Next Article in Journal
Exogenous Nitric Oxide Induces Pathogenicity of Alternaria alternata on Huangguan Pear Fruit by Regulating Reactive Oxygen Species Metabolism and Cell Wall Modification
Previous Article in Journal
Overview of the Current Challenges in Pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Eleven New Species of the Genus Tarzetta (Tarzettaceae, Pezizales) from Mexico
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Three New Species of Mytilinidioid Fungi (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from Mexico

by
Tania Raymundo
1,
César R. Martínez-González
2,
Michelle Martínez-Pineda
1,
Aurora Cobos-Villagrán
1,
Isabel Ramírez-Rosales
3 and
Ricardo Valenzuela
1,*
1
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Departamento de Botánica, Laboratorio de Micología, Prolongación de Carpio and Plan de Ayala s.n., Col. Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de México 11340, Mexico
2
Departamento de Fitotecnia, Instituto de Horticultura, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, km 38.5 Carretera Federal México-Texcoco, Texcoco 56230, Estado de México, Mexico
3
Département de biologie, Faculté des sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Principale, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2024, 10(10), 725; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10100725
Submission received: 9 August 2024 / Revised: 29 September 2024 / Accepted: 2 October 2024 / Published: 18 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity, Taxonomy and Ecology of Ascomycota)

Abstract

:
Mytilinidioid fungi are conchiform in nature, with the appearance of bivalve shells or wedge-shaped, rigid, brittle, and carbonaceous hysterothecia growing on the bark of gymnosperms or angiosperms. Based on their morphological characteristics and molecular markers (ITS and LSU), this study describes three new species of mytilinidioid fungi: Ericboehmia mexicana of the family Hysteriaceae of the order Hysteriales and Lophium pinicola and Mytilinidion mexicanum of the family Mytilinidiaceae of the order Mytilinidiales. The first species grows on Liquidambar styracyphlua, the second species grows on Pinus patula, and the third species grows on Acacia californica subsp. pringlei. The specimens studied were deposited in the ENCB Herbarium.

1. Introduction

Mytilinidioid fungi are conchiform in nature, with the appearance of bivalve shells or wedge-shaped, rigid, brittle, or carbonaceous hysterothecia. Etymologically, the name of these fungi refers to Mytilus, a genus of mussels [1]. These fungi are polyphyletic and classified in the families Hysteriaceae of Hysteriales and Mytilinidiaceae of Mytilinidiales, in the subclass Pleosporomycetidae of the class Dothideomycetes. This group is characterized by being globoid- to obovoid-shaped or strongly laterally compressed, with erect, oyster-shaped hysterothecia standing on edge and lateral walls that are more or less connivant and extended vertically, along with a prominent longitudinal keel or cristate apex and a thin-walled, sclero parenchymatous the genes or lack peridium [2]. Commonly distributed in temperate environments, mytilinidioid fungi are found in association with the wood, bark, resin, cones, scales, needles, seeds, and roots of gymnosperms and angiosperms [2]. In Mexico, only Mytilinidion mytilinellum (Fr.) H. Zogg has been recorded, growing on Pinus pseudostrobus Lindl. [3]. The objective of this study was to describe three new species of mytilinidioid fungi: one in the family Hysteriaceae (Ericboehmia mexicana) and two in the family Mytilinidiaceae (Lophium pinicola and Mytilinidion mexicanum).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Zone

The Ericboehmia mexicana specimens were collected from a tropical montane cloud forest in Sierra Alta Hidalguense at Temazate in the municipality of Tlanchinol, Hidalgo State, Mexico, in 2018 (Figure 1). The Lophium pinicola specimens were collected from a Pinus-Quercus forest in Rancho Santa Elena in the municipality of Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo State, in 2023 and from the municipality of Naupan, Puebla State, in 2016. The Mytilinidion mexicanum specimens were collected from a tropical, dry forest in Las Grutas in the municipality of Tamuín, Biosphere Reserve Sierra del Abra Tanchipa, San Luis Potosí State, in 2023. The specimens were deposited in the fungi collection “Gastón Guzmán Huerta” at the Herbarium of the Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas (ENCB) of the Instituto Politécnico Nacional.

2.2. Morphological Examination

The macroscopic characteristics of the samples are based on descriptions by Boehm et al. (2009a,b) [2,4] and Gardiennet et al. (2019) [5]. The ascomata were measured with a Leica S9-E stereoscopic microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Subsequently, cross-sections of the ascoma were taken and mounted on slides; then, 70% ethanol was added to hydrate and eliminate air bubbles from the tissues, and 5% potassium hydroxide (KOH) was added to soften and clarify them. The tissues were observed using an Olympus CX3 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications of up to 1000×. Images of the structures with taxonomic importance were captured using a Sony DSC-WX350 digital camera (Sony Group Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The meanings of the taxonomic terms are based on those by Ulloa and Hanlin (2012) [6].

2.3. Drawing Techniques

The ascomata were drawn using graphite pencils on 270 g/m2 and 27.9 × 35.6 cm Bristol paper. Three-dimensional models were mounted and exposed at 45° angles, illuminating the upper left corners, as indicated by scientific illustration convention. The contrast between darkness and lightness and the harmony of the compositions were also considered to obtain the three-dimensional shapes of the ascomata, along with their textures. The spatial distribution of the mytilinidioid fungi was also represented for each species described as new, and the morphological characteristics of the ascomata were highlighted.

2.4. Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing of DNA

Genomic DNA was extracted from herbarium voucher specimens using the CTAB method [7] and was quantified with a Nanodrop 2000c (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). Dilutions of each sample at 20 ng were prepared to amplify two regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA), internal transcribed spacer rDNA-ITS1 5.8S rDNA-ITS2 (ITS; primers ITS5-ITS4) [8], and ribosomal large subunit-coding DNA (28S rRNA; primers LROR-LR3) [9]. The reaction mixture for PCR was prepared in a final volume of 13 μL, containing a buffer of the enzyme 1× Taq DNA polymerase, 0.8 mM of deoxinucleoside triphosphate (0.2 mM of each), 100 ng of DNA, 20 pmol of each primer, and 2 units of GoTaq DNA (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). PCR amplification conditions were 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min for ITS and LSU. All PCR reactions were undertaken in a Peltier Thermal Cycler PTC-200 (BIORAD, Mexico city, Mexico ). The PCR products were verified via agarose gel electrophoresis. The gels were run for 1 h at 95 V cm−3 in 1.5% agarose and 1× TAE buffer (Tris Acetate-EDTA). The gel was stained with GelRed (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA), and the bands were visualized in an Infinity 3000 transilluminator (Vilber Lourmat, Eberhardzell, Germany). The amplified products were purified using the ExoSAP Purification kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. They were then quantified and prepared for the sequence reaction using BigDye Terminator v.3.1 (Applied Biosystem, Waltham, MA, USA). These products were sequenced in both directions using the Applied Biosystem model 3730XL (Applied BioSystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The sequences of both strands of each gene were analyzed, edited, and assembled using BioEdit version 7.0.5 [10] to generate consensus sequences. These consensus sequences were compared to those deposited in GenBank at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the BLASTN 2.2.19 tool [11].

2.5. Phylogenetic Methods

The newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ (accessed on 24 July 2024) including one voucher specimen of Ericboehmia mexicana with LSU, four voucher specimens of Lophium pinicola with ITS and LSU, and one voucher specimen of Mytilinidion mexicanum with ITS and LSU markers.
The sequence data, retrieved from GenBank for previous studies on Ericboehmia, are listed in Table 1. The sequences were aligned using as an external group to Dendrographa decolorans (Turner & Borrer) Ertz & Tehler (HQ454610). For the Mytilinidiales, the sequences were subjected to standard BLAST searches in GenBank to determine the primary identities of the fungal isolates of Mytilinidiales, as listed in Table 2. Glonium circumserpens (Nyl.) Kantvilas & Coppins and Cenococcum geophilum Fr. [12] were used as the outgroup. The LSU region of Ericboehmia and each region of the Mytilinidiales were independently aligned using the online version of MAFFT v. 7 [13,14,15]. The alignment was revised in PhyDE v. 10.0 [16], followed by minor manual adjustments to ensure character homology between taxa. Two matrices were generated: the Ericboehmia dataset included LSU sequences from 39 specimens, representing 26 taxa (650 characters), and the Mytilinidiales dataset included ITS sequences from 19 specimens, with 9 taxa (685 characters), and LSU sequences from 22 specimens, with 12 taxa (585 characters). Two partition schemes were established: one for ITS and one for LSU, which were established using the option to minimize the stop codons with Mesquite v3.2 [17].
In both datasets, the data were analyzed using maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian inference (BI). Maximum parsimony analyses were carried out in PAUP* 4.0b10 [18] using the heuristic search mode, 1000 random starting replicates, and TBR branch swapping, with MULTREES and Collapse on. Bootstrap values were estimated using 1000 bootstrap replicates under the heuristic search mode, each with 100 random starting replicates. Maximum likelihood analyses were carried out in RAxML v. 8.2.10 [19] with a GTR + G model of a nucleotide substitution. To assess the branch support, 10,000 rapid bootstrap replicates were run using the GTRGAMMA model. Bayesian inference analyses were carried out in MrBayes v. 3.2.6 x64 [20] with four chains. The best evolutionary model for alignment was sought using PartitionFinder [21,22,23]. The information block for the matrix included two simultaneous runs of Montecarlo chains, with the temperature set to 0.2 and sampling of 10 million generations (standard deviation ≤ 0.1). Chain convergence was visualized in Tracer v.1.6 [24]. The remaining trees were used to calculate a 50% majority rule consensus topology and posterior probabilities (PPs). The trees were visualized and optimized in FigTree v. 1.1.4 [25] and were edited in Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
Table 1. GenBank accession numbers for the taxa used in the phylogenetic analysis of Ericboehmia. The sequences generated for this study are in bold.
Table 1. GenBank accession numbers for the taxa used in the phylogenetic analysis of Ericboehmia. The sequences generated for this study are in bold.
TaxonCulture Accession No. or Voucher SpecimenGenBank Accession No.Country of Origin of the SequenceSource
LSU
Dendrographa decoloransErtz 14063HQ454610Belgium[26]
Ericboehmia centramuraMFLUCC 12-0808KM272256Thailand[27]
Ericboehmia curtisiiCBS:198.34FJ161176USA[2,4]
Ericboehmia curtisiiCBS:198.34MH866967USA[5]
Ericboehmia doimaeensisMFLUCC 16-0329MH535894Thailand[28]
Ericboehmia mexicanaT. Raymundo 7609PP575996MexicoThis study
Ericboehmia saulensisAG18089MN338581French Guiana [5]
Ericboehmia thailandicaMFLUCC 16-0338MH535895Thailand [28]
Gloniopsis calamiMFLUCC 15-0739NG_059715Thailand [29]
Gloniopsis fluctiformisC419MK348005Thailand [30]
Gloniopsis leucaenaeC289MK347967Thailand [30]
Gloniopsis praelongaCBS:123337FJ161195USA[4]
Hysterium angustatumCMW:20409FJ161194USA[2,4]
Hysterium angustatumMFLUCC 16-0623MH535893Italy[28]
Hysterium angustatumGKM5211GQ221906New Zealand[31]
Hysterium barrianumANM1442GQ221884USA[31]
Hysterium barrianumANM1495GQ221885USA[31]
Hysterium pulicareCBS:123377FJ161201USA[4]
Hysterium pulicareCBS:240.34MH866998USA[32]
Hysterium vermiformeGKM1234GQ221897Kenya[31]
Hysterobrevium constrictumGKM426NGQ221901Kenya[31]
Hysterobrevium moriCBS:123564FJ161198USA[4]
Hysterobrevium moriCBS:123335FJ161202USA[4]
Hysterobrevium moriCBS:123563FJ161196USA[4]
Hysterobrevium rosaeMFUCC 14-0551MH535897Italy[28]
Hysterobrevium rosaeMFUCC 14-0552MH535898Italy[28]
Hysterobrevium smilacisCBS:114601FJ161174Sweden[2]
Hysterobrevium smilacisCBS:200.34MH866968USA[2]
Hysterodifractum partisporumHUEFS:42865KF914916Brazil[33]
Hysterodifractum partisporumHUEFS 42865NG_060652Brazil[33]
Ostreichnion sassafrasCBS:322.34FJ161188USA[2]
Ostreichnion sassafrasCBS:322.34MH867054USA[32]
Psiloglonium araucanumCBS:112412FJ161172South Africa[4]
Psiloglonium araucanumCMW:18760FJ161192South Africa [4]
Psiloglonium clavisporumCBS:123338FJ161197USA[4]
Psiloglonium clavisporumCBS:123341FJ161206USA[4]
Rhytidhysteron hysterinumEB 0351GU397350France[4]
Rhytidhysteron neorufulumMFLUCC 13-0221KU377567Thailand[33]
Rhytidhysteron rufulumGKM361AGQ221893Kenya[31]
Table 2. GenBank accession numbers for the taxa used in the phylogenetic analyses of Lophium and Mytilinidion. The sequences generated for this study are in bold.
Table 2. GenBank accession numbers for the taxa used in the phylogenetic analyses of Lophium and Mytilinidion. The sequences generated for this study are in bold.
VoucherCountryIsolation SourceGenBank Accession No.Source
ITSLSU
Cenococcum geophilum1-17-2USA----------JN860135[34]
Glonium circumserpensCBS 123343AustraliaSaxicolous -----FJ161200[2]
Lophium arboricolaCBS 758.71
Type
United KingdomLarix deciduaNR153447NG064094[12]
Lophium arboricolaNW-FVA 6260GermanyAcer pseudoplatanusON710911-----[12]
Lophium arboricolaZK52b/08Czech
Republic
Picea abiesFR837917FR837917[12]
Lophium arboricolaP98PolandPicea abiesOR754901OR754923[12]
Lophium arboricolaP99PolandAbies albaOR754902OR754924[12]
Lophium arboricolaCBS 102826SpainOn dungKU705825KU705842[12]
Lophium mytilinumCBS 123344USAPinus strobus-----FJ161203[2]
Lophium mytilinumCBS 269.34USAPinus sp.EF596817EF596817[35]
Lophium mytilinumCBS 114111SwedenPinus sylvestrisEF596819EF596819[2]
Lophium pinicolaT. Raymundo 9516 TypeMexicoPinus patulaPQ149439PQ151434This study
Lophium pinicolaT. Raymundo
6015
MexicoPinus patulaPQ149440PQ151435This study
Lophium pinicolaR. Valenzuela 18065MexicoPinus patulaPQ149441PQ151436This study
Lophium pinicolaMart.-Pineda 2300MexicoPinus patulaPQ149442PQ151437This study
Lophium zalerioidesMFLUCC
14-0417
Italy-----MF621583MF621587[36]
Mytilinidion mexicanumT. Raymundo 9300 TypeMexicoAcacia californica subsp. pringleiPQ149443PQ151438This study
Mytilinidion resinicolaCBS 304.34
Type
USALarix laricinaMH855535MH867038[2]
Mytilinidion rhenanumEB 0341France----------GU323207[35]
Mytilinidion scolecosporumCBS 305.34
Type
USAPinus strobusNR160069NG057808[2]
Pseudocamaropycnis piniCBS 115589
Type
ChinaLeaf of Pinus elliotiiKU728518KU728557[37]
Slimacomyces isiolusFP1465Japan-----AB597207AB597217[12]
Slimacomyces isiolusP10436Japan-----AB597213AB597220[12]

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

We successfully amplified and sequenced the LSU region from one Mexican specimen of Ericboehmia. After the incorporation of additional sequences downloaded from GenBank (Table 1), the aligned LSU dataset included 720 characters (including gaps), of which 457 were conserved sites, 157 were variable sites, and 106 were parsimony informative sites. The three phylogenetic analyses (MP, ML, and BI) of the LSU dataset recovered similar topologies (Figure 2). No significant conflicts (bootstrap value > 70%) were detected among the topologies obtained via the separate phylogenetic analyses. The parsimony analysis of the alignment found 942 trees of 210 steps (CI = 0.3045, HI = 0.1084, RI = 0.5176, and RC = 0.5095). The best RAxML tree, with a final likelihood value of –30,521.086301 of a new species based on morphological characters and phylogenetic analysis of LSU (GenBank accession number PP575996) sequences, is presented in Figure 2. The matrix had 1010 distinct alignment patterns, with 5.14% undetermined characters or gaps. The estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.106245, C = 0.272982, G = 0.128304, and T = 0.280642. The substitution rates were as follows: AC = 1.075210, AG = 1.284501, AT = 1.182456, CG = 1.007215, CT = 5.348215, and GT = 1.000000. The gamma distribution shape parameter was α = 0.002754. In the Bayesian analysis, the standard deviation between the chains stabilized at 0.00002 after 3 million generations. No significant changes in the tree topology trace or cumulative split frequencies of the selected nodes were observed after about 0.25 million generations, which were discarded as 25% burn-in. The phylogenetic analysis of LSU showed that Ericboehmia mexicana is monophyletic, with strong support (BS = 100%, BS = 100%, and BI p = 1), and is distinctive from other species. The distinct morphology and LSU sequences provide evidence that this is a new species.
The Mytilinidiales dataset of combined ITS and LSU markers comprised 23 specimens in 12 taxa, with 1270 characters (including gaps). The three phylogenetic analyses (MP, ML, and BI) of the dataset recovered similar topologies (Figure 3). No significant conflicts (bootstrap value > 80%) were detected among the topologies obtained via the separate phylogenetic analyses. The parsimony analysis of the alignment found 856 trees from 245 steps (CI = 0.2560, HI = 0.1002, RI = 0.2812, and RC = 0.1058). The best RAxML tree, with a final likelihood value of −24,012.573014, is presented in Figure 3. The matrix had 985 distinct alignment patterns, with 3.02% undetermined characters or gaps. The estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.102410, C = 0.108420, G = 0.100814, and T = 0.100578. The substitution rates were as follows: AC = 1.000475, AG = 1.001835, AT = 1.000824, CG = 1.000221, CT = 4.000421, and GT = 1.100000. The gamma distribution shape parameter was α = 0.002014. In the Bayesian analysis, the standard deviation between the chains stabilized at 0.001 after 4.5 million generations. No significant changes in the tree topology trace or cumulative split frequencies of the selected nodes were observed after about 0.25 million generations, which were discarded as 25% burn-in. The analyses produced a phylogenetic tree in which Lophium pinicola and Mytilinidion mexicanum were shown as monophyletic groups (BS = 100%, BS = 100%, and BI p = 1).

3.2. Taxonomy

Ericboehmia mexicana Cobos-Villagrán, Raymundo & R. Valenz. sp. nov.
Mycobank: MB855225.
Diagnosis: This species differs from Ericboehmia species in the large size of asci (336–) 345–439 (–447) × 60–90 μm and the size of ascospores (120–) 132–150 × (25–) 29–32 (–40) growing on Liquidambar styraciflua L.
Type: Mexico, Hidalgo State, Tlanchinol municipality, 168 km Pachuca–Tampico Road, El Temazate, 21°01′40″ N, 98°38′33″ W, 1500 m, 31 May 2018, T. Raymundo 7609 (ENCB, Holotype).
GenBank: LSU: PP575996.
Etymology: The epithet refers to the name of the country where the species was collected.
Ascomata 1200–1600 μm long, 1000–1100 μm wide, and 800–1000 μm high (n = 10), shell-shaped, with a laterally flattened and narrow base and a convex upper ridge, with a longitudinal slit and grooves along its longitudinal axis. gregarius in small, scattered clusters, erumpent to shallow, carbonaceous, and dull black to slightly shiny. Peridium 20–150 × 115–120 μm thick, with a thin upper part of up to 20 μm and a thickened base of up to 150 μm, composed of sclerenchymatous cells of textura globulosa to textura angularis. Pseudoparaphyses 1.5–2 μm wide, branched, hyaline, without septa, and embedded in a gelatinous matrix. Asci (336–) 345–439 (–447) × 60–90 μm, bitunicate, 8-spored, biseriate, cylindrical to clavate, and hyaline. Ascospores (120–) 132–150 × (25–) 29–32 (–40) μm (n = 30), pale brown, reddish brown to dark brown, slightly fusiform when young, becoming oblong, smooth, with a single central transverse septum.
Distribution and ecology: This species grows on the bark of fallen logs of Liquidambar styraciflua in a tropical montane cloud forest. It is only known from the type locality.
Specimens examined: Mexico, Hidalgo State, Tlanchinol municipality, 168 km Pachuca–Tampico Road, El Temazate, 21°01′40″ N, 98°38′33″ W, 1500 m, 31 May 2018, R. Valenzuela 18309 (ENCB), A. Cobos-Villagrán 1720 (ENCB), S. Cuevas-Pérez 20 (ENCB), A. Ramírez-Chavarín 20 (ENCB.
Taxonomic notes: Ericboehmia mexicana is distinguished from the other species of the genus by having larger ascospores. The ascomata are morphologically similar to those of E. beejakoshae (M. Niranjan & V.V. Sarma) Gardiennet, Lechat & J. Fourn. and E. appendiculata (R.M. Sánchez & Bianchin.) Gardiennet, Lechat & J. Fourn., and both have smaller ascospores, the first being 42.5–57.5 × 10.5–13.7 μm and from Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India [38], and the second being 58–88 × 15–28 μm and from Argentina [39]. Phylogenetically, E. mexicana is closely related to E. curtisii (Duby) Gardiennet, Lechat & J. Fourn., but E. curtisii is distinguished by having smaller ascomata (0.3–0.7 × 0.1–0.3 × 0.2–0.3 mm vs. 1.2–1.6 × 1–1.1 × 0.8–1 mm and smaller and transversally multiseptated ascospores ((45–) 62–82 × (10–) 12–15 (–17) µm vs. (120–) 132–150 × (25–) 29–32 (–40) µm) [4].
Lophium pinicola Raymundo, Mart.-Pineda & R. Valenz. sp. nov.
MycoBank: MB855226.
Diagnosis: This species differs from Lophium mytilinidion in that the ascospores are 198–200 × 1–2 μm, spirally arranged, and grow on Pinus patula Schiede ex Aschltdl &Cham.
Type: Mexico, Hidalgo State, Huasca de Ocampo municipality, Rancho Santa Elena Reserve, 20°06′39″ N, 98°31′32″ W, 2617 m, 16 October 2023, T. Raymundo 9516 (ENCB, Holotype).
GenBank: ITS: PQ149439, PQ149440, PQ149441, and PQ149442; LSU: PQ151434, PQ151435, PQ151436, and PQ151437.
Etymology: The epithet refers to the host Pinus patula on which the species was found.
Ascomata 750–2000 μm long, 300–400 μm wide, and 160–200 μm high, mytilinidioid, conchiform, dimidiate, black, shiny and dull with age, with a horizontally and vertically striated surface. Peridiumthin and scleroparenchimatous. Hamathecium has trabeculate pseudoparaphyses, up to 1 μm, filiform and hyaline. Asci 190–210 × 7–8 μm, bitunicate, cylindrical, hyaline, and eight-spored. Ascospores 198–200 × 1–2 μm, filiform, fasciculate, spirally arranged, hyaline to yellowish, multiseptate, smooth, and thin-walled.
Habitat: This species grows on fallen logs of Pinus patula in Pinus-Quercus forests.
Additional specimens: Mexico, Hidalgo State, Huasca de Ocampo municipality, Rancho Santa Elena Reserve, LN 20°06′39″ LW 98°31′32″, 2617 m, 16 October 2023, R. Valenzuela 18065 (ENCB). Puebla State, Naupan municipality, 8 km Tejocotal–Naupan Road, 8 May 2016, R. Valenzuela 16515 (ENCB), T. Raymundo 6015 (ENCB), M. Mtz-Pineda 2300 (ENCB).
Taxonomic notes: Lophium pinicola is distinguished from the other species in the genus by the combination of the following characteristics: the size of the ascomata, the host, and the size and spiral arrangement of the ascospores within the asci. Lophium mytilinum is similar in that it grows on Pinus spp. but differs in terms of its ascospores, which are parallel in the asci and slightly larger ((130–) 170–250 (–300) × 1–2 μm), with a cosmopolitan distribution [4]. Lophium elegans H. Zoggs is similar in that it has ascospores that are spirally arranged in the asci but differs in that it has larger ascospores ((200–) 260–280 (–300) × 2 μm) and grows on Juniperus in Europe [4]. Phylogenetically, L. pinicola is closely related to L. zalerioides Jun F. Li, Phook., Camporesi & K.D. Hyde but L. zalerioides was only found in its asexual morph, growing on fallen cones of Cupressus glabra Sudw. in Italy [36].
Mytilinidion mexicanum Raymundo, Mart.-Pineda &R. Valenz sp. nov.
MycoBank: MB855227.
Diagnosis: This species differs from Mytilinidion mytilinellum in that it has ascospores that are (15–) 17–20 (–22) × 4–5 μm, oblong, fusiform, slightly constricted at the middle septum, pale brown to dark brown, and slightly lighter end cells, as well as having round ends and growing on Acacia californica subsp. pringlei (Rose) L. Rico.
Type: Mexico, San Luis Potosi State, Tamuin municipality, Biosphere Reserve Sierra del Abra Tanchipa, Ejido Los Sabinos Dos, Las Grutas, 22°07′11″ N, 98°58′58″ W, 24 June 2023, T. Raymundo 9300 (ENCB, Holotype).
GenBank: ITS: PQ149443; LSU: PQ151438.
Etymology: The epithet refers to the country where the species was collected.
Ascomata 750–2000 μm long, 160–180 μm wide, and 200–300 μm high, mytilinidioid, conchiform to elongate, dimidiate to broadly attached to wood, black, and shiny to dull, with a horizontally striated surface. Peridium 97–110 μm thick, carbonaceous, textura globosa, pseudoparenchimatous, and thick-walled, with globose cells. Pseudoparaphyses up to 1 μm in diameter, filiform, branched, anastomosed, septate, and hyaline. Asci 90–95 × 5–6 μm, bitunicate, cylindrical, pediculated, 8-spored, hyaline, and uniseriate. Ascospores (15–) 17–20 (–22) × 4–5 μm, oblong-fusiform, with rounded ends, slightly curved, pale brown to dark brown, slightly lighter in the end cells, 3-septate, slightly constricted at the middle septum, the second largest cell, smooth, and thin-walled.
Habitat: Gregarious, growing on the decaying wood of Acacia californica subsp. pringlei in tropical dry forests.
Additional specimens: Mexico, San Luis Potosi State, Tamuin municipality, Biosphere Reserve Sierra del Abra Tanchipa, Ejido Los Sabinos Dos, Las Grutas, 22°07′11″ N, 98°58′58″ W, 24 June 2023, R. Valenzuela 17876 (ENCB); 13 November 2023, T. Raymundo 9676 (ENCB), T. Raymundo 9679 (ENCB), T. Raymundo 9681 (ENCB), and T. Raymundo 9682 (ENCB).
Taxonomic notes: Mytilinidion mexicanum is distinguished from the other species of the genus in that it has 3-septate, (15–) 17–20 (–22) × 4–5 μm, and oblong-fusiform ascospores and grows on the decaying wood of Acacia californica subsp. pringlei in tropical dry forests. Mytilinidion mytilinellum differs in having (2–) 3 (–5)-septate, (14–) 16–22 (–24) × (2.5–) 3–4 (–5) μm, and elongate ascospores, growing on coniferous hosts, and having a cosmopolitan distribution [4]. M. tortile is similar because it has 3-septate, oblong to fusiform, and slightly curved ascospores but differs in that it has smaller ascospores (11–14 × 5–7 μm) and grows on Larix and Juniperus in Europe [4]. Phylogenetically, M. mexicanum is closely related to M. resinicola M.L. Lohman and M. rhenanum Fuckel, but M. resinicola has elliptic to oblong and larger ascospores (24–26 × 8–9 μm), which are deeply constricted at the septa and grow on the resinous bark of Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch in the USA [4]. M. rhenanum differs in that it has 3–5 (–7)-septate, (24–) 30–42 (–50) × 3–5 μm, and elongate ascospores, which grow on the roots of rotten stumps of Pinus sylvestris L. in Germany [4].

4. Discussion

Mytilinidioid fungi are a morphological group that has been segregated into the orders Hysteriales and Mytilinidiales; however, this name is used to separate them from other morphological groups of Dothideomycetes. In the present study, phylogenetic analyses of Ericboehmia mexicana (Hysteriales), Lophium pinicola, and Mytilinidion mexicanum (Mytilinidiales) were performed separately. Therefore, they will be discussed separately in this section.
The genus Ericboehmia was segregated from Ostreichnion, another mytilinidioid fungus, due to their morphological and phylogenetic differences [5]. The septation of the ascospores is the main morphological characteristic that distinguishes Ostreichnion from Ericboehmia: Ostreichnion has muriform ascospores, while Ericboehmia has two-celled ascospores with sometimes secondary, more or less developed, distosepta, making them phylogenetically distant [5]. Ericboehmia mexicana is a mytilinidioid fungus, with oyster-shaped ascomata, a prominent, longitudinal keel or crested apex, a thin and brittle peridium, and a trabeculated gelatinous matrix. Microscopically, it has bicellular ascospores, characteristic of the genus, but they are larger than those of the other species of Ericboehmia. The Ericboehmia mexicana samples were collected from Liquidambar styraciflua in a tropical montane cloud forest in the neotropical region of Mexico. Seven species of Ericboehmia have been recognized in the Index Fungorum (https://www.indexfungorum.org/, accessed on 15 July 2024). Five species are found in tropical regions of South America and Southeast Asia: Ericboehmia saulensis Gardiennet, Lechat & J. Fourn., has been reported in French Guiana on dead, corticated twigs of Caesalpinia pulcherrima (L.) Swartz; E. centramura (Senan.) Gardiennet, Lechat & J. Fourn., E. doimaeensis (Jayasiri & K.D. Hyde) Gardiennet, Lechat & J. Fourn., and E. thailandica (Jayasiri & K.D. Hyde) Gardiennet, Lechat & J. Fourn. have been found on decaying wood in Thailand; and E. beejakoshae has been collected from thorny twigs in the Adaman Islands. Two species grow in temperate forests in South America and North America: E. appendiculata has been collected from the bark of Nothofagus pumilio (Poepp. & Endl.) Krasser in Patagonia and Argentina, and E. curtisii has been found on the branches of Vitis in South Carolina, USA [5,27,28,29,30]. The morphological and ecological differences between E. mexicana and the other species described in the genus, together with phylogenetic analyses, demonstrate that it is a new species.
Lophium piniciola and M. mexicanum are classified as monophyletic groups in Mytilinidiales, because they form well-supported phylogenetic clades. Lophium pinicola is phylogenetically related to L. arboricola and L. zalerioides; however, both species have only been described in the asexual phase. The first species grows on Larix decidua Mill. [40], Picea abies (L.) H. Karst., and Abies alba Mill. in the Czech Republic [41], England [42], Norway [42], and Poland [12], while it has been recorded on Acer pseudoplatanus L. in Germany [43]. The second species has been recorded in Italy, growing on Cupressus glabra [36]. The Lophium pinicola samples were collected from Pinus patula in Pinus-Quercus forests in the Hidalgo and Puebla States of Mexico. On the other hand, the Mytilinidion mexicanum samples were collected from decaying wood of Acacia californica subsp. pringlei in a tropical dry forest in Biosphere Reserve Sierra del Abra Tanchipa, San Luis Potosí State, Mexico. Morphologically, it is separate from the other species of the genus, because it has 3-septate, oblong-fusiform, and slightly curved ascospores. Phylogenetically, it is close to M. rhenanum and M. resinicola, but the first species has larger, filiform, and 3–5-septate ascospores and grows on coniferous wood in Norway and Switzerland [4,44], while M. resinicola has elliptic to oblong and 3-septate ascospores [4]. Finally, another close species is M. scolescosporum M.L. Lohman, which is characterized as having 5–7-septate and 40–50 × 2–2.5 μm ascospores and grows on Pinus strobus L. in the USA [45].

5. Conclusions

Mytilinidioid fungi are an artificial group of Dothideomycetes, which have been little studied, because they are difficult to find due to their microscopic size. They are characterized as having ascomata with the appearance of bivalve shells and living on coniferous leaves and wood or the resinous cones and rotten wood of angiosperms in temperate and tropical forests. This study was the first to be carried out on mytilinidioid fungi in Mexico and described three new species, with morphological, ecological, and phylogenetic evidence. The new species are Ericboehmia mexicana, Lophium pinicola, and Mytilinidion mexicanum. This study demonstrates the great diversity of mytilinidioid fungi, which are part of the most diverse class in the Phylum Ascomycota, and the lack of studies on them in both temperate and tropical zones. It is necessary to collect samples from unexplored regions and look for them in different types of vegetation to learn about their ecological and geographical distribution in Mexico and the world. Additionally, it is essential to employ more molecular markers to generate more robust phylogenetic trees.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.R. and R.V.; methodology, A.C.-V., M.M.-P., I.R.-R. and C.R.M.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, T.R. and R.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Instituto Politécnico Nacional, through the projects SIP20240029, SIP20240034 and SIP 20240367.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

All authors would like to thank the authorities and guides of the Ejido Los Sabinos Dos, with special thanks to M. en C. Alejandro Duran Fernández, director of the Biosphere Reserve Sierra del Abra Tanchipa, San Luis Potosi State, for allowing us to use their facilities to study the fungal species. We are also grateful with Don Roberto Campuzano, proprietor of the Rancho Santa Elena for gave us his hospitality at the ranch, and thanks to Martha Cecilia Chavez Peón Hoffman-Pinter, director of the Area Natural Protegida Rancho Santa Elena Reserve for allowing us to collect mushroom and deposit them in ENCB Herbarium. Special thanks to M. en C. Carolina Vazquez Chun for contacting us and helping her to study and identify the Reserve’s mushrooms. We also appreciate the fine suggestions of the two assigned reviewers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Duby, J.E. Memoire sur la tribu des Hysterinees de la famille des Hypoxylees (Pyrenomycetes). Mem. Soc. Phys. Hist. Nat. Genève. 1862, 16, 15–70. [Google Scholar]
  2. Boehm, E.W.A.; Schoch, C.L.; Spatafora, J.W. On the evolution of the Hysteriaceae and Mytilinidiaceae (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) using four nuclear genes. Mycol. Res. 2009, 113, 461–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Marmolejo Monciváis, J.G. Distribución vertical de hongos en hojas de tres especies de pinos en Nuevo León, México. Rev. Mex. Cienc. For. 2018, 9, 379–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Boehm, E.W.A.; Mugambi, G.; Miller, A.N.; Huhndorf, S.; Marincowitz, S.; Schoch, C.L.; Spatafora, J.W. A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Hysteriaceae, Mytilinidiaceae and Gloniaceae with keys to world species. Stud. Mycol. 2009, 64, 49–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gardiennet, A.; Lechat, C.; Fournier, J. Ericboehmia, a new genus segregated from Ostreichnion in the Hysteriaceae, with the new species E. saulensis. Ascomycete.org. 2019, 11, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ulloa, M.; Hanlin, R.T. Illustrated Dictionary of Mycology, 2nd ed.; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2012; p. 761. [Google Scholar]
  7. Martínez-González, C.R.; Ramírez-Mendoza, R.; Jiménez-Ramírez, J.; Gallegos-Vázquez, C.; Luna-Vega, I. Improved method for genomic DNA extraction for Opuntia Mill. (Cactaceae). Plant Methods 2017, 13, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.D.; Lee, S.B.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 135–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, Z.; Schwarts, S.; Wagner, L.; Miller, W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J. Comput. Biol. 2000, 7, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Czachura, P.; Janik, P. Lophium arboricola (Mytilinidiales, Ascomycota) from conifer resins. Plant Fungal Syst. 2023, 69, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Katoh, K.; Misawa, K.; Kuma, K.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2017, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Muller, K.; Quandt, D.; Muller, J.; Neinhuis, C. PhyDER-Phylogenetic Data Editor. Program Distributed by the Authors, ver. 10.0. 2005. Available online: https://www.phyde.de (accessed on 18 July 2024).
  17. Maddison, W.P.; Maddison, D.R. Mesquite: A modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 3.31. 2017. Available online: http://mesquiteproject.org (accessed on 22 July 2024).
  18. Swofford, D.L. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods); Version 4.0b10; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  19. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Frandsen, P.B.; Calcott, B.; Mayer, C.; Lanfear, R. Automatic selection of partitioning schemes for phylogenetic analyses using iterative k-means clustering of site rates. BMC Evol. Biol. 2015, 15, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lanfear, R.; Calcott, B.; Kainer, D.; Mayer, C.; Stamatakis, A. Selecting optimal partitioning schemes for phylogenomic datasets. BMC Evol. Biol. 2014, 14, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lanfear, R.; Frandsen, P.B.; Wright, A.M.; Senfeld, T.; Calcott, B. Partition Finder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 772–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.J.; Xie, D.; Baele, G.; Suchard, M.A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 2018, 67, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rambaut, A. FigTree v.1.4.2. A Graphical Viewer of Phylogenetic Trees. 2014. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 24 July 2024).
  26. Ertz, D.; Tehler, A. The phylogeny of Arthoniales (Pezizomycotina) inferred from nucLSU and RPB2 sequences. Fungal Divers. 2011, 49, 47–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tibpromma, S.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Liu, J.-K.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; McKenzi, E.H.C.; Camporesi, E.; Bulgakov, T.S.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 491–602: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2017, 83, 1–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jayasiri, S.C.; Hyde, K.D.; Jones, E.B.G.; Peršoh, D.; Camporesi, E.; Kang, J.C. Taxonomic novelties of hysteriform Dothideomycetes. Mycosphere 2018, 9, 803–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hyde, K.D.; Hongsanan, S.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Jones, E.B.G.; Phookamsak, R.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Boonmee, S.; Zhao, Q.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 367–490: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2016, 80, 1–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jayasiri, S.C.; Hyde, K.D.; Jones, E.B.G.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Jeewon, R.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Bhat, D.J.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Liu, J.K.; Lu, Y.Z.; et al. Diversity, morphology and molecular phylogeny of Dothideomycetes on decaying wild seed pods and fruits. Mycosphere 2019, 10, 1–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mugambi, G.K.; Huhndorf, S.M. Parallel evolution of hysterothecial ascomata in ascolocularous fungi (Ascomycota, Fungi). Syst. Biodivers. 2009, 7, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vu, D.; Groenewald, M.; de Vries, M.; Gehrmann, T.; Stielow, B.; Eberhardt, U.; Al-Hatmi, A.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Cardinali, G.; Houbraken, J.; et al. Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Stud. Mycol. 2019, 92, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Almeida, D.A.C.; Gusmão, L.F.P.; Miller, A.N. Brazilian Semi-Arid Ascomycetes I: New and interesting records of hysteriaceous ascomycetes. Mycosphere 2014, 5, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Spatafora, J.W.; Owensby, C.A.; Douhan, G.W.; Boehm, E.W.; Schoch, C.L. Phylogenetic placement of the ectomycorrhizal genus Cenococcum in Gloniaceae (Dothideomycetes). Mycologia 2012, 104, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schoch, C.L.; Shoemaker, R.A.; Seitfert, K.A.; Hambleton, S.; Spatafora, J.W.; Crous, P.W. A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci. Mycologia 2006, 98, 1041–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hyde, K.D.; Norphanphoun, C.; Abreu, V.P.; Bazzicalupo, A.; Thilini Chethana, K.W.; Clericuzio, M.; Dayarathne, M.C.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Ekanayaka, A.H.; He, M.-Q.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 603–708: Taxonomic and phylogenetic notes on genera and species. Fungal Divers. 2017, 87, 1–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z. They seldom occur alone. Fungal Biol. 2016, 120, 1392–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Niranjan, M.; Sarma, V.V. Twelve new species of Ascomycetous fungi from Andaman Islands, India. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. 2018, 8, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sánchez, R.M.; Carmarán, C.C.; Bianchinottim, V. Ostreichnion (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from andean patagonian forests (Argentina). Darwiniana Nueva Ser. 2018, 6, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hernández-Restrepo, M.; Schumacher, R.K.; Wingfield, M.J.; Ahmad, I.; Cai, L.; Duong, T.A.; Edwards, J.; Gené, J.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Jabeen, S.; et al. Fungal Systematics and Evolution: FUSE 2. Sydowia 2016, 68, 193–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koukol, O.; Kolařík, M.; Kolářová, Z.; Baldrian, P. Diversity of foliar endophytes in wind-fallen Picea abies trees. Fungal Divers. 2012, 54, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bills, G.F.; Platas, G.; Peláez, F.; Masurekar, P. Reclassification of a pneumocandin-producing anamorph, Glarea lozoyensis gen. et sp. nov., previously identified as Zalerion arboricola. Mycol. Res. 1999, 103, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schlößer, R.; Bien, S.; Langer, G.J.; Langer, E.J. Fungi associated with woody tissues of Acer pseudoplatanus in forest stands with different health status concerning sooty bark disease (Cryptostroma corticale). Mycol. Prog. 2023, 22, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nordén, B.; Andreasen, M. Key to hysterioid fungi on bark and wood in Scandinavia. Agarica 2021, 42, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lohman, M.L. Three new species of Mytilidion in the proposed subgenera Lophiopsis. Mycologia 1932, 24, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Localities of new species of mytilinidioid fungi in Mexico.
Figure 1. Localities of new species of mytilinidioid fungi in Mexico.
Jof 10 00725 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree reconstructed from the alignment of LSU nucleotide sequences by Bayesian inference. For each node, the following values are provided: maximum parsimony bootstrap (%)/maximum likelihood bootstrap (%) and posterior confidence (p-value). The new species, Ericboehmia mexicana, is shown in bold.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree reconstructed from the alignment of LSU nucleotide sequences by Bayesian inference. For each node, the following values are provided: maximum parsimony bootstrap (%)/maximum likelihood bootstrap (%) and posterior confidence (p-value). The new species, Ericboehmia mexicana, is shown in bold.
Jof 10 00725 g002
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood phylogeny based on concatenated ITS and LSU sequence alignment. Maximum parsimony and Bayesian analyses recovered identical topologies with respect to the relationships among the main clades of members of the order Mytilinidiales. For each node, the following values are provided: maximum parsimony bootstrap (%)/maximum likelihood bootstrap (%) and posterior confidence (p-value). The scale bar represents the expected number of nucleotide substitutions per site. The new species, Lophium pinicola and Mytilinidion mexicanum, are shown in bold.
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood phylogeny based on concatenated ITS and LSU sequence alignment. Maximum parsimony and Bayesian analyses recovered identical topologies with respect to the relationships among the main clades of members of the order Mytilinidiales. For each node, the following values are provided: maximum parsimony bootstrap (%)/maximum likelihood bootstrap (%) and posterior confidence (p-value). The scale bar represents the expected number of nucleotide substitutions per site. The new species, Lophium pinicola and Mytilinidion mexicanum, are shown in bold.
Jof 10 00725 g003
Figure 4. Drawing of Ericboehmia mexicana Cobos-Villagrán, Raymundo & R. Valenz., showing details of the shape, texture, and distribution of the ascomata.
Figure 4. Drawing of Ericboehmia mexicana Cobos-Villagrán, Raymundo & R. Valenz., showing details of the shape, texture, and distribution of the ascomata.
Jof 10 00725 g004
Figure 5. Ericboehmia mexicana Cobos-Villagrán, Raymundo & R. Valenz.: (AC) ascomata; (D) hymenium; (E) ascus apex with ascospores; (F) ascospores.
Figure 5. Ericboehmia mexicana Cobos-Villagrán, Raymundo & R. Valenz.: (AC) ascomata; (D) hymenium; (E) ascus apex with ascospores; (F) ascospores.
Jof 10 00725 g005
Figure 6. Drawing of Lophium pinicola (Raymundo, Mart.-Pineda, and R. Valenz), showing details of the shape, texture, and distribution of the ascomata.
Figure 6. Drawing of Lophium pinicola (Raymundo, Mart.-Pineda, and R. Valenz), showing details of the shape, texture, and distribution of the ascomata.
Jof 10 00725 g006
Figure 7. Lophium pinicola (Raymundo, Mart.-Pineda, and R. Valenz): (AC) ascomata; (D) hymenium; (E,F) asci and ascospores.
Figure 7. Lophium pinicola (Raymundo, Mart.-Pineda, and R. Valenz): (AC) ascomata; (D) hymenium; (E,F) asci and ascospores.
Jof 10 00725 g007
Figure 8. Drawing of Mytilinidion mexicanum Raymundo, Mart.-Pineda & R. Valenz., showing details of the shape, texture, and distribution of the ascomata.
Figure 8. Drawing of Mytilinidion mexicanum Raymundo, Mart.-Pineda & R. Valenz., showing details of the shape, texture, and distribution of the ascomata.
Jof 10 00725 g008
Figure 9. Mytilinidion mexicanum Raymundo, Mart.-Pineda & R. Valenz.: (AC) ascomata; (D) hymenium; (E) asci; (F) ascospores.
Figure 9. Mytilinidion mexicanum Raymundo, Mart.-Pineda & R. Valenz.: (AC) ascomata; (D) hymenium; (E) asci; (F) ascospores.
Jof 10 00725 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Raymundo, T.; Martínez-González, C.R.; Martínez-Pineda, M.; Cobos-Villagrán, A.; Ramírez-Rosales, I.; Valenzuela, R. Three New Species of Mytilinidioid Fungi (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from Mexico. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10100725

AMA Style

Raymundo T, Martínez-González CR, Martínez-Pineda M, Cobos-Villagrán A, Ramírez-Rosales I, Valenzuela R. Three New Species of Mytilinidioid Fungi (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from Mexico. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(10):725. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10100725

Chicago/Turabian Style

Raymundo, Tania, César R. Martínez-González, Michelle Martínez-Pineda, Aurora Cobos-Villagrán, Isabel Ramírez-Rosales, and Ricardo Valenzuela. 2024. "Three New Species of Mytilinidioid Fungi (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from Mexico" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 10: 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10100725

APA Style

Raymundo, T., Martínez-González, C. R., Martínez-Pineda, M., Cobos-Villagrán, A., Ramírez-Rosales, I., & Valenzuela, R. (2024). Three New Species of Mytilinidioid Fungi (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from Mexico. Journal of Fungi, 10(10), 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10100725

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop