Next Article in Journal
Biofabrication of Bacterial Constructs: New Three-Dimensional Biomaterials
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Protocols on Streptococcus mutans with Different Combinations of Wavelengths and Photosensitizing Dyes
Open AccessArticle

New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT® Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
2
Pacific Center for Plastic Surgery, Newport Beach, CA 92660, USA
3
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA
4
Medical Device Pros, LLC, Satellite Beach, FL 32937, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2019, 6(2), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6020043
Received: 16 April 2019 / Revised: 4 May 2019 / Accepted: 6 May 2019 / Published: 12 May 2019
The IDEAL IMPLANT® Structured Breast Implant is a dual lumen saline-filled implant with capsular contracture and deflation/rupture rates much lower than single-lumen silicone gel-filled implants. To better understand the implant’s mechanical properties and to provide a potential explanation for these eight-year clinical results, a novel approach to compressive load testing was employed. Multi-dimensional strains and tangent moduli, metrics describing the shape stability of the total implant, were derived from the experimental load and platen spacing data. The IDEAL IMPLANT was found to have projection, diametric, and areal strains that were generally less than silicone gel implants, and tangent moduli that were generally greater than silicone gel implants. Despite having a relatively inviscid saline fill, the IDEAL IMPLANT was found to be more shape stable compared to gel implants, which implies potentially less interaction with the capsule wall when the implant is subjected to compressive loads. Under compressive loads, the shape stability of a higher cross-link density, cohesive gel implant was unexpectedly found to be similar to or the same as a gel implant. In localized diametric compression testing, the IDEAL IMPLANT was found to have a palpability similar to a gel implant, but softer than a cohesive gel implant. View Full-Text
Keywords: dual lumen; breast implant; breast implant testing; structured; tangent modulus; IDEAL IMPLANT; strain; silicone gel; breast implant mechanical properties; compression; breast implant rupture; breast implant evaluation; capsular contracture; structured saline breast implant; breast implant dimensions dual lumen; breast implant; breast implant testing; structured; tangent modulus; IDEAL IMPLANT; strain; silicone gel; breast implant mechanical properties; compression; breast implant rupture; breast implant evaluation; capsular contracture; structured saline breast implant; breast implant dimensions
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Brandon, H.J.; Nichter, L.S.; Back, D.D. New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT® Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants. Bioengineering 2019, 6, 43.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop