Next Article in Journal
Portable Analyses of Strategic Metal-Rich Minerals Using pXRF and pLIBS: Methodology and Database Development
Previous Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Parcel-Level Dataset on Farmland Assessment: Addressing Grid-Cell Data Bias Estimation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Data Descriptor

RNA Sequencing Dataset of Drosophila Nociceptor Translatomic Response to Injury

by
Christine M. Hale
1,
Kyle J. Beauchemin
1,
Courtney L. Brann
1,
Julie K. Moulton
1,
Ramaz Geguchadze
2,
Benjamin J. Harrison
2 and
Geoffrey K. Ganter
1,*
1
College of Arts and Sciences, University of New England, 11 Hills Beach Road, Biddeford, ME 04103, USA
2
College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, 11 Hills Beach Road, Biddeford, ME 04103, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Data 2025, 10(2), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/data10020011
Submission received: 12 November 2024 / Revised: 11 January 2025 / Accepted: 13 January 2025 / Published: 21 January 2025

Abstract

:
To prepare to address the mechanisms of injury-induced nociceptor sensitization, we sequenced the translatome of the nociceptors of injured Drosophila larvae and those of uninjured larvae. Third-instar larvae expressing a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged ribosomal subunit specifically in Class 4 dendritic arborization neurons, recognized as pickpocket-expressing primary nociceptors, via the GAL4/UAS method, were injured by ultraviolet light or sham-injured. Larvae were subjected to translating ribosome affinity purification for the GFP tag and nociceptor-specific ribosome-bound RNA was sequenced.
Dataset: The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive and are accessible through SRA series accession number PRJNA1056042 “Injury-Induced Transcription Changes in Drosophila Nociceptors” (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1056042 (accessed on 1 January 2025)).
Dataset License: CC01.0.

1. Summary

Uncontrolled pain places an enormous burden on human life. Currently, analgesic medications inadequately address the problem due to issues with efficacy, tolerance, side effects, and addiction liability, particularly in chronic pain conditions. Improved therapies for managing abnormal pain, including chronic pain, are needed. Chronic pain often involves nociceptor sensitization, and one way in which nociceptors become sensitized is by injury. The primary nociceptors in Drosophila larvae can be sensitized by injuring the adjacent epidermis with ultraviolet radiation. We previously showed that UV-induced sensitization requires activity of the Bone Morphogenetic Protein pathway, which is known to affect gene expression. To reveal translatomic changes in primary nociceptors caused by injury, we isolated translating mRNAs from the nociceptors of injured and uninjured animals using the Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification method and compared the resulting sequences. Because over 75% of all identified human disease genes have orthologs in the fly genome, the Drosophila model system has the capacity to rapidly identify valuable targets for novel analgesic therapies.

2. Data Description

2.1. Background and Summary

After injury, healing is promoted by nociceptive sensitization, an increase in pain sensitivity in and around the damaged tissue. However, sensitization can also perpetuate abnormal pain states like chronic pain [1]. Nociceptive sensitization, including allodynia and hyperalgesia, can be induced by ultraviolet (UV) light injury in the larval fruit fly, revealing novel regulators of this process [2,3]. Although in this model the epidermis is severely compromised by ultraviolet irradiation, nociceptor morphology appears to remain intact. While others [4,5] have explored nociceptor gene expression using microarray approaches and yielded important information about stimulus transduction, to our knowledge, there has been no prior analysis of the nociceptor-specific translatomic consequences of UV injury in Drosophila. We expect that this effort will reveal events in the primary nociceptor that lead to nociceptive sensitization.
Using the Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification approach (see Figure 1), we isolated mRNA from the primary nociceptors of third-instar Drosophila larvae 24 hours after UV injury, at which point they experience peak allodynia [2,6,7]. We hypothesized that transcriptional/translational responses to injury lead to the process of nociceptive sensitization and/or recovery from sensitization. Building on our prior research in nociceptive sensitization using fly larvae, we believe that further investigation into the mechanisms of its development and recovery will deepen our understanding of the complete nociceptive sensitization mechanism and reveal new targets for chronic pain drug development.

2.2. Technical Validation

Pairwise, Dispersion, and Principal Component Analysis

The ‘estimateSizeFactors’ function in DESeq2 was carried out to control for differences in library sizes using the “median-of-ratios method” [8,9]. Inter-/intra-relationships among groups and sample quality were visualized by pairwise scatterplots of all samples in both groups (Figure 2) in R, using count data normalized by log10 transformation [10]. Read count distribution and the potential high magnitude of low read counts was investigated through visualization of a histogram of the sum of log10-transformed count data across all samples, also in R (Figure 3B,D) [11,12]. The DESeq2 function ‘estimateDispersions’ was then used to calculate dispersion estimates across genes for all samples and visualized with the DESeq2 dispersions plot (‘plotDispEsts’) (Figure 3A,C). After preliminary analysis of the count data for low expression, we set a custom threshold of at least 20 counts per six samples via the following code written in R and applied it to the dds object within the DESeq2 pipeline [12]: ‘keep <- rowSums(counts(dds, normalized=TRUE) >= 20) >= 6’ ‘dds <- dds[keep,]’.
After counts had been thresholded to eliminate sparsely expressed genes, the DESeq output was visualized for sample clustering analysis using DESeq-normalized data and the principal components plot function (Figure 4) found within the DESeq2 package [9]. Sequencing depth is indicated in Table 1.

3. Methods

3.1. Genetics

Flies were maintained in 6 oz stock bottles containing a sucrose–cornmeal–yeast medium. Bottles were stored in Percival Scientific Incubators with a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle and kept between 50–60% humidity and at a temperature of 25 °C. Incubators were set to an arbitrary dawn time of 9:00 A.M. Genotypes used in the experiments were prepared using the Gal4/UAS system [13] with the Gal4 driver line featuring the nociceptor-specific pickpocket promoter: ppk1.9-GAL4 (in w1118) [14,15,16]. UAS responder line was UAS-GFP-RpL10Ab [17] (in w*) (BDSC_42681), allowing for affinity purification [18].

3.2. Sensitizing Injury

Flies expressing the eGFP-tagged ribosomal subunit RpL10Ab specifically in nociceptors (approximately 70 cells per animal) were allowed to mate for 48 hours prior to the timed egg lay. After two days, the flies were placed in a tube containing solidified grape juice agar along one wall to encourage egg deposition. The egg-laying period was restricted to two hours, and then the adults were removed. Developmentally timed larvae were collected 4–5 days after egg laying and placed into a UV crosslinker (Spectrolinker XL-1000, Spectronics Corporation, Westbury, NY, USA), and the larvae were exposed to a dosage of UV-C between 12.0–18.0 mJ, monitored with a UV photometer (Spectroline XS-254 UV-C, Spectronics Corporation, Westbury, NY, USA). For mock-treated control animals, an identical protocol was performed, including putting the animals into the crosslinker, but without the actual delivery of UV. The larvae were placed in recovery vials for 24 h and then separated into 100 mg groups. Larvae were flash-frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen until analysis.

3.3. RNA Extraction, Sequencing, and Preliminary Analysis

Frozen larvae were homogenized, and homogenates underwent immunopurification of the eGFP-tagged ribosomes using magnetic beads (Invitrogen Dynabeads Antibody Coupling Kit, Carlsbad, CA, USA) bound to two anti-GFP antibodies (19C8 and 19F7, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Monoclonal Antibody Facility, New York, NY, USA). RNA was then isolated and purified from these eGFP-tagged ribosomes using a standard RNA isolation protocol (Machery-Nagel NucleoSpin RNA kit, Toronto, ON, Canada). RNA was then tested for quantity and purity with an Agilent Bioanalyzer, obtaining an RNA integrity number (RIN) ranging from 4.8 to 6.6. While RINs of 6 or greater are recommended by the RNA-sequencing vendor GENEWIZ® (South Plainfield, NJ, USA), we judged the integrity to be sufficient, since RNA of insects typically scores lower than mammals, for which the RIN algorithm was developed [19]. RNA was stored at −80 °C before being shipped (7.5 to 13.5 nM) on dry ice to the vendor. GENEWIZ carried out mRNA sequencing via polyA selection with supplied RNA using Illumina HiSeq, PE 2x150 (150 bp paired end). GENEWIZ trimmed sequence reads via Trimmomatic v.0.36, mapped sequence reads to the Drosophila melanogaster BDGP6 reference genome via ENSEMBL using the STAR aligner v.2.5.2b, and determined gene hit counts (calculation of reads/gene/sample) using feature counts from the Subread package v.1.5.2. A total of six samples of customer-supplied RNA were used for RNA sequencing by the vendor: three control (mock-injured) samples and three experimental (UV-injured) samples, with each sample of RNA being derived from the 100 mg groups of prepared larvae that were pooled by condition. In the supplied deliverables by GENEWIZ were original text files of the unique gene hit counts (reads/gene) for each of these six samples. These individual counts files were used as inputs for further quality assessment.

3.4. Code Availability

The R code used to analyze and process the raw count data from control and UV-injured samples (Table 1) using DESeq2 package version on R version 4.0.3 is publicly available at https://github.com/gkganter/Hale-et-al.-DESeq2-Code/blob/main/TRAPseq_DESeq2_3_19_2022_1100am.R (accessed on 1 January 2025).

Author Contributions

C.M.H., K.J.B., C.L.B., J.K.M. and R.G. performed the experiments. C.M.H. and B.J.H. analyzed the results. G.K.G. supervised this work. C.M.H., J.K.M. and G.K.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was sponsored by NIH/NIGMS award 1P20GM103643 to I. Meng and NIH/NIGMS award 1R15GM080713 to G Ganter.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data described in the study are openly available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1056042 (accessed on 1 January 2025).

Acknowledgments

Stocks obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) were used in this study. Confocal microscopy was performed in the UNE Histology and Imaging Core (NIGMS P20GM103643).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Reichling, D.B.; Levine, J.D. Critical role of nociceptor plasticity in chronic pain. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Babcock, D.T.; Galko, M.J. Two sides of the same coin no longer: Genetic separation of nociceptive sensitization responses. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2009, 2, 517–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Follansbee, T.L.; Gjelsvik, K.J.; Brann, C.L.; McParland, A.L.; Longhurst, C.A.; Galko, M.J.; Ganter, G.K. Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via the canonical SMAD pathway. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 8524–8533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Honjo, K.; Mauthner, S.E.; Wang, Y.; Skene, J.H.P.; Tracey, W.D., Jr. Nociceptor-enriched genes required for normal thermal nociception. Cell Rep. 2016, 16, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Babcock, D.T.; Landry, C.; Galko, M.J. Cytokine signaling mediates UV-induced nociceptive sensitization in Drosophila larvae. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mauthner, S.E.; Hwang, R.Y.; Lewis, A.H.; Xiao, Q.; Tsubouchi, A.; Wang, Y.; Honjo, K.; Skene, J.H.; Grandl, J.; Tracey, W.D., Jr. Balboa binds to pickpocket in vivo and is required for mechanical nociception in Drosophila larvae. Curr Biol. 2014, 24, 2920–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Babcock, D.T.; Shi, S.; Jo, J.; Shaw, M.; Gutstein, H.B.; Galko, M.J. Hedgehog signaling regulates nociceptive sensitization. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 1525–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Anders, S.; Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Nat. Preced. 2010, 11, R106. [Google Scholar]
  9. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. McDermaid, A.; Monier, B.; Zhao, J.; Liu, B.; Ma, Q. Interpretation of differential gene expression results of RNA-seq data: Review and integration. Brief. Bioinform. 2018, 20, 2044–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lun, A.T.; McCarthy, D.J.; Marioni, J.C. A step-by-step workflow for low-level analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data with Bioconductor. F1000Research 2016, 5, 2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2021; Available online: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 1 January 2025).
  13. Brand, A.H.; Perrimon, N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 1993, 118, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Adams, C.M.; Anderson, M.G.; Motto, D.G.; Price, M.P.; Johnson, W.A.; Welsh, M.J. Rippedpocket and pickpocket, novel Drosophila DEG/ENaC subunits expressed in early development and in mechanosensory neurons. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 140, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ainsley, J.A.; Pettus, J.M.; Bosenko, D.; Gerstein, C.E.; Zinkevich, N.; Anderson, M.G.; Adams, C.M.; Welsh, M.J.; Johnson, W.A. Enhanced locomotion caused by loss of the Drosophila DEG/ENaC protein Pickpocket1. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, 1557–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhong, L.; Hwang, R.Y.; Tracey, W.D. Pickpocket Is a DEG/ENaC Protein Required for Mechanical Nociception in Drosophila Larvae. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Thomas, A.; Lee, P.J.; Dalton, J.E.; Nomie, K.J.; Stoica, L.; Costa-Mattioli, M.; Chang, P.; Nuzhdin, S.; Arbeitman, M.N.; Dierick, H.A. A versatile method for cell-specific profiling of translated mRNAs in Drosophila. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Heiman, M.; Kulicke, R.; Fenster, R.J.; Greengard, P.; Heintz, N. Cell type-specific mRNA purification by translating ribosome affinity purification (TRAP). Nat Protoc. 2014, 9, 1282–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Winnebeck, E.C.; Millar, C.D.; Warman, G.R. Why does insect RNA look degraded? J. Insect Sci. 2010, 10, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Translating Ribosomal Affinity Purification (TRAP) isolation of nociceptor RNA workflow. Left: Third-instar Drosophila larvae expressing UAS-GFP-RpL10Ab within their nociceptors (right) underwent UV injury and were given 24 h to recover, flash frozen, and then homogenized to undergo immunomagnetic purification of nociceptor GFP-tagged ribosomes. RNA sequencing vendor GENEWIZ® carried out sequencing, mapped reads to the Drosophila reference genome, and determined gene hit counts. Right: Nociceptor expressing GFP-tagged ribosomal subunit (green). Adjacent neurons visualized with anti-HRP (blue).
Figure 1. Translating Ribosomal Affinity Purification (TRAP) isolation of nociceptor RNA workflow. Left: Third-instar Drosophila larvae expressing UAS-GFP-RpL10Ab within their nociceptors (right) underwent UV injury and were given 24 h to recover, flash frozen, and then homogenized to undergo immunomagnetic purification of nociceptor GFP-tagged ribosomes. RNA sequencing vendor GENEWIZ® carried out sequencing, mapped reads to the Drosophila reference genome, and determined gene hit counts. Right: Nociceptor expressing GFP-tagged ribosomal subunit (green). Adjacent neurons visualized with anti-HRP (blue).
Data 10 00011 g001
Figure 2. Pairwise scatterplots revealing intra-/inter-sample relationships. Sample gene counts from nociceptor transcripts were log10-transformed in R and were analyzed for quality and inter-/intra-relationships by pairwise scatterplots of all samples in both groups (Control vs. UV-injured). Each dot within the scatterplot represents a gene, and the mean expression of that gene between the two samples shown by its x-y coordinate placement. n = 3 (pooled samples)/group (Control vs. UV-injured).
Figure 2. Pairwise scatterplots revealing intra-/inter-sample relationships. Sample gene counts from nociceptor transcripts were log10-transformed in R and were analyzed for quality and inter-/intra-relationships by pairwise scatterplots of all samples in both groups (Control vs. UV-injured). Each dot within the scatterplot represents a gene, and the mean expression of that gene between the two samples shown by its x-y coordinate placement. n = 3 (pooled samples)/group (Control vs. UV-injured).
Data 10 00011 g002
Figure 3. Dispersion and histogram plots visualizing sample quality and noise within the data. (A) Dispersion plot of the mean of the normalized counts was plotted using DESeq2. The plot estimates dispersion or intra-sample variability in a gene’s expression within each condition group (Control vs. UV-injured). Interestingly, analyses showed a high number of low-count features at the limit of the y-axis for estimated dispersion, and (B) the histogram of the log2 count data vs. number of genes expressed also displayed similar low-count features across all samples, even after removal of 0-count genes from the dataset. This indicated a robust degree of sensitivity due to the high sequencing depth (see Table 1) and may also indicate the detection of low-copy-number transcripts, long noncoding RNA’s, and additional species of transcript that can be the subject of future investigation. A conservative pre-threshold limit for counts across all samples (≥20 counts for each of the six samples (n = 3 pooled samples/condition (Control vs. Experimental)) was then established (visualized by the red dotted line). (C,D) Dispersion and histogram plots following the established threshold limit for counts across all samples to eliminate noise, showing the removal of low-count features.
Figure 3. Dispersion and histogram plots visualizing sample quality and noise within the data. (A) Dispersion plot of the mean of the normalized counts was plotted using DESeq2. The plot estimates dispersion or intra-sample variability in a gene’s expression within each condition group (Control vs. UV-injured). Interestingly, analyses showed a high number of low-count features at the limit of the y-axis for estimated dispersion, and (B) the histogram of the log2 count data vs. number of genes expressed also displayed similar low-count features across all samples, even after removal of 0-count genes from the dataset. This indicated a robust degree of sensitivity due to the high sequencing depth (see Table 1) and may also indicate the detection of low-copy-number transcripts, long noncoding RNA’s, and additional species of transcript that can be the subject of future investigation. A conservative pre-threshold limit for counts across all samples (≥20 counts for each of the six samples (n = 3 pooled samples/condition (Control vs. Experimental)) was then established (visualized by the red dotted line). (C,D) Dispersion and histogram plots following the established threshold limit for counts across all samples to eliminate noise, showing the removal of low-count features.
Data 10 00011 g003
Figure 4. Analysis of normalization of gene count data across all samples and principal component analysis (PCA) of sample relationship post DESeq2 normalization in R. (A) Quality analysis was investigated by comparing bar plots of the raw (un-normalized) log2 count data across all samples to the normalized log2 count data after the DESeq2 function for differential gene expression analysis had been applied across all samples. (B) Clustering of samples per condition was visualized through a principal component analysis (PCA) plot, which breaks down the maximum levels of variation into components of the top 100 differentially expressed genes after regularized-logarithm transformation (rlog) in DESeq2.
Figure 4. Analysis of normalization of gene count data across all samples and principal component analysis (PCA) of sample relationship post DESeq2 normalization in R. (A) Quality analysis was investigated by comparing bar plots of the raw (un-normalized) log2 count data across all samples to the normalized log2 count data after the DESeq2 function for differential gene expression analysis had been applied across all samples. (B) Clustering of samples per condition was visualized through a principal component analysis (PCA) plot, which breaks down the maximum levels of variation into components of the top 100 differentially expressed genes after regularized-logarithm transformation (rlog) in DESeq2.
Data 10 00011 g004
Table 1. Sample identification and statistics. UV samples were derived from UV-injured late-third-instar larvae expressing GFP-tagged ribosomal subunit RPL10 under the control of the ppk promotor, thereby limiting its expression to the nociceptors. Control samples were identical to samples from UV-injured animals in every way except that no UV radiation was applied. Three biological replicates of each treatment made up each group. Sequencing depth is indicated in millions of reads per sample.
Table 1. Sample identification and statistics. UV samples were derived from UV-injured late-third-instar larvae expressing GFP-tagged ribosomal subunit RPL10 under the control of the ppk promotor, thereby limiting its expression to the nociceptors. Control samples were identical to samples from UV-injured animals in every way except that no UV radiation was applied. Three biological replicates of each treatment made up each group. Sequencing depth is indicated in millions of reads per sample.
File NameSample NameOrganismReads/SampleTax IDBreed
SAMN39083405Control-s1Drosophila melanogaster111.6M7227ppk-gal4/uas-rpl10
SAMN39083406Control-s2Drosophila melanogaster100.3M7227ppk-gal4/uas-rpl10
SAMN39083407Control-s3Drosophila melanogaster112.5M7227ppk-gal4/uas-rpl10
SAMN39083408UV-s1Drosophila melanogaster90.2M7227ppk-gal4/uas-rpl10
SAMN39083409UV-s2Drosophila melanogaster107.3M7227ppk-gal4/uas-rpl10
SAMN39083410UV-s3Drosophila melanogaster112.0M7227ppk-gal4/uas-rpl10
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hale, C.M.; Beauchemin, K.J.; Brann, C.L.; Moulton, J.K.; Geguchadze, R.; Harrison, B.J.; Ganter, G.K. RNA Sequencing Dataset of Drosophila Nociceptor Translatomic Response to Injury. Data 2025, 10, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/data10020011

AMA Style

Hale CM, Beauchemin KJ, Brann CL, Moulton JK, Geguchadze R, Harrison BJ, Ganter GK. RNA Sequencing Dataset of Drosophila Nociceptor Translatomic Response to Injury. Data. 2025; 10(2):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/data10020011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hale, Christine M., Kyle J. Beauchemin, Courtney L. Brann, Julie K. Moulton, Ramaz Geguchadze, Benjamin J. Harrison, and Geoffrey K. Ganter. 2025. "RNA Sequencing Dataset of Drosophila Nociceptor Translatomic Response to Injury" Data 10, no. 2: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/data10020011

APA Style

Hale, C. M., Beauchemin, K. J., Brann, C. L., Moulton, J. K., Geguchadze, R., Harrison, B. J., & Ganter, G. K. (2025). RNA Sequencing Dataset of Drosophila Nociceptor Translatomic Response to Injury. Data, 10(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/data10020011

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop