Next Article in Journal
Leadership Theories and the Veterinary Health Care System
Previous Article in Journal
The Effectiveness of Commercial Vaccination against Lawsonia intracellularis in Mitigating the Reduction in ADWG, the Increased Mortality and Fecal Shedding of the Vaccinated Pigs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Veterinary Sciences
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/vetsci9100537
vetsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Endoparasites Infecting Domestic Animals and Spectacled Bears (Tremarctos ornatus) in the Rural High Mountains of Colombia

by
Paula Tatiana Zárate Rodriguez
,
Luisa Fernanda Collazos-Escobar
and
Javier Antonio Benavides-Montaño
*
Animal Science Department, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Palmira Carrera 32 # 12-00, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(10), 537; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9100537
Submission received: 12 August 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 17 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus) is a threatened species, a member of the Ursidae family that lives in the Andes rural high mountain territories of Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia near livestock areas. Parasites in the spectacled bear are a relevant area of interest to preserve this species and understand its habitats and interactions with farm animals. The present work aimed to evaluate the presence of endoparasites in both T. ornatus and domestic animals in these areas, by copro- parasitological examination. The results indicate that some parasites have zoonotic potential in wild endangered species and domestic animals in Colombian regions. More sensitive molecular techniques are needed for further identification of the parasite species.

Abstract

This research described the co-infection prevalence of endoparasites in Tremartus ornatus and domestic animals in the rural high mountains of Colombia by copro-parasitological examination. Some parasites have a zoonotic potential in wild endangered species and domestic animals in Colombian regions. T. ornatus had a notable infection with Eimeria spp., Ascaris spp., Ancylostoma spp., and Baylisascaris spp. Cryptosporidium spp., Balantidium coli, Anoplocephala spp., and Acanthamoeba spp. In B. taurus, Eimeria spp. is coinfecting with Cryptosporidium spp. (6.6%) and represents 18% of the total parasitism. In E. caballus and B. taurus. Eimeria spp. coinfecting (34.7%), with the Strongylus spp. (21.9–25%). In T. ornatus, Eimeria spp. is coinfecting with Ancylostoma spp. (36.2%), Cryptosporidium spp., Ascaris spp., Baylisascaris spp., and B. coli.

1. Introduction

The spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus) is a member of the Ursidae family, grouped in three subfamilies: Tremarctinae (spectacled bear, Tremarctos ornatus); Ailuropodinae (Giant panda, Ailuropoda melanoleuca); and Ursinae (Gray bear, Ursus arctos; American black bear, Ursus americanus; polar bear, Ursus maritimus; Asiatic black bear, Ursus thibetanus; sloth bear, Melursus ursinus; and malayo, Helarctos malayanus) [1,2,3].
T. ornatus is a threatened and endangered species according to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature [4]. This species has been systematically studied in its taxonomy, genetics, reproduction, distribution, habitats, diets, behavior, status, and conservation [5] as well as livestock-based conflicts in Colombia, Ecuador, and Bolivia [5,6].
In Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia, Andean bears occupy more than 260,000 km2 of forested habitat [7]. These specimens are believed to number over 20,000 adults in these countries [7,8]. Unfortunately, T. ornatus’ population has been reduced by 30% to 42% in South America in the last years [9]. These areas are insufficient to guarantee T. ornatus’ preservation [7].
Parasites in Andean bears T. ornatus are a relevant area of interest. Although there is minimal information about the endoparasites of T. ornatus in Colombia, a notable study developed using coprological techniques in the Chingaza National Park described the presence of Cryptosporidium spp., Ascaris spp., Baylisascaris spp., Microsporidium spp., Trichostrongylus spp., Strongylus spp., Blastocystis spp., Fasciola spp., and Trichomonas spp. in T. ornatus [10].
In countries such as Peru, in a wildlife refuge at Yanachaga Chemillen National Park, authors reported the apicomplexans Blastocystis spp. protozoa, Cryptosporidium spp. (14.3%), ciliates such as Giardia spp., and three nematodes: Strongyloides spp. (25%), an undetermined species of Ascarididae (21.4%), and Ancylostomatidae. The most significant prevalence of parasites belonged to the Strongyloididae family (25%), followed by Ascarididae (21.4%) and Cryptosporidiidae (14.3%) [11].
More parasites in fecal samples have been identified during the dry season (87.5%) than in the rainy season (16.7%). Up to date, eight species of endoparasites and one species of ectoparasites have been identified in Andean bears [11]. The black bear (Ursus americanus) is the most researched species in this topic; however, its ecological niches are different from T. ornatus’.
Recently, a new parasites species was discovered: Baylisascaris venezuelensis. This species is closely related to Baylisascaris transfuga [12], a parasite of the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). This relationship suggests that this panda species could probably be a reference for studying parasites in T. ornatus [13]. We consider that T. ornatus must be studied rigorously considering its ecological distribution and food habits. Therefore, it requires better biological support to know more about its parasite dynamics. In this study, we report endoparasites in domestic animals and T. ornatus at the high altitude of the central Andes, where domestic animals and T. ornatus live in common areas. We aim to contribute information about T. ornatus’ ecology and parasite niche relations.
We found endoparasites in domestic animals and wild bear populations in high rural areas of Colombia using copro-parasitological methods. Future studies may complement these results through the implementation of biomolecular analyses. Parasites such as Eimeria spp. are present in both domestic animals and T. ornatus, coinfecting with other parasites such as Cryptosporidium spp. and Buxtonella sulcata.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Population

This field study was carried out in the department of Valle del Cauca, in the rural area of Palmira and Cerrito, in the districts of Combia (lat: 3°40′325″ N, long: 076°03′058″ E, alt: 2179.9 m.a.s.l), Tenerife (lat: 03°44′411″ N, long: 076 04′956″ E, alt: 2898–3844 m.a.s.l), Cañon del Combeima (lat: 04°33′467″ N, long: 075°19′251″ E, alt: 1592–2305 m.a.s.l) during the rainy months of 13 July and 6 December 2021; and the village of Gabriel Lopez, Totoró Municipality, which is located in the Valle de Malvazá, 20 km east of the capital of the Cauca department, 3000 m.a.s.l.

2.1.1. Rural High Mountains of Tenerife, Valle del Cauca

Tenerife is located 1750 to 2750 m.a.s.l, with temperatures of 2 °C–14 °C. The climate is dry, with a relatively well-defined dry season from January to June and a rainy season from July to December. On the other hand, Combia is located in the rural area of Cerrito, where their inhabitants have reported bear attacks. With fewer than ten animals per owner, Combia’s residents have a small production system that guarantees food security through the production of poultry, eggs, milk, and meat [14].

2.1.2. El Silencio, Cañon del Combeima (Tolima)

This is located in the Central Mountain system, within the Parque Nacional Natural los Nevados, on the way to the Nevado del Tolima, at 2600 m.a.s.l. Its waters are essential to sustain the production of Colombian coffee, rice, sorghum, cotton and corn. The wild animals that require preservation in this area are Tapirus pinchaque (mountain tapir), T. ornatus (spectacled bear), Pudu mephistophiles (northern Pudu), Odocoeilus virginianus (white-tailed deer), Silvilagus andinus (Andean tapeti), Leopardus tigrinus (oncilla) and Puma concolor (puma) [15,16].

2.1.3. The Village of Gabriel Lopez, Municipalities of Totoró (Cauca)

This is located in the Valle de Malvazá, 20 km east of the capital of the department of Cauca, at 3000 m.a.s.l. Its temperatures range between 9 °C and 19 °C. The economic activity of its inhabitants revolves around agricultural products such as potatoes, fique, coffee, and aromatics [17]. It borders the Paramo de las Delicias (central mountain range) and the upper basin of the Cauca River, where several water sources of importance are born, such as the Palace River [18]. There are numerous reports of bears attacking and eating cattle and horses in these areas (Figure 1).
The geographic location. High altitude of the central Andean mountains. The farms are located at the border of T. ornatus territory, 2600 to 4100 m.a.s.l. Valle del Cauca, Tolima, and Cauca (Colombia). Generated with ArcGIS, 10.8.1 version of SIG laboratory, Universidad Nacional—Palmira.

2.2. Description Area

Most farms in the rural high mountains are centered on the production of beef and dairy cattle. It is a traditional system without technical support in which calves are allowed to graze freely or are stocked and brought in for lactation twice a day. Diarrhea in calves was reported in some farms. Most animals drink water from rivers or small ponds without water treatment (non-potable).
Some areas have small farms with pigs, cattle, horses, sheep, and pets such as dogs and cats. T. ornatus transits through livestock lands to find food, for instance, “piñuelas” Puya furfuracea (Willd.). The Valle del Cauca is rich in “frailejones” Ruilopezia cardonae (Cuatrec.), Speletia steyermarkii Cuatrec and Hesperomeles goudotiana “mortiño colorado” [19]. (Figure 2). Some cattle owners move animals to high altitudes for them to graze in T. ornatus’ land, invading and affecting this bear’s territory, while also contaminating rivers and water sources (Figure 2A–C).

2.3. Type of Study

This cross-sectional study sought to assess the associations between the disease or health-related traits and other variables of interest in a specific population and time. The presence or absence of the disease and its variables were examined in a sample and without considering the temporal sequence of cause and effect [14]. The prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites was estimated using prevalence (p) = the number of total cases divided by the sum of the population at the moment (×100). The data were expressed in percentages (%). We used at least three stool samples to accurately diagnose parasitic intestinal infections (IPI) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The value for significance of the association and allowable error was 0.05 [20]. We collected 58 stool samples from T. ornatus, but we estimated the populations of bears to range from 40 to 60 specimens.

2.4. Samples

Stool samples (10 g) were obtained from domestic animals, horses, and cattle on the border of the reserve forest, directly from the rectum. Between 13 July and 6 December 2021, we collected fresh feces in the morning (6–12 h old), which were identified with the aid of an experienced park ranger. Fresh samples were recognized by their brown or green color. Saline wet mounts were made by mixing approximately 2 mg of stool with a drop of physiological saline on a microscope glass slide and placing a coverslip over the stool suspension. Samples were also analyzed using iodine wet mounts and microscopically examined with the afore mentioned method. The wet mounts were studied microscopically with a low power objective (10×) followed by switching to a high-powered one (40×). Each stool sample was screened by an experienced microscopist before reporting negative results. Additionally, the Zieh Nielsen technique was employed using 10 g of fuchsine diluted in 100 mL of ethanol and a 5% of phenol solution (5 mL of phenol and 95 mL of water). Then, 10 mL of basic fuchsine was filtered, and 100 mL of phenol solution was added in order to form the mother solution. Excess alcohol was removed with tap water and discolored with 7% H2SO4 until the plate was pale pink, forming a sulphuric acid solution (7% H2SO4, 7 mL of sulphuric acid mixed with 93 mL of Ethanol). Excess colorant was also removed with tap water, and then we added methylene blue or malachite green, spreading it for 3 min. 10 g of methylene blue was diluted in 95% ethanol, and then 30 mL was filtered from the 100 mL of the mother solution; afterwards, 70 mL of water was added. The malachite green solution was conformed of 5 g malachite green diluted in 10% ethanol, 100 mL). The excess colorant was eliminated with tap water and left to dry in order to visualize the plate with immersion oil, using the 100× objective. The parasite analysis was performed with direct microscopic examination using a ZEISS AxioCam ICc 1 microscope, with flotation using the Sheather technique and sedimentation methods, as well as fixation and coloring techniques of Zieh Nielsen [10,14]. Samples were stored at −20 °C for future molecular studies.

3. Results

From 264 fecal samples collected from domestic animals and T. ornatus, we identified that 98/264 specimens were positive to at least one parasite, with a total prevalence of 60.93%. 35/58 were prevalent in T. ornatus (60%) [95% CI = 48–73%], 31/112 in B. taurus (28%) [95% CI = 8–26%], and 22/48 in E. caballus (46%) [95% CI = 26–60%] (Table 1).
Most samples from domestic animals were collected from B. taurus, Equidae Equus caballus, Equus asinus and their crossing. Samples from calf and young bears were more soluble than adults’ feces. None of them had blood, mucus, or clinical parasitic symptoms.
Most of the bear samples were soft with green and brown color due to the nature of the vegetable tissue in the animals’ feeding area (Figure 2E,F). Some samples had a red fruit smell.
We studied the prevalence of parasites associated with more than one species considering the total number of samples (264). We identified that the most frequent association in B. taurus was Eimeria spp. with Cryptosporidium spp. (4/60, 6.6%). Eimeria spp. represents 18% of the total parasite associations, followed by Cryptosporidium spp. In horses and cattle, Eimeria had a strong association with other parasites (34.7%), but most co-infections were associated with the Strongyle family (21.9–25%). In bears, there was a robust parasite co-infection with Eimeria spp., Ancylostoma spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Ascaris spp., Baylisascaris spp., and B. coli (36.2%) (Figure 3).
Using microscopy techniques, we observed different parasites with morphological characteristics and compatible measures with Buxtonella sulcata, Eimeria bovis, Eimeria zuernii, Strongylus vulgaris, Ascaris lumbricoides, Baylisascaris venezuelensis, Ancylostoma ailuropodae and Eimeria pellita; however, further studies using molecular techniques are required to confirm these classifications (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
For example, a cyst of B. sulcata measuring 61.324 × 60.97 µm (Figure 4A) is compatible with a cyst of B. sulcata, which is oval-shaped or round-shaped, yellowish green in color and measuring 54.8–96.2 μm in diameter, with a mean of 67.3 ± 11.1 μm. A double-layered capsule that displays a macronucleus and contractile vacuoles surrounds these cysts (60–68.6 × 60–68.8 µm) [21,22].
In the case of Figure 5F, the 58.9 × 57 µm cyst is consistent with Balantidium coli, a smaller and dark cyst, measuring 40 × 60 µm [23]. The findings in T. ornatus can be attributed to the small pig production systems at high altitude bordering this bear’s lands. Figure 5B shows an egg with 48.7 × 105 µm in size, compatible with Strongylus vulgaris (83–93 × 48–52 µm). Figure 4D displays a cyst measuring 30.9 × 20.5 µm, consistent with Eimeria bovis (25–34 × 17–23 µm) [24]. The cyst measures 20.5 × 19.2 µm, which is compatible with Eimeria zuernii (15–22 × 13–18 µm) Figure 4F [24]. The egg in Figure 5C measures (51 × 36 µm), which is within the dimensions of Ascaris lumbricoides (45–75 × 35–50 μm) [25]. The oval-shape and size of Figure 5D, measuring 63 × 77 µm, is compatible with Baylisascaris venezuelensis (66.3–74.7 × 78.3–88 µm) [12].

4. Discussion

In this study, 264 faecal samples using coproparasitological examinations techniques help to identify gastrointestinal parasites in Tremartus ornatus and domestic animals in the rural high mountains of Colombia. This technique has a lower operational cost and moderate sensitivity and specificity. These techniques are biologically useful, but they need to be complemented with biomolecular technologies in future studies to better understand the biological relations between host and the biology of parasites due to the difficulties in obtaining samples from these animals and optimize the effort in undeveloped countries, where there is limited knowledge available and research investment [14,26,27].
Interestingly, the prevalence of Eimeria spp. in T. ornatus (30%) in this study is biologically relevant (Table 1). The following parasites have been previously reported in Ursus americanus: Eimeria albertensis and Eimeria borealis [28]. In giant panda: Ailuropoda melanoleuca, Eimeria, with a prevalence of 15.9% [26]; in red panda: Ailurus fulgens, Eimeria spp. (67.44%), which is also the most prevalent parasite [27]. Similar studies report Eimeria spp. (47.32%) in Himalayan black bear, Ursus thibetanus. Additionally, Eimeria ursi has been found in brown bears, Ursus arctus, in Eurasia [28]. In Colombia and Ecuador, coccidiosis and Eimeria spp. in T. ornatus has also been reported, but the specific species have not been identified [10,29].
In our study, we found that Eimeria spp. was also the most prevalent (33.08%) in horses. We also found cyst of Eimeria spp. (53.89%) in B. taurus, which had a similar prevalence to the reports of other studies in low and high altitudes (17.4–77.9%) [30,31]. Parasite species such as Eimeria spp. might be transmitted from cattle to bear and vice versa, and probably, as stated previously, the host specificity of this parasite might be caused by adaptive rather than cophylogenetic processes [32,33].
In the case of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia spp., and Microsporidium spp., our study found traces of them in B. taurus (5.36%, 3.57%, 2.68%); E. caballus (4.17%, 0%, 1.7%) and T. ornatus (10%, 1.7%, 0%). Enteric protozoa such as Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. are responsible for causing diarrhea and even death in neonatal and young bovine calves [34,35]. The prevalence reported for cryptosporidiosis in humans, animals, and water sources were 7.8%, 20.4%, and 38.9%, respectively [36].
In horses, we found a 4.2% higher prevalence in this species than in other countries, where the value is 2.3% [37]. We also identified that, in horses, there is association with Microsporidium spp. (6.25%). This data is consistent with previous studies [37]. In our research, Eimeria spp. was found circulating in B. taurus, E. caballus, and T. ornatus. Cryptosporidium spp. is circulating in B. taurus, E. caballus, and T. ornatus. Microsporidium spp. is infecting B. taurus and E. caballus, and finally, Buxtonella spp. was identified in B. taurus, E. caballus, and T. ornatus (Figure 6).
Giardia in horse was not detected in this study with coprological techniques, but G. duodenalis (17.4%) has been previously reported in Colombia’s horses using PCR [38]. Giardia spp. in cattle and T. ornatus has been previously reported in domestic animals and wildlife, particularly G. duodenalis in livestock [39,40]. This parasite was reported in T. ornatus by Figueroa, in Peru [41]. G. duodenalis is a common anthropozoonotic parasite [42].
Although this is the first evidence of Giardia spp. in both species (B. taurus and T. ornatus), it is essential to know the level of parasites impacting their health. This information may have consequences for conservation, associated with nutritional stress, parasitism, and the human-cattle-T. ornatus conflict. As such, intervention may be needed to prevent further damage [43,44]. Genetic characterization of Giardia isolates from humans and T. ornatus and the water used in a closed environment will help to understand the transmission routes and the level of association of this parasites in farms where cattle-horses and bears share common spaces in Colombia at high altitude [45].
The microsporidia are obligate intracellular parasites consisting of at least 200 genera and 1400 species, infecting a broad range of animals (vertebrates and invertebrates). They infect fish, insects, farm animals, humans, and companion pets, leading to zoonotic transmission and affecting immunocompetent and immunocompromised humans [46,47,48]. In giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), Enterocytozoon bieneusi has been identified through PCR techniques with a positive rate of 35.5% [49].
E. bieneusi is the most common human-infecting microsporidian species, which includes pathogens of diverse companion animals and livestock [50]. Fast evolutionary rates, host switching using distant related hosts and habitats, as well as habitats destruction, environmental stress, extensive animal farming, and human encroachment on wild ecosystems may drive these new host-parasite interactions [50].
Microsporidium spp. in T. ornatus was not reported in our study, but we encourage further research using more sensitive molecular techniques on biological evidence, considering that Microsporidios spp. showed a prevalence of 16.66% in a study developed in the Chingaza National Park [10].
Another cattle–bear–horse parasite prevalence was B. sulcata, an opportunistic ciliate protozoan cattle and water buffalo ciliate [51] that inhabits the colon of cattle, causing diarrhea and debilitating the animals. Despite sporadic reports in the literature from the Indian subcontinent [52], it can be misdiagnosed as B. coli, a ciliated protozoan found in the cecum and colon of humans, nonhuman primates and pigs [52,53]. In this study B. coli was present in horses (4.17%), T. ornatus (1.7%), and Cattle (0.89%). Higher infection rates have been reported in cattle (9.9–23.6–38.5%), suggesting the influence of protozoan diarrheal symptoms in bovines [22]. In Egypt, studies conveyed a prevalence of 32.86% [54], 27.7% in Uruguay [55], and 0.32% in Camelus dromedarius [54] and 6.25% in Cattle from Colombia [56,57,58]. Buxtonella spp. has also been identified in feces of rhesus macaques, hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) and agile mangabeys (Cercopithecus agilis) [59].
Interestingly, we did not find previous reports of B. sulcata in horses. Probably the parasite was introduced to America by the Spanish conquistadors, who obtained their horses in northern Africa, where they had been in contact with camels infected with Infundibulorium cameli syn of B. sulcata. Future studies are required to test the association with horses [60].
Regarding nematodes identified in T. ornatus during this study, we found Ascaris spp. (21.7%), Baylisascaris spp. (13.33%), Ancylostoma spp. (15%) and Strongylus spp. (1.67%). Other studies developed in T. ornatus reported Ascaris spp. (55.55%), Baylisascaris spp. (38.88%), Trichostrongylus spp. (11.11%) and Strongylus spp. (16.66%) in the Chingaza National Park of Colombia [10]. In Ecuador, T. ornatus in captivity were found infected by Ancylostoma spp. and Ascaris spp. [29].
Parasites such as Baylisascaris spp. and Ascaris spp. have also been reported in T. ornatus at the zoological or captivity level in USA [61]. Likewise, they have been identified in fecal samples from wild populations in Venezuela and Peru (Strongyloidea, Ascarididae, and Ancylostomatidae) [41]. During our study, we found associations between Ascaris spp.—Ancylostoma spp. (3.44%) and Baylisascaris spp.—Ancylostoma spp. (1.72%) (Figure 3 and Figure 6). In rural high mountains, there have been reports in domestic animals’ nematodes from the Ascarididae family in Toxocara cati (44%), Toxocara canis (25%), and Parascaris equorum (37%) [14].
Baylisascaris spp. has been previously published as B. venezuelensis, since it has already been characterized in T. ornatus using molecular techniques and compared with Baylisascaris transfuga, which has shown a 52.9% prevalence in brown bears [12,62].
Baylisascaris spp. has a monoxenous life cycle [63] and high potential to cause visceral, ocular, and neural migratory larvae in a range of different hosts, such as mammals and birds; therefore, they represent a zoonotic risk [62]. It is critical to warn tourists to prevent a zoonotic outbreak, considering that B. procyonis, B. columnaris and B. transfuga are described as etiological agents of migratory larvae [12,61]. Regarding B. venezuelensis, its level of pathogenicity in bears it is unknown, even though B. schroederi in pandas is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Additional research on the potential risk of B. venezuelensis to spectacled bears is needed [64].
Regarding other nematodes, we report Ancylostoma spp. (15%) in T. ornatus. This species has also been found in Colombia with a prevalence of 5.55% in T. ornatus [10]. Uncinaria sp. has also been documented in the American black bear, Ursus americanus, brown bears and polar bears, Ursus maritimus [65].
Regarding Strongylus spp., we found a prevalence of 1.72% (1/58), which is less than that reported in T. ornatus (16.67%) in Chingaza, Colombia in [10]. Similarly, a prevalence of 25% was reported in Peru [41].
The interaction or multiple associations between wild animals and domestic animals and humans are not completely understood [66], and the potential role of hosts for transmission of zoonotic diseases in rural high mountains is not completely explored, as well as other wild animals that can trigger different dynamics. Zoonotic parasites such as Uncinaria spp., Strongyloides spp., Baylisascaris spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. are present in T. ornatus and domestic animals. This environment can cause potential larval migrans, skin problems as well as enteric human, domestic and wild infections.
Previous reports in humans at high rural mountains by Peña-Quistial shows that Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati had a prevalence of 24% and 44% [14] indicating that these parasites might be circulating in domestic animals that are able to cause larva migrans [14,66]. In the case of Baylisascaris (Ascarididae family, Ascaridida order, phylum Nematoda), its potential role to infect other animals as well as the agent that can cause larva migrans in humans and animals requires further research.
Finally, further research is needed to better understand parasitic dynamics in different seasons and the parasites’ effects on these populations in the high rural mountains of Colombia, where farms located at this altitude increase the likelihood that the mountain bear T. ornatus, under low food conditions, extreme climate events, and deforestation and fragmentation processes, is forced to increase its interaction with domestic animals, which will continue to drive human–bear conflicts [11,67].

5. Conclusions

Endoparasites such as Eimeria spp. in T. ornatus and Cryptosporidium spp. and Buxtonella sulcata are common parasites in T. ornatus, B. taurus and E. caballus that require further studies around the clinical effects in these populations.
We recommend developing seasonal parasites studies as well as research regarding the population dynamic of each parasite to know the levels of exposition throughout the year. Future studies are also needed to identify other parasites species association among T. ornatus, wild and domestic animals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.B.-M.; methodology, J.A.B.-M.; validation, P.T.Z.R. and J.A.B.-M.; formal analysis, P.T.Z.R., L.F.C.-E. and J.A.B.-M.; investigation, P.T.Z.R., L.F.C.-E. and J.A.B.-M.; resources, J.A.B.-M.; data curation, P.T.Z.R. and L.F.C.-E.; writing—original draft preparation, P.T.Z.R. and L.F.C.-E.; writing—review and editing, P.T.Z.R., L.F.C.-E. and J.A.B.-M.; visualization, J.A.B.-M.; supervision, J.A.B.-M.; project administration, J.A.B.-M.; funding acquisition, J.A.B.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Universidad Nacional de Colombia–Palmira–, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Oficina de Investigación y Extensión. Proyecto HERMES Code: 48846. QUIPU Code: 202010026052. Epidemiological association between high mountain livestock production systems and Andean bear (T. ornatus) in the central Andes of Colombia: implications for production systems and environmental conservation. Call for projects to strengthen research and innovation at the National University of Colombia—Palmira campus 2019–2021. Modality: Single modality.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the IDEA Ethical Committee Board on 28 September 2020 (No. 04), assigned by the Institute of Environmental Studies. This project implied little to no risk for the participants. A number of in-depth interviews were conducted with communities of Tenerife, Combia (Palmira-Valle del Cauca; El silencio, Finca la Rivera-Cañon del Combeima (Ibague-Tolima), and La Mesa-Combia-Toez, Cauca. In the case of domestic animal samples, the owners provided written consent for sample collection.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all animal owners involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the collaboration of the Gabriel López Peasant Users Association, Combia and Tenerife communities, as well as Cañon del Combeima populations, which let us collect samples in Rural High Mountains from domestic and wild animals in agriculture and cattle farms at the border of Mountain bear lands. The authors appreciate the sampling collection performed by Carlos Eduardo Agudelo Morales and Gabino. We also thank Nora C. Mesa Cobo for revising and recommendations and Daniel Fernando Vasco Montaño for critical comments to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cristina, C.S.; Lenin, M.H. Sexaje Molecular a Partir de Heces en Osos de Anteojos (Tremarctos ornatus). Rev. Investig. Vet. Perú 2016, 27, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Juárez-Casillas, L.A.; Varas, C. Genética evolutiva y molecular de la familia Ursidae: Una revisión bibliográfica actualizada. Therya 2011, 2, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, L.; Li, Q.W.; Ryder, O.A.; Zhang, Y.P. Phylogeny of the bears (Ursidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 32, 480–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ruiz-García, M.; Vásquez, J.Y.A.; Castellanos, A.; Kolter, L.; Shostell, J.M. Molecular evolution (mitochondrial and nuclear microsatellites markers) in the andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus; Ursidae, Carnivora): How many ESUs are there? In Conservation Genetics in Mammals: Integrative Research Using Novel Approaches; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 165–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. GarcÍA-Rangel, S. Andean bear Tremarctos ornatus natural history and conservation. Mammal Rev. 2012, 42, 85–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Goldstein, I.; Paisley, S.; Wallace, R.; Jorgenson, J.P.; Cuesta, F.; Castellanos, A. Andean bear–livestock conflicts: A review. Ursus 2006, 17, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peyton, B.; Yerena, E.; Rumiz, D.I.; Jorgenson, J.; Orejuela, J. Status of wild Andean bears and policies for their management. Ursus 1998, 10, 87–100. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3873115 (accessed on 13 March 2022).
  8. Kattan, G.; Hernández, O.L.; Goldstein, I.; Rojas, V.; Murillo, O.; Gómez, C.; Restrepo, H.; Cuesta, F. Range fragmentation in the spectacled bear Tremarctos ornatus in the northern Andes. Oryx 2004, 38, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ruiz-García, M.; Arias Vásquez, J.Y.; Restrepo, H.; Cáceres-Martínez, C.H.; Shostell, J.M.; Jezkova, T. The genetic structure of the spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus; Ursidae, Carnivora) in Colombia by means of mitochondrial and microsatellite markers. J. Mammal. 2020, 101, 1072–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Quintero Romero, L.D. Determinación de la Carga Parasitaria en Muestras Fecales de oso Andino (Tremarctos ornatus) en la Región Occidental del Parque Nacional Natural (PNN) Chingaza; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana: Bogotá, Colombia, 2019; Available online: http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa (accessed on 13 March 2022).
  11. Figueroa Pizarro, J. Interacciones humano–oso andino Tremarctos ornatus en el Perú: Consumo de cultivos y depredación de ganado. Therya 2015, 6, 251–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pérez Mata, A.; García Pérez, H.; Gauta Parra, J. Caracterización Morfológica y molecular de Baylisascaris Venezuelensis, N. Sp. De una Infección Natural en el oso Andino de anteojos, Tremarctos ornatus Cuvier, 1825 en Venezuela. Neotrop. Helminthol. 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, T.; Xie, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, D.; Koehler, A.V.; Gasser, R.B. Parasites of the Giant Panda: A Risk Factor in the Conservation of a Species. Adv. Parasitol. 2018, 99, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Peña-Quistial, M.; Benavides-Montaño, J.A.; Duque, N.J.R.; Benavides-Montaño, G. Prevalence and associated risk factors of Intestinal parasites in rural high-mountain communities of the Valle del Cauca-Colombia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Delgado Chávez, A.L.; de Méndez Acero, A. Formulación del Plan de Emergencias Para el Parque Nacional Natural Tayrona Como Herramienta Técnica Para el Fortalecimiento del Plan de Manejo del Área Protegida; Universidad de La Salle: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2008; Available online: https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/ing_ambiental_sanitaria/648 (accessed on 13 March 2022).
  16. UAESPNN. Plan de Manejo del Parque Nacional Natural Los Nevados. 2006–2010. Available online: https://www.guao.org/sites/default/files/biblioteca/Los%20nevados.pdf (accessed on 13 March 2022).
  17. Caicedo Collazos, J.J.; Cortés Landázury, R. De la cuestión agropecuaria, las economías de enclave y los desequilibrios ecológicos en el Valle de Malvazá: Un análisis económico de impacto ambiental. Biotecnol. Sect. Agropecu. Agroind. 2008, 6, 105–119. [Google Scholar]
  18. Morales-Betancourt, J.A.; Estévez-Varón, J.V. El páramo: Ecosistema en vía de extinción? Rev. Luna Azul 2006, 22, 39–51. Available online: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=321727224004 (accessed on 13 March 2022).
  19. Diazgranados, M. A nomenclator for the frailejones (Espeletiinae Cuatrec., Asteraceae). PhytoKeys 2012, 1–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rózsa, L.; Reiczigel, J.; Majoros, G. Quantifying Parasites in Samples of Hosts. J. Parasitol. 2000, 86, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Adhikari, B.B.; Rana, H.; Sultan, K.; Devkota, B.; Nakao, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Sato, H.; Dhakal, I. Prevalence of Buxtonella sulcata in water buffaloes and cows in Chitwan Valley, southern Nepal. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 11, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ganai, A.; Parveen, S.; Kaur, D.; Katoch, R.; Yadav, A.; Godara, R.; Ahamed, I. Incidence of Buxtonella sulcata in bovines in R.S. Pura, Jammu. J. Parasit. Dis. 2015, 39, 446–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ahmed, A.; Ijaz, M.; Ayyub, R.M.; Ghaffar, A.; Ghauri, H.N.; Aziz, M.U.; Ali, S.; Altaf, M.; Awais, M.; Naveed, M.; et al. Balantidium coli in domestic animals: An emerging protozoan pathogen of zoonotic significance. Acta Trop. 2020, 203, 105298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lopez-Osorio, S.; Villar, D.; Failing, K.; Taubert, A.; Hermosilla, C.; Chaparro-Gutierrez, J.J. Epidemiological survey and risk factor analysis on Eimeria infections in calves and young cattle up to 1 year old in Colombia. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Butploy, N.; Kanarkard, W.; Maleewong Intapan, P. Deep Learning Approach for Ascaris lumbricoides Parasite Egg Classification. J. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 2021, 6648038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hu, H.; Zhang, X.; Pei, J.; Su, L.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Wu, X. Investigation on the Morphology and infection situation of intestinal parasites in the wild giant pandas. Anim. J. Econ. Anim. 2018, 22, 106–111. [Google Scholar]
  27. Shrestha, S.; Maharjan, M. Parasitic burden in Red panda (Ailurus fulgens Cuvier, 1825) of Illam district Community forest, Nepal. Nepal. J. Zool. 2015, 3, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hair, J.D.; Mahrt, J.L. Eimeria albertensis n.sp. and E. borealis n.sp. (Sporozoa: Eimeriidae) in black bears Ursus americanus from Alberta. J. Protozool. 1970, 17, 663–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Luzuriaga Espinosa, M.G. Estudio Químico y Parasitológico de Muestras Fecales del oso Andino (Tremarctos ornatus) Provenientes de 2 Reservas Ecológicas, 2 Zoológicos y un Centro de Rescate en el Ecuador; USFQ: Quito, Ecuador, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pinilla Leon, J.C.; Delgado, N.U.; Florez, A.A. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in cattle and sheep in three municipalities in the Colombian Northeastern Mountain. Vet. World 2019, 12, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Pinilla León, J.C.; Flórez, P.; Sierra, M.T.; Morales Ramírez, E.; Sierra, R.; Vásquez de Díaz, M.C.; Tobon, J.C.; Sánchez, A.; Ortiz, D. Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Parasitism in Bovines of Cesar State, Colombia. Available online: https://alicia.concytec.gob.pe/vufind/Record/1609-9117_4e1d2758c2737f0873551aea65de8136/Details (accessed on 13 March 2022).
  32. Johnson, K.P.; Adams, R.J.; Page, R.D.; Clayton, D.H. When do parasites fail to speciate in response to host speciation? Syst. Biol. 2003, 52, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kvičerová, J.; Hypša, V. Host-parasite incongruences in rodent Eimeria suggest significant role of adaptation rather than cophylogeny in maintenance of host specificity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Urquhart, G.; Armour, J.; Duncan, J.; Dunn, A.; Jennings, F. Veterinary Parasitology; Blackwell Science LTD: Oxford, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  35. Soulsby, E.J.L. Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals; Baillière Tindall: London, UK, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  36. Galván-Díaz, A.L. Cryptosporidiosis in Colombia: A Systematic Review. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2018, 5, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Laatamna, A.E.; Wagnerova, P.; Sak, B.; Kvetonova, D.; Xiao, L.; Rost, M.; McEvoy, J.; Saadi, A.R.; Aissi, M.; Kvac, M. Microsporidia and Cryptosporidium in horses and donkeys in Algeria: Detection of a novel Cryptosporidium hominis subtype family (Ik) in a horse. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 208, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Santín, M.; Vecino, J.A.C.; Fayer, R. A large scale molecular study of Giardia duodenalis in horses from Colombia. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 196, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dixon, B.R. Giardia duodenalis in humans and animals—Transmission and disease. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 135, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 110–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Figueroa, J. New records of parasites in free-ranging Andean bears from Peru. Ursus 2015, 26, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Appelbee, A.J.; Thompson, R.C.; Olson, M.E. Giardia and Cryptosporidium in mammalian wildlife—Current status and future needs. Trends Parasitol. 2005, 21, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chapman, C.A.; Schoof, V.A.; Bonnell, T.R.; Gogarten, J.F.; Calmé, S. Competing pressures on populations: Long-term dynamics of food availability, food quality, disease, stress and animal abundance. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 20140112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Johnston, A.R.; Gillespie, T.R.; Rwego, I.B.; McLachlan, T.L.; Kent, A.D.; Goldberg, T.L. Molecular epidemiology of cross-species Giardia duodenalis transmission in western Uganda. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Beck, R.; Sprong, H.; Bata, I.; Lucinger, S.; Pozio, E.; Cacciò, S.M. Prevalence and molecular typing of Giardia spp. in captive mammals at the zoo of Zagreb, Croatia. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 175, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cali, A.; Owen, R.L. Microsporidiosis. In Laboratory Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases Principles and Practice; Balows, A., Hausler, J.W.J., Ohashi, M., Turano, A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1988; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  47. Han, B.; Takvorian, P.M.; Weiss, L.M. Invasion of Host Cells by Microsporidia. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Udonsom, R.; Prasertbun, R.; Mahittikorn, A.; Chiabchalard, R.; Sutthikornchai, C.; Palasuwan, A.; Popruk, S. Identification of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in goats and cattle in Thailand. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, W.; Zhong, Z.; Song, Y.; Gong, C.; Deng, L.; Cao, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Cao, X.; Tian, Y.; Li, H.; et al. Human-Pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in China. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Park, E.; Poulin, R. Two parasites in one host: Spatiotemporal dynamics and co-occurrence of Microsporidia and Rickettsia in an amphipod host. Parasitology 2021, 148, 1099–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Norman Grim, J.; Jirků-Pomajbíková, K.; Ponce-Gordo, F. Light microscopic morphometrics, ultrastructure, and molecular phylogeny of the putative pycnotrichid Ciliate, Buxtonella sulcata. Eur. J. Protistol. 2015, 51, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mughal, M.A.S.; Khan, M.K.; Abbas, Z.; Chatha, A.K.; Abbas, R.Z.; Qureshi, A.S.; Mahmood, M.S.; Ali, S.; Sindhu, Z.-U.-D.; Zafar, A.; et al. First report on the epidemiology of Buxtonella sulcata in bovines in Pakistan. Res. Sq. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Al-Bakri, H.S.; Suliman, E.G.; Al-Saffar, T.M. Prevalence of intestinal ciliate Buxtonella sulcata in cattle in Mosul. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci. 2010, 24, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. El-Dakhly, K.M.; Arafa, W.M.; Mahrous, L.N.; Yousef, A.M. Gastrointestinal Helminthic Infections in Egyptian Domestic Camels, Camelus dromedarius, with a Special Reference to Trichostrongylids. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 2020, 10, 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  55. Correa, O.; Castro, O.R.A. Presence of the ciliated protozoan Buxtonella sulcata (Trichostomatia, Balantidiidae) in cattle in Uruguay. Veterinaria 2015, 51, 32–37. [Google Scholar]
  56. Forero, J.A.V.; Bernal, C.E.M. Prevalencia de Buxtonella sulcata en bovinos de la Sabana de Bogota; Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Facultad de Medicina Veterianria y Zootecnia: Bogotá, Colombia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  57. Griffiths, I.B.; Parra, D.G.; Vizcaino, O.G.; Gallego, M.I. Prevalence of parasite eggs and cysts in faeces from dairy cows in Colombia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 1986, 18, 155–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hernández Guzmán, J.A. Presencia de Parásitos Gastrointestinales y Pulmonares en Bovinos Lecheros de dos Hatos de la Sabana de Bogotá, Colombia; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana: Bogotá, Colombia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pomajbíková, K.; Oborník, M.; Horák, A.; Petrželková, K.J.; Grim, J.N.; Levecke, B.; Todd, A.; Mulama, M.; Kiyang, J.; Modrý, D. Novel insights into the genetic diversity of Balantidium and Balantidium-like cyst-forming ciliates. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schuster, R.K. Parasites of dromedaries and bactrian camels—A review Part 1: Stenoxenous parasites. J. Camel Pract. Res. 2018, 25, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Schaul, J. Baylisascaris Transfuga in Captive and Free-Ranging Populations of Bears (Family: Ursidae). Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  62. Štrkolcová, G.; Goldová, M.; Šnábel, V.; Špakulová, M.; Orosová, T.; Halán, M.; Mojžišová, J. A frequent roundworm Baylisascaris transfuga in overpopulated brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Slovakia: A problem worthy of attention. Acta Parasitol. 2018, 63, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sapp, S.G.; Gupta, P.; Martin, M.K.; Murray, M.H.; Niedringhaus, K.D.; Pfaff, M.A.; Yabsley, M.J. Beyond the raccoon roundworm: The natural history of non-raccoon Baylisascaris species in the New World. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2017, 6, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhang, J.-S.; Daszak, P.; Huang, H.-L.; Yang, G.-Y.; Kilpatrick, A.M.; Zhang, S. Parasite threat to panda conservation. EcoHealth 2008, 5, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rogers, L.L. Parasites of black bears of the Lake Superior region. J. Wildl. Dis. 1975, 11, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mackenstedt, U.; Jenkins, D.; Romig, T. The role of wildlife in the transmission of parasitic zoonoses in peri-urban and urban areas. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2015, 4, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rojas Vera Pinto, R.A.; Butrón, R.; Martel, C. Reports of feeding incidents of cattle by andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus) in Central Peru. Rev. Mex. Mastozool. (Nueva Epoca) 2020, 10, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vetsci 09 00537 g001 550
Figure 1. The geographic location. High altitude of Central Andean Mountains. The farms are located at the border of T. ornatus territory, 2600 to 4100 m.a.s.l. Valle del Cauca, Tolima, and Cauca (Colombia). Generated with ArcGIS, version 10.8.1 of SIG laboratory, Universidad Nacional—Palmira.
Figure 1. The geographic location. High altitude of Central Andean Mountains. The farms are located at the border of T. ornatus territory, 2600 to 4100 m.a.s.l. Valle del Cauca, Tolima, and Cauca (Colombia). Generated with ArcGIS, version 10.8.1 of SIG laboratory, Universidad Nacional—Palmira.
Vetsci 09 00537 g001
Vetsci 09 00537 g002 550
Figure 2. Cattle farms at the High altitude of Central Andean Mountain are located at the border of T. ornatus’ territory (A–C). Awareness-raising campaign to conserve the land of the Andean bear and protect its territories (D), Feces collected from T. ornatus (E,F).
Figure 2. Cattle farms at the High altitude of Central Andean Mountain are located at the border of T. ornatus’ territory (A–C). Awareness-raising campaign to conserve the land of the Andean bear and protect its territories (D), Feces collected from T. ornatus (E,F).
Vetsci 09 00537 g002
Vetsci 09 00537 g003 550
Figure 3. Quantity of individuals for each possible combination of endoparasites. Eim: Eimeria, Cry: Cryptosporidium spp., Giard: Giardia spp., Micro: Microsporidium spp., Trich: Trichostrongylus spp., Entam: Entamoeba spp., Str. Strongylus spp; Taenia: Taenia spp., Bux: Buxtonella sulcata, Par: Parascaris equorum, Std: Strongyloides spp., Asc: Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancy: Ancylostoma spp., Bayli: Bailisascaris venezuelensis, Balant: B. coli.
Figure 3. Quantity of individuals for each possible combination of endoparasites. Eim: Eimeria, Cry: Cryptosporidium spp., Giard: Giardia spp., Micro: Microsporidium spp., Trich: Trichostrongylus spp., Entam: Entamoeba spp., Str. Strongylus spp; Taenia: Taenia spp., Bux: Buxtonella sulcata, Par: Parascaris equorum, Std: Strongyloides spp., Asc: Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancy: Ancylostoma spp., Bayli: Bailisascaris venezuelensis, Balant: B. coli.
Vetsci 09 00537 g003
Vetsci 09 00537 g004 550
Figure 4. Eggs and cysts found in E. caballus and B. taurus. E. caballus: Buxtonella sulcata (A), Strongylus spp. (B) Strongyloides spp. (C), Eimeria bovis. (D), Trichostrongylus spp. (E); Eimeria zuernii (F).
Figure 4. Eggs and cysts found in E. caballus and B. taurus. E. caballus: Buxtonella sulcata (A), Strongylus spp. (B) Strongyloides spp. (C), Eimeria bovis. (D), Trichostrongylus spp. (E); Eimeria zuernii (F).
Vetsci 09 00537 g004
Vetsci 09 00537 g005 550
Figure 5. Eggs and cysts found in T ornatus. Ancylostoma spp. (A), Strongylus spp. (B); Ascaris spp. (C), Baylisascaris spp. (D), Strongyloides spp. (E), B. coli (F). Smear with carbon fuchsine exhibiting acid-fast staining Ziehl–Neelsen (G), Cryptosporidium oocysts 40× (H) and 100× (I).
Figure 5. Eggs and cysts found in T ornatus. Ancylostoma spp. (A), Strongylus spp. (B); Ascaris spp. (C), Baylisascaris spp. (D), Strongyloides spp. (E), B. coli (F). Smear with carbon fuchsine exhibiting acid-fast staining Ziehl–Neelsen (G), Cryptosporidium oocysts 40× (H) and 100× (I).
Vetsci 09 00537 g005
Vetsci 09 00537 g006 550
Figure 6. Endoparasites between domestic animals and T. ornatus. Eim: Eimeria spp., Cry: Cryptosporidium spp., Giard: Giardia spp., Micro: Microsporidium spp., Trich: Trichostrongylus spp., Entam: Entamoeba spp., Str: Strongyle; Taenia: Taenia spp., Bux: Buxtonella sulcata, Par: Parascaris equorum, Strng: Strongyloide spp., Asc: Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancy: Ancylostoma spp., Bayli: Bailisascaris spp., Balant: Balantidium coli.
Figure 6. Endoparasites between domestic animals and T. ornatus. Eim: Eimeria spp., Cry: Cryptosporidium spp., Giard: Giardia spp., Micro: Microsporidium spp., Trich: Trichostrongylus spp., Entam: Entamoeba spp., Str: Strongyle; Taenia: Taenia spp., Bux: Buxtonella sulcata, Par: Parascaris equorum, Strng: Strongyloide spp., Asc: Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancy: Ancylostoma spp., Bayli: Bailisascaris spp., Balant: Balantidium coli.
Vetsci 09 00537 g006
Table
Table 1. Prevalence of endoparasites of domestic animals and T. ornatus in Tolima, Valle del Cauca, and Cauca (Colombia).
Table 1. Prevalence of endoparasites of domestic animals and T. ornatus in Tolima, Valle del Cauca, and Cauca (Colombia).
SpeciesPrevalence MeansPrevalence IC 95%
Cattle-Bos tauros
Eimeria spp.53.89% (SD ± 4.6%)41–66%
Cryptosporidium spp.5.36% (SD ± 2.5%)0.3–11%
Giardia spp.3.57% (SD ± 1.7%)1.1–8.3%
Microsporidium spp.2.68% (SD ± 1.3%)1.4–6.8%
Trichostrongylus spp.2.68% (SD ± 1.3%)1.4–6.8%
Entamoeba spp.1.79% (SD ± 0.9%)1.6–5.1%
Fasciola spp.1.79% (SD ± 0.86%)1.6–5.1%
Buxtonella spp.0.89 % (SD ± 0.43)−1.5–0.03%
Equus caballus
Eimeria spp.33.08% (SD ± 2.08%)16.8–49.4%
Strongylus spp.18.08% (SD ± 2.50%)4.7–31.4%
Cryptosporidium spp.4.17% (SD ± 2.08%)2.8–11.1%
Buxtonella spp.4.17% (SD ± 2.50%)2.8–11.1%
Taenia spp.4.17% (SD ± 5.42%)2.8–11.1%
Parascaris equorum2.08% (SD ± 2.92%)2.9–7.0%
Microsporidium spp.2.08% (SD ± 2.92%)2.9–7.0%
Strongyloides spp.2.08% (SD ± 3.96%)2.9–7.0%
Trichonema spp.2.08% (SD ± 3.96%)2.9–7.0%
Mesocestoides spp.2.08% (SD ± 1.46%)2.9–7.0%
Dicroelium spp.2.08% (SD ± 1.46%)2.9–7.0%
Tremarctos ornatus
Eimeria spp.30.0% (SD ± 7.07%)18.2–41.8%
Ascaris spp.21.7% (SD ± 5.11%)11.1–32.3%
Ancylostoma spp.15.0% (SD ± 3.54%)5.8–24.2%
Baylisascaris spp.13.3% (SD ± 3.14%)4.6–22.1%
Cryptosporidium spp.10.0% (SD ± 2.36%)2.3–17.7%
Balantidium coli5.0% (SD ± 1.18%)0.6–10.6%
Anaplocephalidae spp.3.3% (SD ± 0.79%)1.3–8.0%
Acanthamoeba spp.1.7% (SD ± 0.39%)1.6–5.0%
Dientamoeba spp.1.7% (SD ± 0.39%)1.6–5.0%
Diphyllobotrium spp.1.7% (SD ± 0.39%)1.6–5.0%
Fluke1.7% (SD ± 0.39%)1.6–5.0%
Giardia spp.1.7% (SD ± 0.39%)1.6–5.0%
Paramphistomum spp.1.7% (SD ± 0.39%)1.6–5.0%
Parascaris spp.1.7% (SD ± 0.39%)1.6–5.0%
Stephanurus spp.1.7% (SD ± 0.39%)1.6–5.0%
Strongylus spp.1.7% (SD ± 0.39%)1.6–5.0%
Buxtonella spp.1.7% (SD ± 0.39%)1.6–5.0%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zárate Rodriguez, P.T.; Collazos-Escobar, L.F.; Benavides-Montaño, J.A. Endoparasites Infecting Domestic Animals and Spectacled Bears (Tremarctos ornatus) in the Rural High Mountains of Colombia. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9100537

AMA Style

Zárate Rodriguez PT, Collazos-Escobar LF, Benavides-Montaño JA. Endoparasites Infecting Domestic Animals and Spectacled Bears (Tremarctos ornatus) in the Rural High Mountains of Colombia. Veterinary Sciences. 2022; 9(10):537. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9100537

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zárate Rodriguez, Paula Tatiana, Luisa Fernanda Collazos-Escobar, and Javier Antonio Benavides-Montaño. 2022. "Endoparasites Infecting Domestic Animals and Spectacled Bears (Tremarctos ornatus) in the Rural High Mountains of Colombia" Veterinary Sciences 9, no. 10: 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9100537

APA Style

Zárate Rodriguez, P. T., Collazos-Escobar, L. F., & Benavides-Montaño, J. A. (2022). Endoparasites Infecting Domestic Animals and Spectacled Bears (Tremarctos ornatus) in the Rural High Mountains of Colombia. Veterinary Sciences, 9(10), 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9100537

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop