1. Introduction
Nowadays, progress in medicine and materials development has made possible the study, design, and application of numerous biomaterials covering a wide range of medical fields covering orthopedics, drug administration, dentistry, skin tissue engineering, and cardiovascular systems, among many others, for the benefit of the human being [
1,
2]. In this way, people’s quality of life and longevity can be improved. However, as human life expectancy rises, so does the elderly population, which is more prone to chronic musculoskeletal diseases such as osteoarthritis. It is believed that up to 15% of the population is affected by osteoarthritis [
3].
For this reason, any biomaterial has to meet a number of requirements, the main one being biocompatibility with the human body, which is the ability of a material to fulfill its function in medical treatment by generating the most appropriate beneficial cellular or tissue response in that specific situation and optimizing the clinically relevant performance of that treatment [
4,
5]. In order to prevent implant loosening and to obtain a longer duration of service, which would save revision surgery, these biomaterials must have the following properties: high ductility, high fatigue and wear resistance, absence of cytotoxicity, and a combination of high strength and low Young’s modulus that is equivalent to human cortical bone and ranges from 10 to 30 GPa. Furthermore, the implant must integrate well with the nearby bone [
2,
5,
6,
7,
8].
Biomedical implants based on polymers and ceramics show low mechanical strength and brittleness, which limits their applications for harsh working conditions [
9]. Therefore, currently, within orthopedic surgery, it is necessary to develop prostheses made mainly of metallic materials.
Around 70–80% of implants are made of metallic biomaterials [
7]. The most commonly used metals for medical applications are 316L stainless steel, CoCrMo alloys, and Ti and its alloys, such as Ti6Al4V and NiTi alloys [
5,
10]. The modulus of elasticity of metals is generally much higher than that of bone and prevents load transfer to the bone. The stress shielding effect can cause osteoporosis due to the excessive difference between the elastic modulus of metal and bone. In addition, there are few adequate metal candidates recommended for their use as long-term implants due to the toxic effect of the ions that they release in the adjacent tissues, their poor resistance to wear and corrosion, and, therefore, their low biocompatibility. Nevertheless, these issues can be solved by mixing the base metal with alloying components that do not exhibit any harmful impact on the body [
2,
5,
9,
11].
One of the most significant risks that can be caused by a metallic implant is corrosion, which is the deterioration of a material due to an electrochemical attack in its environment. Losses resulting from corrosion are estimated at hundreds of billions of dollars each year. This is in the order of 2–4% of the Gross National Product [
12]. In order to prevent this phenomenon; a film is usually produced on the surface of the material, which makes it impermeable and protects it from the environment.
In general, titanium and its alloys have triumphed with respect to more traditional and are today widely used in aerospace, industrial, and biomedical applications, especially as tissue substitutes, such as dental implants, femoral heart valves, and fracture plates, due to the possibility of modifying their properties by changing the composition of the alloying elements, their biocompatibility with biological materials, their high corrosion resistance, high mechanical performance, low modulus and high thermal stability [
2,
3,
8,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17]. Due to titanium’s poor electrical conductivity, which aids in the material’s electrochemical oxidation by forming a highly stable passive oxide coating on its surface naturally, this material is biocompatible. The material is hence very resistant to corrosion [
1,
6,
16,
18].
There are three different kinds of titanium-based alloys: α, α + β, and β titanium. When heated above 882 °C, pure titanium changes from its alpha structure, known as the compact hexagonal structure (HCP), to its beta structure, body-centered cubic (BCC), as a result of an allotropic transition. Yet, the beta phase may often be kept at ambient temperature in this element’s alloys, resulting in a material that has both phases. Additionally, changes in alloy characteristics such as ductility, plasticity, or formability result from differences in the relative quantities of different phases. These metallographic transformations and the properties of titanium alloys can be improved by the addition of α-stabilizers (C, N, O, Al), which increase the allotropic transformation temperature, β-stabilizers (V, Nb, Mo, Ta, Fe, Mn, Cr, Co, W, Ni, Cu, Si), which decrease the allotropic transformation temperature and the α / β ratio is affected, leading to an increase in the amount of β phase and finally neutral stabilizers (Zr, Sn, Hf, Ge, Th) [
2,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24,
25].
Ti6Al4V alloy is the most widely used of all titanium alloys for orthopedic applications, as it has excellent mechanical properties, corrosion resistance in biofluids due to the stable passive oxide layer formed on its surface, biocompatibility and its properties can be modified by heat treatment. However, it does not have good wear resistance, even with soft tissue friction. Furthermore, it is highly toxic, as it causes harmful tissue reactions caused by the release of vanadium ions, which is a toxic and carcinogenic element and can even lead to aseptic loosening of the prosthesis, and of aluminum ions which, in high concentrations, can cause certain long-term health disorders such as peripheral neuropathy, dementia, apathy or severe tremors, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases and adverse tissue effects [
15,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32].
Taking all of this into account, four elements, Ti, Mo, Zr, and Si, were chosen for the construction of these new alloys because there is an important demand to develop new Ti alloys that have good mechanical properties and contain no toxic elements.
Ti-Mo alloys were investigated because molybdenum is a less poisonous element than common metals such as cobalt, nickel, and chromium, it is a β-stabilizing element, and some research suggests that adding molybdenum results in mechanical qualities resembling those of human bone. It also has low cost, high melting temperature, thermal stability, and corrosion resistance, being able to form a highly adherent stable oxide film (MoO
3) that stops titanium corrosion [
11,
12,
19,
33,
34,
35,
36].
Ti-Mo-Zr alloys were developed because zirconium is becoming a desirable alternative for the majority of medical applications. It is highly biocompatible with human tissues, has a low modulus of elasticity, and is very resistant to corrosion [
19,
25,
37,
38].
New Ti-Mo-Zr-Si alloys were recently fabricated when small quantities of Si were added to Ti-Mo-Zr because silicon is an element present in human bone and is deemed biocompatible due to its effects on corrosion resistance, creep resistance, ductility, and titanium strength at high temperatures. Similar to molybdenum, it is a β-stabilizing element that affects the decline in the elastic modulus [
19,
32,
37,
39].
Thus, two new TiMoZrxSi alloys have been synthesized using a vacuum arc remelting furnace (VAR), and their microstructure, corrosion behavior, quantitative microanalysis, modulus of elasticity, and hardness were all examined in this study. These methods included metallography, electrochemical, scanning electron microscopy, three-point bending, and microhardness tests.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Material Preparation
We have carried out the analysis of two different compositional alternatives of new alloys with Titanium, Molybdenum, Zirconium, and Silicon, with the purpose of performing different experiments in order to determine the effect produced by the addition of silicon in one of the samples and in this way, to obtain their properties. The chemical composition of the studied alloys is TiMoZr (73% Ti, 20% Mo, 7% Zr) and TiMoZr0.5Si (72.5% Ti, 20% Mo, 7% Zr, 0.5% Si). The raw materials used were high-purity elements such as Ti (99% purity), Mo (99% purity), and Zr (99% purity) supplied by Alfa Aesar by Thermo Fisher Scientific. The production of these alloys was carried out at the Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering from Ghe, Asachi Technical University of Iasi, Romania, using a vacuum arc remelting furnace (VAR) where a consumable electrode was fused in a vacuum at a monitored rate using the heat produced by an electric arc between the electrode and the ingot. To achieve an adequate uniformity of the alloys, these were centrifuged and remelted six times (three times in each part) in an inert atmosphere of argon and ultimately solidified in an ingot. Arc melting was chosen for developing the new TiMoZrxSi alloys because the method produces ingots of the highest purity. Part of the ingots was sent to Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University for their preparation and testing.
First of all, the surfaces of the two samples were prepared by embedding them by adding a 4:1 ratio of epoxy resin in molds. It is to say, for every 4 drops of resin, a drop of catalyst was added. The samples were then cut longitudinally with a thickness of 1 to 1.5 mm using the Buehler IsoMet 4000 precision saw (Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA). Furthermore, vertical cuts of about 0.5 mm thickness were performed employing the cutting device. Then, grinding and polishing were performed in two stages using the Struers TegraPol-11 polishing machine (Struers ApS, Ballerup, Denmark ): using progressive grit silicon carbide papers from 280 to 1200 and the final polishing by applying 0.1 microns of alpha alumina suspension to polish the surfaces to a mirror finish. The experimental steps were in accordance with ASTM E3-11(2017) for the preparation of metallography samples.
Finally, the samples were immersed in a heated “Ultrasons-HD” ultrasonic apparatus from J.P. Selecta (JPS, Barcelona, Spain) for 10 minutes to remove all traces of dirt and impurities (see
Figure 1).
The titanium alloys under study, as mentioned above, have a passive titanium oxide layer that protects them from the medium, and this layer has different properties from those of the base metal. Thus, to obtain a correct hardness measurement, first, a lower load is applied to make the indenter penetrate to a certain depth, and then progressively higher loads are applied to obtain the hardness values of the base metal.
2.2. Metallography
For this test, images of the sample surfaces were taken using the Axio Vert.A1 MAT ZEISS (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) metallographic optical microscope, magnifying 10 and 20 times their actual size. Each sample was immersed in a Kroll etching reagent composed of H2O, HNO3, and HF for 15 seconds, and images of the etched surface were taken.
2.3. Electrochemical Tests
In order to carry out these tests, a sample (working electrode) in Ringer’s solution is introduced in the electrochemical cell together with two electrodes: the saturated calomel electrode (SCE) is used as the reference electrode, and the platinum electrode acts as the counter electrode. The Ringer Grifols solution (from Grifols Laboratories, Barcelona, Spain) had the following contents in mmol/L: Na+ 129.9; K+ 5.4; Ca2+ 1.8; Cl− 111.7; and C3H5O3 27.2.
Five techniques were applied using the BioLogic Essential SP-150 potentiostat (Bio-Logic Science Instruments SAS, Seyssinet-Pariset, France): Corrosion Potential, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy in Ringer’s solution, in saline medium, and in fever state, Corrosion Rate, Corrosimetry, and Pitting Potential.
2.3.1. Corrosion Potential
In order to measure the corrosion potential, the “Ecorr vs. time” technique was applied for 24 h, with potential values of ±10 V and with a potential recording every 300 s or every time varying by 200 mV. The data obtained were plotted as a graph of potential vs. time, which may remain constant with respect to time or show a trend toward passivation or corrosion.
2.3.2. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)
For the impedance measurement, “Potential Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy” was selected, and the surface value and the measurement duration of 5 minutes were entered. This measurement was performed 7 times for each sample, at ± 300 mV vs. Ecorr in Ringer’s solution, with maximum and minimum potential values of ±10 V. These data were represented by Bode and Nyquist diagrams and equivalent circuits.
This same technique, with the same data, was applied in the simulation of saline and fever-state media. In the saline medium, however, the saline solution was first created using 35 g of NaCl in 1 L of solution, and the sample was immersed for 24 h. On the other hand, in the case of fever states, the electrochemical cell was immersed in a Grant Instruments Y14 thermostatic bath (Grant Instruments, Cambridgeshire, England), applying heat (40 °C) for 24 h. After the measurements were taken, they were plotted on bode diagrams.
2.3.3. Corrosion Rate
In order to perform these measurements, the “Linear Polarization” technique was selected, and the sample surface area value and the test duration of 20 minutes were entered to stabilize its potential. The maximum and minimum potential values were ±10 V, with the potential scanning presenting a 0.167 mV/s time-variation relationship from −0.025 to 0.025 V versus open circuit potential (Eoc), with data recording every 0.5 s and intensity throughout the potential scanning at 100%. These linear polarization curves were then plotted, and EC-Lab’s “Tafel Fit” analysis was applied to find the corrosion rate values for each sample.
2.3.4. Corrosimetry
The measurement of the Rp was performed by applying the “Corrosimetry” technique within the software and filling in the configuration window the parameters such as surface area, equivalent weight, and density of the samples with the duration time of each cycle to be performed being a total of 10 cycles for each sample, in addition to parameters previously obtained by means of linear polarization (βa and βc). The maximum and minimum potential values were ±10 V, and the potential scan showed a time-varying ratio of 0.167 mV/s from −0.025 to 0.025 V versus Eoc, with data recorded every 1 s and intensity throughout the potential scan at 100%. Next, polarization resistance data were plotted versus time.
2.3.5. Pitting Potential
In order to carry out the test, the “Cyclic Potentiodynamic Polarization” technique was selected where the applied potential scan was −0.7 V and 2 V with respect to the reference electrode and with a reverse scan of up to −0.5 V with a data recording every 0.5 s and of the intensity every time 200 mA or every 1 s varies. The maximum and minimum values of the potential were ±10 V. After performing the test for each sample, the graphs obtained were curves as a function of current intensity (mA) and potential (V).
2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
In order to realize this test, the samples were prepared and placed inside the Zeiss Sigma 300 VP (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) microscope using a sample holder, and a vacuum was applied. Then, using SmartSEM, an image of the surface of the sample was taken at 1000× magnification and for 20kV, and, using SmartEDX, the quantitative microanalysis of the sample was carried out, obtaining the percentages of the elements and the spectrum.
2.5. Three-Point Bending Test
The three-point bending method was carried out using the Bose ElectroForce® 3100 machine (Bose Corporation, Framingham, MA, USA), which complies with ISO 7438:2020 and can withstand up to 20 N of applied force. In this case, each specimen of rectangular cross-section, with a length varying from approximately 13 to 12 mm, was placed at the extremities of the bottom shank of the testing device, allowing enough space between the supports, which ranged from 7.80 to 10.63 mm, depending on the length of the specimens. Then, a vertical load with a linear velocity of 3 mm/s was applied at the center point of the specimen until the specimen exceeded its yield strength or split. In order to determine the modulus of elasticity, the obtained values of the applied load versus the displacement of the specimens were plotted, and their slope was obtained.
2.6. Microhardness
According to ISO 14577-1:2015, 10 indentations were made for each applied load of each sample, in this case, 5 gf, 25 gf, and 50 gf using the Affri DM8 B hardness tester. When very small loads are applied, there is a good chance that the mark will be found in only one phase so that the hardness of that phase can be evaluated; as the load increases, the mark may cover parts of several phases, giving an idea of the total hardness of the material. Then, using the Aries software, the lengths of the diagonals were measured, and the Vickers microhardness values were automatically calculated. These hardness values were plotted against the number of indentations performed.