Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Serum Lipid Profiles in Sanctuary-Housed Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) at Tacugama Chimpanzee Sanctuary
Previous Article in Journal
Diversity of Escherichia coli from Faecal Samples of Danish Calves with Diarrhoea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Fat-Tailed Coarse-Wooled Sheep Breeds Ovis aries from Kazakhstan

1
Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Cytogenetics, RSE Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Science Committee, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
3
Laboratory of Molecular Genetic Examination, LLP Kazakh Research Institute of Livestock and Fodder Production, Almaty 050035, Kazakhstan
4
Institute of Zoology, Science Committee, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
5
Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610213, China
6
Faculty of Natural Sciences and Geography, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
7
Division of Population Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, 1111 Yata, Mishima 411-8540, Shizuoka, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(10), 988; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12100988 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 September 2025 / Revised: 3 October 2025 / Accepted: 12 October 2025 / Published: 13 October 2025

Simple Summary

Sheep are one of the most important farm animals in Kazakhstan, where traditional breeds such as Edilbay, Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled, and Gissar are still widely raised. However, little is known about their genetic background. In this study, we examined maternal DNA from these breeds to better understand their diversity and origins. We found that they carry many different genetic types, showing both rich diversity and shared ancestry. Most of the genetic variation was found within breeds rather than between them, which suggests that these sheep have a long history of mixing and exchange. Interestingly, the Edilbay breed appears to preserve ancient maternal lineages that connect modern sheep to their wild relatives. Our findings highlight Kazakhstan as an important region in sheep history and emphasize the need to conserve the genetic diversity of its traditional breeds.

Abstract

Sheep play a central role in Kazakhstan’s pastoral economy, yet the maternal genetic composition of its traditional breeds remains poorly characterized. We analyzed partial mitochondrial D-loop sequences (848 bp) from 115 individuals of three fat-tailed coarse-wooled breeds (Edilbay, Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled, and Gissar) to assess genetic diversity, population structure, and phylogenetic relationships. Ninety-eight haplotypes were identified, indicating high haplotype diversity (Hd = 0.996 ± 0.002) and moderate nucleotide diversity (π = 0.02624 ± 0.00048). Haplotypes clustered into haplogroups A (57.4%) and B (42.6%), with Edilbay dominating the star-like cluster of haplogroup A, consistent with recent expansion. AMOVA revealed that most variation (92.03%) occurred within populations, with no significant differentiation among breeds. Phylogenetic analyses placed Edilbay close to the most recent common ancestor of fat-tailed domestic sheep and the wild Ovis species, suggesting retention of an ancestral lineage. These findings highlight Kazakhstan as a genetic crossroads in sheep history and underscore the conservation value of its maternal diversity.

1. Introduction

Domestic sheep (Ovis aries) were among the first livestock species domesticated by humans and remain one of the most widely distributed and economically significant farm animals worldwide. Archaeological and genetic evidence indicate that the Asian mouflon (Ovis orientalis) is the wild progenitor of modern domestic sheep, having contributed substantially to their gene pool during the domestication process [1]. Domestication began approximately 9000–10,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent, a region in the Middle East closely associated with the rise of early agriculture [2,3]. From this origin, sheep dispersed across Eurasia, adapting to diverse environments under both natural pressures and human-driven selection.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), particularly the hypervariable D-loop region, has proven to be a powerful marker for investigating maternal lineages, population structure, and phylogenetic relationships in domestic sheep [4,5]. To date, six major mtDNA haplogroups (A–F) have been identified globally, with haplogroups A and B predominant, and haplogroup C more frequent in Central Asia. These distributions suggest multiple domestication events or extensive gene flow between wild and domestic populations [6,7,8].
Kazakhstan represents an important center of sheep husbandry, with 33 breeds currently recognized by FAO DAD-IS (2024, accessed on 19 October 2024) [9], many of which are fat-tailed and adapted to harsh climatic conditions. Among them, the Edilbay, Gissar, and Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled breeds are critical genetic resources, valued for their ecological plasticity and meat production [10,11]. The Edilbay breed is believed to have originated from a composite of Kazakh fat-tailed and Kalmyk sheep, and was established at the end of the 19th century in the Ural region (currently the city of Oral in Western Kazakhstan) [10]. Today, it is widespread across Kazakhstan and is regarded as a critical genetic resource. Mature rams can reach weights of up to 103 kg, while ewes typically weigh around 75 kg [11]. The Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled breed is another native breed, developed through the national breeding strategy of Kazakh selectionists. It is distinguished by high precocity and remarkable ecological plasticity, which allow yearlong pasturing under diverse environmental conditions [12]. The Gissar breed, the largest domesticated sheep in the world, was originally developed in the Gissar Valley of Tajikistan and later introduced into Kazakhstan, where it is now distributed in the southern region. Primarily raised for meat, it is notable for its remarkable adaptation to semi-arid environments [13].
Previous genetic studies using mtDNA [5,6,14], microsatellites [11], and SNP arrays [15,16] have revealed high haplotype diversity in Kazakh breeds, strong Asiatic maternal signals, and evidence of long-term lineage continuity from the Bronze Age [17]. However, these studies are fragmented: most focus on individual breeds, use limited sample sizes, or lack a comparative phylogeographic framework integrating Kazakh sheep with global haplogroup data.
As a result, the maternal genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships of fat-tailed breeds within Kazakhstan remain insufficiently understood. Although the genetic history of sheep has been widely studied across Europe [18,19], the Middle East [2,20], and East Asia [21], Central Asian populations, particularly Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled breeds, have been comparatively underrepresented, leaving their role in global domestication and migration processes unclear. Our study advances previous Kazakh sheep research on mtDNA by analyzing a comparatively long 848 bp D-loop fragment across multiple populations, expanding sampling to three fat-tailed coarse-wooled breeds, and embedding the results within a broader Central Asian and Eurasian comparative framework. By integrating local sampling with global haplogroup references and additional GenBank sequences, this work provides the most detailed assessment to date of maternal diversity in Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled sheep and underscores their broader evolutionary and conservation significance, as well as addressing the persistent research gap.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Information

A total of 115 peripheral blood samples were collected from Kazakhstani Ovis aries, represented by three fat-tailed coarse-wool sheep breeds: Gissar (GISS), Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wool (KFTCW), and Edilbay (ED), with detailed information presented in Table 1 and Figure 1. The Gissar breed is maintained mainly on a single farm in the Turkestan region (South Kazakhstan); therefore, only one flock was employed for sampling. The animals were adult ewes aged 2.5–3 years. Blood collection was performed under the supervision of a veterinary specialist, in accordance with the routine injection program for ruminants, ensuring that no stressful situations were caused. This study was approved by the Local Bioethics Committee of the Institute of Genetics and Physiology of the Republic of Kazakhstan (№12-351 from 23 November 2022). Blood samples were collected using sterile needles and vacuum test tubes containing EDTA (Leuven, Belgium). Samples were transported to the laboratory in portable refrigerated boxes at ±4 °C.

2.2. DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing

Genomic DNA extraction was performed using the GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Scientific Baltics UAB, Vilnius, Lithuania), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quality control of the extracted DNA was performed using the NanoDrop One spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific Baltics UAB, Vilnius, Lithuania). The partial sequences of the displacement loop (D-loop) region (849 bp) were amplified using primers F: 5′-AACTCCCAAACATACAACACGG-3′ and R: 5′-ATTTGAGTATTGAGGGCGGGAT-3′ [22]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in a total volume of 25 μL, containing 0.5–1 μL of genomic DNA with a concentration of 50–100 ng/μL; 1 μL each of forward and reverse primers (concentration of 0.4 μM per primer); 12.5 μL of PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific Baltics UAB, Vilnius, Lithuania); and nuclease-free water to complete the volume. The PCR amplification was conducted under the following conditions: pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 45 s, 55–59 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 60 s. A final extension was performed at 72 °C for 15 min, and the reaction was terminated at 4 °C. The PCR products were assessed using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, purified, and sequenced in both directions using the PCR primers on the SeqStudio Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at the Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Cytogenetics of the Institute of Genetics and Physiology of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Forward and reverse reads were assembled into consensus sequences using SeqMan (Lasergene package; DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA) [23]. Chromatograms were visually inspected, and low-quality ends were trimmed prior to alignment. Only high-quality sequences were retained for downstream analyses.

2.3. Molecular Diversity and Population Dynamics Analyses

All 115 obtained DNA sequences of the D-loop region (849 bp) were aligned with an Ovis aries reference sequence of haplogroup B (NC_001941) [19] using the MAFFT v.7.313 [24] under the default parameters as implemented in PhyloSuite v.1.2.2 [25] and have been deposited in GenBank with the accession numbers PV963845-PV963959 (Table S1). Haplotypes were extracted using DnaSP 5.0 [26], as well as molecular diversity indices for each breed, including the number of haplotypes (h), nucleotide diversity (π), haplotype diversity (Hd), average number of nucleotide differences (k), number of segregating sites (S), and the number of mutations (m). Uncorrected sequence divergence (p-distances) was calculated in MEGA v. 11 software [27] between analyzed breeds of Kazakhstani fat-tailed coarse-wooled sheep. To identify which haplogroup the Kazakhstani sheep breeds belong to, we conducted median–joining haplotype network analysis using Network v4.6.0 (Fluxus Technology Ltd., UK) (accessed on 15 December 2024) [28].
Population dynamic analysis was conducted to estimate mismatch distribution and neutrality indices (Fu and Li’s D and F tests) [29] using DnaSP 5.0. These statistics were selected over other neutrality tests (Tajima’s D, Fu’s Fs) because they are particularly sensitive to the excess of rare variants on external branches of the genealogy, making them well-suited for detecting recent demographic expansion or purifying selection in mitochondrial DNA sequences. For completeness, we also calculated Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs, which are widely reported in mtDNA studies, and provided in Supplementary Table S2.
Mismatch distribution indices, including Harpending’s raggedness index (Rag) and Ramos-Onsins and Rozas’ R2 statistic, were calculated in DnaSP v5.0 [26] to summarize demographic patterns. Sum of squared deviations (SSD) and goodness-of-fit p-values were not reported as model fitting did not converge for the D-loop data.
Genetic variation within populations, among populations within groups, and between groups was assessed by the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) carried out in the program Arlequin v.3.11 [30], with the significance test based on 1000 permutations. To visualize the genetic structure among breeds, Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) was performed in R v.4.4.1 using the ape [31] and vegan packages. Pairwise genetic distances were calculated from mitochondrial D-loop sequences under the Tamura–Nei (TN93) substitution model, which accounts for unequal base frequencies and transition/transversion rate biases characteristic of mitochondrial DNA. The resulting distance matrix was subjected to PCoA (cmdscale function), and the first two principal coordinates were plotted in two-dimensional space.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis was conducted based on 144 sequences of D-loop region, including 115 samples generated in this study, 10 sequences of Ovis aries available in GenBank representing five haplogroups (A–E) [6], 9 sequences representing Edilbay and Gissar breeds, as well as 4 sequences of sheep closely related to Kazakhstani indigenous breeds—such as the Kalmyk breed [32]—that were retrieved from GenBank. Additionally, we included wild representatives—Ovis orientalis (Asian mouflon) [33] and O. orientalis ophion (also known as O. gmelini ophion—Cyprus mouflon) [34]—and two outgroups—Ovis ammon (argali) [6] and Ovis vignei (Urial) [33] (Table S1)—which were chosen due to their close evolutionary relationships within the genus Ovis.
Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) implemented in IQ-TREE v.1.6.8 [35] under the HKY + G + I model selected as the best-fit model using PartitionFinder in PhyloSuite v.1.2.2 under the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Branch support analyses were conducted under 5000 ultrafast-bootstrap replicates (UFBoot) [36]. Nodes with UFBoot ≥ 90 were considered to be well-supported [36]. The phylogenetic trees were viewed and edited with iTOL v6 (https://itol.embl.de) (accessed on 15 January 2025) [37].

3. Results

3.1. MtDNA Diversity and Population Structure of Kazakhstani Sheep Breeds

Molecular diversity indices calculated for the partial segment of the mitochondrial D-loop region (848 bp) obtained from 115 Kazakhstani fat-tailed sheep revealed consistently high genetic variation across all three studied breeds. Haplotype diversity (Hd) was high, with values ranging from 0.976 in KFTCW to 0.988 in the ED breed, while the GISS breed exhibited the highest diversity (0.997), indicating a high number of unique haplotypes per breed. Nucleotide diversity (π) ranged from 0.02187 (GISS) to 0.02528 (KFTCW) and 0.02736 (ED), reflecting the more variable nature of the control region (Table 2).
Pairwise uncorrected sequence divergences (p-distances) were calculated among the Kazakhstani fat-tailed coarse-wool sheep breeds, which revealed relatively low levels of genetic divergence, indicating overall close maternal relationships among the breeds. The lowest genetic distance was observed between the Edilbay and Gissar breeds (0.0252), followed closely by Gissar and KFTCW (0.0258), and KFTCW and Edilbay (0.0267).
Neutrality tests using Fu and Li’s D and F statistics produced non-significant positive values for all breeds, indicating no strong deviation from neutrality (Table 3). Tajima’s D values were likewise non-significant (ED = 0.0079, KFTCW = 0.6404, and GISS = 0.3688), whereas Fu’s Fs values were significantly negative (ED = −24.11, KFTCW = −19.66, and GISS = −6.11; all p < 0.05), consistent with recent demographic expansion. Mismatch distribution analysis, assessed through the raggedness index (Rag) and R2 statistic, provided more insight into demographic patterns. Low Rag and R2 values in ED and the total dataset (Rag = 0.0024, R2 = 0.1155 for ED; Rag = 0.0012, R2 = 0.0927 for total) are compatible with recent demographic expansion under a sudden expansion model (Table 3). In contrast, higher values in KFTCW and GISS suggest either population stability, genetic structure, or a lack of recent expansion (Figure 2). In some cases, the calculation of SSD and p-values did not converge in Arlequin, likely reflecting complex demographic histories and moderate sample sizes. Nevertheless, the concordance of Fu’s Fs with mismatch-based indices (Rag, R2) and observed vs. expected curves supports a demographic expansion signal in Edilbay and in the pooled dataset.
A median-joining haplotype network was constructed based on D-loop sequences to explore the maternal lineage structure of Kazakhstani fat-tailed coarse-wooled sheep breeds. The haplotype network identified two major haplogroups—HPGA and HPGB—which included the vast majority of haplotypes from the studied populations (Figure 3). Haplogroup A (HPGA) formed a large star-like cluster with short mutational distances between haplotypes, suggesting a recent population expansion. This cluster was dominated by Edilbay (ED)-breed individuals, and also included numerous haplotypes from Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled (KFTCW) and Gissar (GISS) breeds, indicating shared maternal ancestry among these populations. Haplogroup B (HPGB) showed a more dispersed structure, with longer mutational branches separating haplotypes. It included individuals from all three studied breeds, but with stronger representation from KFTCW and GISS, reflecting a degree of maternal lineage divergence and possibly historical admixture. In contrast, haplogroups C (HPGC), D (HPGD), and E (HPGE) were represented exclusively by reference haplotypes and contained no Kazakhstani sheep. This indicates that the studied breeds are not maternally descended from these rarer or regionally restricted haplogroups. Among the 124 haplotypes identified (98 from our dataset), most were unique to single individuals. Several haplotypes were shared by two to three individuals within the same population (e.g., AKZ, ATR, KDZ, SHK, and TRZ), while only one haplotype (H11) was shared between populations (KDZ and TRZ) within the KFTCW breed. No haplotypes were shared across breeds.
To assess the genetic structure among the three fat-tailed coarse-wooled sheep breeds (ED, KFTCW, and GISS), an Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) was performed using a hierarchical design, where six populations were grouped into three breed-level groups. The AMOVA included all three breeds: ED (comprising the populations ORL, ATR, and AKZ), KFTCW (populations TRZ and KDZ), and GISS (represented solely by population SHK). The results indicated that most of the genetic variation was found within populations (92.03%), while a smaller but significant portion was attributed to differences among populations within breeds (11.03%; FSC = 0.10706, p = 0.00196). However, no significant variation was detected among breeds (−3.06%; FCT = −0.03060, p = 0.63148). The negative variance component does not imply an actual loss of genetic variation, but rather indicates that differentiation among breeds is negligible, with most genetic diversity residing within populations rather than between groups. The overall genetic differentiation was moderate (FST = 0.07974, p = 0.00098) (Table 4). It should be noted that the GISS breed was represented by only one population (SHK), which may have limited the detection of among-group variation, as variance components within that group could not be estimated. Nonetheless, the inclusion of GISS allowed for a complete breed-level comparison.
To consider the genetic differentiation among the three Kazakh sheep breeds, PCoA was examined based on pairwise distances of mitochondrial D-loop sequences. The first two axes explained 87.8% of the total variation (75.2% and 12.6%, respectively; Figure 4). Samples clustered largely according to their breeds, with partial overlap between the ED, GISS, and KFTCW groups, indicating shared maternal lineages or historical gene flow. Several samples fell outside their breed’s 95% confidence ellipse, suggesting the presence of rare haplotypes or potential admixture events.

3.2. Phylogenetic Relationships

The Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree reconstructed from 143 mitochondrial D-loop sequences (849 bp) resolved two major domestic sheep clades corresponding to haplogroups A (HPGA) and B (HPGB) (Figure 5). The majority of Kazakhstani sheep sequences clustered within haplogroup A (HPGA), which accounted for 57.4% (57/105) of the analyzed samples, including Edilbay (30), Gissar (13), and Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled (KFTCW) sheep (14). The remaining 42.6% (48/105) of sequences belonged to haplogroup B (HPGB), comprising Edilbay (23), Gissar (5), and KFTCW (20) individuals. Thus, HPGA was the predominant maternal lineage in Kazakhstani sheep, a pattern consistent with the dominance of this haplogroup in other Central Asian sheep populations reported in previous studies [2,18]. Within HPGB, Ovis orientalis (Asian mouflon) clustered alongside a subset of Kazakhstani domestic sheep, representing a mixture of Edilbay, Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled, and Gissar breeds, consistent with earlier findings of haplogroup B being shared between domestic sheep and wild Asiatic mouflon [34,38].
Importantly, we identified a distinct intermediate branch that diverged after the wild Ovis lineages and the minor haplogroups C, D, and E, but before the main HPGA clade. This branch comprised sequences from multiple Kazakhstani populations, including Edilbay (AKZ n = 5), Gissar (SHK n = 1), and Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled sheep (TRZ n = 1, KDZ n = 1), along with one Kalmyk breed sequence (OR459706). Having a median bootstrap support, this grouping may represent a transitional clade between the more ancient haplogroups (C, D, and E) and the predominant domestic haplogroups A and B, reflecting a lineage that retained ancestral diversity while contributing to the maternal pool of Central Asian sheep. Its composition, integrating several Kazakhstani breeds and a Kalmyk sample, points to a shared evolutionary trajectory shaped by the Eurasian steppe pastoralism corridor. Additionally, a sub-branch of Edilbay-breed individuals (population AKZ) diverged directly after the wild Ovis lineages (BS = 89%), reinforcing the possibility of an ancestral position of this breed within Central Asian sheep or a closer relationship to wild ancestors, as previously hypothesized by Hiendleder et al. (1998) [19].
Sequences representing haplogroups C, D, and E formed distinct peripheral clades outside the Kazakhstani clusters, confirming their absence in the analyzed populations. Outgroups (O. vignei and O. ammon) were placed basal to the domestic sheep clades as expected. Ultrafast-bootstrap support values (UFBoot) were high (≥90) for the nodes defining major haplogroups, supporting the robustness of the higher-level topology.

4. Discussion

4.1. Maternal Genetic Diversity and Regional Comparisons

Mitochondrial DNA is among the most widely used molecular tools for investigating genetic diversity and inferring the maternal origins of domestic sheep [19,39,40]. Our analysis of partial D-loop sequences (848 bp) from Kazakhstani fat-tailed breeds revealed high haplotype diversity (Hd = 0.996) and moderate nucleotide diversity (π = 0.02624), indicative of substantial maternal variability. This overall pattern is consistent with the general trend for Eurasian sheep but differs in the relative composition of haplogroups. The nearly balanced proportions of HPGA (57.4%) and HPGB (42.6%) are unusual compared to many neighboring populations, where one haplogroup typically dominates. Notably, haplogroups C, D, and E were absent from our dataset.
Comparative data from previous studies help contextualize these findings. In Russian native sheep, Koshkina et al. (2023) [32] reported a predominance of HPGB (64.8%), with HPGA at 28.9%, and minor contributions from HPGC (5.5%) and HPGD (0.8%) based on whole mitochondrial genomes. Similarly, Kalaydzhiev et al. (2023) [41] found very high haplotype diversity in Bulgarian native breeds, yet with an overwhelming frequency of HPGB (95.2%) and only 4.8% HPGA. These contrasts underscore the unique intermediate position of Kazakhstan, where both eastern HPGA-rich and western HPGB-rich lineages appear to have converged and mixed over time.
Comparable evidence from other Central Asian populations further contextualizes these results. In Mongolia, mtDNA D-loop analyses reveal high haplotype diversity (Hd ≈ 0.97), with haplogroup A predominating, followed by B and low-frequency C, while haplogroups D and E are largely absent [42]. This reflects broad maternal variation with limited geographic partitioning, consistent with centuries of nomadic herd mobility. In Kyrgyzstan, although most recent work has employed microsatellites and SNPs rather than mtDNA, local breeds display high within-breed diversity and shallow subdivision, highlighting weak maternal structuring under open pastoral systems [43]. In Uzbekistan, modern mtDNA datasets remain scarce, but ancient mitogenomes dated to ca. 4400–3100 BP document the co-occurrence of multiple maternal lineages, supporting long-term lineage complexity along the steppe corridor [44]. Together, these regional patterns include Mongolia’s A-biased pool, Kyrgyzstan’s weak subdivision, and Uzbekistan’s early multi-lineage signals, which frame Kazakhstan’s balanced A/B composition as part of a broader Central Asian mosaic shaped by sustained pastoral mobility and admixture.
Our findings also align with Mukhametzharova et al. (2018) [5], who analyzed a 539 bp fragment of mtDNA D-loop in six Kazakh sheep breeds. Their study identified three haplogroups, A (43.75%), B (39.06%), and C (17.19%), with haplogroups D and E absent. Notably, the Edilbay breed was represented only within haplogroups A and B. The detection of haplogroup C in their dataset was confined to other breeds (semi-fine-wooled types) that had undergone crossbreeding with European sheep aimed at productivity improvement.
On the other hand, archaeogenetic evidence reinforces the persistence of major haplogroups over time. Tarlykov et al. (2021) [17] examined Bronze Age sheep from Kazakhstan and found haplogroups A (57%), B (36%), and C (7%), proportions remarkably similar to those in modern populations. This suggests long-term continuity of maternal lineages despite centuries of breeding, migration, and transhumance.
The high mitochondrial diversity observed across Kazakhstani fat-tailed coarse-wooled breeds, particularly Edilbay, aligns with the view that Central Asia represents a major center of sheep genetic diversity and post-domestication expansion. However, given that our analysis is based on partial D-loop sequences, such interpretations should be regarded as hypotheses until validated by whole-mitogenome or nuclear genome evidence. This interpretation is consistent with studies highlighting the Iranian Plateau and the Caucasus—both geographically proximate to Kazakhstan—as regions harboring high mtDNA variation due to their roles in early sheep dispersal [45]. The elevated haplotype and nucleotide diversity in the D-loop region reflect both the natural mutability of mitochondrial control sequences and the preservation of multiple maternal lineages within Kazakh populations. Comparable diversity patterns have been reported in Turkish and Iranian native sheep [2,46], where transcontinental trade routes such as the Silk Road likely facilitated long-distance gene flow.

4.2. Population Dynamics and Structure

Demographic- and structure-oriented analyses indicate a maternal gene pool characterized by recent growth in parts of the dataset and weak breed-level subdivision overall. The mismatch distribution supports expansion in the Edilbay breed and in the pooled sample (low raggedness and R2), whereas KFTCW and GISS show higher indices compatible with relative stability or latent structure. The lack of convergence for SSD and p-values likely reflects a complex demographic history and moderate sample sizes rather than data quality issues. Therefore, mismatch results should be considered alongside neutrality tests and phylogenetic evidence to support demographic interpretations. While Fu and Li’s statistics and Tajima’s D showed no strong deviation from neutrality, Fu’s Fs and mismatch indices indicated expansion in Edilbay and the pooled dataset. This discrepancy likely reflects the greater sensitivity of Fu’s Fs and mismatch analyses to recent demographic events, compared with the more conservative nature of Fu and Li’s and Tajima’s statistics under moderate sample sizes.
The star-like haplotype configuration of HPGA, dominated by Edilbay individuals, resembles expansion signals observed in wild-to-domestic transition studies [19], potentially reflecting a founder effect or rapid demographic growth. In contrast, the broader haplotype spread in HPGB and the presence of more divergent lineages in KFTCW and Gissar suggest historical introgression or the retention of distinct maternal origins, particularly plausible for the Gissar breed, which has known external origins. The lack of significant genetic differentiation among breeds in the AMOVA despite strong within-population variation parallels findings from northern Eurasia and the Baltic region, where livestock mobility and breeding practices have blurred phylogeographic boundaries [18]. Collectively, these results highlight a shared maternal ancestry across Kazakhstani sheep breeds, with Edilbay potentially acting as a genetic reservoir, while Gissar and KFTCW reflect more recent admixture and localized evolution.
The AMOVA attributes 92.03% of variance to within-population differences, 11.03% to among-population within-breed differences, and no significant variance among breeds. The slightly negative among-group component (−3.06%) further indicates an absence of meaningful breed-level structure, consistent with the PCoA showing overlapping clusters and high within-flock diversity. These conditions are expected under sustained exchange of ewes and rams across the steppe, where seasonal movements and trade have historically blurred maternal boundaries. It should be noted that the Gissar breed was sampled from a single flock, which limits breed-level generalization; however, the consistency across all three breeds supports the robustness of the observed diversity and structure patterns. This interpretation is further supported by the haplotype distribution. Nearly all haplotypes were unique to single individuals or populations, with only one haplotype (H11) shared between KDZ and TRZ within the KFTCW breed, and none shared across breeds. Such a pattern underscores the predominance of within-population diversity and the limited extent of maternal overlap between breeds.
Comparable signals appear in neighboring regions. Mongolian D-loop studies report high haplotype diversity with little geographic partitioning, attributed to centuries of nomadic herd management and open-range movements [47]. Indian sheep show high within-population variance and modest regional differences based on combined mtDNA and microsatellite data [48]. Recent data from Pakistan (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; D-loop; 159 individuals) also show very-high haplotype diversity (Hd = 0.985) with three maternal lineages (A, B, and C), pointing to broad admixture within provinces [49]. Similarly, Iranian sheep exhibit high diversity and within-population variance near putative domestication centers [50].
These results fit broader models of post-domestication movements, where repeated dispersals and secondary introductions erode the fine-scale structure unless barriers or strict management enforce isolation [51]. The absence of haplogroups C–E in our dataset does not contradict these dynamics. Rare haplogroups may be missed due to moderate sample sizes or short sequence fragments. Studies using the complete D-loop or whole mitogenomes often detect rare haplotypes overlooked in partial analyses [52].
In summary, the expansion signatures (mismatch), weak breed differentiation (AMOVA and PCoA), and very-low between-breed p-distances together point to a historically panmictic maternal system in Kazakhstan. This pattern is consistent with other steppe populations, where demographic growth and sustained inter-flock connectivity, rather than breed isolation, shaped maternal structure.

4.3. Phylogenetic Relationships Among Kazakhstani Sheep Breeds

Our phylogenetic reconstruction places Kazakhstani sheep predominantly within haplogroups A and B, but with a distinctive near-equal balance between the two (HPGA = 54.3%; HPGB = 45.7%). This contrasts with the dominance of HPGA in most East and Central Asian flocks [2,19] and the near-fixation of HPGB in several Balkan and Caucasian populations [18,53]. Such a balance is consistent with Kazakhstan’s position as a contact zone where eastern HPGA-rich and western HPGB-rich lineages converged, likely through repeated livestock exchanges along the Eurasian steppe corridor, particularly during the Silk Road period [54].
A notable feature is the placement of Edilbay close to the node linking domestic sheep with O. vignei and O. ammon. This position suggests that Edilbay could represent a hypothesized relic of an ancestral Central Asian lineage, although this interpretation remains tentative due to reliance on partial mtDNA sequences. Alternative explanations such as incomplete lineage sorting, limited sampling, or stochastic retention of basal haplotypes must also be considered.
The clustering of O. orientalis (Asiatic mouflon) within HPGB agrees with earlier genetic evidence for its role as a direct maternal contributor to haplogroup B [1,19]. The relatively high HPGB proportion in our dataset, higher than in some Iranian and Anatolian flocks [7,18], may reflect secondary introgression from western flocks or selective breeding preferences favoring HPGB lineages.
Intermediate clades between minor haplogroups (C, D, and E) and the main domestic clusters of HPGA and B (Figure 3 and Figure 4) suggest that Central Asian flocks—particularly Edilbay (hypothetically)—may serve as a genetic bridge connecting Asian, European, and Middle Eastern lineages. Similar transitional haplotypes have been reported in Anatolian mouflon, Caucasian sheep [7,55], and hybrids such as Iranian Kerman sheep [38]. Their presence across Edilbay, Gissar, and KFTCW indicates that such lineages reflect a shared maternal heritage of steppe pastoralism rather than isolated events.
These findings parallel paleogenomic evidence from Bronze Age sheep in Central Asia, which show mixtures of Near Eastern, Caucasian, and steppe lineages persisting into modern breeds [54]. Thus, while Edilbay may preserve genetic traces of ancient diversity, its precise status requires further study with higher-resolution genomic tools. The combination of Edilbay’s proximity to wild Ovis MRCA, the balanced A/B haplogroup composition, and the presence of transitional lineages underscores Kazakhstan’s position as a genetic and cultural crossroads in sheep history.

4.4. Implications for Breed Conservation and Genetic Management

The balanced yet diverse maternal lineage pool in Kazakhstani sheep positions them as both a crucial conservation resource and a reservoir for breed improvement. The prevalence of two major haplogroups, combined with potential remnants of rarer lineages, provides adaptive potential not always available in more lineage-homogenous populations like those of the Balkans or South Asia. Given Kazakhstan’s long history of inter-regional animal movement and breed amalgamation, maintaining these genetic reservoirs through targeted breeding strategies, such as lineage-informed registries and monitoring of haplogroup frequencies, will be essential. Additionally, if haplogroup C does persist in low-frequency populations, as suggested by Mukhametzharova et al.’s results, efforts should be made to sample and preserve these rare maternal lineages. In practical terms, conservation actions should include the establishment of lineage-informed breed registries, cryopreservation of germplasm from key maternal lines, and targeted sampling coupled with genomic screening of flocks where rare haplogroups may still persist. These measures will help safeguard genetic diversity and ensure that the adaptive potential of Kazakh fat-tailed sheep is retained for future breeding and management programs.

5. Conclusions

Kazakhstani fat-tailed sheep exhibit high haplotype diversity and an unusual balance between haplogroups A and B, reflecting the country’s role as a meeting point for eastern and western maternal lineages. Population analyses demonstrate high within-breed variation, minimal differentiation among breeds, and signatures of demographic expansion, patterns consistent with long-standing livestock mobility and genetic exchange across the Eurasian steppe.
The phylogenetic placement of the Edilbay breed near the most recent common ancestor of domestic sheep and wild Ovis may indicate that it retains elements of an ancestral Central Asian lineage, although this should be regarded as a working hypothesis rather than a definitive conclusion. Preserving such breeds could, therefore, help safeguard maternal lineages of potential historical significance.
Together, these findings highlight Kazakhstan as both a reservoir of genetic diversity and a crossroads in sheep domestication history, underscoring the importance of conservation and breeding strategies that maintain within-breed diversity while also protecting rare or potentially ancestral lineages.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci12100988/s1, Table S1: Taxon set used in this study for the phylogenetic analysis and haplotype network. Table S2. Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs neutrality test indices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.D., D.U. and M.A.; methodology, D.U. and T.K.; software, D.U.; validation, K.D., M.A. and T.K.; formal analysis, A.K., M.A. and R.A.; investigation, K.D. and D.U.; resources, K.D., T.K., A.K. and B.B.; data curation, D.U.; writing—original draft preparation, K.D. and D.U.; writing—review and editing, D.U., T.K., A.K., M.A., B.B., S.N. and R.A.; visualization, D.U.; supervision, K.D., D.U. and S.N.; project administration, K.D. and B.B.; funding acquisition, K.D. and B.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, grant number AP19577108 (analysis of the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary demographic events of fat-tailed coarse-wool sheep breeds raised in Kazakhstan).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of RSE “Institute of Genetics and Physiology” of the Committee of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (No. 12-351, 23 November 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

All novel sequences obtained in this study were deposited to the GenBank under accession numbers PV963845-PV963959.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Temirlan Kulboldin for his assistance with the sample collection. Special thanks are extended to Kanat Eshimov of the “Birlik” farm and its staff, as well as to all participating sheep farms, for their valuable collaboration and steadfast commitment to advancing both scientific research and the agricultural sector of the Republic of Kazakhstan. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions, that significantly improved the earlier version of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
KZKazakhstan
D-loopDisplacement loop (mitochondrial control region)

References

  1. Hiendleder, S.; Mainz, K.; Plante, Y.; Lewalski, H. Analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences in domestic sheep: Phylogenetic and technical considerations. Genetics 2002, 160, 1651–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Meadows, J.R.S.; Cemal, İ.; Karaca, O.; Gootwine, E.; Kijas, J.W. Five ovine mitochondrial lineages identified from sheep breeds of the Near East. Genetics 2007, 175, 1371–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zeder, M.A. The domestication of animals. J. Anthropol. Res. 2012, 68, 161–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kamalakkannan, R.; Kumar, S.; Bhavana, K.; Prabhu, V.R.; Machado, C.B.; Singha, H.S.; Sureshgopi, D.; Vijay, V.; Nagarajan, M. Evidence for independent domestication of sheep mtDNA lineage A in India and introduction of lineage B through Arabian sea route. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mukhametzharova, I.; Islamov, Y.; Ganieva, G.; Bespalova, A. Genetic characterization of Kazakh native sheep breeds using mitochondrial DNA. Online J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 18, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meadows, J.R.S.; Hiendleder, S.; Kijas, J.W. Haplogroup relationships between domestic and wild sheep resolved using a mitogenome panel. Heredity 2011, 106, 700–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Demirci, S.; Koban Baştanlar, E.; Dağtaş, N.D.; Pişkin, E.; Engin, A.; Özer, F.; Yüncü, E.; Doğan, S.A.; Togan, I. Mitochondrial DNA diversity of modern, ancient and wild sheep (Ovis gmelinii anatolica) from Turkey: New insights on the evolutionary history of sheep. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kerven, C.; Robinson, S.; Behnke, R. Pastoralism at scale on the Kazakh rangelands: From Clans to Workers to Ranchers. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 4, 590401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. FAO. Domestic Animal Diversity Information System (DAD-IS). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2024. Available online: https://www.fao.org/dad-is/en/ (accessed on 19 October 2024).
  10. Kanapin, K.K. Edilbay Sheep; Bastau: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2009; 180p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  11. Dossybayev, K.; Amandykova, M.; Abdrakhmanov, S.; Orakbayeva, A.; Yergali, K.; Torekhanov, A. Genetic diversity and relationships among sheep breeds in Kazakhstan based on 12 microsatellite loci. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2019, 29, 1601–1609. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhumadilla, K.; Zhumadillaev, N.K. State and prospects of development of Kurdy meat-sal sheep breeding in Kazakhstan. In Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Almaty, Kazakhstan, 29 October 2014; Zootechnical Science of Kazakhstan: Past, Present and Future. pp. 163–172. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ikromov, F. Methods for Increasing the Prolificacy of Gissar Ewes at Small- and Middle-Scale Households; Taj Livestock Research Institute: Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2010; 7p. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wood, N.J.; Phua, S.H. Variation in the control region sequence of the sheep mitochondrial genome. Anim. Genet. 1996, 27, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pozharskiy, A.; Khamzina, A.; Gritsenko, D.; Khamzina, Z.; Kassymbekova, S.; Karimov, N.; Karymsakov, T.; Tlevlesov, N. SNP genotyping and population analysis of five indigenous Kazakh sheep breeds. Livest. Sci. 2020, 241, 104252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dossybayev, K.; Amandykova, M.; Orakbayeva, A.; Adylkanova, S.; Kozhakhmet, A.; Yergali, K.; Kulboldin, T.; Kulataev, B.; Torekhanov, A. Genome-wide association studies revealed several candidate genes of meat productivity in Saryarka fat-tailed coarse-wool sheep breed. Genes 2024, 15, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tarlykov, P.; Atavliyeva, S.; Auganova, D.; Akhmetollayev, I.; Loshakova, T.; Varfolomeev, V.; Ramankulov, Y. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of ancient sheep from Kazakhstan: Evidence for early sheep introduction. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tapio, M.; Marzanov, N.; Ozerov, M.; Ćinkulov, M.; Gonzarenko, G.; Kiselyova, T.; Kantanen, J. Sheep mitochondrial DNA variation in European, Caucasian, and Central Asian areas. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23, 1776–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hiendleder, S.; Mainz, K.; Plante, Y.; Lewalski, H. Analysis of mitochondrial DNA indicates that domestic sheep are derived from two different ancestral maternal sources: No evidence for contributions from urial and argali sheep. J. Hered. 1998, 89, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Othman, E.O.; Balabel, E.A.; Abdel-Samad, M.F. Mitochondrial DNA Diversity in Five Egyptian Sheep Breeds. Glob. Vet. 2014, 12, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, Y.X.; Yang, J.; Lv, F.H.; Hu, X.J.; Xie, X.L.; Zhang, M.; Li, W.R.; Liu, M.J.; Wang, Y.T.; Li, J.Q.; et al. Genomic Reconstruction of the History of Native Sheep Reveals the Peopling Patterns of Nomads and the Expansion of Early Pastoralism in East Asia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 2380–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, X.-L.; Gong, Y.-F.; Liu, Z.-Z.; Zheng, G.-R.; Zhou, R.-Y.; Jin, X.-M.; Li, L.-H.; Wang, H.-L. Study on tandem repeat sequence variation in sheep mtDNA D-loop region. Acta Genet. Sin. 2006, 33, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar]
  23. Burland, T.G. DNASTAR’s Lasergene sequence analysis software. Methods Mol. Biol. 2000, 132, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.; Li, W.; Jakovlic, I.; Zou, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, G. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Librado, P.; Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1451–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fluxus-Engineering. Network 10.2.0.0; Fluxus Technology Ltd.: Clare, Suffolk, UK, 2023; Available online: https://www.fluxus-engineering.com (accessed on 15 December 2024).
  29. Fu, Y.-X.; Li, W.-H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 1993, 133, 693–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Excoffier, L.; Laval, G.; Schneider, S. Arlequin (version 3.1): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. Online 2005, 1, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Paradis, E.; Schliep, K. ape 5.0: An environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 526–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Koshkina, O.; Deniskova, T.; Dotsev, A.; Kunz, E.; Selionova, M.; Medugorac, I.; Zinovieva, N. Phylogenetic analysis of Russian native sheep breeds based on mtDNA sequences. Genes 2023, 14, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lv, F.-H.; Wang, X.-X.; Liu, D.; Peng, W.-F.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Y.-X.; Li, W.-R.; Liu, M.-J.; Ma, Y.-H.; Zhao, Q.-J.; et al. Mitogenomic meta-analysis identifies two phases of migration in the history of eastern Eurasian sheep. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 2515–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sanna, D.; Barbato, M.; Hadjisterkotis, E.; Cossu, P.; Decandia, L.; Trova, S.; Pirastru, M.; Leoni, G.G.; Naitana, S.; Francalacci, P.; et al. The first mitogenome of the Cyprus mouflon (Ovis gmelina ophion): New insights into the phylogeny of the genus Ovis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nguyen, L.-T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Minh, B.Q.; Nguyen, M.A.T.; Haeseler, A.V. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W38–W47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mereu, P.; Pirastru, M.; Sana, D.; Bassu, G.; Naitana, S.; Leoni, G.G. Phenotype transition from wild mouflon to domestic sheep. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2024, 56, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nigussie, H.; Mwacharo, J.M.; Osama, S.; Agaba, M.; Mekasha, Y.; Kebede, K.; Abegaz, S.; Pal, S.K. Genetic diversity and matrilineal genetic origin of fat-rumped sheep in Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 51, 1393–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Meadows, J.R.S.; Li, K.; Kantanen, J.; Tapio, M.; Sipos, W.; Pardeshi, V.; Gupta, V.; Calvo, J.H.; Whan, V.; Norris, B.; et al. Mitochondrial sequence reveals high levels of gene flow between breeds of domestic sheep from Asia and Europe. J. Hered. 2005, 96, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kalaydzhiev, G.; Palova, N.; Dundarova, H.; Lozanova, L.; Mehandjyiski, I.; Radoslavov, G.; Hristov, P. Mitochondrial diversity and phylogenetic relationship of eight native Bulgarian sheep Breeds. Animals 2023, 13, 3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, Y.S.; Tseveen, K.; Batsukh, B.; Seong, J.; Kong, H.S. Origin-related study of genetic diversity and heteroplasmy of Mongolian sheep (Ovis aries) using mitochondrial DNA. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 2020, 35, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Deniskova, T.; Dotsev, A.; Lushihina, E.; Shakhin, A.; Kunz, E.; Medugorac, I.; Rever, H.; Wimmers, K.; Khayatzadeh, N.; Solkner, J.; et al. Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of Sheep Breeds in the Kyrgyzstan. Front Genet. 2019, 10, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, L.; Zhang, X.; Hu, Y.; Li, H.; Peng, Z.; Xiang, H.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, X. Ancient mitochondrial genome depicts sheep maternal dispersal and migration in Eastern Asia. J. Genet. Genom. 2024, 51, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Naderi, S.; Rezaei, H.R.; Pompanon, F.; Blum, M.G.B.; Negrini, R.; Naghash, H.R.; Balkiz, Ö.; Mashkour, M.; Gaggiotti, O.E.; Ajmone-Marsan, P.; et al. The goat domestication process inferred from large-scale mitochondrial DNA analysis of wild and domestic individuals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 17659–17664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pedrosa, S.; Uzun, M.; Arranz, J.J.; Gutiérrez-Gil, B.; San Primitivo, F.; Bayón, Y. Evidence of three maternal lineages in Near Eastern sheep supporting multiple domestication events. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 272, 2211–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ganbold, O.; Lee, S.-H.; Seo, D.; Paek, W.K.; Manjula, P.; Munkhbayar, M.; Lee, J.H. Genetic diversity and the origin of Mongolian native sheep. Livest. Sci. 2019, 220, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sharma, R.; Ahlawat, S.; Sharma, H.; Sharma, P.; Panchal, P.; Arora, R.; Tantia, M.S. Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analyses unveil the genetic structure of native sheep breeds from three major agro-ecological regions of India. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ahmed, S.; Nadeem, M.S.; Johansson, A.M.; Jonas, E.; Muhammad, K.; Mehmood, S.A. Molecular diversity and phylogenetic analysis of ten sheep breeds from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, based on mitochondrial D-loop sequences. Mamm. Genome 2025, 36, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Moradi, M.H.; Phua, S.H.; Hedayat, N.; Khodaei-Motlagh, M.; Razmkabir, M. Haplotype and Genetic Diversity of the mDNA in indigenous Iranian sheep and an insight into the history of sheep domestication. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2017, 19, 591–601. [Google Scholar]
  51. Machová, K.; Málková, A.; Vostrý, L. Sheep Post-Domestication Expansion in the Context of Mitochondrial and Y Chromosome Haplogroups and Haplotypes. Genes 2022, 13, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Peng, W.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, L.; Feng, C.; Yang, Y.; Li, B.; Wu, L.; Wu, A.; Wang, S.; Ren, X.; et al. Analysis of World-Scale Mitochondrial DNA Reveals the Origin and Migration Route of East Asia Goats. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 796979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Radoslavov, G.; Kalaydzhiev, G.; Yordanov, G.; Palova, N.; Salkova, D.; Hristov, P. Genetic diversity of native Bulgarian sheep breeds based on the mitochondrial D-loop sequence analysis. Small Rumin. Res. 2025, 249, 107527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kaptan, D.; Atağ, G.; Vural, K.B.; Morell Miranda, P.; Akbaba, A.; Yüncü, E.; Buluktaev, A.; Abazari, M.F.; Yorulmaz, S.; Kazancı, D.D.; et al. The Population History of Domestic Sheep Revealed by Paleogenomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2024, 41, msae158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Deniskova, T.E.; Dotsev, A.V.; Selionova, M.I.; Kunz, E.; Medugorac, I.; Reyer, H.; Barbato, M.; Traspov, A.A.; Brem, G.; Zinovieva, N.A. Population structure and genetic diversity of 25 Russian sheep breeds based on whole-genome genotyping. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2018, 50, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution map of fat-tailed coarse-wooled sheep breeds in Kazakhstan. Photos of each breed representative are from this study, taken by Kapas T. Edilbay breed flocks shown in red color, Gissar breed in green, and Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled breed in blue color.
Figure 1. Distribution map of fat-tailed coarse-wooled sheep breeds in Kazakhstan. Photos of each breed representative are from this study, taken by Kapas T. Edilbay breed flocks shown in red color, Gissar breed in green, and Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wooled breed in blue color.
Vetsci 12 00988 g001
Figure 2. Mismatch distribution analysis of analyzed sheep from Kazakhstan.
Figure 2. Mismatch distribution analysis of analyzed sheep from Kazakhstan.
Vetsci 12 00988 g002
Figure 3. Median-joining haplotype network based on mitochondrial D-loop sequences from Kazakhstani fat-tailed coarse-wooled sheep breeds. Circle size is proportional to haplotype frequency (largest circle = 5 sequences; medium circle = 3 sequences; smallest circle = 1 sequence). Colors represent breed populations as shown in Figure 1. All sequences obtained from GenBank are shown in black. Red small dots represent median vectors.
Figure 3. Median-joining haplotype network based on mitochondrial D-loop sequences from Kazakhstani fat-tailed coarse-wooled sheep breeds. Circle size is proportional to haplotype frequency (largest circle = 5 sequences; medium circle = 3 sequences; smallest circle = 1 sequence). Colors represent breed populations as shown in Figure 1. All sequences obtained from GenBank are shown in black. Red small dots represent median vectors.
Vetsci 12 00988 g003
Figure 4. Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of 115 Kazakhstani sheep individuals based on TN93—pairwise genetic distances. Points represent individual samples, colored by breed according to Figure 1. The first two principal coordinates explain 87.8% of the total variation (75.2% and 12.6%, respectively).
Figure 4. Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of 115 Kazakhstani sheep individuals based on TN93—pairwise genetic distances. Points represent individual samples, colored by breed according to Figure 1. The first two principal coordinates explain 87.8% of the total variation (75.2% and 12.6%, respectively).
Vetsci 12 00988 g004
Figure 5. ML tree demonstrating the phylogenetic relationships of Kazakhstani fat-tailed coarse-wooled sheep breeds with wild representatives, and five main haplogroups of O. aries.
Figure 5. ML tree demonstrating the phylogenetic relationships of Kazakhstani fat-tailed coarse-wooled sheep breeds with wild representatives, and five main haplogroups of O. aries.
Vetsci 12 00988 g005
Table 1. Sampling information of O. aries from Kazakhstan.
Table 1. Sampling information of O. aries from Kazakhstan.
BreedFlockLocationNsFarm
Edilbay (ED)ATRAtyrau region, WKZ 18“Suyindik”
ORLBirlik village, Zhangaly district, WKZ 20“Birlik”
AKZAyakoz town, EKZ 20“Aigul”
Kazakh fat-tailed
coarse-wooled (KFTCW)
KDZKundyzdy village, Abay region, EKZ20“Kundyzdy”
TRZShokpar village, Shu district,
Zhambyl region, SKZ
18“Aksunkar”
Gissar (GISS)SHKDarbaza village, Turkestan region, SKZ19“Darbaza”
Ns—number of samples; ATR—Atyrau, ORL—Oral, AKZ—Ayakoz, KDZ—Kundyzdy, TRZ—Taraz, SHK—Shymkent. Note: the flock names were employed in the analyses and throughout the text.
Table 2. Molecular diversity statistics for three breeds of O. aries from Kazakhstan. N—number of samples; Nh—number of haplotypes; S—number of polymorphic sites; m—number of mutations; k—average number of nucleotide differences; Hd—haplotype diversity; π—nucleotide diversity; st.dev.—standard deviations.
Table 2. Molecular diversity statistics for three breeds of O. aries from Kazakhstan. N—number of samples; Nh—number of haplotypes; S—number of polymorphic sites; m—number of mutations; k—average number of nucleotide differences; Hd—haplotype diversity; π—nucleotide diversity; st.dev.—standard deviations.
BreedNsSmkNhHd ± st.dev.π ± st.dev.
GISS58989923.200540.997 ± 0.0040.02187 ± 0.00275
KFTCW38797921.438270.976 ± 0.0140.02528 ± 0.00115
ED19575718.549170.988 ± 0.0210.02736 ± 0.00074
Total11511812122.255980.996 ± 0.0020.02624 ± 0.00048
Table 3. Population dynamics indices of Kazakhstani O. aries based on mtDNA. Fu and Li’s D and F neutrality test statistics (p > 0.10); Rag—raggedness index, R2—Ramos-Onsins index.
Table 3. Population dynamics indices of Kazakhstani O. aries based on mtDNA. Fu and Li’s D and F neutrality test statistics (p > 0.10); Rag—raggedness index, R2—Ramos-Onsins index.
BreedFu and Li’s D Fu and Li’s FRag R2
ED0.376160.413420.00240.1155
KFTCW0.440140.553620.00580.1313
GISS0.421960.539360.01510.1524
Total−0.11543−0.115540.00120.0927
Table 4. Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) based on D-loop sequences in Kazakhstani sheep.
Table 4. Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) based on D-loop sequences in Kazakhstani sheep.
Source of Variationd.f.Sum
of Squares
Variance ComponentsPercentage of
Variation
Among groups243.814−0.34252 Va−3.06
Among populations within groups3102.0011.23505 Vb11.03
Within populations1091122.75810.30054 Vc92.03
Total1141268.57411.19307
d.f.—degrees of freedom; Va—variance among groups (between breeds); Vb—variance among populations within groups (among flocks within each breed); Vc—variance within populations (within each flock).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dossybayev, K.; Ualiyeva, D.; Kapassuly, T.; Amandykova, M.; Kozhahmet, A.; Bekmanov, B.; Amzeyev, R.; Naruya, S. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Fat-Tailed Coarse-Wooled Sheep Breeds Ovis aries from Kazakhstan. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12100988

AMA Style

Dossybayev K, Ualiyeva D, Kapassuly T, Amandykova M, Kozhahmet A, Bekmanov B, Amzeyev R, Naruya S. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Fat-Tailed Coarse-Wooled Sheep Breeds Ovis aries from Kazakhstan. Veterinary Sciences. 2025; 12(10):988. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12100988

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dossybayev, Kairat, Daniya Ualiyeva, Tilek Kapassuly, Makpal Amandykova, Altynay Kozhahmet, Bakytzhan Bekmanov, Rauan Amzeyev, and Saitou Naruya. 2025. "Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Fat-Tailed Coarse-Wooled Sheep Breeds Ovis aries from Kazakhstan" Veterinary Sciences 12, no. 10: 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12100988

APA Style

Dossybayev, K., Ualiyeva, D., Kapassuly, T., Amandykova, M., Kozhahmet, A., Bekmanov, B., Amzeyev, R., & Naruya, S. (2025). Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Fat-Tailed Coarse-Wooled Sheep Breeds Ovis aries from Kazakhstan. Veterinary Sciences, 12(10), 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12100988

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop