Next Article in Journal
Implementation of a Pilot-Scale Biotrickling Filtration Process for Biogas Desulfurization under Anoxic Conditions Using Agricultural Digestate as Trickling Liquid
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of Conventional and Novel Treatments for Osteoporotic Hip Replacements
Previous Article in Journal
Jointly Learning Non-Cartesian k-Space Trajectories and Reconstruction Networks for 2D and 3D MR Imaging through Projection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hyper-Branched Cyclodextrin-Based Polymers as Anticoagulant Agents: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Bioengineering
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/bioengineering10020159
bioengineering-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

De Novo Design of Imidazopyridine-Tethered Pyrazolines That Target Phosphorylation of STAT3 in Human Breast Cancer Cells

by
Akshay Ravish
1,†,
Rashmi Shivakumar
1,†,
Zhang Xi
2,†,
Min Hee Yang
3,
Ji-Rui Yang
4,
Ananda Swamynayaka
5,
Omantheswara Nagaraja
5,
Mahendra Madegowda
5,
Arunachalam Chinnathambi
6,
Sulaiman Ali Alharbi
6,
Vijay Pandey
4,7,
Gautam Sethi
8,*,
Kwang Seok Ahn
3,*,
Peter E. Lobie
2,4,7,* and
Basappa Basappa
1,*
1
Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Department of Studies in Organic Chemistry, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore 570006, India
2
Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518055, China
3
Department of Science in Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
4
Tsinghua Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
5
Department of Studies in Physics, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore 570006, India
6
Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
7
Institute of Biopharmaceutical and Health Engineering, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
8
Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117600, Singapore
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Bioengineering 2023, 10(2), 159; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020159
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Revised: 2 January 2023 / Accepted: 8 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Convergence of Science and Engineering: A Promising Window toward Improving the Public Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In breast cancer (BC), STAT3 is hyperactivated. This study explored the design of imidazopyridine-tethered pyrazolines as a de novo drug strategy for inhibiting STAT3 phosphorylation in human BC cells. This involved the synthesis and characterization of two series of compounds namely, 1-(3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo [1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-2-(4-(substituted)piperazin-1-yl)ethanone and N-substituted-3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazoline-1-carbothioamides. Compound 3f with 2,3-dichlorophenyl substitution was recognized among the tested series as a lead structure that inhibited the viability of MCF-7 cells with an IC50 value of 9.2 μM. A dose- and time-dependent inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation at Tyr705 and Ser727 was observed in MCF-7 and T47D cells when compound 3f was added in vitro. Calculations using density functional theory showed that the title compounds HOMOs and LUMOs are situated on imidazopyridine-pyrazoline and nitrophenyl rings, respectively. Hence, compound 3f effectively inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation in MCF-7 and T47D cells, indicating that these structures may be an alternative synthon to target STAT3 signaling in BC.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women [1,2,3,4]. As shown in numerous studies, various drugs such as tamoxifen, vinflunine, anastrazole, 5-fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, paclitaxel/docetaxel, ribociclib, olaparib, and other drugs have been shown to possess therapeutic potential for women with BC depending on the stage and the specific molecular subtype [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Genes that encode transcription factors are directly involved in breast cancer progression, proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, and chemotherapy resistance [13,14]. STAT3 is one such transcription factor that harbors six functional domains, including the terminal-NH2 domain, the coiled-coil domain, the DNA-binding domain, the SRC homology 2 domain, and the transactivation domain [15,16]. STAT3 is activated by both tyrosine and serine phosphorylation and translocates into the nucleus to regulate transcription [17,18,19].
De novo drug design retains the potential for the discovery of new and potent lead molecules for oncology [20]. Pharmacology has heavily utilized imidazopyridine scaffolds in drug development [21]. Ten approved drugs contain imidazopyridine, and another 12 are in active clinical development [22,23]. A synthetic imidazopyridine compound 16, was synthesized, tested, and determined to reduce the level of phospho-STAT3 and downstream signaling cascades in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, which was attributed to an increase in SHP-1A [24]. Furthermore, the design and synthesis of an imidazopyridine scaffold-bearing compound (P3971) has been identified as a potent STAT3 inhibitor with an IC50 value of 350 nM and demonstrated significant antiproliferative activity against a variety of cancerous cell lines including HCT116 and H460 [25]. Additionally, pyrazoles may provide better pharmacological effects, and have also generated a number of drugs such as pyrazofurin, celecoxib, ramifenazone, lonazolac, and rimonabant [26,27,28,29,30]. We reported the synthesis of pyridine-fused pyrazoles as a STAT3 inhibitor and an inhibitor of cancer cell growth [31]. Additionally, the pyrazole-based compound MNS1-Leu inhibited IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in patient-derived HGG cells without adversely affecting Akt, STAT1, JAK2, or ERK1/2 phosphorylation [32]. Compound C6 was also discovered to be a STAT3-specific inhibitor that had the strongest anti-proliferation activities against breast cancer cells with an IC50 value of 160 nM [33]. In light of this, we developed a conventional de novo design and identified the essential output structures comprising imidazopyridine, pyrazole, pyrrole, and proposed a series of imidazopyridine-tethered pyrazolines (ITP) that could target STAT3 in breast cancer cells based on synthetic accessibility and chemical stability (Figure 1).

2. Results and Discussion

Using the literature method, we initially synthesized an intermediate (1-[2-methyl-imidazo[1,2-α] pyridine-3-yl]ethanone) by reacting 2-aminopridine with 3-bromopentane-2,4-dione [34]. Further, the chalcone [(E)-1-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-α]pyridin-3-yl)-3-(3-nitrophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one] was synthesized by the condensation reaction between the intermediateate and 3-nitro-benzaldehyde in presence of alcoholic NaOH, using the literature protocol [35]. The 2-pyrazoline compound 1 [(2,6-dimethyl-3-(5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine)] was synthesized by refluxing the chalcone and hydrazine hydrate in ethanol solvent. The synthesis of compound 2 [(1-(3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)] was synthesized by reacting compound 1 with ethanol via acidic dehydration reaction. Furthermore, the synthesis of 2-pyrazoline compounds (3a–i) [1-(3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-2-(4-substitutted-piperazin-1-yl)ethanones] was prepared by reacting the compound 1 with chloroactetyl chloride, and substituted-piperazines under basic condition. The compounds 4(a–h) [3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-N-substituted-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole-1-carbothioamide] were synthesized by reacting compound 1 with substituted-isothiocyanates under basic condition (Scheme 1, Table 1). All synthesized compounds were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and LCMS techniques. The NMR spectral peaks were assigned to all the compounds, which were consistent with the theoretical calculations.
The goal herein was to assess the ability of imidazopyridine-tethered pyrazolines to inhibit cell viability in mammary carcinoma cells (using the Alamar Blue assay), since pyridine-fused pyrazoles were previously shown to inhibit cell viability in various breast cancer cells [36,37]. Results of the study indicated that compounds such as (3f), (3e), (4g), and 3g inhibited MCF-7 cell viability with IC50 values of 9.27, 13.24, and 10.90 μM, respectively (Figure 2). These compounds, which contained substitutions of 2,3-dichlorophenyl, 4-chlorophenyl, 2,5-disubstituted trifluorophenyl, 2-fluoro,4-chloro-phenyl groups as the side chain, exhibited relative inhibition of MCF-7 cell viability. The viability of T47D, BT-474, and SK-BR-3 cells was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by the lead compound 3f indicating that the compound was efficacious to decrease the viability of human breast cancer cells (Table 2; Supplementary Figures). The low chemical stability of thio-urea-based compounds may account for the inactivity of most thiourea-conjugated pyrazolines (excluding 4g) against TNBC cells. Further, compounds 3f, 3h, and 4b showed significant effect against TNBC cells, but were not toxic to the normal MCF-10A cells, indicating their selectivity towards cancer cell cytotoxicity.
Further, the in silico mode-of-action analysis was performed for lead compound 3f using CHEMBL’s latest version as described by kalakoti et al., [38]. For this purpose, the smile format of compound 3f was added into the similarity searching engine of CHEMBL, which yielded 14,856 bio-activity profiles and which gave the choice of organism, cell type, and also the predicted human targets in the similarity ranking order [39]. The analysis of the results sheet identified STAT3 as a target for compound 3f with a ranking of 4783 indicating the predicted score would be reasonable to test in in vitro functional studies.
Therefore, in vitro experiments were performed to evaluate the effect of compound 3f on the phosphorylation of STAT3 in MCF-7 and T47D cells, utilizing our laboratory protocol [40]. For this purpose, Western blot analysis was performed after the treatment of MCF-7 and T47D cells with compound 3f (0, 1, 3, 5 μM) and using p-STAT3 (Tyr705), p-STAT3 (Ser727), and STAT3 antibodies for blotting. Analysis of the results indicated that compound 3f reduced the phosphorylation level of STAT3 at Tyr705 and Ser727 in a dose-dependent manner without affecting the total STAT3 protein expression (Figure 3A). Furthermore, compound 3f also reduced the phosphorylation of STAT3 at Tyr705 and Ser727 in a time-dependent manner in both MCF-7 and T47D cells (Figure 3B). These results clearly suggest that compound 3f decreased the constitutive phosphorylation of STAT3 in ER+ breast cancer cell lines.
In order to understand the lead structure specificity in the bioactivity of the ITP compounds, DFT calculations were performed. From the frontier molecular orbital (FMOs) theory, HOMO and LUMO are the most influential factors in bioactivity. HOMO has the priority to provide electrons, while LUMO can accept electrons. Moreover, the difference in energy between these two FMOs can be used to predict the strength and stability of molecular complexes [41]. Figure 4 shows the molecular orbital of compounds, while Table 2 lists the calculated global chemical reactivity descriptor parameters of compounds.
HOMO-LUMO levels indicate the interactions between the compound and the protein target. Usually, the HOMO of the compound interacts with the LUMO of the target for binding, and vice versa. A higher HOMO and lower LUMO energies of the molecule imply greater target stability and binding. The lower HOMO-LUMO gap indicates that the lead has lower kinetic stability or higher chemical reactivity and polarizability. Compounds 4g and 3f have the most considerable ionization potential among the compounds, 6.905 eV and 6.764 eV, respectively. All of the synthesized molecules are stable within the permitted limits. Molecules with high polarizability are chemically more soft or reactive, related to chemical hardness. Figure 4 shows contour plots of the HOMO and LUMO for compounds 3f and 4g. The green and red contours surrounding the atoms represent the negative and positive lobes of wave functions, respectively. The green and red contours encircling the atoms depict the wave function’s negative and positive lobes. It is clear from the plots that the HOMO is localized on the dimethylimidazole-pyridin, pyrazoline sites, and O and S atoms of all the molecules. In contrast, LUMO is localized on the nitrophenyl ring in all the molecules.
The distribution of electrostatic potential (EP) over atomic sites is represented by the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) profile, which can be connected to the partial charge distribution, the electronegativity of atoms in lead molecules, and their interactions. The MEP plots of compounds 3f and 4g are shown in Figure 5, where the EP varies from the negative (red) to the positive value (blue) in the sequence given by the color spectrum: red (negative) < orange < yellow < green < blue (positive). The negative EPs are located on the O atomic sites of C=O and N-O2, which indicate that these sites are electron-rich. The positive EPs are seen on H atoms, particularly for H attached to the N, indicating this is an electron-deficient site. Depending on the nature of EPs, these sites would prefer to bind to sites having the opposite potential in the binding pocket or hydrogen bonding interaction (Table 3). For example, the electron-rich C=O should combine with positively charged protons of amino acid residues present in the binding pocket.
The rigid docking method analyzed the synthesized compounds 3f and 4g [42]. AutoDock4.2 was used to determine the orientation of inhibitors bound to STAT3 (PDB ID: 1BG1) and the conformation with the highest binding energy value for each molecule. The binding modes of STAT3 inhibitors were analyzed using the PyMOL software to identify new STAT3 inhibitors. The binding site at the SH2 domain of STAT3 was described by Becker et al. [43]. It was used to elucidate the interactions that contributed to the compounds’ binding affinity to STAT3.
The promising binding modes of 3f and 4g at the SH2 domain of the STAT3 protein were analyzed. Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the ligand and receptor complex poses with the highest binding energy. The binding energies of 3f and 4g to the SH2 domain of STAT3 were observed to be −9.27 kcal/mol and −6.95 kcal/mol, respectively, indicating that the molecule has a high affinity for the target. The binding patterns of the lead molecules 3f and 4g were studied. Both molecules bound to the same site on the receptor molecule (STAT3) and exhibited similar interactions with the vital amino acids of the SH2 domain of STAT3. The docking results showed that the ketone group of 3f forms a hydrogen bond with Leu706 of the SH2 domain, and the nitro group of the same molecule interacts with ARG688 via a salt bridge. One of the oxygens in the nitro group of 4g forms a hydrogen bond and the other oxygen participated in the interaction through a salt bridge with the same ARG688 (Figure 8). To summarize, the presence of nitro groups (Figure 8 and Figure 9) in the molecules and structural flexibility facilitates its interaction with the SH2 domain of STAT3.
Finally, we attempted to understand the effect of compound 3f on the blocking of pSTAT3 into nuclear functionally since pSTAT3 dimers could enter the nucleus to give transcription. For this purpose, we conducted an immunocytochemistry assay using MCF-7 and T47D cells. We observed that compound 3f inhibited the nuclear translocation of STAT3 in MCF-7 and T47D cells. We also analyzed the distribution of phospho-STAT3 in the nucleus and cytoplasm using fluorescent-labeled antibodies. Compound 3f could block the nuclear translocation of pSTAT3 in MCF-7 and T47D cells, as shown in Figure 10A,B, respectively.

3. Materials and Methods

All chemicals and solvents for chemistry were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and TCI chemicals, INDIA. The completion of the reaction was monitored by pre-coated silica gel TLC plates. 1H and 13C NMR were recorded on an Agilent NMR spectrophotometer (400 MHz); TMS was used as an internal standard and CDCl3 was used as a solvent, chemical shifts are expressed as ppm.

3.1. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Imidazole-Pyridine Substituted Pyrazoline Derivatives

1-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)ethenone reacting with 3-nitrobenzaldehyde in 30% KOH gives chalcone which on treating with hydrazine hydrate gives 2-pyrazolines. The synthesis of the compound was reported in earlier reports and complies with the reported molecule [34,35].

3.2. Synthesis of 2-Pyrazoline Derivatives (3a–i) from 2,6-Dimethyl-3-(5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine

One mmol of (1) was dissolved in toluene and kept in an ice bath. After 15 min triethylamine (1.5 mmol) was added in portions followed chloroacetyl chloride (1.5 mmol) and the reaction was monitored by TLC. After the completion of the reaction, toluene was distilled off under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with chloroform. The crude solid was used directly in the next reaction without further purification. The crude solid (1 mmol) and substituted piperazines (1 mmol) were dissolved in acetone and refluxed overnight with triethylamine (1 mmol). TLC was monitored and acetone was distilled off, the crude obtained was extracted with chloroform and recrystallized using DCM-Hexane to afford substituted pyrazoline derivatives(3a–i).

3.3. Synthesis of 2-Pyrazoline Derivatives (4a–h) from 2,6-Dimethyl-3-(5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine

Pyrazoline derivative (1) (1 mmol) and substituted isothiocyanates (1.2 mmol) were dissolved in toluene and refluxed overnight with triethylamine (1 mmol). The reaction was monitored by TLC and reaction mass was filtered, washed with hexane to remove unreacted isothiocyanate, and dried in hot air oven to yield pure substituted thiourea derivatives (4a–h).

3.4. 1-(3-(2,6-Dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)ethanone (2)

Yellow solid; MP: 166–168 °C; yield: 92%;1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.28 (s, 1H), 8.14–8.11 (m, 2H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.56–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.30–7.23 (m, 1H), 5.65 (dd, J = 11.7, 4.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.06 (dd, J = 11.6, 5.6 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.35 (dd, J = 17.2, 4.8 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.59 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.50 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.40, 153.78, 153.32, 151.49, 150.77, 148.72, 137.10, 135.07, 134.93, 131.57, 128.63, 127.91, 125.82, 121.01, 118.30, 62.92(CH), 49.65(CH2), 27.07(CH3), 23.77(CH3), 21.48(CH3); MS = 377.1488, m/z = 378.1891 [M + 1]+

3.5. 1-(2-(3-(2,6-Dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)piperidin-4-one (3a)

Yellow solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.21 (s, 1H), 8.21–8.06 (m, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.27 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (dd, J = 11.5, 4.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.05 (dd, J = 17.1, 11.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.96 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H, COCH2), 3.83 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H, COCH2), 3.36 (dd, J = 17.2, 4.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.09–2.86 (m, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.59 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.51 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 213.42, 172.00, 153.82, 150.90, 148.42, 137.20, 135.18, 135.07, 131.44, 128.70, 128.05, 125.73, 121.17, 118.15, 82.39, 82.07, 81.76, 63.71, 63.19, 58.41, 49.26, 46.30((CH2)2), 23.84(CH3), 21.58(CH3); MS = 474.2016, m/z = 475.2095 [M + 1]+

3.6. Tert-butyl-4-(2-(3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)piperazine-1-carboxylate (3b)

Yellow solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, cdcl3): δ 9.21 (s, 1H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (s, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.25 (m, 1H), 5.64 (dd, J = 11.8, 4.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.04 (dd, J = 17.3, 11.9 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.82 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, COCH2), 3.69 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, COCH2), 3.48 (s, 4H, (CH2)2), 3.35 (dd, J = 17.3, 5.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.65–2.59 (m, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.59 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.44 (s, 9H, (CH3)3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.94, 159.69, 153.80, 153.68, 151.91, 150.87, 148.48, 137.18, 135.12, 135.03, 131.48, 128.67, 127.99, 125.79, 121.12, 118.20, 84.70(C(CH3)), 64.68(CH2), 63.15(CH), 58.33(CH2)2, 50.48(CH2)2, 49.23(CH2), 33.45(CH3)3, 23.80(CH3), 21.53(CH3).

3.7. 1-(3-(2,6-Dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-2-(piperazin-1-yl)ethanone (3c)

Yellow; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.20 (s, 1H), 8.14 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), 7.70–7.48 (m, 3H), 7.28 (s, 1H), 5.65 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.04 (dd, J = 12.0, 16.4 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.78 (dd, J = 16.0, 16.0 Hz, 2H, COCH3), 3.36 (d, J = 16.8 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.08 (s, 2H, (CH2)2), 2.81 (d, J = 18.0 Hz, 2H, (CH2)2), 2.60 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.47 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.26 (s, 1H, NH).

3.8. 2-(4-Acetylpiperazin-1-yl)-1-(3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)ethanone (3d)

Brown solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.20 (s, 1H), 8.20–8.05 (m, 2H), 7.62–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.28–7.26 (m, 1H), 5.64 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.09–3.99 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.85 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, COCH2), 3.67 (t, J = 26.2 Hz, 4H, (CH2)2), 3.51 (s, 1H, COCH2), 3.39–3.32 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.66 (d, J = 14.7 Hz, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.59 (s, 3H, COCH3), 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.07 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 168.90, 166.74, 148.78, 148.66, 146.99, 145.81, 143.35, 132.13, 130.08, 130.03, 126.38, 123.67, 122.96, 120.66, 116.07, 113.10, 59.34(CH), 58.11(CH2), 53.31(CH2)2, 46.18(CH2)2, 41.35(CH2), 21.17(CH3), 18.74(CH3), 16.42(CH3); MS = 503.2281, m/z = 504.2384 [M + 1]+

3.9. 2-(4-(4-Chlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl)-1-(3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)ethanone (3e)

Brown solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.25 (s, 1H), 8.14 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (s, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.63–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.26 (s, 1H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.66 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.05 (dd, J = 12.4, 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.90 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H, COCH2), 3.74 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, COCH2), 3.37 (dd, J = 2.8, 16.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.23 (s, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.86 (d, J = 16..0 Hz, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.60 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.46 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.80, 154.41, 148.67, 148.40, 146.71, 145.68, 143.38, 132.11, 129.99, 126.42, 124.35, 123.63, 122.86, 122.44, 122.36, 120.72, 118.90, 116.06, 115.95, 115.86, 113.11, 59.60(CH), 58.06(CH2), 53.65(CH2)2, 50.23(CH2)2, 44.12(CH2), 18.69(CH3), 16.34(CH3); MS = 571.21, m/z = 572.26 [M + 1]+

3.10. 2-(4-(2,3-Dichlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl)-1-(3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)ethanone (3f)

Yellow solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, cdcl3): δ 9.26 (s, 1H), 8.15–8.13 (m, 2H), 7.65 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.55–7.51 (m, 2H), 7.26–7.9 (m, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 6.95 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.67 (dd, J = 11.6, 4.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.12–4.01 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.90 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, COCH2), 3.75 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, COCH2), 3.37 (dd, J = 17.2, 4.6 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.12 (s, 4H, (CH2)2, 2.88 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.60 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.47 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.01, 151.21, 148.77, 148.58, 146.78, 145.82, 143.50, 133.96, 132.17, 130.05, 129.96, 127.51, 127.43, 126.48, 124.60, 123.63, 122.92, 120.76, 118.68, 116.06, 113.19, 59.67(CH2), 58.12(CH2), 53.74(CH2)2, 51.18(CH2)2, 44.19(CH2), 18.78(CH3), 16.48(CH3); MS = 605.17, m/z = 606.23 [M + 1]+

3.11. 2-(4-(4-Chloro-2-fluorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl)-1-(3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)ethanone (3g)

White solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.25 (s, 1H), 8.18–8.08 (m, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.26 (m, 1H), 7.03–7.00 (m, 2H), 6.84 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (dd, J = 11.7, 4.8 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.05 (dd, J = 17.2, 11.9 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.88 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, COCH3), 3.73 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, COCH3), 3.36 (dd, J = 17.3, 4.9 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.13 (s, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.86 (td, J = 10.7, 5.9 Hz, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.60 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.45 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.92, 148.74, 148.61, 146.81, 145.82, 143.46, 138.96, 138.88, 132.19, 130.06, 129.95, 126.47, 124.45, 123.60, 122.93, 120.75, 119.59, 116.87, 116.63, 116.07, 113.17,59.68(CH), 58.12(CH2), 53.60(CH2)2, 50.32(CH2)2, 44.19(CH2), 18.76(CH3), 16.50(CH3); MS = 589.2004, m/z = 590.2119 [M + 1]+

3.12. 2-(4-(3,4-Difluorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl)-1-(3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)ethanone (3h)

Brown solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.24 (s, 1H), 8.11 (s, 2H), 7.63–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.25 (s, 1H), 7.30–7.27 (m, 1H), 6.72–6.64 (m, 1H), 6.56 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (dd, J = 11.8, 4.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.05 (dd, J = 17.3, 11.9 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.90 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, COCH3), 3.75 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, COCH3), 3.39–3.33 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.19 (s, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.86 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.60 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.46 (s, 3H, CH3);13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.60, 148.71, 148.51, 146.83, 145.71, 143.30, 132.10, 130.01, 129.98, 126.38, 123.60, 122.90, 122.89, 120.63, 117.15, 116.98, 116.00, 113.07, 111.44, 105.40, 105.20, 77.21, 76.90, 76.58, 59.34, 58.05, 53.20, 49.28, 44.13, 18.70, 16.37.

3.13. 1-(3-(2,6-Dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-2-(4-(2-fluorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl)ethanone (3i)

Brown solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.25 (s, 1H), 8.14–8.12 (m, 2H), 7.65–7.49 (m, 3H), 7.28–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.04–6.90 (m, 4H), 5.66 (dd, J = 11.5, 4.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.04 (dd, J = 17.1, 11.9 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.89 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, COCH3), 3.75 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, COCH2), 3.36 (dd, J = 17.1, 4.4 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.17 (s, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.88 (d, J = 17.8 Hz, 4H, (CH2)2), 2.60 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.45 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.80, 154.41, 148.67, 148.40, 146.71, 145.68, 143.38, 132.11, 129.99, 126.42, 124.35, 123.63, 122.86, 122.44, 122.36, 120.72, 118.90, 116.06, 115.95, 115.86, 113.11, 59.60(CH), 58.06(CH2), 53.65(CH2)2, 50.23(CH2)2, 44.12(CH2), 18.69(CH3), 16.34(CH3).

3.14. 3-(2,6-Dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-N-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazoline-1-carbothioamide (4a)

White solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, cdcl3): δ 9.13 (s, 1H), 9.04 (s, 1H), 8.18–8.09 (m, 2H), 7.66 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 3H), 7.56 (dd, J = 17.5, 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (s, 1H), 6.25 (dd, J = 11.6, 3.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.15 (dd, J = 17.2, 11.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.39 (dd, J = 17.2, 3.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.60 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.46 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.18, 149.96, 148.64, 147.58, 146.05, 143.87, 138.53, 132.10, 130.31, 129.86, 128.73, 125.92, 125.55, 124.00, 123.73, 122.69, 120.75, 116.29, 112.82, 61.22(CH), 44.57(CH2), 18.81(CH3), 16.72(CH3); MS = 470.1525, m/z = 471.1626 [M + 1]+

3.15. 3-(2,6-Dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-N-(4-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole-1-carbothioamide (4b)

Orange solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 10.13 (s, 1H), 9.37 (s, 1H), 9.13 (s, 1H), 8.14 (s, 1H), 8.01-7.94 (m, 3H), 7.54–7.60 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, 2H), 6.23 (dd, J = 2.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.19 (dd, J = 1.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.84–3.76 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.63 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.51 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.18, 149.96, 148.64, 147.58, 146.05, 143.87, 138.53, 132.10, 130.31, 129.86, 128.73, 125.92, 125.55, 124.00, 123.73, 122.69, 120.75, 116.29, 112.82, 61.22(CH), 44.57(CH2), 18.81(CH3), 16.72(CH3); MS = 515.1376, m/z = 516.2025 [M + 1]+

3.16. N-Cyclohexyl-3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazoline-1-carbothioamide (4c)

Yellow solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.10 (s, 1H), 8.08 (s, 2H), 7.64–7.48 (m, 3H), 7.27–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.21 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.15 (dd, J = 11.7, 3.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.07 (dd, J = 17.1, 11.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.34 (dd, J = 17.1, 3.9 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.58 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.46 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.09 (s, 1H, CH), 1.73 (s, 4H, (CH2)2), 1.54–1.45 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.45–1.29 (m, 4H, (CH2)2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 168.90, 166.74, 148.78, 148.66, 146.99, 145.81, 143.35, 132.13, 130.09, 126.38, 123.67, 122.96, 120.66, 116.07, 113.10, 59.34(CH), 58.11(CH), 53.31(CH2)2, 46.18(CH2)2, 44.18(CH2), 41.35(CH2), 18.74(CH3), 16.42(CH3); MS = 476.20, m/z = 477.25 [M + 1]+

3.17. N-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazoline-1-carbothioamide (4d)

Yellow solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.11 (s, 1H), 8.97 (s, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.63–7.52 (m, 4H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (s, 1H), 6.23 (dd, J = 11.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.16 (dd, J = 17.2, 11.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.41 (dd, J = 17.2, 3.6 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.61 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.47 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.18, 149.96, 148.64, 147.58, 146.05, 143.87, 138.53, 132.10, 130.31, 129.86, 128.73, 125.92, 125.55, 124.00, 123.73, 122.69, 120.75, 116.29, 112.82, 61.22(CH), 44.57(CH2), 18.81(CH3), 16.72(CH3); MS = 476.1681, m/z = 485.2469 [M + 1]+

3.18. N-(3-Chlorophenyl)-3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazoline-1-carbothioamide (4e)

Yellow solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.11 (s, 1H), 9.03 (s, 1H), 8.17–8.11 (m, 2H), 7.77 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (dd, J = 7.0, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.8 Hz, 2H), 7.18–7.12 (m, 1H), 6.22 (dd, J = 11.6, 3.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.16 (dd, J = 17.3, 11.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.40 (dd, J = 17.3, 3.9 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.61 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.48 (s, 3H, CH3).; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.01, 151.21, 148.77, 148.58, 146.78, 145.82, 143.50, 133.96, 132.17, 130.05, 129.96, 127.51, 127.43, 126.48, 124.60, 123.63, 122.92, 120.76, 118.68, 116.06, 113.19, 53.74(CH), 51.18(CH2), 18.78(CH3), 16.48(CH3).

3.19. 3-(2,6-Dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-N-(p-tolyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazoline-1-carbothioamide (4f)

White solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.13 (s, 1H), 8.93 (s, 1H), 8.17–8.12 (m, 2H), 7.67 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.30 (dd, J = 9.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.26 (dd, J = 11.6, 3.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.15 (dd, J = 17.2, 11.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.39 (dd, J = 17.2, 3.8 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.61 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.46 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.34 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.72, 149.77, 148.71, 147.53, 145.98, 144.00, 135.94, 135.71, 132.21, 130.44, 129.93, 129.41, 125.99, 124.40, 124.11, 122.77, 120.80, 116.30, 112.92, 77.32, 77.00, 76.69, 61.32, 44.62, 21.01, 18.88, 16.74.

3.20. N-(3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazoline-1-carbothioamide (4g)

Yellow solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.31 (s, 1H), 9.13 (s, 1H), 8.26 (s, 2H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 7.66 (s, 1H), 7.64-7.53 (m, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (s, 1H), 6.21 (dd, J = 11.5, 3.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.20 (dd, J = 17.3, 11.6 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.45 (dd, J = 17.3, 3.8 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.63 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.49 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.21, 150.70, 148.74, 148.46, 146.34, 143.25, 140.10, 132.24, 131.85, 130.74, 130.06, 129.00, 128.18, 125.98, 125.25, 124.33, 123.03, 122.65, 121.68, 120.79, 118.36, 116.52, 112.64, 61.33(CH), 44.73(CH2), 18.73(CH3), 16.83(CH3); MS = 606.13, m/z = 607.19 [M + 1]+

3.21. N-Butyl-3-(2,6-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-5-(3-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazoline-1-carbothioamide (4h)

White solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.09 (s, 1H), 8.16–8.06 (m, 2H), 7.56 (ddd, J = 25.3, 17.7, 7.8 Hz, 3H), 7.28 (dd, J = 9.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 6.15 (dd, J = 11.7, 3.9 Hz, 1H CH), 4.08 (dd, J = 17.2, 11.8 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.69 (qd, J = 13.2, 6.3 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.34 (dd, J = 17.2, 4.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.58 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.46 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.70 (dd, J = 8.5, 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.50 (dd, J = 15.1, 7.4 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.00 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 175.43, 149.31, 148.69, 146.88, 145.85, 144.44, 132.15, 130.15, 129.88, 125.94, 123.79, 122.66, 120.69, 116.25, 113.04, 61.30(CH), 44.53(CH2), 44.50(CH2), 31.22(CH2), 20.27(CH2), 18.70(CH3), 16.63(CH3), 13.8(CH3); MS = 450.1838, m/z = 451.2311 [M + 1]+

3.22. Cell Viability Assay

MCF-7 cells were procured from Procell Life Science and Technology Co. LTD, Wuhan, China. Human breast cancer T47D, BT474, and SK-BR-3 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Washington, DC, NW, USA). Cells (2000) were cultured in MEM or Leibovitz’s L-15 medium enriched with 2% FBS and maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. A stock solution of DMSO-dissolved compounds was prepared, and this solution was diluted with culture medium as required. MCF-7 Cells (4 × 103) were cultured in 96-well plates for 12 h and then treated for 72 h with compounds at concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.1, 10, 100, and 1000 mM. Using Alamar Blue, the compounds were evaluated for their inhibitory effects [44,45]

3.23. Preparation of Whole Cell Lysates

As previously reported, whole-cell lysates from cells treated with compound 3f were prepared to detect protein expression and phosphorylation [46] using a lysis buffer [Tris (20 mM, pH 7.4), NaCl (250 mM), EDTA (2 mM, pH 8.0), Triton X-100 (0.1%), aprotinin (0.01 mg/mL), leupeptin (0.005 mg/mL), phenylmethane sulfonyl fluoride (0.4 mM), and NaVO4 (4 mM)]. To remove insoluble material, lysates were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min.

3.24. Western Blot Analysis

Equal protein concentrations of cell lysate were resolved on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by transfer to nitrocellulose membranes as reported previously [47]. Incubation was carried out overnight at 4 °C with antibodies after treatment with 5% skim milk. Afterward, the membranes were washed, probed with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h, and then visualized using chemiluminescence.

3.25. In Silico DFT Calculations

The theoretical calculations were performed using Gaussian 09 [48] and Gaussview 5 program. The polarized and diffused basis set 6-311+G(d, p) provides accurate values for all theoretical calculations. The computational studies utilized the most useful and precise hybrid method of B3LYP [49]. The structures of the compounds were fully optimized with no constraint. The global chemical reactivity descriptors (GCRD) were evaluated to understand the chemical properties of a molecule, such as ionization potential, electron affinity, chemical hardness (η), softness (S), potential (μ), electronegativity (χ), and electrophilic index (ψ). The global hardness [η = (ELUMO − EHOMO)/2], softness (S = 1/2η), chemical potential [μ = (EHOMO + ELUMO)/2], electronegativity [χ = (I+A)/2], and electrophilic index (ψ = μ2/2η) were calculated by taking the energies of HOMO as ionization potential (I) and LUMO as electron affinity (A). Chemical hardness, softness, and potential were used to understand the chemical reactivity of the molecular system [50].

3.26. Docking Simulation

AUTODOCK4.0 [51] software was employed for molecular docking studies. The docking receptor STAT3 (PDB ID: 1BG1) was retrieved from the RCSB Protein Data Bank. The graphical user interface AUTODOCK TOOLS was utilized to build up the protein molecule. The water molecules were removed from the protein crystal and only polar hydrogens were applied. The predicted gasteigers charge was found to be −25.9962. For both dockings, the grid box size was 127 × 127 × 85 with a grid spacing of 0.55Å. The receptor and the complex were saved in the pdbqt file format. Using Lamarckian genetic algorithm searches, twenty runs were performed. The default parameters were employed, with a maximum of 2.5 × 106 energy assessments and an initial population of 50 randomly placed individuals [52]. The autogrid4.exe and autodock4.exe functions were executed at the end of the docking process to generate glg and dlg files. Maestro (v2020.4) [53] and PyMOL (v2.5.2) [54] were used to generate the interaction pictures and visualization plots.

3.27. Immunocytochemistry Assay

As described earlier, STAT3 phosphorylation in cells was quantified [55]. After compound 3f treatment (10 μM for 4 h), cells were fixed for 20 min with paraformaldehyde (4%). Thereafter, cells were treated with 0.2% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline for permeabilization, followed by blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin for 1 h. Then, the preparation was incubated overnight at 4 °C with a rabbit polyclonal anti-human STAT3 antibody (dilution, 1:100). The next day, slides were subjected to washing and incubation with Alexa Fluor 594 (dilution, 1:1000) anti-Rabbit IgG1 for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. In the next step, DAPI (5 μg/mL) was used for counterstaining the nuclei. The slides were mounted and analyzed under an Olympus FluoView FV1000 confocal microscope (Tokyo, Japan).

4. Conclusions

A series of imidazopyridine-tethered-purazoles were synthesized and screened for loss of viability of breast cancer cells. The lead compound 3f inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation in MCF-7 and T47D cells. The DFT calculations and molecular docking experiments showed a theoretical bioactivity correlation for compound 3f towards STAT3. In conclusion, compound 3f effectively inhibited the phosphorylation of STAT3 in MCF-7 and T47D cells, indicating that ITPs may be an alternative method to target STAT3 in BC.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bioengineering10020159/s1. Supplementary data for newly synthesized molecules and their IC50 values determined against human breast cancer cells.

Author Contributions

A.R., R.S., M.H.Y., J.-R.Y., Z.X., A.S. and O.N. performed the experiments; B.B., M.M., P.E.L., K.S.A., A.C., S.A.A. and V.P. designed the experiments; B.B., G.S., K.S.A., M.M. and P.E.L. provided resources; B.B., P.E.L., G.S. and K.S.A. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by DBT-NER, and Vision Group on Science and Technology (CESEM), Government of Karnataka. This work was also supported by Singapore MOE Tier 1 grant to GS. This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (NRF-2021R1I1A2060024). This work was also supported by the Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Innovative Oncotherapeutics (ZDSYS20200820165400003) (Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission), China; Shenzhen Development and Reform Commission Subject Construction Project ([2017]1434), China; Overseas Research Cooperation Project (HW2020008) (Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School), China; Tsinghua University Stable Funding Key Project (WDZC20200821150704001); the Shenzhen Bay Laboratory (21310031), China and TBSI Faculty Start-up Funds, China. This project was supported by Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2023R5), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

The synthesized compounds are available at Basappa Laboratory.

References

  1. Ghoncheh, M.; Pournamdar, Z.; Salehiniya, H. Incidence and Mortality and Epidemiology of Breast Cancer in the World. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2016, 17, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wenger, C.R.; Clark, G.M. S-phase fraction and breast cancer—A decade of experience. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998, 51, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pandya, V.; Githaka, J.M.; Patel, N.; Veldhoen, R.; Hugh, J.; Damaraju, S.; McMullen, T.; Mackey, J.; Goping, I.S. BIK drives an aggressive breast cancer phenotype through sublethal apoptosis and predicts poor prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. van Kuilenburg, A.B.; Maring, J.G. Evaluation of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetic models and therapeutic drug monitoring in cancer patients. Pharmacogenomics 2013, 14, 799–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Osborne, C.K. Tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 1609–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gourmelon, C.; Bourien, H.; Augereau, P.; Patsouris, A.; Frenel, J.S.; Campone, M. Vinflunine for the treatment of breast cancer. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2016, 17, 1817–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tutt, A.N.J.; Garber, J.E.; Kaufman, B.; Viale, G.; Fumagalli, D.; Rastogi, P.; Gelber, R.D.; de Azambuja, E.; Fielding, A.; Balmaña, J.; et al. Clinical Trial Steering Committee and Investigators. Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2-Mutated Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 2394–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Symmans, F.W. Breast cancer response to paclitaxel in vivo. Drug Resist. Updat. 2001, 4, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cuzick, J.; Sestak, I.; Forbes, J.F.; Dowsett, M.; Cawthorn, S.; Mansel, R.E.; Loibl, S.; Bonanni, B.; Evans, D.G.; Howell, A. IBIS-II investigators. Use of anastrozole for breast cancer prevention (IBIS-II): Long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020, 395, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Cuzick, J.; Sestak, I.; Baum, M.; Buzdar, A.; Howell, A.; Dowsett, M.; Forbes, J.F. ATAC/LATTE investigators. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hortobagyi, G.N.; Stemmer, S.M.; Burris, H.A.; Yap, Y.S.; Sonke, G.S.; Paluch-Shimon, S.; Campone, M.; Blackwell, K.L.; André, F.; Winer, E.P.; et al. Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1738–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jia, L.Y.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Sethi, G.; Bishayee, A. Potential role of targeted therapies in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Anticancer. Drugs 2016, 27, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, J.H.; Kim, C.; Kim, S.H.; Sethi, G.; Ahn, K.S. Farnesol inhibits tumor growth and enhances the anticancer effects of bortezomib in multiple myeloma xenograft mouse model through the modulation of STAT3 signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 2015, 360, 280–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Furtek, S.L.; Backos, D.S.; Matheson, C.J.; Reigan, P. Strategies and Approaches of Targeting STAT3 for Cancer Treatment. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Garg, M.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Bhardwaj, V.; Goel, A.; Gupta, R.; Sharma, A.; Baligar, P.; Kumar, A.P.; Goh, B.C.; Wang, L.; et al. The pleiotropic role of transcription factor STAT3 in oncogenesis and its targeting through natural products for cancer prevention and therapy. Med. Res. Rev. 2021, 41, 1291–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lee, J.H.; Kim, C.; Baek, S.H.; Ko, J.H.; Lee, S.G.; Yang, W.M.; Um, J.Y.; Sethi, G.; Ahn, K.S. Capsazepine inhibits JAK/STAT3 signaling, tumor growth, and cell survival in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 17700–17711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Baek, S.H.; Ko, J.H.; Lee, H.; Jung, J.; Kong, M.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, J.; Chinnathambi, A.; Zayed, M.E.; Alharbi, S.A.; et al. Resveratrol inhibits STAT3 signaling pathway through the induction of SOCS-1: Role in apoptosis induction and radiosensitization in head and neck tumor cells. Phytomedicine 2016, 23, 566–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ma, J.H.; Qin, L.; Li, X. Role of STAT3 signaling pathway in breast cancer. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020, 18, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Hartenfeller, M.; Schneider, G. De novo drug design. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 672, 299–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Khatun, S.; Singh, A.; Bader, G.N.; Sofi, F.A. Imidazopyridine, a promising scaffold with potential medicinal applications and structural activity relationship (SAR): Recent advances. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 40, 14279–14302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Brown, D.G.; Wobst, H.J. A Decade of FDA-Approved Drugs (2010–2019): Trends and Future Directions. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 2312–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. He, L.J.; Yang, D.L.; Chen, H.Y.; Huang, J.H.; Zhang, Y.J.; Qin, H.X.; Wang, J.L.; Tang, D.Y.; Chen, Z.Z. A Novel Imidazopyridine Derivative Exhibits Anticancer Activity in Breast Cancer by Inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin Signaling. Onco. Targets Ther. 2020, 13, 10111–10121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Su, J.C.; Chang, C.H.; Wu, S.H.; Shiau, C.W. Novel imidazopyridine suppresses STAT3 activation by targeting SHP-1. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2018, 33, 1248–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Godse, P.; Kumar, P.; Yewalkar, N.; Deore, V.; Lohar, M.; Mundada, R.; Padgaonkar, A.; Manohar, S.; Joshi, A.; Bhatia, D.; et al. Discovery of P3971 an orally efficacious novel anticancer agent targeting HIF-1α and STAT3 pathways. Anticancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 1460–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nichols, W.C.; Kvols, L.K.; Ingle, J.N.; Edmonson, J.H.; Ahmann, D.L.; Rubin, J.; O’Connell, M.J. Phase II study of triazinate and pyrazofurin in patients with advanced breast cancer previously exposed to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rep. 1978, 62, 837–839. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Tołoczko-Iwaniuk, N.; Dziemiańczyk-Pakieła, D.; Nowaszewska, B.K.; Celińska-Janowicz, K.; Miltyk, W. Celecoxib in Cancer Therapy and Prevention—Review. Curr. Drug Targets. 2019, 20, 302–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nehra, B.; Rulhania, S.; Jaswal, S.; Kumar, B.; Singh, G.; Monga, V. Recent advancements in the development of bioactive pyrazoline derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 205, 112666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Santoro, A.; Pisanti, S.; Grimaldi, C.; Izzo, A.A.; Borrelli, F.; Proto, M.C.; Malfitano, A.M.; Gazzerro, P.; Laezza, C.; Bifulco, M. Rimonabant inhibits human colon cancer cell growth and reduces the formation of precancerous lesions in the mouse colon. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 125, 996–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mamytbeková, A.; Hájícek, J.; Grimová, J.; Rezábek, K. Reductive effect of lonazolac on lung metastasis formation in mice. Neoplasma 1990, 37, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Srinivasa, V.; Li, F.; Siveen, K.S.; Dai, X.; Swamy, S.N.; Sethi, G.; Mantelingu, K.; Bender, A.; Rangappa, K.S. Synthesis and biological evaluation of tetrahydropyridinepyrazoles (‘PFPs’) as inhibitors of STAT3 phosphorylation. Med. Chem. Commun. 2014, 5, 32–40. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, L.; Peterson, T.E.; Lu, V.M.; Parney, I.F.; Daniels, D.J. Antitumor activity of novel pyrazole-based small molecular inhibitors of the STAT3 pathway in patient derived high grade glioma cells. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Wang, F.; Feng, K.R.; Zhao, J.Y.; Zhang, J.W.; Shi, X.W.; Zhou, J.; Gao, D.; Lin, G.Q.; Tian, P. Identification of novel STAT3 inhibitors bearing 2-acetyl-7-phenylamino benzofuran scaffold for antitumour study. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 115822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Anilkumar, N.C.; Sundaram, M.S.; Mohan, C.D.; Rangappa, S.; Bulusu, K.C.; Fuchs, J.E.; Girish, K.S.; Bender, A.; Basappa Rangappa, K.S. A One Pot Synthesis of Novel Bioactive Tri-Substitute-Condensed-Imidazopyridines that Targets Snake Venom Phospholipase A2. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Kuthyala, S.; Hanumanthappa, M.; Kumar, S.M.; Sheik, S.; Karikannar, N.G.; Prabhu, A. Crystal, Hirshfeld, ADMET, drug-like and anticancer study of some newly synthesized imidazopyridine containing pyrazoline derivatives. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1197, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Basappa, B.; Chumadathil Pookunoth, B.; Shinduvalli Kempasiddegowda, M.; Knchugarakoppal Subbegowda, R.; Lobie, P.E.; Pandey, V. Novel Biphenyl Amines Inhibit Oestrogen Receptor (ER)-α in ER-Positive Mammary Carcinoma Cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bharathkumar, H.; Mohan, C.D.; Ananda, H.; Fuchs, J.E.; Li, F.; Rangappa, S.; Surender, M.; Bulusu, K.C.; Girish, K.S.; Sethi, G.; et al. Microwave-assisted synthesis, characterization and cytotoxic studies of novel estrogen receptor α ligands towards human breast cancer cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 1804–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kalakoti, Y.; Yadav, S.; Sundar, D. Deep Neural Network-Assisted Drug Recommendation Systems for Identifying Potential Drug-Target Interactions. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 12138–12146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sebastian, A.; Pandey, V.; Mohan, C.D.; Chia, Y.T.; Rangappa, S.; Mathai, J.; Baburajeev, C.P.; Paricharak, S.; Mervin, L.H.; Bulusu, K.C.; et al. Novel Adamantanyl-Based Thiadiazolyl Pyrazoles Targeting EGFR in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. ACS Omega 2016, 1, 1412–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Lee, J.H.; Mohan, C.D.; Deivasigamani, A.; Jung, Y.Y.; Rangappa, S.; Basappa, S.; Chinnathambi, A.; Alahmadi, T.A.; Alharbi, S.A.; Garg, M.; et al. Brusatol suppresses STAT3-driven metastasis by downregulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 26, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fleming, I. Molecular Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; ISBN 9780470746585. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ansari, M.F.; Siddiqui, S.M.; Ahmad, K.; Avecilla, F.; Dharavath, S.; Gourinath, S.; Azam, A. Synthesis, antiamoebic and molecular docking studies of furan-thiazolidinone hybrids. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 124, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Becker, S.; Groner, B.; Müller, C.W. Three-dimensional structure of the Stat3beta homodimer bound to DNA. Nature 1998, 394, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pandey, V.; Wang, B.; Mohan, C.D.; Raquib, A.R.; Rangappa, S.; Srinivasa, V.; Fuchs, J.E.; Girish, K.S.; Zhu, T.; Bender, A.; et al. Discovery of a small-molecule inhibitor of specific serine residue BAD phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E10505–E10514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Barash, U.; Rangappa, S.; Mohan, C.D.; Vishwanath, D.; Boyango, I.; Basappa, B.; Vlodavsky, I.; Rangappa, K.S. New Heparanase-Inhibiting Triazolo-Thiadiazoles Attenuate Primary Tumor Growth and Metastasis. Cancers 2021, 13, 2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, J.; Sikka, S.; Siveen, K.S.; Lee, J.H.; Um, J.Y.; Kumar, A.P.; Chinnathambi, A.; Alharbi, S.A.; Basappa Rangappa, K.S.; Sethi, G.; et al. Cardamonin represses proliferation, invasion, and causes apoptosis through the modulation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 pathway in prostate cancer. Apoptosis 2017, 22, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mohan, C.D.; Bharathkumar, H.; Bulusu, K.C.; Pandey, V.; Rangappa, S.; Fuchs, J.E.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Dai, X.; Li, F.; Deivasigamani, A.; et al. Development of a novel azaspirane that targets the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 34296–34307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R. Gaussian 09; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee, W.C.; Yang, R.G. Parr, Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ananda, S.; Khamees, H.A.; Mahendra, M.; Kumara, C.; Jagadeesh Prasad, D.; Hegde, T.A.; Vinitha, G. Structural, thermal, dielectric, nonlinear optical properties and DFT investigations of a novel material 2-(6-chloropyridin-3-yl)-N'-(2, 3-dihydro-1, 4-benzodioxin-6-ylmethylidene) acetohydrazide for optoelectronic applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 14677–14702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Schrödinger, L.; DeLano, W. PyMOL. 2020. Available online: http://www.pymol.org/pymol (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  52. Sanner, M.F. Python: A programming language for software integration and development. J Mol Graph Model 1999, 17, 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  53. Abbasi-Radmoghaddam, Z.; Riahi, S.; Gharaghani, S.; Mohammadi-Khanaposhtanai, M. Design of potential anti-tumor PARP-1 inhibitors by QSAR and molecular modeling studies. Mol. Divers. 2021, 25, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Schrödinger, LLC. Schrödinger Release 2020-1: Maestro; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kim, J.W.; Gautam, J.; Kim, J.E.; Kim, J.A.; Kang, K.W. Inhibition of tumor growth and angiogenesis of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells by ruxolitinib, a selective JAK2 inhibitor. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 17, 3981–3989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Bioengineering 10 00159 g001 550
Figure 1. Conventional de novo design of novel ITPs as STAT3 inhibitors in cancer cells.
Figure 1. Conventional de novo design of novel ITPs as STAT3 inhibitors in cancer cells.
Bioengineering 10 00159 g001
Bioengineering 10 00159 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2-pyrazolines: reagents and conditions: (a) AcOH, EtOH, reflux; (b) (i) chloroactetyl chloride, toluene, 0–5 °C, (ii) substituted piperazines, acetone, NEt3, reflux; (c) substituted isothiocyanates, toluene, NEt3, reflux.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2-pyrazolines: reagents and conditions: (a) AcOH, EtOH, reflux; (b) (i) chloroactetyl chloride, toluene, 0–5 °C, (ii) substituted piperazines, acetone, NEt3, reflux; (c) substituted isothiocyanates, toluene, NEt3, reflux.
Bioengineering 10 00159 sch001
Bioengineering 10 00159 g002 550
Figure 2. Inhibitory effect of compounds 3f (A), 3e (B), 4g (C), and 3g (D) on the viability of MCF-7 cells. MCF-7 cells were treated with various concentrations of 2-pyrazolines for 72 h and the viability of cells was analyzed by Alamar Blue assays. The results are presented as mean ± S.E.M. of triplicate determinations.
Figure 2. Inhibitory effect of compounds 3f (A), 3e (B), 4g (C), and 3g (D) on the viability of MCF-7 cells. MCF-7 cells were treated with various concentrations of 2-pyrazolines for 72 h and the viability of cells was analyzed by Alamar Blue assays. The results are presented as mean ± S.E.M. of triplicate determinations.
Bioengineering 10 00159 g002
Bioengineering 10 00159 g003 550
Figure 3. The lead compound 3f decreases the phosphorylation of STAT3 in MCF-7 and T47D cells in a concentration (A) and time-dependent (B) manner. MCF-7 and T47D cells were treated with the indicated concentration of 3f for 4 h. MCF-7 and T47D cells were treated with 5 µM of compound for the indicated time intervals. Thereafter, equal amounts of lysates were analyzed by Western blot analysis using antibodies against p-STAT3(Tyr705), p-STAT3(Ser727), or STAT3. The expression of each protein was quantified. β-ACTIN was used as input control.
Figure 3. The lead compound 3f decreases the phosphorylation of STAT3 in MCF-7 and T47D cells in a concentration (A) and time-dependent (B) manner. MCF-7 and T47D cells were treated with the indicated concentration of 3f for 4 h. MCF-7 and T47D cells were treated with 5 µM of compound for the indicated time intervals. Thereafter, equal amounts of lysates were analyzed by Western blot analysis using antibodies against p-STAT3(Tyr705), p-STAT3(Ser727), or STAT3. The expression of each protein was quantified. β-ACTIN was used as input control.
Bioengineering 10 00159 g003
Bioengineering 10 00159 g004 550
Figure 4. Computed molecular orbital plots for synthesized molecules.
Figure 4. Computed molecular orbital plots for synthesized molecules.
Bioengineering 10 00159 g004
Bioengineering 10 00159 g005 550
Figure 5. Molecular electrostatic charge distribution plots for 3f and 4g.
Figure 5. Molecular electrostatic charge distribution plots for 3f and 4g.
Bioengineering 10 00159 g005
Bioengineering 10 00159 g006 550
Figure 6. Cartoon representation of the SH2 domain of STAT3 with compounds 3f and 4g at the binding pocket.
Figure 6. Cartoon representation of the SH2 domain of STAT3 with compounds 3f and 4g at the binding pocket.
Bioengineering 10 00159 g006
Bioengineering 10 00159 g007 550
Figure 7. Surface view of STAT3 and the molecules (3f and 4g) and a zoomed view of the molecules in the SH2 domain of STAT3.
Figure 7. Surface view of STAT3 and the molecules (3f and 4g) and a zoomed view of the molecules in the SH2 domain of STAT3.
Bioengineering 10 00159 g007
Bioengineering 10 00159 g008 550
Figure 8. Two-dimensional (2D) interaction diagram of compound 3f in the SH2 domain of STAT3.
Figure 8. Two-dimensional (2D) interaction diagram of compound 3f in the SH2 domain of STAT3.
Bioengineering 10 00159 g008
Bioengineering 10 00159 g009 550
Figure 9. Two-dimensional (2D) interaction diagram of compound 4g in the SH2 domain of STAT3.
Figure 9. Two-dimensional (2D) interaction diagram of compound 4g in the SH2 domain of STAT3.
Bioengineering 10 00159 g009
Bioengineering 10 00159 g010 550
Figure 10. The nuclear localization of STAT3 in MCF-7 (A) and T47D (B) cells was inhibited by compound 3f. MCF-7 and T47D cells were treated with the compound 3f (5 μM), and then analyzed for intracellular distribution by immunocytochemistry. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. The fluorescence intensity of p-STAT3 and STAT3 was performed. The merged image indicates the overlapping of p-STAT3/STAT3/DAPI images. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 10. The nuclear localization of STAT3 in MCF-7 (A) and T47D (B) cells was inhibited by compound 3f. MCF-7 and T47D cells were treated with the compound 3f (5 μM), and then analyzed for intracellular distribution by immunocytochemistry. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. The fluorescence intensity of p-STAT3 and STAT3 was performed. The merged image indicates the overlapping of p-STAT3/STAT3/DAPI images. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments.
Bioengineering 10 00159 g010
Table
Table 1. Physical data of 2-pyrazolines.
Table 1. Physical data of 2-pyrazolines.
Compound CodeR1 or R2Melting Point in °CYield in %
3aPiperidone170–17297
3b1-Boc piperazine166–16896
3cPiperazine176–17835
3d1-acetyl piperazine208–21098
3e1-(4-chlorophenyl)piperazine180–18296
3f1-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)piperizine122–12495
3g1-(4-chloro-2-fluorophenyl)piperazine196–19895
3h1-(3,4-difluorophenyl)piperazine192–19496
3i1-(2-fluorophenyl)piperazine160–16298
4aAniline210–21298
4b4-nitrophenylaniline230–23295
4cCyclohexylamine204–20698
4d4-chlorophenylaniline240–24298
4e3-chlorophenylaniline242–24498
4f4-methylphenylaniline256–25897
4g3,5-bis(triflourophenyl)aniline230–23298%
4hn-butylamine246–24896%
Table
Table 2. Effect of newly synthesized imidazopyridine-tethered pyrazolines on various breast cancer/carcinoma cell viability.
Table 2. Effect of newly synthesized imidazopyridine-tethered pyrazolines on various breast cancer/carcinoma cell viability.
EntryIC50 (μM)
MCF-7T47DBT-474SK-BR-3MCF-10A
2>100>10097.82±1.76>100>100
3a22.81 ± 1.3623.31 ± 1.284.109 ± 0.41>100>100
3b22.29 ± 1.3515.15 ± 1.1321.29 ± 1.3228.28 ± 1.34>100
3c29.27 ± 1.4739.95 ± 1.4926.75 ± 1.3795.17 ± 1.79>100
3d21.03 ± 1.32>1008.04 ± 0.4732.14 ± 1.46>100
3e13.24 ± 1.1229.9 ± 1.0517.6 ± 0.8739.13 ± 1.4638.34 ± 1.44
3f9.27 ± 0.9723.51 ± 1.2513.91 ± 1.32>100>100
3g19.40 ± 1.2986.55 ± 1.9563.16 ± 1.7599.96 ± 1.988.69 ± 0.69
3h19.56 ± 1.2912.5 ± 1.013.061 ± 0.3238.81 ± 1.426.27 ± 0.26
3i63.69 ± 1.80>100>100>100>100
4a81.37 ± 1.91>100>100>100>100
4b65.36 ± 1.8245.61 ± 1.437.259 ± 0.5469.02 ± 1.41>100
4c46.08 ± 1.66>10052.83 ± 1.54>100>100
4d>100>100>100>100>100
4e>100>100>100>100>100
4f56.92 ± 1.39>100>100>100>100
4g10.90 ± 1.01>100>100>100>100
4h>10054.42 ± 1.68>100>10090.59 ± 1.98
Olaparib3.28 ± 0.68
Table
Table 3. FMOs energy with global chemical parameters values of synthesized compounds.
Table 3. FMOs energy with global chemical parameters values of synthesized compounds.
Global Parameters3f3h3i4c4d4g
EHOMO (eV)−5.764−5.799−5.704−5.645−5.733−5.905
ELUMO (eV)−3.049−3.086−3.016−3.201−3.267−3.366
ΔELUMO–HOMO (eV)2.7152.7132.6882.4442.4662.539
Ionization potential (I) (eV)5.7645.7995.7045.6455.7335.905
Electron affinity (A) (eV)3.0493.0863.0163.2013.2673.366
Hardness (η) (eV)1.3571.3561.3441.2221.2331.269
Softness (S) (eV)−10.3680.3680.3720.4090.4050.393
Chemical potential (μ) (eV)−4.406−4.442−4.360−4.423−4.500−4.635
Electronegativity (χ) (eV)4.4064.4424.3604.4234.5004.635
Electrophilicity (ψ) (eV)7.1517.2747.0728.0048.2118.463
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ravish, A.; Shivakumar, R.; Xi, Z.; Yang, M.H.; Yang, J.-R.; Swamynayaka, A.; Nagaraja, O.; Madegowda, M.; Chinnathambi, A.; Alharbi, S.A.; et al. De Novo Design of Imidazopyridine-Tethered Pyrazolines That Target Phosphorylation of STAT3 in Human Breast Cancer Cells. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020159

AMA Style

Ravish A, Shivakumar R, Xi Z, Yang MH, Yang J-R, Swamynayaka A, Nagaraja O, Madegowda M, Chinnathambi A, Alharbi SA, et al. De Novo Design of Imidazopyridine-Tethered Pyrazolines That Target Phosphorylation of STAT3 in Human Breast Cancer Cells. Bioengineering. 2023; 10(2):159. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020159

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ravish, Akshay, Rashmi Shivakumar, Zhang Xi, Min Hee Yang, Ji-Rui Yang, Ananda Swamynayaka, Omantheswara Nagaraja, Mahendra Madegowda, Arunachalam Chinnathambi, Sulaiman Ali Alharbi, and et al. 2023. "De Novo Design of Imidazopyridine-Tethered Pyrazolines That Target Phosphorylation of STAT3 in Human Breast Cancer Cells" Bioengineering 10, no. 2: 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020159

APA Style

Ravish, A., Shivakumar, R., Xi, Z., Yang, M. H., Yang, J. -R., Swamynayaka, A., Nagaraja, O., Madegowda, M., Chinnathambi, A., Alharbi, S. A., Pandey, V., Sethi, G., Ahn, K. S., Lobie, P. E., & Basappa, B. (2023). De Novo Design of Imidazopyridine-Tethered Pyrazolines That Target Phosphorylation of STAT3 in Human Breast Cancer Cells. Bioengineering, 10(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020159

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop