Next Article in Journal
Development of an ELISA for NNV-Specific Antibody Detection in Grouper Hatcheries in China
Previous Article in Journal
Inflammation and Necrosis Syndrome in Young Piglets—A Longitudinal Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seasonal Dynamics and Pathogen Diversity of Tick Species Parasitizing Migratory Birds in Sardinia, Italy: Implications for the Spread of Rickettsia, Babesia, and Theileria Species

1
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna “G. Pegreffi”, Via Duca degli Abruzzi 8, 07100 Sassari, Italy
2
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna “G. Pegreffi”—Centro di Sorveglianza Epidemiologica, Via XX Settembre 9, 09125 Cagliari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(8), 753; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080753
Submission received: 19 June 2025 / Revised: 2 August 2025 / Accepted: 8 August 2025 / Published: 13 August 2025

Simple Summary

This study investigates the diversity of tick species parasitizing migratory birds in Sardinia and the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens, focusing on Rickettsia and Babesia/Theileria species. Seasonal differences were observed, with Ixodes ricinus dominating in autumn and Hyalomma marginatum in spring. Molecular analyses revealed a 13.6% prevalence of Rickettsia spp., mainly R. helvetica, R. monacensis, and R. aeschlimannii, and a lower prevalence (1.4%) of Babesia/Theileria species. These findings suggest migratory birds contribute to the dispersal of tick vectors and zoonotic pathogens across geographic regions. These results underscore the importance of integrated surveillance of avian–tick–pathogen interactions to better understand emerging tick-borne disease risks in Mediterranean ecosystems.

Abstract

Migratory birds play a key role in the ecology of tick-borne pathogens, serving as both hosts for ticks and as potential carriers of a wide range of infectious agents that can affect wildlife, domestic animals, and humans. Their long-distance movements contribute to the dispersal of ticks and the pathogens they harbor, with potential implications for the emergence and spread of zoonotic disease. This study focuses on the prevalence of Rickettsia spp. and Babesia/Theileria spp. in ticks collected from migratory birds in Sardinia, Italy, during two consecutive migration seasons (April–May and October–November 2021), corresponding to the spring and autumn migratory periods. A total of 961 ticks, primarily Ixodes ricinus, was collected from various bird species. Molecular analyses using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing enabled the detection and identification of multiple Rickettsia species, with R. helvetica, R. monacensis, and R. aeschlimannii being the most frequently identified. Protozoan pathogens, including B. venatorum and Theileria ovis, were also detected in the tick samples. These findings underscore the diversity of pathogens in bird-associated ticks and the role of migratory birds in the geographical spread of these diseases. These results also provide valuable insights into pathogen transmission dynamics and stress the importance of monitoring migratory birds to assess and mitigate the risks of zoonotic diseases. Further research is needed to clarify the ecological interactions among birds, ticks, and pathogens across different geographic regions.

1. Introduction

In a world facing rapid environmental changes, human activities significantly influence ecosystems, contributing to the decline of numerous animal and plant species. Among the tools used to monitor and understand these changes, bird ringing has proven essential [1]. Researchers can track avian biology, behavior, migratory patterns, productivity, and population dynamics by individually marking birds. Such data are fundamental for conservation and ecological management, especially as species respond to shifting habitats and climate.
Birds, particularly migratory species, play a unique role in ecological networks [1,2]. Many breeding birds in northern Europe undertake seasonal migrations, ranging from short regional movements to intercontinental journeys toward the Southern Hemisphere. These migrations not only allow birds to exploit seasonal resources but also position them as potential vectors of pathogens and parasites, including ticks and tick-borne microorganisms. As migratory birds cross national and ecological boundaries, they may contribute to the dispersal of zoonotic agents across vast geographic areas [3,4].
In addition to acting as vectors of ticks and associated pathogens, migratory birds may also experience direct health consequences from pathogen exposure during migration. It exposes birds to a wide range of environments and novel parasites or pathogens, representing a physiological cost and a potential risk to their survival and fitness [5].
Ticks, as obligate hematophagous ectoparasites, are recognized vectors of a wide variety of zoonotic pathogens. Their distribution and population dynamics are heavily influenced by environmental factors, particularly climate, which affects both tick development and the viability of the pathogens they carry [6]. With global warming, previously unsuitable regions become favorable for tick survival and expansion, increasing the risk of vector-borne disease emergence [7]. In Europe, medically relevant tick species include Ixodes ricinus, Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l., Hyalomma marginatum, and Dermacentor reticulatus [8]. In Sardinia, several of these, including Rh. sanguineus, D. marginatus, Haemaphysalis and Hyalomma spp., are commonly found [9,10].
Human exposure to tick-borne pathogens occurs primarily through outdoor activities, agriculture, forestry, and growing urban–wildland interface zones [11]. Moreover, migratory birds can transport ticks over long distances, potentially introducing infected ticks into new areas [12]. These birds may also act as reservoir hosts, especially when the physiological stress of migration compromises their immune systems [13].
Among the emerging tick-borne diseases, rickettsioses caused by members of the Spotted Fever Group Rickettsia (SFGR) and protozoan infections, such as babesiosis and theileriosis, have attracted growing attention due to their zoonotic potential and impact on both human and animal health. These pathogens are transmitted by various ixodid ticks, which serve as competent vectors and reservoirs in diverse ecological settings [14].
In Sardinia, multiple studies have highlighted the island’s ecological suitability for the circulation of SFGR, reporting the presence of several Rickettsia species, including R. massiliae in R. sanguineus s.l., R. aeschlimannii in Hyalomma marginatum, R. raoultii in R. sanguineus s.l. and D. marginatus, and R. slovaca in D. marginatus [10,15]. Parallel to these bacterial agents, protozoan parasites such as Babesia and Theileria spp. have been identified in ticks and blood of both symptomatic and asymptomatic domestic animals, confirming their widespread presence on the island. Molecular investigations have detected Babesia and Theileria DNA in livestock such as cattle, sheep, pigs, and horses, with notable findings including the first identification of Theileria annulata in cattle in Sardinia and a high prevalence of T. orientalis in the northern regions. In addition, B. bigemina and T.equi have been reported in specific host populations and geographic areas [16].
Although the involvement of birds in the ecology of Borrelia spp. is well established [17], their contribution to the spread of other pathogens, such as SFGR and piroplasms, is less understood.
Our study addresses this gap by investigating the prevalence and diversity of tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from migratory birds in Sardinia, focusing on Rickettsia and Babesia/Theileria species. By combining molecular detection methods with ecological surveillance, this research contributes to the broader understanding of vector–pathogen–host interactions. It also supports the development of effective strategies for monitoring and controlling tick-borne zoonoses in Mediterranean ecosystems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sample Collection

This study was carried out in the Asinara National Park, a biodiversity-rich protected area in northwestern Sardinia, strategically positioned along major avian migratory routes in the Mediterranean area. As part of an ornithological ringing program coordinated by ISPRA (Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale), birds were captured using mist nets during the spring and autumn migration periods of 2021. Sampling took place at the Tumbarino Ornithological Observatory (one of the most important bird ringing stations in Sardinia) from mid-April to the end of May for spring migration and from mid-September to the end of October for autumn migration. Ticks from birds were gently removed with a sterile tick removal hook (Figure 1), placed in labeled vials, and transported to the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna (IZS) for laboratory analysis.

2.2. Molecular Tick Identification and Pathogen Detection

At the laboratory, ticks were first classified by developmental stage (larva, nymph, and adult) and engorgement status. Species identification was carried out exclusively using molecular methods to ensure high accuracy, particularly for immature stages, which are difficult to distinguish morphologically. Genomic DNA was extracted from individual ticks using the commercial Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The mithocondrial 16S rDNA gene was then amplified using PCR using the primers 16S+1 (5′-CTGCTCAATGATTTTTTAAATTGCTGTGG-3′) and 16S-1 (5′-CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCAAGT-3′), as previously described by Black and Piesnam [18]. The resulting PCR products were sequenced to determine species identity. Molecular identification was also applied to adult ticks to confirm morphological assessments.
Originally collected for a study on Borrelia spp. [17], these tick specimens were retrospectively examined to investigate the presence of other tick-borne pathogens, namely, Rickettsia spp. and Babesia/Theileria spp. Pathogen detection was performed using both real-time and conventional PCR assays targeting the gltA which encodes citrate synthase gene conserved across both pathogenic and non-pathogenic Rickettsia species. Detection of Babesia/Theileria spp. was performed targeting the 18S rRNA gene, as detailed in Table 1.
PCR reaction mixes and thermal cycling conditions were optimized in-house. Real-time PCR was carried out using the Quantifast Probe PCR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in a 20 µL reaction containing 0.5 µM of each primer, 0.25 µM of TaqMan probe, 1.25× Internal Control Assay, and 2 µL of DNA. Cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 50 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Samples with a Ct values ≤ 45 cycles were considered positive.
Conventional PCRs were performed in 25 µL reaction volumes, each containing 12.5 µL of 6× PCR Master Mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 1 µM of each primer, 1 µL of DNA template, and nuclease-free water. Cycling conditions included an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s (optimized for the 18S rRNA and gltA targets) and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Each run included negative (no-template) and positive (DNA extracted from R. rickettsii and B. bovis) controls.

2.3. Purification and Sequencing

All PCR positive amplicons were purified using the QIAquick Spin PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Purified products were subjected to bidirectional Sanger sequencing using the same primers used for amplification. Sequencing was performed on an ABI-PRISM 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Seevetal, Germany) with the dRhodamine Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Applied Biosystems) in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines.
Resulting chromatograms were edited and assembled using ChromasPro v. 1.34 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Tewantin, Queensland, Australia). Sequences alignment was conducted with CLUSTALX [21] and species-level identification was based on BLASTn analysis against the GenBank database using a ≥99% identity threshold. This approach ensured accurate species determination for both tick vectors and associated pathogens. Pairwise and multiple sequence alignments, as well as identity matrices, were generated using CLUSTALW [21] and BioEdit [22], respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Tick Species Composition

A total of 961 ticks (862 in autumn and 99 in spring) was collected from 461 migratory birds during the autumn and spring migratory periods of 2021. The autumn sample was dominated by short-distance migrants, primarily local and regional species like the European robin and common blackbird, which accounted for the majority of parasitized individuals (Table 2). Of the 592 larvae collected, 91 (91/592; 15.4%) were fully engorged, 45 (45/592; 7.6%) partially engorged, and 456 (456/592; 77%) non-engorged. Among the 231 nymphs, 64 (64/231; 27.7%) were engorged, 13 (13/231; 5.6%) partially engorged, and 154 (154/231; 66.6%) non-engorged. All adult ticks were fully engorged at the time of collection.
In contrast to autumn, the spring migration was dominated by long-distance migrants like the common redstart and pied flycatcher, which migrate from sub-Saharan Africa to their European breeding grounds (Table 3). During this period, 30 larvae were collected, of which five (5/30; 16.7%) were engorged and 25 unengorged (25/30; 83.3%). Among the 55 adult ticks, 37 (37/55; 67.3%) were engorged and 13 (13/55; 23.6%) unengorged. All 14 nymphs collected in spring were unengorged.
The tick species composition showed notable seasonal variation. In autumn (post-breeding), Ixodes ricinus was the predominant species, accounting for 77% of ticks collected. Conversely, Hyalomma marginatum predominated in spring (pre-breeding), comprising 75% of the collected ticks. Details of tick–host associations across bird species are shown in Table 2 and Table 3. Despite the application of molecular methods, some immature ticks could only be identified to the genus level (Ixodes spp. and Hyalomma spp.) due to ambiguous sequence data.

3.2. Rickettsia spp. Prevalence During Migration Seasons

Real-time PCR revealed the presence of Rickettsia spp. in 13.6% (131/961) of the tested ticks. Among them, 87 were not engorged, 35 were fully engorged, and 8 were partially engorged. Species-level identification based on gltA gene sequencing revealed the presence of only pathogenic species in the analyzed samples. Rickettsia helvetica was the most frequently detected species (50/131; 38.2%), followed by Rickettsia monacensis (49/131; 37.4%) and Rickettsia aeschlimannii (29/131; 22.1%). Less frequently detected species included R. sibirica (2/131; 1.5%) and R. raoultii (1/131; 0.8%).
R. helvetica and R. monacensis were primarily associated with European robins (Erithacus rubecula), blackbirds (Turdus merula), and song thrushes (Turdus philomelos), and were mostly detected in larvae and nymphs of I. ricinus, especially those collected from robins. These two species were also found in I. frontalis and Hy. marginatum.
Rickettsia aeschlimannii was most commonly found in ticks from the woodchat shrike (Lanius senator) and was also present in ticks from the common redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) and pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). It was identified in I. ricinus, I. frontalis, and Hyalomma spp., with a strong association observed between R. aeschlimannii and Hyalomma ticks collected from redstarts and flycatchers. Ixodes ricinus was the most frequently detected tick species and was responsible for the majority of R. helvetica and R. monacensis detections. Larvae represented the most common developmental stage (n = 80), particularly in ticks collected from robins, blackbirds, and song thrushes. Nymphs were moderately represented (n = 28), especially in I. ricinus and I. frontalis from blackbirds, song thrushes, and woodchat shrikes. Adult ticks (n = 23) were identified primarily in Hyalomma marginatum and Ixodes frontalis, particularly on redstarts and shrikes. During the spring migration, the most common Rickettsia species identified was R. aeschlimannii, with 29 positive samples across various stages. Additionally, R. sibirica and R. raoultii were detected in small numbers (Table 4).

3.3. Babesia/Theileria spp. Prevalence During Migration Seasons

PCR targeting piroplasmid DNA revealed 14 positive samples out of 961 ticks analyzed (1.4%). The majority of detections (9/14) were associated with European robins (Erithacus rubecula), primarily from Ixodes ricinus. Detected pathogens included B. venatorum (in two unengorged larvae), T. ovis (in four unengorged and one partially engorged larva), Theileria sp. OT3 (in one unengorged larva), T. orientalis (from three unengorged and one engorged larva), and T. equi (from one unengorged larva). Additionally, one unengorged larva of Ixodes ventalloi collected from a robin tested positive for T. ovis. Common blackbirds (Turdus merula) accounted for four positive samples, involving both larvae and nymphs of I. ricinus and I. frontalis, and included B. venatorum, B. capreoli, and T. orientalis. One positive larva was also recorded from a song thrush (Turdus philomelos), although the genospecies could not be identified. Overall, T. ovis (n = 5) and T. orientalis (n = 4) were the most frequently detected genospecies, followed by B. venatorum (n = 2), T. equi (n = 1), B. capreoli (n = 1), and Theileria sp. OT3 (n = 1). Most positive ticks were larvae, with a single case detected in a nymph (Table 5).

4. Discussion

This study provides a comprehensive insight into the diversity and seasonal dynamics of tick species parasitizing migratory birds, as well as their role in the dissemination of Rickettsia and Babesia/Theileria species. Expanding on the findings of Chisu et al. [17], who originally analyzed these samples for Borrelia spp., we retrospectively examined the same tick collection to detect additional tick-borne pathogens. This broader approach contributes to a more integrated understanding of the eco-epidemiology of avian–vector–pathogen interactions.
A clear seasonal difference in tick species composition was observed. Ixodes ricinus was the overwhelmingly dominant tick species during the autumn migration, especially among short-distance migratory birds such as the European robin (Erithacus rubecula), common blackbird (Turdus merula), and song thrush (Turdus philomelos). The high proportion of larvae and nymphs in early feeding stages suggests a recent acquisition of ticks during migratory stopovers or local movements within the region. Although bird species were classified according to broad migratory strategy, some short-distance migrants (e.g., Erithacus rubecula and Turdus merula) are known partial migrants with migratory behavior varying across their range. In Sardinia, particularly during autumn and winter, mixed populations of residents and migrants are likely to co-occur, which may influence tick exposure dynamics (Table 2 and Table 3).
Additionally, while most long-distance migrants in this study were trans-Saharan, Sylvia atricapilla represents an exception. Many individuals of this species overwinter within the Mediterranean basin rather than crossing the Sahara. Consequently, these birds likely acquire ticks locally or regionally, indicating that autumn captures largely reflect endemic host–vector dynamics. This is consistent with the findings of Rataud et al. [23] and Dumas et al. [24], who noted that local birds play a central role in sustaining regional tick populations and in maintaining the enzootic transmission of tick-borne pathogens. This interpretation also aligns with the seasonal host–tick associations reported by Chisu et al. [17], who documented a high prevalence of Borrelia spp. in immature Ixodes ticks collected in autumn from the same bird species.
The increased presence of Hyalomma marginatum during spring is of particular epidemiological concern due to their established vector competence for Rickettsia aeschlimannii and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, pointing out the potential for avian-mediated introductions of vector-borne pathogens into new ecological settings [25,26]. These data reinforce the critical role of migratory birds in shaping the spatiotemporal distribution of tick species and in facilitating the long-range movement of zoonotic pathogens.
Larvae (representing the 64.7% of the ticks collected) were the most commonly collected tick stage in autumn, followed by nymphs (25.5%) and, to a lesser extent, adults (9.8%). This pattern was seen for Ixodes ricinus, a species that has a life cycle synchronized to maximize larval activity in late summer and early autumn [27]. Moreover, the predominance of larvae reflects the typical host-seeking behavior of these life stages, which are adapted to parasitize smaller, ground-foraging vertebrates such as passerine birds [28,29]. Similarly, Dumas et al. [24] and Chisu et al. [17] noted that larval ticks are the primary stage collected from small-to-medium-sized avian hosts, aligning with their role in the early stages of the enzootic transmission cycle. The ground-foraging ecology of many of the birds sampled (such as robins and thrushes) further increases their exposure to larvae and nymphs, which remain close to the substrate during their questing phase. This host–stage association reinforces the importance of avian ecology in shaping tick-host dynamics and has implications for understanding how immature tick stages are distributed across habitats and hosts.
A rickettsial infection prevalence of 13.6% was observed in ticks associated with birds. The most commonly detected species were R. helvetica, R. monacensis, and R. aeschlimannii, reflecting their known associations with ixodid ticks in the Palearctic region [30]. In this study, R. helvetica and R. monacensis were primarily associated with immature stages of Ixodes ricinus, particularly those collected from European robins, blackbirds, and song thrushes. These passerines, due to their ground-foraging behavior and high tick-infestation rates, may serve as both biological amplifiers and ecological dispersers of these pathogens. Notably, the detection of R. helvetica in I. ricinus from European robins (74.4%) suggests a potential reservoir competence, a hypothesis supported by previous observations of transovarial and transstadial transmission in I. ricinus populations [31,32]. Given its association with serious human conditions, including perimyocarditis and neurological syndromes such as Bell’s palsy [33,34], the widespread distribution of R. helvetica is of increasing public health interest.
Similarly, R. monacensis, a recognized human pathogen, was also frequently detected in I. ricinus and I. frontalis ticks collected from robins and blackbirds [35]. While I. ricinus remains the principal vector, the presence of R. monacensis in ticks feeding on multiple bird species suggests that blackbirds, and potentially robins, may play a reservoir role. The identification of this pathogen in both larvae and nymps supports the potential for vertical transmission and the persistence across tick generations.
Rickettsia aeschlimannii was more commonly associated with adult Hyalomma ticks [36], particularly Hy. marginatum and Hy. rufipes, and, to a lesser extent, adult I. ricinus and I. frontalis. These ticks were largely collected from long-distance migratory birds, such as those in Table 4, suggesting the introduction of R. aeschlimannii from North African or Mediterranean regions during spring migration. Given its pathogenicity in humans and its wide tick host range, this species warrants careful surveillance, particularly in migratory bird stopover sites and breeding areas.
The occasional detection of R. sibirica and R. raoultii, both medically relevant but less commonly reported in Western Europe, further indicates the broad biogeographical range of ticks transported by birds. R. sibirica was detected in I. ricinus ticks from redstarts, a species that migrates between Europe and Africa, suggesting its possible involvement in transcontinental pathogen dispersal. These detections emphasize the role of migratory birds as vehicles for the introduction of exotic or emerging Rickettsia species into non-endemic regions.
Seasonal variation in tick species composition was also evident, with I. ricinus predominating in the autumn and Hyalomma marginatum being more common in spring. These dynamics can influence which Rickettsia species are introduced or amplified at specific times of year, potentially shaping local disease risk. Although the number of ticks collected during spring migration was markedly lower than in autumn, this likely reflects the reduced sample size of birds examined in spring rather than a true seasonal decline in tick prevalence. Despite this limitation, a high infestation rate was recorded, particularly among long-distance migrants such as the common redstart and pied flycatcher. These findings suggest that sampling effort, rather than ecological factors alone, may partially explain the seasonal differences in tick abundance.
Piroplasmid DNA was detected in 1.4% of examined ticks (14/961), indicating a low but ecologically relevant prevalence of Babesia and Theileria spp. in avian-associated tick populations. The ticks were primarily Ixodes ricinus larvae collected from European robins and blackbirds. Notably, most of these were not engorged, which suggests that pathogens may not result from recent bloodmeal, raising the possibility of alternative transmission routes, such as transovarial or environmental acquisition. While vertical transmission has been reported for some Babesia spp., it remains unconfirmed for Theileria spp., raising questions about the origin and viability of these infections in immature tick stages.
Among the identified pathogens, B. venatorum emerged as a noteworthy zoonotic agent. Two I. ricinus larvae from a robin and a blackbird tested positive for this species, which was first reported in migratory birds in Norway and is now recognized as a pathogen capable of infecting humans [37]. B. venatorum is primarily associated with roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), and adult I. ricinus ticks commonly parasitize these mammals [38]. Its detection in immature ticks supports the possibility of transovarial transmission, facilitating the maintenance of the pathogen even in the absence of its principal vertebrate host. Further investigation is needed to determine whether birds carry Babesia spp. in their bloodstream, and it could clarify their potential role as biological or mechanical vectors.
Similarly, B. capreoli, another species associated with roe deer, was detected in a single I. ricinus nymph. Like B. venatorum, it is suggested to be transmitted transovarially within ticks, as inferred from its occasional detection in larval stages [38].
The presence of Theileria spp., including T. orientalis, T. ovis, and T. equi, further supports the circulation of apicomplexan parasites on the island and their potential dissemination through birds [16,39]. Although birds are not competent reservoirs for these pathogens, they may act as mechanical carriers of infected ticks, thereby contributing to the ecological spread of these pathogens. Notably, T. ovis was detected in I. ventalloi, a tick species not traditionally associated with livestock [40]. This finding raises important questions about overlooked vectors in the epidemiology of ovine theileriosis and highlights the need to investigate the vector competence across a broader range of tick species.
Importantly, the molecular approach employed in this study did not confirm whether the detected pathogens were viable or being transmitted. The absence of data on parasite developmental stages or the origin of the bloodmeal origin limits definitive conclusions about the dynamics of pathogen transmission. Nevertheless, the detection of piroplasmid DNA in unengorged larvae, especially for Theileria spp., for which transovarial transmission has not been established, prompts further investigation. Further experimental studies are needed to explore the dynamics of parasite viability, transmission potential, and host–vector competence. Given the limited number of positive samples, particularly the single detection of piroplasmids in a nymph, further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm the role of migratory birds and their ticks in the ecology of Babesia and Theileria spp.
The concurrent detection of multiple Rickettsia, Babesia, and Theileria species in bird-associated ticks highlights the importance of integrated eco-epidemiological surveillance at the interface of wildlife, vectors, and zoonotic pathogens. Although our findings suggest that birds may play a role in the ecology of these pathogens through their association with infected ticks, we did not directly analyze avian blood samples to confirm their status as competent reservoirs. Therefore, birds in this study can be considered only potential carriers rather than confirmed reservoirs. Future studies involving direct sampling of birds will be necessary to clarify their reservoir competence.

5. Conclusions

This study highlights the relationship between migratory birds, tick vectors, and the dissemination of various zoonotic pathogens such as Rickettsia, Babesia, and Theileria species. These findings not only reinforce the role of birds in the ecological dynamics of tick-borne diseases, but also emphasize the need for integrative, One Health surveillance approaches that consider the interconnectedness of wildlife, vectors, and human health. With shifting climate patterns, habitat alterations, and changing migratory behaviors, continued monitoring of tick populations and pathogen prevalence is essential to understand and mitigate the risks of pathogen introduction and spread. As such, ongoing research into the role of migratory birds in tick-borne pathogen dynamics is critical to anticipating emerging public health and veterinary challenges.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.V.; methodology, C.V., I.P., L.G., P.B., G.C., G.M. (Gaia Muroni), and C.F.; software, C.V., I.P., P.B. and L.G.; validation, C.V., I.P., P.B., and L.G.; resources, C.V. and G.M.; data curation, C.V.; writing—original draft preparation, C.V., I.P., L.G., G.C., G.M. (Gaia Muroni), and C.F.; writing—review and editing, C.V.; visualization, C.V., G.M. (Giovanna Masala); supervision, C.V.; project administration, C.V., I.P., and L.G.; funding acquisition, G.M. (Giovanna Masala). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health: RC IZS SA 02/20.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Bird capture and handling were carried out by authorized ringers within the framework of the national bird ringing program coordinated by ISPRA. No specific ethical approval was required, as the procedures did not involve invasive or experimental manipulation and were conducted exclusively for ringing and tick collection purposes, in accordance with Italian law n. 157/1992 and Directive 2009/147/EC on the conservation of wild birds.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data collected during this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Anderson, G.; Green, R. The Value of Ringing for Bird Conservation. Br. Trust. Ornithol. Ringing Migr. 2009, 24, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, W.; Wei, J.; Xu, Y. Prioritizing Global Conservation of Migratory Birds over Their Migration Network. One Earth 2023, 6, 1340–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hoffman, T.; Olsen, B.; Lundkvist, Å. The Biological and Ecological Features of Northbound Migratory Birds, Ticks, and Tick-Borne Microorganisms in the African–Western Palearctic. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. La Sorte, F.; Fink, D. Migration Distance, Ecological Barriers and En-Route Variation in the Migratory Behaviour of Terrestrial Bird Populations. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2017, 26, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Altizer, S.; Bartel, R.; Han, B.A. Animal Migration and Infectious Disease Risk. Science 2011, 331, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tonk-Rügen, M.; Kratou, M.; Cabezas-Cruz, A. A Warming World, a Growing Threat: The Spread of Ticks and Emerging Tick-Borne Diseases. Pathogens 2025, 14, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ostfeld, R.S.; Brunner, J.L. Climate Change and Ixodes Tick-Borne Diseases of Humans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 20140051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Noll, M.; Wall, R.; Makepeace, B.L.; Vineer, H.R. Distribution of Ticks in the Western Palearctic: An Updated Systematic Review (2015–2021). Parasites Vectors 2023, 16, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chisu, V.; Loi, F.; Foxi, C.; Chessa, G.; Masu, G.; Rolesu, S.; Masala, G. Coexistence of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Ticks Collected from Their Hosts in Sardinia: An Update. Acta Parasitol. 2020, 65, 999–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chisu, V.; Leulmi, H.; Masala, G.; Piredda, M.; Foxi, C.; Parola, P. Detection of Rickettsia Hoogstraalii, Rickettsia Helvetica, Rickettsia Massiliae, Rickettsia Slovaca and Rickettsia Aeschlimannii in Ticks from Sardinia, Italy. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2017, 8, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yi, B.; Fan, M.; Chen, J.; Yao, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, H. An Alarming Public Health Problem: Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens in Urban Recreational Parks. China CDC Wkly. 2025, 7, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Battisti, E.; Urach, K.; Hodzic, A.; Fusani, L.; Hufnagl, P.; Felsberger, G.; Ferroglio, E.; Duscher, G.G. Zoonotic Pathogens in Ticks from Migratory Birds, Italy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 2986–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Eikenaar, C.; Hessler, S.; Hegemann, A. Migrating Birds Rapidly Increase Constitutive Immune Function during Stopover. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2020, 7, 192031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Banović, P.; Díaz-Sánchez, A.A.; Foucault-Simonin, A.; Mateos-Hernandez, L.; Wu-Chuang, A.; Galon, C.; Simin, V.; Mijatović, D.; Bogdan, I.; Corona-González, B.; et al. Emerging Tick-Borne Spotted Fever Group Rickettsioses in the Balkans. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2023, 107, 105400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chisu, V.; Foxi, C.; Mannu, R.; Satta, G.; Masala, G. A Five-Year Survey of Tick Species and Identification of Tick-Borne Bacteria in Sardinia, Italy. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 678–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chisu, V.; Alberti, A.; Zobba, R.; Foxi, C.; Masala, G. Molecular Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of Babesia and Theileria Spp. in Ticks from Domestic and Wild Hosts in Sardinia. Acta Trop. 2019, 196, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chisu, V.; Giua, L.; Bianco, P.; Foxi, C.; Chessa, G.; Masala, G.; Piredda, I. Tick Dispersal and Borrelia Species in Ticks from Migratory Birds: Insights from the Asinara National Park, Sardinia, Italy. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 16, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Black, W.C.; Piesman, J. Phylogeny of hard- and soft-tick taxa (Acari: Ixodida) based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 10034–10038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Labruna, M.B.; Whitworth, T.; Horta, M.C.; Bouyer, D.H.; McBride, J.W.; Pinter, A.; Popov, V.; Gennari, S.M.; Walker, D.H. Rickettsia Species Infecting Amblyomma Cooperi Ticks from an Area in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, Where Brazilian Spotted Fever Is Endemic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dahmana, H.; Amanzougaghene, N.; Davoust, B.; Normand, T.; Carette, O.; Demoncheaux, J.-P.; Mulot, B.; Fabrizy, B.; Scandola, P.; Chik, M.; et al. Great Diversity of Piroplasmida in Equidae in Africa and Europe, Including Potential New Species. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2019, 18, 100332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X Version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dagona, A.G. BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rataud, A.; Henry, P.-Y.; Moutailler, S.; Marsot, M. Research Effort on Birds’ Reservoir Host Potential for Lyme Borreliosis: A Systematic Review and Perspectives. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 69, 2512–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dumas, A.; Bouchard, C.; Dibernardo, A.; Drapeau, P.; Lindsay, L.R.; Ogden, N.H.; Leighton, P.A. Transmission Patterns of Tick-Borne Pathogens among Birds and Rodents in a Forested Park in Southeastern Canada. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0266527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bonnet, S.I.; Vourc’h, G.; Raffetin, A.; Falchi, A.; Figoni, J.; Fite, J.; Hoch, T.; Moutailler, S.; Quillery, E. The Control of Hyalomma Ticks, Vectors of the Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Majid, A.; Almutairi, M.M.; Alouffi, A.; Tanaka, T.; Yen, T.-Y.; Tsai, K.-H.; Ali, A. First Report of Spotted Fever Group Rickettsia Aeschlimannii in Hyalomma Turanicum, Haemaphysalis Bispinosa, and Haemaphysalis Montgomeryi Infesting Domestic Animals: Updates on the Epidemiology of Tick-Borne Rickettsia Aeschlimannii. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1283814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kahl, O.; Gray, J.S. The Biology of Ixodes Ricinus with Emphasis on Its Ecology. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2023, 14, 102114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kocianová, E.; Rusňáková Tarageľová, V.; Harustiakova, D.; Spitalská, E. Seasonal Infestation of Birds with Immature Stages of Ixodes Ricinus and Ixodes Arboricola. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2017, 8, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Van Gestel, M.; Heylen, D.; Verheyen, K.; Fonville, M.; Sprong, H.; Matthysen, E. Recreational Hazard: Vegetation and Host Habitat Use Correlate with Changes in Tick-Borne Disease Hazard at Infrastructure within Forest Stands. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 919, 170749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mancuso, E.; Di Domenico, M.; Di Gialleonardo, L.; Menegon, M.; Toma, L.; Di Luca, M.; Casale, F.; Di Donato, G.; D’Onofrio, L.; De Rosa, A.; et al. Tick Species Diversity and Molecular Identification of Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae Collected from Migratory Birds Arriving from Africa. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pedersen, B.N.; Jenkins, A.; Kjelland, V. Tick-Borne Pathogens in Ixodes Ricinus Ticks Collected from Migratory Birds in Southern Norway. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wallménius, K.; Barboutis, C.; Fransson, T.; Jaenson, T.G.T.; Lindgren, P.-E.; Nyström, F.; Olsen, B.; Salaneck, E.; Nilsson, K. Spotted Fever Rickettsia Species in Hyalomma and Ixodes Ticks Infesting Migratory Birds in the European Mediterranean Area. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nilsson, K.; Wallménius, K.; Hartwig, S.; Norlander, T.; Påhlson, C. Bell’s Palsy and Sudden Deafness Associated with Rickettsia Spp. Infection in Sweden. A Retrospective and Prospective Serological Survey Including PCR Findings. Eur. J. Neurol. 2014, 21, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Scarpulla, M.; Barlozzari, G.; Salvato, L.; De Liberato, C.; Lorenzetti, R.; Macrì, G. Rickettsia Helvetica in Human-Parasitizing and Free-Living Ixodes Ricinus from Urban and Wild Green Areas in the Metropolitan City of Rome, Italy. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018, 18, 404–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ebani, V.V.; Mancianti, F. Potential Role of Avian Populations in the Epidemiology of Rickettsia Spp. and Babesia Spp. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rumer, L.; Graser, E.; Hillebrand, T.; Talaska, T.; Dautel, H.; Mediannikov, O.; Roy-Chowdhury, P.; Sheshukova, O.; Mantke, O.D.; Niedrig, M. Rickettsia Aeschlimannii in Hyalomma Marginatum Ticks, Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 325–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Andersson, M.O.; Bergvall, U.A.; Chirico, J.; Christensson, M.; Lindgren, P.-E.; Nordström, J.; Kjellander, P. Molecular Detection of Babesia Capreoli and Babesia Venatorum in Wild Swedish Roe Deer, Capreolus Capreolus. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fanelli, A. A Historical Review of Babesia spp. Associated with Deer in Europe: Babesia divergens/Babesia divergens-like, Babesia capreoli, Babesia venatorum, Babesia cf. odocoilei. Vet. Parasitol. 2021, 294, 109433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chisu, V.; Serra, E.; Foxi, C.; Chessa, G.; Masala, G. Molecular Investigation of Theileria and Babesia Species in Domestic Mammals from Sardinia, Italy. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Latrofa, M.S.; Giannelli, A.; Persichetti, M.F.; Pennisi, M.G.; Solano-Gallego, L.; Brianti, E.; Parisi, A.; Wall, R.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Otranto, D. Ixodes Ventalloi: Morphological and Molecular Support for Species Integrity. Parasitol. Res. 2017, 116, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. European robin (Erithacus rubecula) removal from a mist net during the bird monitoring study and tick removal during field sampling.
Figure 1. European robin (Erithacus rubecula) removal from a mist net during the bird monitoring study and tick removal during field sampling.
Vetsci 12 00753 g001
Table 1. Primers sets used for the detection of Rickettsia spp. and piroplasmida DNA.
Table 1. Primers sets used for the detection of Rickettsia spp. and piroplasmida DNA.
PathogenTarget GenePrimer/ProbeSequenceReferences
Rickettsia spp.gltACS5 Forws5′-GAGAGAAAATTATATATCCAAATGTTGAT-3′[19]
CS5 Rev5′-AGGGTCTTCGTGCATTTCTT-3′
CS5 ProbeFAM-CATTGTGCCATCCAGCCTACGGT -BHQ1
Rickettsia spp.gltAgltA For5′-CCTATGGCTATTATGCTTGC-3′[10]
gltA Rev5′-ATTGCAAAAAGTACAGTGAACA -3′
Piroplasmida5.8S rRNA gene5.8S Forw5′-AYYKTYAGCGRTGGATGTC-3′[20]
5.8S Rev5′-TCGCAGRAGTCTKCAAGTC-3′
5.8S ProbeFAM-TTYGCTGCGTCCTTCATCGTTGT-MGB
Piroplasmida18S rRNA geneBJ1 For5′-GTCTTGTAATTGGAATGATGG-3′[16]
BN2 Rev5′-TAGTTTATGGTTAGGACTACG-3′
Table 2. Tick infestation data collected from parasitized migratory birds during autumn migration, including tick developmental stages (larvae (L), nymphs (N), and adults (A)), migratory behavior classification of each bird species, and the percentage of individuals parasitized per species. Some data are adapted from Chisu et al. [17].
Table 2. Tick infestation data collected from parasitized migratory birds during autumn migration, including tick developmental stages (larvae (L), nymphs (N), and adults (A)), migratory behavior classification of each bird species, and the percentage of individuals parasitized per species. Some data are adapted from Chisu et al. [17].
SeasonBird Species (Scientific name)Migration TypeTested Ticks (n% of Total Ticks)Parasitized Birds (n% of Total Birds)Birds Parasitized/ExaminedTick Species AssociatedLNATotal
AutumnEuropean robin (Erithacus rubecula)Short-distance579
(67%)
301
(74.3%)
301/579
(52%)
I. ricinus28410014398
I. frontalis78248110
I. inopinatus1001
I. ventalloi4004
Ixodes spp.3924366
Common blackbird (Turdus merula)Short-distance188 (21.8%)54 (13.3%)54/188
(28.7%)
I. frontalis1113
I. ricinus128560184
I. ventalloi0101
Song thrush
(Turdus philomelos)
Short-distance68 (8%)34 (8.4%)34/68
(50%)
I.ricinus4322166
I. inopinatus2002
Woodlark
(Lullula arborea)
Short-distance17 (2%)7 (1.7%)7/17
(41.2%)
I. ricinus101112
Hy. marginatum2215
Eurasian blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla)Long-distance4 (0.5%)4 (1%)4/4
(100%)
I. frontalis4004
Garden warbler (Sylvia borin)Long-distance2 (0.2%)2 (0.5%)2/2
(100%)
I. ricinus1102
Common redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus)Long-distance3 (0.4%)2 (0.5%)2/3
(66.7%)
I. ricinus3003
Little owl
(Athene noctua)
Resident1 (0.1%)1 (0.3%)1/1
(100%)
I. ricinus1001
TOTAL--862405--59223139862
Notes: (1) Short-distance migrants include partial migrants, with mixed populations of residents and seasonal migrants in Sardinia. (2) Long-distance migrants include trans-Saharan migrants. (3) Resident species are non-migratory.
Table 3. Tick infestation in migratory and resident birds during spring season: prevalence, tick species, and developmental stages. Data partly adapted from Chisu et al. [17].
Table 3. Tick infestation in migratory and resident birds during spring season: prevalence, tick species, and developmental stages. Data partly adapted from Chisu et al. [17].
SeasonBird Species (Scientific name)Migration TypeTested Ticks (n% of Total Ticks)Parasitized Birds (n% of Total Birds)Birds Parasitized/ExaminedTick Species AssociatedLNATotal
SpringCommon redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus)Long-distance56 (57%)25 (44.6%)25/56
(44.6%)
Hy. marginatum752335
Hy. rufipes211417
Rh. bursa1001
I. inopinatus1001
I. ventalloi0101
I. frontalis1001
Wood warbler (Phylloscopus sibilatrix)Long-distance11 (11%)7 (12.5%)7/11
(63.6%)
Hy. marginatum50611
European pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca)Long-distance8 (8%)7 (12.5%)7/8
(87.5%)
Hy. marginatum1438
European robin (Erithacus rubecula)Short-distance10 (10%)5 (8.9%)5/10
(50%)
Hy. marginatum90110
Common whitethroat (Sylvia communis)Long-distance3 (3%)3 (5.3%)3/3
(100%)
Hy. marginatum0033
Willow warbler (Phylloscopus trochilus)Long-distance2 (2%)2 (3.6%)2/2
(100%)
Hy. marginatum0022
Common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos)Long-distance3 (3%)2 (3.6%)2/3
(66.6%)
Amblyomma marmoreum0011
Hy. marginatum2002
Song thrush (Turdus philomelos)Short-distance2 (2%)1 (1.8%)1/2
(50%)
Hy. marginatum1102
Whinchat (Saxicola rubetra)Long-distance1 (1%)1 (1.8%)1/1
(100%)
Hyalomma spp.0101
Tyrrhenian spotted flycatcher (Muscicapa striata tyrrhenica)Long-distance1 (1%)1 (1.8%)1/1
(100%)
I. frontalis0101
Eurasian magpie (Pica pica)Resident1 (1%)1 (1.8%)1/1
(100%)
Hy. marginatum0011
Woodchat shrike (Lanius senator)Long-distance1 (1%)1 (1.8%)1/1
(100%)
I. frontalis0011
TOTAL--9956--30145599
Notes: (a) L = larvae; N = nymphs; A = adults. (b) Percentages refer to the proportion relative to the total number of ticks or birds per species during the spring season. Absolute numbers are reported outside parentheses; percentages are shown inside parentheses. (c) Migration types: Short-distance migrants include partial migrants; long-distance migrants include trans-Saharan species; resident species are non-migratory.
Table 4. Distribution of R. helvetica, R. monacensis, R. aeschlimannii, R. sibirica, and R. raoultii according to bird host species, tick species, and tick developmental stage (Larva [L], Nymph [N], Adult [A]).
Table 4. Distribution of R. helvetica, R. monacensis, R. aeschlimannii, R. sibirica, and R. raoultii according to bird host species, tick species, and tick developmental stage (Larva [L], Nymph [N], Adult [A]).
Bird SpeciesTick SpeciesTick StageR. helveticaR. monacensisR. aeschlimanniiR. sibiricaR. raoultiiTotal
European robin
(Erithacus rubecula)
I. ricinusL312600057
I. ricinusN540009
I. frontalisL030003
Blackbird
(Turdus merula)
I. ricinusL630009
I. ricinusN450009
I. frontalisL010001
I. frontalisN100001
Hy. marginatumN010001
Song thrush
(Turdus philomelos)
I. ricinusL230005
I. ricinusN020002
I. frontalisL010001
Woodchat shrike (Lanius senator)I. ricinusA003003
I. ricinusN001001
I. frontalisA002002
I. frontalisN002002
Hy. marginatumL001001
Common redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus)I.ricinusA100001
I. ricinusA0092011
I. ricinusN002002
I. ricinusL002002
Hy. marginatumN001001
Hy. rufipesA003003
Pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca)I. ricinusA002002
Whitethroat
(Sylvia communis)
I. ricinusA001001
Nightingale
(Luscinia megarhynchos)
I. ricinusL000011
Total 50492921131
Table 5. Distribution of piroplasmids by tick species and life stage on selected passerine hosts.
Table 5. Distribution of piroplasmids by tick species and life stage on selected passerine hosts.
Bird SpeciesTick SpeciesTick StageB. venatorumB. capreoliT. ovisT. sp. OT3T. orientalisT. equiTotal
European robin
(Erithacus rubecula)
I. ricinusL1021116
I. frontalisL0000101
I. ventalloiL0010001
I. ricinusL0010001
Common blackbird
(Turdus merula)
I. ricinusL1000001
I. ricinusN0100001
I. ricinusL0010001
I. frontalisL0000101
Song thrush
(Turdus philomelos)
I. ricinusL0000101
TOTAL 21514114
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Valentina, C.; Giua, L.; Bianco, P.; Chessa, G.; Foxi, C.; Muroni, G.; Masala, G.; Piredda, I. Seasonal Dynamics and Pathogen Diversity of Tick Species Parasitizing Migratory Birds in Sardinia, Italy: Implications for the Spread of Rickettsia, Babesia, and Theileria Species. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080753

AMA Style

Valentina C, Giua L, Bianco P, Chessa G, Foxi C, Muroni G, Masala G, Piredda I. Seasonal Dynamics and Pathogen Diversity of Tick Species Parasitizing Migratory Birds in Sardinia, Italy: Implications for the Spread of Rickettsia, Babesia, and Theileria Species. Veterinary Sciences. 2025; 12(8):753. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080753

Chicago/Turabian Style

Valentina, Chisu, Laura Giua, Piera Bianco, Giovanna Chessa, Cipriano Foxi, Gaia Muroni, Giovanna Masala, and Ivana Piredda. 2025. "Seasonal Dynamics and Pathogen Diversity of Tick Species Parasitizing Migratory Birds in Sardinia, Italy: Implications for the Spread of Rickettsia, Babesia, and Theileria Species" Veterinary Sciences 12, no. 8: 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080753

APA Style

Valentina, C., Giua, L., Bianco, P., Chessa, G., Foxi, C., Muroni, G., Masala, G., & Piredda, I. (2025). Seasonal Dynamics and Pathogen Diversity of Tick Species Parasitizing Migratory Birds in Sardinia, Italy: Implications for the Spread of Rickettsia, Babesia, and Theileria Species. Veterinary Sciences, 12(8), 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080753

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop