Next Article in Journal
Seasonal Characteristics and Source Apportionment of Water-Soluble Inorganic Ions of PM2.5 in a County-Level City of Jing–Jin–Ji Region
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Investigation of Natural Radioactivity and Health Risk Assessment in Basaltic Volcanic Building Materials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxics
Volume 14
Issue 1
10.3390/toxics14010016
toxics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Use of Red Mud in Agricultural Soil Cadmium Remediation: A Critical Review

by
Weiwei Sun
1,†,
Wenyi Xie
2,†,
Lei Wang
3,
Lei Wang
2,
Yang Gong
2,
Xuwei Li
2,
Chi Wang
1,
Jiali Yan
1,* and
Xiaochen Lin
2,*
1
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, China
2
Nanjing Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, Nanjing 210042, China
3
Ecological Environment Bureau of Chuzhou City, Chuzhou 239000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Toxics 2026, 14(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010016
Submission received: 9 November 2025 / Revised: 12 December 2025 / Accepted: 16 December 2025 / Published: 23 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Toxicity Reduction and Environmental Remediation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Red mud is a highly alkaline solid waste with an annual emission of over 200 million tons, which requires large-scale utilization methods. Soil Cd remediation is a global concern, due to its high toxicity and strong mobility. Given red mud’s potential for soil Cd remediation, this study reviews its basic characteristics, the mechanisms of soil Cd immobilization by red mud, and the use of red mud-based passivators for agricultural soil Cd remediation. In general, red mud regulates soil pH, thus increasing the soil’s Cd adsorption capacity; provides abundant surface active sites for adsorption and complexation with soil Cd; introduces cations to immobilize Cd via ion exchange; and enriches Cd-resistant microbe species to reduce soil Cd toxicity. Furthermore, the potential environmental risks and suggestions on red mud application are discussed. Further research should focus on improving the remediation effectiveness of red mud on cadmium-contaminated agricultural soil, demonstrating its long-term efficacy and economic costs, and proposing practical technical models and standards for application.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Red mud is a highly alkaline industrial by-product generated from alumina production. The yield of red mud varies depending on the alumina ore type and extraction process. In general, production of one ton of alumina yields 1 to 1.5 tons of red mud [1]. The annual global emissions of red mud exceed 200 million tons, and the estimated global reserves in 2024 are approximately 4 billion tons [2,3]. Most existing red mud is stored as slurry in piles, which requires a large amount of land. On the other hand, due to the high alkalinity and heavy metal content (such as chromium, copper, arsenic, cadmium, lead, molybdenum, and vanadium), the storage of red mud poses environmental problems, including water pollution, soil contamination, and air pollution. Moreover, red mud contains rare earth elements, including gallium, niobium, rhenium, scandium, tantalum, uranium, yttrium, and lanthanides; the insufficient recovery of valuable metals results in the underutilization of these resources [4,5,6]. The resource utilization and large-scale absorption of red mud have become a common focus of attention for both academic and industrial communities worldwide. Moreover, it is also a significant challenge that the global aluminum industry urgently needs to overcome for sustainable development.
At present, the principal approaches for the utilization of red mud primarily focus on the following aspects: (1) extraction of recovery of valuable metals, such as iron, aluminum, and rare metals [7,8]; (2) preparation of building materials, such as road base surface materials, cement, concrete, bricks, and ceramic granules [9,10,11]; (3) soilization of red mud, the preparation of artificial soil for vegetation restoration through the utilization of red mud [12,13,14,15]; (4) environmental contamination remediation, applying red mud as soil amendments, preparing desulfurization agents and wastewater adsorbents [16,17,18,19]. Among these utilization approaches, red mud has received increasing attention for the remediation of agricultural soil contamination with heavy metals [20].
With rapid industrial development, soil heavy metal pollution has become increasingly severe, posing a significant threat to ecosystems and human health [21]. Among various heavy metals, cadmium (Cd) is particularly of concern due to its high toxicity, strong mobility, and persistence [20,22]. It is reported that over 235 million hectares of agricultural soils worldwide are Cd-contaminated, especially in Asia and Europe [23]. The migration and accumulation of Cd in soil affect soil and crop quality and can enter the human body through the food chain, exerting detrimental effects on human nervous, reproductive, and respiratory functions [21,24]. Therefore, how to effectively remediate Cd-contaminated agricultural soil and reduce the environmental risks posed by Cd has become an important research topic.
The characteristics of red mud, including high alkalinity (pH 10–12.5), large specific area (15–30 m2·g−1), and rich iron (8–30.2%) and aluminum oxides (7.7–26.4%) contents, endow it with excellent Cd adsorption capacity, which therefore makes it a potential amendment for Cd-contaminated soil [20,25,26]. The utilization of red mud in Cd-contaminated agricultural soil has been widely reported; however, the influence of red mud on soil Cd mobility and plant Cd accumulation varies with experimental conditions [27,28]. This study reviews the mechanism of Cd-contaminated agricultural soil remediation by red mud and discusses the environmental risks of red mud application, aiming to provide references for agricultural soil Cd pollution remediation and the utilization of red mud.

2. Red Mud Characteristics

2.1. Red Mud Composition

Red mud is a solid waste generated during the alumina production process. Its physical and chemical properties, as well as its composition, vary depending on the bauxite and production technology. According to the alumina production process, red mud can be classified into sintering red mud, Bayer red mud, and combined red mud. The Bayer process for producing alumina, with its low energy consumption and high efficiency, has been widely adopted [14]. Table 1 summarizes the main composition of red mud generated by different production processes. In general, the main components of red mud are A12O3, Fe2O3, SiO2, TiO2, CaO, and Na2O, accounting for 90%. The chemical compositions of different types of red mud vary significantly. The CaO content in red mud produced by the sintering and combined methods is higher, which is closely related to the addition of alkaline substances such as lime. On the other hand, Bayer red mud shows higher contents of aluminum and iron oxide. Moreover, red mud contains trace amounts of elements including chromium, copper, arsenic, cadmium, lead, molybdenum, and vanadium, as well as radioactive elements such as radium, thorium, and uranium [3,14].

2.2. Red Mud Physical and Chemical Properties

Red mud has a complex mineral composition, with loose microstructure and small particle size. There are significant differences in particle size distribution, pore structure, and chemical properties among red mud produced by different methods (Table 2). For example, Bayer red mud has a finer particle size (3–10 μm), large specific surface area, high alkalinity (pH 11.3 ± 1.0), poor permeability (permeability coefficient 10−5–10−6 m2·s−1), low shear strength (40–50 kPa), and high salt content (exchangeable sodium ions account for 53–91%) [34,35,36,37]. Compared with Bayer red mud, the sintering red mud exhibits a pH of 10–12, and possesses a larger particle size, ranging from 1 to 20 μm, with a maximum particle size of approximately 30 μm, which leads to a better permeability (permeability coefficient 10−4–11−5 m2·s−1) [20,29,35]. The sintering red mud also has a fine pore structure due to particle agglomeration of calcium carbonate and silicon dioxide crystallization [34].

3. Mechanisms of Soil Cd Remediation by Red Mud

3.1. Soil pH Regulation by Red Mud

Soil pH is a key factor that controls soil Cd environmental behaviors [38,39]. A decrease of one pH unit can result in a 4.3-fold increase in the solubility of Cd in soil [40]. On the contrary, a one-unit increase in pH (within 4–7.7) can lead to a 3-fold increase in soil Cd adsorption capacity [41]. As different studies involve varying soil types, the effect of pH on Cd solubility also differs. However, both studies suggest that higher pH values are favorable for Cd immobilization. Due to its high alkalinity, the application of red mud to soil significantly increases the soil pH, especially in acidic soils. And the increase in soil pH promotes the transformation of Cd2+ into insoluble precipitates, such as Cd hydroxides, carbonates, or phosphates [38,39,42], thereby decreasing soil Cd availability. Wang et al. found that 5% red mud increased soil pH by 0.5, with a maximum Cd stabilization efficiency of 68% [38]. In a severe Cd-contaminated soil, Gray et al. raised the soil pH by 1.68 with 5% red mud, and reduced the exchangeable Cd from 33 mg·kg−1 to 16 mg·kg−1 [42].

3.2. Adsorption and Complexation of Soil Cd by Red Mud

The aluminum and iron oxides in red mud provide abundant surface-active sites that can immobilize Cd ions through chemical adsorption and/or complexation. Li et al. found that the particle size of red mud-based passivator increased from 1–20 μm to 10–100 μm with an increase in Cd content from 0.21% to 3.48%, after the adsorption of Cd2+ [43]. The adsorption of Cd2+ by red mud involves both non-specific and specific adsorption [39,44,45]. Guo et al. demonstrated that both the Bayer red mud and sintering red mud followed the pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetics for Cd2+, and the adsorption maximum was 25.19 and 21.96 mg·g−1, respectively [46]. Furthermore, a study using extended X-ray absorption fine structure showed that Cd adsorption by red mud is mainly outer-sphere complexation (about 65%) and is accompanied by a smaller amount of inner-sphere complexation (about 35%) [47]. Luo et al. investigated the adsorption mechanism of red mud on Cd through X-ray near-edge adsorption spectroscopy, and indicated that Cd2+ and Cd(OH)Cl were the main components, and summarized the surface complexation model of Cd2+ sorbed to hydroxyl groups at neutral pH as reactions (1) and (2).
Cd2+ + SOH + H2O ↔ SOCdOH + 2H+
and/or
Cd2+ + SOH ↔ SOCd+ + H+
The outer-sphere complexation model is as reaction (3):
Cd2+ + 2SH ↔ CdS2+2H+
(SOH denotes the functional groups from iron and aluminum oxyhydroxide minerals, and SH represents ion exchange sites) [43,46,47].

3.3. Ion Exchange

The cations introduced by red mud (such as Na+ and Ca2+) may immobilize Cd via ion exchange [48]. Cd2+ in soil pore water can replace Ca2+ in red mud, thereby becoming immobilized. Meanwhile, the free Ca2+ could reduce the absorption of Cd by plants through ion competition [49]. Liu et al. demonstrated that applying red mud significantly increased the exchangeable calcium content in soil (by 31–78%) and decreased the available Cd [50]. However, an excessive amount of free cations may lead to Cd desorption. Zheng et al. found that overloading with CaCl2 and MgCl2 increased Cd release in the experimental soil by 11.2% and 10.8%, respectively [51]. Moreover, Yan et al. found that a low-dose red mud treatment (0.5%) increased the Cd release after the soil was flooded and then drained, due to the replacement of Cd sorbed on soil by Na+ at relatively low soil pH [52].

3.4. Microbial Mechanism

Soil microbes can reduce Cd toxicity and promote its immobilization through bioadsorption, biomineralization, and the secretion of extracellular polymers and chelating agents (Figure 1) [53,54]. In an acid paddy soil, the addition of red mud enriched specific soil bacterial phyla involved in iron reduction, which may contribute to the reduction in Cd release after soil drainage as well as soil Cd bioavailability [50]. In a vegetable garden soil, red mud promoted the proliferation of soil microbes and the formation of microbial biofilms, and immobilized Cd in the rhizosphere soil via biosorption and chemical chelation [55].

4. The Utilization of Red Mud-Based Passivator in Agricultural Soil for Cd Remediation

The immobilization of soil Cd by red mud is variable and highly dependent on soil and red mud properties. To improve its immobilization efficiency and control potential environmental risks, combined application and pre-treatment have been used to remediate Cd in agricultural soil using red mud.

4.1. Original Red Mud

The Cd immobilization effects by red mud varied with different application rates, and 0–6% red mud application rates are commonly used in existing studies [27,50,56,57]. The effects of original red mud on soil Cd availability and plant Cd accumulations with various application dosages are summarized in Table 3. At a relatively low application dosage, Yan et al. found that 2% red mud increased the pH of an acid paddy soil from 4.8 to 8.0, and reduced soil exchangeable Cd by 28% and rice grain Cd by 72% [50]. At higher application rates, Xu et al. found that 6% red mud increased soil pH from 4.7 to 7.5 and reduced exchangeable Cd by 24% [27]. Interestingly, red mud may have a reverse effect on Cd under certain conditions. Yan et al. flooded an acid paddy soil amended with 0.5% red mud, and found that during the beginning of the drainage, instead of lowering the Cd release, 0.5% red mud treatment increased the release of Cd from soil. While this phenomenon was not observed with 1% or 2% red mud treatments [52]. They assumed that the activation of Cd in the 0.5% red mud treatment group was highly related to the reductive dissolution of Fe(III) oxides. However, with higher red mud application rates, which resulted in higher soil pH, the influence of soil became the key factor and led to a decrease in Cd release [52].

4.2. Combined with Other Amendments

To further promote the soil Cd immobilization, many researchers studied the combined effects of red mud with other amendments (Table 4). Red mud and adsorptive materials such as zeolite can synergistically reduce the mobility of Cd in soil. Application of 5% composite material (red mud: zeolite = 3:1) decreased exchangeable Cd by 79.31% and carbonate-bound Cd by 45.17%, while increasing the residual Cd fraction by 170.84%. Moreover, the residual Cd and iron–manganese oxide-bound Cd fractions exhibited a significant negative correlation. The enhanced Cd immobilization may not only result from the adsorption effect of zeolite but also be associated with the substantial increase in available silicon in the soil induced by zeolite [59]. However, in another case, the combination of red mud with zeolite or gypsum did not reduce the soil Cd availability, perhaps due to the antagonistic effect of Ca2+ released from them with Cd2+ [48].
Red mud can also act synergistically with fertilizers to remediate Cd-contaminated agricultural soils. After 120 days of combined treatment with red mud and rice straw compost, the bioavailable Cd in the soil decreased by 75.3%, which was greater than the reduction achieved by red mud alone (68.4%) or compost alone (63.2%) [60]. Zhao et al. tested the effectiveness and longevity of red mud combined with rape or corn straw, and the results showed that with the combination of rape or corn straw, the reduction in soil available Cd increased from 35% to 42–48% in the first year, and 18% to 23–26% after eight years [61]. Besides organic amendments, combining red mud with inorganic materials also promotes soil Cd immobilization [62,63]. By combining red mud with inorganic fertilizer (silicon fertilizer and phosphorus fertilizer), Yang et al. reduced the soil available Cd by 47% and rice grain Cd by 62% [62]. Similarly, Li et al. demonstrated that applying red mud combined with lime and kaolin at various ratios reduced the soil available Cd by 28–57%, and the rice grain Cd by 47–82%, with 3 treatments lowering the rice grain Cd to below the food safety standard of Cd in China (0.2 mg kg−1) [63]. Besides inorganic amendments, combining red mud with organic materials also promotes soil Cd immobilization. For example, Zhao et al. increased soil pH by 25.5% in a field experiment using a combination application of red mud, biochar, and sepiolite [64]. As a result, the soil organic matter content increased by 34.6%, while the available Cd content decreased by 46.8%, leading to decreases in the transport coefficient of potato roots to tubers, roots to stems, and stems to leaves by 91.7%, 33.8%, and 33.3%, respectively [64]. These results predict greater soil Cd immobilization with combined application.
Many soil microbial strains have been reported to alter the availability of soil Cd [65,66,67]. Besides other amendments, the combination of red mud and specific microbes is expected to further enhance the Cd immobilization efficiency; however, relevant studies are still lacking. One example is that Zhu et al. applied red mud-Lactobacillus plantarum mixture to a Cd-spiked soil and lowered the soil available Cd and garlic bolt Cd contents with maximum rates being 60% and 44%, respectively [68].
Table 4. The combined effects of red mud with other amendments.
Table 4. The combined effects of red mud with other amendments.
AmendmentsApplication DosageSoil pH
Before
Application		Soil Cd
Concentration (mg·kg−1)		Available Cd Content After Application
(mg kg−1)		Change in
Extractable Cd Concentration (%)		Plant Cd Uptake (%)Reference
Red mud, Silicon fertilizer, Phosphorus fertilizer1800 kg ha−2 + 600 kg ha−2 + 675 kg ha−25.60.470.23−47%−63%[62]
Red mud, Corn straw0.5% + 0.1% (w/w)8.91.130.58−49%-[61]
Red mud, Rape straw0.5% + 0.1% (w/w)8.91.130.65−42%-[61]
Red mud, Diatomite, Lime (5:3:2)0.6 kg m−25.8--−29%−59%[69]
Red mud, Diatomite, Lime (5:3:2)0.6 kg m−25.8--−72%−72%[69]
Red mud, Astragalus sinicus L. straw22,500 kg hm−2 + 3000 kg hm−25.4--−25%−45%[70]
Red mud, Astragalus sinicus L. straw22,500 kg hm−2 + 4500 kg hm−25.4--−31%−55%[70]
Red mud, Lime, Kaolin (7:1:4)0.16%5.51.280.76−28%−47%[63]
Red mud, Lime, Kaolin (5:3:4)0.16%5.51.280.62−41%−49%[63]
Red mud, Lime, Kaolin (4:4:4)0.16%5.51.280.59−43%−56%[63]
Red mud, Lime, Kaolin (2: 6:4)0.16%5.51.280.45−57%−82%[63]
Red mud, Biochar, Sepiolite (3:5:3)5000 kg·hm−25.40.820.25−47%−87%[64]

4.3. Red Mud Pre-Treatments

Pre-treatments before application are often used to either enhance red mud’s Cd sorption capacity and/or reduce environmental risks [25,71]. Multiple pre-treatment methods have been reported, including heat treatment, neutralization treatment, and ball milling treatment (Table 5) [25,71]. Heat treatment is conducted by calcinating dried red mud at 600–1000 °C, which leads to changes in its structure and phases and thereby improves red mud’s adsorption capacity [25]. Yang et al. demonstrated that 500 °C heat treatment significantly increased red mud’s specific surface area and nearly doubled Cd(II) sorption stability [71]. Neutralization treatments are usually conducted by mixing raw red mud with acid solutions (HCl, HNO3) or CO2, which greatly reduces the amount of alkali discharged into the environment [25]. Shi et al. found that reaction with 0.5% HCl increased the aluminum, calcium, and iron content on red mud’s surface and increased the number of adsorption sites [48]. As a result, this acid-treated red mud reduced soil available Cd by 28% [48]. Similarly, Luo et al. observed that after activation with hydrochloric acid (0.25 mol/L), the Cd2+ adsorption capacity of red mud increased from 0.16 mol·kg−1 to 0.19 mol·kg−1 (pH = 6.5). When combined with ball milling, the specific surface area rose markedly from 21.6 m2·g−1 of the raw red mud to 77.4 m2·g−1, exposing more adsorption sites and further enhancing the Cd adsorption capacity to 0.21 mol/kg. Moreover, the adsorbed Cd exhibited greater stability, with a decrease in the proportion of exchangeable Cd and an increase in the residual Cd fraction [39]. Compositing nanoparticles onto red mud can also enhance its Cd adsorption capacity. Pang et al. employed a redox precipitation method to deposit nanoscale MnO2 onto red mud, increasing its specific surface area from 10.22 m2·g−1 to 38.91 m2·g−1 and its pore volume from 0.02 cm3·g−1 to 0.73 cm3·g−1, thereby nearly tripling its Cd adsorption capacity to 46.36 mg·g−1 [72]. However, most studies on treated red mud are conducted in liquid systems to investigate their Cd adsorption capacity [25,71]. The efficiency and environmental risks of treated red mud for Cd remediation in agricultural soil, particularly its effects on plant Cd accumulation, warrant further study.

5. Environmental Risks of Red Mud Application

Red mud utilization is a top research topic and has made significant progress in the remediation of Cd-contaminated soils. However, the toxic heavy metals, radioactive elements, and strong alkalinity of red mud pose potential environmental risks when applied to agricultural soils.

5.1. Toxic Heavy Metals in Red Mud

Red mud contains toxic heavy metals, such as chromium, copper, arsenic, cadmium, lead, molybdenum, and vanadium. The improper application of red mud may lead to the release of these elements into the soil and groundwater systems through rain leaching, causing secondary environmental pollution [73,74]. A soil column experiment simulating the situation after the Hungarian red mud disaster showed that the leaching solution of the red mud significantly changed the chemical properties of the soil, and the concentrations of various soluble elements, such as Cr, Cu, Na, Mo, and Pb in the soil increased after red mud treatment [75]. Studies by Ujaczki et al. have shown that excessive application of red mud poses environmental risks and reduces crop yields. When red mud application exceeded 20%, the total As, Cr, and Ni in the soil reached 21, 98, and 46 mg kg−1, respectively [76]. Furthermore, a 30% red mud application resulted in a 50% decrease in white mustard growth [76]. As for Cd, most of the red mud contains a relatively low Cd. Hua et al. summarized the Cd content in red mud from different countries, and all red mud Cd content ranges from below LOD to 34 mg kg−1 dry weight, which is within the EU maximum permissible limits for metals/metalloids in sludge for application to agricultural land (20–40 mg kg−1), except for one case in Brazil (86 mg kg−1) [77]. When using red mud, attention should be paid to its inherent heavy metal contents and their leachability when mixed with soil. It is necessary to limit the application rate to prevent potential soil contamination.

5.2. High Alkalinity of Red Mud

Red mud contains a large amount of alkaline substances, with a relatively high pH value of 10–12, and the application of red mud in soils usually increases its pH [78,79,80]. Besides the effects on Cd, significant changes in soil pH also affect nutrient availability, thereby influencing plant nutrient absorption and growth [81,82]. Liang et al. demonstrated that when 1% red mud was applied to soil, the release of phosphorus decreased from 14.4 to 2.6 mg·kg−1 [83]. Kong et al. reported that red mud promoted the growth of salt marsh species, Spartina alterniflora, but not that of freshwater marsh species, Sagittaria lancifolia [84]. Attention should be paid to the alignment of soil pH changes with the requirements of the target crops.

5.3. High Sodium Content in Red Mud

The Na2O content in red mud can reach 10%, and long-term or excessive application of red mud can significantly increase soil electrical conductivity, leading to soil salinization [85,86]. When red mud application was 40–50%, the sodium content reached 100 times that of the control group [76]. An increase in the exchangeable sodium content in the soil will disrupt the structure of soil aggregates, resulting in soil compaction, diminished water and air permeability, and, subsequently, affecting plant roots’ water and nutrient absorption and plant growth [86]. Measures should be taken to prevent soil salinization. If necessary, red mud should undergo dealkalization pretreatment to remove sodium and other alkali substances.

5.4. Effect of Red Mud on Soil Microbes

Soil microbes are involved in ecosystem processes such as nutrient cycling and the decomposition of organic matter, and play a crucial role in maintaining the health and ecological functions of soil [87]. Changes in soil pH following red mud application may alter the diversity and composition of soil microbial communities [87,88]. Although Yan et al.’s study showed that 2% red mud application had little impact on soil microbial alpha diversity and even improved the stability of the co-occurrence network [50], higher rates may have adverse effects. Feigl et al.’s study showed that 30–50% red mud application lowered the soil bacterial Shannon index by 18–48% [89]. On the other hand, it is reported that 4% red mud application significantly reduced the abundance of heterotrophic fungi in the soil and caused the bacterial community to shift from being dominated by Gram-positive bacteria to being dominated by Gram-negative bacteria, and even led to the disappearance of specific key microbial populations (such as the Arthrobacter genus). Meanwhile, red mud reduced the activity of soil enzymes, including β-glucosidase, which plays a vital role in the soil carbon–nitrogen cycling [90]. The decline in the activity of these enzymes indicated the degradation of soil ecological functions. Currently, the interaction mechanisms between red mud and microorganisms remain insufficiently understood and require further investigation.

6. Outlook on Remediation of Cadmium-Contaminated Agricultural Soil Using Red Mud

Although red mud shows excellent potential for agricultural soil Cd remediation, most existing studies have been conducted in simulation experiments under controlled conditions, which may differ significantly from large-scale application in a real environment. In addition to the environmental risks discussed above, other concerns arise when red mud is applied to agricultural soils.
(1)
The specificity and uncertainty of the remediation effect
The effect of Cd remediation by red mud is significantly affected by many factors, such as red mud composition, soil properties, Cd concentrations, co-existing metals, and plant types [77,85]. For instance, red mud showed a better Cd immobilization effect than zeolite in calcareous soil, but its performance differed in acidic soil [77]. Furthermore, the application dosage is also a crucial factor. A proper amount of red mud may benefit plant growth, whereas excessive application may, on the contrary, inhibit it due to salinization or ionic toxicity. Due to the diversity of red mud and soil properties, there is no “one-size-fits-all” standardized application strategy. Before each remediation, a detailed site-specific risk assessment must be conducted, including the physical and chemical properties of the soil and the red mud used, to determine the optimal pre-treatment method and application dosage [85]. This not only increases initial research costs and time, but also raises the requirements for the technicians.
(2)
The long-term effects of red mud on soil Cd immobilization
Although red mud can effectively immobilize soil Cd through mechanisms such as increasing soil pH, precipitation, adsorption, and complexation, the long-term stability of these effects remains unclear [85,86]. Agricultural soil is a dynamic system with its physical and chemical properties changing over time. Under the influence of factors such as long-term rainfall leaching, organic acids secreted by plant roots, or the application of acidic fertilizers, the remediated soil by red mud may be re-acidified, leading to the reactivation and release of heavy metals and causing secondary environmental risks. Moreover, changes in soil redox potential also affect the Cd immobilization. For example, the periodic alternation of flooding and drainage conditions in paddy soil systems causes the dissolution and regeneration of iron oxides, which control the release of Cd, and in turn affect the immobilization of Cd by red mud [52]. However, currently, there are still very scarce field test data on the long-term stability of red mud in Cd immobilization [25].
(3)
The economic cost of soil Cd remediation by red mud
The economic cost of red mud remediation is a key factor that limits its large-scale application. Although red mud, as an industrial waste, is almost cost-free, its application process involves multiple high-cost steps. Firstly, the transportation cost may be high. Red mud is a large, high-density bulk material, and its sources are concentrated in aluminum smelting plants, while contaminated agricultural soils may be located far away. Transporting hundreds of thousands of tons of red mud over long distances to the remediation site will incur huge transportation costs [85]. Secondly, the pre-treatment cost significantly increases the total cost. When applied to neutral or alkaline soil, to avoid the excessive import of alkalinity and enhance remediation efficiency, complex pretreatment processes, such as acid neutralization, physical modification, or compounding with other materials, are often required [68,91]. Although these treatments can enhance remediation, they also increase costs. Most current research lacks a comprehensive cost–benefit analysis of the red mud remediation. Compared with environmental and social benefits, the direct economic profit generated by using red mud to remediate agricultural soil may be relatively low. A complete economic feasibility assessment should comprehensively consider materials, transportation, pre-treatment, application, long-term monitoring, and potential environmental risk costs. However, data in this aspect is extremely scarce.

7. Conclusions

Red mud has exhibited significant potential as a cost-effective and efficient amendment for the remediation of Cd-contaminated agricultural soils. Its high alkalinity, large specific surface area, and abundant iron and aluminum oxides collectively contribute to cadmium immobilization through multiple mechanisms, including pH regulation, adsorption, complexation, ion exchange, and microbial interactions. Furthermore, the application of red mud can take various forms—it may be directly incorporated into soils, combined with other amendments or microbial agents, or utilized following specific pre-treatments. In addition, the use of modified or composite red mud materials has been shown to further enhance Cd stabilization and reduce environmental risks. However, the remediation performance of red mud remains highly dependent on its physicochemical properties, soil characteristics, application forms and surrounding environmental conditions. Concerns also persist regarding the long-term stability of immobilized Cd, potential secondary pollution, and the economic feasibility of large-scale applications. Therefore, future studies should focus on field-scale verification, quantitative assessment of long-term stability, comprehensive environmental risk evaluation, and cost–benefit analyses. Establishing standardized technical guidelines and safe application frameworks will be essential for promoting the sustainable and large-scale utilization of red mud in agricultural soil Cd remediation.

Author Contributions

Writing (original draft), W.S., W.X. and C.W.; writing (review and editing), L.W. (Lei Wang 1), L.W. (Lei Wang 2), X.L. (Xuwei Li) and Y.G.; writing (review and supervision) J.Y. and X.L. (Xiaochen Lin). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC3702203), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42302300 and 42207277), the Anhui Provincial Educational Foundation (Grant Nos. 2024AH051434), the Chuzhou University Start-up Foundation for Research (2022qd020).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Swain, B.; Akcil, A.; Lee, J. Red mud valorization an industrial waste circular economy challenge; review over processes and their chemistry. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 52, 520–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Li, Q.; Geng, C.; Zhang, H.; Shi, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, C. The large-scale sustainable utilization status of bauxite residue (red mud): Challenges and perspectives for China. Environ. Rev. 2024, 33, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Akcil, A.; Swami, K.R.; Gardas, R.L.; Hazrati, E.; Dembele, S. Overview on hydrometallurgical recovery of rare-earth metals from red mud. Minerals 2024, 14, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Qi, Y. The neutralization and recycling of red mud—A review. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1759, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Sun, Z.; Wu, J.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, G.; Zhou, F.; Feng, E.; Chen, Z.; Cao, Y. Research progress on the extraction of strategic critical metals (rare earth elements, gallium, and germanium) and the high-value utilization of major element silicon from bulk mineral-metallurgical solid waste. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 118119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Li, X.F.; Zhang, T.A.; Lv, G.Z.; Wang, K.; Wang, S. Summary of research progress on metallurgical utilization technology of red mud. Minerals 2023, 13, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Fang, C.; Lou, R.; Ju, Y.; Jia, Y.; Wu, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, X.; Lv, B.; Chen, X. Critical metal recovery from red mud: A systematic review of sustainable extraction technologies and circular economy potential. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 118985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Meshram, N.; Lini Dev, K. Sustainable Utilization of Red Mud as Recycled Waste: A Critical Review and Future Research Directions. Indian Geotech. J. 2024, 54, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Wu, D.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, Y.; Yu, P.; Fu, T. Research status and carbon reduction analysis of red mud in the field of building materials. Particuology 2025, 104, 303–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Singh, V.; Bano, S.; Chauhan, V.B.; Pal, P.; Kumar, A.; Srivastava, J.B. Red mud as a sustainable road construction material: An experimental investigation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 411, 134549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Gao, Y.; Li, Z.; Xin, G.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y. Utilization of high-volume red mud application in cement based grouting material: Effects on mechanical properties at different activation modes. J. Mater. Civil Eng. 2023, 35, 04023011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xue, B.; Chen, L.; Wang, G.; Wang, J.; Wan, H.; Lin, X.; Zhu, G. Simulation of red mud/phosphogypsum-based artificial soil engineering applications in vegetation restoration and ecological reconstruction. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 951, 175656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, L.; Xue, B.; Wang, G.; Zhu, G.; Gou, W.; Yang, D. Potential of artificial soil preparation for vegetation restoration using red mud and phosphogypsum. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 941, 173553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Archambo, M.; Kawatra, S.K. Red mud: Fundamentals and new avenues for utilization. Min. Proc. Ext. Metall. Rev. 2021, 42, 427–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Jia, K.; Zhou, Z.; Singh, S.V.; Wang, C. A review of the engineered treatment of red mud: Construction materials, metal recovery, and soilization revegetation. Results Eng. 2024, 24, 102927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Raj, R.; Yadav, B.; Yadav, J.S.; Kumar, S. Red mud utilisation for sustainable construction and soil improvement: A comprehensive review. Discov. Sustain. 2024, 5, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Xie, W.M.; Zhou, F.P.; Bi, X.L.; Chen, D.D.; Li, J.; Sun, S.Y.; Liu, J.Y.; Chen, X.Q. Accelerated crystallization of magnetic 4A-zeolite synthesized from red mud for application in removal of mixed heavy metal ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 358, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Sun, X.; Hu, C.; Li, T.; Zhang, J.; Su, Y.; Jiang, M. Research progress on iron-rich industrial waste as environmentally functional material. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2024, 42, 101772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Rai, S.; Bahadure, S.; Chaddha, M.J.; Agnihotri, A. Utilization of Aluminium Industry Solid Waste (Red Mud/Bauxite Residue) in Pollution Control. In Innovations in Sustainable Mining: Balancing Environment, Ecology and Economy; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 21–43. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, J.; Li, X.; Fischel, M.; Lin, X.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L.; Yan, J. Applying red mud in cadmium contamination remediation: A scoping review. Toxics 2024, 12, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Hamid, Y.; Tang, L.; Hussain, B.; Usman, M.; Lin, Q.; Rashid, M.S.; He, Z.; Yang, X. Organic soil additives for the remediation of cadmium contaminated soils and their impact on the soil-plant system: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 707, 136121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. Yan, G.; Hua, Y.; Jin, H.; Huang, Q.; Zhou, G.; Xu, Y.; He, Y.; Zhu, Z. Sly-miR398 participates in cadmium stress acclimation by regulating antioxidant system and cadmium transport in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Li, H.; Luo, N.; Li, Y.W.; Cai, Q.Y.; Li, H.Y.; Mo, C.H.; Wong, M.H. Cadmium in rice: Transport mechanisms, influencing factors, and minimizing measures. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 224, 622–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Song, L.; Zhou, J.; Xu, X.; Na, M.; Xu, S.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Zheng, X. Inoculation of cadmium-tolerant bacteria to regulate microbial activity and key bacterial population in cadmium-contaminated soils during bioremediation. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2024, 271, 115957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Wang, M.; Liu, X. Applications of red mud as an environmental remediation material: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Wang, F.; Xu, J.; Yin, H.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, H.; Wang, L. Sustainable stabilization/solidification of the Pb, Zn, and Cd contaminated soil by red mud-derived binders. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 284, 117178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Xu, Z.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Fan, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Lin, Y.; Liu, H.; Guo, S.; Xu, M.; et al. Red mud based passivator reduced Cd accumulation in edible amaranth by influencing root organic matter metabolism and soil aggregate distribution. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 275, 116543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Hu, C.; Zhao, Z.; Lyu, M.; Chen, Z.; Xin, L.; Chen, H. Application of red mud in hydrothermal remediation of Cd-and petroleum-contaminated soil. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 113333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Wang, P.; Liu, D. Physical and chemical properties of sintering red mud and bayer red mud and the implications for beneficial utilization. Materials 2012, 5, 1800–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Kalkan, E.; Nadaroglu, H.; Dikbas, N.; Tasgin, E.; Celebi, N. Bacteria-Modified Red Mud for Adsorption of Cadmium Ions from Aqueous Solutions. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2013, 22, 417–429. [Google Scholar]
  31. Babisk, M.; Amaral, L.; Ribeiro, L.; Vieira, C.; Prado, U.; Gadioli, M.; Oliveira, M.; Luz, F.; Monteiro, S.; Garcia Filho, F. Evaluation and application of sintered red mud and its incorporated clay ceramics as materials for building construction. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 2186–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Shoppert, A.; Loginova, I.; Rogozhnikov, D.; Karimov, K.; Chaikin, L. Increased as adsorption on maghemite-containing red mud prepared by the alkali fusion-leaching method. Minerals 2019, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Shoppert, A.; Loginova, I.; Napol’skikh, A. Obtaining of Pigment-Quality Magnetite from Sintering Process Red Mud. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 969, 012056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Xiao, W.; Liu, Y.; Jun, W. Characteristics of red mud in combined process and its performance on Pb (II) removal in aqueous solution. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2020, 14, 515–522. [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu, D.Y.; Wu, C.S. Stockpiling and comprehensive utilization of red mud research progress. Materials 2012, 5, 1232–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Xiao, Y.; Tiong, M.; Mo, K.H.; Guo, M.; Ling, T. Recycling Bayer and sintering red muds in brick production: A review. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A 2022, 23, 335–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Xue, S.; Zhu, F.; Kong, X.; Wu, C.; Huang, L.; Huang, N.; Hartley, W. A review of the characterization and revegetation of bauxite residues (Red mud). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 1120–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, Y.; Li, F.; Song, J.; Xiao, Y.; Luo, L.; Yang, Z.; Chai, L. Stabilization of Cd-, Pb-, Cu-and Zn-contaminated calcareous agricultural soil using red mud: A field experiment. Environ. Geochem. Health 2018, 40, 2143–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Luo, L.; Ma, C.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, S.; Lv, J.; Cui, M. New insights into the sorption mechanism of cadmium on red mud. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 1108–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Wang, J.; Wang, P.M.; Gu, Y.; Kopittke, P.M.; Zhao, F.J.; Wang, P. Iron–manganese (oxyhydro) oxides, rather than oxidation of sulfides, determine mobilization of Cd during soil drainage in paddy soil systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 2500–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Christensen, T.H. Cadmium soil sorption at low concentrations: I. Effect of time, cadmium load, pH, and calcium. Water Air Soil Poll. 1984, 21, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Gray, C.W.; Dunham, S.J.; Dennis, P.G.; Zhao, F.J.; McGrath, S.P. Field evaluation of in situ remediation of a heavy metal contaminated soil using lime and red-mud. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 142, 530–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Srivastava, P.; Singh, B.; Angove, M. Competitive adsorption behavior of heavy metals on kaolinite. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2005, 290, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Guo, L.; Xu, X.; Wang, Q.; Yuan, X.; Niu, C.; Dong, X.; Liu, X.; Lei, H.; Zhou, L. A comprehensive investigation of the adsorption behaviour and mechanism of industrial waste sintering and bayer red muds for heavy metals. Environ. Geochem. Health 2024, 46, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Lombi, E.; Zhao, F.J.; Zhang, G.; Sun, B.; Fitz, W.; Zhang, H.; McGrath, S.P. In situ fixation of metals in soils using bauxite residue: Chemical assessment. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 118, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Lackovic, K.; Angove, M.J.; Wells, J.D.; Johnson, B.B. Modeling the adsorption of Cd (II) onto Muloorina illite and related clay minerals. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2003, 257, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Serrano, S.; O’Day, P.A.; Vlassopoulos, D.; García-González, M.T.; Garrido, F. A surface complexation and ion exchange model of Pb and Cd competitive sorption on natural soils. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2009, 73, 543–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Shi, L.; Chen, H.; Wu, C.; Huang, L.; Cui, M.; Xue, S. Effects of red mud and the combinations on lead, cadmium, and arsenic availability in contaminated soil. J. Univ. Chin. Acad. Sci. 2018, 35, 617. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lin, L.; Wu, X.; Deng, X.; Lin, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhang, J.; He, T.; Yi, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; et al. Mechanisms of low cadmium accumulation in crops: A comprehensive overview from rhizosphere soil to edible parts. Environ. Res. 2024, 245, 118054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Yan, J.; Li, X.; Pan, Z.; Lin, X.; Zuo, Q.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, S.; Sui, F.; Zhang, L.; Fischel, M.H.H. Red mud causes dynamic changes in the soil microbial community and cadmium fractions in a slightly cadmium-contaminated paddy soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 493, 138349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Galan-Freyle, N.J.; Aranguren-Diaz, Y.; Ospina-Maldonado, S.L.; Chapuel-Aguillon, P.F.; Pertuz-Peña, M.F.; Hernandez-Rivera, S.P.; Pacheco-Londoño, L.C. Exploring cadmium bioaccumulation and bioremediation mechanisms and related genes in soil microorganisms: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2025, 32, 20215–20231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Yan, J.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Zhou, J.; Shi, J.; Liu, K.; Chen, X.; Zhou, S.; Sun, W.; Sui, F.; et al. Red mud amendments reduce cadmium mobility in paddy soil and limit cadmium accumulation in rice grains: A mechanistic investigation. Plant Soil 2025, 514, 477–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Peng, M.; Qu, Z.; Sun, T.; Huang, L.; Li, Z. Improving soil environment and wheat growth by regulating the rhizosphere soil microbial community through inorganic acid application under red mud alkali stress. Plant Soil 2025, 515, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Ahmad, H.; Shah, M.A.; Khan, R.; Ali, S.; Khan, K.; Zheng, X.; Zhou, X.B. Unveiling the Potential of Rhizospheric Bacillus subtilis to Enhance Nitrogen Metabolism, Soil Microbiota, and Nutrient Uptake Under Cadmium Stress in Maize. Physiol. Plant. 2025, 177, e70613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  55. Xu, Z.M.; Zhang, Y.X.; Wang, L.; Liu, C.G.; Sun, W.M.; Wang, Y.F.; Long, S.X.; He, X.T.; Lin, Z.; Liang, J.L. Rhizobacteria communities reshaped by red mud based passivators is vital for reducing soil Cd accumulation in edible amaranth. Sci. Total. Environ. 2022, 826, 154002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Fan, M.R.; Luo, L.; Liao, Y.L. Effects of red mud on the remediation of Pb, Zn and Cd in heavy metal contaminated paddy soil. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 2012, 13, 388–392. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang, Y.; Liang, C.H.; Liang, S.W. Effects of lime-containing substances on cadmium speciation in soil and cadmium uptake by lettuces. J. Yangzhou Univ. (Agric. Life Sci. Ed.) 2017, 38, 90–95. [Google Scholar]
  58. Li, B.; Yang, J.; Wei, D.; Chen, S.; Li, J.; Ma, Y. Field evidence of cadmium phytoavailability decreased effectively by rape straw and/or red mud with zinc sulphate in a Cd-contaminated calcareous soil. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Zhu, Q.; Luo, H.; Wu, G.; Zhou, Y. Stabilization of cadmium in soil using modified red mud-zeolite composite material. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2016, 35, 907–912. [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhou, R.; Liu, X.; Luo, L.; Zhou, Y.; Wei, J.; Chen, A.; Tang, L.; Wu, H.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, F. Remediation of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd-contaminated agricultural soil using a combined red mud and compost amendment. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 118, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Rui, Z.; Lv, Y.Z. Effectiveness and longevity of amendments to a cadmium-contaminated soil. J. Integr. Agr. 2020, 19, 1097–1104. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yang, J.; Zou, Z.; Yang, H.; Wu, J.; Yang, Z.; Fang, C.; Wei, X. Effects of combination soil amendments on availability and migration of Cd in soil and rice. Front. Environ. Sci. 2025, 13, 1548784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Li, Y.; Yin, Y.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Shang, J. Effects of different combined amendments on Cd uptake and accumulation by rice. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2020, 39, 47–255. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhao, C.; Xu, C.; Wang, F.; Long, L.; Liu, K. Effects of different amendments on cadmium migration in soil-potato system. Soils Crops 2023, 9, 326–335. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang, K.; Jia, R.; Li, L.; Jiang, R.; Qu, D. Community structure of Anaeromyxobacter in Fe (III) reducing enriched cultures of paddy soils. J. Soils Sediments 2020, 20, 1621–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Wang, C.; Huang, Y.; Yang, X.; Xue, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Pang, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z. Burkholderia sp. Y4 inhibits cadmium accumulation in rice by increasing essential nutrient uptake and preferentially absorbing cadmium. Chemosphere 2020, 252, 126603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Wang, J.; Lu, X.; Zhang, J.; Ouyang, Y.; Wei, G.; Xiong, Y. Rice intercropping with alligator flag (Thalia dealbata): A novel model to produce safe cereal grains while remediating cadmium contaminated paddy soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 394, 122505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Zhu, S.; Xu, T.; Li, Q.; Deng, X.Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, G. Remediation effect of cadmium contaminated soil by the combination of Lactobacillus plantarum and red mud. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 821, 012021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Mao, Q.; Yang, Y.; Huang, H.; Liu, Z.; Peng, Q.; Luo, L. Effects of red mud based passivator on the transformation of Cd fraction in acidic Cd-polluted paddy soil and Cd absorption in rice. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 640, 736–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Fan, M.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Núñez-Delgado, A.; Luo, L.; Long, S.; Huang, H.; Hu, L.; Liao, Y. Effects of the combined application of Chinese Milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) and red mud to remediate the cadmium-polluted acidic Paddy soil. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Yang, T.; Wang, Y.; Sheng, L.; He, C.; Sun, W.; He, Q. Enhancing Cd (II) sorption by red mud with heat treatment: Performance and mechanisms of sorption. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 255, 109866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  72. Pang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Xiang, B.; Peng, D.; Huang, T. Cadmium adsorption performance and mechanism from aqueous solution using red mud modified with amorphous MnO2. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Morsali, S.; Yildirim, F. Environmental impact assessment of red mud utilization in concrete production: A life cycle assessment study. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024, 26, 12219–12238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. Winkler, D.; Bidlo, A.; Bolodár-Varga, B.; Erdő, Á.; Horváth, A. Long-term ecological effects of the red mud disaster in Hungary: Regeneration of red mud flooded areas in a contaminated industrial region. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 644, 1292–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  75. Rékási, M.; Feigl, V.; Uzinger, N.; Gruiz, K.; Makó, A.; Anton, A. Effects of leaching from alkaline red mud on soil biota: Modelling the conditions after the Hungarian red mud disaster. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 29, 709–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Ujaczki, É.; Feigl, V.; Farkas, É.; Vaszita, E.; Gruiz, K.; Molnár, M. Red mud as acidic sandy soil ameliorant: A microcosm incubation study. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2016, 91, 1596–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Yang, J.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Wei, D.; Chen, S.; Guo, Q.; Ma, Y. Effects of rape straw and red mud on extractability and bioavailability of cadmium in a calcareous soil. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2015, 9, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Meng, X.; Yang, J.; Zheng, G.; Xia, T. Effects of red mud on cadmium uptake and accumulation by rice and chemical changes in rhizospheres by rhizobox method. Minerals 2022, 12, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Peng, Y.; Zhang, T.; Tang, B.; Li, X.; Cui, S.; Guan, C.Y.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Q. Interception of fertile soil phosphorus leaching with immobilization materials: Recent progresses, opportunities and challenges. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Rédey, A.; Yuzhakova, T.; Utasi, A.; Kovács, Z.; Lakó, J.; Kovács, J.; Domokos, E.; Dióssy, L. Lessons learnt from an environmental catastrophe in Hungary. Glob. J. Adv. Pure Appl. Sci. 2013, 1, 520–531. [Google Scholar]
  81. Feigl, V.; Anton, A.; Uzigner, N.; Gruiz, K. Red mud as a chemical stabilizer for soil contaminated with toxic metals. Water Air Soil Poll. 2012, 223, 1237–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Barrow, N.J.; Hartemink, A.E. The effects of pH on nutrient availability depend on both soils and plants. Plant Soil 2023, 487, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Liang, Z.; Peng, X.; Luan, Z.; Li, W.; Zhao, Y. Reduction of phosphorus release from high phosphorus soil by red mud. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 65, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Kong, T.; Mendelssohn, I.A. The impact of red mud on growth of wetland vegetation and substrate fertility. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 1996, 4, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Hua, Y.; Heal, K.V.; Friesl-Hanl, W. The use of red mud as an immobiliser for metal/metalloid-contaminated soil: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 325, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  86. Zhou, Y.; Cui, Y.T.; Yang, J.; Chen, L.; Qi, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Q.; Zhou, T.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Roles of red mud in remediation of contaminated soil in mining areas: Mechanisms, advances and perspectives. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 356, 120608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  87. Naz, M.; Dai, Z.; Hussain, S.; Tariq, M.; Danish, S.; Khan, I.U.; Qi, S.; Du, D. The soil pH and heavy metals revealed their impact on soil microbial community. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 321, 115770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  88. Xiong, R.; He, X.; Gao, N.; Li, Q.; Qiu, Z.; Hou, Y.; Shen, W. Soil pH amendment alters the abundance, diversity, and composition of microbial communities in two contrasting agricultural soils. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e04165-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Feigl, V.; Ujaczki, É.; Vaszita, E.; Molnár, M. Influence of red mud on soil microbial communities: Application and comprehensive evaluation of the Biolog EcoPlate approach as a tool in soil microbiological studies. Sci. Total. Environ. 2017, 595, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Garau, G.; Castaldi, P.; Santona, L.; Deiana, P.; Melis, P. Influence of red mud, zeolite and lime on heavy metal immobilization, culturable heterotrophic microbial populations and enzyme activities in a contaminated soil. Geoderma 2007, 142, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  91. Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Sun, R.; Cao, Y. Neutralization of red mud using bio-acid generated by hydrothermal carbonization of waste biomass for potential soil application. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 271, 122525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Toxics 14 00016 g001
Figure 1. Immobilization mechanisms of Cd using red mud.
Figure 1. Immobilization mechanisms of Cd using red mud.
Toxics 14 00016 g001
Table 1. Red mud composition from different production processes.
Table 1. Red mud composition from different production processes.
Red Mud TypeOriginComposition %Reference
SiO2Fe2O3Al2O3CaOMgOTiO2Na2OK2O
BayerGuizhou, China8.526.419.021.8-7.44.80.07[29]
Brazil12.234.522.13.8-3.65.30.7[30]
Turkey17.335.020.25.30.34.09.4-[31]
Russia12.0453.2113.35.98-5.485.16-[32]
sinteringGuizhou, China17.310.410.440.2-7.13.50.05[29]
Russia12.0540.1012.88.40-4.107.82-[32]
Russia4.016.634.84.80.81.8033.0-[33]
combinedChongqing, China24.48.521.725.51.23.76.92.8[34]
Table 2. Properties of red mud from different production processes.
Table 2. Properties of red mud from different production processes.
Red Mud TypepHParticle Size Range (μm)Permeability (m2·s−1)Shear Strength (kPa)Exchangeable Sodium Content (%)Reference
Bayer11.3 ± 1.02–1810−5–10−640–4553–91[20,29,37]
Sintering10–121–2010−4–11−5287-[20,29,37]
Table 3. Effects of red mud on cadmium accumulation in plants.
Table 3. Effects of red mud on cadmium accumulation in plants.
Red Mud Addition Rate
(% w/w)		Red Mud pHCd Concentration in Soil
(mg·kg−1)		Soil pH
After Red Mud
Addition		Available Cadmium (Cd) Content After Red Mud Addition (mg kg−1)Change in
Extractable Cd Concentration (%)		Plant Uptake Cd Change (%)Reference
0.5%11.11.5--−46.7%−36.7%[58]
1%11.750.54.80/6.8037.3−26.14%-[50]
1%--4.84/6.10 −10%-[27]
2%11.750.54.80/8.0036.4−27.92%−75%[50]
4%--4.84/7.87-−19%-[27]
4%12.51.797.13/11.291.33−25.70%-[56]
5%-4.366.71/7.872.90−33.34%−48.01%[57]
6%--4.84/8.13-−24%−49.68%[27]
Table 5. Red mud pre-treatments.
Table 5. Red mud pre-treatments.
Pre-TreatmentDescriptionEffects
Heat treatmentCalcination at 600–1000 °CChanges red mud’s structure and phases and significantly enhances red mud’s Cd adsorption capacity.
Neutralization treatmentRaw red mud is mixed with acid solutions (HCl, HNO3) or CO2Reduces the amount of alkali discharged into the environment.
Ball milling treatmentBall millingSpecific surface area exposes additional adsorption sites, resulting in a marked enhancement of Cd immobilization.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, W.; Xie, W.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Gong, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Yan, J.; Lin, X. The Use of Red Mud in Agricultural Soil Cadmium Remediation: A Critical Review. Toxics 2026, 14, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010016

AMA Style

Sun W, Xie W, Wang L, Wang L, Gong Y, Li X, Wang C, Yan J, Lin X. The Use of Red Mud in Agricultural Soil Cadmium Remediation: A Critical Review. Toxics. 2026; 14(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Weiwei, Wenyi Xie, Lei Wang, Lei Wang, Yang Gong, Xuwei Li, Chi Wang, Jiali Yan, and Xiaochen Lin. 2026. "The Use of Red Mud in Agricultural Soil Cadmium Remediation: A Critical Review" Toxics 14, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010016

APA Style

Sun, W., Xie, W., Wang, L., Wang, L., Gong, Y., Li, X., Wang, C., Yan, J., & Lin, X. (2026). The Use of Red Mud in Agricultural Soil Cadmium Remediation: A Critical Review. Toxics, 14(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010016

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop