Next Article in Journal
The Presence and Size of the Corpus Luteum Influence the In Vitro Production of Sheep Embryos
Previous Article in Journal
Micro- and Nanoplastics as Emerging Threats to Both Terrestrial and Aquatic Animals: A Comprehensive Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Emerging Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b Causes Neurological Disease and Mortality in Scavenging Ducks in Bangladesh

1
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
2
Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
3
Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Suedufer 10, 17493 Greifswald, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(8), 689; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080689
Submission received: 29 May 2025 / Revised: 6 July 2025 / Accepted: 21 July 2025 / Published: 23 July 2025

Simple Summary

Due to the global concern of H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b in different host ranges, this study investigates the molecular epidemiology and pathology of HPAI H5N1 viruses in unvaccinated scavenging ducks in Bangladesh, with the goal of assessing viral evolution and associated disease outcomes. Ducks affected with HPAIV showed incoordination, torticollis, and paralysis. Pathological examination revealed prominent meningoencephalitis, encephalopathy, and encephalomalacia, along with widespread lesions in the trachea, lungs, liver, and spleen, suggestive of systemic HPAIV infection. A phylogenetic analysis of full-genome sequences confirmed continued circulation of clade 2.3.2.1a genotype G2 in these ducks. A mutation analysis of the HA protein in clade 2.3.4.4b viruses revealed potential antigenic drift and receptor-binding adaptation. The detection of clade 2.3.4.4b with marked neurological and systemic lesions suggests ongoing viral evolution with increased pathogenic potential also for ducks. These findings highlight the urgent need for enhanced surveillance and biosecurity to control HPAI spread in Bangladesh.

Abstract

Scavenging domestic ducks significantly contribute to the transmission and maintenance of highly pathogenic H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b avian influenza viruses in Bangladesh, a strain of growing global concern due to its broad host range, high pathogenicity, and spillover potential. This study investigates the molecular epidemiology and pathology of HPAI H5N1 viruses in unvaccinated scavenging ducks in Bangladesh, with the goal of assessing viral evolution and associated disease outcomes. Between June 2022 and March 2024, 40 scavenging duck flocks were investigated for HPAI outbreaks. Active HPAIV H5N1 infection was detected in 35% (14/40) of the flocks using RT-qPCR. Affected ducks exhibited clinical signs of incoordination, torticollis, and paralysis. Pathological examination revealed prominent meningoencephalitis, encephalopathy and encephalomalacia, along with widespread lesions in the trachea, lungs, liver, and spleen, indicative of systemic HPAIV infection. A phylogenetic analysis of full-genome sequences confirmed the continued circulation of clade 2.3.2.1a genotype G2 in these ducks. Notably, two samples of 2022 and 2023 harbored HPAIV H5N1 of clade 2.3.4.4b, showing genetic similarity to H5N1 strains circulating in Korea and Vietnam. A mutation analysis of the HA protein in clade 2.3.4.4b viruses revealed key substitutions, including T156A (loss of an N-linked glycosylation site), S141P (antigenic site A), and E193R/K (receptor-binding pocket), indicating potential antigenic drift and receptor-binding adaptation compared to clade 2.3.2.1a. The emergence of clade 2.3.4.4b with the first report of neurological and systemic lesions suggests ongoing viral evolution with increased pathogenic potential for ducks. These findings highlight the urgent need for enhanced surveillance and biosecurity to control HPAI spread in Bangladesh.

1. Introduction

The poultry industry in Bangladesh has faced significant threats from influenza A viruses (IAVs), posing serious challenges to both the national economy and public health. Since the first reported outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) H5N1 in 2007, the virus has caused widespread damage [1,2]. HPAI H5N1 is known for its severe pathogenicity and broad host range, infecting various domestic birds such as chickens, ducks, and quail, but only rarely pigeons [3,4], as well as wild and migratory bird species [5]. HPAI viruses have been intermittently detected in Bangladesh, including clade 2.3.4.4b H5N6 in domestic poultry and clade 2.3.4.4h H5N6 in migratory birds and domestic ducks [6,7]. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that migratory birds traveling along the Central Asian flyway have played a key role in the transboundary spread of these virus strains [8]. Globally, the first outbreak of the AIV H5N1 subtype, belonging to the A/goose/Guangdong/1/96 (Gs/GD/96) lineage, caused an HPAI outbreak in poultry in China [9]. Since 2008, this novel reassortant H5 virus has been detected in ducks and live bird markets in China, carrying clade 2.3.4 hemagglutinin in combination with various neuraminidase subtypes such as N2, N5, N6, and N8. Over time, clade 2.3.4 further evolved into four genetically distinct subgroups [10]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, H5 viruses of clade 2.3.4.4 have evolved into eight distinct subclades, labeled 2.3.4.4a through 2.3.4.4h [11]. The H5N6 virus from subclade 2.3.4.4a was initially identified in poultry in Laos in 2013 and subsequently spread to Vietnam and China. The widespread distribution of H5N8 viruses from clade 2.3.4.4 across various regions and host species, along with recurrent outbreaks caused by clade 2.3.4.4b between 2016 and mid-2020 [12,13], led to the emergence of a novel H5N1 virus within clade 2.3.4.4b in late 2020. By the end of 2021, this H5N1 variant had largely replaced the circulating H5N8 strains of the same clade worldwide [14]. Between 2014 and 2017, the virus spread to North America, facilitating the development of a new clade, 2.3.4.4c [15]. H5N6 viruses from subclades 2.3.4.4d through 2.3.4.4h became established in both domestic and wild bird populations throughout Southeast Asia [16,17]. In Europe, an H5N8 virus from clade 2.3.4.4b detected in turkeys in Poland was genetically linked to Eurasian low-pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses and H5N8 viruses previously identified in sub-Saharan Africa [18]. Similar strains were subsequently reported in poultry and wild birds across several European countries [19,20]. Following their emergence, clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 viruses have undergone extensive reassortment with LPAI viruses, leading to significant genotypic diversity and widespread dissemination across Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Americas [21,22,23].
In February 2007, H5N1 clade 2.2.2 was first detected in Bangladesh, followed by the emergence of clade 2.3.4.2 and clade 2.3.2.1a in 2011, affecting multiple host species [24] and circulating within live poultry markets [25]. By 2012, clades 2.2.2 and 2.3.4.2 were no longer detected, and clade 2.3.2.1a became the dominant strain associated with outbreaks in the country [25,26]. The reassortant virus has since maintained a stable presence, with ongoing detection in domestic poultry and live bird markets, indicating its continued circulation [27,28,29]. Unlike earlier H5N1 variants, recently emerged clade 2.3.4.4b viruses have demonstrated remarkable genetic plasticity, an expanded host range, and enhanced environmental persistence, contributing to sustained transmission across continents.
In Bangladesh, ducks are the second most significant contributors to national poultry meat and egg production [30]. As natural reservoirs and primary hosts of influenza A viruses, ducks play a pivotal role in the ecology, persistence, and transmission of HPAI H5N1 viruses [31]. The majority of domestic ducks belong to the species Anas platyrhynchos and are typically raised under scavenging or semi-intensive systems. These husbandry practices often bring ducks into close contact with other domestic poultry and wild migratory waterfowl, thereby increasing the risk of interspecies transmission of avian influenza viruses [32].
Given that ducks often remain asymptomatic while shedding high viral loads, they serve as silent reservoirs, facilitating the undetected spread of the virus to other domestic poultry species and across regions [33]. Scavenging ducks were selected as the focal host due to their unique ecological role in Bangladesh’s poultry production system, where they frequently interact with wild birds, poultry, and shared water bodies—making them important sentinels and amplifiers of AIV transmission. Additionally, the emergence of novel reassortant strains such as clade 2.3.4.4b necessitates continuous and enhanced genomic surveillance to monitor viral evolution, reassortment patterns, and potential zoonotic threats. Despite numerous outbreaks, comprehensive data on the current genetic makeup and transmission dynamics of HPAI viruses in ducks in Bangladesh remain limited. This gap hinders the development of effective control strategies, including biosecurity measures and targeted vaccination campaigns. Therefore, the current research focused on isolating and identifying H5N1 viruses from the scavenging ducks of Bangladesh. Full-genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the isolated viruses, focusing on characterizing their genetic relationship to regional and global H5N1 strains, especially clade 2.3.4.4b, were performed. Gross and histopathological changes in infected ducks were documented to better understand the disease pathology and its contribution to transmission and mortality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

The scavenging ducks were handled as per the institution’s policies for the handling and use of laboratory animals. This study has been approved by the ethical committee of the Bangladesh Agricultural University Research System (protocol number: BAURES/ESRC/43/2024).

2.2. Sampling Collection and Processing

This study was conducted in different regions of the Mymensingh division of Bangladesh from June 2022 to March 2024. A total of 40 scavenging duck flocks were selected based on the presence of at least one reported respiratory or neurological clinical sign. These flocks, ranging in size from approximately 70 to 2500 ducks, were included as part of active and passive surveillance in high-risk areas. Necropsy was performed on site with appropriate safety measures and gross pathological changes were recorded. Pools of lung and tracheal tissues were collected aseptically from each duck at necropsy in sterile screw-capped tubes for virological analysis. Samples were stored at −80 °C until further analysis. For histopathology, tissues including lungs, trachea, brain, liver, cecal tonsil, and spleen were collected in 10% neutral buffered formalin. The formalin-fixed tissues were embedded in paraffin and sectioned for routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. The H&E-stained sections were examined under a compound light microscope (Olympus BX43, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Nucleic Acid Extraction

Pooled tissues of the lung and the trachea were collected in 2 mL of minimal essential medium supplemented with streptomycin and penicillin. A Tissue Lyser instrument (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to homogenize tissue samples for two minutes using a single 5 mm stainless steel bead in a 2 mL collection tube. Following centrifugation at 3000× g for 10 min, 200 µL of the clarified tissue homogenate was collected and used for nucleic acid extraction using the QIAampViral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany).

2.4. Taq-Man Multi-Target RT-qPCR for Screening and Subtyping of Avian Influenza Virus

RT-qPCR was used to determine whether AIV was present in the samples. A previously established [34] TaqMan probe-based single-step RT-qPCR assay was employed for the detection of the M gene using AgPath Universal Probe One-Step RT-qPCR Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After that, all AIV M gene RT-qPCR-positive samples were subtyped to confirm the H5N1. Each RT-qPCR reaction was performed in a total volume of 12.5 µL, which included 2.5 µL of RNA template, 6 µL of 2X RT-PCR master mix, 0.5 µL of enzyme mix, 1.5 µL of nuclease-free water, and 2 µL of a primer-probe mixture (10 pmol of each component). The thermal cycling conditions include reverse transcription at 45 °C for 10 min, followed by an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min. This was followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s and annealing/extension at 60 °C for 1 min, during which fluorescence signals were captured. After the run, amplification plots were examined, and Ct (cycle threshold) values were determined. Ct values were used to estimate the relative viral load, and samples with Ct values of less than 35 were considered positive. The Optimized TaqMan Multiplex was used to simultaneously detect generic AIV (M gene) and a subtype of AIV (H5 and N1 genes). The false-negative and false-positive results were verified using the positive and negative control within each sample panel.

2.5. Genome Sequencing

Selected positive samples (based on the ct values ranging between 20 and 28) were considered for sequencing. As previously described, a nanopore-based sequencing method was utilized for whole-genome sequencing of HPAIV H5N1 [35]. Universal amplification of extracted RNA was performed using AIV-End-RT-PCR with the SuperScript III One-Step RT-PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The resulting PCR products were purified using AMPure XP magnetic beads (Beckman-Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The whole-genome sequencing was carried out on the Mk1C MinION platform (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) using an R9.4.1 flow cell and the Rapid Barcoding Kit, following the manufacturer’s protocols. Consensus sequences were generated using a reference-based mapping approach with MiniMap2. Final genome assemblies were manually refined in Geneious Prime version 2025.0.3 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand) to retain the highest-quality reads (≥60%).

2.6. Phylogenetic Analysis

Contemporary H5N1 sequences from Bangladesh, along with representative highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) field strains, were retrieved from public databases including the NCBI GenBank and GISAID. Multiple sequence alignments were performed using the online version of MAFFT (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/; accessed on 21 January 2025). Maximum likelihood trees were generated using the GTR model incorporated in MEGA XII software, with branch support assessed through 1000 bootstrap replicates. Final tree visualizations and annotations were completed using MEGA XII [36] and Inkscape 1.0 (https://inkscape.org; accessed on 25 January 2025). The obtained full-genome sequences of seven Bangladeshi H5N1, A/duck/Bangladesh/SD1/2022(SD1), A/duck/Bangladesh/SD4/2022(SD4), A/duck/Bangladesh/SD9/2023(SD9), A/duck/Bangladesh/SD13/2023(SD13) A/duck/Bangladesh/SD22/2023(SD22), A/duck/Bangladesh/SD34/2024(SD34), and A/duck/Bangladesh/SD35/2024(SD35), were deposited in the GISAID database with the accession number mentioned in Supplementary Table S1.

2.7. Molecular Analysis

Amino acid mutation profiles of potentially meaningful functional residues of HA, NA, and six internal proteins were compared with the selected Bangladeshi strains and reference clade sequences of H5N1 viruses using the Bioedit software version 7.2 (https://bioedit.software.informer.com/7.2/: accessed on 12 January 2025) and verified in the web-based tool Flu Surver incorporated into the GISAID platform. The cleavage site, receptor-binding sites (RBSs), and glycosylation sites were given special attention because they are critical determinants of the pathogenicity, host specificity, transmissibility, and immune evasion of AIVs.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Features and Gross Lesions

From June 2022 to March 2024, 40 scavenging duck farms were monitored in the Mymensingh division, in northern Bangladesh. Ducks exhibiting clinical signs, primarily respiratory and neurological, were included in the study. Flock histories, including age, mortality rates, and duck plague vaccination status, were recorded (Table 1). Most of the affected ducks of 50% flocks (20/40) showed similar clinical signs and symptoms, which were mostly sudden death, torticollis (Figure 1A), drowsiness, paralysis, neck bending, coughing, convulsion, and rattling. Severely affected ducks were necropsied either on-site or at the host laboratory. The common gross pathological lesions found included congestion of the entire body of the duck and hemorrhages, which are considered signs of a systemic infectious disease in ducks. The significant postmortem lesions observed were severe fibrino-hemorrhagic pneumonia (Figure 1B) and hemorrhagic brain (Figure 1C). No significant gross lesion was found in other visceral organs. The severely affected organs were collected for molecular detection and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathological analysis.

3.2. Detection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus

HPAI H5N1 was detected in 14 of 40 flocks by RT-qPCR, with Ct values ranging from 19.73 to 33.47. The remaining 26 flocks tested negative for avian influenza virus (AIV), though the presence of other pathogens was not assessed here. A subset of H5N1-positive samples was selected for whole-genome sequencing based on low Ct values (19.73–26.39) and molecular characterization. Edited and assembled sequences were used for the construction of the phylogenetic tree.

3.3. Histopathological Lesions

In the affected ducks, different histopathological lesions were observed. In the trachea, the mucosal layer was found thickened due to inflammation (Figure 2A), with profuse mucous secretion and accumulation over or along the mucosal layer (Figure 2B). The inflammatory cells were predominantly lymphocytes. Histopathological examination of the lung revealed pleuritis with the loss of mucosal epithelium (Figure 2C) as one of the predominant lesions, along with pneumonia characterized by marked congestion and hemorrhages, alveolitis with thickened interalveolar septa, diffuse alveolar collapse, a focal loss of pneumocyte I (Figure 2D), and compensatory proliferation of pneumocyte II (Figure 2D: inset box).
HPAI-infected ducks showed significant pathological lesions in the brain. Most of the HPAI-positive ducks exhibited notable congestion, microgliosis, and numerous vacuoles within the brain parenchyma (Figure 3A). Additionally, severe focal to diffuse meningitis characterized by predominant mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in many of the infected ducks (Figure 3B). In some cases, encephalitis (Figure 3C, circled) was evident, along with multifocal degenerative (encephalopathy) and necrotic foci indicative of encephalomalacia (Figure 3D, circled). Discrete necrosis of neurons accompanied by neuronophagia (Figure 3D, inset box) was also noted.
Other signs of systemic infection were observed in the liver: chronic multifocal necrotizing hepatitis in portal area (Figure 4A) and in liver parenchyma (Figure 4B). In the cecal tonsil, the main pathological lesions were typhlitis (Figure 4C). Additionally, we found muscular degeneration in the inner muscle layer of the cecal tonsil (Figure 4C, circle). In the spleen, the main pathological lesions observed were mild lymphoid depletion (Figure 4D).
In summary, HPAI H5N1-infected ducks showed predominant mononuclear inflammatory infiltration across multiple tissues. The significant lesions were observed in the respiratory central nervous and gastrointestinal systems. The respiratory tract showed tracheitis, pleuritis, and pneumonia. In the central nervous system, meningoencephalitis was evident along with encephalopathy, encephalomalacia, and neuronal necrosis accompanied by neuronophagia. As part of our field investigation, we did perform necropsy on apparently healthy ducks from non-infected flocks. These ducks showed no clinical signs or gross pathological lesions in the respiratory tract or other systemic organs during postmortem examinations. Since no gross abnormalities were observed, we did not proceed with a histopathological analysis of these tissues.

3.4. Phylogenetic Relationships

A total of seven out of fourteen positive samples were sequenced successfully. The phylogenetic trees were constructed for all eight genome sequences. The HA phylogenetic analysis revealed that five strains (SD1, SD9, SD22, SD34, and SD35) of H5N1 belonged to clade 2.3.2.1a, and the other two strains (SD4 and SD13) belonged to clade 2.3.4.4b of the Gs/Gd lineage (Figure 5). The strains of clade 2.3.2.1a are closely related to previous and contemporary H5N1 viruses of Bangladesh that have been circulating for nearly a decade. Importantly, two new strains of clade 2.3.4.4b were detected that are closely related to Korean, Vietnamese, and Japanese strains of H5N1. Previously isolated Bangladeshi clade 2.3.4.4b strains were also clustered with the current strains, indicating the continuing presence of clade 2.3.4.4b in Bangladesh. The NA sequences reflect the clade-specific clustering of the HA gene (Figure 5).
The six internal genes of the studied viruses from Bangladesh clustered respective to specified clades (Supplemental Figure S1). However, the two 2.3.4.4b viruses detected in this study are distinct from a new Japanese cluster 2.3.4.4b isolated from a crow in Japan in 2024. The reassortment of internal genes among different clades or subtypes was not observed.

3.5. Mutational Analysis

Among seven H5N1 viruses, two distinct multibasic hemagglutinin (HA) cleavage site motifs were identified: PQKERRRKR*GLF, characteristic of clade 2.3.2.1a, and PLREKRRKR*GLF, associated with clade 2.3.4.4b. Both motifs are indicative of high pathogenicity, confirming the virulent nature of these clades. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the HA protein comprises the 130 loop, the 190 helix, and the 220 loop [37]. Within the receptor-binding site (RBS), the conserved residues Q226 and G228 (H3 numbering) remained unchanged across all isolates, suggesting a continued preference for avian-type receptors (sialic acid with α2,3-Gal linkage). However, other amino acid variations were observed within the 220 loop compared to the Gs/Gd strains of H5N1. In five of the seven viruses from clade 2.3.2.1a, mutations Q222K and N223I were detected. In contrast, two isolates belonging to clade 2.3.4.4b exhibited N223V and S227R substitutions. These mutations may reflect clade-specific adaptations and could influence receptor-binding efficiency or host ranges [38]. The receptor-binding pocket formed by the 190 helix, which has been associated with the HPAI phenotype in chickens [39], contains key mutations, such as E193R/K/N and Q196K. Among the seven H5N1 isolates studied, five viruses from clade 2.3.2.1a exhibited the E193R substitution, while two other isolates of clade 2.3.4.4b showed an E193N mutation. Additionally, the Q196K substitution was identified in two clade 2.3.4.4b viruses, further indicating potential functional divergence within the receptor-binding pocket among different clades. An S137A mutation within the 130 loop was consistently observed across all seven characterized H5N1 viruses. Overall, the study observed mutations such as T156A, S141P, and E193R/K in some of the strains. These substitutions are located within or near known antigenic sites and the receptor-binding domain and have been reported in previous studies to be associated with antigenic variation or altered receptor affinity [39,40,41]. The hemagglutinin (HA) protein contains several N-linked glycosylation sites, defined by the N-X-S/T motif (where X is any amino acid except proline), as well as multiple antigenic sites [40,41]. The number, type, and position of these glycan modifications vary among virus strains, potentially influencing host immune recognition and viral fitness [42]. However, the potential phenotypic impacts of these mutations require further investigation through in vitro receptor-binding assays, cell culture studies, or animal models to confirm their functional significance.
All studied H5N1 isolates are predicted to carry four N-linked glycosylation sites (H5 numbering) within the HA1 protein at positions 27 (NNS), 39 (NVT), 181 (NNT), and 302 (NNS), as well as one site in the HA2 protein at position 500 (NGT). Notably, the glycosylation site at positions 154–156 (NNT, H3 numbering)—commonly observed in other gs/GD strains—was absent in all isolates, instead showing the motifs DDA or DNA (Table 2). Additionally, an S141P mutation was identified in the antigenic site A (residues 136–141) of two recent clade 2.3.4.4b isolates. These variations could influence antigenicity and immune evasion [43]. A summary of the key HA amino acid residues is provided in Table 2.
In addition to the HA protein, an analysis of the internal genes PB2, PB1, PA, NP, NA, M, and NS revealed several conserved mutations known to influence viral replication and host adaptation. The mutations observed in these gene segments were consistent with those previously reported in our earlier characterization of clade 2.3.2.1a H5N1 isolates [28], suggesting a conserved genetic backbone within this clade. Notably, the signature PB2-E627K mutation, which enhances polymerase activity and viral replication in mammalian hosts [44], was not detected in our study isolates. Similarly, the PB1-F2 N66S substitution, known to increase virulence in mice [45], and the PA-T97I mutation, associated with increased replication efficiency [46], were also absent in the viruses from both clades 2.3.2.1a and 2.3.4.4b. These findings suggest that while these mutations are typically involved in viral adaptation to mammals, the viruses in this study appear to be primarily adapted to avian hosts, supporting their limited zoonotic potential. These findings also support the idea that while HA undergoes more rapid evolution for antigenic escape, the internal proteins maintain stability to preserve replicative fitness across various avian host species.

4. Discussion

Domestic free-range ducks can act as reservoirs for HPAIV because they are often not associated with the development of overt clinical disease. However, recent increases in duck mortalities in Bangladesh [47] accompanied by neurological signs due to HPAIV H5 infections suggests that ducks may no longer serve solely as reservoir hosts. In Bangladesh, domestic ducks form a bridge between migratory birds and poultry sold at live bird markets (LBMs), thereby creating an ideal environment for viral genetic evolution and interspecies transmission. In this study, we detected and characterized clade 2.3.4.4b and 2.3.2.1a HPAI H5N1 virus in samples from AIV surveillance in domestic duck flocks in Bangladesh, in 2022–2024.
The H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b was detected in domestic scavenging duck flocks that were clinically affected and brought for postmortem analysis. The virus is genetically linked to the previous Bangladeshi H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b detected in domestic free-range ducks that were clinically healthy [48]. However, the observed increase in pathogenicity, as well as the clinical infections and mortality seen in these scavenging ducks, despite sharing a similar genotype, remains unexplained. Further investigation is required to determine the factors contributing to this shift in virulence and its impact on both animal and human health.
The H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b has raised significant concern worldwide due to its observed virulence, high transmissibility, and its ability to infect a range of hosts, including both avian and mammalian species. In the USA, the H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b virus has caused a series of alarming spillover events, highlighting the growing risk of zoonotic transmission and mammalian adaptation [49,50]. In contrast, Bangladesh has experienced an endemic circulation of H5N1 viruses belonging to clade 2.3.2.1a, while clade 2.3.4.4b has predominantly spread across Asia and Europe. The clade 2.3.4.4b was first detected in domestic free-range ducks in Bangladesh, where it was initially reported to be clinically asymptomatic [48]. The detection of the HPAI H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b virus in domestic scavenging ducks exhibiting clinical signs of infection underscores a shift in viral behavior that warrants closer attention. Their free-ranging behavior and lack of vaccination increase their susceptibility to infection and potential to serve as reservoirs or mixing vessels for novel AIV strains. Only two flocks, SD4 and SD13, were found positive for 2.3.4.4b, and their mortalities were 17.33% and 0.33%, respectively. The other clade 2.3.2.1 also has a border range of mortality as mentioned in Table 1. While a few H5N1-negative flocks showed relatively high mortality, we suspect this may be due to other concurrent infections common in scavenging duck populations, such as duck plague virus, Mycoplasma spp., Pasteurella multocida, or Riemerella anatipestifer. However, as the primary objective of this study was to investigate the presence and impact of HPAI H5N1, further diagnostic workup for other pathogens was not conducted.
Multiple experimental infection studies have demonstrated that HPAI infection in ducks can lead to severe clinical manifestations [51,52,53]. Research indicates that younger and meat-type ducks tend to exhibit higher virus loads in tissues, increased viral shedding, and elevated mortality rates ranging from 30% to 50%, often accompanied by pronounced neurological signs following HPAI infection [54,55,56]. The heightened susceptibility in younger ducks may be attributed to age-dependent variations in innate immune responses triggered by HPAI virus infection [56]. In our study, ducks from multiple age groups exhibited severe neurological signs, including head tremors and paresis, as detailed in Table 1. Correspondingly, histological examination revealed severe encephalitis, encephalomalacia, and neuronal necrosis, along with diffuse vacuolation in brain’s spongy matter (encephalopathy). In addition to central nervous system lesions, pronounced pathological lesions were observed in the respiratory and gastrointestinal systems, indicating a high level of pathogenicity in naturally infected ducks. Some of the lesions observed in the respiratory and gastrointestinal systems may have been influenced by poor management practices and co-infection with other viral or secondary bacterial infections, as previously reported in studies from Korea and Egypt [51,55]. This observation emphasizes a potentially increased pathogenicity of clade 2.3.4.4b in ducks. However, further controlled studies and broader surveillance including asymptomatic populations are needed to validate this observation.
In terms of genetic features, the surface glycoproteins, particularly HA, exhibit rapid evolution, primarily driven by immune selection pressure. These changes may support effective immune evasion and enhance viral replication efficiency in avian hosts, with the potential for adaptation to mammalian hosts as well. In contrast, the internal gene segments of the H5N1 viruses, particularly those belonging to clade 2.3.2.1a and 2.3.4.4b, circulating in Bangladesh, showed minimal evolution. This evolutionary conservation highlights the importance of ongoing genomic surveillance and functional studies to assess the pandemic risk posed by these circulating strains. Given all the local farm-level factors, including biosecurity gaps, free-range duck rearing, mixed-species farming systems, live poultry trade, and frequent and intense exposure to migratory wild birds, which would facilitate further genetic evolution and increase the risk of host spillover events, the seemingly stable genetic properties of HPAIV circulating in Bangladesh is astonishing and cannot be readily explained. In other regions where clade 2.3.4.4b virus circulates enzootically, i.e., in Europe and the Americas, a plethora of more than 200 genotypes have developed, which come and go [57].

5. Conclusions

The HPAI H5N1 clade 2.3.2.1a and 2.3.4.4b viruses continue to circulate in duck populations in Bangladesh. Mutation analysis of the HA protein in clade 2.3.4.4b viruses identified key amino acid substitutions affecting glycosylation site, antigenic site A, and the receptor-binding pocket, suggesting ongoing antigenic drift and adaptation in the receptor-binding domain. Infected ducks exhibited significant neuronal lesions, and the observed mortality indicates a possible increase in pathogenicity in this host species. These findings point to the continuing evolution of HPAI viruses with potentially enhanced virulence in ducks. The detection of molecular changes associated with antigenic drift and increased pathogenicity in circulating H5N1 viruses underscores the need for sustained genomic surveillance in avian hosts. Functional studies are essential to assess the implications of these mutations for host adaptation, transmission dynamics, and zoonotic potential. Strengthening active monitoring and preparedness is critical to mitigate the risks posed by evolving HPAI viruses in endemic regions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci12080689/s1. Figure S1: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on complete six internal gene sequences of contemporary and representative strains. The evolutionary history was inferred utilizing the maximum likelihood method based on the general time-reversible model with 1000 bootstrap replicates and visualized using MEGA XII software. The red color indicates recently characterized 5 strains of clade 2.3.2.1a, while blue color indicates the 2 strains of clade 2.3.4.4b found in Bangladesh. Some other strains of the similar clusters within the branch collapsed. Supplemental Table S1: Accession number of submitted sequence of duck samples to the publicly accessed platform Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID).

Author Contributions

Conception, design and supervision: R.P. and E.H.C.; drafting of the paper: R.P., S.B.H. and S.T.; analysis and interpretation of the data: R.P., S.B.H., M.M.U., S.T., M.R.H., R.A.S., J.A.B., M.N., A.K.A., T.H. and E.H.C.; revising the paper critically for intellectual content: R.P., T.H. and E.H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and LS20201342 to Rokshana Parvin. The funders have no role in study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. Nanopore sequencing work at the Friedrich-Loeffler Institute, Germany, was in the frame of its activities as a member of the FAO network of excellence of Reference Centres for Animal Influenza.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Bangladesh Agricultural University Research System BAURES/ESRC/43/2024 2024-06-12.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in the analyses were deposited in the GISAID platform (Accession numbers).

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Md. Shafiqul Islam, for his excellent technical work. We acknowledge Bangladesh Agricultural University Research System (BAURES) for administrative support during the implementation of the research project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AIVsAvian influenza viruses
CtCycle threshold
Gs/GDGoose/Guangdong
H&EHematoxylin and Eosin
HAHemagglutinin
HPAIHighly pathogenic avian influenza
HPAIVHighly pathogenic avian influenza virus
LPAILow-pathogenic avian influenza
MMatrix
NANeuraminidase
NPNucleoprotein
NSNon-structural
PAPolymerase A
PB1Polymerase B1
PB2Polymerase B2
RBDReceptor-binding domain
RBSReceptor-binding sites
WHOWorld Health Organization

References

  1. Parvin, R.; Begum, J.A.; Nooruzzaman, M.; Chowdhury, E.H.; Islam, M.R.; Vahlenkamp, T.W. Review Analysis and Impact of Co-Circulating H5N1 and H9N2 Avian Influenza Viruses in Bangladesh. Epidemiol. Infect. 2018, 146, 1259–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rimi, N.A.; Hassan, M.Z.; Chowdhury, S.; Rahman, M.; Sultana, R.; Biswas, P.K.; Debnath, N.C.; Islam, S.S.; Ross, A.G. A Decade of Avian Influenza in Bangladesh: Where Are We Now? Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, 4, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Turner, J.C.M.; Feeroz, M.M.; Hasan, M.K.; Akhtar, S.; Walker, D.; Seiler, P.; Barman, S.; Franks, J.; Jones-Engel, L.; McKenzie, P.; et al. Insight into Live Bird Markets of Bangladesh: An Overview of the Dynamics of Transmission of H5N1 and H9N2 Avian Influenza Viruses. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2017, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Islam, A.; Islam, S.; Amin, E.; Hasan, R.; Hassan, M.M.; Miah, M.; Samad, M.A.; Shirin, T.; Hossain, M.E.; Rahman, M.Z. Patterns and Risk Factors of Avian Influenza A(H5) and A(H9) Virus Infection in Pigeons and Quail at Live Bird Markets in Bangladesh, 2017–2021. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 1016970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Khatun, M.N.; Tasnim, S.; Hossain, M.R.; Rahman, M.Z.; Hossain, M.T.; Chowdhury, E.H.; Parvin, R. Molecular Epidemiology of Avian Influenza Viruses and Avian Coronaviruses in Environmental Samples from Migratory Bird Inhabitants in Bangladesh. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1446577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, Y.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Tian, J.; Bai, X.; Yang, C.; Shi, J.; Ai, R.; Chen, W.; Zhang, W.; et al. Outbreaks of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N6) Virus Subclade 2.3.4.4h in Swans, Xinjiang, Western China, 2020. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 2956–2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yang, G.; Chowdury, S.; Hodges, E.; Rahman, M.Z.; Jang, Y.; Hossain, M.E.; Jones, J.; Stark, T.J.; Di, H.; Cook, P.W.; et al. Detection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N6) Viruses in Waterfowl in Bangladesh. Virology 2019, 534, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Turner, J.C.M.; Barman, S.; Feeroz, M.M.; Hasan, M.K.; Akhtar, S.; Jeevan, T.; Walker, D.; Franks, J.; Seiler, P.; Mukherjee, N.; et al. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N6) Virus Clade 2.3.4.4h in Wild Birds and Live Poultry Markets, Bangladesh. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 2492–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Xu, X.; Subbarao, K.; Cox, N.J.; Guo, Y. Genetic Characterization of the Pathogenic Influenza A/Goose/Guangdong/1/96 (H5N1) Virus: Similarity of Its Hemagglutinin Gene to Those of H5N1 Viruses from the 1997 Outbreaks in Hong Kong. Virology 1999, 261, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lee, D.H.; Bertran, K.; Kwon, J.H.; Swayne, D.E. Evolution, Global Spread, and Pathogenicity of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5Nx Clade 2.3.4.4. J. Vet. Sci. 2017, 18, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. WHO. Avian Influenza Weekly Update Number 474 Human Infection with Avian Influenza A (H5) Viruses Human Infection with Avian Influenza A (H7N9) Virus in China; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 7–9. [Google Scholar]
  12. Engelsma, M.; Heutink, R.; Harders, F.; Germeraad, E.A.; Beerens, N. Multiple Introductions of Reassorted Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5Nx Viruses Clade 2.3.4.4b Causing Outbreaks in Wild Birds and Poultry in The Netherlands, 2020–2021. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e02499-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yehia, N.; Naguib, M.M.; Li, R.; Hagag, N.; El-Husseiny, M.; Mosaad, Z.; Nour, A.; Rabea, N.; Hasan, W.M.; Hassan, M.K.; et al. Multiple Introductions of Reassorted Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses (H5N8) Clade 2.3.4.4b Causing Outbreaks in Wild Birds and Poultry in Egypt. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 58, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xie, R.; Edwards, K.M.; Wille, M.; Wei, X.; Wong, S.-S.; Zanin, M.; El-Shesheny, R.; Ducatez, M.; Poon, L.L.M.; Kayali, G.; et al. The Episodic Resurgence of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5 Virus. Nature 2023, 622, 810–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Poen, M.J.; Venkatesh, D.; Bestebroer, T.M.; Vuong, O.; Scheuer, R.D.; Oude Munnink, B.B.; de Meulder, D.; Richard, M.; Kuiken, T.; Koopmans, M.P.G.; et al. Co-Circulation of Genetically Distinct Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A Clade 2.3.4.4 (H5N6) Viruses in Wild Waterfowl and Poultry in Europe and East Asia, 2017–2018. Virus Evol. 2019, 5, vez004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tsunekuni, R.; Yaguchi, Y.; Kashima, Y.; Yamashita, K.; Takemae, N.; Mine, J.; Tanikawa, T.; Uchida, Y.; Saito, T. Spatial Transmission of H5N6 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses among Wild Birds in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan, 2016–2017. Arch. Virol. 2018, 163, 1195–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hiono, T.; Okamatsu, M.; Matsuno, K.; Haga, A.; Iwata, R.; Nguyen, L.T.; Suzuki, M.; Kikutani, Y.; Kida, H.; Onuma, M.; et al. Characterization of H5N6 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses Isolated from Wild and Captive Birds in the Winter Season of 2016–2017 in Northern Japan. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 61, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Świętoń, E.; Fusaro, A.; Shittu, I.; Niemczuk, K.; Zecchin, B.; Joannis, T.; Bonfante, F.; Śmietanka, K.; Terregino, C. Sub-Saharan Africa and Eurasia Ancestry of Reassortant Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N8) Virus, Europe, December 2019. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 1557–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. King, J.; Schulze, C.; Engelhardt, A.; Hlinak, A.; Lennermann, S.-L.; Rigbers, K.; Skuballa, J.; Staubach, C.; Mettenleiter, T.C.; Harder, T.; et al. Novel HPAIV H5N8 Reassortant (Clade 2.3.4.4b) Detected in Germany. Viruses 2020, 12, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lewis, N.S.; Banyard, A.C.; Whittard, E.; Karibayev, T.; Al Kafagi, T.; Chvala, I.; Byrne, A.; Meruyert, S.; King, J.; Harder, T.; et al. Emergence and Spread of Novel H5N8, H5N5 and H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in 2020. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2021, 10, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sagong, M.; Lee, Y.; Song, S.; Cha, R.M.; Lee, E.; Kang, Y.; Cho, H.; Kang, H.; Lee, Y.; Lee, K. Emergence of Clade 2.3.4.4b Novel Reassortant H5N1 High Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Virus in South Korea during Late 2021. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69, e3255–e3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ouoba, L.B.; Habibata-Zerbo, L.; Zecchin, B.; Barbierato, G.; Hamidou-Ouandaogo, S.; Palumbo, E.; Giussani, E.; Bortolami, A.; Niang, M.; Traore-Kam, A.; et al. Emergence of a Reassortant 2.3.4.4b Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Avian Influenza Virus Containing H9N2 PA Gene in Burkina Faso, West Africa, in 2021. Viruses 2022, 14, 1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bevins, S.N.; Shriner, S.A.; Cumbee, J.C.; Dilione, K.E.; Douglass, K.E.; Ellis, J.W.; Killian, M.L.; Torchetti, M.K.; Lenoch, J.B. Intercontinental Movement of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Clade 2.3.4.4 Virus to the United States, 2021. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 28, 1006–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Islam, A.; Wille, M.; Rahman, M.Z.; Porter, A.F.; Hosaain, M.E.; Hassan, M.M.; Shirin, T.; Epstein, J.H.; Klaassen, M. Phylodynamics of High Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Virus in Bangladesh Identifying Domestic Ducks as the Amplifying Host Reservoir. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2024, 13, 2399268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Barman, S.; Turner, J.C.M.; Hasan, M.K.; Akhtar, S.; El-Shesheny, R.; Franks, J.; Walker, D.; Seiler, P.; Friedman, K.; Kercher, L.; et al. Continuing Evolution of Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Viruses in Bangladeshi Live Poultry Markets. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2019, 8, 650–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Marinova-Petkova, A.; Feeroz, M.M.; Rabiul Alam, S.; Kamrul Hasan, M.; Akhtar, S.; Jones-Engel, L.; Walker, D.; McClenaghan, L.; Rubrum, A.; Franks, J.; et al. Multiple Introductions of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses into Bangladesh. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2014, 3, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kwon, J.-H.; Lee, D.-H.; Criado, M.F.; Killmaster, L.; Ali, M.Z.; Giasuddin, M.; Samad, M.A.; Karim, M.R.; Hasan, M.; Brum, E.; et al. Genetic Evolution and Transmission Dynamics of Clade 2.3.2.1a Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A/H5N1 Viruses in Bangladesh. Virus Evol. 2020, 6, veaa046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nooruzzaman, M.; Mumu, T.T.; Hossain, I.; Kabiraj, C.K.; Begum, J.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Ali, M.Z.; Giasuddin, M.; King, J.; Diel, D.G.; et al. Continuing Evolution of H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses of Clade 2.3.2.1a G2 Genotype in Domestic Poultry of Bangladesh during 2018–2021. Avian Pathol. 2025, 54, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Xing, X.; Shi, J.; Cui, P.; Yan, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, X.; Tian, G.; et al. Evolution and Biological Characterization of H5N1 Influenza Viruses Bearing the Clade 2.3.2.1 Hemagglutinin Gene. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2024, 13, 2284294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Rahman, M.; Chowdhury, E.H.; Parvin, R. Small-Scale Poultry Production in Bangladesh: Challenges and Impact of COVID-19 on Sustainability. Ger. J. Vet. Res. 2021, 1, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Badruzzaman, A.T.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Hasan, M.; Hossain, M.K.; Husna, A.; Hossain, F.M.A.; Giasuddin, M.; Uddin, M.J.; Islam, M.R.; Alam, J.; et al. Semi-Scavenging Poultry as Carriers of Avian Influenza Genes. Life 2022, 12, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Henning, J.; Wibawa, H.; Morton, J.; Usman, T.B.; Junaidi, A.; Meers, J. Scavenging Ducks and Transmission of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza, Java, Indonesia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 1244–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Forrest, H.L.; Kim, J.-K.; Webster, R.G. Virus Shedding and Potential for Interspecies Waterborne Transmission of Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus in Sparrows and Chickens. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 3718–3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hassan, K.E.; Ahrens, A.K.; Ali, A.; El-Kady, M.F.; Hafez, H.M.; Mettenleiter, T.C.; Beer, M.; Harder, T. Improved Subtyping of Avian Influenza Viruses Using an RT-QPCR-Based Low Density Array: “Riems Influenza a Typing Array”, Version 2 (RITA-2). Viruses 2022, 14, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. King, J.; Harder, T.; Beer, M.; Pohlmann, A. Rapid Multiplex MinION Nanopore Sequencing Workflow for Influenza A Viruses. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Suleski, M.; Sanderford, M.; Sharma, S.; Tamura, K. MEGA12: Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis Version 12 for Adaptive and Green Computing. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2024, 41, msae263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yen, H.-L.; Aldridge, J.R.; Boon, A.C.M.; Ilyushina, N.A.; Salomon, R.; Hulse-Post, D.J.; Marjuki, H.; Franks, J.; Boltz, D.A.; Bush, D.; et al. Changes in H5N1 Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Receptor Binding Domain Affect Systemic Spread. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhang, G.; Shi, Y.; Ge, H.; Wang, Y.; Lu, L.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Q. Genomic Signatures and Host Adaptation of H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b: A Call for Global Surveillance and Multi-Target Antiviral Strategies. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2025, 8, 100377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Teng, Q.; Xu, D.; Shen, W.; Liu, Q.; Rong, G.; Li, X.; Yan, L.; Yang, J.; Chen, H.; Yu, H.; et al. A Single Mutation at Position 190 in Hemagglutinin Enhances Binding Affinity for Human Type Sialic Acid Receptor and Replication of H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus in Mice. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 9806–9825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cattoli, G.; Milani, A.; Temperton, N.; Zecchin, B.; Buratin, A.; Molesti, E.; Aly, M.M.; Arafa, A.; Capua, I. Antigenic Drift in H5N1 Avian Influenza Virus in Poultry Is Driven by Mutations in Major Antigenic Sites of the Hemagglutinin Molecule Analogous to Those for Human Influenza Virus. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 8718–8724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kim, J.-K.; Negovetich, N.J.; Forrest, H.L.; Webster, R.G. Ducks: The “Trojan Horses” of H5N1 Influenza. Influenza Other Respi. Viruses 2009, 3, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yang, Z.-S.; Huang, S.-W.; Wang, W.-H.; Lin, C.-Y.; Wang, C.-F.; Urbina, A.N.; Thitithanyanont, A.; Tseng, S.-P.; Lu, P.-L.; Chen, Y.-H.; et al. Identification of Important N-Linked Glycosylation Sites in the Hemagglutinin Protein and Their Functional Impact on DC-SIGN Mediated Avian Influenza H5N1 Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Luczo, J.M.; Spackman, E. Epitopes in the HA and NA of H5 and H7 Avian Influenza Viruses That Are Important for Antigenic Drift. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2024, 48, fuae014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lee, C.-Y.; An, S.-H.; Choi, J.-G.; Lee, Y.-J.; Kim, J.-H.; Kwon, H.-J. Rank Orders of Mammalian Pathogenicity-Related PB2 Mutations of Avian Influenza A Viruses. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Conenello, G.M.; Tisoncik, J.R.; Rosenzweig, E.; Varga, Z.T.; Palese, P.; Katze, M.G. A Single N66S Mutation in the PB1-F2 Protein of Influenza A Virus Increases Virulence by Inhibiting the Early Interferon Response In Vivo. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 652–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cheng, K.; Yu, Z.; Chai, H.; Sun, W.; Xin, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, J.; Zhang, K.; Li, X.; Yang, S.; et al. PB2-E627K and PA-T97I Substitutions Enhance Polymerase Activity and Confer a Virulent Phenotype to an H6N1 Avian Influenza Virus in Mice. Virology 2014, 468–470, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hassan, M.Z.; Rahman, M.M.; Das, B.C.; Al Amin, M.; Sultana, S.; Ferdouse, H.; Jaber, M.; Rahman, M.S.; Hoque, M.F. Epidemiology of Duck as Reservoir of Avian Influenza Virus in Bangladesh. Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. 2018, 4, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Barman, S.; Turner, J.C.M.; Hasan, M.K.; Akhtar, S.; Jeevan, T.; Franks, J.; Walker, D.; Mukherjee, N.; Seiler, P.; Kercher, L.; et al. Emergence of a New Genotype of Clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A Viruses in Bangladesh. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2023, 12, e2252510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Meade, P.S.; Bandawane, P.; Bushfield, K.; Hoxie, I.; Azcona, K.R.; Burgos, D.; Choudhury, S.; Diaby, A.; Diallo, M.; Gaynor, K.; et al. Detection of Clade 2.3.4.4b Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus in New York City. J. Virol. 2024, 98, e0062624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Caserta, L.C.; Frye, E.A.; Butt, S.L.; Laverack, M.; Nooruzzaman, M.; Covaleda, L.M.; Thompson, A.C.; Koscielny, M.P.; Cronk, B.; Johnson, A.; et al. Spillover of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Virus to Dairy Cattle. Nature 2024, 634, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mansour, S.M.G.; Ali, H.; ElBakrey, R.M.; El-Araby, I.E.; Knudsen, D.E.B.; Eid, A.A.M. Co-Infection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza and Duck Hepatitis Viruses in Egyptian Backyard and Commercial Ducks. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2018, 6, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hashim, S.M.; Ismael, E.; Tarek, M.; Mohammed, F.F.; Abdel Reheem, F.A.; Doghaim, R.E. Genetic Characterization and Pathological Evaluation of Clade 2.3.4.4b Avian Influenza Virus(H5N8) in Naturally Infected Domestic Ducks in Egyptian Farms. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2022, 10, 2609–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bingham, J.; Green, D.J.; Lowther, S.; Klippel, J.; Burggraaf, S.; Anderson, D.E.; Wibawa, H.; Hoa, D.M.; Long, N.T.; Vu, P.P.; et al. Infection Studies with Two Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Strains (Vietnamese and Indonesian) in Pekin Ducks (Anas platyrhynchos), with Particular Reference to Clinical Disease, Tissue Tropism and Viral Shedding. Avian Pathol. 2009, 38, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Aiello, R.; Beato, M.S.; Mancin, M.; Rigoni, M.; Tejeda, A.R.; Maniero, S.; Capua, I.; Terregino, C. Differences in the Detection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Virus in Feather Samples from 4-Week-Old and 24-Week-Old Infected Pekin Ducks (Anas platyrhynchos Var. Domestica). Vet. Microbiol. 2013, 165, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Rhyoo, M.-Y.; Lee, K.-H.; Moon, O.-K.; Park, W.-H.; Bae, Y.-C.; Jung, J.-Y.; Yoon, S.-S.; Kim, H.-R.; Lee, M.-H.; Lee, E.-J.; et al. Analysis of Signs and Pathology of H5N1-Infected Ducks from the 2010–2011 Korean Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Outbreak Suggests the Influence of Age and Management Practices on Severity of Disease. Avian Pathol. 2015, 44, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pantin-Jackwood, M.J.; Suarez, D.L.; Spackman, E.; Swayne, D.E. Age at Infection Affects the Pathogenicity of Asian Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses in Ducks. Virus Res. 2007, 130, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Graziosi, G.; Lupini, C.; Catelli, E.; Carnaccini, S. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5 Clade 2.3.4.4b Virus Infection in Birds and Mammals. Animals 2024, 14, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Clinical and postmortem findings in the affected ducks. The affected duck shows (A) torticollis, (B) severe fibrino-hemorrhagic pneumonia, and (C) hemorrhagic brain. All abnormalities are marked with black circles.
Figure 1. Clinical and postmortem findings in the affected ducks. The affected duck shows (A) torticollis, (B) severe fibrino-hemorrhagic pneumonia, and (C) hemorrhagic brain. All abnormalities are marked with black circles.
Vetsci 12 00689 g001
Figure 2. Histopathological lesions of trachea and lungs. (A) Tracheitis characterized by infiltration of reactive cells, predominantly mononuclear cells (black arrowhead). (B) Tracheitis with profuse mucous secretion (black arrowhead). (C) Pleuritis with pleural thickening (black line). (D) Severe pulmonary hemorrhages with loss of type I pneumocytes and compensatory proliferation of type II pneumocytes (inset, black arrowhead); H & E stain; scale bar indicates magnification.
Figure 2. Histopathological lesions of trachea and lungs. (A) Tracheitis characterized by infiltration of reactive cells, predominantly mononuclear cells (black arrowhead). (B) Tracheitis with profuse mucous secretion (black arrowhead). (C) Pleuritis with pleural thickening (black line). (D) Severe pulmonary hemorrhages with loss of type I pneumocytes and compensatory proliferation of type II pneumocytes (inset, black arrowhead); H & E stain; scale bar indicates magnification.
Vetsci 12 00689 g002
Figure 3. Histopathological lesions of brain. (A) Severe congestion and numerous vacuoles (black arrow) within brain parenchyma. (B) Meningoencephalitis characterized by marked thickening of the meninges. (C) Focal to diffuse encephalitis with encephalomalacia (circle) and (D) encephalomalacia (circle) accompanied by neuronophagia (inset, black arrowhead), and neuronal necrosis (red arrowhead); H & E stain; scale bar indicates magnification.
Figure 3. Histopathological lesions of brain. (A) Severe congestion and numerous vacuoles (black arrow) within brain parenchyma. (B) Meningoencephalitis characterized by marked thickening of the meninges. (C) Focal to diffuse encephalitis with encephalomalacia (circle) and (D) encephalomalacia (circle) accompanied by neuronophagia (inset, black arrowhead), and neuronal necrosis (red arrowhead); H & E stain; scale bar indicates magnification.
Vetsci 12 00689 g003
Figure 4. Histopathological lesions of the liver, cecal tonsil, and spleen of the dead duck. (A) Liver shows chronic necrotizing multifocal portal to peri-portal hepatitis (black arrow) and (B) inflammatory infiltrations in the liver parenchyma (black arrow). (C) Cecal tonsil shows typhlitis and muscular degeneration in inner muscular layer (circle). (D) The spleen shows mild lymphoid depletion (circle); H & E stain; scale bar indicates magnification.
Figure 4. Histopathological lesions of the liver, cecal tonsil, and spleen of the dead duck. (A) Liver shows chronic necrotizing multifocal portal to peri-portal hepatitis (black arrow) and (B) inflammatory infiltrations in the liver parenchyma (black arrow). (C) Cecal tonsil shows typhlitis and muscular degeneration in inner muscular layer (circle). (D) The spleen shows mild lymphoid depletion (circle); H & E stain; scale bar indicates magnification.
Vetsci 12 00689 g004
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on complete HA and NA genes. HA gene sequences of 102 H5N1 viruses (upper) and NA genes of gene sequences of 101 H5N1 (lower) of contemporary and representative strains. The clade names shown (e.g., 2.3.4.4b and 2.3.2.1a) refer to the hemagglutinin (HA) clade designation and are used here to indicate the overall genetic background of the viruses, which share both HA and NA segment relationships. The evolutionary history was inferred utilizing the maximum likelihood method based on the general time-reversible model with 1000 bootstrap replicates and visualized using MEGA XII software. The red color indicates 5 recently characterized strains of clade 2.3.2.1a, while the blue color indicates the 2 strains of clade 2.3.4.4b found in Bangladesh. Some other strains of the clades within the branch were collapsed.
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on complete HA and NA genes. HA gene sequences of 102 H5N1 viruses (upper) and NA genes of gene sequences of 101 H5N1 (lower) of contemporary and representative strains. The clade names shown (e.g., 2.3.4.4b and 2.3.2.1a) refer to the hemagglutinin (HA) clade designation and are used here to indicate the overall genetic background of the viruses, which share both HA and NA segment relationships. The evolutionary history was inferred utilizing the maximum likelihood method based on the general time-reversible model with 1000 bootstrap replicates and visualized using MEGA XII software. The red color indicates 5 recently characterized strains of clade 2.3.2.1a, while the blue color indicates the 2 strains of clade 2.3.4.4b found in Bangladesh. Some other strains of the clades within the branch were collapsed.
Vetsci 12 00689 g005aVetsci 12 00689 g005b
Table 1. Summarized flock history of the studied duck populations.
Table 1. Summarized flock history of the studied duck populations.
Shed/Flock IDAge (Days)Number of BirdsNumber of Dead BirdsMortality (%)VaccinationH5N1 RT-qPCR
(Ct Value)
K412020000No
K73822002009.09No
K83050020.4No30.27
SD190300103.33Duck Plague23.21
SD260150040026.66Duck Plague
SD33822002009.09No
SD413751317.33No19.73
SD52725062.4No30.26
SD73001150403.48Duck Plague
SD8210200000No
SD9180120000No23.45
SD1036550000No
SD1115080000No
SD12240250010.04Duck Plague29.89
SD13210150050.33Duck Plague25.96
SD14300200030.15Duck Plague
SD15540100000No
SD167530000No30.95
SD1715012000No
SD18901502013.33Duck Plague32.06
SD19420120119.17No
SD2036525072.8No
SD212102500502Duck Plague
SD2245600457.5Duck Plague26.39
SD23250400256.25No
SD2445100030030Duck Plague33.47
SD2536532051.56No
SD264055020036.36Duck Plague29.86
SD2790100020020Duck Plague
SD28603005016.66No
SD29150700No
SD3190550101.82Duck Plague, Cholera
SD323080012515.6Duck Plague
SD33 (a–e)36160080050Duck Plague
SD3427025020.8Duck Plague24.48
SD3545522853.85Duck Plague22.50
Bold face samples are the positive H5N1 strains that have sequenced; (a–e) indicates the average of the five different flocks of a single farm.
Table 2. Potential residual sites of HA protein of the studied H5N1 Bangladeshi strains.
Table 2. Potential residual sites of HA protein of the studied H5N1 Bangladeshi strains.
H5N1 Isolates in This Study↓CladeHA Cleavage Site190 Helix130 Loop220 Loop and
RBS
N-Linked Glycosylation SiteAntigenic Site A
Positions-→
(H3 Numbering)
323–330190–198135–138221–228154–156141
Gs-Gd/19961PQRERRRKKR*GLFEQTKLYQNPVSSAPKVNGQSGNSAS
SD4/20222.3.4.4bPLREKRRK-R*GLFEQTNLYKNPVSAASQVNGQRGDDAP
SD13/2023PLREKRRK-R*GLFEQTNLYKNPVSAASQVNGQRG DDAP
SD1/20222.3.2.1aPQKERRRK-R*GLFEQTRLYQNPVSAASKINGQSGDNAS
SD9/2023PQKERRRK-R*GLFEQTRLYQNPVSAASKINGQSG DNAS
SD22/2023PQKERRRK-R*GLFEQTRLYQNPVSAASKINGQSG DNAS
SD34/2024PQKERRRK-R*GLFEQTRLYQNPVSAASKINGQSG DNAS
SD35/2024PQKERRRK-R*GLFEQTRLYQNPVSAASKINGQSG DNAS
Down arrow indicated H5N1 isolates name, Right arrow indicated position of the aminocid.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parvin, R.; Helal, S.B.; Uddin, M.M.; Tasnim, S.; Hossain, M.R.; Shila, R.A.; Begum, J.A.; Nooruzzaman, M.; Ahrens, A.K.; Harder, T.; et al. Emerging Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b Causes Neurological Disease and Mortality in Scavenging Ducks in Bangladesh. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080689

AMA Style

Parvin R, Helal SB, Uddin MM, Tasnim S, Hossain MR, Shila RA, Begum JA, Nooruzzaman M, Ahrens AK, Harder T, et al. Emerging Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b Causes Neurological Disease and Mortality in Scavenging Ducks in Bangladesh. Veterinary Sciences. 2025; 12(8):689. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080689

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parvin, Rokshana, Sumyea Binta Helal, Md Mohi Uddin, Shadia Tasnim, Md. Riabbel Hossain, Rupaida Akter Shila, Jahan Ara Begum, Mohammed Nooruzzaman, Ann Kathrin Ahrens, Timm Harder, and et al. 2025. "Emerging Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b Causes Neurological Disease and Mortality in Scavenging Ducks in Bangladesh" Veterinary Sciences 12, no. 8: 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080689

APA Style

Parvin, R., Helal, S. B., Uddin, M. M., Tasnim, S., Hossain, M. R., Shila, R. A., Begum, J. A., Nooruzzaman, M., Ahrens, A. K., Harder, T., & Chowdhury, E. H. (2025). Emerging Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b Causes Neurological Disease and Mortality in Scavenging Ducks in Bangladesh. Veterinary Sciences, 12(8), 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080689

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop