Next Article in Journal
Special Issue: Firefighters’ Occupational Exposures and Health Risks
Previous Article in Journal
Alpha-Lipoic Acid Alleviates Lead-Induced Testicular Damage in Roosters by Reducing Oxidative Stress and Modulating Key Pathways
Previous Article in Special Issue
Eco-Friendly Synthesis of Zirconia Nanoparticles Using Sonchus asper Extract: A Sustainable Approach to Enhancing Chinese Cabbage Growth and Remediating Chromium-Contaminated Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ecological Risk Assessment and Source Identification of Potential Toxic Elements in Farmland Soil of Nanyang Basin, China

1
School of Geographic Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China
2
Henan Key Laboratory for Synergistic Prevention of Water and Soil Environmental Pollution, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2025, 13(5), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050342
Submission received: 23 March 2025 / Revised: 23 April 2025 / Accepted: 24 April 2025 / Published: 25 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessment and Remediation of Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil)

Abstract

:
This study investigated spatial distribution features and ecological risks of eight potential toxic elements (Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb, As, Cd, and Hg) in surface soil samples (0–20 cm) collected from farmland in the Nanyang Basin, China. This research also aimed to analyze the sources of these elements. Its findings revealed that the mean contents of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb, As, Cd, and Hg were 54.35, 26.57, 25.20, 82.09, 22.17, 8.27, 0.17, and 0.13 mg·kg−1, respectively, all of which were lower than their corresponding risk screening values. However, the mean contents of Cu, Zn, Cd, and Hg exceeded the background values of Henan Province. Spatial distribution analysis revealed that Cr and Ni exhibited similar patterns, with high contents primarily observed in the western part of the research area. Generally speaking, Cu, Zn, and Pb contents were higher in the south and lower in the north, whereas Hg, As, and Cd displayed a scattered distribution of high-value areas. Ecological risk assessment indicated that Hg and Cd posed relatively high risks, with their comprehensive ecological risk indexes (RIs) predominantly classified as moderate. Source identification suggested that As primarily originates from agriculture, Cd from industry sources, Hg from coal combustion, and the remaining elements from mixed sources, including parent material, transportation, and agriculture.

1. Introduction

Soil is fundamental to human survival and critical for sustainable agricultural development in China [1]. With the fast growth of China’s population and the accelerated development of urban areas and industries, soil pollution has emerged as a critical issue [2,3]. Over the years, human activities have introduced a wide range of organic and inorganic pollutants, such as pesticides, fertilizers, industrial waste, domestic garbage, and automobile emissions, into the soil [4,5,6], altering the natural background values of soil chemical elements in urban and surrounding areas and significantly increasing the content of soil potential toxic elements (PTEs) [7]. As a result, soil quality has declined, threatening both crop production and human health [8,9,10]. Recent national assessments highlight the severity of this issue. According to data from the Ministry of Land and Resources and the Ministry of Environmental Protection, it is indicated that 19.4% of cultivated land samples exceed the permissible thresholds for PTEs. In light of these findings, a comprehensive investigation into PTEs’ spatial distribution, ecological risks, and sources in farmland soils is imperative. Such research is vital for devising effective pollution-control strategies, enhancing agricultural soil quality, and ensuring food security and public health.
Presently, there exist a number of approaches for accessing soil PTE ecological risk. Among them, the potential ecological risk index approach is broadly applied because it can not only assess the ecological hazard of individual PTEs but also provide an understanding of the combined effects of multiple PTEs. Source apportionment methods for PTEs in soils are also relatively well established. The positive matrix factorization (PMF) model has become one of the most popular receptor models, and it has been successfully utilized in determining PTE pollution sources in agricultural soils because it can handle missing and imprecise data without requiring the determination of complex source profiles [11,12]. Through PMF analysis of farmland soils in the Nanyang Basin, the sources of PTEs can be effectively distinguished [13] and pollution sources can be determined [14].
Nanyang is situated in Henan Province’s southwestern part and recognized as the largest agricultural city in the province. It is often referred to as the “Granary of Zhongzhou”. With its abundant agricultural resources and strategic geographical advantages, Nanyang serves as a major production hub for grain, oil, and tobacco in China and is designated as a national commodity grain base. Its agricultural development plays a crucial role not only in Henan Province but also at the national level. In addition to diverse agricultural products, the region is rich in mineral resources [15]. The primary food crops cultivated in Nanyang include wheat, corn, and rice. To further enhance agricultural production efficiency and quality, Henan Province has established a 1500-acre, high-standard farmland demonstration zone in the Nanyang Basin, aiming to consolidate the important position of the Nanyang Basin in national agriculture. The Nanyang Basin, a densely populated agricultural region, faces a significant challenge from PTE pollution in its farmland soils. This pollution threatens agricultural productivity and poses a direct risk to local residents’ health. Reports of excessive PTE levels in certain areas [16,17] underscore the urgency of this issue. Therefore, a systematic investigation into the contamination levels, spatial distribution, and contamination sources of soil PTEs is critically needed to provide a scientific basis for valid soil contamination prevention, control, and remediation strategies. This study focuses on the farmland soils of the Nanyang Basin as the research subject, quantifies the PTE contents within the soil, assesses the ecological risk using the potential ecological risk index, identifies PTE pollution’s spatial distribution patterns in farmland soils of the Nanyang Basin, and determines the sources of pollution by integrating the PMF model. The findings of our work aim to inform regional land use planning, guide agricultural structural adjustments, and uphold the development of effective pollution management policies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Overview of the Study Area

Nanyang is situated in the southwestern area of Henan Province, at the intersection of Hubei, Henan, and Shanxi Provinces. This area spans the longitudes 110°58′ E to 113°49′ E and the latitudes 32°17′ N to 33°48′ N. The region is characterized by a basin topography, enclosed by mountains on three sides and open to the south, positioned along the Qinling Mountains–Huaihe River Line. The average altitude is about 150 m a.s.l [18]. Winters are cold and dry, while summers are hot and humid. Therefore, the region is rich in mineral resources, with significant deposits of gold, pyrite, lead–zinc, silver, copper, and phosphate. The average annual temperature is about 16.8 °C [19]. The annual precipitation ranges between 750 and 850 mm [18]. According to the results of our experiments, the pH of the soil in the research area ranges from 5.23 to 7.96, with the majority of soils being acidic (pH < 7). The soil organic matter (SOM) contents vary between 14.79 and 50.94 g/kg. The mean content is 30.45 g/kg. The range of cation exchange capacity (CEC) contents is 14.67 to 44.36. The average content is 24.01 cmol (+)/kg, which means that the soil is medium-fertility soil. The region’s main agricultural products are peanuts, wheat, corn, and rice, while the region is also renowned for its livestock and sericulture industries. Notably, Nanyang yellow cattle, black pig, and tussah production hold national recognition, with Nanyang yellow cattle ranked as the premier breed among China’s five major cattle breeds.

2.2. Sample Collection and Testing

Soil samples were gathered near grid points’ centers by using a uniformly arranged point method with a grid size of 10 km × 10 km. In order to minimize potential contamination from anthropogenic sources, specific buffer zones were established around sampling locations. Sampling points were situated at distances greater than 2 km away from cities, towns, residential regions, major traffic routes, and industrialized enterprises. Furthermore, a buffer of at least 1 km was maintained from villages, and a minimum distance of 200 m was observed from roads and ditches in the farmland. Following these criteria, in total, 126 samples from farmland soils were collected within the research area (Figure 1).
At the sampling points, surface soil samples (0–20 cm) were gathered using a “plum blossom” sampling pattern. Within each 1 km2 grid, a composite sample was gained by collecting multiple subsamples from 3 to 5 locations within a 100 m radius around the central sampling point, which were then thoroughly mixed. At every sampling point, approximately 1 kg of surface soil (0–20 cm) was collected. During the sampling process, plant residues, brick and tile fragments, gravel, and other debris on the soil surface were all removed. The soil specimens were put in cloth bags and labeled with sample numbers. Concurrently, the study recorded the geographical coordinates of the sampling points, current land use, and surrounding environmental information.
In the laboratory, the specimens were air-dried naturally and sieved via a 10-mesh (1.7 mm) nylon sieve before pH and cation exchange capacity (CEC) determination. For detecting PTEs and organic matter (OM), the study randomly collected approximately 25 g of soil from 30 points within the 10-mesh sample and sieved the soil via a 100-mesh nylon sieve with an aperture of 0.15 mm.
Soil specimens were digested using the HNO3-HF-HClO4 system to determine elements’ contents, including Ni, Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cr, as per the Technical Specification for Soil Environmental Monitoring (HJ/T 166-2004) [20]. These contents were measured by utilizing an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (XSeries-2 ICP-MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 81 Wyman Street, USA) as specified by Thermo Fisher (HJ 766-2015) [21]. After aqua regia digestion, As and Hg contents were analyzed by an atomic fluorescence spectrophotometer (AFS-3100, Beijing Haiguang Instrument Co., LTD, Beijing Shunyi) in accordance with standards GB/T 22105.1-2008 [22] and GB/T 22105.2-2008 [23]. All reagents used in the tests were of analytical-grade purity, with deionized water employed throughout procedures. Quality control measures were implemented for each batch of samples, including parallel tests, blank tests, and standard recovery tests, using GSS-2 as the standard reference soil sample. For guaranteeing the analytical results’ reliability and accuracy, every batch included three standard specimens and three blank specimens. Parallel specimens constituted 20% of the total batch. Recovery rates for the analyzed PTEs ranged between 85% and 108%. Phase matching errors for parallel samples were maintained between 5% and 25%.

2.3. Data Analysis

2.3.1. Assessment of PTE Pollution

For assessing PTEs’ contamination levels, the single pollution index (PI), ecological risks of a single potential toxic element (Ei), and the comprehensive ecological risk index (RI) were employed [24,25,26]. The potential ecological risk index (RI) is a significant indicator for assessing soil PTEs’ risk levels. It quantifies both the risk levels of individual elements and their cumulative impact on the environment. The PI, Ei, and RI indexes are calculated as follows:
P I = C i C n i E i = i = 1 n ( T i × P I ) R I = i = 1 n E i
In the formulae, PI represents the single pollution index of a PTE in soil, Ei stands for the potential ecological risk of the i-th PTE, RI represents the comprehensive potential ecological risk index of a PTE in soil, Ci means the content of the i-th PTE (mg·kg−1), C n i indicates the background value of the i-th PTE, and Ti represents the toxicity coefficient of the i-th PTE, as depicted in Table 1 [24]. Categories for potential ecological risk indexes refer to Table 2 [24].

2.3.2. Correlation Analysis

Correlation analysis means examination of the relationship between two or more factors to determine how they are related. It determines the association degree among variables. In the natural sciences, the Pearson correlation coefficient is broadly applied in view of its broad applicability and high reliability. It is particularly effective for analyzing complex data influenced by multiple factors [27]. The Pearson correlation coefficient was utilized here to study PTEs’ correlations. The Pearson correlation coefficient is defined as the quotient of covariance and the standard deviation of estimated samples. Its mathematical expression is as below:
r = i = 1 n x i x ¯ y i y ¯ i = 1 n x i x ¯ 2 i = 1 n y i y ¯ 2
In the formula, x ¯ and y ¯ stand for the means of n trial values. The value of r ranges from −1 to 1, with higher absolute values implying superior dependency among variables [28].

2.3.3. Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) Model

The positive matrix factorization (PMF) model is a multivariate factor analysis tool originally proposed by Paatero (1994) for source assignment of contaminants in the environment. The fundamental principle is to decompose the receptor’s original data matrix (X) into a factor score matrix (G), a factor loading matrix (F), and a residual matrix (E) by using the least-squares method of minimum iteration [29,30,31]. This method is useful in identifying the number of PTE sources and determining the contributions of various sources to PTE accumulation and can better resolve the sources of pollutants [32]. The formula is as below:
X i j = k = 1 p ( G i k × F k j ) + E i j
In the formula, Xij represents the content of the j-th element in the i-th sample, p means the number of factors, Gik means the relative contribution of the k-th source in the i-th sample, Fkj indicates the eigenvalue of the k-th source for the content of the j-th PTE, and Eij stands for the residual of the j-th element in the i-th sample. The original matrix, X, is decomposed through the PMF model to obtain the optimal matrices G and F, minimizing the objective function, Q [33], thereby addressing the dimensionless parameter issue. Q is defined as below:
Q = i = 1 n j = 1 m E i j U i j 2
The formula for calculating the uncertainty, Uij, is as follows:
(1) When the content ≤ method detection limit (MDL):
U i j = 5 6 × M D L
(2) When the content > MDL:
U i j = ( σ × X i j ) 2 + M D L 2
In the formula, Uij represents the uncertainty, σ indicates the standard deviation, Xij means the elemental content (mg·kg⁻1), and MDL means the method detection limit (mg·kg⁻1). The detection limits for As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn are 2, 0.05, 3, 2, 0.005, 5, 2, and 3 mg·kg⁻1, respectively [34].

2.4. Statistical Tools

Statistical analysis of descriptive data, raw data processing, and pollution index calculations were conducted utilizing Microsoft Excel 2021. ArcGIS 10.2 was employed for mapping and spatial analysis. SPSS 27.0 and Origin 2021 were employed to perform correlation analysis [35]. Additionally, primary sources of PTEs in soil of the Nanyang Basin were identified, with their respective contribution rates quantified, utilizing EPA PMF 5.0 software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Statistics of PTE Contents in Soil

This study conducted a descriptive statistical analysis of various PTEs of agricultural soils in the Nanyang Basin, and the results are shown in Table 3. The mean contents of Cu, Zn, Cd, and Hg exceeded the background values of soil in Henan Province [4], but the average contents of all PTEs failed to exceed the national risk screening values (GB 15618-2018) [36]. Regarding the range of variation among different PTEs, excluding maximum values for Cu, Zn, and Cd higher than risk screening values, the maximum values for the other elements were all lower than the screening values. The spatial coefficients of variation (CVs) of PTEs in the study region took the following order: Hg > Cd > As > Zn > Cu > Ni > Pb > Cr. Compared with the risk screening values of agricultural land in GB 15618-2018 [36], Cu exhibited the highest exceedance rate at 10.32%, followed by Zn and Cd, both at 4.76%, while the remaining elements showed no exceedance. These exceedance rates suggest that Cu, Zn, and Cd contents showed varying degrees of contamination in the samples.

3.2. Spatial Distribution of PTEs in Soil

The spatial distribution of the eight PTEs (Figure 2) was analyzed utilizing inverse-distance-weighted (IDW) interpolation in ArcGIS. The Cr and Ni spatial distribution patterns were similar, with high contents clustered in the western part of the research area and low contents mainly distributed in the east. Cu, Zn, and Pb also exhibited analogous spatial distribution patterns. Generally, their contents were high in the south and low in the north. Notably, Cu contents varied considerably between the northern and southern regions, with the southern region exhibiting significantly higher levels. The pollution was present in varying degrees in the northern part of Dengzhou, the central part of Xinye, and the northwestern and eastern parts of Tanghe. Zn contents were relatively high in southern Dengzhou and eastern Fangcheng, suggesting potential contamination, whereas other areas had lower Zn levels, posing minimal risk. Pb contents were highest in the central and southern regions of the research area and gradually decreased toward the periphery.
The spatial distribution of As is generally similar to that of Zn, but compared with Zn, the high-value area of As in the southwest has shrunk, while that in the northeast has expanded. The distribution of high-value areas for Cd is relatively decentralized, particularly in the western part of Dengzhou, western Neixiang, and central to eastern Tanghe, indicating varying degrees of pollution, which may be linked to industrial activities. In contrast, the remaining areas show relatively low Cd contents. Hg forms high-value areas in the southwest of Tanghe, the south of Wancheng, and the east of Xinye, with a certain degree of pollution. The Hg content is relatively low in the other areas.

3.3. Potential Ecological Risk Assessment

PTEs’ potential ecological risk statuses in farmland soils in the Nanyang Basin were assessed using the potential ecological risk index (Ei) and the comprehensive ecological risk index (RI) (Table 4). This assessment indicated that Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb, and As posed a low ecological risk. However, Hg posed a significant high ecological risk in farmland soils of the Nanyang Basin. Specifically, a substantial proportion of sampling points were classified as having considerable to extremely high risk: 8.73% were at extremely high risk, 30.95% at high risk, and 53.97% at considerable risk. A small fraction of sampling points presented moderate (5.56%) or low (0.79%) risk. Thus, Hg was identified as the primary ecological risk factor in the farmland soils of the Nanyang Basin. Cd was the second most concerning element. A small percentage of sampling points were classified as extremely high (0.79%) or high risk (3.17%) for Cd, 19.84% were at considerable risk, 69.05% at moderate risk, and 7.14% at low risk. The contents of Hg and Cd exceeded Henan Province’s background values, and their higher ecological risks were closely related to local anthropogenic activities like industrial and coal combustion emissions. Attention should be given to contamination with Hg and Cd.
From the RI value for each soil sampling point, the RI risk level was derived (Table 2) and the proportion of all soil samples of the same class to the total soil sample points was calculated to obtain the percentage of RI risk level, as shown in the last column of Table 4. The average RI was 280.51, with values ranging from 86.19 to 944.84, indicating an overall moderate ecological risk. In terms of the proportion of sampling points at different RI risk levels, 2.38% of the points were at low risk, 74.60% at moderate risk, 19.84% at considerable risk, and 3.17% at high risk. Additionally, extensive application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in agricultural practices may have propelled PTE accumulation in farmland soils, further elevating ecological risks.

3.4. Source Identification of PTEs

3.4.1. Correlation Analysis of PTEs

Correlation analysis is a preliminary approach to identifying PTEs that share a common source, laying the groundwork for subsequent pollution source apportionment. By statistically analyzing the relationships among PTEs, their homogeneity can be assessed [37]. Previous studies suggested that a significant correlation among PTEs in soil may indicate a common or combined pollution source, whereas a lack of correlation suggests multiple independent sources [38,39]. Therefore, correlation analysis is a critical step in determining the origins of PTE contamination [40]. Figure 3 presents the Pearson correlation analysis of PTEs in the soil, created using Origin 2021 software. The analysis exhibited a powerful positive correlation between Ni and Cr (r = 0.92), indicating significant homogeneity and a likely shared source. The correlation coefficients for Pb-Cr, Pb-Ni, Pb-Cu, Zn-Cr, and Zn-Ni ranged from 0.30 to 0.54, suggesting low to moderate correlations, which implies that these PTEs may originate from a common or combined pollution source and exhibit interdependent behavior. In contrast, the correlations between As, Cd, and Hg and other PTEs were not significant. The correlation coefficients between Cd and Hg and other PTEs were all below 0.30, indicating that Cd and Hg homogeneity with respect to other PTEs is weak, and the accumulated pollution with these elements may come from separate pollution sources.

3.4.2. Source Identification of PTEs Based on PMF

The EPA PMF 5.0 model was employed to quantitatively analyze PTE pollution sources in farmland soils of the Nanyang Basin. The contribution proportions of PTEs of each factor are shown in Figure 4. For determining the optimal number of factors, this study conducted 20 runs, randomly selecting the initial points for three to six factors. After the calculation, a stable ratio of QRobust to QTrue was obtained while the number of factors was 4, achieving the best model fitting effect. The residuals of all PTE contents were within the range of −3 to 3 [41], except for the R2 values for Zn and Cu fitting, which were, respectively, 0.42 and 0.48; the R2 values of the other elements were higher than 0.6; the R2 value of Cr fitting was higher than 0.6; the R2 values of Ni and Pb fitting were higher than 0.7; and the R2 values of As, Cd, and Hg fitting were higher than 0.99. These results suggest that the PMF model developed in this study exhibits robust overall fitting performance and effectively elucidates the pollution sources of PTEs in farmland soils of the Nanyang Basin.
Factor 1 represents a complex combination of PTEs, with the highest contribution rates observed for Pb (80.1%), Cr (77.1%), Cu (76.6%), Ni (74.7%), and Zn (69.4%). The strong correlation between Cr and Ni (r = 0.92), along with similar spatial distribution patterns (Figure 2), suggests a common external pollution source. According to Table 1, the Cr and Ni mean contents do not exceed Henan Province’s background soil values, indicating that such elements are less affected by anthropogenic activities. This finding aligns with previous research, which suggests that natural weathering of soil and bedrock is Ni’s and Cr’s main source [42,43,44]. At the same time, Factor 1 shows a high contribution of Pb, Zn, and Cu. The sources of Cu and Zn are relatively widespread.
Utilizing pesticides and fertilizers in agriculture is a contributor to Cu and Zn enrichment in soil. Furthermore, the well-developed livestock and poultry industry in the research area is another source of these elements. Specifically, the excretion of animal manure results in organic fertilizers with elevated Cu and Zn contents, which are subsequently applied to farmland, further contributing to soil enrichment. Several studies have also identified Pb, Cu, and Zn as indicative elements of traffic-related activities, primarily originating from leaded gasoline combustion, engine wear, vehicle component degradation, and tire friction [45,46]. Pb has a certain correlation with Cr and Ni, suggesting that Pb, Cr, and Ni may come from a common pollution source. Therefore, it is comprehensively indicated that Factor 1 is a composite source comprising natural parent material, traffic emissions, and agricultural activities.
The high loading element of Factor 2 is Hg, accounting for 54.8%. The Hg content in the research area, on average, is 4.33 times superior than Henan Province’s background value, indicating a certain degree of accumulation. Hg is widely recognized as a byproduct of coal and fossil fuel combustion [47,48,49]. During the combustion process, Hg turns into a gaseous state and enters the atmosphere and can be deposited in farmland soil through atmospheric deposition and cause pollution [50]. Based on these findings, Factor 2 is identified as being primarily associated with the atmospheric deposition and emissions of coal combustion.
Factor 3 is mainly characterized by As, accounting for 88.4% of its variance. As exhibits a relatively low correlation with respect to other elements, suggesting a distinct source. Existing research indicates that agricultural production activities are significant contributors to As accumulation in soil, potentially explaining its prominence in Factor 3 [51,52]. The use of pesticides, livestock manure, and various fertilizers has been shown to contribute significantly to elevated As contents [53,54]. Additionally, industrial waste mismanagement can introduce As into farmland soil through chemical fertilizer contamination, waste accumulation, and sewage irrigation. From these findings, Factor 3 is recognized as stemming from agricultural activities. Factor 4 is primarily characterized by a high contribution of Cd, which accounts for 52.7% of this factor. Cd is a key indicator of industrial pollution, primarily influenced by industrial activities like lead–zinc mining and smelting [55,56]. The research area is abundant in mineral resources, like gold, pyrite, lead–zinc, silver, copper, and phosphate. During the ore smelting process, the release of dust-laden flue gas and the surface and underground runoff of wastewater contribute to Cd accumulation in the soil. Based on these findings, Factor 4 is identified as an industrial pollution source.
To sum up, PTE pollution’s four primary sources have been identified in farmland soils of the research region: industrial sources, coal combustion and atmospheric deposition sources, agricultural sources, and comprehensive sources (including parent material, agricultural source, and traffic sources). As mainly comes from agricultural input pollution, Cd mainly from industrial emissions, and Hg mainly from coal combustion and atmospheric deposition. Pb, Zn, Cu, Ni, and Cr are primarily affected by comprehensive sources, including natural parent material weathering, agricultural inputs, and traffic-related emissions.

4. Conclusions

Mean contents of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb, As, Cd, and Hg in the soil were below risk screening values in GB 15618-2018. However, average contents of Cu, Zn, Cd, and Hg exceeded Henan Province’s soil background values. Spatial distribution analysis revealed that Cr and Ni exhibited similar patterns. Their high contents were primarily observed in the western part of the research region. Generally speaking, Cu, Zn, and Pb contents were higher in the south and lower in the north, whereas Hg, As, and Cd displayed a scattered distribution of high-value areas. Ecological risk assessment indicated that Hg and Cd posed relatively high risks, with the comprehensive ecological risk indexes predominantly classified as moderate. It is essential to strengthen soil ecological risk control in the research area, especially the control of Hg and Cd. Source identification suggested that As primarily originates from agriculture, Cd from industry sources, Hg from coal combustion, and the remaining elements from mixed sources, including parent material, transportation, and agriculture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.H. and Y.J.; methodology, X.F. and H.G.; investigation, X.F. and M.L.; data curation, X.F. and G.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, W.H. and Y.J.; writing—review and editing, W.H. and Y.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province, China (252300420869 and 252300421759); the Key Project of the Science and Technology Research of Henan Provincial Department of Education (23A170005 and 24B170009); the Soft Science Project of Science and Technology of Henan Province (232400410456); and the Xinyang Academy of Ecological Research Open Foundation (2023XYQN26).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, S.B.; Wang, M.; Li, S.S.; Zheng, H.; Lei, X.Q.; Sun, X.Y.; Wang, L.F. Current status of and discussion on farmland heavy metal pollution prevention in China. Earth Sci. Front. 2019, 26, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pourret, O.; Bollinger, J.C. “Heavy metal”-What to do now: To use or not to use? Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 610–611, 419–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiang, Y.L.; Ma, J.H.; Wang, Y.B.; Yang, Y.H. Background values of soil heavy metals in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain in Henan Province, China. Toxics 2025, 13, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lai, S.Y.; Dong, Q.Y.; Song, C.; Yang, Z.J. Distribution characteristics and ecological risk assessment of soil heavy metals in the eastern mountainous area of the Nanyang Basin. Environ. Sci. 2021, 42, 5500–5509. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ma, Y.D.; Sun, Y.Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.T.; Guo, M.R.; Hu, C.Y.; Shui, B.N. Analysis of heavy metal sources and potential ecological risk assessment of mangroves in Aojiang Estuary. Ecol. Indic. 2025, 173, 113343–113352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Luo, J.; Feng, S.Y.; Ning, W.J.; Liu, Q.Y.; Cao, M. Integrated source analysis and network ecological risk assessment of soil heavy metals in Qinghai–Tibet plateau pastoral regions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 490, 137780–137796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jiang, Y.L.; Guo, H.; Chen, K.Y.; Fei, X.W.; Li, M.Z.; Ma, J.H.; He, W.C. Health risk assessment for potential toxic elements in the soil and rice of typical paddy fields in Henan Province. Toxics 2024, 12, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liu, H.W.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.S.; Wang, H.Y.; Li, Y.L.; Shi, Y.; Li, D.C.; Holm, P.E.; Ou, Q.; Hu, W.Y. Quantitative source apportionment, risk assessment and distribution of heavy metals in agricultural soils from southern Shandong Peninsula of China. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021, 767, 144879–144888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Burges, A.; Epelde, L.; Garbisu, C. Impact of repeated single-metal and multi-metal pollution events on soil quality. Chemosphere 2015, 120, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, A.X.; Li, B.R.; Li, J.; Chen, W.; Xu, L. Heavy metals in paddy soil-rice systems of industrial and township areas from subtropical China: Levels, transfer and health risks. J. Geochem. Explor. 2018, 194, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.T.; Guo, G.H.; Zhang, D.G.; Lei, M. An integrated method for source apportionment of heavy metal (loid)s in agricultural soils and model uncertainty analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 276, 116666–116676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hopke, P.K.; Dai, Q.; Li, L.; Feng, Y. Global review of recent source apportionments for airborne particulate matter. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 740, 140091–140100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, J.Z.; Gong, J.J.; Wang, Z.L.; Gao, J.W.; Yang, J.K.; Hu, S.Q.; Tang, S.X. Enrichment factors, health risk, and source identification of heavy metals in agricultural soils in semi-arid region of Hainan Island. Environ. Sci. 2022, 43, 4590–4600. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hu, B.F.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, Y.F.; Ji, W.J.; Fu, Z.Y.; Shao, S.; Li, S.; Huang, M.X.; Zhou, L.Q.; Shi, Z. Spatio-temporal variation and source changes of potentially toxic elements in soil on a typical plain of the Yangtze River Delta, China (2002–2012). J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 271, 110943–110957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lai, S.Y. The distribution characteristics and influence factors of soil Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in mountainous area of eastern Nanyang Basin. Master’s Thesis, Hebei Geo University, Shijiazhuang, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fei, X.F.; Lou, Z.H.; Xiao, R.; Ren, Z.Q.; Lv, X.N. Contamination assessment and source apportionment of heavy metals in agricultural soil through the synthesis of PMF and GeogDetector models. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 747, 141293–141332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, H.; Wei, W.; Huang, J.M.; Zhao, G.H. Heavy metal pollution characteristics and health risk assessment of soil-crops system in Anhui section of the Yangtze River Basin. Environ. Sci. 2023, 44, 1686–1697. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, Z.P.; Wang, L.; Yan, M.J.; Ma, B.; Cao, R.X. Source apportionment of soil heavy metals based on multivariate statistical analysis and the PMF model: A case study of the Nanyang Basin, China. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2024, 33, 103537–103550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Du, Y.; Ma, T.; Deng, Y.; Shen, S.; Lu, Z. Sources and fate of high levels of ammonium in surface water and shallow groundwater of the Jianghan Plain, Central China. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2017, 19, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. HJ/T 166-2004; The Technical Specification for Soil Environmental Monitoring; National Standards of the People’s Republic of China. Ministry of Ecology and Environment: Beijing, China, 2004.
  21. HJ 766-2015; Solid Waste-Determination of Metals-Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS); National Standards of the People’s Republic of China. Ministry of Ecology and Environment: Beijing, China, 2015.
  22. GB/T 22105.1-2008; Soil Quality-Analysis of Total Mercury, Arsenic and Lead Contents-Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry-Part 1: Analysis of Total Mercury Contents in Soils; National Standards of the People’s Republic of China. Ministry of Ecology and Environment: Beijing, China, 2008.
  23. GB/T 22105.2-2008; Soil Quality-Analysis of Total Mercury, Arsenic and Lead Contents-Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry-Part 2: Analysis of Total Arsenic Contents in Soils; National Standards of the People’s Republic of China. Ministry of Ecology and Environment: Beijing, China, 2008.
  24. Hakanson, L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach. Water Res. 1980, 14, 975–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tian, K.; Huang, B.; Xing, Z.; Hu, W.Y. Geochemical baseline establishment and ecological risk evaluation of heavy metals in greenhouse soils from Dongtai, China. Ecol. Ind. 2017, 72, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kowalska, J.B.; Mazurek, R.; Gąsiorek, M.; Zaleski, T. Pollution indices as useful tools for the comprehensive evaluation of the degree of soil contamination–A review. Environ. Geochem. Health 2018, 40, 2395–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dong, L.P.; Nie, Q.H.; Sun, X.K.; Cao, W.F.; Kou, D.T.; Bai, Z.Q.; Yang, S.N. Analysis of impact of shield tunneling parameters on ground settlement based on Pearson correlation coefficient method. Constr. Technol. 2024, 53, 0116–0123. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bermudez-Edo, M.; Barnaghi, P.; Moessner, K. Analysing real world data streams with spatio-temporal correlations: Entropy vs. Pearson correlation. Automat. Constr. 2018, 88, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, Y.X.; Chao, S.H.; Liu, J.W.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.J.; Zhang, A.C.; Cao, H.B. Source apportionment and health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil for a township in Jiangsu province, China. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 1658–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Brown, S.G.; Eberly, S.; Paatero, P.; Norris, G.A. Methods for estimating uncertainty in PMF solutions: Examples with ambient air and water quality data and guidance on reporting PMF results. Sci. Total. Environ. 2015, 518–519, 626–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Norris, G.; Duvall, R.; Brown, S.; Bai, S. EPA Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) 5.0 Fundamentals and User Guide. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Wash-ington, DC, EPA/600/R-14/108 (NTIS PB2015-105147), 2014. Available online: https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NERL&direntryid=308292 (accessed on 25 January 2025).
  32. Chen, X.D.; Lu, X.W. Contamination characteristic and source apportionment of heavy metals in topsoil from an area in Xi’an city, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 151, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chai, L.; Wang, Y.H.; Wang, X.; Ma, L.; Cheng, Z.X.; Su, L.M. Pollution characteristics, spatial distributions, and source apportionment of heavy metals in cultivated soil in Lanzhou, China. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 125, 107507–107519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, H.F.; Wang, S.; Li, S.; Chen, H.L.; Huang, L.C.; Fu, W.J.; Xie, S.W.; Liu, S.J.; Zhou, Y.B.; Wu, Z.F. Characteristics and source analysis of heavy metal pollution in farmland soil in typical urban-rural integration zones in Guangdong. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2024, 44, 277–287. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang, L.; Ren, Q.; Ge, S.J.; Jiao, Z.Q.; Zhan, W.H.; Hou, R.X.; Ruan, X.L.; Pan, Y.F.; Wang, Y.Y. Metal(loid)s spatial distribution, accumulation, and potential health risk assessment in soil-wheat systems near a Pb/Zn smelter in Henan Province, central China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 11, 2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. GB 15618-2018; Soil Environmental Quality—Standards for Soil Pollution Risk Control of Agricultural Land; National Standards of the People’s Republic of China. Ministry of Ecology and Environment: Beijing, China, 2018.
  37. Liang, J.H.; Tian, Y.Q.; Fei, Y.; Liu, Z.Y.; Shi, H.D.; Qi, J.X.; Mo, L. Source apportionment and potential ecological risk assessment of soil heavy metalsin typical industrial and mining towns in North China. Environ. Sci. 2023, 44, 5657–5665. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sun, H.; Bi, R.T.; Guo, Y.; Yuan, Y.Z.; Chai, M.; Guo, Z.X. Source apportionment analysis of trace metal contamination in soils of Guangdong province, China. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2018, 38, 704–714. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shen, Z.J.; Li, J.Q.; Li, C.X.; Liao, Z.Y.; Mei, N.; Luo, C.Z.; Wang, D.Y.; Zhang, C. Pollution source apportionment of heavy metals in cultivated soil around a red mud yard based on APCS-MLR and PMF models. Environ. Sci. 2024, 45, 1058–1068. [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, X.Y.; Liu, P.Z.; Du, Q.L.; Shen, Q.J.; Wu, D. Evaluation of heavy metal pollution in soil of lead-zinc mine wasteland with geological high backgound. Nonferrous Met. 2019, 2, 76–82. [Google Scholar]
  41. Uddin, R.; Hopke, P.K.; Impe, J.V.; Sannigrahi, S.; Salauddin, M.; Cummins, E.; Nag, R. Source identification of heavy metals and metalloids in soil using open-source Tellus database and their impact on ecology and human health. Sci. Total. Environ. 2024, 953, 175987–176004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Long, Z.J.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Shi, Z.L.; Yu, D.M.; Chen, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, R. Effect of different industrial activities on soil heavy metal pollution, ecological risk, and health risk. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shi, J.C.; Yang, Y.; Shen, Z.J.; Lin, Y.D.; Mei, N.; Luo, C.Z.; Wang, Y.M.; Zhang, C.; Wang, D.Y. Identifying heavy metal sources and health risks in soil-vegetable systems of fragmented vegetable fields based on machine learning, positive matrix factorization model and Monte Carlo simulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 478, 135481–135495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nanos, N.; Martín, J.A.R. Multiscale analysis of heavy metal contents in soils: Spatial variability in the Duero river basin (Spain). Geoderma 2012, 189, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Duan, H.J.; Shen, H.X.; Peng, C.Y.; Ren, C.; Wang, Y.F.; Liu, D.X.; Wang, Y.L.; Guo, R.C.; Ma, J.H. Source apportionment and health risk assessment of heavy metals in dust around bus stops in Kaifeng City based on APCS-MLR model. Environ. Sci. 2024, 45, 3502–3511. [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu, D.X.; Meng, F.L.; Duan, H.J.; Li, Y.M.; Ma, J.H. Analysis of heavy metal sources in farmland soil of sewage irrigation and industrial complex area Based on APCS-MLR and PMF. Environ. Sci. 2024, 45, 4812–4824. [Google Scholar]
  47. Driscoll, C.T.; Mason, R.P.; Chan, H.M.; Jacob, D.J.; Pirrone, N. Mercury as a global pollutant: Sources, pathways, and effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 4967–4983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gibb, H.; O’Leary, K.G. Mercury exposure and health impacts among individuals in the artisanal and small–scale gold mining community: A comprehensive review. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Beckers, F.; Rinklebe, J. Cycling of mercury in the environment: Sources, fate, and human health implications: A review. Critical reviews in environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 47, 693–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, T.Y.; Hu, G.R.; Yu, R.L.; Lin, C.Q.; Huang, H.B. Source analysis of heavy metals in farmland soil around a waste incineration plant based on PMF model. Environ. Sci. 2022, 43, 5718–5727. [Google Scholar]
  51. Huang, C.C.; Cai, L.M.; Xu, Y.H.; Wen, H.H.; Jie, L.; Hu, G.C.; Chen, L.G.; Wang, H.Z.; Xu, X.B.; Mei, J.X. Quantitative analysis of ecological risk and human health risk of potentially toxic elements in farmland soil using the PMF model. Land. Degrad. Dev. 2022, 33, 1954–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, S.Y.; He, M.J.; Zhi, Y.Y.; Chang, S.X.; Gu, B.J.; Liu, X.M.; Xu, J.M. An integrated analysis on source-exposure risk of heavy metals in agricultural soils near intense electronic waste recycling activities. Environ. Int. 2019, 133, 105239–105247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, F.F.; Guan, Q.Y.; Tian, J.; Lin, J.K.; Yang, Y.Y.; Yang, L.Q.; Pan, N.H. Contamination characteristics, source apportionment, and health risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soil in the Hexi Corridor. Catena 2020, 191, 104573–104584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bhattacharya, P.; Welch, A.H.; Stollenwerk, K.G.; Mclaughlin, M.J.; Bundschuh, J.; Panaullah, G. Arsenic in the environment: Biology and chemistry. Sci. Total. Environ. 2007, 379, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhou, X.Y.; Wang, X.R. Impact of industrial activities on heavy metal contamination in soils in three major urban agglomerations of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 230, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cortada, U.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Martínez, J.; Rey, J. Impact in soils caused by metal(loid)s in lead metallurgy. The case of La Cruz Smelter (Southern Spain). J. Geochem. Explor. 2018, 190, 302–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of sampling points in research area.
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of sampling points in research area.
Toxics 13 00342 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of PTEs.
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of PTEs.
Toxics 13 00342 g002
Figure 3. Correlation analysis of PTEs in farmland soils of Nanyang Basin.
Figure 3. Correlation analysis of PTEs in farmland soils of Nanyang Basin.
Toxics 13 00342 g003
Figure 4. Source identification of soil PTEs based on PMF.
Figure 4. Source identification of soil PTEs based on PMF.
Toxics 13 00342 g004
Table 1. Toxicity coefficients (Tis) of PTEs.
Table 1. Toxicity coefficients (Tis) of PTEs.
ProjectAsHgCdCrPbZnNiCu
Ti10403025155
Table 2. Classification of PTE indexes.
Table 2. Classification of PTE indexes.
EiRisk LevelRIRisk Level
Ei < 40Low riskRI < 150Low risk
40 ≤ Ei < 80Moderate risk150 ≤ RI < 300Moderate risk
80 ≤ Ei < 160Considerable risk300 ≤ RI < 600Considerable risk
160 ≤ Ei < 320High riskRI ≥ 600High risk
Ei ≥ 320Extremely high risk--
Table 3. Statistics of PTE contents in surface soil of research area.
Table 3. Statistics of PTE contents in surface soil of research area.
PTEContent RangeMedian
/(mg·kg−1)
Mean
/(mg·kg−1)
Standard Deviation
/(mg·kg−1)
CV (%)Background Value [4]
/(mg·kg−1)
Screening Value [36]
/(mg·kg−1)
Exceeded Screening (%)
Cr3.00–74.8055.4054.3511.4621.0963.201500.00
Ni2.59–48.1125.8426.577.2527.2927.40700.00
Cu2.00–55.9124.7025.208.1432.3220.005010.32
Zn3.00–203.4974.8182.0936.8044.8362.502004.76
Pb2.00–37.6221.8522.174.6821.1222.30900.00
As0.71–34.028.188.274.1149.739.80400.00
Cd0.01–0.820.150.170.1056.250.070.34.76
Hg0.01–0.640.110.130.0965.130.031.80.00
Table 4. Summary of statistical values pertaining to proportions of soil specimens at various degrees of potential ecological risk.
Table 4. Summary of statistical values pertaining to proportions of soil specimens at various degrees of potential ecological risk.
ElementsEiRI
CrNiCuZnPbAsCdHg
Range0.15–2.710.47–8.780.79–33.330.09–8.870.53–8.430.72–34.715.22–349.6935.84–856.1386.19–944.84
Mean1.754.887.441.535.018.4973.57177.85280.51
Standard deviation0.381.324.781.231.054.2041.15114.96122.45
Low risk (%)1001001001001001007.140.792.38
Moderate risk (%)00000069.055.5674.60
Considerable risk (%)00000019.8453.9719.84
High risk (%)0000003.1730.953.17
Extremely high risk (%)0000000.798.73
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, W.; Fei, X.; Guo, H.; Zhang, G.; Li, M.; Jiang, Y. Ecological Risk Assessment and Source Identification of Potential Toxic Elements in Farmland Soil of Nanyang Basin, China. Toxics 2025, 13, 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050342

AMA Style

He W, Fei X, Guo H, Zhang G, Li M, Jiang Y. Ecological Risk Assessment and Source Identification of Potential Toxic Elements in Farmland Soil of Nanyang Basin, China. Toxics. 2025; 13(5):342. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050342

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Weichun, Xiaowei Fei, Hao Guo, Guangyu Zhang, Mengzhen Li, and Yuling Jiang. 2025. "Ecological Risk Assessment and Source Identification of Potential Toxic Elements in Farmland Soil of Nanyang Basin, China" Toxics 13, no. 5: 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050342

APA Style

He, W., Fei, X., Guo, H., Zhang, G., Li, M., & Jiang, Y. (2025). Ecological Risk Assessment and Source Identification of Potential Toxic Elements in Farmland Soil of Nanyang Basin, China. Toxics, 13(5), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop