CYPOR Variability as a Biomarker of Environmental Conditions in Bream (Abramis brama), Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Perch (Perca flavescens), and Pike-Perch (Sander lucioperca) from Lake Ladoga
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
- Toxin accumulation: Insufficient CYP activity can slow the metabolism of toxic substances, promoting their accumulation in the liver and contributing to the development of hepatopathies.
- Oxidative stress: CYPOR and CYP participate in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Impaired function of these systems can increase ROS production, leading to oxidative stress and hepatocellular damage.
- Inflammatory processes: Metabolic products formed through CYP-mediated reactions may induce inflammatory responses that contribute to hepatopathy development.
- To evaluate the ecological state of the reservoir and its coastal zone as fish habitats.
- To conduct hematological analyses to assess the clinical status of fish.
- To perform bacteriological and histological examinations to further evaluate fish health.
- To determine CYPOR levels and assess the impact of habitat conditions on these parameters.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Hematological Examination
2.2. Bacteriological and Histological Studies
2.3. Studies to Determine CYPOR Concentrations in Liver Homogenates
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Ecological Status
3.2. Bacteriological Examination
3.3. Hematological Examination Results
3.4. Histological Examination
3.5. CYPOR Examination
- Identification of specific factors (or their combination) responsible for induction;
- Studying changes in the activity of CYPOR-dependent cytochrome P450 isoforms;
- Assessment of the functional outcomes of such induction in vivo (e.g., clearance rate of specific substrates, formation of toxic metabolites, oxidative stress).
4. Discussion
- Conduct targeted chemical analyses to quantify specific pollutants (PCBs, PAHs, heavy metals, and a broad panel of pharmaceuticals) in water, sediments, and fish tissues from these high-risk sites.
- Correlate the concentrations of specific chemical groups with the magnitude of CYPOR induction and specific histopathological endpoints.
- Validate the biomarker utility of CYPOR by comparing its response with other established biomarkers (e.g., CYP1A activity via EROD assay, oxidative stress markers) in a controlled exposure experiment with key identified contaminants.
- Investigate the population-level consequences of this chronic stress by assessing reproductive health (gonadal histology, vitellogenin levels) and growth parameters in affected fish.
5. Conclusions
- The littoral zones of southern Lake Ladoga, particularly Volkhov Bay, are subjected to significant anthropogenic pollution, leading to chronic toxic exposure in resident fish populations. This is evidenced by deteriorated water quality parameters, widespread histopathological damage in organs (liver, gills, kidneys), and hematological abnormalities.
- Fish from polluted sites exhibit a severe (15–20 fold) induction of hepatic cytochrome P450 reductase (CYPOR) compared to healthy controls. This dramatic upregulation is strongly correlated with the observed pathological state and environmental degradation.
- CYPOR demonstrates high potential as a sensitive and integrative biomarker for environmental stress in fish. Its response likely reflects the overall metabolic demand for detoxification imposed by complex pollutant mixtures in real-world ecosystems.
- The isolated fish microbiota, while typical for healthy individuals, exhibited concerning patterns of multi-antibiotic resistance, highlighting an additional risk associated with environmental contamination in Lake Ladoga.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CYPOR | cytochrome P450 reductase |
| CYP | cytochrome P450 |
| NADPH | reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate |
| ROS | reactive oxygen species |
| PAHs | polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; |
| PCBs | polychlorinated biphenyls |
| ALT | Alanine Aminotransferase |
| AST | aspartate aminotransferase |
| PXR | pregnane X receptor |
| CAR | constitutive androstane receptor |
| AhR | aryl hydrocarbon receptor |
| Mn | mineralization |
| EC | electrical conductivity |
| ORP | oxidation-reduction potential |
| M | mean |
| SD | standard deviation |
| SE | standard error |
| CV | coefficient of variation; |
| MAC | Maximum Allowable Concentration |
References
- Popova, O.; Ponamarev, V. The prevalence of hepatopathy in productive animals and aquaculture objects. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ensuring Sustainable Development: Ecology, Energy, Earth Science and Agriculture (AEES 2023), Moscow, Russia, 21–22 December 2023; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2024; p. 4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feist, S.W.; Stentiford, G.D.; Kent, M.L.; Ribeiro Santos, A.; Lorance, P. Histopathological assessment of liver and gonad pathology in continental slope fish from the northeast Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Environ. Res. 2015, 106, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuentes-Lopez, K.; Olivero-Verbel, J.; Caballero-Gallardo, K. Presence of Nematodes, Mercury Concentrations, and Liver Pathology in Carnivorous Freshwater Fish from La Mojana, Sucre, Colombia: Assessing Fish Health and Potential Human Health Risks. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2025, 88, 189–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uddin, M.A.; Aktar, M.N.A.S.; Halim, K.A.; Hasanuzzaman, K.M.; Islam, A. Health and disease status of cultured Gulsha (Mystus cavasius) at Mymensingh region of Bangladesh. Res. Agric. Livest. Fish. 2020, 7, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agbabiaka, L.A.; Onwuzuruigbo, F.O.; Jimoh, O.A. Threat to fish food safety in Nigeria: Role of antimicrobial usage and resistance in aquaculture. Aquac. Rep. 2025, 40, 102643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, X.; Zha, J.; Martyniuk, C.J.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, J. Histopathological and proteomic responses in male Chinese rare minnow (Gobiocypris rarus) indicate hepatotoxicity following benzotriazole exposure. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 229, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walter, G.L.; Jones, P.D.; Giesy, J.P. Pathologic alterations in adult rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, exposed to dietary 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Aquat. Toxicol. 2000, 50, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ponamarev, V. Methods for determining cytochrome P450 reductase in biological fluids of animals. BIO Web Conf. 2025, 160, 01030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponamarev, V.S.; Popova, O.S.; Ukrainskaya, O.A. The role of the cytochrome system in the biotransformation of xenobiotics and drugs (review). Agrar. Sci. Euro-North-East 2025, 26, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulyaeva, L.F.; Grishanova, A.Y.; Gromova, O.A.; Slynko, N.M.; Vavilin, V.A.; Lyakhovich, V.V. Microsomal Monooxygenase System of Living Organisms in Environmental Biomonitoring: Analytical Review; Series “Ecology”; Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Novosibirsk, Russia, 1994; p. 100. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Gao, B.; Feng, S. Combined effects of two antibiotic contaminants on Microcystis aeruginosa. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 279, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, H.; Liu, S.; Xu, X.R.; Liu, S.S.; Zhou, G.J.; Sun, K.F.; Zhao, J.L.; Ying, G.G. Antibiotics in typical marine aquaculture farms surrounding Hailing Island, South China: Occurrence, bioaccumulation and human dietary exposure. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 90, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allameh, A.; Niayesh-Mehr, R.; Aliarab, A.; Sebastiani, G.; Pantopoulos, K. Oxidative Stress in Liver Pathophysiology and Disease. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Larina, S.N.; Ignatiev, I.V.; Chebyshev, N.V.; Kukes, V.G. Nuclear receptors and xenobiotic metabolism. Antibiot. Chemother. 2009, 54, 42–48. [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez-Mozaz, S.; Huerta, B.; Barceló, D. Bioaccumulation of emerging contaminants in aquatic biota: Patterns of pharmaceuticals in Mediterranean river networks. In Emerging Contaminants in River Ecosystems: Occurrence and Effects Under Multiple Stress Conditions; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 121–141. [Google Scholar]
- Ambili, T.R.; Saravanan, M.; Ramesh, M.; Abhijith, D.B.; Poopal, R.K. Toxicological effects of the antibiotic oxytetracycline to an Indian major carp Labeo rohita. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2013, 64, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, K.H.D. Combined Toxicity of Microplastics and Antimicrobials on Animals: A Review. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paramonov, S.G.; Zelikova, D.D.; Sklyarova, L.V.; Alkhutova, I.M. Environmental risks from micropollution of the environment with tetracycline. Pharm. Formulas 2022, 4, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, L.; Zang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Ai, W.; Ding, N.; Wang, H. Joint toxicity of fluoroquinolone and tetracycline antibiotics to zebrafish (Danio rerio) based on biochemical biomarkers and histopathological observation. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2017, 42, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Au-Yeung, C.; Tsui, Y.-L.; Choi, M.-H.; Chan, K.-W.; Wong, S.-N.; Ling, Y.-K.; Lam, C.-M.; Lam, K.-L.; Mo, W.-Y. Antibiotic Abuse in Ornamental Fish: An Overlooked Reservoir for Antibiotic Resistance. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreeva, N.L.; Lunegov, A.M.; Baryshev, V.A.; Popova, O.S.; Kuznetsova, E.V. Pharmacology in Aquaculture: Study Guide; Saint Petersburg State Academy of Veterinary Medicine: Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2017; 76p. [Google Scholar]
- National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th ed.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54050/ (accessed on 30 November 2025).
- Petrova, E.A. Algorithm for Taking Blood from Different Animal Species; Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University: Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 2024; 115p. [Google Scholar]
- Sula, E.; Aliko, V.; Pagano, M.; Faggio, C. Digital light microscopy as a tool in toxicological evaluation of fish erythrocyte morphological abnormalities. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2020, 83, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canedo, A.; de Jesus, L.W.O.; Bailão, E.F.L.C.; Rocha, T.L. Micronucleus test and nuclear abnormality assay in zebrafish (Danio rerio): Past, present, and future trends. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 290, 118019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Skorodumov, D.I.; Subbotin, V.V. Microbiological Diagnostics of Bacterial Diseases of Animals; Izograf: Moscow, Russia, 2005; 656p. [Google Scholar]
- CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 35th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2025; Available online: https://clsi.org/shop/standards/m100-ed35/ (accessed on 30 November 2025).
- Bankhead, P.; Loughrey, M.B.; Fernández, J.A.; Dombrowski, Y.; McArt, D.G.; Dunne, P.D.; McQuaid, S.; Gray, R.T.; Murray, L.J.; Coleman, H.G.; et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stritt, M.; Stalder, A.K.; Vezzali, E. Orbit Image Analysis: An open-source whole-slide image analysis tool. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2020, 16, e1007313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cloud-Clone Corp. ELISA Kit for Cytochrome P450 Reductase (CPR). No. SED312Hu. Available online: https://cloud-clone.com/products/SED312Hu.html (accessed on 7 October 2025).
- Hunter, J.D. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007, 9, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kudersky, L.A. Selected Works: Research in Ichthyology, Fisheries and Related Disciplines; KMK: Moscow, Russia, 2013; Volume 3, 526p. [Google Scholar]
- Guidelines 4.2.1884-04; Sanitary-Microbiological and Sanitary-Parasitological Analysis of Surface Water Bodies. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation: Moscow, Russia, 2004.
- Zahran, E.; Mamdouh, A.Z.; Elbahnaswy, S.; El-Son, M.M.A.; Risha, E.; ElSayed, A.; El Barbary, M.I.; El Sebaei, M.G. The impact of heavy metal pollution: Bioaccumulation, oxidative stress, and histopathological alterations in fish across diverse habitats. Aquacult. Int. 2025, 33, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pramanik, S.; Biswas, J.K. Histopathological fingerprints and biochemical changes as multi-stress biomarkers in fish confronting concurrent pollution and parasitization. iScience 2024, 27, 109457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rana, S.V.S. Biomarkers of trace element toxicity in fish: A new paradigm in environmental health risk assessment. In Fish Species in Environmental Risk Assessment Strategies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 6–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Oost, R.; Beyer, J.; Vermeulen, N.P. Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: A review. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2003, 13, 57–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cabello, F.C.; Godfrey, H.P.; Buschmann, A.H.; Dölz, H.J. Aquaculture as yet another environmental gateway to the development and globalisation of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, e127–e133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tolson, A.H.; Wang, H. Regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes by xenobiotic receptors: PXR and CAR. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2010, 62, 1238–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



















| Water Area | Shlisselburg Bay | Volkhov Bay | Svir Bay | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Station | Sh1 | Sh2 | Sh3 | Sh4 (C *) | V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 (C *) | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 (C *) |
| Depth, m | 8 | 3.5 | 5 | 15 | 6 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 10 | 7.1 | 8.3 | 6.4 | 20 |
| Water Area | Station | h, m | Horizon | T, ℃ | El, µS/cm | Mn, g/L | O2, mg/L | % Sat, (O2) | pH | Eh, mV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volkhov Bay | V1 | 6 | surface | 19.1 ± 0.7 | 162.2 ± 0.5 | 0.103 ± 0.060 | 9.5 ± 0.5 | 103.2 ± 1.3 | 8.2 ± 0.4 | 133.0 ± 1.3 |
| bottom | 19.8 ± 0.6 | 187.3 ± 0.6 | 0.122 ± 0.020 | 8.8 ± 0.3 | 95.5 ± 1.5 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 80.0 ± 1.2 | |||
| V2 | 6.3 | surface | 19.4 ± 0.2 | 158.9 ± 0.9 | 0.103 ± 0.030 | 9.8 ± 0.7 | 106.2 ± 0.9 | 8.3 ± 0.3 | 43.0 ± 0.9 | |
| bottom | 18.6 ± 0.3 | 171.1 ± 0.7 | 0.115 ± 0.050 | 9.5 ± 0.5 | 101.3 ± 1.5 | 8.1 ± 0.4 | 62.0 ± 0.7 | |||
| V3 | 6.5 | surface | 16.7 ± 0.2 | 177.7 ± 0.5 | 0.067 ± 0.008 | 10.6 ± 0.3 | 110.5 ± 1.6 | 8.1 ± 0.5 | 71.0 ± 1.2 | |
| bottom | 15.8 ± 0.6 | 103.3 ± 0.2 | 0.066 ± 0.003 | 10.2 ± 0.1 | 106.7 ± 1.2 | 8.2 ± 0.5 | 83.0 ± 1.2 | |||
| V4 | 10 | surface | 18.6 ± 0.3 | 102.2 ± 0.9 | 0.114 ± 0.010 | 9.8 ± 0.6 | 103.5 ± 1.4 | 8.0 ± 0.6 | 66.0 ± 1.8 | |
| bottom | 17.4 ± 0.3 | 101.2 ± 0.7 | 0.095 ± 0.001 | 11.0 ± 0.4 | 96.5 ± 1.3 | 7.8 ± 0.2 | 84.0 ± 0.9 | |||
| Svir Bay | S1 | 7.1 | surface | 12.8 ± 0.5 | 94.5 ± 0.8 | 0.061 ± 0.002 | 11.2 ± 0.3 | 105.7 ± 1.7 | 8.0 ± 0.1 | 99.0 ± 0.6 |
| bottom | 12.0 ± 0.85 | 95.9 ± 0.6 | 0.060 ± 0.005 | 11.00 ± 0.1 | 106.6 ± 1.0 | 8.0 ± 0.3 | 112.0 ± 1.0 | |||
| S2 | 8.3 | surface | 12.8 ± 0.6 | 84.3 ± 0.8 | 0.056 ± 0.005 | 11.1 ± 0.4 | 105.5 ± 0.9 | 7.9 ± 0.5 | 90.0 ± 1.3 | |
| bottom | 12.6 ± 0.4 | 83.9 ± 0.7 | 0.055 ± 0.006 | 11.3 ± 0.2 | 105.5 ± 1.5 | 7.9 ± 0.2 | 125.0 ± 1.8 | |||
| S3 | 6.4 | surface | 15.8 ± 0.2 | 71.8 ± 0.6 | 0.032 ± 0.003 | 10.2 ± 0.3 | 102.3 ± 1.8 | 7.7 ± 0.3 | 109.0 ± 1.6 | |
| bottom | 15.5 ± 0.3 | 71.2 ± 0.5 | 0.030 ± 0.006 | 10.3 ± 0.5 | 100.8 ± 1.4 | 7.4 ± 0.2 | 130.0 ± 0.9 | |||
| S4 | 22 | surface | 9.7 ± 0.2 | 92.8 ± 0.7 | 0.060 ± 0.003 | 12.2 ± 0.6 | 105.8 ± 1.9 | 7.4 ± 0.5 | 131.5 ± 1.2 | |
| bottom | 9.5 ± 0.4 | 95.2 ± 0.2 | 0.060 ± 0.002 | 12.3 ± 0.5 | 102.6 ± 1.8 | 7.1 ± 0.4 | 110.0 ± 1.0 | |||
| Shlisselburg Bay | Sh1 | 8 | surface | 16.0 ± 0.4 | 92.5 ± 0.5 | 0.061 ± 0.001 | 10.5 ± 0.1 | 105.8 ± 1.2 | 7.6 ± 0.4 | 84.2 ± 0.3 |
| bottom | 14.5 ± 0.2 | 94.7 ± 0.5 | 0.061 ± 0.001 | 10.4 ± 0.2 | 98.7 ± 1.4 | 7.8 ± 0.4 | 156.2 ± 1.9 | |||
| Sh2 | 3.5 | surface | 14.5 ± 0.1 | 84.2 ± 0.5 | 0.053 ± 0.002 | 10.7 ± 0.2 | 105.5 ± 1.6 | 8.4 ± 0.1 | 70.5 ± 0.2 | |
| bottom | 13.0 ± 0.2 | 87.3 ± 0.4 | 0.053 ± 0.004 | 11.2 ± 0.3 | 105.5 ± 1.2 | 8.0 ± 0.5 | 92.5 ± 0.3 | |||
| Sh3 | 5 | surface | 11.2 ± 0.3 | 91.4 ± 1.2 | 0.055 ± 0.003 | 11.4 ± 0.3 | 103.0 ± 1.6 | 8.4 ± 0.1 | 87.0 ± 0.5 | |
| bottom | 10.2 ± 0.7 | 90.7 ± 0.5 | 0.063 ± 0.005 | 11.5 ± 0.4 | 98.9 ± 1.0 | 7.9 ± 0.1 | 98.3 ± 1.0 | |||
| Sh4 | 15 | surface | 10.3 ± 0.5 | 94.3 ± 1.0 | 0.065 ± 0.003 | 10.6 ± 0.2 | 101.6 ± 1.7 | 7.6 ± 0.7 | 96.0 ± 1.5 | |
| bottom | 10.0 ± 0.4 | 93.5 ± 0.7 | 0.066 ± 0.001 | 10.5 ± 0.9 | 97.7 ± 1.2 | 7.4 ± 0.6 | 95.0 ± 1.7 |
| Seasons | Fishing Stations | Fish Species | Number of Fish Examined | Fish Condition Assessment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Fish with Pathological Changes (%) | Pathology Severity (Points) | Number of Fish by Points | ||||
| Spring | V1 5 km from the mouth of the Volkhov River | bream | 10 | 50 | 2; 3; 4.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0; 1—4.0 |
| pike-perch | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | ||
| roach | 10 | 60 | 2; 3; 4.0 | 3—2.0; 2—3.0; 1—4.0 | ||
| perch | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0; 1—4.0 | ||
| V2 Syassky Pulp and Paper Mill area | bream | 10 | 60 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 4—3.0 | |
| pike-perch | 10 | 70 | 2; 3; 4.0 | 2—2.0; 4—3.0; 1—4.0 | ||
| roach | 10 | 60 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 4—3.0 | ||
| perch | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | ||
| V3 5 km to the left of the mouth of the Volkhov River | bream | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | |
| pike-perch | 10 | 40 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 | ||
| roach | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | ||
| perch | 10 | 40 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 | ||
| V4 Outside the littoral zone | bream | 10 | 40 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 | |
| pike-perch | 10 | 40 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 | ||
| perch | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 1—2.0; 4—3.0 | ||
| smelt | 10 | 30 | 2.0 | 3—2.0 | ||
| Summer | V1 5 km from the mouth of the Volkhov River | bream | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 |
| pike-perch | 10 | 60 | 2; 3.0 | 4—2.0; 2—3.0 | ||
| roach | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 3—2.0; 2—3.0 | ||
| perch | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | ||
| V2 Syassky Pulp and Paper Mill area | bream | 10 | 60 | 2; 3; 4.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0; 1—4.0 | |
| pike-perch | 10 | 60 | 2; 3; 4.0 | 2—1.0; 4—3.0 | ||
| roach | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | ||
| perch | 10 | 60 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 4—3.0 | ||
| V3 5 km to the left of the mouth of the Volkhov River | bream | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | |
| pike-perch | 10 | 40 | 2; 3.0 | 1—2.0; 3—3.0 | ||
| roach | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | ||
| perch | 10 | 40 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 | ||
| V4 Outside the littoral zone | bream | 10 | 40 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 | |
| pike perch | 10 | 30 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 1—3.0 | ||
| roach | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | ||
| smelt | 10 | 30 | 2.0 | 3—2.0 | ||
| Autumn | V1 5 km from the mouth of the Volkhov River | bream | 10 | 40 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 |
| pike-perch | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 3—2.0; 2—3.0 | ||
| roach | 10 | 40 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 | ||
| perch | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | ||
| V2 Syassky Pulp and Paper Mill area | bream | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 3—2.0; 2—3.0 | |
| pike-perch | 10 | 60 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 4—3.0 | ||
| roach | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | ||
| perch | 10 | 50 | 2; 3.0 | 2—2.0; 3—3.0 | ||
| V3 5 km to the left of the mouth of the Volkhov River | bream | 10 | 40 | 2—3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 | |
| pike-perch | 10 | 40 | 2—3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 | ||
| roach | 10 | 30 | 2—3.0 | 2—2.0; 1—3.0 | ||
| perch | 10 | 40 | 2—3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 | ||
| V4 Outside the littoral zone | bream | 10 | 40 | 2—3.0 | 3—2.0; 1—3.0 | |
| pike perch | 10 | 30 | 2—3.0 | 2—2.0; 1—3.0 | ||
| roach | 10 | 40 | 2—3.0 | 2—2.0; 2—3.0 | ||
| smelt | 10 | 20 | 2.0 | 2—2.0 | ||
| Pathological Material Tested | Bacteriological Examination Results |
|---|---|
| Sample No. 1 | Isolated:
|
| Sample No. 2 | Isolated:
|
| Sample No. 3 | Isolated:
|
| Sample No. 4 | Isolated:
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ponamarev, V.; Popova, O.; Semenova, E.; Mikhailov, E.; Romanov, A. CYPOR Variability as a Biomarker of Environmental Conditions in Bream (Abramis brama), Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Perch (Perca flavescens), and Pike-Perch (Sander lucioperca) from Lake Ladoga. Vet. Sci. 2026, 13, 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010094
Ponamarev V, Popova O, Semenova E, Mikhailov E, Romanov A. CYPOR Variability as a Biomarker of Environmental Conditions in Bream (Abramis brama), Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Perch (Perca flavescens), and Pike-Perch (Sander lucioperca) from Lake Ladoga. Veterinary Sciences. 2026; 13(1):94. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010094
Chicago/Turabian StylePonamarev, Vladimir, Olga Popova, Elena Semenova, Evgeny Mikhailov, and Alexey Romanov. 2026. "CYPOR Variability as a Biomarker of Environmental Conditions in Bream (Abramis brama), Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Perch (Perca flavescens), and Pike-Perch (Sander lucioperca) from Lake Ladoga" Veterinary Sciences 13, no. 1: 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010094
APA StylePonamarev, V., Popova, O., Semenova, E., Mikhailov, E., & Romanov, A. (2026). CYPOR Variability as a Biomarker of Environmental Conditions in Bream (Abramis brama), Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Perch (Perca flavescens), and Pike-Perch (Sander lucioperca) from Lake Ladoga. Veterinary Sciences, 13(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010094

