Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Beeswax Supplementation on Productive Performance of Growing Assaf Lambs
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Dose Hydrocortisone Treatment Does Not Affect Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations in Healthy Dogs
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Relationship between Neutrophil Activation and Different States of Canine L. infantum Infection: Nitroblue Tetrazolium Test and IFN-γ
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Aging on the Immune Response to Core Vaccines in Senior and Geriatric Dogs
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

DNA Polymorphisms and mRNA Levels of Immune Biomarkers as Candidates for Inflammatory Postpartum Disorders Susceptibility in Italian Buffaloes

Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(9), 573; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10090573
by Ahmed Ateya 1,*, Fatmah A. Safhi 2, Huda El-Emam 1, Muath Q. Al-Ghadi 3, Mohamed Abdo 4,5, Liana Fericean 6, Rada Olga 6,*, Ostan Mihaela 6, Manar M. Hizam 7, Maha Mamdouh 8, Eman M. Abu El-Naga 9 and Walaa S. Raslan 8
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(9), 573; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10090573
Submission received: 22 August 2023 / Revised: 8 September 2023 / Accepted: 11 September 2023 / Published: 14 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Immune Biomarkers in Animal Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments to the Author:

Postnatal inflammatory diseases of buffalo reduce conception rate and age of buffalo and have a detrimental effect on the economic yield of herd farming. In this manuscript, the authors used PCR-DNA sequencing to identify differences in the nucleotide sequences of immune genes between healthy buffalo and those with inflammatory reproductive disorders. When buffalo experienced inflammatory reproductive disorders, they were significantly more likely to express the genes examined. Therefore, these molecular changes may provide important information on the physiological relationships of various reproductive pathways. The author's analysis is very detailed. However, some issues need to be resolved before they are received.

 

Point 1: Each line should be labeled during the manuscript review process for ease of access, and this manuscript is not labeled with line numbers.

 

Point 2: The content of the 2.1 Dairy Buffaloes and Research Samples part of the manuscript is more verbose and requires a more concise description. (For example, the authors described twice that the buffaloes used in the study could be divided into healthy and those with inflammatory reproductive problems, it is recommended to rewrite it and describe it only once to make it look more streamlined.)

 

Point 3: In the sentence and recover DNA and RNA, would it be better to replace the recover with a extract.

 

Point 4: The the two categories described in the 4.1 Association of Immune Genes Polymorphisms with Inflammatory Reproductive Disorders section needs to specifically describe those two categories.

 

Point 5: In part 4.2. Immune Markers Gene Expression Profile of the manuscript, the author proposed using SNP genetic markers and gene expression to study gene polymorphism, but in the whole manuscript, it only showed that the expression of these genes was higher in buffaloes with inflammatory reproductive disorders, which had no obvious relationship with polymorphism.

 

Point 6: The format of manuscripts and references needs to be revised in detail according to the requirements of the journal.

 

  • The entire manuscript needs to be examined and slightly revised.

Author Response

Reviewer 1

 

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Comments to the Author:

Comment

Postnatal inflammatory diseases of buffalo reduce conception rate and age of buffalo and have a detrimental effect on the economic yield of herd farming. In this manuscript, the authors used PCR-DNA sequencing to identify differences in the nucleotide sequences of immune genes between healthy buffalo and those with inflammatory reproductive disorders. When buffalo experienced inflammatory reproductive disorders, they were significantly more likely to express the genes examined. Therefore, these molecular changes may provide important information on the physiological relationships of various reproductive pathways. The author's analysis is very detailed. However, some issues need to be resolved before they are received.

Response

We thank reviewer for this positive comment.

Comment

Point 1: Each line should be labeled during the manuscript review process for ease of access, and this manuscript is not labeled with line numbers. 

Response

We are grateful to the reviewer for drawing it to our consideration. The manuscript is labeled with line numbers.

Comment

Point 2: The content of the “2.1 Dairy Buffaloes and Research Samples” part of the manuscript is more verbose and requires a more concise description. (For example, the authors described twice that the buffaloes used in the study could be divided into healthy and those with inflammatory reproductive problems, it is recommended to rewrite it and describe it only once to make it look more streamlined.)

Response

We are grateful to the reviewer for drawing it to our consideration. The sentence is rewritten and described once to make it look more streamlined.

Comment

Point 3: In the sentence “and recover DNA and RNA”, would it be better to replace the “recover” with a “extract”.

Response

We thank reviewer for this. The word recover is replaced by extract.

Comment

Point 4: The “the two categories” described in the “4.1 Association of Immune Genes Polymorphisms with Inflammatory Reproductive Disorders” section needs to specifically describe those two categories.

 Response

We are grateful to the reviewer for drawing it to our consideration. The two categories are specifically described.

Comment

Point 5: In part “4.2. Immune Markers’ Gene Expression Profile” of the manuscript, the author proposed “using SNP genetic markers and gene expression to study gene polymorphism”, but in the whole manuscript, it only showed that the expression of these genes was higher in buffaloes with inflammatory reproductive disorders, which had no obvious relationship with polymorphism.

Response

  • We thank reviewer for this. Concerning this sentence we mean that previous studies explored genetic polymorphisms using qualitative genetic markers (RFLP and DNA sequencing).
  • Our study utilized qualitative SNP genetic markers and quantitative gene expression to overcome the drawbacks of past studies. This is illustrated in the manuscript by adding the words qualitative and quantitative.
  • SNP as a genetic marker gives qualitative results (gene shape i.e. normal or mutated); however real time PCR is a quantitative (amount of mRNA that indicates amount of protein). In our investigation we combined the two approaches. As a result, in both healthy and affected by inflammatory reproductive illnesses buffaloes, the mechanisms of the examined gene regulation are well understood. Giving different results by real time PCR make the role of each studied marker in the susceptibility of economic diseases more obvious. There is not a guarantee that the two approaches give different results in the examined animals.
  • Some previous studies reported that DNA sequencing of some candidate genes gives monomorphic pattern between examined animals i.e. there are no single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between examined animals. This means the investigated genes is not a candidate gene for the trait of interest. The selected gene may give a monomorphic pattern in the DNA sequence; however, therefore, it could give different results using quantitative real time. We determined to use qualitative and quantitative approaches in our investigation.

Comment

Point 6: The format of manuscripts and references needs to be revised in detail according to the requirements of the journal.

Response

We are grateful to the reviewer for drawing it to our consideration. The format of manuscript and references is revised in detail according to the requirements of the journal.

Comment

Comments on the Quality of English Language

  • The entire manuscript needs to be examined and slightly revised.

Response

We are grateful to the reviewer for drawing it to our consideration. The entire manuscript is examined and slightly revised.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Kind Authors,

I have read your work with interest and attention and, while recognizing the validity of your work, I believe that a number of changes must be made before any publication.

You will find my instructions in the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer

Thank you very much for your interest and consideration. It is of great pleasure to receive your decision on our paper "DNA Polymorphisms and mRNA Levels of Immune Biomarkers as Candidates for Inflammatory Postpartum Disorders Susceptibility in Italian Buffaloes"

Please find our revised manuscript and the response to the reviewer comments. All comments were considered while revising this paper.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

I have carefully read the revised version of your article and I am satisfied with the changes made.

I just suggest you add the genome accession number to line 168

Back to TopTop