Next Article in Journal
Sheep Welfare in Confined and Pasture Production Systems: A Comparative Study with Emphasis on Parasitological Status
Previous Article in Journal
Part 1: A Sector-Wide Survey of UK/British Isles Shelter Organisations Caring for Cats: Caregiver-Reported Approaches to Housing, Husbandry and General Care Provision
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of a Compound Probiotic on Production Performance, Intestinal Health, Immune Function, and Gut Microbiota in Broiler Chickens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Partial Replacement of Wheat Bran with Poplar Wood Composite Fiber on Growth Performance, Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Immune Function, and Gut Microbiota in Growing Pigs

Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Vet. Sci. 2026, 13(6), 588; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13060588
Submission received: 19 May 2026 / Revised: 15 June 2026 / Accepted: 15 June 2026 / Published: 17 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutritional Health of Monogastric Animals—2nd Edition)

Simple Summary

This study investigated the effects of replacing wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber (PWCF) in pig diets. The research involved 140 growing pigs fed either a control diet or an experimental diet with 2% wheat bran replaced by PWCF for 60 days. The results showed that PWCF did not negatively affect pig growth performance, nutrient digestibility, or immune function. Instead, it helped regulate nitrogen metabolism by lowering blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels and serum total free amino acids (TFAAs) and enhanced antioxidant capacity by increasing catalase activity. Notably, PWCF supplementation led to significant increases in the relative abundance of certain gut bacteria known to degrade dietary fiber. Overall, PWCF can be a suitable alternative fiber source in pig diets, offering benefits such as nitrogen metabolism regulation and gut microbiota modulation, without compromising growth or health. This supports the use of PWCF in diversifying fiber ingredients in pig feed.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of partially replacing wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber (PWCF) on growth performance, immune status, apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD), and gut microbial composition in growing pigs. A total of 140 healthy crossbred (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) growing pigs with an initial body weight of 47.25 ± 0.49 kg were randomly assigned to two dietary treatments, with five replicates per treatment and fourteen pigs per replicate. The control (CT) group was fed a corn–soybean meal-based diet containing wheat bran and rice bran meal, whereas the experimental group received the same diet in which 2% wheat bran was replaced by PWCF. The experiment lasted for 60 days. Compared with the CT group, replacing wheat bran with PWCF did not affect body weight, average daily feed intake, feed conversion ratio, or average daily gain on days 30 or 60 (p > 0.05). In addition, no negative effects were observed on ATTD of nutrients and serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgG, and IgM levels at either time point, indicating that PWCF can serve as a suitable partial substitute for wheat bran in growing pig diets. However, it could regulate nitrogen metabolism by reducing blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration and the BUN/creatinine ratio, as well as decreasing total free amino acids in serum (p < 0.05). In addition, the antioxidant capacity can be transiently improved by increasing catalase activity. Gut microbiota analysis showed that the replacement significantly increased the relative abundances of Treponema, the Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014_group and Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 (p < 0.05). These changes suggest that PWCF modulates gut microbiota and enriches fiber-degrading bacterial populations. Overall, substituting wheat bran with PWCF did not impair growth performance, immunity, or digestibility, while altering microbial community composition. These findings support the potential application of PWCF as an alternative fiber source, contributing to greater diversity in feed formulation.

1. Introduction

Dietary fiber (DF) refers to a group of food components that are resistant to hydrolysis by endogenous digestive enzymes and are therefore poorly digested and absorbed in the small intestine. It is widely present in plant-derived foods such as cereals, fruits, and vegetables [1]. In recent years, increasing evidence has shown that DF can influence growth performance [2], immune function [3], apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) [4], and gut microbial composition in growing pigs [5]. Previous studies have demonstrated that moderate inclusion of DF in diets does not impair average daily gain or overall growth performance in growing pigs [6,7]. However, supplementation with a high level of soybean hulls (20%) has been reported to reduce the gain-to-feed ratio [8]. Previous studies have also shown that DF supplementation can improve ileal nutrient digestibility [7] while reducing the ATTD of crude protein (CP) and energy [9]. In addition, DF has been reported to promote intestinal development and support gut health [10,11]. Similar findings indicate that DF inclusion may decrease meal frequency while increasing average meal size and reducing the apparent fecal digestibility of dry matter (DM), organic matter, crude ash, nitrogen, and gross energy (GE). However, it may enhance the digestibility of crude fiber (CF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) [12]. Collectively, these results suggest that the effects of DF in pig diets are complex and may depend on the inclusion level and fiber source. Therefore, further studies are required to determine the optimal DF supplementation level for growing pigs.
Wheat bran is a widely used feed ingredient due to its broad availability and low cost. It is rich in dietary fiber (approximately 35–45%), crude protein (14–18%), and minerals (ash, 4–8%). The dietary fiber fraction is predominantly insoluble, with insoluble dietary fiber accounting for approximately 90–95% of total dietary fiber and soluble dietary fiber representing only 5–10% [13,14]. However, the application of wheat bran in animal diets also has notable limitations. During storage, wheat bran is susceptible to contamination by pathogenic microorganisms and the production of various mycotoxins, such as deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. These toxins can impair immune function and exert chronic negative effects on growth performance, as well as reproductive health [15]. Wheat bran has been reported to harbor relatively high microbial loads. The microorganisms commonly detected in wheat bran include bacterial genera such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Micrococcus, and Lactobacillus, as well as fungi including Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Streptomyces, together with their associated mycotoxins. This microbial contamination increases the difficulty of wheat bran storage and poses potential risks to feed safety [16]. As an alternative lignocellulosic fiber source, poplar wood composite fiber (PWCF) is produced from poplar wood through mechanical processing and fiber separation [17]. It is primarily composed of structural carbohydrates, including cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, and is characterized by a high dietary fiber content as well as favorable physicochemical properties, such as water-holding and swelling capacities. Owing to the extensive cultivation of poplar trees and the large quantity of wood-processing residues generated annually, PWCF represents an abundant and potentially sustainable fiber resource. Furthermore, PWCF is predominantly composed of insoluble dietary fiber, with only a small proportion of soluble dietary fiber, making it a valuable source of structural fiber in animal diets. These characteristics suggest that PWCF may serve as a promising alternative fiber source to partially replace conventional fiber ingredients such as wheat bran in swine diets. However, information regarding its application and physiological effects in pigs remains limited.
Therefore, in the present study, a poplar wood-based composite fiber was developed using poplar powder as the main ingredient, and its feasibility as a partial substitute for wheat bran was evaluated. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of dietary supplementation with PWCF on growth performance, immune status, ATTD, and gut microbial composition in growing pigs. By examining these parameters, this study sought to determine whether PWCF could partially replace wheat bran in growing pig diets. Such substitution may contribute to reducing feed costs and improving feed efficiency, thereby providing a theoretical basis for the practical application of alternative DF sources in swine nutrition.

2. Materials and Methods

The experiment was conducted at the Tianpeng Experimental Farm located in Langfang, China, from July 2022. All animal procedures in this study were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (IFR-CAAS20220725).

2.1. Experimental Design and Animal Management

A total of 140 healthy growing pigs (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire), with an equal number of barrows and gilts and a similar initial body weight (47.25 ± 0.49 kg), were randomly assigned to two dietary treatment groups. Each treatment included five replicates, with fourteen pigs per replicate. The control group (CT) was fed the basal diet, whereas the fiber treatment group (FF) received the same diet in which 2% wheat bran was replaced with 2% PWCF (Hebei Weierli Animal Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang, China). The basal diet was formulated as a pelleted feed according to the nutrient requirements for growing–finishing pigs recommended by the NRC (2012), and its nutrient composition is presented in Table 1. The PWCF is composed of 50% fiber sourced from white poplar harvested between May and July 2022. The white poplar was ground to achieve a fiber particle size ranging from 300 to 400 μm. This material was thoroughly mixed with the remaining 50% of the composition, which primarily consists of maifanstone, xanthan gum, and montmorillonite as carrier components. The hygienic quality of the PWCF complies with the Chinese National Feed Standard GB 13078-2017 [18]. The nutrient composition of the PWCF used is shown in Table 2. The experimental period lasted for 60 days.

2.2. Growth Performance

Body weight (BW) was recorded individually for each pig on days 0, 30, and 60 using a calibrated electronic scale (accuracy: ±0.1 kg). Feed intake was measured simultaneously. Average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and the feed-to-gain ratio (F: G) were calculated to evaluate growth performance.

2.3. Determination of Serum Biochemical, Immunoglobulins, and Antioxidant-Related Indices

At the end of the experiment, one pig from each replicate was selected for blood sampling; blood samples were collected from the anterior vena cava of the experimental pigs using anticoagulant blood collection tubes, and the samples were centrifuged at 3000× g and 4 °C for 15 min; the supernatant was collected for the determination of serum biochemical, immunoglobulins, and antioxidant-related indices. Serum levels of glucose (GLU), triglyceride (TG), total protein (TP), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were measured using commercial assay kits from Chengdu Makalu Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China, on an automatic biochemical analyzer (Erba XL-200; Erba Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), with the specific procedures carried out following the corresponding kit instructions.
Blood ammonia and creatinine were determined using a commercial assay kit (Beijing Boxbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Serum amino acids were analyzed using a high-performance liquid chromatography system (LC-20AT; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Immunoglobulins in serum, including immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM), were detected with assay kits purchased from Shanghai Enzyme-Linked Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and the specific operations were performed in accordance with the kit instructions. Serum catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured using commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

2.4. Nutrient Composition and Fiber Physical Characteristics Determination, and Apparent Total Tract Digestibility Calculation

During the last three days of the experiment, fresh fecal samples were collected by rectal stimulation from three randomly selected pigs in each pen. Approximately 200 g of feces was obtained from each pig, and samples collected from pigs within the same pen were thoroughly mixed to generate one composite sample per replicate. The composite fecal samples were dried in a laboratory oven at 65 °C for 48 h to obtain air-dried material for subsequent analyses. Dry matter (DM), CP, EE, Ca, and ash content in both feed and fecal samples were analyzed using AOAC official methods 930.15, 990.03, 920.39, 967.30, and 942.05, respectively. Gross energy (GE) was determined via adiabatic bomb calorimetry (Parr 6300, Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA). The contents of NDF and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were quantified according to the protocols described by Van Soest [19]. Furthermore, the water-holding capacity and swelling capacity of poplar wood composite fiber were determined according to the methods described by previous studies [20,21]. Acid-insoluble ash (AIA) was used as an indigestible marker, and the apparent digestibility of dietary nutrients was evaluated according to the procedures of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 942.05) [22].
The ATTD was calculated using the following formula:
ATTD = [1 − (Afeed × Nfeces)/(Nfeed × Afeces)] × 100,
where Afeed = Content of AIA in feed (%); Afeces = Content of AIA in feces (%); Nfeed = Content of a certain nutrient in feed (%); and Nfeces = Content of a certain nutrient in feces (%).

2.5. Fecal Microbiota Analysis

On the final day of the experiment, fresh fecal samples were collected via rectal massage and then frozen and stored at −80 °C for subsequent analysis. Following the procedures described in a previous study [23], total microbial DNA was extracted from fecal samples using a commercial kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcoss, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The V3–V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the universal primers 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). The PCR products were purified with a DNA purification kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA). Purified amplicons were sequenced on a high-throughput sequencing platform. Sequence data were processed using the DADA2 pipeline to denoise reads and generate amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) under default parameters. Taxonomic assignment of all ASVs was performed in QIIME 2 using a naïve Bayes classifier against the SILVA 138 reference database. Alpha diversity indices were calculated using Mothur (version 1.30), whereas beta diversity was analyzed using the vegan package (version 3.3.1). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis distances was conducted to visualize differences in microbial community composition, and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) was applied to assess the statistical significance of group separation. Taxonomic differentiation was identified through LEfSe (linear discriminant analysis effect size). All bioinformatic analyses were performed using the Majorbio Cloud Platform (https://cloud.majorbio.com/) (accessed on 19 February 2026) (Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All experimental data were analyzed using SAS statistical software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The experiment was conducted using a completely randomized design with two dietary treatments and five replicate pens per treatment. For growth performance variables (BW, ADG, ADFI, and F: G), the pen was considered the experimental unit (n = 5 pens per treatment). For apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD), fecal samples collected from pigs within the same pen were pooled to generate one composite sample per pen; therefore, the pen was considered the experimental unit (n = 5 pens per treatment). For serum biochemical parameters, amino acid profiles, immunoglobulins, antioxidant indices, and fecal microbiota analyses, one pig was randomly selected from each pen for sampling, resulting in five observations per treatment group (n = 5 pens per treatment). Body weight was measured on days 30 and 60 and analyzed separately at each sampling time to evaluate treatment effects during the corresponding production phase. Therefore, repeated-measures analysis was not performed. Data were inspected prior to analysis to verify that they were suitable for parametric testing. Differences between treatments were evaluated using Student’s t-test. No random effects were included in the statistical model because treatment was the only factor of interest and the pen was considered the experimental unit. Results are presented as mean ± SEM, and statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05. Given the limited number of replicate pens per treatment (n = 5), the statistical power to detect small treatment effects may be limited.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance and Apparent Total Tract Nutrient Digestibility

Dietary supplementation with PWCF had no significant effects on BW or F: G in growing pigs (p > 0.05) (Table 3). In addition, during the period from days 31 to 60, pigs in the FF group exhibited slightly higher ADG and ADFI compared with the CT group, although these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). As shown in Table 4, no significant differences were observed between the FF group and CT group in the apparent digestibility of DM, CP, calcium, P, EE, or GE (p > 0.05).

3.2. Serum Biochemical Parameters

There were no significant differences observed in serum GLU, TC, TP, creatinine, or blood ammonia concentrations between the FF group and the CT group on either day 30 or day 60 (p > 0.05) (Table 5). However, on day 60, serum BUN levels tended to be lower in the FF group than in the CT group (p = 0.084). In addition, the BUN/creatinine ratio was not significantly affected on day 30 (p > 0.05), whereas it was significantly lower in the FF group than in the control group on day 60 (p < 0.05).

3.3. Serum-Free Amino Acid Profiles

As shown in Table 6, on day 30, no significant differences were observed in the serum concentrations of aspartic acid, glutamic acid, serine, histidine, glycine, threonine, arginine, alanine, tyrosine, valine, methionine, isoleucine, lysine, or leucine between the FF group and the CT group (p > 0.05). However, the concentrations of phenylalanine and total free amino acids (TFAA) tended to be lower in the FF group than in the CT group (p = 0.082 and p = 0.059, respectively). On day 60, no significant differences were observed in the concentrations of aspartic acid, glutamic acid, serine, histidine, glycine, arginine, tyrosine, valine, methionine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, lysine, or leucine between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, the FF group showed significantly lower concentrations of threonine and TFAA than the CT group (p < 0.05), and alanine tended to be decreased (p = 0.065).

3.4. Serum Immunoglobulin Levels and Antioxidant-Related Indices

As shown in Table 7, no significant differences were observed in the serum concentrations of IgG, IgA, or IgM between the FF group and CT group, both on day 30 and day 60 (p > 0.05). As for the antioxidant-related indices, as shown in Table 8, on day 30, compared with the control group, the FF group significantly increased the serum CAT concentration in growing pigs (p < 0.05), but had no significant effects on MDA or SOD levels (p > 0.05). However, on day 60, no significant differences were observed in serum MDA, CAT, or SOD levels between the FF group and the control group.

3.5. Fecal Microbiota Composition

Figure 1 illustrates the effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with PWCF on the fecal microbiota of growing pigs. After 60 days of feeding, the ACE and Chao1 indices were significantly higher in the FF group than in the CT group (p < 0.05; Figure 1A, B). Similarly, the Shannon diversity index was slightly increased in the FF group compared with the CT group (p < 0.05; Figure 1C). In contrast, the Simpson index was numerically higher in the CT group than in the FF group, although the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05; Figure 1D). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis distances further revealed a significant separation of microbial communities between the FF and CT groups at the genus level (ANOSIM: p = 0.011, R = 0.380; Figure 1E), indicating that PWCF supplementation markedly altered the overall gut microbial structure.
In addition, the genus-level taxonomic composition of the fecal microbiota was analyzed. The top 10 most abundant genera across treatments included norank_f_Muribaculaceae, Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Christensenellaceae_R-7_group, UCG-002, UCG-005, Terrisporobacter, Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, Treponema, and Bacillus (Figure 1F). LEfSe analysis revealed distinct microbial biomarkers between the CT and FF groups (Figure 1G). Taxa enriched in the FF group mainly included Treponema, the Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014_group and Prevotellaceae_UCG-001. In contrast, Bacillus, unclassified Bacilli, and the norank_f_Eubacterium coprostanoligenes group were identified as biomarkers of the CT group.

4. Discussion

In traditional nutrition research, DF has long been regarded as an anti-nutritional factor because it cannot be degraded by endogenous digestive enzymes and may reduce nutrient digestibility. Therefore, diets formulated for monogastric animals, particularly growing pigs, have typically contained relatively low levels of DF, generally ranging from approximately 8% to 15% total dietary fiber depending on the production stage and feeding objective [24,25]. Although monogastric animals cannot directly utilize DF, gut microorganisms possess the capacity to ferment fiber substrates, producing beneficial microbial metabolites that may exert probiotic effects on the host [25]. At present, the application of DF in swine nutrition remains challenging, as multiple factors must be considered, including the wide variety of fiber sources, the complexity of fiber composition, and differences among pig breeds [26]. In this study, wheat bran was partially replaced with PWCF to assess the effects of dietary fiber supplementation on growth performance, immune status, nutrient digestibility, and gut microbiota in growing pigs.

4.1. Partial Replacement of Wheat Bran with PWCF Did Not Affect Growth Performance in Growing Pigs

DF levels in pig diets are often restricted because of their potential anti-nutritional properties, which may reduce the digestibility of protein and energy [27]. In the present study, partial replacement of wheat bran with PWCF did not adversely affect average daily gain or feed conversion ratio in growing pigs. These findings suggest that PWCF can be incorporated at a low inclusion level without compromising growth performance. Consistent with our results, Wang et al. reported that pigs fed diets containing 5%, 10%, or 15% alfalfa meal exhibited improved feed utilization efficiency, whereas ADFI and ADG were not significantly affected [28]. Together, these results indicate that moderate inclusion of predominantly insoluble lignocellulosic fiber sources, such as PWCF, can be well tolerated by growing pigs and does not necessarily impair productive performance under practical feeding conditions. Consistent with the present findings, previous studies have reported that moderate inclusion of insoluble dietary fiber sources, including wheat bran, sugar beet pulp, and soybean hulls, generally does not impair growth performance in growing pigs when total dietary fiber levels are maintained within practical feeding ranges. The increased utilization of threonine for mucin synthesis may be particularly relevant in the present study, as PWCF supplementation improved intestinal health indicators, suggesting enhanced mucus barrier activity and epithelial maintenance. However, other research has reported that high-fiber diets may reduce ADG and increase the F: G. For instance, when DF levels increased from 5% to 7%, ADG was significantly decreased in growing pigs [29,30]. These results indicate that excessive DF inclusion can exert negative effects on growth performance. Similarly, pigs fed high-fiber diets have been reported to exhibit poorer growth outcomes, including reduced carcass weight and dressing percentage, as well as a higher carcass fat iodine value [31]. Such adverse effects may be attributed to the fact that DF can increase digesta viscosity and limit interactions between nutrients and digestive enzymes in the small intestine, thereby reducing nutrient digestion and absorption [32].

4.2. Partial Replacement of Wheat Bran with PWCF Did Not Affect the Apparent Total Tract Digestibility of Nutrients in Growing Pigs

Apparent total tract digestibility is an important indicator for evaluating feed efficiency, improving swine production performance, and reducing environmental burden [33]. Previous studies have shown that increasing DF levels to 6.86% significantly decreased the digestibility of CP, EE, CF, and ADF in growing pigs [34]. Similarly, in corn-based diets, increasing DF content resulted in a linear reduction in the ATTD of CP, DM, ash, and organic matter [35]. This decline may be attributed to the increased proportion of plant cell wall components associated with DF sources, which are generally resistant to digestion [36]. Other studies have also reported that the digestibility of DM, GE, and NDF decreases as DF levels increase in growing pig diets [37]. In addition, DF fractions have been negatively correlated with DE and metabolizable energy concentrations, indicating that high-fiber diets may reduce energy utilization in pigs [38]. However, in the present study, supplementation with PWCF did not exert any negative effects on ATTD, suggesting that this fiber source can effectively substitute wheat bran at the tested inclusion level. It is noteworthy that PWCF contained a relatively high ash content (30.13%) compared with many conventional dietary fiber sources. This characteristic may reflect the naturally occurring mineral fraction associated with poplar wood and the compositional properties of the processed fiber product. Despite the elevated ash content, no adverse effects were observed on nutrient digestibility, growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, or intestinal health indicators in the present study. These findings suggest that the mineral fraction of PWCF was well tolerated at the dietary inclusion level evaluated. Nevertheless, further characterization of the mineral composition and bioavailability of PWCF is warranted to better understand its nutritional contribution and potential physiological implications.

4.3. Effects of Partial Replacement of Wheat Bran with PWCF on Immune Function and Serum Biochemical Parameters in Growing Pigs

The content of immunoglobulins in serum can directly reflect the immune capacity of the organism. In the present study, supplementation of PWCF in the diet to partially replace wheat bran exerted no adverse effects on the immune capacity of growing pigs. However, several studies have shown that high-fiber diets reduce the contents of IgM and IgG in the plasma of growing pigs, impair their immune capacity, and induce certain intestinal damage [26]. Relevant studies have demonstrated that TP is closely associated with protein absorption and utilization [39]. Meanwhile, GLU, TG, LDL, HDL, TC, and other lipid metabolism indices are closely associated with fat deposition and metabolism in pigs [40]. Previous studies have shown that reductions in serum glucose and triglyceride concentrations are often observed in diets containing high levels of soluble dietary fiber, which can increase digesta viscosity and slow the diffusion and absorption of glucose and lipids across the intestinal epithelium [41,42]. In the present experiment, supplementation of PWCF in the diet did not reduce the contents of GLU and TG, which indicates that dietary supplementation of this fiber exerts no adverse effects on lipid absorption in growing pigs. Meanwhile, serum CAT concentration was significantly increased in growing pigs on day 30. Although CAT does not directly participate in nitrogen metabolism, its role in scavenging H2O2, protecting nitrogen-metabolizing enzymes, and maintaining redox homeostasis may indirectly contribute to the normal progression of nitrogen metabolism [43].

4.4. Effects of Partial Replacement of Wheat Bran with PWCF on Nitrogen Metabolism in Growing Pigs

BUN is negatively correlated with dietary efficiency and lean tissue deposition [44]. Therefore, plasma BUN concentration serves as an indicator of dietary protein supply and utilization [45]. Supplementation of PWCF in the present study reduced serum BUN concentration, which is consistent with the findings of Malmlöf and Lenis et al., who reported that feeding high-fiber diets decreased the postprandial mean concentrations of urea in portal and arterial blood in pigs [46,47]. However, the results of the present study are also in contrast to those of Van Der Meulen (1997), who demonstrated that when corn starch was completely replaced with raw potato starch in growing pigs, the postprandial mean concentrations of urea in portal and arterial blood were increased compared with the low-fiber control group [48]. Changes in blood urea concentration depend on the dietary protein level and the fermentability of DF [49]. Therefore, based on the concept of ideal protein ratio, the use of DF combined with a reduced dietary protein level may lower the BUN concentration, thereby decreasing urea excretion via urine. In summary, compared with other DF, PWCF can effectively replace wheat bran and reduce the content of BUN in the serum of growing pigs.
The BUN/creatinine ratio is considered a sensitive indicator for evaluating protein catabolism, and its variation depends on the balance between BUN production and creatinine excretion [50]. In the present study, no significant difference in the BUN/creatinine ratio was observed between the two groups on day 30, whereas the ratio was significantly lower in the FF group on day 60. This change was primarily driven by the declining trend in BUN, while creatinine concentration remained stable throughout the experimental period. This indicates that the decline in this ratio might be attributed to the reduction in protein metabolism [51]. Mechanistically, long-term FF treatment may suppress muscle protein degradation or amino acid deamination, thereby reducing ammonia production and subsequently decreasing hepatic urea synthesis, which ultimately leads to a lower BUN concentration. However, further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis, as nitrogen balance, urinary nitrogen excretion, and hepatic metabolism were not directly measured in the present study.
As a precursor for urea synthesis, blood ammonia can help explain the mechanism underlying the decrease in BUN [52]. In the present study, blood ammonia concentration did not differ significantly between the two groups and did not decrease in parallel with BUN. This may suggest that reduced ammonia generation was not the sole direct cause of the decline in BUN. At the same time, the stable blood ammonia concentration indicates that FF treatment did not impair hepatic ammonia detoxification capacity, thereby maintaining a safe and stable nitrogen metabolic state.
The plasma amino acid profile directly reflects amino acid metabolic homeostasis [53]. On day 30, FF treatment only tended to reduce total amino acid concentration, indicating that the animals may have maintained metabolic balance through compensatory regulation. However, on day 60, TFAA concentration was significantly reduced, with threonine showing a particularly marked decline. The decrease in total amino acids may suggest alterations in amino acid metabolism or utilization. Potential explanations could include changes in amino acid transport, intestinal absorption, or metabolic partitioning; however, these mechanisms were not directly assessed in the present study and therefore remain speculative. The concurrent reductions in total amino acids and BUN may indicate an influence of PWCF supplementation on nitrogen metabolism, although the underlying physiological mechanisms remain unclear. In addition, the decrease in essential amino acids may reflect altered amino acid availability, but its effects on protein metabolism require further investigation [54]. As an essential amino acid, threonine plays a critical role in intestinal health because it is a major constituent of mucin glycoproteins secreted by goblet cells [55]. Therefore, the reduced serum threonine concentration observed in the FF group may also reflect altered intestinal utilization associated with mucin synthesis and turnover. However, this possibility was not directly evaluated in the present study and requires further investigation.
In summary, FF treatment reduced BUN concentration and the BUN/creatinine ratio, indicating altered nitrogen metabolism. In addition, FF treatment was associated with lower serum TFAA and threonine concentrations, suggesting changes in amino acid utilization and metabolic homeostasis. Notably, blood ammonia concentration remained unchanged, indicating that FF supplementation did not adversely affect nitrogen metabolic status.

4.5. Effects of Partial Replacement of Wheat Bran with PWCF on Gut Microbiota in Growing Pigs

The gut microbial community is composed of various bacterial species in specific proportions, among which interspecific interactions constrain each other’s functions and enable mutual dependence to establish an ecological balance [56]. The gut microbiota plays a pivotal role in the interactions between diet and host physiology and represents one of the most important determinants of intestinal health [57]. DF acts as a substrate during fermentation and facilitates the proliferation of selective microbiota, thereby leading to alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota [24]. It has been well established that DF exerts a positive effect on maintaining the diversity of the gut microbial community and intestinal health in pigs [58]. PWCF is rich in hemicellulose dominated by xylan, which has a main chain composed of xylose residues, simple side chains, and a low degree of branching, making it an excellent carbon source for intestinal fiber-degrading bacteria [59].
Compared with the CT group, the FF group exhibited a higher relative abundance of Treponema, Lachnospiraceae, and Prevotellaceae. Treponema is a typical fiber-degrading spirochete whose genome is enriched in coding genes for xylanase, endoglucanase, and other hydrolases, enabling it to efficiently hydrolyze the xylan backbone. The high xylan content in poplar wood provides a specific substrate for this genus, allowing it to dominate the fiber-degrading ecological niche [60]. Although wheat bran also contains arabinoxylan, it has numerous and highly branched side chains, making it more readily utilized by rapidly fermenting bacteria (e.g., Lactobacillus, Ruminococcaceae), and thus it exhibits lower selectivity for such fiber-degrading bacteria than the high xylan in poplar wood [61]. Meanwhile, PWCF contains a certain proportion of lignin yet does not reach a high degree of lignification; it is mainly distributed in the intercellular layers and cell corners, forming a “fiber–lignin” composite structure [62]. Prevotellaceae is sensitive to fluctuations in ammonia concentration and pH [63]. Moderate lignin retards protein degradation and reduces ammonia accumulation, thus favoring its growth more, whereas wheat bran, with a high protein content and rapid fermentation, easily leads to elevated ammonia concentrations and inhibits Prevotellaceae [64].
Relevant studies have demonstrated that Treponema, Lachnospiraceae, and Prevotellaceae are common xylan-degrading genera and families with abundant xylanases, indicating that supplementation with PWCF can effectively increase the relative abundance of DF-degrading genera [60,65,66,67]. Wang et al. also reported similar findings that the proportions of Prevotellaceae and Lachnospiraceae are positively correlated with DF intake. These bacterial families are associated with the fermentation of plant-derived non-starch polysaccharides into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Treponema has been reported to participate in the degradation of dietary fiber. However, fermentation metabolites, intestinal pH, pathogen abundance, nutrient absorption, and intestinal health indicators were not evaluated in the present study [68]. Therefore, whether the increased abundance of Treponema resulted in functional changes in the intestinal environment remains to be determined.
Likewise, several studies have demonstrated that DF supplementation in the diet promotes the growth of beneficial bacteria (e.g., Lachnospiraceae and Prevotellaceae) and inhibits the growth of pathogenic bacteria, thereby exerting a certain anti-inflammatory effect. This finding is consistent with the results of the present study: the proportion of Lachnospira in the FF group was significantly higher than that in the CT group, suggesting that DF supplementation may influence the composition of the gut microbial community. However, its effects on intestinal inflammation and microbial dysbiosis were not directly assessed in the present study [69,70].
The present study only analyzed the changes in the relative abundance of Treponema, Lachnospiraceae, and Prevotellaceae, but did not determine their core metabolites, especially SCFAs such as acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid, making it impossible to directly verify whether the alterations in microbial abundance are actually translated into differences in metabolic functions. These results indicated that PWCF can alter the composition of the gut microbiota and increase the relative abundance of bacterial genera capable of degrading PWCF, whereas whether it exerts beneficial effects on intestinal barrier function requires further investigation.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, replacing 2% wheat bran with PWCF in diets for growing pigs had no adverse effects on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, or health-related indicators, while influencing serum nitrogen-related parameters and gut microbiota composition. Further studies evaluating different inclusion levels are required to determine the dose-dependent effects and practical application potential of PWCF.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.P., X.L. and G.G.; methodology, Y.P., X.L. and G.G.; validation, Y.P., D.M. and Y.L.; formal analysis, G.G., W.S. and Y.F.; investigation, G.G., X.J. and Y.F.; data curation, G.G., X.J. and Y.F.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.F. and G.G.; writing—review and editing, Y.P., X.L., W.S., Y.L. and D.M.; supervision, Y.P. and X.L.; project administration, Y.L. and W.S.; funding acquisition, Y.P. and X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Science and Technology Program of Shijiazhuang City (2417908202A), the Hebei Province Agricultural Science and Technology Achievement Transformation Project (2026JNZ-A03), the Strategic Cooperation Project between the People’s Government of Shijiazhuang and the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (25014), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP) (CAAS-IFR-JCCX-2025-04).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (IFR-CAAS20220725).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The 16S rRNA raw data supporting the findings of this study are available in the NCBI database at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1468394/ (accessed on 20 May 2026), accession number PRJNA1468394. The data are publicly accessible and can be requested from the corresponding author for any additional information or clarification.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate all crew members for their assistance during experiments at Tianpeng Experimental Farm.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADFAcid detergent fiber
ADFIAverage daily feed intake
ADGAverage daily gain
AIAAcid-insoluble ash
AOACAssociation of Official Analytical Chemists
ASVAmplicon sequence variants
ATTDApparent total tract digestibility
BUNBlood urea nitrogen
BWBody weight
CATCatalase
CFCrude fiber
CPCrude protein
CTControl group
DMDry matter
FFFiber treatment group
F: GFeed-to-gain ratio
GEGross energy
GLUGlucose
IgAImmunoglobulin A
IgGImmunoglobulin G
IgMImmunoglobulin M
MDAMalondialdehyde
NDFNeutral detergent fiber
PCoAPrincipal coordinate analysis
PWCFPoplar wood composite fiber
SCFAsShort-chain fatty acids
SODSuperoxide dismutase
TFAATotal free amino acid
TGTriglyceride
TPTotal protein

References

  1. Zhao, J.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, G.; Liu, L.; Lai, C. Relationship between Dietary Fiber Fermentation and Volatile Fatty Acids’ Concentration in Growing Pigs. Animals 2020, 10, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wu, W.; Xie, J.; Zhang, H. Dietary fibers influence the intestinal SCFAs and plasma metabolites profiling in growing pigs. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 4644–4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, Q.; Burrough, E.R.; Gabler, N.K.; Loving, C.L.; Sahin, O.; Gould, S.A.; Patience, J.F. A soluble and highly fermentable dietary fiber with carbohydrases improved gut barrier integrity markers and growth performance in F18 ETEC challenged pigs1. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 2139–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Le Goff, G.; van Milgen, J.; Noblet, J. Influence of dietary fibre on digestive utilization and rate of passage in growing pigs, finishing pigs and adult sows. Anim. Sci. 2002, 74, 503–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, J.; Bai, Y.; Tao, S.; Zhang, G.; Wang, J.; Liu, L.; Zhang, S. Fiber-rich foods affected gut bacterial community and short-chain fatty acids production in pig model. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 57, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, X.; Hongliang, W.; Piao, X. Validation of metabolisable energy prediction equation for de-oiled corn distillers dried grains with solubles fed to finishing pigs. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 15, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, Q.; Su, Y.B.; Li, D.F.; Liu, L.; Huang, C.F.; Zhu, Z.P.; Lai, C.H. Effects of inclusion levels of wheat bran and body weight on ileal and fecal digestibility in growing pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 28, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Goehring, D.L.; Wu, F.; DeRouchey, J.M.; Goodband, R.D.; Tokach, M.D.; Woodworth, J.C.; Paulk, C.B.; Dritz, S.S. The effects of dietary soybean hulls particle size and diet form on nursery and finishing pig performance. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2020, 4, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Hansen, M.J.; Chwalibog, A.; Tauson, A.H.; Sawosz, E. Influence of different fibre sources on digestibility and nitrogen and energy balances in growing pigs. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2006, 60, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wenk, C. The role of dietary fibre in the digestive physiology of the pig. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2001, 90, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, H.; Mao, X.B.; Che, L.Q.; Yu, B.; He, J.; Yu, J.; Han, G.Q.; Huang, Z.Q.; Zheng, P.; Chen, D.W. Impact of fiber types on gut microbiota, gut environment and gut function in fattening pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 195, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Quemeneur, K.; Montagne, L.; Le Gall, M.; Lechevestrier, Y.; Labussiere, E. Relation between feeding behaviour and energy metabolism in pigs fed diets enriched in dietary fibre and wheat aleurone. Animal 2020, 14, 508–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Saqui-Salces, M.; Huang, Z.; Vila, M.F.; Li, J.; Mielke, J.A.; Urriola, P.E.; Shurson, G.C. Modulation of intestinal cell differentiation in growing pigs is dependent on the fiber source in the diet. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 95, 1179–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, H.; Mao, X.; He, J.; Yu, B.; Huang, Z.; Yu, J.; Zheng, P.; Chen, D. Dietary fibre affects intestinal mucosal barrier function and regulates intestinal bacteria in weaning piglets. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 110, 1837–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Santos Alexandre, A.P.; Vela-Paredes, R.S.; Santos, A.S.; Costa, N.S.; Canniatti-Brazaca, S.G.; Calori-Domingues, M.A.; Augusto, P.E.D. Ozone treatment to reduce deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN) contamination in wheat bran and its impact on nutritional quality. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2018, 35, 1189–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Li, L.; Zheng, X. Effect of ozone treatment on processing properties of wheat bran and shelf life characteristics of noodles fortified with wheat bran. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 3893–3902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chen, S.; Zhang, X.; Ling, Z.; Xu, F. Characterization of the Micromorphology and Topochemistry of Poplar Wood during Mild Ionic Liquid Pretreatment for Improving Enzymatic Saccharification. Molecules 2017, 22, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. GB 13078-2017; Feed Hygienic Standard. National Standardization Management Committee, State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine: Beijing, China, 2017.
  19. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wang, L.; Xu, H.; Yuan, F.; Fan, R.; Gao, Y. Preparation and physicochemical properties of soluble dietary fiber from orange peel assisted by steam explosion and dilute acid soaking. Food Chem. 2015, 185, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, W.; Zeng, G.; Pan, Y.; Chen, W.; Huang, W.; Chen, H.; Li, Y. Properties of soluble dietary fiber-polysaccharide from papaya peel obtained through alkaline or ultrasound-assisted alkaline extraction. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 172, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Ngoc, T.T.; Len, N.T.; Lindberg, J.E. Impact of fibre intake and fibre source on digestibility, gut development, retention time and growth performance of indigenous and exotic pigs. Animal 2013, 7, 736–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yin, C.; Xu, L.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Bai, R.; Gao, G.; Fan, Y.; Li, Y.; Sun, W.; Li, X.; et al. Gut microbiota and bile acid profiles in purebred vs. crossbred sows: Links to oxidative stress and inflammation in late gestation. Microb. Genom. 2025, 11, 001579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jha, R.; Berrocoso, J.D. Review: Dietary fiber utilization and its effects on physiological functions and gut health of swine. Animal 2015, 9, 1441–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jha, R.; Fouhse, J.M.; Tiwari, U.P.; Li, L.; Willing, B.P. Dietary Fiber and Intestinal Health of Monogastric Animals. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ding, S.; Cheng, Y.; Azad, M.A.K.; Dong, H.; He, J.; Huang, P.; Kong, X. Dietary fiber alters immunity and intestinal barrier function of different breeds of growing pigs. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1104837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Noblet, J.; Le Goff, G. Effect of dietary fibre on the energy value of feeds for pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2001, 90, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, J.; Qin, C.; He, T.; Qiu, K.; Sun, W.; Zhang, X.; Jiao, N.; Zhu, W.; Yin, J. Alfalfa-containing diets alter luminal microbiota structure and short chain fatty acid sensing in the caecal mucosa of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhao, Y.; Liu, C.; Niu, J.; Cui, Z.; Zhao, X.; Li, W.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Gao, P.; Guo, X.; et al. Impacts of dietary fiber level on growth performance, apparent digestibility, intestinal development, and colonic microbiota and metabolome of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 101, skad174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ngoc, T.T.B.; Thao, T.T.T.; Dung, P.V. Effects of Different Fibre Sources in Pig Diets on Growth Performance, Gas Emissions and Slurry characteristics. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2020, 9, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nemechek, J.E.; Tokach, M.D.; Dritz, S.S.; Goodband, R.D.; DeRouchey, J.M.; Woodworth, J.C. Effects of diet form and type on growth performance, carcass yield, and iodine value of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 4486–4499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  32. Johansen, H.N.; Knudsen, K.E.; Sandström, B.; Skjøth, F. Effects of varying content of soluble dietary fibre from wheat flour and oat milling fractions on gastric emptying in pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 1996, 75, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  33. Herd, R.M.; Arthur, P.F. Physiological basis for residual feed intake1. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, E64–E71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pu, G.; Hou, L.; Du, T.; Wang, B.; Liu, H.; Li, K.; Niu, P.; Zhou, W.; Huang, R.; Li, P. Effects of short-term feeding with high fiber diets on growth, utilization of dietary fiber, and microbiota in pigs. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 963917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bindelle, J.; Buldgen, A.; Delacollette, M.; Wavreille, J.; Agneessens, R.; Destain, J.P.; Leterme, P. Influence of source and concentrations of dietary fiber on in vivo nitrogen excretion pathways in pigs as reflected by in vitro fermentation and nitrogen incorporation by fecal bacteria. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rodrigues, L.A.; Wellington, M.O.; Van Kessel, A.G.; Columbus, D.A. Nutrition and Immunology in Swine. In Sustainable Swine Nutrition; Chiba, L.I., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 245–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Acosta, J.A.; Stein, H.H.; Patience, J.F. Impact of increasing the levels of insoluble fiber and on the method of diet formulation measures of energy and nutrient digestibility in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jaworski, N.W.; Lærke, H.N.; Bach Knudsen, K.E.; Stein, H.H. Carbohydrate composition and in vitro digestibility of dry matter and nonstarch polysaccharides in corn, sorghum, and wheat and coproducts from these grains1. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 1103–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, Q.; Wang, B.; Hu, N.; Bao, N.; Pan, L.; Zhao, Y.; Qin, G. Relationship between dietary amino acid release kinetics and nitrogen deposition in growing pigs. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 9, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bee, G.; Gebert, S.; Messikommer, R. Effect of dietary energy supply and fat source on the fatty acid pattern of adipose and lean tissues and lipogenesis in the pig1. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80, 1564–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Espinosa, C.D.; Fry, R.S.; Kocher, M.E.; Stein, H.H. Effects of copper hydroxychloride and dietary fiber on intestinal permeability, growth performance, and blood characteristics of nursery pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 263, 114447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ramos, D.; Mar, D.; Ishida, M.; Vargas, R.; Gaite, M.; Montgomery, A.; Linder, M.C. Mechanism of Copper Uptake from Blood Plasma Ceruloplasmin by Mammalian Cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, S.; Tang, C.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Meng, F.; Luo, G.; Xin, H.; Zhong, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; et al. The Effects of Dietary Inclusion of Mulberry Leaf Powder on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Quality of Tibetan Pigs. Animals 2022, 12, 2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Whang, K.Y.; Easter, R.A. Blood Urea Nitrogen as an Index of Feed Efficiency and Lean Growth Potential in Growing-Finishing Swine. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 13, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, S.Y.; Selle, P.H. A consideration of starch and protein digestive dynamics in chicken-meat production. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2015, 71, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Malmlöf, K. Porto-arterial plasma concentration differences of urea and ammonia-nitrogen in growing pigs given high- and low-fibre diets. Br. J. Nutr. 1987, 57, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Lenis, N.P.; Bikker, P.; van der Meulen, J.; van Diepen, J.T.; Bakker, J.G.; Jongbloed, A.W. Effect of dietary neutral detergent fiber on ileal digestibility and portal flux of nitrogen and amino acids and on nitrogen utilization in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1996, 74, 2687–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  48. van der Meulen, J.; Bakker, G.C.M.; Bakker, J.G.M.; de Visser, H.; Jongbloed, A.W.; Everts, H. Effect of resistant starch on net portal-drained viscera flux of glucose, volatile fatty acids, urea, and ammonia in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75, 2697–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Younes, H.; Demigné, C.; Behr, S.; Rémésy, C. Resistant starch exerts a lowering effect on plasma urea by enhancing urea N transfer into the large intestine. Nutr. Res. 1995, 15, 1199–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yalçınkaya, E.; Topçu, M.; Kasapoğlu, U.S.; Arıkan, H.; Yapıcı, H.B.; Eryüksel, S.E.; Karakurt, S. Metabolic and Muscular Determinants of Weaning Failure: The Role of BUN/Creatinine Ratio and Rectus Femoris Thickness. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ogata, E.S.; Foung, S.K.H.; Holliday, M.A. The Effects of Starvation and Refeeding on Muscle Protein Synthesis and Catabolism in the Young Rat. J. Nutr. 1978, 108, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mikkelsen, A.C.D.; Thomsen, K.L.; Vilstrup, H.; Aamann, L.; Jones, H.; Mookerjee, R.P.; Hamilton-Dutoit, S.; Frystyk, J.; Aagaard, N.K. Potassium deficiency decreases the capacity for urea synthesis and markedly increases ammonia in rats. Am. J. Physiol.-Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2021, 320, G474–G483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hu, X.; Guo, F. Amino Acid Sensing in Metabolic Homeostasis and Health. Endocr. Rev. 2021, 42, 56–76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Qiu, L.; Huang, Q.; Li, W.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, J.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, P.; Liu, S.; et al. Aging influences protein digestion, absorption and amino acid metabolism. Biogerontology 2025, 26, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bortoluzzi, C.; Fernandes, J.I.M.; Doranalli, K.; Applegate, T.J. Effects of dietary amino acids in ameliorating intestinal function during enteric challenges in broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 262, 114383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hu, R.; Li, S.; Diao, H.; Huang, C.; Yan, J.; Wei, X.; Zhou, M.; He, P.; Wang, T.; Fu, H.; et al. The interaction between dietary fiber and gut microbiota, and its effect on pig intestinal health. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1095740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Walsh, C.J.; Guinane, C.M.; O’Toole, P.W.; Cotter, P.D. Beneficial modulation of the gut microbiota. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 4120–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jha, R.; Rossnagel, B.; Pieper, R.; Van Kessel, A.; Leterme, P. Barley and oat cultivars with diverse carbohydrate composition alter ileal and total tract nutrient digestibility and fermentation metabolites in weaned piglets. Animal 2010, 4, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sivan, P.; Heinonen, E.; Escudero, L.; Gandla, M.L.; Jiménez-Quero, A.; Jönsson, L.J.; Mellerowicz, E.J.; Vilaplana, F. Unraveling the unique structural motifs of glucuronoxylan from hybrid aspen wood. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 343, 122434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Maghini, D.G.; Oduaran, O.H.; Olubayo, L.A.I.; Cook, J.A.; Smyth, N.; Mathema, T.; Belger, C.W.; Agongo, G.; Boua, P.R.; Choma, S.S.R.; et al. Expanding the human gut microbiome atlas of Africa. Nature 2025, 638, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Rose, D.J.; Patterson, J.A.; Hamaker, B.R. Structural Differences among Alkali-Soluble Arabinoxylans from Maize (Zea mays), Rice (Oryza sativa), and Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Brans Influence Human Fecal Fermentation Profiles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hori, C.; Gaskell, J.; Igarashi, K.; Kersten, P.; Mozuch, M.; Samejima, M.; Cullen, D. Temporal Alterations in the Secretome of the Selective Ligninolytic Fungus Ceriporiopsis subvermispora during Growth on Aspen Wood Reveal This Organism’s Strategy for Degrading Lignocellulose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 2062–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Matos, A.M.; Carvalho, V.M.; Avila, V.A.D.; Ornaghi, M.G.; Bonin, E.; Castilho, R.A.; Prado, R.M.D.; Prado, I.N.D. PSXI-19 Levels of a blend of clove, castor and cashew oils and microencapsulated active ingredients (eugenol, thymol and vanillin) against some ruminal Prevotella. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vogel, K.P.; Johnson, V.A.; Mattern, P.J. Protein and Lysine Contents of Endosperm and Bran of the Parents and Progenies of Crosses of Common Wheat. Crop Sci. 1978, 18, 751–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bueno, D.; de Freitas, C.; Brienzo, M. Enzymatic Cocktail Formulation for Xylan Hydrolysis into Xylose and Xylooligosaccharides. Molecules 2023, 28, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chen, T.T.; Long, W.M.; Zhang, C.H.; Liu, S.; Zhao, L.P.; Hamaker, B.R. Fiber-utilizing capacity varies in Prevotella- versus Bacteroides- dominated gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Zaplana, T.; Miele, S.; Tolonen, A.C. Lachnospiraceae are emerging industrial biocatalysts and biotherapeutics. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 11, 1324396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jin, W.; Xue, C.; Liu, J.; Yin, Y.; Zhu, W.; Mao, S. Effects of Disodium Fumarate on In Vitro Rumen Fermentation, The Production of Lipopolysaccharide and Biogenic Amines, and The Rumen Bacterial Community. Curr. Microbiol. 2017, 74, 1337–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cantu-Jungles, T.M.; Hamaker, B.R. New View on Dietary Fiber Selection for Predictable Shifts in Gut Microbiota. mBio 2020, 11, e02179–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chen, L.; Ye, Z.; Li, J.; Xiao, F. P0201 Gut Bacteria Prevotellaceae Related Lithocholic Acid Metabolism Promotes Colonic Inflammation. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2025, 19, i604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on fecal microbial composition in growing pigs. (A) ACE index; (B) Chao1 index; (C) Shannon index; (D) Simpson index; (E) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis distances at the genus level; (F) Microbial community composition at the genus level; (G) LEfSe analysis of differential enrichment of fecal bacteria at the genus level (linear discriminant analysis [LDA] > 3.5). CT = basal diet; FF = CON + 2% poplar wood composite fiber (replacing 2% wheat bran). n = 5.
Figure 1. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on fecal microbial composition in growing pigs. (A) ACE index; (B) Chao1 index; (C) Shannon index; (D) Simpson index; (E) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis distances at the genus level; (F) Microbial community composition at the genus level; (G) LEfSe analysis of differential enrichment of fecal bacteria at the genus level (linear discriminant analysis [LDA] > 3.5). CT = basal diet; FF = CON + 2% poplar wood composite fiber (replacing 2% wheat bran). n = 5.
Vetsci 13 00588 g001
Table 1. Ingredient composition and calculated nutrient levels of the basal diet (as-fed basis, %).
Table 1. Ingredient composition and calculated nutrient levels of the basal diet (as-fed basis, %).
ItemsTreatment Groups
CTFF
Corn63.8763.87
Soybean meal, 46% CP19.0019.00
Rice bran meal8.008.00
Wheat bran4.002.00
Soybean oil1.901.90
Dicalcium phosphate0.180.18
Limestone1.501.50
L-Lysine0.700.70
DL-Methionine0.050.05
L-Threonine0.140.14
L-Tryptophan0.010.01
Salt0.400.40
Phytase0.020.02
Vitamin premix 10.030.03
Mineral premix 10.200.20
Poplar wood composite fiber0.002.00
Total100.00100.00
Nutrient composition
Crude protein 215.4515.41
Net energy, kcal/kg 324752475
Calcium 20.670.68
Total phosphorus 20.510.51
Neutral detergent fiber 312.2413.25
SID Lysine 31.001.00
SID Methionine 30.280.28
SID Threonine 30.600.60
SID Tryptophan 30.160.16
SID = Standardized ileal digestibility. 1 Premix supplied per kilogram of diets: vitamin A, 7245 IU; vitamin D3, 1470 IU; vitamin E, 40 IU; vitamin K3, 1.79 mg; vitamin B1, 2.14 mg; vitamin B2, 4.37 mg; vitamin B6, 2.68 mg; vitamin B12, 0.024 mg; niacin, 25 mg; calcium pantothenate, 15 mg; folic acid, 4.15 mg; 2%biotin, 0.42 mg; iron (FeSO4·H2O), 150 mg; manganese (MnSO4·H2O), 100 mg; copper (CuSO4·5H2O), 23 mg; selenium (Na2SeO3), 0.5 mg; cobalt (CoCl2), 1 mg; iodine (Ca(IO3)2), 23 mg; Zinc 79 mg. 2 Values were analyzed. 3 Values were calculated.
Table 2. Nutrient composition and fiber physical characteristics of the poplar wood composite fiber (PWCF) (air dry basis, %).
Table 2. Nutrient composition and fiber physical characteristics of the poplar wood composite fiber (PWCF) (air dry basis, %).
ItemsComposition
Nutrient composition
Moisture5.42
Crude protein3.55
Crude fiber44.25
Neutral detergent fiber (NDF)70.51
Acid detergent fiber (ADF)59.55
Ether extract (EE)2.65
Nitrogen-free extract14.00
Ash30.13
Calcium1.50
Phosphorus0.03
Fiber physical characteristics
Water-holding capacity (g/mL)6.25
Swelling capacity (g/mL)6.17
Table 3. Growth performance of growing pigs fed diets in which wheat bran was partially replaced by poplar wood composite fiber.
Table 3. Growth performance of growing pigs fed diets in which wheat bran was partially replaced by poplar wood composite fiber.
ItemsTreatment GroupsSEMp-Value
CTFF
Body weight, kg
0 d47.447.70.810.511
30 d71.971.51.180.777
60 d99.399.21.850.965
Average daily gain, g/d
1~30 d81779129.30.584
31~60 d91192331.60.746
1~60 d86486127.70.875
Average daily feed intake, g/d
1~30 d2151210462.90.632
31~60 d2656269565.30.819
1~60 d2403240058.70.969
Average daily feed intake: Average daily gain (F: G)
1~30 d2.632.670.050.586
31~60 d2.922.930.050.870
1~60 d2.782.800.040.667
CT = basal diet; FF = CON + 2% poplar wood composite fiber (replacing 2% wheat bran). n = 5.
Table 4. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on apparent total tract digestibility in growing pigs.
Table 4. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on apparent total tract digestibility in growing pigs.
ItemsTreatment GroupsSEMp-Value
CTFF
Dry matter, %79.278.81.160.825
Crude protein, %75.377.21.710.464
Calcium, %34.836.44.490.810
Phosphorus, %35.839.04.060.590
Ether extract, %72.975.02.200.512
Gross energy, %80.280.61.180.807
CT = basal diet; FF = CON + 2% poplar wood composite fiber (replacing 2% wheat bran). n = 5.
Table 5. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on serum biochemical parameters in growing pigs.
Table 5. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on serum biochemical parameters in growing pigs.
ItemsTreatment GroupsSEMp-Value
CTFF
Glucose, mmol/L
30 d5.474.970.2720.210
60 d4.444.560.1870.656
Triglyceride, mmol/L
30 d0.220.270.0300.115
60 d0.220.290.0250.194
Total protein, mg/mL
30 d53.252.21.970.715
60 d56.658.51.840.498
Blood urea nitrogen, mmol/L
30 d0.570.680.0530.197
60 d0.720.580.0570.084
Creatinine, μmol/mL
30 d0.220.220.0090.576
60 d0.230.210.0120.490
Blood ammonia, μmol/mL
30 d0.330.310.0130.233
60 d0.340.300.0240.194
Blood urea nitrogen/Creatinine
30 d2.713.100.3100.388
60 d3.222.640.1900.048
CT = basal diet; FF = CON + 2% poplar wood composite fiber (replacing 2% wheat bran). n = 5.
Table 6. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on serum-free amino acids in growing pigs.
Table 6. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on serum-free amino acids in growing pigs.
ItemsTreatment GroupsSEMp-Value
CTFF
30 d (mg/L)
Aspartic acid8.498.040.6920.660
Glutamic acid40.2337.242.3140.383
Serine24.7522.011.7780.324
Histidine54.0852.082.3050.562
Glycine94.5080.566.5040.160
Threonine25.5927.143.7710.779
Arginine43.3436.453.8190.219
Alanine61.8954.663.5320.165
Tyrosine34.4129.492.7930.234
Valine41.6440.931.6600.776
Methionine17.9518.421.5820.834
Isoleucine21.5821.721.2260.937
Phenylalanine25.4130.441.9240.082
Lysine40.9339.512.7050.715
Leucine32.0930.371.7610.505
Total free amino acid572.35526.0913.2210.059
60 d (mg/L)
Aspartic acid8.326.430.7720.102
Glutamic acid34.4226.462.9680.074
Serine17.4015.391.4700.361
Histidine12.2210.501.3080.383
Glycine78.5468.744.6150.154
Threonine47.6420.594.432<0.001
Arginine36.3831.775.2680.545
Alanine39.6830.333.2520.065
Tyrosine21.9020.672.7420.757
Valine34.5632.681.8890.497
Methionine9.3311.861.5130.252
Isoleucine15.3314.471.3590.692
Phenylalanine11.6411.621.1230.991
Lysine36.3029.314.4870.329
Leucine28.8225.331.8520.228
Total free amino acid433.97357.6515.1900.010
CT = basal diet; FF = CON + 2% poplar wood composite fiber (replacing 2% wheat bran). n = 5.
Table 7. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on immune parameters in growing pigs.
Table 7. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on immune parameters in growing pigs.
ItemsTreatment GroupsSEMp-Value
CTFF
Immunoglobulin G, mg/mL
30 d34.935.00.5460.853
60 d34.434.00.8640.644
Immunoglobulin A, μg/mL
30 d1811823.990.818
60 d1841822.920.571
Immunoglobulin M, mg/mL
30 d3.673.770.0710.356
60 d3.603.450.0880.282
CT = basal diet; FF = CON + 2% poplar wood composite fiber (replacing 2% wheat bran). n = 5.
Table 8. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on serum biochemical parameters in growing pigs.
Table 8. Effects of partial replacement of wheat bran with poplar wood composite fiber on serum biochemical parameters in growing pigs.
ItemsTreatment GroupsSEMp-Value
CTFF
Malondialdehyde, nmol/mL
30 d4.18 3.89 0.1570.120
60 d3.84 3.73 0.1480.642
Catalase, U/mL
30 d9.80 10.87 0.2240.013
60 d10.34 10.61 0.420 0.615
Superoxide dismutase, U/mL
30 d9.31 10.82 0.8030.230
60 d8.70 9.12 0.6450.656
CT = basal diet; FF = CON + 2% poplar wood composite fiber (replacing 2% wheat bran). n = 5.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, Y.; Gao, G.; Jiang, X.; Ming, D.; Li, Y.; Sun, W.; Li, X.; Pi, Y. Effects of Partial Replacement of Wheat Bran with Poplar Wood Composite Fiber on Growth Performance, Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Immune Function, and Gut Microbiota in Growing Pigs. Vet. Sci. 2026, 13, 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13060588

AMA Style

Fan Y, Gao G, Jiang X, Ming D, Li Y, Sun W, Li X, Pi Y. Effects of Partial Replacement of Wheat Bran with Poplar Wood Composite Fiber on Growth Performance, Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Immune Function, and Gut Microbiota in Growing Pigs. Veterinary Sciences. 2026; 13(6):588. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13060588

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Yuyang, Ge Gao, Xinyue Jiang, Dongxu Ming, Yanpin Li, Wenjuan Sun, Xilong Li, and Yu Pi. 2026. "Effects of Partial Replacement of Wheat Bran with Poplar Wood Composite Fiber on Growth Performance, Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Immune Function, and Gut Microbiota in Growing Pigs" Veterinary Sciences 13, no. 6: 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13060588

APA Style

Fan, Y., Gao, G., Jiang, X., Ming, D., Li, Y., Sun, W., Li, X., & Pi, Y. (2026). Effects of Partial Replacement of Wheat Bran with Poplar Wood Composite Fiber on Growth Performance, Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Immune Function, and Gut Microbiota in Growing Pigs. Veterinary Sciences, 13(6), 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13060588

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop