Next Article in Journal
Myocardial Adiponectin Isoform Shift in Dogs with Congestive Heart Failure—A Comparison to Hibernating Brown Bears (Ursus arctos horribilis)
Next Article in Special Issue
Foodborne Disease and the Need for Greater Foodborne Disease Surveillance in the Caribbean
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Transcriptomic Profiling and Gene Expression for Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease in the Dog and Human
Previous Article in Special Issue
Raw Meat-Based Diets in Dogs and Cats
 
 
Review

Inquiring into the Gaps of Campylobacter Surveillance Methods

1
Department of Biopathology and Clinical Microbiology, Aeginition Hospital, Athens Medical School, Athens 15772, Greece
2
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Human Movement and Quality of Life Sciences, University of Peloponnese, Sparta 23100, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2017, 4(3), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci4030036
Received: 30 April 2017 / Revised: 7 July 2017 / Accepted: 17 July 2017 / Published: 19 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food and Waterborne Infections in Animals and Humans)
Campylobacter is one of the most common pathogen-related causes of diarrheal illnesses globally and has been recognized as a significant factor of human disease for more than three decades. Molecular typing techniques and their combinations have allowed for species identification among members of the Campylobacter genus with good resolution, but the same tools usually fail to proceed to subtyping of closely related species due to high sequence similarity. This problem is exacerbated by the demanding conditions for isolation and detection from the human, animal or water samples as well as due to the difficulties during laboratory maintenance and long-term storage of the isolates. In an effort to define the ideal typing tool, we underline the strengths and limitations of the typing methodologies currently used to map the broad epidemiologic profile of campylobacteriosis in public health and outbreak investigations. The application of both the old and the new molecular typing tools is discussed and an indirect comparison is presented among the preferred techniques used in current research methodology View Full-Text
Keywords: Campylobacteriosis; methodology; molecular typing; human infection; zoonosis; surveillance; epidemiology Campylobacteriosis; methodology; molecular typing; human infection; zoonosis; surveillance; epidemiology
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Magana, M.; Chatzipanagiotou, S.; Burriel, A.R.; Ioannidis, A. Inquiring into the Gaps of Campylobacter Surveillance Methods. Vet. Sci. 2017, 4, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci4030036

AMA Style

Magana M, Chatzipanagiotou S, Burriel AR, Ioannidis A. Inquiring into the Gaps of Campylobacter Surveillance Methods. Veterinary Sciences. 2017; 4(3):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci4030036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magana, Maria, Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou, Angeliki R. Burriel, and Anastasios Ioannidis. 2017. "Inquiring into the Gaps of Campylobacter Surveillance Methods" Veterinary Sciences 4, no. 3: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci4030036

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop