Next Article in Journal
The Silent Conquest: The Journey of Micro- and Nanoplastics Through Children’s Organs
Previous Article in Journal
Nanomaterial-Enabled Environmental Remediation and Removal of Emerging Pollutants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Foliar Transpiration Inhibitor Reduces Cd Accumulation in Rice Grain: The Potential Effect of the Endophytic Bacterial Community
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxics
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/toxics13100811
toxics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Malic Acid on Cadmium Uptake and Translocation and Essential Element Accumulation in Rice

by
Shuo Zhang
1,
Yiteng Zhang
1,
Guoyi Lv
1,
Tianqi Liu
2,
Zhongqi Liu
3,
Yubo Jiang
1,
Yubo Hao
1,
Yang Yu
1,
Wenjun Dong
1 and
Chunrong Qian
1,*
1
Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China
2
College of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
3
Key Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2025, 13(10), 811; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13100811
Submission received: 12 August 2025 / Revised: 19 September 2025 / Accepted: 20 September 2025 / Published: 24 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transformation Process and Toxic Effects of Pollutants in Agricultural Environment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) contamination poses a serious threat to rice safety and productivity. This study investigated the potential of malic acid (MA), a key metabolic organic acid, to mitigate Cd toxicity and its genotype-dependent effects on cadmium uptake and essential element homeostasis in rice. Using hydroponic experiments with multiple genotypes, we found that MA application (0.5–1.5 mmol·L−1) significantly reduced Cd accumulation in both roots and shoots, with the most effective reduction (up to 68.0%) achieved at 1.5 mmol·L−1. Notably, genotype X24 was a low-Cd accumulator, while genotypes 20, 58, and 65 were high accumulators. Beyond Cd reduction, this study reveals the profound and genotype-specific modulation of nutrient homeostasis by MA, including consistent suppression of K and enhancement of Ca across genotypes, and highly divergent responses in Mg, Mn, Fe, and Zn accumulation. Furthermore, MA dramatically alleviated Cd-induced inhibition of root morphology, particularly in the high-Cd genotype 58, increasing root length and tip number by 42.8% and 57.8%, respectively. Our results provide novel insights into the genotype-dependent rebalancing of essential elements under MA amendment, highlighting the crucial role of genetic background in plant responses to organic acid treatments. These findings provide a mechanistic basis for developing MA-based foliar conditioners and genotype-specific strategies for managing Cd contamination in rice.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of China’s staple food crops. In recent years, Cd contamination in rice has become increasingly severe [1]. Annual pollution affects approximately 12 million tons of grain, resulting in economic losses estimated at CNY 20 billion [2,3].
Cd enters rice grains through multiple pathways, including atmospheric deposition, sewage irrigation, sludge application, and heavy metal-enriched fertilizers [4]. Atmospheric deposition is the primary source of Cd pollution in industrial areas [5]. Industrial and mining activities emit large amounts of Cd-containing gases and dust into the atmosphere. These pollutants enter the soil or adhere to rice plants via gravity or rainfall, subsequently being absorbed by roots and leaves and transported to grains during the filling stage. The closer the rice fields are to Cd pollution sources, the higher the Cd content in the grains [6,7]. In some industrialized countries, atmospheric deposition contributes nearly 50% of the Cd found in rice [8]. In China, sewage irrigation represents another major Cd pollution source [9], with increasing volumes of untreated wastewater elevating Cd levels in paddies [10,11,12]. Although sludge improves soil quality, it can also introduce Cd and other heavy metals [13,14,15]. Furthermore, phosphate fertilizers—some containing up to 174 mg·kg−1 Cd—have become a significant source of soil Cd pollution after long-term application [16,17,18,19].
Cd enters rice roots via both active (carrier protein-mediated, energy-dependent symplastic transport) and passive (electrochemical potential-driven apoplastic transport) mechanisms [20]. Following uptake, a portion of Cd is immobilized in roots (e.g., bound to cell walls, organic acids, or proteins [21,22,23]), while the remainder is translocated via the xylem to shoots, stems, and panicles, and finally accumulates in grains during filling [20]. Under Cd stress, rice activates detoxification pathways to mitigate toxicity [21,22,23,24,25], though the efficiency of these mechanisms—and thus Cd accumulation capacity—varies significantly across genotypes [26]. For example, hybrid rice exhibits stronger Cd uptake and transport abilities than conventional rice [27], and differences in root absorption and xylem transport efficiency are key drivers of genotypic variation in grain Cd content [28,29,30,31]. Additionally, the phloem plays a critical role in Cd translocation to grains, with variability in phloem transport further contributing to genotypic differences in grain Cd levels [32].
Cd toxicity also disrupts various physiological processes in rice: it damages chloroplast ultrastructure, reduces photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance [33], and transpiration [34], and accelerates leaf chlorosis. Notably, chlorophyll stability and the rate of chlorosis have been proposed as practical indicators for rapidly assessing Cd tolerance among rice varieties [35]. Beyond impairing crop productivity, Cd accumulated in rice grains enters the food chain, posing serious health risks to humans and animals [36,37,38,39]. These impacts highlight the urgency of developing effective strategies to reduce Cd accumulation in rice.
Malic acid (MA), a key small-molecule organic acid in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, links metabolic processes across plant organelles and plays pivotal roles in plant stress adaptation [40]. Under stress conditions, plants produce and secrete organic acids to regulate rhizosphere cation exchange capacity, modulate nutrient balance, and enhance tolerance to toxic metals [41,42]. For heavy metals like Cd, organic acids can bind to Cd in the xylem, converting it into less toxic forms and alleviating translocation-related toxicity [43]. Exogenous MA has been shown to promote plant growth, increase net photosynthetic rate, reduce H2O2 accumulation, and improve root activity under Cd stress [44], while root-secreted MA is closely associated with Cd tolerance in rice. However, conflicting findings exist—some studies suggest root-secreted organic acids may mobilize soil Cd, increasing its bioavailability and promoting accumulation in certain plants [45,46].
Given rice’s high Cd enrichment capacity among staple cereals [47,48,49], and the need for effective, sustainable Cd mitigation strategies, this study aimed to (1) determine the optimal MA concentration for inhibiting Cd uptake and translocation in rice seedlings; (2) elucidate the genotype-dependent effects of MA on Cd accumulation; and (3) explore how MA modulates essential element homeostasis under Cd stress. The findings are expected to provide a mechanistic basis for developing MA-based foliar conditioners and genotype-specific Cd management strategies for rice in heavy-metal-polluted regions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials

The experimental materials are rice germplasm resources preserved in the laboratory and rice genotypes grown on a large scale in the south of China (Table 1). All chemical reagents used in this study, unless otherwise specified, were of analytical grade and purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Hydroponic Culture Test

Uniform and healthy rice seeds were selected, sterilized with 5% sodium hypochlorite for 15 min, rinsed with deionized water, and placed in sterilized trays with deionized water covering the seeds. The trays were incubated at 30 °C in the dark for germination. After root and shoot emergence, seedlings were transferred to a climate chamber for light exposure. At the two-leaf stage, seedlings were moved to 8 L hydroponic boxes (100 seedlings per box) containing 1/10 Hoagland nutrient solution. This setup ensured that from the two-leaf stage onward, all seedlings were consistently maintained in the nutrient solution.
Treatments were initiated at the three-leaf stage. The experiment adopted a randomized complete block design (RCBD), with each 8 L hydroponic box serving as an independent experimental unit. All hydroponic boxes were randomly placed in the climate chamber to eliminate potential positional interference (e.g., uneven light or temperature distribution). The experiment comprised a control group (CK) and three treatment groups, each with three independent biological replicates (n = 3). The compositions were as follows: CK (no additions), M0 (0.3 mg·L−1 Cd), M0.5 (0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 0.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid), and M1.5 (0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid). Prior to treatment, seedlings from all groups underwent a 24 h pre-starvation in deionized water to standardize their nutritional status. Following this, the standard 1/10 Hoagland solution was applied and refreshed every two days for a 10-day treatment period. The pH of all solutions was adjusted to and maintained within the range of 5.5–6.0 throughout the experiment. The climate chamber conditions were light period 25 °C, 16 h, 40% humidity; dark period 20 °C, 8 h, 60% humidity. After treatment, rice seedling roots were immersed in 5 mmol·L−1 CaCl2 for 15 min to remove surface Cd2+, followed by three rinses with deionized water. Some seedlings were used for root scanning, while others were dried to constant weight for Cd and essential element analysis.

2.3. Determination of Root Morphology

Washed rice seedlings (n = 20) were scanned using a root scanner (Perfection V700 Photo, Seiko Epson Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The resulting images were analyzed with WinRHIZO software (version 2009a, Regent Instruments, Québec City, QC, Canada) [50] to measure total root length, root surface area, root volume, and root tip number.

2.4. Determination of Cd and Essential Elements

Rice root and shoot samples (0.5 g each) were digested with 7 mL HNO3, left at room temperature for 12 h, and heated at 110 °C for 2.5 h. After cooling, 1 mL H2O2 was added, and heating continued for 1.5 h. The digest was evaporated to <1 mL at 170 °C, diluted, and analyzed for Cd, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, and Zn using ICP-MS (NexION®1000, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at Nanjing Webiolotech Testing Technology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China).

2.5. Data Processing and Calculation Method

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics (version 26.0). Significant differences among treatments were determined by Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05 level. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates. Figures were prepared using Origin 8.6 (version 8.6).

3. Results

3.1. Genotypic Differences in Cadmium Accumulation in Rice

Rice seedlings of genotypes X24, 20, 58, and 65 were subjected to 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd stress for ten days, and significant differences in Cd accumulation in shoots and roots were observed among the rice genotypes (Figure 1). Among the four genotypes, X24 was identified as a low-Cd-accumulating variety, with significantly lower Cd concentrations in both shoots and roots compared to genotypes 58 and 65 (Figure 1). Genotype 58 showed the highest shoot Cd accumulation, while genotype 65 had the highest root Cd accumulation, consistent with their classification as high-Cd accumulators. In summary, under 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd stress, genotypes 58 and 65 showed slightly higher Cd accumulation capacity than genotype 20, which in turn accumulated more Cd than genotype X24.

3.2. Effects of Cd on Essential Element Accumulation in Rice Genotypes

To explore how Cd stress interacts with genotypic differences to affect nutrient uptake, we analyzed the accumulation of essential elements (K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn) in roots and shoots of the four genotypes under Cd-free and Cd-stressed conditions.
Under the Cd-free condition, significant genotypic differences in essential element accumulation were observed among the four rice genotypes. In conditions without Cd stress, root Mg, K, and Zn accumulation was notably more prominent in genotype 65, while X24 demonstrated higher levels of Ca and Mn (Figure 2, Table A1). In the shoots, X24 maintained elevated Mg, Ca, and Mn content; genotype 58 had the highest K accumulation; and genotype 65 showed the greatest Zn accumulation. These results clearly reveal the distinct patterns of elemental accumulation among different genotypes (Figure 2). A similar pattern was observed in shoots: genotype X24 maintained higher accumulation of Mg (Z = 1.49), Ca (Z = 1.36), and Mn (Z = 1.89); genotype 58 had the highest K (Z = 0.95); genotype 65 showed the highest Zn (Z = 1.74); and genotype 20 displayed slightly higher Fe levels (Z = 0.65). These results indicate distinct elemental accumulation patterns among genotypes, with 65 showing strong Zn affinity and X24 exhibiting strength in multiple elements (Mg, Ca, Mn), demonstrating consistent root-shoot accumulation patterns.
Under Cd stress, both common and genotype-specific responses were observed (Figure 2, Table A2). Common responses included: significant reduction in root Mg and Zn (ΔZ < 0) and shoot Mg, Ca, Mn, and Zn (ΔZ < 0) across all genotypes; and increased root Mn accumulation (ΔZ > 0), although this effect was most pronounced in genotype X24 (ΔZ = +2.62). Genotype-specific responses revealed the following: Cd significantly enhanced root Fe accumulation only in X24 (ΔZ = +2.75) while reducing it in others; specifically promoted shoot Fe accumulation in genotype 58 (ΔZ = +1.44); and differentially affected K distribution, increasing root K in genotypes 20 and 65 but decreasing shoot K in genotype 58.
These findings demonstrate that Cd stress generally disrupts nutrient homeostasis but elicits genotype-specific adaptations, particularly in Fe and Mn accumulation, suggesting distinct genetic strategies for coping with cadmium toxicity.

3.3. Effects of Malic Acid on Cd Accumulation in Rice Genotypes

When rice seedlings of genotypes X24, 58, and 65 were exposed to 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd stress, with the addition of 0.5 or 1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid, Cd accumulation in both shoots and roots significantly decreased, with varying degrees of reduction among genotypes (Figure 3).
Without malic acid, genotype X24 showed significantly lower Cd accumulation in shoots and roots compared to genotypes 58 and 65. Compared to the control (M0), 0.5 and 1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid reduced shoot Cd content in genotype X24 by 36.8% and 63.2%, respectively, and root Cd content by 29.9% and 62.5%. For genotype 58, shoot Cd content decreased by 51.2% and 67.5%, and root Cd content by 25.1% and 65.3%. In genotype 65, shoot Cd content declined by 41.6% and 68.0%, and root Cd content by 29.2% and 59.5%. These results demonstrate that 0.5, 1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid effectively inhibits Cd accumulation, with significant genotypic differences in sensitivity to malic acid.

3.4. Effects of Malic Acid on Essential Elements in Rice Genotypes

The application of exogenous malic acid (0.5 and 1.5 mmol·L−1) induced pronounced, genotype-dependent shifts in the accumulation of essential elements in both roots and shoots (two key nutritional organs) of rice seedlings (Genotypes X24, 58, and 65), as detailed by Z-score analysis (Figure 4).
Root responses revealed both common and genotype-specific patterns across all three genotypes (Figure 4, Table A3). A consistent regulatory effect was observed for potassium (K) and calcium (Ca): malic acid significantly suppressed K accumulation and notably enhanced Ca accumulation in roots of all genotypes. Conversely, the effects on zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), and manganese (Mn) were highly genotype-specific. In genotype X24, malic acid application maintained relatively high Mg accumulation (Z-scores: 1.52 → 1.33 → 1.09) and slightly reduced Mn accumulation (1.92 → 0.66 → 0.21), though Mn levels remained above the overall average (Z-score > 0). In genotype 58, a notable promotion of Mn accumulation was observed specifically under the 1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid treatment (Z-score: −1.07 → 0.48, shifting from below to above average), while Fe accumulation was strongly suppressed (2.46 → −0.38). Genotype 65 exhibited a similar trend of Mn promotion (−1.00 → 0.36) and Fe suppression (−0.29 → −0.88), while maintaining stably high Zn levels (Z-scores > 1.24) across all malic acid treatments.
Shoot responses demonstrated even greater genotypic divergence compared to roots (Figure 4, Table A4). Most strikingly, in genotype X24, malic acid triggered a dramatic shift in Mg and Ca homeostasis: Mg accumulation increased from below the overall average to a highly abundant state (Z-score: −1.20 → 1.83), and Ca accumulation also significantly elevated (from −0.08 to 1.34). This shift was accompanied by a concurrent reduction in the accumulation of K, Fe, and Zn. The responses of genotypes 58 and 65 were markedly different from that of X24. Both genotypes showed increased Ca accumulation (e.g., genotype 65: Z-score −1.68 → 0.01) and decreased K accumulation in shoots; however, unlike X24, their Mg, Fe, and Zn status remained largely unchanged. Notably, Mn accumulation in shoots was consistently high in genotype X24 (Z-score > 0) but persistently low in genotypes 58 and 65 (Z-score < 0) across all treatments, highlighting a fundamental genotypic difference in Mn translocation and accumulation.
In summary, exogenous malic acid consistently modulates the distribution of K and Ca in both roots and shoots across the three rice genotypes, while eliciting highly divergent, genotype-specific effects on the homeostasis of Mg, Mn, Fe, and Zn. These findings underscore that genetic background is a primary determinant of the nutritional responses of rice seedlings to organic acid amendments.

3.5. Effect of Malic Acid on Root Morphology of Rice Genotypes Under Cd Stress

This study selected two rice genotypes (58 and 65) for investigation, which were treated with 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd for 10 days. The rice root system was first affected by Cd toxicity, and the root length, root surface area, root volume, and root tip number of seedlings could reflect the tolerance of rice root organs to Cd.
Compared with the CK treatment, 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd significantly inhibited root development in rice genotype 58, reducing root length by 45.8%, root surface area by 19.8%, root volume by 6.2%, and root tip number by 26.4%. Notably, the reductions in root length and surface area reached statistical significance (p < 0.05, Figure 5). The addition of 0.5 and 1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid effectively mitigated these Cd-induced inhibitory effects. Compared with the M0 treatment, 1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid treatment resulted in significant increases of 42.8% in root length and 57.8% in root tip number (Figure 5).
Under 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd stress, the root length, root surface area, and root tip number of genotype 65 decreased significantly by 35.1%, 35.2%, and 42.6%, respectively, compared with CK treatment. Adding 0.5 and 1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid could alleviate the inhibitory effect of Cd on the root length, root surface area, and root tip number of genotype 65 seedlings. Compared with the M0 treatment, 1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid could significantly increase the root length, root surface area, and root tip number by 28.9%, 18.0%, and 55.4%. In summary, Cd inhibits root growth in both genotype 58 and 65, manifesting as a decrease in root length and root surface area parameter values and a decrease in root tip number.
Adding malic acid can significantly reduce the inhibitory effect of Cd on root development. It is speculated that adding 0.5~1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid to the root system can promote the growth and development of rice roots, reduce the toxic effect of Cd on rice roots, and have a positive effect on the entire growth period of rice.

4. Discussion

Cadmium, as a toxic heavy metal, significantly inhibits plant growth and development. In our study, exposure to 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (the concentration used in this experiment) significantly inhibited the growth of rice seedlings, as evidenced by reduced seedling fresh weight (Figure 6). This aligns with previous findings that Cd toxicity retards rice growth at low concentrations and severely impairs all growth stages or even causes mortality at high concentrations [45,46]. Cd influences malic acid secretion in rice roots, with low concentrations promoting and high concentrations inhibiting its production [51]. While some studies suggest that root-secreted organic acids can activate Cd in the rhizosphere and enhance its bioavailability [52,53,54,55,56], others report that exogenous malic acid does not promote Cd uptake [57,58], indicating complex interactions between organic acids and Cd accumulation in rice [59].
Our comparative analysis revealed distinct genotypic patterns in Cd accumulation: genotype X24 consistently showed low Cd accumulation, whereas genotypes 20, 58, and 65 were high accumulators (Figure 1). Notably, the addition of 0.5 or 1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid significantly reduced Cd accumulation in roots and shoots of genotypes X24, 58, and 65 under Cd stress, with optimal reduction at 1.5 mmol·L−1 (Figure 3). This protective effect may be attributed to malic acid’s role in critical metabolic processes that inhibit Cd bioavailability and absorption [60].
A central finding of this study is that genetic background fundamentally determines how rice genotypes respond to both Cd stress and malic acid amendment, particularly regarding essential element homeostasis. While Cd is known to interfere with mineral nutrient uptake [61]—suppressing Mn and Zn in wheat roots [62] while promoting P, K, and Mn absorption [63]—our standardized Z-score analysis revealed not only genotypic variation in inhibitory effects but also a clear distinction between common stress responses and genotype-specific adaptations. Under Cd-free conditions, genotype 65 exhibited superior Zn accumulation capacity (Z = 2.13 in roots, Z = 1.74 in shoots), while genotype X24 showed prominent accumulation of multiple elements (Mg, Ca, and Mn) with consistent root–shoot distribution patterns. Under Cd stress, all genotypes showed reduced root Mg/Zn and shoot Mg/Ca/Mn/Zn (ΔZ < 0), yet only genotype X24 displayed increased root Fe (ΔZ = +2.75) and substantial root Mn enhancement (ΔZ = +2.62), suggesting Mn absorption may be a key adaptive trait for X24 in coping with Cd toxicity.
Most significantly, our results demonstrate that malic acid’s effect on nutrient homeostasis is profoundly genotype-dependent. Under 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd stress, malic acid consistently suppressed K accumulation and enhanced Ca accumulation across all genotypes—a common regulatory pattern potentially linked to conserved physiological roles in stress response. However, for other elements, responses varied dramatically by genotype: malic acid maintained high Mg and moderately reduced Mn (though still above average) in X24 roots; promoted Mn accumulation while strongly suppressing Fe in genotype 58; and enhanced Mn while maintaining high Zn levels in genotype 65. This genotypic divergence underscores that genetic background is a primary determinant of nutritional responses to organic acid amendments.
The mechanistic basis for these responses may involve multiple pathways. Previous studies have suggested that organic acids such as malic acid can form complexes with Cd, reducing its bioavailability, or compete for metal ion transporters responsible for Cd2+ uptake. The consistent reduction in K accumulation alongside Fe and Zn suppression suggests that malic acid may modulate non-selective cation channels [64] through which these elements and Cd enter rice cells, thereby reducing Cd transport while independently enhancing Ca uptake via specific transporters. Cd’s physicochemical similarity to essential elements like K, Fe, and Zn enables it to compete for binding sites on carrier proteins [65], further complicating these interactions.
We observed striking genotypic divergence in shoot responses, particularly regarding Mg and Mn homeostasis. Malic acid triggered a dramatic shift in Mg and Ca accumulation specifically in genotype X24 shoots (Mg: Z = −1.20 → 1.83; Ca: Z = −0.08 → 1.34), while genotypes 58 and 65 showed minimal changes in these elements. Furthermore, Mn accumulation remained consistently high in X24 shoots but persistently low in 58 and 65 across all treatments, highlighting fundamental genotypic differences in Mn translocation efficiency.
The uniform increase in Ca accumulation across genotypes has important physiological implications for Cd stress mitigation. As calcium pectate in the cell wall matrix, enhanced Ca likely contributes to improved cell wall formation and intracellular osmotic regulation, maintaining normal physiological conditions under stress. Additionally, Ca’s involvement in protein synthesis and enzymatic metabolism further supports plant growth and development under Cd stress. This mechanism may explain why malic acid significantly alleviated Cd-induced root growth inhibition in genotypes 58 and 65 (Figure 3), possibly through its participation in diverse metabolic pathways and enzyme formation that stimulate meristematic cell proliferation.
In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that 1.5 mmol·L−1 malic acid not only promotes root development and mitigates Cd toxicity but also modulates essential element homeostasis in a fundamentally genotype-dependent manner. The genetic background of the host plant emerges as a primary factor determining whether malic acid amendment will suppress, promote, or have minimal effect on specific essential elements, providing crucial insights for developing genotype-specific strategies for heavy metal stress management in rice. While our physiological and elemental data strongly support a role for malic acid in modulating Cd uptake and nutrient homeostasis, future studies incorporating gene expression analyses and direct measurement of metal–organic acid complexes will be essential to fully elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms.

5. Conclusions

Malic acid serves as an effective amendment for mitigating cadmium toxicity in rice, but its efficacy and mechanistic actions are fundamentally governed by the plant’s genetic background. We identified distinct Cd accumulation patterns among genotypes, with X24 exhibiting low accumulation and 58/65 being high accumulators. The key finding is that 1.5 mmol·L−1 MA optimally reduced Cd accumulation across these genotypes. More importantly, this study unveils a novel, genotype-specific reprogramming of essential element homeostasis induced by MA, characterized by consistent suppression of K and promotion of Ca, alongside highly divergent responses in Mg, Fe, Mn, and Zn accumulation. This genotypic variation extends to physiological responses, as MA significantly restored Cd-impaired root growth in sensitive genotypes. The dual role of MA in reducing Cd uptake and modulating nutrient equilibrium represents a significant advancement over previous studies focused solely on Cd mitigation. Therefore, the application of MA represents a promising strategy for reducing Cd bioavailability and accumulation in rice. However, given the strong genotype dependence, we emphasize the necessity of considering genetic profiles in developing MA-based agronomic practices or foliar conditioners, which constitutes a novel contribution to the field.

Author Contributions

S.Z.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft. Z.L.: Conceptualization, Methodology. T.L. and C.Q.: Data curation. Y.H. and Z.L.: Data curation. Y.Y. and W.D.: Formal analysis. G.L. and Y.Z.: Software, Visualization. Y.J. and C.Q.: Funding acquisition and Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Technology R&D and Application for Improving Comprehensive Grain Production Capacity of Modern Agricultural Provincial Laboratory (ZY04JD05), the Heilongjiang Provincial Collaborative Innovation and Promotion System for Green and Organic Agriculture, Basic Research Support Program of Outstanding Young Teachers in Heilongjiang Provincial Undergraduate Universities (YQJH2023181), National Natural Science Foundation of China (42407423), the Heilongjiang Province Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Span Project Agricultural Science and Technology Foundation Innovation Project (CX25JC75).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CdCadmium
TCATricarboxylic acid
CKControl group
MAMalic acid

Appendix A

Table A1. The accumulation of essential elements in rice roots and shoots of different genotypes (Mean ± SD, mg·kg−1). Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
Table A1. The accumulation of essential elements in rice roots and shoots of different genotypes (Mean ± SD, mg·kg−1). Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
GenotypeMgKCaMnFeZn
RootX241122 ± 280 bc12,358 ± 2461 a3480 ± 220 a128 ± 48 a2316 ± 146 b205 ± 47 b
20987 ± 76 c9681 ± 1324 d2555 ± 198 b45 ± 11 b4998 ± 126 a291 ± 32 b
581014 ± 79 bc16,099 ± 778 b2707 ± 107 b43 ± 3 b5757 ± 315 a281 ± 13 b
651586 ± 46 a20,130 ± 592 a2579 ± 148 b50 ± 8 b4951 ± 289 a514 ± 47 a
ShootX246061 ± 414 a52,747 ± 1729 a6463 ± 479 a676 ± 33 a369 ± 138 b131 ± 16 b
204842 ± 60 b45,501.7 ± 984 b5382 ± 166 bc469 ± 23 b454 ± 65 a119 ± 8 b
584893 ± 439 b54,039 ± 6137 a5616 ± 340 b384 ± 25 c424 ± 101 a104 ± 14 b
654775 ± 180 b48,533 ± 2423 b4717 ± 141 c411 ± 16 c338 ± 54 b263 ± 6 a
Table A2. The content of essential elements in rice roots and shoots of different genotypes under 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd stress (Mean ± SD, mg·kg−1). Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
Table A2. The content of essential elements in rice roots and shoots of different genotypes under 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd stress (Mean ± SD, mg·kg−1). Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
GenotypeMgKCaMnFeZn
RootX24728 ± 22 d12,568 ± 1698 c3214 ± 157 a907 ± 106 a5562 ± 2089 a129 ± 13 d
20922 ± 20 b12,543 ± 257 c2779 ± 43 b70 ± 2 b3700 ± 73 ab220 ± 11 b
58846 ± 26 c15,955 ± 776 b2709 ± 61 b71 ± 6 b4073 ± 257 ab201 ± 10 c
65975 ± 41 a21,667 ± 1095 a1766 ± 190 c92 ± 41 b3422 ± 155 b310 ± 7 a
ShootX245987 ± 112 a54,199 ± 885 a6255 ± 52 a353 ± 8 a201 ± 44 b93 ± 15 b
204107 ± 330 b48,909 ± 3883 a5375 ± 450 b252 ± 22 b227 ± 24 b 92 ± 9 b
584114 ± 301 b53,145 ± 3525 a5574 ± 272 b178 ± 11 c634 ± 335 a76 ± 4 b
653905 ± 140 b51,482 ± 490 a4155 ± 111 c182 ± 15 c225 ± 121 b239 ± 6 a
Table A3. Effect of malic acid on the accumulation of essential elements in rice roots of different genotypes (Mean ± SD, mg·kg−1). Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
Table A3. Effect of malic acid on the accumulation of essential elements in rice roots of different genotypes (Mean ± SD, mg·kg−1). Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
GenotypeMgKCaMnFeZn
X24M0728 ± 22 c12,568 ± 1698 a3214 ± 157 b907 ± 106 a5562 ± 2089 a129 ± 13 a
M0.51027 ± 52 b6317 ± 2087 b4634 ± 83 a863 ± 312 a4721 ± 369 a97 ± 12 b
M1.51121 ± 59 a4264 ± 555 b4487 ± 71 a351 ± 12 b3403 ± 1138 a77 ± 11 b
58M0846 ± 26 a15,955 ± 776 a2709 ± 61 b71 ± 6 c4073 ± 257 a201 ± 10 a
M0.5805 ± 59 a9915 ± 699 b3602 ± 672 a230 ± 13 a2727 ± 226 b153 ± 11 b
M1.5856 ± 26 a4974 ± 250 c3235 ± 144 ab139 ± 7 b1628 ± 58 c171 ± 25 ab
65M0975 ± 41 a21,667 ± 1095 a1766 ± 190 c92 ± 4 c3422 ± 155 a310 ± 7 a
M0.5765 ± 61 b14,047 ± 715 b2596 ± 19 b205 ± 7 a2182 ± 98 b192 ± 5 c
M1.5831 ± 52 b9259 ± 919 c3292 ± 167 a176 ± 10 b1806 ± 34 c215 ± 4 b
Table A4. Effect of malic acid on the accumulation of essential elements in rice shoots of different genotypes (Mean ± SD, mg·kg−1). Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
Table A4. Effect of malic acid on the accumulation of essential elements in rice shoots of different genotypes (Mean ± SD, mg·kg−1). Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
GenotypeMgKCaMnFeZn
X24M05987 ± 112 a54,199 ± 885 a6255 ± 52 a353 ± 8a201 ± 44a93 ± 15 a
M0.55816 ± 409 a51,404 ± 3270 ab7363 ± 841 a279 ± 27 b255 ± 106 a73 ± 8 a
M1.55602 ± 393 a48,853 ± 2872 b7276 ± 609 a253 ± 7 b231 ± 126 a88 ± 6 a
58 M04113 ± 301 a53,145 ± 3525 a5574 ± 272 b178 ± 11 b634 ± 335 a76 ± 4 a
M0.54267 ± 32 a48,831 ± 572 b5820 ± 54 b181 ± 3 b343 ± 6 ab66 ± 1 b
M1.53923 ± 21 a43,179 ± 968 c6427 ± 171 a269 ± 3 a211 ± 20 b83 ± 5 a
65 M03905 ± 140 a51,482 ± 490 a4155 ± 111 b182 ± 15 b225 ± 121 a239 ± 6 a
M0.53980 ± 318 a49,770 ± 4399 a4453 ± 381 b209 ± 16 b174 ± 56 a230 ± 16 a
M1.53903 ± 121 a42,647 ± 1177 b4977 ± 169 a262 ± 18 a138 ± 33 a240 ± 19 a

References

  1. Ahmad, S.; Sehrish, A.K.; Alomrani, S.O.; Zhang, L.; Waseem, M.; Noureen, S.; Ullah, I.; Tabassam, R.; Abbas, G.; Ali, S. Combined application of biochar and metal-tolerant bacteria alleviates cadmium toxicity by modulating the antioxidant defense mechanism and physicochemical attributes in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in cadmium-contaminated soil. Plant Stress 2024, 11, 100348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Qin, Y.; Li, Z.; Sun, J.; Xu, M.; Gu, M.; Wei, Y.; Lei, J. Manganese (II) sulfate affects the formation of iron-manganese oxides in soil and the uptake of cadmium and arsenic by rice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 263, 115360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yuan, S.; Chen, P.; Zhou, W.; Liu, H.; Cheng, K.; Xiao, X.; Tang, H.; Yi, Z. Response characteristics of soil Cd availability to microbes in paddy soil with long-term fertilization and its impact on Cd uptake in rice. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 957, 177680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lwin, C.S.; Jung, H.; Kim, M.S.; Lee, E.J.; Lee, T.G. Geochemical speciation, uptake, and transportation mechanisms of arsenic, cadmium, and lead in soil–rice systems: Additional aspects and challenges. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Teng, Y.; Hu, J.; Sun, H.; Xiao, Y.; Guo, J.; Yu, H. Research on the impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on Cd absorption in the cell walls of rice roots. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2025, 200, 107379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Haider, F.U.; Liqun, C.; Coulter, J.A.; Cheema, S.A.; Wu, J.; Zhang, R.; Wenjun, M.; Farooq, M. Cadmium toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation strategies. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 211, 111887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Z.; Qin, Y.; Ya, F.; Ma, Y.; Pan, G.; Peng, S.; Liang, S.; Feng, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Gu, M.; et al. Foliar spraying of a novel biosynthesized nano-selenium: Enhancing cadmium reduction in rice grains and regulating in vitro bioavailability with mechanistic insights. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2025, 148, 108280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, R.; Ren, R.; Wang, L.; Zhi, Q.; Yu, T.; Hou, Q.; Yang, Z. Using machine learning to predict selenium and cadmium contents in rice grains from black shale-distributed farmland area. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 168802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hafez, E.M.; Gao, Y.; La, H.G.; Alharbi, K.; Hamada, M.M.; Omara, A.E.-D.; Alshaal, T. Enhancing rice productivity in wastewater-irrigated saline Cd-contaminated soils using microbial-nanoparticle synergy. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2025, 39, 104253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iqbal, A.; Ligeng, J.; Mo, Z.; Adnan, M.; Lal, R.; Zaman, M.; Usman, S.; Hua, T.; Imran, M.; Pan, S.; et al. Substation of vermicompost mitigates Cd toxicity, improves rice yields and restores bacterial community in a Cd-contaminated soil in Southern China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 465, 133118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Roy, R.; Hossain, A.; Sarker, T.; Asaduzzaman, M. Alleviation of heavy metal accumulation in rice: A synergistic planetary health approach of organic amendment and phytoremediation in cadmium contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2025, 19, 100864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dou, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Ma, D.; Chen, L.; Zhou, G.; Duan, Y.; Tao, L.; Chen, J. Relationship between calcium forms and organic carbon content in aggregates of calcareous soils in northern China. Soil Tillage Res. 2024, 244, 106210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, X.; Lin, Q.; Li, G.; Guo, C.; Li, L.; Wang, J. Evaluating water management efficiency in regulating cadmium and arsenic accumulation in rice in typical japonica paddy soils at varied pH levels. Agriculture 2024, 14, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Veeken, A.; Hamelers, B. Sources of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in biowaste. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 300, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Wang, H.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, Z.; Fu, C.; Ye, Y.; Wang, F.; Chen, X.; et al. Effects of different phosphorus fertilizers on cadmium absorption and accumulation in rice under low-phosphorus and rich-cadmium soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 11898–11911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mukta, T.A.; Hoque, M.A.; Shimo, F.J.; Islam, S. Cadmium contamination in rice and associated human health risk. Agric. (Pol’nohospodárstvo) 2024, 70, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. El-Mamoon, M.F.; Abdel-Salam, A.A.; Abdel-Hmied, A.H.; Moursy, A.A.; Hekal, M.A. Concentrations of Cd, Co, and Pb in soil and taro plant (Colocasia esculenta) at various distances from a phosphate fertilizer factory. Benha J. Appl. Sci. 2023, 8, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shao, X.; Yao, H.; Cui, S.; Peng, Y.; Gao, X.; Yuan, C.; Chen, X.; Hu, Y.; Mao, X. Activated low-grade phosphate rocks for simultaneously reducing the phosphorus loss and cadmium uptake by rice in paddy soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 780, 146550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xia, F.; Zhao, Z.; Niu, X.; Wang, Z. Integrated pollution analysis, pollution area identification and source apportionment of heavy metal contamination in agricultural soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 465, 133215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, S.; Huang, D.; Zhu, Q.; Zhu, H.; Liu, S.; Luo, Z.; Cao, X.; Wang, J.; Rao, Z.; Shen, X. Speciation and phytoavailability of cadmium in soil treated with cadmium-contaminated rice straw. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 2679–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, T.; Gao, Z.; Wang, T.; Lu, X.; Yang, L.; Shen, L.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, J.; Ren, D.; Zhang, G.; et al. Appropriate supply of ammonium nitrogen and ammonium nitrate reduces cadmium content in rice seedlings by inhibiting cadmium uptake and transport. Rice Sci. 2024, 31, 587–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Song, J.; Song, Q.; Wang, D.; Liu, Y. Mitigation strategies for excessive cadmium in rice. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 3847–3869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Madomguia, D.; Basokdou, G.B.; Appoline Isabelle, K.W.; Dongo, P.K.; Nya, E.; Togouet, S.H.Z. Accumulation of heavy metals in maga-pouss rice fields (far-north region, Cameroon) and transfer to rice grains. Agric. Sci. 2024, 15, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jiang, K.; Chen, S.; Xiang, N.; Hu, J.; Cheng, Y. Deciphering the translocation of cadmium in indica rice under high-cadmium soil conditions. Environ. Geochem. Health 2025, 47, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dabgar, S.; Bhavsar, S.; Modi, N. Effects of lead and cadmium on shoot length and root length of Cascabela thevetia (L.) lippold. Int. Assoc. Biol. Comput. Digest 2023, 3, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barman, F.; Majumdar, S.; Arzoo, S.H.; Kundu, R. Genotypic variation among 20 rice cultivars/landraces in response to cadmium stress grown locally in West Bengal, India. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 148, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, T.; Hu, W.; Weng, L.; Deng, L.; Li, J.; Yu, J.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Chen, C.; Sheng, T.; et al. Phenotypic and genetic dissection of the contents of important metallic elements in hybrid rice grown in cadmium-contaminated paddy fields. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Xu, Q.; Wang, C.; Li, S.; Li, B.; Li, Q.; Chen, G.; Chen, W.; Wang, F. Cadmium adsorption, chelation and compartmentalization limit root-to-shoot translocation of cadmium in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 11319–11330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pan, B.; Cai, Y.; Liu, B.; Cai, K.; Lv, W.; Tian, J.; Wang, W. Abatement of Cd in rice grain and toxic risks to human health by the split application of silicon at transplanting and jointing period. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 302, 114039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hakeem, K.R.; Alharby, H.F.; Pirzadah, T.B. Exogenously applied calcium regulates antioxidative system and reduces cadmium-uptake in Fagopyrum esculentum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 180, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Uraguchi, S.; Mori, S.; Kuramata, M.; Kawasaki, A.; Arao, T.; Ishikawa, S. Root-to-shoot Cd translocation via the xylem is the major process determining shoot and grain cadmium accumulation in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2677–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. He, L.; Huang, D.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, H.; Xu, C.; Li, B.; Zhu, Q. Meta-analysis of the effects of liming on soil pH and cadmium accumulation in crops. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 223, 112621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, S.; Liu, Z. Effects of growing seasons and genotypes on the accumulation of cadmium and mineral nutrients in rice grown in cadmium contaminated soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 1282–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, Y.; Zhou, W.; Xiao, H.; Xin, J.; Zhao, C.; Tian, R. Photosynthetic responses of Pontederia cordata to cadmium stress: Anatomical structure, ultrastructure, physiology, and gene expression. Plants 2025, 14, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Che, S.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Yue, C.; Zhou, X.; Xu, Y.; Tian, S.; Cao, Z.; Wei, X.; Li, S.; et al. The adsorption and fixation of Cd and Pb by the microbial consortium weakened the toxic effect of heavy metal-contaminated soil on rice. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 497, 154684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, G.; Huang, Y.; Ding, X.; Ding, M.; Wang, P.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zou, L.; Zhang, W.; Li, Z. Effects of high manganese-cultivated seedlings on cadmium uptake by various rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 264, 115440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gulzar, U.; Hussain, A.; Hamayun, M.; Iqbal, A.; Seleiman, M.F.; Alotaibi, M.; Lee, B. Gibberellins producing endophytic Aspergillus nidulans DSE-2 biosorbs Cd and down-regulates OsNRAMP5 and OsCd1 genes to improve rice growth in contaminated soil. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2025, 221, 109650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ghouri, F.; Shahid, M.J.; Liu, J.; Lai, M.; Sun, L.; Wu, J.; Liu, X.; Ali, S.; Shahid, M.Q. Polyploidy and zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviated Cd toxicity in rice by modulating oxidative stress and expression levels of sucrose and metal-transporter genes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 448, 130991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shahzad, M.; Peng, D.; Khan, A.; Ayyaz, A.; Askri, S.M.H.; Naz, S.; Huang, B.; Zhang, G. Sufficient manganese supply is necessary for OsNramp5 knockout rice plants to ensure normal growth and less Cd uptake. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 288, 117386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Feng, X.; Pang, Z.; Liu, J.; Peng, H.; Liang, Y.; Guo, B. Chemical and microbial mechanisms underpinning calcium-regulated suppression of cadmium bioavailability in alkaline paddy soil and cadmium accumulation in rice grain. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 302, 118620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, S.; Dong, Q.; Wang, Z. Differential effects of citric acid on cadmium uptake and accumulation between tall fescue and Kentucky bluegrass. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Dresler, S.; Matraszek, R. Exogenous malic and acetic acids reduce cadmium phytotoxicity and enhance cadmium accumulation in roots of sunflower plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 94, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mnasri, M.; Ghabriche, R.; Fourati, E.; Zaier, H.; Sabally, K.; Barrington, S.; Lutts, S.; Abdelly, C.; Ghnaya, T. Cd and Ni transport and accumulation in the halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum: Implication of organic acids in these processes. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Su, Y.; Shi, Q.; Li, Z.; Deng, H.; Zhou, Q.; Li, L.; Zhao, L.; Yuan, S.; Liu, S.; Chen, Y. Rhodopseudomonas palustris shapes bacterial community, reduces Cd bioavailability in Cd contaminated flooding paddy soil, and improves rice performance. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 926, 171824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kováčik, J.; Klejdus, B.; Babula, P.; Hedbavny, J. Ascorbic acid affects short-term response of Scenedesmus quadricauda to cadmium excess. Algal Res. 2017, 24, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guo, H.; Chen, H.; Hong, C.; Jiang, D.; Zheng, B. Exogenous malic acid alleviates cadmium toxicity in Miscanthus sacchariflorus through enhancing photosynthetic capacity and restraining ROS accumulation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 141, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, D.; Gao, Z.; Li, J.; Yao, Q.; Tan, W.; Xing, W.; Lu, Z. Effects of cadmium stress on the morphology, physiology, cellular ultrastructure, and BvHIPP24 gene expression of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2023, 25, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Das, S.; Sengupta, S.; Patra, P.K.; Dey, P. Limestone and yellow gypsum can reduce cadmium accumulation in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea): A study from a three-decade old landfill site. Chemosphere 2024, 353, 141645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wu, W.; Yang, W.; Zheng, F.; Zhang, Q.; Ma, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, S.; Yang, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Deng, X. Strategic attenuation of Cd accumulation in rice through stage-specific flooding: Synergistic coordination of rhizospheric Cd bioavailability, microbial communities, and iron plaque speciation. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 377, 126455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, S.; Han, W.; Liu, T.; Feng, C.; Jiang, Q.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y. Tetracycline inhibits the nitrogen fixation ability of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) nodules in black soil by altering the root and rhizosphere bacterial communities. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 908, 168047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Q.; Guo, J.; Zhang, X.; Yu, H.; Huang, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, M.; Li, T. Changes of non-protein thiols in root and organic acids in xylem sap involved in cadmium translocation of cadmium-safe rice line (Oryza sative L.). Plant Soil 2019, 439, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pan, J.; Guan, M.; Xu, P.; Chen, M.; Cao, Z. Salicylic acid reduces cadmium (Cd) accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by regulating root cell wall composition via nitric oxide signaling. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 797, 149202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Akter, S.; Samad, R. Effects of kinetin and gibberellic acid on growth and ion transport of rice under cadmium stress. Bangladesh J. Bot. 2024, 53, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chen, Z.; Huang, J.; Li, S.; Shao, J.; Shen, R.; Zhu, X. Salicylic acid minimize cadmium accumulation in rice through regulating the fixation capacity of the cell wall to cadmium. Plant Sci. 2023, 336, 111839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, Y.; Zeng, H.; Ding, S.; Hu, Z.; Tie, B.; Luo, S. A new insight into the straw decomposition associated with minerals: Promoting straw humification and Cd immobilization. J. Environ. Sci. 2025, 148, 553–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ubeynarayana, N.; Jeyakumar, P.; Bishop, P.; Pereira, R.C.; Anderson, C.W.N. Effect of soil cadmium on root organic acid secretion by forage crops. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, H.; Xie, S.; Du, X.; Bao, Z.; Xu, F.; Awadelseid, S.F.; Yaisamut, O. Effects and mechanisms of different exogenous organic matters on selenium and cadmium uptake by rice in natural selenium-cadmium-rich soil. Heliyon 2024, 10, e37740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lu, H.; Chen, L.; Liu, J.; Tang, X.; Chen, C.; Sheteiwy, M.S.; Yu, J.; Wang, X.; Han, J.; Wu, Y.; et al. Periphytic biofilm (PB) in paddy field: A natural cadmium barrier for rice (Oryza sativa L.) safe production through physiological detoxification and gene regulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 495, 139136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wu, J.; Guo, J.; Hu, Y.; Gong, H. Distinct physiological responses of tomato and cucumber plants in silicon-mediated alleviation of cadmium stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, K.; Wang, F.; Yu, Y.; Yang, S.; Han, Y.; Yao, H. Microplastics and soil microbiomes. BMC Biol. 2025, 23, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huang, L.; Li, W.; Tam, N.F.Y.; Ye, Z. Effects of root morphology and anatomy on cadmium uptake and translocation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Environ. Sci. 2019, 75, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yoshihara, T.; Goto, F.; Shoji, K.; Kohno, Y. Cross relationships of Cu, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cd accumulations in common japonica and indica rice cultivars in Japan. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 68, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fontanili, L.; Lancilli, C.; Suzui, N.; Dendena, B.; Yin, Y.; Ferri, A.; Ishii, S.; Kawachi, N.; Lucchini, G.; Fujimaki, S.; et al. Kinetic analysis of zinc/cadmium reciprocal competitions suggests a possible Zn-insensitive pathway for root-to-shoot cadmium translocation in rice. Rice 2016, 9, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, X.; Xue, W.; Qi, L.; Zhang, C.; Wang, C.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Peng, L.; Liu, Z. Malic acid inhibits accumulation of cadmium, lead, nickel and chromium by down-regulation of OsCESA and up-regulation of OsGLR3 in rice plant. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 341, 122934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, S.; Xu, J.; Peng, L.; Cheng, Z.; Kuang, X.; Li, D.; Peng, C.; Song, H. Cadmium accumulation in rice grains is mitigated by duckweed-like hydrophyte through adsorption and increased ammonia nitrogen. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 890, 164510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toxics 13 00811 g001
Figure 1. Cadmium concentration in rice root and shoot under 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd exposure. CK: Untreated control group (no additions); M0: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment). Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
Figure 1. Cadmium concentration in rice root and shoot under 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd exposure. CK: Untreated control group (no additions); M0: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment). Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
Toxics 13 00811 g001
Toxics 13 00811 g002
Figure 2. Heatmap of Z-scores for essential element accumulation in roots and shoots of four rice genotypes under Cd and control conditions. CK: Untreated control group (no additions); M0: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment).
Figure 2. Heatmap of Z-scores for essential element accumulation in roots and shoots of four rice genotypes under Cd and control conditions. CK: Untreated control group (no additions); M0: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment).
Toxics 13 00811 g002
Toxics 13 00811 g003
Figure 3. Effect of malic acid on cadmium accumulation and partitioning in rice root and shoot under Cd stress. M0: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment); M0.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 0.5 mM malic acid; M1.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 1.5 mM malic acid. Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
Figure 3. Effect of malic acid on cadmium accumulation and partitioning in rice root and shoot under Cd stress. M0: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment); M0.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 0.5 mM malic acid; M1.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 1.5 mM malic acid. Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
Toxics 13 00811 g003
Toxics 13 00811 g004
Figure 4. Heatmap of Z-scores for essential element accumulation in roots and shoots of rice genotypes X24, 58, and 65 under malic acid treatments. M0: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment); M0.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 0.5 mM malic acid; M1.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 1.5 mM malic acid.
Figure 4. Heatmap of Z-scores for essential element accumulation in roots and shoots of rice genotypes X24, 58, and 65 under malic acid treatments. M0: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment); M0.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 0.5 mM malic acid; M1.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 1.5 mM malic acid.
Toxics 13 00811 g004
Toxics 13 00811 g005
Figure 5. Malic acid rescues cadmium-impaired root growth across rice genotypes and doses. RGR (Relative Growth Rate) was calculated as the ratio of [trait value in treatment] to [trait value in control]. Values > 1 indicate growth promotion, while values < 1 indicate growth inhibition. CK: Untreated control group (no additions); M0: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment); M0.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 0.5 mM malic acid; M1.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 1.5 mM malic acid. Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
Figure 5. Malic acid rescues cadmium-impaired root growth across rice genotypes and doses. RGR (Relative Growth Rate) was calculated as the ratio of [trait value in treatment] to [trait value in control]. Values > 1 indicate growth promotion, while values < 1 indicate growth inhibition. CK: Untreated control group (no additions); M0: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment); M0.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 0.5 mM malic acid; M1.5: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd + 1.5 mM malic acid. Different letters indicate a significant difference between different genotypes at 5% level.
Toxics 13 00811 g005
Toxics 13 00811 g006
Figure 6. Effects of Cd on the growth of rice seedlings. CK: Untreated control group (no additions); 0.3 ppm Cd: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment).
Figure 6. Effects of Cd on the growth of rice seedlings. CK: Untreated control group (no additions); 0.3 ppm Cd: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd (sole Cd stress treatment).
Toxics 13 00811 g006
Table 1. List of different rice materials.
Table 1. List of different rice materials.
ListGenotype
X24Xiang zao shan 24
20Nan xiong zao you zhan
58Zhu zhen B
65Zhen shan 97B
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, G.; Liu, T.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Hao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Dong, W.; Qian, C. Effects of Malic Acid on Cadmium Uptake and Translocation and Essential Element Accumulation in Rice. Toxics 2025, 13, 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13100811

AMA Style

Zhang S, Zhang Y, Lv G, Liu T, Liu Z, Jiang Y, Hao Y, Yu Y, Dong W, Qian C. Effects of Malic Acid on Cadmium Uptake and Translocation and Essential Element Accumulation in Rice. Toxics. 2025; 13(10):811. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13100811

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Shuo, Yiteng Zhang, Guoyi Lv, Tianqi Liu, Zhongqi Liu, Yubo Jiang, Yubo Hao, Yang Yu, Wenjun Dong, and Chunrong Qian. 2025. "Effects of Malic Acid on Cadmium Uptake and Translocation and Essential Element Accumulation in Rice" Toxics 13, no. 10: 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13100811

APA Style

Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Lv, G., Liu, T., Liu, Z., Jiang, Y., Hao, Y., Yu, Y., Dong, W., & Qian, C. (2025). Effects of Malic Acid on Cadmium Uptake and Translocation and Essential Element Accumulation in Rice. Toxics, 13(10), 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13100811

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop