Next Article in Journal
Feasibility of High-Cellular-Resolution Full-Field, Artificial-Intelligence-Assisted, Real-Time Optical Coherence Tomography in the Evaluation of Vitiligo: A Prospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Study
Previous Article in Journal
Concurrent Learning Approach for Estimation of Pelvic Tilt from Anterior–Posterior Radiograph
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biomaterials for Alveolar Ridge Preservation as a Preoperative Procedure for Implant Treatment: History and Current Evidence
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Bacterial Flora in Screw-Fixed Superstructures with Different Sealing Materials: A Comparative Clinical Trial

Bioengineering 2024, 11(2), 195; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11020195
by Kikue Yamaguchi *, Motohiro Munakata, Kota Ishii and Takashi Uesugi
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Bioengineering 2024, 11(2), 195; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11020195
Submission received: 29 January 2024 / Revised: 14 February 2024 / Accepted: 16 February 2024 / Published: 19 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Implant Surgery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have systematically investigated the effect of Zn-containing GI on the bacterial flora in screw access holes in comparison with some different sealing materials. It is very valauble that the present study further confirmed the potential antibacterial efficacy of Zn-rich sealing materials in vivo. However, it should be concerned that the investigation was only invovled in only 19 patients from age 20 to 80, and the potential different difference between the young and old patients, for example 20-50 and 50-80. It is suggested to provide more information involving the age  bracket before publication. 

Author Response

We express our strong appreciation to the Reviewer for their insightful comments on our paper. We feel the comments have helped us significantly improve the paper.

We have added patient data in Table 2. And we have edited the entire document.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Methodological Biases exist

(The Authors must see my remarks)

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We express our strong appreciation to the Reviewer for their insightful comments on our paper. We feel the comments have helped us significantly improve the paper.

We have responded to the comments in the PDF. In addition, we have highlighted and marked the revised sections of the text. Finally, we also proofread the full text in English.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop