Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Veterinary Prescription of Gastroprotectants in Dogs in Spain
Previous Article in Journal
A Monoclonal Antibody-Based Indirect Competitive ELISA for Detecting Goose Astrovirus Antibodies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Veterinary Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/vetsci13010060
vetsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Common Radiographic Findings in Moroccan Working Equids: A Retrospective Study (2015–2022)

by
Zineb EL Brini
1,*,
Ichrak Mhar
2,
Fatima Ezzahra Bouktaib
3,
Mohamed Piro
1,
Carola Daniel
2 and
Hassan Alyakine
1
1
Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Reproduction, Agronomy and Veterinary Institute Hassan II, Rabat 10000, Morocco
2
The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
3
Laboratory of Biodiversity, Ecology and Genome, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University Mohammed V, B.P 1014 RP, Rabat 10100, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2026, 13(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010060
Submission received: 22 November 2025 / Revised: 16 December 2025 / Accepted: 19 December 2025 / Published: 8 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Anatomy, Histology and Pathology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Simple Summary

Working equids, including horses, donkeys, and mules, are essential for daily transportation and labor in many Moroccan communities. However, they are often exposed to demanding conditions that predispose them to musculoskeletal injuries, including foot-related changes, fractures, and other skeletal disorders. In this study, we reviewed more than 1100 radiographs from nearly 500 equids examined at four Society for the Protection of Animals Abroad (SPANA) centers in Morocco. Foot-related changes were the most frequent findings, followed by fractures and periosteal new bone formation. Less common conditions included degenerative joint disease, limb deformities, and other bone-related abnormalities. Radiography proved to be a key diagnostic tool for identifying these disorders and supporting clinical decision-making in low-resource settings. These findings provide descriptive information on radiographically detectable musculoskeletal conditions in working equids and offer a basis for future research under field conditions.

Abstract

Working equids are at high risk of musculoskeletal disorders due to strenuous labor, repetitive tasks, and harsh environmental conditions. This retrospective study describes the distribution of radiographically detected musculoskeletal findings in working equids presented to four Society for the Protection of Animals Abroad (SPANA) centers in Morocco, based on 498 animals and 1125 radiographs collected between 2015 and 2022. The study population was mainly composed of horses (78.1%), followed by donkeys (15.3%) and mules (6.6%). Most were males (65.7%), and the majority were between 5 and 15 years old (60.4%). The distal limb (foot, pastern, and fetlock) was the most frequently examined region (62.7%). Among the animals reviewed, 381 (76.5%) exhibited at least one radiographically detected abnormality, while 117 (23.5%) showed no visible osseous change. The most frequent findings included foot-related changes (36.2%), defined as non-fracture podiatric abnormalities, fractures (29.7%), and periosteal new bone formation (22%). Less frequent findings were degenerative joint disease (8.1%), joint subluxation or luxation (1.6%), epiphyseal abnormalities (1.6%), and angular deformities (0.8%). These results provide an overview of radiographically detected osseous changes in working equids under field conditions. They highlight the diagnostic value of radiography in low-resource environments and provide a basis for future field-based studies.

1. Introduction

Horses, donkeys, and mules are essential to the livelihoods of many communities, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where they contribute significantly to employment, transportation, agriculture, and household tasks [1,2]. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization [3], the global population of working equids—including donkeys, horses, and mules—is estimated at approximately 112 million, with nearly 39 million residing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), supporting the livelihoods of approximately 600 million people worldwide, especially in marginalized and economically disadvantaged areas [4].
In Morocco, the working equid population exceeds one million. As reported by the Directorate of Strategy and Statistics [5], this includes approximately 187,029 horses, 949,604 donkeys, and 324,069 mules. These animals are deeply integrated into the socio-economic structure of both rural and peri-urban areas, where they are primarily used for agricultural work, urban and peri-urban transport, cart pulling, construction-related activities, equestrian tourism, and cultural ceremonies. Their endurance and versatility make them indispensable work partners in daily life.
Due to the physically demanding nature of their work, often performed for long hours under challenging working environments, including hard or uneven working surfaces, working equids are particularly susceptible to musculoskeletal disorders, including chronic joint and soft tissue abnormalities and overuse-related injuries associated with repetitive mechanical loading [6,7,8]. Such health issues can compromise animal welfare and pose direct risks to the livelihoods of dependent communities, reinforcing the relevance of the One Health approach, in line with internationally recognized animal welfare frameworks [2,4].
Radiography plays a key role in evaluating musculoskeletal health in equids, offering a practical and cost-effective means of detecting skeletal abnormalities, assessing injury severity, and informing treatment plans [9]. However, despite its widespread use in clinical settings, there is a notable lack of research describing radiographically detected musculoskeletal findings in working equids, particularly within the socio-economic context of Morocco.
This study aims to identify and categorize radiographically detected musculoskeletal abnormalities in Morocco’s working equids through a retrospective analysis of radiographic data. By quantifying the distribution of these skeletal changes within the examined population, the study explores patterns of abnormalities in relation to working conditions and the socio-economic context. As the analysis is restricted to equids referred for imaging, the findings should be interpreted within this specific population and not extrapolated to the wider working-equid population. Nevertheless, these findings provide a basis to inform targeted health interventions and guide future research and outreach strategies in similar working-animal settings.

2. Materials and Methods

The present study aimed to describe the distribution and frequency of radiographically detected musculoskeletal abnormalities observed in working equids referred for imaging examination at four Society for the Protection of Animals Abroad (SPANA) centers in Morocco—Marrakech, Casablanca, Chemaia, and Khemisset—between 2015 and 2022. SPANA is a non-profit organization providing free veterinary care and welfare support for working equids in Morocco.
Only animals presenting clinical signs of lameness or locomotor abnormalities were selected for radiographic evaluation. Lameness was identified based on routine locomotor examination performed by SPANA veterinarians, including visual gait assessment, palpation, and flexion tests. Diagnostic anesthesia (nerve or intra-articular blocks) was not performed systematically under field conditions. The number of radiographs per case varied depending on the anatomical region and on the ability to reach a diagnostic conclusion, in accordance with the standard clinical workflow of SPANA centers. In some cases, multiple anatomical regions were radiographed in the same animal. For descriptive analyses, each radiographic abnormality was recorded and classified independently by lesion category, while animal-level analyses were performed based on the presence or absence of at least one radiographic finding per individual.
Radiographs were obtained using Agfa computed radiography (CR) systems provided by BCF Technology (Bellshill, Scotland, UK). Standard lateromedial and dorsopalmar/dorsoplantar projections were acquired whenever possible, with oblique or skyline views performed when clinically indicated. Exposure parameters were selected according to manufacturer recommendations and adjusted to the animal’s size and the anatomical region examined. Anti-scatter grids were not available in SPANA centers and were therefore not used.
All images were reviewed by two veterinarians experienced in equine orthopedics and diagnostic imaging: the first author, with over seven years of experience, and a senior clinician with approximately thirty years of professional practice in diagnostic imaging. The evaluation was performed blindly, without access to clinical history or examination findings, to minimize interpretation bias. As a consequence, no clinical–radiographic correlation could be performed, and the analysis was therefore limited to the description of radiographic findings. Lesions were identified independently by both readers according to predefined diagnostic criteria proposed by Butler et al. [10].

2.1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

To ensure consistency in lesion classification, predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied across all types of radiographic abnormalities. These criteria were intended to standardize the analysis and minimize bias related to image quality or lesion overlap.
Only radiographic abnormalities that were clearly visible and consistent with pathological changes were included, whereas incidental or doubtful findings were excluded from the analysis. The classification of lesions followed the diagnostic principles described by Butler et al. [10], providing a standardized and widely accepted framework for the interpretation of equine radiographic findings. Radiographs of insufficient diagnostic quality (e.g., severe motion artifacts, inadequate exposure, or non-diagnostic projections) were excluded from the analysis.
  • Foot-related changes. Radiographs were included when they showed podiatric abnormalities such as ossification of the ungular cartilages, abnormal hoof conformation (e.g., excessively long toe, low or underrun heels), or laminitic changes (increased distance between the dorsal hoof wall and the distal phalanx, dorsal distal phalanx modeling, or rotation). Changes affecting the solar border of the distal phalanx were described as solar margin remodeling, which could include an irregular contour, blunting, or focal areas of bone lysis visible on radiographs, and did not meet the radiographic criteria for laminitis. Fractures involving the foot were excluded from this category and classified separately. Changes in the hoof capsule were described as associated morphological features and were not considered primary osseous lesions.
  • Fractures. Defined as visible discontinuity of the cortical bone or fragmentation of osseous structures, regardless of anatomical location or orientation.
  • Periosteal new bone formation. All forms of periosteal new bone formation (smooth, irregular, multilamellar, or extensive) were grouped under a single category.
  • Degenerative joint disease (DJD). Included radiographic evidence of periarticular osteophytes or enthesophytes, subchondral sclerosis, narrowing or collapse of the joint space, with or without partial ankylosis.
  • Subluxation/Luxation. Partial or complete displacement of articular surfaces relative to one another, confirmed on orthogonal projections.
  • Epiphyseal conditions. Included developmental abnormalities of the growth plate, such as incomplete ossification, physeal irregularities, and metaphyseal flaring in young animals.
  • Angular limb deformities. Defined as varus or valgus deviations in the frontal plane, confirmed radiographically by misalignment of the limb axis and asymmetry of the physis or metaphysis on dorsopalmar/dorsoplantar views.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.3.2) [11] within the RStudio environment (version 2024.04.1). Animals without recorded findings were coded as “0”, and those showing at least one radiographic finding were coded as “1”.
Age was standardized and classified into three categories: <5 years, 5–15 years, and >15 years. The frequency of radiographic findings was calculated as the proportion of affected animals, with exact 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Associations between the presence of findings and categorical variables (age, sex, species) were evaluated using Chi-square (χ2) tests, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
A secondary analysis assessed each finding category separately, comparing distributions across variables. Rare findings were described qualitatively and interpreted with caution.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Population Studied

Data were collected from a population of 498 equines, yielding a total of 1125 radiographs. The distribution of equine species within the sample revealed that horses were overrepresented, with 78.1% (n = 389). Donkeys comprised 15.3% (n = 76), while mules represented 6.6% (n = 33) (Table 1).
The study population consisted of 65.7% males (n = 327) and 30.5% females (n = 152). Age distribution showed that 21.7% (n = 108) of the individuals were under 5 years old, 60.4% (n = 301) were between 5 and 15 years, and 15.7% (n = 78) were over 15 years of age, while sex and age data were missing for 3.8% (n = 19) and 2.2% (n = 11) of the population, respectively (see Supplementary Table S1).

3.2. Most Common Conditions Determined Radiographically

The following results describe radiographically detected osseous abnormalities. The frequency of radiographed anatomical regions varied notably across the study population (see Supplementary Table S1). The distal limb including the foot, pastern, and fetlock was the most frequently examined region, representing 62.7% (n = 312/498) of cases. Other anatomical regions were less frequently examined, including the metacarpus/ metatarsus (11.4%, n = 57), the carpus (9.6%, n = 48), the radius/ulna (5%, n = 25), and tarsus (4.4%, n = 22). Among the 498 cases reviewed, 23.5% (n = 117) showed no radiographic evidence of osseous abnormalities. In contrast, 76.5% (n = 381) exhibited a total of 416 pathological lesions, documented from the evaluation of 1125 radiographic views.
Foot-related changes were the most frequently observed radiographic changes, with an overall proportion of 36.2% (138/381). The most frequent finding was ossification of the ungular cartilages, observed in 50% of affected animals (69/138) (Figure 1A). Abnormal hoof conformation, characterized by overgrowth and imbalance of the hoof capsule, was present in 39.1% (54/138) (Figure 1C), while solar margin modeling (20.3%, 28/138) and radiographic features suggestive of chronic laminitis (10.1%, 14/138) were also identified (Figure 1B).
Fractures accounted for a significant proportion of the pathological lesions observed, with a frequency of 29.7% (113/381). The proximal phalanx was the most frequently affected bone, representing 31% (35/113) of fracture cases, followed by fractures of the third metacarpal/metatarsal bone (17.7%, 20/113), the radius (12.4%, 14/113), and the distal phalanx (7.1%, 8/113). Examples of these fracture types are illustrated in Figure 2A–C. Other less frequently affected bones included the tibia, humerus, and ulna. Details of fracture localization and distribution are provided in the Supplementary Table S1.
Periosteal new bone formation was identified in 22.0% (84/381) of affected animals (Figure 3A–C). Most lesions were located in the pastern region (59.5%, n = 50) (Figure 3A), followed by those observed along the cortical surface of the third metacarpal or metatarsal bone (23.8%, n = 20). Degenerative and developmental joint disorders were also observed among the study population. Degenerative joint disease (DJD) accounted for 8.1% (31/381) of affected animals (Figure 3B). The joints most frequently involved were the fetlock and the carpus, each representing 35.5% (11/31) of DJD cases, followed by the tarsus, accounting for 22.6% (7/31). Joint luxation or subluxation (Figure 1B) and epiphysitis (Figure 3C) were less common, each representing 1.6% (6/381) of cases. Angular limb deformities, characterized by visible deviation of the limb axis, were the least frequent findings, occurring in 0.8% (3/381) of the affected population.

3.3. Statistical Analysis Results

Analysis of the distribution of radiographic findings across demographic variables revealed no statistically significant association between the overall occurrence of radiographic abnormalities and either age (χ2 = 2.49; p = 0.288) or sex (χ2 = 1.29; p = 0.526), whereas species showed a significant difference (χ2 = 9.62; p = 0.008). The proportion of animals showing at least one radiographic finding remained high across all age groups (68.5–74.4%) and genders (65.1% in females, 68.5% in males), with the highest values observed in mules (87.9%), followed by donkeys (73.7%) and horses (64.0%) (Table 1).
When examining individual radiographic categories, age significantly influenced the distribution of findings (χ2 = 60.6; p < 0.001), while sex remained non-significant (χ2 = 11.1; p = 0.68). Younger animals (<5 years) most frequently presented fractures (30.6%) and foot-related changes (19.4%), whereas periosteal new bone formation (14.8%) and epiphyseal conditions (5.6%) were less common. Animals aged 5–15 years predominantly showed foot-related findings (30.6%) and fractures (18.9%), with periosteal new bone formation (16.0%) also observed. Older animals (>15 years) exhibited a higher proportion of fractures (28.2%), periosteal new bone formation (24.4%), and foot-related changes (26.9%) (Table 2).
No significant variation in the type of radiographic findings was observed between sexes. Foot-related changes (32.9%) and fractures (21.7%) were similarly distributed between females and males (25.4% and 23.6, respectively), while %, other categories remained low and comparable (Table 2).
Species comparisons showed significant differences in the distribution of radiographic findings (χ2 = 34.7; p = 0.002): mules exhibited higher proportions of fractures (42.4%) and periosteal new bone formation (27.3%), donkeys showed more periosteal new bone formation (17.1%) and luxation/subluxation (3.9%), while horses had the highest proportions of foot-related changes (29.3%) and new bone formation (15.9%) (Table 2).
Overall, species emerged as the main factor influencing the distribution of skeletal radiographic findings among the examined animals.

4. Discussion

4.1. Demographic Patterns in Radiographed Animals

Our study reports quantitative differences in species, sex, and age distribution among working equids referred for radiographic examination at various SPANA centers, reflecting animals exposed to sustained physical workloads and work-related mechanical stress. Horses represented the largest proportion of the study population, followed by donkeys and then mules, a disparity likely influenced by multiple factors. In Morocco, horses are often perceived as having a higher economic and functional value compared to donkeys and mules, which could partly influence owners’ decisions to seek veterinary care. Conversely, although studies have shown that donkeys are more prone to lameness [7,12,13], their innate stoicism and high pain tolerance [14,15], often result in subtle or absent clinical signs, making lameness more difficult for owners to detect [16]. Mules represented the smallest proportion of animals presented for radiographic examination in this Moroccan study population. This finding is consistent with international NGO-based data reporting that mules constitute the lowest proportion of equids presented to veterinary services in several low- and middle-income countries [17]. Handling difficulties, combined with safety concerns for both personnel and equipment further limit the feasibility of radiographic examination in donkeys and mules by limiting the number of views obtained or discouraging radiography altogether. Previous studies have reported stress-related negative behavioral responses in working donkeys and mules, with aggressive and avoidance behaviors being more frequently observed in mules under challenging handling and working conditions [18,19]. Consequently, the lower proportion of donkeys and mules undergoing radiographic examination likely reflects a combination of economic, handling-related, and diagnostic constraints.
Males were overrepresented in the study population, consistent with previous findings from Morocco and other countries. Bakkar et al. [20] reported that more than 60% of the 900 working equids examined at the American Fondouk in Morocco were male, a pattern similarly observed by Norris et al. [13] in 2448 equids. This predominance likely reflects traditional management practices, where females are mainly retained for reproduction to maintain herd sustainability, while males are preferred for draft and transport work. Males are generally perceived as stronger and more resilient, leading to their selection for labor-intensive activities that increase the risk of fatigue, injuries, and poorer welfare outcomes. Comparable findings were reported by Assefa et al. [21] in Ethiopia, where 98% of working donkeys were male, underscoring a widespread preference for males based on their greater pulling capacity and economic value.
The age distribution of radiographed cases showed notable variation. Most animals were between 5 and 15 years old, which corresponds to the period considered optimal for active work in equids [22]. At this age, sustained workloads and cumulative mechanical stress increase the likelihood of locomotor problems. A substantial number of animals were younger than 5 years, despite recommendations to avoid work before skeletal maturity [23]. Similar observations have been made in Egypt, where young working equids frequently presented with lameness or bone injuries [24]. Starting work too early and being exposed to excessive strain before full bone development may predispose these animals to long-term orthopedic issues and a reduced working lifespan [25]. In contrast, studies in performance horses indicate that early, controlled exercise can promote adaptive skeletal responses, particularly in bone, and may reduce injury risk when training is progressive and well managed [26,27]. These conditions, however, differ markedly from those experienced by working equids, where workloads are often excessive, poorly regulated, and associated with limited recovery. Conversely, older equids were underrepresented, suggesting that few remain in service long enough to reach advanced age. The degenerative changes observed in this group are consistent with age-related joint disease described previously [28,29,30,31].
Together, these demographic patterns (species, sex, and age) influence the likelihood of presenting musculoskeletal disorders identified through radiographic examination. Since radiographs are performed mainly for lameness investigation, the overrepresentation of certain groups likely reflects differential exposure and owner perception rather than true population prevalence.

4.2. Lesions Diagnosed by Radiography

Radiography provided valuable insight into skeletal conditions in working equids but also revealed its diagnostic limits. In many animals, no bone abnormalities were visible, showing that radiography alone cannot fully reflect the clinical status. A thorough and standardized clinical lameness assessment prior to diagnostic imaging is essential to accurately localize the region of pain and optimize interpretation of radiographic findings, particularly under field conditions. Similar findings were described in Ethiopia, where lameness in working donkeys was often linked to muscular or ligamentous problems associated with insufficient rest [21]. These observations highlight the need for a multimodal diagnostic approach that combines radiography with ultrasonographic evaluation whenever possible.
The predominance of hoof and distal limb disorders in radiographed animals underscores the central importance of hoof health in equine welfare and productivity. Numerous field studies from Africa and Asia have consistently identified hoof disorders as major contributors to reduced working capacity and economic loss in equids [6,32,33,34,35,36]. Limited farriery, poor hoof balance, and chronic strain contribute to hoof problems, highlighting the need for regular trimming and owner education. Ossification of the ungular cartilages (OUC), or sidebone, was a frequent radiographic finding in working equids. Marked or irregular ossification may reflect adaptive modeling in response to chronic mechanical stress [37]. Earlier reports noted high prevalence in heavy breeds, but these data came from very different management contexts [38,39]. More recent studies in working donkeys described early OUC, often bilateral and occasionally linked to lameness or complications such as septic pedal osteitis [40].
Ossification of the ungular cartilages (OUC) is considered multifactorial, influenced by limb conformation, hereditary predisposition, hoof imbalance, inadequate farriery, and repetitive concussion on hard surfaces [41,42,43,44,45]. Other factors such as age, sex, body size, workload, and environmental conditions may also contribute [46,47,48], acting together to promote cartilage mineralization visible radiographically.
Laminitis was rarely identified in our radiographic dataset. This contrasts with the high prevalence reported in Moroccan Fantasia horses with chronic bilateral laminitis, largely linked to high-carbohydrate diets and metabolic predisposition [49]. In donkeys, laminitis is more often associated with obesity, sedentary conditions, and overfeeding [50]. These factors are uncommon in working equids, which are usually lean and subjected to sustained physical effort with limited nutrition. This likely contributes to the low occurrence observed here. At SPANA centers, radiography is used as a complementary diagnostic tool in cases of lameness when clinical examination alone does not allow clear characterization of the underlying osseous involvement. Laminitis is usually diagnosed clinically, while radiographs help assess the position of the distal phalanx, foot conformation, and disease progression [51]. When foot radiographs were performed for suspected laminitis or other foot disorders, occasional cases showed solar margin modeling consistent with chronic laminitis or with imbalance of the foot [10].
Fractures were among the most common osseous lesions identified, mainly affecting the phalanges, metacarpal/metatarsal bones, and the radius. Similar studies in comparable working equid populations also reported frequent distal limb involvement [52]. In performance horses, such fractures are often linked to repetitive loading, microdamage, or sudden trauma [53,54,55,56], and similar biomechanical principles likely apply to working equids. Additional factors such as heavy workloads, uneven terrain, poor hoof balance, and inadequate farriery may further increase risk. Trauma from kicks, especially in crowded or poorly managed housing, is also a plausible contributor [57,58].
Periosteal new bone formation was one of the most frequent osseous findings in our study. In horses, these reactions have been reported in association with high-speed exercise [59,60,61], but in working equids they more likely reflect cumulative mechanical strain and localized trauma rather than sport-related loading. The pastern region was the most commonly affected site, where such lesions are typically referred to as ringbone [10]. In this region, periosteal reactions may arise from trauma-induced periostitis, enthesophyte formation at tendon or ligament insertions, or chronic remodeling linked to repetitive mechanical stress [10]. In Morocco, external trauma also appears relevant. The use of hobbles made from inappropriate materials, such as wire or baling twine, has been reported as a cause of localized pastern injuries and subsequent periosteal new bone formation [62,63]. Overall, periosteal new bone formation in working equids likely reflects chronic mechanical overload and localized trauma.
The main limitations of this study include its retrospective design and the absence of detailed clinical histories and follow-up data, which limited assessment of lesion progression over time. In addition, the blind radiographic reading without access to clinical history prevented any clinical–radiographic correlation, and the results therefore describe radiographic findings rather than the causes of lameness. Radiographs were obtained only in animals referred for imaging, which may have introduced a selection bias. Variability in the number and quality of radiographs may have influenced the level of detail available for lesion characterization. Despite these limitations, this study highlights the value of radiography under field conditions and provides a robust basis for future prospective investigations.

5. Conclusions

This retrospective study provides an overview of the main musculoskeletal disorders identified by radiography in working equids presented to four SPANA centers in Morocco. Foot pathologies were the most frequent findings, highlighting the central importance of hoof health in maintaining mobility, welfare, and work capacity. Fractures and periosteal new bone formation were also common and reflected the demanding working conditions typically described for equids in similar environments.
Radiography proved valuable for objectively documenting musculoskeletal lesions and supporting clinical assessment under field conditions. Promoting regular hoof care, improved farriery, and safer handling practices remains essential to reduce the burden of these conditions.
Future field-based studies integrating clinical, environmental, and management information will help refine these findings and support the development of preventive strategies adapted to low-resource settings.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci13010060/s1, Table S1: Distribution of radiographic cases by species, age, sex, and anatomical region.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.E.B., I.M. and H.A.; Methodology, Z.E.B., I.M. and H.A.; Validation, H.A., M.P. and C.D.; Formal analysis, Z.E.B. and F.E.B.; Investigation, I.M.; Data curation, Z.E.B. and I.M.; Writing—original draft preparation, Z.E.B. and I.M.; Writing—review and editing, H.A., M.P. and C.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because it involved the retrospective analysis of anonymized radiographic records obtained during routine veterinary care, with no experimental procedures performed on animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Artificial intelligence tools were used to assist with language editing and improving the clarity of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Maggs, H.C.; Ainslie, A.; Bennett, R.M. Donkey Ownership Provides a Range of Income Benefits to the Livelihoods of Rural Households in Northern Ghana. Animals 2021, 11, 3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sturgeon, B. Working Animals—One Health, One Welfare. In One Welfare in Practice: The Role of the Veterinarian; Stephens, T., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 279–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. FAO; FAOSTAT. Statistical Database. Available online: https://www.fao.org/statistics/en (accessed on 23 February 2025).
  4. Valette, D. Invisible Workers: The Economic Contributions of Working Donkeys, Horses and Mules to Livelihoods; The Brooke: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  5. MAP; Haut-Commissariat au Plan (HCP). Annuaire Statistique du Maroc [Statistical Yearbook of Morocco], Format Excel. Available online: https://www.hcp.ma/Downloads/Annuaire-Statistique-Du-Maroc-Format-Excel_t22392.html (accessed on 28 January 2024).
  6. Reix, C.E.; Burn, C.C.; Pritchard, J.C.; Barr, A.R.S.; Whay, H.R. The Range and Prevalence of Clinical Signs and Conformation Associated with Lameness in Working Draught Donkeys in Pakistan. Equine Vet. J. 2014, 46, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pritchard, J.C.; Lindberg, A.C.; Main, D.C.J.; Whay, H.R. Assessment of the Welfare of Working Horses, Mules and Donkeys, Using Health and Behaviour Parameters. Prev. Vet. Med. 2005, 69, 265–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maranhão, R.P.A.; Palhares, M.S.; Melo, U.P.; Rezende, H.H.C.; Braga, C.E.; Silva Filho, J.M.; Vasconcelos, M.N.F. Afecções mais frequentes do aparelho locomotor dos equídeos de tração no município de Belo Horizonte. Arq. Bras. Med. Veterinária E Zootec. 2006, 58, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kinns, J.; Nelson, N. Imaging Tarsal Trauma. Equine Vet. Educ. 2010, 22, 296–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Butler, J.A. The Head. In Clinical Radiology of the Horse, 4th ed.; Butler, J.A., Colles, C.M., Dyson, S.J., Kold, S.E., Poulos, P.W., Eds.; Wiley Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 449–530. [Google Scholar]
  11. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2022; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 1 September 2025).
  12. Burn, C.C.; Dennison, T.L.; Whay, H.R. Environmental and Demographic Risk Factors for Poor Welfare in Working Horses, Donkeys and Mules in Developing Countries. Vet. J. 2010, 186, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Norris, S.L.; Kubasiewicz, L.M.; Watson, T.L.; Little, H.A.; Yadav, A.K.; Thapa, S.; Raw, Z.; Burden, F.A. A New Framework for Assessing Equid Welfare: A Case Study of Working Equids in Nepalese Brick Kilns. Animals 2020, 10, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Burden, F.; Thiemann, A. Donkeys Are Different. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015, 35, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McLean, A.K.; Navas González, F.J.; Canisso, I.F. Donkey and Mule Behavior. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2019, 35, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. van Dierendonck, M.C.; Burden, F.A.; Rickards, K.; van Loon, J.P.A.M. Monitoring Acute Pain in Donkeys with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Donkeys Composite Pain Assessment (equus-donkey-compass) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Donkey Facial Assessment of Pain (equus-donkey-fap). Animals 2020, 10, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Merridale-Punter, M.S.; Wiethoelter, A.K.; El-Hage, C.M.; Patrick, C.; Hitchens, P.L. Common Clinical Findings Identified in Working Equids in Low- and Middle-Income Countries from 2005 to 2021. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0304755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Watson, T.; Kubasiewicz, L.M.; Nye, C.; Thapa, S.; Norris, S.L.; Chamberlain, N.; Burden, F.A. “Not All Who Wander Are Lost”: The Life Transitions and Associated Welfare of Pack Mules Walking the Trails in the Mountainous Gorkha Region, Nepal. Animals 2022, 12, 3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ali, A.B.A.; Matoock, M.Y.; Fouad, M.A.; Heleski, C.R. Are Mules or Donkeys Better Adapted for Egyptian Brick Kiln Work? (Until We Can Change the Kilns). J. Vet. Behav. 2015, 10, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bakkar, R. Phalangeal Forms in Equids: A Bibliographic Review and a Study of 27 Cases. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat, Morocco, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  21. Assefa, G.; Abera, B.; Nur, A.; Lemma, D.; Keno, L.; Eticha, E.; Chali, G.; Hussen, M. The Major Cause of Lameness and Associated Risk Factors in Working Donkey in and around Hawassa Town, Ethiopia. J. Vet. Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, e1000427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mac-Leod, C. Study of Cart-Working Equids Treated at a Polyclinic in Valdivia, Characterizing Aspects of Hypometry, Pathologies, Nutrition, Hooves, and Shoeing. Bachelor’s Thesis, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  23. The Donkey Sanctuary. The Donkey Sanctuary Guidance for Competent Authorities and Tourism Operators to Ensure the Welfare of Working Equids in Tourism; The Donkey Sanctuary: Sidmouth, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  24. Benedetti, B.; Freccero, F.; Barton, J.; Elmallah, F.; Refat, S.; Padalino, B. A Retrospective Study on the Status of Working Equids Admitted to an Equine Clinic in Cairo: Disease Prevalence and Associations between Physical Parameters and Outcome. Animals 2024, 14, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). Welfare of Working Equids. In Terrestrial Animal Health Code, 28th ed.; World Organisation for Animal Health: Paris, France, 2019; pp. 463–471. [Google Scholar]
  26. Logan, A.A.; Nielsen, B.D. Training Young Horses: The Science behind the Benefits. Animals 2021, 11, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Smith, R.K.W.; Goodship, A.E. The Effect of Early Training and the Adaptation and Conditioning of Skeletal Tissues. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2008, 24, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Merridale-Punter, M.S.; Wiethoelter, A.K.; El-Hage, C.M.; Hitchens, P.L. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Working Equid Lameness in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Animals 2022, 12, 3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Axelsson, M.; Björnsdottir, S.; Eksell, P.; Häggström, J.; Sigurdsson, H.; Carlsten, J. Risk Factors Associated with Hindlimb Lameness and Degenerative Joint Disease in the Distal Tarsus of Icelandic Horses. Equine Vet. J. 2001, 33, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Murray, R.C.; Walters, J.M.; Snart, H.; Dyson, S.J.; Parkin, T.D.H. Identification of Risk Factors for Lameness in Dressage Horses. Vet. J. 2009, 181, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Parkes, R.S.; Newton, J.R.; Dyson, S.J. An Investigation of Risk Factors for Foot-Related Lameness in a United Kingdom Referral Population of Horses. Vet. J. 2013, 196, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Broster, C.E.; Burn, C.C.; Barr, A.R.S.; Whay, H.R. The Range and Prevalence of Pathological Abnormalities Associated with Lameness in Working Horses from Developing Countries. Equine Vet. J. 2009, 41, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Scantlebury, C.E.; Zerfu, A.; Pinchbeck, G.P.; Reed, K.; Gebreab, F.; Aklilu, N.; Mideksa, K.; Christley, R. Participatory Appraisal of the Impact of Epizootic Lymphangitis in Ethiopia. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015, 120, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Solomon, A.S.; Fekadu, A.; Molla, B.; Sheferaw, D. The Prevalence of Foot Related Problems in Working Donkeys and Its Implication on the Livelihood of Donkey Owners in Hawassa City, Southern Ethiopia. Int. J. Livest. Prod. 2019, 10, 86–93. [Google Scholar]
  35. Dagmawit, A.; Kassaye, A.; Berhanu, M. Major Hoof and Musculoskeletal Disorders of Cart Pulling Mules with Special Reference to Lameness in Bahir Dar Town, Northwestern Ethiopia. Int. J. Livest. Prod. 2024, 15, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bonsi, M.; Anderson, N.E.; Carder, G. The Socioeconomic Impact of Diseases of Working Equids in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Critical Review. Animals 2023, 13, 3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jones, L.E.; Dyson, S.J. Radiographic Characterization of Ossification of the Ungular Cartilages in Horses: 271 Cases (2005–2012). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2015, 247, 801–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Verschooten, F.; Van Waerebeek, B.; Verbeeck, J. The Ossification of Cartilages of the Distal Phalanx in the Horse: An Anatomical, Experimental, Radiographic and Clinical Study. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1996, 16, 291–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hedenström, U.O.; Wattle, O.S. Significance of Ossificated Ungular Cartilages Regarding the Performance of Cold-Blooded Trotters. Acta Vet. Scand. 2014, 56, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alhusayni, L.A.; Almubarak, A.I.; Al-Mohamad, Z.A.; Misk, T.N.; El-Hawari, S.F. Radiographic Assessments for the Early Stage of Ungular Cartilage Ossifications (Sidebone) in Donkeys (Equus asinus). Ger. J. Vet. Res. 2025, 5, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Goble, D. Lameness in Draft Horses. In Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse; Ross, M.W., Dyson, S.J., Eds.; Saunders: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2003; pp. 1058–1069. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ruohoniemi, M.; Tulamo, R.; Hackzell, M. Radiographic Evaluation of Ossification of the Collateral Cartilages of the Third Phalanx in Finnhorses. Equine Vet. J. 1993, 25, 453–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stashak, T.S. Ossification of the collateral cartilages of the distal phalanx (sidebones). In Adams’ Lameness in Horses; Stashak, T.S., Ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Walnut Street, PA, USA, 2002; pp. 715–717. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mitchell, J. The North American Standardbred. In Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse, 1st ed.; Ross, M.W., Dyson, S.J., Eds.; W.B. Saunders: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2003; pp. 895–912. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sherlock, C.E.; Mair, T.S. The Enigma of Sidebone as a Cause of Lameness in the Horse. Equine Vet. Educ. 2010, 18, 136–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ruohoniemi, M.; Laukkanen, H.; Ojala, M.; Kangasniemi, A.; Tulamo, R.-M. Effects of Sex and Age on the Ossification of the Collateral Cartilages of the Distal Phalanx of the Finnhorse and the Relationships between Ossification and Body Size and Type of Horse. Res. Vet. Sci. 1997, 62, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Down, S.S.; Dyson, S.J.; Murray, R.C. Ossification of the Cartilages of the Foot. Equine Vet. Educ. 2007, 19, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wattle, O.; Hedenström, U. Development and Clinical Significance of Sidebone in Swedish Cold-Blooded Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013, 33, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Seghrouchni, M.; Elkasraoui, H.; Piro, M.; Alyakine, H.; Bouayad, H.; Chakir, J.; Tligui, N.; Elallali, K.; Azrib, R. Osteoarticular Radiographic Findings of the Distal Forelimbs in Tbourida Horses. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Thiemann, A.K.; Buil, J.; Rickards, K.; Sullivan, R.J. A Review of Laminitis in the Donkey. Equine Vet. Educ. 2022, 34, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. O’Grady, S.E. Managing Acute and Chronic Laminitis—A Reality Check! In Proceedings of the OVMA Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada, 25–27 January 2018; Ontario Veterinary Medical Association (OVMA): Milton, ON, Canada, 2018; pp. 265–276. [Google Scholar]
  52. Abdel-Hady, A.A.A.; Sadan, M.A.; Metwally, A.A.; Soliman, A.S. Clinico-Radiographic Studies on the Prevalent Distal Limb Affections in Working Equine at Luxor City. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 2017, 7, 24–32. Available online: https://advetresearch.com/index.php/AVR/article/view/7 (accessed on 15 December 2025).
  53. Bertone, A.L. Distal Limb: Fetlock and Pastern. In Equine Sports Medicine and Surgery; Hinchcliff, K.W., Kaneps, A.J., Geor, R.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  54. Riggs, C.M. Aetiopathogenesis of Parasagittal Fractures of the Distal Condyles of the Third Metacarpal and Third Metatarsal Bones—Review of the Literature. Equine Vet. J. 1999, 31, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bailey, R.E.A.; Dyson, S.J.; Parkin, T.D.H. Focal Increased Radiopharmaceutical Uptake in the Dorsoproximal Diaphyseal Region of the Equine Proximal Phalanx. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2007, 48, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hopper, N.; Singer, E.; Henson, F. Increased Sclerostin Associated with Stress Fracture of the Third Metacarpal Bone in the Thoroughbred Racehorse. Bone Jt. Res. 2018, 7, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Donati, B.; Fürst, A.E.; Hässig, M.; Jackson, M.A. Epidemiology of Fractures: The Role of Kick Injuries in Equine Fractures. Equine Vet. J. 2018, 50, 580–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Derungs, S.B.; Fürst, A.E.; Hässig, M.; Auer, J.A. Frequency, Consequences and Clinical Outcome of Kick Injuries in Horses: 256 Cases (1992–2000). Equine Vet. J. 2004, 36, 386–390. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hurwitz, D.J. Osseous Interference of Soft Tissue Healing. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 1984, 64, 699–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Norwood, G. The Bucked Shin Complex in Thoroughbreds. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, Louis, MI, USA, 2–6 December 1978; pp. 319–336. [Google Scholar]
  61. Buckingham, S.; Jeffcott, L. Shin Soreness: A Survey of Thoroughbred Trainers and Racetrack Veterinarians. Aust. Equine Vet. J. 1990, 8, 148–153. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kay, G.; Ouassat, M. Preventing Hobble Injuries: Experiences with a Hobble Distribution Programme in Morocco. In Proceedings of the 4th International Colloquium on Working Equines; Pearson, A., Fielding, D., Tabaa, D., Eds.; SPANA: London, UK, 2002; pp. 190–191. [Google Scholar]
  63. Azelhak, R.; Kay, G.R.; Pollock, P.J. Diagnosis, Treatment and Outcome Following Chronic Encircling Hobbling Wounds in a Group of Working Donkeys in Morocco. Austral J. Vet. Sci. 2023, 55, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vetsci 13 00060 g001
Figure 1. Radiographic views of the equine foot illustrating common radiographic findings. (A) Dorsoproximal–palmarodistal oblique view showing marked ossification of the lateral ungular cartilage. (B) Lateromedial view showing an increased distance between the dorsal hoof wall and the dorsal surface of the distal phalanx, together with solar margin remodeling and an elongated hoof capsule, radiographic features suggestive of chronic laminitis. A mild subluxation of the distal interphalangeal joint is also present. (C) Lateromedial view showing a markedly long toe, excessive sole thickness, and a curved horseshoe conforming to the distorted sole, consistent with long-standing improper trimming.
Figure 1. Radiographic views of the equine foot illustrating common radiographic findings. (A) Dorsoproximal–palmarodistal oblique view showing marked ossification of the lateral ungular cartilage. (B) Lateromedial view showing an increased distance between the dorsal hoof wall and the dorsal surface of the distal phalanx, together with solar margin remodeling and an elongated hoof capsule, radiographic features suggestive of chronic laminitis. A mild subluxation of the distal interphalangeal joint is also present. (C) Lateromedial view showing a markedly long toe, excessive sole thickness, and a curved horseshoe conforming to the distorted sole, consistent with long-standing improper trimming.
Vetsci 13 00060 g001
Vetsci 13 00060 g002
Figure 2. Radiographic views illustrating common fractures in working equids. (A) Dorsopalmar radiographic view of the pastern showing a complete, articular, mildly displaced spiral sagittal fracture of the proximal phalanx, with a double radiolucent fracture line extending through both the dorsal and palmar cortices. (B) Lateromedial radiograph of the third metacarpal bone showing a complete, bicortical, non-articular fracture of the diaphysis, with displacement between the proximal and distal segments. (C) Lateromedial view showing a severely displaced, complete oblique diaphyseal fracture of the radius, with marked overriding between the proximal and distal portions of the bone.
Figure 2. Radiographic views illustrating common fractures in working equids. (A) Dorsopalmar radiographic view of the pastern showing a complete, articular, mildly displaced spiral sagittal fracture of the proximal phalanx, with a double radiolucent fracture line extending through both the dorsal and palmar cortices. (B) Lateromedial radiograph of the third metacarpal bone showing a complete, bicortical, non-articular fracture of the diaphysis, with displacement between the proximal and distal segments. (C) Lateromedial view showing a severely displaced, complete oblique diaphyseal fracture of the radius, with marked overriding between the proximal and distal portions of the bone.
Vetsci 13 00060 g002
Vetsci 13 00060 g003
Figure 3. Periosteal and joint-related radiographic findings observed in working equids. (A) Dorsopalmar radiograph of the pastern showing extensive, irregular periosteal new bone formation surrounding a radiopaque foreign body (wire) embedded at the mid-portion of the proximal phalanx (P1). The exuberant periosteal response is compatible with chronic reactive bone formation secondary to soft-tissue trauma. (B) Lateromedial radiograph of the tarsus demonstrating significant narrowing of the distal intertarsal joint space with associated subchondral osteolysis, and reduced joint space of the tarsometatarsal joint, suggestive of advanced degenerative joint disease (DJD; bone spavin). Periosteal new bone formation is evident along the cranial and caudal cortices of the distal tibia. (C) Dorsopalmar view of the distal radius and carpus showing widening of the distal radial physis and mild medial and lateral metaphyseal flaring; the central axes of the radius and metacarpus are not aligned, consistent with angular limb deformity.
Figure 3. Periosteal and joint-related radiographic findings observed in working equids. (A) Dorsopalmar radiograph of the pastern showing extensive, irregular periosteal new bone formation surrounding a radiopaque foreign body (wire) embedded at the mid-portion of the proximal phalanx (P1). The exuberant periosteal response is compatible with chronic reactive bone formation secondary to soft-tissue trauma. (B) Lateromedial radiograph of the tarsus demonstrating significant narrowing of the distal intertarsal joint space with associated subchondral osteolysis, and reduced joint space of the tarsometatarsal joint, suggestive of advanced degenerative joint disease (DJD; bone spavin). Periosteal new bone formation is evident along the cranial and caudal cortices of the distal tibia. (C) Dorsopalmar view of the distal radius and carpus showing widening of the distal radial physis and mild medial and lateral metaphyseal flaring; the central axes of the radius and metacarpus are not aligned, consistent with angular limb deformity.
Vetsci 13 00060 g003
Table 1. Incidence of radiographic abnormalities according to age groups, sex, and species.
Table 1. Incidence of radiographic abnormalities according to age groups, sex, and species.
VariableVariablesNumber of CasesAffected CasesIncidence (%)CI 95%-LowerCI 95%-Upperχ2/p-Value
Age (years)<51087468.558.977.12.49/0.288
5–1530119665.159.470.5
>15785874.463.283.6
UN11654.523.483.3
GenderFemale1529965.157.072.71.29/0.526
Male32722468.563.273.5
UN191157.933.579.7
SpeciesDonkey765673.762.383.19.62/0.008 *
Horse38924964.059.068.8
Mule332987.971.896.6
Incidence (%) refers to the proportion of affected individuals within each age group, sex, and species category. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) provide an estimate of the precision of the incidence rates. Statistical differences between groups were evaluated using the Chi-square (χ2) test. p-values are presented alongside χ2 statistics; values less than 0.05 (denoted by *) indicate statistical significance. UN = Unknown.
Table 2. Risk Analysis of Specific Pathologies in Equids According to Age, Sex, and Species.
Table 2. Risk Analysis of Specific Pathologies in Equids According to Age, Sex, and Species.
Risk FactorLevel of Risk FactorNo ExaminedABCDEFGχ2/p-Value
Age (years)<510819.430.614.81.851.855.561.8560.6/<0.001 *
5–1530130.618.916.07.31000.33
>157826.928.224.47.695.1300
NA1136.49.099.099.09000
GenderFemale15232.921.711.85.260.660.66011.1/0.68
Male32725.423.618.66.731.531.530.92
NA1926.315.826.35.26000
SpeciesDonkey762529.017.19.213.952.631.3234.7/0.002 *
Horse38929.319.815.95.40.770.510.51
Mule3315.242.427.39.0906.060
Pathologies are coded as follows: A—Foot disorders, B—Fractures, C—Periosteal new bone formation, D—Degenerative joint disease, E—Sub/luxation, F—Epiphyseal conditions, G—Angular deformities. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test (X2). p-values < 0.05 (denoted by *) were considered statistically significant. NA = Not Available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

EL Brini, Z.; Mhar, I.; Bouktaib, F.E.; Piro, M.; Daniel, C.; Alyakine, H. Common Radiographic Findings in Moroccan Working Equids: A Retrospective Study (2015–2022). Vet. Sci. 2026, 13, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010060

AMA Style

EL Brini Z, Mhar I, Bouktaib FE, Piro M, Daniel C, Alyakine H. Common Radiographic Findings in Moroccan Working Equids: A Retrospective Study (2015–2022). Veterinary Sciences. 2026; 13(1):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010060

Chicago/Turabian Style

EL Brini, Zineb, Ichrak Mhar, Fatima Ezzahra Bouktaib, Mohamed Piro, Carola Daniel, and Hassan Alyakine. 2026. "Common Radiographic Findings in Moroccan Working Equids: A Retrospective Study (2015–2022)" Veterinary Sciences 13, no. 1: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010060

APA Style

EL Brini, Z., Mhar, I., Bouktaib, F. E., Piro, M., Daniel, C., & Alyakine, H. (2026). Common Radiographic Findings in Moroccan Working Equids: A Retrospective Study (2015–2022). Veterinary Sciences, 13(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010060

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop