Next Article in Journal
Provision of Desalinated Irrigation Water by the Desalination of Groundwater Abstracted from a Saline Aquifer
Next Article in Special Issue
A Decade of Cave Drip Hydrographs Shows Spatial and Temporal Variability in Epikarst Storage and Recharge to Appalachian Karst Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Stochastic Analysis of the Marginal and Dependence Structure of Streamflows: From Fine-Scale Records to Multi-Centennial Paleoclimatic Reconstructions
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Holistic Approach to Study Groundwater-Surface Water Modifications Induced by Strong Earthquakes: The Case of Campiano Catchment (Central Italy)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Karst Brackish Springs of Albania

1
Independent Researcher, 1001 Tirana, Albania
2
Earth and Environmental Sciences Departement, University Aldo Moro, 70125 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hydrology 2022, 9(7), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9070127
Submission received: 22 June 2022 / Revised: 9 July 2022 / Accepted: 12 July 2022 / Published: 20 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydro-Geology of Karst Areas)

Abstract

:
The territory of Albania presents wide outcrops of soluble rocks, with typical karst landforms and the presence of remarkable carbonate aquifers. Many karst areas are located near the coasts, which results in a variety of environmental problems, mostly related to marine intrusion. This paper focuses on the brackish springs of Albania, which exhibit temperatures approximately equal to the yearly air temperature at their location. Total dissolved solids of the springs are higher than 1000 mg/L, their waters are not drinkable, and they are rarely used for other purposes. The groundwater of the alluvial aquifers of Albania, particularly those of Pre-Adriatic Lowland, are often brackish too, but these will not be addressed here. Brackish springs of Albania are mainly of karst origin and can be classified into two groups: springs in evaporitic rock, mainly gypsum, and springs in carbonate rock. The hydro-chemical facies of the first group are usually Ca-SO4, locally with increased concentrations of Na-Cl, whereas springs belonging to the second group usually exhibit Na-Cl facies. The largest brackish springs of Albania are described in detail, including their hydro-chemical correlations.

1. Introduction

Karst aquifers are among the richest and purest on Earth [1,2,3,4], and are heavily threatened by a variety of dangers, including anthropogenic impacts and marine intrusion [5,6,7,8,9]. The importance of karst waters has repeatedly been documented over the last few decades, up to the recent project World Karst Aquifer Map (WOKAM), which highlighted that the total surface area of carbonates and evaporites was estimated to be 20 × 106 km2 (about 15% of the total ice-free land surface area on Earth [10,11]). The largest karst area is in Asia (>7.5 × 106 km2), whereas Europe has the greatest percentage of karst, corresponding to 21.6% of its land surface area [3,4,11].
Karst aquifers currently supply about 10% of the global population with drinking water and, in some areas, are the only available water resource [12]. More than half the population in Albania, and in countries such as Bosnia and Herzegovina, Jordan, Austria, and Slovakia, drink karst water [13,14,15]. In Albania, every citizen consumes about 227 m3/s or 7.15 × 109 m3/year [16], thanks to the over 110 karst springs, with average discharge >100 l/s (17 springs exhibit discharge values >1 m3/s; [16,17]). During droughts, on several occasions in recent decades, there have been discussions about the possibility of using some Albanian springs to supply Italy with freshwater; this, for instance, was the case for Blue Eye spring in the Bistrica group (mean discharge 18.4 m3/s) [13,18].
In Albania, karst aquifers are hosted both by carbonate rocks occupying about 6490 km2, and evaporites rocks with a surface area of about 260 km2 [16,17]. These aquifers manifest very significant fluctuations in terms of water quantity and quality; they are related to hydrometeorological changes, as well as to variations in groundwater level, water flow velocity, spring discharge and water quality (chemical and physical parameters) [19,20,21,22,23].
Notwithstanding the data above, knowledge of the Albanian karsts, with particular regard to coastal springs, still needs further improvements. To provide an example, the review on submarine springs and coastal karst aquifers by Fleury et al. [24] did not include any information about Albania, thus testifying the lack of information about coastal karst in this country. Similarly, in the recent effort of the World Karst Spring hydrograph (WoKaS), the first global karst springs discharge database with over 400 spring observations worldwide [25], Albania is poorly represented. This highlights the need to improve our knowledge of Albanian karst, especially regarding data on spring discharge and hydrochemistry. In this sense, the present article contributes to providing basic data about the brackish springs in the country (without considering those present within alluvial aquifers), being a comprehensive collection of information and chemical measurements of the most significant karst brackish springs in Albania.
The use of karst springs for a water supply requires their in-depth quantitative and qualitative assessments. Previous studies on the quality of karst springs in Albania have demonstrated many of them to be brackish [17,26,27]; this paper focuses on these springs. Brackish cold springs are those at which total dissolved solids (TDSs) usually vary between 1000–10,000 mg/L, and the water temperature is approximately equal to the yearly air temperature at their location. These springs are non-potable, and usually not used for curative purposes; however, in special cases, some chemical components can be extracted from them. Albania’s brackish springs, based on their origin, are ranked into two groups: (a) springs in evaporitic rock (mainly gypsum); and (b) springs in carbonate rock (Figure 1, Table 1).

2. Springs in Evaporitic Deposits

Inland springs in evaporitic rocks (Figure 1) are mainly related to gypsum deposits cropping out in Korab Mountain and along the Ionian areas. At Korab, brackish springs emerge along the Banja River, near the city of Peshkopi, and along Gypsum River. In the Ionian area, the main springs emerge along the Thana Lake, near Lushnja municipality, and in Bashaj of Smokthina, Vlora. Other brackish springs are related to minor salt outcrops near Glina, Kolonja and Kardhiq in the Gjirokastra district, and at the former salt mine of Dhrovjan, Saranda.

2.1. Springs in Korab Area

Korab is an inner tectonic zone where, in its central sector, two tertiary gypsum tectonic windows are present [29,30,31]. The southern gypsum outcrop covers about 24 km2, whereas the northern outcrop is about 66 km2 (Figure 1). Both are surrounded by Paleogene shale-marl formations (Eocene-Oligocene), on which Cretaceous and Triassic-Jurassic flyschioid and limestone deposits overthrust. Gypsums are mostly massive, with a local presence of layering.
The active rise of Korab area during the Pliocene-Pleistocene was accompanied by strong erosion, as evidenced by the deep cutting stream valleys filled with solid deposits (>15 m thick), and by karstification processes. The largest streams are Banja River in the south, and Gypsum River, in the north (Figure 2 and Figure 3). In the upper relief, karstic funnels and small valleys are present, hosting erosion-karst towers, caves and springs. In the Korab gypsum, there are two types of karst groundwater streams with very different physico-chemical qualities [32].
Deep transient groundwater flow (H2S-rich thermo-mineral water) and shallow groundwater flow feed cold karst springs with variable discharges (Table 1). The main cold springs of the Korab gypsum massif mainly emerge along the deep Gypsum and Banja valleys (Figure 2). In the Gypsum River valley there are small springs discharging 1–2 L/s, but important groundwater resources are drained in thick gravel deposits filling the wide riverbed. During the dry season, the Gypsum River flow (about 200 L/s) is fed mainly fed by drainage of the riverbed groundwater flow. Springs in the Banja River are larger, with discharges (Table 2) depending upon elevation. Smaller springs, often temporary, such as Gypsum, Rabdishta and Bellova, emerge in the upper Banja River. One spring only (Vlesha), discharging in the range of 4 to 35 L/s, is located in northwest Korab, far from the above-mentioned discharge areas of the rivers.
Table 1. Main Albanian cold brackish springs parameters. Analyses conducted by the Hydrochemical Laboratory of the former Hydrogeological Enterprise (Tirana) and the Hydrochemical Laboratory of Silezia University (Poland) [34]. Rock type: G, gypsum; H, halite; L, limestone; Q, discharge; T, temperature; EC, electrical conductivity.
Table 1. Main Albanian cold brackish springs parameters. Analyses conducted by the Hydrochemical Laboratory of the former Hydrogeological Enterprise (Tirana) and the Hydrochemical Laboratory of Silezia University (Poland) [34]. Rock type: G, gypsum; H, halite; L, limestone; Q, discharge; T, temperature; EC, electrical conductivity.
LocationSpring NameRock TypeQ
l/s
T
°C
pH
-
EC
µS/cm
TDS
mg/L
Ca
mg/L
Mg
mg/L
Na+K
mg/L
Cl
mg/L
SO4
mg/L
HCO3
mg/L
Hydrochem.
Facies
Mg/Ca
-
Na/Cl
-
Springs in evaporitic rocks
KorabBrezhdanG10012.76.122480230963622.818.83.4826.01491180.0SO4-Ca0.361.11
KonriG7010.87.1123502127614.01.24.451.135.01404207.0SO4-Ca0.031.36
Gypsum RiverG25013.78.1018521470474.00.02.2 0.717.6902.0153.0SO4-Ca-0.45
VleshaG9.013.27.5221102376704.26.441.130.100.161589.0190.2SO4-Ca--
DumreThana lakeG10.0-7.0-3286663.348.0268.6329.8592.1308.6SO4−Cl-Ca-Na0.121.25
Thana LekeG7.015.76.834102636612.970.4148.9 3.15247.31313377.2SO4-(Cl)-Ca-(Na)0.190.94
BashajBashaj, SmokthinëGH20.012.07.4-11284376.843.73812.537.95813.81083.2158.6Cl-Na0.191.01
Springs in carbonate rocks
Renci structureNr 2, ShengjinL-18.07.7-7058.8317.4275.31915.966.83867.8557.2154.9Cl-Na1.43076
Renci StructureL 4.015.5--2650123.591.6741.01263.8269.1283.6Cl-Na1.20.9
KakariqL7.015.5--2740105.886.0760.51249.6263.4286.7Cl-Na1.340.94
Gjok Gjini, KakariqL 1.015.5--4840156.8169.01429.02485.0439.5253.1Cl-Na1.70.89
RencL 8.015.0--3955144.3115.81193.91988.0293.4393.5Cl-Na1.30.93
RenciL 7.017.2--113639.838.5333.8562.258.4155.5Cl-Na1.60.91
1.2 km N to LezhaL 20.0---195435.8127.0519.11002.9138.3222.6Cl-Na5.80.8
3 km W to LezhaL10.017.4--183071.660.6534.7891.0144.8225.7Cl-Na1.40.93
OrikumMarmiroL 8018.07.622703940118.5143.31196.02094.5288.7283.0Cl-Na2.000.88
HimarePotamiL 200.011.77.72170110067.536.8295.6541.372.0152.5Cl-Na0.90.84
50.012.07.8172597467.841.1232.7457.465.4159.8Cl-Na1.00.78
0–35012.07.82420153073.742.3434.0660.3225.5167.1Cl-Na0.951.01
FilikurL 7.013.0--1720.049.459.9535.0891.0131.3172.0Cl-Na2.00.93
QeparoiMulliriL 350.015.17.5584105276140.5191.31604.52840.0395.0262.3Cl-Na2.240.87
Hoston 1L 6.014.07.83320199084.5063.18571.10994.0139.91203.74Cl-Na1.230.89
Hoston 2L 4.014.27.853540205595.5053.64581.2994.0146.08207.4Cl-Na0.930.9
Hoston 3L 0.716.77.42070132488.4236.36363.40560.90112.75306.22Cl-Na0.671.0
ButrintBufi 1L 15.015.67.511,1207240176.8237.82231.73905.0562.5225.7Cl-Na2.210.88
Bufi 2L 17.015.67.613,5308386212.2293.82584.34881.2287.2215.9Cl-Na2.270.81
BufiL600.015.37.693005658161.13190.121701.03014.1444.83208.62Cl-Na1.940.87
KML threshold value 150010050Na: 17525250
Cold springs at the Korab gypsum massif are characterized by temperatures around 10.8–13.7 °C, electrical conductivity fluctuating between 1852 and 2480 µS/cm, pH in the range 6.12–8.10, and with SO4-Ca hydro-chemical facies. They have very low contents of Cl and Na ions, which indicates that gypsum formations have not increased the salt content.
Shallow circulation spring water is in equilibrium with gypsum deposits; the springs are saturated or close to calcium saturation [35]. The Korab gypsum springs are mainly used for irrigation, but they are also considered by local communities to have beneficial healing abilities.

2.2. Springs of Dumre Plateau

Dumre Plateau is in central Albania, in the Pre-Adriatic Lowlands. The main sector of the plateau is connected to the evaporitic dome of Dumre, situated along the transverse fault Vlore-Elbasan-Diber [36]. The age of evaporites is estimated to be Perm-Triassic [30,37]. The diapir evaporite deposit consists of gypsum, anhydrides, and other salts, and is 6000 m thick [38], with a carbonate caprock with well-cemented breccia and soil.
The Dumre dome covers an area of about 170 km2, with a rolling landscape and average relief of 130 m a.s.l. It is surrounded by Paleogene flysch formations and Miocene-Pliocene molasses, all with low hydraulic permeability. Elevation of the massif decreases southwards until the bottom of the Thana artificial lake (15–25 m a.s.l.). The gypsum dome produces a karst relief filled with landforms such as sinkholes, funnels, endorheic basins and lakes. The density of sinkholes in the southern plateau is 15–20/km2 [39,40,41], most of them being produced as collapse or solution sinkholes [42,43,44]. These processes at Dumre are still active today, locally representing a danger people’s safety [45,46,47]. Sinkholes with an initial depth of a few meters can evolve to reach 15 m in depth, at the same time widening; often transformed into lakes, they are the most distinctive landform of the Dumre plateau, which hosts about 80 karst lakes (most of them being permanent), for a total area of 7.70 km2. This is also typical of similar karst settings and poljes in other countries [48,49,50,51,52].
Reactivation of karst phenomena, related to transformation of anhydrides into gypsum, is well developed in Dumre. The resulting increase in volume closes the voids within the evaporites, thus reducing karstification in depth. As a result, karst phenomena are apparently closely related to the surface portion of evaporites, where gypsum predominates and water mainly flows in the epiphreatic zone [53]. The hydration of anhydrides in gypsum causes an increase in volume between 30% and 58% in the area near the surface [54]. Partial hydration, and the possible dissolution of saline bodies, leads to the formation of sulphate megabreccias, widely present at Dumre. The presence of salts in the Dumre evaporites distinguishes it from the gypsum at Korab, which is further confirmed by the groundwater chemical composition (Table 1): the contents of Na and Cl ions in spring water are 18.8 and 26.0 mg/L at Korab, whereas at Dumre, springs are up to 268.6 mg/L and 329.8 mg/L, respectively. In addition, the dissolution of salts in the Dumre plateau is the main cause of sinking processes and formation of vertical pits.
The aquifer at Dumre consists of the caprock basement and the upper karstified portion of anhydrite-gypsum. The top of the caprock formations in the topographically depressed areas, where the lakes are located, is isolated by the practically impermeable fine-granular materials, which prevents the lakes from communicating with the aquifer [39,47,55,56]. Thus, the lakes are mostly fed by precipitation, and generally they have good hydro-chemical quality.
Until 25 years ago, Lake Belsh was used as a drinking supply [41]. In recent decades, urban development, tourism, and the intensification of agriculture, have highly polluted the lake water with urban wastewater, herbicides, and pesticides [57].
Using the Turc formula at Dumre, the average air temperature is 15.1 °C, average annual rainfall is 1054 mm, and effective annual infiltration is estimated to be 469 mm/year (45% of the precipitation) or 2.53 m3/s. One-third of this amount (about 0.84 m3/s) is diffusely drained into numerous lakes [55], with the remaining part (approximately 1.69 m3/s) infiltrating in depth to recharge the saturated zone.
Natural water springs are rare in the Dumre plateau. The main regional direction of groundwater is north-south, towards Lake Thana where there are numerous springs (Figure 4), whose locations follows the lake level fluctuations:
(a)
The big linear springs, with the most important discharges, are located at the northernmost tip of Lake Thana (Figure 4 and Figure 5), and emerge from fine-granular deposits. The flowing front of the springs is up to several hundred meters in length, with the total flow (Figure 6b) estimated to fluctuate from 10 to 20 L/s;
(b)
Small linear springs (Figure 4 and Figure 5) emerge from the caprock, about 20–40 m thick near the springs; they become submerged during high lake water levels. Individual discharges range from 1 to about 10 L/s, and the total annual discharge is evaluated to be in the range of 20–100 L/s;
(c)
At two submerged springs (Figure 5 and Figure 6) it was not possible to measure the discharge, which was estimated approximately to be 1300–1400 L/s.
According to non-systematic measurements, the electrical conductivity of point linear springs varies from 1900 to 3250 μS/cm; however, no data are available for the submerged springs. Based upon the chemical analyses, the hydro-chemical facies of gypsum karst springs along Thana shores is mainly SO4-Ca (Table 2), but high concentrations of ions Cl and Na are present (Table 1).

2.3. Bashaj Spring

Bashaj Spring is located at the western foothills of Griba Mountain, whose elevation decreases from 1850 m to 350 m a.s.l. toward the Smokthina River. It emerges at the bottom of the deep Kripur stream, 2 km east of Bashai. The right Smokthina Riverbank, where the spring emerges, is composed of Middle Jurassic limestones, partially covered by Lower Oligocene flysch; below, Perm-Triassic evaporites are present, in tectonic contact [29,30].
Bashaj Spring discharge is about 20 L/s, with a temperature of 12 °C. The spring has high mineralization: TDS is about 11.3 g/l, with Cl-Na hydro-chemical facies, and very high SO4 content (1083 mg/L; Table 1). The concentrations of other elements are: NH4-1.2 mg/L; K-37.9 mg/L; Fe-0.2 mg/L; Al-0.06 mg/L; Br-2.6 mg/L; moreover, the ratio of Na/Cl is 1.01, and Cl/Br is equal to 2236.
A distinctive hydro-chemical characteristics of Bashaj Spring is that although groundwater circulates in a gypsum environment, it is richer in NaCl than in CaSO4. This can be explained by the presence of highly soluble salt within the gypsum formation, as for the large springs of Dumre. Despite the high salinity of spring water, the population of Basha area have used the underground resource for producing bread during crisis times, such as World War II, when salt was scarce.

3. Coastal Springs

Albanian coastlines are quite different between the Adriatic and Ionian seas [58]. The Adriatic coast is characterized by low elevation, plains and hill landscapes, which developed in recent Pliocene, Neogene, and Quaternary formations. The Quaternary gravel deposits filling the deltas of Rivers Mat, Ishmi, Erzen, Shkumbin and Vjosa are the most abundant in groundwater (Figure 1), and drain into the sea without forming any springs, with the only exception being the Renci structure. The Ionian coast generally consists of high, steep mountains in Mesozoic carbonates.
The drainage of karst aquifers on the Albanian coast occurs through natural springs with different discharges and hydrodynamic conditions. These can be classified, according to Stevanovic [12], into lithological contact springs, diffuse drainage areas, and submarine springs.
For the first group (lithological contact springs at sea level or above), the contact is created by carbonate rocks overthrusting the Paleogene-Neogene clay-sand/flysch formations. This type of contact is practically water-tight and prevents the sea-water intrusion. Usually, these springs are characterized by good hydro-chemical qualities, and are very important as water supply sources. This group includes springs Uji i Ftohtë near Vlora, the springs of Tragjasi, Borsh, and that of Sasaj-Piqeras [17,59].
Diffuse drainage areas consist of small, distributed discharge points. This type of drainage is characteristic of high-permeability karst aquifers [12,60], in direct contact with the sea, and is also typical of other Mediterranean settings [61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70]. In particular, along the Adriatic Sea several springs and sinkhole features associated with mixing between freshwater and sea water characterize the Apulian coastlines [71,72,73,74,75,76]. This is also the case in most of the southern rocky coast of Albania where distributed drainage is spread in the three areas of Karaburun, Palasë-Qeparoi, and Ksamil-Gjuza (Figure 1) [28,77,78].
Eventually, the group of submarine springs is related to deep karst conduits, inherited from the last period of glaciation when the sea level was about 100–150 m lower, creating conditions for the development of submarine karst [77,78,79]. Their formation is related to the topographic gradient greatly favoring the discharge of karst waters to the sea [80]. Underground water resources usually have considerable fluctuations in quantitative and qualitative indicators, aided by the pronounced changes in the Mediterranean climate [78]. According to an overall estimate, over 90% of the world’s submarine resources are located along the Mediterranean coastlines [24].

3.1. Springs of the Renci Structure

The Renci structure mainly consists of limestones, with subordinate Upper Cretaceous dolomites (Figure 7), intensely fissured and karstified. Its central-western part borders the Adriatic Sea, whose water penetrates wide portions of the massif, thus causing many important sources to be brackish (Table 1). Only in the northern part of the Renci massif, the farthest from the sea, groundwater is drinkable. Plenty of springs are temporary, flowing only for a few days during the rainy season. The mean groundwater discharge is estimated to be at about 900 l/s. The inflows of permanent salt springs usually range from about 1 to 20 l/s (Table 1), but large amounts of groundwater, unfortunately with no available quantitative measurements, are drained into the Knalla swamp and the sea [81].

3.2. Springs of the Ionian Sea Rock Coast

The Albanian rock coastline, extending from the Karaburun peninsula to the Albanian—Greek border, is represented by karst aquifers composed of several Mesozoic to Eocene carbonate structures, overthrusting westward on the Upper Eocene—Oligocene flysch formations. Dense fissures and high karstification sensibly increase the permeability of carbonates and facilitate the karst groundwater flow towards the sea. The total karst water resources along the Ionian coast are estimated to be in the range of 1500–2000 Ls. Most of these waters are salty and, depending on the hydrogeological and hydrodynamic conditions, they are drained into the sea as: (a) diffuse drainage, (b) submarine resources, and (c) coastal resources.
Along the coast, the high permeability of carbonates causes the formation of a low water levels, with quite a thin freshwater body fluctuating on the denser sea salt water [82]. This is the case for the Karaburun Peninsula, and the Palase-Qeparoi and Saranda-Ksamil areas (Figure 1). Throughout the above-mentioned structures, rapid diffuse groundwater drainage occurs without producing any concentrated springs. Several attempts to tap freshwater in the Karaburun Peninsula, Dhermi area, and in Kakome Bay by drilling wells located 100–300 m far from the sea, were not successful, due to the presence of salty water.
The level of carbonate rocks karstification is influenced by the Pleistocene Sea level movements, at the origin of the formation of submarine springs [1,27,83,84,85,86].
Submarine springs have been identified along the Himare coastal area, as well as in the bay of Spile, where springs with unknown discharge are present. The largest is Lera Pas, with a presumed flow of 1000–1500 L/s.
The largest brackish springs of the Albanian coastline are those emerging at sea, which represents the present base level of drainage and karstification. They are located along the coastline from the Vlora Bay in the north to the Butrint lagoon in the south (Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10, Table 3).

3.3. Marmiro Spring

Marmiro spring, at an elevation of 1.5–2.0 m a.s.l. to the southwest of Pasha-Liman Lake (Vlora Bay), is recharged by the Karaburun massif, whose groundwater mixes with the intruding salty water. It consists of many issuing points around the Marmiro church, feeding a small stream flowing to the Pasha-Liman Lake (Figure 8b). The discharge is quite variable, from about 0.07 l/s to more than 1000 l/s, and is conditioned by the water salinity. According to non-systematic measurements, electrical conductivity ranges from 2270 to 6650 μS/cm. Notably, at the Pasha Liman Lake, there are numerous other groundwater venues which have not been studied so far, and which would be worthy of further research.

3.4. Himare Springs

Himare springs (several submarine springs and Potami) are recharged by the Cika carbonate structure (Figure 9). The first emerge at Spile Bay in Himare and is clearly visible in calm sea conditions. The largest submarine spring of the area (Lera Pas) is about 2.0 km southeast of Spile Bay (Figure 9). The strong groundwater flow emerges from a depth of about 7–8 m, with estimated discharge of 1000–1500 L/s.
The Potami spring (no. 2 in Figure 9) is the most important in the Himare area, being the only coastal spring used for water supply. It is located at the southern Spile beach, in the southern periphery of the Cika Mountain anticline structure, mainly comprising thick-layer Upper Cretaceous limestone. The spring emerges at 1.0 m a.s.l., is collected through a concrete channel about 200 m long, and then discharged into the sea. Both spring discharge and the chemical composition of water exhibit considerable seasonal variations: the first varies from about 50 L/s to more than 350 L/s, whereas TDSs are in the range of 1000–1500 mg/L, according to available surveys.
A comparison of the chemical analysis with the spring discharge (Table 1) indicates an unusual inverse relation of discharge with salinization, but the data are insufficient to come to reasonable conclusions. Concerning the possibility of using the spring as a drinking resource, it appears that some chemical parameters exceed the maximum permissible limit (KML) for drinking water: in detail, KML for Cl is 250 mg/L, whereas at the spring it fluctuates around 460–660 mg/L, and KML for Na is 200 mg/L, whereas at the spring it ranges from 200 to > 400 mg/L. Nevertheless, even though the Potami spring does not meet the drinking water standards, it continues to be used for the centralized public water supply of Himare, and for irrigation.

3.5. Qeparoi Springs

Under the Qeparoi springs name, the Mulliri spring and the Hoston group of coastal springs, near the village Qeparoi, are described (Figure 9). The first is in the northern sector of the beach, where alluvial deposits of the Qeparoi plain cover the Upper Cretaceous carbonates rocks. This spring represents the southernmost drainage of the Cika carbonate structure. The farthest emergence, with respect to the sea (“head of the spring”), consists of a karstic pit several meters in diameter, with the water front in the direction of flow being about 170 m long. The seasonal spring flow is in the range of 70–80 to >400 L/s. The water is salty; according to measurements in different seasons, electrical conductivity varies from 8000 to 10000 μS/cm, and water temperature fluctuates around 15.1–15.5 °C.
The Hoston group of springs is located along the rock shoreline separating the Qeparoi beaches to the north and Borsh to the south, representing the southern pericline of the Kudhes carbonate structure, whose total groundwater resources, estimated in about 890 l/s [87], are drained along a 600–700 m long spring-line. Along the Hoston coastline there are dozens of springs at elevations from sea level to 2 m a.s.l., whose discharges vary between 1 and 20 L/s. An exception is a spring emerging in the southernmost part of the coast, near the Borsh plain (discharge 0.5–0.6 m3/s, temperature 14 °C, electrical conductivity 4630 μS/cm).

3.6. Butrint Springs

The Butrint springs are located at the eastern corner of the homonymous lake (Figure 10): they are the Mulliri Armiro (discharge 100–200 L/s) at the northeast corner, and the Bufi springs (Bufi 1 and 2 in Figure 10), emerging near Rreza Lake. Bufi springs are connected by a canal about 500 m-long, flowing into the Butrint Lake. They are recharged from the Jurassic plate siliceous limestone formations, and have a total discharge of 600–700 L/s, temperature of 15.3–15.6 °C, and electrical conductivity of about 11,000–13,500 μS/cm, with a Cl-Na hydro-chemical facies (Table 1). These springs result by the mixing of karst freshwater with the seawater, as unequivocally supported by the values of ionic ratios, with particular regard to Na/Cl (0.88, typical value for marine water).

4. Hydrochemistry of Brackish Springs

The Piper diagram (Figure 11h), as well as the correlation plots in Figure 11e–g, show that the karst brackish spring of Albania belong to three hydro-chemical facies; (a) SO4-Ca for evaporitic springs; (b) Cl-Na for the Bashaj spring, related to the presence of halite; and (c) Cl-Na for coastal springs affected by seawater intrusion.
The springs of Dumre present intermediate hydro-chemical facies; they issue from gypsum rocks, but with high halite (NaCl) contents.
The evaporitic springs (facies SO4-Ca) are characterized by very low concentrations of Na and Cl (Figure 11a), whereas the concentrations of Ca and SO4 (Figure 11b) are very high, which shows that the gypsum deposits of Korab are relatively “clean”, consisting of gypsum but without salt.
The main factor controlling the chemical composition of coastal brackish springs is the mixing with varying degrees of freshwater of karst origin with marine waters. The mixing rate is highest at Butrint Spring no. 1 (about 30% seawater) and lowest at the Renci 2 spring (about 2–3% seawater).
Chemical compositions of the five evaporitic springs are quite different. The main reaction controlling their chemical composition is the dissolution of salts such as gypsum and halite [88]. In most of the figures presented here (Figure 11a,d,e,h) the Bashaj spring stands far from the Korab springs, due to higher TDS values and the different ion relationship. According to Cl, SO4 and Na ion contents, Bashaj Spring appears to be a coastal spring: it has high TDS, Cl, and Na contents, although water circulates in the gypsum formation, cropping out along the overthrust tectonic fault of the Kurvelesh massif.
As already pointed out by Avgustinski et al. [34], water qualities at Bashaj are characteristic of groundwater circulating at great depths; near the surface, groundwater coming from the depths mixes with fresh shallow water, with consequent decreases in temperature and salinity. However, if water was actually circulating at depths, it would surely contain dissolved gases even in small quantities, but this is not the case. Furthermore, it could also have higher temperatures. Apparently, Bashaj is the spring with shallow groundwater circulation in evaporites. What is striking in the case of this spring is that groundwater circulating in a gypsum environment is richer in Cl-Na than in CaSO4. This is explained by the presence of halite, which exhibits a much higher solubility than gypsum [89].
Among the other gypsum springs, those at Dumre emerging at the Thana lakeside are distinguished for their relatively high content of NaCl, which indicates that halite deposits may also be present in the Dumre evaporites.

5. Conclusions

The available data about karst brackish springs of Albania, collected and presented in this contribution, allowed us to distinguish two types of hydro-chemical facies, characterizing the groups of evaporitic (mainly gypsum) springs and coastal sea springs, respectively. The only exception is the Bashaj Spring, with a discharge of about 20 L/s: it emerges from a small outcrop of evaporites with a high content of halite, along a tectonic contact between the Mesozoic limestones and the Oligocene flysch deposits. The spring is characterized by very high content of Cl (5813 mg/L) and Na (3812 mg/L).
For the first group (evaporitic springs), two main areas can be identified. The first is Korab Mountain (areal extension 90 km2), located in the center of the homonymous tectonic zone. At Korab, the springs discharge from some l/s to about 200–300 L/s, and are characterized by a SO4-Ca hydro-chemical facies, total dissolved solids in the range of 1500–2300 mg/L, and electrical conductivity of 1800 µS/cm. As indicated by the concentrations of Cl and Na ions, the content of salts is very low.
The second area is represented by the Dumre gypsum plateau, with a surface of 170 km2, outcropping in the Ionian outer tectonic zone. This plateau is characterized by very developed karstification, documented by the high number of sinkholes which also host more than 80 karst lakes. The total groundwater resources of Dumre, as recharged by the effective infiltration, are estimated to be about 1.7 m3/s (5.35 × 107 m3/year), and are totally drained within the Thana artificial lake, at the southern edge of the plateau. The water is characterized by SO4-Cl-Ca-Na hydro-chemical facies, total dissolved solids in the range 2600–3300 mg/L, and electrical conductivity of 3400 µS/cm; notably, the concentrations of Cl and Na ions at the Dumre springs are about tenfold higher than those in the Korab area. This is likely due to presence of halite in the gypsum deposits at Dumre, whose high solubility also explains the intensive karstification processes therein.
Concerning the coastal springs, these are mainly distributed at the Ionian coastal line, along a 147 km-long stretch from Vlora to the Albanian-Greek border. This is a mountainous karst area, intensively karstified, with total karst water resources estimated to be about 21.5 m3/s or 67.7 × 107 m3/year. A significant amount of this (67% of the total karst water resources, corresponding to 14.5 m3/s) is brackish, and only 33% (7.0 m3/s) has a good quality, and is usable for drinking purposes. Most of the brackish water is drained mainly as diffuse flow, and only approximately 1.9 m3/s is drained as concentrated brackish coastal springs.
All brackish coastal springs are characterized by Cl-Na hydro-chemical facies, with total dissolved solids in the range of 1100 to 8390 mg/L.
Given the above values, karst brackish springs of Albania cannot be used as potable water sources. For irrigation purposes, the SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) coefficient should be taken into account, which is in direct correlation with the adsorption of sodium by soil. If the SAR is less than 10 meq/l, the water can be used for irrigation [90].
In the case of Korab, the SAR value is below the threshold limit, and actually the waters can be used to irrigate the fields. The situation at Dumre is quite different, because the SAR is close to 150 meq/l, which is potentially not suitable for irrigation. However, the springs at Dumre discharge into the Thana artificial lake, which is also supplied by the Devoll River. The resulting mixed water brings the SAR value below the threshold, thus making it useful for intensive application in the Central Albanian plains.
The Albanian karst is certainly among the most remarkable areas in the Dinarides for importance and quality of carbonate aquifers and the hydric resources contained therein. Nevertheless, scientific knowledge about many karst aspects of Albania still deserves attention from researchers, and needs much work in order to fully understand the dynamics of groundwater flow. With the goal of contributing to improve such knowledge, the present article provides significant information and data about the main brackish springs in Albania, which were previously scattered across local publications and reports. These are of particular importance, especially concerning coastal environments in karst settings [91,92,93,94,95], and are becoming some of the main priorities in times of climate change regarding the safeguarding and protection of very delicate natural ecosystems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Original Draft, R.E.; Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Review and Editing, Supervision, M.P.; Writing-Review and Editing, I.S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Readers can contact authors for availability of data and materials.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflict of interest are declared for this article.

References

  1. Bakalowicz, M. Karst groundwater: A challenge for new resources. Hydrogeol. J. 2005, 13, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Parise, M.; Gabrovsek, F.; Kaufmann, G.; Ravbar, N. Recent advances in karst research: From theory to fieldwork and applications. In Advances in Karst Research: Theory, Fieldwork and Applications; Parise, M., Gabrovsek, F., Kaufmann, G., Ravbar, N., Eds.; Geological Society: London, UK, 2018; Volume 466, pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stevanović, Z. Kast water in potable water supply: A global scale overview. Environ. Earth Sci. 2019, 78, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Goldscheider, N.; Chen, Z.; Auler, A.S.; Bakalowicz, M.; Broda, S.; Drew, D.; Hartmann, J.; Jiang, G.; Moosdorf, N.; Stevanović, Z.; et al. Global distribution of carbonate rocks and karst water resources. Hydrogeol. J. 2020, 28, 1661–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zwahlen, F. Vulnerability and Risk Mapping for the Protection of Carbonate Aquifers; Final Report COST Action, 620; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gutierrez, F. Hazards associated with karst. In Geomorphological Hazards and Disaster Prevention; Alcantara, I., Goudie, A., Eds.; University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; pp. 161–175. [Google Scholar]
  7. Parise, M. Hazards in karst. In Proceedings International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference “Sustainability of the Karst Environment. Dinaric Karst and Other Karst Regions”, Plitvice Lakes, Croatia, 23–26 September 2009; Bonacci, O., Ed.; Series on Groundwater; IHP-UNESCO: Paris, France, 2020; no. 2; pp. 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  8. Parise, M.; Ravbar, N.; Živanovic, V.; Mikszewski, A.; Kresic, N.; Mádl-Szőnyi, J.; Kukuric, N. Hazards in Karst and Managing Water Resources Quality. In Karst Aquifers—Characterization and Engineering; Stevanović, Z., Ed.; Professional Practice in Earth Sciences; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 601–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Murgulet, D. Effects of climate change and sea level rise on coastal water resources. In Emerging Issues in Groundwater Resources; Fares, A., Ed.; Advances in Water Security; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2016; pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Z.; Auler, A.S.; Bakalowicz, M.; Drew, D.; Griger, F.; Hartmann, J.; Jiang, G.; Moosdorf, N.; Richts, A.; Stevanović, Z.; et al. The World Karst Aquifer Mapping project: Concept, mapping procedure and map of Europe. Hydrogeol. J. 2017, 25, 771–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chen, Z.; Goldscheider, N.; Auler, A.S.; Bakalowicz, M.; Broda, S.; Drew, D.; Hartmann, J.; Jiang, G.; Moosdorf, N.; Richts, A.; et al. World Karst Aquifer Map; IAH-UNESCO: Paris, France, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stevanović, Z. (Ed.) Karst Aquifers—Characterization and Engineering; Professional Practice in Earth Sciences; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; ISBN 978-3-319-12849-8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Stevanović, Z. Global distribution and use of water from karst aquifers. In Advances in Karst Research: Theory, Fieldwork and Applications; Parise, M., Gabrovsek, F., Kaufmann, G., Ravbar, N., Eds.; Geological Society: London, UK, 2018; Volume 466, pp. 217–236. [Google Scholar]
  14. Stevanović, Z.; Eftimi, R. Karstic sources of water supply for large consumers in south-eastern Europe—sustainability, disputes and advantages. In Proceedings International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference “Sustainability of the Karst Environment. Dinaric Karst and Other Karst Regions”, Plitvice Lakes, Croatia, 23–26 September 2009; Bonacci, O., Ed.; Series on Groundwater; IHP-UNESCO: Paris, France, 2020; no. 2; pp. 181–185. [Google Scholar]
  15. Food and Agriculture Organization. AQUASTAT. Available online: www.fao.org/aquastat/ (accessed on 8 June 2022).
  16. Eftimi, R. Hydrogeological characteristics of Albania. AQUAmundi 2010, 1012, 079–092. [Google Scholar]
  17. Eftimi, R. Karst and karst water resources of Albania and their management. Carbonates Evaporites 2020, 35, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Eftimi, R.; Malik, P. Assessment of regional flow type and groundwater sensitivity to pollution using hydrograph analyses and hydrochemical data of the Selita and Blue Eye karst springs, Albania. Hydrogeol. J. 2019, 27, 2045–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. White, W.B. Geomorphology and Hydrology of Karst Terrains; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  20. White, W.B. Karst hydrology: Recent developments and open questions. Eng. Geol. 2002, 65, 85–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ford, D.C.; Williams, P. Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  22. Palmer, A.N. Understanding the hydrology of karst. Geol. Croat. 2010, 63, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hartmann, A.; Goldscheider, N.; Wagner, T.; Lange, J.; Weiler, M. Karst water resources in a changing world: Review of hydrogeological modeling approaches. Rev. Geophys. 2014, 52, 218–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fleury, P.; Bakalowicz, M.; de Marsily, G. Submarine springs and coastal karst aquifers: A review. J. Hydrol. 2007, 339, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Olarinoye, T.; Gleeson, T.; Marx, V.; Seeger, S.; Adinehvand, R.; Allocca, V.; Andreo, B.; Apaéstegui, J.; Apolit, C.; Arfib, B.; et al. Global karst springs hydrograph dataset for research and management of the world’s fastest flowing groundwater. Sci. Data 2020, 7, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Eftimi, R. Hydrochemical characteristics of some lithologically different karst massifs of Albania. In Water Resources & Environmental Problems in Karst, Proceeding International Conference and Field Seminar, Belgrade, Serbia, 14–19 September 2005; Stevanović, Z., Milanovic, P., Eds.; Geological Faculty of Belgrade University: Belgrade, Serbia, 2005; pp. 499–504. [Google Scholar]
  27. Eftimi, R.; Andreychouk, V.; Szczypek, T.; Puchedjda, W. Karst springs of Albania and their management. Acta Geogr. Sil. 2019, 13/2, 39–56. [Google Scholar]
  28. Eftimi, R.; Liso, I.S.; Parise, M. Typology and hydro-geochemistry of karst springs in the southern coast of Albania. Environ. Earth Sci. 2022, submitted.
  29. Institute of Geological Studies. Geological Map of Albania Scale 1:200,000; Faculty of Geology and Mining, Oil and Gas Journal: Fier, Albania, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  30. Meço, N.; Aliaj, S. Geology of Albania; Gebruder Bornatrager: Berlin, Germany, 2000; 246p. [Google Scholar]
  31. Xhomo, A.; Kodra, A.; Xhafa, Z.; Shallo, M. Gjeologjia e Shqipërisë; Shërbimi Gjeologjik, Shqiptar: Tirana, Albania, 2002; 410p. [Google Scholar]
  32. Eftimi, R.; Frashëri, A. Thermal and Mineral Waters of Albania; PRINT-AL: Tirana, Albania, 2016; 214p. [Google Scholar]
  33. Eftimi, R.; Bisha, G.; Tafilaj, I.; Habilaj, L. Hydrogeological Map of Albania; Scale 1:200,000; Hamid Shijaku: Tirana, Albania, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  34. Avgustinski, V.L.; Astashkina, A.A.; Shukevich, L. Mineral Water Resources of Albania; Health Ministry, Central Archive, Albanian Geological Survey: Tirana, Albania, 1957.
  35. Krystof, J.; Andrejczuk, V.; Różkovski, J. Results of geochemical modeling of groundwater in the gypsiferous Triassic series of the Deshat Korab Mountain (in Polish). Biuletyn Państwego Institytutu Geologiccznego 2012, 451, 107–113. [Google Scholar]
  36. Aliaj, S.; Melo, V.; Hyseni, A.; Skrami, J.; Mëhillka, L.; Muço, B.; Profiti, K.; Prillo, S. The Technical Structure of Albania; Seismological Institute: Tirana, Albania, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  37. Velaj, T. Evaporites in Albania and their impact on thrusting processes. Balkan Geophys. Soc. 2001, 4, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Plaku, S.; Murataj, P. Mbi halogjenët e zonës Jonike. Përmb. Stud. 1974, 3, 157–176. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kristo, V. Features of the karstic relief of Dumrea and development conditions. Geogr. Stud. 1994, 5, 27–41. [Google Scholar]
  40. Qiriazi, P.; Parise, M.; Sala, S. Il carsismo nei gessi del territorio albanese. Mem. Ist. Ital. Speleol. Ser. II 2004, 16, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  41. Parise, M.; Qiriazi, P.; Sala, S. Evaporite karst of Albania: Main features and cases of environmental degradation. Environ. Geol. 2008, 53, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gutierrez, F.; Parise, M.; De Waele, J.; Jourde, H. A review on natural and human-induced geohazards and impacts in karst. Earth Sci. Rev. 2014, 138, 61–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Parise, M. Sinkholes. In Encyclopedia of Caves, 3rd ed.; White, W.B., Culver, D.C., Pipan, T., Eds.; Academic Press, Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 934–942. ISBN 978-0-12-814124-3. [Google Scholar]
  44. Parise, M. Sinkholes, Subsidence and Related Mass Movements. In Treatise on Geomorphology, 2nd ed.; Shroder, J.J.F., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; Volume 5, pp. 200–220. ISBN 9780128182345. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tafilaj, I.; Aliaj, S.; Eftimi, R. Recent land subsidence on Dumre evaporate dome. In Meeting “Expert Assessment of Land Subsidence to Hydrogeological and Engineering Geological Conditions in the Regions of Sofia, Skopje and Tirana”; Third Working Group Meeting: Sofia, Bulgaria, 1998; pp. 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  46. Parise, M.; Qiriazi, P.; Sala, S. Natural and anthropogenic hazards in karst areas of Albania. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2004, 4, 569–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Qiriazi, P. Gjeografia Fizike e Shqipërisë; Media Prim: Tirana, Albania, 2019; 580p. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bonacci, O. Poljes. In Encyclopedia of Caves and Karst Science; Gunn, J., Ed.; Fitzroy Dearborn: Chicago, IL, USA, 2004; pp. 599–600. [Google Scholar]
  49. Breg, M. Degradation of dolines on Logasko polje (Slovenia). Acta Carsologica 2007, 36, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lopez, N.; Spizzico, V.; Parise, M. Geomorphological, pedological, and hydrological characteristics of karst lakes at Conversano (Apulia, southern Italy) as a basis for environmental protection. Environ. Geol. 2009, 58, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Blatnik, M.; Frantar, P.; Kosec, D.; Gabrovsek, F. Measurements of the outflow along the eastern border of Planinsko Polje, Slovenia. Acta Carsologica 2017, 46, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Rozic, B.; Popit, T.; Gale, L.; Verbovsek, T.; Vidmar, I.; Dolonec, M.; Zvab Rozic, P. Origin of the Jezero v Ledvicah Lake; a depression in a gutter-shaped karstic aquifer (Julian Alps, NW Slovenia). Acta Carsologica 2019, 48, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chiesi, M.; De Waele, J.; Forti, P. Origin and evolution of a salty gypsum/anhydride karst spring: The case of Poiano (Northern Apennines, Italy). Hydrogeol. J. 2010, 18, 1111–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yilmaz, I. Gypsum/anhidride: Some engineering problems. Bull. Eng. Environ. 2001, 59, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vogli, D. Irrigation System of Dumre Plateau; Ministry Construction Archive: Tirana, Albania, 1980.
  56. Kabo, M. (Ed.) Physical Geography of Albania; Academy of Science: Tirana, Albania, 1990; Volume I, II. [Google Scholar]
  57. Cane, F.; Hoxha, B.; Avdolli, M. Water quality in karstic lakes of Albania. Nat. Montenegrina 2010, 9, 349–356. [Google Scholar]
  58. Eftimi, R. Some considerations on seawater-freshwater relationship in Albanian coastal area. In Coastal Aquifers Intrusion Technology: Mediterranean Countries; Lopez-Geta, J.A., De Dios Gomez, J., De La Orden, J., Eds.; Geological Survey of Spain: Madrid, Spain, 2003; pp. 239–250. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tafilaj, I. Hydrogeology of Uji Ftohte Karst Springs; Albanian Hydrogeological Service: Tirana, Albania, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  60. Stringfield, V.T.; Legrand, H.-E. Hydrology of carbonate rock terrenes—A review with special reference to the United States. J. Hydrol. 1969, 8, 349–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cotecchia, V. Studi e ricerche sulle acque sotterranee e sull’intrusione marina in Puglia (Penisola Salentina). Quad. CNR IRSA 1977, 20, 461. [Google Scholar]
  62. Cotecchia, V. Le acque sotterranee e l’intrusione marina in Puglia: Dalla ricerca all’emergenza nella salvaguardia della risorsa. Mem. Descr. Carta Geol. d’Italia 2014, 92, 1228. [Google Scholar]
  63. Rudnicki, J. Karst in coastal areas—Development of karst processes in the zone of mixing of fresh and saline water (with special reference to Apulia, Southern Italy). Studia Geol. Pol. 1980, 65, 9–59. [Google Scholar]
  64. Arfib, B.; de Marsily, G.; Ganoulis, J. Les sources karstiques côtières en Méditerranée: Étude des mécanismes de pollution saline de l’Almyros d’Héraklion (Crète), observations et modélisation. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 2002, 173, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tulipano, L. Overexploitation consequences and management criteria in coastal karstic aquifers. In Coastal Aquifers Intrusion Technology: Mediterranean Countries; Lopez-Geta, J.A., De Dios Gomez, J., De La Orden, J., Eds.; Instituto Geologico Minero Espana: Madrid, Spain, 2003; pp. 113–126. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mocochain, L.; Clauzon, G.; Bigot, J.Y.; Brunet, P. Geodynamic evolution of the peri-Mediterranean karst during the Messinian and the Pliocene: Evidence from the Ardèche and Rhône Valley systems canyons, Southern France. Sediment. Geol. 2006, 188–189, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fleury, P.; Bakalowicz, M.; de Marsily, G.; Cortes, J.M. Functioning of a coastal karstic system with a submarine outlet, in southern Spain. Hydrogeol. J. 2008, 16, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tassy, A.; Arfib, B.; Gilli, E. Better understanding of coastal water resources through a salinity study during an exceptional high-water event: The case of Port-Miou (Cassis, SE France). In Advances in Research in Karst Media; Andreo, B., Carrasco, F., Durán, J.J., LaMoreaux, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  69. Liso, I.S.; Parise, M. Apulian karst springs: A review. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2020, 8, 63–83. [Google Scholar]
  70. Didonna, F.; Maurano, F. (Eds.) Panoramic View of Caves and Karst of Mediterranean Countries; Società Spelologica Italiana: Bologna, Italy, 2021; p. 221. [Google Scholar]
  71. Tulipano, L.; Fidelibus, M.D. Mechanisms of groundwaters salinisation in a coastal karstic aquifer subject to over-exploitation. In Proceedings of the 17th SWIM, Delft, The Netherlands, 6–10 May 2002; pp. 39–49. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bruno, E.; Calcaterra, D.; Parise, M. Development and morphometry of sinkholes in coastal plains of Apulia, southern Italy. Preliminary sinkhole susceptibility assessment. Eng. Geol. 2008, 99, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Basso, A.; Bruno, E.; Parise, M.; Pepe, M. Morphometric analysis of sinkholes in a karst coastal area of southern Apulia (Italy). Environ. Earth Sci. 2013, 70, 2545–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Margiotta, S.; Parise, M. Hydraulic and Geomorphological Hazards at Wetland Geosites Along the Eastern Coast of Salento. Geoheritage 2019, 11, 1655–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. D’Angeli, I.M.; De Waele, J.; Fiorucci, A.; Vigna, B.; Bernasconi, S.M.; Florea, L.J.; Liso, I.S.; Parise, M. Hydrogeology and geochemistry of the sulfur karst springs at Santa Cesarea Terme (Apulia, southern Italy). Hydrogeol. J. 2021, 29, 481–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Margiotta, S.; Marini, G.; Fay, S.; D’Onghia, F.M.; Liso, I.S.; Parise, M.; Pinna, M. Hydro-stratigraphic conditions and human activity leading to development of a sinkhole cluster in a Mediterranean water ecosystem. Hydrology 2021, 8, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mijatović, B. The groundwater discharge in the Mediterranean karst coastal zones and freshwater tapping: Set problems and adopted solutions. Case studies. Environ. Geol. 2007, 51, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bakalowicz, M. Coastal Karst groundwater in the Mediterranean: A resource to be preferably exploited onshore, not from karst submarine springs. Geosciences 2018, 8, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Bakalowicz, M. Karst and karst groundwater resources in the Mediterranean. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 74, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bayer, C.S.; Ozyurt, N.N.; Oztan, M.; Bastanlar, Y.; Varinlioglu, G.; Koyuncu, H.; Ulkenli, H.; Hamarat, S. Submarine and coastal karstic groundwater discharges along the southwestern Mediterranean coast of Turkey. Hydrogeol. J. 2011, 19, 399–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Eftimi, R. Conservation and wise use of wetlands in the Mediterranean basin. In Focus on the Kune-Vaini Lagoon, Lezha, Albania. Hydrogeological and Geological Study; MedWet: Tirana, Albania, 1988; pp. 14–20. [Google Scholar]
  82. Stringfield, V.T.; Legrand, H.E. Effects of karst features on circulation of water in carbonate rocks in coastal areas. J. Hydrol. 1971, 14, 139–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dini, M.; Mastronuzzi, G.; Sansò, P. The effects of relative sea-level changes on the coastal morphology of southern Apulia (Italy) during the Holocene. In Geomorphology, Human Activity, and Global Environmental Changes; Slaymaker, O., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000; pp. 43–66. [Google Scholar]
  84. Biondić, B.; Biondić, R. State of seawater intrusion of the Croatian coast. In Coastal Aquifers Intrusion Technology: Mediterranean Countries; Lopez-Geta, J.A., De Dios Gomez, J., De La Orden, J., Eds.; Geological Survey of Spain: Madrid, Spain, 2003; pp. 225–238. [Google Scholar]
  85. Biondić, B.; Biondić, R.; Meaški, R. Water supply spring zone Novljanska Žrnovnica (Croatia)—new quantities of drinking water in the conditions of salt water intrusion. Acta Carsologica 2012, 41, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Arfib, B.; Charlier, J.B. Insights into saline intrusion and freshwater resources in coastal karstic aquifers using a lumped Rainfall–Discharge–Salinity model (the Port-Miou brackish spring, SE France). J. Hydrol. 2016, 540, 148–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Eftimi, R. Water Supply of South Albanian Coastal Area. Hydrogeological Investigation; World Bank Project: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  88. Reiman, C.; Birke, D. Geochemistry of European Bottled Water; Bortntraeger Science Publishers: Stuttgart, Germany, 2010; 268p. [Google Scholar]
  89. Appelo, C.A.J.; Postma, D. Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution; Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; 536p. [Google Scholar]
  90. Fipps, G. Irrigation Water Quality Standards and Salinity Management Strategies; Agri Life Extension, Texas A&M Systems: College Station, TX, USA, 2003; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  91. Scott, D.B.; Medioli, F.S.; Schafer, C.T. Monitoring in Coastal Environments Using Foraminifera and Thecamoebian Indicators; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 1–177. [Google Scholar]
  92. Avnaim-Katav, S.; Almogi-Labin, A.; Sandler, A.; Sivan, D. Benthic foraminifera as palaeoenvironmental indicators during the last million years in the eastern Mediterranean inner shelf. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2013, 386, 512–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rubino, F.; Moscatello, S.; Belmonte, M.; Ingrosso, G.; Belmonte, G. Plankton resting stages in the marine sediments of the Bay of Vlore (Albania). Int. J. Ecol. 2013, 2013, 101682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Bergamin, L.; Di Bella, L.; Ferraro, L.; Frezza, V.; Pierfranceschi, G.; Romano, E. Benthic foraminifera in a coastal marine area of the eastern Ligurian Sea (Italy): Response to environmental stress. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 96, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Romano, E.; Bergamin, L.; Parise, M. Benthic foraminifera as environmental indicators in Mediterranean marine caves. A review. Geosciences 2022, 12, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location map of cold brackish springs in Albania. Springs in evaporitic deposits (halite-gypsum): 1, Korab; 2, Dumre; 3, Bashaj; 4, Glina. Springs in carbonate rocks: 5, Renci; 6, Marmiro; 7, Himare; 8, Qeparoi; 9, Butrint. Karst areas with diffusive drainage are bordered in red: (a) Karaburun; (b) Palase-Qeparoi; and (c) Ksamil-Gjuza (modified after [27,28]).
Figure 1. Location map of cold brackish springs in Albania. Springs in evaporitic deposits (halite-gypsum): 1, Korab; 2, Dumre; 3, Bashaj; 4, Glina. Springs in carbonate rocks: 5, Renci; 6, Marmiro; 7, Himare; 8, Qeparoi; 9, Butrint. Karst areas with diffusive drainage are bordered in red: (a) Karaburun; (b) Palase-Qeparoi; and (c) Ksamil-Gjuza (modified after [27,28]).
Hydrology 09 00127 g001
Figure 2. (a) Hydrogeological map of the Peshkopi area at Korab (modified after [33]) with the locations of springs: 1, Banya (thermal spring); 2, Brezhdani; 3, Konri; 4, Gypsum; 5, Rabdishta; 6, Bellova; 7, Gypsum River; and 8, Vlesha; (b) Gypsum River; (c) field hydro-chemical measurements in Gypsum River.
Figure 2. (a) Hydrogeological map of the Peshkopi area at Korab (modified after [33]) with the locations of springs: 1, Banya (thermal spring); 2, Brezhdani; 3, Konri; 4, Gypsum; 5, Rabdishta; 6, Bellova; 7, Gypsum River; and 8, Vlesha; (b) Gypsum River; (c) field hydro-chemical measurements in Gypsum River.
Hydrology 09 00127 g002
Figure 3. Brackish springs in the Peshkopia area: (a) Konri (no. 2 in Figure 2); (b) Brezhdani (no. 3 in Figure 2); (c) Gypsum (no. 4 in Figure 2); and (d) Vlesha (no. 8 in Figure 2).
Figure 3. Brackish springs in the Peshkopia area: (a) Konri (no. 2 in Figure 2); (b) Brezhdani (no. 3 in Figure 2); (c) Gypsum (no. 4 in Figure 2); and (d) Vlesha (no. 8 in Figure 2).
Hydrology 09 00127 g003
Figure 4. Topographic map of Dumre plateau, marked with the red line.
Figure 4. Topographic map of Dumre plateau, marked with the red line.
Hydrology 09 00127 g004
Figure 5. Gypsum springs in Thana artificial lake: (a) big linear springs; (b) small linear springs; (c) submerged springs.
Figure 5. Gypsum springs in Thana artificial lake: (a) big linear springs; (b) small linear springs; (c) submerged springs.
Hydrology 09 00127 g005
Figure 6. (a) Big linear springs issuing from caprock (in the foreground) and a submerged spring just offshore; (b) small linear spring in the northern part of Thana Lake.
Figure 6. (a) Big linear springs issuing from caprock (in the foreground) and a submerged spring just offshore; (b) small linear spring in the northern part of Thana Lake.
Hydrology 09 00127 g006
Figure 7. Hydrogeological map of the Renci structure (modified after [33]).
Figure 7. Hydrogeological map of the Renci structure (modified after [33]).
Hydrology 09 00127 g007
Figure 8. (a) Location of Marmiro Spring; (b) Marmiro Spring near the Marmiro church.
Figure 8. (a) Location of Marmiro Spring; (b) Marmiro Spring near the Marmiro church.
Hydrology 09 00127 g008
Figure 9. Hydrogeological map of Himare-Qeparoi (modified after [33]).
Figure 9. Hydrogeological map of Himare-Qeparoi (modified after [33]).
Hydrology 09 00127 g009
Figure 10. Hydrogeological map of the Butrint area (modified after [33]).
Figure 10. Hydrogeological map of the Butrint area (modified after [33]).
Hydrology 09 00127 g010
Figure 11. Plots showing the correlations between: (a) Cl and Na; (b) SO4 and Ca; (c) SO4 and TDSs; (d) Na and TDSs; (e) Cl and TDSs; (f) Mg and TDSs; (g) Mg and T; (h) a Piper diagram.
Figure 11. Plots showing the correlations between: (a) Cl and Na; (b) SO4 and Ca; (c) SO4 and TDSs; (d) Na and TDSs; (e) Cl and TDSs; (f) Mg and TDSs; (g) Mg and T; (h) a Piper diagram.
Hydrology 09 00127 g011
Table 2. Basic characteristics of brackish cold springs in Korab Mountain area (Figure 2).
Table 2. Basic characteristics of brackish cold springs in Korab Mountain area (Figure 2).
LocationSpring NameElevation
m a.s.l.
Q
l/s
T
°C
EC
µS/cm
Hydrochem.
Facies
Thermal springNr 16881443.54060SO4-Ca
Banja RiverBrezhdani715100–30012.2–13.31550–2400SO4-Ca
Banja RiverKonri74670–25010.7–12.01500–2300SO4-Ca
Banja RiverGjipsi8300–2509.71450–2150SO4-Ca
Banja RiverRabdishte9351–9-1560–1695SO4-Ca
Banja RiverBellova9501–12-1630–2160SO4-Ca
Gjipsi RiverPërroi970200–300010–141500–1935SO4-Ca
Village VleshëVlesha8804–3512.22110SO4-Ca
Table 3. Main characteristics of brackish cold karst springs of the Ionian coastal areas of Albania.
Table 3. Main characteristics of brackish cold karst springs of the Ionian coastal areas of Albania.
LocationSpringHydraulic TypeElevation
m a.s.l.
Q
Min-Max
Mean
m3/s
EC
3S/cm
Cl
mg/L
OrikumMarmiroFree flow2.00.07
1.0
2270–6650-
HimarePotamiFree flow0.4–1.00.1–0.5
0.18
1700–2300450–660
QeparoiMulliriFree flow1.00.06
0.3
84002840
QeparoiHostonFree flow0.0–0.4?
1.0–1.5
3000–10,000-
ButrintBufiFree flow4.0–5.0150--
ButrintBufi 1Free flow2.0–4.01.5–4.7
2.5
9000–13,0003000–4900
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eftimi, R.; Parise, M.; Liso, I.S. Karst Brackish Springs of Albania. Hydrology 2022, 9, 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9070127

AMA Style

Eftimi R, Parise M, Liso IS. Karst Brackish Springs of Albania. Hydrology. 2022; 9(7):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9070127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eftimi, Romeo, Mario Parise, and Isabella Serena Liso. 2022. "Karst Brackish Springs of Albania" Hydrology 9, no. 7: 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9070127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop