Next Article in Journal
Femoral Neck Thickness Index as an Indicator of Proximal Femur Bone Modeling
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Phytogenic Feed Supplement Containing Carvacrol and Limonene on Sheep Performance and Parasitological Status on a Hungarian Milking Sheep Farm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigating Polymorphisms and Expression Profile of Immune, Antioxidant, and Erythritol-Related Genes for Limiting Postparturient Endometritis in Holstein Cattle

1
Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Animal Histology and Anatomy, School of Veterinary Medicine, Badr University in Cairo (BUC), Cairo 11829, Egypt
3
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sadat City, Sadat City 32897, Egypt
4
Department of Biochemistry and Chemistry of Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Menofia University, Menofia 32951, Egypt
5
Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan 81528, Egypt
6
Department of Biology and Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Life Sciences King Michael I, 300645 Timisoara, Romania
7
Department of Development of Animal Wealth, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(6), 370; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10060370
Submission received: 16 April 2023 / Revised: 18 May 2023 / Accepted: 22 May 2023 / Published: 23 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research in Bovine Uterine Infection)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Different genetic loci have a significant impact on individual susceptibility to various bacterial infections, which may help to explain the unique phenotypic presentation of postpartum endometritis. Finding the genes and mutations that cause the variation in disease resistance could greatly improve the efficacy of breeding animals with innate disease resistance. Molecular genetic analyses of the immunological (TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, IL10, NCF4, and LITAF), antioxidant (ATOX1, GST, and OXSR1), and erythritol-related (TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1) genes comparing healthy and endometritis cows found differences in nucleotide sequence and transcript levels. This remark might indicate that healthy animals have their immune systems well controlled. These genes’ abundance in transcripts offers a possible source of postpartum uterine health markers.

Abstract

This study looked at genetic polymorphisms and transcript levels of immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related markers for postparturient endometritis prediction and tracking in Holstein dairy cows. One hundred and thirty female dairy cows (65 endometritis affected and 65 apparently healthy) were used. Nucleotide sequence variations between healthy and endometritis-affected cows were revealed using PCR-DNA sequencing for immune (TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, IL10, NCF4, and LITAF), antioxidant (ATOX1, GST, and OXSR1), and erythritol-related (TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1) genes. Chi-square investigation exposed a noteworthy variance amongst cow groups with and without endometritis in likelihood of dispersal of all distinguished nucleotide variants (p < 0.05). The IL10, ATOX1, and GST genes were expressed at substantially lower levels in endometritis-affected cows. Gene expression levels were considerably higher in endometritis-affected cows than in resistant ones for the genes TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, NCF4, LITAF, OXSR1, TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1. The sort of marker and vulnerability or resistance to endometritis had a significant impact on the transcript levels of the studied indicators. The outcomes might confirm the importance of nucleotide variants along with gene expression patterns as markers of postparturient endometritis susceptibility/resistance and provide a workable control plan for Holstein dairy cows.

1. Introduction

The three weeks before and after parturition, or the periparturient phase, are when an animal experiences the largest alterations to its endocrine system [1]. These changes are significantly more pronounced than they are at any other time during the lactation–gestation cycle [2]. Because of the decreased feed intake, endocrine, and metabolic fluctuations after parturition, the postpartum period is the most worrying time [3]. It is also frequently accompanied by a number of physiological stresses that have an immunological source. Given that nearly 75% of diseases in adult dairy cows normally manifest within the first month following delivery [4], the first 10 days following calving are when the overall number of diseases—including mastitis, ketosis, endometritis, digestive problems, and lameness—is most likely to develop [5]. According to some theories, periparturient diseases in dairy cows are brought on by an imbalance between the body’s insufficient antioxidant protection and amplified synthesis of lipid peroxides and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [6].
Bos taurus and chiefly dairy cattle are disposed to uterine infection and illness post-delivery [7]. Uterine involution, which is marked by the exclusion of bacterial infection and rejuvenation of the endometrial tissue, is crucial for recurring uterine receptiveness and founding conception in postpartum dairy cows [8]. Cows can battle to quickly eliminate uterine infections due to unfortunate immune response [9]. This is connected to an ongoing inflammatory response in endometrial tissue, which is where endometritis originates [10]. In the period after parturition, dairy cows are liable to bacterial uterus infections [11]. Since a variety of bacteria may be easily isolated from the uterine lumen, it is believed that bacterial infections are the chief origin of the majority of uterine diseases [7,12]. Due to poor inflammation activation and bacterial clearance, endometritis has also been linked to augmented levels of proinflammatory cytokine transcripts [13]. In dairy cattle, uterine disorders (UD) are very common and cause noteworthy economic losses [14]. Metritis (MET), an acute inflammatory disorder distressing all layers of the uterine wall within 21 to 50 days following delivery, is estimated to cost USD 350 per case by Overton and Fetrow [15].
Marker-aided selection (MAS) is a method for identifying genetic variables that influence susceptibility to common diseases [16,17]. In the era of genomic selection, the implementation of selection approaches for novel functional qualities, such as disease resistance, is made possible by large cow training sets merging phenotypes with high-throughput genomic SNP indicator information [18]. The term “transcriptome” denotes is the full range of messenger RNA, or mRNA, molecules expressed by an organism [19]. It is frequently used to immunological monitoring in inflammatory disorders to locate pathogenic, diagnostic, and prognostic indications. It is essential for discovering new therapeutic or diagnostic targets [20,21]. Antibiotic residues and preventive medications are no longer desirable due to rising disease resistance [22]. The answer to low-cost and effective control of these diseases is to take advantage of host genetic resistance because it is not constrained by these drawbacks in the broadest sense [23]. Unfortunately, numerous gene loci need to be found and specified in order to effectively manage these illnesses [24].
Several regulatory enzymes of the intermediary metabolism have variable gene expression, which can offer helpful methods for enhancing genetic selection for cattle adaptation to adverse environments [25]. Because there is an excess of erythritol in the tissues of bovine fetuses, most bacteria have the unusual facility to catabolize erythritol, which has been linked to their pathogenicity [26]. Since erythritol was identified as the cause of B. abortus localization in the placenta of pregnant cows, it has been assumed that erythritol contributes to Brucella pathogenicity [26]. Ribose 5-phosphate isomerase A (RPIA) and transketolase (TKT), which are involved in glycerol metabolism and boosting erythritol manufacture, were co-overexpressed and significantly augmented erythritol development [27]. The AMP deaminase-encoding gene (AMPD) is advantageous for erythritol production and governs carbon fluidities in glycolysis and the TCA cycle [28]. The relationship between erythritol-related genes and endometritis susceptibility in Holstein dairy cows has not been extensively studied previously. Diagnoses and management of complex disorders under a multigenic regulator are more challenging than those under a unigenic one [29]. Numerous candidate gene variations and anonymous markers are searched for connections with disease resistance in order to identify disease-resistance indicators. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) are then mapped [30]. Only modest progress has been made in determining the molecular genetic roots of endometritis in animals [31,32]. This study used PCR-DNA sequencing and real-time PCR to examine potential immune (TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, IL10, NCF4, and LITAF), antioxidant (ATOX1, GST, and OXSR1), and erythritol-related (TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1) gene efficacy as candidates for prediction and tracking endometritis resistance/susceptibility in postparturient Holstein dairy cows.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Dairy Cows and Research Samples

This research used Holstein dairy cows (n = 130) reared on a private farm in the area of Ismailia, Egypt, of which 65 were endometritis-affected and 65 appeared to be in good health. All cows were inspected by the same veterinarian each day. The endometritis cows were selected based on body temperature and physical examination findings during postparturient period (40 to 60 days postpartum), with close consideration to body temperature. The animals were examined and findings (body temperature, pulse, respiration rate, mucous membranes, and vaginal discharge) recorded [33]. The first group involved clinically well-fitted cows that had had a usual calving and standard postpartum stage (i.e., customary feed consumption, body temperature, no uterine discharge). The second group included cows indicating endometritis (pyrexia, tenacious-colored uterine discharge with offensive odor, anorexia, depression).
The cows, in their third lactation season, were raised in a commercial dairy herd of roughly 500 animals. Cows normally weighed 470 kg and were 5 years old. The livestock were kept in a cubicle (free-stall/feedlot) barn that featured straw-lined stalls, a slatted floor that was habitually scraped, a total mixed ration (TMR), twice-daily milking, and artificial insemination. The jugular vein of every cow was punctured to attain five milliliters of blood. In order to recover DNA and RNA, the samples were positioned into tubes filled with anticoagulants in a vacuum to acquire whole blood (EDTA or sodium fluoride). All animal management procedures, tested trial gathering, and sample discarding were carried out underneath the supervision of the University of Sadat City’s Veterinary Medical School in accordance with IACUC guidelines (code VUSC-015-1-23).

2.2. Isolation and Amplifying DNA

By means of the genetic material JET entire blood genomic DNA isolation kit and the manufacturer’s guidelines, total blood was used to retrieve the genome’s DNA (Thermo scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania). DNA with a high degree of purity and concentration was examined using Nanodrop. Immune (TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, IL10, NCF4, and LITAF), antioxidant (ATOX1, GST, and OXSR1), and erythritol-related (TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1) genes were amplified. The Bos taurus genome accessible in PubMed was employed to create the oligonucleotide sequences for amplification. Table 1 contains a list of the primers used during the PCR.
A heat cycler with a 150 mL final bulk was used to process the polymerase chain amplification mixture. Each reaction container contained the following components: 66 μL d.d. water, genetic material with 6 microliters, each matching primer with 1.5 microliters, and of master mixture with 75 microliters (Jena Bioscience, Jena, Germany). At a beginning 95 °C for unwinding temperature, the PCR combinations stayed spent four minutes. The 35-cycles included 95 °C denaturation cycles lasting one minute each, annealing cycles lasting one minute at the temps listed in Table 1, 30 s rounds for elongation at 72 °C; ten additional minutes of extending occurred at 72 °C. The materials were saved at 4 °C. A gel certification system was employed to find demonstrative PCR findings using agarose gel electrophoresis and to view PCR segment patterns under UV light.

2.3. Finding Polymorphism

Prior to DNA sequencing, Jena Bioscience # pp-201s/Munich, Hamburg, Germany, offered tools for purifying PCR and eliminating primer dimmers, nonspecific bands, and other contaminants, producing the intended amplified product of the predicted scope [34]. To measure PCR output, satisfactory quality and good concentrations were achieved by employing a Nanodrop (Waltham, MA, USA, UV-Vis spectrometer Q5000) [35]. Healthy alongside endometritis-affected cows were used to search for SNPs using sequencing of the amplified products containing the actual PCR result. The PCR yields were sequenced on an ABI 3730XL DNA sequencer (United States: Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) operating the Sanger et al. [36]-described enzyme chain terminator method.
The software programs Chromas 1.45 and BLAST 2.0 were used for examining the DNA analysis outcomes [37]. Polymorphisms were identified when comparing the immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related gene products produced using PCR to the reference gene sequences obtained from GenBank. Relying on the sequence matching amongst the dairy cows, the MEGA4 tool has the ability to recognize dissimilarities in the examined genes’ amino acid sequences [38].

2.4. Transcript Levels of Immune, Antioxidant and Erythritol Related Genes

Following the manufacturer’s guidelines, the whole RNA was extracted from the blood samples taken from the investigated dairy cows using the Trizol solution (RNeasy Mini Ki, 74104, Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands, 74004). Using a NanoDrop® ND-1000 spectrophotometer, we quantified and confirmed the amount of the extracted RNA. The producer’s technique was utilized for producing the complementary nucleic acid for every sample (Waltham, MA, USA: Thermo Fisher, product no. EP0441). SYBR Green PCR Master Mix and quantifiable RT-PCR were employed to evaluate the expression profiles of immune (TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, IL10, NCF4, and LITAF), antioxidant (ATOX1, GST, and OXSR1), and erythritol-related (TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1) genes (2x SensiFastTM SYBR, Bio-line, CAT No: Bio-98002). The SYBR Green PCR Master Mix was exploited for calculating comparative amount possessed by the mRNA (Toronto, ON, Canada: Quantitect SYBR green PCR reagent, catalog no. 204141).
The sequences for sense as well as antisense primers were created using the Bos taurus genome found in PubMed (Table 2). The ß. actin gene served as the constitutive normalization reference. Overall RNA with 25 microliters, 1 microliter of every matching primer, 8 microliters of water without nuclease, 0.5 microliters of reverse transcriptase, 12.5 microliters of Quantitect SYBR green reaction master solution, and 3 microliters of Trans Amp buffer made up the PCR combination. The finished reaction mixture then underwent the following steps inside a heater cycler: inverse transcription for 30 min at 55 °C; preliminary denaturation aimed at 8 min at 95 °C; 40 cycles at 95 °C aimed at 15 s and the primer binding temperatures specified throughout Table 2; and extending aimed at 1 min at 72 °C. A melting curve investigation was employed subsequent to the amplifying step for proving specificity of the amplified product. By comparing each gene’s expression in the analyzed sample to that of the ß. Actin gene, the 2−ΔΔCt scheme was exploited for considering the differences in the expression of each gene [39,40].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Ho: 
Polymorphisms and expression profile of immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related genes could not limit postparturient endometritis in Holstein cattle.
HA: 
Polymorphisms and expression profile of immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related genes limited postparturient endometritis in Holstein cattle.
The substantial differences in the discovered genes’ SNPs between the examined cows were found using a chi-square analysis. A statistical investigation was exploited for this reason using the GraphPad statistical program (p < 0.05). The t-test and form 17 of the statistical software set Statistical Program for Social Science (SPSS) was exploited for judging if it was present a statistically noteworthy variance between healthy and endometritis-affected cows. Mean and standard error (mean ± SE) were used to present the findings. The significance of the variations was assessed using p < 0.05. The investigated immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related genes’ transcript levels served as an unchanging factor for designating healthy and endometritis-affected cows as the reliant factor, and significance of the numerous influences was judged using a distinguishable investigation model. To differentiate between endometritis-affected and healthy cows, the transcript quantities of indicators undergoing examination were utilized. A two-way ANOVA and a univariate general linear model (GLM) were used for investigating the relationship between two variables (indicator kind alongside endometritis incidence) and how it impacts transcript levels.

3. Results

3.1. Genetic Polymorphisms of Immune, Antioxidant, and Erythritol-Related Genes

The PCR-DNA sequence verdicts of healthy and affected dairy cows revealed differences in the SNPs in the amplified DNA bases related to endometritis for the TLR4 (528-bp), TLR7 (420-bp), TNF-α (551-bp), IL10 (571-bp), NCF4 (865-bp), LITAF (644-bp), ATOX1 (450-bp), GST (480-bp), OXSR1 (525-bp), TKT (456-bp), RPIA (390-bp), and AMPD1 (502-bp) genes. All the discovered SNPs were approved using the DNA sequence differences between immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related markers investigated in the researched cows and the reference gene sequences obtained from GenBank (Figures S1–S12). The healthy and endometritis-affected cows exhibited noticeably altered incidences of the studied markers, as determined using the SNPs’ chi-square analysis (p < 0.05) (Table 3). The exonic region changes shown in Table 1 were present in all of the immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related markers under investigation, causing coding DNA sequence alterations in the affected cows compared to healthy ones.

3.2. Patterns for Transcript Levels of Immune, Antioxidant, and Erythritol-Related Indicators

In Figure 1, the transcript profiles for the assessed immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related indicators are displayed. The IL10, ATOX1, and GST genes were expressed at substantially lower levels in endometritis-affected cows. Gene expression levels were considerably higher in endometritis-affected cows than in resistant ones for the genes TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, NCF4, LITAF, OXSR1, TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1.
The sort of indicator and vulnerability or resistance to endometritis had a significant impact on the mRNA concentrations of the indicators being studied. For each gene examined in the endometritis-affected cows, TLR4 had the highest potential mRNA level (2.51 ± 0.11); IL10 had the lowest potential level (0.31 ± 0.06). In the healthy cows, GST had the highest potential amount of mRNA (1.87 ± 0.11), while NCF4 had the lowest (0.39 ± 0.08).

4. Discussion

A better understanding of the genes, underlying mutations, and interactions with other factors that impart resistance is warranted in order to produce disease-resistant livestock or eradicate diseases [23]. The immune (TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, IL10, NCF4, and LITAF), antioxidant (ATOX1, GST, and OXSR1), and erythritol-related (TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1) genes in endometritis-affected and healthy Holstein dairy cows were characterized in this research using a PCR-DNA sequencing technique. The findings show that the SNPs involving both categories vary. The chi-square study revealed that nucleotide polymorphism dispersion amongst the inspected calves was significant (p < 0.05). It is important to emphasize that the polymorphisms found and made available in this context provide additional data for the evaluated indicators when compared to the corresponding datasets acquired from GenBank.
There have been recent studies targeting novel genes specific to livestock endometritis susceptibility using genome-wide association analysis [32,41], but up to this point, no studies have examined the link between the SNPs in these genes and endometritis risk. The European cow (Bos taurus) gene sequences used in our study, which were reported in PubMed, are the first to demonstrate this association. According to our knowledge, there has not been any prior research on the variation of the immune (TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, IL10, NCF4, and LITAF), antioxidant (ATOX1, GST, and OXSR1), and erythritol-related (TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1) markers and how they relate to postparturient endometritis in Holstein dairy cows. The candidate gene method, however, was employed to keep track of the soundness of endometritis-affected livestock. For example, endometritis and CXCR1 SNPs have been linked in Holstein dairy cows [42]. In dairy cattle, uterine infection was linked to lactoferrin (LTF) gene polymorphism [43]. There has also been evidence linking the beta defensin gene polymorphism and clinical endometritis in dairy cows [44]. SNPs in the TLR4 and TLR2 genes and endometritis tolerance in buffalo have been elaborated [45,46].
The term “transcriptome” states that the genome’s complete set of genes that are reliably and efficiently expressed in various physiological and pathological conditions [19]. It is frequently used in inflammatory diseases to evaluate the immune system to identify pathogenic, diagnostic, and prognostic signatures, and has been helpful in the finding of novel therapeutic or diagnostic targets [47]. Through measuring the mRNA levels of immune (TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, IL10, NCF4, and LITAF), antioxidant (ATOX1, GST, and OXSR1), and erythritol-related (TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1) genes, we examined the changes in the immune, redox, and erythritol metabolic state in postparturient endometritis-affected Holstein dairy cows compared with healthy ones. The IL10, ATOX1, and GST genes were expressed at significantly lower amounts in endometritis-affected cows according to the molecular changes. The expression levels of the genes TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, NCF4, LITAF, OXSR1, TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1 were significantly greater in endometritis-affected Holstein dairy cows than in resistant ones. Gene expression as well as genomic SNP markers were employed to evaluate genetic polymorphisms in order to address the limitations of earlier studies. The mechanisms that were investigated to regulate the immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related indicators in both healthy and endometritis-affected cows are thus widely acknowledged. This is the first study to fully analyze the transcript levels of the immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related indicators linked to the hazard of bovine endometritis. Consequently, qualitative and quantitative differences in the investigated genes’ expression precede the development of bovine uterine disease.
Greater relative quantities of mRNA for the IL1A, IL6, IL17A, TNF, PGES, and PGHS2 genes were found in primiparous Holstein cows postpartum when compared to healthy cows [48]. Additionally, C3, C2, LTF, PF4, and TRAPPC13 had unique mRNA expression patterns in the blood and endometrial tissue of dairy cows with subclinical endometritis [49]. In contrast to control cows, cows with clinical and subclinical endometritis displayed a significant change in the mRNA expression of uterus-associated proinflammatory markers, according to Pothmann et al. [50]. In the endometrium of repeat breeding cows with and without subclinical endometritis, there were significantly more transcript levels of tumor necrosis factor and inducible nitric oxide synthase [51]. Three examined cytokines, including IL-1, IL-1β, and IL-6, were found to have increased gene expression in buffaloes with endometritis compared to healthy animals [52].
Innate immune systems, particularly Toll-like receptors and antimicrobial peptides, are vital for the endometrium’s first defense in contradiction of microorganisms [31,53]. Ten members of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family are generally encoded in the mammalian genome, and they find pathogen-associated molecular forms [54]. TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 recognize nucleic acids and frequently from viruses, whereas TLR1, TLR2, and TLR6 distinguish bacterial lipids such as lipoteichoic acid (LTA) [31]. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli is known by TLR4 [55]. TLR9 also categorizes bacterial DNA, and TLR5 binds bacterial flagellin [31]. The NOD1 and NOD2 receptors, which bind nucleotides, are used to detect bacteria that have entered host cells [31]. When TLRs are activated, proinflammatory mediators are formed, which then drive the immune response to rest the extent of the infections and eradicate them from the tissues [56]. To assist in removal of the pathogenic bacteria, for instance, TNF motivates the formation of antimicrobial peptides [57].
The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 inhibits the production of natural killer cells IL-1 and TNF by macrophages, as well as IFN- and IL-2 by Th1 lymphocytes [58,59]. It has been demonstrated that IL-10 is formed by a diversity of T-cells and has anti-inflammatory possessions to defend uterine tissues from extremely virulent action of inflammatory cells and mediators through its interface with controlling suppressor T CD8+ cells, which could clarify its significant upsurge in uterine washings of cows with subclinical endometritis [60]. However, IL-10 has been shown to be the cause of inflammation, persistent post-partum infection, and damage to uterine local resistance [61]. The innate immunity gene neutrophil cytosolic factor 4 (NCF4) appears to be relevant and to be involved in the development of mastitis in cattle [62,63]. Lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF factor (LITAF) is a new protein that binds to a crucial area of the TNF promoter and is said to be responsible for activating TNF-α expression after LPS stimulation [64,65]. It has been proven that using the SNP in the LITAF gene in marker-assisted selection may increase chickens’ resistance to Salmonella enteritidis [66].
Oxidative stress markers have been linked to metabolic complications in recent years, especially in dairy cows where the peripartum period placed high loads on the body’s homeostatic routes [67]. According to research, the peripartum period’s antioxidant capability is insufficient to counteract the intensification in ROS [68]. As a result, the imbalance between increased ROS manufacture and decreased antioxidant fortifications close to parturition endorses oxidative stress and may be an issue in periparturient diseases in dairy cows [69]. Antioxidants protect by scavenging or detoxifying ROS, blocking their manufacturing, or sequestering transition metals that are the basis of free radicals [70]. Such mechanisms comprise both enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant resistances formed within the body, known as endogenous antioxidant indicators as glutathione S transferase (GST) [71]. The ATOX1 gene produces the copper metallochaperone protein recognized as ATOX1 [72]. ATOX1 guarded against reactive oxygen species in cells. As it transfers copper from the cytosol to transporters ATP7A and ATP7B, ATOX1 is essential for keeping copper homeostasis [73]. Serine/threonine protein kinase (OSR1) is encoded by the oxidative stress-responsive kinase 1 (OXSR1) gene, and it governs downstream kinases in reaction to environmental stressors [74]. When compared to the time at calving, the expression profile of OXSR1 throughout the periparturient period exhibited a considerable up-regulation at (14) and (+14), with the lowest form seen at calving in dromedary camels [75].
Our study is the first to identify nucleotide sequence variations and the expression profile of genes related to erythritol in healthy Holstein dairy cows and those infected with endometritis. Our findings show that infected cows had higher mRNA values of TKT, RPIA, and AMPD than healthy ones. It has been established that erythritol has a reinforcing possible role in microbial virulence [76]; therefore, we utilized the genetic resistance to bovine endometritis found in the TKT, RPIA, and AMPD genes.
Multi-pathogen bacterial infections of the vaginal tract develop in dairy cattle following urination [7]. To remove pathogens from the uterus during bacterial infection, immune cells and endometrial cells provide a local immunological reaction [77]. A bacterial infection of the endometrium causes the production of chemokines and cytokines, which activates an inflammatory response. Leucocyte recruitment during inflammation has been reported to be interceded by inflammatory cytokines and complement fragments [78]. Endometritis is also characterized by unchecked extended inflammation linked to tissue damage, which causes the release of molecular forms accompanying injury, further aggravating inflammation and guaranteeing its perseverance [32]. Afterwards, oxidative stress is brought on by the extreme gathering of ROS [79]. These modifications are also associated with increased expression of molecules involved in LPS signaling, tissue remodeling, and acute phase response [49]. The aforementioned reasons could account for the significant amendment in the expression configuration of immune (TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, IL10, NCF4, and LITAF), antioxidant (ATOX1, GST, and OXSR1), and erythritol-related (TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1) indicators in endometritis-affected cows. Thus, we assume that an infectious etiology is to blame for the bovine endometritis in the study’s cows. The endometritis-affected cows were exhibiting a substantial inflammatory response, as shown by our real-time PCR data. Gene expression disruption can be used to characterize the common pathological processes, whereas normal gene expression controls the bulk of physiological mechanisms [80,81]. Therefore, researching and classifying the genes that cause a phenotype should be possible through investigation of gene transcript level and the related molecular pathways.

5. Conclusions

Single nucleotide variants (SNPs) in the genes were discovered using PCR-DNA sequencing for immune (TLR4, TLR7, TNF-α, IL10, NCF4, and LITAF), antioxidant (ATOX1, GST, and OXSR1), and erythritol-related (TKT, RPIA, and AMPD1) genes found in resistant and endometritis-infected Holstein dairy cows. Additionally, healthy and affected cows showed differences in these markers’ mRNA amounts. By employing genetic markers accompanying natural resistance during cattle selection, these unique functional variants offer a promising chance to reduce bovine endometritis. Cows’ varying gene expression patterns for resistance and susceptibility to endometritis could function as guidance as well as an indicator for gauging their wellbeing. Forthcoming approaches to treating endometritis can be easily completed using the gene domains found here.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci10060370/s1, Figure S1: Assessment of healthy and endometritis-affected dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|KX138607.1| and TLR4 marker (528-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA. Figure S2: Assessment of healthy and endometritis-affected dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|EF583900.1| and TLR7 marker (420-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA. Figure S3: Assessment of healthy and endometritis-affected dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|NM_173966.1| and TNF-α marker (551-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA. Figure S4: Assessment of healthy and endometritis-affected dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|NM_174088.1| and IL10 marker (571-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA. Figure S5: Assessment of healthy and endometritis dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|NM_00145983.1| and NCF4 marker (865-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA. Figure S6: Assessment of healthy and endometritis-affected dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|NM_001046252.2| and LITAF marker (644-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA. Figure S7: Assessment of healthy and endometritis-affected dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|XM_005209648.4| and ATOX1 marker (450-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA. Figure S8: Assessment of healthy and endometritis-affected dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|X61233.1| and GST marker (480-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA. Figure S9: Assessment of healthy and endometritis-affected dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|NM_001075892.2| and OXSR1 marker (525-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA. Figure S10: Assessment of healthy and endometritis-affected dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|NM_001003906.1| and TKT marker (456-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA. Figure S11: Assessment of healthy and endometritis-affected dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|NM_001035433.2| and RPIA marker (390-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA. Figure S12: Assessment of healthy and endometritis-affected dairy cows with sequences derived from GenBank gb|NM_001100349.1| and AMPD1 marker (502-bp), indicating nitrogenous bases matching for DNA.

Author Contributions

The experimentation was developed, the PCR completed, and the paper written by A.A. and M.A.-S. performed DNA sequencing and contributed to the writing of the paper. Contributions were made to the planning of the manuscript and data analyses by M.A., O.E.S., E.M.A.E.-N., L.F. and I.B.-D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Research Institute for Biosecurity and Bioengineering from Timisoara and the University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara collaborated on the project 6PFE that resulted in the publication of this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal management procedures, tested trial gathering, and sample discarding were carried out underneath the supervision of the University of Sadat City’s Veterinary Medical School in accordance with IACUC guidelines (code VUSC-015-1-23).

Informed Consent Statement

All dairy farmers provided their knowledgeable agreement to contribute to the investigation.

Data Availability Statement

Upon reasonable request, the supporting information for the study’s findings will be provided by the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the staff at the Development of Animal Wealth department of Mansoura University’s, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Morgante, M.; Gianesella, M.; Casella, S.; Stelletta, C.; Cannizzo, C.; Giudice, E.; Piccione, G. Response to glucose infusion in pregnant and nonpregnant ewes: Changes in plasma glucose and insulin concentrations. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 2012, 21, 961–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Grummer, R.R.; Mashek, D.G.; Hayirli, A. Dry matter intake and energy balance in the transition period. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2004, 20, 447–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Elshahawy, I.E.; Abdullaziz, I.A. Hemato-biochemical profiling in relation to metabolic disorders in transition dairy cows. AJVS 2017, 55, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  4. LeBlanc, S.J.; Lissemore, K.D.; Kelton, D.F.; Duffield, T.F.; Leslie, K.E. Major advances in disease prevention in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 1267–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ingvartsen, K.L.; Andersen, J.B. Symposium: Dry matter intake of lactating dairy cattle. Integration of metabolism and intake regulation: A review focusing on periparturient animals. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83, 1573–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Riveros, J.L.; Urquieta, B.; Bonacic, C.; Hoffmann, B.; Bas, F.; Schuler, G. Endocrine changes during pregnancy, parturition and post-partum in Guanacos (Lama guanicoe). Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 116, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sheldon, I.M.; Williams, E.J.; Miller, A.N.; Nash, D.M.; Herath, S. Uterine diseases in cattle after parturition. Vet. J. 2008, 176, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Del Vecchio, R.P.; Matsas, D.J.; Fortin, S.; Sponenberg, D.P.; Lewis, G.S. Spontaneous uterine infections are associated with elevated prostaglandin F2α metabolite concentrations in postpartum dairy cows. Theriogenology 1994, 41, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dohmen, M.J.; Joop, K.; Sturk, A.; Bols, P.E.; Lohuis, J.A. Relationship between intra-uterine bacterial contamination, endotoxin levels and the development of endometritis in postpartum cows with dystocia or retained placenta. Theriogenology 2000, 54, 1019–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Donnez, J.; Cacciottola, L. Endometriosis: An Inflammatory Disease That Requires New Therapeutic Options. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Donofrio, G.; Ravaneti, L.; Cavirani, S.; Herath, S.; Capocefalo, A.; Sheldon, I.M. Bacterial infection of endometrial stromal cells influences bovine herpesvirus 4 immediate early gene activation: A new insight into bacterial and viral interaction for uterine disease. Reproduction 2008, 136, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Williams, E.J.; Fischer, D.P.; Noakes, D.E.; England, G.C.; Rycroft, A.; Dobson, H.; Sheldon, I.M. The relationship between uterine pathogen growth density and ovarian function in the postpartum dairy cow. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Buzzaccarini, G.; Vitagliano, A.; Andrisani, A.; Santarsiero, C.M.; Cicinelli, R.; Nardelli, C.; Ambrosini, G.; Cicinelli, E. Chronic endometritis and altered embryo implantation: A unified pathophysiological theory from a literature systematic review. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2020, 37, 2897–2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liang, D.; Arnold, L.M.; Stowe, C.J.; Harmon, R.J.; Bewley, J.M. Estimating US dairy clinical disease costs with a stochastic simulation model. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 1472–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Overton, M.; Fetrow, J. Economics of Postpartum Uterine Health; Proc Dairy Cattle Reproduction Council: Omaha, NE, USA, 2008; pp. 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ashwell, M.S.; Rexroad Jr, C.E.; Miller, R.H.; Van Raden, P.M.; Da, Y. Detection of loci affecting milk production and health traits in an Elite US Holstein population using microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 1997, 28, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bishop, M.D.; Hawkins, G.A.; Keeler, C.L. Use of DNA markers in animal selection. Theriogenology 1995, 43, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Buch, L.H.; Kargo, M.; Berg, P.; Lassen, J.; Sørensen, A.C. The value of cows in reference populations for genomic selection of new functional traits. Animal. 2012, 6, 880–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kukurba, K.R.; Montgomery, S.B. RNA Sequencing and Analysis. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2015, 13, 951–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tang, F.; Lao, K.; Surani, M.A. Development and applications of single-cell transcriptome analysis. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Banchereau, R.; Cepika, A.M.; Banchereau, J.; Pascual, V. Understanding human autoimmunity and autoinflammation through transcriptomics. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 35, 337–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Davies, J.; Davies, D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010, 74, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pal, A.; Chakravarty, A.K. Disease resistance for different livestock species. In Genetics and Breeding for Disease Resistance of Livestock; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 271–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bishop, S.C.; Woolliams, J.A. Genomics and disease resistance studies in livestock. Livest. Sci. 2014, 166, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. van Harten, S.; Brito, R.; Almeida, A.M.; Scanlon, T.; Kilminster, T.; Milton, J.; Greeff, J.; Oldham, C.; Cardoso, L.A. Gene expression of regulatory enzymes involved in the intermediate metabolism of sheep subjected to feed restriction. Animals 2013, 7, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rodríguez, M.C.; Viadas, C.; Seoane, A.; Sangari, F.J.; López-Goñi, I.; García-Lobo, J.M. Evaluation of the effects of erythritol on gene expression in Brucella abortus. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sawada, K.; Taki, A.; Yamakawa, T.; Seki, M. Key role for transketolase activity in erythritol production by Trichosporonoides megachiliensis SN-G42. J. Biosci Bioeng. 2009, 108, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, L.; Nie, M.Y.; Liu, F.; Chen, J.; Wei, L.J.; Hua, Q. Multiple gene integration to promote erythritol production on glycerol in Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Lett. 2021, 43, 1277–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ibeagha-Awemu, E.M.; Kgwatalala, P.; Ibeagha, A.E.; Zhao, X. A critical analysis of disease-associated DNA polymorphisms in the genes of cattle, goat, sheep, and pig. Mamm. Genome. 2008, 19, 226–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Islam, M.A.; Rony, S.A.; Rahman, M.B.; Cinar, M.U.; Villena, J.; Uddin, M.J.; Kitazawa, H. Improvement of disease resistance in livestock: Application of immunogenomics and CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Animals 2020, 10, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Davies, D.; Meade, K.G.; Herath, S.; Eckersall, P.D.; Gonzalez, D.; White, J.O.; Conlan, R.S.; O’Farrelly, C.; Sheldon, I.M. Toll-like receptor and antimicrobial peptide expression in the bovine endometrium. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2008, 6, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pereira, G.; Guo, Y.; Silva, E.; Silva, M.F.; Bevilacqua, C.; Charpigny, G.; Lopes-da-Costa, L.; Humblot, P. Subclinical endometritis differentially affects the transcriptomic profiles of endometrial glandular, luminal, and stromal cells of postpartum dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 6125–6143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Okawa, H.; Fujikura, A.; Wijayagunawardane, M.M.P.; Vos, P.L.A.M.; Taniguchi, M.; Takagi, M. Effect of diagnosis and treatment of clinical endometritis based on vaginal discharge score grading system in postpartum Holstein cows. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2017, 79, 1545–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Boom, R.; Sol, C.J.; Salimans, M.M.; Jansen, C.L.; Wertheim-van Dillen, P.M.; Noordaa, J.V.D. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990, 28, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Boesenberg-Smith, K.A.; Pessarakli, M.M.; Wolk, D.M. Assessment of DNA yield and purity: An overlooked detail of PCR troubleshooting. Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 2012, 34, 1+3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sanger, F.; Nicklen, S.; Coulson, A.R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 5463–5467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tamura, K.; Dudley, J.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1596–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−∆∆CT. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pfaffl, M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. May, K.; Sames, L.; Scheper, C.; König, S. Genomic loci and genetic parameters for uterine diseases in first-parity Holstein cows and associations with milk production and fertility. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 105, 509–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Asadpour, R.; Feyzi, L.; Jafari-Joozani, R.; Hamali, H.; Abolfazl Hajibemani, A.; Firouzamandi, M. The relationship between polymorphism of the CXCR1 gene and the risk of endometritis in Holstein dairy cows. Vet. Arh. 2020, 90, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hajibemani, A.; Sharifiyazdi, H.; Mirzaei, A.; Ghasrodashti, A.R. Characterization of single nucleotide polymorphism in the 5’-untranslated region (5’-UTR) of Lactoferrin gene and its association with reproductive parameters and uterine infection in dairy cattle. Vet. Res. Forum. 2012, 3, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Goroohi, Z.; Sharifiyazdi, H.; Mirzaei, A. Association between beta defensin gene polymorphism and clinical endometritis in dairy cows. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 2019, 28, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Osman, N.M.; Mossallam, A.A.; El Seedy, F.R.; Mahfouz, E.R. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in TLR4 gene and endometritis resistance in river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). JJBS 2018, 11, 577–583. [Google Scholar]
  46. Abou Mossallam, A.A.; Osman, N.M.; Othman, O.E.; Mahfouz, E.R. Polymorphism evaluation of TLR2 gene associated with endometritis infection in buffalo reared in Egypt. BJI 2022, 26, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Burel, J.G.; Babor, M.; Pomaznoy, M.; Lindestam Arlehamn, C.S.; Khan, N.; Sette, A.; Peters, B. Host rranscriptomics as a tool to identify diagnostic and mechanistic immune signatures of tuberculosis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 19, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Johnson, H.; Torres, C.G.; Carvallo, F.; Duchens, M.; Peralta, O.A. Endometrial expression of selected transcripts in postpartum of primiparous Holstein cows with clinical and subclinical endometritis. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2015, 156, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Raliou, M.; Dembélé, D.; Düvel, A.; Bolifraud, P.; Aubert, J.; Mary-Huard, T.; Rocha, D.; Piumi, F.; Mockly, S.; Heppelmann, M.; et al. Subclinical endometritis in dairy cattle is associated with distinct mRNA expression patterns in blood and endometrium. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pothmann, H.; Flick, P.; Tichy, A.; Gabler, C.; Drillich, M. Messenger RNA expression of selected factors at different sites of the bovine endometrium associated with uterine health. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 649758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Janowski, T.; Barański, W.; Łukasik, K.; Skarżyński, D.; Rudowska, M.; Zduńczyk, S. Prevalence of subclinical endometritis in repeat breeding cows and mRNA expression of tumor necrosis factor α and inducible nitric oxide synthase in the endometrium of repeat breeding cows with and without subclinical endometritis. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2013, 16, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Taha, A.A.; Mahfouz, E.R.; Bibars, M.A.; Hassan, N.A.; Othman, O.E. Cytokine genes expression in uteri of Bubalus bubalis associated with endometritis infection. Jordan J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 14, 245–251. [Google Scholar]
  53. Botos, I.; Segal, D.M.; Davies, D.R. The structural biology of Toll-like receptors. Structure 2011, 13, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fujita, M.; Into, T.; Yasuda, M.; Okusawa, T.; Hamahira, S.; Kuroki, Y.; Eto, A.; Nisizawa, T.; Morita, M.; Shibata, K.-I. Involvement of leucine residues at positions 107, 112, and 115 in a leucine-rich repeat motif of human Toll-like receptor 2 in the recognition of diacylated lipoproteins and lipopeptides and Staphylococcus aureus Peptidoglycans. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 3675–3683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. White, S.N.; Taylor, K.H.; Abbey, C.A.; Gill, C.A.; Womack, J.E. Haplotype variation in bovine Toll-like receptor 4 and computational prediction of a positively selected ligand-binding domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 10364–10369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vijay, K. Toll-like receptors in immunity and inflammatory diseases: Past, present, and future. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018, 59, 391–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Aslam, R.; Speck, E.R.; Kim, M.; Crow, A.R.; Bang, K.W.; Nestel, F.P.; Ni, H.; Lazarus, A.H.; Freedman, J.; Semple, J.W. Platelet Toll-like receptor expression modulates lipopolysaccharide-induced thrombocytopenia and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production in vivo. Blood 2006, 107, 637–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Martinez-Espinosa, I.; Serrato, J.A.; Ortiz-Quintero, B. Role of IL-10-producing natural killer cells in the regulatory mechanisms of inflammation during systemic infection. Biomolecules 2021, 21, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, Z.; Guan, D.; Huo, J.; Biswas, S.K.; Huang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Xu, S.; Lam, K.P. IL-10 enhances human natural killer cell effector functions via metabolic reprogramming regulated by mTORC1 signaling. Front. Immunol. 2021, 23, 619195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Iyer, S.S.; Cheng, G. Role of interleukin 10 transcriptional regulation in inflammation and autoimmune disease. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 32, 23–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Brodzki, P.; Kostro, K.; Krakowski, L.; Marczuk, J. Inflammatory cytokine and acute phase protein concentrations in the peripheral blood and uterine washings of cows with subclinical endometritis in the late postpartum period. Vet. Res. Commun. 2015, 39, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ju, Z.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Yang, C.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Wang, F.; Li, M.; Zhong, J.; Huang, J. Role of an SNP in alternative splicing of bovine NCF4 and mastitis susceptibility. PLoS ONE 2015, 24, e0143705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ju, Z.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Yang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Li, R.; Li, J.; Zhong, J.; et al. The effect of the SNP g.18475 A>G in the 3’UTR of NCF4 on mastitis susceptibility in dairy cattle. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2018, 23, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Verschoor, C.P.; Pant, S.D.; Schenkel, F.S.; Sharma, B.S.; Karrow, N.A. SNPs in the bovine IL-10 receptor are associated with somatic cell score in Canadian dairy bulls. Mamm. Genome 2009, 20, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Takashiba, S.; Van Dyke, T.E.; Shapira, L.; Amar, S. Lipopolysaccharide-inducible and salicylate-sensitive nuclear factor (s) on human tumor necrosis factor alpha promoter. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 1529–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Malek, M.; Hasenstein, J.; Lamont, S. Analysis of chicken TLR4, CD28, MIF, MD-2, and LITAF genes in a Salmonella enteritidis resource population. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bernabucci, U.; Ronchi, B.; Lacetera, N.; Nardone, A. Markers of oxidative status in plasma and erythrocytes of transition dairy cows during hot season. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 2173–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Duhig, K.; Chappell, L.C.; Shennan, A.H. Oxidative stress in pregnancy and reproduction. Obstet. Med. 2016, 9, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xiao, J.; Khan, M.Z.; Ma, Y.; Alugongo, G.M.; Ma, J.; Chen, T.; Khan, A.; Cao, Z. The antioxidant properties of selenium and vitamin E; their role in periparturient dairy cattle health regulation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Masella, R.; Di Benedetto, R.; Varì, R.; Filesi, C.; Giovannini, C. Novel mechanisms of natural antioxidant compounds in biological systems: Involvement of glutathione and glutathione-related enzymes. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2005, 16, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Glasauer, A.; Chandel, N.S. Targeting antioxidants for cancer therapy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 92, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Flores, A.G.; Unger, V.M. Atox1 contains positive residues that mediate membrane association and aid subsequent copper loading. J. Membr. Biol. 2013, 246, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Narindrasorasak, S.; Zhang, X.; Roberts, E.A.; Sarkar, B. Comparative analysis of metal binding characteristics of copper chaperone proteins, Atx1 and ATOX1. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2004, 2, 105–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Trevisan, M.; Browne, R.; Ram, P.; Muti, J.; Freudenheim, A.; Carosella, M.; Armstrong, D. Correlates of markers of oxidative status in the general population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001, 154, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ateya, A.; El-Sayed, A.; Mohamed, R. Gene expression and serum profile of antioxidant markers discriminate periparturient period time in dromedary camels. Mammal Res. 2021, 66, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sangari, F.J.; Agüero, J. Identification of Brucella abortus B19 vaccine strain by the detection of DNA polymorphism at the ery locus. Vaccine 1994, 12, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Agostinis, C.; Mangogna, A.; Bossi, F.; Ricci, G.; Kishore, U.; Bulla, R. Uterine immunity and microbiota: A shifting paradigm. Front. Immunol. 2019, 17, 2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Yockey, L.J.; Iwasaki, A. Interferons and proinflammatory cytokines in pregnancy and fetal development. Immunity 2018, 49, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pisani, L.F.; Lecchi, C.; Invernizzi, G.; Sartorelli, P.; Savoini, G.; Ceciliani, F. In vitro modulatory effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (EPA and DHA) on phagocytosis and ROS production of goat neutrophils. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2009, 131, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shi, H.R.; Huang, X.Y.; Yan, Z.Q.; Yang, Q.L.; Wang, P.F.; Li, S.G.; Sun, W.; Gun, S. Effect of Clostridium perfringens type C on TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway in piglet small intestines. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 135, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nathan, C.; Cunningham-Bussel, A. Beyond oxidative stress: An immunologist’s guide to reactive oxygen species. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Differential transcript levels of immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related genes between healthy (n = 65) and endometritis-affected (n = 65) dairy cows. The symbol * denotes significance when p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Differential transcript levels of immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related genes between healthy (n = 65) and endometritis-affected (n = 65) dairy cows. The symbol * denotes significance when p < 0.05.
Vetsci 10 00370 g001
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primer of immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related genes employed for genetic polymorphisms.
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primer of immune, antioxidant, and erythritol-related genes employed for genetic polymorphisms.
Investigated MarkerSenseAntisenseAnnealing Temperature (°C)Size of PCR Product (bp)Reference
TLR45′-AGAGACGACACTACAGTGCCTCG-3′5′-GAAGTCATTTAGAGAGACTAG-3′60528Current study
TLR75′-TTTTCCACAGCTCATCTCTTCA-3′5′-AAGGAGGCTGGAGAGATGCCTG-3′60420Current study
TNF-α5′-ACCAGCCAGGAGAGAGACAAGC-3′5′-GTCAGCAGGCACCACCAGCTGGT-3′62551Current study
IL105′-ATGCATAGCTCAGCACTACTCTG-3′5′-TCACCATCCTGGAGGTCTTCT-3′60571Current study
NCF45′-CCTGGGACCACAGCCTAAACGA-3′5′-CTTGATGGTGCTGATGGTGTCC-3′58865Current study
LITAF5′-CTTTCTATGAAGGGCTTTTTTC-3′5′-CACCCAATATACAGATTTTTGA-3′62644Current study
ATOX15′-GCTCCTGTGGCGTGCACACCCG-3′5′-TGGTGTGCAGGCCAAGACTTGG-3′60450Current study
GST5′-CGGCTCAGGCCGCCGCCGAGC-3′5′-TGGGACAGCAGGGTCTCGAAAG-3′58480Current study
OXSR15′-AGCGCCAGGCGCCGTCCGACC-3′5′-GAGTATTGTAGCGATGGTAGC-3′60525Current study
TKT5′-GCTGCTTGCAGCTCCGCAGCC-3′5′-GAGCCAGTGGCCACATCGGTGA-3′62456Current study
RPIA5′-CCACGTGCAGTTGCCGGGACGT-3′5′-TTGATGAGGTTGAGGTCAGCGTC-3′58390Current study
AMPD15′-CAGAGAGTGCAGATCACTGGC-3′5′-ACTCATCCATCTCGTTGAGCAT-3′60502Current study
TLR4 = Toll-like receptor 4; TLR7 = Toll-like receptor 7; TNF-α = tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL10 = interleukin 10; NCF4 = neutrophil cytosolic factor 4; LITAF = lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF factor; ATOX1 = antioxidant 1 copper chaperone; GST = glutathione S-transferase; OXSR1 = oxidative stress-responsive kinase 1; TKT = transketolase; RPIA = ribose 5-phosphate isomerase A; and AMPD1 = adenosine monophosphate deaminase 1.
Table 2. Oligonucleotide forward and reverse primers for immune, antioxidant and erythritol related genes under investigation used in real-time PCR.
Table 2. Oligonucleotide forward and reverse primers for immune, antioxidant and erythritol related genes under investigation used in real-time PCR.
Investigated MarkerPrimerProduct Size (bp)Annealing Temperature (°C)GenBank IsolateOrigin
TLR4F5′-CCTTGCGTACAGGTTGTTCC-3
R5′-GGCTGCCTAAATGTCTCAGGT-3′
13359MT424003.1 Current study
TLR7F5′-CCAAGGTGCTTTCCAGTTGC-3
R5′-ACCAGACAAACCACACAGCA-3′
16158NM_001033761.1 Current study
TNF-αF5′-AGAGACAAGCAGCTGCAGAAC-3′
R5′-GCAGGGTATGTGAGAGAGAGC-3′
9660NM_173966.3Current study
IL10F5′-GCACTACTCTGTTGCCTGGT-3′
R5′-AAGCTGTGCAGTTGGTCCTT-3′
17960NM_174088.1Current study
NCF4F5′-ATGAGGCGGGAGTTCCAGA-3′
R5′-CACCATGAGCTTCACGTCCT-3′
10258NM_001045983.1Current study
LITAFF5′-GCGGCGGTAAAATGTCTGTT-3′
R5′-TTGACAGCCACCGTCTCTTC-3′
10058NM_001046252.2Current study
ATOX1F5′-CAGGAAAGGCTGTCTCCTACC-3′
R5′-CCTAGATCTGTCTGGAGGGC-3′
11659NM_001130758.1Current study
GSTF5′-ACCAGTCCAATGCCATCCTG-3′
R5′-CAGCGAAGGTCCTCTACACC-3′
11560NM_177516.1Current study
OXSR1F5′-CGCAGAGTAGCAAAGAGGCG-3′
R5′-CGCAAACTCACTGACCTCTCT-3′
18759NM_001075892.2Current study
TKTF5′-TGCTGAGATCATGGCTGTCC-3′
R5′-CCGTCCAAGTCGGAGTTGAT-3′
19558NM_001003906.1Current study
RPIAF5′-GAAGTCGACGCTGACCTCAA-3′
R5′-GGCAATCACGATGAAGCGAC-3′
9959NM_001035433.2Current study
AMPD1F5′-TTCGTCCAAAACCGCGTCTA-3′
R5′-TGAGGGTTGATGGTGGCTTC-3′
15558NM_001100349.1Current study
ß. actinF5′-TCGTGATGGACTCCGGTGA-3′
R5′-TGTCACGGACGATTTCCGCTC-3′
18360AY141970.1Current study
TLR4 = Toll-like receptor 4; TLR7 = Toll-like receptor 7; TNF-α = tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL10 = interleukin 10; NCF4 = neutrophil cytosolic factor 4; LITAF = lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF factor; ATOX1 = antioxidant 1 copper chaperone; GST = glutathione S-transferase; OXSR1 = oxidative stress-responsive kinase 1; TKT = transketolase; RPIA = ribose 5-phosphate isomerase A; and AMPD1 = adenosine monophosphate deaminase 1.
Table 3. SNP distribution and kind of mutation for the genes under investigation in healthy and endometritis-affected Holstein cows.
Table 3. SNP distribution and kind of mutation for the genes under investigation in healthy and endometritis-affected Holstein cows.
GeneSNPsHealthy
n = 65
Endometritis
n = 65
Total
n = 130
Kind of Inherited ChangeAmino Acid Order and SortChi Scorep Value
TLR4T55C38-38/130Nonsynonymous19 Y to H60.95<0.0001
T171C29-29/130Synonymous57 S46.51<0.0001
G213A-4141/130Synonymous71 Q65.76<0.0001
G285T48-48/130Nonsynonymous95 L to F76.98<0.0001
C381T35-36/130Synonymous127 D57.74<0.0001
G400A28-28/130Nonsynonymous134 D to N44.91<0.0001
C491T-3737/130Nonsynonymous164 A to V59.34<0.0001
TLR7G56A42-42/130Nonsynonymous19 C to Y67.37<0.0001
TNF-αT87C26-26/130Synonymous29 L41.70<0.0001
T208C-3131/130Nonsynonymous70 C to R49.72<0.0001
A389G-5252/130Nonsynonymous130 K to R83.40<0.0001
IL10G148A-3030/130Nonsynonymous 50 E to K 48.12<0.0001
C152T55-55/130Nonsynonymous 51 A to V 88.22<0.0001
G225A34-34/130Synonymous75 K54.53<0.0001
G321A-2828/130Synonymous107 E44.89<0.0001
G357C49-49/130Synonymous119 L78.59<0.0001
NCF4A744G-3737/130Synonymous248 P59.34<0.0001
LITAFA392G56-56/130Nonsynonymous131 D to G89.82<0.0001
ATOX1A75G-2727/130Synonymous25 A43.31<0.0001
C141T-4646/130Synonymous47 C73.78<0.0001
GSTA30G36-36/130Synonymous10 E57.74<0.0001
OXSR1G35T48-48/130Nonsynonymous12 R to L76.98<0.0001
C195T21-21/130Synonymous65Y33.68<0.0001
A270G30-30/130Synonymous90 K48.12<0.0001
C414A-5151/130Synonymous139 V81.80<0.0001
TKTG76T-3939/130Nonsynonymous26 G to W62.55<0.0001
A396G53-53/130Synonymous132 Q85.01<0.0001
RPIAG56A33-33/130Nonsynonymous19 R to H52.93<0.0001
T72C44-44/130Synonymous24 H70.57<0.0001
C202T-5757/130Nonsynonymous68 R to C91.43<0.0001
AMPD1T315C47-47/130Synonymous105 N75.39<0.0001
TLR4 = Toll-like receptor 4; TLR7 = Toll-like receptor 7; TNF-α = tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL10 = interleukin 10; NCF4 = neutrophil cytosolic factor 4; LITAF = lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF factor; ATOX1 = antioxidant 1 copper chaperone; GST = glutathione S-transferase; OXSR1 = oxidative stress-responsive kinase 1; TKT = transketolase; RPIA = ribose 5-phosphate isomerase A; and AMPD1 = adenosine monophosphate deaminase 1. A = alanine; C = cysteine; D = aspartic acid; E = glutamic acid; F = phenylalanine; G = glycine; H = histidine; K = lysine; L = leucine; N = asparagine; P = proline; Q = glutamine; R = arginine; S = serine; V = valine; W = tryptophan; and Y = tyrosine.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Sharif, M.; Abdo, M.; Shabrawy, O.E.; El-Naga, E.M.A.; Fericean, L.; Banatean-Dunea, I.; Ateya, A. Investigating Polymorphisms and Expression Profile of Immune, Antioxidant, and Erythritol-Related Genes for Limiting Postparturient Endometritis in Holstein Cattle. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10060370

AMA Style

Al-Sharif M, Abdo M, Shabrawy OE, El-Naga EMA, Fericean L, Banatean-Dunea I, Ateya A. Investigating Polymorphisms and Expression Profile of Immune, Antioxidant, and Erythritol-Related Genes for Limiting Postparturient Endometritis in Holstein Cattle. Veterinary Sciences. 2023; 10(6):370. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10060370

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Sharif, Mona, Mohamed Abdo, Omnia El Shabrawy, Eman M. Abu El-Naga, Liana Fericean, Ioan Banatean-Dunea, and Ahmed Ateya. 2023. "Investigating Polymorphisms and Expression Profile of Immune, Antioxidant, and Erythritol-Related Genes for Limiting Postparturient Endometritis in Holstein Cattle" Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 6: 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10060370

APA Style

Al-Sharif, M., Abdo, M., Shabrawy, O. E., El-Naga, E. M. A., Fericean, L., Banatean-Dunea, I., & Ateya, A. (2023). Investigating Polymorphisms and Expression Profile of Immune, Antioxidant, and Erythritol-Related Genes for Limiting Postparturient Endometritis in Holstein Cattle. Veterinary Sciences, 10(6), 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10060370

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop