Next Article in Journal
Toxicokinetic Characterization of MDM Hydantoin via Stable Metabolite DMH: Population Modeling for Predicting Dermal Formaldehyde Formation
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Cyanobacterial Bloom Control: Inhibitory Effects of Nano Zero-Valent Iron on Microcystis aeruginosa and Metabolic Disruption
Previous Article in Special Issue
Coffee By-Products Studied by the Planar Ames Bioassay with pH Indicator Endpoint Using the 2LabsToGo-Eco
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multielement Composition Analysis of Cicada as an Edible Insect and Dietary Risk Assessment

Handan Municipal Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, No. 581 Beicang Road (A), Handan 056008, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Toxics 2025, 13(11), 916; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13110916 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 26 September 2025 / Revised: 16 October 2025 / Accepted: 23 October 2025 / Published: 24 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Risk Evaluation of Hazardous Substances in Food)

Abstract

Cicadas are a traditional food in China. In this study, we performed multielement analysis on cicadas using Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). In total, 40 cicada samples were collected in Hebei Province (China). Comparing the results of mushroom and vegetable samples selected as the standard foods among the eight food categories, which had the highest correlation with other food categories, there are 12 elements (Al, Mn, Zn, Cu, Cd, Ba, Se, V, As, Li, Pb and Co) in cicadas both higher than mushroom and vegetable samples, which a total of 25 elements were detected. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA), cluster analysis, and correlation analysis were used in the data analysis. HQ (Hazard quotient) value for Cd, As, Pb, and Al is 0.281 in males and is 0.324 in females. Concentrations of essential trace elements (Zn, Cu, and Se) in cicadas ranged from 1.7 to 101.9 times higher than those in mushrooms or vegetables. We analyzed in detail the two perspectives: one is the risk of potentially toxic elements, and the other is the enrichment of essential trace elements. In this study, we reveal that cicadas show a low risk of potentially toxic elements and high concentrations of essential trace elements, making them an edible insect.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The history of entomophagy dates back at least 2000 years throughout the world, including Southeast Asia, Africa, Australia, and Latin America [1,2,3]. The first three questions for this study are: What insects are edible? Why eat insects? How to eat them? More than 2000 species of insects are consumed as food in the world, including beetles, caterpillars, bees, wasps, ants, grasshoppers, locusts, crickets, cicadas, leafhoppers, planthoppers, scale insects, true bugs, termites, dragonflies, flies, and other orders [4,5,6]. Food shortages have been a daunting and serious problem, as the global population continues to increase and individuals live longer [7]. Insects, as a food, contain high concentrations of protein, vitamins, essential trace elements, and easily digestible fatty acids [8,9,10]. Therefore, the consumption of insects can reduce the health damage caused by malnutrition in areas where food is scarce. Many researchers have investigated residents’ consumption intentions regarding the consumption of insects as a sustainable food [11]. Insects are often processed, such as roasting, frying, and boiling, before being eaten. These preparations can enhance the flavor and texture of insects [12]. After addressing the three questions, we show that the subject of investigation and assessment of multielement composition for edible insects is more important.
Increasing research has focused on the risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in food, such as cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and aluminum (Al), with the development of industry and agriculture. Adverse effects of Cd include causing “itai-itai” disease and kidney disease [13,14]. Exposure to inorganic As may cause chronic toxicities and increase the risk of kidney, liver, and skin cancers [15]. Adverse effects of Pb include brain damage, high blood pressure, kidney damage, and cancer [16]. Regardless of the doses of Al, the toxicity attributed to Al is potentially harmful to the nervous system of humans [17]. The research, which is about dietary risk assessment in vegetables, crops, meats, and other food categories, has been carried out throughout the world, and high risk is reported in some areas [18,19,20,21].
The concentration of essential trace elements in food is an important indicator of the nutritional value of food. Zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and Selenium (Se) are important for human health. Zn deficiency has been associated with the stunting of children’s lives and bodies, anemia, and susceptibility to infections [22,23]. The lack of Cu can increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases [24]. Se deficiency causes cardiomyopathy, known as Kashin disease, and causes an endemic osteoarthropathy, known as Kashin–Beck disease [25,26]. Eating foods rich in Zn, Cu, and Se can effectively reduce the risk of diseases caused by Zn, Cu, and Se deficiency. Therefore, foods rich in Zn, Cu, and Se are considered to have higher nutritional value.
In previous studies, we have analyzed multiple elements in fish, meat, dairy products, grains, vegetables, and mushrooms. After conducting a correlation analysis of the results, it was found that vegetable and mushroom samples had the highest correlation with other food categories. 32 mushroom samples and 34 vegetable samples were collected from 20 counties and districts of Hebei Province (China) and subjected to analysis. Therefore, cicadas were compared with vegetable and mushroom samples, and then the results of edible insects were analyzed according to the comparison results. The aim was to analyze the risk of potentially toxic elements and the content of essential elements. If the HQ of potentially toxic elements is high and the content of essential elements is low, it indicates that consuming cicadas would be meaningless in terms of element intake levels. Otherwise, it indicates that eating cicadas is relatively safe. The feasibility of eating cicadas was analyzed from two perspectives: the risk of potentially toxic elements and the rich essential trace elements.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals, Standards, and Instruments

Nitric acid 60% and hydrochloric acid 32% (high purity acids grade) are purchased from Merck Co., (Taufkirchen, Germany). Hydrogen peroxide 30% aqueous solution (ultra-Metal-oxide-semiconductor, CMOS grade) was obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., (Shanghai, China). Quality Control samples (QC samples), the chemical composition in Spinacia powder (GBW10015a), and the chemical composition in Scallop powder (GBW10024), were acquired from the Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration (Beijing, China). Multi-element Solution Certified Reference Material (GNM-M 259345), Internal Standard Mix, and Single Element Standard Certified Reference Material (K, Ca, Fe, Mg, Na) were acquired from GRINM GROUP (China General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals, Beijing, China). NEXIONTM 350X ICP-MS and NEXION Setup Solution were purchased from PerkinElmer (Hopkinton, MA, USA). A High-Performance Microwave Digestion System was obtained from LabTech (Beijing, China). Precision balance, 0.1 mg readability, was acquired from METTLER TOLEDO (Zurich, Switzerland). An ultrapure water production system, whose model is Gradient A10, was purchased from Millipore (Taufkirchen, Germany).

2.2. Sample Preparation

In August, 40 cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) samples were collected from local markets in 20 counties and districts in Hebei Province (China). After the samples were sent to the laboratory, they were minced at low temperature and stored at −18 °C until analysis. All the samples were prepared separately. Powdered sample (approximately 0.2 g) was weighed in triplicate, transferred to digestion vessels with 8 mL of 60% nitric acid, soaked overnight, and then 2 mL of Hydrogen peroxide 30% aqueous solution was added. The samples were digested using the High-Performance Microwave Digestion System under the following conditions: 1. Rise from room temperature to 120 °C using 5 min, and retain 5 min. 2. Rise from 120 °C to 160 °C using 5 min, and retain 10 min. 3. Rise from 160 °C to 200 °C using 5 min, and retain 25 min. Subsequently, the digestion solution was evaporated less than 1 mL at 140 °C, diluted by ultrapure water to 10 mL, and analyzed by ICP-MS. The vegetable, mushroom and QC samples involved in the comparison in this paper were also treated in the same microwave digestion procedure. All the vessels were cleaned with 10% hydrochloric acid and then rinsed with ultra-pure water before use.

2.3. ICP-MS Condition

The torch alignment wizard and the detector voltage SmartTune wizard (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were run before smart tuning was started using the NEXION setup solution (PerkinElmer). Plasma gas (argon) was set at 19 L/min, auxiliary gas (argon) at 1.2 L/min, and nebulizer gas (argon) at 1 L/min. The scan mode for all elements was peak hopping, and the dwell time for all elements was 50 ms per atomic mass unit (AMU). The radio frequency (RF) power was 1600 W. All elements were tested under the conditions described above.

2.4. Method Validation

According to the content of each element in the previously investigated food, 25 elements were divided into three concentration series. The only difference among the three groups is that the concentrations of the calibration curves are different. The high concentration group included 5 elements (K, Ca, Na, Mg, and Fe) with concentrations of 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 30, and 50 mg/L. The medium concentration group included 11 elements (Al, Mn, B, Li, Zn, Cu, Sr, Cd, Sn, Ba, and Rb), and the concentrations were 3, 5, 10, 30, 50, 100, 300, 500 μg/L, respectively. The low concentration group included 9 elements (V, Cr, Co, Ni, As, Se, Mo, Sb, and Pb), and the concentrations were 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 3, 5, 10, 30, 50, 100 μg/L, respectively. Spiking concentrations of 5 μg/Kg and blank were tested 10 times.
MDL = 3 × standard deviation of 10 blank detections/sensitivity
MDL is the abbreviation of Method Detection Limit. The sensitivity was defined as the slope of the spiked sample and the blank sample [27]. The recoveries of 25 elements were performed by spiking at a concentration of 10 mg/L in the high concentration group, at a concentration of 50 μg/L in the medium concentration group, and at a concentration of 10 μg/L in the low concentration group. To determine the accuracy of the assay, one spinach powder QC sample and one scallop QC sample were inserted in each of the ten samples.

2.5. Dietary Risk Assessment

The dietary risk assessment of cicadas, an edible insect, was performed by Hazard Quotient (HQ).
EDI = C × IR × BW/R.
EDI is the estimated daily intake. C is the exposed concentration. In this study, the 95th percentile (P95) concentration is used in the calculation to make the assessment more rigorous. IR is the intake rates of edible insects, 133 Kg/100 people/Year [5]. BW is body weight. R is a coefficient to transform the unit from Kg/100 people/Year to Kg/1 people/week, and is 100 × 53.
Hazard Quotient (HQ) = EDI/PTWI
PTWI is the abbreviation for provisional tolerated weekly intake. PTWI of Cd is 5.8 μg/kg bw, PTWI of As is 15 μg/kg bw, PTWI of Pb is 25 μg/kg bw, and PTWI of Al is 2000 μg/kg bw [28].
The HQ is a very important concept in potentially toxic elements risk assessment. HQ less than or equal to 1 indicates that adverse effects are not likely to occur and thus can be considered to have negligible hazard.

2.6. Data Analysis

In order to understand the content of multiple elements in Cicadas, all 25 elements were arranged in ascending order according to the average concentration, and the elements were divided into three groups: concentration less than 1 (mg/Kg), concentration more than 1 and less than 10 (mg/Kg), and concentration more than 10 (mg/Kg). In this study, we compared the mean, median, and P95 values of each element concentration in Cicada samples, vegetable samples, and mushroom samples. Raw data on the concentrations of the 25 elements in cicadas, mushrooms, and vegetables were presented in the Supplementary Materials. The mean and median concentrations of 12 elements (Al, Mn, Zn, Cu, Cd, Ba, Se, V, As, Li, Pb, and Co) are both greater than mushroom and vegetable samples. Using the SPSS Statistics 27 software, we compared the correlation coefficients of each element to three food categories: cicadas, mushrooms, and vegetables. The Principal Component analysis (PCA) of all samples was performed according to element classification. The HQ of 4 potentially toxic elements (Cd, As, Pb, and Al) was used for dietary risk assessment, and the concentration of 3 essential elements (Zn, Cu, and Se) was analyzed by ratio with vegetables and mushrooms.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Calibration Curves, MDL, and Recoveries

The correlation coefficient R, the BEC (background equivalent concentration), and MDL for all elements are shown in Table 1. The correlation coefficients for 25 elements were more than 0.9990. The BEC for B, Zn, Al, and Li was 2.07 μg/L, 2.76 μg/L, 1.56 μg/L, and 1.47 μg/L, respectively. The MDL of this method is more than 1 μg/L for B, Zn, and Al. The detection rate of boron was only 12.5%. The average concentration of Zn and Al was 73.15 mg/Kg and 102.78 mg/Kg, respectively. The average concentration is much higher than that of BEC and MDL; therefore, BEC and MDL meet the detection requirements. The recoveries were shown in Figure 1a. The recoveries of all 25 elements were between 80% and 120%. The test results of QC samples were shown in Table 2. The results of triplicate measurements were consistent with the allowable error range of QC samples.

3.2. Multielements in Cicadas, Mushrooms, and Vegetables

The mean concentrations of 25 elements in cicada samples were sorted in ascending order. A total of 14 elements with average concentrations below 1 mg/Kg are shown in Figure 1b, including B, Sb, As, Sn, Pb, Co, Li, Se, V, Mo, Ni, Rb, Cr, and Ba. There are 4 elements, whose average concentrations range from 1 mg/Kg to 10 mg/Kg, were shown in Figure 1c, including Cd, Sr, Fe, and Mg. 7 elements with an average concentration above 10 mg/Kg are shown in Figure 1d, including Ca, Cu, Na, K, Zn, Mn, and Al. Raw data on the concentrations of the 25 elements in cicadas, mushrooms, and vegetables will be presented in the Supplementary Materials. We will compare the mean and median values in cicadas, mushrooms, and vegetables, and select elements with higher concentrations than mushrooms and vegetables regardless of the mean and median values. The mean and median values of 12 elements (Al, Mn, Zn, Cu, Cd, Ba, Se, V, As, Li, Pb, and Co) were higher than mushroom and vegetable samples.
For dimensionality reduction of complex datasets, we used PCA in this study. The first five PCs could account for 79.45% of the Cumulative Variance of Rotated Component Loadings. Among the four potentially toxic elements, Cd and Al in PC1 extract 20.62% of the total variance, As in PC2 extract 19.20% of the total variance, and Pb in PC3 extract 17.83% of the total variance. Among the three essential elements, Zn and Cu in PC1, as well as Se in PC4, account for 12.89% of the total variance. The dietary risk assessment was carried out after applying the weight function to all the data. The cluster analysis of Pb, As, and Cd in three food categories is shown in Figure 2. The concentration of Cd in cicada was significantly higher than that in mushrooms and in vegetables.
The pairwise correlation for each element across three food categories is shown in Figure 3. The Pearson correlation coefficient for V between cicadas and vegetables was 0.366 (p < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient for Cr between mushrooms and vegetables was 0.386 (p < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient for Mo between cicadas and vegetables was −0.449 (p < 0.01), and between mushrooms and vegetables was 0.394 (p < 0.05).

3.3. Dietary Risk Assessment

In this paper, 4 potentially toxic elements (Cd, As, Pb, and Al) are calculated using HQ to assess dietary risk. The HQ was shown in Table 3. The average concentration of Cd in Cicadas was 30.1 times higher than in mushrooms, and 53.0 times higher than in vegetables. The median concentration of Cd in Cicadas was 40.1 times higher than in mushrooms, and 43.0 times higher than in vegetables. Due to the high concentration of Cd, eliminating the interference of Cd to make the test results accurate is one of the key points of this study. 96Mo16O+ and 114Sn interfere with 111Cd+ and 114Cd+, respectively [29]. The mean and median concentration of Mo were 0.26 mg/Kg and 0.25 mg/Kg. The mean and median concentration of Sn were 0.05 mg/Kg and 0.04 mg/Kg, respectively. To avoid the Mo element interfering with the results, 144Cd+ was selected for detection while using the correction equation.
The correction equation:
114Cd+ = counts per second (CPS) at 114 AMU − (0.66%/24.22%) × 118Sn
The abundance of 114Sn was 0.66% and that of 118Sn was 24.22%.
The concentration of Cd in this paper is the result after correction by the correction equation.

3.4. Concentration of 3 Essential Elements

Concentrations of essential trace elements (Zn, Cu, and Se) in cicadas, mushrooms, and vegetables are shown in Table 4. In cicadas, the concentration of Zn was highest, with a mean value of 73.15 mg/Kg and a median value of 68.59 mg/Kg. In mushrooms, the concentration of Zn was highest too, with a mean value of 10.37 mg/Kg and a median value of 10.27 mg/Kg. All samples (cicadas, mushrooms, and vegetables) showed higher Zn concentration than Cu concentration and higher Cu concentration than Se concentration. The mean and median Cu concentrations in cicadas were divided from mushrooms and vegetables, and the ratio was greater than that of Zn and Se. The ratio of mean and median (Cicada/Mushroom) was 9.1 and 10.7, respectively. The ratio of mean and median (Cicada/Vegetable) was 69.0 and 101.9, respectively.

4. Conclusions

Consuming insects as food could solve many of the problems caused by malnutrition, mostly in developing countries. Insects contain high concentrations of protein, vitamins, essential trace elements, and easily digestible fatty acids. However, dietary risk assessment for insect consumption has not been studied extensively.
In this study, we performed multielement analysis of cicadas using Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). 12 elements were found to be higher than both the mushroom and the vegetable from the 25 elements detected. Of the 12 elements, the dietary risk of 4 potentially toxic elements was assessed, and the content of 3 essential elements was analyzed. The results indicate that HQ value for Cd, As, Pb, and Al in males and females was less than 1.0. An HQ of less than 1 indicates that adverse effects are not likely to occur. Thus, the 4 selected potentially toxic elements can be considered to have a negligible hazard. The concentrations of essential trace elements (Zn, Cu, and Se) in cicadas ranged from 1.7 to 101.9 times higher than those in mushrooms or vegetables. Of course, the PCA, cluster analysis, and correlation analysis also found some information that caught our attention. Pearson correlation analysis indicated that the concentrations of vanadium (V) was positively correlated with the vegetables 24 elements (except Li, Zn and Sn) in vegetables and cicadas. Does the element V exhibit any phenomenon of antagonistic migration in plants and insects compared to other elements? And whether the correlation of elements V, Cr, and Mo in different food categories is related to biological cometabolism. This is the next scientific topic that we are going to study. At the end of the research, we declare that consuming cicadas is relatively safe in two ways. One aspect is the lower risk of potentially toxic elements, and the other aspect is the higher concentration of essential trace elements.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics13110916/s1. Table S1: The concentrations of 25 elements and in Cicadas, mushrooms, and vegetables.

Author Contributions

G.D.: conceptualization, methodology, founding acquisition, and writing—original draft. M.L.: validation. Y.F.: software. P.S.: formal analysis. Y.H.: data curation. Y.L.: investigation. W.L.: supervision and data curation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Health Commission of Hebei Province (China) [No. 20220512].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have permission to share data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Srivastava, S.K.; Babu, N.; Pandey, H. Traditional insect bioprospecting—As human food and medicine. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2009, 8, 485–494. [Google Scholar]
  2. Orsi, L.; Voege, L.L.; Stranieri, S. Eating edible insects as sustainable food? Exploring the determinants of consumer acceptance in Germany. Food Res. Int. 2019, 125, 108573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zielińska, E.; Zieliński, D.; Karaś, M.; Jakubczyk, A. Exploration of consumer acceptance of insects as food in Poland. J. Insects Food Feed. 2020, 6, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alam, A.; Abbas, S.; Ali, J. Diet suitability through biological parameters in Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) clades. Entomol. Res. 2024, 54, 12751, Erratum in Entomol. Entomol. Res. 2024, 54, e12751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huis, A.; Van Itterbeeck, J.; Klunder, H.; Mertens, E.; Halloran, A.; Muir, G.; Vantomme, P. Edible Insects Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security; United Nations Digital Library: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Volume 171. [Google Scholar]
  6. Niassy, S.; Affognon, H.D.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Akutse, K.S.; Tanga, C.M.; Ekesi, S. Some key elements on entomophagy in Africa: Culture, gender and belief. J. Insects Food Feed. 2016, 2, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. FAO. How to Feed the World in 2050; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Pinent, M.; Costa Neto, E.M.; Grabowski, N.T.; Fratini, F.; Mancini, S. Editorial: Insects as Food and Feed. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 873765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, M.; Wang, C.-Y.; Sun, L.; He, Z.; Yang, P.-L.; Liao, H.-J.; Feng, Y. Edible Aquatic Insects: Diversities, Nutrition, and Safety. Foods 2021, 10, 3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kalita, T.; Sharma, R.; Sengupta, S.; Basumatari, D. Entomophagy practices in Bodoland Territorial Region, Assam: Nutritional potential and implications for food security. J. Insects Food Feed. 2022, 8, 1485–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mishyna, M.; Fischer, A.R.H.; Steenbekkers, B.L.P.A.; Janssen, A.M.; Bos-Brouwers, H.E.J. Consumption and production of edible insects in an urban circularity context: Opinions and intentions of urban residents. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2023, 42, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mishyna, M.; Chen, J.; Benjamin, O. Sensory attributes of edible insects and insect-based foods—Future outlooks for enhancing consumer appeal. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 95, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nishijo, M.; Nakagawa, H.; Suwazono, Y.; Nogawa, K.; Kido, T. Causes of death in patients with Itai-itai disease suffering from severe chronic cadmium poisoning: A nested case-control analysis of a follow-up study in Japan. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e015694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, S.; Sharma, A. Cadmium toxicity: Effects on human reproduction and fertility. Rev. Environ. Health 2019, 34, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Williams, P.N.; Lin, S.; Hou, Y.; Cai, C. In Vitro Model To Assess Arsenic Bioaccessibility and Speciation in Cooked Shrimp. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 4710–4715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mohammadyan, M.; Moosazadeh, M.; Khanjani, N.; Moghadam, S.R. Quantitative and semi-quantitative risk assessment of occupational exposure to lead among electrical solderers in Neyshabur, Iran. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 31207–31214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Krewski, D.; Yokel, R.A.; Nieboer, E.; Borchelt, D.; Cohen, J.; Harry, J.; Kacew, S.; Lindsay, J.; Mahfouz, A.M.; Rondeau, V. Human health risk assessment for aluminium, aluminium oxide, and aluminium hydroxide. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health-Part B-Crit. Rev. 2008, 11, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, J.; Zhang, R.; Tang, J.; Chen, J.; Zheng, C.; Zhao, D.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Qi, X.; Wu, X.; et al. Occurrence and Exposure Assessment of Nickel in Zhejiang Province, China. Toxics 2024, 12, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Woldetsadik, D.; Sims, D.B.; Huerta, E.H.; Nelson, T.; Garner, M.C.; Monk, J.; Hudson, A.C.; Schlick, K. Elemental profile of wheat in the las vegas market: Geographic origin discrimination and probabilistic health risk assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2024, 191, 114862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Desalew, A.; Zelelew, B.; Alemu, A.K.; Melese, A.T.; Assefa, A.G.; Negash, M.T.; Ayele, D.T.; Beshaw, T.; Akele, M.L. Profiling and health risk assessment of trace metal contents in bovine tissues: A case study in Gondar City, Ethiopia. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2024, 134, 106554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, D.; Wang, P.; Zhao, F.-J. Toxic Metals and Metalloids in Food: Current Status, Health Risks, and Mitigation Strategies. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2024, 11, 468–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lowe, N.M.; Hall, A.G.; Broadley, M.R.; Foley, J.; Boy, E.; Bhutta, Z.A. Preventing and Controlling Zinc Deficiency Across the Life Course: A Call to Action. Adv. Nutr. 2024, 15, 100181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, J.; Lee, J.; Ryu, M.-S. Cellular Zinc Deficiency Impairs Heme Biosynthesis in Developing Erythroid Progenitors. Nutrients 2023, 15, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gu, J.; Huang, W.; Duanmu, Z.; Zhuang, R.; Yang, X. Cuproptosis and copper deficiency in ischemic vascular injury and repair. Apoptosis 2024, 29, 1007–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rataan, A.O.; Geary, S.M.; Zakharia, Y.; Rustum, Y.M.; Salem, A.K. Potential Role of Selenium in the Treatment of Cancer and Viral Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cui, S.L.; Que, W.J.; Jiao, Z.; Deng, Q.; Zhang, X.F.; Cao, Y.H.; Liu, N.; Li, A.L.; Sowanou, A.; Li, Z.; et al. Disease and Economic Burden of Kashin-Beck Disease—China, 2021. China Cdc Wkly. 2024, 6, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. U.S.EPA. EPA METHOD 200.8 Determination of Trace Elements in Waters and Wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wu, Y. General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed CXS 193-1995 Adopted in 1995 Revised in 1997, 2006, 2008, 2009 Amended in 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, X.; Chen, L.J.; Peng, H.; Wang, G.; Belshaw, N.S.; Zheng, H.T.; Hu, S.H.; Zhu, Z.L. Fast and highly sensitive Cd isotopic analyses in low-Cd complex samples with MC-ICPMS based on plasma electrochemical vapor generation. Anal. Chim. Acta 2022, 1215, 339980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The recoveries for 25 elements and Concentrations in Cicadas. (a) The recoveries for 25 elements; (b) Concentrations below 1 mg/Kg in Cicadas; (c) Concentrations range from 1 mg/Kg to 10 mg/Kg in Cicadas; (d) Concentrations above 10 mg/Kg in Cicadas. The error line in the bar chart was the full sample concentrations’ standard deviation (SD).
Figure 1. The recoveries for 25 elements and Concentrations in Cicadas. (a) The recoveries for 25 elements; (b) Concentrations below 1 mg/Kg in Cicadas; (c) Concentrations range from 1 mg/Kg to 10 mg/Kg in Cicadas; (d) Concentrations above 10 mg/Kg in Cicadas. The error line in the bar chart was the full sample concentrations’ standard deviation (SD).
Toxics 13 00916 g001
Figure 2. The cluster analysis of Pb, As, and Cd in three food categories. The points circled in the figure are derived from the clustering of cicadas.
Figure 2. The cluster analysis of Pb, As, and Cd in three food categories. The points circled in the figure are derived from the clustering of cicadas.
Toxics 13 00916 g002
Figure 3. The Heat map of pairwise correlation in three food categories for each element. C-M means the correlation between cicadas and mushrooms; C-V means the correlation between cicadas and vegetables; and M-V means the correlation between mushrooms and vegetables.
Figure 3. The Heat map of pairwise correlation in three food categories for each element. C-M means the correlation between cicadas and mushrooms; C-V means the correlation between cicadas and vegetables; and M-V means the correlation between mushrooms and vegetables.
Toxics 13 00916 g003
Table 1. Analytical performances for 25 elements.
Table 1. Analytical performances for 25 elements.
ElementMassRBEC (μg/L)MDL (μg/L)
K390.99940.1520.017
Ca430.99910.1040.142
Na230.99990.0530.149
Mg240.99980.0590.025
Fe570.99960.0430.017
Al270.99931.5601.052
Mn550.99940.4480.026
B110.99922.0721.505
Li70.99981.4660.325
Zn660.99992.7601.414
Cu630.99970.6210.194
Sr880.99950.4540.150
Cd1140.99990.1420.017
Sn1180.99910.7210.145
Ba1370.99900.2780.521
Rb850.99970.2890.063
V510.99940.1210.040
Cr520.99910.5100.381
Co590.99970.1740.046
Ni600.99990.3630.164
As750.99990.9260.273
Se820.99930.9940.694
Mo980.99970.1320.046
Sb1210.99980.1570.013
Pb2080.99990.3600.170
Table 2. The concentration of 25 elements in the QC sample.
Table 2. The concentration of 25 elements in the QC sample.
ElementSpinacia PowderElementScallop Powder
Certified ConcentrationMeasured ConcentrationCertified ConcentrationMeasured Concentration
K *4.0 ± 0.24.0K *1.15 ± 0.061.01
Ca *0.88 ± 0.090.79Ca *0.075 ± 0.0090.075
Na1.80 ± 0.071.85Na *0.46 ± 0.040.45
Mg *0.99 ± 0.071.05Mg *0.174 ± 0.0060.169
Fe0.093 ± 0.0070.090Fe41 ± 541
Al *0.16 ± 0.030.15Al *0.0156 ± 0.00270.0161
Mn80 ± 483Mn19.2 ± 1.219.8
B30.6 ± 4.233.4B12 ± 113
Li3.8 ± 0.54.2Li0.13 ± 0.020.12
Zn42 ± 444Zn75 ± 377
Cu10.4 ± 0.811.0Cu1.34 ± 0.181.28
Sr120 ± 7124Sr6.5 ± 0.46.2
Cd **190 ± 20182Cd1.06 ± 0.11.12
Sn0.062 ± 0.0070.058Sn0.13 ± 0.0040.13
Ba10.9 ± 1.710.1Ba0.62 ± 0.060.59
Rb31 ± 231Rb5.1 ± 0.34.9
V2 ± 0.012.01V0.36 ± 0.10.44
Cr9.0 ± 1.310.01Cr0.28 ± 0.070.30
Co0.49 ± 0.030.48Co0.047 ± 0.0060.047
Ni1.9 ± 0.21.8Ni0.29 ± 0.080.21
As0.54 ± 0.060.49As3.6 ± 0.64.0
Se0.09 ± 0.010.09Se1.5 ± 0.31.7
Mo0.65 ± 0.080.67Mo0.066 ± 0.0160.070
Sb0.038 ± 0.0070.035Sb0.014 ± 0.0020.013
Pb1.07 ± 0.090.99Pb0.12 ± 0.0070.13
The concentrations of elements with * were 10 g/Kg. The concentration of the element with ** was μg/Kg. The concentrations of elements without any maker were mg/Kg.
Table 3. HQ for 4 elements in cicadas.
Table 3. HQ for 4 elements in cicadas.
ElementsGenderP95(mg/Kg)IR (Kg/100 People/Year)BW (Kg)PTWI [mg/(kg bw Weeks)]HQ
CdMale3.4513366.20.00580.2310
Female3.4513357.30.00580.2669
AsMale0.1313366.20.0150.0033
Female0.1313357.30.0150.0037
PbMale0.1613366.20.0250.0024
Female0.1613357.30.0250.0028
AlMale233.0313366.220.0442
Female233.0313357.320.0510
Table 4. Concentrations and ratios of essential trace elements (Zn, Cu, and Se) in cicadas, mushrooms, and vegetables.
Table 4. Concentrations and ratios of essential trace elements (Zn, Cu, and Se) in cicadas, mushrooms, and vegetables.
ElementsCicadaMushroomVegetable
Mean (mg/Kg)Median (mg/Kg)Mean (mg/Kg)Ratio of Mean
(Cicada/Mushroom)
Median (mg/Kg)Ratio of Median (Cicada/Mushroom)Mean (mg/Kg)Ratio of Mean (Cicada/Vegetable)Median (mg/Kg)Ratio of Median (Cicada/Vegetable)
Zn73.14968.59110.3687.055410.2706.67862.27632.1392.00634.193
Cu12.20411.0171.3379.1281.03110.6840.17768.9920.108101.897
Se0.1400.0910.0572.4750.0521.7380.00431.846--*
-- indicate less than the MDL (0.000694 mg/Kg); * indicate the absence of a ratio result.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ding, G.; Liu, M.; Fang, Y.; Sun, P.; Han, Y.; Lian, Y.; Li, W. Multielement Composition Analysis of Cicada as an Edible Insect and Dietary Risk Assessment. Toxics 2025, 13, 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13110916

AMA Style

Ding G, Liu M, Fang Y, Sun P, Han Y, Lian Y, Li W. Multielement Composition Analysis of Cicada as an Edible Insect and Dietary Risk Assessment. Toxics. 2025; 13(11):916. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13110916

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ding, Guotao, Mengyu Liu, Yanfei Fang, Peng Sun, Yonghong Han, Yingying Lian, and Weihao Li. 2025. "Multielement Composition Analysis of Cicada as an Edible Insect and Dietary Risk Assessment" Toxics 13, no. 11: 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13110916

APA Style

Ding, G., Liu, M., Fang, Y., Sun, P., Han, Y., Lian, Y., & Li, W. (2025). Multielement Composition Analysis of Cicada as an Edible Insect and Dietary Risk Assessment. Toxics, 13(11), 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13110916

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop