Amplified Light Absorption with Nanomaterials for Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging in Biomedical Research: A Review
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Fundamentals of PA Imaging
3. Nanomaterials for Enhanced Light Absorption
3.1. Metallic Nanomaterials
3.1.1. Gold Nanoparticles
3.1.2. Copper Nanoparticles
3.1.3. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
3.2. Carbon-Based Nanomaterials
3.3. Stimuli-Responsive Nanoparticles
3.4. Robustness of the PA Nanomaterials
4. Signal Amplification
4.1. Optical Excitation Method
4.2. Plasmonic and Nanophotonic Enhancement
4.3. Acoustic Detection Improvement
4.4. Signal and Image Processing
5. Clinical Translation, Safety, and Standardization Considerations
6. Future Perspective and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| PA | Photoacoustic |
| PET | Positron emission tomography |
| MRI | Magnetic resonance imaging |
| US | Ultrasound |
| CT | Computed tomography |
| NIR | Near-infrared |
| ICG | Indocyanine green |
| BBG | Brilliant blue G |
| SNR | Signal-to-noise ratio |
| AuNPs | Gold nanoparticles |
| AuNRs | Gold nanorods |
| ANSI | American National Standards Institute limits |
| GSCs | Gold sphere chains |
| GNSs | Gold nanospheres |
| AuNSs | Gold nanostars |
| HBGNCs | Hyper-branched gold nanoconstructs |
| CuNPs | Copper-based nanoparticles |
| PTT | Photothermal therapy |
| PDT | Photodynamic therapy |
| CuS | Copper sulfide |
| Ox-POM | Oxidized molybdenum polyoxometalate |
| GSH | Glutathione |
| IONPs | Iron oxide nanoparticles |
| SiO2 | Silica |
| mSiO2 | Mesoporous silica |
| CNTs | Carbon nanotubes |
| Ga@RGO | Gallium coated with reduced graphene oxide |
| rGO | Reduced graphene oxide |
References
- Kamali, A.; Dieckhaus, L.A.; Peters, E.C.; Preszler, C.A.; Witte, R.S.; Pires, P.W.; Hutchinson, E.B.; Laksari, K. Ultrasound, photoacoustic, and magnetic resonance imaging to study hyperacute pathophysiology of traumatic and vascular brain injury. J. Neuroimaging 2023, 33, 534–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.; Choi, S.; Knieling, F.; Clingman, B.; Bohndiek, S.; Wang, L.V.; Kim, C. Clinical translation of photoacoustic imaging. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2025, 3, 193–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadia, R.T.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J. CT image denoising methods for image quality improvement and radiation dose reduction. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 2024, 25, e14270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Feng, T.; Qiu, H.; Gu, Y.; Chen, Q.; Zuo, C.; Ma, H. Simultaneous photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging: A review. Ultrasonics 2024, 139, 107277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, D.; Hardaniya, M.; Pande, S.; Maity, D. Advances in Optical Contrast Agents for Medical Imaging: Fluorescent Probes and Molecular Imaging. J. Imaging 2025, 11, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, T.; Zheng, X.; Manshian, B.B.; Soenen, S.J. Optical imaging in biomedical research: Guidelines and practical insights. Health Nanotechnol. 2025, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Song, J.; Chen, X.; Yang, H. X-ray-activated nanosystems for theranostic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 3073–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, S.; Lin, J.; Huang, P. Nanomaterials for NIR-II Photoacoustic Imaging. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2022, 12, 2202208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Q.; Zhu, R.; Song, J.; Yang, H.; Chen, X. Photoacoustic Imaging: Contrast Agents and Their Biomedical Applications. Adv. Mater. 2018, 31, e1805875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manohar, S.; van Apeldoorn, A.; Steenbergen, W. Cells make themselves heard. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 216–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Pang, Y.; Ku, G.; Xie, X.; Stoica, G.; Wang, L.V. Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 803–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, A.G. On the Production and Reproduction of Sound by Light. Am. J. Sci. 1880, 3, 305–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neelamraju, P.M.; Gundepudi, K.; Sanki, P.K.; Busi, K.B.; Mistri, T.K.; Sangaraju, S.; Dalapati, G.K.; Ghosh, K.K.; Ghosh, S.; Ball, W.B.; et al. Potential applications for photoacoustic imaging using functional nanoparticles: A comprehensive overview. Heliyon 2024, 10, e34654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, S.; Lee, D.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.-H.; Jeong, S.; Kim, J. Contrast Agents for Photoacoustic Imaging: A Review Focusing on the Wavelength Range. Biosensors 2022, 12, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.V.; Hu, S. Photoacoustic Tomography: In Vivo Imaging from Organelles to Organs. Science 2012, 335, 1458–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, S.; Neuhaus, K.; Murphy, M.; Leahy, M. Contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging: A review of stem cell tracking. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, W.Y.; Kang, M.S.; Lee, H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.; Han, D.-W.; Kim, K.S. Recent Trends in Photoacoustic Imaging Techniques for 2D Nanomaterial-Based Phototherapy. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Belyaev, I.B.; Zelepukin, I.V.; Kotelnikova, P.A.; Tikhonowski, G.V.; Popov, A.A.; Kapitannikova, A.Y.; Barman, J.; Kopylov, A.N.; Bratashov, D.N.; Prikhozhdenko, E.S.; et al. Laser-Synthesized Germanium Nanoparticles as Biodegradable Material for Near-Infrared Photoacoustic Imaging and Cancer Phototherapy. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2307060. [Google Scholar]
- Barlow, B.R.; Kim, J. Next generation gold nanomaterials for photoacoustic imaging. Nanomedicine 2025, 20, 1479–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karthikeyan, L.; Rithisa, B.; Min, S.; Hong, H.; Kang, H.; Thangam, R.; Vivek, R. Multimodal biomedical utility of polyaniline-based supramolecular nanomaterials. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 493, 152530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.V.; Yao, J. A practical guide to photoacoustic tomography in the life sciences. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menozzi, L.; Yao, J. Deep tissue photoacoustic imaging with light and sound. npj Imaging 2024, 2, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi, S.; Kim, J.; Jeon, H.; Kim, C.; Park, E.-Y. Advancements in photoacoustic detection techniques for biomedical imaging. npj Acoustics 2025, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Hartanto, J.; Joseph, R.; Wu, C.-H.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.-S. Hybrid photoacoustic and fast super-resolution ultrasound imaging. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Pan, Y.; Chen, N.; Zeng, S.; Liu, L.; Gao, R.; Zhang, J.; Fang, C.; Song, L.; Liu, C. Visualizing tumor angiogenesis and boundary with polygon-scanning multiscale photoacoustic microscopy. Photoacoustics 2022, 26, 100342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Z.; Gezginer, I.; Zhou, Q.; Tang, L.; Deán-Ben, X.L.; Razansky, D. Multimodal optoacoustic imaging: Methods and contrast materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024, 53, 6068–6099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Choi, S.; Kim, C.; Kim, J.; Park, B. Review on Photoacoustic Monitoring after Drug Delivery: From Label-Free Biomarkers to Pharmacokinetics Agents. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puglisi, J.D.; Tinoco, I. Absorbance melting curves of RNA. Methods Enzymol. 1989, 180, 304–325. [Google Scholar]
- Stoscheck, C.M. Quantitation of protein. Methods Enzymol. 1990, 182, 50–68. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, S.; Yang, J.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, W.J.; Lee, S.; Kim, C. Deep Learning Enhances Multiparametric Dynamic Volumetric Photoacoustic Computed Tomography In Vivo (DL-PACT). Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2202089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, J.; Xu, Y.; Xu, L.; Nie, L. Quantitative Functional Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Mice with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging. Radiology 2021, 300, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Enaida, H.; Hisatomi, T.; Hata, Y.; Ueno, A.; Goto, Y.; Yamada, T.; Kubota, T.; Ishibashi, T. Brilliant blue G selectively stains the internal limiting membrane/brilliant blue G-assisted membrane peeling. Retina 2006, 26, 631–636. [Google Scholar]
- Moon, H.; Kumar, D.; Kim, H.; Sim, C.; Chang, J.-H.; Kim, J.-M.; Kim, H.; Lim, D.-K. Amplified Photoacoustic Performance and Enhanced Photothermal Stability of Reduced Graphene Oxide Coated Gold Nanorods for Sensitive Photoacoustic Imaging. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 2711–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, Y.A.; Yang, T.; Wang, Q.; Lv, X.; Song, X.; Ke, H.; Guo, Z.; Huang, X.; Hu, J.; Li, Z.; et al. Albumin-coordinated assembly of clearable platinum nanodots for photo-induced cancer theranostics. Biomaterials 2018, 154, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Leon, A.; Wei, P.; Bordera, F.; Wegierak, D.; McMillen, M.; Yan, D.; Hemmingsen, C.; Kolios, M.C.; Pentzer, E.B.; Exner, A.A. Pickering Bubbles as Dual-Modality Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Contrast Agents. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 22308–22317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noh, I.; Kim, M.; Kim, J.; Lee, D.; Oh, D.; Kim, J.; Kim, C.; Jon, S.; Kim, Y.-C. Structure-inherent near-infrared bilayer nanovesicles for use as photoacoustic image-guided chemo-thermotherapy. J. Control. Release 2020, 320, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, D.; Xie, C.; Pu, K. Development of Semiconducting Polymer Nanoparticles for Photoacoustic Imaging. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2017, 38, 1700125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louis, C.; Pluchery, O. Gold Nanoparticles for Physics, Chemistry and Biology; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Repenko, T.; Rix, A.; Nedilko, A.; Rose, J.; Hermann, A.; Vinokur, R.; Moli, S.; Cao-Milàn, R.; Mayer, M.; von Plessen, G.; et al. Strong Photoacoustic Signal Enhancement by Coating Gold Nanoparticles with Melanin for Biomedical Imaging. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mantri, Y.; Jokerst, J.V. Engineering Plasmonic Nanoparticles for Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 9408–9422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.-S.; Zhao, Y.; Yoon, S.J.; Gambhir, S.S.; Emelianov, S. Miniature gold nanorods for photoacoustic molecular imaging in the second near-infrared optical window. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, J.; Zhang, J.; Yang, M.; Cui, D.; de la Fuente, J.M. Glucose-functionalized Au nanoprisms for optoacoustic imaging and near-infrared photothermal therapy. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.-S.; Frey, W.; Kim, S.; Homan, K.; Kruizinga, P.; Sokolov, K.; Emelianov, S. Enhanced thermal stability of silica-coated gold nanorods for photoacoustic imaging and image-guided therapy. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 8867–8878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, W.; Kaur, S.; Kim, Y.D.; Kim, J.-M.; Lee, S.H.; Lim, D.-K. Precise control over the silica shell thickness and finding the optimal thickness for the peak heat diffusion property of AuNR@SiO2. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Kim, J.; VanderLaan, D.; Kubelick, K.P.; Jhunjhunwala, A.; Choe, A.; Emelianov, S.Y. Tunable Interparticle Connectivity in Gold Nanosphere Assemblies for Efficient Photoacoustic Conversion. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2305202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Kubelick, K.P.; Vanderlaan, D.; Qin, D.; Lee, J.; Jhunjhunwala, A.; Cadena, M.; Nikolai, R.J.; Kim, J.; Emelianov, S.Y. Coupling Gold Nanospheres into Nanochain Constructs for High-Contrast, Longitudinal Photoacoustic Imaging. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 7202–7210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Thoröe-Boveleth, S.; Chigrin, D.N.; Kiessling, F.; Lammers, T.; Pallares, R.M. Nanoscale engineering of gold nanostars for enhanced photoacoustic imaging. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; VanderLaan, D.; Lee, J.; Choe, A.; Kubelick, K.P.; Kim, J.; Emelianov, S.Y. Hyper-Branched Gold Nanoconstructs for Photoacoustic Imaging in the Near-Infrared Optical Window. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 9257–9265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canning, A.J.; Vu, T.; Menozzi, L.; Klippel, P.; Chen, X.; Chen, J.; Charity, T.; Hoang, K.; Yang, J.J.; Jing, Y.; et al. Advancing precision photothermal therapy by integrating armored gold nanostars with real-time photoacoustic thermometry and imaging. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadx6350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Remlova, E.; Jessernig, A.; Bammel, M.; Nozdriukhin, D.; Chen, Y.; Cipolato, O.; Deán-Ben, X.L.; Herrmann, I.K.; Razansky, D. Deep tissue optoacoustic monitoring of photothermal treatments in the NIR-II assisted with silica-coated gold nanorods. npj Imaging 2025, 4, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Retout, M.; Lepeintre, V.; Amer, L.; Yim, W.; Jokerst, J.V. Activatable Photoacoustic Probe for Imaging Infection: Gold Nanorod Dissociation In Vivo Reports Bacterial Protease Activity. ACS Nano 2025, 19, 12041–12052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Q.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yan, S.; Li, Z. Copper-based nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 483, 149040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuo, X.; Liu, Z.; Aishajiang, R.; Wang, T.; Yu, D. Recent Progress of Copper-Based Nanomaterials in Tumor-Targeted Photothermal Therapy/Photodynamic Therapy. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, L.; Wang, X.; Rui, X.; Lin, J.; Yang, H.; Tian, Q.; Tao, C.; Yang, S. The In Situ Sulfidation of Cu2O by Endogenous H2S for Colon Cancer Theranostics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 15782–15786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, H.-C.; Ren, J.; Lin, Y.; Gao, D.; Hu, D.; Yin, T.; Qiu, C.; Miao, X.; Liu, C.; Liu, X.; et al. Intravital NIR-II three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging of biomineralized copper sulfide nanoprobes. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 3005–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, Z.; Li, D.; Xiong, Z.; Song, C.; Gao, Y.; Liu, R.; Shen, M.; Shi, X. Antifouling Dendrimer-Entrapped Copper Sulfide Nanoparticles Enable Photoacoustic Imaging-Guided Targeted Combination Therapy of Tumors and Tumor Metastasis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 6069–6080. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Qiu, Z.; Zhao, S.; Huang, Y.; Liang, H. A Unique Multifunctional Nanoenzyme Tailored for Triggering Tumor Microenvironment Activated NIR-II Photoacoustic Imaging and Chemodynamic/Photothermal Combined Therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2022, 11, 2102073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Estelrich, J.; Busquets, M.A. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Photothermal Therapy. Molecules 2018, 23, 1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hubert, V.; Dumot, C.; Ong, E.; Amaz, C.; Canet-Soulas, E.; Chauveau, F.; Wiart, M. MRI coupled with clinically-applicable iron oxide nanoparticles reveals choroid plexus involvement in a murine model of neuroinflammation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kayal, S.; Ramanujan, R.V. Anti-cancer drug loaded iron–gold core–shell nanoparticles (Fe@ Au) for magnetic drug targeting. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 5527–5539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Likhitkar, S.; Bajpai, A. Magnetically controlled release of cisplatin from superparamagnetic starch nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alwi, R.; Telenkov, S.; Mandelis, A.; Leshuk, T.; Gu, F.; Oladepo, S.; Michaelian, K. Silica-coated super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION) as biocompatible contrast agent in biomedical photoacoustics. Biomed. Opt. Express 2012, 3, 2500–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vale, A.C.A.R.; Monte, R.S.; Das, A.; de Azevedo, L.A.; Silva, R.B.; Gomes, A.S.L.; Júnior, S.A. Synthesis and characterization of hybrid mesoporous silica-iron oxide nanocomposite as a potential contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging. Next Mater. 2025, 9, 100992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vo, T.M.T.; Mondal, S.; Nguyen, V.T.; Park, S.; Choi, J.; Bui, N.T.; Oh, J. Rice starch coated iron oxide nanoparticles: A theranostic probe for photoacoustic imaging-guided photothermal cancer therapy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 183, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fithri, N.A.; Wu, Y.; Cowin, G.; Akther, F.; Tran, H.D.N.; Tse, B.; van Holthe, N.W.; Moonshi, S.S.; Peter, K.; Wang, X.; et al. Gold-iron oxide nanoparticle: A unique multimodal theranostic approach for thrombosis. Appl. Mater. Today 2023, 31, 101750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vicente, T.T.; Arsalani, S.; Quiel, M.S.; Fernandes, G.S.P.; Silva, K.R.D.; Fukada, S.Y.; Gualdi, A.J.; Guidelli, É.J.; Baffa, O.; Carneiro, A.A.O.; et al. Improving the Theranostic Potential of Magnetic Nanoparticles by Coating with Natural Rubber Latex for Ultrasound, Photoacoustic Imaging, and Magnetic Hyperthermia: An In Vitro Study. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Periyathambi, P.; Vicente, T.T.; Uliana, J.H.; Prado, M.E.C.D.S.; Gualdi, A.J.; Pavan, T.Z.; Carneiro, A.A.O. Oleic acid-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for enhanced magnetomotive ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging in oil-based phantoms. Mater. Lett. 2026, 403, 139409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gostaviceanu, A.; Gavrilaş, S.; Copolovici, L.; Copolovici, D.M. Graphene-Oxide Peptide-Containing Materials for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hooshyar, P.; Kiani, D.R.; Fakhraeelotfabadi, S.; Fardmanesh, M. Applications of Graphene-Based Nanomaterials as Contrast Agents in Biomedical Imaging Technologies: A Review. Biomed. Mater. Devices 2023, 2, 721–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, R.; He, M.; Yuan, Y.; Tang, L.-J.; Jiang, J.; Chu, X. Single-walled carbon nanotubes hitchhike on Ly-6Chi monocytes for photoacoustic image-guided photothermal shock therapy of metabolic inflammation. Chem. Sci. 2025, 36, 16936–16946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De La Zerda, A.; Zavaleta, C.; Keren, S.; Vaithilingam, S.; Bodapati, S.; Liu, Z.; Levi, J.; Smith, B.R.; Ma, T.-J.; Oralkan, O.; et al. Carbon nanotubes as photoacoustic molecular imaging agents in living mice. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zerda, A.D.L.; Liu, Z.; Bodapati, S.; Teed, R.; Vaithilingam, S.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T.; Chen, X.; Dai, H.; Gambhir, S.S. Ultrahigh Sensitivity Carbon Nanotube Agents for Photoacoustic Molecular Imaging in Living Mice. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 2168–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swierczewska, M.; Choi, K.Y.; Mertz, E.L.; Huang, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, L.; Yoon, H.Y.; Park, J.H.; Bhirde, A.; Lee, S.; et al. One-Step Nanocarbon Functionalization for Biomedical Applications. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3613–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, S.; Yoo, S.W.; Kim, H.J.; Park, J.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, C.; Kim, H. Recent Progress on Molecular Photoacoustic Imaging with Carbon-Based Nanocomposites. Materials 2021, 14, 5643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayanda, O.S.; Mmuoegbulam, A.O.; Okezie, O.; Iya, N.I.D.; Mohammed, S.A.E.; James, P.H.; Muhammad, A.B.; Unimke, A.A.; Alim, S.A.; Yahaya, S.M.; et al. Recent progress in carbon-based nanomaterials: Critical review. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2024, 26, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Zhu, H.; Xing, W.; Tao, P.; Shang, W.; Fu, B.; Song, C.; Hong, Y.; Dickey, M.D.; et al. Synthesis of Liquid Gallium@Reduced Graphene Oxide Core–Shell Nanoparticles with Enhanced Photoacoustic and Photothermal Performance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 6779–6790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, S.; Kim, S.Y. Gold Nanorod/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite Nanocarriers for Near-Infrared-Induced Cancer Therapy and Photoacoustic Imaging. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 11849–11860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawasaki, R.; Kondo, K.; Miura, R.; Yamana, K.; Isozaki, H.; Shimada, R.; Kawamura, S.; Hirano, H.; Nishimura, T.; Tarutani, N.; et al. Theranostic Agent Combining Fullerene Nanocrystals and Gold Nanoparticles for Photoacoustic Imaging and Photothermal Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Fan, Y.; Yang, Z.; Wong, C.-Y.; Yang, M. A novel reactive oxygen species nano-amplifier for tumor-targeted photoacoustic imaging and synergistic therapy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 681, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sivasubramanian, M.; Chu, C.-H.; Cheng, S.-H.; Chen, N.-T.; Chen, C.-T.; Chuang, Y.C.; Yu, H.; Chen, Y.-L.; Liao, L.-D.; Lo, L.-W. Multimodal Magnetic Resonance and Photoacoustic Imaging of Tumor-Specific Enzyme-Responsive Hybrid Nanoparticles for Oxygen Modulation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 910902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; He, M.; Luo, Y.; Ye, F.; Tian, J.; Zhao, S. A dual stimulus-responsive NIR-II photoacoustic probe for precise diagnosis of colon cancer and photothermal-starvation synergistic therapy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2025, 428, 137263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, N.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S.; Wu, Y.; Ge, X.; Song, J.; Ma, Q.; Gao, S. Stimuli-Responsive Hybrid Vesicle for Tumor Dual-Model NIR-II Photoacoustic and Fluorescence Imaging and Precise Radiotherapy. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 10, 2200694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Cui, D.; Shi, Y.; Huang, G. Tumor-specific enhanced NIR-II photoacoustic imaging via photothermal and low-pH coactivated AuNR@PNIPAM-VAA nanogel. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leng, N.; Zhou, Y.; Wen, C.; Fang, Q.; Guo, X.; Cai, B.; Huang, K.-B.; Liang, H. GSH responsive AuNRs@TFF nanotheranostic for NIR-II photoacoustic imaging-guided CDT/PTT synergistic cancer therapy. Biomater. Adv. 2025, 166, 214056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, X.; Jiang, Z.; Dai, J.; Fu, Q.; Pan, S. Photoacoustic contrast agents: A review focusing on image-guided therapy. Nanoscale Horiz. 2025, 10, 1285–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavigli, L.; Khlebtsov, B.N.; Centi, S.; Khlebtsov, N.G.; Pini, R.; Ratto, F. Photostability of Contrast Agents for Photoacoustics: The Case of Gold Nanorods. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, F.; Feng, X.; Bai, L.; Zhang, R.; Liu, S.; Ding, R.; Kishor, R.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, Y. One laser pulse generates two photoacoustic signals. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1602.07894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Wang, L.V. Grueneisen Relaxation Photoacoustic Microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 066005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Ning, L.; Zeng, Z.; Pu, K. Development of Second Near-Infrared Photoacoustic Imaging Agents. Trends Chem. 2021, 3, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, X.; Fu, Q.; Bai, L.; Chen, B.; Wang, R.; Gao, S.; Song, J. Photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy in the second near-infrared window. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 8835–8851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.; Yin, L.; Zhang, X.; Liang, T.; Guo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Xie, C.; Fan, Q. Recent advances in small molecule dye-based nanotheranostics for NIR-II photoacoustic imaging-guided cancer therapy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1002006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knights, O.B.; Ye, S.; Ingram, N.; Freear, S.; McLaughlan, J.R.; McLaughlan, J.R. Optimising gold nanorods for photoacoustic imaging in vitro. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 1472–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jinhwan, K.; Anthony, Y.; Kelsey, K.; Stanislav, E. Gold nanoparticles conjugated with DNA aptamer for photoacoustic detection of human matrix metalloproteinase-9. Photoacoustics 2022, 25, 100307. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, N.; Wu, X. The photothermal coupling of TiN@Au core-shell nanorods applied to near-infrared photothermal therapy. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2024, 204, 109242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.; Wang, L.V. The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 19, 365–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Chen, Y.; Ma, C. Photothermally tunable Fabry-Pérot fiber interferometer for photoacoustic mesoscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express 2020, 11, 2607–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Mirg, S.; Gaddale, P.; Agrawal, S.; Li, M.; Nguyen, V.; Xu, T.; Li, Q.; Liu, J.; Tu, W.; et al. Multiparametric Brain Hemodynamics Imaging Using a Combined Ultrafast Ultrasound and Photoacoustic System. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2401467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kai-Wei, C.; Ermek, B.; Xueding, W.; Kwoon, W.; Ömer, O.; Guan, X. Photoacoustic imaging of visually evoked cortical and subcortical hemodynamic activity in mouse brain: Feasibility study with piezoelectric and capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) arrays. Biomed. Opt. Express 2023, 14, 6283–6290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Zhang, B.; Feng, Q.; He, H.; Ding, Y.; Liu, Q. Photoacoustic Wavefront Shaping with High Signal to Noise Ratio for Light Focusing Through Scattering Media. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, M.; Jing, X.; Gao, S.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, T. Combining Windowed Enveloping and the Delay and Sum Algorithm for Photoacoustic Image Reconstruction. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 4877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gröhl, J.; Kirchner, T.; Adler, T.J.; Hacker, L.; Holzwarth, N.; Hernández-Aguilera, A.; Herrera, M.A.; Santos, E.; Bohndiek, S.E.; Maier-Hein, L. Learned spectral decoloring enables photoacoustic oximetry. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, W.; Zhang, H.; Huang, C.; Shijo, V.; Xu, C.; Xu, W.; Xia, J. Deep Learning Enhanced Volumetric Photoacoustic Imaging of Vasculature in Human. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, e2301277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matteis, V.D. Exposure to Inorganic Nanoparticles: Routes of Entry, Immune Response, Biodistribution and In Vitro/In Vivo Toxicity Evaluation. Toxics 2017, 5, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mülhopt, S.; Diabaté, S.; Dilger, M.; Adelhelm, C.; Anderlohr, C.; Bergfeldt, T.; Torre, J.G.D.L.; Jiang, Y.; Valsami-Jones, E.; Langevin, D.; et al. Characterization of Nanoparticle Batch-To-Batch Variability. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Bai, X.; Liang, Y.; He, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, C.; Song, C.; Li, S.; et al. Dynamic microvascular monitoring with miniaturized omnidirectional broadband photoacoustic imaging system for living entities (MOBILE). Nat. Commun. 2026, 17, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phuc, N.V.; Folz, J.; Li, Y.; Henry, J.; Zhang, W.; Qian, T.; Wang, X.; Paulus, Y.M. Indocyanine green-enhanced multimodal photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography molecular imaging of choroidal neovascularization. J. Biophotonics 2021, 14, e202000458. [Google Scholar]
- Oberdick, S.D.; Jordanova, K.V.; Lundstrom, J.T.; Parigi, G.; Poorman, M.E.; Zabow, G.; Keenan, K.E. Iron oxide nanoparticles as positive T1 contrast agents for low-field magnetic resonance imaging at 64 mT. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 11520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armanetti, P.; Flori, A.; Avigo, C.; Conti, L.; Valtancoli, B.; Petroni, D.; Doumett, S.; Cappiello, L.; Ravagli, C.; Baldi, G.; et al. Spectroscopic and photoacoustic characterization of encapsulated iron oxide super-paramagnetic nanoparticles as a new multiplatform contrast agent. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 199, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makwana, V.; Karanjia, J.; Haselhorst, T.; Anoopkumar-Dukie, S.; Rudrawar, S. Liposomal doxorubicin as targeted delivery platform: Current trends in surface functionalization. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 593, 120117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wood, C.A.; Han, S.; Kim, C.S.; Wen, Y.; Sampaio, D.R.T.; Harris, J.T.; Homan, K.A.; Swain, J.L.; Emelianov, S.Y.; Sood, A.K.; et al. Clinically translatable quantitative molecular photoacoustic imaging with liposome-encapsulated ICG J-aggregates. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Imaging Contrast Agents Type | Size and Shape | Light Source | PA Signal | Stability | Target and Applications | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Au nanosphere assemblies | Sphere (6.8–10.2 nm) | NIR (700–900 nm) | Semi-connected: 2.5× (vs. nanorods), 1.3× (vs. nanostars) | Stable for >1200 laser pulses (≤40 mJ/cm2, ANSI) | Strong and stable PA contrast agent design for longitudinal PA imaging at or above clinical laser fluence limits | [45] |
| Polydopamine-coated gold sphere chains | Sphere (40 nm) | NIR (800 nm) | >550% higher PA signal than uncoated AuNRs | Stable for >1000 laser pulses (≤30 mJ/cm2, ANSI) | High-contrast, photostable PA contrast agent for longitudinal molecular PA cancer imaging in vitro and in vivo | [46] |
| Gold nanostars | Nanostars (45 ± 5 nm) | NIR (700–800 nm) | MOPS-AuNS: 19–25× vs. spherical AuNP | Stable for 10 min continuous irradiation; 48 h in FBS | Melanin shells are used to maximize the PA signal in the 700–800 nm region for in vitro and ex vivo imaging | [47] |
| Hyper- branched gold nanoconstructs | branched gold nanoconstructs (35–75 nm), branch thickness: ~6 nm | NIR (700–900 nm) | PA signal: 2.43× vs. GNRs, 1.44× vs. GNSTs | Stable for 200 pulses (10 mJ/cm2) | Blackbody-like PA agent with polarization-independent strong NIR absorption, high PA output, and excellent photostability. | [48] |
| Silica- coated AuNRs | AuNRs (length of 45–50 nm and a diameter of 15–20 nm, an aspect ratio of roughly 2.5–3.0); silica shell about 15 nm thickness | NIR-II (1064 nm) | In deep tissue, PA intensity increases approximately linearly with temperature up to ~50 °C | No photodegradation at ns 9 mJ/cm2, structure maintained even after CW 16 W/cm2 | Deep-tissue, real-time optoacoustic monitoring of photothermal therapy, | [50] |
| Armored core–gold nanostars | Diameter ~98 nm (range 106~125 nm across formulations), hollow/caged nanostar + outer shell (shell thickness tunable ~1–10 nm). | NIR (800 nm) | AC-GNS produces a strong PA contrast (In vivo PACT successfully tracked doses 0.5–2.5 pM.) | PA signal persists even after repeated PACT+ high-fluence PTT, with no long-term toxicity | Infection diagnosis and real-time evaluation of gingipain inhibitors for Alzheimer-related drug development. | [49] |
| Activatable AuNR assemblies | Diarginine-assembled AuNR clusters with PEG–peptide | NIR (850 nm) | Up to ~4-fold PA signal increase upon protease-triggered dissociation | Structurally stable under safe fluences; activation occurs specifically in the presence of the target protease | PA-guided precision photothermal therapy of solid tumors | [51] |
| Imaging Contrast Agents Type | Size and Shape | Light Source | PA Signal | Stability | Target and Applications | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2S-activated Cu2O/CuS probe | Hollow nanoparticles (21–26 nm) | NIR (808 nm) | Strong “turn-on” PA signal after sulfidation; rapid and significant increase vs. Cu2O | Stable in physiological pH; selective activation by endogenous H2S | Colon cancer theragnostic: PA imaging-guided PTT | [54] |
| CuS nanoprobes | spherical (6–8 nm), hydrodynamic diameter increased to ~16.9 nm | NIR-II (1064 nm) | 6–8× higher PA signal vs. water | High colloidal stability in serum; good biocompatibility | Tumor, vascular, and organ imaging using NIR-II PA imaging | [55] |
| RGD-CuS DENPs | Core: 4.2 nm (spherical), dendrimer-entrapped CuS NPs | NIR-II (1064 nm) | 7× stronger PA signal vs. untreated control | Stable dendrimer-encapsulated structure in physiological media | TNBC tumor model: NIR-II PA imaging-guided PTT + gene therapy | [56] |
| Ox-POM@Cu Nanoenzyme | spherical (~5 nm) | NIR-II (1064 nm) | PA signal increases linearly with GSH; strong NIR-II activation | High hydrophilicity and stability; oxygen-vacancy-enhanced electron transfer | TME-activated PAI + synergistic CDT/PTT cancer therapy | [57] |
| Imaging Contrast Agents Type | Size and Shape | Light Source | PA Signal | Stability | Target and Applications | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2@Fe3O4 core–shell | Spherical (~11 nm) | NIR-II (1064 nm) | Detected 0.23 mg/mL at 10 mm within the Intralipid matrix | Stable in serum, no aggregation | Biocompatible PA contrast agent for deep tissue imaging and detection of silica-SPIONs in dense muscle (avian pectus, murine quadriceps) | [62] |
| mSiO2@Fe3O4 core–shell | spherical (~260 nm) | (532 nm and NIR-II (1064 nm)) | Up to 0.0763 a.u., 28.76 dB SNR at 17.6 mg/mL at 532 nm) | long-term dispersion stability | Potential PA contrast agent providing good spatial and depth resolution for biomedical imaging | [63] |
| NRL-coated magnetic nanoparticles | Spherical, NRL-coated magnetic nanoparticles (15–20 nm) | NIR (750 nm) | At 0.50 wt%: contrast 28.81 dB (NRL-400) | Improved colloidal stability and magnetic response in aqueous phantoms | NPs for MMUS, PA imaging, and magnetic hyperthermia | [66] |
| Oleic acid- coated iron oxide nanoparticles | Spherical (OA-IONPs: 12–14 nm) | NIR LED arrays (850 nm) | At 1.5 mg/mL: PA SNR ≈ 11.3 dB; PA signal increases with concentration | Stable dispersion in oil-based phantom, suitable for repeated MMUS/PA measurements | Contrast agent for MMUS and PA imaging in non-aqueous/oil-based phantoms, with potential translation to specialized biomedical imaging setups | [67] |
| Imaging Contrast Agents Type | Size and Shape | Light Source | PA Signal | Stability | Target and Applications | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ga@RGO core–shell NPs | Liquid Ga core with RGO shell (~660 nm) | NIR (680–970 nm) | ~5× higher PA signal than Ga NPs and ~2× higher than AuNRs; gain ~25 dB | Shell prevents coalescence; chemically stable | PA contrast agent and photothermal platform for cancer theranostics | [76] |
| AuNR/FP-PrGO-Ce6 nanocarriers | AuNRs on PrGO sheets with FA-PEG and Ce6 (~387 nm) | NIR (680–900 nm) | >2.4–2.5× higher PA amplitude than bare AuNR; increases with concentration | Stable in aqueous/serum media; stable over repeated laser on/off cycles | Targeted PA imaging and synergistic PDT/PTT of folate-receptor–positive tumors | [77] |
| Imaging Contrast Agents Type | Size and Shape | Light Source | PA Signal | Stability | Target and Applications | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu2+-BSA-Gox@PANI (dual H2S/glucose–responsive) | Uniformly distributed spherical (~210 nm) | NIR II (1064 nm) | 2× (vs bare PANI) | Stable for six 808 nm laser irradiation on/off cycle at 1.5 W/cm2 | Precise diagnosis and photothermal-starvation synergistic therapy of colon cancer | [81] |
| AuNNPs–Ag2S vesicle (pH-responsive hybrid vesicle) | Assembled vesicle (~190 nm) | NIR-II (950–1700 nm) | 9-fold increase compared to baseline after accumulation in tumors | Engineered for single use and not stable in an acidic microenvironment | Dual-mode NIR-II PA/fluorescence imaging–guided precise radiotherapy | [82] |
| AuNR@PNIPAM-VAA nanogel (low pH and thermal co-activated) | Nanorods with encapsulated sphere (~100 nm) | NIR II (1064 nm) | Shows ~1.6-fold enhancement with an increase in temperature in the simulated microenvironment | Stable for 6 laser irradiation on/off cycles at 0.75 W/cm2 | Tumor-specific, switchable NIR-II PA imaging for low-pH tumor microenvironment detection and dynamic monitoring | [83] |
| AuNRs@TFF (GSH-responsive AuNRs with tannic-acid–Fe network) | Nanorods (~70-80 nm) | NIR II (1064 nm) | 5-fold higher than bare AuNRs in vitro and ~3.5-fold higher in vivo | Stable for 5 consecutive laser irradiation on/off cycles at 1.0 W/cm2 | NIR-II PA-guided synergistic chemodynamic therapy (CDT) and photothermal therapy (PTT) for tumors | [84] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kim, Y.D.; Prabagar, J.S.; Lim, D.-K. Amplified Light Absorption with Nanomaterials for Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging in Biomedical Research: A Review. Bioengineering 2026, 13, 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13040404
Kim YD, Prabagar JS, Lim D-K. Amplified Light Absorption with Nanomaterials for Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging in Biomedical Research: A Review. Bioengineering. 2026; 13(4):404. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13040404
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Yong Duk, Jijoe Samuel Prabagar, and Dong-Kwon Lim. 2026. "Amplified Light Absorption with Nanomaterials for Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging in Biomedical Research: A Review" Bioengineering 13, no. 4: 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13040404
APA StyleKim, Y. D., Prabagar, J. S., & Lim, D.-K. (2026). Amplified Light Absorption with Nanomaterials for Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging in Biomedical Research: A Review. Bioengineering, 13(4), 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13040404

