Next Article in Journal
Changes in Serum Levels of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-1 in Patients with Essential Hypertension
Previous Article in Journal
Cascaded Deep Learning Frameworks in Contribution to the Detection of Parkinson’s Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Practical Performance of Model Quality Assessment of Homology Models

1
Department of Computer Science, School of Computing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
2
AIST-Tokyo Tech Real World Big-Data Computation Open Innovation Laboratory (RWBC-OIL), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Aomi, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-0064, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2022, 9(3), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9030118
Submission received: 9 February 2022 / Revised: 8 March 2022 / Accepted: 11 March 2022 / Published: 15 March 2022

Abstract

Protein structure prediction is an important issue in structural bioinformatics. In this process, model quality assessment (MQA), which estimates the accuracy of the predicted structure, is also practically important. Currently, the most commonly used dataset to evaluate the performance of MQA is the critical assessment of the protein structure prediction (CASP) dataset. However, the CASP dataset does not contain enough targets with high-quality models, and thus cannot sufficiently evaluate the MQA performance in practical use. Additionally, most application studies employ homology modeling because of its reliability. However, the CASP dataset includes models generated by de novo methods, which may lead to the mis-estimation of MQA performance. In this study, we created new benchmark datasets, named a homology models dataset for model quality assessment (HMDM), that contain targets with high-quality models derived using homology modeling. We then benchmarked the performance of the MQA methods using the new datasets and compared their performance to that of the classical selection based on the sequence identity of the template proteins. The results showed that model selection by the latest MQA methods using deep learning is better than selection by template sequence identity and classical statistical potentials. Using HMDM, it is possible to verify the MQA performance for high-accuracy homology models.
Keywords: model quality assessment; evaluation of model accuracy; protein structure prediction; machine learning; deep learning; MQA; EMA model quality assessment; evaluation of model accuracy; protein structure prediction; machine learning; deep learning; MQA; EMA

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takei, Y.; Ishida, T. A Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Practical Performance of Model Quality Assessment of Homology Models. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9030118

AMA Style

Takei Y, Ishida T. A Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Practical Performance of Model Quality Assessment of Homology Models. Bioengineering. 2022; 9(3):118. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9030118

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takei, Yuma, and Takashi Ishida. 2022. "A Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Practical Performance of Model Quality Assessment of Homology Models" Bioengineering 9, no. 3: 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9030118

APA Style

Takei, Y., & Ishida, T. (2022). A Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Practical Performance of Model Quality Assessment of Homology Models. Bioengineering, 9(3), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9030118

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop