Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Music during a Physical Examination Skills Practice: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Infection by Microsporum canis in Paediatric Patients: A Veterinary Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Myocardial Adiponectin Isoform Shift in Dogs with Congestive Heart Failure—A Comparison to Hibernating Brown Bears (Ursus arctos horribilis)

Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach to Canine Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease

Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, 205 Duck Pond Dr., Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Sonja Fonfara and Lynne O’Sullivan
Vet. Sci. 2017, 4(4), 47;
Received: 23 June 2017 / Revised: 9 September 2017 / Accepted: 20 September 2017 / Published: 26 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Comparison of Cardiovascular Systems and Diseases Across Species)


The most common heart disease that affects dogs is myxomatous mitral valve disease. In this article, we review the current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to this disease, and we also present some of the latest technological advancements in this field.
Keywords: dogs; heart; echocardiography; mitral repair dogs; heart; echocardiography; mitral repair

1. Introduction

Among canine cardiac diseases, myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) represents, by far, the most common. In general, the disease is more prevalent in small breeds than in large breeds, and some small breeds are reported to have an incidence close to 100% over a dog’s lifetime [1,2]. However, large breed dogs can be affected as well [3,4].
A heritable, genetically-determined component for the disease can be implied by the strong predilection for small breeds in general, and particularly for certain breeds (i.e., Cavalier King Charles Spaniels, Dachshund), in which the heritability of disease status and severity has been demonstrated [5,6,7]. However, the etiology of the myxomatous process is still unknown and under investigation. Some experimental evidence seems to support a possible role of the serotonin signaling pathway triggered by altered mechanical stimuli in the disease development [8,9,10,11,12]. In this hypothesis, the activation of tension mechanosensors is associated with a local increase of expression of the main serotonin synthesizing enzyme, tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1) and, therefore, a postulated increase in autocrine production of serotonin at the level of the leaflets [9,13,14,15]. Also supporting this hypothesis, in vitro experiments of Lacerda and colleagues showed that canine mitral leaflets undergoing static and cyclic strains, compared to unstrained controls, express increased amount of activated interstitial cell phenotype markers, glycosaminoglycans synthetic enzymes, proteoglycans, extracellular matrix catabolic enzymes, and TPH1 [14]; however, a pig model of MR failed to show increased mitral valve (MV) expression of TPH1 compared to controls [9]. Differences in species and techniques used do not allow a direct comparison of the two studies, and further investigation of this pathway is needed for confirming this hypothesis.
The pathophysiology of the disease, on the other hand, is well described. Valves affected by the myxomatous degeneration undergo a process of microscopic structural derangement which ultimately leads to the macroscopic alterations that cause incomplete apposition of the mitral leaflets and, therefore, mitral regurgitation (MR). In valves affected by MMVD, cellularity and matrix deposition are increased [8,12,15]. The valvular interstitial cells (VIC) change phenotype, transforming into a more myofibroblast type [16]; collagenolytic enzymes and matrix metalloproteinases are increasingly expressed [14], and glycosaminoglycans infiltrate the spongiosa layer, disrupting collagen fiber orientation. These changes impair the biomechanical properties of the valve, and its ability to withstand the forces to which is subjected [17]. Grossly, affected MVs appear thick and nodular, and the degree of severity and distribution of the lesions is age related [18]. Lesions usually start as isolated nodules on the free edge of the leaflets, and they progress to eventually coalesce and involve larger areas of the valve and of the chordae tendineae, therefore compromising leaflet coaptation and causing MR. The severity of MR ultimately determines the amount of left atrial and left ventricular remodeling and the hemodynamic consequences of the disease.

2. Diagnosis

Even though in geriatric dogs of predisposed breeds the identification of a left apical holosystolic murmur is almost unequivocally caused by MMVD [19], many dogs affected by mild disease can present without an audible murmur [20] and, therefore, the definitive diagnosis of this condition is made by performing an echocardiographic exam. Affected valves have a nodular, thickened appearance (Figure 1). The anterior mitral leaflet is more often affected, and bi-leaflet involvement is also common, while isolated lesions on the posterior leaflet are somewhat rare [21]. The free edge of the leaflet is usually more affected than the annular region.
Evidence of MR is confirmed by Doppler echocardiography that allows identifying the presence of a systolic, high velocity regurgitant jet originating from the left ventricle, accelerating at the level of the MV, and directed into the left atrium (LA). Given the diverse involvement of the two leaflets, often the regurgitant jet appears eccentric and multiple jets could be present.

3. Assessing Disease Severity

The severity of MMVD is assessed by combining information from history, physical exam and various imaging modalities. Exercise intolerance, presence of cough, decreased appetite, difficulty breathing, and syncopal episodes are history findings that have been associated with a poorer prognosis in affected dogs [22,23,24]. At physical examination, murmur grade and absence of sinus arrhythmia can be predictive of cardiac death [22]. Thoracic radiographs allow assessment of cardiac enlargement [25,26] and presence of pulmonary edema [27], which in dogs with MMVD is usually the hallmark of congestive heart failure (CHF). Echocardiography, however, should be considered the non-invasive gold standard for cardiac evaluation [28]. Therefore, the main echocardiographic parameters used for assessing MMVD are reviewed in the next section, followed by a brief outline of some most recent advances in echocardiography.

3.1. Conventional Echocardiography

3.1.1. Assessing MR Severity

During systole, some portions of one or both leaflets could appear bulging into the LA as a result of mitral prolapse (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The chordae tendinae can be involved in the degenerative process as well, appearing thickened and elongated. Due to these changes, they fail in their mechanical task of holding the valve in place during systole, causing a portion of the valve to prolapse or even “flail” into the LA. Assessing MR severity is important for monitoring disease progression, and could help to predict the outcome of affected dogs [29,30], as MR represents the main hemodynamic derangement of the disease and, therefore, the cause of congestive heart failure (CHF). Assessment of the severity of MR can be semi-quantitative or quantitative. Probably the most commonly used semi-quantitative method is the ratio between the area of the regurgitant jet signal and the LA area (ARJ/LAA) [31]; with this technique MR is defined as mild (ARJ/LAA < 30%), moderate (30% ≤ ARJ/LAA ≤ 70%), or severe (ARJ/LAA > 70%) [32,33]. This method is affected by several technical and hemodynamic limitations [31], but has been demonstrated to correlate quite well to other more advanced Doppler techniques [33], and it is relatively easy to perform and not time-consuming. A more accurate method for quantifying MR is the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) [34]. Although this method is more time-consuming, it provides more information, allowing the calculation of effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), regurgitant volume (RV), and regurgitant fraction (RF). However, even MR quantification based on PISA can lack accuracy or be precluded by eccentric or multiple regurgitant jets, and by orifice shapes different from circular [34,35]. Other methods that can be used for evaluating MR severity are the subjective assessment of the density of the continuous wave Doppler trace and its comparison to the intensity of the MV inflow signal [36,37], and the measurement of the diameter of the vena contracta [38].

3.1.2. Assessing Cardiac Remodeling

Mitral regurgitation is often referred to cause a pure volume overload [39]. The extra volume that is added to the LA during systole by the MR re-enters the left ventricle (LV) at each diastole, increases the diastolic wall stress and triggers the response of atrial and ventricular remodeling. Given the progressive nature of LA and LV enlargement, serial measurements of these chambers are important steps for assessing disease severity and progression [40]. Moreover, LA and ventricular sizes, and their magnitude of change, proved to be important independent predictors of survival in a multitude of studies [23,24,29,30,41].
Left atrial dimensions can be quantified using several echocardiographic techniques [42,43,44]. The most common assessment of LA dimension entails standardization of the LA diameter to the animal body size through measurement of the aortic root diameter (Ao), and calculation of the ratio LA:Ao. In a mixed healthy canine population, this ratio is found to be <1.6 [42], and LA:Ao > 1.5 is commonly used to define LA enlargement [11,43,45]. However, given the complex shape and remodeling patterns of the LA, an assessment that takes into account different echocardiographic views [42], or a volumetric assessment of the LA [44,46], could constitute a more comprehensive evaluation of LA size. The bi-plane area-length method for determining LA volume performed superiorly to LA:Ao for identification of mild atrial enlargement in the study of Wesselowski et al. [44]. When evaluated with this technique, two studies proposed a maximum LA volume of 0.92 mL/Kg and 1.1 mL/Kg as normal reference values, respectively [44,46].
Assessing the LV also provides important information in the evaluation of disease severity and progression. The mechanisms involved in LV remodeling and enlargement secondary to MR are a set of complex mechanical stimuli and molecular responses [39], which lead to a progressive increase in end-diastolic and end-systolic volume. As for atrial dimensions, efforts have been made for producing estimates of LV dimensions that would faithfully reflect the progression in LV enlargement, and would be unrelated to the size of the dog [47,48,49,50]. One of the most accurate and extensive investigations of canine cardiac dimensions identified an allometric relationship between body weight and M-Mode derived LV end systolic diameter (LVIDs) and end diastolic diameter (LVIDd) [50], allowing the definition of prediction intervals for a wide range of body weights (BW). Briefly, the M-Mode derived LVIDd divided by the dog’s BW elevated to the power of 0.294 (BW0.294) should be ≤1.85, while the M-Mode derived LVIDs divided by the dog’s BW elevated to the power of 0.315 (BW0.315) should be ≤1.26; values greater than these will indicate LV enlargement. Systolic function could also be impaired in dogs with MMVD [3,4]. However, the evaluation of systolic function is difficult in dogs affected by MMVD because of the change in ventricular loading conditions. With the progression of the disease, in fact, MR imposes a progressive increase in preload and slight decrease in afterload. All the non-invasive indices of cardiac function are affected by these changes to some extent. Fractional shortening and ejection fraction are, in fact, usually increased in the hyper dynamic ventricle of an affected dog, and this reduces the sensitivity of these indices for assessing LV dysfunction [51]. In this condition, a decrease in systolic function could be suggested by an increase in end systolic left ventricular dimensions. Particularly, given the above-mentioned relationship between this measurement and body sizes, an allometrically scaled LVIDs > 1.26 indicates an increase in LVIDs, and can be suggestive of LV systolic dysfunction in patients affected by MMVD.

3.2. Advanced Echocardiographic Techniques

The continuous technological development of echocardiography keeps providing new, advanced tools for the evaluation of cardiac dimension and function. Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) allows quantification of myocardial motion, and its use in healthy dogs and dogs with MMVD for assessing the left and the right ventricles has been extensively investigated [52,53,54,55]. The most useful variable commonly obtained is the ratio between early diastolic mitral inflow peak velocity (E-wave) and the peak early diastolic motion of the parietal mitral annulus (e’-wave). With progression of MMVD, early LV filling is affected by increasing LA pressure and diastolic dysfunction, which have opposite impacts, making the assessment of these conditions difficult. Myocardial motion and, thus, the e’ wave, however, is less affected by loading conditions compared to the E-wave [56]. Therefore, the ratio E/e’ could be used for predicting LV filling pressures by removing most of the effect of the diastolic dysfunction [57]. However, these assumptions do not always hold in the severe volume overload caused by MMVD, or in scenarios in which diastolic function is preserved [58,59], limiting the ability of this variable to accurately predict LV filling pressures in dogs with severe MMVD.
Attempts have been made also to use tissue Doppler indices, as well as speckle-tracking-derived strain and strain rate, to obtain load-independent indices of LV systolic function [60,61]. However, from these studies a TDI or speckle-tracking derived index of systolic function for dogs with MMVD could not be identified.
Some TDI variables have also been reported to be useful to predict the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PHT) in dogs affected by MMVD [55,62]. Particularly, in one study cutoff values of 10 and 9.33 for E/e’ ratio calculated using the e’ of the lateral and septal MV annulus, respectively, were moderately accurate in predicting the presence of PHT in dogs affected by MMVD [55]. In another study from Serres and colleagues, a global tricuspid TDI (defined as the parietal tricuspid annular systolic velocity multiplied by the ratio between early and late diastolic velocities) greater than 11.8 had 89% sensitivity and 93% specificity in distinguishing between normal dogs and dogs with an estimated systolic pulmonary arterial pressure >30 mmHg [62]. However, in these studies the pulmonary pressure was estimated on the basis of tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity, a technique known to lack accuracy [63,64].
The lack of a third dimension in conventional echocardiography poses a limit to the amount of information that can be derived from 2D images and cine-loops. Most of the calculation of areas and volumes that are performed using this technique rely on geometrical assumptions, attempting to approximate complex three-dimensional cardiac structures. Preliminary experiments in the development of three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) were started during late 1970s and early 1980s [65,66,67,68] with the first dedicated analysis of the MV morphology in 1989 by Levine and colleagues [69]. Following decades of studies and validation against gold standards, transthoracic and transesophageal 3DE are now recommended diagnostics for evaluating cardiac chambers and valves in humans [70,71]. The first report of a 3D reconstruction of a dog’s ventricle using ultrasonographic data was published in 1979 [72]. However, it was 2010 before the first publication in the veterinary field regarding the use of real-time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (RT-3DTTE) in clinical settings in dogs with and without acquired cardiovascular diseases was published [73]. In that study, conventional methods for estimating end-systolic and end-diastolic LV volumes (two 2D methods and the Teichholz method from M-Mode images) were compared to RT-3DTTE, finding good agreement between the 2D techniques and RT-3DTTE, and confirming a known overestimation of the LV volumes by the Teichholz method. In the same study, the estimation of LA sizes using RT-3DTTE was also investigated and compared to LA/Ao measures, finding increasing differences between the two techniques with atrial dilatation. Another study compared LA measurements obtained using RT-3DTTE in 32 healthy dogs to several 2D methods for estimating LA sizes [74]. In this study, only allometric scaling of 2D LA measurements correlated with LA volume obtained using RT-3DTTE [74].
Subsequently, an analysis of LV volumes in healthy dogs and dogs affected by MMVD was performed [75], and found that end-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes significantly expand only in dogs that are severely affected, and that the central portion of the LV, compared to the basilar and apical portions, is the main contributor to this increase in volumes. Furthermore, the LV was found to change into a more spherical shape, with potential implications on the geometry of the MV apparatus.
In 2016, our group first reported the use of RT-3DTTE for performing a dedicated evaluation of the MV in healthy dogs [76]. In this study, we demonstrated that performing analysis of canine MVs using RT-3DTTE and a dedicated software for off-line analysis is feasible and repeatable. Additionally, we described how a population of healthy dogs of different breeds presents an overall elliptical, saddle-shaped MV annulus. Interestingly, in subsequent work, when healthy dogs were compared to dogs affected by MMVD, we found that dogs with the disease present an MV of abnormal morphology, which tends to lose its elliptical and saddle shape in favor of a more circular and flatter morphology [77] (Figure 4). The cross-sectional nature of this study, however, does not allow to infer whether the abnormal MV morphology is somehow a contributor to the etiopathogenesis of the disease, or just a consequence of the overall pathologic changes occurring in MMVD.

4. Therapy

4.1. Medical Therapy

Dogs affected by MMVD are mostly managed by administering drugs with the purpose of prolonging survival time. The “Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of canine chronic valvular heart disease” stipulated in 2009 by a panel of experts in veterinary cardiology, and currently undergoing a review process, defined the standard therapeutic guidelines for dogs affected by MMVD, along with the adoption of a staging system meant to guide the clinician in the therapeutic choices [26].
In general, dogs affected by hemodynamically-insignificant MMVD (without echocardiographic or radiographic evidence of cardiac enlargement, i.e., ACVIM Stage B1) are not suggested to receive any treatment, but it is advised to periodically monitor these dogs in order to identify disease progression.
In 2016, the conclusion of a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy of pimobendan for delaying the onset of CHF in dogs with preclinical MMVD (EPIC study) with LA and LV enlargement (i.e., ACVIM Stage B2) suggested that administration of pimobendan was associated with a prolongation of the preclinical period by approximately 15 months, compared to the placebo group [78]. Regarding the use of ACE-inhibitors in this stage of the disease, studies have shown contrasting results [79,80], and their administration is, therefore, not recommended by a consensus of the panelists. It is very important to remark, however, that ACVIM Stage B2 dogs represent a heterogeneous group of patients. Therefore, the benefit observed in the EPIC study can be inferred only for dogs that respect inclusion criteria of this study. In fact, for being enrolled in the aforementioned trial, dogs had to have evidence of significant left cardiac enlargement both at echocardiographic examination (LA/Ao ≥ 1.6, LVIDd divided by allometric scaled BW ≥ 1.7) and on thoracic radiographs (Vertebral Heart Score > 10.5).
Dogs affected by MMVD that develop CHF are considered to be in ACVIM Stage C. Chronic pharmacologic management of dogs in this stage is usually comprised of furosemide to provide diuresis, ACE-inhibitors and spironolactone to counteract renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation [80,81,82], and pimobendan to improve forward stroke volume [83,84]. However, Stage C dogs do require a tailored pharmacological approach in which drugs and their dosages are adjusted on the basis of the patient’s clinical condition. Management of the life-threatening, acute episodes of CHF or other complications, such as development of atrial fibrillation, may require the use of other drugs such as digoxin, diltiazem, hydralazine, and amlodipine. Since cough can be present, and may significantly affect quality of life, cough suppressants such as hydrocodone and bronchodilators are sometimes used [85,86].
When escalating the drugs’ dosages does not result anymore in the expected improvement in clinical conditions, the dog is considered in the refractory stage (i.e., ACVIM Stage D) of the disease. As for dogs in ACVIM Stage C, this category of patients requires a tailored approach that attempts to prolong survival mainly by means of diuresis, improvement of patient’s oxygenation status, reduction of afterload, control of arrhythmias and cough. Torsemide is a loop diuretic and chloride channel blocker which exerts a more potent and longer lasting diuresis than furosemide, produces less kaliuresis, and is also reported to have an aldosterone blocking effect [87,88,89,90]. The amount of scientific evidence relative to the safety and efficacy of this drug in dogs with MMVD and CHF is currently limited, and its use is usually reserved for dogs who become refractory to furosemide, i.e., dogs that experience reoccurrence of CHF despite high doses of furosemide (≥4 mg/kg/day) [88].
A potential complication associated with MMVD is the development of PHT as a result of elevated LV filling pressures [91,92]. Pulmonary hypertension has been recognized as a negative prognostic factor in dogs with MMVD, and an estimated systolic pulmonary pressure greater than 55 mmHg is an independent predictor of poor outcome in dogs with ACVIM Stage B2 and C MMVD [93]. Sildenafil is a selective phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor which promotes pulmonary vasodilation, therefore, lowering the pulmonary pressure. Its use in dogs with PHT secondary to MMVD has not being extensively evaluated, but some studies identify a benefit in quality of life and clinical signs in dogs with PHT treated with sildenafil [94,95,96]. Therefore, its use in patients with CHF caused by MMVD and elevated pulmonary pressure may be considered. However, it is important to recognize that PHT in patients with left-sided heart failure is initially due to high LA pressure and that these patients usually respond well to diuretics. Therefore, it is opinion of the authors that in dogs with PHT and MMVD, sildenafil should be considered only in those cases when diuretics are not successful in lowering the pulmonary pressure.

4.2. Surgical Therapy

The treatment of choice in humans affected by severe MR is MV surgery [97]. The medical therapy mentioned in the previous paragraph, in fact, palliates the symptoms and prolongs survival of affected dogs, but has no effect on the main mechanism that leads to CHF, that is, MR due to the valvular lesions. Conventional MV repair techniques require cardio-pulmonary bypass in order to perform left atriotomy, direct visualization of the MV, mitral annuloplasty, and chordae tendinae replacement [98]. The final goal of the technique is to restore leaflet coaptation and, therefore, to diminish/abolish MR. Unfortunately, the technique requires a very well trained team and special equipment, which discourages the widespread use of this practice in veterinary medicine. To date in fact, routine successful MV repair in dogs is performed only by one team worldwide [98,99,100,101].

4.2.1. Mitral Valve Replacement

Mitral valve replacement has been attempted in veterinary medicine. Attempts in replacing the canine MV have used mechanical valves and bioprosthetic valves. The first one represents an artificial implant, and the reports regarding this technique seem to describe very good results in the immediate post-operative period, but very poor long term prognosis mainly due to thrombosis [102,103]. Bioprosthetic valves instead use animal tissue as material in order to improve the biocompatibility of the implant. The few manuscripts reporting the use of these implants and long-term prognosis in dogs seem to provide encouraging results regarding prosthesis function, durability, and low thrombogenicity [104,105,106]. However, these implants require an open-heart surgery as well, and, therefore, suffer from most of the surgical limitations listed above. This is probably the most important factor preventing a more thorough investigation of these prostheses and therefore widespread use of them.

4.2.2. Minimally-Invasive Approaches

In the last years, several devices had been developed for performing MV repair and replacement either through a transcatheter or a transapical approach. The main device which is currently used for transcatheter MV repair in humans is the MitraClip [107,108]. Delivered in the LA through a trans-septal approach, this device clips together two facing portions of anterior and posterior leaflet, therefore, performing an edge-to-edge MV repair. The device underwent two successful clinical trials and is currently Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformité Européene (CE) approved for MV repair [107,109]. Transapical MV repair has also been recently introduced, and the main CE approved device for performing this procedure is currently the NeoChord DS-1000. Once introduced in the LV through a mini-thoracotomy, the device captures a prolapsing portion of a MV leaflet, and a pair of artificial chordae tendinae is sutured to the captured leaflet. The artificial chordae are then tensioned under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance and fixed to the LV apex [110]. Another similar device, also currently under investigation in human medicine with encouraging results, uses a LV thoracotomy and transapical approach to deliver expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) artificial cords to the prolapsing portions of the MV. The device is directed to the prolapsing portions of a leaflet under transesophageal guidance and, once actuated, it pierces the leaflet and anchors the ePTFE artificial cords on the atrial side of it through pre-formed knots. The ePTFE cord is then pulled out from the ventricular apex and its tension is adjusted under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance in order to reduce the prolapse [111]. Our group has recently tested this device in six healthy beagles demonstrating the technique’s feasibility, and early (30 days) endothelialization of the ePTFE implants [112]. Lastly, several devices for MV replacement through either transcatheter or transapical approach are at various stages of development and ongoing clinical trials [113]. All these techniques have the tremendous advantage of not requiring cardiopulmonary bypass to be performed and, therefore, would constitute a great asset for the therapy of MMVD in dogs. To the best of our knowledge, no scientific publication has so far reported the use of any of these techniques in veterinary medicine, but from personal experience and communications with other investigators, some veterinary centers are currently investigating the feasibility and efficacy of these devices in dogs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Häggström, J.; Hansson, K.; Kvart, C.; Swenson, L. Chronic valvular disease in the cavalier King Charles spaniel in Sweden. Vet. Rec. 1992, 131, 549–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Detweiler, D.K.; Patterson, D.F. The prevalence and types of cardiovascular disease in dogs. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1965, 127, 481–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Borgarelli, M.; Zini, E.; D’Agnolo, G.; Tarducci, A.; Santilli, R.A.; Chiavegato, D.; Tursi, M.; Prunotto, M.; Häggström, J. Comparison of primary mitral valve disease in German Shepherd dogs and in small breeds. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2004, 6, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Borgarelli, M.; Tarducci, A.; Zanatta, R.; Haggstrom, J. Decreased systolic function and inadequate hypertrophy in large and small breed dogs with chronic mitral valve insufficiency. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2007, 21, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Swenson, L.; Häggström, J.; Kvart, C.; Juneja, R.K. Relationship between parental cardiac status in Cavalier King Charles spaniels and prevalence and severity of chronic valvular disease in offspring. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1996, 208, 2009–2012. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Olsen, L.H.; Fredholm, M.; Pedersen, H.D. Epidemiology and inheritance of mitral valve prolapse in Dachshunds. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 1999, 13, 448–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lewis, T.; Swift, S.; Woolliams, J.A.; Blott, S. Heritability of premature mitral valve disease in Cavalier King Charles spaniels. Vet. J. 2011, 188, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Oyama, M.A.; Levy, R.J. Insights into serotonin signaling mechanisms associated with canine degenerative mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010, 24, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cremer, S.E.; Zois, N.E.; Moesgaard, S.G.; Ravn, N.; Cirera, S.; Honge, J.L.; Smerup, M.H.; Hasenkam, J.M.; Sloth, E.; Leifsson, P.S.; et al. Serotonin markers show altered transcription levels in an experimental pig model of mitral regurgitation. Vet. J. 2015, 203, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cremer, S.E.; Singletary, G.E.; Olsen, L.H.; Wallace, K.; Häggström, J.; Ljungvall, I.; Höglund, K.; Reynolds, C.A.; Pizzinat, N.; Oyama, M.A. Serotonin concentrations in platelets, plasma, mitral valve leaflet, and left ventricular myocardial tissue in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2014, 28, 1534–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ljungvall, I.; Höglund, K.; Lilliehöök, I.; Oyama, M.A.; Tidholm, A.; Tvedten, H.; Häggström, J. Serum serotonin concentration is associated with severity of myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2013, 27, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Orton, E.C.; Lacerda, C.M.R.; MacLea, H.B. Signaling pathways in mitral valve degeneration. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lacerda, C.M.R.; Kisiday, J.; Johnson, B.; Orton, E.C. Local serotonin mediates cyclic strain-induced phenotype transformation, matrix degradation, and glycosaminoglycan synthesis in cultured sheep mitral valves. Am. J. Physiol. 2012, 302, H1983–H1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lacerda, C.M.R.; MacLea, H.B.; Kisiday, J.D.; Orton, E.C. Static and cyclic tensile strain induce myxomatous effector proteins and serotonin in canine mitral valves. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Aupperle, H.; Disatian, S. Pathology, protein expression and signaling in myxomatous mitral valve degeneration: Comparison of dogs and humans. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Disatian, S.; Ehrhart, E.J.; Zimmerman, S.; Orton, E.C. Interstitial cells from dogs with naturally occurring myxomatous mitral valve disease undergo phenotype transformation. J. Heart Valve Dis. 2008, 17, 402–411; discussion 412. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Richards, J.M.; Farrar, E.J.; Kornreich, B.G.; Moїse, N.S.; Butcher, J.T. The mechanobiology of mitral valve function, degeneration, and repair. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pomerance, A.; Whitney, J.C. Heart valve changes common to man and dog: A comparative study. Cardiovasc. Res. 1970, 4, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Côté, E.; Edwards, N.J.; Ettinger, S.J.; Fuentes, V.L.; MacDonald, K.A.; Scansen, B.A.; Sisson, D.D.; Abbott, J.A. Management of incidentally detected heart murmurs in dogs and cats. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2015, 246, 1076–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Pedersen, H.D.; Häggström, J.; Falk, T.; Mow, T.; Olsen, L.H.; Iversen, L.; Jensen, A.L. Auscultation in mild mitral regurgitation in dogs: Observer variation, effects of physical maneuvers, and agreement with color doppler echocardiography and phonocardiography. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 1999, 13, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Terzo, E.; Di Marcello, M.; McAllister, H.; Glazier, B.; Lo Coco, D.; Locatelli, C.; Palermo, V.; Brambilla, P.G. Echocardiographic assessment of 537 dogs with mitral valve prolapse and leaflet involvement. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2009, 50, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. López-Alvarez, J.; Elliott, J.; Pfeiffer, D.; Chang, Y.-M.; Mattin, M.; Moonarmart, W.; Hezzell, M.J.; Boswood, A. Clinical severity score system in dogs with degenerative mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2015, 29, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Borgarelli, M.; Savarino, P.; Crosara, S.; Santilli, R.A.; Chiavegato, D.; Poggi, M.; Bellino, C.; La Rosa, G.; Zanatta, R.; Haggstrom, J.; et al. Survival characteristics and prognostic variables of dogs with mitral regurgitation attributable to myxomatous valve disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2008, 22, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Borgarelli, M.; Crosara, S.; Lamb, K.; Savarino, P.; La Rosa, G.; Tarducci, A.; Haggstrom, J.; Santilli, R.A.; Chiavegato, D.; Poggi, M.; et al. Survival characteristics and prognostic variables of dogs with preclinical chronic degenerative mitral valve disease attributable to myxomatous degeneration. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2012, 26, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Buchanan, J.W.; Bücheler, J. Vertebral scale system to measure canine heart size in radiographs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1995, 206, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Atkins, C.; Bonagura, J.; Ettinger, S.; Fox, P.; Gordon, S.; Haggstrom, J.; Hamlin, R.; Keene, B.; Luis-Fuentes, V.; Stepien, R. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of canine chronic valvular heart disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2009, 23, 1142–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Diana, A.; Guglielmini, C.; Pivetta, M.; Sanacore, A.; di Tommaso, M.; Lord, P.F.; Cipone, M. Radiographic features of cardiogenic pulmonary edema in dogs with mitral regurgitation: 61 Cases (1998–2007). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2009, 235, 1058–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chetboul, V.; Tissier, R. Echocardiographic assessment of canine degenerative mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 127–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Reimann, M.J.; Møller, J.E.; Häggström, J.; Martinussen, T.; Zatrazemi, S.S.C.; Svanholm, L.; Nielsen, L.B.M.; Pedersen, H.D.; Olsen, L.H. Mitral regurgitation severity and left ventricular systolic dimension predict survival in young cavalier king charles spaniels. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2017, 31, 1008–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sargent, J.; Muzzi, R.; Mukherjee, R.; Somarathne, S.; Schranz, K.; Stephenson, H.; Connolly, D.; Brodbelt, D.; Fuentes, V.L. Echocardiographic predictors of survival in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2015, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zoghbi, W.A.; Enriquez-Sarano, M.; Foster, E.; Grayburn, P.A.; Kraft, C.D.; Levine, R.A.; Nihoyannopoulos, P.; Otto, C.M.; Quinones, M.A.; Rakowski, H.; et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2003, 16, 777–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Serres, F.; Chetboul, V.; Tissier, R.; Sampedrano, C.C.; Gouni, V.; Nicolle, A.P.; Pouchelon, J.-L. Chordae tendineae rupture in dogs with degenerative mitral valve disease: Prevalence, survival, and prognostic factors (114 cases, 2001–2006). J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2007, 21, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Muzzi, R.A.L.; de Araújo, R.B.; Muzzi, L.A.L.; Pena, J.L.B.; Silva, E.F. Regurgitant jet area by Doppler color flow mapping: Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation severity in dogs. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2003, 5, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gouni, V.; Serres, F.J.; Pouchelon, J.-L.; Tissier, R.; Lefebvre, H.P.; Nicolle, A.P.; Sampedrano, C.C.; Chetboul, V. Quantification of mitral valve regurgitation in dogs with degenerative mitral valve disease by use of the proximal isovelocity surface area method. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2007, 231, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Biner, S.; Rafique, A.; Rafii, F.; Tolstrup, K.; Noorani, O.; Shiota, T.; Gurudevan, S.; Siegel, R.J. Reproducibility of proximal isovelocity surface area, vena contracta, and regurgitant jet area for assessment of mitral regurgitation severity. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2010, 3, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zoghbi, W.A.; Adams, D.; Bonow, R.O.; Enriquez-Sarano, M.; Foster, E.; Grayburn, P.A.; Hahn, R.T.; Han, Y.; Hung, J.; Lang, R.M.; et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: A report from the american society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2017, 30, 303–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bolger, A.F.; Eidenvall, L.; Ask, P.; Loyd, D.; Wranne, B. Understanding continuous-wave Doppler signal intensity as a measure of regurgitant severity. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 1997, 10, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Di Marcello, M.; Terzo, E.; Locatelli, C.; Palermo, V.; Sala, E.; Dall’Aglio, E.; Bussadori, C.M.; Spalla, I.; Brambilla, P.G. Assessment of mitral regurgitation severity by Doppler color flow mapping of the vena contracta in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2014, 28, 1206–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Dillon, A.R.; Dell’Italia, L.J.; Tillson, M.; Killingsworth, C.; Denney, T.; Hathcock, J.; Botzman, L. Left ventricular remodeling in preclinical experimental mitral regurgitation of dogs. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 73–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lord, P.; Hansson, K.; Kvart, C.; Häggström, J. Rate of change of heart size before congestive heart failure in dogs with mitral regurgitation. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2010, 51, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Reynolds, C.A.; Brown, D.C.; Rush, J.E.; Fox, P.R.; Nguyenba, T.P.; Lehmkuhl, L.B.; Gordon, S.G.; Kellihan, H.B.; Stepien, R.L.; Lefbom, B.K.; et al. Prediction of first onset of congestive heart failure in dogs with degenerative mitral valve disease: The PREDICT cohort study. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rishniw, M.; Erb, H.N. Evaluation of four 2-dimensional echocardiographic methods of assessing left atrial size in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2000, 14, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hansson, K.; Häggström, J.; Kvart, C.; Lord, P. Left atrial to aortic root indices using two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography in cavalier King Charles spaniels with and without left atrial enlargement. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2002, 43, 568–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wesselowski, S.; Borgarelli, M.; Bello, N.M.; Abbott, J. Discrepancies in identification of left atrial enlargement using left atrial volume versus left atrial-to-aortic root ratio in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2014, 28, 1527–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Häggström, J.; Boswood, A.; O’Grady, M.; Jöns, O.; Smith, S.; Swift, S.; Borgarelli, M.; Gavaghan, B.; Kresken, J.-G.G.; Patteson, M.; et al. Effect of pimobendan or benazepril hydrochloride on survival times in dogs with congestive heart failure caused by naturally occurring myxomatous mitral valve disease: The QUEST study. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2008, 22, 1124–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Höllmer, M.; Willesen, J.L.; Tolver, A.; Koch, J. Left atrial volume and function in dogs with naturally occurring myxomatous mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2017, 19, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Teichholz, L.E.; Kreulen, T.; Herman, M.V.; Gorlin, R. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: Echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence or absence of asynergy. Am. J. Cardiol. 1976, 37, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Boon, J.; Wingfield, W.E.; Miller, C.W. Echocardiographic indices in the normal dog. Vet. Radiol. 1983, 24, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Goncalves, A.C.; Orton, E.C.; Boon, J.A.; Salman, M.D. Linear, logarithmic, and polynomial models of M-mode echocardiographic measurements in dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2002, 63, 994–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cornell, C.C.; Kittleson, M.D.; Della Torre, P.; Häggström, J.; Lombard, C.W.; Pedersen, H.D.; Vollmar, A.; Wey, A. Allometric scaling of M-mode cardiac measurements in normal adult dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2004, 18, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. McGinley, J.C.; Berretta, R.M.; Chaudhary, K.; Rossman, E.; Bratinov, G.D.; Gaughan, J.P.; Houser, S.; Margulies, K.B. Impaired contractile reserve in severe mitral valve regurgitation with a preserved ejection fraction. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2007, 9, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tidholm, A.; Nicolle, A.P.; Carlos, C.; Gouni, V.; Caruso, J.L.; Pouchelon, J.L.; Chetboul, V. Tissue Doppler imaging and echo-Doppler findings associated with a mitral valve stenosis with an immobile posterior valve leaflet in a bull terrier. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2004, 51, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bonagura, J.D.; Schober, K.E. Can ventricular function be assessed by echocardiography in chronic canine mitral valve disease? J. Small Anim. Pract. 2009, 50, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kim, J.-H.; Park, H.-M. Usefulness of conventional and tissue doppler echocardiography to predict congestive heart failure in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2015, 29, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Baron Toaldo, M.; Poser, H.; Menciotti, G.; Battaia, S.; Contiero, B.; Cipone, M.; Diana, A.; Mazzotta, E.; Guglielmini, C. Utility of tissue doppler imaging in the echocardiographic evaluation of left and right ventricular function in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease with or without pulmonary hypertension. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2016, 30, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lisauskas, J.; Singh, J.; Courtois, M.; Kovács, S.J. The relation of the peak Doppler E-wave to peak mitral annulus velocity ratio to diastolic function. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2001, 27, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nagueh, S.F.; Smiseth, O.A.; Appleton, C.P.; Byrd, B.F.; Dokainish, H.; Edvardsen, T.; Flachskampf, F.A.; Gillebert, T.C.; Klein, A.L.; Lancellotti, P.; et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: An update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2016, 29, 277–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Schober, K.E.; Bonagura, J.D.; Scansen, B.A.; Stern, J.A.; Ponzio, N.M. Estimation of left ventricular filling pressure by use of Doppler echocardiography in healthy anesthetized dogs subjected to acute volume loading. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2008, 69, 1034–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jacques, D.C.; Pinsky, M.R.; Severyn, D.; Gorcsan, J. Influence of alterations in loading on mitral annular velocity by tissue doppler echocardiography and its associated ability to predict filling pressures. Chest 2004, 126, 1910–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Smith, D.N.; Bonagura, J.D.; Culwell, N.M.; Schober, K.E. Left ventricular function quantified by myocardial strain imaging in small-breed dogs with chronic mitral regurgitation. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tidholm, A.; Ljungvall, I.; Höglund, K.; Westling, A.B.; Häggström, J. Tissue doppler and strain imaging in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease in different stages of congestive heart failure. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2009, 23, 1197–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Serres, F.; Chetboul, V.; Gouni, V.; Tissier, R.; Sampedrano, C.C.; Pouchelon, J.-L. Diagnostic value of echo-Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging in dogs with pulmonary arterial hypertension. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2007, 21, 1280–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Soydan, L.C.; Kellihan, H.B.; Bates, M.L.; Stepien, R.L.; Consigny, D.W.; Bellofiore, A.; Francois, C.J.; Chesler, N.C. Accuracy of Doppler echocardiographic estimates of pulmonary artery pressures in a canine model of pulmonary hypertension. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2015, 17, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Testani, J.M.; St. John Sutton, M.G.; Wiegers, S.E.; Khera, A.V.; Shannon, R.P.; Kirkpatrick, J.N. Accuracy of noninvasively determined pulmonary artery systolic pressure. Am. J. Cardiol. 2010, 105, 1192–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Matsumoto, M.; Matsuo, H.; Kitabatake, A.; Inoue, M.; Hamanaka, Y.; Tamura, S.; Tanaka, K.; Abe, H. Three-dimensional echocardiograms and two-dimensional echocardiographic images at desired planes by a computerized system. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1977, 3, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Geiser, E.A.; Ariet, M.; Conetta, D.A.; Lupkiewicz, S.M.; Christie, L.G.; Conti, C.R. Dynamic three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the intact human left ventricle: Technique and initial observations in patients. Am. Heart J. 1982, 103, 1056–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ghosh, A.; Nanda, N.C.; Maurer, G. Three-dimensional reconstruction of echocardiographic images using the rotation method. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1982, 8, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Matsumoto, M.; Inoue, M.; Tamura, S.; Tanaka, K.; Abe, H. Three-dimensional echocardiography for spatial visualization and volume calculation of cardiac structures. J. Clin. Ultrasound 1981, 9, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Levine, R.A.; Handschumacher, M.D.; Sanfilippo, A.J.; Hagege, A.A.; Harrigan, P.; Marshall, J.E.; Weyman, A.E. Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the mitral valve, with implications for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 1989, 80, 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Bax, J.J.; Delgado, V. Advanced imaging in valvular heart disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2017, 14, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Lang, R.M.; Badano, L.P.; Mor-Avi, V.; Afilalo, J.; Armstrong, A.; Ernande, L.; Flachskampf, F.A.; Foster, E.; Goldstein, S.A.; Kuznetsova, T.; et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2015, 16, 233–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Eaton, L.W.; Maughan, W.L.; Shoukas, A.A.; Weiss, J.L. Accurate volume determination in the isolated ejecting canine left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1979, 60, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tidholm, A.; Westling, A.B.B.; Höglund, K.; Ljungvall, I.; Häggström, J. Comparisons of 3-, 2-Dimensional, and M-Mode echocardiographical methods for estimation of left chamber volumes in dogs with and without acquired heart disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010, 24, 1414–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Tidholm, A.; Bodegård-Westling, A.; Höglund, K.; Ljungvall, I.; Häggström, J. Comparisons of 2- and 3-dimensional echocardiographic methods for estimation of left atrial size in dogs with and without myxomatous mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2011, 25, 1320–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ljungvall, I.; Höglund, K.; Carnabuci, C.; Tidholm, A.; Häggström, J. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular volume and shape by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2011, 25, 1036–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Menciotti, G.; Borgarelli, M.; Aherne, M.; Häggström, J.; Ljungvall, I.; Lahmers, S.M.; Abbott, J.A. Assessment of mitral valve morphology using three-dimensional echocardiography. Feasibility and reference values. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2016, 18, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Menciotti, G.; Borgarelli, M.; Aherne, M.; Wesselowski, S.; Häggström, J.; Ljungvall, I.; Lahmers, S.M.; Abbott, J.A. Mitral valve morphology assessed by three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in healthy dogs and dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2017, 19, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Boswood, A.; Häggström, J.; Gordon, S.G.; Wess, G.; Stepien, R.L.; Oyama, M.A.; Keene, B.W.; Bonagura, J.; MacDonald, K.A.; Patteson, M.; et al. Effect of pimobendan in dogs with preclinical myxomatous mitral valve disease and cardiomegaly: The EPIC Study—A Randomized clinical trial. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2016, 30, 1765–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kvart, C.; Häggström, J.; Pedersen, H.D.; Hansson, K.; Eriksson, A.; Järvinen, A.-K.; Tidholm, A.; Bsenko, K.; Ahlgren, E.; Lives, M.; et al. Efficacy of enalapril for prevention of congestive heart failure in dogs with myxomatous valve disease and asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2002, 16, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Atkins, C.E.; Keene, B.W.; Brown, W.A.; Coats, J.R.; Crawford, M.A.; DeFrancesco, T.C.; Edwards, N.J.; Fox, P.R.; Lehmkuhl, L.B.; Luethy, M.W.; et al. Results of the veterinary enalapril trial to prove reduction in onset of heart failure in dogs chronically treated with enalapril alone for compensated, naturally occurring mitral valve insufficiency. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2007, 231, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Bernay, F.; Bland, J.M.; Häggström, J.; Baduel, L.; Combes, B.; Lopez, A.; Kaltsatos, V.; Ha, J. Efficacy of spironolactone on survival in dogs with naturally occurring mitral regurgitation caused by myxomatous mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010, 24, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Pouchelon, J.-L.; Jamet, N.; Gouni, V.; Tissier, R.; Serres, F.; Carlos Sampedrano, C.; Castaignet, M.; Lefebvre, H.P.; Chetboul, V. Effect of benazepril on survival and cardiac events in dogs with asymptomatic mitral valve disease: A retrospective study of 141 cases. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2008, 22, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lombard, C.W.; Jöns, O.; Bussadori, C.M. Clinical efficacy of pimobendan versus benazepril for the treatment of acquired atrioventricular valvular disease in dogs. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2006, 42, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Häggström, J.; Boswood, A.; O’Grady, M.; Jöns, O.; Smith, S.; Swift, S.; Borgarelli, M.; Gavaghan, B.; Kresken, J.G.; Patteson, M.; et al. Longitudinal analysis of quality of life, clinical, radiographic, echocardiographic, and laboratory variables in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease receiving pimobendan or benazepril: The QUEST study. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2013, 27, 1441–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  85. Ferasin, L.; Crews, L.; Biller, D.S.; Lamb, K.E.; Borgarelli, M. Risk factors for coughing in dogs with naturally acquired myxomatous mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2013, 27, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Guglielmini, C.; Diana, A.; Pietra, M.; Di Tommaso, M.; Cipone, M. Use of the vertebral heart score in coughing dogs with chronic degenerative mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2009, 71, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Uechi, M.; Matsuoka, M.; Kuwajima, E.; Kaneko, T.; Yamashita, K.; Fukushima, U.; Ishikawa, Y. The effects of the loop diuretics furosemide and torasemide on diuresis in dogs and cats. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2003, 65, 1057–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Oyama, M.A.; Peddle, G.D.; Reynolds, C.A.; Singletary, G.E. Use of the loop diuretic torsemide in three dogs with advanced heart failure. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2011, 13, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Hori, Y.; Takusagawa, F.; Ikadai, H.; Uechi, M.; Hoshi, F.; Higuchi, S. Effects of oral administration of furosemide and torsemide in healthy dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2007, 68, 1058–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Uchida, T.; Hayashi, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Matsumura, Y. Effects of torasemide on renal haemodynamics and function in anaesthetized dogs. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 1991, 18, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Chiavegato, D.; Borgarelli, M.; D’Agnolo, G.; Santilli, R.A. Pulmonary hypertension in dogs with mitral regurgitation attributable to myxomatous valve disease. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2009, 50, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kellihan, H.B.; Stepien, R.L. Pulmonary hypertension in canine degenerative mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Borgarelli, M.; Abbott, J.; Braz-Ruivo, L.; Chiavegato, D.; Crosara, S.; Lamb, K.; Ljungvall, I.; Poggi, M.; Santilli, R.A.; Haggstrom, J. Prevalence and prognostic importance of pulmonary hypertension in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2015, 29, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Brown, A.J.; Davison, E.; Sleeper, M.M. Clinical efficacy of sildenafil in treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010, 24, 850–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Bach, J.F.; Rozanski, E.A.; MacGregor, J.; Betkowski, J.M.; Rush, J.E. Retrospective evaluation of sildenafil citrate as a therapy for pulmonary hypertension in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2006, 20, 1132–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kellum, H.B.; Stepien, R.L. Sildenafil citrate therapy in 22 dogs with pulmonary hypertension. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2007, 21, 1258–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Nishimura, R.A.; Otto, C.M.; Bonow, R.O.; Carabello, B.A.; Erwin, J.P.; Guyton, R.A.; O’Gara, P.T.; Ruiz, C.E.; Skubas, N.J.; Sorajja, P.; et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 63, e57–e185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Uechi, M. Mitral valve repair in dogs. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Uechi, M.; Mizukoshi, T.; Mizuno, T.; Mizuno, M.; Harada, K.; Ebisawa, T.; Takeuchi, J.; Sawada, T.; Uchida, S.; Shinoda, A.; et al. Mitral valve repair under cardiopulmonary bypass in small-breed dogs: 48 Cases (2006–2009). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2012, 240, 1194–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Mizuno, T.; Mizukoshi, T.; Uechi, M. Long-term outcome in dogs undergoing mitral valve repair with suture annuloplasty and chordae tendinae replacement. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2013, 54, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Nishida, M.; Kagawa, Y.; Mizukoshi, T.; Mizuno, M.; Mizuno, T.; Harada, K.; Uechi, M. Post-mortem evaluation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) used in mitral valve repair in dogs. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Klement, P.; Feindel, C.M.; Scully, H.E.; Mesher, E.; Klement, G.; Del Nido, P.; Wilson, G.J. Mitral valve replacement in dogs. Surgical technique and postoperative management. Vet. Surg. 1987, 16, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Orton, E.C.; Hackett, T.B.; Mama, K.; Boon, J.A. Technique and outcome of mitral valve replacement in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2005, 226, 1508–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. White, R.N.; Stepien, R.L.; Hammond, R.A.; Holden, D.J.; Torrington, A.M.; Milner, H.R.; Cobb, M.A.; Hellens, S.H. Mitral valve replacement for the treatment of congenital mitral dysplasia in a bull terrier. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1995, 36, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. White, R.N.; Boswood, A.; Garden, O.A.; Hammond, R.A. Surgical management of subvalvular aortic stenosis and mitral dysplasia in a golden retriever. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1997, 38, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Takashima, K.; Soda, A.; Tanaka, R.; Yamane, Y. Long-term clinical evaluation of mitral valve replacement with porcine bioprosthetic valves in dogs. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2008, 70, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Feldman, T.; Wasserman, H.S.; Herrmann, H.C.; Gray, W.; Block, P.C.; Whitlow, P.; St. Goar, F.; Rodriguez, L.; Silvestry, F.; Schwartz, A.; et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair using the edge-to-edge technique: Six-month results of the EVEREST phase I clinical trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005, 46, 2134–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Feldman, T.; Kar, S.; Rinaldi, M.; Fail, P.; Hermiller, J.; Smalling, R.; Whitlow, P.L.; Gray, W.; Low, R.; Herrmann, H.C.; et al. Percutaneous mitral repair with the MitraClip system: Safety and midterm durability in the initial EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge REpair Study) cohort. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Whitlow, P.L.; Feldman, T.; Pedersen, W.R.; Lim, D.S.; Kipperman, R.; Smalling, R.; Bajwa, T.; Herrmann, H.C.; Lasala, J.; Maddux, J.T.; et al. Acute and 12-month results with catheter-based mitral valve leaflet repair: The EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) High Risk Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 59, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Seeburger, J.; Rinaldi, M.; Nielsen, S.L.; Salizzoni, S.; Lange, R.; Schoenburg, M.; Alfieri, O.; Borger, M.A.; Mohr, F.W.; Aidietis, A. Off-pump transapical implantation of artificial neo-chordae to correct mitral regurgitation: The tact trial (transapical artificial chordae tendinae) proof of concept. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 63, 914–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Gammie, J.S.; Wilson, P.; Bartus, K.; Gackowski, A.; Hung, J.; D’Ambra, M.N.; Kolsut, P.; Bittle, G.J.; Szymanski, P.; Sadowski, J.; et al. Transapical beating-heart mitral valve repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene cordal implantation device. Circulation 2016, 134, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Borgarelli, M.; Lanz, O.; Pavlisko, N.; Abbott, J.A.; Menciotti, G.; Aherne, M.; Lahmers, S.M.; Lahmers, K.K.; Gammie, J.S. Mitral valve repair in dogs using an ePTFE chordal implantation device: A pilot study. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2017, 19, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Partida, R.A.; Elmariah, S. Transcatheter mitral valve interventions: Current therapies and future directions. Curr. Treat. Opt. Cardiovasc. Med. 2017, 19, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Gross pathology specimen fixed in 10% formalin showing the MV of a dog affected by MMVD. The LA was removed and thick, nodular mitral leaflets are shown.
Figure 1. Gross pathology specimen fixed in 10% formalin showing the MV of a dog affected by MMVD. The LA was removed and thick, nodular mitral leaflets are shown.
Vetsci 04 00047 g001
Figure 2. Two-dimensional echocardiographic image of a dog with mitral prolapse. In this right parasternal long axis four-chamber view, the mitral leaflets, thickened and nodular in appearance, can be noticed bulging into the LA. RA: right atrium; RV: right ventricle; LV: left ventricle; LA: left atrium; and MV: mitral valve.
Figure 2. Two-dimensional echocardiographic image of a dog with mitral prolapse. In this right parasternal long axis four-chamber view, the mitral leaflets, thickened and nodular in appearance, can be noticed bulging into the LA. RA: right atrium; RV: right ventricle; LV: left ventricle; LA: left atrium; and MV: mitral valve.
Vetsci 04 00047 g002
Figure 3. Three-dimensional echocardiographic “surgical” view of the MV of a dog with mitral prolapse. In this three-dimensional echocardiographic image, the MV is visualized as seen from the LA. It can be noticed how several areas of both anterior and posterior MV leaflets are bulging. It can also be noticed that the two leaflets fail to coapt in two areas (regurgitant orifices), which is where the MR occurs.
Figure 3. Three-dimensional echocardiographic “surgical” view of the MV of a dog with mitral prolapse. In this three-dimensional echocardiographic image, the MV is visualized as seen from the LA. It can be noticed how several areas of both anterior and posterior MV leaflets are bulging. It can also be noticed that the two leaflets fail to coapt in two areas (regurgitant orifices), which is where the MR occurs.
Vetsci 04 00047 g003
Figure 4. Atrial (A,B) and lateral (C,D) view of MV models of a healthy dog (A,C) and a dog affected by MMVD (B,D). Healthy dogs have a more elliptical annulus (A) while dogs with MMVD have a more circular one (B). Furthermore, in healthy dogs the saddle shape is more evident (C) than in dogs with MMVD (D) that have a smaller annulus height. Tenting height and tenting area are reduced in dogs with MMVD (D) compared to healthy dogs (C). Ao, aortic annulus; APD, antero-posterior annulus diameter; ALPMD, anterolateral- posteromedial annulus diameter; CmD, commissural diameter; LA, left atrial side of the valve; TnA, tenting area (dashed); AnH, annulus height; LV, left ventricular side of the valve; TnH, tenting height. Reproduced with permission from Menciotti et al., J. Vet. Cardiol.; published by Elsevier, 2017 [77].
Figure 4. Atrial (A,B) and lateral (C,D) view of MV models of a healthy dog (A,C) and a dog affected by MMVD (B,D). Healthy dogs have a more elliptical annulus (A) while dogs with MMVD have a more circular one (B). Furthermore, in healthy dogs the saddle shape is more evident (C) than in dogs with MMVD (D) that have a smaller annulus height. Tenting height and tenting area are reduced in dogs with MMVD (D) compared to healthy dogs (C). Ao, aortic annulus; APD, antero-posterior annulus diameter; ALPMD, anterolateral- posteromedial annulus diameter; CmD, commissural diameter; LA, left atrial side of the valve; TnA, tenting area (dashed); AnH, annulus height; LV, left ventricular side of the valve; TnH, tenting height. Reproduced with permission from Menciotti et al., J. Vet. Cardiol.; published by Elsevier, 2017 [77].
Vetsci 04 00047 g004
Back to TopTop