Next Article in Journal
Identification of Risk Factors Associated with Treatment for BRD in Beef Calves Within the First 60 Days After Arrival at Fattening Operations in Northwestern Italy Beef Calves
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Immunization Against Inhibin on Camel Testicular Morphometry, Echotexture Analysis, Semen Quality, and Vascularization in Relation to Hormonal Aspect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Free-Range Sheep and Domestic Dogs from the Greater Hinggan Mountains Area of China

1
National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), World Health Organization Centre for Tropical Diseases, Shanghai 200025, China
2
Jiagedaqi District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Daxing’anling 165000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(9), 897; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12090897
Submission received: 15 July 2025 / Revised: 25 August 2025 / Accepted: 6 September 2025 / Published: 15 September 2025

Simple Summary

Enterocytozoon bieneusi (E. bieneusi) is a microsporidian parasite infecting humans and animals globally, yet data on its occurrence in free-range livestock and companion animals in rural areas remain limited. In this study, fecal samples from 95 free-range sheep and 140 dogs in two villages of the Greater Hinggan Mountains, China, were examined using nested PCR targeting the ITS region of the rDNA gene. The overall infection rate of E. bieneusi was 3.0% (7/235), including 5.3% (5/95) in sheep and 1.4% (2/140) in dogs. Sequence analysis identified two known genotypes in sheep (BEB6 and NESH4, phylogenetic group 2) and one in dogs (CHN-F1, phylogenetic group 1), with CHN-F1 reported in dogs for the first time. Notably, genotype BEB6 is a recognized zoonotic type, highlighting sheep as a potential source of human infection and environmental contamination. These findings expand current knowledge on the genetic diversity of E. bieneusi in rural settings and underscore the risk of cross-species transmission between humans and animals.

Abstract

Enterocytozoon bieneusi (E. bieneusi) is a globally distributed microsporidian that infects both humans and animals. However, reports on its occurrence in free-ranging sheep and domestic dogs from rural areas are limited. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence and genotype distribution of E. bieneusi among freely grazing sheep and household dogs in the Hinggan Mountain region of China. A total of 235 fecal samples were collected, consisting of 95 from sheep and 140 from dogs, and screened for E. bieneusi by nested PCR targeting the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) within the nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene. The total infection rate of E. bieneusi amounted to 3.0% (7/235), with sheep exhibiting a rate of 5.3% (5/95) and dogs demonstrating a rate of 1.4% (2/140). Sequence analysis identified two known genotypes in sheep (BEB6 and NESH4, both within phylogenetic group 2) and one known genotype in dogs (CHN-F1, phylogenetic group 1), with CHN-F1 being reported in dogs for the first time. Importantly, the detection of BEB6, a genotype previously associated with human infection, suggests that sheep could act as a potential reservoir contributing to zoonotic transmission and environmental contamination. These findings expand knowledge of the genotype spectrum of E. bieneusi in rural animal populations and provide evidence of possible cross-species transmission between humans and the surveyed animals in the region.

1. Introduction

Microsporidia are a diverse phylum of obligate intracellular parasitic fungi, comprising more than 1700 described species in over 220 genera, which infect a broad range of vertebrate and invertebrate hosts and are ubiquitous in the environment [1]. Among them, at least 17 species have been identified in humans, with four species—Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Encephalitozoon cuniculi, Encephalitozoon intestinalis, and Encephalitozoon hellem—being the most commonly reported [2,3]. Among them, E. bieneusi accounts for more than 90% of human microsporidiosis cases, with a pooled global prevalence of approximately 7.9% [4]. Immunocompromised or immunodeficient individuals, particularly HIV-positive patients and organ transplant recipients, are the most susceptible, with reported infection rates ranging from 2.5% to 76.9% [5,6]. In these populations, infection commonly results in persistent diarrhea, abdominal pain, wasting, weight loss, and malabsorption, whereas in immunocompetent individuals it usually manifests as self-limiting diarrhea or may even remain asymptomatic [7,8]. In addition to humans, E. bieneusi is found in more than 170 animals across 42 countries, highlighting its zoonotic potential [4]. Human infection typically occurs via the fecal–oral route, through ingestion of contaminated water or food, or by direct contact with infected individuals, including both humans and animals [4]. Spores, the infective stage of E. bieneusi, have also been detected in food, water, and various environmental samples [9], indicating multiple potential sources of exposure. Early evidence came from Peru, where Cama et al. (2007) identified an unusual genotype (Peru 16) in seven guinea pigs and a 2-year-old child from the same household, suggesting direct transmission across species [10]. Since then, increasing reports of overlapping genotypes in humans and animals have further supported the possibility of cross-species transmission [11,12,13]. Given that E. bieneusi can spread through direct human–animal contact [2], investigating its occurrence in hosts closely associated with humans is critical for clarifying infection sources and transmission pathways.
Accurate detection of E. bieneusi is hampered by the small size and unclear staining of its spores, rendering traditional microscopy insufficient. Consequently, molecular tools, particularly polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) within the nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) of E. bieneusi, serve as the gold-standard typing method [14]. To date, around 900 different genotypes of E. bieneusi have been discovered and categorized into 13 groups through phylogenetic analysis [15]. Notably, more than 94% of the genotypes identified belong to Group 1 and 2. The two groups encompass 93% of human pathogenic genotypes and 96% of zoonotic genotypes, earning them the designation of zoonotic groups [15]. By contrast, the remaining groups, ranging from Groups 3 to 13, typically include no more than ten genotypes that are predominantly isolated from specific hosts or wastewater and are thus designated as nonzoonotic groups [2,16]. Numerous hosts, particularly free-range animals, can propagate both zoonotic and nonzoonotic genotypes of E. bieneusi [15,16].
In rural areas, domestic animals such as sheep and dogs maintain close proximity with humans, potentially facilitating the transmission of zoonotic pathogens, including microsporidia [17]. To date, 69 genotypes of E. bieneusi have been identified in sheep, with 9 of these genotypes also identified in humans [15]. Notably, genotype BEB6, which has a broad distribution and the capacity to infect humans, highlights the significance of sheep in the dissemination of microsporidiosis. Similarly, dogs have been found to harbor at least 65 genotypes of E. bieneusi worldwide, with a substantial percentage being zoonotic and capable of infecting multiple hosts [15,18]. These observations underscore the crucial role of dogs in the transmission of E. bieneusi to humans and other animals. Understanding the epidemiology of E. bieneusi in these animals is pivotal for preventing its spread to humans and other animals.
In rural northern China, sheep farming serves as a primary source of income, and dogs are commonly kept in nearly every household as guardians of the home. Although E. bieneusi has been reported in a wide range of hosts worldwide, data on its occurrence and genetic diversity in free-range sheep and dogs in these regions remain scarce [19]. This knowledge gap limits our understanding of the epidemiology of E. bieneusi and its potential public health significance in areas where humans and domestic animals live in close contact. Based on this gap, we hypothesized that E. bieneusi is present in free-range sheep and dogs in northern China, and that these animals may harbor genotypes of zoonotic concern. To address this hypothesis, the present study aimed to investigate the infection rate and genotype distribution of E. bieneusi in free-range sheep and dogs from two villages in the Greater Hinggan Mountains region of China. Additionally, this study further assessed the zoonotic potential of the identified genotypes through sequence homology and phylogenetic analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fecal Sample Collection

Between 10 December 2018 and 31 October 2020, a total of 235 fecal samples were collected, including 95 from sheep and 140 from dogs, in two villages located in Jiagedaqi District of the Greater Hinggan Mountains region, China. This district consists of two townships (Jiabei Township and Baihua Township), comprising three villages and five villages, respectively. The two selected villages are representative of these townships. Together, the villages comprise approximately 120 households with a total population of approximately 500 residents. Due to the impact of African swine fever, no households in the investigated area keep pigs; instead, free-range sheep and household dogs are the main domestic animals. Ten households raise sheep, each maintaining 5–12 animals. During the daytime, sheep are allowed to graze freely in surrounding pastures, while at night, they are gathered within household fences. Additionally, approximately 100 families residing in the village own dogs, usually one or two per household. These dogs are commonly tethered near doorways to guard their property. All sampled animals appeared to be healthy. Fecal samples (~10 g each) were collected directly from the ground immediately after defecation and placed into sterile self-sealing bags. Samples were then transported to the laboratory within 2 days in ice boxes. The sample size was determined to cover all available sheep and dogs within the study villages. Information on age, sex, and detailed health status of the animals was not recorded, as the study was designed to focus on occurrence at the population level rather than individual-level risk factors.

2.2. DNA Extraction

Each fecal sample was homogenized with distilled water. The homogenates were then sieved and centrifuged at 1500× g for 5 min. From the processed material, approximately 200 mg of each homogenized sample was processed using the QIAamp DNA Mini Stool Kit (Qiagen, Germany), adhering strictly to the manufacturer’s instructions. To optimize the DNA yield, the lysis temperature was elevated to 95 °C. Subsequently, the DNA was eluted using AE elution buffer (200 mL) and stored at −20 °C until PCR analysis.

2.3. Detecting and Genotyping E. bieneusi

To detect and genotype E. bieneusi, nested PCR was performed using species-specific primers targeting an approximately 390 bp nucleotide fragment of the ITS region of the rDNA gene, which includes 76 bp of the 3′ end of the small subunit (SSU) rDNA gene, 243 bp of the ITS region, and 70 bp of the 5′ end of the large subunit (LSU) rDNA gene, as originally described by Buckholt et al. [20]. The primer sequences were as follows: external primers F1 (5′-GGTCATAGGGATGAAGAG-3′) and R1 (5′-TTCGAGTTCTTTCGCGCTC-3′), and internal primers F2 (5′-GCTCTGAATATCTATGGCT-3′) and R2 (5′-ATCGCCGACGGATCCAAGTG-3′) [20]. The PCR conditions for the two rounds were as follows: 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 40 s and 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 40 s, with both of them having an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min and a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min [20]. For all PCR amplifications, TaKaRa TaqDNA Polymerase (Takara Biomedical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was utilized. Both a negative control without DNA and a positive control with Peru6 genotype DNA from deer were included. The PCR products were then analyzed via 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized via DNAGREEN staining (Tiandz, Inc., Beijing, China).

2.4. Sequencing Analysis

The PCR products exhibiting a positive reaction for E. bieneusi were subjected to direct sequencing at Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China, which is located in Shanghai, China. This sequencing was performed utilizing the Big Dye1 Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit, which was produced by Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The raw sequences obtained from sequencing were aligned using Clustal X (1.83) software (available at http://www.clustal.org/) (accessed on 15 September 2024). Homology comparisons of E. bieneusi ITS were performed against the GenBank database via the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) (accessed on 15 September 2024). All the genotypes were identified only based on 243 bp of the ITS region of the rDNA gene of E. bieneusi, according to the established nomenclature system [21]. When ITS sequences were identical to previously reported genotypes, they were assigned the corresponding published names. In cases where a known genotype was detected in a novel host, the sequence was submitted to the GenBank database under the accession number PX136961.

2.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

To confirm the phylogenetic group designation and to assess the relationship between the identified genotypes and those already known, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with the Kimura 2-parameter model in MEGA 7. Bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates was used to determine support for the resulting tree.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the OpenEpi software program (http://www.openepi.com/Proportion/Proportion.htm) (accessed on 20 August 2025).

3. Results and Discussion

This is the first report documenting the occurrence of E. bieneusi infection in sheep and dogs within the region. Analysis of 235 samples revealed that only 3.0% (7/235; 95% confidence interval: 1.3–5.8%) were positive for E. bieneusi, with sheep exhibiting a detection rate of 5.3% (5/95; 95% CI: 1.9–11.3%) and dogs showing a rate of 1.4% (2/140; 95% CI: 0.2–4.6%) (Table 1). A global pooled prevalence rate for E. bieneusi in sheep has been estimated to stand at 17.4%, while in China, the figure is slightly higher at 17.9% [17]. A comparative analysis across various regions of China has shown that the prevalence rate observed in the present study is notably lower than that reported in other provinces. For instance, Heilongjiang Province recorded rates varying between 4.4% and 51.7% [22,23], while Inner Mongolia exhibited a particularly high prevalence of 69.3% [24]. Tibet’s rates fell within the range of 6.4% to 23.4% [25,26], Ningxia reported rates ranging from 12.2% to 47.1% [23,27], Jiangsu had a prevalence of 36.5% [28], Shanxi showed a rate of 34.2% [29], Yunnan reported a prevalence of 12.3% [30], and Shandong had a lower rate of 1.6% [31]. Moreover, besides China, reports of E. bieneusi infection in sheep are limited to only a few countries, including Brazil (19.2%) [32], Egypt (6.7%) [33], Iran (10.0%) [34], and Sweden (45.0%) [35], all of which have documented markedly higher prevalence rates compared with our results. These variations in infection rates could be attributed to several factors, including climatic variations, animal husbandry practices, detection methods, and the number of animals examined. Here, all the positive samples originated from Xingfu village geographically. Indeed, prior studies have also demonstrated significant variations in infection rates even among different studies conducted within the same region, such as two studies from Heilongjiang Province of China reporting distinct infection rates of 4.4% (2/45) and 22.5% (31/138) [22,36]. Therefore, increasing the number of survey samples and expanding the geographical scope can contribute to understanding the actual prevalence of E. bieneusi in specific animal hosts within a region, which is crucial for preventing and controlling its spread.
In the present study, the infection rate of dogs infected with E. bieneusi was relatively low, at only 1.4% (Table 1). Previous research has demonstrated that the infection rate varies significantly across countries or regions, ranging from 0.8% in Spain [37] to 39.6% in China [38]. However, disparities in infection rates have been reported in different studies within the same country. For instance, while one study in Spain reported a low infection rate of 0.8% [37], three other studies conducted in the same country reported infection rates of 19.2% [39], 11.8% [40], and 8.7% [41]. Similarly, only one study reported the prevalence of E. bieneusi in dogs in countries such as Korea (43.8%) [42], Colombia (15.0%) [43], Poland (4.9%) [44], Switzerland (8.3%) [45], Australia (4.4%) [46], and Egypt (13.0%) [33]. Therefore, these figures cannot be considered representative of the overall infection situation in those regions. In China, at least 14 provinces have reported cases of infected dogs, with infection rates ranging from 2.5% in Heilongjiang [47] to 40.7% in Hebei [48]. Overall, the infection rate observed in the present study was lower than that previously reported in China, which could be attributed to the source and mobility range of the dogs sampled in this study. Here, the collected dogs were scattered among different families and had no more than two dogs per family. These dogs have a small, consistent activity area and limited contact with the external environment, potentially reducing the risk of infection. However, it is noteworthy that this study still revealed the presence of E. bieneusi infection in dogs in the investigated areas. Given that people inevitably come into contact with dogs, it is particularly important to properly manage dog feces to prevent environmental contamination and infection of other animals or humans. This point cannot be ignored.
Through sequence analysis of seven E. bieneusi isolates obtained in this study, three genotypes were identified: CHN-F1, NESH4, and BEB6 (Table 1, Figure S1). Among the samples tested, genotype BEB6 was identified in four sheep, genotype NESH4 was present in one sheep, and genotype CHN-F1 was detected in two dogs. Consistent with previous epidemiological surveys, genotype BEB6 is globally the most frequently reported genotype among sheep, and our findings further confirm its prevalence in sheep herds [15]. This genotype is not confined to sheep but also dominates in other ruminant species, such as goats, cattle, camels, donkeys, horses and deer [49]. Notably, genotype BEB6 poses a significant zoonotic threat due to its ability to infect children residing in the Shanghai and Henan regions of China [50,51]. Furthermore, it is widely distributed among approximately 15 different animal species from five distinct countries, including foxes, cats, dogs, chinchillas, whooper swans, pet birds, flies, golden takins, nonhuman primates, and captive wild animals in zoos [15,49]. Additionally, it is present in the environment, such as in raw wastewater and on the surfaces of fruits and vegetables as well as in the raw milk of cattle, sheep, and water buffaloes [52,53]. Therefore, sheep infected with this genotype could have significant public health implications. Additionally, the NESH4 genotype, which was also obtained from sheep in this study, was previously reported in sheep from Heilongjiang Province, China [54]. To date, this genotype has not been reported to infect humans or other hosts, and further studies are needed to confirm its potential host specificity.
In our study, two dog kennels harbored the same genotype, CHN-F1, which was initially identified in a farmed fox-derived isolate of E. bieneusi in Heilongjiang Province, China [55]. Subsequently, it has been sporadically detected in foxes in Xinxiang and has become dominant in infected raccoon dogs in northern China [56,57]. These findings suggest that this genotype may be specific to canine animals. However, recently, CHN-F1 has also been reported in feral and captive pigeons in Central Europe, indicating a potentially broader host range [58]. Importantly, our study represents the first detection of CHN-F1 in dogs, thereby further expanding the known host range of this genotype. Additional studies are needed to clarify whether CHN-F1 has the potential to infect humans.

4. Conclusions

The present study represents the first report of E. bieneusi infection in free-ranging sheep and domestic dogs in the Greater Hinggan Mountains. Three genotypes were identified, including BEB6, CHN-F1, and NESH4. Genotype BEB6 identified here has previously been detected in humans and some animals in other countries, which suggests that sheep may act as reservoirs for this genotype and facilitate its transmission to humans. Notably, CHN-F1 was identified in dogs for the first time in this study, thereby expanding the known host range of this genotype. By contrast, the zoonotic potential of CHN-F1 and NESH4 remains unclear. Although the overall infection rate of E. bieneusi in this study was relatively low, the detection of zoonotic genotypes and the clustering of all genotypes within phylogenetic Groups 1 or 2 suggest that sheep and dogs in this region may serve as potential reservoirs for human infection. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening fecal management and improving hygienic practices to mitigate the risk of zoonotic transmission.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci12090897/s1: Figure S1: Phylogenetic relationships of Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes identified in this study with known genotypes deposited in GenBank, as inferred by a neighbor-joining analysis of the ITS rDNA gene sequences based on genetic distances calculated with the Kimura-2-parameter model. Bootstrap values (%) from 1000 replicates are shown at the nodes. Each sequence is labeled with its GenBank accession number, genotype designation, and host origin. The genotype CSK2 (KY706128) from white kangaroo was used as the outgroup. Black circles preceding genotype names indicate known genotypes detected in a novel host in the present study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C., Y.S. and W.W.; methodology, Y.J. and Z.Y.; software, Y.J. and X.W.; validation, Y.J., Z.Y., H.Z. (Hongling Zhang) and H.Z. (Hao Zhou); formal analysis, Y.J.; investigation, Y.J., X.W., H.Z. (Hongling Zhang), H.Z. (Hao Zhou) and W.W.; resources, Y.J.; data curation, Y.J. and Z.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.J.; writing—review and editing, Y.J. and J.C.; visualization, Y.J.; supervision, J.C., Y.S. and W.W.; project administration, J.C.; funding acquisition, Y.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82273693) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2300902).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, China (Approval Code: 2014-001; Approval Date: 14 July 2014).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Li Zhao from Daxing’anling Prefecture Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiagedaqi, for sample collection in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Han, B.; Pan, G.; Weiss, L.M. Microsporidiosis in Humans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2021, 34, e0001020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  2. Li, W.; Feng, Y.; Santin, M. Host Specificity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Public Health Implications. Trends Parasitol. 2019, 35, 436–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shen, Y.; Gong, B.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y.; Yang, F.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Cao, J.; Liu, A. First identification and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in humans in Myanmar. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  4. Ruan, Y.; Xu, X.; He, Q.; Li, L.; Guo, J.; Bao, J.; Pan, G.; Li, T.; Zhou, Z. The largest meta-analysis on the global prevalence of microsporidia in mammals, avian and water provides insights into the epidemic features of these ubiquitous pathogens. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  5. Chozas, M.; Dashti, A.; Prieto-Pérez, L.; Pérez-Tanoira, R.; Cobo, E.; Bailo, B.; Del Palacio, M.; Hernández-Castro, C.; González-Barrio, D.; Carmena, D.; et al. Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon intestinalis (microsporidia) in HIV-positive patients in central Spain. Med. Mycol. 2023, 61, myad039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tumwine, J.K.; Kekitiinwa, A.; Bakeera-Kitaka, S.; Ndeezi, G.; Downing, R.; Feng, X.; Akiyoshi, D.E.; Tzipori, S. Cryptosporidiosis and microsporidiosis in Ugandan children with persistent diarrhea with and without concurrent infection with the human immunodeficiency virus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2005, 73, 921–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sak, B.; Brady, D.; Pelikánová, M.; Květoňová, D.; Rost, M.; Kostka, M.; Tolarová, V.; Hůzová, Z.; Kváč, M. Unapparent microsporidial infection among immunocompetent humans in the Czech Republic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  8. Gong, B.; Yang, Y.; Liu, X.; Cao, J.; Xu, M.; Xu, N.; Yang, F.; Wu, F.; Li, B.; Liu, A.; et al. First survey of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and dominant genotype Peru6 among ethnic minority groups in southwestern China’s Yunnan Province and assessment of risk factors. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  9. Li, W.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Diagnosis and molecular typing of Enterocytozoon bieneusi: The significant role of domestic animals in transmission of human microsporidiosis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 133, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cama, V.A.; Pearson, J.; Cabrera, L.; Pacheco, L.; Gilman, R.; Meyer, S.; Ortega, Y.; Xiao, L. Transmission of Enterocytozoon bieneusi between a child and guinea pigs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 2708–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Su, Y.; Liang, X.; Sun, X.; Peng, S.; Lu, H.; Jiang, N.; Yin, J.; Xiang, M.; et al. Identification and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in China. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 2006–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  12. Chen, L.; Zhao, J.; Li, N.; Guo, Y.; Feng, Y.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Genotypes and public health potential of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Giardia duodenalis in crab-eating macaques. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Zhou, K.; Liu, M.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Wang, R.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.; Yao, L.; Yu, H.; Liu, A. Enterocytozoon bieneusi in patients with diarrhea and in animals in the northeastern Chinese city of Yichun: Genotyping and assessment of potential zoonotic transmission. Parasite 2022, 29, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  14. Mathis, A.; Weber, R.; Deplazes, P. Zoonotic potential of the microsporidia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 18, 423–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Koehler, A.V.; Zhang, Y.; Gasser, R.B. A perspective on the molecular identification, classification, and epidemiology of Enterocytozoon bieneusi of Animals. Exp. Suppl. 2022, 114, 389–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Koehler, A.V.; Wang, T.; Gasser, R.B. Enterocytozoon bieneusi of animals-With an ‘Australian twist’. Adv. Parasitol. 2021, 111, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Taghipour, A.; Bahadory, S.; Javanmard, E. The global molecular epidemiology of microsporidia infection in sheep and goats with focus on Enterocytozoon bieneusi: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop. Med. Health 2021, 49, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  18. Jian, J.; Zi, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Su, Y.; Yao, L.; Li, B.; Peng, X.; Cao, J.; Shen, Y.; et al. Occurrence and genetic characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pet dogs in Yunnan Province, China. Parasite 2024, 31, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  19. Qiu, L.; Xia, W.; Li, W.; Ping, J.; Ding, S.; Liu, H. The prevalence of microsporidia in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Buckholt, M.A.; Lee, J.H.; Tzipori, S. Prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in swine: An 18-month survey at a slaughterhouse in Massachusetts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 2595–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Santín, M.; Fayer, R. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype nomenclature based on the internal transcribed spacer sequence: A consensus. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2009, 56, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, W.; Li, Y.; Li, W.; Yang, J.; Song, M.; Diao, R.; Jia, H.; Lu, Y.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, X.; et al. Genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in livestock in China: High prevalence and zoonotic potential. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  23. Yang, H.; Mi, R.; Cheng, L.; Huang, Y.; An, R.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Han, X.; et al. Prevalence and genetic diversity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in sheep in China. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. Ye, J.; Xiao, L.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Roellig, D.M.; Feng, Y. Dominance of Giardia duodenalis assemblage A and Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype BEB6 in sheep in Inner Mongolia, China. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 210, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, F.; Ma, L.; Gou, J.M.; Yao, H.Z.; Ren, M.; Yang, B.K.; Lin, Q. Seasonal distribution of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Tibetan sheep in Qinghai, China. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  26. Zhang, Q.; Cai, J.; Li, P.; Wang, L.; Guo, Y.; Li, C.; Lei, M.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in Tibetan sheep and yaks. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Peng, J.J.; Zou, Y.; Li, Z.X.; Liang, Q.L.; Song, H.Y.; Li, T.S.; Ma, Y.Y.; Zhu, X.Q.; Zhou, D.H. Occurrence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Chinese Tan sheep in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 2729–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cheng, C.; Cai, Y.; Xing, H.; Tao, J.; Cheng, D. Investigation of the infection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in sheep and goats in Jiangsu, China. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  29. Qin, R.L.; Liu, Y.Y.; Mei, J.J.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, Z.H.; Zheng, W.B.; Liu, Q.; Gao, W.W.; Xie, S.C.; Zhu, X.Q. Molecular identification and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in sheep in Shanxi Province, North China. Animals 2022, 12, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  30. Chen, D.; Wang, S.S.; Zou, Y.; Li, Z.; Xie, S.C.; Shi, L.Q.; Zou, F.C.; Zhu, X.Q.; Yang, J.F.; Zhao, G.H. Prevalence and multi-locus genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in black-boned sheep and goats in Yunnan Province, southwestern China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 65, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Li, W.C.; Wang, K.; Gu, Y.F. Detection and genotyping study of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in sheep and goats in East-central China. Acta Parasitol. 2019, 64, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fiuza, V.R.D.S.; Lopes, C.W.G.; Cosendey, R.I.J.; de Oliveira, F.C.R.; Fayer, R.; Santín, M. Zoonotic Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes found in brazilian sheep. Res. Vet. Sci. 2016, 107, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Al-Herrawy, A.Z.; Gad, M.A. Microsporidial spores in fecal samples of some domesticated animals living in Giza, Egypt. Iran. J. Parasitol. 2016, 11, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  34. Askari, Z.; Mirjalali, H.; Mohebali, M.; Zarei, Z.; Shojaei, S.; Rezaeian, T.; Rezaeian, M. Molecular detection and identification of zoonotic microsporidia spore in fecal samples of some animals with close-contact to human. Iran. J. Parasitol. 2015, 10, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  35. Stensvold, C.R.; Beser, J.; Ljungström, B.; Troell, K.; Lebbad, M. Low host-specific Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype BEB6 is common in Swedish lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 205, 371–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhao, W.; Zhang, W.; Yang, D.; Zhang, L.; Wang, R.; Liu, A. Prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and genetic diversity of ITS genotypes in sheep and goats in China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 32, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dashti, A.; Santín, M.; Cano, L.; de Lucio, A.; Bailo, B.; de Mingo, M.H.; Köster, P.C.; Fernández-Basterra, J.A.; Aramburu-Aguirre, J.; López-Molina, N.; et al. Occurrence and genetic diversity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi (Microsporidia) in owned and sheltered dogs and cats in Northern Spain. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 2979–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, H.; Lin, X.; Sun, Y.; Qi, N.; Lv, M.; Xiao, W.; Chen, Y.; Xiang, R.; Sun, M.; Zhang, L. Occurrence, risk factors and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dogs and cats in Guangzhou, southern China: High genotype diversity and zoonotic concern. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  39. Galván-Díaz, A.L.; Magnet, A.; Fenoy, S.; Henriques-Gil, N.; Haro, M.; Gordo, F.P.; Millán, J.; Miró, G.; del Águila, C.; Izquierdo, F. Microsporidia detection and genotyping study of human pathogenic E. bieneusi in animals from Spain. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lores, B.; del Aguila, C.; Arias, C. Enterocytozoon bieneusi (microsporidia) in faecal samples from domestic animals from Galicia, Spain. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2002, 97, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Del Aguila, C.; Izquierdo, F.; Navajas, R.; Pieniazek, N.J.; Miró, G.; Alonso, A.I.; Da Silva, A.J.; Fenoy, S. Enterocytozoon bieneusi in animals: Rabbits and dogs as new hosts. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 1999, 46, 8S–9S. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Amer, S.; Kim, S.; Han, J.I.; Na, K.J. Prevalence and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in wildlife in Korea: A public health concern. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  43. Santín, M.; Cortés Vecino, J.A.; Fayer, R. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in dogs in Bogota, Colombia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008, 79, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Piekarska, J.; Kicia, M.; Wesołowska, M.; Kopacz, Ż.; Gorczykowski, M.; Szczepankiewicz, B.; Kváč, M.; Sak, B. Zoonotic microsporidia in dogs and cats in Poland. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 246, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mathis, A.; Breitenmoser, A.C.; Deplazes, P. Detection of new Enterocytozoon genotypes in faecal samples of farm dogs and a cat. Parasite 1999, 6, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, Y.; Koehler, A.V.; Wang, T.; Cunliffe, D.; Gasser, R.B. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in cats and dogs in Victoria, Australia. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  47. Li, W.; Li, Y.; Song, M.; Lu, Y.; Yang, J.; Tao, W.; Jiang, Y.; Wan, Q.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, L. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Cryptosporidium, Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Giardia duodenalis in cats and dogs in Heilongjiang province, China. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 208, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chen, M.; Wang, H.; Li, X.; Guo, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zheng, L.; Liang, G.; Sui, Y.; Wang, B.; Dai, H.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of Enterocytozoon bieneusi from foxes and raccoon dogs in the Henan and Hebei provinces in China. BMC Vet. Res. 2024, 20, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  49. Zhao, W.; Wang, J.; Yang, Z.; Liu, A. Dominance of the Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype BEB6 in red deer (Cervus elaphus) and Siberian roe deer (Capreolus pygargus) in China and a brief literature review. Parasite 2017, 24, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  50. Wang, L.; Xiao, L.; Duan, L.; Ye, J.; Guo, Y.; Guo, M.; Liu, L.; Feng, Y. Concurrent infections of Giardia duodenalis, Enterocytozoon bieneusi, and Clostridium difficile in children during a cryptosporidiosis outbreak in a pediatric hospital in China. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  51. Yu, F.; Li, D.; Chang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Guo, Z.; Jia, L.; Xu, J.; Li, J.; Qi, M.; Wang, R.; et al. Molecular characterization of three intestinal protozoans in hospitalized children with different disease backgrounds in Zhengzhou, central China. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  52. Liu, Y.Y.; Qin, R.L.; Mei, J.J.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, Z.H.; Zheng, W.B.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, X.Q.; Gao, W.W.; Xie, S.C. Molecular detection and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in beef cattle in Shanxi Province, North China. Animals 2022, 12, 2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  53. Yildirim, Y.; Al, S.; Duzlu, O.; Onmaz, N.E.; Onder, Z.; Yetismis, G.; Hizlisoy, H.; Gonulalan, Z.; Yildirim, A. Enterocytozoon bieneusi in raw milk of cattle, sheep and water buffalo in Turkey: Genotype distributions and zoonotic concerns. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 334, 108828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jiang, Y.; Tao, W.; Wan, Q.; Li, Q.; Yang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, W. Zoonotic and potentially host-adapted Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in sheep and cattle in Northeast China and an increasing concern about the zoonotic importance of previously considered ruminant-adapted genotypes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 3326–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  55. Zhao, W.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Z.; Liu, A.; Zhang, L.; Yang, F.; Wang, R.; Ling, H. Genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Farmed Blue Foxes (Alopex lagopus) and Raccoon Dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in China. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  56. Sui, Y.; Tong, C.; Li, X.; Zheng, L.; Guo, Y.; Lu, Y.; Huang, S.; Wang, H.; Chen, M.; Xu, C.; et al. Molecular detection and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in captive foxes in Xinxiang, Central China and its impact on gut bacterial communities. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 141, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Xu, C.; Ma, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.X.; Zhao, J.P.; Ba, H.X.; Rui-Du Xing, X.M.; Wang, Q.K.; Zhao, Q. Prevalence, risk factors and molecular characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in five provinces of Northern China. Acta Trop. 2016, 161, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Holubová, N.; Zikmundová, V.; Kicia, M.; Zajączkowska, Ż.; Rajský, M.; Konečný, R.; Rost, M.; Mravcová, K.; Sak, B.; Kváč, M. Genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium spp., Encephalitozoon spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in feral and captive pigeons in Central Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2024, 123, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Detection rates and genotypes of E. bieneusi in goats and dogs from two villages in the Greater Hinggan Mountains of China.
Table 1. Detection rates and genotypes of E. bieneusi in goats and dogs from two villages in the Greater Hinggan Mountains of China.
HostXingfu Village Baihua VillageTotal
Detection Rate (n)Detection Rate (n)Detection Rate (n)Phylogenetic Group: Genotype (n)
Sheep8.1% (5/62)0/335.3% (5/95)2: NESH4 (1), BEB6 (4)
Dog2.5% (2/80)0/601.4% (2/140)1: CHN-F1 (2)
Total3.0% (7/235)0/933.0% (7/235)1: CHN-F1 (2); 2: BEB6 (4), NESH4 (1)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; Wu, W.; Shen, Y.; Cao, J. Molecular Detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Free-Range Sheep and Domestic Dogs from the Greater Hinggan Mountains Area of China. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12090897

AMA Style

Jiang Y, Yuan Z, Wang X, Zhang H, Zhou H, Wu W, Shen Y, Cao J. Molecular Detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Free-Range Sheep and Domestic Dogs from the Greater Hinggan Mountains Area of China. Veterinary Sciences. 2025; 12(9):897. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12090897

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Yanyan, Zhongying Yuan, Xu Wang, Hongling Zhang, Hao Zhou, Weiping Wu, Yujuan Shen, and Jianping Cao. 2025. "Molecular Detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Free-Range Sheep and Domestic Dogs from the Greater Hinggan Mountains Area of China" Veterinary Sciences 12, no. 9: 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12090897

APA Style

Jiang, Y., Yuan, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Zhou, H., Wu, W., Shen, Y., & Cao, J. (2025). Molecular Detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Free-Range Sheep and Domestic Dogs from the Greater Hinggan Mountains Area of China. Veterinary Sciences, 12(9), 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12090897

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop