Next Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Activity of Teat Antiseptic Formulations Based on Plant Extracts for Controlling Bovine Mastitis: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
Skin Punch as a Potential Diagnostic Tool for Peripheral Neuropathies of Dogs: Set up of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Protocol on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Biopsy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lead, Cadmium, and Arsenic in Edible Tissues of Guinea Pigs Raised in the Central Andes of Peru: Potential Human Health Risk?

by
Doris Chirinos-Peinado
1,
Jorge Castro-Bedriñana
1,*,
Fiorela Rivera-Parco
2 and
Elva Ríos-Ríos
3
1
Food and Nutritional Security Research Group, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo 12000, Peru
2
Faculty of Zootechnics, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo 12000, Peru
3
Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima 15024, Peru
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(4), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12040292
Submission received: 6 February 2025 / Revised: 17 March 2025 / Accepted: 18 March 2025 / Published: 21 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases in Veterinary Medicine)

Simple Summary

This pioneering study analyzed, for the first time, the presence of toxic metals and metalloid content in guinea pig meat and its relationship with its chemical composition in the context of exposure to mining contamination and wastewater irrigation in the Central Andes of Peru. The findings indicate that although lead (Pb) accumulated in greater quantities in the heart, cadmium (Cd) was higher in the liver, and arsenic (As) was higher in the kidneys, with accumulation observed in specific organs, the levels in the meat remained within permissible limits and did not pose a risk to the health of the Peruvian population between 2 and 85 years of age. These results are critical for the regulation of toxic metals and metalloid contamination in food production in the Central Andes of Peru, contributing to food security and public health in the region.

Abstract

Toxic metals and metalloids food contamination is a source of health risks; this study evaluated lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and arsenic (AS) contamination in the meat, liver, kidneys, heart, and lungs of guinea pigs raised on a farm near a mini mineral concentrator and with pastures irrigated with wastewater in the Central Andes of Peru. The risk of consuming these elements was estimated in the Peruvian population aged 2 to 85 years, whose consumption is 660 g/per capita/year. The quantification of Pb, Cd, and As was carried out via Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry. The heart had 3.3, 4.3, 7.3, and 81 times more Pb than the liver, lung, kidneys, and meat. The liver had 1.02, 2.22, 9.15, and 722.5 times more Cd than the kidneys, heart, lungs, and meat, respectively. The kidneys had 1.16 and 1.72 times more As than the liver and heart, respectively. The Target Hazard Quotient (TQH) and Hazard Index (HI) for Pb, Cd, and As, were <1 in the entire population, and there was no risk from their consumption. The cancer risk values found in the study are within the tolerated ranges. The findings expand the scientific basis for the safe and innocuous production of guinea pigs in the Central Andes of Peru and provide evidence to establish limits on water, soil, pastures, and agri-food products.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Potentially toxic elements, such as cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), nickel (Ni), chromium (Cr), mercury (Hg), and arsenic (As), pose an environmental and health risk due to their high density (>5 g/cm3), toxicity, and ability to bioaccumulate in the food chain. Their presence, from both natural and industrial sources, can seriously affect living organisms, making their monitoring and control a global priority [1].
There is growing concern about food contamination with toxic metals and metalloids, particularly in rural areas of the Peruvian Andes, where mining activity and the use of wastewater for irrigation represent significant sources of environmental exposure [2]. Recent studies indicate the presence of Pb and Cd in soil and pastures, and their concentrations are increasing due to mining/metallurgical activities [3], the use of phosphorus agrochemicals containing cadmium [4], and the use of wastewater for irrigation [1], with the presence of As reported in milk from cows raised in the Central Andes [5]. These metals emitted in the form of fine particles in smoke and vapor are transported many kilometers and deposited mainly in the soil and water, incorporating themselves into the production chain and bioaccumulating in the food consumed by humans [6,7,8,9,10], including dairy products and meats, such as that of guinea pigs.
In Peru, the country with the largest production of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) worldwide, and other developing countries, in recent years, the breeding of these small meat rodents has experienced sustained growth, becoming an important source of animal protein for the local population and a source of income for Andean populations, contributing to food security in these populations [11,12,13]. This trend is due to the nutritional qualities of guinea pig meat, which is rich in proteins and essential minerals, such as calcium, iron, and zinc, and low in saturated fat [12].
Genetic improvements have been implemented to optimize growth, performance, and reproduction [14] but contamination with toxic metals and metalloids in water, soil, and plants poses risks to carcass safety and human health.
Pb, Cd, and As are known for their toxic and cumulative effects on animal and human tissues, and their chronic exposure can trigger serious health problems, including neurological, renal, and carcinogenic effects [15,16]. The concentration of these metals in biological and clinical samples from cancer patients was higher than that of healthy individuals [17]. In this context, the detection and quantification of these toxic metals and metalloids in guinea pig tissues is essential to assess potential risks to consumers and ensure food safety. According to previous studies, animal meat and their organs can represent a significant source of exposure to heavy metals through the food chain [18,19]; in this case, when they are raised in areas close to mineral concentrators and the forage irrigation is with wastewater, it is crucial to understand potential exposure levels and non-carcinogenic risks through guinea pig consumption.
Meat consumption, in general, has been increasing in recent decades [20], which underlines the importance of monitoring the quality of this food. The consumption of guinea pig meat and offal is an integral part of the traditional diet of Andean peoples and is a fundamental and emblematic pillar of Peruvian gastronomy, with a rich, millennia-long history. The carcass is made up of the skinned guinea pig without digestive viscera; it includes the skin, head, liver, kidneys, heart, and lungs, and in Peru, it is consumed by children and older adults. However, there are few studies that explore heavy metal contamination in guinea pig carcasses and the associated risks to human health and food safety [12]. In the province of Huancayo, located in central Peru, where there are several guinea pig farms, a worrying accumulation of heavy metals has been detected in soils and pastures [3] as a result of agricultural and livestock activities, including the excessive use of phosphorus fertilizers, proximity to an old waste dump, and irrigation of pastures with wastewater [21]. These contaminated conditions not only affect the quality of soils and food but also pose a risk to animals raised on these lands, such as guinea pigs, whose edible organs, such as the heart, liver, lungs, and kidneys, can accumulate these toxic metals and metalloids, given their capacity for bioaccumulation [19].
This study’s objective was to determine the level of Pb, Cd, and As in the meat, liver, kidneys, heart, and lung of 4-month-old fattening guinea pigs raised in the Central Andes of Peru impacted by heavy metal contamination, comparing the values obtained with the established maximum permissible limits and evaluating the health risks through the Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) and the Hazard Index (HI) derived from the consumption of guinea pig in the Peruvian population aged 2–85 years.
This analysis is crucial not only to safeguard the health of consumers but also to provide a scientific basis for implementing policies, safer practices in guinea pig breeding, and food control measures in the Andean region, helping to protect the population and promoting safer agricultural and livestock practices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Aspects

ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines on experimental design and reporting standards for animal research were followed throughout the research. All animal procedures were approved by the General Research Institute of the National University of Central Peru and Rectoral Resolution No. 1435-R-2023. The number of animals used in this study was considered minimal in order not to jeopardize the study’s objectives. The guinea pigs were euthanized by cervical dislocation prior to slaughter, a procedure that minimizes pain and suffering to the animals.

2.2. Study Location

The guinea pigs in this study belong to a representative farm of meat guinea pigs, located in the district of Huancayo, province of Huancayo, on the urban periphery on the right bank of the Mantaro River (Figure 1). The climate of the study area is characterized by two well-defined seasons. The rainy season is from October to March, and the dry season is from April to September. According to Köppen and Geiger, the climate is classified as ET. The average annual temperature and rainfall are 8.7 °C and 1682 mm.

2.3. Animals and Breeding System

The guinea pigs in this study were between 4 and 4.5 months old, with a market live weight between 1100 and 1200 kg, adults; they were raised in wooden and wire mesh pools and had access to cultivated pastures and cut alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and barley (Hordeum vulgare), which were both produced on the same farm. The pastures were irrigated with water from a spring near the Mantaro River and with wastewater without any prior treatment.
In a study conducted on the same farm, the presence of Pb, Cd, and As in the soil was reported at 292 mg/kg, 3.54 mg/kg, and 1.58 mg/kg, respectively. In the grass used in animal feed, the concentrations of these toxic elements were 23.17 mg/kg, 0.25 mg/kg, and 0.06 mg/kg, respectively [5].

2.4. Sample Preparation and Metal and Metalloid Determination

2.4.1. Sampling of Guinea Pig Meat and Offal

For this study, from a batch of 100 guinea pigs that finished fattening, a total of 10 guinea pigs were randomly selected from a representative farm in the district and Huancayo province. The guinea pigs were sacrificed and 5 samples were obtained per guinea pig, totaling 50 samples: 10 meat, 10 liver, 10 kidney, 10 heart, and 10 lungs.
To sacrifice the guinea pigs, they are held by their hind legs, hit on the back of the neck to numb them, and then a cut is made in their neck (slit throat), causing bleeding, a good evacuation of blood with a minimum time of 2 min per animal, and thus the death of the animal. Scalding is performed in a container with water maintaining a minimum temperature of 65 °C. Hair removal is performed manually and then it is washed to eviscerate it, removing the red and white viscera and appendages. The carcasses are then aired and weighed, and they are deboned to obtain meat, fat, and skin and to separate the liver, kidneys, heart, and lungs for shipment to the laboratory. The samples are kept at a temperature of −18 °C to maintain the cold chain in expanded polystyrene boxes and dry ice until the samples are digested by microwave [22].

2.4.2. Preparation of Biological Samples for Toxic Metal and Metalloid Analysis

The preparation of meat and offal samples and the quantification of Pb, Cd, and As were carried out in the accredited Laboratory of the National Institute of Agrarian Research of Huancayo.
Biological samples (2 g/fresh samples) were digested using method 3050B [23], which involves repeated additions of nitric acid (HNO3) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) of analytical reagent grade (Inorganic Ventures, Christiansburg, VA, USA) for digestion. Deionized water was used to prepare all solutions. Standard solutions (99.99%, ICP grade) of Pb (Lot S2-PB708977), Cd (Lot S2-CD705778), and As (Lot S2-AS766036), corresponding to 1000 mg/kg of each element, were prepared by sequential dilution. Samples were cooled to room temperature to prevent foaming and splashing, and digestion vessels were uncovered in a fume hood. Each solution was filtered into a 100 mL volumetric flask using Whatman filter paper (0.45 µm) to remove any suspended residue. A total of 14 mL of 1% HNO3 was added to the solution and diluted to the mark with deionized water. Digestion of the blanks was also performed in parallel with the meat and offal samples with all digestion parameters being the same.

2.4.3. Metal and Metalloid Determination in Guinea Pig Meat and Offal for Human Consumption

Pb, Cd, and As measurements were carried out with MP-AES (Agilent 4100, Agilent Techologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA), Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry [24,25], performing a prior optimization, using standard solutions of the three elements to give the maximum signal intensity by adjusting parameters such as wavelength, nebulizer flow, pump speed, and flow current the lamp for each element (Table 1).
Calibration curves for Pb, Cd, and As were plotted using linear regression analysis of the concentrations of the standard solutions versus the emission values. A series of standard solutions were prepared by diluting the intermediate standard solution with deionized water. The same analytical procedure was used for the determination of the elements in digested blank solutions.
The Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantification (LoQ) values in mg/L for MP-AES 4210 for Cd were 0.001 and 0.003; for Pb, they were 0.001 and 0.003; and for As, the EPA method 200.7 was used [26].
The analytical method (MP-AES) had good linearity, evidencing its reliability in determining trace levels of Pb, Cd, and As in guinea pig meat and offal. The concentrations of each element were determined from calibration curves plotted for emission versus concentration. Duplicate determinations were performed for each sample and the average results were reported. Blank values were also measured.

2.4.4. Precision and Accuracy

Analytical results must have precision and accuracy, and in our study, the precision of the results was evaluated by the percentage relative standard deviation of the results of three samples (n = 3) and triplicate readings per sample, with nine measurements for a given sample. In this study, recovery rates were between 99.5% and 99.9%.
Duplicate samples allowed for determining the precision of the method and calculating the mean and coefficient of variation, which was less than 5%. The precision is measured using standard solutions of each element, determining the relative error, which, in percentage, represents the precision of the method and must be greater than 95%. For these calculations, standard solutions of Pb, Cd, and As, with 155, 150, and 50 mg/kg of sample, were used [27]. At the time of analysis, the corresponding concentrations were 148.14, 152.50, and 49.58 mg/kg, which are values that, when transformed into percentages, indicate that the method complies with the precision parameters.

2.5. Maximum Limits of Pb, Cd, and As in Meat and Meat Products

The National Health Commission and the State Market Regulation Administration of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) published the National Food Safety Standard for Maximum Levels of Contaminants in Food, GB 2762-2022, which updates the 2017 regulation published as GB 2762-2017, this report includes the limits of Pb, Cd, and As in meat and meat products, including edible viscera of livestock and poultry [28], which are shown in Table 2.
The National Health Commission and the State Market Regulation Administration of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) published the National Food Safety Standard. Considering that there is no regulation of maximum limits for guinea pig meat, in this study, we have used the values proposed for livestock and poultry [28], which will give us a good approximation regarding the consumption of guinea pig meat.

2.6. Risk Assessment

The Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) is used to assess the potential non-carcinogenic effects associated with long-term exposure to toxic metals and metalloids in food, and the Hazard Index (HI) assesses the chronic risk of multiple heavy metals [9,29], previously proposed by [30].
An exposure assessment was carried out for the Peruvian population aged 2 to 85 years using the average levels of Pb, Cd, and As in the portion of guinea pig meat consumed, which, according to official reports from Peru, is 660 g per capita/year [31], and the body weights of the population aged 2–85 years. This unique national study included 62,600 people aged 2 to 85 years whose data are current, and there is no other study of this magnitude [32].
The THQ and the Hazard Index (HI) for Pb, Cd, and As from the consumption of guinea pig meat toxicologically demonstrate whether the meat produced in the study area is within the levels established by the Codex Alimentarius [33] and whether these toxic metals and metalloids pose risks to human health [34,35,36].
The potential chronic non-carcinogenic risk of heavy metals, expressed as THQ, was calculated as follows [37,38]:
T H Q = E F × D × D F C × M C R f D × W B × T A
The Exposure Frequency (EF) and the period of exposure equivalent to longevity (ED) for an adult are considered to be 365 days per year and a lifespan of 70 years.
DFC is the daily consumption of guinea pigs in kg/day: 0.002.
MC is the average concentration of toxic metals and metalloids in milk in µg/kg.
RfD is the oral reference dose of each metal [39,40,41].
-
Lead: 0.0035 mg/kg of body weight/day
-
Cadmium: 0.001 mg/kg of body weight/day
-
Arsenic: 0.003 mg/kg of body weight/day
WB is the body weight in kg.
TA is the average lifespan in days which is 25,550 days (70 × 365).
The HI is used to assess the potential long-term risk to human health when two or more toxic metals and metalloids are involved. It is the sum of the THQs [42,43]. It indicates the likely risk of non-cancer diseases. A value > 1 indicates a potential risk of health effects; if the HI is <1, no adverse health effects are expected [44].
The carcinogenic risk (CR), which is the probability that an individual will develop cancer from oral exposure to an environmental carcinogen level over time, was computed based on the USEPA Human Health Risk Assessment model and calculated using the following equation: RC = IDE × SF, where IDE is the estimated daily intake and SF is the cancer slope factor (SF), which is the factor of metals considered carcinogens.
The applied oral slope factors were as follows: 0.0085 (mg kg/day) for Pb, 15 (mg kg/day) for Cd, and 1.5 (mg kg/day) for As. For risk management purposes, a cancer risk from 1 × 10−6 to 1 × 10−4 is considered acceptable or tolerable [45].

2.7. Data Processing

Data were analyzed using SPSS 23.0 (IBM, Endicott, NY, USA). The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A one-way ANOVA was used to compare the average values of the metals in the different samples of guinea pig meat and edible offal. The maximum limits used for Pb, Cd, and As in guinea pig meat and offal are shown in Table 1. Graphs were also prepared indicating the THQ and HI curves for the toxic metals and metalloids studied in the Peruvian population aged 2–85 years. In order to explain the concentrations of these metals in the different edible organs of the guinea pig, a radial graph was prepared.

3. Results

3.1. Edible Components of the Guinea Pig Carcass

In an average 800 g carcass, meat represents more than 90% of this portion, with edible offal representing less than 10%, which concentrates different amounts of heavy metals (Table 3).
These results have served to determine the content of these toxic metals and metalloids in the average daily per capita consumption of guinea pig meat, which is 0.0018 kg.

3.2. Lead Levels in Meat, Kidneys, Lungs, Heart, and Liver of Guinea Pigs

The highest concentration of Pb in the guinea pig carcass is recorded in the heart, which had 3.3, 4.3, 7.3, and 81 times more than the liver, lung, kidneys, and meat (muscles and skin), respectively. This result shows that the edible offal is the one that concentrates a greater amount of lead, while the meat (muscle mass) of the legs and arms, representing 93.7% of the edible portion, had less Pb than the rest of the components of the edible portion.
The concentration of Pb in meat was below the MPL (0.2 mg/kg), while the concentrations of Pb in heart, liver, lung, and kidneys were 11.12, 3.34, 2.62, and 1.53 times higher than the MPL for cattle and poultry viscera (0.5 mg/kg) (Table 4).

3.3. Cadmium Levels in Meat, Kidneys, Lungs, Heart, and Liver of Guinea Pigs

The highest concentration of Cd in guinea pig carcasses was found in the liver and kidneys, followed by the heart, lungs, and meat. The liver had 1.02, 2.22, 9.15, and 722.5 times more than the kidneys, heart, lungs and meat, respectively.
The concentration of Cd in meat was below the MPL (0.1 mg/kg), while in the liver, kidneys, heart, and lungs, the Pb concentration exceeded the MPL for cattle and poultry viscera by 2.89, 1.42, 1.30, and 0.32 times (Table 5).

3.4. Arsenic Levels in Meat, Kidneys, Lungs, Heart, and Liver of Guinea Pigs

The highest concentration of As in the guinea pig carcass was recorded in the kidneys, followed by the liver and heart. No As was detected in the meat and lung, but it is possible that concentrations were below the detection limit.
The kidneys had 1.16 and 1.72 times more than the liver and heart. The concentrations of As in the kidneys, liver, and heart exceeded the MPL (0.5 mg/kg) for viscera of cattle and poultry by 3.21, 2.77, and 1.87 times (Table 6).

3.5. Comparison of Lead, Cadmium, and Arsenic Concentrations in Guinea Pig Meat and Offal

The average amount of Pb, Cd, and As in meat, kidneys, lungs, heart, and liver, in order of importance, was Pb > Cd > As. The average concentrations of these toxic metals and metalloids in meat produced in the study areas were above the maximum permissible limits regulated internationally (Figure 2).
The radial graph visually shows that the highest concentration of Pb is observed in the heart, with lower concentrations in the liver and kidneys and even lower in the meat, while the contents of Cd and As were similar in the heart, liver, and kidneys and were not detected in the meat or the lungs.

3.6. Potential Health Risks

The THQs for Pb, Cd, and As due to guinea pig consumption were below the value of 1 at all ages, with no risk whatsoever from the consumption of guinea pig produced in the Central Andes of Peru (Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9, and Figure 3). On average, the THQ for As was 5.3 times higher than the THQ for Pb and Cd, indicating that this metalloid would be the main contaminant of guinea pig meat and offal under the breeding conditions at the study site. It is also observed that the THQs for Pb, Cd, and As are higher the younger the people are. From approximately 15 years of age onwards, the values become lower and remain similar until 85 years of age.
The Hazard Index (HI) was below 1, not representing a risk for its consumption (Table 10, Figure 4).
The average cancer risk values associated with guinea pig consumption for Pb, Cd, and As were 4.47 × 10−8, 3.55 × 10−5, and 3.87 × 10−6 for the study population. The total cancer risk for the Peruvian population was 3.94 × 10−5, a value that did not exceed the acceptable limit of 1 × 10−6 to 1 × 10−4 [45].

4. Discussion

4.1. Edible Components of the Guinea Pig Carcass

The guinea pig, in its different gastronomic presentations, includes not only the meat or muscle fraction, skin, and accumulated fat, but also the liver, kidneys, heart, and lungs. In an average 800 g carcass, approximately 750 g are meat, skin, and fat, and the rest of the organs or offal weigh approximately 50 g. These values are within the range determined in other works. An FAO publication reported that the average weights of the liver, kidneys, heart, and lungs were 23.29 ± 6.03, 6.06 ± 1.43, 2.79 ± 0.76, and 4.85 ± 1.51 g, respectively [46]. In another study, the weight of the liver is reported to be 20.3 g [47]. In another study, in guinea pigs slaughtered at 72 days of age and fed a mixed diet (80% ryegrass, plus 20% concentrate), the relative weights of the liver, lungs, heart, and kidneys were reported to be from 3.41 to 4.41, 0.57 to 0.78, 0.30 to 0.41, and 1.07 to 1.20%, respectively [48]. If the weight of each organ in an 800 g carcass is calculated, the liver, lungs, heart, and kidneys would have average weights ranging from 27.28 to 35.28, 4.56 to 6.24, 2.4 to 3.26, and 8.56 to 9.60 g, respectively, and our results are between these ranges.

4.2. Lead, Cadmium, and Arsenic Levels in Guinea Pig Meat, Liver, Kidney, Heart, and Lungs

Pb, Cd, and As concentrations differed among the different edible parts of the guinea pig, being lower in the meat than in the viscera. All samples had concentrations below the LMP established by the USDA [28]. The highest concentrations of Pb were recorded in the heart, Cd in the liver and kidneys, and As in the kidneys, while the meat had the lowest contents in the following order: Pb > Cd > As. Even though the levels of Pb, Cd, and As were low, the heart is found to have more than 11 times more Pb than the MPL (Figure 1). The Pb concentrations in descending order were as follows: heart > liver > lungs > kidneys > meat (muscle and skin). These results support other studies that point to the liver and kidneys as organs with a high Pb load; however, these studies do not report contents in the heart.
Although the largest proportion of absorbed Pb is deposited in the skeleton, which contains more than 90% of the body load of Pb [49], it is observed that, among soft tissues, the liver and kidney reach the highest concentrations, but it is also found in most body tissues, including muscle [50,51]. Blood, soft tissues, and bones are therefore the main kinetic reservoirs of the body burden of Pb [52].
In sheep reared in a former mining area of the Sierra Madrona and Alcudia Valley (Spain), blood samples were taken before slaughter, and liver and muscle samples were taken. They reported that blood, liver, and muscle Pb levels were higher in the mining area than in the low contamination control area. The blood Pb concentration in the mining area was 6.7 μg/dL in sheep and 10.9 μg/dL in rams, which are values above background levels (>6 μg/dL) in 73.3% of the animals. The concentration of Pb in the liver of 68% of the sheep from the mining area was 6.16 μg/g dry weight (dw) and exceeded the minimum level associated with toxic exposure (5 μg/g dw), and 87.5% of the liver samples, were above the EU MRLs established for offal intended for human consumption (0.5 µg/g dw~1.4 µg/g dw). In contrast, none of the sheep muscle samples exceeded the EU MPL (0.1 µg/g wet weight ~0.34 µg/g dry weight) established for meat. These results suggest a possible effect on the health of sheep exposed to Pb contamination in this area and possible implications for food safety for human consumers of meat and offal from these animals [53].
In chicken meat, the authors of [54] reported a Pb and Cd content of 0.03 ± 0.006 and 0.008 ± 0.002 mg/kg, and they reported values of 0.03 ± 0.013 and 0.058 ± 0.026 mg/kg for Pb and Cd in the liver; also, for gizzard, they reported values of 0.019 ± 0.009 (Pb) and 0.018 ± 0.008 (Cd), indicating that the maximum permissible values for meats is 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg for Pb and Cd, respectively [55,56]. In red meat, the contents of As, Pb, and Cd were reported as 24.35, 480.86, and 171.134 µg/kg, with the MPL for As, Pb, and Cd being 500, 100, and 50 µg/kg [57]. In trout muscle, the Pb content in the continuous flow system was reported as 0.044 ± 0.02 mg/kg; for the recirculation system, it was 0.061 ± 0.02 mg/kg, and for Cd, in the same systems, it was 0.011 ± 0.002 mg/kg and 0.013 ± 0.001 mg/kg, respectively, indicating that the MPL according to the EU Regulation 2023/915 for Pb and Cd is 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively [58]. Therefore, the consumption of trout meat from the studied farms did not pose a significant threat to consumer health. In another study that evaluated the presence of toxic and essential metals in the liver, kidney, and muscle of pigs from a slaughterhouse in Galicia, northwest Spain, using ICP-OES and ICP-MS, they reported that the average concentrations of Cd in the liver, kidney, and muscle were 0.073, 0.308, and 0.009 mg/kg; 0.004, 0.008 and 0.003 mg/kg for Pb; and 0.013, 0.011, and 0.003 mg/kg for As. These concentrations can be considered low, and, in general, similar to those reported in other studies in Spain. None of the samples exceeded the maximum admissible concentrations established by the European Union, so they are safe for consumption [59].
In cuts of loin and neck obtained from Creole cattle in various municipalities of Antioquia, the authors of [60] reported average values of Pb at 0.041 ± 0.016 and, for Cd, values < 0.010 mg/kg; the levels were within the values allowed by Colombian regulations for all cases, which establish limits of 0.050 mg/kg and 0.10 mg/kg for Cd and Pb, coinciding with the limits established by the European Union for meat products Reg. EU. 37/2010 [61].
In Baquba, Diyala province, Iraq, using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), the concentrations of Cd and Pb in the heart, kidneys, and meat of beef (cow), lamb (sheep), and chicken were determined, among other metals. Heavy metal levels in beef, lamb, chicken, heart, kidney, and meat ranged from 0.058 to 0.680 ppm Cd and 2.269 to 5.726 ppm Pb [62]. Overall, meat was found to have the highest and significant levels of metals, and heart and kidney had the lowest. Significant differences in heavy metal concentrations were also observed in beef, lamb, and chicken. Pb and Cd concentrations exceeded the permissible limits set by WHO/FAO [63].
In a study conducted in Fars province (south of Iran), Pb and Cd contents in muscle, liver, and kidney samples of cattle and their relationship with their concentrations in the feed consumed were reported. The arithmetic means concentrations (mg/kg wet weight) of Pb and Cd were 0.221 and 0.028 in the muscle, 0.273 and 0.047 in the liver, and 0.244 and 0.114 in the kidney. All measured concentrations (with the exception of Pb in muscle) were below the EU MPLs. Cd contents in kidneys were significantly higher than those observed in other tissues [64].
Our findings show that each element accumulates differently in meat and offal and is affected by the level of emissions from anthropogenic activities in adjacent areas. However, no risk of toxicity from Pb, Cd, and As is expected due to human consumption of guinea pigs due to the low per capita consumption of this species.

4.3. Health Risk in the Peruvian Population Aged 3–85 Years Due to Consumption of Guinea Pig Meat

The health risk assessment associated with Pb, Cd, and As contamination, in the edible portion of guinea pig, was calculated by estimating the Target Hazard Quotient (THQ), the Hazard Index (HI), and the cancer risk (CR). For this, 50 samples of meat and offal (meat, heart, liver, kidneys, and lungs) were used. The health protection standard for lifetime risk for THQ and HI is 1.0 [65], and for cancer risk, values from 1 × 10−6 to 1 × 10−4 are considered acceptable or tolerable [45].
In the present study, the THQ and HI values of Pb, Cd, and As concentrations from guinea pig consumption in the Peruvian population aged 2–85 years (Figure 2) were below the safe limit (1.0). Consequently, our findings demonstrated that the intake of these metals from guinea pig consumption is safe and will not cause carcinogenic risks to consumers. The THQ values for Pb, Cd, and As and the HI for these elements were below unity, such that the guinea pig meat and offal that are part of the consumable portions were found to be well below 1 (Figure 3). However, considering that the per capita consumption of guinea pigs is only 660 g/year, even when more than 5 kg are consumed per year, the HI is well below the value of 1, which indicates little risk to consumers; thus, the consumption of this nutritious meat should be promoted and contributes to the nutritional food security of the Andean populations.
We evaluated the THQ for Pb, Cd, and As based on guinea pig consumption in the Peruvian population. The THQ of exposure to these elements with age showed an inverse relationship, with younger children having the highest intake of toxic metals and metalloids from guinea pig milk consumption and the lowest body weight, therefore presenting the highest TQH value. This suggests that guinea pig meat and offal consumed could be an important source of toxic metals and metalloids for young children. The exposure to Pb, Cd, and As for children aged 2, 3, and 5 years is 4.78, 4.12, 3.64, and 3.24 times that of an adult aged 25 years and weighing 65 kg, i.e., based on body weight [66].
THQ values followed a descending order of As > Pb > Cd. A previous study conducted on milk in the Central Andes of Peru showed that the THQ followed a descending order of As > Pb > Cd, with values of 0.05–1.13, 0.01–0.28, and 0.01–0.24 for the minimum milk intake in people aged 2–85 years; 0.09–1.41, 0.02–0.35, and 0.02–0.30 for the average intake; and 0.13–1.69, 0.03–0.42, and 0.03–0.36 for the maximum milk intake, with higher values at younger ages [67]. Other studies, also on fresh cow milk, showed that As had the highest THQ value [68,69].
The HI values for guinea pig consumption in children aged 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 4.9, 4.1, 3.6, and 3.2 times higher than for a 25-year-old adult weighing 65 kg. For the population aged 2–85 years, the HI values were between 0.0019 and 0.0080, well below the threshold of 1. This result indicates that these levels of human exposure to Pb, Cd, and As would not have any adverse effects during a consumer’s lifetime. However, it should be noted that only guinea pig consumption was considered in this study because the varied daily diet produced under the conditions of the study area could increase substantially. Guinea pig consumption makes a low contribution to total dietary toxic metal and metalloid intake among local residents. For example, milk consumption contributes significantly to the intake of these elements [70,71].
In a study on dietary exposure to heavy metals in raw milk in the vicinity of leather processing plants in China, they report HI values between 0.0124 and 0.0832, well below the THQ threshold of 1 for individuals aged 3 to 69 years, indicating no risk to consumers; however, in our study, milk could make a low contribution to total dietary heavy metal intake in the studied region [72].
In the USA, considering their toxicity and frequency of occurrence, As, Pb, and Cd have been established as the first, second, and seventh priority food contaminants [73]; therefore, we recommend the establishment of monitoring and risk assessment programs for heavy metal concentrations in foods produced in the Central Andes, where mining and metallurgical activities contaminate different foods produced under the environmental conditions of this region of the world. The results could be used to manage and establish regulations that reduce human exposure to these metals.

4.4. Implication of Pb, Cd, and As Intake on Health

The accumulation of heavy metals, such as lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and arsenic (As), in the soils and grasslands of the Central Andes of Peru, which is exacerbated by mining/metallurgical activities, the use of phosphate fertilizers, and irrigation with contaminated water, represents a significant threat to public and mental health. These sources of contamination introduce toxic metals and metalloids into the food chain, increasing the risks associated with their human consumption. Pb, even at low levels, is associated with significant neurotoxic effects, particularly in vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant women [74,75].
Previous studies in Peru, such as those carried out in communities near the Las Bambas mining project, have shown a negative impact on child psychomotor development, with a 12.5% risk in children under three years of age according to the TEPSI test, and alterations in the IQ assessed using the Stanford–Binet test [76]. At a global level, research indicates that joint exposure to Pb, Cd, and As contributes to cognitive impairment, depressive disorders, and anxiety disorders, including generalized anxiety, agoraphobia, and social anxiety disorder [77,78,79].
In adults, exposure to Pb, Cd, and mercury (Hg) is correlated with adverse effects on neurocognitive function, including impairments in memory, attention, and executive functions. These neurotoxic effects are linked to mechanisms such as oxidative stress, neurotransmitter disruption, and metal accumulation in brain tissue, affecting critical regions such as the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex [80,81]. These findings underscore the urgency of public policies that reduce exposure to these metals, especially during pregnancy and lactation, stages in which neurological effects can be more severe and permanent.
Scientific evidence highlights that mitigating these exposures can prevent neurodevelopmental delays and improve the quality of life of affected communities. Likewise, empirical research needs to be strengthened to validate and expand these findings, particularly in contexts such as the Central Andes, where the interaction between environmental factors and social vulnerability is critical to understanding the impact of toxic metals and metalloids on public health [71,82,83].
The implementation of environmental monitoring strategies, health education, and strict regulation of industrial activities is essential to protect at-risk populations and address this problem with a sustainable and inclusive approach.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the levels of As, Pb, and Cd in guinea pig meat and offal in farms in the Central Andes of Peru did not exceed the internationally established limit values. The higher concentrations of As and Pb in guinea pig meat and offal in the study area could be due to the use of contaminated irrigation water for pastures and phosphate rock fertilizers, which are the main sources of Cd. These elements pass from the soil to the pasture and guinea pigs; however, due to the low per capita consumption of guinea pigs in the Peruvian population, the TQH and HI were below 1. Our risk assessment suggested that the concentrations of As, Pb, and Cd in guinea pig meat and offal that are part of the guinea pig consumption portions do not cause health risks to the Peruvian population between 2 and 85 years of age. The findings of this study expand the scientific basis for the safe and harmless production of guinea pigs in the Central Andes of Peru and are important for developing guidelines and standards that ensure that meat products are safe and harmless for human consumption. We urge the establishment of standards and maximum limits for heavy metals and arsenic in water, soil, pastures, and products produced in the Central Andes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci12040292/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.-B. and D.C.-P.; methodology, J.C.-B., D.C.-P. and E.R.-R.; formal analysis, J.C.-B.; investigation, D.C.-P. and F.R.-P.; resources, D.C.-P. and F.R.-P.; data curation, D.C.-P.; writing—preparation of the original draft, J.C.-B.; writing—review and editing, D.C.-P., E.R.-R. and F.R.-P.; visualization, D.C.-P. and E.R.-R.; supervision, D.C.-P.; project administration, D.C.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National University of Central Peru and ExFedu funds for the implementation of the project entitled “Lead, cadmium, and arsenic in meat from guinea pigs raised at the Yauris-UNCP EE: Health risk assessment study” (RCU N°1435-R-2023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Western Australia (approval number: 2020/ET000166).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank the management of the Yauris Agricultural Farm for donating the meat guinea pigs used for this study and the technicians at the Food Security Research Laboratory at the Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Suneeta, C.; Prachi, D. Heavy Metal Content of Foods and Health Risk Assessment in the Study Population of Vadodara. Curr. World Environ. J. 2013, 8, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Paredes, M.; Cerquín, M. Efectos de la suplementación de treonina sobre el rendimiento productivo, carcasa y pesos de órganos de cuyes de engorde con alimentación mixta por 72 días. Rev. Investig. Vet. Perú 2021, 32, e21701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Castro-Bedriñana, J.; Chirinos-Peinado, D.; García-Olarte, E.; Quispe-Ramos, R.; Gordillo-Espinal, S. Lead transfer in the soil-root-plant system in a highly contaminated Andean area. PeerJ 2021, 9, e10624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chirinos-Peinado, D.; Castro-Bedriñana, J.; Ríos-Ríos, E.; Mamani-Gamarra, G.; Quijada-Caro, E.; Huacho-Jurado, A.; Nuñez-Rojas, W. Lead and Cadmium Bioaccumulation in Fresh Cow’s Milk in an Intermediate Area of the Central Andes of Peru and Risk to Human Health. Toxics 2022, 10, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chirinos-Peinado, D.; Castro-Bedriñana, J.; Ríos-Ríos, E.; Castro-Chirinos, G.; Quispe-Poma, Y. Lead, Cadmium, and Arsenic in Raw Milk Produced in the Vicinity of a Mini Mineral Concentrator in the Central Andes and Health Risk. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2024, 202, 2376–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ali, A.S.; Bayih, A.A.; Gari, S.R. Meta-analysis of public health risks of lead accumulation in wastewater, irrigated soil, and crops nexus. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Njoga, E.O.; Ezenduka, E.V.; Ogbodo, C.G.; Ogbonna, C.U.; Jaja, I.F.; Ofomatah, A.C.; Okpala, C.O.R. Detection, Distribution and Health Risk Assessment of Toxic Heavy Metals/Metalloids, Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead in Goat Carcasses Processed for Human Consumption in South-Eastern Nigeria. Foods 2021, 10, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ullah, A.K.M.; Maksud, M.A.; Khan, S.R.; Lutfa, L.N.; Shamshad, B.Q. Dietary intake of heavy metals from eight highly consumed species of cultured fish and possible human health risk implications in Bangladesh. Toxicol. Rep. 2017, 4, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Muñoz, O.; Zamorano, P.; Garcia, O.; Bastias, J.M. Arsenic, cadmium, mercury, sodium, and potassium concentrations in common foods and estimated daily intake of the population in Valdivia (Chile) using a total diet study. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 109 Pt 2, 1125–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Islam, M.S.; Ahmed, M.K.; Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M.; Raknuzzaman, M. The concentration, source and potential human health risk of heavy metals in the commonly consumed foods in Bangladesh. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 122, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pinchao-Pinchao, Y.; Serna-Cock, L.; Osorio-Mora, O.; Tirado, D.F. Guinea pig breeding and its relation to sustainable food security and sovereignty in South America: Nutrition, health, and production challenges. CyTA—J. Food 2024, 22, 2392886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sánchez-Macías, D.; Barba-Maggi, L.; Morales-DelaNuez, A.; Palmay-Paredes, J. Guinea pig for meat production: A systematic review of factors affecting the production, carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2018, 143, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ngoula, F.; Guemdjo Tekam, M.; Kenfack, A.; Tadondjou Tchingo, C.; Nouboudem, S.; Tsafack, B.; Teguia, A. Effects of heat stress on some reproductive parameters of male cavie (Cavia porcellus) and mitigation strategies using guava (Psidium guajava) leaves essential oil. J. Therm. Biol. 2017, 64, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Spotorno, A.; Marin, J.; Manriquez, G.; Valladares, J.; Rico, E.; Rivas, C. Ancient and modern steps during the domestication of Guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus L.). J. Zool. 2006, 270, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Irshad, M.; Malik, H.A.; Shaukat, S.; Mushtaq, S.; Ashraf, M. Characterization of heavy metals in livestock manures. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2013, 22, 1257–1262. [Google Scholar]
  16. Park, J.H.; Lamb, D.; Paneerselvam, P.; Choppala, G.; Bolan, N.; Chung, J.W. Role of organic amendments on enhanced bioremediation of heavy metal (loid) contaminated soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 185, 549–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khoshakhlagh, A.H.; Mohammadzadeh, M.; Gruszecka-Kosowska, A. The preventive and carcinogenic effect of metals on cancer: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2024, 24, 2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aderemi, T.A.; Adenuga, A.A.; Oyekunle, J.A.O.; Ogunfowokan, A.O. High level leaching of heavy metals from colorful ceramic foodwares: A potential risk to human. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 17116–17126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cui, J.; Wu, B.; Halbrook, R.S.; Zang, S. Age-dependent accumulation of heavy metals in liver, kidney and lung tis-sues of homing pigeons in Beijing, China. Ecotoxicology 2013, 22, 1490–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Godfray, H.C.J.; Aveyard, P.; Garnett, T.; Hall, J.W.; Key, T.J.; Lorimer, J.; Pierrehumbert, R.T.; Scarborough, P.; Springmann, M.; Jebb, S.A. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science 2018, 361, eaam5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lukáčová, A.; Binkowski, Ł.; Golian, J. Comparision of mercury concentration in meat products of different origin. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2014, 3, 31–33. [Google Scholar]
  22. Damerau, A.; Venäläinen, E.R.; Peltonen, K. Heavy metals in meat of Finnish city rabbits. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2012, 5, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. USEPA. Method 3050B: Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Soils, Revision 2. Washington, DC. 1996. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/esam/epa-method-3050b-acid-digestion-sediments-sludges-and-soils (accessed on 2 June 2023).
  24. Thirumdas, R.; Janve, M.; Siliveru, K.; Kothakota, A. Chapter 10: Determination of food quality using atomic emission spectroscopy. In Evaluation Technologies for Food Quality; Zhong, J., Wang, X., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Kidlington, UK, 2019; pp. 175–192. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ramos, N.C.; Lamorena, R.B. Detection of Copper, Cadmium, Manganese, Lead, and Zinc Content in Milled Rice Using Microwave Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy. Philipp. J. Sci. 2021, 150, 765–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. USEPA. Method 200.7: Determination of Metals and Trace Elements in Water and Wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry. 1994. Revision 4.4. Cincinnati, OH. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/esam/method-2007-determination-metals-and-trace-elements-water-and-wastes-inductively-coupled (accessed on 2 June 2023).
  27. Alvira, M.L.; Rada-Mendoza, M.D.P.; Hoyos, S.O.; Villada, C.H. Cuantificación de arsénico por absorción atómica en termoformados y películas flexibles y biodegradables. Biotecnol. Sect. Agropecu. Agroind. 2012, 10, 157–165. [Google Scholar]
  28. USDA China Releases the Standard for Maximum Levels of Contaminants in Foods. National Food Safety Standard Maximum Levels of Contaminants in Foods. GAIN Report Number: CH2023-0040. 2023. Available online: https://fas.usda.gov/data/china-china-releases-standard-maximum-levels-contaminants-foods-0 (accessed on 12 July 2024).
  29. Zheng, S.; Wang, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Sun, W. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil and food crops in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration of China. Food Chem. 2020, 316, 126213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shaheen, N.; Irfan, N.M.; Khan, I.N.; Islam, S.; Islam, M.S.; Ahmed, M.K. Presence of heavy metals in fruits and vegetables: Health risk implications in Bangladesh. Chemosphere 2016, 152, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. MIDAGRI Cadena Productiva de Cuy. Viceministerio de Políticas y Supervisión del Desarrollo Agrario Dirección General de Políticas Agrarias. Ministerio de Agricultura del Perú. 2023. Available online: https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/4061856/Cadena%20productiva%20de%20cuy.pdf (accessed on 11 July 2024).
  32. CENAN-INEI Estado Nutricional en el Perú. Componente Nutricional ENAHO-CENAN-INS; Ministerio de Salud: Lima, Perú, 2011. Available online: https://bvs.minsa.gob.pe/local/MiNSA/1843.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2023).
  33. FAO; WHO. Foodborne Antimicrobial Resistance-Compendium of Codex Standards; Codex Alimentarius Commissio: Rome, Italy, 2023. [CrossRef]
  34. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM). Statement on tolerable weekly intake for cadmium. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. European Food Safety Authority. EFSA. Lead dietary exposure in the European population. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2831–2859. [Google Scholar]
  36. Aditi Singh, A.; Kostova, I. Health effects of heavy metal contaminants Vis-à-Vis microbial response in their bioremediation. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2024, 568, 122068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rahmani, J.; Fakhri, Y.; Shahsavani, A.; Bahmani, Z.; Urbina, M.A.; Chirumbolo, S.; Keramati, H.; Moradi, B.; Bay, A.; Bjørklund, G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of metal concentrations in canned tuna fish in Iran and human health risk assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 118, 753–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Suren, B.; Bandara, K.M.; Towle, A.; Monnot, D. A human health risk assessment of heavy metal ingestion among consumers of protein powder supplements. Toxicol. Rep. 2020, 7, 1255–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Riaz, R.M.Y.; Murtaza, G.; Farooqi, Z.U.R.; Ali, S.; Aziz, H.; Mahboob, S.; Al-Ghanim, K.A.; Owens, G.; Ahmad, H.R.; Riaz, U. Assessment of Arsenic Contamination in Groundwater and Associated Human Health Risk. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khan, M.U.; Malik, R.N.; Muhammad, S.; Ullah, F.; Qadir, A. Health Risk Assessment of Consumption of Heavy Metals in Market Food Crops from Sialkot and Gujranwala Districts, Pakistan. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2014, 21, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sultana, M.S.; Rana, S.; Yamazaki, S.; Aono, T.; Yoshida, S. Health risk assessment for carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic heavy metal exposures from vegetables and fruits of Bangladesh. Cogent Environ. Sci. 2017, 3, 1291107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhuang, P.; McBride, M.B.; Xia, H.; Li, N.; Li, Z. Health risk from heavy metals via consumption of food crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 1551–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ayaz, H.; Nawaz, R.; Nasim, I.; Irshad, M.A.; Irfan, A.; Khurshid, I.; Okla, M.K.; Wondmie, G.F.; Ahmed, Z.; Bourhia, M. Comprehensive human health risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in urban soils: Insights from selected metropolitan zones. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 1260317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Singh, D.; Kumar, A. Quantification of metal uptake in Spinacia oleracea irrigated with water containing a mixture of CuO and ZnO nanoparticles. Chemosphere 2020, 243, 125239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume III—Part A, Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment EPA 540-R-02-002; USEPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  46. Chauca, L. Producción de Cuyes (Cavia porcellus). Cap.6 Comercialización de Productor. Mercadeo de Carcasas; Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación: Roma, Italy, 1997. Available online: https://www.fao.org/4/W6562s/w6562s06.htm (accessed on 12 July 2024).
  47. Stan, F.G.; Martonos, C.; Dezdrobitu, C.; Damina, A.; Gudea, A. Detailed Morphological Description of the Liver and Hepatic Ligaments in the Guinea Pig (Cavia porcellus). Sci. Works Ser. C Vet. Med. 2017, 63, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  48. Paredes-Vilca, O.J.; Jimenes, D.L.; Dávila, G.J.; Apaza, C.J. Contaminación y pérdida de biodiversidad por actividades mineras y agropecuarias. estado del arte. Rev. Investig. Altoandinas 2024, 26, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Goyer, R.A.; Clarkson, T.W. Toxic Effects of Metals. In Casarett and Doullis Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 6th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 811–867. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rudy, M. The analysis of correlations between the age and the level of bioaccumulation of heavy metals in tissues and the chemical composition of sheep meat from the region in SE Poland. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 1117–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Thompson, L.J. Chapter 37. Lead. In Veterinary Toxicology: Basic and Clinical Principles, 2nd ed.; Gupta, R.C., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 522–526. [Google Scholar]
  52. Skerfving, S.; Bergdahl, I. Chapter 31: Lead. In Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, 3rd ed.; Nordberg, G.F., Fowler, B.A., Nordberg, M., Friberg, L.T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 599–643. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pareja-Carrera, J.; Mateo, R.; Rodríguez-Estival, J. Lead (Pb) in sheep exposed to mining pollution: Implications for animal and human health. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 108, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kia, S.A.; Aslani, R.; Khaniki, G.J.; Shariatifar, N.; Molaee-Aghaee, E. Determination and health risk assessment of heavy metals in chicken meat and edible giblets in Tehran, Iran. J. Trace Elem. Miner. 2024, 7, 100117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. JECFA. Codex General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed. In Proceedings of the 64th Meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), Rome, Italy, 8–17 February 2005. JECFA/64/CAC/RCP49-2001. [Google Scholar]
  56. FAO/WHO. Codex Alimentarius—General Standards for Contaminants and Toxins in Food. Schedule 1: Maximum and Guideline Levels for Contaminants and Toxins in Food; Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Codex Committee: Rome, Italy, 2002.
  57. Salim, S.A.; Ov, N.S.; Dana, Z.; Hashami, Z.; Afrah, A.; Sadeghi, E.; Bashiry, M. A comprehensive image of environmental toxic heavy metals in red meat: A global systematic review and meta-analysis and risk assessment study. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 889, 164100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Agnieszka, A.; Barszcz, S.M. Impacts of water management in aquaculture on heavy metal accumulation in rainbow trout muscles and associated health risks from consumption. Food Control 2024, 164, 110617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. López-Alonso, M.; Miranda, M.; Castillo, C.; Hernández, J.; García-Vaquero, M.; Benedito, J.L. Metales tóxicos y esenciales en hígado, riñón y músculo de cerdos en matadero en Galicia, noroeste de España. Food Addit. Contam. 2007, 24, 943–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Restrepo, D.A.; López, J.H.; Berdugo, J.A.; Gallo-Ortiz, A.; Duarte-Correa, Y. Residues of veterinary drugs and heavy metals in bovine meat from Urabá (Antioquia, Colombia), a promising step forward towards international commercialization. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2021, 13, 100192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. EU. Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin. Off. J. Eur. Union 2010, L15, 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  62. Al-Zuhairi, W.A.; Farham, M.A.; Ahemd, M.A. Determine of Heavy Metals in the Heart, Kidney and Meat of Beef, Mutton, and Chicken from Baquba and Howaydir Market in Baquba, Diyala Province, Irak. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 5965–5967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. FAO/WHO. Report of the 32nd Session of the Codex Committee of the Food Additives Contaminants; FAO/WHO: Beijing, China, 2000.
  64. Hashemi, M. Heavy metal concentrations in bovine tissues (muscle, liver and kidney) and their relationship with heavy metal contents in consumed feed. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 154, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. USEPA. USEPA Region III Risk-Based Concentration Table: Technical Background Information; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
  66. JECFA. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. 73 Report, 2010, Geneva, Switzerland; WHO Technical Report Series, no. 960. 2011; 237p. Available online: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44515/WHO_TRS_960_eng.pdf (accessed on 24 October 2023).
  67. Castro-Bedriñana, J.; Chirinos-Peinado, D.; Ríos-Ríos, E.; Castro-Chirinos, G.; Chagua-Rodríguez, P.; De La Cruz-Calderón, G. Lead, Cadmium, and Arsenic in Raw Cow’s Milk in a Central Andean Area and Risks for the Peruvian Populations. Toxics 2023, 11, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Castro-Gonzalez, N.P.; Moreno-Rojas, R.; Calderón-Sánchez, F.; Moreno, O.A.; Meneses, J.M. Assessment risk to children’s health due to consumption of cow’s milk in polluted areas in Puebla and Tlaxcala, Mexico. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2017, 10, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Castro-González, N.P.; Calderón-Sánchez, F.; Pérez-Sato, M.; Soní-Guillermo, E.; Reyes-Cervantes, E. Health risk due to chronic heavy metal consumption via cow’s milk produced in Puebla, Mexico, in irrigated wastewater areas. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill 2019, 12, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chirinos-Peinado, D.; Castro-Bedrinana, J.; Barnes, E.P.G.; Ríos-Ríos, E.; García-Olarte, E.; Castro-Chirinos, G. Assessing the Health Risk and Trophic Transfer of Lead and Cadmium in Dairy Farming Systems in the Mantaro Catchment, Central Andes of Peru. Toxics 2024, 12, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Castro-Bedriñana, J.; Chirinos-Peinado, D.; Ríos-Ríos, E.; Machuca-Campuzano, M.; Gómez-Ventura, E. Dietary risk of milk contaminated with lead and cadmium in areas near mining-metallurgical industries in the Central Andes of Peru. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 220, 112382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Su, C.; Liu, H.; Qu, X.; Zhou, X.; Gao, Y.; Yang, H.; Zheng, N.; Wang, J. Heavy Metals in Raw Milk and Dietary Exposure Assessment in the Vicinity of Leather-Processing Plants. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 3303–3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. ATSDR. The ATSDR 2022 Substance Priority List; ATSDR: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/programs/substance-priority-list.html (accessed on 6 February 2025).
  74. Ramirez, O.D.; Gonzalez, E.D.F.; Blanco, A.T.; Pineda, B.; Gomez, M.S.; Quino, M.J.; Carrillo, M.P.; Perez de la Cruz, V. Cognitive impairment induced by lead exposure during lifespan: Mechanisms of lead neurotoxicity. Toxics 2021, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zaw, Y.H.; Taneepanichskul, N. Blood heavy metals and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the first trimester of pregnancy among migrant workers. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Astete, J.; Gastanaga, M.C.; Fiestas, V.; Oblitas, T.; Sabastizagal, I.; Lucero, M.; Abadie, J.M.; Munoz, M.E.; Valverde, A.; Suarez, M. Comunicable diseases, mental health and exposure to environmental pollutants in population living near Las Bambas mining project before exploitation phase, Peru 2006. Rev. Peru Med. Exp. Salud Publica 2010, 27, 512–519. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ayuso-Alvarez, A.; Simon, L.; Nunez, O.; Rodriguez-Blazquez, C.; Martin-Mendez, I.; Bel-Lan, A. Association between heavy metals and metalloids in topsoil and mental health in the adult population of Spain. Environ. Res. 2019, 179, 108784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Berk, M.; Williams, L.J.; Andreazza, A.C.; Pasco, J.A.; Dodd, S.; Jacka, F.N. Heavy metal and the blues: Secondary analysis of persistent organic pollutants (POP), heavy metals and depressive symptoms in the NHANES National Epidemiological Survey. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e005142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jurczak, A.; Brodowska, A.; Szkup, M.; Prokopowicz, A.; Karakiewicz, B.; Łój, B.; Kotwas, A.; Brodowska, A.; Grochans, E. Influence of Pb and Cd levels in whole blood of postmenopausal women on the incidence of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2018, 25, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Balali-Mood, M.; Naseri, K.; Tahergorabi, Z.; Khazdair, M.R.; Sadeghi, M. Toxic mechanisms of five heavy metals: Mercury, lead, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 643972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lopes de Andrade, V.; Marreilha Dos Santos, A.P.; Aschner, M. Neurotoxicity of metal mixtures. Adv. Neurotoxicol. 2021, 5, 329–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Weider, S.; Laerum, A.M.W.; Evensen, K.A.I.; Reitan, S.K.; Lydersen, S.; Brubakk, A.M.; Indredavik, M.S. Neurocognitive function and associations with mental health in adults born preterm with very low birthweight or small for gestational age at term. Front. Psychol. 2023, 13, 1078232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Althomali, R.H.; Abbood, M.A.; Saleh, E.A.M.; Djuraeva, L.; Abdullaeva, B.S.; Habash, R.T.; Alhassan, M.S.; Alawady, A.H.; Alsaalamy, A.H.; Najafi, M.L. Exposure to heavy metals and neurocognitive function in adults: A systematic review. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2024, 36, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map showing the location of the guinea pig farm, Huancayo, Peru. Source: Google Maps.
Figure 1. Map showing the location of the guinea pig farm, Huancayo, Peru. Source: Google Maps.
Vetsci 12 00292 g001
Figure 2. Radial graph of Pb, Cd, and As content in different meat and viscera of guinea pigs. Pb accumulation is significantly higher in the heart compared to other tissues, while Cd and As levels are similar and more homogeneous, with higher concentrations in the liver and kidney. These results reflect differences in heavy metal bioaccumulation depending on the function and metabolism of each tissue.
Figure 2. Radial graph of Pb, Cd, and As content in different meat and viscera of guinea pigs. Pb accumulation is significantly higher in the heart compared to other tissues, while Cd and As levels are similar and more homogeneous, with higher concentrations in the liver and kidney. These results reflect differences in heavy metal bioaccumulation depending on the function and metabolism of each tissue.
Vetsci 12 00292 g002
Figure 3. Curves of the Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) for Pb, Cd, and As for consumption of guinea pig produced in the Central Andes in the Peruvian population aged 2–85 years.
Figure 3. Curves of the Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) for Pb, Cd, and As for consumption of guinea pig produced in the Central Andes in the Peruvian population aged 2–85 years.
Vetsci 12 00292 g003
Figure 4. Hazard Index (HI) curve for the Peruvian population aged 3–85 years for consumption of guinea pig meat produced in the Central Andes.
Figure 4. Hazard Index (HI) curve for the Peruvian population aged 3–85 years for consumption of guinea pig meat produced in the Central Andes.
Vetsci 12 00292 g004
Table 1. Operating conditions of the MP-AES (Agilent-4200) for the determination of Pb, Cd, and As in guinea pig meat and offal.
Table 1. Operating conditions of the MP-AES (Agilent-4200) for the determination of Pb, Cd, and As in guinea pig meat and offal.
ElementWavelength (nm)Nebulizer Flow (L/min)ReplicasPump Speed (rpm)Reading Time (s)
Pb220.35315.03153
Cd226.50215.03153
As228.81215.03153
Table 2. Maximum limits of Pb, Cd, and As in meat and meat products, including edible viscera (mg/kg).
Table 2. Maximum limits of Pb, Cd, and As in meat and meat products, including edible viscera (mg/kg).
Meats and Meat ProductsPbCdAs
Meats (excluding organ meats from livestock and poultry and their products)0.20.10.5
Organ meats from livestock and poultry0.5-0.5
Meat products (excluding organ meats from livestock and poultry)0.30.10.5
Liver from livestock and poultry0.50.50.5
Kidney from livestock and poultry0.51.00.5
Source: Lead limits in foods [28].
Table 3. Components of an edible portion of a guinea pig carcass.
Table 3. Components of an edible portion of a guinea pig carcass.
Edible ComponentGrams%
Meat749.593.69
Liver30.863.86
Kidneys10.471.31
Heart4.850.61
Lungs4.320.54
Total800100.00
Table 4. Concentration of lead in guinea pig meat and offal (mg/kg).
Table 4. Concentration of lead in guinea pig meat and offal (mg/kg).
SamplesnMeanStandard Deviation95% Confidence Interval for the MeanMinMax
Lower LimitUpper Limit
Meat100.069 b0.0600.0250.112<LOD0.183
Liver101.669 b0.3551.4151.9231.2322.356
Kidneys100.765 b0.2890.5590.9720.2941.183
Heart105.583 a3.5933.0138.1531.24911.946
Lungs101.312 b0.6840.8231.8020.3412.010
a, b, Mean values per sample with different letters vary statistically (p < 0.05). Each animal generated a sample of meat, liver, kidneys, heart, and lungs. Thus, the 10 animals generated a total of 50 samples.
Table 5. Concentration of cadmium in guinea pig meat and offal (mg/kg).
Table 5. Concentration of cadmium in guinea pig meat and offal (mg/kg).
SamplesnMeanStandard Deviation95% Confidence Interval for the MeanMinMax
Lower LimitUpper Limit
Meat100.002 b0.0060.0020.007<LOD0.020
Liver101.445 a0.7300.9231.9670.6842.745
Kidneys101.420 a1.0020.7032.137<LOD3.096
Heart100.652 ab1.9600.7492.055<LOD6.227
Lungs100.158 ab0.2820.0440.359<LOD0.941
a, b, Mean values per sample with different letters vary statistically (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Arsenic concentration in guinea pig meat and offal (mg/kg).
Table 6. Arsenic concentration in guinea pig meat and offal (mg/kg).
SamplesnMeanStandard Deviation95% Confidence Interval for the MeanMinMax
Lower LimitUpper Limit
Meat10<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD
Liver101.385 ab0.5740.9751.7950.7752.409
Kidneys101.607 a1.2310.7262.487<LOD3.358
Heart100.934 ab2.2070.6452.513<LOD6.783
Lungs10<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD-
a, b, Mean values per sample with different letters vary statistically (p < 0.05).
Table 7. Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) for lead due to guinea pig consumption in the Peruvian population aged 2–85 years.
Table 7. Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) for lead due to guinea pig consumption in the Peruvian population aged 2–85 years.
AgeTHQ-PbAgeTHQ-PbAgeTHQ-PbAgeTHQ-Pb
20.0013250.0003480.0002710.0003
30.0011260.0003490.0002720.0003
40.0010270.0003500.0002730.0003
50.0009280.0003510.0002740.0003
60.0008290.0003520.0002750.0003
70.0007300.0003530.0002760.0003
80.0006310.0002540.0002770.0003
90.0006320.0003550.0002780.0003
100.0005330.0002560.0003790.0003
110.0004340.0002570.0003800.0003
120.0004350.0003580.0003810.0003
130.0004360.0002590.0002820.0003
140.0003370.0003600.0003830.0003
150.0003380.0002610.0003840.0003
160.0003390.0002620.0003850.0003
170.0003400.0002630.0003
180.0003410.0002640.0003
190.0003420.0002650.0003
200.0003430.0002660.0003
210.0003440.0002670.0003
220.0003450.0002680.0003
230.0003460.0002690.0003
240.0003470.0002700.0003
THQ: Target Hazard Quotient. A value > 1 indicates a potential risk of having effects on health [44].
Table 8. Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) for cadmium due to guinea pig consumption in the Peruvian population aged 2–85 years.
Table 8. Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) for cadmium due to guinea pig consumption in the Peruvian population aged 2–85 years.
AgeTHQ-CdAgeTHQ-CdAgeTHQ-CdAgeTHQ-Cd
20.0011250.0002480.0002710.0002
30.0009260.0002490.0002720.0002
40.0008270.0002500.0002730.0002
50.0007280.0002510.0002740.0002
60.0006290.0002520.0002750.0002
70.0006300.0002530.0002760.0002
80.0005310.0002540.0002770.0003
90.0005320.0002550.0002780.0003
100.0004330.0002560.0002790.0002
110.0004340.0002570.0002800.0002
120.0003350.0002580.0002810.0003
130.0003360.0002590.0002820.0003
140.0003370.0002600.0002830.0002
150.0003380.0002610.0002840.0003
160.0002390.0002620.0002850.0003
170.0002400.0002630.0002
180.0002410.0002640.0002
190.0002420.0002650.0002
200.0002430.0002660.0002
210.0002440.0002670.0002
220.0002450.0002680.0002
230.0002460.0002690.0002
240.0002470.0002700.0002
THQ: Target Hazard Quotient. A value > 1 indicates a potential risk of having health effects [44].
Table 9. Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) for arsenic from guinea pig consumption in the Peruvian population aged 2–85 years.
Table 9. Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) for arsenic from guinea pig consumption in the Peruvian population aged 2–85 years.
AgeTHQ-AsAgeTHQ-AsAgeTHQ-AsAgeTHQ-As
20.0056250.0012480.0011710.0013
30.0049260.0012490.0011720.0013
40.0043270.0011500.0011730.0013
50.0038280.0012510.0011740.0012
60.0034290.0011520.0011750.0013
70.0031300.0011530.0011760.0013
80.0028310.0011540.0011770.0013
90.0025320.0011550.0011780.0013
100.0022330.0011560.0011790.0013
110.0019340.0011570.0011800.0013
120.0017350.0011580.0011810.0014
130.0016360.0011590.0011820.0014
140.0014370.0011600.0011830.0013
150.0014380.0011610.0012840.0014
160.0013390.0011620.0011850.0013
170.0013400.0011630.0011
180.0013410.0011640.0012
190.0013420.0011650.0012
200.0012430.0011660.0012
210.0012440.0011670.0011
220.0012450.0011680.0012
230.0012460.0011690.0012
240.0012470.0011700.0012
THQ: Target Hazard Quotient. A value > 1 indicates a potential risk of having health effects [44].
Table 10. Hazard Index (HI) in the Peruvian population aged 3–85 years for consumption of guinea pig meat produced in the Central Andes of Peru.
Table 10. Hazard Index (HI) in the Peruvian population aged 3–85 years for consumption of guinea pig meat produced in the Central Andes of Peru.
AgeHIAgeHIAgeHiAgeHI
20.0080250.0017480.0015710.0018
30.0069260.0016490.0015720.0019
40.0061270.0016500.0016730.0018
50.0054280.0016510.0016740.0018
60.0048290.0016520.0015750.0018
70.0044300.0016530.0015760.0019
80.0039310.0016540.0016770.0019
90.0035320.0016550.0016780.0019
100.0032330.0016560.0016790.0018
110.0027340.0016570.0016800.0018
120.0024350.0016580.0016810.0020
130.0022360.0015590.0016820.0020
140.0020370.0016600.0016830.0018
150.0019380.0016610.0016840.0019
160.0019390.0015620.0016850.0019
170.0018400.0015630.0016
180.0018410.0015640.0017
190.0018420.0015650.0017
200.0018430.0015660.0017
210.0017440.0015670.0016
220.0017450.0015680.0017
230.0017460.0015690.0017
240.0017470.0015700.0017
HI: Hazard Index: A value > 1 indicates a potential risk of having health effects [44].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chirinos-Peinado, D.; Castro-Bedriñana, J.; Rivera-Parco, F.; Ríos-Ríos, E. Lead, Cadmium, and Arsenic in Edible Tissues of Guinea Pigs Raised in the Central Andes of Peru: Potential Human Health Risk? Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12040292

AMA Style

Chirinos-Peinado D, Castro-Bedriñana J, Rivera-Parco F, Ríos-Ríos E. Lead, Cadmium, and Arsenic in Edible Tissues of Guinea Pigs Raised in the Central Andes of Peru: Potential Human Health Risk? Veterinary Sciences. 2025; 12(4):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12040292

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chirinos-Peinado, Doris, Jorge Castro-Bedriñana, Fiorela Rivera-Parco, and Elva Ríos-Ríos. 2025. "Lead, Cadmium, and Arsenic in Edible Tissues of Guinea Pigs Raised in the Central Andes of Peru: Potential Human Health Risk?" Veterinary Sciences 12, no. 4: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12040292

APA Style

Chirinos-Peinado, D., Castro-Bedriñana, J., Rivera-Parco, F., & Ríos-Ríos, E. (2025). Lead, Cadmium, and Arsenic in Edible Tissues of Guinea Pigs Raised in the Central Andes of Peru: Potential Human Health Risk? Veterinary Sciences, 12(4), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12040292

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop