportion of Eurotiomycetes, Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes representatives in the fungal communities of Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and Tephromela atra lichens depended on geographical location. Some genera were also found in samples collected in distant geographical locations. Comparative analysis of species from Turkey and South Korea revealed common fungal taxa in two lichen genera, Peltigera and Parmelia [37]. These common taxa were unidentified representatives of Chaetothyriales, Dothideomycetes and Fungi. Overall, few studies have been devoted to the comparative analysis of geographically distant lichen mycobiomes.
This study aimed to determine the taxonomic structure of the mycobiomes of six lichen species located 800 km apart, but within similar climatic zones. We also aimed to compare metabarcoding data with the results of cultural methods of analysing fungal diversity in thalli of the same species and other species of lichen collected at the same time in winter. In order to understand the differences between the same species in different locations, we selected two identical species (Cetraria islandica and Nephromopsis nivalis, also known as Flavocetraria nivalis) and two pairs of closely related lichen species within the same genus. To establish possible connections between mycobiomes within a single location, we selected different genera and species of lichen.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites and Sample Collection

Samples were collected in December 2024 from two geographically distinct locations: the Khibiny Mountains (vicinity of Kirovsk) and the area around of Naryan-Mar city (Table 1). Samples from the first site were collected in the Botanical Cirque of the Khibiny Mountains, at an altitude of between 450 and 580 m above sea level. The samples were collected in the following locations: (1) at the edge of the elfin birch forest, from under a layer of snow (20 cm) on the soil (Cladonia stellaris (Opiz) Pouzar & Vĕzda); (2) in the tundra, on rocky scree, shallowly under snow, from a stone (Cetraria islandica (L.) Ach., Nephromopsis nivalis (L.) Divakar, A.Crespo & Lumbsch); (3) in the tundra, on a section of a snow-free cliff, from a stone (Stereocaulon vesuvianum Pers.). The plant communities in these biotopes were dominated by angiosperms such as Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng., Dryas octopetala L., Empetrum nigrum L., Kalmia procumbens (L.) Gift, Kron & P. F. Stevens, Oxytropis sordida (Willd.) Pers., Oxyria digyna (L.) Hill and Phyllodoce caerulea (L.) Bab. Mosses were represented by Andreaea rupestris Hedw., Niphotrichum canescens (Hedw.) Bedn.-Ochyra & Ochyra, Racomitrium lanuginosum (Hedw.) Brid., Pleurozium schreberi (Willd. ex Brid.) Mitt. and Sanionia uncinata (Hedw.) Loeske.
Samples were collected in duplicate from each location, with point coordinates taken to an accuracy of three metres. Using sterile gloves, snow was carefully removed from around the lichens and the thalli were aseptically placed in sterilised, double-layered paper bags for transportation. The first batch of specimens was shipped immediately (wet, with ice and snow in the bags) by post to the laboratory. They dried during shipping and were free from mould damage. The second set of specimens were dried at room temperature for several hours before shipping.
One sample was taken from each microbiological specimen, all of which are stored in the KPABG herbarium. Identification was carried out using the standard method [38] at the PABGI KSC RAS instrument base.
Samples from the second site (Naryan-Mar) were collected from a 10 × 10 m test plot located in a depression in the microrelief, which had large areas of blown sand. The altitude here is 10 m above sea level. This area was dominated by a dwarf shrub-lichen community consisting mainly of Cladonia stellaris. The plant communities in these biotopes were dominated by the following species: Betula nana L., Larix sibirica Ledeb., Vaccinium vitis-idaea L., Hylocomium splendens (Hedw.) Schimp. and Empetrum nigrum L. Lichen samples were collected from larches along the edge of the plot on a raised area of terrain within a larch-birch dwarf shrub-moss community, where Vaccinium vitis-idaea and Hylocomium splendens were predominant in the ground cover. The lichen samples from Naryan-Mar were processed and identified in the same way as the samples from the Khibiny Mountains. After receiving the specimens were stored at −20 °C until further processing. Lichen taxon names are given according to Westberg et al. [39].

2.2. Preparing Samples for Inoculation onto Agarised Culture Media

A portion of the lichen thallus was placed in a mortar and moistened with 1 mL of 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4). The material was ground to a homogeneous state, with particle sizes smaller than 1 mm. The resulting homogenate was transferred into a sterile 15 mL centrifuge tube prefilled with 4 mL of 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer. Residual material was rinsed from the mortar using an additional 1 mL of the same buffer, which was also added to the tube. Subsequently, 4 mL more of the buffer was added, resulting in a final volume of 10 mL plus the biomass. The suspension was vortexed at 4000 rpm for 2 min. Figure 1 shows the sample preparation procedure.

2.3. Preparation of Samples, DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing

2.3.1. DNA Extraction from Lichen Thalli

Total DNA was extracted from lichen thalli using the FASTDNA™ SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Yantai, Shandong, China) with modifications to the initial sample preparation steps. Approximately 200 mg of lichen thallus was finely chopped with sterile scissors into fragments 0.5–2 mm in size. The material was transferred into a sterile porcelain mortar, supplemented with 200 μL of Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), and ground into a homogeneous paste-like suspension. The resulting homogenate was transferred into a lysing matrix tube containing beads. Next, 500 μL of PBS buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.8 mM KH2PO4; pH 7.4) was added to the tube, followed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 1 min (MiniSpin, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The tubes were then frozen at −15 to −20 °C for 30–60 min. Subsequently, 122 μL of MT buffer (provided in the kit) and 200 μL of PBS were added. Mechanical disruption was performed using a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals) in two 40 s cycles at 6 m/s, with manual mixing between cycles to ensure even distribution of beads. The contents of the tubes were then transferred using a sterile metal spatula into a 5 mL sterile syringe preloaded with sterile glass wool, which was compressed with the syringe plunger. Care was taken to prevent large beads (≥1.4 mm in diameter) from entering the syringe. The liquid phase was transferred into a sterile 2 µL microcentrifuge tube by pressing down on the plunger. The plunger was removed, and an additional 270 μL of PBS was added to the syringe to extract the remaining liquid, which was also collected into the same tube. All tubes were volume-equalised using PBS buffer. Samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 14,000 rpm, and the supernatant was transferred to new sterile 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes. DNA extraction was then continued according to the manufacturer’s protocol for the FASTDNA SPIN Kit for Soil.

2.3.2. DNA Extraction from Pure Cultures

Genomic DNA was extracted from yeast fungal biomass using a modified CTAB-based protocol. Fungal biomass was transferred to 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes, followed by the addition of 1 mL TE buffer and 20 μL of lysozyme solution (20 mg/mL). Samples were incubated in a thermo-shaker (TS-100C SC-24C, BioSan, Riga, Latvia) at 37 °C and 800 rpm for 30 min. Tubes were centrifuged for 2 min at 14,000 rpm, and the supernatant was discarded. The pellet was resuspended in 500 μL TES buffer and incubated at 60 °C for 30 min, followed by freezing at −20 °C. After thawing, 140 μL of 5 M NaCl and 65 μL of preheated 10% CTAB solution were added to the sample. The mixture was incubated at 65 °C for 10 min. Subsequently, 705 μL of a chloroform:isoamyl alcohol mixture (24:1) was added, and the sample was vortexed (LV-1006, Elmi, Latvia) at 3000 rpm for 1 min until flocculent material disappeared. Tubes were then incubated at −15 °C for 15 min and centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm. The upper (aqueous) phase was transferred to a new tube, and 225 μL of 3 M sodium acetate was added, followed by brief vortexing. After incubation at −15 °C for 15 min, the samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 14,000 rpm. The supernatant was transferred to a 1.5 mL tube, and DNA was precipitated by adding 0.55 volumes of isopropanol. The mixture was incubated at −20 °C for 20–30 min to allow DNA aggregation, then centrifuged for 5 min at 14,000 rpm. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was washed twice with 1 mL of cold 70% ethanol. After each wash, the sample was briefly vortexed and centrifuged for 2 min at 14,000 rpm. Ethanol was carefully removed, and the pellet was air-dried under a UV lamp for approximately 10 min. DNA was then resuspended in 50 μL of TE buffer. Samples were incubated in a thermo-shaker (TS-100 SC-20, BioSan, Latvia) at 37 °C for 30 min. If complete dissolution of the DNA was not achieved, tubes were left overnight at 4 °C and re-incubated. Extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C. For filamentous fungi, the initial steps differed: a 5 × 5 mm agar block containing fungal mycelium was excised using a sterile scalpel. The biomass was transferred into a 2 mL tube containing 500 μL of TE buffer, homogenised with a sterile spatula, and supplemented with 500 μL of distilled water. Lysozyme solution (20 μL, 20 mg/mL) was added, and samples were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h at 800 rpm. The pellet obtained after centrifugation (2 min, 14,000 rpm) was resuspended in 500 μL of TES buffer, and 6 μL of proteinase K was added to inactivate nucleases. Next, 40 mg of sterile powdered glass was added, and the mixture was gently stirred by hand. Tubes were placed on a cold rack and frozen at −15 °C for 15 min. Ice and biomass disruption was carried out using a rotary drill with a custom grinding tip, taking care not to touch the walls of the tube to avoid microplastic contamination. Samples were then incubated in a thermo-shaker at 60 °C and 800 rpm for 30 min. From the addition of 140 μL of 5 M NaCl and CTAB onward, the protocol followed that described for yeast-like fungi.

2.3.3. Processing of Nephromopsis nivalis Thalli to Remove Epiphytic Propagules

To remove fungal propagules from the thallus surface, thallus fragments were vigorously shaken in 1 mL of pre-cooled (5 °C) TRIS buffer (pH 6.5), with the addition of 100 mg of sterile silica gel for chromatography with a particle size of 60 μm, as well as 100 mg of silica gel with a particle size of 100–150 μm. This process was carried out in 2 mL test tubes. A Fast Prep homogeniser (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) was used. The shaking mode was set to 40 s at a speed of 6 m/s, repeated twice. After processing in the homogeniser, the biomass was placed in a syringe fitted with a sterile glass fibre filter. The buffer residues were removed using a plunger and the biomass washed three times with 20 mL of sterile water. The resulting biomass was then used for the total DNA extraction process described above.

2.3.4. The Process of Obtaining Amplicons for the Analysis of Pure Fungal Cultures via PCR

To identify the obtained fungal strains, PCR amplification was performed targeting a genomic region that partially includes the 18S rRNA gene (small subunit), the complete ITS region, 5.8S rRNA, ITS2, and a part of the 28S rRNA gene (large subunit). Two primers were used: ITS1F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTA) and NL4R (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG) [40,41] (Figure 2). The expected size of the amplified fragment was approximately 1300 base pairs (bp).

2.3.5. Electrophoresis of Genomic DNA and PCR Products

The presence of DNA and the length of PCR fragments were assessed by horizontal electrophoresis in agarose gel. Electrophoresis was performed at 96 V for 60 min. Visualisation of the results was carried out using the Molecular Imager Gel Doc XR documentation system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The resulting images were recorded and processed using the Quantity One software v. 4.6.5 (Bio-Rad, USA).

2.3.6. Preparing PCR Products for Sanger Sequencing

Sequencing was performed using an automated capillary sequencer 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at the Bioengineering Shared Research Centre at the Federal Research Centre for Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow, Russia. Samples for Sanger sequencing were prepared as follows: in a 200 μL microtube, 5 μL of purified PCR product (template) was mixed with 1 μL of a primer at a concentration of 1.6 pmol/μL. Each PCR product was thus submitted for sequencing with both forward and reverse primers as two separate reactions.

2.3.7. Sanger Sequencing

The obtained electropherograms in “ab1” format were processed using MEGA version X [42]. To generate high-quality sequences, electropherograms were trimmed; in the case of sequences obtained using the NL4 primer, reverse complementary sequences were generated. Multiple sequence alignment and contig assembly were performed using Unipro UGENE v. 52.0 [43]. The resulting contigs were analysed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) [44]. The obtained sequences, along with reference sequences of type strains from the NCBI and MycoBank databases (BLAST; MycoBank), were aligned using MEGA X. Taxonomic identification of each strain was based on the percentage of sequence identity (Table 2), with sequence coverage exceeding 90% in most cases.

2.3.8. NGS Sequencing and Identification of OTUs

PCR amplification of ITS fragments was carried out using the universal primers ITS-F (5′-CYHVGTYATTTAGAGGAASTAA-3′) and ITS-R (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGHTGB-3′) [46]. PCR fragments were barcoded using the Nextera XT Index Kit v.2 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The PCR fragments were purified using Agencourt AMPure beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and quantitated using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Then, all of the amplicons were pooled together in equimolar amounts and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq (2 × 300 nt paired-end reads). Overlapping paired Illumina reads were merged using FLASH v1.2.11. Usearch v.11 commands were used to cluster merged reads into OTUs at 97% identity threshold. Low quality reads, chimeric sequences and singletons were excluded from the OTUs during the analysis. To estimate the frequencies of OTUs in each sample reads were mapped to OTUs using Usearch at 97% identity threshold. Taxonomy of OTUs was predicted using UNITE ITS reference database v.10 and Sintax classification algorithm in Vsearch v2.28.1.
BLAST algorithms were used in the MycoBank and NSBI databases to identify OTE sequences, as had been done for pure cultures before.

2.4. Calculation of Colony-Forming Units (CFU) per Gram of Dry Sample

The calculation was performed using the following formula:
C F U / g = N F V m
where N is the number of colonies grown on the plate (units); F is the dilution factor (reciprocal of the dilution); V is the volume of the suspension plated onto the Petri dish (mL); m is the mass of the dry sample (g).

2.5. Determination of Alpha Diversity Indices

We used the following indices to assess the alpha diversity of the fungal community in lichens: species richness (the number of unique species), Shannon index [47] (higher values indicate greater community diversity; values close to 0 indicate a community dominated by a single species, while high values range from 2 to 4).
H = i = 1 S p i × l n ( p i )
where H′ is the Shannon index; S is the total number of species; pi is the proportion of the i-th species in the total community (the number of isolates of one species divided by the total number of isolates, i.e., the frequency or probability of occurrence of species i); ln is the natural logarithm.
The Simpson index [48] measures dominance within the community (values close to 1 indicate dominance by a single species).
D = i = 1 S n i ( n i 1 ) / N ( N 1 )
where D is the Simpson index, representing the probability that two randomly selected individuals belong to the same species; S is the total number of species; ni is the number of individuals of species i in the sample; N is the total number of individuals of all species in the sample; ni(ni − 1) is the number of ordered pairs of different individuals of the same species i (sampling without replacement); N(N − 1) is the total number of ordered pairs of any two individuals in the entire sample.

2.6. Light Microscopy

Micrographs were taken using an Axio Imager 2 light microscope (Carl-Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

2.7. Statistical Analysis and Visualisation

Statistical analysis and visualisation were performed using the MS Excel 2010 and Orange V.3.39.0 software packages.

2.8. Deposition of Sequences of Pure Cultures and Illumina NGS Sequences

The OTU sequences obtained by NGS profiling have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PX406301-PX406485 and PX502199-PX502209. The 18S rRNA (partial), ITS1, 5.8S rRNA, ITS2 and 28S rRNA (partial) gene sequences are deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: PX352608–PX352694.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Mycobionts

In addition to the traditional identification method using diagnostic keys, ITS1 gene sequences were analysed using high-throughput sequencing. The sequences obtained were analysed using BLAST algorithms (NCBI). The results are presented in Table 3.
Metabarcoding, which uses primers to amplify the ITS1 region of rRNA, confirmed that the samples belonged to the expected species. However, the S. vesuvianum and S. paschale samples were found to contain S. alpinum sequences. The Cl. arbuscula lichen samples contained sequences of Cl. submitis and Cl. uncialis. Nevertheless, morphological analysis and the presence of dominant OTUs belonging to species identified based on morphological and biochemical characteristics confirm that these samples belong to S. vesuvianum, S. paschale and Cl. arbuscula.

3.2. OTU Analysis

All samples were analysed in duplicate for each site, with the results then compiled. The number of initial reads varied depending on the sample (Table 4). For samples of the same species collected at the same locus, the number of initial reads could differ by more than twofold; for example, the C. islandica samples from Naryan-Mar showed this variation. The number of unique OTUs identified in replicates of a single sample also varied. The highest number of unique OTUs was identified in Cladonia and S. paschale samples, and the lowest in N. nivalis samples that had been processed using abrasive materials. The percentage of sequencing reads was acceptable for processing the sequencing results further and ranged from 88% to 96%.

3.3. Analysis of Mycobiome Structure Using High-Throughput Sequencing

We analysed eight paired samples (16 samples in total) of lichens, as well as four processed samples of N. nivalis located in the Khibiny Mountains and Naryan-Mar. The four samples were processed using an abrasive material to obtain impurity-free DNA (see the ‘Materials and Methods’ Section 2). As the total proportion of OTUs unrelated to mycobiont OTUs was low (Table 5), the data set was normalised by taking the sum of all OTUs unrelated to mycobionts as 100%. Non-major sequences related to Lecanoromycetes and other species of lichenised fungi were also excluded. Repeats were averaged. Statistical error graphs are presented in Figure S1.
Following normalisation, it was decided to exclude those minor OTUs that accounted for less than 0.49% (±0.04) of all OTUs in the pool and that did not belong to the mycobiont. Consequently, we obtained sets of OTUs that dominated the composition of the mycobiomes of the studied lichens (Figure 3). The taxonomic affiliation and the relative contribution of OTUs to the mycobiome communities of the studied lichens are shown in Supplementary Table S3.
The highest number of dominant OTUs was observed in samples of S. paschale, S. vesuvianum and N. nivalis. The fewest dominant OTUs were found in C. islandica (NM) and Cl. stellaris samples.

3.4. Alpha Diversity in Mycobiomes

Alpha diversity was calculated based on statistical data obtained from the entire OTU array for each sample, with non-fungal OTUs excluded (Figure 4). The same calculation was performed on the data array without mycobiont sequences (Figure 5).
Both species of Cladonia exhibited the greatest species diversity, with a Chao1 index above 140. For the other samples, the index was below 120 (Figure 4B). At the same time, species diversity was higher in lichen samples from Naryan-Mar than in samples from the Khibiny Mountains. There were no significant differences in species richness indices between Cetraria and Nephromopsis lichens, either within species or between territories. The most significant difference in Chao1 indices was found between Stereocaulon lichen samples, reaching a relative value of 53. Richness values correlated positively with Chao1 index values, except for two processed samples of N. nivalis (Figure 4A).
The Shannon diversity index indicates the uniformity with which different taxa are distributed in a sample. At higher values, it reflects the importance of taxa that are present in low numbers but that may be ecologically significant. The most distinct difference in this indicator was observed between lichens from two locations (Figure 4C). Notably, intact thalli of N. nivalis and thalli treated with an abrasive suspension did not differ significantly in this respect, whereas the richness indicator did differ significantly between these samples, particularly for samples from the Khibiny Mountains.
The Simpson index indirectly measures dominance rather than diversity. It calculates the probability that two individuals selected at random from the same sample belong to the same species. Therefore, when the index is high, the probability of several species dominating is also high. As expected, this index increases slightly in samples treated with abrasive, since the removal of epiphytic fungi increases the proportion of dominant endophytes in the total mycobiome (Figure 4D). The dramatic difference between C. islandica from Khibiny and Naryan-Mar is less clear. The decrease in the weight of dominant species in the sample from Naryan-Mar implies a high invasive load on the thallus from the ecosystem. Similar differences are also evident in two species of Cladonia.
As the overall assessment of OTU diversity in samples is based on a comparison of the full range of amplicons (OTU reads), diversity indicators are distorted by the abundance of DNA from the dominant fungus (the mycobiont). To determine the diversity of non-mycobiont OTU sequences, these sequences were filtered out and the remaining sample analysed using Shannon and Simpson indices. The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 5.
Overall, after removing the mycobiont OTU and other minor OTUs (less than 0.49%), the values of both indices decreased, indicating a lower level of diversity within the fixed range of contribution values from 0.49% to 100%. At the same time, we found a low level of difference in the Shannon index and a very significant difference in the Simpson index in the samples of C. islandica (KH) and S. vesuvianum. Therefore, for these species, the diversity of the entire sample is equivalent to that of a narrow range of dominant species. In other words, there are few minor OTUs and they do not significantly contribute to the overall diversity pool. In other cases, however, minor OTUs contribute significantly to overall diversity, and among them there are groups that are emerging as potential dominants. This assumption is confirmed by the results of the analysis of N. nivalis (KH) samples treated with abrasive material. The Shannon index increased significantly, exceeding the values of the index for the total OTU pool.
Depending on the site, the Simpson index in the processed samples increases or decreases, indicating a change in the diversity of dominant fungal species.

3.5. Analysis of the Taxonomic Affiliation and Relative Contribution of the Dominant OTUs

We analysed the relative contribution and taxonomic affiliation of OTUs selected based on dominance (Figure 3). The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 6.
Ascomycetes predominated in all samples. The proportion of Basidiomycetes was higher in samples from the Khibiny Mountains. Only the C. islandica and S. vesuvianum samples from the Khibiny Mountains contained OTUs classified as Chytridomycetes. OTUs that could not be identified as belonging to any known type or class of fungi were also found in the C. islandica, N. nivalis and S. vesuvianum samples from the Khibiny Mountains. These were OTUs No. 623, 624 and 229 in the S. vesuvianum samples and accounted for 9.9% of dominant OTUs in total. According to the MycoBank alignment results, OTU 229 belongs to the phylum Cryptomycota (formerly Rozellomycota), which was first validated by Doweld in 2013 (https://www.indexfungorum.org/names/NamesRecord.asp?RecordID=550328 (accessed on 27 November 2025) [49].
In the N. nivalis (KH) sample, OTU No. 369 accounted for 1.6% of the total. This amplicon is also present in the OTU library of the processed N. nivalis sample, at a proportion of 2.2%. The clone has the greatest similarity (at 30% coverage) to the soil clone KY687698 from Sweden [50]. The phylogeny of these sequences is shown in Figure S2. The closest sequences were selected based on similarity, although in most cases the coverage level was low. A minor Mucoromycota clone was found only in unprocessed Cl. stellaris (KH) samples. It was one of the representatives of the Mortierella genus.
Three classes of ascomycetes were dominant in the samples: Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes and Leotiomycetes (Figure 6B). This is consistent with previous data on the dominant classes in lichen mycobiome composition [31,51]. The classes Agaricomycetes and Lecanoromycetes were subdominant. The remaining classes were represented by minor OTUs. In abrasive-processed N. nivalis (KH) samples, the proportion of Eurotiomycetes OTUs increased significantly while that of Dothideomycetes and Agaricomycetes decreased. The proportion of Lecanoromycetes OTUs remained unchanged. The result was different in the processed N. nivalis (NM) sample. Here, the proportion of Dothideomycetes and Eurotiomycetes OTUs increased, while the number of Leotiomycetes and Lecanoromycetes OTUs decreased. Thus, in both variants, only the proportion of Eurotiomycetes increased upon abrasive treatment. This class of ascomycetes includes many fungi that specialise in parasitism. Lichens often become their hosts [31].
The Sordariomycetes class and unclassified OTUs significantly contribute to the composition of the S. vesuvianum mycobiome.
All samples exhibited significant OTU diversity belonging to various orders (Figure 6C). Representatives of 49 orders were identified in the total OTU pool. Clones related to the orders Helotiales, Chaetothyriales and Atheliales were detected at varying quantities in all samples. Representatives of the orders Pleosporales, Mycosphaerellales, Lecanorales and Cladosporiales, as well as sequences unidentified to order level, were usually found in most samples (usually with the exception of one or two). The remaining orders were less represented. In N. nivalis (KH) lichens, both unprocessed and abraded thalli were dominated by Chaetothyriales representatives. This order also dominates the communities of Cl. stellaris (KH) and S. vesuvianum (KH).
A specific marker for C. islandica from the Khibiny Mountains is the order Lichenoconiales, as no OTEs associated with this taxonomic group were found in other samples. Conversely, representatives of the order Rhytismatales are clear indicators of the biotope. Only samples from Naryan-Mar contained OTEs associated with this order. These OTUs account for between 3% and 12% of all OTUs with a percentage contribution of more than 0.49%. Additionally, in abrasive-processed samples of N. nivalis (NM), the proportion of these OTUs decreases (from 12% to 9%), though it remains relatively high. Given that many representatives of this order are plant parasites, the data on their significant contribution to the mycobiomes of Naryan-Mar lichens are consistent with the results of alpha diversity analysis. The orders Xylariales, Sakaguchiales, Phaeothecales, Orbiliales, Mycocaliciales, Lecideales, Filobasidiales, Cystobasidiales, Candelariales and Baeomycetales can be classified as rare in the analysed samples, with their OTUs occurring sporadically. In other words, representatives of these orders are not closely associated with lichens and are most likely random species that have been transmitted from the niches of surrounding ecosystems. This is indirectly evidenced by the more significant enrichment of these OTUs in N. nivalis samples from Naryan-Mar.
At the family level, the sample data from the study does not show any regularity (Figure 6D). The largest number of identified families was found in C. islandica (KH) samples, followed by N. nivalis (NM), Cl. arbuscula (NM) and S. paschale (NM) samples. Between 59% and 73% of OTUs in the C. islandica (KH), N. nivalis (KH), Cl. stellaris (KH) and S. vesuvianum (KH) samples could not be identified at the family level using the ITS1 region. These sequences most likely represent new taxa at the family or genus level. OTUs associated with Atheliaceae were present in all samples, as were representatives of Cladosporiaceae, Herpotrichiellaceae, and Teratosphaeriaceae.
At the genus and species level, a large proportion of OTUs could not be accurately identified, either because they represent new taxa or because they cannot be identified based on the ITS1 region alone. The genera and species that were accurately identified are presented in Table S1. All samples contain OTUs associated with the genera Cladosporium, Epithamnolia and Fibularhizoctonia (anamorph Athelia). The genus Cladosporium is represented by the species C. hillianum, C. cladosporioides, C. angustiherbarum and C. herbarum. E. rangiferinae and E. xanthoriae were present in N. nivalis, Cl. stellaris and S. paschale. The genus Athelia was not represented by any known species. Most of the genera identified at genus level are plant parasites, lichens, or lichenicolous species. However, some are represented by saprotrophs, including Hypholoma, Trichoderma, Cortinarius, and Penicillium.

3.6. The Relationship Between the Presence of Fungal Taxa and Lichen Species, and Their Geographical Location

To determine which taxa are common to different species within a single location or genus of lichens separated by 800 km, we conducted an analysis of the logical relationships between several sets or groups. Figure 7 shows Venn diagrams illustrating the similarities and differences in the mycobiome compositions of lichens at two sites.
The mycobiomes of all Khibiny samples contain only two OTUs that can be classified as new species of the genera Athelia and Epithamnolia (Figure 7A,C). Both taxa predominate in C. islandica and N. nivalis. Members of these genera are primarily parasitic and lichenicolous fungi of lichens [52,53]. The genus Athelia also contains species that are pathogenic to insects and plants [54,55]. Based on our results, these species appear to be non-specific parasites of lichens, capable of infecting various host species. Clearly, the biotope and surrounding ecosystem strongly influence mycobiome composition. In lichens from Naryan-Mar, we observed a different composition of common taxa. Here, uncultivated fungi belonging to the class Leotiomycetes, as well as Cladonia gracilis, dominate. A significant proportion of the representatives of the class Leotiomycetes are phytopathogenic fungi that cause severe damage to plants.
The presence of the Cladonia OTU is difficult to explain, given that the samples were carefully prepared for analysis and the presence of foreign thalli was excluded. Furthermore, they are present in all eight samples from the four species. During development, it is likely that mycobionts in close contact with each other in one locus are able to germinate and be present in the thalli of morphologically similar species. However, the possibility that Cl. gracilis soredia were mechanically transmitted to the thalli of other lichens cannot be ruled out. Two species of Cladosporium, Epithamnolia sp. and Coniothyrium lignorum, were also present in all four lichen species from Naryan-Mar. All of these species are facultative or obligate parasites. Lichens from Naryan-Mar generally show closer ecological connections, as they share more fungal taxa with each other than with samples from the Khibiny Mountains.
Shared taxa for respective species and closely related species are shown in Figure S3. Epitamnolia sp. (OTU29), Cladosporium cladosporoides (OTU16) and Athelia sp. (OTUs 19 and 20) were present in all sample pairs from different loci, except for the processed N. nivalis samples. Five common OTUs were found in S. vesuvianum and S. paschale samples, including the aforementioned OTUs and genera (OTU14: Cladosporium herbarum, OTU20, and OTU29). Stereocaulon lichen samples differ from the others in that they contain the common OTUs 62 and 88 (Venturia sp. and Leotiaceae sp., respectively). The highest number of common OTUs (seven) was observed in N. nivalis samples.

3.7. Search for Epiphytic and Endophytic Fungal Groups in Nephromopsis nivalis

This lichen species has flat thalli without tubular structures, a smooth surface and a well-developed cortex, which makes it convenient for studying the ratio of epiphytic and endophytic microorganisms. Two populations of N. nivalis were selected from habitats differing in altitude, temperature and precipitation. Parallel samples of thalli were subjected to abrasive processing (see Section 2), after which DNA was isolated from the thoroughly washed thalli.
The results of the OTE ratio analysis are shown in Figure 8.
In this case, Venn diagrams clearly illustrate the number of fungal OTUs that remained after the thallus surface was processed. While we cannot claim to have removed all epiphytic colonies or mycelium due to the absence of sterility control procedures on the thallus surface or microscopy controls, the results showed a decrease in the number of OTU taxa contributing more than 0.49% in the Khibiny population and an increase in samples from Naryan-Mar. It is interesting that the proportion of Cl. gracilis decreased in the processed sample from Naryan-Mar (Figure 8D #3 and #14). It is possible that this species was present on the surface of the N. nivalis thallus in the form of powdery soralia but was tightly integrated into its cortical layer.
The result showing an increase in the number of OTUs in the washed sample from Naryan-Mar seems somewhat paradoxical. However, it should be noted that the increase in the number of OTUs reflects an increase in the proportion of those OTUs. These OTUs were minor in the structure of the microbiomes of the untreated samples. It would therefore be more accurate to present the proportion of OTUs out of the total in the untreated and treated samples. For thalli from Khibiny, the proportion of total OTUs in the unprocessed thallus is 47%, compared to 78% in the processed thallus. For thalli from Naryan-Mar, the proportions are 70% and 52.5%, respectively. In other words, in samples from Naryan-Mar, the proportion of epiphytic dominants is higher than that of forms hidden inside the thallus. When these dominant forms are removed from the surface, the community’s structure changes and the dominant OTUs become those that were minor before processing.
Thus, the predominant sequences in the “core” of the mycobiome were those represented by lichenicolous and parasitic taxa from the classes Dothideomycetes and Agaricomycetes. When comparing the Venn diagrams obtained for unprocessed and processed samples from different locations (Figure S3), we see that the number of common OTUs decreases after processing from seven to four common OTUs. The main “endophytic” taxa become Cladosporium and Athelia, along with Stereocaulon and a representative of an unidentified genus in the family Herpotrichiellaceae.

3.8. Analysis of the Diversity of Cultivated Fungi

We used the standard cultivation method in Petri dishes containing an agarised nutrient medium whose composition was selected to meet the specific needs of lichen-forming fungi [19].
The highest abundance of CFUs (colony-forming units) was diagnosed in two lichen samples from Naryan-Mar: C. islandica and S. paschale (Figure 9). The lowest number of fungal CFUs were isolated from N. nivalis and Cl. stellaris in the Khibiny Mountains.
Most isolates exhibited standard mycelial growth and formed large-diameter colonies. Dark-coloured and melanised colonies were generally small and compact, as were yeast colonies.
The species richness index, calculated based on the phylogenetic analysis of 92 isolates, was highest in C. islandica samples from Khibiny (10) and Naryan-Mar (15), and in Cl. arbuscula (NM) samples (Table 6).
Overall, the species diversity is higher in the Naryan-Mar samples. It was impossible to calculate the species diversity index for the Cl. stellaris (KH) samples due to the small number of CFUs. C. islandica (NM) and Cl. arbuscula (NM) samples demonstrate the maximum Shannon index. This is consistent with the diversity data obtained using the NGS method. The proximity of the Shannon and Simpson indices in N. nivalis (KH) samples indicates a small number of species, with one taxon dominating. This is corroborated by the data in Table S2.
Thirteen strains were obtained from C. islandica (KH) samples, 28 from C. islandica (NM), seven from N. nivalis (KH), two from Cl. stellaris, 16 from S. vesuvianum, two from N. nivalis (NM), 12 from Cl. arbuscula and 12 from S. paschale (Table S2). Thus, the largest number of isolates were obtained from C. islandica and S. vesuvianum samples. Various ascomycete and basidiomycete fungi were isolated from most lichen samples. However, from S. vesuvianum, we mainly obtained strains that were close to, or identical to, Tolypocladium inflatum, which is the asexual form of Cordyceps subsessilis [56]. Two other isolates belonged to new genera in the Fayodiaceae and Hyphodiscaceae families.
We analysed the logical relationships between sets of strains identified at genus level. Venn diagrams revealed that none of the fungal genera were common to all four lichens from Khibiny. Similarly, we found no shared genera among the four lichen species from Naryan-Mar (Figure S4). However, C. islandica (KH) and N. nivalis (KH) shared three genera: Hypholoma, Leptosporomyces and Lichenoconium. C. islandica (NM) and Cl. arbuscula (NM) shared two genera: Occultifur and Oidiodendron. C. islandica (NM) contained two genera that were also present in S. paschale: Phoma and Sydowia. Overall, the results demonstrated a closer relationship between lichen species from Naryan-Mar.
Analysis of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 gene sequences revealed that 21 of the isolated cultures belonged to new genera and that another six could be assigned to new families. Five of the six strains were isolated from C. islandica (both from KH and NM), while only one was isolated from N. nivalis (from NM). Three strains (5.3.2.7, 5.3.2.8 and 5.3.1.3) are phylogenetically identical and are likely to be clones retrieved from a single population (see Figure 10A). They belong to the Lecanoromycetes order, Lecanorales. These strains are most closely related to Rhizoplaca and Lecidea, and they may represent a new family within this order (Figure 10B). This is also indicated by the morphology of the colonies and cells, which resembles that of the lichen genera Rhizoplaca and Lecidea (Figure 10C).
The ITS1/ITS2 gene sequences of strain 1.2.1.5 clustered together with representatives of the order Tremellales (Figure 11A). The closest match was strain KBP Y-7165 (98.62% similarity; GenBank number OR195509), which was previously isolated from Stereocaulon sp. (unpublished). The closest type strain was Tremella shuangheensis strain CGMCC2.5615 (85.49%; GenBank number MK050285) [57]. Morphologically, these are yeast cells and the colonies are dry, compact and yellowish-beige (Figure 11B,C). Strain 6.2.1.3, which was isolated from N. nivalis, was phylogenetically closest to representatives of the families Septobasidiaceae and Chionosphaeraceae, particularly the genera Septobasidium and Ballistosporomyces (Figure 12A). However, it formed a separate branch, with 87.61% similarity to the strain with which it was most closely related, Septobasidium sp. (MK307666). Strain 5.2.1.12, isolated from C. islandica (NM), exhibited the greatest phylogenetic similarity to Myriangium duriaei (MH855793), at 83.18%, and Anhellia nectandrae (NR111700), at 84.14%, thus demonstrating a relationship with representatives of the order Myriangiales (Figure 13A). This strain forms compact, dark brown colonies with mycelial morphology (Figure 13B,C).
Most of the isolated cultures were identified at species and genus level. Common species included Tolypocladium inflatum, Sydowia sp., Cladophialophora minutissima, Aureobasidium pullulans, Cladosporium ossifragi, Phoma herbarum and Penicillium lividum, among others (Table S2). A significant proportion of the species and genera identified were known plant pathogens or parasites of lichens and fungi. Surprisingly, the samples of Stereocaulon vesuvianum were dominated by species of the Tolypocladium genus, which are known to be parasites of Coleoptera and mycophagous [56]. By contrast, S. paschale was dominated by the phytopathogens Phoma herbarum and Sydowia sp. [58,59], the saprotroph Penicillium lividum and the entomophagous fungus Beauveria brongniartii [60].

4. Discussion

During this study, we discovered that fungal sequences not associated with the lichen mycobiont accounted for 3–22% of all identified OTUs. This percentage varies depending on the lichen species and the sample used for DNA or CFU isolation. The lowest values for this indicator were found in S. vesuvianum and the highest in Cl. stellaris and Cl. arbuscula. Therefore, the total proportion of epiphytic and endophytic fungi is less than a quarter of the total OTU pool. In abrasive-processed samples of N. nivalis, the proportion of OTUs belonging to non-mycobionts decreases two to threefold, indicating the dominance of epiphytic fungi in lichen thalli. We also found that the proportion of non-mycobiont OTUs is higher in lichens from Naryan-Mar. Subsequent analysis confirmed that samples from Naryan-Mar generally contain more OTUs and cultivated species. This difference is related to the characteristics of the biotopes: samples from Khibiny were mainly collected from tundra areas with minimal tree and shrub vegetation, whereas samples from Naryan-Mar were collected from tundra areas near coniferous forests and lakes. The influence of biotope characteristics is an important reason for differences in plant mycobiome composition [61], and the same is true for lichen microbiome composition [62].
Analysis of the most abundant OTUs, accounting for over 0.49% of non-mycobiont OTUs, revealed that the fewest such sequences were found in Khibiny samples. Among the species studied, Stereocaulon samples exhibited the highest value of this indicator, likely due to the morphology of their thalli (the presence of phyllocladia and pseudocyphellae), which accumulate significant dust particles from the air. Little is known about the accumulation of dust particles by lichen thalli, but it is established that thalli actively absorb heavy metals and other pollutants from the air [63]. The greater the thallus’s specific surface area, the greater the probability of accumulating particles transported by air masses.
The highest OTU species diversity index was found in the mycobiomes of Cladonia, and the lowest was found in samples of N. nivalis. The same is true of the cultivated forms of fungi identified in these samples. It can be assumed that the morphology of the thallus influences the extent to which it becomes contaminated with dust and aerosol particles, as well as cells of fungi, algae and bacteria. The greater the thallus’s specific surface area, the more likely it is that particles will adhere to it. This assumption requires further experimental verification in terms of lichen research. Among the studied samples, N. nivalis has the smallest specific surface area and a developed cortex layer. This prevents particles from being retained on the surface and reduces the likelihood of their introduction into the underlying layers of the thallus. The Shannon index reflects the uniformity of the distribution of different taxa in a sample and varies depending on the lichen’s location rather than its species affiliation. This once again emphasises the importance of environmental influences on the composition of lichen microbial communities [62]. At the same time, a higher Shannon index value suggests that minor taxa significantly contribute to the structure of the mycobiome. The highest Chao1 index values are characteristic of the two studied species of Cladonia. Interestingly, fewer cultivable fungal forms were isolated from these samples than from others. This is most likely due to their inability to grow on the applied culture media and under the cultivation conditions. Well-adapted forms, such as Cladosporium, Penicillium and various yeast fungi, can easily be detected in lichen thalli [64,65]. Conversely, the slow-growing forms identified by us and other researchers are rarely isolated from lichens due to the use of traditional nutrient media and cultivation times and conditions. We found that discarding OTUs with a lower weight (less than 0.49%) in the mycobiome composition resulted in altered Shannon and Simpson indices in almost all samples, with the exception of N. nivalis from Khibiny. Surprisingly, the Shannon index increased in the sample treated with abrasive, indicating an increase in the proportion of OTUs that were minor in the analysis of the entire sample. These OTUs likely constitute the uncultivable pool of endolichenic organisms [66]. This is confirmed by the fact that the Simpson index remains virtually unchanged, indicating that a pool of dominant taxa remains in addition to minor taxa and that these taxa acquire greater weight in the community. The taxonomic structure of communities at different hierarchical levels generally resembles that previously described [2,6,13,15,18,19,21,31,67]. However, at the division level, differences emerge between samples from different locations. For instance, in samples from the Khibiny Mountains, we identified a greater number of OTUs affiliated with the Basidiomycota division. At class level, the dominant OTUs were sequences belonging to the classes Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes and Leotiomycetes, which is consistent with previous data obtained for these and other lichen species [13,31,37,68]. The presence of Lecanoromycetes sequences in almost all samples is an interesting finding. These are predominantly lichenised ascomycetes and their presence in lichens as part of minor fungal groups rather than as mycobionts has been described previously [69].
Overall, this study confirmed the predominance of fungi belonging to the classes Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Leotiomycetes and Tremellomycetes in lichens, as previously reported [13,31,37,67,68]. The fungi that represent these classes are often mycophiles and parasitise both fungi and lichens, as well as plants [3,70,71,72]. Many of them are plant endophytes or insect parasites [55,60,72].
Our data showed that the composition of the lichen mycobiome depends significantly on the biotope in which the thallus forms. In mono-sinusias and in the absence of higher plants (such as in tundra or rocky mountain areas), the diversity of fungi in thalli may be low and limited to lichenicolous species and obligate parasites. However, in the presence of higher plants and mosses, as well as in complex, multi-species lichen communities, the diversity of fungi in thalli increases due to the integration of phytopathogenic species and species associated with insects. The consistent presence of fungi belonging to the genera Cladosporium, Phoma and Penicillium [20,64,65,66] in lichens of different species and climatic zones may confirm their ability to grow and survive in adverse conditions across a wide range of ecological niches. However, their confirmed presence in the endolichenic mycobiome may also indicate their specificity to lichens as a habitat [20,65,66]. We discovered that certain fungal orders can serve as markers for both lichen species and biotopes.
Our study of mycobiome similarities has led us to conclude that fungi that are obligate to lichens are represented by mycoparasites (e.g., Tolypocladium) and specific lichenicolous fungi (e.g., Epithamnolia). At the same time, each lichen species has its own unique set of fungi, as confirmed by a recent publication [73]. The new isolates that we have identified are previously uncultivated representatives of the orders Lecanorales, Septobasidiales, Tremellales and Myriangiales. These are slow-growing forms that are adapted to low temperatures and low concentrations of sugar in the nutrient medium. Using poorer nutrient media in combination with the addition of polyols and polysaccharides against a background of low glucose or sucrose concentrations may result in the isolation of more new taxa from lichens, as well as a reassessment of our understanding of the diversity of previously uncultivated fungi inhabiting lichens.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated that lichens harbour a significant variety of fungal species, primarily belonging to the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota divisions. The most abundant fungal groups are lichenicolous fungi, mycoparasites and phytopathogens belonging to the classes Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Leotiomycetes and Tremellomycetes. Most of the taxa identified are specific to certain lichen species, and the most common were lichen parasites and lichenicolous fungi with unknown ecological strategies. The diversity and abundance of fungi in lichen thalli depend on both species’ affiliation and habitat conditions. A higher invasive load from the biocenosis may result in thalli containing a greater number of colony-forming units, leading to higher taxonomic diversity. The taxonomic diversity of fungi in lichens may also depend on their location within the thallus. Removing epiphytic microorganisms can significantly decrease the diversity and abundance of fungi and alter the taxonomic structure of the mycobiome. Cultivated forms of fungi that grow well on traditional nutrient media were characterised by low diversity and represented well-known, widespread species and genera. However, using a depleted nutrient medium led to the isolation of new, previously uncultivated taxa. In the future, the routine isolation of previously uncultivated fungi from lichens will be possible through the application of new methodological approaches, which involve imitating natural habitat conditions. This will require replacing glucose, sucrose, tryptones and starch with alternative carbon and nitrogen sources, such as amino acids, polyols and heteropolysaccharides.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof11120848/s1, Figure S1. The graphs show the representation values of individual OTUs in the total OTUs array, as well as the statistical error when averaged. Figure S2. The phylogenetic tree shows the distance among unidentified OTUs that were retrieved from two species of lichens, N. nivalis (N_Niv-KH) and S. vesuvianum (S_Ves_KH). The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Jukes-Cantor model. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−5242.00) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. This analysis involved 33 nucleotide sequences. There were a total of 441 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X. Figure S3. Venn diagrams illustrating the presence of shared OTUs in lichens collected from Khibiny (KH) and Naryan-Mar (NM). Shared OTUs are shown in bold. The following lichens are represented: Ctr_Isl (Cetraria islandica); N_Niv (Nephromopsis nivalis); C_St (Cladonia stellaris); C_Arb (Cladonia arbuscula); S_Ves (Stereocaulon vesuvianum); and S_Pas (Stereocaulon paschale). Figure S4. The Venn diagrams illustrate the genera that are shared by lichens collected from Khibiny (A) and Naryan-Mar (B). The shared genera are shown in bold.Table S1. The list of the genera and species that were identified based on an analysis of the ITS1 gene sequence, compared with sequences of this gene from the MycoBank and NCBI databases. Ctr_Is, Cetraria islandica; N_Niv, Nephromopsis nivalis; C_St, Cladonia stellaris; C-Arb, C. arbuscula; S_Ves, Stereocaulon vesuvianum; S_Pas, S. paschale. KH, Khibiny; NM, Naryan-Mar. Table S2. A list of the strains isolated from the six lichen species in the Khibiny and Naryan-Mar regions. UP, in the process of depositing. Table S3. Taxonomic affiliation and the relative contribution of OTUs to the mycobiome communities of the lichens studied.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.H. and T.P.; methodology, T.P.; data preparation, M.S. and A.B.; formal analysis, A.H., A.B. and T.P.; investigation, A.H., A.M. and T.P.; data curation, T.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.H.; writing—review and editing, A.M. and T.P.; visualisation, A.H. and T.P.; supervision, T.P.; project administration, T.P.; funding acquisition, T.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Russian Science Foundation, grant number 25-24-00195.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The OTU sequences obtained by NGS profiling have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PX406301-PX406485 and PX502199-PX502209. The 18S rRNA (partial), ITS1, 5.8S rRNA, ITS2 and 28S rRNA (partial) gene sequences of pure cultures are deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: PX352608-PX352694.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tatiana Dyachkova, Nenets Nature Reserve, for her contribution to the collection of lichens in the Naryan-Mar area.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
OTUOperational Taxonomic Unit
PBSPhosphate-Saline Buffer
CTABCetyltrimethylammonium Bromide
BLASTBasic Local Alignment Search Tool
KPABGKola Polar Alpine Botanical Garden
PABGI KSC RASPolar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institute of the Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
CFUColony-Forming Units

References

  1. Grube, M.; Berg, G. Microbial Consortia of Bacteria and Fungi with Focus on the Lichen Symbiosis. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2009, 23, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bates, S.T.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Lauber, C.L.; Walters, W.A.; Knight, R.; Fierer, N. A Preliminary Survey of Lichen Associated Eukaryotes Using Pyrosequencing. Lichenologist 2012, 44, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lawrey, J.D.; Diederich, P. Lichenicolous Fungi: Interactions, Evolution, and Biodiversity. Bryologist 2003, 106, 80–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moya, P.; Molins, A.; Martínez-Alberola, F.; Muggia, L.; Barreno, E. Unexpected Associated Microalgal Diversity in the Lichen Ramalina farinacea Is Uncovered by Pyrosequencing Analyses. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lücking, R.; Leavitt, S.D.; Hawksworth, D.L. Species in Lichen-Forming Fungi: Balancing between Conceptual and Practical Considerations, and between Phenotype and Phylogenomics. Fungal Divers. 2021, 109, 99–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Suryanarayanan, T.S.; Thirunavukkarasu, N.; Hariharan, G.N.; Balaj, P. Occurrence of Non-Obligate Microfungi inside Lichen Thalli. Sydowia 2005, 57, 120–130. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hafellner, J. Focus on Lichenicolous Fungi: Diversity and Taxonomy under the Principle “One Fungus—One Name”. Biosyst. Ecol. Ser. 2018, 34, 227–243. [Google Scholar]
  8. Diederich, P.; Lawrey, J.D.; Ertz, D. The 2018 Classification and Checklist of Lichenicolous Fungi, with 2000 Non-Lichenized, Obligately Lichenicolous Taxa. Bryologist 2018, 121, 340–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhurbenko, M. Lichenicolous Fungi from the Holarctic. Part III: New Reports and a Key to Species on Hypogymnia. Opusc. Philolichenum 2020, 19, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhurbenko, M.P.; Diederich, P.; Gagarina, L.V. Lichenicolous Fungi from Vietnam, with the Description of Four New Species. Herzogia 2021, 33, 525–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhurbenko, M. Lichenicolous Fungi from the Holarctic. Part IV: New Reports and a Key to Species on Dermatocarpon. Opusc. Philolichenum 2021, 20, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arnold, A.E.; Miadlikowska, J.; Higgins, K.L.; Sarvate, S.D.; Gugger, P.; Way, A.; Hofstetter, V.; Kauff, F.; Lutzoni, F. A Phylogenetic Estimation of Trophic Transition Networks for Ascomycetous Fungi: Are Lichens Cradles of Symbiotrophic Fungal Diversification? Syst. Biol. 2009, 58, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Muggia, L.; Fleischhacker, A.; Kopun, T.; Grube, M. Extremotolerant Fungi from Alpine Rock Lichens and Their Phylogenetic Relationships. Fungal Divers. 2016, 76, 119–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Muggia, L.; Pérez-Ortega, S.; Ertz, D. Muellerella, a Lichenicolous Fungal Genus Recovered as Polyphyletic within Chaetothyriomycetidae (Eurotiomycetes, Ascomycota). Plant Fungal Syst. 2019, 64, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Muggia, L.; Quan, Y.; Gueidan, C.; Al-Hatmi, A.M.S.; Grube, M.; de Hoog, S. Sequence Data from Isolated Lichen-Associated Melanized Fungi Enhance Delimitation of Two New Lineages within Chaetothyriomycetidae. Mycol. Prog. 2021, 20, 911–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Poelt, J. Über parasitische Flechten. II. Planta 1958, 51, 288–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moya, P.; Molins, A.; Chiva, S.; Bastida, J.; Barreno, E. Symbiotic Microalgal Diversity within Lichenicolous Lichens and Crustose Hosts on Iberian Peninsula Gypsum Biocrusts. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kachalkin, A.V.; Glushakova, A.M.; Pankratov, T.A. Yeast Population of the Kindo Peninsula Lichens. Microbiology 2017, 86, 786–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kachalkin, A.; Tomashevskaya, M.; Pankratov, T.; Yurkov, A. Endothallic Yeasts in the Terricolous Lichens Cladonia. Mycol. Prog. 2024, 23, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Suryanarayanan, T.S.; Thirunavukkarasu, N. Endolichenic Fungi: The Lesser Known Fungal Associates of Lichens. Mycology 2017, 8, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fleischhacker, A.; Grube, M.; Kopun, T.; Hafellner, J.; Muggia, L. Community Analyses Uncover High Diversity of Lichenicolous Fungi in Alpine Habitats. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 70, 348–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Muggia, L.; Kopun, T.; Grube, M. Effects of Growth Media on the Diversity of Culturable Fungi from Lichens. Molecules 2017, 22, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kachalkin, A.V.; Tomashevskaya, M.A.; Pankratov, T.A. Heterocephalacria septentrionalis sp. nov. Fungal Planet Description Sheets: 1042–1111. Persoonia-Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2020, 44, 301–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kachalkin, A.V.; Tomashevskaya, M.A.; Pankratov, T.A. Teunia lichenophila, sp. nov. Fungal Planet Description Sheets: 1182–1283. Persoonia-Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2021, 46, 313–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cometto, A.; Leavitt, S.D.; Millanes, A.M.; Wedin, M.; Grube, M.; Muggia, L. The Yeast Lichenosphere: High Diversity of Basidiomycetes from the Lichens Tephromela atra and Rhizoplaca melanophthalma. Fungal Biol. 2022, 126, 587–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Diederich, P.; Millanes, A.M.; Wedin, M.; Lawrey, J.D. Flora of Lichenicolous Fungi, Volume 1: Basidiomycota; National Museum of Natural History: Luxembourg, 2022; ISBN 978-2-919877-26-3. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhurbenko, M.P.; Brackel, W. von Checklist of Lichenicolous Fungi and Lichenicolous Lichens of Svalbard, Including New Species, New Records and Revisions. Herzogia 2013, 26, 323–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Suija, A.; Zhurbenko, M.P.; Stepanchikova, I.S.S.; Himelbrant, D.E.; Kuznetsova, E.S.; Motiejūnaitė, J. Kukwaea pubescens gen. et sp. Nova (Helotiales, Incertae Sedis), a New Lichenicolous Fungus on Cetraria islandica, and a Key to the Lichenicolous Fungi Occurring on Cetraria S. Str. Phytotaxa 2020, 459, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cardinale, M.; Steinová, J.; Rabensteiner, J.; Berg, G.; Grube, M. Age, Sun and Substrate: Triggers of Bacterial Communities in Lichens. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2012, 4, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Klarenberg, I.J.; Keuschnig, C.; Warshan, D.; Jónsdóttir, I.S.; Vilhelmsson, O. The Total and Active Bacterial Community of the Chlorolichen Cetraria islandica and Its Response to Long-Term Warming in Sub-Arctic Tundra. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 540404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, T.; Wei, X.-L.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Liu, H.-Y.; Yu, L.-Y. Diversity and Distribution of Lichen-Associated Fungi in the Ny-Ålesund Region (Svalbard, High Arctic) as Revealed by 454 Pyrosequencing. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shishido, T.K.; Wahlsten, M.; Laine, P.; Rikkinen, J.; Lundell, T.; Auvinen, P. Microbial Communities of Cladonia Lichens and Their Biosynthetic Gene Clusters Potentially Encoding Natural Products. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pino-Bodas, R.; Zhurbenko, M.P.; Stenroos, S. Phylogenetic Placement within Lecanoromycetes of Lichenicolous Fungi Associated with Cladonia and Some Other Genera. Persoonia 2017, 39, 91–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhurbenko, M.; Zhurbenko, M. Lichenicolous Fungi and Lichens Growing on Stereocaulon from the Holarctic, with a Key to the Known Species. Opusc. Philolichenum 2010, 8, 9–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhurbenko, M.; Zhurbenko, M.; Kukwa, M.; Oset, M. Roselliniella stereocaulorum (Sordariales, Ascomycota), a New Lichenicolous Fungus from the Holarctic. Mycotaxon 2009, 109, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vančurová, L.; Muggia, L.; Peksa, O.; Řídká, T.; Škaloud, P. The Complexity of Symbiotic Interactions Influences the Ecological Amplitude of the Host: A Case Study in Stereocaulon (Lichenized Ascomycota). Mol. Ecol. 2018, 27, 3016–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, J.; Woo, J.-J.; Sesal, C.; Gökalsın, B.; Eldem, V.; Açıkgöz, B.; Başaran, T.I.; Kurtuluş, G.; Hur, J.-S. Continental Scale Comparison of Mycobiomes in Parmelia and Peltigera Lichens from Turkey and South Korea. BMC Microbiol. 2024, 24, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Allen, A.; Hilton, B. The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. Edited by C. W. Smith, A. Aptroot, B.J. Coppins, A. Fletcher, O.L. Gilbert, P.W. James and P. A. Wolseley. London: The British Lichen Society, Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD. Pp. x + 1046. ISBN 978 09540418 8 5 Hardback. Price £45 (plus £7 p & p) to BLS members; £65 (plus £7 p & p) to non-members. Orders and cheques to Richmond Publishing Co Ltd., P.O. Box 963, Slough, SL2 3RS. Lichenologist 2010, 42, 123–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Westberg, M.; Moberg, R.; Myrdal, M.; Nordin, A.; Ekman, S. Santesson’s Checklist of Fennoscandian Lichen-Forming and Lichenicolous Fungi; Uppsala University Museum of Evolution: Uppsala, Sweden, 2021; p. 856. ISBN 978-91-519-9881-7. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1577869/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed on 27 November 2025).
  40. O’Donnell, K.L. Fusarium and its near relatives. In The Fungal Holomorph: Mitotic, Meiotic and Pleomorphic Speciation in Fungal Systematics; Reynolds, D.R., Taylor, J.W., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1993; pp. 225–233. [Google Scholar]
  41. Nikitin, D.A.; Ivanova, E.A.; Zhelezova, A.D.; Semenov, M.V.; Gadzhiumarov, R.G.; Tkhakakhova, A.K.; Chernov, T.I.; Ksenofontova, N.A.; Kutovaya, O.V. Assessment of the Impact of No-Till and Conventional Tillage Technologies on the Microbiome of Southern Agrochernozems. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2020, 53, 1782–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Okonechnikov, K.; Golosova, O.; Fursov, M.; the UGENE team. Unipro UGENE: A Unified Bioinformatics Toolkit. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1166–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. BLAST: Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. Available online: https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi (accessed on 18 October 2025).
  45. Vu, D.; Groenewald, M.; de Vries, M.; Gehrmann, T.; Stielow, B.; Eberhardt, U.; Al-Hatmi, A.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Cardinali, G.; Houbraken, J.; et al. Large-Scale Generation and Analysis of Filamentous Fungal DNA Barcodes Boosts Coverage for Kingdom Fungi and Reveals Thresholds for Fungal Species and Higher Taxon Delimitation. Stud. Mycol. 2019, 92, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bellemain, E.; Carlsen, T.; Brochmann, C.; Coissac, E.; Taberlet, P.; Kauserud, H. ITS as an Environmental DNA Barcode for Fungi: An in Silico Approach Reveals Potential PCR Biases. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dickman, M. Some Indices of Diversity. Ecology 1968, 49, 1191–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Simpson, E.H. Measurement of Diversity. Nature 1949, 163, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jones, M.D.M.; Richards, T.A.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Bass, D. Validation and Justification of the Phylum Name Cryptomycota Phyl. Nov. IMA Fungus 2011, 2, 173–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tedersoo, L.; Bahram, M.; Puusepp, R.; Nilsson, R.H.; James, T.Y. Novel Soil-Inhabiting Clades Fill Gaps in the Fungal Tree of Life. Microbiome 2017, 5, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fernández-Mendoza, F.; Fleischhacker, A.; Kopun, T.; Grube, M.; Muggia, L. ITS1 Metabarcoding Highlights Low Specificity of Lichen Mycobiomes at a Local Scale. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 4811–4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhurbenko, M.P. Lichenicolous Fungi Growing on Thamnolia, Mainly from the Holarctic, with a Worldwide Key to the Known Species. Lichenologist 2012, 44, 147–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Esslinger, T.L.; Esslinger, T.L. A Cumulative Checklist for the Lichen-Forming, Lichenicolous and Allied Fungi of the Continental United States and Canada, Version 21. Opusc. Philolichenum 2016, 15, 136–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yan, L.; Song, W.; Yu, D.; Kishan Sudini, H.; Kang, Y.; Lei, Y.; Huai, D.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Genetic, Phenotypic, and Pathogenic Variation Among Athelia rolfsii, the Causal Agent of Peanut Stem Rot in China. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 2722–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Araújo, J.P.M.; Hughes, D.P. Chapter One—Diversity of Entomopathogenic Fungi: Which Groups Conquered the Insect Body? In Advances in Genetics; Lovett, B., St. Leger, R.J., Eds.; Genetics and Molecular Biology of Entomopathogenic Fungi; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; Volume 94, pp. 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gazis, R.; Skaltsas, D.; Chaverri, P. Novel Endophytic Lineages of Tolypocladium Provide New Insights into the Ecology and Evolution of Cordyceps-like Fungi. Mycologia 2014, 106, 1090–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, A.-H.; Yuan, F.-X.; Groenewald, M.; Bensch, K.; Yurkov, A.M.; Li, K.; Han, P.-J.; Guo, L.-D.; Aime, M.C.; Sampaio, J.P.; et al. Diversity and Phylogeny of Basidiomycetous Yeasts from Plant Leaves and Soil: Proposal of Two New Orders, Three New Families, Eight New Genera and One Hundred and Seven New Species. Stud. Mycol. 2020, 96, 17–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Basavand, E.; Babaeizad, V.; Mirhosseini, H.A.; Dehghan Niri, M. Occurrence of Leaf Spot Disease Caused by Phoma herbarum on Oregano in Iran. J. Plant Pathol. 2020, 102, 575–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Silva, A.C.; Henriques, J.; Diogo, E.; Ramos, A.P.; Bragança, H. First Report of Sydowia polyspora Causing Disease on Pinus pinea Shoots. For. Pathol. 2020, 50, e12570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Imoulan, A.; Hussain, M.; Kirk, P.M.; El Meziane, A.; Yao, Y.-J. Entomopathogenic Fungus Beauveria: Host Specificity, Ecology and Significance of Morpho-Molecular Characterization in Accurate Taxonomic Classification. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2017, 20, 1204–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Qi, Z.; Tian, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, X.; Lei, Y.; Tang, F. Mycobiome Mediates the Interaction between Environmental Factors and Mycotoxin Contamination in Wheat Grains. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 928, 172494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sierra, M.A.; Danko, D.C.; Sandoval, T.A.; Pishchany, G.; Moncada, B.; Kolter, R.; Mason, C.E.; Zambrano, M.M. The Microbiomes of Seven Lichen Genera Reveal Host Specificity, a Reduced Core Community and Potential as Source of Antimicrobials. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jóźwiak, M.A. Ectohydricity of Lichens and Role of Cortex Layer in Accumulation of Heavy Metals. Ecol. Chem. Eng. 2014, 20, 659–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Masumoto, H.; Degawa, Y. The Effect of Surface Sterilization and the Type of Sterilizer on the Genus Composition of Lichen-Inhabiting Fungi with Notes on Some Frequently Isolated Genera. Mycoscience 2019, 60, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Oh, S.-Y.; Yang, J.H.; Woo, J.-J.; Oh, S.-O.; Hur, J.-S. Diversity and Distribution Patterns of Endolichenic Fungi in Jeju Island, South Korea. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Maduranga, K.; Attanayake, R.N.; Santhirasegaram, S.; Weerakoon, G.; Paranagama, P.A. Molecular Phylogeny and Bioprospecting of Endolichenic Fungi (ELF) Inhabiting in the Lichens Collected from a Mangrove Ecosystem in Sri Lanka. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Park, C.H.; Kim, K.M.; Elvebakk, A.; Kim, O.-S.; Jeong, G.; Hong, S.G. Algal and Fungal Diversity in Antarctic Lichens. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2015, 62, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Si, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, S.; Bose, T.; Chang, R. Fungal Diversity Associated with Thirty-Eight Lichen Species Revealed a New Genus of Endolichenic Fungi, Intumescentia Gen. Nov. (Teratosphaeriaceae). J. Fungi 2023, 9, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gueidan, C.; Hill, D.J.; Miadlikowska, J.; Lutzoni, F. 4 Pezizomycotina: Lecanoromycetes. In Systematics and Evolution: Part B; McLaughlin, D.J., Spatafora, J.W., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015; pp. 89–120. ISBN 978-3-662-46011-5. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yamamoto, K.; Sugawa, G.; Takeda, K.; Degawa, Y. Tolypocladium bacillisporum (Ophiocordycipitaceae): A New Parasite of Elaphomyces from Japan. Truffology 2022, 5, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  71. Vilhelmsson, O.; Sigurbjörnsdóttir, A.; Grube, M.; Höfte, M. Are Lichens Potential Natural Reservoirs for Plant Pathogens? Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Crous, P.W.; Rossman, A.Y.; Aime, M.C.; Allen, W.C.; Burgess, T.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Castlebury, L.A. Names of Phytopathogenic Fungi: A Practical Guide. Phytopathology 2021, 111, 1500–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mawarda, P.C.; van der Kaaij, R.; Dini-Andreote, F.; Duijker, D.; Stech, M.; Speksnijder, A.G. Unveiling the Ecological Processes Driving Soil and Lichen Microbiome Assembly along an Urbanization Gradient. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2025, 11, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic representation of the dilution procedure and strain labelling. Inoculation was performed using a Drigalski spatula on an agar nutrient medium with the following composition (g/L): glucose—4; mannitol—1; xylose—1; tryptone—1; yeast extract—1; ammonium sulphate—0.1; potassium phosphate monobasic—0.1; magnesium sulphate—0.05; calcium nitrate—0.025; chloramphenicol—0.1; a complex of trace elements and vitamins; and agar—15 g. For each dilution variant, 50 µL of the suspension was applied to each Petri dish (two replicates per condition). The inoculated plates were incubated at 16 °C under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle for two months. Cultures were monitored every two weeks. As a result, a series of isolated colonies were obtained and subsequently used to establish pure cultures.
Figure 1. A schematic representation of the dilution procedure and strain labelling. Inoculation was performed using a Drigalski spatula on an agar nutrient medium with the following composition (g/L): glucose—4; mannitol—1; xylose—1; tryptone—1; yeast extract—1; ammonium sulphate—0.1; potassium phosphate monobasic—0.1; magnesium sulphate—0.05; calcium nitrate—0.025; chloramphenicol—0.1; a complex of trace elements and vitamins; and agar—15 g. For each dilution variant, 50 µL of the suspension was applied to each Petri dish (two replicates per condition). The inoculated plates were incubated at 16 °C under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle for two months. Cultures were monitored every two weeks. As a result, a series of isolated colonies were obtained and subsequently used to establish pure cultures.
Jof 11 00848 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the PCR product. The arrows show the direction of DNA chain synthesis. ITS1 is the forward primer and NL4 is the reverse primer.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the PCR product. The arrows show the direction of DNA chain synthesis. ITS1 is the forward primer and NL4 is the reverse primer.
Jof 11 00848 g002
Figure 3. Number of OTUs obtained after normalisation and filtering with a threshold of 0.49% for ten lichen samples. Ctr_Is: Cetraria islandica; N_Niv: Nephromopsis nivalis; C-St: Cladonia stellaris; C_Arb: Cladonia arbuscula; S_Ves: Stereocaulon vesuvianum; S_Pas: Stereocaulon paschale; KH: Khibiny; NM: Naryan-Mar; (P): processed samples. The samples from Khibiny are indicated by the grey bars, and the green bars show the samples from Naryan-Mar.
Figure 3. Number of OTUs obtained after normalisation and filtering with a threshold of 0.49% for ten lichen samples. Ctr_Is: Cetraria islandica; N_Niv: Nephromopsis nivalis; C-St: Cladonia stellaris; C_Arb: Cladonia arbuscula; S_Ves: Stereocaulon vesuvianum; S_Pas: Stereocaulon paschale; KH: Khibiny; NM: Naryan-Mar; (P): processed samples. The samples from Khibiny are indicated by the grey bars, and the green bars show the samples from Naryan-Mar.
Jof 11 00848 g003
Figure 4. Alpha diversity: richness (A), Chao1 index (B), Shannon (C) and Simpson (D) coefficients for the fungal communities detected via OTU analysis of all sequences retrieved from the corresponding samples. Data from two replicates of each sample were analysed for lichen communities from Khibiny (KH) and Naryan-Mar (NM), as well as for the following species: Cetraria islandica (Ctr_Is), Nephromopsis nivalis (N_Niv), Cladonia stellaris (C_St), Cladonia arbuscula (C_Arb), Stereocaulon vesuvianum (S_Ves) and Stereocaulon paschale (S_Pas), and for processed samples (P). The grey dots show samples taken in Khibiny, while the green dots show samples taken in Naryan-Mar.
Figure 4. Alpha diversity: richness (A), Chao1 index (B), Shannon (C) and Simpson (D) coefficients for the fungal communities detected via OTU analysis of all sequences retrieved from the corresponding samples. Data from two replicates of each sample were analysed for lichen communities from Khibiny (KH) and Naryan-Mar (NM), as well as for the following species: Cetraria islandica (Ctr_Is), Nephromopsis nivalis (N_Niv), Cladonia stellaris (C_St), Cladonia arbuscula (C_Arb), Stereocaulon vesuvianum (S_Ves) and Stereocaulon paschale (S_Pas), and for processed samples (P). The grey dots show samples taken in Khibiny, while the green dots show samples taken in Naryan-Mar.
Jof 11 00848 g004
Figure 5. Plots of the Shannon (A) and Simpson (B) indices for fungal communities detected via OTU analysis of all sequences (orange dots) and sequences with an abundance greater than 0.49% (blue dots) are shown, as retrieved from the corresponding samples. The data used for the analysis, which were obtained from two replicates for each sample, are given for the lichen communities from Khibiny (KH) and Naryan-Mar (NM), as well as for the species Cetraria islandica (Ctr_Is), Nephromopsis nivalis (N_Niv), Cladonia stellaris (C_St), Cladonia arbuscula (C_Arb), Stereocaulon vesuvianum (S_Ves) and Stereocaulon paschale (S_Pas), and for the processed samples (P).
Figure 5. Plots of the Shannon (A) and Simpson (B) indices for fungal communities detected via OTU analysis of all sequences (orange dots) and sequences with an abundance greater than 0.49% (blue dots) are shown, as retrieved from the corresponding samples. The data used for the analysis, which were obtained from two replicates for each sample, are given for the lichen communities from Khibiny (KH) and Naryan-Mar (NM), as well as for the species Cetraria islandica (Ctr_Is), Nephromopsis nivalis (N_Niv), Cladonia stellaris (C_St), Cladonia arbuscula (C_Arb), Stereocaulon vesuvianum (S_Ves) and Stereocaulon paschale (S_Pas), and for the processed samples (P).
Jof 11 00848 g005
Figure 6. Relative abundance plots of fungi for divisions (A), classes (B), orders (C) and families (D) in lichen communities from Khibiny (KH) and Naryan-Mar (NM) for the species Cetraria islandica (Ctr_Is), Nephromopsis nivalis (N_Niv), Cladonia stellaris (C_St), Cladonia arbuscula (C_Arb) and Stereocaulon paschale (S_Pas). Abundance data are shown as a percentage. ‘Unclassified’ includes all other taxa not identified among the OTU sequences. Only the orders and families whose OTUs are above 10% in at least one sample are shown. The taxonomic affiliation and the relative contribution of OTUs to the mycobiome communities of the studied lichens are shown in Supplementary Table S3.
Figure 6. Relative abundance plots of fungi for divisions (A), classes (B), orders (C) and families (D) in lichen communities from Khibiny (KH) and Naryan-Mar (NM) for the species Cetraria islandica (Ctr_Is), Nephromopsis nivalis (N_Niv), Cladonia stellaris (C_St), Cladonia arbuscula (C_Arb) and Stereocaulon paschale (S_Pas). Abundance data are shown as a percentage. ‘Unclassified’ includes all other taxa not identified among the OTU sequences. Only the orders and families whose OTUs are above 10% in at least one sample are shown. The taxonomic affiliation and the relative contribution of OTUs to the mycobiome communities of the studied lichens are shown in Supplementary Table S3.
Jof 11 00848 g006
Figure 7. Venn diagrams showing the overlap in OTUs between species of Khibiny lichens (A) and Naryan-Mar lichens (B). Shared OTUs are shown in a larger font size. The taxonomic affiliation and relative abundance of OTUs are shown in the histograms for lichens from Khibiny (C) and Naryan-Mar (D). The taxonomic affiliation and the relative contribution of OTUs to the mycobiome communities of the studied lichens are shown in Supplementary Table S3.
Figure 7. Venn diagrams showing the overlap in OTUs between species of Khibiny lichens (A) and Naryan-Mar lichens (B). Shared OTUs are shown in a larger font size. The taxonomic affiliation and relative abundance of OTUs are shown in the histograms for lichens from Khibiny (C) and Naryan-Mar (D). The taxonomic affiliation and the relative contribution of OTUs to the mycobiome communities of the studied lichens are shown in Supplementary Table S3.
Jof 11 00848 g007
Figure 8. Venn diagrams showing the number of shared OTUs between processed and unprocessed Nephromopsis nivalis samples from Khibiny (A) and Naryan-Mar (B). Taxonomic affiliation and relative abundance of OTUs are shown in the histograms for samples from Khibiny (C) and Naryan-Mar (D). The shares of individual OTUs are shown in the histograms for intact (left) and processed (right) thallus samples. The taxonomic affiliation and the relative contribution of OTUs to the mycobiome communities of the studied lichens are shown in Supplementary Table S3.
Figure 8. Venn diagrams showing the number of shared OTUs between processed and unprocessed Nephromopsis nivalis samples from Khibiny (A) and Naryan-Mar (B). Taxonomic affiliation and relative abundance of OTUs are shown in the histograms for samples from Khibiny (C) and Naryan-Mar (D). The shares of individual OTUs are shown in the histograms for intact (left) and processed (right) thallus samples. The taxonomic affiliation and the relative contribution of OTUs to the mycobiome communities of the studied lichens are shown in Supplementary Table S3.
Jof 11 00848 g008
Figure 9. The number of colony-forming units (CFUs) of fungi counted in eight lichen samples per gram of air-dried thallus. The grey columns show the values for the Khibiny samples, and the green ones show the values for the Naryan-Mar samples. Statistical processing was performed based on four replications (p < 0.05).
Figure 9. The number of colony-forming units (CFUs) of fungi counted in eight lichen samples per gram of air-dried thallus. The grey columns show the values for the Khibiny samples, and the green ones show the values for the Naryan-Mar samples. Statistical processing was performed based on four replications (p < 0.05).
Jof 11 00848 g009
Figure 10. Phylogenetic position of three fungal strains (5.3.2.7, 5.3.2.8 and 5.3.1.3) isolated from the lichen C. islandica (NM) in relation to closely related taxa in the order Lecanorales (A); growth of strain 5.3.2.7 on FA+ agar medium (B); colonies of strain 5.3.2.7 on FA+ medium (C); morphology of the mycelium of strain 5.3.2.7 (D). Magnification: 600×; scale bar: 5 μm.
Figure 10. Phylogenetic position of three fungal strains (5.3.2.7, 5.3.2.8 and 5.3.1.3) isolated from the lichen C. islandica (NM) in relation to closely related taxa in the order Lecanorales (A); growth of strain 5.3.2.7 on FA+ agar medium (B); colonies of strain 5.3.2.7 on FA+ medium (C); morphology of the mycelium of strain 5.3.2.7 (D). Magnification: 600×; scale bar: 5 μm.
Jof 11 00848 g010
Figure 11. The phylogenetic position of strain 1.2.1.5, which was isolated from the lichen C. islandica (KH), is shown in relation to related taxa in the order Tremellales (A). The growth of strain 1.2.1.5 on FA+ agar medium is shown in (B). The morphology of strain 1.2.1.5 cells is shown in (C). The comparative morphology of young buds (YB) of mature cells is shown in (D). Magnification: 600×; scale bar: 5 μm.
Figure 11. The phylogenetic position of strain 1.2.1.5, which was isolated from the lichen C. islandica (KH), is shown in relation to related taxa in the order Tremellales (A). The growth of strain 1.2.1.5 on FA+ agar medium is shown in (B). The morphology of strain 1.2.1.5 cells is shown in (C). The comparative morphology of young buds (YB) of mature cells is shown in (D). Magnification: 600×; scale bar: 5 μm.
Jof 11 00848 g011
Figure 12. The phylogenetic position of strain 6.2.1.3, which was isolated from the lichen N. nivalis (NM), is shown in relation to related taxa in the order Septobasidiales (A). The growth of strain 6.2.1.3 on FA+ agar medium is shown in (B), and the morphology of the mycelium of strain 6.2.1.3 is shown in (C). Magnification: 600×; scale bar: 5 μm.
Figure 12. The phylogenetic position of strain 6.2.1.3, which was isolated from the lichen N. nivalis (NM), is shown in relation to related taxa in the order Septobasidiales (A). The growth of strain 6.2.1.3 on FA+ agar medium is shown in (B), and the morphology of the mycelium of strain 6.2.1.3 is shown in (C). Magnification: 600×; scale bar: 5 μm.
Jof 11 00848 g012
Figure 13. The phylogenetic position of strain 5.2.1.12, which was isolated from the lichen C. islandica (NM), is shown in relation to related taxa in the order Myriangiales (A). The growth of strain 5.2.1.12 on FA+ agar medium is shown in (B). The morphology of strain 1.2.1.5 mycelium is shown in (C) at a magnification of 600×. The scale bar is 5 μm.
Figure 13. The phylogenetic position of strain 5.2.1.12, which was isolated from the lichen C. islandica (NM), is shown in relation to related taxa in the order Myriangiales (A). The growth of strain 5.2.1.12 on FA+ agar medium is shown in (B). The morphology of strain 1.2.1.5 mycelium is shown in (C) at a magnification of 600×. The scale bar is 5 μm.
Jof 11 00848 g013
Table 1. Sampling site information and collected lichen species.
Table 1. Sampling site information and collected lichen species.
Sampling PlacesCoordinatesSample IDSpecies
Massif Khibiny. Botanical Cirque. Slope of scree. Tundra belt. Boulder. Rock. ±0 cm below snow level67°38′46″ N 33°38′55″ ECtr_Is-KHCetraria islandica (L.) Ach.
67°38′47″ N 33°38′55″ EN_Niv-KHNephromopsis nivalis (L.) Divakar, A.Crespo & Lumbsch (syn. Flavocetraria nivalis (L.) Kärnefelt & A.Thell)
Massif Khibiny. Botanical Cirque. Moraine slope. Border of birch forest. Soil. 20 cm below snow levelC_St-KHCladonia stellaris (Opiz) Pouzar & Vĕzda
Massif Khibiny. Slope of Botanical Cirque. Tundra belt. Rock vertical wall in ice film. Above snow level ~100 cm67°38′31″ N 33°39′19″ ES_Ves-KHStereocaulon vesuvianum Pers.
Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Iskateley settlement, Layavozhskaya road67°39′22″ N 53°8′25″ ECtr_Is-NMCetraria islandica (L.) Ach.
N_Niv-NMNephromopsis nivalis (L.) Divakar, A.Crespo & Lumbsch
C_Arb-NMCladonia arbuscula (Wallr.) Flot.
S_Pas-NMStereocaulon paschale (L.) Hoffm.
Table 2. Correspondence between taxonomic rank and percentage identity [45].
Table 2. Correspondence between taxonomic rank and percentage identity [45].
Taxonomic Level of IdentificationPercentage of Similarity
Species definitively identified>98%
New species within a genus94.3–98%
New genus within a family88.5–94.2%
New family within an order81.2–88.4%
New order within a class80.9–81.1%
New class within a phylum<80.9%
Table 3. Identifying lichens using ITS1 gene sequencing data.
Table 3. Identifying lichens using ITS1 gene sequencing data.
Sample IDOtu NumberGenBank No. of SequenceOtu Abundance (med.), % *Query Cover, %Identity, %Genbank No. of a Nearest Sequence
Ctr_Is_KH
Ctr_Is_NM
Otu3PX50220192
27
94100MG250320
Ctr_Is_KH
Ctr_Is_NM
Otu17PX5022071.5
57
9299.57KY764999
N_Niv_KH
N_Niv_NM
Otu232PX50220966.5
65
10099.6GU067707
N_Niv_KH
N_Niv_NM
Otu1PX50219930
30
94100MG461626
C_St_KHOtu2PX50220081.577100MK812280
C_Arb_NMOtu6PX50220327.69899.59OL694693
Otu7PX50220427.59199.56MK508932
Otu9PX50220523.89899.59KY119382
S_Ves_KHOtu4PX50220282.59198.25LC742699
S_Pas_NMOtu25PX5022085794100HQ650690
Otu12PX5022063395100MT925689
*—averaged over two repetitions.
Table 4. The values shown are for the number of final reads, the number of reads in OTUs, the richness of unique taxonomic units, and the mapping percentage of the lichen samples studied.
Table 4. The values shown are for the number of final reads, the number of reads in OTUs, the richness of unique taxonomic units, and the mapping percentage of the lichen samples studied.
Sample IDReads InitialReads in OTURichnessMapped Percent
Ctr_Is_KH15,353 ± 139413,938 ± 986123 ± 090.95 ± 1.84
N_Niv_KH28,561 ± 329427,264 ± 3091120 ± 1195.48 ± 0.19
N_Niv_KH (processed) *28,698 ± 210227,614 ± 208640 ± 2.596.21 ± 0.22
C_St_KH27,784 ± 302426,155 ± 2674256 ± 2494.21 ± 0.62
S_Ves_KH15,340 ± 75813,348 ± 74677 ± 2687.00 ± 0.56
Ctr_Is_NM8766 ± 29367775 ± 2596102 ± 988.72 ± 0.10
N_Niv_NM28,933 ± 180627,368 ± 1820139 ± 2294.56 ± 0.38
N_Niv_NM (processed) *19,160 ± 41518,316 ± 40680 ± 1895.60 ± 0.05
C_Arb_NM10,290 ± 17099053 ± 1540186 ± 2387.92 ± 0.36
S_Pas_NM19,976 ± 21613,770 ± 1020172 ± 169.00 ± 5.86
*—samples were processed with an abrasive and then washed.
Table 5. The mass proportion of mycobiont OTUs and other fungal OTUs in the mycobiome of the studied lichen samples.
Table 5. The mass proportion of mycobiont OTUs and other fungal OTUs in the mycobiome of the studied lichen samples.
Sample IDOTU, % MycobiontOTU, %
Others
Ctr_Is_KH93.44 ± 0.866.56 ± 0.86
N_Niv_KH95.84 ± 1.444.16 ± 1.44
N_Niv_KH (processed) *98.98 ± 0.311.02 ± 0.31
C_St_KH81.17 ± 3.618.83 ± 3.60
S_Ves_KH96.18 ± 2.843.82 ± 2.84
Ctr_Is_NM83.91 ± 1.0616.09 ± 1.06
N_Niv_NM94.68 ± 1.175.32 ± 1.17
N_Niv_NM (processed) *96.35 ± 0.152.76 ± 0.68
C_Arb_NM80.70 ± 0.1219.31 ± 0.12
S_Pas_NM91.96 ± 0.988.04 ± 0.98
*—samples were processed with an abrasive and then washed.
Table 6. Species richness and the Shannon and Simpson indices, calculated based on the number and diversity of cultivated fungal taxa from lichens.
Table 6. Species richness and the Shannon and Simpson indices, calculated based on the number and diversity of cultivated fungal taxa from lichens.
Sample IDRichnessShannon IndexSimpson Index
Ctr_Is_KH102.240.13
Ctr_Is_NM152.820.29
N_Niv_KH51.730.17
N_Niv_NM20.870.50
S_Ves_KH41.060.54
S_Pas_NM51.670.21
C_Arb_NM92.300.15
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hakobjanyan, A.; Melekhin, A.; Sukhacheva, M.; Beletsky, A.; Pankratov, T. Mycobiomes of Six Lichen Species from the Russian Subarctic: A Culture-Independent Analysis and Cultivation Study. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11120848

AMA Style

Hakobjanyan A, Melekhin A, Sukhacheva M, Beletsky A, Pankratov T. Mycobiomes of Six Lichen Species from the Russian Subarctic: A Culture-Independent Analysis and Cultivation Study. Journal of Fungi. 2025; 11(12):848. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11120848

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hakobjanyan, Armen, Alexey Melekhin, Marina Sukhacheva, Alexey Beletsky, and Timofey Pankratov. 2025. "Mycobiomes of Six Lichen Species from the Russian Subarctic: A Culture-Independent Analysis and Cultivation Study" Journal of Fungi 11, no. 12: 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11120848

APA Style

Hakobjanyan, A., Melekhin, A., Sukhacheva, M., Beletsky, A., & Pankratov, T. (2025). Mycobiomes of Six Lichen Species from the Russian Subarctic: A Culture-Independent Analysis and Cultivation Study. Journal of Fungi, 11(12), 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11120848

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop