Polymicrobial Septic Peritonitis Caused by Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus casseliflavus following Uterine Rupture in a Goat
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Case Description
3. Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Coll-Roman, L.M.; Cabrera, C.; Vander Broek, A.R.; Bauck, A.G.; Kelleman, A.A.; Pozor, M.A.; Stockler, J.W.; Wiley, C.; Scully, C.; Mackay, E.E.; et al. Multicenter study of uterine tears and other reproductive complications in periparturient goats presented to veterinary teaching hospitals. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2023, 37, 2623–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brounts, S.H.; Hawkins, J.F.; Baird, A.N.; Glickman, L.T. Outcome and subsequent fertility of sheep and goats undergoing cesarean section because of dystocia: 110 cases (1981–2001). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2004, 224, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Ametaj, B.N.; Ambrose, D.J.; Gänzle, M.G. Characterization of the bacterial microbiota of the vagina of dairy cows and isolation of pediocin-producing Pediococcus acidilactici. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pascottini, O.B.; Van Schyndel, S.J.; Spricigo, J.F.W.; Rousseau, J.; Weese, J.S.; LeBlanc, S.J. Dynamics of uterine microbiota in postpartum dairy cows with clinical or subclinical endometritis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Javsicas, L.H.; Giguère, S.; Freeman, D.E.; Rodgerson, D.H.; Slovis, N.M. Comparison of Surgical and Medical Treatment of 49 Postpartum Mares with Presumptive or Confirmed Uterine Tears. Vet. Surg. 2010, 39, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davies, R.; Rozanski, E.; Tseng, F.; Jennings, S.; Paul, A. Traumatic uterine rupture in three felids. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 2016, 26, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- M100-S33; Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2023.
- Nocera, F.P.; Papulino, C.; Del Prete, C.; Palumbo, V.; Pasolini, M.P.; De Martino, L. Endometritis associated with Enterococcus casseliflavus in a mare: A case report. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2017, 7, 760–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedrichs, K.R.; Jensen, A.L.; Kjelgaard-Hansen, M. Reference Intervals and Decision Limits. In Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology, 7th ed.; Brooks, M.B., Harr, K.E., Seelig, D.M., Wardrop, K.J., Weiss, D.J., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 1273–1284. [Google Scholar]
- Kaneko, J.J.; Harvey, J.W.; Bruss, M.L. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals, 6th ed.; Kaneko, J.J., Harvey, J.W., Bruss, M.L., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Latimer, K.S. Duncan and Prasse’s Veterinary Laboratory Medicine: Clinical Pathology, 5th ed.; Latimer, K.S., Ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Rosenberg, L.M.; Marinoff, J.; Crouch, E.E.; Valenzano, D.M.; Peters-Kennedy, J.; Cheong, S.H.; de Amorim, M.D. Uterine perforation secondary to metritis and placenta percreta in a postpartum bitch. Can. Vet. J. 2020, 61, 584–588. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Alimi, O.A.; Abdulwahab, W.F.; Amid, S.A.; Abdulkadir, S.Z.; Lawal, F.M.; Aliyu, A.; Adediran, S.O.; Ajadi, A.A.; Bolaji, M.; Uthman, H.O.; et al. Hematological prediction study of peritonitis following laparotomy in goats. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2020, 82, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beukers, A.G.; Zaheer, R.; Goji, N.; Amoako, K.K.; Chaves, A.V.; Ward, M.P.; McAllister, T.A. Comparative genomics of Enterococcus spp. isolated from bovine feces. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sheldon, I.M.; Dobson, H. Postpartum uterine health in cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2004, 82–83, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nooij, P.P. Laparohysterectomy as a treatment for uterine rupture in the cow. Can. Vet. J. 1982, 23, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gilbert, R.O.; Cable, C.; Fubini, S.L.; Steiner, A. Surgery of the Bovine Reproductive System and Urinary Tract. In Farm Animal Surgery; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 439–503. [Google Scholar]
Parameters | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 5 | Day 7 | Day 9 | Day 11 | Day 13 | Day 14 | Reference Interval [9,10,11] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBC cell × 1012/L (cell × 106/µL) | 20.7 (20.7) | 20.5 (20.5) | 12.5 (12.5) | 9.55 (9.55) | 7.8 (7.8) | 5.2 (5.2) | - | - | 8–18 (8–18) |
Hemoglobin g/L (g/dL) | 102 (10.2) | 103 (10.3) | 78 (7.8) | 62 (6.2) | 46 (4.6) | 31 (3.1) | - | - | 80–120 (8–12) |
HCT L/L (%) | 0.3 (30) | 0.3 (30) | 0.24 (24) | 0.18 (18) | 0.14 (14) | 0.09 (9) | 0.11 (11) | 0.21 (21) | 0.22–0.38 (22–38) |
MCV fL (μm3) | 14 (14) | 15 (15) | 19 (19) | 19 (19) | 18 (18) | 17 (17) | - | - | 16–25 (16–25) |
MCH pg/cell | 4.9 | 5 | 6.3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | - | - | 5.2–8.0 |
MCHC g/L (g/dL) | 340 (34) | 340 (34) | 320 (32) | 340 (34) | 330 (33) | 340 (34) | - | - | 300–360 (30–36) |
Reticulocytes cell × 109/µL (cell × 103/µL) | - | - | - | - | - | 30.3 (30.3) | - | - | - |
WBC cell × 109/L (cell/µL) | 28 (28,000) | 10.2 (10,200) | 11.2 (11,200) | 14.7 (14,700) | 31 (31,000) | 33 (33,000) | - | - | 4–13 (4000–13,000) |
Band neutrophils cell × 109/L (cell/µL) | 0 | 0.306 (306) | 0 | 0.147 (147) | 0.31 (310) | 0 | - | - | Rare |
Segmented neutrophils cell × 109/L (cell/µL) | 23.24 (23,240) | 3.162 (3162) | 6.16 (6160) | 7.056 (7056) | 22.94 (22,940) | 24.09 (24,090) | - | - | 1.2–7.2 (1200–7200) |
Lymphocytes cell × 109/L (cell/µL) | 3.38 (3380) | 5.508 (5508) | 4.368 (4368) | 5.145 (5145) | 6.2 (6200) | 7.92 (7920) | - | - | 2–9 (2000–9000) |
Monocytes cell × 109/L (cell/µL) | 0.280 (280) | 1.122 (1122) | 0.672 (672) | 2.352 (2352) | 1.550 (1550) | 0.990 (990) | - | - | 0–0.55 (0–550) |
Eosinophils cell × 109/L (cell/µL) | 0 | 0.102 (102) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0.050–0.650 (50–650) |
Basophils cell × 109/L (cell/µL) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0–120 (0–120) |
Thrombocytes cell × 109/L (cell × 103/µL) | 0.641 (0.641) | 0.202 (0.202) | 0.066 (0.066 | 0.227 (0.227) | 0.464 (0.464) | - | - | - | 0.3–0.6 (0.3–0.6) |
Total protein g/L (g/dL) | 57.9 (5.79) | 48.2 (4.82) | 44 (4.4) | - | 50.9 (5.09) | 57.8 (5.78) | 62(6.2) | 62 (6.2) | 64–70 (6.4–7.0) |
Albumin g/L (g/dL) | 25.9 (2.59) | 20.3 (2.03) | 15.6 (1.56) | - | 15.4 (1.54) | 17.2 (1.72) | - | - | 27–39 (2.7–3.9) |
AST µkat/L (units/L) | 0.77 (46) | 2.01 (120.1) | 6.97 (417.5) | - | 7.27 (435.1) | 5.45 (326.5) | - | - | 2.79–8.57 (167–513) |
GGT µkat/L (units/L) | 0.25 (14.9) | 0.18 (10.6) | 0.08 (4.9) | - | 0.39 (23.2) | 0.51 (30.4) | - | - | 0.33–0.94 (20–56) |
Total bilirubin μmol/L (mg/dL) | 7.011 (0.41) | 2.736 (0.16) | 1.026 (0.06) | - | 4.788 (0.28) | 8.208 (0.48) | - | - | 0–1.71 (0–0.1) |
BUN mmol/L (mg/dL) | 29.881 (83.7) | 39.091 (109.5) | 24.704 (69.2) | - | 37.164 (104.1) | 20.599 (57.7) | - | - | 3.57–7.14 (10–20) |
Creatinine μmol/L (mg/dL) | 167.076 (1.89) | 174.148 (1.97) | 125.528 (1.42) | - | 115.804 (1.31) | 116.688 (1.32) | - | - | 88.4–159.12 (1.0–1.8) |
Susceptibility Profile [7] | ||
---|---|---|
Antimicrobial Tested | Enterococcus faecium | Enterococcus casseliflavus |
Ampicillin | Resistant | Sensible |
Penicillin | Resistant | Sensible |
Chloramphenicol | Sensible | Intermediate |
Ciprofloxacin | Resistant | Intermediate |
Erythromycin | Intermediate | Intermediate |
Tetracycline | Resistant | Sensible |
Vancomycin | Sensible | Intermediate |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
dos Santos, G.S.; Francischetti, G.S.; Garritano, N.F.; Hagen, S.C.F.; Cagnim, A.F.; Catão-Dias, J.L.; Ferreira Neto, J.S.; Sucupira, M.C.A.; Heinemann, M.B. Polymicrobial Septic Peritonitis Caused by Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus casseliflavus following Uterine Rupture in a Goat. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11060268
dos Santos GS, Francischetti GS, Garritano NF, Hagen SCF, Cagnim AF, Catão-Dias JL, Ferreira Neto JS, Sucupira MCA, Heinemann MB. Polymicrobial Septic Peritonitis Caused by Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus casseliflavus following Uterine Rupture in a Goat. Veterinary Sciences. 2024; 11(6):268. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11060268
Chicago/Turabian Styledos Santos, Gabriel S., Giovanna S. Francischetti, Natália F. Garritano, Stefano C. F. Hagen, Artur F. Cagnim, José Luiz Catão-Dias, José S. Ferreira Neto, Maria Claudia A. Sucupira, and Marcos B. Heinemann. 2024. "Polymicrobial Septic Peritonitis Caused by Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus casseliflavus following Uterine Rupture in a Goat" Veterinary Sciences 11, no. 6: 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11060268
APA Styledos Santos, G. S., Francischetti, G. S., Garritano, N. F., Hagen, S. C. F., Cagnim, A. F., Catão-Dias, J. L., Ferreira Neto, J. S., Sucupira, M. C. A., & Heinemann, M. B. (2024). Polymicrobial Septic Peritonitis Caused by Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus casseliflavus following Uterine Rupture in a Goat. Veterinary Sciences, 11(6), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11060268