Next Article in Journal
The Role of Cannabinoids in the Setting of Cirrhosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Qigong and a Tale of Two Back Complaints
Previous Article in Journal
Mini-Review: Assessing the Potential Impact of Microneedle Technologies on Home Healthcare Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biopsychosocial Assessment of Pain with Thermal Imaging of Emotional Facial Expression in Breast Cancer Survivors
Article Menu
Issue 2 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessConcept Paper
Medicines 2018, 5(2), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5020051

Accreditation Standard Guideline Initiative for Tai Chi and Qigong Instructors and Training Institutions

1
Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
2
School of Life Science, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
3
National Institute of Complementary Medicine Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia
4
Hanne-Doris Lang Medical Center, 20099 Hamburg, Germany
5
D’Youville College, Buffalo, NY 14201, USA
6
Department of Family Medicine, The Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul 06591, Korea
7
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 443749, Korea
8
San Feliciano Hospital Rome, University of Chieti, 83-00166 Chieti, Italy
9
Massachusetts General Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
11
College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
12
School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
13
Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
14
School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
15
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 17165 Stockholm, Sweden
16
The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
17
School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
18
The Second Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China
19
College of Tai Chi, University of East-West Medicine, Sunnyvale, CA 94085, USA
20
Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 26 April 2018 / Revised: 27 May 2018 / Accepted: 4 June 2018 / Published: 8 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mind-body Medicine Approaches)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1782 KB, uploaded 8 June 2018]   |  

Abstract

Evidence of the health and wellbeing benefits of Tai Chi and Qigong (TQ) have emerged in the past two decades, but TQ is underutilized in modern health care in Western countries due to lack of promotion and the availability of professionally qualified TQ instructors. To date, there are no government regulations for TQ instructors or for training institutions in China and Western countries, even though TQ is considered to be a part of Traditional Chinese medicine that has the potential to manage many chronic diseases. Based on an integrative health care approach, the accreditation standard guideline initiative for TQ instructors and training institutions was developed in collaboration with health professionals, integrative medicine academics, Tai Chi and Qigong master instructors and consumers including public safety officers from several countries, such as Australia, Canada, China, Germany, Italy, Korea, Sweden and USA. In this paper, the rationale for organizing the Medical Tai Chi and Qigong Association (MTQA) is discussed and the accreditation standard guideline for TQ instructors and training institutions developed by the committee members of MTQA is presented. The MTQA acknowledges that the proposed guidelines are broad, so that the diversity of TQ instructors and training institutions can be integrated with recognition that these guidelines can be developed with further refinement. Additionally, these guidelines face challenges in understanding the complexity of TQ associated with different principles, philosophies and schools of thought. Nonetheless, these guidelines represent a necessary first step as primary resource to serve and guide health care professionals and consumers, as well as the TQ community. View Full-Text
Keywords: Tai Chi; Qigong; standards; accreditation; certification; guideline Tai Chi; Qigong; standards; accreditation; certification; guideline
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Oh, B.; Yeung, A.; Klein, P.; Larkey, L.; Ee, C.; Zaslawski, C.; Knobf, T.; Payne, P.; Stener-Victorin, E.; Lee, R.; Choi, W.; Chun, M.; Bonucci, M.; Lang, H.-D.; Pavlakis, N.; Boyle, F.; Clarke, S.; Back, M.; Yang, P.; Wei, Y.; Guo, X.; Weng, C.-H.D.; Irwin, M.R.; Elfiky, A.A.; Rosenthal, D. Accreditation Standard Guideline Initiative for Tai Chi and Qigong Instructors and Training Institutions. Medicines 2018, 5, 51.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Medicines EISSN 2305-6320 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top